Saturday, March 24, 2018

Cooper can't handle the truth... when it comes to Crystal Mangum

188 comments:

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney, thus far your supposedly humble and brilliant sharlog does not exist. Your previous sharlog was neither humble nor brilliant, so how can you post another one.

March 24, 2018 at 2:29 PM


Hey, Anony.

As of 6:15 p.m. today, my latest humble and brilliant opinion sharlog does exist. Worked all hours of the day and night to get it finished. Actually its production went relatively fast... began work on it Thursday morning.

As to whether it will be humble or brilliant is up to the viewer... but to me, my opinions seem to be humble and brilliant. Hah.

Nifong Supporter said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney Har:

Your last post about another humble but brilliant sharlog, which was a lie your last sharlog was neither humble nor brilliant, suggests Crystal's(actually your) motions for default and summary judgment have failed.

March 24, 2018 at 3:52 AM



Actually I have yet to see a Response from the defendants regarding Mangum's lawsuit. Not surprising as the defendants have no defense.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous FakeKenhyderal said...
Sidney Harr -- Why haven't you addressed the questions regarding your methods of delivering your complaints to the defendants?

March 23, 2018 at 7:25 AM


I will be addressing the summons and complaints in an upcoming sharlog. It is too involved and complicated for a quick and simple comment.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney Har:

Your last post about another humble but brilliant sharlog, which was a lie your last sharlog was neither humble nor brilliant, suggests Crystal's(actually your) motions for default and summary judgment have failed.

March 24, 2018 at 3:52 AM



Actually I have yet to see a Response from the defendants regarding Mangum's lawsuit. Not surprising as the defendants have no defense."

It has been explained to you that the defendants were not validly served the complaint and summons. They have no obligation to respond. You have the obligation to effect valid service of process.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

You are the one who can not handle the truth.

Crystal was not raped at the Lacrosse party.

There was no vendetta against Crystal.

There was no perjury in Dr> Niconls' testimony.

Officer Marianne Bond has not been impeached as a witness against Crystal.

Delusional megalomania is neither brilliance nor humility.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"Anonymous FakeKenhyderal said...
Sidney Harr -- Why haven't you addressed the questions regarding your methods of delivering your complaints to the defendants?

March 23, 2018 at 7:25 AM


I will be addressing the summons and complaints in an upcoming sharlog. It is too involved and complicated for a quick and simple comment."

You will be spewing out more bullshit, nothing more. There is nothing involved or complex about valid service of process. You are required to have someone authorized to serve the complaint and summons. You did not meet that requirement, and no amount of bullshit you dump here will not change that simple, easy to understand legal requirement.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

You forget something very fundamental. The court, not you, decides the merit of your case, or more correctly, whether or mot your case has merit.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

Ir is res ipsa loquitur that Governor Cooper does not fear hearing the truth from you.

Here is your track record:

Crystal was the victim/accuser in the Duke Rape case , which means you say Crystal was raped.

The Lacrosse players raped Crystal.

Nifong was a decent honorable minister of justice whose actions were in compliance with ethical standards for a prosecutor.

Nifong was the best DA Durham ever had.

Nifong was brought down by a Carpetbagger jihad.

Nifnong did not conceal exculpatory evidence.

Duke conspired to discriminate against you because you supported Nifong.

You do not know what truth is.

Governor Cooper did not meet with you because he recognizes you are an absolute zero and, as Governor, he has more important things to do then waste time with an absolute zero

Anonymous said...

Since your sharply is in a format no longer supported by Android or Apple devices, I can't view it. Why do you insist on such an outdated format?

Just write your blog entry....It would save you a great deal of time and give everyone an opportunity to read it.

Anonymous said...

"Sharlog", not "sharply.

Anonymous said...

Sidney, I repeat: Governor Cooper does not meet with you because he knows you are not worth meeting with. Someone like former President Obama would be someone worth meeting with. You are not.

Now, like you tried to equate Crystal to the genuine heroines of the #MeToo movement, like your Wacko-lyte Kenny trying to equate you with Dr. Martin Luther King, you will try to equate yourself with Mt. Obama.

Yo' Mama said...

I demanded a personal meeting with President Trump to demand that Sidny Harr be sent to Guantanamo and waterboarded to death. I sent him a 9,000 page legal brief proving that Sidny Harr is an enemy combatant.

President Trump cannot handle the truth!!!

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

Your delusional megalomania is manifest in your lawsuits, in this latest screed which is neither humble nor brilliant.

You do not know haw to file or litigate a lawsuit.

I am speaking as one who has been both a plaintiff and a defendant in personal injury suits. Your complaint states why you are suing. You then have to prove it in court and the court decides whether or not your case has merit.

When you file your suits, you proclaim that you have proven your case and then demand judgment in your favor.

Anonymous said...

Maybr Sidney's Wacko-lyte Kenny will get involved. Maybe Kenny thinks(or is that presuming a fact not in evidence?) the Governor will meet with Sidney because Kenny believes(delusionally) that Sidney is as great as Dr. Martin Luther King. After all, Kenny believes the Lacrosse plays are guilty because he heard Crystal's first hand account of the rape which never happened.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal, your first hand account from Crystal because the facts, ALL the facts when ALL of them are considered show that Crystal did not tell the truth when she alleged she had been raped.

If you choose to believe a false rape accuser, you are the one with a serious problem, not the innocent men who maintained their innocence.

Fake Kenhyderal said...

Can't watch your sharlog either, Sid.

guiowen said...

Sid,
I can't open your sharlog. Suggest you use a different system.

kenhyderal said...

