Monday, July 16, 2012

Complaint filed with A.G.O. against Durham prosecutors


Word count: 984

Within hours of posting this blog, Sidney B. Harr, the Lay Advocate for the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong, filed a formal complaint with the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office against Durham County prosecutors Kelly Gauger, Charlene Coggins-Franks, and Orange County Medical Examiner Dr. Clay Nichols. Dr. Nichols authored the April 14, 2011 Autopsy Examination Report on Reginald Daye which contained may discrepancies in its findings when compared with operative and consultative reports. Furthermore, the conclusion arrived at by Dr. Nichols – that Daye’s death was due to complications of a stab wound to the chest – is without support or documentation. No nexus is established by the medical examiner between the stab wound and Daye’s death.

Filing of this complaint was made with great sadness and reluctance, and unfortunately deemed necessary in the pursuit of justice for Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser who is wrongfully charged with Daye’s death. Many communications were made with prosecutors Kelly Gauger and Charlene Coggins-Franks, beseeching them to dismiss the baseless charges against Mangum. Letter upon letter was hand delivered to the office of the Durham County District Attorney’s office requesting him to prevent reputations from needlessly being smeared and lives destroyed… but to no avail. Even reaching out to the state’s highest elected executive official, Governor Bev Perdue, went for naught as she ignored the frequent communications pleading for the innocent victim of a vendetta prosecution to be cleared of frivolous charges and granted precious freedom so that she could finally be reunited with her three children.

Problems abound with not only the first degree murder charge, but with the little known/rarely used “larceny of chose in action” charge, as well. Prosecutors provide no credible evidence that Mangum took two cashier’s checks and lack credible evidence that she had intent or made any effort to unlawfully convert the checks for her benefit. In addition, both charges lack motive. Fact is, that like the 2010 arson case, on April 3, 2011, Crystal Mangum was the victim of an assault by an intoxicated Daye. Mangum was noted to have small lacerations around her left eye and a swollen lower lip. In addition, clumps of her hair were found at the scene, and the bathroom door she locked behind her in seeking refuge from Daye, was kicked in by him. What more is necessary to suggest physical abuse? Instead of charging Reginald Daye with domestic violence, assault on a female, false imprisonment, and placing him under arrest, Daye is not charged with a crime and is determined to be a victim of domestic violence.

What happened to Crystal Mangum should bode ill for advocacy groups such as the North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence. However, despite attempts to get the Durham-based activists involved in the injustice, they, like so many others, have elected to remain on the sidelines as spectators. They are ignoring the message being sent by prosecutors that if a spouse is being physically abused and he/she fights back in self-defense, they run the risk of being labeled the aggressor. I am betting that the people at the Coalition believe, however, that the treatment of Crystal Mangum is singular and not a widespread likelihood… something that they can live with as most Durhamians possess animosity towards Mangum as it is.

Attorney General Roy Cooper dismissed charges against the Duke Lacrosse defendants claiming that there was no credible evidence. The question with the prosecution of Crystal Mangum for murder and larceny is where is the credible evidence against her? Regarding the larceny charge, the prosecutors would be hard pressed at best to even prove that a crime was committed.

In dismissing the charges against the Duke Lacrosse defendants, A.G. Cooper questioned the credibility of Mangum, the accuser. In the current murder case against Mangum, there is no doubt that the Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011 by Dr. Clay Nichols is false, misleading, and fraudulent in its findings and conclusion. Mr. Cooper should be questioning how the prosecutors could bring such a charge based on an autopsy report that is totally lacking in credibility… grounds for immediate dismissal.

The number of 106 fatal victims of 2011 North Carolina domestic violence probably erroneously included Reginald Daye. Truth is that Daye’s death should be categorized under “deaths due to medical malpractice.” Mangum prevented herself from being a statistic of domestic violence fatalities when she fought back against her attacker by stabbing him… a non-life threatening wound. The attorney general’s concern about the high incident of deaths due to domestic violence should encourage him to protect all victims of physical abuse, including those who fight back in self-defense.

Although the Duke Lacrosse defendants never spent a day in jail, the day of the filing of the complaint with the A.G.O. marks the 470th wrongful day of incarceration of Crystal Mangum, a true victim of domestic violence and a victim of a vendetta prosecution by Durham prosecutors bent on carrying out a misguided mission to exact retribution against Mangum for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case. It is needless to say that such a perversion and miscarriage of justice against Mangum would not be occurring if Mike Nifong were still the Durham district attorney.

Whether Attorney General Cooper will allow the Durham prosecutors to continue to throw away precious taxpayer dollars on a Carpetbagger jihadist inspired vendetta against Mangum remains to be seen. Hopefully the state will be able to resolve this problem of imperfect justice without interference from the federal government and the national attention that accompanies it. For the sake of Crystal Mangum, victims of domestic abuse, Lady Justice, and all Tar Heelians, A.G. Roy Cooper will do the right thing and see that all criminal charges against Crystal Mangum are dismissed. 


Click on the link below to view the Formal Complaint filed as well as related documents:
LINK: http://www.justice4nifong.com/legal/cgm/agoCOdirec.htm

211 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 211 of 211
Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"
New discovery from the state? The state is just now coming out with new discovery after an incident that occurred in April 2011?"

It took DA NIFONG 9 months to learn his complaining witness was not credible. In spite of this bit of gross legal malpractice, you regard him as a paragon of prosecutorial excellence.

Hypocrite!


