tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post4362391271727789860..comments2024-03-26T13:03:49.523-07:00Comments on justice4nifong: Unabashed mainstream media bias against Nifong, Mangum, and HarrNifong Supporterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comBlogger210125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-78855082348410300112016-10-06T15:00:41.197-07:002016-10-06T15:00:41.197-07:00Anonymous 2:27 PM:
Sidney views filing fees and r...Anonymous 2:27 PM:<br /><br />Sidney views filing fees and related costs as entertainment expenses. <br /><br />He is achieving nothing if his objective were actually to win lawsuits, and the filing fees thus could be viewed as a waste of money if that were his objective. It is clear that winning lawsuits is not his real objective. Sidney's lay-legal activities offer self-amusement and the opportunity to annoy others, and every penny has been well spent. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-66539727591169144412016-10-06T14:27:15.085-07:002016-10-06T14:27:15.085-07:00Sidney, how much have you spent in filing fees and...Sidney, how much have you spent in filing fees and related costs in your endeavors? I think you said it was $500 for one of the filing fees recently. I assume you cannot deduct any of these expenses for tax purposes. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-51321577464616802142016-10-06T10:04:25.417-07:002016-10-06T10:04:25.417-07:00Actually, Sidney, what you should do is find a law...Actually, Sidney, what you should do is find a lawyer (in your area) with political ambitions, and help him/her launch a campaign against Lorrin Freeman. I have no doubt that both Kenhyderal and Kilgo will contribute money to the campaign.<br />Once your protege has been elected DA, you will enjoy access to the DA's office.<br />Please start ASAP, since political campaigns take time.guiowenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11904401455585682885noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-73511048128494032922016-10-06T06:48:13.780-07:002016-10-06T06:48:13.780-07:00Except as has been explained to you - she can igno...Except as has been explained to you - she can ignore you. You just aren't that special. She is an elected official, if you don't like being ignored, you solve it through the political process.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-17159030041178545392016-10-06T04:47:31.779-07:002016-10-06T04:47:31.779-07:00Sid wrote: "In Lorrin Freeman's case, her...Sid wrote: <i>"In Lorrin Freeman's case, her improper action was inaction by ignoring me. It's that simple."</i><br /><br /><b>BBBZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT</b> (Manual Buzzer Sound)<br />Run him. Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. <br /><br />Walt-in-DurhamWalthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16064038481537517025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-22854043062988946012016-10-06T03:50:32.540-07:002016-10-06T03:50:32.540-07:00Hey, A Lawyer.
Thanks for alerting me to the vi...<b><br />Hey, A Lawyer. <br /><br />Thanks for alerting me to the violation of the kenhyderal Doctrine. It has been addressed.<br /></b>Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-5963617364934982062016-10-06T03:43:09.756-07:002016-10-06T03:43:09.756-07:00Anonymous A Lawyer said...
