Thursday, October 4, 2012

Durham prosecutors’ conspiracy on a grand scale against Crystal Mangum

Click on the following link to access the flog.  Grab some popcorn while you're at it as this is an especially long flog.  But it is in two sections, the first lasting 26 minutes and the second 20.  Allow a bit of uploading time between shifting from Part One to Part Two.

LINK:  http://www.justice4nifong.com/direc/flog/flog22/flog22.html

Word count: 5,309

In the North Carolina State Bar’s regulation, under Advocate, is Rule 3.8, “Special responsibilities of a prosecutor.” It states: “The prosecutor in a criminal case shall refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause.”

Further on, in this same document it reads: “A prosecutor has the responsibility of a minister of justice and not simply that of an advocate, the prosecutor’s duty is to seek justice not merely to convict. This responsibility carries with it specific obligations to see that the defendant is accorded procedural justice and that guilt is decided upon the basis of sufficient evidence.”

These flowery idealistic statements can be comforting to civilians living under the North Carolina justice system, however they are not worth a hill of pinto beans if these tenets are not adhered to, and they represent nothing more than show without substance.

The Durham County prosecutors have not only disregarded these codes of professional conduct, but have violated them to the extreme by acting as criminals themselves in framing an innocent person for crimes that she did not commit… all as payback for a perceived slight against three Duke Lacrosse student/athlete/partygoers in 2006.

Not only that, but the prosecutors are attempting to place this innocent person and single mother of three, Crystal Gail Mangum, in prison for life without the possibility of parole. The harshness of the retribution sought is not only due to the fact that she accused three lacrosse players from families of wealth, power, and prestige, but because she is an African American.

The reason the Durham prosecutors feel at ease bringing such baseless charges to bear against Ms. Mangum is due to the fact they feel that they can count on the cooperation from various other sectors in depriving Mangum of justice and her liberty.

Prosecutors, in seeking a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole against Crystal Mangum heavily relied on the following four conspiratorial consorts: (1) the medical examiner; (2) the defense attorney; (3) the mainstream media; and (4) the enablers.

The main objective of the Durham prosecutors and their conspirators was to keep the truth about the bogus charges against Ms. Mangum hidden from Durhamians, Tar Heelians, and all Americans. Secreting the true realities from the public allows the injustices to take root and grow. The conspiracy’s purpose is to hide from the people the prosecutors’ crimes being committed against Crystal Mangum.

It is the truth that will set Crystal Mangum free… and that is why the Durham prosecutors and their allies are doing their best to conceal, confuse, mislead, and cover-up the events concerning their malicious prosecution. If Americans knew the truth and extent of the flagrant injustices against Ms. Mangum, they would be enraged and in an uproar to demand swift rectification.

BACKDROP: THE 2006 DUKE LACROSSE CASE AND THE 2010 ARSON CASE

In early 2006, Crystal Mangum, a North Carolina Central University student and mother of two, was making ends meet and supporting her family by working for an escort service and performing as an exotic dancer.

In early 2006, the Duke University lacrosse team had a well-deserved reputation for being obnoxious, irreverent, boisterous, and basically out of control. Nearly a third of the team had a run-in with the law, usually misdemeanor alcohol-related offenses including disorderly conduct, under-aged drinking, driving with open alcoholic containers, and urinating in public. The team’s coach, Mike Pressler, had even been ordered by Duke University President Richard Brodhead to rein in his players.

On March 13, 2006, the Duke Lacrosse team hosted one of its notorious beer-guzzling parties at a rental house on Buchanan Street. The entertainment was to consist of two strippers, for which one of the team members made arrangements. He misled the escort service by using a false name and claiming he wanted the dancers for a small bachelor party of four or five… not for the Duke lacrosse team and their invitees which would number fifty or more.

For reasons unknown, the escort service assigned two African American females for the gig, despite the specific request for Caucasian dancers. One of the dancers was Crystal Mangum.

Misinformation about the number of guests at the event resulted in no body guards being scheduled to accompany the dancers.

Once the two dancers began to perform, the raucous partygoers started shouting degrading and dehumanizing comments, and making obscene gestures. This prompted the scheduled two hour performance to be reduced to several minutes after the dancers abruptly quit because of the unwarranted and humiliating reception. They hurriedly retreated to the bathroom for temporary sanctuary… and what transpired from that point on until a police report was taken hours later, which included accusations of sexual assault by Mangum, is in dispute.

What is not in dispute regarding the party is that there was under-aged drinking involved, and that some of the partygoers shouted the “N-word” epithet at the two African American women.

Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong prosecuted the case against three suspected Duke lacrosse players identified by Mangum as being the ones who sexually assaulted her. These young men came from well-heeled families, were bailed out and never spent a day in jail, and their high-powered defense teams put up a rigorous defense, which included frequent press conferences wherein evidence and information was released to the media.

Not long after the prosecution into the case was launched, the State Bar began its own investigation into D.A. Nifong about questionable prejudicial statements he may have made before the media. A complaint filed by the Bar itself against Nifong forced him to step down as prosecutor before a trial date had even been set.

The prosecution’s case was turned over to the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office and it began its own review. After several month of investigation by the Attorney General’s Office, the attorney general, Roy Cooper, was prepared to make its intentions known as to what course it would take.

Before his announcement, two of his assistant attorney generals, James J. Coman and Mary Winstead, met with Brad Bannon, a defense attorney with the prestigious Joseph B. Cheshire law firm… which represented one of the Duke Lacrosse defendants. During this meeting, Mr. Bannon impressed upon the assistant A.G.s the importance of the attorney general to specifically pronounce the defendants to be “innocent” and to claim that “nothing happened.”

On April 11, 2007, Attorney General Cooper made a promulgation during which he dismissed all criminal charges against the Duke Lacrosse defendants and stopped all criminal investigation into charges related to the party. But, he made the unprecedented move of proclaiming that the Duke Lacrosse defendants were “innocent,” that “nothing happened,” and that Ms. Mangum had made false and unreliable allegations.

Mr. Cooper added that the charges would not be brought against Ms. Mangum for falsely reporting a crime because he believed that she was mentally ill or had mental problems.

Subsequent to the Attorney General’s statement, Mike Nifong was forced from his elected position as Durham district attorney and he was later disbarred, making him the first prosecutor to be disbarred by the North Carolina State Bar since its inception in 1933. He was also sentenced to 24 hours in jail for contempt of court by Judge Osmond Smith III, and A.G. Cooper unsuccessfully sought to have the U.S. Department of Justice criminally investigate Mr. Nifong for depriving the three Duke Lacrosse defendants of their civil rights.

The mainstream media lionized the three defendants and celebrated their proclamations of innocence by the attorney general… all stories related to the Duke Lacrosse case or its participants including the mention that the boys were declared “innocent.” What the media fails to mention is that the proclamation of innocent by the attorney general is irrelevant and meaningless as Roy Cooper is a member of the executive branch and not judicial.

In addition, the Duke Lacrosse defendants and their attorneys were able to shake down Duke University for $20 million for each defendant without a fight. Their attempts to finagle the cash-strapped city of Durham out of $10 million each has met with some unexpected resistance. The greed-driven legal battle goes on as the media continues to coddle these young men who never spent a single day in jail, graduated from college, and have moved on with their lives.

The media’s treatment of Crystal Mangum was similar to that given to Mr. Nifong… she was vilified and demonized… labeled as the false accuser.

Over the ensuing years a culture had evolved in the Triangle Area and throughout the state that was hostile and unsympathetic towards Nifong, Mangum, their supporters, and others considered by the Powers-That-Be to be on the wrong end of the Duke Lacrosse case. Amidst this toxic environment, Crystal Mangum tried to move forward with her life, graduating from NC Central University in Durham, and enrolling in its graduate program. A single mother of three in 2010, she was employed, lived in an apartment with her children, helped care for her parents, and was independent.

Then, on February 17, 2010, the city of Durham, which had been targeting Mangum for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case, got its break when the city police received a 9-1-1 call from Crystal’s children. Earlier that evening, Ms. Mangum’s ex-boyfriend repeatedly punched her in the face in response to a disparaging remark she made about him. She retreated and fought back in self-defense as her children, fearing for her well-being and life, made the emergency call.

To summarize the outcome, Ms. Mangum was arrested under a slew of unsubstantiated charges including attempted murder, communicating threats, assault and battery, and identity theft, while her ex-boyfriend was neither charged nor arrested.

Ms. Mangum was held under an unreasonably high bail in the six figures, and after languishing in jail for three months, she was released from the detention center but placed under house arrest when a bail bondsman unexpectedly satisfied the $100,000 bond.

With their prize defendant no longer being held in jail, the prosecution moved forward with the trial against Mangum who was represented by a featherweight defense. She was convicted on three piddly misdemeanor charges and sentenced to time served. The jury deadlocked on the most serious felony arson charge, and Durham prosecutors decided not to retry her on it.

2011 VENDETTA PROSECUTION AGAINST CRYSTAL MANGUM

That the Durham prosecutors were not through with Crystal Mangum became plainly evident a year later. On April 3, 2011, in the early morning hours, Crystal Mangum and Reginald Daye, the man with whom she and her children shared his apartment, were embroiled in an argument fomented by his jealousy over the attention she had just given to a police officer acquaintance.

Inside his apartment over approximately the next hour, a highly intoxicated Mr. Daye intermittently punched Crystal Mangum in the face and head approximately ten times. He spit on her, he pulled out her hair, and when she sought refuge in a locked bathroom, he proceeded to kick in the door to get at her. He brought into the bedroom, where the assault was centered, steak knives from the kitchen and proceeded to throw them at her.

Daye was straddling her with his hands around her neck strangling her when she picked up a knife that was lying nearby and stabbed him once in the left torso. Once wounded, Daye got up from atop Mangum. She grabbed her purse and fled from the apartment with Daye quickly giving up pursuit.

Crystal Mangum went to Ms. Liddy Howard’s apartment in a nearby housing complex. A friend, Ms. Howard watched Crystal’s children at times, and she allowed her to get some rest until daybreak.

Hours later, police arrived and without investigative questioning of her, she was arrested and charged with assault with a deadly weapon with the intent to kill inflicting serious injury. Then she was told that anything she said could be used against her, so she declined to give an interview.

Despite physical evidence that Ms. Mangum had been beaten – with swelling to the lower lip, a small laceration around he left eye, a lesion to the back of her left hand, and clumps of her hair deposited at two sites – Reginald Daye was not charged or arrested for domestic violence, assault on a female, or false imprisonment.

EMS took Reginald Daye by ambulance to Duke University Hospital where his assessment revealed a blood alcohol level of 296 mg/dL, which induces stupor in a nonalcoholic adult male. His condition was considered stable enough for him to undergo several preoperative diagnostic tests, including x-rays and body scans.

Emergency surgery disclosed a laceration to the colon and a minor lesion to the spleen, both which were repaired. With the operation a success, Daye’s prognosis was for a full recovery.

Despite prophylactic treatment with sedatives to prevent delirium tremens, Mr. Daye began showing significant agitation and other signs of alcoholic withdrawal on the third postoperative day. This development resulted in his transfer to the surgical intensive care unit where a decision was made to intubate Daye in order to protect his airway and better deliver oxygen.

Unfortunately, the endotracheal tube was positioned in the esophagus instead of the trachea which resulted in oxygen being delivered to the stomach instead of the lungs. The lack of oxygen resulted in death of sensitive brain cells and led to cardiac arrest. With cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) begun, the wayward endotracheal tube was removed and another endotracheal tube was introduced… this one properly placed in the trachea. After oxygen flow was reestablished to the lungs, the heart was successfully resuscitated and once again pumped spontaneously. The brain cells would not recover and Daye remained comatose.

Daye’s condition was monitored for a week, and on April 13, 2011, without showing improvement or signs of regaining consciousness, he was electively removed from life support after which he died.

An autopsy was performed on Reginald Daye the following morning of April 14, 2011, and the medical examiner concluded that Daye died of “complications of a stab wound to the chest,” although no nexus was established in the report.

The fraudulent Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011 was used as the basis of Durham prosecutor Kelly Gauger’s first degree murder charge against Crystal Mangum, and on April 18, 2011 she received a grand jury indictment against Mangum not only for the murder charge, but also two counts of larceny of chose in action. The two count larceny charge being an integral part of the first degree murder charge.

CONSPIRACY BY THE MEDICAL EXAMINER

In order for Prosecutor Kelly Gauger to charge Mangum with murder, she needs an autopsy report to falsely state that the knife wound was responsible for Reginald Daye’s death. She gets exactly that in the April 14, 2011 autopsy report by Dr. Clay Nichols with his conclusion that Daye died from “complications from a stab wound to the chest.”

Crystal Mangum was indicted for the murder of Mr. Daye based on a fraudulent autopsy report that not only contained an unsubstantiated and incorrect conclusion, but fabricated physical findings, as well. The Durham prosecution’s case against Ms. Mangum relied solely on a document totally lacking in credibility.

