Saturday, December 8, 2012

Anniversary of “Day of Infamy” a day of disappointment in Court


Word count: 1,357

Note:  This blog was written prior to seeing
The Herald-Sun article of December 7, 2012

On Friday, December 7, 2012, the 71st anniversary of the bombing of Pearl Harbor, it is only fitting that a few bombs were dropped on Crystal Mangum’s second court appearance in which she was representing herself. Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser who now faces trumped up murder and larceny charges as part of a vendetta prosecution, was expecting to have her Motion to Dismiss the Larceny of Chose in Action charge heard before the Court… however, that did not happen. The exact actions that took place in the courtroom are unknown as none of the members of the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong were in attendance… this due to them being misled by a scheduled appearance of Ms. Mangum on the Court docket which was for twelve noon, whereas her hearing was actually conducted two hours earlier at ten AM.

So without any firsthand information about what transpired at the hearing, the following is based upon what I have been able to piece together about the courtroom events. Honorable Judge Michael O’Foghludha, a Superior Court Judge from Durham presided over the hearing, and he made the determination not to address Mangum’s Motion to Dismiss. My understanding is that Judge O’Foghludha decided not to hear the case because a Certificate of Service had not been filed, and Durham Assistant District Attorney Charlene Coggins-Franks complained to the judge that she had just received a copy of the motion. The fact is that Mangum’s motion was filed exactly one week earlier on Friday, November 30, 2012, at 10:17 AM, along with my Petition for writ of mandamus seeking Mangum’ release from custody on her own recognizance. After filing both documents with the Clerk of Court’s office, I went up one flight to the sixth floor and handed the stamped motion and petition to the receptionist in the District Attorney’s office. Six days later, in the mid-afternoon of Thursday, December 6, 2012, the Durham D.A.’s office had the courtesy to inform me that Mangum’s motion would be turned over to Ms. Coggins-Franks. I am unaware as to when the prosecutor actually did take possession of Mangum’s motion.

That said, Judge O’Foghludha could have heard Mangum’s Motion to Dismiss; the lack of a Certificate of Service shouldn’t’ve represented any impediment to his bringing her motion before the court and ruling on it. Fact is that he elected not to hear the motion, and I can fully understand why. Bottom line is that it takes courage to make a ruling that is favorable to Crystal Mangum, even when completely backed by law and morality. Mangum’s case is so politically charged that not only attorneys, but judges cower at the prospect of having to choose between doing the right thing or carrying out the wishes of the avengers of the Duke Lacrosse defendants and their Carpetbagger families. The absence of a Certificate of Service was the tiny porous opening that the honorable judge needed in order to jettison responsibility for acting on a motion that would undoubtedly force him to do the right thing… and grant Mangum’s Motion to Dismiss the Larceny of Chose in Action charge. Courage is a commodity that is in extremely short supply in our society, and the one person who did possess it and stood up in defiance of the Powers-That-Be in order to try and see that justice was done, was himself done in by the justice system with the assistance of the mainstream media… that man of uncommon courage and integrity is former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong.

Paragraph of enlightenment: It is not only Mangum’s defense attorneys, but anyone and everyone connected with the vile and vendetta-driven prosecution of Mangum, who is subsequently under pressure and duress to act in accordance with the wishes of the Powers-That-Be. There was a purpose in making an example of Mike Nifong… and that was to discourage any similar acts of independent legal valor. With this in mind, it is easy to understand why Judge O’Foghludha, in using any excuse at hand, chose to pass on a hearing of Crystal Mangum’s motion to dismiss… kicking the can further down the road another six and a half weeks when the next court appearance for Mangum is scheduled on January 22, 2013. If the prosecution was so thoroughly disadvantaged by not being given notice of the defendant’s motion to dismiss and time to prepare, then the next court date should have been set within a week or two at which time the motion could be heard.

