Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Facebook Badge
Subscribe!
Labels
- "60 Minutes" (3)
- "Bill LuMaye Show" (2)
- "Black Wind" (1)
- "Blood Done Sign My Name" (1)
- "Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong" (20)
- "Forsaken: A novel" (1)
- "Good Morning America" (1)
- "Innocent Promulgation of 04-11-07" (10)
- "Mike Nifong Mistake" (3)
- "Missoula" (1)
- "Picking Cotton" (1)
- "Price of Silence" (1)
- "Super-Duper Cooper" (13)
- "Survivor" (1)
- "The Last Lawyer" (1)
- "wrong-ender" (1)
- #MeToo Movement (1)
- 14 News Carolina (1)
- 38 un-indicted LAX players (2)
- 60 Minutes (1)
- A.G. Josh Stein (1)
- ABC 11 News (4)
- ABC 2006 Primary Poll (1)
- ABC News (1)
- ACLU (2)
- ACLU legal director Katy Parker (3)
- Admissions (1)
- Affirmatives (1)
- African American voters (1)
- Akiel Denkins (1)
- Al Bellamy (1)
- Al McSurely (2)
- Alan Gell (26)
- Alex J. Hagan (1)
- Alvin Keller (2)
- Amanda Martin (2)
- Amy Shlosberg Ph.D. (1)
- Andrew Breitbart (1)
- Angela Garcia-Lamarca (15)
- Ann B. Petersen (4)
- Ann Kirby (1)
- Anna M. Davis (1)
- Anne Blythe (3)
- Anne Petersen (2)
- Anthony Baker (5)
- Anthony Green (1)
- Anthony Wilson (1)
- Antoinetta Yvonne McCoy (1)
- Antwan Jamison (1)
- Ashleigh Banfield (1)
- Ashley Moore (1)
- Associated Press (1)
- Asst. A.G. John Schaeffer (3)
- Attorney Alex Hagan (1)
- Attorney General Josh Stein (1)
- Attorney General's Office (3)
- Attorney Kathryn Shields (2)
- Attorney Kimberly Rehberg (2)
- Auschwitz (1)
- autopsy report (1)
- Aykia Hanes (1)
- B.W. Collier (1)
- Barry Saunders (4)
- Batman (1)
- Belinda Foster (4)
- Ben and Jerry's (1)
- Bev Perdue (9)
- biased media (1)
- Bill Kenerly (3)
- Bill O'Reilly (1)
- Bill Wolfe (22)
- blog commenters (1)
- Bob Ashley (1)
- Bob Bennett (1)
- Bob Gaesslin (1)
- Bob Wilson (1)
- Brad Bannon (6)
- Brad Miller (1)
- Brady Rule (2)
- Branny Vickory (1)
- Breck Archer (1)
- Brian Davis (1)
- Brian Meehan (5)
- Brittany Pinkham (1)
- Brittany Willis (11)
- Bryant Harrison Dennis (1)
- Butch Davis (1)
- Caitlin Breedlove (2)
- Campbell Univ. School of Law (2)
- Capitol Broadcasting Company (1)
- Carissa Hessick (1)
- Carletta Alston (6)
- Carlos Mahoney (2)
- Carlos Wilson (2)
- carpetbagger jihad (26)
- Carpetbaggers (1)
- Caulton Tudor (1)
- CBS News (4)
- CBS-17 News (1)
- CDPL (1)
- Charlene Coggins-Franks (17)
- Charles M. Blow (1)
- Charles Poll (1)
- Cheryl Teh (1)
- Chief Justice Cheri Beasley (1)
- Chris Cuomo (1)
- Chris Shella (9)
- Christine Mumma (4)
- Christopher Ray McBride (1)
- Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner (1)
- Civil lawsuit against Duke (4)
- Clay Nichols MD (43)
- Clayton Jones (2)
- Clerk John Brubaker (1)
- Clerk of Courts (1)
- Clerk Peter Moore (1)
- Clive Cussler (1)
- CNN (1)
- Colin Campbell (1)
- Collin Finnerty (4)
- Colon Willoughby (11)
- Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong (2)
- Congresswoman Deborah Ross (1)
- correspondence (1)
- Cory Harrison (1)
- Court TV Live (1)
- Craig Taylor (1)
- Crystal Mangum (230)
- Crystal Worley (1)
- Cy Gurney (1)
- Cyril H. Wecht (1)
- D.A. Leon Stanback (2)
- D.A. Lorrin Freeman (7)
- D.A. Satana Deberry (5)
- Daily Mail (1)
- Damont Eli White (1)
- Dan Blue (1)
- Daniel Dale (1)
- Daniel E. Atkinson (1)
- Daniel Meier (20)
- Daniel Snyder (1)
- Darryl Howard (1)
- Dave Evans (7)
- David Hall (1)
- David Hoke (25)
- David Levi (5)
- David Price (6)
- David Ranii (1)
- David Rudolf (1)
- David Williamson (1)
- Dawn Kavanaugh (1)
- death penalty (1)
- Debbie Blay (1)
- Debbie Crane (1)
- Debbie Yow (2)
- Deborah Ross (1)
- Debra Goldman (1)
- Demario Atwater (1)
- Demetria Green (2)
- Demetrius Green (3)
- Dept of Administration (1)
- Deputy Sheriff Robert Davis (1)
- Derrick Allen (4)
- Detroit News (1)
- Devon Sherwood (1)
- DHHS (2)
- Diane Rehm (1)
- Dillon Tart (1)
- disbarment (1)
- dismissal (1)
- Dixie Wells (1)
- DNA evidence (1)
- Domestic violence (2)
- Donald Brunson (5)
- Donald Trump (1)
- Donna Hargens (1)
- Donnie Harrison (1)
- Dottie Amtey (6)
- Dr Cyril Wecht (1)