The medical examiner’s role in this conspiracy was crucial, as the murder charge could not have been brought against Mangum without his report.

Ironically, although the conspiratorial bridge between Prosecutor Gauger and the medical examiner was essential for the murder charge against Mangum, the contribution by the doctor represented the weakest link in the criminal case against her.

CONSPIRACY BY THE DEFENSE ATTORNEYS

In order for such a weak case as that against Mangum to even be brought before the court, prosecutors had to rely on significant cooperation from Mangum’s defense attorneys. Collusion by defense attorneys was mandatory if the prosecution of Mangum was to make any headway.

Any competent defense attorney, acting in the best interests of Ms. Mangum, could easily shred the prosecution’s case against her instantaneously. A motion to dismiss the charges, a motion to reduce bail, and a preliminary hearing are actions a defense attorney could have taken to minimize Mangum’s time behind bars following her arrest.

Although Mangum’s attorney Chris Shella did file several motions for bail reduction, he did not aggressively attack the weak case of the prosecution against his client.

Also, Mr. Shella allowed Judge Osmond Smith III to hear a bail reduction in March 2012 even though the black-rober should have recused himself, as he had presided over the pretrial phase of the Duke Lacrosse trial and had issued rulings against Mangum in it.

Durham prosecutors wanted Mangum to suffer, so her incarceration was a prominent part of their plan. They intended to move the case at a snail’s pace, which could be facilitated with cooperation by defense attorneys, while Ms. Mangum languished in jail.

Defense attorney Woody Vann, the court’s initially appointed attorney for Mangum, was reinstated approximately one year after her arrest when Mr. Shella voluntarily removed himself after supporters of Mangum drafted and filed motions for her and called a press conference.

After I met with Mr. Vann on May 24, 2012, and pointed out the discrepancies between the autopsy report and other medical records, he eventually retained the services of a forensic pathologist, Dr. Christena Roberts, to review Daye’s death. The court approved payment for the defense expert, and the report purportedly has been completed.

However, Mr. Vann has not given his client, Ms. Mangum, a copy of the Roberts’ report, and he has not shared all of the prosecution discovery and evidence, with Ms. Mangum… including photographs taken of Mangum’s injuries, of Daye’s injury, and of the evidence at the crime scene.

Because of the unanticipated involvement of Mangum’s supporters in her case, the prosecution-defense strategic objective has changed from an attempt to have Mangum convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without parole, to having Mangum accept a plea deal in exchange for a sentence of time served.

The defense attorney’s collaboration with prosecutors here is vital, as a lawyer usually holds a position of trust with his client relying on him to give advice and direction in his defendant’s best interests. The defense attorney Mr. Vann is best positioned to deliver to the prosecution the acceptance by Crystal Mangum of a plea deal that would bring a quick end to the out of control prosecution and relieve the state of any civil liability for its grievous wrongs against her. A plea deal would also dispense with the need for an open trial which could expose Duke University Hospital to damaging publicity.

Recently Mr. Vann allegedly told Ms. Mangum that she had a “weak case,” and suggested that she consider taking a plea deal from the prosecution… this without giving his client full access to the evidence and prosecution discovery. Although nothing has been offered in writing by prosecutors, Mr. Vann is testing the waters and shopping the plea deal offer to her. Undoubtedly, the desperation by the prosecutors is evident with Mr. Vann mentioning “time served.”

With Ms. Mangum’s defense essentially consisting of a traitorous mole, it is no wonder that the prosecution would bring such a merit-less case against her with the reasonable expectation of prevailing in putting an innocent person in jail for life without the possibility of parole.

CONSPIRACY BY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA

The ultimate goal of the prosecution centered conspiracy is to keep hidden from the public the sinister and illegal actions being taken against Crystal Mangum in an attempt to put her in prison for the rest of her life. If the singularly diabolical nature of the prosecution of Mangum had been revealed to the masses, a great possibility existed that there would have been an uproar to derail the prosecutors’ goals.

Even though the media had demonized Mangum to the point where people had little or no sympathy for her, the flagrant abuse of her within the legal system would elicit revulsion in most and unease in almost all.

What the Durham prosecutors wanted from the media is what the mainstream media has delivered thus far… a misleading fantasy with mischaracterizations of the main actors and total concealment of the truth with a disregard for logic and common sense.

The mainstream media has basically presented the criminal case as follows:

1. Crystal Mangum is a violent and mentally unstable liar who has a penchant for physically abusing her boyfriends.

2. Reginald Daye was portrayed a hardworking man who humanely took in Crystal Mangum and her three children… there being no mention of his alcoholism or past criminal history that included assault on a female.

3. On April 3, 2012, shortly after midnight, the two began arguing over two cashier’s checks which Mangum had no way of converting to her own personal use.

4. As a result of the argument, Mangum stabbed Daye and ran off with the two cashier’s checks, there being no mention of the injuries sustained by Mangum… no mention of clumps of her hair found at the scene… and no mention of the locked bathroom door being kicked in.

5. Reginald Daye died as a result of the stab wound which perforated six organs. There is no mention that Daye’s intubation was botched by Duke University Hospital staff which led to his brain death, and that he was in coma for a week. Neither is there any mention that he died after being electively removed from life support.

The misinformation above is what most unenlightened individuals, the majority of people, believe… courtesy of the mainstream media.

Another attack track taken by the media is to paint Mangum supporters as being troublemakers, interlopers, and self-serving legal obstructionists whose actions unintentionally work to her detriment.

Headlines even state that, with many of them emphasizing the series of feeble investigations against “Mangum supporters.”

The North Carolina State Bar investigation against Sidney B. Harr was even instigated by “more than one journalist.” To protect the journalistic complainants’ identity, the State Bar named itself as the complainant.

Then, once the Bar agreed to consider the complaint, the media was quick to jump on the story… the very one for which they were responsible.

The mainstream media’s biggest contribution to the conspiracy was its large scale cover-up in which it ignored the false findings of the all important autopsy report upon which the murder charge against Mangum was based. It also kept hushed about the cause of Reginald Daye’s death and the events surrounding it, with omissions of the pertinent facts regarding the misplaced endotracheal tube, the resultant brain death, Daye’s weeklong comatose course, and his removal from life-support which was the proximate cause of his death.

By concealment of these facts, the mainstream media purposely tried to shield Orange County Medical Examiner Clay Nichols, hide Duke University Hospital culpability in Daye’s death, mislead the public into believing that the stab wound was responsible for Daye’s death, and that Mangum supporters were interfering with the presentation of justice.

The media was well aware of the truth related to disparities in the autopsy report when compared with other medical documents… in other words, that the autopsy report was false and misleading.

The media was well aware of the truth regarding Reginald Daye’s death and that his demise had absolutely nothing to do with the stab wound he received.

Showing little curiosity about blatantly false statements in an autopsy report, the media exhibited marked apathy about the autopsy report as well as showing no desire to bring to the public’s attention the events surrounding Daye’s death at the Duke University facility.

Instead the media was busy focusing its investigative firepower into obtaining the personal cell phone records of former UNC head football coach Butch Davis, obtaining the collegiate academic record of professional UNC and professional gridiron great Julius Peppers, and learning the identities of Tar Heel football players who had their parking tickets dismissed.

Treachery by the legal profession against Ms. Mangum, Mike Nifong, their supporters, and others considered to be on the wrong end of the Duke Lacrosse case by the Powers-That-Be has been proven to be not newsworthy when it comes to the mainstream media.

In order for the prosecutorial cabal to be able to pull off such a merit-less prosecution against Mangum, it was mandatory that the mainstream media cooperate by obscuring and deceiving the public about what really transpired between Mangum and Daye the morning of the stabbing and about what happened to Daye during his hospitalization at Duke University Hospital.

The media has performed exceptionally in keeping the truth about the prosecution of Mangum buried beneath layers of omissions, diversions, selective and biased reporting, and overtly sloppy and inaccurate reporting.

Durham prosecutors, with their trumped up and fraudulent charges against Mangum, could not have asked for better cooperation from the mainstream media.

CONSPIRACY BY THE ENABLERS

My definition of an enabler is a person or organization that has position and standing to have an effect on a situation, but elects to remain silent and idle. In the face of injustice towards Mangum, many politicians, civil rights leaders and their organizations, clergy, and other community leaders have refused to lift a finger to confront the mistreatment of Ms. Mangum by the justice system.

Whether due to a deficiency of courage, a lack of will, or both, the enablers with their bully pulpit have consistently rebuffed my entreaties for them to engage in the matter even in the most minimal or superficial way. Enablers could have raised concerns about Ms. Mangum’s situation with the media or with Durham prosecutors themselves, but all of whom I contacted refused.

None of the many members of the North Carolina General Assembly who I reached out to were willing to get involved. Ms. Mangum’s political Durham representatives, specifically Senator Floyd McKissick Jr., Representatives Larry Hall and Mickey Michaux, and Congressman David Price all refused to help out their constituent.

The Durham City Council, likewise, declined to wade into the issue, even though taxpayer dollars used for the wrongful prosecution and incarceration were being wasted.

The NAACP on a local and national level would not speak out or take action against the injustice toward Mangum, but then again, the NAACP has a record of being extremely selective in whom it chooses to lend its support. Its tendency to shy away from any controversial issue was evidenced by its refusal to intercede on behalf of the wrongly accused Scottsboro Boys.

Although the NAACP did step in and help prevent Wilson prosecutors from railroading James Arthur Johnson more than it did, it is an institution that has proven to be timorous when it comes to getting involved in criminal justice issues in general.

The ACLU locally and nationally did not so much as give a response to letters sent to them seeking assistance for the great injustice against the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser.

Located in downtown Durham, the North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence, kept away from the Mangum fray despite the fact that evidence, common sense, and logic clearly supported her assertion that she was being physically abused and stabbed her assailant in self-defense.

In being rebuffed by the coalition, I was told that getting involved in any manner in Crystal Mangum’s case would be setting a precedent that the organization did not want to follow.

With the offices of the governor and the attorney general bemoaning the unacceptably high death rate in the Tar Heel state resulting from domestic violence, neither of them reacted to my concerns about how this victim of a domestic dispute who acted in self defense was now being unjustly charged with the murder of the abuser.

Had any of the aforementioned enablers taken a stand and raised awareness about the ostacles confronting Mangum in receiving a just and fair hearing within the criminal justice system, the vendetta conspiracy against her would have been brought down.

Since the enablers have remained inactive, the mainstream media has had no obligation to delve into the shenanigans being perpetuated against Mangum by the prosecutors.

Bottom line is that the cover-up by the mainstream media represents the bulwark to preventing the truth about Mangum’s ordeal from reaching the eyes and ears of the public… thereby stifling any outrage or opposition to her mistreatment.

With the public deaf and blind to what’s taking place in the courtroom, the defendant’s right to a fair and impartial trial can be severely compromised. The media has deftly provided the ear plugs and blinders in allowing Crystal Mangum to be ravaged by vindictive prosecutors and their conspiratorial accomplices.

RECAP: PUTTING THE CONSPIRATORIAL PIECES TOGETHER

The devious plot of Durham prosecutors Kelly Gauger and Charlene Coggins-Franks to transform Crystal Mangum from the victim of domestic violence that she was into a first degree murderer, all for misguided retribution for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case, required the contribution and cooperation from many sources… in general being the following four groups: (1) the medical examiner; (2) the defense attorneys; (3) the mainstream media; and (4) the enablers.

That the prosecution was prejudiced against Mangum is evidenced by its disregard for the evidence supporting the fact that Mangum was physically abused by an intoxicated Reginald Daye who had a past history of assault on a female, and that Reginald Daye was not arrested or charged with domestic violence, assault of a female, or unlawful imprisonment in this instance.

After Daye’s death due to medical malpractice, the prosecution’s bias was further displayed by its murder charge against Mangum. It went to fanatical extremes to make it a first degree murder charge by concocting a little known/rarely used “larceny of chose in action” charge in conjunction with the “felony-murder rule”… the alleged larceny not even filling the requisites needed for the charge.

Prosecutors then relied upon the medical examiner to provide the foundation upon which to build their murder charge by issuing an autopsy report concluding that Reginald Daye’s death was due to “complications of a stab wound to the chest.” This is totally false.

With such a weak and baseless case against Mangum, the prosecutors needed to have the full cooperation of the defense attorneys who represented her. Her lawyers were to go through the appearances of providing adequate counsel while intentionally accomplishing nothing of substance with their client Mangum languishing in jail under a high bail.

Any halfway competent defense attorney acting in good faith would have immediately challenged the prosecution’s case… the murder charge against Mangum would never have gotten off the ground.

The mainstream media was needed to keep the masses ignorant of the misdeeds and malfeasances of the prosecution in its vendetta case against Crystal Mangum. Media apathy was mandatory to keep from exposing the true cause of Daye’s death, the problems with the autopsy report, and to protect both Duke University Hospital and the Orange County Medical examiner.