Another development, from what sources have told me, is that Dr. Christena L. Roberts is supposedly planning to visit Ms. Mangum on Monday, December 10, 2012. Dr. Roberts is a forensic pathologist hired with State funds to evaluate Reginald Daye’s death and his autopsy report. The Court authorized payment to her in an order by Judge Henry Hight signed on June 18, 2012, however, according to Woody Vann, who is supposed to be Mangum’s back-up assistant, he told the court approximately two weeks ago that the written report by Roberts had not yet been completed. A written report by Roberts for a ten hour investigation not completed after more than five months? It doesn’t make sense. What does make since is her desire not to produce a written report about Reginald Daye’s death or the autopsy report by North Carolina Deputy Chief Medical Examiner Clay Nichols. Dr. Roberts is well aware that any report she drafts will directly implicate Duke University Hospital in Daye’s death, and it will support my contention, all along, that Medical Examiner Nichols’ autopsy report of April 14, 2011, contains false findings and an unsupported conclusion regarding Daye’s death. In addition, the report will sink the prosecution’s claim that Mangum’s stabbing of Daye (which was in self-defense) was the direct and proximate cause of his death.

Why travel all the way from Black Mountain, NC, to Durham just in order to give Crystal Mangum a verbal report only… which is what I am expecting. My expectation is that after five months with no written report at hand, Dr. Christena Roberts has no intention of putting in writing the sins of Dr. Nichols, Duke University Hospital, and the City of Durham. This trip, I believe, is part of an intricate ploy to attempt to address Judge Robert Hobgood’s order to provide Ms. Mangum with a written report and yet still not put anything in writing. It’s time for the gamesmanship by Durham prosecutors and turncoat defense attorneys to stop and for Dr. Roberts to immediately provide Mangum with a written report as directed by Judge Hobgood.

If a written report from Dr. Roberts is forthcoming on the possible Monday visit, I will be shocked. However you can bet that it will be watered down like the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy… all punches will be pulled.

Also, you can rest assured that if I get my hands on a copy of the report, I will make it assessable to view of people worldwide on this blog site… the true source of enlightenment on all things related to the Duke Lacrosse case and beyond.

Finally, on this last Friday, the 7th, I received a notice that certified mail was awaiting me at the post office. I attempted to retrieve it Friday morning, but it had not yet been delivered to the post office. Now, I do not know the identity of the sender, but using Sherlockian deduction, I have reason to believe that it is from the Authorized Practices Committee of the State Bar. I will collect it on Monday, and if it is the motion by the Bar, I will upload it on this blog site along with my response, once completed.

Although many bombs have been dropped Friday, as the dust settles, I will try to parse out the truth from the innuendo and shine light where the shadow of darkness now conceals the truth about the bogus charges against Crystal Mangum… a victim of domestic violence by Reginald Daye and a victim of vendetta justice by the State. 

68 comments:

Nifong Supporter said...


Break the Conspiracy said...
Sidney:

You first alleged that Daye had beaten Crystal on March 24 in a comment posted on November 5 at 1:21pm. You have had one month to obtain medical records. These records are critical. I recognize that not having a car makes it more difficult and time consuming to obtain these records—but not impossible.

* Do you have access to a telephone that you can use?
* Have you called the clinic to determine what is necessary?
* Have you asked Crystal to sign a release at your last weekly visit?
* Have you asked any J4N or FoCM members to assist you?
* Do you know any one else who owns a car?

Press reports on November 15 indicated that the court would instruct Roberts to produce the report. You have had three weeks to obtain the report. This report is critical to validate your criticism of the autopsy.

* Have you asked Crystal to sign a power of attorney authorizing you to obtain the report?
* Do you have access to a telephone that you can use?
* Have you called Roberts asking when the report will be available?
* Have you called Vann asking whether he has contacted Roberts?
* Have you asked any J4N or FoCM members to assist you?
* Do you know any one else who owns a car?

Crystal is looking to you for guidance, but you provide no leadership. You have done little more than to repeat the same complaints on a website with few readers.

I will regard you as an enabler if you do not act.

Hey, Break.

I appreciate your fervor for justice, and believe me, I am doing the best I can to help Crystal. With her incarceration, communication and getting anything accomplished is extremely difficult and time consuming. I will try to get the reports of March 24th as soon as I can, but I have other obligations, as important as those reports are.

It appears now that Dr. Roberts is trying to evade Judge Hobgood's order to provide Crystal Mangum with a written report. The reason for this, as you are aware, is to protect Medical Examiner Nichols, Duke University Hospital, and the City of Durham

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
According to Liestoppers, a judge has ordered Dr. Christena Roberts to prepare a written report and has ruled that Crystal can review the report. However, Crystal will be with a custodial officer at the time, to prevent Crystal from sharing confidential information with unauthorized persons(read SIDNEY).