@ JSwift: Why did you delete your criticism of my post to Guiowen 3-24-18 1:24, in the previous thread? In it, you adopted the invariable tactic, of The Duke Lacrosse Apologists cabal, to attack all and everything even trivialities with a full on assault; a sign of desperation to preserve the angelic depiction of The Duke Lacrosse Players and promote the depiction of Crystal as a wicked, scheming sorceress.

Anonymous said...

More delusions from Kenhyderal:

"@ JSwift: Why did you delete your criticism of my post to Guiowen 3-24-18 1:24, in the previous thread? In it, you adopted the invariable tactic, of The Duke Lacrosse Apologists cabal,"

There was no Duke Apologists cabal.

to attack all and everything even trivialities with a full on assault; a sign of desperation to preserve the angelic depiction of The Duke Lacrosse Players"

which is what you call the innocent men availing themselves of their right to be presumed innocent, to maintain there innocence. You can offer no facts that they are guilty, as is evidenced by your repetition of your railing about Duke apologists.

"and promote the depiction of Crystal as a wicked, scheming sorceress.

There are facts which show the Lacrosse defendants are innocent, that no rape happenec at the Lacrosse party and you can not stand it that the facts do not support your fantasizing about Crystal being raped.

There are no facts to support your belief that Crystal's first hand account was the truth.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

Crystal's first hand account is part of the public record. Check out
http://johnsville.blogspot.com/2007/06/crystal-gail-mangum-april-6-2006.html

There are images of Crystal's hand written statement at that URL

Crystal alleged that she had been raped by three members of the Lacrosse team who had deposited their semen, their DNA on her person. She claimed she had been beaten.

The physical exam revealed no evidence she had been beaten.

The rape kit materials revealed mo evidence of semen.

The only DNA found on Crystal did not match the DNA of any member of the Lacrosse team.

That you may have read an article that says semen can dissipate in a matter of hours does not establish that Semen was ever present on the rape kit. There are other sources on line which say markers of semen persist for days.

You yourself have said that the timing of semen deposition can not be determined. That is an admission that you can not prove said semen was deposited at the Lacrosse party. That means you have no factual evidence there ever were any anonymous unidentified rapists at the party, regardless of Crystal's known consensual sexual history.

The bottom line is, Crystal's first hand account is not credible.

Anonymous said...

I like to say res ipsa loquitur because it makes me feel smart.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal,
Let's get back to your argument about why we should believe in the rape of the century. You say we should believe CGM because she is very truthful. The rest of us, however, do not know her and believe she had good reason to lie. You then argue that we should believe her because some friend of yours, Kilgo, told you that a lacrosse player friend of his (call him X) told him that some other lacrosse player (call him Y) saw some non-lacrosse players lead Crystal to some bathroom where they presumably raped her. Let's go over this, step by step.
You tell us that Kilgo told you so. Unfortunately, you have been known to tell us some untruths in the past. I don't wish to say you lied,but I know that, because of context, you misinterpret or forget certain things. Still you are a good guy, so I feel that with 60%, you can be believed.
Assuming you told us the truth (as to what Kilgo told you), it is not clear that he told the truth. Still, he must be a good guy, so I will assume his statement (as to what X said) has 60% probability of being correct.
Now, I don't know X, but as a friend of a friend of yours, he must be a good guy, so I will assume there is a 60% probability that what he said (about what Y told him) is correct.
Now, I will give Y the benefit of the doubt, and assume there is a 60% probability that what he said (about the other guests) was correct.
Finally, it is not clear to me that when these non-player guests took CGM into the bathroom, they actually assaulted her. So, let's assume there is a 60% probability that they did rape her.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

Anonymous said...

Res ipsa loquitur.

guiowen said...

So: there is a 60% probability that what you told us is correct. Conditional on this,, there is a 60% probability that what Kilgo told you is correct: hence there is a 36% probability that X actually told this. If so, there is a 60% that what X said is true. Hence there is a 21.6% probability that Y actually said this to X. Now, conditional on this, there is a 60% probability that Y told the truth.Thus there is a 12.96 probability that the non-players took CGM into a bathroom. Finally, there is a conditional probability of 60% that they raped her. Thus all told, there is a 7.776% probability that CGM was a raped.
In other words, Kenny, your long story tells us that there is less than an 8% probability that your argument is valid.
I hope that was clear.



Anonymous said...

Quite the mathematician.

guiowen said...

The mathematics is quite correct. I'm just interested in getting Kenhyderal to shut up. Not that he ever will.

Anonymous said...

Sid,

There is nothing long and complicated about the Summons and Complaint issue. Either you got it properly served, or you didn't. Whether they have refused to pick it up or not is totally irrelevant. The law says if they didn't pick it up, they aren't served. You try again. It's really easy.

The fact you refuse to try and just want to whine about injustice and say you should be treated differently than anyone else is just proof you aren't serious about these lawsuits.

Anonymous said...

Guiowen, your mathematical analysis is valid.

I would say, however, what trumps the math is that there is zero evidence that Crystal was raped.

Now let's wait for Kenny to say, Nifong believed her.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

When are you going to chime in with Nifong believed Crystal?

So explain this. Nifong did not have Crystal actually interviewed by his office until almost 9 months after the Duke Rape Hoax became news. Is that the act of a DA who believes the accusing witness?

Even if he did believe her, Nifong admitted he had no evidence to corroborate what he believed, when he told the Community forum at NCCU that the absence of evidence did not mean the crime did not happen, it meant that nothing had been left.

Then Nifong showed he needed evidence to corroborate what he believed when he engaged DNA Security to test the rape kit materials for DNA evidence. He got DNA evidence which exonerated the men he wanted to prosecute for the crime. What did he then do? He concealed the evidence, and the only possible credible reason being that the DNA evidence exonerated the men he wanted to prosecute. The FACT that he concealed the evidence shows Nifong did not believe there were anonymous rapists at the Lacrosse party.