Once Mangum supporters started to rally after her case remained in limbo for a year, the media was utilized to beat back their accusations of prosecutorial misconduct by placing these advocates in a bad light… presenting them as unstable, trouble-making interlopers.

With enablers’ muskets muzzled, compliant media-types kept the unscrupulous doings of the conspirators deeply buried, as no one, save Mangum supporters and members of the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong raised the alarm about the gross injustice taking place.

Corruption, conspiracy, and cover-up, all on a grand scale, are preventing Crystal Mangum from receiving true justice which she is due.

Mangum is not the only one on trial in this case… the bigger defendant is the North Carolina criminal justice system itself, and it is imperative that all Tar Heelians let their voices be heard in order to deliver a verdict that lives up to the promise of equal justice for all… even Crystal Mangum.



763 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 400 of 763   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"So you're saying that expert defense witnesses do not produce a written report? Is that what you're trying to say? Could you please provide more elucidation?"

With regard to the anonymous poster to whom you are replying said, I will not comment.

I am saying it is not credible(except maybe to you) that a defense attorney would hire an expert witness just to deliver an oral report. Why he would not want a written report is that he does not want the prosecution to get hold of a written report which will not help the defensne.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"If the party was as respectful and orderly as you describe, then they would probably not have quit performing after a couple of minutes and sought shelter in the bathroom. I rest my case."

I did not make the party out to be respectful or orderly. I said it was not the out of control orgy you falsely made it out to be.

You can not rest a case when you have no case to rest.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Actually, I consider KC to be like a misguided friend, and I recently realized that in addition to be dumbfounded at the brilliance of my flog, in addition he is also under duress of the on-going Duke Lacrosse avaricious lawsuits... I understand Duke University wants to depose him... am I right?"

The only thing you are right about is that Duke University wants to depose KC Johnson. I notice, in spite of your anti innocent Lacrosse player vendetta, no one wants to depose you.

You lie when you say Professor Johnson is your friend.

You lie when you say he has been dumbfounded by the brilliance of your flog. You have never displayed any brilliance in your flog.

You lie when you say he is under duress from the Lacrosse player suits against Duke. He is handling Duke's attempts to learn his confidential sources very well.

Three more lies to your credit, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"So you're saying that expert defense witnesses do not produce a written report? Is that what you're trying to say? Could you please provide more elucidation?

Thanks."

It seems more like you are conjuring up another straw fisherman holding a red herring.

You are trying to explain why Woody Vann would have paid an expert witness to deliver an oral report rather than a written report.

The only possible reason Woody Vann would not want a written report is because Dr. Robertson's findings would be deleterious to Crystal's defense.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous October 7, 2012 8:56 AM

"Who's Homer"?

Some fool thinks Homer is me.

Said fool is frustrating himself and getting himself p----d off by printing the name "Homer" over and over again. He is also getting his hands cramped up by all his typing.

Anonymous said...

Said fool may be another creation of KEN-Malek-HYDER-Williams-AL.

kenhyderal said...

I may be deficient in spelling but I have sufficient intellect to determine when I am being fed propaganda. Like, for example, the idea that Crystal is a scheming and coniving sorceress that was out to destroy these saintly, innocent and naieve college boys; when, in fact, they were well know for their boorish and out of control behaviour P.S. I don't engage, here, in the playing of childish word games or in chanting repetitive appelations in my posts. I ony post under my user name kenhyderal.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"I may be deficient in spelling but I have sufficient intellect to determine when I am being fed propaganda."

No you don't. Your fascination with Kilgo shows you can not tell when you are being fed prapoganda.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"in fact they(the lacrosse players) were well know for their boorish and out of control behaviour".

That is not a fact. That is a piece of propaganda manufactured by DA NIFONG and SIDNEY HARR.

You show again you do not have the intellectual capacity to recognize propaganda.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"[It is propaganda] that Crystal is a scheming and coniving sorceress that was out to destroy these saintly, innocent and naieve college boys"

No one(except you, maybe) has ever characterized as "a scheming and coniving sorceress". Crystal was identified by the facts that came out in the case as a false accuser.

The case became infamous because corrupt DA NIFONG exploited the false accusations to stir up racial tensions and win an election.

You probably believe the propaganda, or rather the outright lie, that DA NIFONG acted according to ethical standards for a prosecutor.

More evidence, from your own words, that you do not have the intellectual capacity to identify propaganda.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"P.S. I don't engage, here, in the playing of childish word games or in chanting repetitive appelations in my posts."

But said "childish word games" really get you p---ed off.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"[Crystal] was out to destroy these saintly, innocent and naieve college boys".

Whatever the moral character of the Lacrosse team, which does exceed the moral character of you, of SIDNEY, and of Crystal, the fact is they were innocent.

The crime alleged by Crystal never happened. Crystal lied about it. So how could any one be guilty of said crime?

You have never come up with a credible explanation.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"I ony post under my user name kenhyderal."

That is questionable, coming from someone who lacks the intellectual capacity to identify propaganda.

Anonymous said...

KENHUDERAL:

"[I do not indulge] in chanting repetitive appelations in my posts."

No. You just indulge in declaring, with no facts, innocent Caucasian men of raping Crystal Mangum.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:


"[It is propaganda that Crystal] was out to destroy these saintly, innocent and naieve college boys"."

You again show how intensely you dislike Caucasian men who are more accomplished than you, who have an intellectual capacity which is several orders of magnitude higher than yours.

Anonymous said...

Correction:

KENHYDERAL:

"[I do not indulge] in chanting repetitive appelations in my posts."

No. You just indulge in declaring, with no facts, innocent Caucasian men of raping Crystal Mangum.

Sorry for the typo in your screen name.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:


"I may be deficient in spelling but I have sufficient intellect to determine when I am being fed propaganda."

That you can not figure out how to use a spell checker or to look up correct spelling before you post your errors does not indicate a high intellectual capacity.

Anonymous said...

Right on kennyhyderal

Anonymous said...

Right on Homer.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 3:41 said: "No you don't. Your fascination with Kilgo shows you can not tell when you are being fed prapoganda"........... Despite his often crude language I found Kilgo to be more of a straight talker then the Duke LaCrosse Team apologists like K.C. Johnson, Joan Foster or Michael Gaynor.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 4:37 said: "That you can not figure out how to use a spell checker or to look up correct spelling before you post your errors does not indicate a high intellectual capacity"...... Not that I would be presumptious to compare myself with these but.... http://www.leelofland.com/wordpress/15-famous-thinkers-who-couldnt-spell/

Anonymous said...

Amazing that readers get drawn in by this hate speech and contemptuous rhetoric. I usually wouldn't comment, but this is pure garbage.

Mangum is now charging that the Lacrosse players paid a guard to rape her in jail. Unbelievable. Someone please make sure that this woman gets help! Thank god she is no longer raising her children - perhaps they still have a chance to be functional members of society.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Despite his often crude language I found Kilgo to be more of a straight talker then the Duke LaCrosse Team apologists like K.C. Johnson, Joan Foster or Michael Gaynor."

Which again shows you are not able to recognize propaganda when it is presented to you.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Not that I would be presumptious to compare myself with these but.... http://www.leelofland.com/wordpress/15-famous-thinkers-who-couldnt-spell/"

The fallacy here is that you presume you can think. If you could think, you would not give credibility to kilgo.

Some of those, like JFK, Benjamin Franklin, Agatha Christie, William Faulkner, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Winston Chruchill, did not have access to spell checkers.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous October 7, 2012 10:49 PM

That is a rather serious allegation. Not that I am an advocate for Crystal(except that she get a speedy and fair trial), but I think one should supply a reference for that allegation.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Despite his often crude language I found Kilgo to be more of a straight talker then the Duke LaCrosse Team apologists like K.C. Johnson, Joan Foster or Michael Gaynor."

Which does not change this inconsistency. You claim anonymous posters are not credible. You can not confirm who kilgo actually is. His information, supposedly. comes from some anonymous member of the Duke Lacrosse team. You can not confirm that Kilgo actually knows anyone from the Duke 2006 Lacrosse team.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

The above comment gives evidence that you are not capable of great thinking. You are eminently capable of presuming guilt on the part of innocent Caucasian men.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous October 7, 2012 10:49 PM

I have done a search on the internet and I can not find a source for your allegation.

Could you provide a source.

Personally, I would like to see how SIDNEY and KENHYDERAL react to such an allegation.

Anonymous said...

Homer says:

Right on, anonymous October 7, 2012 7:13 PM

Anonymous said...

Since it is only fair that we portray Mangum's criminal record in the way that Sidney portray Mr. Daye's record, please add the following to her criminal record.

"Police charged her with attempted first-degree murder, five counts of arson, assault and battery, communicating threats, three counts of misdemeanor child abuse, injury to personal property, identity theft and resisting a public officer."
This...from WRAL....from 2010. I will also post the rest of her criminal record, from 2002 and 2011. Then we can all see, side by side, which of these two individuals, Mangum or Daye, has the REAL record of violence.

Anonymous said...

Bro seems to be suffering from some sort of problem understanding the poster's very clear words concerning Roberts, and expert witness testimony. We ALL know how Harr got his second-hand information about the existence of a report, written or oral, from Dr. Roberts. He got it through (a)lying about it, or (b)talking to Mangum and lying about it. Vann would NOT, under any circumstance, talk to Harr about whatever Vann may have heard from Roberts. Roberts, as an expert witness , supposedly forensics and pathology, would NOT comment on the hospital's management of Daye's care. She would be called upon by Vann to help, if she could, bolster any claim of self defense....or....perhaps involuntary manslaughter. (lance??) assuming she could comment about the angle of the knife wound, etc. Proximate cause applies clearly in this case; Daye died as a result of complications from the stab wound inflicted by Mangum. We will have to wait to see where Vann goes, if anywhere, with hired gun commentary and testimony. Harr is absolutely lying when he says Roberts made statements about the tube placement, etc, and in relation to the Nichols report as fraud.
The point here is not whether there was or was not a written report. The point is that Harr has no access to it, if it even exists, has no clue what may or may not be in it, and is not sitting a conference room with Mr. Vann, drinking coffee and discussing Roberts' findings. How stupid can you get, bro....

Anonymous said...

well, if it were true that Mangum is now fantasizing about yet another mystery rape......one would have to wonder if she is going to embellish her tale. The innocent mother of three strikes again.....

Anonymous said...

Funny how sidney always seems to live in a parallel universe, always having an "Out" when he is caught in his lies. Example: Mangum didn't set the fire, the police did it.....later....well, if she set it, it wasn't a big fire and, oh yeah, the police officer I trashed earlier....well, he should have been trashed cause he called the FD!!" tap...tap...shuffle toe...tap...tap...tap. (the sound of sidney harr tap dancing.....)

Anonymous said...

Ever get the feeling that maybe, just maybe, Siste kinda likes the idea of , er, uh, fantasizing about rape and being over-powered by males???? Hmmmmmmm......she seems to repeat the same story over and over......the teenage rape that wasn't, the 2006 hoax, the 2010 battle with Walker because, she later said, he was "attacking" her, the 2011 Daye attack where he, coincidentally said the VERY SAME WORDS, per Sister, as did the LAX rapist9s). ("You aren't going anywhere....). and now, the latest silliness which may not even be true.....about a paid prison rape allegation. Hate to say it, but perhaps Mangum has some kind of wild fantasy thing going here........50 Shades of Crystal....

Anonymous said...

Have no idea whether Mangum said some guard raped her. Never heard that one before. But, if she did make that kind of allegation, it would not surprise me......because she seems to have a vivid imagination and because she seems to enjoy all the attention she gets from Durham's wingnuts.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

One of the people you cited as a great thinker who could not spell was Albert Einstein.

Now you are going to accuse me of trying to discredit Albert Einstein. Go ahead.

A handwritten letter by Albert Einstein recently surfaced and was sold for a great sum.

According to what was in that letter, Albert Einstein would think that people like Corrie Ten Boom, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Father Maximilian Kolbe and the Four Chaplains of the Dorchester were all weak people.

Anonymous said...

Kenny Hissy wouldn't know a great thinker if she bit him in his Dubai.

Anonymous said...

5,000+word count. Please, Sidney, you must still be thinking of your high school days when the teacher would give extra credit for longer book reports.
Holy bat cape, fella, how about some new material? You could just as easily write a new flop and say, within it, please refer, here, to my prior flub of such-n-such date.. Insert here. whew, long winded bullhockey does not even begin to describe this hairball inducing piece.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

With reference to the previous comment:

I did my surgical residency in a VA Hospital. The medical service at the time consisted of a bunch of semi-retired general practitioners who did not like to write up complete histories and physical exams.

When it came to past history and review of systems, what one would read was, "See old records".

You go back through the chart and check records of old admissions. On years worth of histories and physicals, on past history and systems review, all you could read was, "See old records".

You would have been just as effective a blogger these past few couple of years if all your blog posts consisted of the words, "See old blogs", or, "What I said a week ago I say again".

Way to go, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Referring to my comment of October 8, 2012 5:56 AM, Alber=t Einstein would have considered Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King a weak man.

