justice4nifong: Letter from Dr. Sidney Harr to CBS correspondent Major Garrett

Saturday, July 16, 2022

Letter from Dr. Sidney Harr to CBS correspondent Major Garrett

161 comments:

kenhyderal said...: Looks as if the US Postal system is just as broken as the US Justice System. Or, is there some deceipt here. This piece of mail was not, under any circumstances, undeliverable. I suspect that that the unofficial notation that it was undeliverable was a cover for the letter being vetted and and refused either by Garret or those screening this CBS celebrity's mail. Not that I'm a conspiracy theorist but wasn't Rae Evans a former executive at CBS? I suggest Dr. Harr that you e-mail Garrett a link to this post; July 16, 2022 at 4:21 PM
Anonymous said...: Sid,

Is this the Super Secret Project? A letter returned to you because you mailed it to the wrong address?; July 16, 2022 at 4:28 PM
Nifong Supporter Supporter said...: Dr. Harr,

It seems obvious that Rae Evans intervened and prevented your letter from being delivered. As you know, she has substantial influence over the operations of CBS. Have you considered suing Ms. Evans?; July 16, 2022 at 5:07 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: kenhyderal said...
Looks as if the US Postal system is just as broken as the US Justice System. Or, is there some deceipt here. This piece of mail was not, under any circumstances, undeliverable. I suspect that that the unofficial notation that it was undeliverable was a cover for the letter being vetted and and refused either by Garret or those screening this CBS celebrity's mail. Not that I'm a conspiracy theorist but wasn't Rae Evans a former executive at CBS? I suggest Dr. Harr that you e-mail Garrett a link to this post

July 16, 2022 at 4:21 PM

Hey, kenhyderal.

You're absolutely correct. Clearly someone vetting the mail was instructed to return mail. Much of the letters sent to news media is Returned-to-Sender unopened. Don't know if Rae Evans is involved.

I wish I had an e-mail for Mr. Garrett.; July 16, 2022 at 6:32 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
Sid,

Is this the Super Secret Project? A letter returned to you because you mailed it to the wrong address?

July 16, 2022 at 4:28 PM

Hey, Anony.

The letter was mailed to the correct address... and it was not the Super Secret Project.

The Super Secret Project was an attempt to get the North Carolina State Bar to authorize or waive procedures to allow me to represent Crystal Mangum for all cases related to her murder case. The NC State Bar basically said it was unable to comply with my request. When I asked the NC State Bar for an attorney to be appointed or referred to Crystal (as we were unable to find an attorney willing to represent) it said it was unable to do that.

So the project, which was a long-shot, was unsuccessful.; July 16, 2022 at 6:42 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Nifong Supporter Supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

It seems obvious that Rae Evans intervened and prevented your letter from being delivered. As you know, she has substantial influence over the operations of CBS. Have you considered suing Ms. Evans?

July 16, 2022 at 5:07 PM

Hey, Nifong Double Supporter.

I have nothing substantial to tie Rae Evans to CBS returning my letter to Major Garrett. Subsequently, I have no intention of filing a lawsuit against her. Filing lawsuits are not something I relish... doing so only as a last resort.; July 16, 2022 at 6:48 PM
Nifong Supporter Supporter said...: Dr. Harr,

Please post your letter to the NC State Bar and the response. Your request was a reasonable one and I am shocked that it was not approved.; July 17, 2022 at 5:26 AM
Harr Supporter said...: Dr. Harr,

Will you continue to represent Crystal as a lay advocate in her cases and prepare and file legal documents for her?; July 18, 2022 at 5:44 AM
guiowen said...: Sidney,
Try 2020 M street, NW; July 18, 2022 at 10:03 AM
Anonymous said...: Maybe we can’t blame the problem on Rae Evans after all.; July 18, 2022 at 12:27 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...: I’ll repeat my comment.

We had a Christmas card returned last month with the same return to sender message ( it was mailed in November 2021 to the correct address in California).

It happens.; July 18, 2022 at 4:12 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Wait…You actually tried to get the North Carolina State Bar to authorize or waive procedures to allow you to represent Crystal Mangum?

The same State Bar that sued you in 2013 for practicing law without a license?

You remember, the one where you were “permanently enjoined...from the practice of law in North Carolina”?

The one where the Wake County judge enjoined you from “providing any legal services or giving legal advice or counsel to any other person, firm, or corporation, including but not limited to preparation of or filing any court pleadings for or on behalf of others or advising others, specifically including Crystal Mangum.”?

And no, the NC State Bar does not appoint attorneys. A 1 minute search would have shown you that.

No wonder it was a super secret project. I wouldn’t want anyone to know I’d done something so absurd, either.; July 18, 2022 at 5:45 PM
Anonymous said...: You can contact Mr. Garrett on Twitter or send him an email at his “The Takeout” podcast.

A quick search will provide you with this information. I would not be surprised if you are unable to find either, however.; July 19, 2022 at 5:17 AM
Anonymous said...: Anon at 5:17 ...

Sid won't even look or try. He will just say "the mail should have worked, the fact it didn't is proof of a conspiracy" and refuse to do anything else.

His goal has never been to get Crystal released from prison. Right now she is literally a captive audience for his nonsense. That's why he refuses to take any advice that might actually help. He and Kenny have Crystal right where they want her. Does anyone really believe Crystal will stick around with Sid once she is out? Sid clearly doesn't. He did all he could to sabotage her trial, hoping for life. She didn't get that, but now he's doing all he can to make sure she serves her full sentence.

But, like way too many in the past who abused and took advantage of Crystal, he is doing the same thing to her - by pretending he's her hero, but in reality he's isolating her and gaslighting her. It's classic abuse.; July 19, 2022 at 10:31 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Nifong Supporter Supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

Please post your letter to the NC State Bar and the response. Your request was a reasonable one and I am shocked that it was not approved.

July 17, 2022 at 5:26 AM

Hey, Nifong Double Supporter.

Because of obligations to Crystal and Adonis, I really don't have the time to post my formal request to the State Bar seeking authorization/waiver to represent Ms. Mangum. The Bar's refusal to allow me to represent Crystal was basically based on the fact that there were no legal rules or statutes to permit it... that was the gist of the response.

I believe conditions surrounding Mangum's case did warrant allowing me to legally represent her.; July 19, 2022 at 11:16 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Harr Supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

Will you continue to represent Crystal as a lay advocate in her cases and prepare and file legal documents for her?