It comes down to, no matter what you believe about Crystal's allegation of rape, her allegation is no where near credible.

Except to a black on white guilt presuming racist who has the morals and ethics of a Scottsboro persecutor.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

Let's go into this date rape drug thing.

You say that two people reported Crystal was sober when she arrived at the party.

Two others reported she was impaired when she arrived at the party.

Crystal herself reported she had consumed 44 ounces of beer prior to arriving at the party and then taking flexeril. That combination is known to cause impairment. That is what clinical experts say. It is your opinion, again based on what Crystal told you, that she had taken flexeril after consuming alcohol and was not impaired, is that she was not impaired. Neither you nor Crystal are clinical experts.

She was tested for date rape drugs and none were found. Then you argue, since Chloral Hydrate is not tested for, she must have been administered Chloral Hydrate.

Following Crystal's rape allegation, the police searched the party house. They did not have a warrant. The inhabitants of the house cooperated with the police, voluntarily giving statements, submitting samples for DNA testing before the NTO. The police found no evidence of any date rape drug in the house.

Your unexpert opinion is, again based on, you believe Crystal. That is guilt presumption based solely on the word of the accusing witness. In the Scottsboro case the persecutors of the Scottsboro boys presumed guilt solely on the word of the accusers.

Ergo, you are as racist as the persecutors of the Scottsboro boys, only your racism is directed against Caucasian(William Cohan's description). You are, by your own attitude, a black on white guilt presuming racist.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

Your comment from March 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM:

"Dr. Anonymous said:" The facts, and you like to use the term fact, are no evidence was found on the rape kit materials that semen was present................... The Defence was not as certain as you because they made a point to confront Dr. Manly and make her concede that an exudate from a undiagnose(and apparently symptomless) vaginal infection could explain the presents of this whitish fluid which she assumed to be semen"

This says you believe that Dr. Manly was pressured to change her opinion as to whether or not the white fluid found on Crystal was semen. That in turn says you believe it was semen. That brings us back to:

If the fluid was semen, it would mean that the rape kit materials were collected when semen was present in Crystal's genital tract and not after the semen had dissipated. If that were true the rape kit materials should have tested positive for markers of semen.

The rape kit materials showed no evidence of semen.

The fluid was not semen.

Crystal was not subjected to sexual intercourse at the party, forcible or otherwise.

FakeKenhyderal said...

Sid -- I know you've adopted the "David versus Goliath" motif over the years. I saw this over the weekend and thought you might enjoy it:

https://www.ted.com/talks/malcolm_gladwell_the_unheard_story_of_david_and_goliath

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

I would wager you would have preferred Dr. Manly to have told the Lacrosse defense counsel that she believed the white fluid in Crystal's genital tract was semen.

That gets back to this conundrum:

If the fluid was semen than the rape kit materials were collected while semen was present, not after any semen had dissipated. Then the rape kit materials would have tested positive for markers of semen. The rape kit materials tested NEGATIVE FOR SEMEN.

Which means Crystal had not been subjected to sexual intercourse, forcible or not.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

Your anonymous rapist alternative explanation was, is, and always will be thoroughly discredited.

Anonymous said...

Ken,

Why do you lie when you post at this blog?

kenhyderal said...

Guiowen said: "The mathematics is quite correct",............................ "Figures don't lie but liars always figure" mark Twain?

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said:"Ken,Why do you lie when you post at this blog..............................."did you stop beating your wife?"

guiowen said...

I guess Kenhyderal is "figuring".

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal,
If you disagree with what I wrote, please tell us.

guiowen said...

Anony 6:44,
Kenny doesn't lie. It's just that lately, everything is out of context.

guiowen said...

By the way, Kenny,
If you have difficulty with multiplication, I'll be happy to recommend a 2nd-grade book for you.

Anonymous said...

What's funny ... even Kenny has given up trying to defend Sid and his ridiculous posts these days. He's now just obsessed with rehashing the Duke Lacrosse stuff from years and years ago. He posts nothing new ... he just keeps reposting it, and claims that some anonymous poster told him he was on the right track, so he insists he is.

It's sad that Sid has even lost Kenny at this point.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Guiowen said: "The mathematics is quite correct",............................ "Figures don't lie but liars always figure" mark Twain?"

You and Sidney are examples, but neither one of you are capable of figuring very effectively, as your belief in anonymous rapists documents.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Anonymous said:"Ken,Why do you lie when you post at this blog..............................."did you stop beating your wife?""

Sidney likes to say, no one ever proved Ceystal lred about being raped. Kenny likes to pontificate about the DNA found on Crystal, the timing of the deposition of said DNA Kenny concedes can not be determined, that said DNA proves there were unidentified rapists at the party. When asked to prove there were unidentified rapists, he responds, prove there weren't. He also claims that the non entity Kilgo told him that some anonymous Lacrosse player told him that unidentified non Lacrosse player party attendees raped Crystal, and that he believes Kilgo because it agrees with what Crystal told him.

It all adds up to trying to figure out a case for rape against the Lacrosse players using smoke and mirrors, not facts.

Anonymous said...

guiowen:.

"By the way, Kenny,

If you have difficulty with multiplication, I'll be happy to recommend a 2nd-grade book for you."

First you have to show Kenny can comprehend a second grade math book.

Anonymous said...

Sidney, we're still waiting to be flabergasted.

Do you think you have left us flabbergasted with all your failed attempts to make good on the promises you made?

kenhyderal said...