If I am not mistaken, p...<i><br />Anonymous A Lawyer said...<br />If I am not mistaken, prosecutorial immunity extends only if the prosecutor is properly performing her duties. <br /><br />No one needs immunity for properly performing their duties. By definition, immunity shields prosecutors from judicial scrutiny for improper actions.<br /></i><br /><b><br />Hey, A Lawyer.<br /><br />In Lorrin Freeman's case, her improper action was inaction by ignoring me. It's that simple.<br /></b>Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-69291777116135405652016-10-06T03:01:29.353-07:002016-10-06T03:01:29.353-07:00
Sid:
You have 86 days to exonerate and free Mang...<br />Sid:<br /><br />You have 86 days to exonerate and free Mangum.<br /><br />It has been 98 days since the end of June, 166 days since April 23rd, 205 days since the Ides of March and 3,400 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.<br /><br />Abe Froman<br />Chicago, ILAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-32430507729695768272016-10-05T17:36:40.743-07:002016-10-05T17:36:40.743-07:00Sid wrote: "Yesterday, October 4th, I filed a...Sid wrote: <i>"Yesterday, October 4th, I filed an Informal Brief ...."</i><br /><br />Filled with a lot of words, but no sense. Sid's brief is his usual lack of cogent argument and of course no Sid brief would be complete without an ad hominem attack on someone. In this case, The Attorney General of North Carolina. Sid does at least cite the correct parts of the state constitution and the District Attorney's act. Unfortunately, he draws an erroneous conclusion from the plain meaning of the statute. That will doom his appeal. Of course Sid doesn't really care about this appeal, it's all about wasting other people's time. If he cared, he'd haul himself over to the NCSU library and go to the fifth floor to look at a few law books or digests. Finally, Sid closes his ridiculous brief with the demand that Judge Flanagan be prohibited from sitting on his fool case. Sadly, all Sid does is demonstrate his unwillingness to learn. <br /><br />What a waste. <br /><br />Walt-in-DurhamWalthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16064038481537517025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-38765217612715471722016-10-05T17:20:05.262-07:002016-10-05T17:20:05.262-07:00Sid wrote: "If I am not mistaken, prosecutori...Sid wrote: <i>"If I am not mistaken, prosecutorial immunity extends only if the prosecutor is properly performing her duties."</i><br /><br />You are mistaken.<br /><br />Walt-in-DurhamWalthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16064038481537517025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-35321500573170983052016-10-05T12:45:22.163-07:002016-10-05T12:45:22.163-07:00To the Anon. at 1:52 a.m.-- would you please take ...To the Anon. at 1:52 a.m.-- would you please take your racist claptrap somewhere else? There are grown-ups trying to have a conversation here.A Lawyernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-66626140826830967802016-10-05T12:43:31.776-07:002016-10-05T12:43:31.776-07:00If I am not mistaken, prosecutorial immunity exten...<i>If I am not mistaken, prosecutorial immunity extends only if the prosecutor is properly performing her duties. </i><br /><br />No one needs immunity for properly performing their duties. By definition, immunity shields prosecutors from judicial scrutiny for <i>improper</i> actions.A Lawyernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-49138020149797206942016-10-05T06:35:41.498-07:002016-10-05T06:35:41.498-07:00Sid, it's been explained to you that she has n...Sid, it's been explained to you that she has no jurisdiction, and no duty to meet with anyone.<br /><br />You are still an idiot, and will still lose.<br /><br />I am sure your appeal brief is the same crap you've filed before, and you will, once again, lose.<br /><br />And, you are mistaken - that's been explained to you - you just won't learn.<br /><br />Are you really this sad and pathetic of an old man, or is this a joke to you like it is to everyone else but Kenny who believes you, and Crystal, who sadly you have deluded?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-16972116824631692822016-10-05T04:33:24.851-07:002016-10-05T04:33:24.851-07:00Anonymous A Lawyer said...
There's a differenc...<i><br />Anonymous A Lawyer said...<br />There's a difference between not trying and wasting one's time. <br /><br />Then why did you waste your time suing DA Freeman when the law is crystal-clear that she has prosecutorial immunity?<br /></i><br /><b><br />Hey, A Lawyer.<br /><br />If I am not mistaken, prosecutorial immunity extends only if the prosecutor is properly performing her duties. My contention is that by ignoring her implicit duty to consider and review in good-faith all evidence and reports of criminality, she was not within the protected bounds of immunity.<br /><br />Read my appeal brief... which I will post on Friday, for more elucidation.<br /></b>Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-14737279537571469232016-10-05T04:27:50.003-07:002016-10-05T04:27:50.003-07:00HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEME...<b><br />HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!<br />IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!<br /><br />Yesterday, October 4th, I filed an Informal Brief appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, VA. <a href="http://www.justice4nifong.com/blog/meVf_IBstampedY161004.htm" rel="nofollow">CLICK HERE</a> to view the first date/time-stamped page.<br /><br />I will post the entire brief, along with its exhibits, on Friday, October 7, 2016.<br /><br />As you were.<br /></b>Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-33583706389040803942016-10-05T03:21:39.595-07:002016-10-05T03:21:39.595-07:00
