tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post4340018522071368414..comments2024-03-26T13:03:49.523-07:00Comments on justice4nifong: Murder at Duke University Hospital: The case for Reginald Daye's demise being intentionalNifong Supporterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comBlogger668125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-4588105154619057952013-11-18T06:01:06.974-08:002013-11-18T06:01:06.974-08:00the sad thing is those same attitudes you see so v...the sad thing is those same attitudes you see so viciously applied on dukes behalf on this blog against society as a whole are just a mere example of what goes on in real life in NC because of duke - even mirrored in a trachea tube - that's what is sadAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-38999378959474047622013-11-18T05:47:18.591-08:002013-11-18T05:47:18.591-08:00that's about the level that argument that walt...that's about the level that argument that walt repeats over and over again is - it doesn't even address the issues that Dr. Harr has explained repeatedly was his concern in filling that complaint.<br /><br />just fitting the mood of the troll crowd on this blog - it gets very old when combined with life or death situations and real life justice system and health services that have negative effects on many. The amount of trolling and hate filled attitudes and remarks on this blog are overwhelming to say the least - and don't seem to address nor give much concern for the real problems that exist as injustice and harm to many in NC - only that 'duke wins' (and Ms. Mangum or Dr. Harr loses) ... what b.s.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-61405776226997069092013-11-18T05:38:47.499-08:002013-11-18T05:38:47.499-08:00sad little poster........now resorts to third gra...sad little poster........now resorts to third grade silliness. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-77735519584218054172013-11-18T05:33:16.743-08:002013-11-18T05:33:16.743-08:00ok - well if it that's easy to get you to leav...ok - well if it that's easy to get you to leave - then make like a tree and all that<br /><br />hah evil duke troll<br />blahAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-76448358069276850872013-11-18T05:19:35.438-08:002013-11-18T05:19:35.438-08:00Anon, try to understand.....one more time. Walt i...Anon, try to understand.....one more time. Walt is not telling you that the officer did or did not do anything wrong. Walt is telling you that because Harr sued under a particular section of the "law", he (harr) HAD to identify somebody, as a defendant (in this case the officer) whose behavior and "status" were subject to the scope of the section under which Harr filed. Here is another way to look at it. As an example, I think WalMart has done me dirty. I want to sue them. I want to file a suit under section 1234 that says I can sue WaltMart's cashiers. Then, when I file my suit, I don't mention any cashiers at all. In fact, I blame the truck driver in the back loading dock for WalMart's mistreatment of me. My suit gets thrown out because I did not file under the section of law that covers the truck driver. The MERITS of my law suit, are not taken up by the court.........because I filed under an invalid section in the first place. Get It?????? Please do NOT keep asking the same dumb questions over and over....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-87737292406173306822013-11-18T05:14:45.950-08:002013-11-18T05:14:45.950-08:00Anonymous November 18, 2013 at 2:50 AM
"... Anonymous November 18, 2013 at 2:50 AM<br /><br /> "He didn't have a problem with the cop doing his job - especially since the cop didn't arrest him for nothing.<br /><br /> He had a problem with the cop being told to get rid of him for nothing (the cop didn't even know why he was getting rid of him in the first place).<br /><br /> got it?"<br /><br />According to SIDNEY, he was already leaving when the officer told him to leave. If so, it seems strange that he would have a problem with the officer telling him to leave. He would have told the Officer, I am leaving. Instead, he tried to pick a fight with the officer, which is documented by the recording SIDNEY posted.<br /><br />Which suggests that SIDNEY's intent was to provoke something over which he could sue, hoping that would result in a bug payoff.<br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-70051355206586092032013-11-18T05:10:07.085-08:002013-11-18T05:10:07.085-08:00Anonymous November 18, 2013 at 3:09 AM.
