Anyone care to speculate as to why politicians, Justice System officials and the media, all of them whom know the truth, are not interested in seeing justice done and in correcting this miscarriage. Maybe fear, cowardice, self interest or just plain saving face, disgracefully, at the expense of Crystal
@ Anonymous 5:43 4-11-21 It's typical of far too many Americans who find the plight and suffering caused by unjust treatment of minorities boring. In civilized countries it would be a matter of extreme concern. But what can one expect from a country where 47 % voted for Donald Trump. In Canada he would be considered unfit to be elected President of a local Kiwanis Club in a small town Conservative district
Please don't criticize Kenny. It's just that, because of context, he forgets half of what he's done, and misunderstands half of what he sees. I try to cover his back, but he refuses to pay attention to what I tell him.
@ Abe: Mayor?? Justin Trudeau is Prime Minister of Canada. We don't elect our Prime Ministers. Only the people in his own Riding (= US District) elect him. He became Prime Minister as Leader of his Political Party (Liberal)that won the most seats in the House of Commons (US House of Representatives) He won the Leadership of his Party in a hard fought Leadership Race (somewhat like a US Presidential Candidate Race) Canada is a Democracy with no political power based on territory. 1 man 1 vote; majority rules. Americans don't like democracy There is no such thing as an undemocratic construct like the US Senate where 1/2 a million in Wyoming can tie 35 million in California. Our Senate has no legislative power Senators are appointed until age 75 by the Party in Power and their roll is to give advice to improve legislation and for sober second thought. Hopefully intelligent accomplished and independent people are who get appointed. They don't have to face elections and they don't have to raise millions. In a District the candidate can knock on every door. To be a US Senator you need to raise millions and be beholden to donors. Job number one is to raise money for your re-election. Job number two is to thwart the will of the "masses". Legislation wanted by the majority of the people will get passed. Eg. universal single payer cradle tp grave health care, sensible gun laws, sensible campaign spending laws etc.
Thanks for the concern. I'm doing okay, but busy. Will be filing a brief for Crystal this coming week, and have been working on a new shar-video. It's titled "Justice dies in darkness."
Where are the updates on the WRAL litigation? What are you holding back from us?
April 30, 2021 at 3:11 PM
Hey, A Durham Man.
Crystal Mangum's libel/defamation lawsuit against WRAL-5 News is awaiting a Response from the defendants. A motion to extend time to respond has been extended until May 17th. To date, I do not believe a Response has been filed. I do not know what defense they will use. Will have to be patient and await.
Also, I believe in transparency and will not withhold anything from you.
Anonymous said... Looks like a stay of mandate was recently filed in the Mangum v. Bond case.
I *think* this means the case can go no further until the court decides...something.
Sid, any updates? Any idea what this means for this case? Obviously, any appeal can’t go forward until this stay is lifted.
May 6, 2021 at 4:51 PM
Hey, Anony.
Thanks for the update. As you know, I have no access to PacerMonitor and by the time Crystal receives any order from the court by mail, days have passed. She may not even be aware of the Stay. She did not mention it to me yesterday.
I think that you are correct in your assessment of the ruling. On May 4th I manually filed with the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, VA, Mangum's Petition for Rehearing En Banc. The Stay on the Mandate may be routine and have no major significance... only to be lifted following a denial (which is customary). Ronnie Long is a rare exception, but thankfully it prevented him from remaining incarcerated for the rest of his life.
I believe that next in the Mangum v. Bond ordeal will be a ruling on the Rehearing En Banc. Don't have any idea as when to expect it.
kenhyderal has explained several times that the Durham District Attorney’s office monitors all of his posts on your blog. The DA’s office would like nothing better than for you to post kenhyderal’s secret plan for a new trial so that the government attorneys can prepare their response in advance. I hope you will not assist the DA’s office in its efforts to deny justice.
The "mandate" is a piece of paper issued by an appellate court that formally sends the case back down to the trial court and instructs it what to do with the case (dismiss it, reopen it, etc.).
The mandate typically issues 15 days after the court's decision, but if a petition for rehearing gets filed during that time, the issuance of the mandate is stayed until the petition for rehearing is resolved.
So yes, this is a purely routine step and has no major significance.