- Dr. Aldona Wos (2)
- Dr. Christena L. Roberts (23)
- Dr. Clay Nichols (44)
- Dr. Cyril H. Wecht (5)
- Dr. Cyril Wecht (39)
- Dr. Deborah Radisch (8)
- Dr. Faye Sultan (1)
- Dr. Luigi Pascarella (5)
- Dr. Mandy Cohen (9)
- Dr. Michelle Aurelius (21)
- Dr. Nichols' autopsy report (1)
- Dr. Ralph Erdmann (1)
- Dr. Sabino Zani (1)
- Dr. Sidney Harr (24)
- Duane Deaver (4)
- Duke discrimination (5)
- Duke Discrimination incident (2)
- Duke Energy (1)
- Duke Hospital (10)
- Duke Lacrosse case (39)
- Duke lacrosse defendants (9)
- Duke Lacrosse Myth (1)
- Duke lacrosse team (2)
- Duke Law School (1)
- Duke University (20)
- Duke University Hospital (13)
- Dukegate Discrimination Scandal (1)
- Durham (5)
- Durham Confederate Statue (1)
- Durham D.A. Satana Deberry (1)
- Durham District Attorney's Office (11)
- Durham Fire Dept. (3)
- Durham legislators (1)
- Durham Police Dept. (6)
- Durham Postmaster (1)
- Durham-in-Wonderland (1)
- Dwayne Dail (2)
- Dwight Ransome (2)
- Earl Deans Jr. (1)
- Ed Clark (1)
- Edwin West III (1)
- Elden Perry (1)
- Eliot Ness (2)
- Ellis & Winters LLP (1)
- Ellis and Winters (2)
- Ellis and Winters LLP (1)
- Eric Ferreri (1)
- Eric Leak (1)
- Erick Daniels (21)
- Erin Hartness (1)
- esophageal intubation (4)
- Essie Justice Group (1)
- Evan Lawrence (1)
- Eve Carson (1)
- Everett Withers (1)
- ex mero motu (1)
- F. Lane Williamson (5)
- Felony murder rule (1)
- First Amendment Rights (1)
- Fix the Court (4)
- flog (2)
- Floyd Brown (11)
- Floyd McKissick (6)
- Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals (1)
- Freda Black (5)
- Friends of Crystal Mangum (1)
- G. K. Butterfield (2)
- Gabe Roth (5)
- George Goode (2)
- George Zimmerman (2)
- Gladys Harris (1)
- Glen Edward Chapman (3)
- Glenn Kessler (1)
- Gov. Jim Hunt (1)
- Gov. Pat McCrory (4)
- Gov. William Holden (2)
- Governor Roy Cooper (2)
- Grady Balentine Jr. (3)
- Grand Jury (2)
- Gregory Boykin (2)
- Gregory C. Butler (3)
- Gregory Taylor (39)
- Gregory Wallace (1)
- guiowen (1)
- Habeas corpus (2)
- Hammond and Hammond (6)
- Happy Holiday (1)
- Harry Dolan (1)
- HB2 (1)
- HBO (1)
- Heather Holley (4)
- Heather Holly (1)
- Henry Louis Gates Jr. (3)
- Henry Louis Gates Jr. near-arrest (1)
- Henry McCollum (1)
- Herald Sun (6)
- Hilary Thompson (1)
- Holden Thorp (1)
- Holly Madison (1)
- Hope Turlington (1)
- Howard S. Boney Jr. (2)
- Hugo Chavez (1)
- I. Beverly Lake (3)
- Ingrid Newkirk (1)
- Innocence Inquiry Commission (1)
- Investigative Report (2)
- Irving Joyner (2)
- Isaac Stroud (1)
- J. Andrew Curliss (1)
- J. Donald Cowan (1)
- Jackie Wagstaff (1)
- Jacquetta Thomas (7)
- Jadon Higganbothan (1)
- Jaki Shelton Green (1)
- James Arthur Johnson (42)
- James Coleman (9)
- James Coman (2)
- James Cooney III (2)
- James E. Williams Jr. (1)
- James Goodmon (14)
- Jameson Marks (1)
- Janell Hobson (1)
- Janie Sutton (1)
- Jason Sarlanis (1)
- Jay Stroud (1)
- Jedi mind-trick (10)
- Jeff Zucker (2)
- Jennifer Geisser (1)
- Jesse Helms (3)
- Jesus of Nazareth (2)
- Jim Cooney (1)
- Jim Goodmon (3)
- Jim Hardin (3)
- Jim O'Neill (1)
- Jim Woodall (5)
- Joe Freeman Britt (1)
- Joe Gibbs (1)
- Joe Rowand (2)
- John Drescher (2)
- John Hope Franklin (1)
- John June (1)
- John Kerry (1)
- John McCann (1)
- John Podhoretz (1)
- John Schaeffer (2)
- John Sherrill (2)
- John Tedesco (1)
- John Tyler (1)
- Johnny Beck (8)
- Johnny Gaskins (2)
- Johnny Manziel (1)
- Johnny West (2)
- Johnson Britt (1)
- Jon Krakauer (1)
- Jon Powell (1)
- Jonathan Broyhill (1)
- Jonna Spilbor (1)
- Jose Lopez (3)
- Joseph Arbour (1)
- Joseph Cheshire (13)
- Joseph Neff (6)
- Josh Gordon (1)
- Josh Stein (3)
- Joshua Wrenn (2)
- Juan Williams (1)
- Judge Abe Jones (4)
- Judge Bryan Collins (5)
- Judge Carl Fox (2)
- Judge Carolyn Thompson (11)
- Judge Catherine Eagles (3)
- Judge Chris Dillon (1)
- Judge Claude Allen (10)
- Judge Doretta Walker (2)
- Judge Jacqueline Brewer (2)
- Judge James Beaty (1)
- Judge James Dever III (1)
- Judge Jennifer Knox (3)
- Judge Joi Peake (1)
- Judge Joi Peakes (1)
- Judge Kenneth Titus (1)
