Thursday, November 29, 2012

Why Crystal Mangum should continue to legally represent herself


Word count: 1,850

NOTE: The day after this blog was posted, on Friday, November 30, 2012, Dr. Harr physically carried to the Clerk of court's office a Motion to Dismiss the Larceny of Chose in Action charge by Mangum, as well as his own Petition for writ of Mandamus to effect the release of Mangum on her own recognizance.  Both of these documents, along with their exhibits have been added to the directory of the link at the end of the blog.

After reading the blog, click on the link at the end to view directory (which now contains an extra button to view the documents filed with the court on November 30, 2012.)

While the saying, “A person who represents himself has a fool for a client,” may be applicable in many, if not most, instances, that is definitely not the case in which Crystal Mangum is currently facing a first degree murder charge and a “Larceny of chose in action” charge (a Class H felony). The criminal charges against Mangum, the victim/accuser in the Duke Lacrosse case, are vendetta-driven and baseless charges that any competent attorney acting in the client’s best interest should have been able to dismantle and debunk hastily. That the prosecution should even have the audacity to level such charges against a young lady who committed no crimes but was the victim of a heinous domestic battery, is due to the politics surrounding the case and the prosecutors’ assurance that the defense attorneys for Mangum will work in collusion against her best interests.

The initial intent of Durham prosecutors Kelly Gauger and Charlene Coggins-Franks was to use the bogus trumped up charges in an attempt to convict Ms. Mangum of first degree murder and have her sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole… not because of Daye’s death, but rather as payback for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case. However, Sidney B. Harr, the Mangum supporter and Lay Advocate for the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong, has gotten involved in publicly pointing out the following: (1) that major discrepancies, inconsistencies, and contradictions existed in the April 14, 2011 Autopsy Examination Report tendered by North Carolina Deputy Chief Medical Examiner Clay Nichols; (2) that the true cause of Reginald Daye’s death was due to wrongful endotracheal tube placement for treatment of complications arising from delirium tremens; (3) the stab wound inflicted by Mangum was non-fatal and successfully treated with emergency surgery with a postoperative prognosis for a full recovery; and (4) the “Larceny of chose in action” charge met none of the criteria and was implemented for the sole purpose of elevating the murder charge to first degree… resulting in a reassessment of their original pie-in-the-sky aspirations.

Durham prosecutors’ desperate objectives now are centered around getting Crystal Mangum to accept a plea deal in order to achieve the following major goals: (1) help prosecutors save face and limit legal civil liability for its malicious prosecution and wrongful incarceration of Mangum; (2) protect Medical Examiner Nichols who conspired with the prosecutors to produce a criminally fraudulent autopsy report as the basis for a trumped up murder charge against Mangum; and (3) shield Duke University Hospital’s reputation and its staff for culpability in Daye’s demise… in which a potential hospital staff homicidal contribution was never even taken into consideration by Durham Police or prosecutors.

During Mangum’s 606 days of unjust incarceration (as of today’s date, and counting…), her legal representation has been, for all intents and purposes, impotent and totally lacking in urgency while their client is confined. There has been no attempt to conduct the most minimal investigation by her legal counsel… no attempt made to obtain clinic records of a March 24, 2011 visit by Mangum after being beaten by Daye – occurring nine days prior to the self-defense stabbing incident… no attempt to interview one of Daye’s former girlfriends whom Daye admitted to punching in the face four or five times… nothing!

The request for forensic pathologist Christena L. Roberts to review Daye’s death and autopsy report was made only after Lay Advocate Harr spent a half hour pointing out discrepancies in the autopsy report to Mangum’s attorney on or about May 24, 2012… and a court order to pay for that defense expert witness was issued on June 18, 2012… more than a year after Mangum was charged. Although the court allowed payment for only ten hours of work, a written report by Dr. Roberts has yet to be completed after more than five months.

Mangum did not have the benefit of a preliminary hearing, and during her 600-plus days behind bars, the only motions filed on her behalf by her attorneys have been for bail reduction; the last four failing to get it reduced below $200,000. No motions have been filed to have the “Larceny of chose in action” charge dismissed, no motions filed to have the first degree murder charge dismissed, and no motion made to have Judge Osmond Smith III recuse himself from hearing a bail reduction case for Mangum (Smith presided over the Duke Lacrosse case and made rulings against Mangum and was responsible for sentencing former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong to 24 hours in jail).

During Mangum’s incarceration her attorneys have essentially conducted no investigation and filed no motions of substance… therefore, they have achieved nothing for their client. Crystal Mangum, in representing herself, surely could do no worse. However, because she is currently representing herself she is now in position to have the Court provide finances for an investigator, she is in position to receive all records and documents (including the long-awaited report from Dr. Roberts), and she is able to file motions with the Court. These are invaluable rights that she now has and she needs to hold on to them lest she be put back in the same situation as she was before when others were named as her counsel of record… that situation being that no substantive motions were filed and prosecution discovery and other evidence was withheld from her.

Around August19, 2012, Lay Advocate Harr first contacted Louisburg attorney Paris Branch-Ramadan, a recent graduate from North Carolina Central University Law School… and he has kept her apprised of the case and his contributions on the internet and his filings with the Clerk of Court. Although Attorney Branch-Ramadan has spoken with Mangum on at least two occasions, and received from Harr the entire prosecution discovery disks (thirteen in all), she has evidently not committed to help by assisting Mangum to represent herself. According to an article by Beth Velliquette of The Herald-Sun titled, “Confusion reigns at Mangum court appearance,” Paris Branch-Ramadan “later said that she purposefully did not appear at the hearing because Mangum had not hired her.”

Whether or not Ms. Branch-Ramadan elects to assist Mangum in representing herself, she has already brought to Harr’s attention the fact that the Court acted maliciously in denying Mangum visitation with her children while she “was incarcerated in any detention center.” Judge Doretta Walker issued this order in family court after acknowledging that she was not an unfit mother. Visitation at the detention center is one in which inmates have no physical contact with visitors who they can see through a thick glass barricade.

Attorney Branch-Ramadan’s observation alerted Harr to the fact that this is not the first time the State has used Mangum’s children as a tool to punish her. In the 2010 so-called “arson case,” Durham prosecutors magically proclaimed that Mangum’s children were her “victims” because she allegedly set fire to the clothes in the bathtub while they were inside the apartment. Based on this obtuse rationale, the Court severely restricted the length and conditions of Mangum’s visitation with her three children while she was on electronically monitored house arrest following released from jail after her bond was satisfied.

Now, because of Judge Walker’s ruling, Mangum is denied visitation with her children while she is in the detention center… a cruel and inhumane punitive order. And it is an order which works to the advantage of the prosecution in trying to force Mangum to accept an unjust plea deal in order to be able to see her children again. Once again, Mangum’s defense attorneys have been, or should have been, aware of this and taken steps to rectify this injustice and draconian leverage against Mangum… but, as usual, no motions were filed by her attorneys to allow Mangum to have visitation with her children. As Paris Branch-Ramadan stated, this is nothing but malicious behavior on the part of the State.

Ms. Branch-Ramadan also pointed out to Harr that the “Larceny of chose in action” charge is being brought against Mangum without a prosecuting witness… in other words, the prosecution does not even have an eyewitness who allegedly saw Ms. Mangum steal, take and carry away, or take by robbery the two cashier’s checks. In fact, Reginald Daye, in a police report interview specifically stated that he gave the two cashier’s checks to Mangum to hold on to, and he is never quoted as saying that she unlawfully took possession of them. Daye’s nephew, Carlos Wilson, never claimed to have seen Mangum steal or take the two cashier’s checks. According to Mr. Wilson, in all police accounts, Daye and Mangum were arguing about “money” and not cashier’s checks. Even Daye, in his highly intoxicated state during the early morning hours of April 3, 2011, stated that the argument leading up to the stabbing was centered about “money” and not cashier’s checks. (During an interview the following day of Monday, April 4, 2011, from his hospital bed, Daye confessed to police officer Marianne Bond that the argument of the prior morning’s incident stemmed from his perception that Mangum disrespected him and that she was “running off at the mouth.”)

Because Mangum’s legal representation has been woefully inept (either purposefully or not) in representing her and protecting her rights, it is imperative that Mangum retain control of her legal destiny in this politically charged case and not turn it over to the control of anyone else. If she does, she will be in the same position as she was previously when motions were not filed on her behalf and prosecution discovery and evidence were withheld from her.

I believe that the reason the Dr. Roberts report has not yet been delivered is because as things now stand Judge Robert Hobgood has ordered that attorney Woody Vann contact Dr. Roberts and have her send her report directly to Mangum. However, any attorney who is considered by the Court to be Mangum’s legal representative would be the person to whom the all important report would be sent, and as in the past, it could be withheld from her.

It is obvious that neither the Durham prosecutors nor Mangum’s past defense attorneys want her to have the Dr. Roberts report, and the prosecution is supposedly moving ahead with plans to offer a plea deal without Mangum having the benefit of having seen the Roberts report… which would undoubtedly favor Mangum and strengthen her position. So in order for Mangum to be assured of receiving the report, it is imperative that she remain at the helm of her defense.

If Attorney Branch-Ramadan agrees to sign on to help Mangum, it should only be as a back-up assistant. She should not seek to represent Mangum which could only be viewed by a reasonable person with full knowledge of the facts as an overreaching power grab that could very likely accrue to Mangum’s extreme detriment.

It would be ill-advised and pure folly for Crystal Mangum to now relinquish control of her defense and her destiny, and place her fate in the hands of another. 

LINK: http://www.justice4nifong.com/legal/cgm/blink/blink112912/direcBlink112912.htm

167 comments:

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Lance states:
"There was some question regarding Sid's background as a physician.

In a prior response on a previous post, Sid stated:

"An attorney who was representing me on trumped up criminal charges was promised that cases would be sent his way if he was able to get me to accept a plea deal from the prosecutor...My wife...forced the judge to refer the case to a civil court where a settlement was reached..."
Lance, I did not recall this statement from Sidney; had to look it up. Quite revealing, actually. "My wife forced the judge to refer the case..? Where settlement was reached? Settlement of a criminal matter in a civil court? If Harr had a run-in with the law that was significant it might explain his reluctance to disclose his full credentials and professional experience, and, the real reasons for his retirement. (forced?) loss of license to practice?
This history of his further explains his irrational hatred of white people and his stance that he is, somehow, above the law.


Hah! Nonbelievers, naysayers, ill-willers, Nifong/Mangum detractors, and others of your ilk, you can go on a fishing expedition regarding my medical career if you want... you'll be lucky to turn up a sardine.

Meanwhile, regarding my current post and link... read 'em and weep.

Nifong Supporter said...


POINT OF EDIFICATION

In many comments in the past, a non-believer/naysayer has ridiculed the comment that Mangum was told by Daye "You're not going anywhere." Well in the link's Main directory you'll find on the uppermost button the link to a police report in which Daye repeatedly admits that he did, in fact, tell Mangum that she wasn't going anywhere.