This is all laid out in the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, which are available free on-line.
Hey Sid -- Why'd you stop posting your (I mean Crystal's) legal filings? Once upon a time, we could see the numerous Motions (Reply Briefs, MAR) and even the defense's responsive briefs.
Now we get nothing, unless *someone* bothers to track down the status on PACER.
You don't even bother updating the Facebook page....
Where's the rest of the "committee", and why aren't they helping you?
Have you considered getting Kenhyderal involved in the blog maintenance? You know he wants to help...
Well I heard mister Harr b*tch about her Well, I heard ol' Sid put her down Well, I hope Sid Harr will remember A Durham man don't need him around, anyhow
Sweet home Durham County Where the skies are so blue Sweet Home Durham County Lord, I'm coming home to you
kenhyderal has explained several times that the Durham District Attorney’s office monitors all of his posts on your blog. The DA’s office would like nothing better than for you to post kenhyderal’s secret plan for a new trial so that the government attorneys can prepare their response in advance. I hope you will not assist the DA’s office in its efforts to deny justice.
May 15, 2021 at 6:47 AM
Hey, kenhyderal supporter.
There is no secret as to Mangum's plan for a new trial. Simply put, a crime was not committed. This is verified by Dr. Cyril Wecht's report of October 25, 2019.
Anonymous said... Can’t keep track of all the lolsuits these days, but the request for rehearing en banc for Mangum v. Bond et al (ncmd-1:2020-cv-00449) was denied.
May 25, 2021 at 3:35 PM
Hey, Anony.
Thank you for the update. As of May 27, 2021, Crystal Mangum had not received that Order. Likewise, I have not seen it either.
Anonymous said... Hey Sid -- Why'd you stop posting your (I mean Crystal's) legal filings? Once upon a time, we could see the numerous Motions (Reply Briefs, MAR) and even the defense's responsive briefs.
Now we get nothing, unless *someone* bothers to track down the status on PACER.
You don't even bother updating the Facebook page....
Where's the rest of the "committee", and why aren't they helping you?
Have you considered getting Kenhyderal involved in the blog maintenance? You know he wants to help...
May 26, 2021 at 12:28 PM
Hey, Anony.
Posting legal documents is too energy intensive and time-consuming. I am currently busy working to free Crystal Mangum... mainly sending letters and working on shar-videos... which is what I have been doing recently.
As for Facebook, I find its interface too confusing, so I don't use it much.
Committee members are supportive but do not usually get personally engaged in specific efforts like I do.
Boring, boring, boring.
ReplyDeleteAnyone care to speculate as to why politicians, Justice System officials and the media, all of them whom know the truth, are not interested in seeing justice done and in correcting this miscarriage. Maybe fear, cowardice, self interest or just plain saving face, disgracefully, at the expense of Crystal
ReplyDeleteKenny,
ReplyDeleteIs there any way we can get you to stop whining? Remember, people here will forgive your racism,if only you stop whining.
@ Anonymous 5:43 4-11-21 It's typical of far too many Americans who find the plight and suffering caused by unjust treatment of minorities boring. In civilized countries it would be a matter of extreme concern. But what can one expect from a country where 47 % voted for Donald Trump. In Canada he would be considered unfit to be elected President of a local Kiwanis Club in a small town Conservative district
ReplyDeleteSomeone who comes from a country that would elect Justin Trudeau as Mayor has no business casting aspersions on Donald Trump or the USA.
ReplyDeleteAbe Froman
Chicago, IL
ReplyDeleteKen-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
you should do something about that, Kenny...
ReplyDeleteLots of 'Trues' on this list by the New York Times:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/11/opinion/fact-check-trump.html
Please don't criticize Kenny. It's just that, because of context, he forgets half of what he's done, and misunderstands half of what he sees. I try to cover his back, but he refuses to pay attention to what I tell him.
ReplyDeleteRight on kenhyderal.
ReplyDeleteDr. Harr,
ReplyDeleteI would like to take this opportunity to remind all your readers that I am proud to call kenhyderal my friend.
Yo Sid, are you awake?