- Judge Linda F. Nelson (2)
- Judge Linda Nelson (1)
- Judge Loretta Biggs (1)
- Judge Louise Flanagan (2)
- Judge Mark Sternlicht (5)
- Judge Melissa Lassiter (1)
- Judge Michael Morgan (3)
- Judge Michael O'Foghludha (6)
- Judge Orlando Hudson (12)
- Judge Osmond Smith (5)
- Judge Patricia Timmons-Goodson (1)
- Judge Paul Gessner (2)
- Judge Paul Ridgeway (20)
- Judge Phil Berger Jr. (4)
- Judge Rebecca Holt (1)
- Judge Richard E. Myers II (1)
- Judge Robert Hobgood (5)
- Judge Thomas Schroeder (1)
- Judge Valerie Zachary (1)
- Judge Wanda Bryant (1)
- judicial integrity (1)
- Julius Jones (1)
- Justice 4 Nifong Facebook (1)
- Justice Anita Earls (1)
- Justice Bob Orr (1)
- Justice Stephen Breyer (5)
- Justice v. Law (1)
- Kalvin Michael Smith (1)
- Katherine E. Jean (2)
- Kathleen Bertrand (1)
- Kathryn Shields (1)
- Kathy Taft (1)
- Keith Adams (1)
- Keith Olbermann (1)
- Keith Richardson (4)
- Keith Sutton (1)
- Kelly Gauger (11)
- Ken Rose (1)
- Kendall Coffey (1)
- Kendall Jones (1)
- kenhyderal (1)
- Kenneth Kagonyera (1)
- Kenneth Meeks (3)
- Kenneth Wainstein (2)
- Kerry Sutton (3)
- kidnapped Nigerian girls (1)
- Kimberly M. Rehberg (2)
- Kindle account (1)
- Kirk Osborn (1)
- Kody Kinsley (3)
- Krista Foberg (1)
- Kristen Snipes (1)
- Kwada Temoney (5)
- L. F. Eason (1)
- Labrian Lynch (1)
- lacrosse (1)
- Lakeisha Carter (2)
- Lamar Allen Johnson (1)
- LaMonte Armstrong (1)
- Larceny of chose in action (8)
- Larry Hall (6)
- Larry Leake (1)
- Larry Phillips (1)
- Larry Stogner (1)
- Lavern Reed (1)
- Lennon Lacy (4)
- Leon Brown (1)
- Leonard Earl Wilson (1)
- Lesley Stahl (2)
- Lethally Blonde (1)
- Levon "Bo" Jones (1)
- libel and defamation (4)
- Liestoppers (1)
- Linwood Wilson (4)
- Lt. Gov.Walter Dalton (1)
- Luke DeCock (1)
- Mack Bolan (1)
- Mack Paul (1)
- Magistrate B. Wakil (9)
- Magistrate Judge Kimberly Swank (1)
- Magistrate Judge P. Trevor Sharp (6)
- mainstream media (9)
- Major Garrett (1)
- malicious prosecution (10)
- Man from Nazareth (2)
- Mandy Locke (7)
- Mani Dexter (4)
- Margaret Schucker (2)
- Mark Davis (1)
- Mark Emmert (1)
- Mark Isley (1)
- Mark McCullough (3)
- Mark Nelson (1)
- Mark Rabil (1)
- Mark Simeon (1)
- Markeith Council (1)
- Martin Baron (2)
- Martina Lemmons (1)
- Mary Winstead (1)
- Matthew Wilson (1)
- McClatchy Newspapers (2)
- media (6)
- medical malpractice (1)
- Meghan Sacks Ph.D. (1)
- Megyn Kelly (1)
- Melanie Sanders (1)
- Melanie Shekita (1)
- Michael Curtis (1)
- Michael Dorman (1)
- Michael Gaynor (1)
- Michael McAdoo (1)
- Michael Parker (11)
- Michael Peterson (6)
- Michael Schoenfeld (8)
- Michael Vick (4)
- Michele Andi Stein (1)
- Michelle Brimhall (1)
- Mickey Michaux (7)
- Mike Easley (10)
- Mike Nifong (142)
- Mike Pressler (2)
- Mike S. Adams (1)
- Milton Fitch (7)
- Milton Walker (5)
- Minister of Justice (10)
- misprision of felony (2)
- Mitt Romney (1)
- Moses Carey Jr. (1)
- Motion for Appropriate Relief (1)
- Motion for Default and Summary Judgment (1)
- MSNBC (4)
- murder at Duke Hospital (1)
- N.C. State Bar (14)
- NAACP (6)
- Nana Duffuor (3)
- NBC-17 News (3)
- NBC-Universal (1)
- NC ACLU (2)
- NC Black Caucus (2)
- NC Center for Actual Innocence (1)
- NC Coalition Against Domestic Violence (3)
- NC Court of Appeals (11)
- NC Department of Justice (1)
- NC DHHS (9)
- NC General Assembly (3)
- NC Judicial Standards Commission (4)
- NC Legislative Black Caucus (2)
- NC Medical Board (1)
- NC Medical Examiner's Office (3)
- NC OCME (4)
- NC Office of Administrative Hearings (3)
- NC SBI (1)
- NC State Bar (11)
- NC Supreme Court (1)
- NC Task Force on Racial Equity in Criminal Justice (1)
- NCAA (3)
- Ned Barnett (1)
- Neil Offen (1)
- News and Observer article (48)
- News and Observer column (4)
- News and Observer editorial (5)
- Newsday (1)
- Newsweek (2)
- Newt Gingrich (1)
- NFL owners (1)
- Nifongian courage (3)
- O. J. Simpson (1)
- Occupy Raleigh (2)
- Office of Administrative Hearings (1)
- Office of Executive Clemency (1)
- Officer Curtis Knight (4)
- Officer Marianne Bond (19)
- Officer Robert Davis (2)