What is you opinion of that?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Other lies you get credit for are that your blogs are earth shattering and are enlightening.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"Hah! You take that feeble aside from another news article that only quotes Seligmann's attorney as being authoritative? Shirley, you jest.

What do you base your claim on? Nothing more than a news article that has been proven false.

As I stated, the only people who know the actual settlement amount aren't talking.

So -- I've given you my proof that the lien was in error. Where's your proof?


Why are those in the know about the settlement amount not speaking? What are they trying to hide? Maybe the settlement amount was more than $20 mil...!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
5,000+word count. Please, Sidney, you must still be thinking of your high school days when the teacher would give extra credit for longer book reports.
Holy bat cape, fella, how about some new material? You could just as easily write a new flop and say, within it, please refer, here, to my prior flub of such-n-such date.. Insert here. whew, long winded bullhockey does not even begin to describe this hairball inducing piece.


Soliari once accused Mozart of using too many notes in his composition. Mozart replied that he used the correct amount.

My reply to you with regards to the wordiness of my flog is the same. I used the correct amount.

Nifong Supporter said...


LISTEN UP, EVERYBODY!!
Important news flash--

Congratulations are in order for Hugo Chavez who was just re-elected for a third six term presidency in Venezuela.

Carry on.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Why are those in the know about the settlement amount not speaking? What are they trying to hide?

Those in the know are not speaking because they are bound by a confidentiality agreement, imposed by Duke which does not want the extent of its wrongdoing even hinted at in public.

"Maybe the settlement amount was more than $20 mil...!"

So you admit you do not know the settlement amount, that you grabbed that amount out of the air when you decided to wrongfully accuse Reade Seligman of tax evasion.

Anonymous said...

In case you didn't know (and apparently you didn't), It is quite common for suit settlement terms to be held in confidence as a condition of settlement. In fact, I would say it is routine, based on personal familiarity with certain types of actions in the healthcare world.
Also, I will say that if the LAX guys got 20mil, they didn't get enough! Hooray for them, as far as I am concerned.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"My reply to you with regards to the wordiness of my flog is the same. I used the correct amount."

In other words, it takes you a lot of words to dispel you lies and your darkness.

Well done, SIDNEY-miniom-of-the-prince-of-darkness-HARR

Anonymous said...

Correction:

SIDNEY HARR:

"My reply to you with regards to the wordiness of my flog is the same. I used the correct amount."

In other words, it takes you a lot of words to diseminate your lies and your darkness.

Well done, SIDNEY-miniom-of-the-prince-of-darkness-HARR

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Nifong Supporter.

That is like being an athletic supporter on a eunuch.

You are supporting nothing.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

With reference to the previous comment:

I did my surgical residency in a VA Hospital. The medical service at the time consisted of a bunch of semi-retired general practitioners who did not like to write up complete histories and physical exams.

When it came to past history and review of systems, what one would read was, "See old records".

You go back through the chart and check records of old admissions. On years worth of histories and physicals, on past history and systems review, all you could read was, "See old records".

You would have been just as effective a blogger these past few couple of years if all your blog posts consisted of the words, "See old blogs", or, "What I said a week ago I say again".

Way to go, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR


Correcto-mundo, mi amigo. My flogs are particularly enlightening, the current one clearly explaining the length and breadth of the conspiracy that Durham prosecutors have used to ensnare Crystal Mangum, an innocent domestic violence victim of Reginald Daye.

Previous flogs and blogs have not entertained the topic in such depth.

Also, I would characterize myself as a "minion-of-the-Man-from-Nazareth."

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"LISTEN UP, EVERYBODY!!
Important news flash--

Congratulations are in order for Hugo Chavez who was just re-elected for a third six term presidency in Venezuela.

Carry on"

What important news flash? You haven't posted any here.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Correcto-mundo, mi amigo. My flogs are particularly enlightening, the current one clearly explaining the length and breadth of the conspiracy that Durham prosecutors have used to ensnare Crystal Mangum, an innocent domestic violence victim of Reginald Daye."

Correct yourself. You lie when you say Crystal was a victim of domestic violence of Reginald Daye. Your flogs have never been enlightening.

"Previous flogs and blogs have not entertained the topic in such depth."

Another lie. Your flogs have never entertained, let alone enlightened.

"Also, I would characterize myself as a minion-of-the-Man-from-Nazareth.'"

All your lies, including the lies in this post squarely put you in the camp of the father of lies.

Anonymous said...

Yep, things are just grand in Venezuela. Hard to vote against a man when you have a gun held to your head.
You? Mozart? whew.....
I am reminded of the acceptance speech given by jane Wyman in 1949 when she won an Oscar award for playing a mute character in Johnny Belinda. " I accept this award very gratefully for keeping my mouth shut"...."I think I'll do it again".

"Brevity is the soul of wit"..Hamlet "Act 2, Scene 2. Polonius, long winded and decided not witty, is running his mouth about his observations of scheming....and gets silenced.

My Dad, every single time we got in the car. "Sit down and shut up".
Your dribble is getting worse, sidney

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"Why are those in the know about the settlement amount not speaking? What are they trying to hide?

Those in the know are not speaking because they are bound by a confidentiality agreement, imposed by Duke which does not want the extent of its wrongdoing even hinted at in public.

"Maybe the settlement amount was more than $20 mil...!"

So you admit you do not know the settlement amount, that you grabbed that amount out of the air when you decided to wrongfully accuse Reade Seligman of tax evasion.


I would agree with you that Duke doesn't want the settlement amount released because it would show how foolish they were to accept such an outrageous agreement. Also, as a result of their baseless generosity, other avaricious un-indicted Duke lacrosse players have jumped on the bandwagon and are now suing Duke.

Also, the Duke Lacrosse defendants and their avaricious attorneys are more than willing to conceal the settlement amount so that they will not appear to be greedy!!

That's the real explanation in a nutshell, for your edification.

Anonymous said...

Bad satire, bad writing, just plain BAD......

Anonymous said...

you crack me up, harr. honestly, you do. I laugh just the same way I laugh when I read Fred Phelps trash from the Westboro Baptist church, and Louis Farrakhan's antisemetic filth......

Anonymous said...

SIDNEH HARR:

"
I would agree with you that Duke doesn't want the settlement amount released because it would show how foolish they were to accept such an outrageous agreement. Also, as a result of their baseless generosity, other avaricious un-indicted Duke lacrosse players have jumped on the bandwagon and are now suing Duke.

Also, the Duke Lacrosse defendants and their avaricious attorneys are more than willing to conceal the settlement amount so that they will not appear to be greedy!!

That's the real explanation in a nutshell, for your edification."

This is another collection of lies you promulgate.

Well done, SIDNEY-minion-of-the-father-of-lies.

Anonymous said...

Correction:

"I would agree with you that Duke doesn't want the settlement amount released because it would show how foolish they were to accept such an outrageous agreement. Also, as a result of their baseless generosity, other avaricious un-indicted Duke lacrosse players have jumped on the bandwagon and are now suing Duke.

Also, the Duke Lacrosse defendants and their avaricious attorneys are more than willing to conceal the settlement amount so that they will not appear to be greedy!!

That's the real explanation in a nutshell, for your edification."

This is another collection of lies you promulgate.

Well done, SIDNEY-minion-of-the-father-of-lies-HARR

Lance the Intern said...

"Why are those in the know about the settlement amount not speaking? What are they trying to hide? Maybe the settlement amount was more than $20 mil...!"

They aren't speaking about it because it was part of the terms of the agreement with Duke.

I'll simply note that you failed (again) to cite your source for the $20 million figure.

As a "minion of the Man from Nazareth", I'll remind you of the 8th commandment, "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour."

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I would agree with you that Duke doesn't want the settlement amount released because it would show how foolish they were to accept such an outrageous agreement. Also, as a result of their baseless generosity, other avaricious un-indicted Duke lacrosse players have jumped on the bandwagon and are now suing Duke.

Also, the Duke Lacrosse defendants and their avaricious attorneys are more than willing to conceal the settlement amount so that they will not appear to be greedy!!

That's the real explanation in a nutshell, for your edification."

You again show how resentful you are that the innocent falsely accused Lacrosse players collected from Duke and you did not.

Right on, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR

Anonymous said...

Oooo, here we go again with the Man from Glad thing..... knew old holier than thou harr would have to roll out the religious theme sooner or later.
So, today we have Mozart Harr, Atticus Harr, and Jesus Harr. Cool.

Lance the Intern said...

"Congratulations are in order for Hugo Chavez who was just re-elected for a third six term presidency in Venezuela."

As a self-identified Socialist, Of course Sid would be offering his congratulations to Chavez...I expect Sid to blame the violent crime that has spun out of control, patronage-bloated bureaucracy and rampant corruption in Venezuela on the "carpetbagger jihad".

The good news for the people of Venezuela is that despite the massive complaints of voter fraud, Chavez won by a narrow victory (54%) over Capriles.

Anonymous said...

Interesting that Sidney thinks there is some kind of report, oral or written, from Roberts that he has not seen and that, apparently, HIS legal layperson client hasn't seen (or heard) either.
If we are to get this straight, Vann tells Sister who tells Harr...that Roberts, orally, says Nichols is a criminal and that Duke Hospital murdered Mr. Daye. Yep, this famous wonderful expert witness who Harr drooled over in his past flubs, is now squarely in Harr's camp.....and yet, Vann, the evil white oppressor, is finding a way to keep the Roberts mouth shut tight.
whoa.......As the Stomach Turns....sidney, you missed your calling......soap opera scripts await your "gifts"

Anonymous said...

yes, of course, it's all Rae Evans' fault.....certainly not Hugo's...or the Man from Corruption City, as we should call him.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

I have been waiting for your next posting and haven't seen it.

You must be ogling at Honey Boo Boo's facebook page again.

Glass houses, SIDNEY

Anonymous said...

From http://www.zimbio.com/Mike+Nifong/articles/jCNfUX1m0K7/Duke+LaCrosse+Case+vs+Tracey+Cline+NC+Holds:

"Crystal Mangum is now Imprisoned in North Carolina for LIFE, probably being Drugged daily by State Penal Officials so she won't TALK and... is also probably being Raped by Men (Prison Guards) & Female Inmates."

Is this the source of the Crystal-raped-by-jail-guard allegation.

I guess there are liars out there other than SIDNEY-minion-of-the-father-of-lies-HARR.

Anonymous said...

This is another quote from the same site:

" On April 11, 2007, North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper stepped before a crowded press conference and spoke the words that ended one of the most publicized legal stories in recent American history. 'We believe these three individuals are innocent of these charges,' he said."

In other words, AG Cooper proclaimed nothing but expressed a belief.

SIDNEY-f0e-of-democracy-and-due-process-HARR believes AG Cooper's opinion, which is what it was, should have been suppressed.

Anonymous said...

I should add, with regard to my post of October 8, 2012 8:45 AM that the logo of the NAACP is prominently displayed on http://www.zimbio.com/Mike+Nifong/articles/jCNfUX1m0K7/Duke+LaCrosse+Case+vs+Tracey+Cline+NC+Holds.

And KENHYDERAL claims black on white racism does not exist.

Anonymous said...

Some more from the same web site which features the NAACP logo:

"This incident further proves that North Carolina's Institutions (Legal, Education, Finance, Tax Revenue, Medical, etc.,) are still being ruled by the Klu Klux Klan and 21st Century Extreme RACISM!"

Well, at least whoever posted that does not blame Mrs. Rae Evans.

I say again, KENHYDERAL claims blaci on white racism does not exist.

Lance the Intern said...

"Also, I am of the understanding that Dr. Christena L. Roberts, who was paid to review Dr. Nichols' autopsy report, has not produced a written report... rather has only spoken verbally with Mangum's defense attorney Woody Vann. Not only that, but his reason for not obtaining a written report was so that the prosecution could not get its hands on it. Does that make any kind of sense?"

If Dr. Roberts was retained as an expert witness pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702,Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 mandates that a pretrial disclosure be made in the form of a written report signed and prepared by the
witness.

Perhaps, as "legal layperson" you can determine whether or not Dr. Roberts was retained "pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702".

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 3:08 said: " You can not confirm who kilgo actually is".............. Yes but he did make a financial contribution towards helping Crystal's children.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

" 'You can not confirm who kilgo actually is'.............. Yes but he did make a financial contribution towards helping Crystal's children."

So?

How does that confirm who he really is?

How does that confirm the existence of Kilgo's anonymous Lacrosse player?

For that matter, what is the source of information about Kilgo's allege donation? If Kilgo himself told you, that would make it doubtful that he ever made such a donation.

Anonymous said...

Regarding http://www.zimbio.com/Mike+Nifong/articles/jCNfUX1m0K7/Duke+LaCrosse+Case+vs+Tracey+Cline+NC+Holds, I wonder how it is that SIDNEY never discovered this site.

Will he now post that he just learned from reliable sources that Crystal is being drugged and raped in jail.

