Sid,The sharlog does not open on an ipad. Can you provide a summary?
Anonymous said...Answer me this: To what did they attribute Daye's severe agitation? They certainly didn't call for a psychiatric consultation.The originally considered DTs, so they started treatment, since that didn't affect the agitation, they excluded DTs as the cause, and were looking for other causes when the esophageal intubation happened, Daye became brain dead, and his agitation was moot.They did suspect, but ruled out, DTs.One doesn't rule out delirium tremens because the agitation doesn't cease after several doses of sedatives. Daye had severe delirium tremens that did not respond to a large amount of sedation. He obviously required more sedative.
Anonymous Anonymous said...Sid,The sharlog does not open on an ipad. Can you provide a summary?I'll try to prepare a written document, but it'll take a day or two to upload it. In the future I'll try to automatically provide text to accompany the sharlog.
Does the new sharlog address the speculation that you could have murdered Daye?
Absolutely nothing new ... same old discredited comments from earlier. It's still funny that you point to Dr. Roberts for everything, but her conclusions, which disagrees with you, so you say it must be a lie.I can't wait til you bring up the debunked felony murder (which was never in play based on the charges), and the inadmissible criminal record.I really hope you aren't the sad old man your obsessions paint you to. You need a boyfriend, or someone else to take your mind off your obsessions.
stop bullying dr. harr you evil duke troll
I am not bullying Sid. I asked for a summary because the sharlog does not open on an ipad.
Harr is the troll ... This entire blog is a complete and total joke.
To Anonymous at 8:17 AM and 2:23 PM:Please stop your evil, mean, hate-filled, nonsensical, crazy making comments.
Sid:Given that you have a medical degree and that you once worked in the medical field and, more specifically, for hospitals, isn't it a conflict of interest for you to advocate on behalf of Mangum? How have you addressed this conflict? Have you advised Mangum of your conflict?
Sid is so completely and totally wrong and ridiculous it's funny. This blog is a total joke - he has zero credibility. I am sure he will keep posting to feed his ego, but beyond that this blog has no point. There is nothing significant he hasn't been proven wrong on but that he still doesn't deny.I just hope he isn't seriousncsuse if he is that's really sad and pathetic.
Anonymous 8:17, 2:23, 4:44 and 5:01,Please mind your manners.
To Anonymous at 4:44 PM and 5:01 PM:We have all had just about enough of your evil, mean, hate-filled, nonsensical, crazy making comments.
stop bullying me you evil duke troll
6:00Please mind your manners.
Please mind your manners so the rest of can have a civil conversation.
Anonymous at 6:00 PM:You are ruining this blog for Sid and the rest of us with your evil, mean, hate-filled, nonsensical, crazy making comments. You need to behave.
What was really outrageous was the very lenient sentence she received for killing someone but women do tend to get a free pass.She should have bee prosecuted for making up a ridiculous story about being gang raped in a bathroom that was too small.Mangum had a criminal record even before that.
dr. harr the evil duke trolls at this website are cyberbullies and should be banned from your blog so that we can discuss the points you make in your posts which show that the durham system needs reform and is controlled by duke and the powers that be who only care about themselves and who have conflicts of interest.
But his points are wrong - you really don't care? You know he considers this blog a joke and laughs at you with the rest of us. Sid is as big into Duke as anyone. They like to laugh at your paranoia.And you believe the conflict that Meier worked for a healthcare company. You don't think Sid's is worse?I will say Sid did have a hearty chuckle yesterday after your latest rant.
seriously you are insanethe ONLY one ranting here is yourself evil duke troll it - against yourself (again)blah
Anonymous 6:55:Please mind your manners.
blahblahblah(in case anyone, (Dr. Harr), wonders - the evil duke troll it is on a roll again (for its own amusement as self-professed by it)
Please mind your manners.
yeah g... - mind your manners evil duke troll it that you areblah
Anonymous 8:08:Please mind your manners.
fy evil duke troll it g...blah
the only joke at this blog is the evil duke trolls who can't accept that dr. harr proved that duke controls durham and then falsely accused him to deny him his freedom of speech because of their conflicts of interest with the citizens of durham and north carolina.