I'm not making this stuff up.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Hah! Nonbelievers, naysayers, ill-willers, Nifong/Mangum detractors, and others of your ilk, you can go on a fishing expedition regarding my medical career if you want... you'll be lucky to turn up a sardine.

Meanwhile, regarding my current post and link... read 'em and weep."

You are unwilling to reveal information about your medical background. You do it in such a way to indicate you have skeletons in our medical closet which you want to conceal. Which indicates if you were subpoenaed to testify, you would go into hiding to avoid divulging those skeletons.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
In many comments in the past, a non-believer/naysayer has ridiculed the comment that Mangum was told by Daye "You're not going anywhere." Well in the link's Main directory you'll find on the uppermost button the link to a police report in which Daye repeatedly admits that he did, in fact, tell Mangum that she wasn't going anywhere.

I'm not making this stuff up."

You are omitting a lot of stuff.

The most significant omissions are that Detective Bond interviewed two women who were involved with Mr. Daye before Crystal and both of them testified tha Reginald Daye WAS NOT a violent man, that he was a good man. You also admit that the charge of assault on a female happened 20 to 25 years previously.

Sidney, you are a totally amoral liar.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

In my opinion as a retired surgeon, those pictures you post do not show Crystal was severely beaten.

If she had been, there is nothing to indicate Reginald Daye was the perpetrator. Reginald Daye rovided evidence Crystal was going out with other men, coming back with $200-$300 after each "date" - evidence she was turning tricks, something you omitted to mention. Did you seriously think you could post those pictures and documents without some of us checking them. Obviously you did not.

Not only are you a totally amoral liar, you are a sadist/bully, getting a charge out of libeling a dead man.

If the Daye family sues you for libel, I hope you represent yourself. You would make the Daye family's case for them.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Have you read the Detective Bond interview? I repeat, two women with whom Mr. Daye had been involved stated very firmly he was not violent, although one did say he did drink heavily at times. Mr. Daye told Detective Bond that Crystal went out with other men on multiple occasions, always returning with cash, $200-$300. Crystal was turning tricks. Of course you will call Mr. Daye self serving. Mr. Daye had no reason to be self serving.

Mr. Dayes contemporary testimony was that Crystal was turning tricks, and assaulted him when he tried to get her to stop.

More than a year after te event, after Mr. Daye had died, after Crystal was charged with murder 1, Crystal claims Mr. Daye assaulted her and she stabbed him in self defense. That is no more credible than her claim she was raped early in the morning of March 14, 2006.

If you want to believe otherwise, that is evidence there is something wrong with you.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Another major omission on your part which was probably deliberate.

Regarding Mr. Daye telling Crystal she was not going anywhere:

Reginald Daye was telling her to eiter stop turning tricks or return his money and leave(the cashiers checks were recovered from Mr. Daye's nephew's apartment where his nephew's wife was watching Crystal's children. Crystal disappeared into the bathroom to call another man for a ride(one of her johns?) Mr. Daye did break down the door, but not to assault her but to keep her there until the police came.

You are an amoral liar/sadist/bully who enjoys defaming a dead man.

Is that why you hate the Lacrosse Players - you can not defame them without someone defending them.

Anonymous said...

SIDEY HRR:

"The criminal charges against Mangum, the victim/accuser in the Duke Lacrosse case, are vendetta-driven and baseless charges that any competent attorney acting in the client’s best interest should have been able to dismantle and debunk hastily."

Crystal is the false accuser/victimizer in the Duke Rape case. There was no vendetta against Crystal. If you say, after reading Detective Bond's document that there was no probable cause to charge Crystal, you indeed are totally stupid.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"

The initial intent of Durham prosecutors Kelly Gauger and Charlene Coggins-Franks was to use the bogus trumped up charges in an attempt to convict Ms. Mangum of first degree murder and have her sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole… not because of Daye’s death, but rather as payback for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case."

BULLSHIT!!!!!

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Sidney B. Harr, the Mangum supporter and Lay Advocate for the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong, has gotten involved in publicly pointing out the following: (1) that major discrepancies, inconsistencies, and contradictions existed in the April 14, 2011 Autopsy Examination Report tendered by North Carolina Deputy Chief Medical Examiner Clay Nichols; (2) that the true cause of Reginald Daye’s death was due to wrongful endotracheal tube placement for treatment of complications arising from delirium tremens; (3) the stab wound inflicted by Mangum was non-fatal and successfully treated with emergency surgery with a postoperative prognosis for a full recovery; and (4) the “Larceny of chose in action” charge met none of the criteria and was implemented for the sole purpose of elevating the murder charge to first degree…"

All lies you try to promulgate as truth.

Well done, SIDNEY-blasphemer-minion-of-the-father-of-lies-HARR.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
During Mangum’s 606 days of unjust incarceration (as of today’s date, and counting…), her legal representation has been, for all intents and purposes, impotent and totally lacking in urgency while their client is confined. There has been no attempt...to interview one of Daye’s former girlfriends whom Daye admitted to punching in the face four or five times… nothing!"

Said incident happened 20 to 25 years before he was stabbed. Detective Bond did interview two women with whom Mr. Daye had been involved before Crystal. Both said Mr. Daye was not violent. One said she would testify as a character witness for Mr. Daye. SIDNEY HARR has made no attempt to publish these facts in his "enlightening" blog.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
The request for forensic pathologist Christena L. Roberts to review Daye’s death and autopsy report was made only after Lay Advocate Harr spent a half hour pointing out discrepancies in the autopsy report to Mangum’s attorney on or about May 24, 2012… and a court order to pay for that defense expert witness was issued on June 18, 2012… more than a year after Mangum was charged. Although the court allowed payment for only ten hours of work, a written report by Dr. Roberts has yet to be completed after more than five months."

Most likely, Woody Vann did not request a written report because said report would uphold, not contradict, Dr. Nichols' findings.

Anonymous said...

Looks like herpetic lesions on Crystals lips.

She'll probably blame that on Daye, too.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Now, because of Judge Walker’s ruling, Mangum is denied visitation with her children while she is in the detention center..."

Why don't you publish the order and let us all know why Judge Walker signed it? Mabe you do not want to because it would reveal more questionable behavior on Crystal's part.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 2:30 PM 11-28-12 said: "Have you read the Detective Bond interview?" ........ You should compare this interview with the one Det.Bond had with him earlier the same day.

Anonymous said...

Please note. This is all about Harr. More bragging about himself. Bull crap.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous @ 2:30 PM 11-28-12 said: "Have you read the Detective Bond interview?" ........ You should compare this interview with the one Det.Bond had with him earlier the same day."

I have.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Here is a poser for you:

You say the police should have arrested Reginald Daye in the hospital for domestic violence.

According to records you posted, Crystal did not allege domestic violence after she was arrested. Contrary to what you say, medical records and police photographs did not document any serious injuries to Crystal(the photographs you published did not show that Crystal was seriously injured - if they were police photographs, they were taken to document Crystal WAS NOT injured). When Detective Bond interviewed Reginald Daye in the hospital, he described an altercation in which Crystal was the aggressor. Detective Bond's interview indicated that Reginald Daye was not violent and had no history of violence, except an incident 20 to 25 years previously in which he admitted slapping a woman.

So what probable cause was there to arrest Reginald Daye? There was no probable cause, especially in the light of the fact that Crystal did not allege domestic violence until after she had been charged with Murder 1.

Anonymous said...

SIDNET HARR:

To put it more simply, Crysal did not allege domestic violence ubtil after Reginald Daye was dead.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

You gleefully published that Reginald Daye had, 20-25 years prior to his stabbing, slapped a woman.

YOU DID NOT PUBLISH THAT TWO, I REPEAT TWO, WOMEN WHO HAD KNOWN MR. DAYE PRIOR TO CRYSTAL TESTIFIED THAT HE WAS NOT, REPEAT WAS NOT, A VIOLENT MAN, THAT ONE HAD SAID SHE WOULD BE A CHARACTER WITNESS FOR MR. DAYE. WHY!!!!

You rave about Crystal being framed but you are obviously trying to frame a dead man.

Right on, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR!

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

You are very evasive about your medical credentials. Why?

Were you to testify in open court that D. Nichols autopsy report was fabricate, you can be sure you would be asked why you are qualified to make such a statement, how would you answer? Would you use your stock answer, anyone with a 5th grade education can see it is fabricated? That would prove only that you are not qualified to comment.

Suppose you applied for privileges at some hospital? Would you refuse to specify what your qualifications were? If you did, I can guarantee you you would not be granted privileges( and you would then claim it was because you are black).

One thing a credentialing committee would ask is why you never did any specialty training beyond PGY 1. Was it because you could not be accepted in a civilian residency?

I would tell you to think about it but you have not shown that you can think.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Earlier I posted:

You gleefully published that Reginald Daye had, 20-25 years prior to his stabbing, slapped a woman.

YOU DID NOT PUBLISH THAT TWO, I REPEAT TWO, WOMEN WHO HAD KNOWN MR. DAYE PRIOR TO CRYSTAL TESTIFIED THAT HE WAS NOT, REPEAT WAS NOT, A VIOLENT MAN, THAT ONE HAD SAID SHE WOULD BE A CHARACTER WITNESS FOR MR. DAYE. WHY!!!!

ANSWER THE QUESTION! DON'T WAIT FOR THE TRANSLATION!

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

The text of the Family Court order is on the appropriately named Liestoppers.

Anonymous said...

Publishing these photos is so very wrong immoral and personally offensive. I cannot believe the stupidity and the utter lack of common decency. Mangum does not look beat up at all. Geez I have had a bigger nick on my face from working in the woods. Give me a break. I figure she will get second degree or lesser with three to five including time served. There is NO evidence to support self defense. That is baloney. These two got into an alcohol fueled scuffle and SHE was the aggressor with a weapon. Date has no history of violence and she does. She's toast

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:


ANSWER THE QUESTION! DON'T WAIT FOR THE TRANSLATION!

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

If you are such an enlightener, why did you not enlighten any of your readers about the fact, that, in the 20-25 years since Reginald Daye did assault a female, two women have come forth to say, Reginald Daye was not a violent man?

ANSWER THE QUESTION!

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Did you read this in Detective Bond's report, That Ms Wilson, wife of Mr. Daye's nephew Carlos Wilson said of Crystal, she did not care for Crystal because of her history and because she gave black women a bad name.

I guess Ms. Wilson does not think Crystal was raped.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

This comes from a blog you posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011:

"CNN writer Maria White, in her April 14, 2011 piece takes the liberty to mislead by claiming that Daye died “as a result of the stabbing…” Keep in mind, this is well after WRAL reported a couple of days post-op that Daye was 'expected to make a full recovery.'”

Judging from Detective Bond's report dated April 6, 2011, Reginald Daye was no where near to having made a full recovery and was not near discharge. That was a couple of days post op.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Hah! Nonbelievers, naysayers, ill-willers, Nifong/Mangum detractors, and others of your ilk, you can go on a fishing expedition regarding my medical career if you want... you'll be lucky to turn up a sardine."

That is probably because no self respecting sardine would ever want to be associated with you.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Now you will claim that Reginald Daye was an agent of thevDuke Lacrosse attorneys, hired by those attorneys prosecuting the ongoing civil suits to discredit Crystal.