Guiowen said:, "By the way, Kenny, f you have difficulty with multiplication, I'll be happy to recommend a 2nd-grade book for you..............You know, I'm not very fast at my times table, because that's not what I think Mathematics is about"--------Marcus du Sautoy, Dean of Mathematics Cambridge University. Concerning Dr. Harr and Dr. MLK "What is fanaticism today will be the fashionable creed of tomorrow, and trite as the multiplication table a week after" Wendell Phillips American Abolitionist. Wait and see you Duke Lacrosse Apologists. Just look at Dr. Anonymous trying to co-opt the Scottsboro Boys. With his ilk that will be Crystal one day.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal's latest:

Guiowen said:, "By the way, Kenny, f(sic) you have difficulty with multiplication, I'll be happy to recommend a 2nd-grade book for you..............You know, I'm not very fast at my times table, because that's not what I think Mathematics is about"--------Marcus du Sautoy, Dean of Mathematics Cambridge University.”

And Justice is not about presuming innocent men guilty based on your interpretation of only part of the fact.

“Concerning Dr. Harr and Dr. MLK "What is fanaticism today will be the fashionable creed of tomorrow, and trite as the multiplication table a week after" Wendell Phillips American Abolitionist.”

Comparing Sidney to Dr. King ism again, blasphemy. Sidney advocates injustice, the presumption that innocent, falsely accused men should be presumed guilty, convicted and incarcerated. Dr. King never advocated anything like that for anyone.

Wait and see you Duke Lacrosse Apologists.”

We defenders of the innocent, falsely accused, wrongfully prosecuted Lacrosse defendants have been waiting on you and Sidney for years and so far you have shown us less than nothing.

Just look at Dr. Anonymous trying to co-opt the Scottsboro Boys.”

Kenny presumes Caucasian men falsely accused of a crime should be presumed guilty solely because of the word of the accuser. The Scottsboro persecutors presumed the falsely accused Scottsboro boys should have been presumed guilty solely on the word of the false accusers. Kenny, you are indulging in projection again. You, not I, are the one adopting the manners, the style, the ethics, the morality of the Scottsboro persecutors.

“With his ilk that will be Crystal one day.’

With all your ilk, and with all of Sidney’s ilk, have you ever proven Crystal ever told the truth when she alleged she had been raped?

NO.

guiowen said...

Wow, Kenny!
How wonderful to have someone who can cut and paste! Too bad you have no original thoughts worth publishing!

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

“Just look at Dr. Anonymous trying to co-opt the Scottsboro Boys”

I am not the only individual who has compared the Lacrosse defendants to the Scottsboro boys. In both cases innocent men were accused of a sex crime which never happened.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/coopt(one definition):

“to appropriate as one's own”

The Scottsboro persecutors presumed the Scottsboro boys were guilty solely on the word of the false accuser.

You presume the Lacrosse defendants guilty solely on the word of their false accuser.

So far as co-opting, according to the definition above, you ARE co-opting the morals, the ethics, of the Scottsboro persecutors.

You ARE as racist as they are.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

We are waiting to be flabbergasted.

How many years has it been since you first proclaimed, Crystal will never go to trial if you had anything to say about it?

How many years has it been since you first proclaimed your committee for J4N would get Nifong's law license restored?

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

You are as racist as the persecutors of the Scottsboro boys.

kenhyderal said...

Guiowen said: "Wow, Kenny! How wonderful to have someone who can cut and paste! Too bad you have no original thoughts worth publishing!".................................................................. An apt quotation is as good as an original remark. ~Author Unknown

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Guiowen said: "Wow, Kenny! How wonderful to have someone who can cut and paste! Too bad you have no original thoughts worth publishing!".................................................................. An apt quotation is as good as an original remark. ~Author Unknown”

Kenny, you have neither come up with any meaningful original thought nor any apt quotations.

guiowen said...

So Kenny, tell me, what is mathematics about?

guiowen said...

So, Kenny,I guess the question is: why should we even listen to some story of yours which has a one-in-thirteen probability of being true?

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

You are resorting to Duck, Dodge, Deny, Avoid, Evade.

By doing so you admit you have no evidence that Crystal was ever raped, that Crystal ever told the truth.

If you think that some day she will be equated with the Scottsboro boys, you are seriously deluded. The Scotttsboro boys are remembered for telling the truth. Crystal is not and never has been, except for you, and you yourself have shown you can not recognize the truty, e.g. your repeated assertions that Nifong did not indict the Lacrosse players for rape.

Anonymous said...

Kenny is a clever smug little prick.

LanceTheIntern said...

Kenhyderal is a troll...An unoriginal one at that. His profile is bogus (created specifically for this site), and there is no reference to anyone fitting the description he's provided here anywhere else on the internet.

Given that, why bother?

guiowen said...

Lance,
I agree. Let's just ignore him from now on.

Anonymous said...

Best advice anyone has given here.

Let Kenny and Sidney spew out their poison.

Then they can stew in the knowledge that no one reads it, let alone believe it.

Hasta la bye bye.

kenhyderal said...

Lance the Intern said: "Kenhyderal is a troll...An unoriginal one at that. His profile is bogus (created specifically for this site), and there is no reference to anyone fitting the description he's provided here anywhere else on the internet"..........................Where have you been Lance? I thought you passed your Bar Exam. Don't put too much faith in "People Search". My google account under user name, kenhyderal predates my appearance on this blog by five years. You may not remember when I proved this. But hey no matter; who cares if you think I'm hiding behind anonymity.

guiowen said...

Lance,
Don't feed the troll.

Anonymous said...

Guiowen, et Kenny stew.

Anonymous said...

kenyhyderal lies: My google account under user name, kenhyderal predates my appearance on this blog by five years.