Maybe SIDNEY is silent because he is furious and rendered speechless because he will not be able to distort the Roberts report to support his ongoing attempt to frame a dead man who can not defend himself.


The antics by Dr. Roberts are disgraceful and shoddy. She needs to produce a written report as ordered by Judge Hobgood. As far as patient privacy concerns go, Daye's pertinent medical records have been online now for months. What's the problem?? Rhetorical(We know... she's trying to protect Nichols, Duke, and Durham.)

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
From Liestoppers regarding the report of Dr. Christena Roberts:

"[Woody] Vann told the judge that the doctor arranged to meet with the Capital Defender’s Office, which is located just down the street from the courthouse, on Monday to talk to them about what to do because she worries that she may violate medical privacy rules by producing a written report and giving it to Mangum, [Woody] Vann said."

snip

"[Crystal] then requested to be present at the meeting, and O’Foghludha said she could attend the meeting under the supervision of the Durham County Sheriff’s Office on the condition that only Vann, an attorney from the Capital Defender’s Office, the doctor, Mangum and a deputy attend it."

In other words to SIDNEY, butt out.

Does anyone want to bet SIDNEY will claim he is being excluded because he is a DA NIFONG Supporter?

Hah! Woody Vann is coming up with creative excuses for preventing Dr. Roberts from producing a report.

There is no doubt in my mind that this is the only case that Dr. Roberts has weighed in on wherein she was so concerned about patient privacy concerns that she didn't produce a written report. This is aburd. Dr. Roberts needs to produce the report as ordered by Judge Hobgood.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Anonymous said...
According to Liestoppers, a judge has ordered Dr. Christena Roberts to prepare a written report and has ruled that Crystal can review the report. However, Crystal will be with a custodial officer at the time, to prevent Crystal from sharing confidential information with unauthorized persons(read SIDNEY).

Maybe SIDNEY is silent because he is furious and rendered speechless because he will not be able to distort the Roberts report to support his ongoing attempt to frame a dead man who can not defend himself.

The antics by Dr. Roberts are disgraceful and shoddy. She needs to produce a written report as ordered by Judge Hobgood. As far as patient privacy concerns go, Daye's pertinent medical records have been online now for months. What's the problem?? Rhetorical(We know... she's trying to protect Nichols, Duke, and Durham.)"

I predicted SIDNEY would accuse Dr. Roberts of cooperating with the prosecution and defense to discredit Crystal.

I also predicted SIDNEY would go ballistic because he would not be able to view Dr. Roberts' report.

Sidney, why do you not follow Break's exhortation to go to the meeting with Dr. Roberts and make every effort to access her report even if it means a contempt citation and a jail citation? If Martin Luther King Jr. believed in Crystal that is what he would do.

I can see it all now. Sidney goes to the meeting. Peace officers tell him to leave. Peace officers arrest and incarcerate Sidney. Sidney then sues the city of Durham for violating his civil rights because he is a DA NIFONG supporter.

You know, he might also accuse Professor Coleman of being coopted by the carpetbagger jihad because he would not have been there to prevent SIDNEY's arrest.

Anyone have any other thoughts?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Hah! Woody Vann is coming up with creative excuses for preventing Dr. Roberts from producing a report."

HAH!!! SIDNEY is showing how p---ed off he is that he will not be allowed to access the report.

"There is no doubt in my mind that this is the only case that Dr. Roberts has weighed in on wherein she was so concerned about patient privacy concerns that she didn't produce a written report."

There is also no doubt in your mind that, in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, Crystal was raped. There is also no doubt in your mind that the carpetbagger jihad, of which you can produce no documentation, exists. That says a lot about what your mind doubts.

"This is aburd. Dr. Roberts needs to produce the report as ordered by Judge Hobgood."

She is. What you think is absurd is that you will not be able to view it or publish it or distort it in your crusade to defame a dead man who can not defend himself.

Way to go, SIDNEY-monion-of-satan-HARR.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The antics by Dr. Roberts are disgraceful and shoddy. She needs to produce a written report as ordered by Judge Hobgood. As far as patient privacy concerns go, Daye's pertinent medical records have been online now for months. What's the problem?? Rhetorical(We know... she's trying to protect Nichols, Duke, and Durham.)"

She is producing a written report as ordered by Judge Hobgood. What you call disgraceful and shoddy is that you are being denied access to that report.