Anonymous said...

Harr is a liar

Anonymous said...

I think it understandable why SIDNY HARR was claiming that prosecution photos were being withheld from Crystal. The only photos in the prosecution discovery file showed that Crystal had not been severely beaten.

Just like he fantasized DA NIFONG had evidence of the Lacrosse players' guilt which were being kept from the public, he was fantasizing that photos showing Crystal's injuries were being kept from her.

guiowen said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Durham prosecutors magically proclaimed that Mangum’s children were her “victims” because she allegedly set fire to the clothes in the bathtub while they were inside the apartment".

Have you forgotten that Crystal admitted she lit the fire. She also did not tell anyone about the fire until after she was in custody.

guiowen said...

Sidney said,
"Meanwhile, regarding my current post and link... read 'em and weep."

Sidney, I don't weep, but I am really very upset about this. Couldn't you get some better photographs? Crystal just doesn't show the beating Reginald Daye gave her. The DA's people are clearly not giving you the correct photos. Can't you go to some higher-ups and explain what's happening?

kenhyderal said...

Drop the sarcasm Guiowen. It's mean spirited. Mocking others is for cowards. Keep in mind Proverbs 17:5 "Whoever mocks the poor reproaches his Maker: and he that is glad at calamities shall not be unpunished"

guiowen said...

What, can the devil quote scripture?
You remind me of the 4th chapter of St. Mathew.

By the way, any luck getting your mother to return your passport?

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Drop the sarcasm Guiowen. It's mean spirited. Mocking others is for cowards. Keep in mind Proverbs 17:5 'Whoever mocks the poor reproaches his Maker: and he that is glad at calamities shall not be unpunished'".

KENNY thinks he will go unpunished for judging others unjustly, for aiding and abetting the bearing of false witness.

Anonymous said...

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Anonymous said...

Wow Daye gave sister a cold sore! Oh my god, the bastard! No wonder she killed him.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I think it understandable why SIDNY HARR was claiming that prosecution photos were being withheld from Crystal. The only photos in the prosecution discovery file showed that Crystal had not been severely beaten.

Just like he fantasized DA NIFONG had evidence of the Lacrosse players' guilt which were being kept from the public, he was fantasizing that photos showing Crystal's injuries were being kept from her.


In other words, in order for assault againt a woman or domestic violence, when it comes to Crystal Mangum being the victim she must be "severely beaten." Right?

For your elucidation, a dean at North Carolina Central University was arrested an charged with assault on a female for allegedly grabbing a woman and shoving her against a file cabinet. See - that's the problem with the justice system in North Carolina... it's selective and based on Class and Color.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

This comes from a blog you posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011:

"CNN writer Maria White, in her April 14, 2011 piece takes the liberty to mislead by claiming that Daye died “as a result of the stabbing…” Keep in mind, this is well after WRAL reported a couple of days post-op that Daye was 'expected to make a full recovery.'”

Judging from Detective Bond's report dated April 6, 2011, Reginald Daye was no where near to having made a full recovery and was not near discharge. That was a couple of days post op.


Complications from delirium tremens can, itself, be life threatening. (It doesn't help much when a person's esophagus is intubated instead of the trachea.)

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

Here is a poser for you:

You say the police should have arrested Reginald Daye in the hospital for domestic violence.

According to records you posted, Crystal did not allege domestic violence after she was arrested. Contrary to what you say, medical records and police photographs did not document any serious injuries to Crystal(the photographs you published did not show that Crystal was seriously injured - if they were police photographs, they were taken to document Crystal WAS NOT injured). When Detective Bond interviewed Reginald Daye in the hospital, he described an altercation in which Crystal was the aggressor. Detective Bond's interview indicated that Reginald Daye was not violent and had no history of violence, except an incident 20 to 25 years previously in which he admitted slapping a woman.

So what probable cause was there to arrest Reginald Daye? There was no probable cause, especially in the light of the fact that Crystal did not allege domestic violence until after she had been charged with Murder 1.


Crystal did not allege anything to the police or investigators because she was arrested and charged before even seeking to interview her. Sgt. Bond did get around to asking Mangum if she wanted to make a statement she said, "yes"... then Sgt. Bond told her that she had been arrested and charged with assault and that anything she said could be used against her (Miranda Rights)... then she said to Crystal, "Do you want to answer some questions?" ..to which Crystal responded, "No."

The prosecution never asked for her account of what happened.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr


Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Sidney Harr Harr Harr

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Crystal did not allege anything to the police or investigators because she was arrested and charged before even seeking to interview her."

When Sgt. Bond went in to read Crysta her rights, Crystal had the odor of alcohol on her breath, was constantly falling asleep and spoke with slurred speech.

Sgt. Bond did get around to asking Mangum if she wanted to make a statement she said, "yes"... then Sgt. Bond told her that she had been arrested and charged with assault and that anything she said could be used against her (Miranda Rights)... then she said to Crystal, "Do you want to answer some questions?" ..to which Crystal responded, 'No.'"

Crystal still had the option of saying, Reginald Daye attacked me and I stabbed him in self defense. She did not. The point is, she did not claim self defense until after Mr. Daye was dead and she was facing a charge of Murder One.

"The prosecution never asked for her account of what happened."

Because Crystal had originally refused to tell them her version of what happened.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

This comes from a blog you posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011:

"CNN writer Maria White, in her April 14, 2011 piece takes the liberty to mislead by claiming that Daye died “as a result of the stabbing…” Keep in mind, this is well after WRAL reported a couple of days post-op that Daye was 'expected to make a full recovery.'”

Judging from Detective Bond's report dated April 6, 2011, Reginald Daye was no where near to having made a full recovery and was not near discharge. That was a couple of days post op.


Complications from delirium tremens can, itself, be life threatening."

You got that right.

"(It doesn't help much when a person's esophagus is intubated instead of the trachea.)"

You also got that right. However you have not provided any evidence that the tube was in the esophagus. Seeing the tube going through the vocal cords is irrefutable evidence that the tube was in the trachea, even though you think you have deluded yourself into believing you have refuted it.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Another straw fisherman holding up a red herring:

"

In other words, in order for assault againt a woman or domestic violence, when it comes to Crystal Mangum being the victim she must be 'severely beaten.' Right?"

You are the one who alleged the photos would show evidence that Crystal had been severely beaten. The photos you have posted do not show that. You believe your allegations of a severe beating should be believed when there is no evidence of said beating. Right?

For your elucidation, a dean at North Carolina Central University was arrested an charged with assault on a female for allegedly grabbing a woman and shoving her against a file cabinet."

First, what was the outcome of the case? And what relevance does it have to the Reginald Daye stabbing case? Does the indictment of three innocent Caucasian men on charges they raped Crystal, charges which were proven to be false, is that an example of a Justice System biased towards Caucasians? I think not.

"See - that's the problem with the justice system in North Carolina... it's selective and based on Class and Color."

The problem is that the system in North Carolina is biased towards a defendant, regardless of race or class - as was shown in the Leon Brown fiasco, which was caused by Black DA Tracey Cline.

You are saying, bias against a defendant is OK if the defendant is white and the accuser is black. Right?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

When are you going to address the issue of your selective reporting of Reginald Daye's history of violence towards women? Are you afraid to do so? I think that is obvious.

You reported that Reginald Daye admitted slapping a woman 20 to 25 years prior to his stabbing.

You DID NOT report that Sgt. Bond interviewed two women, with whom Mr. Daye had been involved before Crystal stabbed him, that both of them vouched that Mr. Daye was not a violent man, and that one of them offered to testify on his behalf as a character witness.

It is evidence you are libeling a dead man by deliberately not telling the entire truth.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Do you have any curiosity about why SIDNEY HARR will not tell the entire truth about Reginald Daye's supposed history of violence towards women?

I do not think you can.

You rant about how the Durham police did not identify the men who deposited DNA on Crystal's person. But you do not ask why DA NIFONG concealed that evidence.

kenhyderal said...

Guiowen said : "What, can the devil quote scripture?"..................... "The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose. An evil soul producing holy witness Is like a villain with a smiling cheek"
[1596 Shakespeare Merchant of Venice i. iii. 93] The key here is found in the words "for his purpose" My purpose was to stop you from mocking Dr.Harr a person of good will

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

In spite of your recent posting, this is the bottom line.

Reginald Daye's statement, taken immediately after the stabbing says that Crystal was the aggressor.

Crystal had the opportunity to tell the police, even before they questioned Reginald Daye, that he had assaulted her and she stabbed him in self defense.

She did not make that allegation until AFTER Reginald Daye was dead and she was facing a charge of murder 1.

You think it would have compromised Crystal's defense if she had claimed self defense at the outset, Right?

You can not blame the Police for not getting Crystal's story when Crystal indicated, as was her right, that she wanted to remain silent.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

An example of your concept of a justice system that should be selectively biased in favor of black defendants:

Denario Atwater, and his cohort, last name Lovette, kidnapped and killed Eve Carson. They stole her car and took her ATM card, then drove the car through a drive through ATM, which was captured on surveillance photos, then used her card at a convenience store ATM.

The photos were advertised in NC, not identifying either Atwater or Lovette as perpetrators but as unknown persons of interest. The photos eventually led to the arrest of Atwater and Lovette and their subsequent conviction, Atwater taking a plea deal to avoid the death penalty.

You were blogging that the posting of what were photos of unknown persons of interest compromised the presumption of innocence of Atwater and Lovette.

Not surprising coming from someone who does not know what innocence means.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"

Guiowen said : "What, can the devil quote scripture?"..................... "The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose. An evil soul producing holy witness Is like a villain with a smiling cheek"
[1596 Shakespeare Merchant of Venice i. iii. 93] The key here is found in the words "for his purpose" My purpose was to stop you from mocking Dr.Harr a person of good will".

Your fallacy is calling SIDNEY HARR a person of good will. SIDNEY HARR has shown, by his words, his actions, he is no person of good will. An example is his reporting somewhat less than the whole truth about Reginald Daye's supposed history of violence towards women.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Hypothetical situation:

Say, 25 years ago you ran a stop sign and crashed into another vehicle and injured the driver. Your driving record has been impeccable since then.

Would a reporter be acting as a person of good will if he repeatedly reported you are a reckless, careless driver who is a menace to all other drivers on the road?

I think not.

guiowen said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
guiowen said...

kenhyderal said...

' The key here is found in the words "for his purpose" My purpose was to stop you from mocking Dr.Harr a person of good will .'





Was that really your purpose?
Let us try to elucidate your purpose. I cite two cases:

1. Sidney complains that the NC justice system is completely under the control of Rae Evans and her Carpetbagger Jihad. When I suggest that he speak, then, to Eric Holder and other people at the US Justice Department, you accuse me of bullying him.
2. Sidney has told us that there are photographs showing the tremendous beating administered to Crystal. When I explain to him that the photos he has found show no such beating, and suggest that he try to find the real photos in some way, you accuse me of mocking him.

