tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post2381082120722255196..comments2024-03-26T13:03:49.523-07:00Comments on justice4nifong: Duke… too big to be forced to do the right thing?Nifong Supporterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-3850762482849180492010-11-25T17:20:47.876-08:002010-11-25T17:20:47.876-08:00After reading Sid's story, I'm watching fo...After reading Sid's story, I'm watching for the new website-- justice4harr.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-7266099608134876302010-11-25T08:59:00.983-08:002010-11-25T08:59:00.983-08:00Sidney,
After reading this post, all I can say is...Sidney,<br /><br />After reading this post, all I can say is that you must have stopped taking your medication.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-42353091306626450722010-11-25T05:15:35.106-08:002010-11-25T05:15:35.106-08:00Cooper also had the authority to tell the public t...Cooper also had the authority to tell the public the results of his investigation that confirmed, in fact, that Crystal was not raped nor was she assaulted or kidnapped.<br /><br />Sid, you are factually innocent of the alleged rape of Crystal Mangum. You don't fit the description of the alleged assailants, you weren't present at the time of the alleged attack, no credible witness can tie you to the alleged crime, and there is no forensic evidence linking you to the crime.<br /><br />The only difference between your innocence and the innocence of the "Duke three" was that Nifong didn't try to indict you on no evidence.<br /><br />Now, instead of trying to interpret law, which you're not trained or qualified to do, why don't you interpret facts for a moment and tell your audience what evidence you believe Nifong had to bring indictments against three random kids.<br /><br />Don't start with the grand jury, either. They did not know all the facts you do. And Crystal's word is worthless because forensics proved that she lied about the oral ejaculation that she said occurred during the attack. What else you got, Sid?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-15880356380772641022010-11-24T15:51:34.297-08:002010-11-24T15:51:34.297-08:00Anonymous said...
"You say in one breath that...<i><br />Anonymous said...<br />"You say in one breath that you aren't 'going after' the former Lacrosse players and in the very next breath you say they're not 'innocent'..."<br /></i><br /><br />The statements I made referenced above are true, and compatible. I am not going after the lacrosse players, and just because Attorney General Roy Cooper stated that they were "innocent" does not make it so. That is a true statement. The only authority A.G. Cooper had was to dismiss charges, which he did. He is not capable of conferring innocence, as the biased media has used to mislead the public.<br /><br /><b><br />That said, let's reflect on some criminal justice events over the past year that we can be deeply thankful for during this Thanksgiving holiday.<br /></b>Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-46463971089576117232010-11-24T06:07:16.841-08:002010-11-24T06:07:16.841-08:00No. 1 Duke beat No.4 ranked Kansas State Wildcats...No. 1 Duke beat No.4 ranked Kansas State Wildcats 82-68 for Coach K's 800th win at Duke.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-7603890500643438732010-11-23T08:12:22.965-08:002010-11-23T08:12:22.965-08:00Sorry for the multiple posts. I was getting error...Sorry for the multiple posts. I was getting error messages from Google.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-75690857401164376072010-11-23T08:11:32.790-08:002010-11-23T08:11:32.790-08:00You say in one breath that you aren't "go...You say in one breath that you aren't "going after" the former Lacrosse players and in the very next breath you say they're not "innocent." In reality, you can't defend Nifong unless Nifong had some reason to indict three people for rape, kidnapping and sexual assault. What was his reason, Sid? Hell, he didn't even know whether the three indicted players where THERE when Crystal finished her (2 minute) "dance." Turns out two of them weren't.<br /><br />So, what evidence did he have? Crystal's word? Her "word" was that an "attacker" ejaculated in her mouth. SBI found no semen in her mouth. DNA security not only found no semen in her mouth, but also found she'd had oral intercourse with least two other guys several days before the attack thereby confirming that science could, IN FACT, identify every penis that had been in her mouth for the several days preceding her SANE exam and none of those penises belonged to any of the three indicted players, or any other Lacrosse player for that matter.<br /><br />Crystal's "word" was WORTHLESS. Nifong knew she lied about the "circumstances" of her "attack" and proceeded to attempt to prosecute the case anyway.