That would be curious since SIDNEY has been maintaining Crystal is quite capable of representing herself.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "And KENHYDERAL claims black on white racism does not exist"................. And so does ever Sociology Department of every major University

Anonymous said...

Oh, well, golly gee, every sociology department? How about all the Afro-American studies departments? and the Women's Race/Gender/Orientation/Class Klan? My goodness, Kenny, had we only known all these esteemed scholars (such as the ever popular foul mouthed Hudson Baker, and the ever "forthcoming" writer Wahneeeema Lubiano....were in agreement on the absence of reverse racism in America......why, fellow, we would have all just collapsed with relief!!! Hosanna!!!
You truly are a sad little man, aren't you......

Lance the Intern said...

"KC Johnson has been so overwhelmed by my bombardment of logic and reason that he is for all intents and purposes dumbstruck. That's the only possible explanation."

I don't presume to speak for Dr. Johnson, but he is a full-time professor at Brooklyn College and the CUNY Graduate Center. the last post in D-I-W regarding Crystal Mangum was in June.

Quite frankly, I believe he's moved on.

Crystal Mangum was never the "target" of Dr. Johnson or his book anyway -- rather it was the failure of DU and it's administration to protect their students, and the inappropriate lengths that Nifong went to in his attempt to prosecute the LAX students that drew the attention of Dr. Johnson and Stuart Taylor.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 9:34 said: "For that matter, what is the source of information about Kilgo's allege donation? If Kilgo himself told you, that would make it doubtful that he ever made such a donation"........ Huh????? We got the money! Again and again, it's " admit nothing, deny everything, launch counterattacks".

Lance the Intern said...

Kenhyderal Stated "We got the money..."

Who is we?

Anonymous said...

KENHYERAL:

" Huh????? We got the money! Again and again, it's 'admit nothing, deny everything, launch counterattacks'."

So how does that establish Kilgo as anyone knowledgeable about the Duke Lacrosse phony rape case?

How does it establish that Kilgo knows an anonymous member of the Duke Lacrosse team?

How does your aversion to any one who does not buy into your racially motivated presumption of guilt on the part of innocent Caucasian men establish you as a thinker rather than as a blatant unrepentant racist?

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

" Huh????? We got the money! Again and again, it's 'admit nothing, deny everything, launch counterattacks'."

Interesting comment from someone who posts that innocent Caucasian men are guilty of rape based on information from what is an anonymous source who cites another anonymous source.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"'And KENHYDERAL claims black on white racism does not exist'................. And so does ever Sociology Department of every major University".

Which only means that every(I think that is what you meant) Sociology Department of every major University got it wrong.

None so blind as they who refuse to see.

Let's have you come up with your own platitude now.

Anonymous said...

Who is the "we"? Are you now admitting to a far more direct role and involvement with Mangum and others than you have previously? Are you now saying that you are an active receiver of money that is somehow linked to Mangum? more and more interesting all the time. isn't it, kenny. Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to tell a big fat fib!

Anonymous said...

I hate to burst your bubble, Harr, but Professor Johnson probably does not actually live and die by the devine light of your inspired flub. I KNOW this may sting a bit, but, sidney, you are not the center of his universe. In fact, I doubt you are even sitting near "BoldlyGo" on the edge of the cosmos. Sorry, pal, I believe the Professor has a few more important tasks to keep him busy than to sit cross-legged at the feet of the J4N wingnut-in-chief. boo hoo

Anonymous said...

From Wikipedia, Kenny Cut n Paste's favorite resource:
......"On December 17, 2010, Mangum was convicted of five misdemeanor charges involving child abuse. She was also convicted of injury to personal property and resisting a public officer. The jury deadlocked 9-3 for conviction on the felony arson charge but was unable to reach a decision on it."
Mangum LIED when she denied setting the fire in the apartment. Her supporter were all orgasmic that she got away with the lie and skipped the arson charge. Then, she blew her cover and public admitted that she had set the fire during a recent interview. Oooops! Gosh, I guess old honest judge Abe Jones must be so proud of himself for telling her she was a good mother......no matter the convictions, the lies, and the little matter of killing Reginald Daye.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy(because KENHYDERAL is so fond of the game):

Answer: An anonymous source who cites an anonymous source.

Question: Who is Kilgo?

Anonymous said...

Even more Jeopardy:

Answer: Everything.

Question: What does Kilgo claim to know about the Duke Lacrosse case?

Anonymous said...

Yet more Jeopardy:

Answer: Nothing.

Question: What does Kilgo actually know about the Duke Lacrosse case?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy for KENHYDERAL's pleasure(or displeasure as the case might be):

Answer: non Credible.

Question: How does KENHYDERAL characterize anonymous sources?

Answer: He has information from an anonymous source which, in turn, comes from another anonymous source.

Question: Why does KENHYDERAL believe Crystal was raped at the Lacrosse party on the night of 13/14 March 2006?

Anonymous said...

This from Liestoppers(i.e.the appropriately named liestoppers):

http://www.thedurhamnews.com/2012/10/08/213460/mangum-wants-to-represent-herself.html

Crystal wants to represent herself. Woody Vann is seeking to withdraw from her defense.

Anonymous said...

From Joan Foster(who posts on the appropriately named Liestoppers):

"I support Ms. Mangum's request to represent herself as long as the trial is televised."

I hope the trial is televised. SIDNEY HARR will try to use if for his personal exposure and millions of people will be enlightened as to what a fool he is.

Anonymous said...

What will SIDNEY HARR do now?

My guess is there are two possibilities.

SIDNEY will claim he has photos documenting Crystal's injuries but will not release them.

SIDNEY will not get the photos and then claim the Prosecution is withholding exculpatory evidence.

Break the Conspiracy said...

This is great news.

I believe that we should congratulate Sidney for having the courage to act on his convictions. He concluded that Vann was conspiring against Crystal, and he persuaded Crystal to fire him.

Sidney has promised that photographs will show the horrific injuries Daye inflicted and photographs of the crime scene will provide additional evidence that Crystal acted in self-defense. If the evidence is as convincing as Sidney claims, the prosecution will be forced to drop charges if Sidney can reach a wide enough audience.

I look forward to seeing the evidence. Sidney, please keep us apprised of your progress.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "Who is we?"....... Myself and Matt Murchison.

kenhyderal said...

Anonyymous @ 10:34 said: "None so blind as they who refuse to see.

Let's have you come up with your own platitude now"......................... In regione caecorum rex est luscus.]
Desiderius Erasmus, Adagia (III, IV, 96)
quoted by Cyclops Kenhyderal

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 1:33 said: I guess old honest judge Abe Jones must be so proud of himself for telling her she was a good mother" ......... You should re-read the statute as to what constitutes arson. Judge Jones instructed the jury that the misdeamenor child neglect charges would rise or fall on whether they convicted on the arson charge. The Jury disregarded his advice. The nine Jurors who voted against convicting her of arson should have also voted her not guilty of the child neglect charges. Judge Jones righted this error by declaring from what evidence he heard Crystal was a good Mother and to reinforce his point he sentenced her to the minimum he could. If she had managed to bail out on day 1 he would of given her 1 day.

Anonymous said...

This is great. Mangum will represent herself with Sidney as her legal layperson. Hooray. I love Joan foster's comment.......
Hot damn.... Lets hope this goes to trial and that Sidney gets to address the jury. Oh my gosh, the thrill of it all. Sidney, get yourself a new yellow shirt! Wheeeeee

Anonymous said...

Wikipedia said nine to three for conviction. Nonetheless she got five convictions and then proceeded to kill a man. In between she pole danced. Nice

Anonymous said...

The judge changed his instructions.

You have made this statement and been corrected before.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

" In regione caecorum rex est luscus.]
Desiderius Erasmus, Adagia (III, IV, 96)
quoted by Cyclops Kenhyderal

You sure do not qualify as a king.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: "Who is we?"....... Myself and Matt Murchison."

You really mean, you, your alter ego of Malek Williams, and Matt Murchison.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Judge Jones righted this error by declaring from what evidence he heard Crystal was a good Mother and to reinforce his point he sentenced her to the minimum he could. If she had managed to bail out on day 1 he would of given her 1 day."

You really mean he compounded his error.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal: Judge Jones instructed the jury that the misdemeanor child neglect charges would rise or fall on whether they convicted on the arson charge.

This was Jones' original instruction. At the request of the prosecution, he changed this instruction. The prosecution argued that jurors may have believed that the first degree arson charges were excessive, but that Mangum nevertheless put her children at risk (as would have been the case with a lesser arson charge). They did not have the option to convict her on lesser arson charges.

You have made this statement in the past, and readers have corrected you. You repeat your "error."

Ken: The jury disregarded his advice.

This statement is false, and ken knows that. The jury was supposed to follow the final advice, not the original advice.

You owe an apology to the jurors.

Anonymous said...

Right on kennyhyderal.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "This statement is false, and ken knows that. The jury was supposed to follow the final advice, not the original advice"................. Judge Jones may have changed his instructions to the jury at the behest of the Prosecution but it's quite obvious he thought the arson charge was bogus and Crystal did not put her children at risk; thus his positive pronouncement on her as a Mother.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Judge Jones may have changed his instructions to the jury at the behest of the Prosecution but it's quite obvious he thought the arson charge was bogus and Crystal did not put her children at risk; thus his positive pronouncement on her as a Mother".

Judge Jones is as profound a non thinker as you are.

Anonymous said...

Kenny are you just plain retarded or what? Mangum admitted that she dID star the fire, numb nut!, Who gives a damn what the judge said. She admitted it. She is guilty of the arson and the child endangerment by her own admission! Get it straight if you possibly can

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy(since I know how much KENHYDERAL loves this game).

Answer: Judge Jones

Question: Who is as intellectually incapable of recognizing propaganda as KENHYDERAL?

KENHYDERAL, could your feelings towards jeopardy be a reflection of your intellectual capacity or lack thereof?

Anonymous said...

Mangum ought to get her wish and be given the opportunity to represent herself in court. And, of course, her legal layperson should be given the opportunity to be at her side, whispering in her ear, and guiding her throughout the trial. She deserves this!

Anonymous said...

I would stand in line for a seat in court to see and hear sidney arguing with a judge. might be kinda fun. the only problem with this comedy is its tragic consequences for Mangum. To be clear, sidney harr has never and does not now, given one damn about Mangum or Nifong. He cares about himself, his own needs, and his racist agenda. Period. Nifong has always been a surrogate and, god help her, mangum (with a weak mind and the morals of a house cat), has been nothing but his puppet. Now she is possibly going to be at risk for a very long prison term.
I wonder if a judge would/will actually allow this fiasco to happen, i.e., mangum being her own lawyer. Not sure a judge has any authority to prevent it. Lance? Walt? Too bad. As sorry as her behavior has been, for years, I believe Mangum is entitled to a fair trial. NO WAY this is going to happen if she is allowed to screw up her life, yet again.

Anonymous said...

uh huh....now we are to believe that kenny hissy fit does not know who kilgo is but has received money from kilgo. which part of this is the bigger lie, folks? Get your play book out....you will need it to be keep track. Kenny, aka ken edwards, aka malek, aka a wide variety of anon posters.....now says WE got the money....from kilgo....for Mangum. okie doke!
funny how excuses get made, isn't it. Malek changes his slave name. Kenny can't get harr to verify him. kilgo sends money in some way that kenny cannot ID.

Anonymous said...

I believe, as do many if not ALL of us to follow this site (from time to time) that the entire Kilgo character, story, tale of woe, mystery rapist, mystery LAX player, etc is a total fabrication. Complete utter and total nonsense. There was no mystery rapist. No mystery LAX player. No secret being kept. No wall of silence. And NO RAPE. The guys at the party were stupid....but not that stupid. They should not have been drinking underage. That IS illegal. They should not have hired strippers. That is (to me) immoral. Worst case....they got it...and far more. But, not one damn thing happened to Mangum that night except that she got drunk, fell on her ass, knew she would either go to jail for public drunk or to hospital (if she cried wolf, er, rape....) And, she figured she had a chance to rip off (extort) rich white boys. Period. End of sorry story.....until and even more despicable human, Nifong, saw a chance to hoodwink (terrible choice of words) the black community into voting for him by stringing up the evil rich white boys.
I wonder where the 88 were when a white girl was raped by a black guy at a black frat party. Hmmmmm.....seems that rape of women is only an issue when it's a particular skin color doing the raping ....if it's a white woman, according to the Duke administration, it's HER fault for being there in the first place.
Amazing that the 88 let THAT one fly right on by, isn't it...

Anonymous said...

Know what I want to see? Nifong, Harr and Mangum.....together.....in court. Now that's entertainment, folks! You know Nifong's stench is all over this whole mess....and Harr, the legal layperson, is about to whiz his britches at the thought of sitting in front of the rail before a jury.
Hey, Mangum has a degree from that outstanding center of higher learning and she has written her very own book...she is no doubt competent to be own her lawyer. But...one caution for those who actually live in Durham (particularly males...)....her jury will be people from Durham and she could be turned loose to once again enjoy the comfort of a man. Grease the pole, Palimino Club!