July 18, 2022 at 5:44 AM

I will continue to represent Crystal until I am able to retain a Bar-accredited attorney who is willing to act as co-counsel with Crystal and who will be more dedicated to acting in Mangum's best interests instead of those of Duke University Hospital. Also, a prospective attorney for Mangum should be willing to meet with me to discuss the manner of death and medical issues in Mangum's case.; July 19, 2022 at 11:22 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: guiowen said...
Sidney,
Try 2020 M street, NW

July 18, 2022 at 10:03 AM

Hey, gui, mon ami.

I looked up the address and it seemed to be a residential building. Don't think it's helpful, but thanks anyway.; July 19, 2022 at 11:25 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Prince Humperdinck said...
I’ll repeat my comment.

We had a Christmas card returned last month with the same return to sender message ( it was mailed in November 2021 to the correct address in California).

It happens.

July 18, 2022 at 4:12 PM

Hey, Prince Humperdinck.

It seems to me that the Washington DC headquarters for CBS News should be able to forward a certified mailed manila envelope to its well-known Washington DC Correspondent Major Garrett.; July 19, 2022 at 11:36 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Prince Humperdinck said...
Wait…You actually tried to get the North Carolina State Bar to authorize or waive procedures to allow you to represent Crystal Mangum?

The same State Bar that sued you in 2013 for practicing law without a license?

You remember, the one where you were “permanently enjoined...from the practice of law in North Carolina”?

The one where the Wake County judge enjoined you from “providing any legal services or giving legal advice or counsel to any other person, firm, or corporation, including but not limited to preparation of or filing any court pleadings for or on behalf of others or advising others, specifically including Crystal Mangum.”?

And no, the NC State Bar does not appoint attorneys. A 1 minute search would have shown you that.

No wonder it was a super secret project. I wouldn’t want anyone to know I’d done something so absurd, either.

July 18, 2022 at 5:45 PM

Hey, Prince Humperdinck.

My plan was a super secret project until after it was carried out to completion. I don't think it was absurd, and I voluntarily let everyone know about it after the fact, so it's not something I'm trying to hide.; July 19, 2022 at 11:49 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid,

What’s next? A super dooper secret project?; July 19, 2022 at 2:40 PM
Nifong Supporter Supporter said...: Dr. Harr,

How much time will it take to post your letter to the State Bar and the response? Adonis won’t miss you if you step away for a few minutes.; July 19, 2022 at 4:54 PM
Anonymous said...: Well, of course YOU don’t think it’s absurd.

Everyone else knows it was, and would have told you as much if you’d bothered to ask.

Telling everyone about it after the fact just further shows your ignorance.

And asking a lawyer to “co-counsel” with Crystal Mangum is a guaranteed path to never finding one. She’s either representing herself (pro se), or a lawyer is representing her. That’s it.

And you cannot act as a co-counsel until you are admitted to practice and are sworn in as a North Carolina licensed lawyer.; July 19, 2022 at 5:08 PM
Harr Supporter said...: Dr. Harr,

I do not understand why you will not post your letter to the NC State Bar. You posted your letter to Major Garrett. The letter to the State Bar was the Super Secret Project and is much more significant than the letter to Mr. Garret. Have you considered asking Chuck to help you?; July 20, 2022 at 5:41 AM
Anonymous said...: What's the status of the Kinsley/DHHS case?; July 20, 2022 at 6:25 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Dr. Harr 7-19-22 11:25 Am It's both residential and Offices and CBS has their Washington Office as well as staff quarters in that building. His podcast The Takeout does not accept e-mails.; July 20, 2022 at 8:51 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: There is an email address on the “The Takeout” FB page.

It seems odd that they’d post an email address that doesn’t accept emails.

Maybe you should ask why on the FB page or on Major Garrett’s twitter feed….; July 20, 2022 at 1:44 PM
Anonymous said...: Here's an idea:

Call CBS and tell them you have a story idea for Garrett Morris or Major Garrett or whoever and that you want to mail him some materials for him and/or his staff to review.

Send your package via FedEx or UPS, like a normal person, and not by certified mail (like you are trying to serve him with court papers). Both UPS and FedEx will provide you with tracking information that will confirm when and to where your package was delivered.

Problem solved.

You are welcome.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; July 20, 2022 at 3:41 PM
Anonymous said...: Maybe the Takeout doesn’t accept emails from Canada?; July 20, 2022 at 5:32 PM
Anonymous said...: Welcome to the 21st century, Sid.

No one is going to blindly accept a computer disk (hell, newer computers no longer have a way to watch them, anyway).

No one is going to blindly accept a flash drive, either. The risk to network security is simply too high.; July 20, 2022 at 5:40 PM
A Durham Man said...: Sid,

There you go again, you’re up to your old tricks. You post the letters to Major Garrett and the NC Judicial Standards Commission, but not the letter to the NC State Bar and the response. What are you hiding from us?

It’s time for you to come clean. Besides, if you don’t post the letter to the State Bar and its response, how will Kenny be able to assist you by doing more legal research to show that the State Bar is acting illegally?; July 21, 2022 at 5:53 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Nifong Supporter Supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

How much time will it take to post your letter to the State Bar and the response? Adonis won’t miss you if you step away for a few minutes.

July 19, 2022 at 4:54 PM

Hey, Nifong Double Supporter.

First of all, Adonis is a very needy Siamese cat.

My letter to the State Bar is very straightforward. I basically stated that NC Bar-accredited attorneys allowed Mangum to be convicted for a crime that was never committed. That State Bar-accredited attorneys undermined and sabotaged her case. That State Bar-accredited attorneys abandoned her and stated she was on her own. And State Bar-accredited attorneys refused to legally represent her. Because of the aforementioned I requested their authorization to allow me to represent her since I, at least, had her best interests at heart... and not Duke University's. The response was basically that there was no rule in place to allow me, a non-attorney, to represent her. So, that's basically it.

If I ever find time, I might post them, but right now I have plenty of letters to send out and I want to produce another shar-video.; July 21, 2022 at 1:09 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Well, of course YOU don’t think it’s absurd.

Everyone else knows it was, and would have told you as much if you’d bothered to ask.

Telling everyone about it after the fact just further shows your ignorance.

And asking a lawyer to “co-counsel” with Crystal Mangum is a guaranteed path to never finding one. She’s either representing herself (pro se), or a lawyer is representing her. That’s it.

And you cannot act as a co-counsel until you are admitted to practice and are sworn in as a North Carolina licensed lawyer.

July 19, 2022 at 5:08 PM

Hey, Anony.

In case you haven't noticed, I don't really care about what other people think of me... I'm not ego-centric.