Your google profile indicates that you have posted on Google under the pseudonym "kenhyderal" since March 2010.

https://www.blogger.com/profile/11840949337424645023

Sidney has a post tagged with the subject "kenhyderal" dated March 12, 2010. Your comments are quoted in that post. I did not attempt to identify your earlier comments on this blog.

http://justice4nifong.blogspot.com/search/label/kenhyderal

Tow months is significantly less than five years.

If you are going to lie, you should attempt to make sure that your lies cannot be disproven so quickly.

guiowen said...

Anony 9:52,
It was taken out of context.

Anonymous said...

I made a typo in the 9:52am comment.

The date of the post tagged with the subject "kenhyderal" is May 12, 2010. That is two months after Google indicates the kenhyderal account was set up. I did not check for earlier comments on this site from kenny.



Anonymous said...

The earliest kenhyderal comment I would was March 14, 2010. That is the same month Google dates his account.

This is a link to the thread.

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3773293499407151140&postID=1644733356433548472

kenhyderal said...

Here is a e-mail to me from Crystal in 2007:
Re: phone, back to School3


G-mail/Inbox






ken edwards



‎Jul‎ ‎29‎, ‎2007 at ‎10‎:‎39‎ ‎PM








cmny43@aim.com

To:kenhyderal



‎Jul‎ ‎30‎, ‎2007 at ‎11‎:‎35‎ ‎AM









School has already started for them, but thanks for asking. They attend year round school and they actually went back on my birthday July 16th. The only thing that they are missing are shoes. The children's closet here in Durham donated clothes to get them started. Please do not feel pressured to do anything though. God will make a way for those who trust and believe in him and the biggest help for me comes in the form of sincere words. I cherish sincerity in everything and I would not want to do anything to hurt our developing relationship.
I realize that Mike had to do what was best for his family, but I would not compromise my integrity to please others. Given all that I have been through I didn't take it personally, however I am disappointed for the sake of justice. I had thought about sending an e-mail of the kids to you, but I have to get recent ones. Are you able to receive pictures okay? Let me know.
Sincerely,
Crystal

Anonymous said...

What does this e-mail have to do with Google or blogger?

kenhyderal said...

Lance wrongly stated, if that was indeed Lance) : His profile is bogus (created specifically for this site)

Anonymous said...

would you like me to post an e-mail Crystal sent me?

Anonymous said...

No, Asshole, Lance was not incorrect.

Your Blogger account is dated March 2010. Your first comment on this site was March 14, 2010.

Anonymous said...

Here is a e-mail to me from Crystal in 2006:
Re: accusation


G-mail/Inbox






george jones



‎Apr ‎8, ‎2006 at ‎8:‎31‎ ‎PM








cmny43@aim.com

To:georgjon



‎Apr ‎8‎, ‎2007 at ‎8‎:‎35‎ ‎PM


I have been busy the last week or so. Mike scheduled a time for me to choose my attackers. Mike has come up with a contrived process that consists only of players and they taped it so a jury could see. I can choose any three. I met with the detectives a couple of times before that so they could coach me on who to select. They chose one of the players because he has some sort of legal problem in Washington, a perfect choice. Each of the players we selected are from rich zip codes, so I may be able to get some money out of this. I thought it went well; I selected the ones we had previously chosen, but I almost made a mistake and selected someone else. Det. Gottlieb saved that, he moved on like I hadn't picked anyone. I also wrote out my statement. Let. Gottlieb made a great suggestion at the end, and I added it at the end. They found semen on the floor of the bathroom, so I said that one of the attackers made me give him a blow job, and I spit it out onto the floor when he came. Pretty clever. They told me this is a long process, so I just have to wait. Oh well.
Sincerely,
Crystal

kenhyderal said...

Those too cowardly to post opinions under their own name, in compensation, feel a need to project their cowardice on to others. I had a google account in 2004. I could post other e-mails dating from then but I do not want to compromise any ones privacy. Your disgusting post shows, for all to see, your true character.

guiowen said...

To Anony 1:59,
Please don't feed the troll.

Anonymous said...

Udaman kenhyderal.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal or Sidney or both continue to post anonymously to create the illusion that they have support.

Anonymous said...

Hmmm. I just had a post that detailed CGM's story going from being raped by "Matt" and "Brett" both vaginally and anally where both "put [their] penis" inside her to her story in Cosmo where she was raped with a broomstick and " they found, like, wooden pieces" during the medical exam.

That post is now gone.

So I'll ask Kenny -- Do broomsticks leave DNA via sperm?

I'll also ask -- where in the medical records of the exams does Dr. Manley or Nurse Levicy mention these "wooden pieces" that CGM states they found?

Or was Crystal lying about the rape then, or is she lying about the rape now?

Anonymous said...

Kenny and Sid are off somewhere taking turns shoving a broomstick up their ass in commemoration of the 12th anniversary of the Mike Nifong "millions of dollars in free advertisement" publicity tour.

Don't leave any wooden pieces, boys.

Anonymous said...

You speak of Kenny and Sid shoviig a broomstick up their ass. Do they share the same ass?

Anonymous said...

Their half-assed comments here have lead me to believe that it would indeed take both of them to make up 1 complete ass.

Anonymous said...

Ken,

Was Crystal quoted accurately? Did the doctor find wooden pieces?

kenhyderal said...

Where is the "troll patrol" when supposed allies, of you Duke Lacrosse Apologists, put on a disgusting display like their posts of March 29th? Are you not embarrassed by them or do you excuse their sick asinine vulgarities because they support your views?

guiowen said...

Please,
Don't feed the troll!

Anonymous said...

Ignore the Scottsboro persecutor wannabe Kenhyderal: Let him stew in his own venom.

Anonymous said...