- Officer Tyler (2)
- Orage Quarles III (1)
- Orange County Medical Examiner (1)
- Oxygen Media LLC (3)
- P. J. Hairston (3)
- Pamela Bernard (2)
- Panhandling permit (1)
- PAPEN Policy (14)
- Paris BranchRamadan (1)
- Patricia Stallings (1)
- Paul Luebke (1)
- Paula Deen (1)
- Paula Harrison (1)
- PETA (1)
- Pete Moses Jr (1)
- Peter Lucas Moses (1)
- Petition for Discretionary Review (1)
- Petition for Writ of Mandamus (1)
- Phil Berger (1)
- Planned Parenthood (1)
- Police Chief Cerelyn Davis (1)
- Prison Industrial Complex (2)
- Professor Boyce Watkins (1)
- Professor Julius Nyang'oro (4)
- Progress Energy (1)
- questionnaire (1)
- quid pro quo (1)
- R (1)
- R. David Henderson (1)
- R.C. Soles (4)
- Racial Justice Act (3)
- Rae Evans (15)
- Raleigh Police Department (1)
- rare deal (1)
- Rashad McCants (2)
- raucous Duke Lacrosse parties (2)
- Rayford Burke (1)
- Reade Seligmann (6)
- Reginald Daye (107)
- Renee Barnes (1)
- Renee Elmers (1)
- Renee Hoffman (1)
- Rep. Darren Jackson (1)
- Rep. Donny Lambert (1)
- Rep. Kelly Alexander (1)
- Rep. Lauren Boebert (1)
- Rep. Shelly Willingham (2)
- Requests for Admission (1)
- res judicata (1)
- Restorative Justice (1)
- Rev. Lee Everett (1)
- Rev. William Barber (5)
- Rhea Evans (1)
- Riccardo Darnell Jones (1)
- Rich Rosen (1)
- Richard Brodhead (6)
- Richard Emery (1)
- Richard Hatch (1)
- Richard Miller (2)
- Rick Cotton (1)
- Rick French (1)
- Rick Gall (1)
- Rick Martinez (1)
- Ripley Rand (1)
- Robert F. Orr (1)
- Robert Wilcoxson (1)
- Ron Margiotta (1)
- Ron Moore (1)
- Ronald Cotton (2)
- Ronnie Long (2)
- Ross Howell Jr. (1)
- Roy Cooper (44)
- Roy Williams (1)
- Rusty Carter (1)
- Ruth Sheehan (1)
- Ryan McFadyen (1)
- Samuel Oliver-Bruno (1)
- Sarah Shourd (1)
- SBI report (2)
- Scott Fowler (1)
- Scott Holmes (4)
- Scottsboro Boys (1)
- Senator Valerie Foushee (1)
- Seth Blum (1)
- Sgt. Marianne Bond (5)
- Shan Carter (8)
- Shannon Gilreath (1)
- Sharon Smith (2)
- Shawn Massey (4)
- Sheila Moses (1)
- Sheilda Harris (1)
- Shirley Lacy (1)
- Shirley Sherrod (1)
- Shon McClain (1)
- Sidney Harr (44)
- Sidney Harr M.D. (10)
- Silence Breakers (1)
- social justice (1)
- Speaker Tim Moore (1)
- Spotlight Team (1)
- Sprint (1)
- Sprint Movement (2)
- Stanley Chambers (1)
- State Capitol Police (1)
- State v Welch (1)
- statute of limitations (1)
- Stephanie Nickerson (1)
- Steve Cron (1)
- Steve Schewel (1)
- Strazzulla v. Hendrick (1)
- Summary Judgment Rule (1)
- Super-Duper Cooper (1)
- Susan Filan (13)
- Susannah Meadows (2)
- Tara Servatius (1)
- taxi driver (1)
- The Boston Globe (1)
- The Charlotte Observer (1)
- The Daily Beast (1)
- The Herald Sun (2)
- The Independent Weekly (3)
- The Washington Post (3)
- The Washington Times (1)
- Theodore James Walker (1)
- Theodore Jerry Williams (4)
- Theondray Welch (1)
- Thom Goolsby (1)
- Thom Tillis (2)
- Thomas Beckett (7)
- Thomas Keith (1)
- Thomas Maher (1)
- Thomas Walker (1)
- Thomasi McDonald (1)
- Timothy Helms (3)
- Timothy Tyson (1)
- Tom Breen (1)
- Tom Fetzer (1)
- Tom Ford (37)
- Tom Keith (2)
- Tom Ross (1)
- Tom Vilsack (1)
- Tony Tata (1)
- Tracey Cline (7)
- Tracy Cooper (1)
- Trayvon Martin (1)
- Troy Davis (1)
- turncoat attorneys (1)
- Tyrone Baker (6)
- U.S. Asst A.G. Kristen Clarke (1)
- U.S. Department of Justice (3)
- U.S. Postmaster General (1)
- UNC-CH (1)
- UNC-Chapel Hill (1)
- vendetta justice (3)
- Victoria Peterson (1)
- Virginia Bridges (1)
- W. David McFadyen (6)
- Wade Smith (4)
- Walter Dellinger (1)
- Washington Redskins (1)
- Wesley Snipes (1)
- Whatchoo (1)
- Wildin Acosta (1)
- William D. Cannon (1)
- William D. Cohan (2)
- Wilmington 10 (1)
- Women & Crime podcast (3)
- Woody Vann (22)
- WRAL-5 News (10)
- WRAL-TV (9)
- wral.com (7)
- Writ for Coram Nobis (1)
- www.justice4nifong.com (1)
- Wyatt Earp (2)
- York Properties (2)
Blog Archive
About Me
- Nifong Supporter
- I'm a senior citizen who believes that the state of North Carolina has harshly, excessively, and unjustly treated former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong.