ReplyDelete@ Abe: Mayor?? Justin Trudeau is Prime Minister of Canada. We don't elect our Prime Ministers. Only the people in his own Riding (= US District) elect him. He became Prime Minister as Leader of his Political Party (Liberal)that won the most seats in the House of Commons (US House of Representatives) He won the Leadership of his Party in a hard fought Leadership Race (somewhat like a US Presidential Candidate Race) Canada is a Democracy with no political power based on territory. 1 man 1 vote; majority rules. Americans don't like democracy There is no such thing as an undemocratic construct like the US Senate where 1/2 a million in Wyoming can tie 35 million in California. Our Senate has no legislative power Senators are appointed until age 75 by the Party in Power and their roll is to give advice to improve legislation and for sober second thought. Hopefully intelligent accomplished and independent people are who get appointed. They don't have to face elections and they don't have to raise millions. In a District the candidate can knock on every door. To be a US Senator you need to raise millions and be beholden to donors. Job number one is to raise money for your re-election. Job number two is to thwart the will of the "masses". Legislation wanted by the majority of the people will get passed. Eg. universal single payer cradle tp grave health care, sensible gun laws, sensible campaign spending laws etc.
ReplyDeleteSid,
ReplyDeleteWhere is kenhyderal aka The Little Man?
Dr. Harr,
ReplyDeletePlease delete the post at 3:46. kenhyderal has explained many times why he is not The Little Man.
Sidney,
ReplyDeleteAre you all right?
Sid,
ReplyDeleteWhere are the updates on the WRAL litigation? What are you holding back from us?
ReplyDeleteguiowen said...
Sidney,
Are you all right?
April 30, 2021 at 9:45 AM
Hey, gui, mon ami.
Thanks for the concern. I'm doing okay, but busy. Will be filing a brief for Crystal this coming week, and have been working on a new shar-video. It's titled "Justice dies in darkness."
ReplyDeleteAnonymous A Durham Man said...
Sid,
Where are the updates on the WRAL litigation? What are you holding back from us?
April 30, 2021 at 3:11 PM
Hey, A Durham Man.
Crystal Mangum's libel/defamation lawsuit against WRAL-5 News is awaiting a Response from the defendants. A motion to extend time to respond has been extended until May 17th. To date, I do not believe a Response has been filed. I do not know what defense they will use. Will have to be patient and await.
Also, I believe in transparency and will not withhold anything from you.
Looks like a stay of mandate was recently filed in the Mangum v. Bond case.
ReplyDeleteI *think* this means the case can go no further until the court decides...something.
Sid, any updates? Any idea what this means for this case? Obviously, any appeal can’t go forward until this stay is lifted.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said...
Looks like a stay of mandate was recently filed in the Mangum v. Bond case.
I *think* this means the case can go no further until the court decides...something.
Sid, any updates? Any idea what this means for this case? Obviously, any appeal can’t go forward until this stay is lifted.
May 6, 2021 at 4:51 PM
Hey, Anony.
Thanks for the update. As you know, I have no access to PacerMonitor and by the time Crystal receives any order from the court by mail, days have passed. She may not even be aware of the Stay. She did not mention it to me yesterday.
I think that you are correct in your assessment of the ruling. On May 4th I manually filed with the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, VA, Mangum's Petition for Rehearing En Banc. The Stay on the Mandate may be routine and have no major significance... only to be lifted following a denial (which is customary). Ronnie Long is a rare exception, but thankfully it prevented him from remaining incarcerated for the rest of his life.
I believe that next in the Mangum v. Bond ordeal will be a ruling on the Rehearing En Banc. Don't have any idea as when to expect it.
Thanks for letting me know about the ruling.
Dr. Harr,
ReplyDeleteGiven your commitment to transparency, I believe it is time for you to provide an update on your secret projects.
Thank you.
And Sid, while you are at it, you should post Kenny’s secret plan to win a new trial.
ReplyDeleteDr. Harr,
ReplyDeletekenhyderal has explained several times that the Durham District Attorney’s office monitors all of his posts on your blog. The DA’s office would like nothing better than for you to post kenhyderal’s secret plan for a new trial so that the government attorneys can prepare their response in advance. I hope you will not assist the DA’s office in its efforts to deny justice.