In other words, every time I advice Sidney to do something more than what he is doing, you immediately interfere and claim that my suggestions are bullying, mockery or something else.

What can we infer from all this? The only explanation I can see is that you really do not want Sidney to do anything else. But this is what would save Crystal (if she can be saved) from years in jail.

In other words, Kenhyderal, whose side are you on? Why are you trying to stop Sidney from helping her in a real way?

What have you got against Crystal?

Anonymous said...

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

kenhyderal said...

Guiown said: "In other words, Kenhyderal, whose side are you on? Why are you trying to stop Sidney from helping her in a real way"................... I recognize your sarcasm and the cruelty that's behind it.

kenhyderal said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 2:01 said "Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny" ..... Please stop your interminable chanting. It's interfering with my sleep.

Anonymous said...

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny


guiowen said...

kenhyderal said...

'Guiown said: "In other words, Kenhyderal, whose side are you on? Why are you trying to stop Sidney from helping her in a real way"................... I recognize your sarcasm and the cruelty that's behind it.'

And that's why you can never answer a question?
Trolls can never answer a question.

kenhyderal said...

I'm not a troll but I don't answer loaded questions or those posed sarcastically and especially questions meant to mock those, unlike you, who are genuine in their desire to help Crystal.

guiowen said...

I've noticed every question asked of you is somehow a loaded question -- or else it's sarcasm.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"I'm not a troll but I don't answer loaded questions or those posed sarcastically and especially questions meant to mock those, unlike you, who are genuine in their desire to help Crystal."

You will not answer the question, why did SIDNEY not present the whole truth about Reginald Daye's supposed history of violence towards women. Here's a loaded question. Why?

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

How is SIDNEY helping Crystal by presenting distorted information about the man she stabbed?

The answer, since you are afraid to answer, is, He doesn't.

If you disagree with that answer, Why?

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

If I tried to promulgate as much injustice as you do, I couldn't sleep either. I have a conscience which would not let me.

Anonymous said...

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...
"I'm not a troll but I don't answer loaded questions or those posed sarcastically and especially questions meant to mock those, unlike you, who are genuine in their desire to help Crystal."


Remind us again, Kenny, how are you helping Crystal?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"([Judge Osmond Smith III] presided over the Duke Lacrosse case and made rulings against Mangum and was responsible for sentencing former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong to 24 hours in jail)"

You again present less than the complete truth.

DA NIFONG was sentenced to 24 hours in jail because he concealed exculpatory evidence from the Lacrosse defendants and then lied about it to the court.

Now you are going to repeat some of your lies, like DA NIFONG was framed, that DA NIFONG did not conceal the evidence, that the evidence was not exculpatory, that this was all due to a non existent carpetbagger jihad.

You will end up by telling me I am the victim of a Jedi mind trick.

And in the face of all this you claim you enlighten by telling the truth.

Do you need further enlightenment or elucidation? Obviously.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

In spite of your recent posting, this is the bottom line.

Reginald Daye's statement, taken immediately after the stabbing says that Crystal was the aggressor.

Crystal had the opportunity to tell the police, even before they questioned Reginald Daye, that he had assaulted her and she stabbed him in self defense.

She did not make that allegation until AFTER Reginald Daye was dead and she was facing a charge of murder 1.

You think it would have compromised Crystal's defense if she had claimed self defense at the outset, Right?

You can not blame the Police for not getting Crystal's story when Crystal indicated, as was her right, that she wanted to remain silent.


Let me set the record straight, according to Sgt. Bond's own report. Before police asked Crystal for a statement, she had been handcuffed and taken into custody. Bond asked Crystal if she wanted to make a statement and Crystal responded, "Yes." Then before she could say anything, Sgt. Bond told her she was under arrest for assault with a deadly weapon and anything she said could be used against her (Miranda rights). Then she asked Crystal if she wanted to answer some questions to which she responded, "No." That terminated the so-called interview with Bond leaving.

Let me know if further elucidation is required.

Nifong Supporter said...


kenhyderal said...
Guiowen said : "What, can the devil quote scripture?"..................... "The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose. An evil soul producing holy witness Is like a villain with a smiling cheek"
[1596 Shakespeare Merchant of Venice i. iii. 93] The key here is found in the words "for his purpose" My purpose was to stop you from mocking Dr.Harr a person of good will


Thanks, kenhyderal, for watching my back. I appreciate it.

"The Merchant of Venice" and Shakespeare... where else can you find blog commenters that add such culture to the site? Certainly not in my Blog Bro's Wonderland site. This blog site has it all!!

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
Let me set the record straight, according to Sgt. Bond's own report. Before police asked Crystal for a statement, she had been handcuffed and taken into custody. Bond asked Crystal if she wanted to make a statement and Crystal responded, "Yes." Then before she could say anything, Sgt. Bond told her she was under arrest for assault with a deadly weapon and anything she said could be used against her (Miranda rights). Then she asked Crystal if she wanted to answer some questions to which she responded, "No." That terminated the so-called interview with Bond leaving.

Let me know if further elucidation is required."

Crystal still had the opportunity to say, Reginald Daye assaulted her and she acted in self defense. She would not have incriminated herself by saying that. She said nothing about self defense until AFTER Reginald Daye was dead and she was facing a Murder 1 rap.

Let ME know if YOU need more elucidation, to which thus far you have no susceptibility.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Thanks, kenhyderal, for watching my back. I appreciate it.

"The Merchant of Venice" and Shakespeare... where else can you find blog commenters that add such culture to the site?

You mean minions of the father of lies who think they can hide their lies. No where but the blog of SIDNEY HARR, arch minion of the father of lies

"Certainly not in my Blog Bro's Wonderland site."

Who acknowledges you as his blog bro? No one.

This blog site has it all!! Yeah, all the lies and distortions which have been told about the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players, tat and much more rot and corruption.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Correction:

"This blog site has it all!!"

Yeah, all the lies and distortions which have told about the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players, that and much more rot and corruption.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Here is an example of the quality of the content you and KENHYDERAL post on this blog:

The police take Crystal into custody outside Milton Walker's apartmemt. She tells them she lit a fire in the apartment. The police call the Durham Fire Department to deal with the fire. But there is smoke damage to the apartment. You blame the Police for the damage caused by the fire Crystal lit.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Here is some more:

The police have Crystal in custody. They ask if she wants to make a statement. She says yes. As they are legally obligated to, the police read her her miranda rights. Crystal then decides to say no.

Crystal had the opportunity to allege domestic abuse, the opportunity to claim self defense. She does not do so. You blame the police for not arresting Reginald Daye for domestic violence.

Were you implying the police read her her miranda rights to forestall her from alleging domestic abuse or from claiming self defense? If you are, you are much much more than incredibly and totally stupid. The police read a defendant his/her rights to forestall the defendant from making a self incriminating statement without representation of counsel.

It makes me wonder, what self incriminating statement was Crystal about to make. Maybe she was about to blurt out, "I stabbed the MF" and the police saved her from incriminating herself.

Let ME know if YOU require more elucidation or enlightenment.

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal,
Your self-righteous whimpering notwithstanding, you are just a sad man who is afraid to answer questions.
If and when you answer difficult questions, we might take you seriously.
If and when you actually do something (other than make up tall stories) to help Crystal, we might take you seriously.
If and when you make an effort to go to Durham and see how you can locate the mythical people who have the information to help Crystal, we might actually take you seriously.
If and when you stop trying to quote your way out of everything, we will believe you are something other than the spirit in the 4th chapter of Mathew's gospel.
Let me just ask you a question: do you believe the photos Sidney posted show any type of beating?
But I guess this is a loaded question.
Do you believe the NC justice system is controlled by the Carpetbagger Jihad?
But I guess this is a loaded question.
Do you think, in that case, Sidney should try to get help from another level of justice?
But I guess this is a loaded question.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

In your latest series of exhibits, you present an abbreviated version of the Bond report. Why? Are you now trying to conceal that you did not tell the whole truth about Reginald Daye's supposed history of violence towards women? Is that your idea of enlightenment? To conceal facts you do not like? Where are the pictures of Crystal that do not show she was beaten when she stabbed Reginald Daye? The O'Brien statement is meaningless since there is no medical documentation.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

What photos you keep posted of Crystal still do not show any evidence of injuries consistent with a severe beating.

Where are the medical records from Crystal's alleged beating in March? Could it be there are no records?

Anonymous said...

The photos show nothing, zip, nada...except that mangum likely has herpes (and, probably, other nasty little bugs) Where's the severe beating evidence, sidney? what a world class liar you are, pal.
Funny how Mangum didn't come up with the self defense crap till Mr. Daye was dead. Isn't that convenient.
The statement by the guy who was supposed to take mangum to the clinic does NOT say he took her anywhere. It establishes nothing....she has had scars and various marks on her for years. And, there is no link between her and any clinic. another lie, sidney.
I doubt Mangum will get first degree murder....but self defense? No way, bro.

Anonymous said...

The order referenced by Harr is a custody action. Given her history and the fact that Mangum is charged with murder, it is not AT ALL unusual that she would not be allowed visitation while she is in jail. People charged with crimes that involve violence (who have a documented history of priors involving violence and a conviction for child abuse, in Mangum's case) would routinely not be allowed visitation. The children (I believe at least two of the three) are out of state in custody of their natural father. It is not practical or reasonable that the court would require the father to bring the children to North Carolina at his expense. Her history has caught up with her and, to the embarrassment of the silly judge who said she was a good mother, mangum now has to deal with the consequences she has brought upon herself. There is very little known about the children except that they have been exposed, over the years, to mangum's life style and to frequent changes of address and living situation. They have not been in a stable home.
The fact that mangum is a sex worker does not, by itself, disqualfiy her from being a fit parent and does not, by itself, means she should not have visitation rights. What does make the no-visitation order far more reasonable is the cuumulative effect of her prior violence conviction, her child abuse conviction, and the current murder charge..........all coupled with her history.
It is silly and a waste of the court's time to think that Mangum is going to be released on her own recog. not gonna happen. she cannot use any grounds of complaining about not being able to prepare an adequate defense either.
In looking at the photos (which should have never been posted), I can see the same little facial nicks and scars on her face that have been visible in prior photos. There is no evidence at all of a severe beating, face punching, scratching (except on Daye by her), head punching, choking or eye gouging. None.
I say again that Harr is totally self absorbed, wanting nothing but attention for himself, a world class jerk of a brag, and a terrible writer. The motion supposedly prepared by Mangum is full of Harr's language, past phrases, and sentence structure. Harr is dumb as a stump if he thinks readers will believe Mangum wrote that piece of silliness by herself.

Anonymous said...

boy, golly gee whiz wow, that's some horrible eye gouging face punch mark there, sidney! whew.....scary looking....geez, her whole damn face is just a black and blue bloody mess, isn't it. Holy cow.
lordy, what did daye do to the poor woman besides give her a fever blister? No wonder she stabbed the violence drunken man....everybody knows how terrible it is to have herpes.

If it were not for the terribel fact that a man is dead at the hands of this looney woman, this entire web site and these photos would be funny as all get out. BUT, Reginald Daye is dead and here with go, yet again, with the whine from the poor helpless professional victim, Crystal.