Anonymous 8:11:Please mind your manners.
Anonymous 8:13:Your comment is quite thought-provoking.Why, if Duke controls Durham, did they orchestrate the attempt to deliberately frame three of their own students for felonies? They must be incredibly stupid. The publicity from the unsuccessful frame caused many to conclude that Duke is led by a group of immoral administrators and trustees. Even if they had been successful in the frame, Duke would have lost respect.This is a fascinating topic. Please expand on your thoughts. Thanks.
truly - do you think anyone is actually amused - even yourself - i mean - does this amuse you to consistently troll yourself in order JUST to troll?we get ityou are a trollso trollish that you troll yourself over and over again in order just to trollblah
Anonymous 8:27:Please mind your manners.
Anonymous 8:27:No you misunderstand me. I really would like to understand why Duke attempted to deliberately frame it's own students. I find that behavior despicable.
well since you trolled yourself to ask that question - why don't you expand upon your own thoughts evil duke troll it g...?
Anonymous 8:49, 8:27, 8:13:One of the interesting questions that arises from your allegation the Duke orchestrated the attempt to deliberately frame its own students is whether Nifong was part of this deliberate attempt or whether he was the honorable minister of justice Sid describes. He could have been completely oblivious to the frame being attempted by Duke and its minions in the Durham Police. On the other hand, Nifong could well have been part of the Duke team. When the frame attempt failed, Duke decided that Nifong was expendable and he became the scapegoat for Duke's evil attempt.This really is fascinating.
Anonymous 8:49:Please mind your manners
i didn't say any of that evil duke troll it g... i am not talking on this blog right now much anyway except to Dr. Harr and to fight you off continuously as you troll on and on - and you know it since you are simply trolling yourself over and over again (as usual) even to fight yourself off (which is really weird btw - but hey that's you)stop trying to pretend to be me - it is not workingyou certainly are a prime example of the evil duke promotes - i am sure they are laughing along with you as you troll onblah
Anonymous 9:16:i didn't say any of that You did not allege directly that Duke attempted to deliberately frame its own student, but that was the logical conclusion of your statement. If Duke controls Durham, its own students would not have been deliberately framed without its support. stop trying to pretend to be me I am trying to discuss a particularly interest subject you raised. I am not pretending to be you. No one could possibly meet that standard.
i didn't raise it trollyou trolled yourself again evil duke troll it g...answer your own question - you seem to be master of framing yourself eh - and my, what framing projections you spin
Anonymous 9:28:I will suggest two theories as to why Duke attempted to deliberately frame its own students as Anonymous 8:13 implies. As I noted, if Duke controls Durham and the Durham justice system as 8:13 so eloquently states, it must have supported, if not orchestrated, the frame attempt.The first theory I have is, that like Leopold and Loeb, duke wanted to see if it could get away with the perfect crime. This theory is completely consistent with 8:13's description of Duke as completely evil. The second theory is that someone (perhaps Nifong) was becoming too independent and Duke was finding it more difficult to control that person. As a result, they decided to frame their own students for a heinous crime. This would send a message. If Duke would sacrifice its own students, they would have no mercy for those who were trying to break away.Which theory do you believe is more compelling?
since they framed Ms. Mangum with murder by killing Mr. Daye with their preventable avoidable deadly malpractice and collaberating with the ME system to commit fraud and even more professional malpractice to cover it up ... the fear mongering and threatening duke environment scenerio certainly does not seem unlikely
By definition malpractice is a mistake, not intentional.You are still a complete idiot who has shown that you refuse to read anything that doesn't fit your world view. That's why Sid is laughing at you - you are a complete and total joke. Lawyers sue Duke all the time - explain that if Duke is so powerful?You really need to start taking your meds again.
You do understand that Mangum committed a felony without Duke, right? Because the Jury didn't believe self-defense, she was guilty of a serious felony, it only became murder when Daye died. So, even if Duke did kill Daye, Crystal would still be a convicted felon.How did Duke affect that? Did Duke cause her to stab Daye?
seriously g... you are an evil duke troll with projection issues (as well as other serious issues)don't troll me againthanksblah
Do other readers have any thoughts about Anonymous 8:13's implication that Duke orchestrated the attempt to deliberately frame it's own students? I wonder what Sid will have to say.