Mangum allowed other lawyers to represent her and look what happened to her. She ended up being convicted of second-degree murder for a crime that was not committed. Mangum needs legal counsel that will put her interests ahead of Duke University. And the only way to assure that would be if any NC State Bar-accredited attorney acts as her co-counsel.; July 21, 2022 at 1:14 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Harr Supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

I do not understand why you will not post your letter to the NC State Bar. You posted your letter to Major Garrett. The letter to the State Bar was the Super Secret Project and is much more significant than the letter to Mr. Garret. Have you considered asking Chuck to help you?

July 20, 2022 at 5:41 AM

Hey, Harr Supporter.

My letter to the NC State Bar was delivered and elicited a response. My letter to Major Garrett was sent back to me Return-to-Sender unopened. By posting the correspondence online on my blog site, it is my hope that he will possibly see it eventually.

If time permits, I might, at some point, post the letter-exchange with the State Bar, but right now I have other priorities.; July 21, 2022 at 1:22 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
What's the status of the Kinsley/DHHS case?

July 20, 2022 at 6:25 AM

Hey, Anony.

The Kinsley/DHHS case is mired in delay. For example, it is my understanding that the last day to submit dispositive motions is the end of February 2023. Keep in mind that this is really not that complex of a case, but it works with the run-out-the-clock defense strategy.; July 21, 2022 at 1:30 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: kenhyderal said...
@ Dr. Harr 7-19-22 11:25 Am It's both residential and Offices and CBS has their Washington Office as well as staff quarters in that building. His podcast The Takeout does not accept e-mails.

July 20, 2022 at 8:51 AM

Hey, kenhyderal.

Thanks for the clarification. If I could get a more specific address, such as a suite number, I might consider resending it.; July 21, 2022 at 1:33 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
Here's an idea:

Call CBS and tell them you have a story idea for Garrett Morris or Major Garrett or whoever and that you want to mail him some materials for him and/or his staff to review.

Send your package via FedEx or UPS, like a normal person, and not by certified mail (like you are trying to serve him with court papers). Both UPS and FedEx will provide you with tracking information that will confirm when and to where your package was delivered.

Problem solved.

You are welcome.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

July 20, 2022 at 3:41 PM

Hey, Abe.

Thanks for the suggestions, but I think my time might be better served by sending packets out to media-types and others who have more definitive mailing addresses.; July 21, 2022 at 1:37 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
Welcome to the 21st century, Sid.

No one is going to blindly accept a computer disk (hell, newer computers no longer have a way to watch them, anyway).

No one is going to blindly accept a flash drive, either. The risk to network security is simply too high.

July 20, 2022 at 5:40 PM

Hey, Anony.

I think that a malicious hacker would not provide his contact information in correspondence accompanying the computer disk if it contained malware viruses. I may be wrong.; July 21, 2022 at 1:42 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous A Durham Man said...

Sid,

There you go again, you’re up to your old tricks. You post the letters to Major Garrett and the NC Judicial Standards Commission, but not the letter to the NC State Bar and the response. What are you hiding from us?

It’s time for you to come clean. Besides, if you don’t post the letter to the State Bar and its response, how will Kenny be able to assist you by doing more legal research to show that the State Bar is acting illegally?

July 21, 2022 at 5:53 AM

Hey, Durham Man.

There's nothing to hide. Just a lot on my plate.

Gotta get back to work.; July 21, 2022 at 2:13 PM
Anonymous said...: “….And the only way to assure that would be if any NC State Bar-accredited attorney acts as her co-counsel.”

And, as I stated, asking any lawyer to be her “co-counsel” is guaranteeing that no lawyer will touch her case.

Don’t take my word for it, as your friends Cyril Wecht or James Coleman.; July 21, 2022 at 4:15 PM
Anonymous said...: A malicious hacker would definitely use someone else’s contact information in correspondence.; July 21, 2022 at 4:16 PM
A Durham Man said...: Kenny,

Was the NC State Bar correct when it denied Sid’s request that he be permitted to represent Crystal in court? Did the NC State Bar violate Crystal’s and Sid’s rights?; July 21, 2022 at 7:46 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

Does the Governor or the Attorney General have the authority to order the NC State Bar to approve Sid’s request?; July 22, 2022 at 4:19 AM
Anonymous said...: Are Victoria Peterson, Steven Matherly, and Vincent Edward Clarke still involved with J4N?; July 22, 2022 at 5:51 AM
Doogie Howser said...: Kenny,

We are waiting for your analysis of the NC State Bar decision. Your posts never disappoint.; July 23, 2022 at 5:09 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny’s busy researching the correct definition of “legal disability”, since Sid’s too busy with his spoiled cat Adonis.

He’ll analyze the NC State Bar decision once he gets CGM’s clemency letter written and signed.

Priorities, you know.; July 23, 2022 at 7:11 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

Where are you?; July 24, 2022 at 4:53 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...: I’m proud to call kenhyderal my friend.; July 24, 2022 at 5:44 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid,

Has Kenny abandoned you and your blog?; July 24, 2022 at 9:40 AM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...
@ Anonymous 6-28-22 10:51 Do you honestly believe Gov. Cooper would grant Crystal Mangum Clemency? That would, for him, raise too many negative political consequences. Consequences he feared while he was AG and under great pressure from the Duke Lacrosse Apologists.

June 28, 2022 at 1:07 PM

to quote guiowen ( gui, mon ami ):

Here we go again:

Sidney: "I have some powerful arguments that will get CGM free within two weeks if not sooner."
Sidney: "Please, everybody, tell me the color of your favorite crying towel."
Kenny: "The evil Duke lacrosse apologists have been successful up to now, but will now suffer as the arc of justice bends in Crystal's direction."
Some time later:
Others: "So tell us Sidney how things went?"
Sidney: "I clearly failed to take into consideration the evil behavior of the justice system, and/or the way CGM's attorneys betrayed her!"
Kenny: "What can you expect from the U.S. system? This would never happen in Canada, or any other reasonable country! Reform reform! Drain this swamp!"

Guiowen -- Just re-post this after every new shlong by Sid. It means much more coming from you than it does from me.

Any people new to this site can skip reading any further comments.; July 25, 2022 at 9:19 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny would no more abandon Sid and this blog than he would allow CGM to sit in jail when he could write a letter requesting clemency to the NC Clemency Board.