Anonymous said...

yep, crystal remembers hearing the LAX guys and daye tell her she was not going anywhere. now, isn't that just another wonderful coincidence. she wants to leave the apartment, has his checks in her purse, has been fighting with him for an hour, getting the crap beat out of her....and yet, and yet....wait for it......when she is read her Miranda.....she clams up and says nothing????? This from a woman who has undoubtedly heard Miranda before. total bull, sidney, total bull.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

The facts you allege in tour petition to have Crystal released are not facts but misrepresentations of fact, many of them concerning events which have no relevance to the Reginald Daye stabbing. Do you think the court will act favorably on a petition which is a compendium of lies about irrelevant situations?

Please let ME know if YOU need more elucidation.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

As pointed out to you by Anonymous December 3, 2012 5:16 AM, in his statement, Mr. O'Brien does not say he took her anywhere for treatment. You asked previously why the Police did not attempt to get the records. Apparently there were no records, something you fail to mention.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

As pointed out to you by Anonymous December 3, 2012 5:16 AM, in his statement, Mr. O'Brien does not say he took her anywhere for treatment. You asked previously why the Police did not attempt to get the records. Apparently there were no records, something you fail to mention.


Non-believer and naysayer, for your edification and elucidation please click on the link below. It will take you to a directory... click on buttons two and three for information about where Ms. Mangum was taken for medical treatment on March 24, 2011.
Info about March 24, 2011 beating

Notify me if further elucidation is required.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
yep, crystal remembers hearing the LAX guys and daye tell her she was not going anywhere. now, isn't that just another wonderful coincidence. she wants to leave the apartment, has his checks in her purse, has been fighting with him for an hour, getting the crap beat out of her....and yet, and yet....wait for it......when she is read her Miranda.....she clams up and says nothing????? This from a woman who has undoubtedly heard Miranda before. total bull, sidney, total bull.


So, let me understand. You are from the school that believes that it is appropriate to get one side of the story, make an arrest based on it, then after reading the cuffed suspect his/her Miranda Rights ask if he/she wants to answer your questions? I've never seen Lt. Columbo do it that way.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

What photos you keep posted of Crystal still do not show any evidence of injuries consistent with a severe beating.

Where are the medical records from Crystal's alleged beating in March? Could it be there are no records?


My point exactly. Neither the prosecution nor the defense attorneys in this case asked Mangum to sign a release in order to obtain the medical records. The reason... they're trying to keep the prior beating covered up.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

Here is an example of the quality of the content you and KENHYDERAL post on this blog:

The police take Crystal into custody outside Milton Walker's apartmemt. She tells them she lit a fire in the apartment. The police call the Durham Fire Department to deal with the fire. But there is smoke damage to the apartment. You blame the Police for the damage caused by the fire Crystal lit.


First, I do not stipulate that Mangum was responsible for starting the bathtub fire. Secondly, the police are responsible for allowing the smoke damage to occur when they allow the fire to burn for fifteen minutes awaiting the fire department... without making any attempt to extinguish it.

The police must accept responsibility for the smoke damage.

guiowen said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
guiowen said...

Sidney,
A couple of days ago I posted this:

"Sidney, I don't weep, but I am really very upset about this. Couldn't you get some better photographs? Crystal just doesn't show the beating Reginald Daye gave her. The DA's people are clearly not giving you the correct photos. Can't you go to some higher-ups and explain what's happening?"

At that point your k night-in-shining-armor, aka Kenhyderal, protested that I was mocking you. You seem to agree with me, now, that you don't have the necessary photos. So, my three-fold question, now, is,
(1) Do you really need a protector to keep me from asking you questions?
(2) Since you seem to have come to the same conclusion as I, in what sense am I mocking you?
(3) Are you doing anything to obtain the "good" photos (those that show the beating)?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"So, let me understand. You are from the school that believes that it is appropriate to get one side of the story, make an arrest based on it, then after reading the cuffed suspect his/her Miranda Rights ask if he/she wants to answer your questions? I've never seen Lt. Columbo do it that way."

Lieutenant Columbo, like Jedi mind tricks, are creatures of fiction, not real life.

This is another straw fisherman holding up a red herring.

The bottom line is, Crystal had the opportunity to claim self defense and allege domestic abuse. She did not do so until Reginald Daye was dead.

Let ME know if YOU need more elucidation.

Anonymous said...

There is nothing in the notes from "Larry" that would (a)support a beating by Daye, (b)no medical notes (c)only hearsay from Larry about what the "doctor" said.
Further, Daye had no prior history of violence against persons or property. Mangum DOES. Daye has character witnesses who say he never raised his hand to them. Not so for the violent Mangum. A neighbor said she heard a child screaming in the apartment and a female saying, "I am going to Fxxx you up"!! Nice, really nice.....Another example of Mangum's total amoral life, language and sorry "mothering". There are NO signs of bruises or other marks to support any beating by Daye. Harr knows this. His whole story is bull crap.
Yes, sidney Atticus, the Miranda is often read to persons who are (first) placed under arrest. Mangum had every opportunity, repeatedly, to say it was self defense and that she was beaten. She told the officers that she was NOT hurt! She conveniently waited till Daye was dead.
If Daye was such a lousy drunken violent scumbag, why did Mangum continue to turn tricks for her own pleasure, yet allow him to be her sugar daddy? This woman has the morals of a house cat. No offense to cats....

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 5:44 12-2-12 said: "Remind us again, Kenny, how are you helping Crystal?" .......... How I help Crystal is between her and I. What I do here is defend Crystal against the lies told about her.

kenhyderal said...

Guiowen said: "Let me just ask you a question: do you believe the photos Sidney posted show any type of beating" Absolutely.

guiowen said...

kenhyderal said...

' Guiowen said: "Let me just ask you a question: do you believe the photos Sidney posted show any type of beating" Absolutely. '

Wonderful, Kenny. Sidney just agreed that they're not the right photos. Nobody else can see more than a herpes sore. But you clearly know better than anyone else.
Care to answer any of my other questions?

guiowen said...

kenhyderal said...

'Anonymous @ 5:44 12-2-12 said: "Remind us again, Kenny, how are you helping Crystal?" .......... How I help Crystal is between her and I.'

Really, Kenny, didn't they teach you grammar at school? The preposition "between" calls for the objective case. It should be "between her and me".

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"So, let me understand. You are from the school that believes that it is appropriate to get one side of the story, make an arrest based on it, then after reading the cuffed suspect his/her Miranda Rights ask if he/she wants to answer your questions? I've never seen Lt. Columbo do it that way.

An interesting viewpoint, since the indictment of the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players was done by a Grand Jury which heard only DA NIFONG's side of the case.

Also, you obviously do not want the public to hear the whole truth about Mr. Daye's alleged history of violence towards women.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
What photos you keep posted of Crystal still do not show any evidence of injuries consistent with a severe beating.

Where are the medical records from Crystal's alleged beating in March? Could it be there are no records?


My point exactly. Neither the prosecution nor the defense attorneys in this case asked Mangum to sign a release in order to obtain the medical records. The reason... they're trying to keep the prior beating covered up."

You are dodging the issue again. There was probably no medical documentation recorded of what happened to Crystal on March 24 because there was no documentation she was ever seen at a medical faciity.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
Non-believer and naysayer, for your edification and elucidation please click on the link below. It will take you to a directory... click on buttons two and three for information about where Ms. Mangum was taken for medical treatment on March 24, 2011.
Info about March 24, 2011 beating

Notify me if further elucidation is required."

Said link takes one to another copy of Mr. O'Brian's statement which does not say Crystal was taken to a medical facility for evaluation or treatment. Where is the elucidation you always promise but neer deliver?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
First, I do not stipulate that Mangum was responsible for starting the bathtub fire."

No you do not. But Crystal admitted, after she lied to you that she did set it.

"Secondly, the police are responsible for allowing the smoke damage to occur when they allow the fire to burn for fifteen minutes awaiting the fire department... without making any attempt to extinguish it."

The police are not responsible. The fire burned for 15 minutes because Crystal did not tell the police about the fire until she was in custody and handcuffed.

"The police must accept responsibility for the smoke damage."

Why? Because you say so. The bottom line is, Crystal set the fire. There would have been no smoke damage had Crystal not set the fire.

This is some real elucidation from which you could benefit, if you were not so willfully blind to the truth.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Guiowen said: "Let me just ask you a question: do you believe the photos Sidney posted show any type of beating" Absolutely."

None so blind as KENHYDERAL who will not see.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"So, let me understand. You are from the school that believes that it is appropriate to get one side of the story, make an arrest based on it, then after reading the cuffed suspect his/her Miranda Rights ask if he/she wants to answer your questions? I've never seen Lt. Columbo do it that way."

You also did not see that was the way the DPD, under the direction of DA NIFONG, treated the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players. You called that justified.

Anonymous said...

This what I love about the victim crowd. They NEVER take responsibility for their own behavior nor do they EVER accept that the consequences of their actions are appropriate. I mean bleepin' never!
Mangum whines about her poor miserable life after she LIED in 2006 and blames others for the sorry shape of her life, given the choices she has made.
Harr stupidly blames the police; no fire set by mangum, no smoke.
Mangum conveniently blames daye, after he is dead, for her killing of him in an act of self defense. Baloney.
Harr blames Duke for Daye's death. Total bullcrap
Harr blames qualified attorneys for not springing Mangum from jail. (she is charged with first degree murder, sidney, your ignorance of the law is amazing!!)
Mangum blames blames blames blames blames...........
Harr.......he is on the band wagon of the evil white oppressor, white privilege crowd.....pooor us, we would get ahead in this world if only you evil white people were not around.
spare me........
Just once, just ONCE, wouldn't it be refreshing to hear the whiners, Harr and Mangum, say I did it, I am responsible, I made the choice, it is my fault, I have to pay the penalty, suffer the consequence, and learn from my experience. Just once!!!
Here's a hint, sidney, sooner or later the statute of limitations for blaming your failures on the racial prejudice of white people is going to run out...

Anonymous said...

What was mangum beaten with? A hair clip? thread from a sewing kit? a toothpick? wow, that's some beating all right.....what's she got, a gash......uh, no,, a big old honkin cut.....no,er, an abrasion, ......stitches, bruises, blood all over here? uh, no, a cold sore and a nick below her eye that frankly looks one helluva lot like she picked the scab off a sore. wow, some horrific beating...

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

The only lies told about Crystal are the lies told by you, by SIDNEY and by Kilgo, that she was the victim of a rape in the early morning of 14 March 2006.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Let me set the record straight, according to Sgt. Bond's own report."

Impossible for you to do, since you do not believe a lot of what is in Sgt. Bond's report, that Crystal was the aggressor, that Crystal was the one who started waving knives, that Mr.Daye, according to the statements of witnesses, was not a violent man.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDEAL(who admits he is no medical expert):

Point out which pictures show that Crystal was beaten.