Anonymous 10:02:Your insight is truly amazing. Duke framed its students back in 2006 to see if they could get away with a perfect crime. They failed, but successfully deflected all of the blame on Nifong.They learned valuable lessons from this unsuccessful frame. These lessons informed their actions in the successful 2011 frame of Mangum.We all benefit from your wisdom.
Anonymous at 10:13 AM:Please mind your behavior. Your evil, mean, hate-filled, nonsensical, crazy making comments and endless "blahs" are tiresome and a distraction to those of us who are trying to engage in serious discussion.
To Anonymous at 10:17:As someone who once worked in the medical field and for a hospital, Sid is seriously conflicted and cannot possibly advocate on behalf of Mangum in this matter. He is part of the conspiracy.
fy g... as you try to frame onremember thatyour own imitation of duke's evilhow special
Anonymous 10:32:Please mind your manners. No obscenities should be permitted on this board.
neither should you evil duke troll it g...do not troll me againagainblah
Ha ha ... Sid you were right ... He didn't have anything new to say only troll and blah ... I guess the first round is on me.
Anonymous at 10:56 AM:Please control yourself.
It looks like Duke will have another strong lacrosse team this season.Let's hope they can make it three national championships in row.Fortunately Crystal will be rotting in prison for many years to come although she should be executed like in the good old days.
Sidney,I wanted to highlight a number of posts from an anonymous poster of who you have spoken highly in the past as having made enlightened comments.Consider the comments made at the following times:10/11 8:17am10/11 2:23pm10/11 4:44pm10/11 5:01pm10/11 6:00pm10/12 4:34am10/12 6:55am10/12 7:55am10/12 8:08am10/12 8:11am10/12 8:27am10/12 8:49am10/12 9:16am10/12 9:28am10/12 10:13am10/12 10:32am10/12 10:56amThese comments provoked numerous reminders urging the poster to mind his manners and to control himself. Although the poster posted additional comments, these 17 posts contain no statements of any value. Rather they rely on gratuitous ad hominem attacks, at times containing thinly disguised obscenities. Sidney, I ask you: Is this how you want your blog to be remembered?
frack you isn't a 4 letter word obsenity evil duke troll itbut to repeat myself - quit trolling yourself in order to appear to be trolling me and fy
I guess we can add 7:21 p.m. to the list.
g... being evil duke troll it g...how special
And 8:29, too.
so ... g... it's been you being the insane evil duke troll it all this time ... whom everyone agrees is rather ill and commits hate crimes at will (well basically when ignored)how many people (er trolls) do you troll yourself and everyone else on this blog with ... eh?
Don't forget the 9:39.
good ol' evil duke troll it g...trolling onblah
Anonymous at 7:21 PM, 8:29 PM, 9:39 PM and 10:26 PM:Your posts add nothing of value and speak poorly of you. Please behave yourself.
Anyone wanna bet that Sid will still mention the following things that are wrong in part 2:1. Daye's inadmissible prior record;2. Felony murder;3. Violation of the Brady rule.None of those are valid, as has been repeatedly explained, but that clearly won't stop him.He's as predictable as paranoid tin-foil troll who is too stupid and delusional to see straight.
fy evil duke troll it g...blahNote: feel free to plagerize and repeat the above after every one of your posts ... just for amusement and all ... g...
To Anonymous at 5:02 AM and 5:15 AM:Please control yourself.
Such an evil, mean, hate-filled, nonsensical, crazy making comment.
Anon at 6:04 am:We are all getting tired of your antics. Straighten up and fly right!
Please try to control yourself. You are destroying this blog.
Anonymous at 6:47 AM:Please mind your manners.
The above comment is directed to Anonymous at 6:49 AM.
Anonymous @ 7:32 AM:You need to behave yourself. If youi can't contribute something positive, don't post.
Anonymous 9:34:If you expect people to take you seriously you need to behave yourself.