The "mandate" is a piece of paper issued by an appellate court that formally sends the case back down to the trial court and instructs it what to do with the case (dismiss it, reopen it, etc.).
ReplyDeleteThe mandate typically issues 15 days after the court's decision, but if a petition for rehearing gets filed during that time, the issuance of the mandate is stayed until the petition for rehearing is resolved.
So yes, this is a purely routine step and has no major significance.
This is all laid out in the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, which are available free on-line.
Thank you, Dr. Caligari!
ReplyDeleteCan’t keep track of all the lolsuits these days, but the request for rehearing en banc for Mangum v. Bond et al (ncmd-1:2020-cv-00449) was denied.
ReplyDeleteHey Sid -- Why'd you stop posting your (I mean Crystal's) legal filings? Once upon a time, we could see the numerous Motions (Reply Briefs, MAR) and even the defense's responsive briefs.
ReplyDeleteNow we get nothing, unless *someone* bothers to track down the status on PACER.
You don't even bother updating the Facebook page....
Where's the rest of the "committee", and why aren't they helping you?
Have you considered getting Kenhyderal involved in the blog maintenance? You know he wants to help...
Is Victoria Peterson still the president of the J4n committee?
ReplyDeleteMyra Kindernect still VP? (Trick question -- she passed away in 2015)
Steven Matherly still "Community Activist"?
Well I heard mister Harr b*tch about her
ReplyDeleteWell, I heard ol' Sid put her down
Well, I hope Sid Harr will remember
A Durham man don't need him around, anyhow
Sweet home Durham County
Where the skies are so blue
Sweet Home Durham County
Lord, I'm coming home to you
ReplyDeleteAnonymous Nifong Supporter Supporter said...
Dr. Harr,
Given your commitment to transparency, I believe it is time for you to provide an update on your secret projects.
Thank you.
May 8, 2021 at 11:02 AM
Hey, Nifong Double Supporter.
Not much to update about... still waiting for action on them.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous kenhyderal supporter said...
Dr. Harr,
kenhyderal has explained several times that the Durham District Attorney’s office monitors all of his posts on your blog. The DA’s office would like nothing better than for you to post kenhyderal’s secret plan for a new trial so that the government attorneys can prepare their response in advance. I hope you will not assist the DA’s office in its efforts to deny justice.
May 15, 2021 at 6:47 AM
Hey, kenhyderal supporter.
There is no secret as to Mangum's plan for a new trial. Simply put, a crime was not committed. This is verified by Dr. Cyril Wecht's report of October 25, 2019.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said...
Can’t keep track of all the lolsuits these days, but the request for rehearing en banc for Mangum v. Bond et al (ncmd-1:2020-cv-00449) was denied.
May 25, 2021 at 3:35 PM
Hey, Anony.
Thank you for the update. As of May 27, 2021, Crystal Mangum had not received that Order. Likewise, I have not seen it either.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said...
Hey Sid -- Why'd you stop posting your (I mean Crystal's) legal filings? Once upon a time, we could see the numerous Motions (Reply Briefs, MAR) and even the defense's responsive briefs.
Now we get nothing, unless *someone* bothers to track down the status on PACER.
You don't even bother updating the Facebook page....
Where's the rest of the "committee", and why aren't they helping you?
Have you considered getting Kenhyderal involved in the blog maintenance? You know he wants to help...
May 26, 2021 at 12:28 PM
Hey, Anony.
Posting legal documents is too energy intensive and time-consuming. I am currently busy working to free Crystal Mangum... mainly sending letters and working on shar-videos... which is what I have been doing recently.
As for Facebook, I find its interface too confusing, so I don't use it much.
Committee members are supportive but do not usually get personally engaged in specific efforts like I do.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said...
Is Victoria Peterson still the president of the J4n committee?
Myra Kindernect still VP? (Trick question -- she passed away in 2015)
Steven Matherly still "Community Activist"?
May 26, 2021 at 1:27 PM
Hey, Anony.
Ms. Peterson stepped down from presidency many years ago and the position has remained unfilled. I plan to appoint a president within a year.
Mr. Matherly still retains his position.
For someone busy working on shart-videos, it’s sure taking you a long time to create them....
ReplyDelete