Nifong Supporter said...


guiowen said...
Sidney,
A couple of days ago I posted this:

"Sidney, I don't weep, but I am really very upset about this. Couldn't you get some better photographs? Crystal just doesn't show the beating Reginald Daye gave her. The DA's people are clearly not giving you the correct photos. Can't you go to some higher-ups and explain what's happening?"

At that point your k night-in-shining-armor, aka Kenhyderal, protested that I was mocking you. You seem to agree with me, now, that you don't have the necessary photos. So, my three-fold question, now, is,
(1) Do you really need a protector to keep me from asking you questions?
(2) Since you seem to have come to the same conclusion as I, in what sense am I mocking you?
(3) Are you doing anything to obtain the "good" photos (those that show the beating)?


Gui, mon ami, why do you believe that I have reached the same conclusions as you about the photographs of Crystal? They show she has puncture-excoriations to the face consistent with fingernails, and her lower lip on the left side is swollen, along with the left side of her face and head.

Secondly, you can feel free to ask me all the questions you desire... and if I have the time, I will answer them.

Thirdly, kenhyderal is right... you are mocking me, but, hey, I can take it... it comes with the territory of being a blogmeister. I appreciate his support, however.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"Let me set the record straight, according to Sgt. Bond's own report."

Impossible for you to do, since you do not believe a lot of what is in Sgt. Bond's report, that Crystal was the aggressor, that Crystal was the one who started waving knives, that Mr.Daye, according to the statements of witnesses, was not a violent man.


Yeah, and Crystal busted down the door, pulled out her own hair, gouged at her own face, and punched herself in the face and head... right?

Daye is not a violent man? ..ask Lavern Reed that question (hint: Daye admitted to punching her in the face four or five times).

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "Point out which pictures show that Crystal was beaten"........... All of them. If there were no apparent injuries why would the photograps even be taken.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
Gui, mon ami, why do you believe that I have reached the same conclusions as you about the photographs of Crystal? They show she has puncture-excoriations to the face consistent with fingernails, and her lower lip on the left side is swollen, along with the left side of her face and head."

The pictures are consistent with the reports of the ER personnel and the police that Crystal had no evidence of a severe beating.

"Secondly, you can feel free to ask me all the questions you desire... and if I have the time, I will answer them."

However you will not answer truthfully.

Thirdly, kenhyderal is right... you are mocking me, but, hey, I can take it... it comes with the territory of being a blogmeister. I appreciate his support, however."

KENHYDERAL's support is about as significant as Italy's support for Germany in World War II.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: "Point out which pictures show that Crystal was beaten"........... All of them. If there were no apparent injuries why would the photograps even be taken".

KENHYDERAL, not unsurprisingly, again runs away from the issue, like the unreasonable guilt presuming racist you are.

I admit police departments have an evil reputation for abusing black arrestees. Crystal, however, has an equally evil reputation for lying. The most believable reason for taking the pictures was to document that Crystal WAS NOT beaten.

None so blind as KENHYDERAL.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Yeah, and Crystal busted down the door, pulled out her own hair, gouged at her own face, and punched herself in the face and head... right?"

Crystal was the aggressor in the Reginald Daye stabbing.

"Daye is not a violent man? ..ask Lavern Reed that question (hint: Daye admitted to punching her in the face four or five times)."

As Detective Bond's report indicated, the incident with Lavern Reed happened 20-25 years ago.

Why don't you talk to Mary Outterbridge and to Stella Rhodes who knew Reginald Daye shortly prior to he was stabbed? Because you do not want to. Both gave statements that Reginald Daye was not a violent man. Ms. Rhodes offered to testify on Mr. Daye's behalf as a character witness.

Be careful of what you wish for because you may get something you don't want. What will come out in open court is Crystal's well documented history of violent behavior. Why don't you seek out the Police officer whom Crystal tried to run down in 2006.

kenhyderal said...

Guiowen @ 10:05 said:"Really, Kenny, didn't they teach you grammar at school? The preposition "between" calls for the objective case. It should be "between her and me"............................. ""People who nitpick grammar and typos as a way to negate what someone says is taking the easy way out" ()unknown

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 1:51 said: " Why don't you seek out the Police officer whom Crystal tried to run down in 2006"........................... The charge was assault against a goverment official. When pulled over for speeding she was attempting to park. In backing up, she accidently brushed the police officer approaching her from the side. He was unhurt. This is not the attempted vehicular homicide the jihad trys to make it out to be.

kenhyderal said...

P.S. that was in 2003

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"

Anonymous @ 1:51 said: " Why don't you seek out the Police officer whom Crystal tried to run down in 2006"........................... The charge was assault against a goverment official. When pulled over for speeding she was attempting to park. In backing up, she accidently brushed the police officer approaching her from the side. He was unhurt.

Police reports compiled at the time of the incident report that Crystal was drunk, had no license, stole the cab, led police on a high speed chase, and attempted to run down a police officer. No one believes those lies you spew out - except maybe for Crystal the liar who probably created the fiction you believe.

"This is not the attempted vehicular homicide the jihad trys to make it out to be."

Since there was no jihad, there was no jihad trying to distort Crystal's record. The people who are lying about Crystal's record are people like KENNY, who are trying to cover up the facts about Crystal.

Anonymous said...

Oh please Kenny. You cannot possibly be as dumb as you sound. Photos are taken whenever physical contact is mentioned by any party in a dispute. If she alledged injuries, which she did NOT, photos would have been taken. If he alledged injuries, photos would have been Taken. It is just routine. Don't be a ninny and pretend you think these photos show crystal was injured. She has a single tiny nick on her cheek which ShE could have self inflicted . She has herpes lesions on her lip. Period. Where's all the bloody violent face punching choking ? Give us a break .........

Anonymous said...

No Kenny it was in 2002. She spun the car around, gunned the motor, and served deliberately trying to hit an officer. DUI level 3' reckless driving, driving with a suspended license. Etc.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"P.S. that was in 2003"

From http://ncfm.org/2011/04/authors/harrycrouch/the-dildo-bandito-crystal-mangum-and-nifong-nuts/:

"In 2002 when lap-dancing on a taxi driver Crystal took his keys. She was drunk, stole his cab, was chased down by police, nearly ran over a cop, and was arrested."

From http://opinion-forum.com/index/2010/12/duke-and-scottsboro-crystal-mangum-and-victoria-price/:

"In 2002 while working at a strip club, she(Crystal) stole a cab and tried to run down a police officer with it."

From the same URL:

"On another occasion, when asked to stop bothering a woman customer at the club, she began wildly pulling the woman’s hair and had to be removed by the bouncer."

From http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/02/22/crystal-mangum-s-return-to-court.html:

"One night in 2002, she lifted a taxi driver's keys while giving him a lap dance. With a blood alcohol level twice the legal limit, Mangum then stole the cab. Police chased her through the city; she was eventually arrested, but not before nearly running over a cop as he approached her car."

From www.thedaily.com/page/2011/04/22/042211-opinions-oped-duke-young-1-2/:

"Mangum has been in trouble with the law before, both before and after she became notorious. In 2002, she stole a cab and went on a drunken joyride, nearly running down a police officer."


Crystal's version from "The Last Dance for Grace" was compiled more than 6 years after the police records were compiled, just like she made her allegations of self defense and domestic abuse after Reginald Daye was dead.

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal said,
"People who nitpick grammar and typos as a way to negate what someone says is taking the easy way out"

Oh, Kenny, "people" here is the plural of "person". It should be "people ... are taking the easy way out".

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"People who nitpick grammar and typos as a way to negate what someone says is taking the easy way out".

This is KENNY's way to weasel out of justifying the unsupported allegations he makes

kenhyderal said...

@ Anonymous at 2:55 12-3-12 ...... All those versions are just sensationalism. Even with the usual over-charging that goes on there the sentence of 3 week ends in gaol reflects the offence's real seriousness. It's more in line with my version that the drunk who gave her his keys voluntarily then changed his mind resulting in a charge of grand larceny. That she was stopped for speeding and her immediate failure to react to the flashing lights got turned into a felony fleeing. Accidentally sideswipeing the approaching office while she tried to park became felonious assault with a deadly weapon. And blowing over the limit as drunken driving. The eventual charges were four misdemeanors. Speeding, DWI 3, assault on a government official, and misdemeanor larcency.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

" All those versions are just sensationalism."

They are based on the police records which generate the facts.

"Even with the usual over-charging that goes on there the sentence of 3 week ends in gaol reflects the offence's real seriousness."

It means Crystal got a break she did not deserve. It is something akin to one of your sayings, that reasonable doubt is often unreasonable. Does Crystal getting a break mean the justice system was biased against her because she was black?

"It's more in line with my version that the drunk who gave her his keys voluntarily then changed his mind resulting in a charge of grand larceny."

Your version? HUH?? You are citing Crystal's version which came into being more than 6 years after the police records were generated. Crystal claimed, more than 6 years after the event, that the cabbie gave her his keys. What really happened IS that she stole his keys.

"That she was stopped for speeding and her immediate failure to react to the flashing lights got turned into a felony fleeing. Accidentally sideswipeing the approaching office while she tried to park became felonious assault with a deadly weapon."

Again, this is version which was generated more than 6 years after the event. The police records show she was eventually cornered. Then she deliberately rammed a police car and tried to run down an officer.

"And blowing over the limit as drunken driving. The eventual charges were four misdemeanors. Speeding, DWI 3, assault on a government official, and misdemeanor larcency(sic)."

Which, again, means Crystal got a break which she did not deserve, any more than OJ deserved his acquittal. Maybe you and SIDNEY can explain how Crystal's break showed the justice system was biased against her. Maybe if she had received the appropriate punishment, she would not have falsely accused the Lacrosse players of raping her, maybe Milton Walker's apartment would not have suffered smoke damage(Crystal DID set the fire) and maybe Reginald Daye would still be alive.

Anonymous said...

So Kenny the initial charges were ultimately changed right? Just the same as what happened with the domestic abuse charge on daye's record......which was changed too. In fact it was DROPPED. But Harr the liar still tries to describe daye as violent........even tho two women of his recent acquaintance say he never raised a hand to them. Seems to me you and Harr are both trying hard to manipulate the record to suit your own versions if truth.

Anonymous said...

I thought harr was a bad writer for a very long time. I had no idea he was such a liar.....and a deliberate deceiver. He is a con artist of the worst kind....a carnival hack. He and a few other looney tune crackpots like Peterson and Jackie Wagstaff get away with antics that would put the average white person in jail for contempt and other violations of the law......just as Mangum has gotten away with so many criminal acts. Will she get away with murder? Makes me wonder if some of her johns, over the years, have been people in the academic community who would find it extremely embarrassing to admit that they have paid for sex with a killer.

Anonymous said...

One wonders why Mangum (at this very late date), didn't bring up this so-called beating AT THE TIME of her arrest, and, then again, when she first claimed self defense, AFTER Daye died. It is also interesting that Mangum hasn't simply requested her own records from the clinic?
The reasons there is no report from the hired gun consultant, I believe, is because the pathologist (who, by the way, is trained in forensic pathology, unlike harr) could find no problems with the Nichols documentation or the medical record of care. Tsk Tsk, be careful what you ask for.......
It is obvious ther is absolutely no indication of a beating by Daye, based on the photos Harr posted. Mangum nas a tiny little mark on her left cheek that looks like a skin tag or other tiny sore has the scab pulled off it. It is NOT a puncture wound. (idiot, harr). The little sores on her lips are very suspicious for herpes. There is no sign of swelling that is apparent in the photos. If you compare her lips to photos in prior pictures, she always has a pouting lower lip....nothing remarkable at all.