Oh, wait.....; July 25, 2022 at 9:22 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...: kenhyderal is a fighter for justice and he will never abandon Dr. Harr or Crystal. I am certain that kenhyderal is working on additional research that he will share with us soon in a post. Then, Crystal will be awarded a new trial and all of the Duke Lacrosse Apologists will have no choice but to put in their orders for crying towels; July 25, 2022 at 2:56 PM
kenhyderal said...: Only in an uncivilized country would the wrongful incarceration of a citizen be the subject of jest and sport by so many. Only in an uncivilized country would troubled teens be allowed to buy assault weapons. Only in an uncivilized country, with millions uninsured and some, who fall ill with cancer, have to sell their home or declare bankruptcy, would universal healthcare still be denied. In all these respects you're generations out of date. Shame.; July 25, 2022 at 8:42 PM
Doogie Howser said...: Kenny,

Does this mean you will not be posting the results of your research confirming that the NC State Bar acted illegally when it denied Sid’s request to be allowed to represent Crystal?; July 26, 2022 at 5:35 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

It has been pointed out to you many times that you are the subject of jest and sport by many posters on this blog. Their posts are not directed at Crystal. However, since it seems to make you feel better, just continue to ignore reality.; July 26, 2022 at 10:08 AM
THE GREAT KILGO said...: kenhyderal,

I HAVE THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE PARTY THAT YOU ARE LOOKING FOR. IT’S NOT TOO LATE FOR YOU TO CONTACT ME. MY EMAIL ADDRESS HAS NOT CHANGED.; July 26, 2022 at 8:35 PM
THE GREAT KILGO said...: WHAT’S HAPPENING, SID.; July 30, 2022 at 10:43 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 7-26-22 10:08 : Besides making sport of me, which is quite incidental and of little concern and even less consequence, many here are inflicting pain on Crystal, her Fiance Dr. Harr and especially her Children. You may not think so, but take my word for it, your scoffing at her plight is very hurtful.; July 30, 2022 at 1:21 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ THE GREAT FAKER : Neither has mine.; July 30, 2022 at 1:23 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

Why would we take your word for anything? You have zero credibility, which has been documented at this blog many times, for all to see.; July 30, 2022 at 3:48 PM
THE GREAT KILGO said...: kenhyderal,

I THOUGHT YOU WANTED THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE PARTY. IF SO, SEND ME AN EMAIL. I’M TIRED OF WAITING FOR YOU.; July 31, 2022 at 5:29 AM
Anonymous said...: I doubt Crystal Mangum or her children read this blog or its comments.; July 31, 2022 at 10:59 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...: To the poster@ 10:59:

Take kenhyderal’s word for it. Your scoffing at her plight is very hurtful to Crystal and her children. I know kenhyderal and I know he would never lie.; July 31, 2022 at 2:56 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!

Apologies for not commenting more frequently. As you are aware, I put a lot of effort and time into my responses, and now I do not have the luxury of taking time to reply.

I am busy working on a new shar-video which I believe will be very effective. It will be a two-parter, I believe. Presently I am almost finished with the draft and have narrated the majority of it. A lot of work to go.

I still need to send out more letters. Not much movement on the lawsuits. Waiting to hear from the appellate courts.

Hope to have at least Part One of the new shar-video uploaded by the end of the month.

As you were.; July 31, 2022 at 3:11 PM
Nifong Supporter Supporter said...: Dr. Harr,

We are all sitting on the edge of our seats waiting for the new shar-video. Are your letters the new super secret project?; July 31, 2022 at 4:21 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 7-30-22 3:48 Don't believe me? Then why not ask one of the parties I mentioned namely Crystal's fiance Dr. Harr.; July 31, 2022 at 7:51 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 7=31=22 19:59 : Doubt based on what? What insight could you possibly have regarding this matter? So typical of the callous attitude too many Americans, with their I'm alright jack" attitude, have for those suffering misfortune at the hands of your flawed state. Empathy is sorely lacking.; July 31, 2022 at 8:03 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ The fake Kilgo 7-31-22 5:29: Don't wait for me. I have no time for imposters or people making sport of a brave "Me Too Heroine " still suffering the consequences ofcoming forward; July 31, 2022 at 8:10 PM
Anonymous said...: WRT Crystal herself - as she doens't have access to a computer or cell phone while in prison, it would be impossible for her to read any or reply to blog entries or comments.

You're a good friend -- you can always ask her.

WRT her children I doubt that they read it because they've never written on any of Sid's posts, or replied to any of the comments.

I know if someone were writing blog entries about me or my mother, I would comment.

I would bet that if we took a survey, everyone who comments here would do the same -- Although I bet both you and Sid would respond negatively, just to skew the results.

So...There's the reason for my doubt. Crystal or her children are welcome to reply.; August 1, 2022 at 11:34 AM
Anonymous said...: Right on kennyhyderal.; August 1, 2022 at 6:01 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 8-1-22 11:34 You are wrong. Crystal's children are now young adults and are fully aware of her wrongful conviction, wronful incarceration and of the efforts by those who care for her to see that justice is done. Involving themselves in interaction on line with people who they know hate their mothers is not something they would want to partake in. But they do appreciate that I always try to defend her against any who slander her.; August 1, 2022 at 8:00 PM
Anonymous said...: You’re neither Crystal nor her children.

Until they respond, I am not wrong, and your opinion does not matter.; August 2, 2022 at 5:08 AM
Anonymous said...: Right on kennyhyderal.; August 2, 2022 at 5:35 AM
guiowen said...: Kenny,
If I were one of Crystal's children, I would be very upset at people who claim to be my mother's friends, but do absolutely nothing to help her. (They use the excuse "I am a man of limited means."); August 2, 2022 at 9:57 AM
Anonymous said...: And don’t forget the excuse “I’m a Canadian.”; August 3, 2022 at 5:40 AM
Anonymous said...: " But they do appreciate that I always try to defend her against any who slander her."

Do they appreciate the effort you and Sid expended trying to get clemency for Crystal Mangum?; August 3, 2022 at 8:17 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymouses 8-2-22 9:57 and 8-3-22 5:40 "They have no bread? Let them eat cake." Governor Cooper has shown, over and over, throught his career, he only acts for Political expediency. Little chance he would entertain a petition from a Canadian. Especially on a matter of injustice he has long known about and for face-saving and politiacal reasons has failed to act.; August 3, 2022 at 10:22 AM
Anonymous said...: Udaman Kenny.; August 3, 2022 at 3:13 PM
Anonymous said...: "Little chance he would entertain a petition from a Canadian..."

The request has to come from Crystal Mangum -- someone was kind enough to actually write the request for you (look it up).

All you need to do is print out the letter, get CGM to sign it, and send the letter (along with the required information and the Wecht document) to the governor's clemency board.

Why have you failed to act? Don't tell me -- tell CGM's children.