What gives you the right to view that report?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Bottom line is that it takes courage to make a ruling that is favorable to Crystal Mangum, even when completely backed by law and morality."

When has Crystal ever done anything completely backed by law and morality?

When she falsely accused three innocent Lacrosse players of raping her?

When she stole a cab, drove recklessly when drunk and then tried to run down a police officer?

When she lit a fire in Milton Walker's apartment?

When she attacked Reginald Daye(evidence you have tried to conceal shows Crystal was the aggressor)?

I don't think so.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Mangum’s case is so politically charged that not only attorneys, but judges cower at the prospect of having to choose between doing the right thing or carrying out the wishes of the avengers of the Duke Lacrosse defendants and their Carpetbagger families".

Another lie for which you get credit.

There never was any action on the part of the innocent Lacrosse players or their families to carry out any vendetta against Crystal.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Courage is a commodity that is in extremely short supply in our society, and the one person who did possess it and stood up in defiance of the Powers-That-Be in order to try and see that justice was done, was himself done in by the justice system with the assistance of the mainstream media… that man of uncommon courage and integrity is former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong."

Another lie for which you get credit.

Corrupt DA NIFONG was and is a sociopathic narcissist who thought his personal welfare trumped the law, legal ethics and the Constitution of the United States. He had the power of the state behind him so he thought he could bully three innocent men by prosecuting them for a crime he knew never happened. It does not take any courage at all to be a bully, whatever the circumstances.

None so blind as SIDNEY HARR who refuses to see.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Dr. Roberts is well aware that any report she drafts will directly implicate Duke University Hospital in Daye’s death, and it will support my contention, all along, that Medical Examiner Nichols’ autopsy report of April 14, 2011, contains false findings and an unsupported conclusion regarding Daye’s death. In addition, the report will sink the prosecution’s claim that Mangum’s stabbing of Daye (which was in self-defense) was the direct and proximate cause of his death."

SIDNEY as a totally incompetent physician is totally incapable of forming a meaningful evaluation of the Reginald Daye autopsy. But now he is claiming he is capable of reading Dr. Roberts' mind.

SIDNEY, when you lack a functioning mind of your own, you are incapable of reading any one else's mind

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"My expectation is that after five months with no written report at hand, Dr. Christena Roberts has no intention of putting in writing the sins of Dr. Nichols, Duke University Hospital, and the City of Durham."

What sins. You have not documented any wrongdoing on the part of Dr. Nichols, Duke University or the City of Durham. You have only made uncorroborated allegations.

Your expectation has been that the J4N committee would force the NC Bar to reinstate DA NIFONG's law license. Has that happened?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Finally, on this last Friday, the 7th, I received a notice that certified mail was awaiting me at the post office. I attempted to retrieve it Friday morning, but it had not yet been delivered to the post office. Now, I do not know the identity of the sender, but using Sherlockian deduction, I have reason to believe that it is from the Authorized Practices Committee of the State Bar. I will collect it on Monday, and if it is the motion by the Bar, I will upload it on this blog site along with my response, once completed".

It may well be from the Bar. One does not have to be very astute to deduce that. You have yet to demonstrate that you are capable of Sherlockian deduction.

Your assertions of the carpetbagger jihad are prima facie evidence that you are incapable of meaningful deduction. Now you will confirm your lack of ability by calling me the victim of a jedi mind trick.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"...I will try to parse out the truth from the innuendo and shine light where the shadow of darkness now conceals the truth about the bogus charges against Crystal Mangum… a victim of domestic violence by Reginald Daye and a victim of vendetta justice by the State."

How will you do that? Probably by trying to continue to defame Reginald Daye, who is dead and can not defend himself, by trying to conceal more evidence about him.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

To my last post I add, you have congealed more evidence about Reginald Day than you have revealed, and you have distorted just about everything you have revealed.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Also, you can rest assured that if I get my hands on a copy of the report,"

I do not think many of us take that as a credible threat. You haven't got the guts to risk a contempt citation and jail time. Feel free to castigate me for remaining anonymous. That is like being stoned to death with popcorn.

"I will make it assessable to view of people worldwide on this blog site…"

How? Not many people read this blog, probably no one outside the US, except KENHYDERAL. Except yourself, no one believes your lies. KENHYDERAL seems to have withdrawn from the fray.

"the true source of enlightenment on all things related to the Duke Lacrosse case and beyond."