This is all going to boil down to he said, she said....and the physical evidence to support ANY claim of self defense is just not there. She knows it is a lie and so does Harr. both are serial liars

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I thought harr was a bad writer for a very long time. I had no idea he was such a liar.....and a deliberate deceiver. He is a con artist of the worst kind....a carnival hack. He and a few other looney tune crackpots like Peterson and Jackie Wagstaff get away with antics that would put the average white person in jail for contempt and other violations of the law......just as Mangum has gotten away with so many criminal acts. Will she get away with murder? Makes me wonder if some of her johns, over the years, have been people in the academic community who would find it extremely embarrassing to admit that they have paid for sex with a killer.


Hey!! I'm no carnival hack.

Besides, what antics have I done that would have had the average white person placed in jail? I'm a law abiding citizen.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
So Kenny the initial charges were ultimately changed right? Just the same as what happened with the domestic abuse charge on daye's record......which was changed too. In fact it was DROPPED. But Harr the liar still tries to describe daye as violent........even tho two women of his recent acquaintance say he never raised a hand to them. Seems to me you and Harr are both trying hard to manipulate the record to suit your own versions if truth.


So, big deal! I can name more than two women who will state that I never raised a hand against them. That must mean I'm not violent... right?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Oh please Kenny. You cannot possibly be as dumb as you sound. Photos are taken whenever physical contact is mentioned by any party in a dispute. If she alledged injuries, which she did NOT, photos would have been taken. If he alledged injuries, photos would have been Taken. It is just routine. Don't be a ninny and pretend you think these photos show crystal was injured. She has a single tiny nick on her cheek which ShE could have self inflicted . She has herpes lesions on her lip. Period. Where's all the bloody violent face punching choking ? Give us a break .........


MED SCHOOL 101:
Herpes lesions are small grouped vesicles in appearance. The lesion on Crystal's lip is a puncture-excoriation which is consistent with a fingernail gouge wound.

Ergo, the lesion intruding on Crystal's upper lip is not Herpes... for your medical edification.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"Yeah, and Crystal busted down the door, pulled out her own hair, gouged at her own face, and punched herself in the face and head... right?"

Crystal was the aggressor in the Reginald Daye stabbing.

"Daye is not a violent man? ..ask Lavern Reed that question (hint: Daye admitted to punching her in the face four or five times)."

As Detective Bond's report indicated, the incident with Lavern Reed happened 20-25 years ago.

Why don't you talk to Mary Outterbridge and to Stella Rhodes who knew Reginald Daye shortly prior to he was stabbed? Because you do not want to. Both gave statements that Reginald Daye was not a violent man. Ms. Rhodes offered to testify on Mr. Daye's behalf as a character witness.

Be careful of what you wish for because you may get something you don't want. What will come out in open court is Crystal's well documented history of violent behavior. Why don't you seek out the Police officer whom Crystal tried to run down in 2006.


Okay, let me take a few minutes to try and digest the point you are attempting to make. 20 - 25 years ago, when Daye punched Lavern Reed in the face 4 to 5 times, he was violent. Nowadays, he is not. When did that change... on April 4, 2012?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Hey!! I'm no carnival hack.

Besides, what antics have I done that would have had the average white person placed in jail? I'm a law abiding citizen."

None so blind as SIDNEY HARR. He has been trying to convince the world that innocent men raped Crystal Mangum.

Sidney, go ye and be enlightened.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"So, big deal! I can name more than two women who will state that I never raised a hand against them. That must mean I'm not violent... right?"

And if one woman comes forth who says years ago you once slapped her, that makes you an habitual violent physical abuser of women...right?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"MED SCHOOL 101:
Herpes lesions are small grouped vesicles in appearance. The lesion on Crystal's lip is a puncture-excoriation which is consistent with a fingernail gouge wound.

Ergo, the lesion intruding on Crystal's upper lip is not Herpes... for your medical edification."

You need to repeat Medical School 101. However, your evasiveness about your Medical background indicates you should never have been admitted to Medical school in the first place.

The pictures DO NOT show Crystal was subjected to a severe beating by Reginald Daye. Ollk at them and weep yourself.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Okay, let me take a few minutes to try and digest the point you are attempting to make. 20 - 25 years ago, when Daye punched Lavern Reed in the face 4 to 5 times, he was violent. Nowadays, he is not. When did that change... on April 4, 2012?

You show you are gagging on the point, not digesting it. When Reginald Daye slapped

When Reginald Daye slapped Lavern Reed, that was an act of violence. He admitted that act when he was being questioned by a police detective about his violent confrontation with Crystal. If he had beaten Crystal, he would have tried to conceal that incident.

The point is, Detective Sgt. Bond investigated Reginald Daye to see if he had a history of habitual violence towards women. He did not. And like the fighter for justice NOT! that you are, you tried to conceal that evidence.

Even though you are bearing false witness against a dead man, which is something "the Man from Nazareth" would have never countenanced, you call yourself a follower of "the Man from Nazareth".

SIDNEY, all you are is a deluded blasphemer.

Let ME know if YOU need further elightenment.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

To my last comment I add, while you are defaming a dead man by bearing false witness against him(concealing the results of what Detective Bond learned about him from women with whom he had relationships is bearing false witness) you are trying to cover up Crystal's documented history of violent behavior, which DID include lighting a fire in her boyfriend's apartment and then lying about it.

Anonymous said...

Nope, the lip does NOT show any injury consistent with fingernail damage. Wrong, cowboy, your limited medical knowlege is showing.
So, let me get this straight, Daye admits to hitting a woman 20 to 25 years ago, and that.....by itself....of course means he is a drunken violent wild man. right, sidney? Using your logic, Mangum is the worst kind of violent drunken substance abusing loon. He tried to run over and officer in 2002. She was drunk. She drove recklessly and endangered the lives of other drivers. She got a level three DUI. So, she is obviously and forever a sorry drunk violent woman. She attacked Walker, went after him with a ladder, damaged his car, set his clothes on fire and, in front of an officer, threatened "I'll stab you, M_F"/ So, yep, she is a violent woman...who make murderous threats, destroys property, and abuses children. Right, sidney???
Oh, and of course, she lied her overused backside off in 2006 and therefore she is forever and always a LIAR. right, sidney?
If Daye was violent 20 years ago, he is forever and always violent. If Mangum was and is a drunk, substance abusing, child abusing, violent woman.....she sure as hell is one NOW. You flaming hypocrite!!!

Anonymous said...

Carnival hack doesn't even come close to the self-promoting , shilling, snake oil salesman behavior you exhibit over and over. sidney

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 10:03 said: "He tried to run over and officer in 2002. She was drunk. She drove recklessly and endangered the lives of other drivers. She got a level three DUI............. Wrong; she did not try to run over a policeman, she accidentally sideswiped him. She was not drunk, she blew over the legal limit. She was charged with speeding not with reckless driving. Stealing a taxi is grand larceny. Crystal was charged with misdemeanor larcency for taking the vehicle without express permission which she thought she had.

Anonymous said...

bull crap. the charges on her record STAND, pal. You and harr can't have it both ways. You cannot say the criminal record for daye proves he was a violent man because 20 years he hit a woman.....knowing those charges were DROPPED. and, out of the other side of your hypocritical mouth, claim that the record for Mangum was all wrong...because she didn't get convicted of what she was initially charged with. Grow up, your backside is showing.....

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous @ 10:03 said: "He tried to run over and officer in 2002. She was drunk. She drove recklessly and endangered the lives of other drivers. She got a level three DUI............. Wrong; she did not try to run over a policeman, she accidentally sideswiped him."

Yes she did.

"She was not drunk, she blew over the legal limit."

She was drunk.

"She was charged with speeding not with reckless driving. Stealing a taxi is grand larceny. Crystal was charged with misdemeanor larcency for taking the vehicle without express permission which she thought she had."

She stole the cab. She made up the story of believing she had permission over 6 years after the event. Since her license had been suspended, why would she have thought the cabbie would voluntarily give her his keys?

The bottom line, KENNY, just like OJ Crystal got a break rather than the punishment she deserved.

Anonymous said...

Lets compare records of daye and mangum, yet again, kenny, so maybe you can get it....
Daye...one charge years ago, which was DROPPED, of domestic violence. He freely admitted to an officer that he hit a Reed 20 or 25 years ago. He has two RECENT female intimate relationships...both of whom said to the investigating officer, that he never raised a hand to him. So, that's HIS record......
Mangum: Violence in 2002 when he tried to run over an officer. I don't give a damn how you try to revisit and revise history; the police records FOUR YEARS before the LAX lies, said she tried to run over the officer. Violence against Walker...went after him with a ladder, attacked his car, set his clothes on fire, got convicted of abusing her children. During the 2010 incident she made a threat to "stab you M-F", in front of an officer...toward Walker.
That's HER record, Kenny.

Now, pal, suppose you tell us all how Mangum has a record of NON violence while Daye has a record of being a wild woman beating drunken wild man.

Anonymous said...

Crystal Mangum has gotten way too many breaks. That's partially why Reginald Daye is dead. Had she been punished appropriately for her behavior in 2002, maybe he might not be dead today. Had she been punished for what she did in 2006, maybe he might not be dead today. (and, yes, lying in a criminal case as she did, was a violation of the law). Had Mangum been punsihed as charged for what she did in the Walker case, maybe Daye might not be dead today.
It just goes on and on......harr tries to say she has been victimized. I believe it is just the opposite; this woman has been far too many free passes. Will she get yet another and get away with murder? Who knows....after all, this is Durham, the home of the 88 and the j4n wingnut klan.

Anonymous said...

harr thinks somebody might want to go on a "fishing expedition" to look into his "medical career". First, who gives a damn about his "medical career". It is painfully obvious the man is limited and has issues that would prevent him from being licensed to practice medicine today. I repeat, who gives a rip.
Second, your "medical career"? wow, sure must have been an impressive one.....one fifth-line notation in one pseudo-science journal article more than 20 years ago? that's your contribution to medicine? wowowowowow, stunning.
so, don't fret, sidney, nobody is gonna go fishing. we don't give a hoot.

Anonymous said...

Let's consider this......sidney says that, sometime, in the past there was criminal charges filed against him....his wife, according to him, "forced" a judge to hand this over to a civil court....and, before the case came to court, a "settlement" was reached. He obviously does not want to discuss it, does not feel he has to disclose any details (which he definitely does NOT), and tells us basically to stick it in our ear. so, in keeping with his attitude of anonmous private none-of-your-business approach, I would say it is another example of his FLAMIMG hypocrisy to criticize anybody who posts here anonomously. If you don't want to be discredited because you feel you need to keep your record private, then shut up about posters who prefer to keep their identifies private. Hypocrite

Anonymous said...