If the clemency is denied, then you can complain about injustice, face-saving, and "politiacal [sic] reasons"; August 3, 2022 at 3:22 PM
kenhyderal supporter said...: I am proud to call kenhyderal my friend.; August 3, 2022 at 5:25 PM
kenhyderal supporter supporter said...: I am proud to call kenhyderal supporter my friend.; August 4, 2022 at 9:51 AM
Anonymous said...: Doesn’t it seem odd to anyone (well, any one of the 4 or so people that comment here) that Dr. Harr continues to make his videos and send his letters, yet hasn’t had Crystal Mangum even attempt to ask for clemency?

If she hadn’t been convicted of 2nd degree murder, she would still have been convicted of something along the lines of assault with a deadly weapon (or whatever it’s called in NC).

We’re that the case, she would have been out of jail last year.

Asking (correctly - without mentioning Sid, his ridiculous lolsuits, the LAX case, the ridiculous lolsuits filed by or for her, or any of the myriad other things that’s been done “on her behalf”) should be the FIRST thing that should be done for CGM.

It should start with CGM reading the template letter someone was nice enough to post, allowing her to modify it (without her adding any of the silliness mentioned above), and submitting it, along with the appropriate documentation.

It could be done in a matter of days, So why not do it? Worst case, it’s as effective as everything else that’s been done.; August 4, 2022 at 5:30 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 8-4-22 Are you one of the so called four? Crystal knows her situation and she works with her Fiance Dr. Harr. Their aim is to obtain the true Justice, that she is owed, as well as real accountability for those who perpetrated and perpetuate the horrendous injustice done to her.; August 6, 2022 at 10:35 AM
guiowen said...: So Crystal just doesn't want to get out of jail? She's more interested in making the governor pay?; August 6, 2022 at 7:35 PM
Anonymous said...: I agree that Crystal should be held accountable for all of her actions over the past 20 years.; August 7, 2022 at 9:30 AM
Anonymous said...: CGM and her Fiance Dr. Harr’s attempts to obtain “the True Justice that she is owed” and “real accountability” would be easier if she were not in prison.

But whatever…. Sid’s lolsuits will give us something to laugh about for another 4-5 years while CGM sits in prison.

Am I one of the “so called four”? I wasn’t counting myself or Sid as one of the “4 or so”.

I’m still waiting for you to explain to us how Crystal reads this blog or it’s comments from prison, BTW.; August 7, 2022 at 1:37 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ G 8-7-22 A sarcastic man is a wounded man. From the point of view of Justice, though, she must be compesated for the years she unjustly lost. However, paramount is the restoration of her good name and a recognition by one and all that she was wrongly treated.; August 7, 2022 at 1:50 PM
Anonymous said...: CGM should be compesated..; August 7, 2022 at 8:56 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

The poster at 9:30 AM on August 7 is not being sarcastic. A number of enablers have assisted CGM in the past and the results speak for themselves.; August 8, 2022 at 4:41 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 8-8-22 4:41 AM : Enabled what? That Crystal has faced no consequences is a myth. The real enablers are the Duke acrosse Apologists. The consequences she faced were for daring to accuse scions of privilege with sexually assaulting her. To paraphrase Rae Evans, every day she has been paying for that. Bravely coming forth was the right thing to do but it has cost her dearly. Everything since has been a direct consequence of doing "the right thing". All those who provided her with character refrences got it right. Judge Jones got it right and finally Dr. Harr and Dr. Dr. Wecht got it right. You've got it wrong.; August 8, 2022 at 8:46 AM
Anonymous said...: Well....
1) enabled CGM to fire existing lawyers and attempt to represent herself pro se
2) enabled CGM to file meaningless lawsuits
3) Enabled her to think her current situation has something to do with the Duke LAX case

I would consider all of these to be negative or self-destructive behavior.; August 8, 2022 at 2:27 PM
guiowen said...: Kenny:
So why don't you, Sidney, and Wecht do the "right thing" and get her out?; August 8, 2022 at 2:52 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

What evidence are you relying upon when you state that a sexual assault occurred?; August 8, 2022 at 3:24 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 8-8-22 3:24 : Told so by the victim and corroborated by 2nd hand hearsay evidence of a direct wittness. I know the victim and, like former DA Nifong, I believe her. The recipient of the information ie. Kilgo convinced me of his credibitity and he relayed to me what he had been told by this Duke Lacrosse wittness. I know 2nd hand hearsay evidence is not admissable but, let me point out, there is no hard evidence, to the contrary, proving no assault happened.; August 9, 2022 at 9:04 AM
Anonymous said...: Kilgo has credibitity.; August 9, 2022 at 3:06 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...: The “victim” has said a lot of things. Do you believe them all?

Kilgo’s second-hand hearsay could be evidence….If he were willing to testify. He isn’t, and never was. AFAIK, he never stated the name of this “direct wittness”, either.

BTW, there is hard evidence that the accused Duke LAX 3 did not commit an assault or rape.; August 9, 2022 at 3:21 PM
Dr. Caligari said...: let me point out, there is no hard evidence, to the contrary, proving no assault happened

There is a great deal of hard evidence proving that the three people Mangum definitively identified as her attackers were innocent.; August 9, 2022 at 3:43 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

Did the victim tell you she was assaulted with a broomstick and wooden pieces were found in her body? Or, did she only tell that story to William Cohan?; August 10, 2022 at 5:32 AM
Anonymous said...: I saw there were are number of filings in the Oxygen Media appeal.

One (Filing 13) was a notice that had to do with a failure to satisfy fee requirements by CGM (and I assume, Sid).

Another (Filing 14) was a letter from Sid regarding the filing fee (I'll note that the fee requirements had to be resolved within 15 days of the original notice -- this letter was filed 14 days after the original notice).

One (filing 17) was a notice regarding the letter (Filing 14) from Sid.

Sid -- can you provide any details regarding these filings?; August 10, 2022 at 7:01 AM
Anonymous said...: I'll note that the Mangum v. Kinsley case was reassigned to Judge Kimberly Swank (a United States Magistrate Judge).

Looks like Sid got his wish to have a judge other tha Judge Devers handle this case.

FWIW, Judge Swank has served in a number of rules for the NC Bar Association. I'm sure Sid will find something about that to complain about.

Any comment, Sid?; August 10, 2022 at 7:11 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid's not approving comments again.

Too busy with your spoiled cat Adonis, Sid?; August 10, 2022 at 7:15 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

Have just learned that Mangum's federal case against Kinsley and NC DHHS has been reassigned to a magistrate judge for adjudication. I was pleasantly surprised that the Attorney General's Office went along with the request.

Honorable Magistrate Judge Kimberly Swank will now be presiding, and I have not found any conflicting interests with her related to Crystal's case. So, I am hopeful.

