tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post3475676907657482985..comments2024-03-26T13:03:49.523-07:00Comments on justice4nifong: Captain Ahab has nothing on Prosecutor Tom FordNifong Supporterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comBlogger192125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-24949297243748241192010-10-18T12:23:44.266-07:002010-10-18T12:23:44.266-07:00"What are you in 3rd grade?"
Another ex..."What are you in 3rd grade?"<br /><br />Another example of Anonymous pro Nifonger responding with an ad homonem.<br /><br />I am not in any grade now because I finished the work for my advanced degrees long ago.<br /><br />Did you ever get beyond the third grade?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-45408901556815304072010-10-18T08:38:59.175-07:002010-10-18T08:38:59.175-07:00The whole sorry affair regarding the false rape se...The whole sorry affair regarding the false rape sexual assault allegation was about money, not about race. Only folks who have a sick emotional need to defend Mangum and Nifong see this otherwise.<br /><br />Fortunately for them, they can continuing deceiving themselves because the sorry little circle of deluded acquaintances they travel in have "redefined" racism to be a one way street. Only whites can be racists.<br /><br />Thus, they can continue harping on what one, provoked individual on the team said and ignore everything else. <br /><br />Because, if you have to see the facts, the "bad" white boys were right and the "good" black woman (and her noble white knight) were wrong. And THIS JUST CAN'T BE!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-75055993752888077862010-10-17T17:08:39.716-07:002010-10-17T17:08:39.716-07:00How clever.
Someone calls you a racist because yo...How clever.<br /><br />Someone calls you a racist because you say it's Kim Robert's fault for a white player calling her the n-word, so you call THEM a racist.<br /><br />What are you in 3rd grade?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-59324525147188367622010-10-17T05:32:57.600-07:002010-10-17T05:32:57.600-07:00"Hey everyone quiet down and listen, a racist..."Hey everyone quiet down and listen, a racist is lecturing on how our justice system should work."<br /><br />That individual is an anonymous racist pro Nifonger.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-16277358247563687012010-10-16T17:51:28.487-07:002010-10-16T17:51:28.487-07:00Please indulge me for one more comment
RUN KILGO ...Please indulge me for one more comment<br /><br />RUN KILGO RUN<br /><br />DUCK KILGO DUCK<br /><br />DECOMPENSATE KILGO DECOMPENSATEAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-21718871852229678082010-10-16T17:36:47.598-07:002010-10-16T17:36:47.598-07:00"Hey everyone quiet down and listen, a racist..."Hey everyone quiet down and listen, a racist is lecturing on how our justice system should work."<br /><br />I am already ROTFLOLAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-7354419229047515312010-10-16T17:27:44.490-07:002010-10-16T17:27:44.490-07:00Hey everyone quiet down and listen, a racist is le...Hey everyone quiet down and listen, a racist is lecturing on how our justice system should work.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-87471689074139709262010-10-16T17:24:29.302-07:002010-10-16T17:24:29.302-07:00Anonymous Nifong Supporter
I am gone for the nigh...Anonymous Nifong Supporter<br /><br />I am gone for the night. You can come out and rave now. After I read your ravings, I will ROTF and LOL at your inability to accept the truth<br /><br />Good Bye for now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-69037322727524695652010-10-16T17:21:36.099-07:002010-10-16T17:21:36.099-07:00"The jury indicted Evans on alleged victim..."The jury indicted Evans on alleged victim's ID and that he could not be excluded on forensic DNA evidence that he could not be excluded from a fingernail."<br /><br />"[F]orensic DNA evidence that he could not be excluded" is of no value to the prosecutor who has the obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused did actually commit the crime.<br /><br />Were the prosecutor tell the jury that the evidence did not exclude the defendant, the judge would instruct the jury that this does not amount to proof beyond a reasonable doubt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-33459363795669353842010-10-16T17:18:01.230-07:002010-10-16T17:18:01.230-07:00"The jury indicted Evans on alleged victim..."The jury indicted Evans on alleged victim's ID and that he could not be excluded on forensic DNA evidence that he could not be excluded from a fingernail."