80 comments:
Did you file Harr III? The panel doesn't link to anything.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Did you file Harr III? The panel doesn't link to anything.
I'm impressed... you are fast. I just posted this. Are you a speed reader?
Anyway, the answer to your question is in the affirmative.
Can't take anymore questions right now. Need to get ready for a visit.
Oops. Now I realize what happened. You didn't read about my filing in the article. You were just going by the illustration. I accidentally spilled the beans!!
Sometimes, when I first upload, there are some quirks in the system and it'll take a few minutes to get them adjusted and corrected.
Sid,
Is the filing of Harr III the major event you predicted on or before April 23? How does this filing result in Mangum's release and exoneration?
Walt or A Lawyer:
I understand that Duke is not required to respond to this filing other than to refer to the decision in Harr Ii. Is that correct? Does Harr risk additional sanctions?
harr persists in filing frivolous, non meritorious lawsuits.
harr said that the main stream media did not cover the story of Duke's discrimination against him. There was no discrimination against harr on the part of Duke. harr's own recording of the confrontation documents that harr violated Duke's non solicitation policy, was told to stop, and then precipitated a conflict with the security guard who told him to stop.
harr claimed his "friend", Provessor Coleman intervened for him. The taped conversation indicated that harr tried to drag an unwilling Professor Coleman into the confrontation.
harr rants and raves how the innocent Duke Lacrosse players shook down Duke for millions of dollars
The motivation for harr's repeated filings against Duke is his deluded belief he can shake down Duke for millions of dollars.
If harr is trying to push harr versus Duke round three, doesn't the statute of limitations come into play? The incident harr calls discrimination happened 6 years ago. He has twice had is case dismissed before going to trial, indicating it was determined before trial that his case had no merit. So after 6 years and two failed attempts to litigate the frivolous case, shouldn't his latest attempt just be dismissed?
Any new suit by Dr. Harr against Duke is barred by the statute of limitations, by res judicata and by the sanctions order in Harr II. It will not end well for Dr. Harr.
I am now more confident than ever that rectumfication will finally prevail soon in Sidney's can... and long before year's end. I can't exactly predict when, but sometime soon you will begin to see cracks in Sidney's butt. Prepare yourself because his behind will soon crumble before your very eyes and be overrun by Crusaders of Justice.
A Lawyer wrote: "Any new suit by Dr. Harr against Duke is barred by the statute of limitations, by res judicata and by the sanctions order in Harr II. It will not end well for Dr. Harr."
I concur.
Sid has added the Associated Press as a defendant in this version. Thus, the District Court will dismiss against all the defendants but A.P. sooner rather than later. However, Sid will at least last to a 12(b)(6) ruling against A.P. This is just an exercise by Sid to call attention to himself. Unless he is a blithering idiot, he knows that he cannot prevail. He has been educated many times why his legal theory is completely wrong. Again, unless he is a blithering idiot, he knows because the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled twice against him, that he will lose again. What we are seeing is the act of a serial pest litigator. Nothing more.
Truly sorry to see Sid wasting the court's time on a piece of litigation that has no merit what so ever.
Walt - can you post a link to the pleadings?
I'm curious how this helps Sid at all ... and what the basis for the lawsuit against the AP is - though actually that's probably to catch their attention.
harr, you again have shown beyond any and all doubt you are a delusional megalomaniac.
There is nothing in the media about your third lawsuit because there is nothing to your lawsuit.
Walt,
Where id you see the Complaint?
And suing AP? For what?
Does NC have an anti-SLAPP law?
Sid -- Why stop with AP. The following companies are represented on AP's Board of Directors:
Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.
The E.W. Scripps Company
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Journal Communications, Inc.
Swift Communications
The Spokesman-Review
Cowles Publishing Co.
GatehouseMedia, LLC
New Media Investment Group
The New York Times Co.
Cox Media Group
ESPN
BH Media Group
The Omaha World-Herald
Univision Communications, Inc.
Fusion
The Santa Fe New Mexican and The Taos News
Gannett Co., Inc.
A. H. Belo Corporation
The Ogden Newspapers Inc.
Paxton Media Group
Hearst Corporation
The McClatchy Company
Times Publishing Company
You should go after them as well.
Sid:
You have 255 days to exonerate and free Mangum.
There are 2 days until April 23rd.
It has been 37 days since the Ides of March and 3,232 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
And, filing another frivolous lawsuit against Duke, which will be summarily dismissed, is doing nothing to advance your goal of freeing Mangum.
Kenny, you still support Sid's actions?
Does anyone realize how disgustingly inappropriate it is that harr considers himself a great civil rights hero, the same harr who calls nifong, who tried to undermine the civil rights of innocent men, a decent honorable minister of justice.
harr's motivation for suing Duke is is belief that he can shake down Duke for millions of dollars, nothing more.
Anonymous at 1:04 PM wrote: "Walt - can you post a link to the pleadings?"
They are available on PACER. For those without access, I'll download a copy and post it on my blog this evening.
"I'm curious how this helps Sid at all ..."
It doesn't in a sane world. Unfortunately Sid suffers from a fixed false belief fantasy. So, this meritless lawsuit feeds his fantasy.
