tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post7599810820775580208..comments2024-03-26T13:03:49.523-07:00Comments on justice4nifong: N & O on Tim Helms’s death: An open caseNifong Supporterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-80709571681239704202010-09-19T12:54:34.581-07:002010-09-19T12:54:34.581-07:00Anonymous said...
"'Furthermore, I never ...<i><br />Anonymous said...<br />"'Furthermore, I never stated that I attended Mr. Nifong's kangaroo hearing before the State Bar.'<br /><br />Not surprising you were too much of a coward to attend that hearing, considering your attitude towards reading the transcript of the hearing."<br /></i><br /><br />Actually, I never got involved or interested about the injustice towards Mike Nifong until long after he was disbarred. It was when I learned that he was the ONLY prosecutor to be disbarred by the North Carolina State Bar since its inception in 1933 that I became an advocate for justice for him.Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-89783436428788384552010-09-19T08:28:14.670-07:002010-09-19T08:28:14.670-07:00"Furthermore, I never stated that I attended ..."Furthermore, I never stated that I attended Mr. Nifong's kangaroo hearing before the State Bar."<br /><br />Not surprising you were too much of a coward to attend that hearing, considering your attitude towards reading the transcript of the hearing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-8450807774283893672010-09-19T08:25:37.234-07:002010-09-19T08:25:37.234-07:00Mr. Harr
What, if anything, did Mr. Nifong ever d...Mr. Harr<br /><br />What, if anything, did Mr. Nifong ever do to exonerate any wrongfully convicted defendant?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-52880190892451559332010-09-19T06:49:17.909-07:002010-09-19T06:49:17.909-07:00Nice try SId - The question I asked was "Has ...Nice try SId - The question I asked was "Has Mikey at any time stated to you that the comments by David Freedman (as evidenced by the video clip) are false?"<br /><br />You did NOT answer this question. Clearly because he has not stated to you (or anyone else) that the comments by Mr. Freedman are false. Why? Because the comments by Mr. Freedman are TRUE. Deny them (and continue to demonize Mr. Freedman) all you want, you can't change it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-48824366188338927682010-09-19T04:37:37.309-07:002010-09-19T04:37:37.309-07:00Sidney
What weight, legal or otherwise, do your o...Sidney<br /><br />What weight, legal or otherwise, do your opinions have?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-56841865764680907142010-09-19T04:36:24.134-07:002010-09-19T04:36:24.134-07:00Sidney
All you have to do to learn what Mike Nifo...Sidney<br /><br />All you have to do to learn what Mike Nifong is guilty of is read the transcript of the ethics trial, something you are too cowardly to do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-63219024870236343992010-09-19T04:34:05.327-07:002010-09-19T04:34:05.327-07:00Sidney
The only things trumped up in the Nifong c...Sidney<br /><br />The only things trumped up in the Nifong case were the charges Mr. Nifong filed against the innocent members of the Duke Lacrosse Team.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-50018839458194476752010-09-18T09:44:20.237-07:002010-09-18T09:44:20.237-07:00As you know, we're approaching the third anniv...<b><br />As you know, we're approaching the third anniversary of when HBO bought rights from novelist K C Johnson and Stuart Taylor to make a tv movie about the Duke Lacrosse case. The following blog and link will give an update on the progress, or lack thereof.<br /></b>Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-16210162949233884462010-09-18T06:41:46.020-07:002010-09-18T06:41:46.020-07:00You can't handle the truth.You can't handle the truth.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-34256228562980611472010-09-17T11:50:51.330-07:002010-09-17T11:50:51.330-07:00Anonymous said...