Kenny,

What’s disgusting about the question asked at 7:47? Wasn’t the author of the article William Cohan? I thought you were a fan of his.

Anonymous said...

One more exposure of a lie Kenhyderal promulgates:

Kenny is on record as believing that anonymous party attendees raped Crystal. He has claimed that Nifong did not indict the Lacrosse players for rape(he had all three indicted for first degree forcible rape) and that Nifong did this in the hope that they would reveal who the rapists were.

I again watched the outstanding ESPN 30 for 30 documentary Fantastic Lies. It shows a scene in which Nifong himself states that after he had David Evans indicted he did not plan on indicting anyone else.

I say again, Kenny is a liar. He denies Crystal did not lie. How can someone who indulges in lying be capable or recognizing whether or not someone else is lying?

Anonymous said...

Correction to the above comement:

I say again, Kenny is a liar. He denies Crystal LIED. How can someone who indulges in lying be capable or recognizing whether or not someone else is lying?

Anonymous said...

This shows how well-informed Kenhyderal is:

Finally, in a jailhouse interview with author Cohan (pp. 518-520), Mangum provided a seventh version of events. She now asserted that the attack had occurred with a broomstick—a claim she had never made before—and that it had left wooden shards, which medical officials needed to remove from her body. No such evidence was recorded, even from the always-eager-to-oblige Tara Levicy.

guiowen said...

Concerning the broomstick: an honorable person would have asked why people were talking about brooms. But we long ago gave up expecting honorable behavior from Kenhyderal.

Anonymous said...

I bet Kenny will soon quote some friend of his to the effect that only Canadians are allowed to talk about brooms.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Kenny,

What’s disgusting about the question asked at 7:47? Wasn’t the author of the article William Cohan? I thought you were a fan of his.

March 30, 2018 at 3:27 AM



Kenny, We are waiting for you to address Crystal's claim about the broomstick.

Anonymous said...

Don't expect to hear from kenhyderal. He is quite happy to ignore facts that don't fit into the narrative he has constructed. In addition, he is nothing more than a troll.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyedral:

This from an email Kenny purportedly got from Crystal:

" Gottlieb made a great suggestion at the end, and I added it at the end. They found semen on the floor of the bathroom, so I said that one of the attackers made me give him a blow job, and I spit it out onto the floor when he came. Pretty clever."

Kenny, if this was trure, then the DNA of the alleged assailant would have been found in Crystal's mouth. The alleged assailant was alleged to be a Lacrosse player. The DNA found on Crystal did not match the DNA of any Lacrosse player.

If the DNA had come from an anonymous rapist, and Nifong did take control of the police investigation, the explain why Nifong did not try to identify who left the DNA?

If this is truly from Crystal, it is documentation that Crystal lied.

Personally, I believe you fabricated the email.

Anonymous said...

Again regarding the email you say Crystal sent to you.

Considering that members of the Lacrosse team lived in that house, it is impossible that the investigators would not find DNA from one of them.

The question is, was Crystal's DNA ever found in the bathroom.

There was a towel found in the house with semen on it. Some wags claimed that the towel was used to wipe down Crystal. None of her DNA was found on the towel.

Anonymous said...

I agree that kenhyderal lacks the courage to address the broomstick.

Anonymous said...

This is very true. Ken will never discus the broomstick.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal, when will you explain the broomstick?

Anonymous said...

So Ken, what’s the deal with the broomstick?

Anonymous said...

Was any DNA found on the broomstick?

guiowen said...

Don{t worry about Kenny. He{s just looking through the internet, hoping to find something about how only black mothers of three are allowed to talk about broomsticks.

Anonymous said...

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick

Broomstick, Broomstick, Broomstick


FakeKenhyderal said...

In the FWIW department, I tried to engage Kenhyderal in a discussion regarding the "broom stick" story from Crystal Mangum wayyy back in 2015.

He neglected to respond in any significant way then, I seriously doubt he will do so now.

Why is that, Kenny?

guiowen said...

I{m going to suggest that, ever time good old Kenny shows up here, we ask him about the broomstick.
It's not clear that that will shut him up, but it's worth trying.

Anonymous said...

Where is the little man kenhyderal?

Anonymous said...

Where is the little man?

Anonymous said...

Just ignore the tiny little man and leave him to stew in his own venom.

Anonymous said...

Sweep, Sweep, Sweep

Sweep, Sweep, Sweep

Sweep, Sweep, Sweep

A Lawyer said...

Dr. Harr:

Any news on Mangum's motions for a default judgment and summary judgment?

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr:

Any news on the broomstick?

Anonymous said...

Sidney, we are still waiting to be flabbergasted.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr,

It is time for a sharlog about the broomstick.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr,

We are waiting to be enlightened about the broomstick.

Anonymous said...

Sidney, we are still waiting to be flabbergasted.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney, we are still waiting to be flabbergasted.

April 4, 2018 at 5:02 AM


Apologies for not commenting recently, but have been extremely busy. Flabbergasting is on the horizon. I am working hard to complete a two-part sharlog... very in-depth and enlightening. Also, am involved in another major project which will come to light in the near future. In the meantime, the wait is on for the defendants in the Malicious Prosecution civil lawsuit to respond. The Sheriff served Durham Officer Marianne Bond on March 22, 2018, and should have served the Durham District Attorney's Office by now... though I have no confirmation. I am assuming that the NC Attorney General's Office will be representing the Durham District Attorney's Office, but don't know about Officer Bond.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney, we are still waiting to be flabbergasted.