"and what the basis for the lawsuit against the AP is - though actually that's probably to catch their attention."
None, other than he is a mean spirited little man who enjoys forcing companies to pay legal bills for his frivolous lawsuits.
Walt-in-Durham
A Lawyer wrote: "Walt,
Where id you see the Complaint?
And suing AP? For what?"
AP is in the caption. He doesn't say why he's suing A.P.
Walt-in-Durham
A Lawyer wrote: "Does NC have an anti-SLAPP law?"
I don't think so.
Walt-in-Durham
Sid:
You have 254 days to exonerate and free Mangum.
April 23rd is tomorrow.
It has been 38 days since the Ides of March and 3,233 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
As promised, my blog now has a link to the complaint in Harr III: http://walt-in-durham.blogspot.com/2016/04/harr-iii_22.html
Walt,
That assumes he can even get service on "Associated Press" - that's not their legal name, and he's not serving their registered agent. I suspect he has a similar issue with "Duke University" - but they have the automatic dismissal under the sanction.
Unsurprisingly - as others have noted - Sid cites the Felony Murder Rule - still.
Kenny, you ready to admit he's lost his mind yet, or you still enjoy being complicit in his abuse of Crystal?
Walt, thanks for posting that "Complaint."
Insofar as it seeks to re-litigate Dr. Harr's dispute with Duke and its officers/employees, it is barred by the sanctions order in Harr II (not to mention res judicata and the statute of limitations), and will summarily be dismissed (probably with new, tougher sanctions entered against Dr. Harr). Any allegations about Crystal Mangum are irrelevant because Dr. Harr has no standing to complain about anything done to her.
The claim against the AP is utter nonsense. He doesn't allege that AP libeled him. AP's supposed "failure to cover" what Dr. Harr thinks they should have covered is a frivolous claim, because under the First Amendment AP can report what they want. And, as someone pointed out above, AP has not been validly served. (In fact, none of the defendants have been served under any method authorized by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.)
So this will result in a quick dismissal, with more sanctions against Dr. Harr (perhaps, this time, a ban on him filing anything in any court without prior judicial approval.)
Dr. Harr should have known all of this, based on prior comments on this blog. And if Dr. Harr thinks this will somehow help Mangum, he is seriously delusional.
A Lawyer ...
Remember, Dr. Harr knows he isn't going to help Crystal, he just likes to emotionally abuse her, and this helps further that. He wants her to think he's trying, and wants her alleged friends like Kenny to tell her he's trying, so she keeps further isolating themselves from those trying to help her, and clinging to Harr. It's absolutely textbook cultish/emotionally abusive behavior.
In addition, he knows he cannot file anything in State Court, or even Federal Court on Crystal's behalf, so he files lawsuits for himself - and tries to bring in irrelevant claims (and still felony murder).
harr again documents he is a deluded megalomabiac.
harr manifests the same old harrian hypocrisy, and I repeat.
harr admits he never reviewed the facts of the Lacrosse hoax. But he thinks it perfectly proper when he proclaims the Lacrosse players guilty.
AG Roy Cooper did investigate the case, found there was no evidence of a crime, and then expressed hs belief that the Lacrosse players were innocent.
harr rants and raves that was not proper for the AG to do that.
Sidney,
What exactly do you expect will happen to day?
Sid:
Today is April 23rd. We are expecting big news today regarding Mangum's imminent release. Don't disappoint us again, Sid.
You have 253 days to exonerate and free Mangum.
It has been 39 days since the Ides of March and 3,234 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
Sid,
38 minutes left.
As April 24 dawns, what happened yesterday that had us all so aroused?
WHERE
IS
KENHYDERAL
Sid:
You have 252 days to exonerate and free Mangum.
April 23rd was yesterday. It has been 40 days since the Ides of March and 3,235 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
Sid:
What was supposed to happen on or before yesterday relating to Mangum's case?
Do you have any more deadlines or predictions you wish to announce?
Feel free to requisition yourself one of the Duke blue crying towel you have promised to me and Walt. You should give a few to kenny, too. I am sure he's crestfallen and I hate to see perfectly good towels go to waste.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
Kenny will be back, he's sleeping under his bridge.
Sid:
You have 251 days to exonerate and free Mangum.
It has been 2 days since April 23rd, 41 days since the Ides of March and 3,236 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
Biggest salvo of duds harr has ever fired off.
In other words,, harr's dudliest salvo yet.
This latest attempt was pathetic even by Harrian standards. It does nothing to help Mangum, or Harr - it actually hurts them because it solidifies the fact that Harr is a delusional loon who shouldn't be taken seriously and believes he should be exempt from the same laws and procedures that everyone else must abide by.
Has harr fled the country ot avoid the sanctions headed his way?
Waa waa, I just want a jury trial!
Sid:
You have 250 days to exonerate and free Mangum.
It has been 3 days since April 23rd, 42 days since the Ides of March and 3,237 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
Wherever Sid is it must be cold, because he seems to have taken all his socks with him.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
Don't matter where he went, I will find his ass and drill a new hole in it. I am the Rectumfinder!
HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!
I apologize for my recent lack of involvement in the blog comment section, however, I have been extremely busy working on Crystal's release and exoneration. Specifically, I have filed a lawsuit which I believe will be to the benefit of Ms. Mangum... it was filed yesterday morning. The parties named as defendants in the suit will receive the complaint tomorrow, so I will plan on posting the brief on this blog site sometime tomorrow afternoon or evening.
As far as Crystal goes, prospects for her imminent freedom and exoneration grow in bounds by the day... and cracks in the wall of injustice will be evident to you all in the near future.