Regarding the Habeas Petition, it appears that there is movement in it as the Attorney General's Office has an attorney to appear in the case.

All's positive, for a change.

Still working hard on shar-video... the last batch of letters sent out garnered no response.

Am quite confident.

As you were.; August 10, 2022 at 11:29 AM
Anonymous said...: Since I posted the information regarding the judge reassignment earlier, you're welcome.

No how about posting the pending comments?; August 10, 2022 at 11:43 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid,

Why are you not posting comments?; August 10, 2022 at 3:04 PM
Anonymous said...: Still not approving comments, I see.; August 10, 2022 at 4:47 PM
Anonymous said...: Sid,

Why are you not posting comments?; August 10, 2022 at 9:16 PM
Anonymous said...: Still not approving comments I see.

Why don’t you turn over the management of this blog to one of your J4N committee members and let them handle the grunt work of approving comments and posting your videos?; August 11, 2022 at 4:21 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid's still not approving comments.

No idea how he can take the time to post a comment, yet not approve any -- but I have my theory.; August 11, 2022 at 9:28 AM
Anonymous said...: Yo Sid,

Where are the comments?; August 11, 2022 at 9:48 AM
Anonymous said...: I see you're still not approving comments, Sid.

Expect me to keep posting about this every 4 hours or so until you start posting them.; August 11, 2022 at 1:09 PM
Anonymous said...: Still waiting for you to approve comments, Sid.; August 11, 2022 at 8:23 PM
Anonymous said...: Approve the comments, Sid.; August 12, 2022 at 5:17 AM
Anonymous said...: Still not approving comments, Sid?
Shame on you.; August 12, 2022 at 11:17 AM
Anonymous said...: How about posting the comments, Sid?; August 12, 2022 at 2:59 PM
Anonymous said...: W
H
Y

A
R
E
N
'
T

Y
o
U

A
P
P
R
O
V
I
N
G

C
O
M
M
E
N
T
S
?
?
?; August 12, 2022 at 3:01 PM
Anonymous said...: Sid,

Why are you not publishing comments? What are you hiding?; August 12, 2022 at 4:16 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

Do you know why Sid is not releasing comments?; August 12, 2022 at 4:36 PM
dhall said...: I’ve had others contact me stating that they have posted comments on your blog that you are not approving, so those comments do not display.

I understand that as part of the moderation process, those comments must be acknowledged by you. Are you not seeing these comments pending approval?; August 12, 2022 at 10:43 PM
kenhyderal supporter said...: Dr. Harr,

If you do not release comments, how will kenhyderal be able to share his legal research with us?; August 13, 2022 at 9:04 AM
Doogie Howser said...: Sid,

Why are comments not being released? Has Rae Evans seized control of your blog?; August 13, 2022 at 1:54 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

It's my understanding that comments have not been received... and therefore not posted.

This may be due to the fact that my cellphone storage is full. It's been full for the past few days. I have since been working to delete photos and trying to free up space. Sorry 'bout that.

As you were.; August 14, 2022 at 12:37 PM
Anonymous said...: You know you can use your cell phone as a Wi-Fi hotspot for your computer, right?

Wait…You’re the guy that still sends out disks with the hope that someone wii read/watch what’s on it. So…probably not.; August 14, 2022 at 2:04 PM
Anonymous said...: Not that this will get to you, but you can delete your old text messages without deleting your photos to free up space..; August 15, 2022 at 8:40 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Not that you'll ever see this, but what's the deal with the filing fees on the Mangum v. Oxygen Media appeal?; August 15, 2022 at 11:43 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

Thank you, Darrell, for the suggestions about how to moderate comments. Obviously they helped. I have no idea why there was a change in the system that prevented me from receiving comments. Will have to keep closer track on comments in the future.

Right now I am typing a document that Crystal wants filed manually tomorrow. After I complete that task for her, I will try to respond to the comments.

Very sorry for the disruption in the posting of the comments. Know that I would never purposely ignore comments and/or fail to post them.

As you were.; August 15, 2022 at 12:22 PM
dhall said...: You’re welcome, Dr. Harr. I’m glad I could help.

I hope you didn’t have to delete any of your photos.; August 15, 2022 at 6:42 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Not that this will get to you, but you can delete your old text messages without deleting your photos to free up space..

August 15, 2022 at 8:40 AM

Hey, Anony.

Don't know why the management process changed suddenly and comments stopped being sent directly to me by e-mail. Because of Commenter Darrell's suggestions, I have been able to find comments on a management site where they were stored awaiting disposition. Still have to search for comments, and of course will post them as soon as I come across them.

Don't know that the full storage on my phone has anything to do with this situation.; August 17, 2022 at 5:41 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Prince Humperdinck said...
Not that you'll ever see this, but what's the deal with the filing fees on the Mangum v. Oxygen Media appeal?

August 15, 2022 at 11:43 AM

Hey, Prince Humperdinck.

The filing and docketing fees had been paid, and I presented a copy of the cashier's check receipt showing payment in full. I assume that that has since been corrected to reflect that the appeal fees have been paid.; August 17, 2022 at 5:44 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
I'll note that the Mangum v. Kinsley case was reassigned to Judge Kimberly Swank (a United States Magistrate Judge).

Looks like Sid got his wish to have a judge other tha Judge Devers handle this case.

FWIW, Judge Swank has served in a number of rules for the NC Bar Association. I'm sure Sid will find something about that to complain about.

Any comment, Sid?

August 10, 2022 at 7:11 AM

Hey, Anony.

I am very pleased that Judge Dever is no longer presiding over Mangum's case. His ties to Duke University School of Law are too strongly linked, in my opinion, to assure an impartial handling of her case. Definitely, the appearance of impartiality will be challenged with his involvement in a case involving the Duke Lacrosse Accuser.

I do not see any conflicts in Mangum's case with Magistrate Judge Swank. I believe she will likely act with impartiality.

Also, there is a difference between the North Carolina State Bar and the North Carolina State Bar Association. Regardless, I do not believe her involvement in such rulings will have any effect with Mangum's case.; August 17, 2022 at 5:54 AM
A Durham Man said...: Kenny,

We are waiting for your response to this post.

Anonymous said...
Kenny,

Did the victim tell you she was assaulted with a broomstick and wooden pieces were found in her body? Or, did she only tell that story to William Cohan?

August 10, 2022 at 5:32 AM; August 17, 2022 at 6:12 AM
dhall said...: If you have an email account defined in your "manage-> comments -> settings" section on Blogger, you should be getting emails when someone leaves a comment.

