tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post1279910487701511727..comments2024-03-26T13:03:49.523-07:00Comments on justice4nifong: Nifong Supporterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comBlogger185125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-69139899760356912922012-06-19T18:23:13.491-07:002012-06-19T18:23:13.491-07:00Great to have you back, kennyhyderal. Where were ...Great to have you back, kennyhyderal. Where were you? Visiting Bremerton again?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-18607272666244636562012-06-19T18:19:35.765-07:002012-06-19T18:19:35.765-07:00Right on kennyhyderal. Anyone who actually knows C...Right on kennyhyderal. Anyone who actually knows Crystal rejects completely the vicious slander, that emananated from The Duke Lacrosse Defence, in an effort to destroy her credibility. These lies are ongoing and widely beleived. None of those who post their poison here have ever met Crystal. I ask them, don't you find it strange that her friends, her professors, her classmates her teachers, her pastor, etc. all have a favorable opinion of her and have provided her with character references. Hearing these references caused Judge Abraham Jones to declared that, from the evidence he heard, he beleived her to be "a good mother" Crystal is not and never was a prostitute. Crystal is not and never was a drug addict or an alcoholic. Crystal was a responsible parent. Crystal was a responsible member of her community. Crystal, having come from humble circumstances, was working hard to build a better like for herself and her children. Her Pastor advised her not to choose exotic dancing and escorting as a way to support herself because, regardless of her character,such a choice can be fraught with peril.<br /><br />Malek Williams<br />Hillside H.S.<br />Class of 1996Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-8889696811771331652012-06-19T11:43:34.919-07:002012-06-19T11:43:34.919-07:00Mangum lied. she said she had only had intercours...Mangum lied. she said she had only had intercourse with one man.....and that this event occured one week prior to the LAX party. The analysis showed multiple male samples....not just one. and NONE were LAX guys.<br />She LIED>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-49842018571756595992012-06-18T15:28:29.624-07:002012-06-18T15:28:29.624-07:00KENHYDERAL:
More about the persistence of male DN...KENHYDERAL:<br /><br />More about the persistence of male DNA in the female genital tract following intercourse:<br /><br />From http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_long_does_sperm_live_when_it%27s_inside_the_body, male DNA can be detected in the female genital tract 5 to 10 days after sex.<br /><br />From http://www.ehow.com/about_5502992_long-sperm-stay-womans-body.html, Sperm can persist in the female genital tract as long as 5 days<br /><br />It seems that the presence of male dna in the female genital tract does not establish a 48 hour window in which the sperm could be deposited. The window is a bit longer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-66877300092751912372012-06-18T06:16:06.534-07:002012-06-18T06:16:06.534-07:00"Lance, read my lips. I do not believe that i...<i><b>"Lance, read my lips. I do not believe that it is okay for any individual or corporation, public or private, to deprive a person of their civil rights, period.</b></i><br /><br />Unless it is the Duke LAX 3, of course. We get it Sid...Lance the Internnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-5701076092828843522012-06-17T11:52:15.869-07:002012-06-17T11:52:15.869-07:00Harr Supporter:
"I hope for your(SIDNEY HAR...Harr Supporter:<br /><br /><br />"I hope for your(SIDNEY HARR's) sake that you adopted a different legal strategy for your appeal."<br /><br />SIDNEY has been asking how the Duke defendants and teir attorneys "shook down" Duke for a substantial settlement.<br /><br />I think SIDNEY, in the belief that he, too, can shake down Duke, wants to copy their strategy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-62792517339259656652012-06-17T11:45:30.759-07:002012-06-17T11:45:30.759-07:00SIDNEY HARR:
"Charges against Mangum will be...SIDNEY HARR:<br /><br />"Charges against Mangum will be dismissed without her going to trial... if I have anything to say about it."<br /><br />So far you have had a lot to say about it. It has had as much effect as the impact of a frozen pea on a steel plate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-27159830982901175752012-06-17T11:43:48.772-07:002012-06-17T11:43:48.772-07:00SIDNEY HARR:
"With regards to her prior atto...SIDNEY HARR:<br /><br />"With regards to her prior attorney, can you tell me what substantive inroads he made on her case during the year he was representing Mangum? I am unaware of any."<br /><br />This from the individual who believes the Duke Lacrosse defendants had no cause of action against Duke.<br /><br />This above is just an admission that you are ignorant.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-40479616938780725052012-06-17T11:41:53.375-07:002012-06-17T11:41:53.375-07:00SIDNEY HARR:
"Regarding my lawsuit against D...SIDNEY HARR:<br /><br />"Regarding my lawsuit against Duke University, it is meritorious and it is not yet over... not by a long shot."<br /><br />It is up to the court to decide whether or not your frivolous lawsuit has merit, not you. That you make this statement is evidence of your belief you are above the law and that you have no respect for the law. So far the court has decided your suit does not have merit.<br /><br />What is a long shot, an extremely long long shot, is that any court will decide your suit has merit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-71270567493508589872012-06-17T11:39:40.611-07:002012-06-17T11:39:40.611-07:00SIDNEY HARR:
"Lance, read my lips. I do not ...SIDNEY HARR:<br /><br />"Lance, read my lips. I do not believe that it is okay for any individual or corporation, public or private, to deprive a person of their civil rights, period."<br /><br />Prior to indictment of any suspect, DA NIFONG conducted a campaign to deprive suspects of the right to be presumed innocent and to undermine their Constitutionally guaranteed rights to counsel and to remain silent. You condoned that activity via your claim that DA NIFONG conducted his prosecution within acceptable ethical standards for a prosecutor.<br /><br />You defended attempts of the NBP to affect the verdict of any upcoming trial as Constitutionally protected free speech. Yet you would deny AG Cooper his right to express his opinion as to the innocence of the Lacrosse defendants.<br /><br />SIDNEY, again I name you HYPOCRITE.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-66442353511865886102012-06-17T11:33:40.953-07:002012-06-17T11:33:40.953-07:00SIDNRY HARR:
"Au contrare(sic), mon ami... n...SIDNRY HARR:<br /><br />"Au contrare(sic), mon ami... nothing could be further from the truth than that I am seeking attention. Truth is that I see gross injustice in the vendetta conspiracy against Mangum, and instead of sitting on my duff and doing nothing, I am taking action to help deliver justice to Mangum."<br /><br />Refusing to put your money where your mouth is, i.e., coming up with bail money for Crystal, is sitting on tour duff. Your poorly instituted personal camouflage is not working. <br /><br />Incidentally, as I have pointed out before, the proper spelling is "au CONTRAIRE".<br /><br />You show a definite inability to learn from your glaring previous mistakes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-28246008567112153332012-06-17T10:47:18.688-07:002012-06-17T10:47:18.688-07:00Sidney: "Regarding my lawsuit against Duke U...Sidney: "Regarding my lawsuit against Duke University, it is meritorious and it is not yet over... not by a long shot."<br /><br />You filed your appeal more than two months ago. I ask again that you post your filing so that your readers may see what legal arguments, if any, you raised in your appeal. <br /><br />As you know, in your initial filing, you ignored the legal issue raised by the defendants and accepted by the Court, preferring to characterize it as "legalese mumbo-jumbo." Making no substantive arguments, you directed "vile invective" at the Court and were admonished by the Court. <br /><br />I hope for your sake that you adopted a different legal strategy for your appeal.Harr Supporternoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-85687135013389419172012-06-17T10:38:05.616-07:002012-06-17T10:38:05.616-07:00Lance the Intern said...
Just so I'm on the sa...<i><br />Lance the Intern said...<br />Just so I'm on the same page, Sid -- in YOUR reality, its OK for a private institution to violate a person's 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment rights.<br /><br />Hmm...didn't YOU file a (frivolous) lawsuit against Duke for (supposedly) violating your rights?<br /><br />But you're not hypocritical...Right.<br /><br />A couple of things come to mind:<br /><br />1) Your lawsuit failed, while there's didn't because Duke KNEW they were guilty of the charges against the LAX players -- just as they KNEW they were innocent of the charges you brought against them.<br /><br />2) It is your jealousy (they won, you didn't) driving your opinion, rather than actual facts.<br /></i><br /><b><br />Lance, read my lips. I do not believe that it is okay for any individual or corporation, public or private, to deprive a person of their civil rights, period.<br /><br />Regarding my lawsuit against Duke University, it is meritorious and it is not yet over... not by a long shot.<br /></b>Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-38637914007578733882012-06-17T10:34:06.696-07:002012-06-17T10:34:06.696-07:00Anonymous said...