As you were.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid,
Is the filing of Harr III the major event you predicted on or before April 23? How does this filing result in Mangum's release and exoneration?
No. The case concerning Duke University and myself is a separate case involving me and having little, if anything, to do with Crystal's situation. I never expected Harr III to directly affect Mangum's case.
It is very likely that I might have been referencing the lawsuit I filed yesterday, although I am not sure.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
harr said that the main stream media did not cover the story of Duke's discrimination against him. There was no discrimination against harr on the part of Duke. harr's own recording of the confrontation documents that harr violated Duke's non solicitation policy, was told to stop, and then precipitated a conflict with the security guard who told him to stop.
harr claimed his "friend", Provessor Coleman intervened for him. The taped conversation indicated that harr tried to drag an unwilling Professor Coleman into the confrontation.
The security guard who forced me off campus never mentioned a word about any solicitation policy. In fact, he told James Coleman that he was told to remove me from campus and that was what he was doing... that he was doing his job.
I did not precipitate any conflict... when I tried to find out why he was being abusive towards me, all he could say was that I was "trespassing." You see, I was, in fact, doing nothing more than others similarly situated. The actions against me by Duke were nothing more than discriminatory.
Walt said...
A Lawyer wrote: "Any new suit by Dr. Harr against Duke is barred by the statute of limitations, by res judicata and by the sanctions order in Harr II. It will not end well for Dr. Harr."
I concur.
Sid has added the Associated Press as a defendant in this version. Thus, the District Court will dismiss against all the defendants but A.P. sooner rather than later. However, Sid will at least last to a 12(b)(6) ruling against A.P. This is just an exercise by Sid to call attention to himself. Unless he is a blithering idiot, he knows that he cannot prevail. He has been educated many times why his legal theory is completely wrong. Again, unless he is a blithering idiot, he knows because the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled twice against him, that he will lose again. What we are seeing is the act of a serial pest litigator. Nothing more.
Truly sorry to see Sid wasting the court's time on a piece of litigation that has no merit what so ever.
Walt, I believe that you are an intelligent person. Surely you must realize that there is a difference between a serial litigator and someone who is trying to get his day in court. That's all I'm doing... trying to get my day in court. If the white Raleigh police officer who spilled a free cup of coffee is allowed to go to court, then why shouldn't I?
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Walt - can you post a link to the pleadings?
I'm curious how this helps Sid at all ... and what the basis for the lawsuit against the AP is - though actually that's probably to catch their attention.
I thought the reason for listing the Associated Press as a defendant was obvious... but maybe it wasn't. The AP is listed because it was part of the conspiracy against me that day. I believe that AP reporter Tom Breen was sent to first confirm me as the target by approaching me and getting my name as a pretense on doing a story about the Breyer interview and audience reaction to it. It was only after Breen walked away that the security guard intercepted me on my way to the building's exit.
Fortunately for me, James Coleman passed by and he was able to intercede on my behalf... had he not, I would have wound up in jail on who knows what charges and the AP would have had the story it was in actuality sent to cover -- "Disturbance at Justice Breyer event by Nifong supporter."
Anonymous Anonymous said...
And, filing another frivolous lawsuit against Duke, which will be summarily dismissed, is doing nothing to advance your goal of freeing Mangum.
Kenny, you still support Sid's actions?
As previously responded, the Duke lawsuit has nothing to do with advancing my goal of achieving justice for Ms. Mangum.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Does anyone realize how disgustingly inappropriate it is that harr considers himself a great civil rights hero, the same harr who calls nifong, who tried to undermine the civil rights of innocent men, a decent honorable minister of justice.
harr's motivation for suing Duke is is belief that he can shake down Duke for millions of dollars, nothing more.
WRONG-O!! I diligently did my best to achieve an out-of-court settlement with Duke University that would result in it guaranteeing that Duke would not harass Nifong supporters in the future. I did so in good faith, with Duke all but ignoring me... with the exception of a single confrontational and accusatory letter on May 10, 2010.
With Duke refusing to engage me in substantive dialog as the statute of limitation approached, I was forced to file a lawsuit.
I don't think the Duke Lacrosse defendants tried to resolve their differences with the university before shaking them down for $20 million each... they certainly didn't waste any time in going after Duke.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid:
What was supposed to happen on or before yesterday relating to Mangum's case?
Do you have any more deadlines or predictions you wish to announce?
Feel free to requisition yourself one of the Duke blue crying towel you have promised to me and Walt. You should give a few to kenny, too. I am sure he's crestfallen and I hate to see perfectly good towels go to waste.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
Hey, Abe.
Patience. kenny and I are not going to be needing the towels... you and Walt are. The end of the State's reign of draconian injustice is around the corner. Unfortunately, your vision cannot navigate around a corner, so you will not be able to see the inevitable until it is right in your face.
DUCK!!
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Has harr fled the country ot avoid the sanctions headed his way?
Sanctions! What sanctions? Sanctions by who and for what?
Believe me, I am not one to flee in the face of adversity. I challenge the fates head-on... like a charging bull towards a red cape.
So, what Defendants did you name that you think will change Crystal's fate?
Sid:
You have 249 days to exonerate and free Mangum.
It has been 4 days since April 23rd, 43 days since the Ides of March and 3,238 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
Sid wrote: "Walt, I believe that you are an intelligent person. Surely you must realize that there is a difference between a serial litigator and someone who is trying to get his day in court."
I do recognize the difference. You are a serial litigator who has not stated a claim upon which relief can be granted. In fact, you have now strayed beyond the statute of limitations which makes you even worse than a serial litigator.
"That's all I'm doing... trying to get my day in court."
If that was the case, you would have stated a claim the first time upon which relief could be granted. You did not. And now, you are stating the same claim a third time.