Another lie for which you get credit, SIDNEY-miion-of-the-father-of-lies-HARR.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"If a written report from Dr. Roberts is forthcoming on the possible Monday visit, I will be shocked. However you can bet that it will be watered down like the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy… all punches will be pulled."

I again say, i predicted how SIDNEY would react to being excluded from accessing Dr. Roberts report.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"If a written report from Dr. Roberts is forthcoming on the possible Monday visit, I will be shocked. However you can bet that it will be watered down like the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy… all punches will be pulled."

If you had reacted to Dr. Christena Roberts in any way other than this, I, and probably a lot of other people, would have been shocked.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Why do you not file another one of your pro se motions, asking the court to sit on the meeting with Crystal as an expert witness for her?

Answer: You would have to establish yourself as an expert, which you would have to present your credentials to the court, and you are very evasive about making your credentials public.

Do you care enough about Crystal to risk revealing the sardines in your professional closet?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Dr. Roberts is well aware that any report she drafts will directly implicate Duke University Hospital in Daye’s death, and it will support my contention, all along, that Medical Examiner Nichols’ autopsy report of April 14, 2011, contains false findings and an unsupported conclusion regarding Daye’s death. In addition, the report will sink the prosecution’s claim that Mangum’s stabbing of Daye (which was in self-defense) was the direct and proximate cause of his death."

It is no surprise that you believe you can read Dr. Roberts mind. After all, you have claimed the ability to read the mind of Jesus Christ upon the cross.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Paragraph of enlightenment: It is not only Mangum’s defense attorneys, but anyone and everyone connected with the vile and vendetta-driven prosecution of Mangum, who is subsequently under pressure and duress to act in accordance with the wishes of the Powers-That-Be."

Another lie for which you get credit, since there is and never has been any vendetta against Crystal.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The exact actions that took place in the courtroom are unknown as none of the members of the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong were in attendance… this due to them being misled by a scheduled appearance of Ms. Mangum on the Court docket which was for twelve noon, whereas her hearing was actually conducted two hours earlier at ten AM."

That probably happened because you were probably obsessing over Honey Boo Boo instead of paying attention to what was going on.

Now go file a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus to force the court to give you the transcript of the hearing because you believe Crystal's conviction would expose you to hostile action from the carpetbagger jihad.

That might actually benefit you because it might cause a judge to have you involuntarily to a menrtal institution where you might get help.

Now lr's have a big HAH

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HAEE:

"It doesn’t make sense. What does make since is [Dr. Roberts'] desire not to produce a written report about Reginald Daye’s death or the autopsy report by North Carolina Deputy Chief Medical Examiner Clay Nichols."

What makes sense is that Woody Vann would not want a written reort from Dr. Roberts would compromise Crystal's defense.

Let's have another great big HAH.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Courage is a commodity that is in extremely short supply in our society, and the one person who did possess it and stood up in defiance of the Powers-That-Be in order to try and see that justice was done, was himself done in by the justice system with the assistance of the mainstream media… that man of uncommon courage and integrity is former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong."

You are obviously talking about the wrong "former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong." The DA NIFONG from the phoney Duke rape case was a craven coward who has ducked and ran once he failed to bully the innocent Duke Lacrosse defendants.

Anonymous said...

Correction:

SIDNEY HARR:

"It doesn’t make sense. What does make since is [Dr. Roberts'] desire not to produce a written report about Reginald Daye’s death or the autopsy report by North Carolina Deputy Chief Medical Examiner Clay Nichols."

What makes sense is that Woody Vann would not want a written reort from Dr. Roberts because it would compromise Crystal's defense.

Let's have another great big HAH.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

How can you say your blog is THE source of enlightenment and truth when you are concealing evidence that Reginald Daye was not an habitual, violent abuser of women?

Anonymous said...

Right on Homer

Anonymous said...

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Anonymous said...

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer



Anonymous said...

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Anonymous said...

Right on KEN-Homer-HYDERAL

Anonymous said...

Right on, Ken-Hyder-Homer-al

Anonymous said...

Right on, KEN-HYMER-HODER-AL.

Anonymous said...

Homer says:

Right on Smithers

Anonymous said...

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Smith-ers Smith-ers Smith-ers

Anonymous said...