<br /><br />Since when is a fingernail a private area? Why did the DNA recovered from Ms. Mangum's private areas exclude David Evans with 100% certainty as a source of that DNA. If he could not have been a source of that DNA, he could not be proven to be a perpetratorAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-34471014910257928872010-10-16T17:13:59.469-07:002010-10-16T17:13:59.469-07:00"Same white man then says there was no eviden..."Same white man then says there was no evidence that a black woman was raped."<br /><br />Specify what evidence there was to show the woman was raped.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-76500162655655169612010-10-16T17:12:37.782-07:002010-10-16T17:12:37.782-07:00"They provoked her to say what she [Kim Rober..."They provoked her to say what she [Kim Roberts] did."<br /><br />How?<br /><br />Kim Roberts said SHE provoked the exchange of racial epithets. You are calling her a liar.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-11479462729914249832010-10-16T17:09:27.745-07:002010-10-16T17:09:27.745-07:00"That Kim Roberts said she provoked it does n..."That Kim Roberts said she provoked it does not mean it was not the man's fault."<br /><br />It does mean SHE was at fault.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-77772135151980281032010-10-16T17:07:43.724-07:002010-10-16T17:07:43.724-07:00"This guy is still saying, even after he said..."This guy is still saying, even after he said it is wrong to use the n-word, that it is the woman's fault for a man to call her a nigger.<br /><br />I don't think anyone has to listen to anything this man has to say."<br /><br />So don't listen to me. I will just ROTF and LOL at your discomfiture.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-23750454815604292112010-10-16T17:05:56.556-07:002010-10-16T17:05:56.556-07:00For Anonymous Nifong supporter whoever or wherever...For Anonymous Nifong supporter whoever or wherever you are:<br /><br />Timotuy Cole was black. The Rape victim is white. The Rape victim identified Timothy Cole with 100% certainty as her rapist. <br /><br />DNA testing subsequently showed aomeone else, not Timothy Cole had raped the victim.<br /><br />Should the prosecutor in the Timothy Cole case have simply accepted the victim's id as reliable evidence?<br /><br />Why should Ms. Mangum's id have been accepted as reliable evidence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-70658147416535857762010-10-16T17:00:42.257-07:002010-10-16T17:00:42.257-07:00Sidney, more about Ronald Cotton:
This comes from...Sidney, more about Ronald Cotton:<br /><br />This comes from http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Ronald_Cotton.php:<br /><br />"<br />On appeal, the North Carolina Supreme Court overturned the 1985 conviction because the second victim had picked another man out of the lineup and the trial court had not allowed this evidence to be heard by the jury. In November 1987, Cotton was retried, this time for both rapes because the second victim decided that Cotton was her assailant. Before the second trial, a man in prison, who had been convicted for similar crimes, told another inmate that he had committed the crimes for which Cotton had been convicted. A superior court judge refused to allow this information into evidence, and Cotton was convicted of both rapes. The next year, Cotton’s appellate defender filed a brief but did not argue the failure to admit the second suspect’s confession, and the conviction was affirmed."<br /><br />Ronald Cotton happened because exculpatory evidence was withheld from his trial.<br /><br />If you are submitting this case as an example of how Mr. Nifong followed "acceptable s\standards, you admit that Mr. Nifong did withhold exculpatory evidence.<br /><br />Withholding exculpatory evidence, by definition, is unacceptable behavior on the part of a prosecutorAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-19629605115711347692010-10-16T16:46:36.996-07:002010-10-16T16:46:36.996-07:00That Kim Roberts said she provoked it does not mea...That Kim Roberts said she provoked it does not mean it was not the man's fault.<br /><br />Can't you get that through your skull?<br /><br />They provoked her to say what she did.<br /><br />You are inconsistent and you come off like you are a racist.<br /><br />There is no acceptable excuse for a white man to call a black woman a nigger. Period.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-19217511638967129262010-10-16T16:43:53.542-07:002010-10-16T16:43:53.542-07:00This guy is still saying, even after he said it is...This guy is still saying, even after he said it is wrong to use the n-word, that it is the woman's fault for a man to call her a nigger.<br /><br />I don't think anyone has to listen to anything this man has to say.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-36988184625771408132010-10-16T16:42:20.849-07:002010-10-16T16:42:20.849-07:00Sidney, more about Ronald Cotton.