"If the white Raleigh police officer who spilled a free cup of coffee is allowed to go to court, then why shouldn't I?"
Race has nothing to do with it. You are a filer of frivolous and vexatious lawsuits.
Walt-in-Durham
harr said:
"WRONG-O!! I diligently did my best to achieve an out-of-court settlement with Duke University that would result in it guaranteeing that Duke would not harass Nifong supporters in the future. I did so in good faith, with Duke all but ignoring me... with the exception of a single confrontational and accusatory letter on May 10, 2010.
With Duke refusing to engage me in substantive dialog as the statute of limitation approached, I was forced to file a lawsuit.
I don't think the Duke Lacrosse defendants tried to resolve their differences with the university before shaking them down for $20 million each... they certainly didn't waste any time in going after Duke."
Your latest rant shows again your interest in money, and it says, in spite of your denials, you thought you could shake down Duke for big bucks.
harr said:
"As previously responded, the Duke lawsuit has nothing to do with advancing my goal of achieving justice for Ms. Mangum."
Trying to get a murderess/false accuser a pass for her crimes is not exactly working for justice.
harr said:
"Believe me, I am not one to flee in the face of adversity."
I don't believe you. Your multiple previous ineffective attempts at personal posterior camouflage show you duck adversity.
"I challenge the fates head-on... like a charging bull towards a red cape."
Ramming your head repeatedly into a brick wall, thinking you are denting the wall and not your head, is not exactly challenging the fates head on.
For harr, the delusionaal, megalomaniacal, hypocritical fabricating ignorant liar:
First you rant and rave about how you deserve your day in court. You did not think the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players were entitled to their day in court when they sued Durham and corrupt nifong over their wrongful prosecution.
Maybe Walt and A Lawyer would comment on this. Many lawsuits are settled in favor of the defendant without ever going to court. You have no right in the US legal system to have your case heard in court. No plaintiff has that right.
You have to prove your case. You allege there was a conspiracy on the part of Duke to violate your civil rights. You have never offered any proof of said conspiracy. The best you have come up with is, what else could it have been. That is just another way of saying that the defense has not disproven your allegations. You have to prove your allegations. No one has to explain why you got involved in the situation at Duke. You have to prove it was a conspiracy. You haven't.
The end of Sidney's's reign of draconian incontinence is around the corner. Unfortunately, his vision cannot navigate behind his back, so he will not be able to see the inevitable until it is right up his ass.
DUCK!!
Anonymous Anonymous said...
So, what Defendants did you name that you think will change Crystal's fate?
I put the obvious defendants in my lawsuit. You will see by tomorrow.
Ciao, Baby.
Sid said:
"The end of the State's reign of draconian injustice is around the corner. Unfortunately, your vision cannot navigate around a corner, so you will not be able to see the inevitable until it is right in your face."
My vision is 20/20, straight thru to 2026, and I see at least two major smackdowns headed your way in the next several months, as the courts deal with the two lawsuits you have filed. The best case is scenario for you is that both suits are dismissed, with no further sanctions or penalties against you.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
hey, harr:
Where does it ast, in the Constitution, in the US code, in any state code, that the filing of a lawsuit guarantees a plaintiff any right to have the suit litigated in court?
hey, harr:
What is your evidence that Duke officials conspired to ambush you.
I put the obvious defendants in my lawsuit. You will see by tomorrow.
If you're suing on Mangum's behalf, you may be in violation of the Bar injunction.
If you are filing on your own behalf, you have no standing to seek any relief that will aid Mangum.
If you're suing judges and prosecutors, you may be violating rules of judicial immunity.
For your own sake, please ask Prof. Coleman or another qualified lawyer to look at your suit before you file it.
If you don't take this advice, this will end badly for you.
He says he's already filed it. I am sure it will be readily dismissed.
If he sues the Judges or the Prosecutors - they have immunity, and he has no standing.
If he sues Crystal's attorneys - he has no standing.
If he sues others - it will also fail.
There is no lawsuit he can file that anyone will have to respond to.
A Lawyer states: If you don't take this advice, this will end badly for you.
I believe you are over-reacting. The courts have made it clear that they will show extreme patience with Sidney as a pro se litigant, being very careful not to apply meaningful sanctions lest they be criticized for making the courts inaccessible.
As long as Sidney does not face financial penalties or incarceration, he loses nothing. Although the likelihood of winning any litigation is zero for the reasons discussed repeatedly, Sidney is hoping that one of his lawsuits will be noticed and generate media coverage of Magnum. However, the last time that happened, the Indy story was not quite what he had in mind.
I expect Sidney will receive nothing worse than a slap on the wrist.
John D. Smith
New York, NY
Correction:
Anonymous said...
hey, harr:
Where does it say, in the Constitution, in the US code, in any state code, that the filing of a lawsuit guarantees a plaintiff any right to have the suit litigated in court?
Sid,
You should be interested in the following:
http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1404&context=sulr
W
H
E
R
E
I
S
K
E
N
H
Y
D
E
R
A
L
?
To Anonymous at 6:30 PM:
Sid's case against Duke was litigated in court. Twice. Both times it was dismissed prior to trial.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
@ Anonymous 6:31:........................... A very interesting and detailed analysis from a the Law School at a University very near my old stamping grounds.
Sid:
You have 248 days to exonerate and free Mangum.
It has been 5 days since April 23rd, 44 days since the Ides of March and 3,239 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
Can't wait to see Sid's brief, and see him rail about Felony Murder (which was never a factor in Crystal's case); Perjury (which didn't occur); and all the other theories and mistakes of law and fact he puts out there.
I'm also curious who he thinks the "obvious" defendants are, and want to see why he claims he has standing.
Where did you file the lawsuit Sid?
Post a Comment