"... Anonymous November 18, 2013 at 3:09 AM.<br /><br /> "As you can see from this current case, if duke decides to 'get rid of' someone - they can do a lot more than throw you off their property to get rid of you - and - from what you can see happening in this case - that getting rid of is excessive, illigal, and causes great harm to many."<br /><br />More uncorroborated allegations from the fabricator, nothing more.<br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-68052271662972518782013-11-18T05:08:42.568-08:002013-11-18T05:08:42.568-08:00walt - what exactly did the cop do wrong that Dr. ...walt - what exactly did the cop do wrong that Dr. Harr could have sued him for?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-11840723888938508662013-11-18T04:47:17.683-08:002013-11-18T04:47:17.683-08:00Morning, Walt....gonna be another exciting day in ...Morning, Walt....gonna be another exciting day in the saga downtown. Mangum will eventually testify, right? I see Jackie has shown up again. Pretty soon we will see her on TV, one way or the other.<br />Not looking too good for Mangum at the moment....but, of course, Sid can always show up and save the day.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-13914399835050640302013-11-18T04:45:49.161-08:002013-11-18T04:45:49.161-08:00Anonymous at 2:50 AM wrote: "He didn't ha...Anonymous at 2:50 AM wrote: <i>"He didn't have a problem with the cop doing his job - especially since the cop didn't arrest him for nothing.<br /><br />He had a problem with the cop being told to get rid of him for nothing (the cop didn't even know why he was getting rid of him in the first place).<br /><br />got it?"</i><br /><br />Failing to sue the police officer, fails to state a claim under Section 1983.<br /><br />Got it? <br /><br />Had Sid sued the police officer, he would have stated a claim under Section 1983 and Sid might have survived a motion to dismiss for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. <br /><br />Got it?<br /><br />Sid failed to even attempt to state facts which would have gotten him relief under any section of the civil rights act, namely that some recognized right was being violated. Supporters of Nifong are not recognized for purposes of our civil rights laws. <br /><br />Got it?<br /><br />Walt-in-DurhamWalthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16064038481537517025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-5586704454959605722013-11-18T03:09:22.963-08:002013-11-18T03:09:22.963-08:00As you can see from this current case, if duke dec...As you can see from this current case, if duke decides to 'get rid of' someone - they can do a lot more than throw you off their property to get rid of you - and - from what you can see happening in this case - that getting rid of is excessive, illigal, and causes great harm to many.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-3537718869508677632013-11-18T02:50:00.312-08:002013-11-18T02:50:00.312-08:00He didn't have a problem with the cop doing hi...He didn't have a problem with the cop doing his job - especially since the cop didn't arrest him for nothing.<br /><br />He had a problem with the cop being told to get rid of him for nothing (the cop didn't even know why he was getting rid of him in the first place).<br /><br />got it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-58146844308236450102013-11-17T18:36:30.855-08:002013-11-17T18:36:30.855-08:00Personally, I believe SIDNEY did not go after the ...Personally, I believe SIDNEY did not go after the Security Guard because he wanted a windfall. He believes the three Lacrosse Defendants "shook down" Duke for big settlements. He was deluded enough to believe he could do the same.<br /><br />He did once post on his blog that if anyone deserved $20 million from Duke(the amount he believes each Lacrosse defendant received), he did.<br /><br />Justice HAH!!!<br /><br />Money, yesss!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-35017182411807134022013-11-17T17:07:00.604-08:002013-11-17T17:07:00.604-08:00Sid wrote: "Judge Schroeder said that Duke Un...Sid wrote: <i>"Judge Schroeder said that Duke University was a private institution and was in essence immune from a discrimination lawsuit. And that was Duke's defense because it knew that it couldn't lie its way out of it because I had recorded my conversation with the guard."</i><br /><br />I have lost count of how many times A Lawyer and I have explained this to you. But, I'll do it one more time because apparently you do not learn. <br /><br />Mercer sued under Title IX which applies to athletic programs at universities that accept federal funding. Duke accepts federal funding, thus its athletic programs are subject to Title IX. Mercer was alleging discrimination based on gender in an athletic program at a university that takes federal money. Thus, her claim was a valid one under Title IX and could proceed. <br /><br />Sid, filed under section 1983 or the Civil Rights Act. Section 1983 applies to discrimination by private parties who are acting under color of state law. Sid refused to file against the Duke University Police Officer or security guard. North Carolina is a company police state. Which means that if a private police force (e.g. DUPD) sends an officer or officers to the appropriate training, those officers can make arrests and carry out other police powers. By definition, a DUPD officer is acting under color of state law in most of what he does. But, Sid refused to sue the one person who could bring him under the protection of Section 1983. Unlike Mercer who was thoughtful and filed an appropriate action, Sid was thoughtless and filed a frivolous action. He lost, most deservedly so. <br /><br />Walt-in-DurhamWalthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16064038481537517025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-25500920477558938092013-11-17T15:46:31.119-08:002013-11-17T15:46:31.119-08:00Anonymous 3:28:
Why do you never say anything?Anonymous 3:28:<br /><br />Why do you never say anything?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-71359453268885800322013-11-17T15:28:41.556-08:002013-11-17T15:28:41.556-08:00It looks like more shananigans to me actually ... ...It looks like more shananigans to me actually ... just more of the same of what anyone can view by reading the local news, the blogs about wonderful duke/durham nc usa politics / healthnoncare land, watching local media news or probably even espn, just more of the same.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-18840757954300425572013-11-17T14:11:12.835-08:002013-11-17T14:11:12.835-08:00The trial should have been delayed from the start ...The trial should have been delayed from the start to get both autopsy reports and prepare for trial for them as well as the noted needed additional time in general you mentioned Dr. Harr, I agree. Especially since the new lawyer has no experience on criminal murder cases as you mention, and again I agree, he has a conflict with the hospital affiliations that he and his immediate associates have to think that would not be an issue of conflict and ethics. <br /><br />He himself has stated there is a conflict between himself and Ms. Mangum on the autopsy reports at the start of the first day of trial, and Ms. Mangum has received the right to obtain a copy of the second autopsy report immediately from the judge. That report should have been viewed and prepared for court already for a fair trial and representation of Ms. Mangum's defense. <br /><br />In addition, today's local news is about the 'broken' state of affiars in the NC ME's office in general - so - at this point it would seem - there exists standing for all autopsy reports in NC to be questioned for many cases. <br /><br />Why is everything always 'broken' in NC? Is it this way everywhere in USA?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-90390156883658829692013-11-17T14:06:45.352-08:002013-11-17T14:06:45.352-08:00Anonymous November 17, 2013 at 8:16 AM:
I told yo...Anonymous November 17, 2013 at 8:16 AM:<br /><br />I told you SIDNEY knew nothing about the law.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-44626088623201036182013-11-17T13:19:50.533-08:002013-11-17T13:19:50.533-08:00I have questions about the jury as well.
The de...I have questions about the jury as well. <br /><br />The delay of day two of the trial due to the jury behavior questioning by the judge is just that - questionable.<br /><br />In addition, are the jurors being sequestered? How can they start a trial right after jury selection the same day and expect the jurors to go out into the noncourt world and have no contact with news or people who have not heard the news - especially since you can watch the trial live and in its entirety on the local news internet sites? Makes no sense to me. Did they just go home to an empty house with no tv, news, internet, or other people who hear the news, and were they prepared to immediately start camping out in their homes away from grocery stores and restuarants, their lives, etc.? ???Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-32344692909825311492013-11-17T12:59:45.408-08:002013-11-17T12:59:45.408-08:00SIDNEY HARR:
"Judge Schroeder said that Duke...SIDNEY HARR:<br /><br />"Judge Schroeder said that Duke University was a private institution and was in essence immune from a discrimination lawsuit. And that was Duke's defense because it knew that it couldn't lie its way out of it because I had recorded my conversation with the guard."<br /><br />Duk did not have to lie because it was obvious that your frivolous lawsuit had no merit.<br /><br />It was also obvious from your recording that you picked a fight with the security guard.<br /><br />It was also obvious that Professor Coleman did not intervene on your bhalf. You tried to involve him in the fight you had picked with the security guard.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-9432563610260165062013-11-17T12:55:30.109-08:002013-11-17T12:55:30.109-08:00SIDNEY HARR:
"I mentioned long ago on this b...SIDNEY HARR:<br /><br />"I mentioned long ago on this blog site that Mangum told me that Daye probably received a black eye when he was pulling her off the bed and she was flailing her legs and she most likely connected at one time. I doubt (and she denies) that he sustained it from a punch in the face by her."<br /><br />You also mentioned some time ago that Crystal did not know who set the fire in Milto Walker's apartment(a lie since she set it).<br /><br />You also claimed that the Durham Police set it to frame rystal for arson.<br /><br />Yu have zero credibility.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-36627704025722770622013-11-17T12:52:10.831-08:002013-11-17T12:52:10.831-08:00SIDNEY HARR:
"It's time once again for a...SIDNEY HARR:<br /><br />"It's time once again for an edification session:<br /><br />What I got from the Durham Detention Center was a set of twelve or thirteen CDs... this while Mangum was still incarcerated. I don't think Mangum had the opportunity to view them on a computer.<br /><br />Whether or not she ever took the time or effort to view the disks after her release I do not know. My perception has been that she has a tendency to put her faith in her attorneys and not really study her case like I feel she should."<br /><br />This does not change the facts, that you had no legal right to obtain the discs or to publish the contents. More attempts to CYA.<br /><br />You, who have made a career of filing and losing frivolous lawsuits say Crystal should trust you rather than an experienced attorney.<br /><br />You probably dislike attorneys because no attorney would represent you when you filed your frivolous lawsuit against Duke.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-57014771493071774382013-11-17T12:47:08.226-08:002013-11-17T12:47:08.226-08:00SIDNEY HARR:
"For starters, I would seek a m...SIDNEY HARR:<br /><br />"For starters, I would seek a mistrial because the defense attorney was not given adequate time to prepare a defense (about two and a half months tops)."<br /><br />However, Crystal had the services of a number of competent attorneys, of whom Chris Shella and Woody Vann were dismissed by her, at your urging it seems. Wanting a mistrial on that ground is like Charles Manson wanting a mistrial because Richard Nixon publicly proclaimed him guilty. The Manson Jury would have never found that out had Manson, himself, not flashed a headline at the jury in the court room.<br /><br />"Secondly, I would say that a continuance should have been granted until the SBI investigate the autopsy report on Daye and released its findings."<br /><br />Why should the SBI have investigated the report? In spite of Dr. Nichols' recent troubles, which are irrelevant to the Reginald Daye autopsy, there is no reason to question the validity of the report. The fact that you, an untrained, inexperienced, probably incompetent physician, sees problems with it does not warrant an investigation by SBI. That is like a blind man going to the police and saying, I just witnessed a crime.<br /><br />"Thirdly, I would say that the juror who tried to influence the other jurors to put Durham's reputation ahead of justice should have been kicked off the jury and the alternate who brought it to Judge Ridgeway's attention put in his place."<br /><br />That would have been an issue only if judge Ridgeway had ignored what the alternate told him. He dealt with it.<br /><br />"Fourthly, Daniel Meier should not have been selected to represent Mangum as he is not a defense attorney or criminal lawyer. I do not believe he defended a client for murder in the past. Also, of concern is his connection with the Hospital Corporation of America, Inc."<br /><br />He still has more experience with the law than do you or Crystal. Your legal experience amounts to filing and losing frivolous suits. You wanted Crystal to represent herself with you as her adviser. You are a whole kitchen full of scorched pots yelling, Hey kettle, you're blackAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-80158851249685663392013-11-17T11:46:59.626-08:002013-11-17T11:46:59.626-08:00A Lawyer said...
Dr. Harr was told, repeatedly, in...<i><br />A Lawyer said...<br />Dr. Harr was told, repeatedly, in comments on this blog, that Heather Sue Mercer's case has nothing to do with his case, because she sued under Title IX and he sued under section 1983. But he repeats that claim in his response to the judge's motion to dismiss. Good thing for him that the AUSA doesn't read this blog, or that could be a basis for a sanctions motion (not that there isn't already).<br /></i><br /><b><br />Judge Schroeder said that Duke University was a private institution and was in essence immune from a discrimination lawsuit. And that was Duke's defense because it knew that it couldn't lie its way out of it because I had recorded my conversation with the guard.<br /></b>Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-21999236789822546772013-11-17T11:43:51.230-08:002013-11-17T11:43:51.230-08:00Anonymous said...
I loved Walker's testimony. ...<i><br />Anonymous said...<br />I loved Walker's testimony. The long pauses, the ums, era, groaning,………what a performance. As I recall, the interview with Mangum that was supposed to be the basis for the TV show……..in that interview she LAUGHED about the Walker episode and how she had made funny of the man's genitals. She thought it was funny that he was "small". …….that story jibes with Walker's account of her trying to take photos of his private body parts. <br />The state is showing that she had a pattern of "going off" on her male shack ups and that her weapon of choice was a knife. <br />Daye's statement about kicking the door and grabbing her is going to show they were both drinking and both fighting. But how did he get a black eye and her…..not ONE mark on her? Just who was swinging at who? And if this fight was in the bedroom, as Harr claimed, and the knives were ALL found in the living room……how explain that?<br />The larceny charge can stick if the state shows she took his property. It does NOT have to be cash……checks, money orders, etc, are treated same as cash…..under the larceny charge concept. Walt? Right or wrong?<br />I don't think she is going to get murder…..this looks like manslaughter<br /></i><br /><b><br />I mentioned long ago on this blog site that Mangum told me that Daye probably received a black eye when he was pulling her off the bed and she was flailing her legs and she most likely connected at one time. I doubt (and she denies) that he sustained it from a punch in the face by her.<br /><br />Let me know if further elucidation is required.<br /></b>Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.com