Right on KEN-Homer-HYDER-Smithers-AL

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"...this is the only case that Dr. Roberts has weighed in on wherein she was so concerned about patient privacy concerns that she didn't produce a written report."

This is the only case in which Dr. Roberts has had to fear that Crystal would turn the information to you, who has no right to the information and who has illegally posted confidential information on the web.

While we are talking about confidential information, why are you so reluctant to publish information about your medical career? You are passing yourself off as someone capable of evaluating Dr. Nichols autopsy report. It is relevant whether or not you are indeed capable.

What are you trying to hide. Why do you publish confidential information on others, to accuse others of crimes of which you have no evidence, but do not want to reveal what the "trumped up" crime was?

What was the civil court settlement? What did it reveal about your competence as a physician(or lack thereof?)? As part of the settlement were you required to give up your license and cease the practice of medicine?

There are probably more skeletons in your closet than sardines - which is probably why you resent competent physicians like Dr. Nichols.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"The antics by Dr. Roberts are disgraceful and shoddy. She needs to produce a written report as ordered by Judge Hobgood. As far as patient privacy concerns go, Daye's pertinent medical records have been online now for months. What's the problem?? Rhetorical(We know... she's trying to protect Nichols, Duke, and Durham.)"

She is producing a written report as ordered by Judge Hobgood. What you call disgraceful and shoddy is that you are being denied access to that report.

What gives you the right to view that report?


She is producing a written report after more than five months? I'll believe it when I see it.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"Anonymous said...
According to Liestoppers, a judge has ordered Dr. Christena Roberts to prepare a written report and has ruled that Crystal can review the report. However, Crystal will be with a custodial officer at the time, to prevent Crystal from sharing confidential information with unauthorized persons(read SIDNEY).

Maybe SIDNEY is silent because he is furious and rendered speechless because he will not be able to distort the Roberts report to support his ongoing attempt to frame a dead man who can not defend himself.

The antics by Dr. Roberts are disgraceful and shoddy. She needs to produce a written report as ordered by Judge Hobgood. As far as patient privacy concerns go, Daye's pertinent medical records have been online now for months. What's the problem?? Rhetorical(We know... she's trying to protect Nichols, Duke, and Durham.)"

I predicted SIDNEY would accuse Dr. Roberts of cooperating with the prosecution and defense to discredit Crystal.

I also predicted SIDNEY would go ballistic because he would not be able to view Dr. Roberts' report.

Sidney, why do you not follow Break's exhortation to go to the meeting with Dr. Roberts and make every effort to access her report even if it means a contempt citation and a jail citation? If Martin Luther King Jr. believed in Crystal that is what he would do.

I can see it all now. Sidney goes to the meeting. Peace officers tell him to leave. Peace officers arrest and incarcerate Sidney. Sidney then sues the city of Durham for violating his civil rights because he is a DA NIFONG supporter.

You know, he might also accuse Professor Coleman of being coopted by the carpetbagger jihad because he would not have been there to prevent SIDNEY's arrest.

Anyone have any other thoughts?


The last post I saw for Liestoppers was April 2012. Are you sure that you got the correct source?

As far as Monday's clandestine meeting goes, I have no intention of attending. I'm not crazy... and I'm no glutton for punishment. Besides, I can be more effective on the outside of bars rather than on the inside of them.

Your reverse psycology won't work on me... I'm reverse psychology proof.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"[Dr. Roberts] is producing a written report after more than five months? I'll believe it when I see it."

Looks like you will never believe because you will never see it. My question was, which you characteristically dodge, is what gives you the right to see it?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
The last post I saw for Liestoppers was April 2012. Are you sure that you got the correct source?"

Why don't you look harder at Liestoppers and find out.

"As far as Monday's clandestine meeting goes, I have no intention of attending. I'm not crazy... and I'm no glutton for punishment. Besides, I can be more effective on the outside of bars rather than on the inside of them."

What makes you think you are effective at anything, You seem to have been highly ineffective at being a physician.

"Your reverse psycology won't work on me... I'm reverse psychology proof."

I am trying to enlighten you. You are enlightenment proof.

Anonymous said...

Where's the little man, kennyhyderal?

Anonymous said...

Awwwwwww. has little sidney got his feelings hurt because he isn't invited to the party??? booo hooo...

here's a clue, bro....butt OUT.

Anonymous said...

The thing that drives Harr up the wall is when he is ignored....we all know this. hooray...maybe at last we will get a judge with a pair....