Maybe you're not logged into your email account on your cellphone?; August 17, 2022 at 7:34 AM
Anonymous said...: "Also, there is a difference between the North Carolina State Bar and the North Carolina State Bar Association."

True, they are different organizations (the NC State Bar is a government entity, the NC State Bar Association is not).

You have to be a lawyer to be a member of the NC State Bar Association, and in order to practice law in NC, you have to be a member of the State Bar.

So while seperate, the two organizations are very much interrelated.; August 17, 2022 at 9:58 AM
Anonymous said...: We all know that the second the Magistrate rules against Sid/Mangum (and for all the reasons that have been stated, Judge Swank will), Sid and Kenny will start whining about some newly discovered conflict, and say she was corrupted by Duke. They will not accept the decision.; August 18, 2022 at 5:18 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: I don't think there's been any reasons that have been stated why the judge will rule against CGM im the Mangum v. Kinsley case.

I know there's a number of things asked for in relief (release from state custody with house arrest as an option, and "reasonable compensation/restorative justice") that simply can't be granted by the defendants, Kody Kinsley or DHHS.

So those aren't going to happen regardless of the outcome of this case.; August 18, 2022 at 8:44 AM
Anonymous said...: A Durham Man,

You should know by now that Kenny ignores all facts that are inconsistent with his preferred narrative. I fully expect that he will stonewall.; August 19, 2022 at 3:41 PM
Doogie Howser said...: Kenny,

We are waiting to hear from you.; August 20, 2022 at 2:53 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

Why are you not responding? Are you unwilling to acknowledge the facts?; August 21, 2022 at 5:52 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!

Still am not receiving comments like I used to on my cellphone. Therefore I am forced to go to my laptop and manipulate the blog site in order to access comments... subsequently, there will probably be a lag time between when comments are sent and when I receive and then post them. Apologies for the delay. Don't know why the system changed. (Maybe it has to do with my cellphone being short on storage?)

Work is progressing on shar-video.

Also, a motion was filed last week in Federal Court... the DHHS case. Will let you know regarding a response from the Defendants.

As you were.; August 21, 2022 at 8:11 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...: Dr. Harr,

Given the problem you are experiencing with releasing comments, I suggest that you check again to see if kenhyderal has submitted a response to A Durham Man. kenhyderal is a fighter for justice and is committed to defending the reputation of his dear friend. It is inconceivable that he has not responded by now.; August 21, 2022 at 9:10 AM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr— I don’t see any other methods to notify you of comments other than email notifications. Are you getting those notifications in your email your computer but not in your email on your phone?

If you’re getting them on one device but not the other, you’re most likely logged out of your email account on the device not receiving them. Since you’re using gmail, I don’t think your cellphone storage is a reason - we’ve emailed back and forth with no issues.

If you’re not receiving notifications on any device, check your settings and ensure your email account is defined correctly in the blogger settings.

If you’ve confirmed your email account is active on your phone, and the email settings are correct, reach out to blogger help.

I should also note that on the blogger community, someone recently (03 Aug) identified issues with notifications being delayed- so it’s not just you..; August 21, 2022 at 1:49 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymouses 8-10-22 , 8-17-22, Doogie Howser, A Durham Man and KH Supporter: Like former DA Mike Nifong, investigative journalist and award winning author Wm. Cohan and thousands upon thousands of sexual assault survivors, I believe Crystal Mangum. Predictably, though, she suffered the fate of so many of the "Me Too Heroines" who, after daring to come forward, were relentlessly and remorselessly attacked and pilloried. As a personal friend and ever sensitive to the traumatic ordeal she endured I never go into the gruesome details of the horrific sexual assault that she suffered.; August 21, 2022 at 6:39 PM
Anonymous said...: In support of Crystal Mangum, Kenhyderal has been busy getting wooden pieces removed from his body.; August 22, 2022 at 10:22 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenhdyeral -- Did you believe CGM when she said she didn't set Milton Walker's clothes on fire?

https://abc7chicago.com/archive/7529131/; August 22, 2022 at 10:29 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Annons 8-22-22 10:22 and 10:29 Relentlessly and remorselessly attacked and pilloried and, instead of decency and compassion is cruelly scoffed at and ridiculed by the likes of you.; August 22, 2022 at 6:14 PM
guiowen said...: Anony 10:22 and 10:29
Kenhyderal never lies. I know this, because he told me so himself.
The problem is that, because of context,he misunderstands half of what others tell him, and forgets half of what he says.
Because of this, I told him that there was about 8% probability that the story he told us (about Kilgo and the others) was true. He complained that some mathematics dean can't do any arithmetic, so he didn't believe me.; August 22, 2022 at 8:16 PM
Anonymous said...: Prince Humperdinck said...
"I don't think there's been any reasons that have been stated why the judge will rule against CGM im the Mangum v. Kinsley case."

I don't think that's how it works. The burden is on Sid/Mangum to PROVE their case.

As I see it - and I am not a medicolegal scholar or a scholar of anything except sausage making (nor have I deep dived into the law and facts of this case) - Sid has sued the DHHS to compel them to perform a discretionary act, i.e., to review and amend Mr. Daye's autopsy report and change it's conclusions re: the cause of Mr. Daye's death.

The DHHS certainly has the authority to review ME/autopsy reports, but they aren't compelled to do so, nor does there appear to be a law permitting citizens to compel the DHHs to review and amend ME reports on their behalf and at their request.

Moreover, the DHHS responses indicate that they have reviewed the report and they stand by it.

It appears to me what Sid is suing for is not only to compel DHHS to do something they have the right (but not obligation) to do (and claim they have done) but (and here's the problem) to compel them to amend the report to adopt Sid's conclusions re: the cause of Mr. Daye's death. I see no way for that argument to succeed.

Again, I may be dead wrong, but that's my initial impression. I would be curious to hear what a real lawyer has to say about this.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; August 23, 2022 at 7:04 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

Your post at 6:14 PM makes no sense. Please provide an English translation.; August 23, 2022 at 9:27 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ G.: Sarcastic as usual and completely off topic. Can you point out anything I said in my replies to those Posters that was not 100% true; August 23, 2022 at 9:39 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 8-23-22 9:27 It was drected at specific posters. I re-iterated what I had said to them in a previous response ie."Relentlessly and remorselessly attacked and pilloried" I porbably should have put it in quotation marks to avoid confusion to other readers. I was suggesting to them they were doing that very thing and chastized them for not showing any human compassion. I hope that clarifies.; August 23, 2022 at 10:06 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Abe -- I don't think Sid is asking for anyone to amend or change the Daye autopsy report.