Anonymous said...

where's bro? Getting dressed to visit the jail? Putting on his lawyer tie?

Lance the Intern said...

Anonymous asked "I wonder if a judge would/will actually allow this fiasco to happen, i.e., mangum being her own lawyer. Not sure a judge has any authority to prevent it. Lance? Walt?"

Woody Vann is court-appointed. Mangum would have to get permission from the court to in order to have him removed.

I'm sure that her "legal layperson" is busy writing up that request as we speak.

Of course, this will only mean more delays for Mangum.

Lance the Intern said...

Isn't Matt Murchison on of Crystal's former "boyfriends"?

Anonymous said...

Murchison is one of Crystal's former boyfriends. He was her boyfriend during the frame. Nifong had him arrested on some charges.

Anonymous said...

Personally, I would like to see what happens if SIDNEY HARR refers to Crystal as the "victim/accuser of the Duke Lacrosse case.

The DA could put Sidney on a very uncomfortable spot by demanding he prove his allegations. SIDNEY would probably reply that he has no proof because the carpetbagger jihad, orchestrated by the courageous Mrs. Rae Evans, has hidden the evidence.

Then he would be asked to document the existence of the said carpetbagger jihad. He would reply that anyone with a 5th Grade education could see there had been a carpetbagger jihad, that people who do not acknowledge the carpetbagger jihad had succumbed to a Jedi mind trick.

Maybe Sidney would be forced to submit to a court ordered competency exam before the court would allow him to continue to assist Crystal.

As Arte Johnson used to say, "VERRRRY INTERESTING".

Anonymous said...

I think Mangum has a Nov. court date. Should be fun.
Thanks, Lance. I understand. So, the judge could, at discretion, refuse to allow Vann to withdraw...or, likewise, could refuse any option than Mangum either paying for a private attorney or using a pool? is this correct, too?

Anonymous said...

Yep, it would be fun for Harr to explain how the DA overcharged Mangum in the Daye killing......since it was on no-conscious cline's watch...and since she and Nifong were "bosom" buddies. wouldn't it be a riot to watch this circus!!!

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

From WIKIPEDIA, regarding the presumption of innocence:

"
The presumption of innocence, sometimes referred to by the Latin expression Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat (the burden of proof lies with who declares, not who denies), is the principle that one is considered innocent until proven guilty. Application of this principle is a legal right of the accused in a criminal trial, recognised in many nations. The burden of proof is thus on the prosecution, which has to collect and present enough compelling evidence to convince the trier of fact, who is restrained and ordered by law to consider only actual evidence and testimony that is legally admissible, and in most cases lawfully obtained, that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If reasonable doubt remains, the accused is to be acquitted."

You believe some Caucasian men are guilty because of hearsay evidence(which in most cases is not legally admissable in court) you heard from a basically anonymous source(he conceals his real identity with a "handle").

Then you say you are a crusader for justice.

HUH!!!!

Anonymous said...

Funny how Dubai thinks the lax guys are guilty without a trial...and Mangum, of course, innocent without a trial. hmmmmm, odd how that works, isn't it....
per Kenny and harr, mangum should be set free without a trial and presumed innocent. on the other hand, the evil white boys, who they presumed guilty, should have been forced to go to trial to "prove their innocence"....

kenhyderal said...

Lance said: "Isn't Matt Murchison on of Crystal's former "boyfriends"?" ........... Matt is the Father of Crystal's youngest daughter, Kayla, whom he has custody of. Her other two children are with their Father, her former husband.

Anonymous said...

I would truly love to hear Mangum on the stand. Oh My goodness, save me a seat, skippy, I will take off work and stand in line.

Anonymous said...

Yep, a former boyfriend, lance. don't you love how kenny describes him as the "Father"......
Crystal sure has had lots of friendly relationships with males.....maybe she is just "lovable".

Anonymous said...

Speaking of the kiddos......let's not forget who the real victims in this god awful mess are.......the kiddso and Mr. Daye. Too late to help him....but, I hope it isn't too late for the children. Keeping them away from their amoral drunk violent convict mother is at least a start in the right direction.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Matt [Murchison] is the Father of Crystal's youngest daughter, Kayla, whom he has custody of. Her other two children are with their Father, her former husband."

According to reports, Crystal and Matt indulged in conceiving Crystal's youngest daughter, less than two months after Crystal was supposedly brutally raped. Crystal's cousin in a youtube video, blamed one of the Lacrosse team members.

Is it normal behavior for a woman who was allegedly so brutally raped to indulge in sex a short time after said rape?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

I challenged you to show how DA NIFONG complied with North Carolina State Bar Rule 3.8, “Special responsibilities of a prosecutor.”

What follows is documentation of DA NIFONG's unethical statements to the media concerning the Lacrosse case:

"Between March 27 and March 31, 2006, Nifong stated to a reporter for ABC for ABC 11 TV News that he might also consider charging other players for not coming forward with information, stating "[m]y guess is that some of this stonewall of silence that we have seen may tend to crumble once charges start to come out."

. Between March 27 and March 31, 2006, Nifong made the following statements to Rene Syler of CBS News: "The lacrosse team, clearly, has not been fully cooperative in the investigation; "The university, I believe, has done pretty much everything they can under the circumstances. They, obviously, don't have a lot of control over whether or not the lacrosse team members actually speak to the police. I think that their silence is as a result of advice with counsel"; "If it's not the way it's been reported, then why are they so unwilling to tell us what, in their words, did take place that night?"; that he believed a crime occurred; that "the guilty will stand trial"; and "There's no doubt a sexual assault took place."

. Between March 27 and March 31, 2006, Nifong made the following statements to a reporter for ABC 11 TV News: "I don't think you can classify anything about what went on as a prank that got out of hand or drinking that took place by people who are underage"; "In this case, where you have the act of rape -- essentially a gang rape -- is bad enough in and of itself, but when it's made with racial epithets against the victim, I mean, it's just absolutely unconscionable"; and "The contempt that was shown for the victim, based on her race was totally abhorrent. It adds another layer of rephrensibleness, to a crime that is already reprehensible."

. Between March 27 and March 31, 2006, Nifong stated to a reporter for for the New York Times, "The thing that most of us found so abhorrent, and the reason I decided to take it over myself, was the combination of gang-like rape activity accompanied by the racial slurs and general racial hostility."

. Between March 27 and March 31, 2006, Nifong stated to a reporter for CBS News, "The racial slurs involved are relevant to show the mindset ... involved in this particular attack" and "obviously, it made what is already an extremely reprehensible act even more reprehensible."

. On March 31, 2006, Nifong stated to a reporter for MSNBC, "Somebody had an arm around her like this, which she then had to struggle with in order to be able to breathe ... She was struggling just to be able to breathe" and "[i]f a condom were used, then we might expect that there would not be any DNA evidence recovered from say a vaginal swab."

. In an April 2006 conversation with a representative of the Raleigh News and Observer newspaper, Nifong compared the alleged rape to the quadruple homicide at Alpine Road Townhouse and multiple cross burnings that outraged the city of Durham in 2005 and stated "I'm not going to let Durham's view in the minds of the world to be a bunch of lacrosse players from Duke raping a black girl in Durham."

While discussing DNA testing at a public forum at North Carolina Central University on April 11, 2006, in the presence of representatives of the news media, Nifong stated that if there was no DNA found "[i]t doesn't mean nothing happened. It just means nothing was left behind."

So explain how DA NIFONG complied with North Carolina State Bar Rule 3.8, “Special responsibilities of a prosecutor.”

Anonymous said...

Mangum was photographed pole dancing, again, seven days after her brutal rape, kidnapping, levitating sodomizing, anal and vaginal and oral violation....that left her horribly in pain.
right. sure. you betcha.
I cannot say how most rape victims act and recover after a rape. I can only speak about the three women I know personally who were raped. NONE of them were able to engage in any kind of sexual intimacy with their partners (in this case, husbands) after months after the rape. There was physical damage as well as emotional damage....that left all three deeply scarred emotionally. A long period of counseling, rest, recovery and healing had to occur. I would say it would be the wild exception to the rule for a woman to be grinding her pelvis on a pole a week after a "brutal rape"....much less engaging in intercourse.
Crystal Mangum was NOT raped... She didn't even get a wet willie.

Anonymous said...

If I were Matt M, I would have demanded a paternity test.....

Anonymous said...

Not sure any crime, short of murder, is worse than what Sanduskey did to those boys. I hope "prison justice" is swift

Anonymous said...

I asked a physician friend of mine about the question of a rape victim's return to intimate activity after rape....especially a rape as described by Mangum....multiple men, with violence, etc.
His comments to me included (I am paraphrasing....)
1. Rarely if ever seen any true rape victim be able to return to intimacy for many months, sometimes years, sometimes never.
2. The physical damage from rape, both internal and external, often delays a return to intimacy
3. Victims generally want no part of contact, period....except in cases of deep personal connection between partners of longstanding...and even this is rare. It isn't a rejection of the partner; it's a healing time to recover from the invasion, helplessness and fear.
I mentioned that Mangum had been photographed doing exotic dancing on a pole within a week after the "rape". His comment to me was that if she had been actually raped as described, it would be against doctor, police, district attorney and every other source of counsel or authority for her to be out in public, doing anything that could cause her harm, expose her to infection or otherwise endanger her. So, IF she had been raped as she claimed, she would have been violating every single instruction to the contrary by returning to the pole dancing activity.
I will leave it to others to draw their own conclusions.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous October 9, 2012 10:16 AM

Gerry Sandusky is claiming it was a conspiracy among evil, attention seeking repeat accusers.

Could he have received advice from SIDNEY?

Anonymous said...

well, heck yeah. You know those (now) young men all got together and decided that they really wanted to go through hell, all over again, and identify themselves, all over again, as victims of this scumbag. sure, right! I hope they get millions and millions and millions...and that he gets exactly what he gave, except by prison bubba looking for love in all the wrong places

Nifong Supporter said...


LISTEN UP, EVERYONE!
Important Breaking News Article


Click to view

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Anonymous October 9, 2012 10:16 AM

Gerry Sandusky is claiming it was a conspiracy among evil, attention seeking repeat accusers.

Could he have received advice from SIDNEY?


Let me set the record straight on Sandusky. I have nothing to do with his defense.

Anonymous said...

Duh, Bro....this came out in the durham News, verbatim, and has been discussed here for the past two days. Idiotic but, hey, you might just get to wear your lawyer wannabe outfit....and, as the song goes, "if you get an outfit, you can be a cowboy, too"...... go for it, sidney.....you and Nifong and Mangum, together again! hosanna

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I would truly love to hear Mangum on the stand. Oh My goodness, save me a seat, skippy, I will take off work and stand in line.


Don't hold your breath. The truth will set Crystal Mangum free and there will not be a trial.

Remember, you heard it here!

Anonymous said...

Hilarious....yet again. I can't wait for Mangum to get on that stand......as Joan Foster, hope it is televised.....
Lawyers Jones, Shella and Vann must be ROFL.....
Mangum never been a good judge of character, has never made good choices, has never demonstrated an ounce of sense......at least she is consistent.

Anonymous said...

Poor Mangum....bedazzled by the foolish, led by the ignorant, pushed by the corrupt and screwed over by the devious..... Once again, she spreads her metaphoric limbs and does the hokey pokey for Harr and the j4n wingnuts.
Don't know which is worse......the tragic consequences of her own amoral and stupid choices, or, the immoral users who have pimped her for their own racist purposes.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"LISTEN UP, EVERYONE!
Important Breaking News Article"

SIDNEY, most of us were aware of that development over 24 hours ago.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Let me set the record straight on Sandusky. I have nothing to do with his defense."

Maybe not directly but he seems to be mounting a SIDNEY-HARRish It's-all-a--conspiracy-defense.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Don't hold your breath. The truth will set Crystal Mangum free and there will not be a trial.

Remember, you heard it here!"

Yes we have repeatedly heard it here ad nauseam. Crystal is still being held for trial.

Explain how you will present what you call the truth without testimony in open court which would entail Crystal to subject herself for cross examination.

Anonymous said...

The betting line says the team will be Mangum, Nifong and Harr........
Harr says it won't go to trial. I guess he figures that Mangum will sit down with the judge and use her brillance, her wit, her great intellect and the mounds of evidence she has......and the judge will just fling open the jail doors.
whooopie bleepin do, children, and haleujah!
There is that one tiny little problem......if what, now mind you, I am just sayin....what if, for some weird reason, Mangum is lying. Perish the thought!

Anonymous said...

All, please take note tat once again sidney has ignored questions and challenges to his lies......tap tap shuffle toe, tap tap.....

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

You are ducking the challenge(not surprising behavior for one who avoids truth).

How did DA NIFONG comply with North Carolina State Baris Rule 3.8, “Special responsibilities of a prosecutor” when he prosecuted the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players?

Anonymous said...