<br /><br />How do you defend Nifong? He had no forensics linking any player to the "attack." He had a witness he knew was lying. How was this activity anything other than blatant prosecutorial misconduct?<br /><br />You can't keep dodging the lack of semen in Crystal's mouth forever, Sid. How do you deal with this?<br /><br />Please don't pull your stale trick about other prosecutors being worse. So what? Every guilty prosecutor should get off scot free if most of them do? Yep, that's a real moral argument.<br /><br />And don't go back to smearing the players' reputations either. That will just make you look even less honest after you just went on record saying that you're "not wasting my time trying to go after the Duke Lacrosse defendants."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-87784472444262020952010-11-23T08:10:39.735-08:002010-11-23T08:10:39.735-08:00FROM THE PREVIOUS COMMENT THREAD:
"Nifong Su...FROM THE PREVIOUS COMMENT THREAD:<br /><br />"Nifong Supporter said...<br /><br />Anonymous said...<br />'You've pursued innocent individuals with relentless dogmatism, simply because their race, religion and socio-economic background do not suit your narrow and highly-politicized world view of the kind of people who deserve your consideration. At the same time, you've elevated their corrupt tormentor.<br /><br />Hardly kind, is it Sid?'<br /><br />Your statement is hardly accurate. I am fighting for justice for Mike Nifong, not wasting my time trying to go after the Duke Lacrosse defendants who are not 'innocent' just because the Attorney General says they are. When it comes to seeking justice for Mr. Nifong, the Duke Lacrosse defendants are not relevant.<br /><br />Next, lets delve further into the reluctance of the media and politicians to investigate the Duke discrimination against me solely for openly being a supporter of Mike Nifong."<br /><br />Since people here are clearly bored with your beef against Duke, let's get back to your defense of Mike Nifong.<br /><br />see next....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-61956483537994119932010-11-23T08:09:52.217-08:002010-11-23T08:09:52.217-08:00FROM THE PREVIOUS COMMENT THREAD:
"Nifong Su...FROM THE PREVIOUS COMMENT THREAD:<br /><br />"Nifong Supporter said...<br /><br />Anonymous said...<br />'You've pursued innocent individuals with relentless dogmatism, simply because their race, religion and socio-economic background do not suit your narrow and highly-politicized world view of the kind of people who deserve your consideration. At the same time, you've elevated their corrupt tormentor.<br /><br />Hardly kind, is it Sid?'<br /><br />Your statement is hardly accurate. I am fighting for justice for Mike Nifong, not wasting my time trying to go after the Duke Lacrosse defendants who are not 'innocent' just because the Attorney General says they are. When it comes to seeking justice for Mr. Nifong, the Duke Lacrosse defendants are not relevant.<br /><br />Next, lets delve further into the reluctance of the media and politicians to investigate the Duke discrimination against me solely for openly being a supporter of Mike Nifong."<br /><br />Since people here are clearly bored with your beef against Duke, let's get back to your defense of Mike Nifong.<br /><br />You say in one breath that you aren't "going after" the former Lacrosse players and in the very next breath you say they're not "innocent." In reality, you can't defend Nifong unless Nifong had some reason to indict three people for rape, kidnapping and sexual assault. What was his reason, Sid? Hell, he didn't even know whether the three indicted players where THERE when Crystal finished her (2 minute) "dance." Turns out two of them weren't.<br /><br />So, what evidence did he have? Crystal's word? Her "word" was that an "attacker" ejaculated in her mouth. SBI found no semen in her mouth. DNA security not only found no semen in her mouth, but also found she'd had oral intercourse with least two other guys several days before the attack thereby confirming that science could, IN FACT, identify every penis that had been in her mouth for the several days preceding her SANE exam and none of those penises belonged to any of the three indicted players, or any other Lacrosse player for that matter.<br /><br />Crystal's "word" was WORTHLESS. Nifong knew she lied about the "circumstances" of her "attack" and proceeded to attempt to prosecute the case anyway.<br /><br />How do you defend Nifong? He had no forensics linking any player to the "attack." He had a witness he knew was lying. How was this activity anything other than blatant prosecutorial misconduct?<br /><br />You can't keep dodging the lack of semen in Crystal's mouth forever, Sid. How do you deal with this?<br /><br />Please don't pull your stale trick about other prosecutors being worse. So what? Every guilty prosecutor should get off scot free if most of them do? Yep, that's a real moral argument.<br /><br />And don't go back to smearing the players' reputations either. That will just make you look even less honest after you just went on record saying that you're "not wasting my time trying to go after the Duke Lacrosse defendants."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-85720414427338207702010-11-23T08:09:30.714-08:002010-11-23T08:09:30.714-08:00FROM THE PREVIOUS COMMENT THREAD:
"Nifong Su...FROM THE PREVIOUS COMMENT THREAD:<br /><br />"Nifong Supporter said...<br /><br />Anonymous said...<br />'You've pursued innocent individuals with relentless dogmatism, simply because their race, religion and socio-economic background do not suit your narrow and highly-politicized world view of the kind of people who deserve your consideration. At the same time, you've elevated their corrupt tormentor.<br /><br />Hardly kind, is it Sid?'<br /><br />Your statement is hardly accurate. I am fighting for justice for Mike Nifong, not wasting my time trying to go after the Duke Lacrosse defendants who are not 'innocent' just because the Attorney General says they are. When it comes to seeking justice for Mr. Nifong, the Duke Lacrosse defendants are not relevant.<br /><br />Next, lets delve further into the reluctance of the media and politicians to investigate the Duke discrimination against me solely for openly being a supporter of Mike Nifong."<br /><br />Since people here are clearly bored with your beef against Duke, let's get back to your defense of Mike Nifong.<br /><br />You say in one breath that you aren't "going after" the former Lacrosse players and in the very next breath you say they're not "innocent." In reality, you can't defend Nifong unless Nifong had some reason to indict three people for rape, kidnapping and sexual assault. What was his reason, Sid? Hell, he didn't even know whether the three indicted players where THERE when Crystal finished her (2 minute) "dance." Turns out two of them weren't.<br /><br />So, what evidence did he have? Crystal's word? Her "word" was that an "attacker" ejaculated in her mouth. SBI found no semen in her mouth. DNA security not only found no semen in her mouth, but also found she'd had oral intercourse with least two other guys several days before the attack thereby confirming that science could, IN FACT, identify every penis that had been in her mouth for the several days preceding her SANE exam and none of those penises belonged to any of the three indicted players, or any other Lacrosse player for that matter.<br /><br />Crystal's "word" was WORTHLESS. Nifong knew she lied about the "circumstances" of her "attack" and proceeded to attempt to prosecute the case anyway.<br /><br />How do you defend Nifong? He had no forensics linking any player to the "attack." He had a witness he knew was lying. How was this activity anything other than blatant prosecutorial misconduct?<br /><br />You can't keep dodging the lack of semen in Crystal's mouth forever, Sid. How do you deal with this?<br /><br />Please don't pull your stale trick about other prosecutors being worse. So what? Every guilty prosecutor should get off scot free if most of them do? Yep, that's a real moral argument.<br /><br />And don't go back to smearing the players' reputations either. That will just make you look even less honest after you just went on record saying that you're "not wasting my time trying to go after the Duke Lacrosse defendants."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-90448214522647893422010-11-23T08:06:56.152-08:002010-11-23T08:06:56.152-08:00No. 1 Duke beats Marquette 82-77 in CBE semifinals...No. 1 Duke beats Marquette 82-77 in CBE semifinals<br /><br />Next up for Duke is the No.4 ranked Kansas State Wildcats (who beat Gonzaga 81-64).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-3171454949563342762010-11-21T20:28:52.212-08:002010-11-21T20:28:52.212-08:00Sydney, did you throw the race card like a ninja f...Sydney, did you throw the race card like a ninja flicks a shoryuken?Whatchoo talkin' 'bout, Sydney?http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/yy34/NotEvenButterface/FuglyFuglyFugly/JulieUgly.jpgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-6048994821664692532010-11-20T07:58:32.178-08:002010-11-20T07:58:32.178-08:00Steve Finnell said...
"you are invited to fol...<i><br />Steve Finnell said...<br />"you are invited to follow my blog"<br /></i><br /><br />Thanks, I'd like to do that. Could you give me the address at your convenience? Look forward to following it.Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.com