Here's the relief asked for (paraphrased for the "Wherefore" section of the document):

1. defendant order NC OMCE to review Nichols autopsy report on Day and produce a written report on it (the OMCE review)

2. Order NC OMCE to present report to the Durham DA's office

3. NC OMCE provide Mangum with a copy of OMCE report

4. Mangum released from custody

5. Mangum receive reasonable compensation

6. Other such relief as court deems appropriate

All it appears to be asking for is a review and report of that review (excluding relief 4 and 5, which the DHHS can't granr anyway).

Nore to follow...; August 23, 2022 at 11:51 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Here's an issue I see with the document.

In the first paragraph, it states that Mangum is seeking "...equitable relief and redress for violations of Mangum's 1964 Cival Rights act that are protected by the Constitutions 5th and 14th amendments"

It then goes on to state that Mangum "contends that her right to have an autopsy report undergo a review by the... NC OCME has been denied by Defendants, thereby depriving her of possible vindication of a second-degree murder conviction..."

Neither the 5th or 14th amendments have anything to do with Mangum's "right to have an autopsy report undergo a review". I can't find anything in the NC statutes (nor in the lolsuit) that state it is a "right" to have an autopsy report review either. If there were, I would think Sid would have included that (of course, I could be wrong and Sid never bothered to research, but that's on him, not me).

Just by looking at the first 2 paragraphs, it seems to me that the lolsuit is a non-starter. Of course, I'll defer to the real lawyers here :); August 23, 2022 at 12:15 PM
Anonymous said...: He Anonymous August 23, 2022 at 9:27 AM:

I ran Ken's statement through Google Translate...Here's what came back:

"I don't like it when CGM's lies are brought to my attention."; August 23, 2022 at 12:18 PM
Anonymous said...: Abe --

Sid reads "The Chief Medical Examiner shall have authority to amend a medical examiner death certificate" as "The Chief Medical Examiner MUST amend a medical examiner death certificate".

Sid can force the CME to review and amend the Daye Autopsy report as much as I can force Sid to stop filing ridiculous lawsuits.; August 23, 2022 at 1:37 PM
Anonymous said...: There is no basis for a court to order an agency of another branch of the government to do something that is entirely within that agency's sole discretion to do or not do.

That being said, DHHS stated that they did review the autopsy report, and they stand by it. I don't see how a judge can force them to review or change an official report or conclusion of a government agency from a different branch of government - even if he disagrees with the report/conclusions.

Like you, I don't think this is a federal court issue, much less a Constitutional one.

Sid is once again trying to thwart justice by attempting to collaterally attack Mangum's conviction thru a civil action in a different court involving different parties. That strategy will not succeed. No federal court judge is going to fall for that trick.

As far as I can see, sorting thru the irrelevant paragraphs Sid inserts in every pleading he drafts/files, Sid does not have a case. The only exception I take with your analysis is your statement that you see no "why the judge will rule against CGM im the Mangum v. Kinsley case." That's not how it works. A person presenting a claim must PROVE he is entitled to a ruling in his favor. The question is whether there is a reason for the court to rule in favor of Sid/Mangum. I don't see how they have come close to meeting their burden or how a court could possibly rule that the DHHS MUST conduct an additional review of the autopsy report.

Even if, by some stretch of the imagination, Sid got the court to order a review of the report and that the findings of that review to be transmitted to the DA, the DHHS is simply going to stand by the report. So, what's point to all this?

This case is a dud as far as I can see. Again, I would welcome an attorney's analysis. I am not nor do I claim any expertise in this subject matter. Maybe I am missing something.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; August 24, 2022 at 8:45 AM
Anonymous said...: Hmmm -- Let's say Sid somehow manages to win this lolsuit...What, after the order from NHHS, the OCME produces a written report that states:
"The Daye autopsy report has been reviewed and no changes or amendments are needed".

The report is presented to the DA's office, and a copy is given to Mangum.

This meets all the relief that NHHS is able to grant.

Then what?; August 24, 2022 at 8:48 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenhyderal -- The "wooden pieces" comment is based on a statement from Crystal Mangum to William Cohan published in Vanity Fair.

The comment regarding not setting Milton Walker's clothes on fire is from an ABC article (with link provided).

How do you consider pointing out either of these statements as "Relentlessly and remorselessly attacked and pilloried", when they are simply referring to false statements made by Crystal Mangum?

The question asked is simple -- You state "I believe Crystal Mangum".

Did you believe at any time the 2 statements identified?

Do you believe them now?; August 24, 2022 at 9:09 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid wants them to do a review - but who really thinks that if they did a review, and agreed with the conclusion reached by Dr. Nichols, and disagree with Dr. Wecht, that Sid would accept it?

He says he just wants them to review it, but we all know that's a lie.; August 24, 2022 at 4:34 PM
kenhyderal supporter said...: To: The poster on August 23 at 12:18

CGM did not lie. kenhyderal has studied closely all of the medical reports that were prepared at Duke Hospital after the party and he can refer you to the evidence that confirms that splinters were removed from the victim’s body.; August 24, 2022 at 5:20 PM
Dr. Caligari said...: This case is a dud as far as I can see. Again, I would welcome an attorney's analysis. I am not nor do I claim any expertise in this subject matter. Maybe I am missing something.

Abe's analysis is spot on. The case is yet another attempt to collaterally attack the criminal conviction through a civil suit against the wrong parties.; August 25, 2022 at 8:31 AM
Anonymous said...: Looks like there was a document submitted for "miscellaneous relief" in the Mangum v. Kinsley lawsuit on 8/16.

I can't seem to find who submitted it (I assume Sid on the behalf of Mangum).

Do you have any details, Sid?; August 26, 2022 at 12:30 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Looks like there was a document submitted for "miscellaneous relief" in the Mangum v. Kinsley lawsuit on 8/16.

I can't seem to find who submitted it (I assume Sid on the behalf of Mangum).

Do you have any details, Sid?

August 26, 2022 at 12:30 PM

Hey, Anony.

The document I filed on behalf of Crystal was a Motion for Expedited Hearing. As of this morning there has been no response from the Attorney General's Office.

NOTE: Am still working hard on my next shar-video. It's coming along pretty well. Hope to have Part One completed in about ten days.; August 26, 2022 at 7:17 PM
Anonymous said...: I’ve only heard of motions for expedited hearings used in child custody cases, and once when a soldier was getting deployed. Why don’t you share these documents?; August 27, 2022 at 5:05 AM

Saturday, July 16, 2022

Letter from Dr. Sidney Harr to CBS correspondent Major Garrett

161 comments:

Facebook Badge

Subscribe!

Labels

Blog Archive

About Me