Anonymous said...

Mangum is getting exactly what Harr asked for..... she cannot complain about problems associated with her decision to represent herself. too damn bad! she was warned over and over about the utter stupidity of doing this.....and yet, good old harr pushed her into it. good for him. I am certain he is just peachy happy that she is now flailing about, trying to ask for bond inappropriately, not filing motions timely, and not having a bleepin clue. Dr. Roberts, the judge and Vann are handling this mess correctly. hooray for them.

Anonymous said...

sic em, break! the poor man does not know when his chain is being jerked. your humor is priceless.

Anonymous said...

Hey Lance, quick question for you or for Walt...... if Vann did not ask for a written report from Roberts, can the judge comple Roberts to produce a written report? My guess is that Vann did, in fact, hear from Roberts and that she said the Nichols report and every bit of the medical information from Daye's hospitalization are all in order and correct, i.e., no help to Mangum. Regardless of any report from Roberts, isn't proximate cause applicable here? As in, the Nichols quote. "She stabbed him. He died".

Anonymous said...

The way the H-S portrayed the session and further instructions from the judge sounds completely in order. By the way, sidney, you need to learn a bit about court calendaring. There is NOTHING that compels the court to follow a particular time-of-day schedule for a given case. Get over it. Also your friend Mangum is up the creek if she thinks she can ask a judge, on the fly, to lower her bail and let her out of jail without a motion. you got her into the mess she is in, i.e., representing herself. Now sit in it....

Anonymous said...

The motion wasn't heard because no certificate of service was attached, as required by the Court Rules. Another example of why Ms. Mangum shouldn't be acting as her own lawyer. If she can't follow all of the court rules (and I don't blame her, no one who isn't a lawyer could possibly follow them all), how will she ever be able to get her evidence before the jury? How will she be able to effectively object to any inadmissible evidence the prosecution offers?

Lance the Intern said...

"Hey Lance, quick question for you or for Walt...... if Vann did not ask for a written report from Roberts, can the judge comple Roberts to produce a written report?

Vann didn't ask for a written report because anything written can be considered discoverable, and Vann would have to turn it over to the prosecution. This would give the prosecution time and opportunity to dispute it's claims. It was a good strategy.

Can the judge compel Dr. Roberts to produce a written report? Sure -- if the defense asks for it. Now the defense (Mangum) will have to turn over that report to the prosecution.

Nice work, Sidney.

Lance the Intern said...

From The Herald Sun:

"Vann, who now serves as Mangum’s standby attorney, called the doctor and asked her to send Mangum a written report, but Mangum told the judge she has not received the report.
Vann told the judge that the doctor arranged to meet with the Capital Defender’s Office, which is located just down the street from the courthouse, on Monday to talk to them about what to do because she worries that she may violate medical privacy rules by producing a written report and giving it to Mangum, Vann said."

In other words, she's concerned that the report will end up in Sidney's hands and then posted on this blog.

At least *someone* on the Mangum team is aware of HIPAA....

Lance the Intern said...

Interesting comment from Mangum (as quoted in The Herald Sun:

“My children are in West Virginia with my husband, and I don’t intend to leave them at all.”

I assume this is in reference to Mr. Ramseier. I wonder -- does Crystal still consider him her "husband"?

Anonymous said...

Good question, Lance. Correct me if I am wrong. Mangum has three children. They are not all by the same man. I thought Ramseier (spelling??) was the father of two of them. Does he have physical custody of all three?
Clearly, there have been lots of "male friends" in Mangum's history.

Anonymous said...

Right, Lance, I suspect the last thing Vann would have wanted was a written document from Roberts.....especially since she most likely found that Nichols and DUH documentation was completely in order and not at all favorable to Mangum.

Lance the Intern said...

Anonymous@10:12 -- Mr. Ramseier has custody of the 2 oldest children (the 3rd child, born during the Duke LAX fiasco in January 2007 is not a child of Mr. Ramseier. I don't think the father has been identified).

Anonymous said...

Mangum is no Clarence Gideon, that's for sure.....and her behavior last week just further illustrates the stupidity of the decision she made....to represent herself. "Has a fool for a client" needs to be modified to read "has a morally bankrupt, characterless, sociopathic, intellectually challenged fool for a client"...... sad....

Anonymous said...