You are comparing oranges and avocados. The SBI, supposedly was working on some sort of "wound-entry-trajectory" scientific theory, for what purpose I have absolutely no idea whatsoever. And supposedly this grand experiment was begun in April 2011 and was just recently concluded in July 2012. It doesn't make any sense to me... especially when Reginald Daye's body was buried shortly after he died in April 2011. Looks to be more hocus-pocus forensics.

Regarding Mr. Nifong, as the witness statements allegedly changed and did not meet the requisites for a rape charge, Mr. Nifong, being the minister of justice that he is, took the initiative to dismiss the rape charge. There is a world of difference here.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"'Frightened!' 'Frightened' of what? ... or who? Pray tell this requires further elucidation."

You are frightened of the truth.You do not tell the truth. You try to avoid the truth. That is an indication that you fear the truth>


Me, fear the truth? Poppycock! I am at one with the truth... and the truth will set Crystal Mangum free. Mark my words. That is why the media and prosecution are so fervently trying to keep the truth hidden from Durhamians and Tar Heelians.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"The second set of motions filed on behalf of Crystal were by her, and they were in pencil. It is difficult to even read them because the copies are of such poor quality. One glance will show that I had nothing to do with those motions... other than to carry them to the Clerk of Court's office to be filed... an activity not restricted to attorneys.

So don't anticipate any further complaints against me based on those motions. I will upload them for you and the Intern as soon as I get back... (to keep you from pestering me about them)."

So why do you keep coming up with excuses for not posting them? It is possible to scan something and digitally enhance it to make it legible.


I will post the pencil written motions as soon as I am able... within the next couple of days. I am not going to try to do any digital enhancing as I do not know how and am not going to waste my time trying to do so. Keep in mind, I warned you that it is definitely no smoking gun... so you're going to be very disappointed.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"You are comparing oranges and avocados. The SBI, supposedly was working on some sort of "wound-entry-trajectory" scientific theory, for what purpose I have absolutely no idea whatsoever. And supposedly this grand experiment was begun in April 2011 and was just recently concluded in July 2012. It doesn't make any sense to me... especially when Reginald Daye's body was buried shortly after he died in April 2011. Looks to be more hocus-pocus forensics.

Regarding Mr. Nifong, as the witness statements allegedly changed and did not meet the requisites for a rape charge, Mr. Nifong, being the minister of justice that he is, took the initiative to dismiss the rape charge. There is a world of difference here."

Apples to Oranges it is. DA NIFONG was a corrupt unethical prosecutor. The current DA, it seems, is not.

That DA NIFONG dropped the rape charge is not an indication of how true a minister of justice he was. He realized he could not make the rape charge stick if the evidence were introduced in trial. There was no evidence of rape, at the outset. So he tried to prosecute wrongfully in a way that would allow him to ignore the evidence.

SIDNEY, you have real problems recognizing what true justice is.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Me, fear the truth? Poppycock! I am at one with the truth... and the truth will set Crystal Mangum free. Mark my words. That is why the media and prosecution are so fervently trying to keep the truth hidden from Durhamians and Tar Heelians."

BULLSHIT!!! You have never posted the truth in this so called blog. You have posted a number of lies and tried to misrepresent them as the truth, e.g. Crystal was a victim in the phony Duke rape case.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HSRR:

"I will post the pencil written motions as soon as I am able... within the next couple of days. I am not going to try to do any digital enhancing as I do not know how and am not going to waste my time trying to do so. Keep in mind, I warned you that it is definitely no smoking gun... so you're going to be very disappointed."

So you are going to post motions which are not legible - that or your are going to publish what you allege are true transcriptions.

SIDNEY, no one in his/her right mind believes you. You have graphically demonstrated how averse you are to publishing truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
You are comparing oranges and avocados. The SBI, supposedly was working on some sort of "wound-entry-trajectory" scientific theory, for what purpose I have absolutely no idea whatsoever. And supposedly this grand experiment was begun in April 2011 and was just recently concluded in July 2012. It doesn't make any sense to me... especially when Reginald Daye's body was buried shortly after he died in April 2011. Looks to be more hocus-pocus forensics."

You try to post your blatantly obvious inadequate hocus pocus as the truth. Yet you believe people will accept as credible your allegation that the autopsy finding was bogus.

You call it hocus pocus because you can not handle the truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

What does not make sense to you is the truth. That is why you try to pass off lies as the truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

" I am at one with the truth... and the truth will set Crystal Mangum free"

Since what you have said has not set Crystal free, it is obvious you are not one with the truth.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"The second set of motions filed on behalf of Crystal were by her, and they were in pencil. It is difficult to even read them because the copies are of such poor quality. One glance will show that I had nothing to do with those motions... other than to carry them to the Clerk of Court's office to be filed... an activity not restricted to attorneys.

So don't anticipate any further complaints against me based on those motions. I will upload them for you and the Intern as soon as I get back... (to keep you from pestering me about them)."

So why do you keep coming up with excuses for not posting them? It is possible to scan something and digitally enhance it to make it legible.


As I feared, the pencil copies did not copy well. Good luck trying to read them, as I'm not investing any more of my valuable time trying to make copies of these motions more visible. More important work is yet to be done.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"As I feared, the pencil copies did not copy well. Good luck trying to read them, as I'm not investing any more of my valuable time trying to make copies of these motions more visible. More important work is yet to be done."

It still sounds like you are trying to hide something.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 211 of 211   Newer› Newest»