From the appropriately named Liestoppers:

Truth Detector;

"I can't wait to see what that NCCU honor's degree does for [Crystal] in the Courtroom.

A lot of people can't wait. As Joan Foster posted, I hope the trial is televised.

SIDNEY probably does not. That would explain why SIDNEY is so desperate to stay out of open court.

Anonymous said...

I'd encourage all to look, again, at the samples of Mangum's writing, legal brillance and intelligence that are demonstrated in the motions "she" wrote and sent along with courier Harr. A third grade teacher would flunk her. but, hey, she has that degree from the same fine institution of higher learning as "no conscious" cline.

Anonymous said...

Right on Homer

JSwift said...

All of you cynical readers are being unfair to Sid.

Sid's belief that Crystal's case will not go to trial is based fully in his expectation that evidence neither he nor Crystal have seen will provide such compelling proof that she acted in self-defense that public opinion will force prosecutors to drop all charges.

Sid has promised that photographs of Crystal taken the night of the stabbing will document the horrific injuries Daye inflicted on Crystal during the hour of terror. The extent and severity of these injuries will leave no doubt that Crystal acted in self-defense to save her life. Moreover, other pictures of the crime scene will show the damage wreaked by Daye--the kicked-in bathroom door, the clumps of hair, the knives he threw at her, the pots of boiling water. Who knows what else the pictures show?

I know what the cynics will say: What if Crystal is lying? What if there is no evidence that Crystal acted in self-defense?

Sid is willing to bet Crystal's life on her telling the truth. He knows that she is credible. She has never lied to him (except for denying that she set fire to Walker's clothes, but that was just a little fire, so the lie doesn't even count). He knows Crystal was beaten up because Daye was charged with assault on a female years earlier.

If Crystal is lying, Sid's strategy will not be successful. Without compelling evidence that she acted in self-defense, there will be no public outcry. She will almost certainly be forced to take a plea (probably less attractive than the plea Sid alleged that Vann encouraged her to take) or go to trial, where her lack of legal expertise will impede a coherent defense.

One thing we know for sure if Crystal is convicted: Sid will not apologize for crippling Crystal's defense. Someone else will be blamed for giving Crystal the stupidest advice possible.

Anonymous said...

Homer says:

Right on Anonymous October 9, 2012 1:53 PM

Lance the Intern said...

[Close up of Sid]
"Ladies and gentlemen, can I please have your attention. I've just been handed an urgent...news story. I need all of you, to stop what you're doing and listen...."

[Sid, Standing on a diving board in a speedo]

"Cannonball!"

Anonymous said...

Yep. Sid......this is IT, bro!! Your moment to shine........bigots on parade!!!!! Wheeeeeee

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

I say again, Sandusky's defense is very SIDNEY HARRish.

Aren't you proud of the influence might be having on people. Sandusky alleging a wide spread controversy as to why he was found guilty.

Anonymous said...

Hey Kenny,

What do you think about Crystal's decision to fire Vann and represent herself with Sid's assistance? You've never been bashful about sharing your opinions with us in the past.

guiowen said...

To J. Swift:

Actually, I've been advising Sidney for a while: if Vann is indeed conspiring with the prosecution, then the only thing to do is persuade Crystal to get rid of him. This will allow Crystal to see all the discovery that Woody Vann wouldn't show her. No doubt this will make a big difference at trial.
It's just too bad that Mike Nifong won't come out of retirement and take the case.

Apparently Crystal is believable and according to Sidney will represent herself well in court. A good idea would be to call the great KILGO and Kenhyderal as witnesses. They will, I am sure, help her present her case.

Anonymous said...

Has there ever been a real case of white men gang raping a black woman? I doubt it.We just don't find them attractive.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous October 9, 2012 9:32 PM:

Yes there have been. However it did not happen on the night of 13/14 March 2006 at 610 N. Buchanan.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous October 9, 2012 9:32 PM:

I add, if you can not see the beauty in such ladies as Diahann Carroll, Vanessa Williams, Rhianna, Darcelle Wynne, you have my sincere sympathy.

Anonymous said...

As a female, I would like to say that rape has nothing to do with beauty or attraction or sex. It is an act of violent aggression, usually based on some type of inner torment, being the victim violence himself (or herself), being (in the case of gang rape) pressured to perform, and being in need of asserting one's own power through submission of another. In other words, rape is all about using the "act" (I am trying to be respectful here...) as a weapon, not in a loving passionate way, but in a destructive and humiliating way.
No woman whether black white green or plaid, deserves to be raped. No man whether black white green or plaid, is entitled to rape.
The evidence from that night is clear, definitive, and overwhelming. Mangum's behavior in the days that followed (the return to stripping and pole dancing) is completely inconsistent with the behavior of a violent gang rape victim. Mangum lied about being raped. She may be lying, yet again, about the circumstances under which he killed Reginald Daye

Anonymous said...

If mangum has to testify, and of course, she would have to testify.....then she will be subject to cross.....and that, friends, will open a can of worms the size of Oprah's posterior. Brother Fong and Brother Harr will need to change their shorts.....

Anonymous said...

Yes, of course, there have been terrible incidents of rape by men (and women) of all races against victims of all races. And, yes, women can and do commit "rape". The point here, though, is that Mangum was NOT raped that night in 2006 at that party by those LAX guys. Because she continues, to this day, to claim "something happened", does not make it so. Mangum is not a demon. She is not worst criminal in Durham, by a very long shot. Nor is she the victim of some paranoia driven grand conspiracy. She IS lacking in judgment, restraint, moral code and empathy for others. Her behavior , at least since 2002, has been studded with one criminal event after another.....remember, she was well along the road toward a bad ending before 2006......a FACT that sidney harr ignores....when, in 2002, she racked up multiple convictions on serious charges that were pled to minimal jail time and a fine.
The debacle of having Mangum defending herself would be a disgrace to Durham's justice system.....and I hope no judge would let this happen. BUT.....she has been deemed competent and, I suppose, it's her right to be a fool as well as a killer.

Anonymous said...

I agree with guiowen. If mangum has a defense of self defense, then she obviously going to have to testify. The presence of a kicked in door does not, in and of itself, prove anything except that it is broken. the presence of disorder in the apartment, liquor bottles, knives, and trash....also proves nothing, in and of itself, except that the occupants or their friends are sloppy, drink alcohol and have knives. The present of a hair clump, with the root intact, and matching Mangum's....could be portrayed as being pulled out by Daye AS HE WAS FIGHTING WITH MANGUM AND OR AS HE WAS STRUGGLING TO DEFEND HIMSELF FROM HER VIOLENCE. We don't know, for instance, how long the fight between them lasted after she stabbed him. We don't know if he fell immediately or tried to get away from her or what. We don't know WHEN the bathroom door was kicked in...or by WHOM. We don't know how long the trash and liquor bottles had been in the apartment. All we have is Harr telling us that Mangum says such-and-such happened. IF there are photos showing a violent beating, then fine, let her bring them forward for judge and jury to see. IF she can prove that her hair got pulled out that night by Daye, then fine, let her prove it. IF she can prove that he was throwing knives at her, strangling her, punching her in the face, and beating the crap out of her, then FINE, let her prove it.
Remember, there are several elements to perfect self defense. Mangum cannot establish these necessary elements without testifying and, even then, without hard evidence to back up her story.....it's really doubtful she will prevail. Tell you what, I wanna see this mysterious photo that shows all the beating injuries. THAT is key to her case...IF it exists at all.

Anonymous said...

Since Harr has not seen the photo that he claims to show the sheer hour of terror beating, I would like to know just exactly how he knows what is in the mystery photo. He claims the photo exists and that it shows the beating that mangum says Daye gave her. Well, if it does exist as described, then she will have evidence to support her self defense claim. Maybe. But, as of right now, there is nothing but Mangum's word that such a photo even exists. I look forward to seeing it....

Anonymous said...

Oh, Kennnnnnnyyyyyyyy? Are you gonna come to Durham to join the Mangum defense team?

guiowen said...

Anonymous said...

"Oh, Kennnnnnnyyyyyyyy? Are you gonna come to Durham to join the Mangum defense team?"


I don't see how he can refuse to come. He is after all her bosom buddy and this would moreover give him an additional opportunity to gripe about the NC (and USA in general) justice system.

guiowen said...

I might have added, if Kenhyderal doesn't come he is what Sidney calls an enabler.

Anonymous said...

As Gomer would say, Shaazamm!! We may get to hear Crystal Mangum explain why she, being the innocent mother of three, went straight to the location of her own child, as she fled from the wildly drunken violent Daye. I can't wait to hear the explanation......
by the way, she passed by numerous apartment doors and residences en route to the child's location........wonder why she didn't scream bloody murder, pound on each and every door???? hmmmmm???

Nifong Supporter said...


LISTEN UP, EVERYONE!!
News article:

Click here for The Herald-Sun article.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
As Gomer would say, Shaazamm!! We may get to hear Crystal Mangum explain why she, being the innocent mother of three, went straight to the location of her own child, as she fled from the wildly drunken violent Daye. I can't wait to hear the explanation......
by the way, she passed by numerous apartment doors and residences en route to the child's location........wonder why she didn't scream bloody murder, pound on each and every door???? hmmmmm???


I hate to disappoint you and all the other detractors and ill-willers, but there is not going to be a trial as the prosecution will fold and dismiss the charges against Mangum. They tried a bluff with Woody's plea offer to her, but everyone knows that they have no case and they're frozen in desperation.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Since Harr has not seen the photo that he claims to show the sheer hour of terror beating, I would like to know just exactly how he knows what is in the mystery photo. He claims the photo exists and that it shows the beating that mangum says Daye gave her. Well, if it does exist as described, then she will have evidence to support her self defense claim. Maybe. But, as of right now, there is nothing but Mangum's word that such a photo even exists. I look forward to seeing it....


Crystal and I and her supporters look forward to seeing the photos and other exculpatory evidence that her attorneys have keep hidden from her. Rest assured my friend, that soon after I see the photos and get my grubby little hands on them, you and the world will see them, too.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I agree with guiowen. If mangum has a defense of self defense, then she obviously going to have to testify. The presence of a kicked in door does not, in and of itself, prove anything except that it is broken. the presence of disorder in the apartment, liquor bottles, knives, and trash....also proves nothing, in and of itself, except that the occupants or their friends are sloppy, drink alcohol and have knives. The present of a hair clump, with the root intact, and matching Mangum's....could be portrayed as being pulled out by Daye AS HE WAS FIGHTING WITH MANGUM AND OR AS HE WAS STRUGGLING TO DEFEND HIMSELF FROM HER VIOLENCE. We don't know, for instance, how long the fight between them lasted after she stabbed him. We don't know if he fell immediately or tried to get away from her or what. We don't know WHEN the bathroom door was kicked in...or by WHOM. We don't know how long the trash and liquor bottles had been in the apartment. All we have is Harr telling us that Mangum says such-and-such happened. IF there are photos showing a violent beating, then fine, let her bring them forward for judge and jury to see. IF she can prove that her hair got pulled out that night by Daye, then fine, let her prove it. IF she can prove that he was throwing knives at her, strangling her, punching her in the face, and beating the crap out of her, then FINE, let her prove it.
Remember, there are several elements to perfect self defense. Mangum cannot establish these necessary elements without testifying and, even then, without hard evidence to back up her story.....it's really doubtful she will prevail. Tell you what, I wanna see this mysterious photo that shows all the beating injuries. THAT is key to her case...IF it exists at all.


That's precisely the point. The photos do exist, as the Durham police forensic report states that such photos were taken. The problem is getting the prosecution and/or defense attorneys to turn them over to Mangum or allow her to see them. She has been asking for more than a year to see them.

The obvious reason they are being withheld is because they support her claims of domestic violence and self-defense.

End of story.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

I say again, Sandusky's defense is very SIDNEY HARRish.

Aren't you proud of the influence might be having on people. Sandusky alleging a wide spread controversy as to why he was found guilty.


I think you doth giveth me too much credit. The Harrish defense may be applicable in his case, but from my understanding, it is not.

Nifong Supporter said...


JSwift said...
All of you cynical readers are being unfair to Sid.

Sid's belief that Crystal's case will not go to trial is based fully in his expectation that evidence neither he nor Crystal have seen will provide such compelling proof that she acted in self-defense that public opinion will force prosecutors to drop all charges.

Sid has promised that photographs of Crystal taken the night of the stabbing will document the horrific injuries Daye inflicted on Crystal during the hour of terror. The extent and severity of these injuries will leave no doubt that Crystal acted in self-defense to save her life. Moreover, other pictures of the crime scene will show the damage wreaked by Daye--the kicked-in bathroom door, the clumps of hair, the knives he threw at her, the pots of boiling water. Who knows what else the pictures show?

I know what the cynics will say: What if Crystal is lying? What if there is no evidence that Crystal acted in self-defense?

Sid is willing to bet Crystal's life on her telling the truth. He knows that she is credible. She has never lied to him (except for denying that she set fire to Walker's clothes, but that was just a little fire, so the lie doesn't even count). He knows Crystal was beaten up because Daye was charged with assault on a female years earlier.