April 4, 2018 at 5:02 AM


Apologies for not commenting recently, but have been extremely busy. Flabbergasting is on the horizon. I am working hard to complete a two-part sharlog... very in-depth and enlightening. Also, am involved in another major project which will come to light in the near future. In the meantime, the wait is on for the defendants in the Malicious Prosecution civil lawsuit to respond. The Sheriff served Durham Officer Marianne Bond on March 22, 2018, and should have served the Durham District Attorney's Office by now... though I have no confirmation. I am assuming that the NC Attorney General's Office will be representing the Durham District Attorney's Office, but don't know about Officer Bond."

So what will you do when your suits are dismissed?

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr,

Will the new sharlog address the broomstick?

A Lawyer said...

In the meantime, the wait is on for the defendants in the Malicious Prosecution civil lawsuit to respond. The Sheriff served Durham Officer Marianne Bond on March 22, 2018, and should have served the Durham District Attorney's Office by now... though I have no confirmation.

So you now recognize that your initial attempt at service was ineffective?

Have you withdrawn your motion for a default judgment?

Anonymous said...

Sidney we remain far from flabbergasted.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr,

You should provide your readers a thorough analysis of the broomstick. They deserve no less.

Anonymous said...

Ken,

In the course of his investigation, did D.A. Nifong preserve the broomstick?

Anonymous said...

Where is the little man?

Anonymous said...

Where is the broomstick?

Anonymous said...

Sidney, we are still waiting to be flabbergasted.

Should Ctystal's(actually your) lawsuits not be dismissed then they will go to the discovery phase and Crystal will have to face questioning from the defense attorneys, and contrary to your delusions she was not a strong witness in her murder trial, and she did not perform well when then AG Roy Cooper's investigators questioned her. I believe after the discovery phase her suits will be dismissed, or, if it goes to trial, after Crystal presents her case, the judge will direct the jury find against her.

Who is going to present her case for her? You have been enjoined ftom practicing law without a license, so you can not advocate for her. As it will be a civil matter, she would not be entitled to a court appointed attorney. And as her likelyhood of recovering is just about zero, no lawyer would represent her on a contingency fee basis.

FakeKenhyderal said...

Truth is....If Sid would just type out his blog entries, he'd have a great deal more time to respond to questions here and, you would think, do something to actually help CGM.

That he's chosen to waste his time creating videos in an outdated format (anyone use an android device or iPad to access this site?) speaks volumes about Sid.

His "sharlogs" aren't created for any purpose other than to promote himself -- poorly.

It's unfortunate -- if you look at the history of this site, you can see there used to be a great deal of meaningful discussion.

Unfortunately, those posters (like A Lawyer or Walt) rarely, if ever, bother to comment any longer -- they know the likelihood of Sid responding to a comment in any meaningful way is not very good.

Anonymous said...

Ken,

Did Dr. Manly recover wooden shards during her examination of Crystal?

Anonymous said...

Sidney, we remain unflabbergasted.

Anonymous said...

Where is the little man? Is he afraid to discuss the broomstick?

Anonymous said...

To paraphrase Sid:


"Kenny can't handle the truth... when it comes to Crystal Mangum"

guiowen said...

I cannot believe we actually got rid of him.

Anonymous said...

Sidney you have yet to flabbergast anyone.


Instead of flabbergasting your readers, you just meekly backed down.

You are, again, incredibly stupid and vain and delusionally megalomaniacal.

You boast that the defendants in Crystal's(actually your) lawsuits did not reply because they had no defense. To reply, all they had to do was just list the specifics of the complaint and then answered either admitted or denied. Then the ball would have been in Crystal's(actually your) court to prove, and you do not prove anything by saying in your complaint, this is what I have proven.

The defendants would have been aware that service was not valid and would have been aware that, had service been valid, that not replying would have opened them up to default and summary judgment.

You deluded yourself into believing you could get a judgment against the defendants by denying them their right to defend themselves. Very Nifongian of you.

Kenhyderal Supporter said...

I’m proud to call kenhyderal my friend.

Anonymous said...

Sidney, we are still waiting to be flabbergasted.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney, we are still waiting to be flabbergasted.

April 9, 2018 at 3:56 AM


Hey, Anony.

Sorry to keep you waiting, but I have been busy working on a miracle. What I would suggest, instead of twiddling your thumbs, is to make sure that you have a plush, comfortable crying towel at the ready. You're going to find it extremely useful in the near future. Really! I'm serious.

The reason I have not been active on commenting is because conjuring up miracles is not easy and is extremely time-consuming. Also, I have a very insightful sharlog on the back burner.

Stay tuned. Again, apologies for the wait.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney, we are still waiting to be flabbergasted.

April 9, 2018 at 3:56 AM


Hey, Anony.

Sorry to keep you waiting, but I have been busy working on a miracle. What I would suggest, instead of twiddling your thumbs, is to make sure that you have a plush, comfortable crying towel at the ready. You're going to find it extremely useful in the near future. Really! I'm serious.

The reason I have not been active on commenting is because conjuring up miracles is not easy and is extremely time-consuming. Also, I have a very insightful sharlog on the back burner.

Stay tuned. Again, apologies for the wait."

Which only means Sidney is working on his latest failure.

Anonymous said...

Sidney, the only seriousness in your life is that you are a seriously deluded megalomaniac.

Kenhyderal Supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

Do you know the whereabouts of kenhyderal? He has not posted on your blog in over a week.

Anonymous said...












Sweep, Sweep, Sweep

Sweep, Sweep, Sweep

Sweep, Sweep, Sweep
















Anonymous said...

According to that insightful article about Sidney which appeared in the Independent Weekly, detailing how Sidney spent most of his post medical school career filing and losing lawsuits, Sidney started his career as a Nifong supporter(which is like being an athletic supporter for a Eunuch) in 2008.