Ah, a perfect term for Harr:
From Liestoppers.....remember Tara Levicy?
When a person with a questionable or limited credential or badge or certificate, who has zero morals and the character of an ashtray, makes a statement that includes psuedoscience, overstatement, falsification of information, deliberate distortion, with a clear intent to deceive....that is a "Levicy". Harr offten resorts to the "Levicy" method.....just as he often employs the Man from Glad artful dodge, or the "I don't know, you'll have to tell me" approach, or the "let me throw in a totally unrelated silly red herring" approach. Look for Levicys in Harr's statements.....they abound....

Anonymous said...

Nifong-ing: the end justifies the means, as in, I'm gonna get myself elected and screw those white boys!
Levicy-ing: Ah, duh, the photo shows that poor Crystal was stabbed in the cheek by a piece of lint that Daye threw at her.
Linwood-ing: If I sing a solo of In the Garden for you, can I still wear my big old shiny badge?
Victoria-ing: We oughta do what they black folk in Uganda is gonna do; they is gonna pass the "Kill the Gays" bill, making it legal to murder all those queers with pervert diseases.
Wahneeeeema-ing: If I had a brain, it would be "forthcoming", like my manuscript
Kenny-ing: waaaaaahh, somebody stole my booboo bankie
Harr-ing: Twinkle twinkle, little star.....go ye, lightening...a pox on you, jihadists. hosanna.

kenhyderal said...

Anonoymous @ 10:33 said: "You cannot say the criminal record for daye proves he was a violent man because 20 years he hit a woman"..... I have never said any such thing.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 11:46 said: "From Liestoppers.....remember Tara Levicy"............ Nurse Tara Levicy, like former DA Mike Nifong and Crystal are all on the hit-list of the Duke LaCrosse Defence Team and their surrogates The Duke LaCrosse Liestoppers. All three are honorable people that have been subjected to the most despicable lies, from these greedy vultures, hoping to bolster their bogus claims by slandering these individuals. The road is long and when the truth be known they will reap what they have sown.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 11:18 said: "then shut up about posters who prefer to keep their identifies private. Hypocrite"..... In my opinion posters that make libelous statements anonymously are not only hypocrits but are also cowards.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 10:50 said: "Had she been punished appropriately for her behavior in 2002, maybe he might not be dead today. Had she been punished for what she did in 2006, maybe he might not be dead today. (and, yes, lying in a criminal case as she did, was a violation of the law). Had Mangum been punsihed as charged for what she did in the Walker case, maybe Daye might not be dead today.............Crystal was punished appropriately in 2002.In 2006 she was the victim. In 2010 she was the victim of a domestic dispute but because of who she was she was charged with a battery of bogus crimes. Only in a place like North Carolina would a case like this be handled the way it was. I hate to keep reminding you but in Canada this case would have been dealt with the following morning in a Magistrate's Court, a no-contact order issued, on both parties and a order for Crystal to make compensation to Walker for the property damage. Judge Jones showed what he thought of it by sentencing her to time served. In her present case after a disgraceful nearly two years in custody she will be acquitted.

Lance the Intern said...

"...in her present case after a disgraceful nearly two years in custody she will be acquitted."

Not likely.

Break the Conspiracy said...

I want to thank Sidney for posting the photographs of both the broken bathroom door and Crystal's injuries. I found the O'Briant statement interesting. This evidence can be useful with a self-defense claim as it may support her claim of a physical altercation. However, the the evidence is not nearly as compelling as Sidney had claimed earlier. It does not conclusively address the question of whether Crystal was sufficiently threatened to justify stabbing Daye.

Obviously, supporting evidence will be required for trial. Crystal must provide her medical records from her March 24 treatment. Sidney realizes that the O'Briant statement is inconclusive without that evidence, and I trust that he is in the process of obtaining the records. I cannot understand why Crystal did not request that the clinic release her records to Sidney prior to posting. Similarly, I assume that he will verify the photographs with time stamp information. Finally, I understand that he will post the Roberts report as soon as it is available. I trust that Crystal has instructed Roberts to prepare it immediately and to provide it to Sidney as soon as possible.

Sidney should post the entire discovery file, every single page, with no exceptions. Otherwise, the naysayers will accuse him of cherry-picking the evidence. In the same way that Sidney has argued persuasively that he cannot analyze the strength of Nifong's case because he has not seen all of the evidence himself, others can make the same request and ask to see all of the evidence in this case. For obvious reasons, Sidney is not able to rely on conclusions that there was no credible evidence reached by Cooper, Coman, Winstead, Baker, Nifong, Chalmers and Himan. Similarly, his readers cannot rely on conclusions reached by Sidney.

Because the evidence he posted did not show a horrific beating, unless he has additional evidence, I do not expect public outrage will force prosecutors to dismiss charges prior to trial. Evidence that required prosecutors to drop charges was my premise in supporting Sidney's decision to encourage Crystal to represent herself. I noted that Crystal's lack of legal expertise would not handicap her defense as long as the case did not go to trial. I cannot recommend that Crystal proceed to trial on felony charges without legal representation.

Ultimately, Crystal's success with a self-defense claim will depend on whether the jury finds her to be credible. As I noted earlier, this evidence may be useful in supporting Crystal's testimony, but it is not conclusive by itself. I recognize that neither Sidney nor Ken, who know Crystal best, has any concerns that her testimony will not be compelling. Other readers are not so convinced. Prosecutors will almost certainly attempt to attack Crystal's credibility with her so-called "inconsistent" statements in the alleged rape and arson cases.

I suggest that Crystal, Sidney and Ken consider the possibility that a jury may not accept Ken's stated view that each of Crystal's statements must be considered separately and taken as credible and accurate as long as one cannot prove with absolute certainty that the statement in question cannot possibly be true. I would not wish to base my defense against multiple felonies on a jury accepting that threshold.

Hopefully, the delays will soon end. We can all agree that no defendant should be required to wait more than 600 days for trial. The NC justice system truly is broken.

Anonymous said...

Well there you go folks......Kenny comes thru in fine form, letting us all know poor sister is the decade long victim. Chrystal's theme song is "it's not my fault". Whine on , crystal

Lance the Intern said...

" The NC justice system truly is broken."

On this, we most certainly agree.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous @ 11:18 said: "then shut up about posters who prefer to keep their identifies private. Hypocrite"..... In my opinion posters that make libelous statements anonymously are not only hypocrits but are also cowards."

Only someone who can not identify the truth would call libelous statements about Crystal, tha Crystal lied about being raped, that Crystal has a documented history of criminal behavior and violence.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous @ 10:50 said: "Had she been punished appropriately for her behavior in 2002, maybe he might not be dead today. Had she been punished for what she did in 2006, maybe he might not be dead today. (and, yes, lying in a criminal case as she did, was a violation of the law). Had Mangum been punsihed as charged for what she did in the Walker case, maybe Daye might not be dead today.............Crystal was punished appropriately in 2002."


"In 2006 she was the victim."

No she wasn't.She was the false accuser/victimizer. You have no factual evidence that Crystal was raped, only a presumption of guilt based on a bias against men who are better off and more accomplished than you.

"In 2010 she was the victim of a domestic dispute but because of who she was she was charged with a battery of bogus crimes."

You have presented no evidence of this. Neither has SIDNEY.

"Only in a place like North Carolina would a case like this be handled the way it was. I hate to keep reminding you but in Canada this case would have been dealt with the following morning in a Magistrate's Court, a no-contact order issued, on both parties and a order for Crystal to make compensation to Walker for the property damage."

Crystal set he fire while the premises were occupied. The fire resulted in extensive smoke damage to the apartment and a call to the fire department. If a Canadian Court heard all the facts(which you are trying to suppress) it would have dealt with Crystal much more severely than did the NC Justice system.

"Judge Jones showed what he thought of it by sentencing her to time served."

He showed he did not belong on the bench. Maybe that is why he lost his bid for reelection.

"In her present case after a disgraceful nearly two years in custody she will be acquitted."

If SIDNEY has any say about it, she won't be.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Nurse Tara Levicy, like former DA Mike Nifong and Crystal are all on the hit-list of the Duke LaCrosse Defence Team and their surrogates The Duke LaCrosse Liestoppers."

There was no hit list. Liestoppers was not acting on behalf of the Lacrosse defendants. The were defending obviously innocent en from wrongful conviction.

"All three are honorable people that have been subjected to the most despicable lies, from these greedy vultures, hoping to bolster their bogus claims by slandering these individuals."

What despicable lies? Please enumerate. Are you saying Crystal was honorable when she lied about rape? Was Tara honorable when she altered the medical records. Was DA NIFONG honorable when he concealed exculpatory evidence? DA NIFONG was directly responsible for the failure to identify the males who left their DNA on Crystal, something about which you have complained loud and long.

"The road is long and when the truth be known they will reap what they have sown."

The truth is already known. Crystal lied about being raped. De facto she conceded that when she did not file a civil suit.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonoymous @ 10:33 said: "You cannot say the criminal record for daye proves he was a violent man because 20 years he hit a woman"..... I have never said any such thing."

Agreed.

However you call SIDNEY a person of good will after he has spent months trying to conceal evidence that Reginald Daye was not a violent man.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

You admitted you were charged with a crime. According to the principle you applied to Reginald Daye, that DOES make you an habitual offender.

Did that incident have anything to do with your early exit from the practice of medicine?

Anonymous said...

Sidney harr is the person who labeled Reginald Daye a violent man, simply because he (daye) admitted that he hit a woman 20 -25 years ago. the charge of domestic abuse was dropped! Yet, sidney, refuses to admit to his misrepresentation of information.
If Daye was a violent woman beating drunk, based on what happened years ago, and based on a charge that was DROPPED.....then Crystal mangum is a violent, drunk, substance abusing, child abusing criminal.....she has more than one charge and conviction involving violence against persons and property. she has made violent threats (she said she would stab Walker in front of an officer in 2010), she has a history of serial LYING, she has abused drugs and alcohol for years and her criminal record goes back to at least 2002. That, according to sidney's standards, makes her a truly wild violent man-abusing, child abusing drunken drug using "sex worker". And, by the way, since Sidney himself has a history involving criminal charges, I agree with another poster.......using sidney's logic, that criminal charge makes sidney a criminal!
Sidney harr is a liar and a hypocrite

Anonymous said...

Years ago my father slapped my mother in anger. I was there when it happened. It didn't really hurt her but it scared them BOTH half to death. She told him that she would walk out with us if he ever raised his hand to her again. He never EVER did. It was an awful day but it changed all our lives for the better. He never denied his actions and he was always always sorry. I respect Reginald Daye for admitting what he did 20 years ago and I respect him even more, knowing that at least two women with whom he had intimate relationships, have stepped forward to say he was NON violent and never hurt either of them. He admitted what he did and took responsibility for it. Mangum, on the other hand, has NEVER ever admitted to anything, has whined and ranted about how it's everybody else's fault, has played her silly race card, has never accepted responsibility for anything in her entire life....and is a moral criminal without a shred of morality or conscience.