DNA evidence, a...Sidney, more about Ronald Cotton.<br /><br />DNA evidence, after it had been obtained, showed a man named Bobby Poole had raped the victim.<br /><br />Does this justify Mr. Nifong proceeding in his prosecution of the Duke Defendants while dismissing the DNA evidence(the only DNA found on Ms. Mangum matched males other than the accused)? Obviously no.<br /><br />Did you think I would not check out the Ronald Cotton case myself?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-77598635769826148442010-10-16T16:35:49.849-07:002010-10-16T16:35:49.849-07:00"Some things never change. White man calls bl..."Some things never change. White man calls black woman n-word. Another white man says it was her own fault."<br /><br />Considering she admitted provoking the exchange of epithets, yes it was her faultAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-20464632002746623322010-10-16T16:30:26.023-07:002010-10-16T16:30:26.023-07:00To my last comment I add:
Cases like the Timothy ...To my last comment I add:<br /><br />Cases like the Timothy Cole case and the Darryl Hunt case went forward on the basis of identification. DNA evidence subsequently proved the identifications were mistaken.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-27690452762204004182010-10-16T16:29:08.504-07:002010-10-16T16:29:08.504-07:00Sidney said, "...such as the Ron Cotton case,...Sidney said, "...such as the Ron Cotton case, prosecutions move forward based on witness identification alone,..."<br /><br />Sidney, you do not report that Ronald Cotton was incorrectly identified as Jennifer Thompson's rapist.<br /><br />From Mark Hansen, Forensic Science: Scoping out eyewitness Ids, 87 A.B.A.J. 39, April, 2001, which dealt with the Ron Cotton case,<br />"But experts say they aren't surprised by her story. Mistaken eyewitness identification is the No. 1 cause of wrongful convictions, they say."<br /><br />Sidney, your citation of the Ron Cotton case does not justify prosecuting on the basis of incorrect id. There was plenty of evidence that the id's made by Ms. Mangum were, at best, mistaken.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-23414143957465635562010-10-16T16:22:54.249-07:002010-10-16T16:22:54.249-07:00"But the white man who says calling the n-wor..."But the white man who says calling the n-word to a black woman was her own fault says he doesn't believe the evidence that the racist's friend raped her."<br /><br />I am completel, totally personally unacquainted with any Duke Lacrosse player, past or present.<br /><br />The black woman, who admits she provoked the exchange of racial epithet is at fault for the occurrence of the slur.<br /><br />There was no evidence that Ms. Mangum was raped. Sidney has repeatedly said that the crime could have still happened even though no evidence was left.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-71717048861752835692010-10-16T16:17:34.241-07:002010-10-16T16:17:34.241-07:00"I guess if you believe that it's a black..."I guess if you believe that it's a black woman's fault when she's called the n-word, ..."<br /><br />Yes, when the woman herself admits she provoked the exchange of racial epithets in which she was called "n-----".<br /><br />I guess you believe it is the white men's fault when said woman falsely accuse them of calling her "n-----".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-67061323246125334012010-10-16T16:14:58.764-07:002010-10-16T16:14:58.764-07:00"The police did not have to prove guilt beyon..."The police did not have to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."<br /><br />That is true. It was Mr. Nifong who, in the course of respecting the right of the defendant to be presumed innocent, had the obligation to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. He had no evidence to prove a crime, no witnesses, other than Ms. Mangum, to testify a crime had happened. How could he have proven anyone guilty of said ALLEGED crime beyond a reasonable doubt?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com