So it has been 10 years of ineffectual delusional megalomania by Sidney, 10years of zero accomplishments.

Anonymous said...

In honor of the 12th anniversary of the Duke LAX Defense attorneys revealing no match found in results of the first DNA testing, Sid and Kenhyderal are busy getting sperm DNA samples from multiple unidentified males in their underwear.

Wm Cohan will be writing about this in his forthcoming book, tentatively titled The Price of Ignorance, in which he will quote many of the Duke LAX attorneys while, oddly enough, not bothering to actually interview them.

He will interview Mike Nifong as part of the new book, but Nifong's input will be limited to the sentence, "We're f*cked".

As you were.

Anonymous said...















Sweep, Sweep, Sweep

Sweep, Sweep, Sweep

Sweep, Sweep, Sweep














Anonymous said...

Sidney we are still waiting to be flabbergasted.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"The reason I have not been active on commenting is because conjuring up miracles is not easy and is extremely time-consuming. Also, I have a very insightful sharlog on the back burner."

You have never published any insightful anything.

What makes you think you can do it now, if not your delusional megalomania?

Anonymous said...

Hey Sid,

Will your new sharlog enlighten us about the broomstick?

Anonymous said...

Oh I've gotta turn and run
From faces that you never see
Oh I've gotta save my anus
From all that I've broken
And pack up these pieces of broomstick

It's too late now to stop the process
This was my choice - you stuck it in
This double life I lead is eating me up from within
A thousand shards of wood you pushed inside my anus
And left me at DOOK to bleed

Anonymous said...

I don’t understand.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal will explain.

Anonymous said...

Where is Kenny, the black on white guilt presuming racist with the morals and ethics of a Scottsboro persecutor, the apologist for a convicted criminal/false rape accuser/convicted murderess?

Anonymous said...


Once I had a love and it was a gas
Soon turned out I had shards in my ass.

Seemed like the real thing only to find
a broomstick shoved up my behind

Anonymous said...

I like it.

Anonymous said...

Encore . . . Encore . . .

Anonymous said...

Sidney we are still unflabbergasted.

Anonymous said...

Where is Kenhyderal, the guilt presuming black on white racist with the ethics and morals of a Scottsboro persecutor

Anonymous said...

Sidney we have yet to be flabbergasted.

Anonymous said...

Sid,

How's that miracle coming?

Anonymous said...

















Sweep, Sweep, Sweep

Sweep, Sweep, Sweep

Sweep, Sweep, Sweep















Anonymous said...

Where is the apologist for the convicted criminal/false rape accuser/convicted murderess?

Anonymous said...

Sidney you have been serious for 10 days now and we still are not flabbergasted.

Anonymous said...

Na na na na
Na na na na
Hey Kenny
Goodbye

Anonymous said...

Na na na na
Na na na na
Hey Ken-ny
Goodbye

A Lawyer said...

What I would suggest, instead of twiddling your thumbs, is to make sure that you have a plush, comfortable crying towel at the ready. You're going to find it extremely useful in the near future. Really! I'm serious.

Were you serious when you said Mangum would be released by March 15, 2015?

How did that work out?

Were you serious when you said Mangum would be released by April 23, 2016?

How did that work out?

Were you serious when you said Mangum would be released by June 30, 2016?

How did that work out?

How are you fixed for crying towels?

Anonymous said...

Sidney you were serious when you said Crystal would never go to trial if you had anything to say about it.

Anonymous said...

Na na na na
Na na na na
Hey Ken-ny
Goodbye

Anonymous said...

Where is Kenhyderal the black on white guilt presuming racist with the morals and ethics of a Scottsboro persecutor?

Nifong Supporter said...


HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

Apologies for not contributing more to the comments, but I have been especially busy recently. Haven't even had an opportunity to work much on the two-part sharlog because of many new developments. First, and most importantly, I manually filed in Durham Superior Criminal Court this morning a Motion for Appropriate Relief based on new evidence. Evidence was generated less than three weeks ago.

Also, a couple of weeks ago I was interviewed for a program on Crystal Mangum that was filming in North Carolina at the time. It is for a program I believe is called "Snapped." Daniel Meier was to be interviewed for this, too. (More restricted than I would have liked... I was not even allowed to wear my j4n tee shirt. And, of course, I had to be prevented from mentioning names and presenting much of the post-conviction injustices.) But, I am pleased that some attention is being given to her case... so I definitely can't complain.

Also, I had to reserve the Summons and Complaints to Bond and the Durham D.A.'s Office by Sheriff. They were served on the 22nd and 28th of March respectively.

Anyway, I still need to work on the exhibits and get them integrated with the brief so that I can post the Motion. Hope to have it posted by the weekend. Then it'll take about another week to complete my flabbergastin' sharlog. Thanks for your patience.


Anonymous said...

Haven't we heard something like this before?

Anonymous said...

Hey lazy @ss -- post the freakin' MAR and the summons and complaint documents!

Don't just write a single sentence about them.

F*ckin' worthless......

Anonymous said...

Who is that bad boy?

Anonymous said...

Na na na na
Na na na na
Hey Ken-ny
Goodbye

Anonymous said...

Please hurry and post that flabbergastin' flog.

Kenny's not here so we can't argue about Canadian v. American history and healthcare.


Anonymous said...

Na na na na
Na na na na
Hey Ken-ny
Goodbye

Anonymous said...

Sidney, we have yet to be flabbergasted.

When will we see your latest attempt to recycle your discredited beliefs about Crystal the victimizer/false accuser in the Duke Rape hoax?

Anonymous said...

Where is the black on white guilt presuming racist Kenhyderal, who espouses the morals and ethics of the Scottsboro persecutors, namely, presume the innocent men guilty because the false accuser says they are.