"Were you in the courtroom ...<i><br />Anonymous said...<br />"Were you in the courtroom beside Mikey during his ethics trial?<br /><br />Did you overhear any discussions between Mikey and his attorney David Freedman during the ethics trial?<br /><br />Has Mikey at any time stated to you that the comments by David Freedman (as evidenced by the video clip) are false?<br /><br />If not, then you need to publicly admit that your are lying, retract your statements, and apologize to Mr. Freedman. <br /><br />If any of the answers are 'yes', please provide proof.<br /><br />Otherwise, you are a liar."<br /></i><br /><br />The statement which you referred to stated that Mr. Nifong, not his attorney, stated that he should be disbarred. The video, which supposedly supported this false statement, did not show Mr. Nifong making any such statement, or any statement, period.<br /><br />Furthermore, I never stated that I attended Mr. Nifong's kangaroo hearing before the State Bar. Nor did I ever state that I discussed Mr. Freedman with Mr. Nifong.<br /><br />I owe Mr. Freedman no apology. He is the one who owes Mr. Nifong an apology for selling him out. And, unfortunately, that is not an uncommon occurence.Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-89147029901087935092010-09-17T11:18:21.296-07:002010-09-17T11:18:21.296-07:00Were you in the courtroom beside Mikey during his ...Were you in the courtroom beside Mikey during his ethics trial?<br /><br />Did you overhear any discussions between Mikey and his attorney David Freedman during the ethics trial?<br /><br />Has Mikey at any time stated to you that the comments by David Freedman (as evidenced by the video clip) are false?<br /><br />If not, then you need to publicly admit that your are lying, retract your statements, and apologize to Mr. Freedman. <br /><br />If any of the answers are "yes", please provide proof.<br /><br />Otherwise, you are a liar.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-41361875358793530702010-09-17T11:00:15.662-07:002010-09-17T11:00:15.662-07:00No, actually the answer is "yes" as per ...No, actually the answer is "yes" as per the document. Wishing it weren't so doesn't make it so.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-24104452083834792082010-09-16T16:59:30.275-07:002010-09-16T16:59:30.275-07:00Anonymous said...
"NC State Bar v/ Mike Nifon...<i><br />Anonymous said...<br />"NC State Bar v/ Mike Nifong (hereafter identified as 'Defendant':<br /><br /><br />'Did Defendant by representing to the Court that he had provided all potentially exculpatory evidence, <br />a, make false statements of material fact or law to a tribunal in violation of Rule 3.3(a)(1)?" The answer is yes. <br />b, engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation in violation of Rule 8.4(c) of the Revised Rules of Professional Conduct?' The answer is yes."<br /></i><br /><br />Actually, the answer is no. The irrelevant DNA evidence which the defense seized upon with which to try and bring down Mr. Nifong was not exculpatory in any way. Also, Mr. Nifong believed that all evidence had been turned in when he addressed the court. (...And I'm not sure that it wasn't.)<br />It is not an uncommon occurence at all for prosecutors to turn over discovery to defense and omit pieces of evidence, especially when large files of big cases are involved. Mr. Nifong personally did not collect all of the documents himself and make three sets of copies for the defense attorneys. Others put the folders together, and he could only assure to the best of his ability that everything was included. He certainly didn't go through each and every document to see that it was included, nor should he have. Prosecutor Gregory Butler was also taken before the State Bar on a ludicrous complaint that he failed to hand over all documents prior to trial. The Bar took no action against him (for he acted in good faith just like Mr. Nifong) nor should it have.Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-78016081368093158852010-09-16T16:49:19.222-07:002010-09-16T16:49:19.222-07:00Anonymous said...
" 'Embattled prosecutor...<i><br />Anonymous said...<br />" 'Embattled prosecutor Mike Nifong said Saturday afternoon that he should be disbarred for his handling of the Duke lacrosse case for breaking 27 of 32 rules of professional conduct.'"<br /></i><br /><br />I watch the video you referenced, and I never saw or heard Mr. Nifong say anything. His attorney, Freedman, like so many attorneys, sold his client down the river. As you may know, in Episode IV of "The MisAdventures of Super-Duper Cooper" I had Freedman portrayed by Judas Iscariot. The media consistently misstated Mr. Nifong as making the statement. The fact is that he did not. His scoundrel attorney undermined him with those statements.Nifong Supporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00893537130835998222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-88492034870599885812010-09-16T12:19:49.383-07:002010-09-16T12:19:49.383-07:00" Embattled prosecutor Mike Nifong said Satur..." Embattled prosecutor Mike Nifong said Saturday afternoon that he should be disbarred for his handling of the Duke lacrosse case for breaking 27 of 32 rules of professional conduct."<br /><br />Watch the video:<br />http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/1507052/#/vid1507052Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3773293499407151140.post-3119824583739995412010-09-16T12:16:17.993-07:002010-09-16T12:16:17.993-07:00NC State Bar v/ Mike Nifong (hereafter identified ...NC State Bar v/ Mike Nifong (hereafter identified as "Defendant":<br /><br /><br />"Did Defendant by representing to the Court that he had provided all potentially exculpatory evidence, <br />a, make false statements of material fact or law to a tribunal in violation of Rule 3.3(a)(1)?" The answer is yes. <br />b, engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation in violation of Rule 8.4(c) of the Revised Rules of Professional Conduct?" The answer is yes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com