When Harr responded to an anonymous poster that he was reverse psychology proof, maybe that poster was trying to get Harr to stay away from the hearing. Maybe reverse psychology worked.

Anonymous said...

I think it is hilarious that Harr, who sang the praises of Dr. Roberts and Vann's decision to obtain an outside hired-gun consultant....AT ONE POINT.......now rants that Roberts is in bed with the nonexistent phantom jihad. Basically, the way this all works in the mind of sicko sidney is that the entire bleepin' world is under the control of Rae Evans with the exception of the lone wolf, harr, who has somehow resisted the evil empire and its queen, Rae Evans. Remember when Roberts was first enegaged? And harr was all kissie-face over it......now, poor Roberts has somehow come into the fold and is protecting Nichols. HI-larious!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous December 11, 2012 4:18 AM

Maybe SIDNEY is using reverse psychology to get Dr. Roberts to prepare a report critical of Dr. Nichols. :-)

Anonymous said...

I was using reverse psychology on KENHYDERAL to get him to stay on the blog. I guess KENNY is also reverse psychology proof.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

I predicted you would try to crash the meeting involving Dr. Roberts. You said you would do the opposite.

Please enlighten us how that shows you are proof against reverse psychology.

Anonymous said...

Sidney, what did the NC Bar say? Did you get a verbal spankin' for player lawyer again?

Lance The Intern said...

By all means Sidney, please, er, enlighten us. What did the NC State Bar say to you?

Anonymous said...

well, sidney, should be all happy...actually. Mangum is representing herself! Isn't that what sidney wanted? so, now what's all the bitching about, sidney? you got your wish, pal. I recall we all heard ad nauseum that Mangum was going to be set free by the truth and that the evil attorneys were all in cahoots and that YOUR plan, to have her be her own worst enemy, er, lawyer, was all that was needed in order to set Mangum free. well, now, what's the delay in this blinding truth that is supposed to, by now, set her free? we were supposed to see photos of the terrible beating she got? all I saw was chapped lips and a mark on her cheek no bigger than a toothpick end. we were supposed to see records of a prior beating's attention at a local urgent care center. Zip. We were supposed to seeing the flaming expose of Nichols' corrupt autopsy findings by the hired gun, Roberts. Zip. We were supposed to find the damaging medical record information from daye's medical murder at the hands of the evil duke doctors. Zip.
So, bro, now we are all just sitting on the edge of our computer chairs, waiting for the next big non-event to non-happen.

Anonymous said...

Since you decided that Mangum is going to defend herself, then I assume that you have a plan for her self defense proof. Something is going to be needed besides mangum getting on the stand and saying "he hit me so I stabbed him". That dog won't quite hunt, sidney. you are going to need evidence...and, so far, it isn't there. tell us your lawyer-wannabe plan for how you and mangum are going to PROVE she stabbed daye in self defense.

Anonymous said...

Even if the photos showed a horrific beating, they would do Ms. Mangum no good unless she knows the rules of evidence. This is what a trial would look like:

MANGUM: Here are photos that show how badly I was beaten.

PROSECUTOR: Objection, your Honor, she can't talk about those photos in front of the jury-- they're not in evidence.

JUDGE: Objection sustained. Ms. Mangum, if you want the jury to see those photos, you have to offer them in evidence.

MANGUM: I offer Defendants' Exhibit A.

PROSECUTOR: Objection, lack of foundation, lack of proper authentication, no chain of custody.

MANGUM: ?????????

Anonymous said...

yeah, poster. you are right. Sad, but my pity for her is tiny, compared to the sorrow I feel for the Reginald Daye family.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous December 11, 2012 11:11 AM:

Considering who Crystal's legal mentor has been, is it any wonder she performs so uniquely. Sidney Harr's most notable legal non-accomplishments are based on an expectation that uncorroborated allegations are proof.

Anonymous said...

So, sidney, you think it's fair for poster to consider you a serial criminal because there was a criminal charge made against you at some point in your past? You think posters are allowed to draw conclusions that you are a criminal, and assert these conclusions as "facts"? You must think this is completely fair because this is precisely the behavior in which you engage when you label Mr. Daye an alcoholic and woman beating wild man...........based on ONE charges, from years ago, that was DROPPED.....much less changed" to a civil matter and settled out of court"....which is what you claim in your past.
Surely the pot can continue to call the kettle black....