If Crystal is lying, Sid's strategy will not be successful. Without compelling evidence that she acted in self-defense, there will be no public outcry. She will almost certainly be forced to take a plea (probably less attractive than the plea Sid alleged that Vann encouraged her to take) or go to trial, where her lack of legal expertise will impede a coherent defense.

One thing we know for sure if Crystal is convicted: Sid will not apologize for crippling Crystal's defense. Someone else will be blamed for giving Crystal the stupidest advice possible.


JSwift! Long time, no read. Good to have you back in the fold with your insightful comments.

Let me say up front that I am not one to cast blame on others or scapegoat, however a conviction for Crystal is hard for to imagine... especially considering that the autopsy report is totally bogus.

Anonymous said...

Refusing to believe you....because you have zero credibility....is not exhibiting "ill will" toward Mangum. It is simply refusing to accept your version of events based on nothing more than air and claims from a proven liar.
When these photos materialize, then the question of whether they exist will go away. Second, if they do materialize, the question of whether they depict and support a one-sided beating....or....show nothing more than that some kind of fighting between two drunk people....was taking place......remains to be seen.
Hate to tell you this, but your bullxxxx is not remotely believable.

Anonymous said...

jswift, your sarcasm, irony and wit are wonderful. love it.....you, lance, walt and guiowen make my day...

Anonymous said...

well, sid, if she defends herself, you will have gotten exactly what you have wanted all along...........a very high probability of a conviction and prison time for Mangum....which, of course, you will blame on Rae Evans and the great conspiracy...which, of course, is all you really want, anyway. We are pretty clear what your true agenda is....and it sure as hell isn't consistent with Mangum's best interests. If you had Mangum's true future in mind, you and your band of bigots would have been doing two things. First, helping to raise bail money, and, second, urging her to work closely with and put herself completely in the confidence of....a qualified attorney....such as Shella. You don't give a damn about Mangum. that is for real, bro.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I hate to disappoint you and all the other detractors and ill-willers, but there is not going to be a trial as the prosecution will fold and dismiss the charges against Mangum. They tried a bluff with Woody's plea offer to her, but everyone knows that they have no case and they're frozen in desperation."

If that were true, you would not be so afraid of going to court.

guiowen said...

Sidney said...


" LISTEN UP, EVERYONE!!
News article:

Click here for The Herald-Sun article."

Sidney, your link is bad. Can you do something about it?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Crystal and I and her supporters look forward to seeing the photos and other exculpatory evidence that her attorneys have keep hidden from her. Rest assured my friend, that soon after I see the photos and get my grubby little hands on them, you and the world will see them, too."

What I anticipate is you will not find any photos or exculpatory evidence, then you will start screeching about how the Prosecution is still withholding evidence.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Let me say up front that I am not one to cast blame on others or scapegoat, however a conviction for Crystal is hard for to imagine... especially considering that the autopsy report is totally bogus."

All this rant means is you have a dearth of imagination.

The autopsy report is not bogus. That is another lie you promulgate.

Right on SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I think you doth giveth me too much credit. The Harrish defense may be applicable in his case, but from my understanding, it is not."

You still seem to have an influence on his "defense", considering you blame the fact that Crystal is a false accuser on an extensive conspiracy.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr:

Speaking as an attorney who has tried civil and criminal cases before juries, I have to say that Ms. Mangum's decision to represent herself is VERY risky. If, as you seem to believe, there is exculpatory evidence that the prosecution and her lawyer have been keeping from her, and the mere release of that evidence will result in the prosecution dropping the case, the gamble will have paid off. But if the prosecution insists on going to trial, a defendant who is not a lawyer is going to have a VERY hard time for example, effectively cross-examining an expert witness for the prosecution. The autopsy report may be "bogus," as you say, but establishing that fact before a jury is not easy. Even exculpatory evidence will not help Ms. Mangum if she cannot lay the proper foundation to get it admitted.

Anonymous said...

Somebody responded and said there really had been a gang rape of a black woman by white men.I would like to know specifically what case this was.There are a few white men that are attracted to black women but they are usually mixed race such as the examples cited.I can't imagine any white man would want to have sex with Crystal Mangum.That's why white on black rape is extremely uncommon but black on white rape happens on a daily basis.

Anonymous said...

Right on Homer

Anonymous said...

Homer says:

right on anonymous October 10, 2012 5:41 PM.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Your posturing about "the truth will set Crystal free" are a series of threats conveyed by your blog to reveal overwhelmingly exculpatory evidence unless the prosecution drops the charges. Very kilgoish.

So far, in spite of more than a year's worth of such threats, the charges against Crystal stand. It is evident you are making empty threats.

Anonymous said...

Correct me if I am wrong....doesn't the court require some kind of backup lawyer to be assigned, even if mangum elects to defend herself? Not sure about this, but I thought that's how it works.
I would also think that this whole business of claiming that the prosecution has been holding back evidence is bogus. To believe that, you have to buy into harr's story of the grand conspiracy........which, as a thinking human being with at least some working brain cells, I do not. It is far more likely that harr is simply constructing excuses for the future ........if mangum winds up convicted and in prison, of course it won't be because she is guilty.........noooooo, it will be because of a frame up by the conspiracy. We all know what this is about, sidney.

Anonymous said...

Yep, can't you just hear it now.... Mangum, representing herself, didn't get a fair trial.....the prosecutor and judge put the fix in....and controlled the jury and the proceedings....and Mangum got framed. Yep, all a part of the evil white oppressor conspiracy. whine . whine. whine.
We can all look forward to years of pissing and moaning by the j4n wingnuts if Mangum isn't set free completely and paid reparations to restore justice. gag me.

Anonymous said...

Let's see now....where are we? Mangum and her legal layperson have managed to screw up her defense strategy and run off three qualified attorneys since 2010.....Jones, Shella and Vann. golly, sidney, do ya think maybe your REAL motive might just be showing? Just a teeeeny little bit?
You do not give a damn about mangum. this is all about your sick racist thinking, isn't is. and, of course, it really is all about YOU, at its root.

Anonymous said...

hey sidney, where did you go to medical school? residency? what hospital as an emergency physician?

Anonymous said...

I am posting a portion of the United States District Court ruling in Harr's appeal regarding his suit against Duke. I think seeing this, yet again, should remind us all what kind of person sidney b. harr actually is. His behavior is shameful and his motives, reprehensible.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT....
"This leaves the issue of Plaintiff's gratuitous and vile invective directed at this court. Such comments were totally unnecessary for, as explained above, the factual distinction Plaintiff pressed was wholly irrelevant to the legal issues raised by the motion to dismiss his complaint.*fn3 Neither the liberal pleading rules nor generous pro se practices of the courts has eliminated "the time honored notion that the law and the courts of the United States are important parts of American society worthy of respect." Theriault v. Silber, 579 F.2d 302, 303 (5th Cir. 1978) (dismissing an appeal with prejudice because the pro se appellant's notice of appeal contained "vile and insulting references to the trial judge"). Plaintiff's pro se status is not an excuse to engage in abusive conduct, and Plaintiff is warned against further personal attacks on the Magistrate Judge or any judicial officer of the federal courts. See id; 18 U.S.C. § 401(1) (providing power to punish misbehavior by fine or imprisonment, or both). The court will not hesitate in appropriate cases to exercise its full contempt and other powers in order to protect the dignity of the nation's judicial system as a forum for the thoughtful resolution of legitimate grievances. Plaintiff is admonished to conduct himself accordingly."
Take note, Kenny, this is your sainted doctor who has demonstrated disrespect for the dead, violated federal law by posting PHI, told countless lies, and caused untold damage for Mangum

guiowen said...

Sidney,
Have you decided yet whether to get Crystal a new attorney? I honestly think representing herself in court is rather risky.
Can't you get Mike Nifong to come out of his comfortable retirement for this case? He really owes it to Crystal, after the way he fouled up her 2006 case. He owes it to you and your J4N Committee, after all you've done for him.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

This headline comes from the CNN web site:

"Sandusky, wife blame everyone else".

Sounds sort of like what you have been trumpeting about Crystal:

Every one else is responsible for what happened to her.

Deliberately or not, you must have had some influence on Mr. Sandusky.

Aren't you proud of yourself?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

This headline comes from the CNN web site:

"Sandusky, wife blame everyone else".

Sounds sort of like what you have been trumpeting about Crystal:

Every one else is responsible for what happened to her.

Deliberately or not, you must have had some influence on Mr. Sandusky.

Aren't you proud of yourself?


Actually, I am!

Keep in mind that I have not been following Mr. Sandusky's situation, so I don't know what's going on there.

However, I do know Crystal's situation, and as the flog clearly shows, the prosecutors have collaborated with the medical examiner, Crystal's attorneys, and the media, while politicians and civil rights organizations have been muzzled by fear.

I'm not blaming everyone, I'm merely putting blame where it belongs.

Nifong Supporter said...


guiowen said...
Sidney,
Have you decided yet whether to get Crystal a new attorney? I honestly think representing herself in court is rather risky.
Can't you get Mike Nifong to come out of his comfortable retirement for this case? He really owes it to Crystal, after the way he fouled up her 2006 case. He owes it to you and your J4N Committee, after all you've done for him.


gui, mon ami, the so-called case against Crystal is so weak that she can easily defend it herself.

As has been shown with her past attorneys, all they accomplish is to make her situation worse... Keep in mind that it is her attorney who is keeping exculpatory evidence from her!!! How crazy is that?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I am posting a portion of the United States District Court ruling in Harr's appeal regarding his suit against Duke. I think seeing this, yet again, should remind us all what kind of person sidney b. harr actually is. His behavior is shameful and his motives, reprehensible.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT....
"This leaves the issue of Plaintiff's gratuitous and vile invective directed at this court. Such comments were totally unnecessary for, as explained above, the factual distinction Plaintiff pressed was wholly irrelevant to the legal issues raised by the motion to dismiss his complaint.*fn3 Neither the liberal pleading rules nor generous pro se practices of the courts has eliminated "the time honored notion that the law and the courts of the United States are important parts of American society worthy of respect." Theriault v. Silber, 579 F.2d 302, 303 (5th Cir. 1978) (dismissing an appeal with prejudice because the pro se appellant's notice of appeal contained "vile and insulting references to the trial judge"). Plaintiff's pro se status is not an excuse to engage in abusive conduct, and Plaintiff is warned against further personal attacks on the Magistrate Judge or any judicial officer of the federal courts. See id; 18 U.S.C. § 401(1) (providing power to punish misbehavior by fine or imprisonment, or both). The court will not hesitate in appropriate cases to exercise its full contempt and other powers in order to protect the dignity of the nation's judicial system as a forum for the thoughtful resolution of legitimate grievances. Plaintiff is admonished to conduct himself accordingly."
Take note, Kenny, this is your sainted doctor who has demonstrated disrespect for the dead, violated federal law by posting PHI, told countless lies, and caused untold damage for Mangum


Ah, yes, I did ruffle a few feathers, didn't I? A rare instance in which I sorta lost control. But, you anonymi must keep reminding yourself that I am not perfect... and on occasion I will give a less than my usual stellar performance.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
hey sidney, where did you go to medical school? residency? what hospital as an emergency physician?


I would suggest that you go to a public library and ask its reference librarian to help you with your search.

Good luck.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Let's see now....where are we? Mangum and her legal layperson have managed to screw up her defense strategy and run off three qualified attorneys since 2010.....Jones, Shella and Vann. golly, sidney, do ya think maybe your REAL motive might just be showing? Just a teeeeny little bit?
You do not give a damn about mangum. this is all about your sick racist thinking, isn't is. and, of course, it really is all about YOU, at its root.


No, it's about justice. Unfortunately this state has a history of providing selective justice based on Class and Color... and not "equal justice for all." That's all I want for Crystal. She should never have been arrested or charged. This is nothing more than a vendetta prosecution as will be shown... mark my words.

(My time is up on this library computer. Sayonara!)

guiowen said...

Sidney said,
"As has been shown with her past attorneys, all they accomplish is to make her situation worse... Keep in mind that it is her attorney who is keeping exculpatory evidence from her!!! How crazy is that?"

But that's precisely why you have to persuade Mike Nifong to come back and help! I realize he's currently living a very pleasant life, but sometimes duty calls, and he, as a true minister of justice, would be the one attorney to help Crystal. He's the only attorney in NC who is not controlled by Rae Evans and her minions. Can't you see that?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"However, I do know Crystal's situation, and as the flog clearly shows, the prosecutors have collaborated with the medical examiner, Crystal's attorneys, and the media, while politicians and civil rights organizations have been muzzled by fear.

I'm not blaming everyone, I'm merely putting blame where it belongs."

What you know and what your flogs have shown is nothing.

You are again promulgating bare faced lies.

Well done, SIDNEY-minion-of-the-father-of-lies-HARR

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 400 of 763   Newer› Newest»