The above is directed at Anonymous at 9:37. She posts so much nonsense, it's hard to keep it straight. I apologize to Anonymous at 9:34.
fy evil duke troll it g(s)...blah
Anonymous said...Sid:Given that you have a medical degree and that you once worked in the medical field and, more specifically, for hospitals, isn't it a conflict of interest for you to advocate on behalf of Mangum? How have you addressed this conflict? Have you advised Mangum of your conflict?Being a physician I do have empathy for other physicians... including Dr. Nichols. In fact, when I first wrote Dr. Radisch and asked her to resolve the issue I did so in hopes of preventing Dr. Nichols from ending up a scapegoat. Also, I wrote Orange County D.A. Jim Woodall and requested that he not bring criminal charges against Dr. Nichols... although I did ask him to investigate the Daye case. However, any concerns I have for Dr. Nichols' career and reputation are outweighed by my concern for justice and the release from jail of an innocent Tar Heelian... Crystal Mangum.Let me know if further elucidation is required.
Anonymous said...Does the new sharlog address the speculation that you could have murdered Daye?Not possible as I have not been on any Duke University/Duke University Hospital property since April 14, 2010, and I never intend to do so. As you know, Daye died at Duke University Hospital.
Anonymous said...It looks like Duke will have another strong lacrosse team this season.Let's hope they can make it three national championships in row.Fortunately Crystal will be rotting in prison for many years to come although she should be executed like in the good old days.Don't count on Mangum rotting in prison for many years to come. I'm not going to allow that to happen. True, she's been in much longer than I had anticipated, but I underestimated the resolve and deniability of the hate-mongering people in positions of power who lack Nifongian courage. Ergo, it's taking longer than I would've hoped, but Mangum will be free sooner rather than later.
Anonymous Anonymous said...Sidney,I wanted to highlight a number of posts from an anonymous poster of who you have spoken highly in the past as having made enlightened comments.Consider the comments made at the following times:10/11 8:17am10/11 2:23pm10/11 4:44pm10/11 5:01pm10/11 6:00pm10/12 4:34am10/12 6:55am10/12 7:55am10/12 8:08am10/12 8:11am10/12 8:27am10/12 8:49am10/12 9:16am10/12 9:28am10/12 10:13am10/12 10:32am10/12 10:56amThese comments provoked numerous reminders urging the poster to mind his manners and to control himself. Although the poster posted additional comments, these 17 posts contain no statements of any value. Rather they rely on gratuitous ad hominem attacks, at times containing thinly disguised obscenities. Sidney, I ask you: Is this how you want your blog to be remembered? I want my blog to be remembered for its enlightened postings rather than the comments of commenters. Naturally, I can't control the commenters, and really don't want to... and policing the comments would tend to take valuable time, of which I have little when in the library.I want people to consider foremost the content of the posting and not of the comments.
Anyone wanna bet that Sid will still mention the following things that are wrong in part 2:1. Daye's inadmissible prior record;2. Felony murder;3. Violation of the Brady rule.None of those are valid, as has been repeatedly explained, but that clearly won't stop him.He's as predictable as paranoid tin-foil troll who is too stupid and delusional to see straight.Actually, Part Two doesn't mention Daye's lengthy criminal record and it doesn't talk about the "felony-murder rule." Reason Five does briefly mention how the exculpatory Roberts report was withheld from Mangum by her attorneys.The fact is that the reasons already listed are more than adequate to have the conviction overturned.Part Two will be hopefully posted by tomorrow (Tuesday) afternoon.
It bears repeating that a report that concluded that Mangum's stab wound caused Mr. Daye's death is not exculpatory for Mangum.
To Anonymous at 11:50 AM:Stop behaving like such an evil, mean, hate-filled, nonsensical, crazy making punk. It is not appropriate or becoming.
Reason Five does briefly mention how the exculpatory Roberts report was withheld from Mangum by her attorneys.Except it isn't exculpatory because it agrees with the ultimate conclusion ... I realize you think she was lying, but unless you think she would have admitted that on the stand, and not had her credibility destroyed, she would have sunk Crystal.So, you are still completely and totally delusional and wrong.That's why no one takes you seriously - you stick to your debunked arguments, and can't adjust.
Sidney said,"Mangum will be free sooner rather than later."Sidney: sooner than what? sooner that 2029?