Sid:
You have 87 days to exonerate and free Mang...<br />Sid:<br /><br />You have 87 days to exonerate and free Mangum.<br /><br />It has been 97 days since the end of June, 165 days since April 23rd, 204 days since the Ides of March and 3,399 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.<br /><br />Abe Froman<br />Chicago, ILAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-90765412309727022952016-10-04T20:25:15.140-07:002016-10-04T20:25:15.140-07:00Sorry JSwift for being careless with the quotation...Sorry JSwift for being careless with the quotations. Thanks Anonymous for making it clearkenhyderalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11840949337424645023noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-17053461019078617682016-10-04T19:11:59.804-07:002016-10-04T19:11:59.804-07:00Everyone do not forget about the MAR! It is the ...Everyone do not forget about the MAR! It is the only avenue of relief for Mangum. Everything else is water over the dam and history.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-57367838591809064492016-10-04T17:45:22.861-07:002016-10-04T17:45:22.861-07:00Dr Roberts wrote her review of the autopsy:
The ...Dr Roberts wrote her review of the autopsy:<br /><br /> <i>The wound pathway under "Injuries" on page 2 of the autopsy is reported as roughly downwards with perforation of the lower left lung lobe ,diaphragm, stomach, colon and kidney.</i><br /><br /> She at no time confirms this and in her review states: <br /><br /><i>In the autopsy report when referring to this perforation in the section titled Pathological Diagnosis Injuries and Summary the report only lists "colon" as being perforated without further designation of area. In a single area of the autopsy report under the Gasrointestinal sections it lists the sigmoid flexure portion of the colon as being perforated. There are 2 obvious problems with this statement. A flexure of the colon is where it takes a sharp bend near the liver and spleen and so they are called hepatic splenic flexures respectively. The sigmoid colon is not labeled as a flexure anatomically as it is a short area of curving between the descending colon and the rectum. The second and most important issue with the autopsy report noting injury to this area of the colon is that it would be physically impossible for a single knife wound that originated in the chest wall to perforate the sigmoid colon. The sigmoid colon is located in the pelvis next to the rectum and there is no second stab wound in the pelvis area in this case. The most logical explanation for the statement that the sigmoid flexure of the colon was perforated is an error in dictation or transcription and lack of careful editing.</i> <br /><br />Maybe we can get Dr. Anonymous to give his take on Dr. Harr's contention that the knife thrust had to be upward.:Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-27678415843052510482016-10-04T17:08:06.591-07:002016-10-04T17:08:06.591-07:00What is the quote from Roberts and what is from yo...What is the quote from Roberts and what is from you? Your quotation marks are unclear.<br /><br />John D. Smith<br />New York, NY<br /><br />JSwifthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07758976125626982551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-79809597957938231832016-10-04T16:36:55.345-07:002016-10-04T16:36:55.345-07:00Dr Roberts wrote her review of the autopsy Quote &...Dr Roberts wrote her review of the autopsy Quote "The wound pathway under "Injuries" on page 2 of the autopsy is reported as roughly downwards with perforation of the lower left lung lobe ,diaphragm, stomach, colon and kidney. She at no time confirms this and in her review states. "In the autopsy report when referring to this perforation in the section titled Pathological Diagnosis Injuries and Summary the report only lists "colon" as being perforated without further designation of area. In a single area of the autopsy report under the Gasrointestinal sections it lists the sigmoid flexure portion of the colon as being perforated. There are 2 obvious problems with this statement. A flexure of the colon is where it takes a sharp bend near the liver and spleen and so they are called hepatic splenic flexures respectively. The sigmoid colon is not labeled as a flexure anatomically as it is a short area of curving between the descending colon and the rectum. The second and most important issue with the autopsy report noting injury to this area of the colon is that it would be physically impossible for a single knife wound that originated in the chest wall to perforate the sigmoid colon. The sigmoid colon is located in the pelvis next to the rectum and there is no second stab wound in the pelvis area in this case. The most logical explanation for the statement that the sigmoid flexure of the colon was perforated is an error in dictation or transcription and lack of careful editing. Maybe we can get Dr. Anonymous to give his take on Dr. Harr's contention that the knife thrust had to be upward.kenhyderalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11840949337424645023noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-52598371850006003312016-10-04T15:00:10.516-07:002016-10-04T15:00:10.516-07:00And, of course, Kenny still assumes that none of t...And, of course, Kenny still assumes that none of the Defense attorneys looked into that, or talked to Dr. Roberts about that ... and since those attorneys won't randomly come on this board and respond to Kenny's comments, he must be right ...<br /><br />He will say he knows Meier monitors this blog, and challenge him to tell Kenny he's wrong.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-20949905917230224142016-10-04T12:52:49.623-07:002016-10-04T12:52:49.623-07:00Kenny,
Thank you for the information.