Harr is just being deliberately ...<i><br />Anonymous said...<br />Harr is just being deliberately stupid and dense to bait and annoy......so,that he can play his silly little games . That is all this is, folks. Pure trash from a pathetic loser who thinks other people pay attention to him. What is the one thing a wing nut like harr cannot stand ? To be ignored. Harr does not give a damn about mangum. We all know it. He is a loudmouth whose intrusion into mangum' s case caused her to lose the attorney SHE wanted in the first place.......and to get Vann back, with delays. <br />Come on harr......bail her out ....PUT UP OR SHUT UP!!!<br /></i><br /><b><br />Au contrare, mon ami... nothing could be further from the truth than that I am seeking attention. Truth is that I see gross injustice in the vendetta conspiracy against Mangum, and instead of sitting on my duff and doing nothing, I am taking action to help deliver justice to Mangum.<br /><br />With regards to her prior attorney, can you tell me what substantive inroads he made on her case during the year he was representing Mangum? I am unaware of any.<br /><br />Charges against Mangum will be dismissed without her going to trial... if I have anything to say about it.<br /></b>Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-16021418275674156832012-06-17T10:09:07.401-07:002012-06-17T10:09:07.401-07:00KENHYDERAL:
"It does not [document the prese...KENHYDERAL:<br /><br />"It does not [document the presence of semen] nor does the white fluid seen intravaginally by Dr. Manly that she assumed to be semen but unfortunately didn't confirm".<br /><br />Why did you, at one time, call the performance of a wet mount, which would have established whether or not semen was present, would have been unnecessary cya medicine?<br /><br />Brilliant analysis NOT! KENHYDERALAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-91347414739092104672012-06-17T10:05:36.256-07:002012-06-17T10:05:36.256-07:00I would say, unsupported allegations, conjecture, ...I would say, unsupported allegations, conjecture, speculation not supported by the evidence, KENHYDERALAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-405902248354158042012-06-17T10:01:47.665-07:002012-06-17T10:01:47.665-07:00I would say, Brilliant analysis NOT!, KENHYDERALI would say, Brilliant analysis NOT!, KENHYDERALAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-91925939478507201052012-06-17T10:00:32.063-07:002012-06-17T10:00:32.063-07:00I would say, Left off, KENHYDERALI would say, Left off, KENHYDERALAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-72159402072438830702012-06-17T07:34:15.985-07:002012-06-17T07:34:15.985-07:00Right on, kennyhyderal.Right on, kennyhyderal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-79444015613127322322012-06-17T06:04:25.949-07:002012-06-17T06:04:25.949-07:00"It does not nor does the white fluid seen in..."It does not nor does the white fluid seen intravaginally by Dr. Manly that she assumed to be semen but unfortunately didn't confirm and for which the Defence quickly offered alternate possibilities for it's nature. Sperm is delivered via, semen as it's vehicle. The finding of unidentified DNA extracted from sperm cells means that these were delivered by semen. When, that was possibly deposited, was within a time period that included the date of the claimed assult. Crystal's given sexual history of consensual sex could not account for these found sperm cells. Only circumstantial evidence; true but suggestive of two possibilities. One, she was concealling consensual contacts or two the sperm came from a non-consensual encounter."<br /><br /><br />Brilliant analysis, kennyhyderal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-65388563463395335722012-06-16T16:34:49.517-07:002012-06-16T16:34:49.517-07:00KENHYDERAL:
"I also wish Kilgo would return....KENHYDERAL:<br /><br />"I also wish Kilgo would return."<br /><br />You and SIDNEY are probably the only ones.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-3897543826116399682012-06-16T16:29:29.015-07:002012-06-16T16:29:29.015-07:00KENHYDERAL:
"Perhaps the blatent racism of s...KENHYDERAL:<br /><br />"Perhaps the blatent racism of some posters that often appears here, drove [Justice58] away."<br /><br />No it wasn't. Justice58's own blatant racism. She did not like being called out on her own racism.<br /><br />She also did not like confronting issues like, why was there no forensic evidence of rape on the rape kit.<br /><br />I remember when asked why there was no DNA from any of the accused on the rape kit, she replied she did not know and that the questioner should ask Crystal.<br /><br />At the time, Crystal was a bit loathe to discuss why there was no forensic evidence of rape on the rape kit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-43793854433461430632012-06-16T16:24:29.197-07:002012-06-16T16:24:29.197-07:00KENHYDERAL:
"[Justice58] was making a solid ...KENHYDERAL:<br /><br />"[Justice58] was making a solid cotribution to this blog".<br /><br />Only if you regard unsupported allegations and dodging relevant issues as solid contributions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-57853038867018278042012-06-16T16:20:33.796-07:002012-06-16T16:20:33.796-07:00KENHYDERAL:
"The finding of unidentified DNA...KENHYDERAL:<br /><br />"The finding of unidentified DNA extracted from sperm cells means that these were delivered by semen."<br /><br />It does not mean that semen was deposited on her person on the night of 13/14 March 2006.<br /><br />I repeat, if one were to have a criminal case against anyone, one would have to establish it as fact that the sperm cells were deposited at the time Crystal alleged the rape happened.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-59316772250454784512012-06-16T16:17:45.437-07:002012-06-16T16:17:45.437-07:00KENHYDERAL:
"Only circumstantial evidence; t...KENHYDERAL:<br /><br />"Only circumstantial evidence; true but suggestive of two possibilities. One, she was concealling consensual contacts or two the sperm came from a non-consensual encounter."<br /><br />What makes a non consenual sex a possibility? Crystal's allegations?<br /><br />Crystal's encounter with the police on the morning of 14 March 2006, wavering between yes I was raped and no I was not established her as not credible.<br /><br />The improper lineup procedure established that Crystal was not credible.<br /><br />That you believe her is meaningless.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com