Dr. Harr,Aren't the things done by Dr. Nichols, and possibly Duke, and others who covered up the malpractice and the obviously fraudulent ME report(s) illegal - nevermind worrying about getting them 'fired'.
Sidney said,"policing the comments would tend to take valuable time, of which I have little when in the library."Sidney, don't you realize that, if not for people like the 8:17, 2:23, 4:44, etc., poster, your blog would not be classified as a "hate site", and you would be able to access the blog from your building, rather than having to go wait in line at the library?
fy evil duke troll it g... and hate-crime blog mongerblah
You are out of control. Mind your manners.
fy evil duke troll it g(s)... and hate-crime blog mongerblah
Dr. Harr,What is the law about falsifying medical records?
Please try and behave yourself.
Mind your manners please.
Sid said: "I can't control the commenters, and I really don't want to."Translation: the trolls have won.Congratulations to all who contributed.
I want people to consider foremost the content of the posting and not of the comments.But the content of the posting just keeps repeating the same discredited crap over and over and over. There is nothing left to comment on in the postings - it's already been said, and you refuse to admit you are wrong, even when you clearly are - so the comments are the only place to get some enjoyment out of this blog anymore.It would be nice if you got rid of the paranoid Duke guy, his delusions ruin everything, and his constant claiming he is the victim on hate crimes when he is the only one who hates is distressing.But, the blog and the content are all jokes, you know that. But, it feeds your ego, so you are happy.
Sidney: sooner than what? sooner that 2029?To be fair, if she serves her maximum 17 years and 9 months, she will be out in 2027, so Sid will have her out by 2029.Assuming she doesn't act the fool in custody and serves her minimum, she will be out in 2024 or 2025. Let's hope she doesn't listen to Sid and stays out of trouble in custody.
Dr. Harr,At the end of the last sharlog sometroll posted a previous post that I had made questioning the Super Duper Cooper status of things.Your reply to that led to my questioning the wellbeing of the nation and the state if the people were required to always have to choose between evils in order to exercise their rights to vote.My line of thought runs similar when thinking of voting for either McCory or Cooper for the next governor since they are ignoring the obvious fraud and threat to all citizens of this state by ignoring the issues in Ms. Mangum's case. I mean - as we speak - they continue to ignore - and more continue to get harmed as they ignore the harm caused by what they ignore. Why vote for that type possibly deadly outcomes if you (as the people) are harmed by what you vote for either way????
Your reply to that led to my questioning the wellbeing of the nation and the state if the people were required to always have to choose between evils in order to exercise their rights to voteI question the wellbeing of you if you take anything Sid says seriously. But, you are winning me a lot of free drinks. Sid keeps trying to get more and more ridiculous to see if people still take him seriously.I bet him a drink everytime someone actually takes him seriously, and you keep doing it.Thanks (and yes, this is all just a joke to Sid).
obviously in your mind this blog is all about you - so your welcome
Sid ... one problem you still have, and completely ignore is that you keep saying that because you believe Daye didn't die due to the stab wound, Crystal should never have been charged.Thing is, as has been explained to you - unless the stabbing was self-defense, it's still a felony. It may not be murder, but it's still a felony.You still haven't explained anything you'd have done differently in the self-defense phase (except Daye's inadmissible record).If her attorneys betrayed her, why did they try so hard for self-defense?
The blog isn't about me, it's about Sid and his ego. The rest of us are just bit players in his show.
so your mindless ego maniac puppets, is that what you are obviously trying to imply?
so your mindless ego maniac puppets, is that what you are obviously trying to imply?Do you mean you're, short for you are? Cause your doesn't fit there.And, no, I'm not implying it, I'm directly saying that you are a mindless puppet for Sid's ego.
yeah righti'm not playing a bit part like you just stated that you are evil duke troll it g...too bad about your recent demise to your own evil duke trollish bad manners and behaviorsblah
Please behave yourself. Use your manners.
What the frack is going on here? I leave for a little while and come back hoping to be elucidated by a nice shlog, but all I find are these evil, mean, hate-filled, nonsensical, crazy making comments from a bunch of insane hate-crime blog mongers.blahblahblah
Post a Comment