I do not ...Kenny,<br /><br />Thank you for the information. <br /><br />I do not have the necessary medical knowledge to make an independent judgment. As a result, I must rely on a medical expert to interpret the findings for me. <br /><br />However, I cannot accept Dr. Harr as a disinterested medical expert. Although he certainly deserves credit for having identified the esophageal intubation documented in the Duke medical records, his bias often impairs his judgment. For example, his conclusion related to the Duke Lacrosse Frame--that the failure to find DNA from the defendants in and on Magnum in an alleged rape in which the perpetrators ejaculated in and on her was not exculpatory evidence--is utterly preposterous, demonstrating either a complete lack of medical knowledge and an ignorance of the law or a willingness to twist the truth to match his preconceived conclusions. <br /><br />Can you find a different medical professional to provide their analysis? Did Roberts address this question in her report? She would have been the logical choice. <br /><br />John D. Smith<br />New York, NYJSwifthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07758976125626982551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-54191380490724924302016-10-04T10:12:32.433-07:002016-10-04T10:12:32.433-07:00Kenhyderal:
"However, the April 14th report ...Kenhyderal:<br /><br />"However, the April 14th report states that the fundus of the stomach had a sutured lesion. This is fundamentally impossible as the fundus of the stomach, which is the part most superiorly positioned, is no where near the colon. Both organs could not be penetrated with a single stab wound."<br /><br />Wrong. A knife penetrating the fundus of the stomach can penetrate the colon. I've performed abdominal surgery, gastric surgery, many times. How many times has harr ever performed abdominal surgery?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-60594219769166118632016-10-04T10:07:58.408-07:002016-10-04T10:07:58.408-07:00Excerpt from Dr. Harr's initial examination of...Excerpt from Dr. Harr's initial examination of the autopsy report.............................................................................."Anatomically there are reasons to doubt the April 14, 2011 Report of Autopsy Examination. According to both reports, the stab wound would have been in the left seventh intercostal space… here. It is very likely that a puncture could have easily penetrated the colon and/or stomach. The April 13, 2011 investigative report well documents that the colon at the splenic flexure was injured. <br />However, the April 14th report states that the fundus of the stomach had a sutured lesion. This is fundamentally impossible as the fundus of the stomach, which is the part most superiorly positioned, is no where near the colon. Both organs could not be penetrated with a single stab wound. The April 14th autopsy report is also flawed when it suggests that the knife traveled in a downward direction after penetrating the skin. Notice the position of the diaphragm… and the lungs are sitting atop them. In order to pierce the diaphragm and the lung from the 7th intercostal space, a knife would have to proceed in an upward direction. <br />The left kidney is located along the back wall of the abdominal cavity, and would require a strenuous thrust up to the hilt of a paring knife to possibly reach the left kidney, and I do not believe it could be reached without first going through the spleen. And it could not be reached if the blade followed a downward course as determined by the medical examiner"-------------------------------------------------. Dr. Nichols was never examined about the angle of the penetration. If the thrust was upward that would confirm Daye was on top of Crystal and that would mean it was self-defence. Overworked and careless Dr. Nicholls appeared to have no recollection of this autopsy.kenhyderalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11840949337424645023noreply@blogger.com