justice4nifong: Third Party Objections and Motion to Quash Subpoena / Crystal Mangum's Response in Opposition

Tuesday, October 1, 2024

Third Party Objections and Motion to Quash Subpoena / Crystal Mangum's Response in Opposition

115 comments:

Anonymous said...: This is yet another lolsuit, unrelated to your current NC JCS one correct?; October 2, 2024 at 4:07 AM
A Durham Man1 said...: Sid:

Isn’t it about time for you to provide an update regarding your secret projects?; October 2, 2024 at 5:33 AM
dhall said...: I can't find any information regarding Mangum v. Nelson. Can you post a link to the original lawsuit?; October 2, 2024 at 5:52 AM
kenhyderal said...: Tyrone said in the prervious thread, "This is a cut and paste from a previous Kenhyderal comment -- IIRC, he even admitted using "artifact" here when he meant "artifice". Sid, are you sure this isn't someone pretending to be Kenhyderal? As "useful" as his comments may be, I've never seen him copy/paste like this before. " ------ It's my post, not a word for word from a previous post. Please forgive my mix-up between arifact and artifice.; October 2, 2024 at 1:49 PM
kenhyderal said...: Tyrone said in the previous thread "This is a cut and paste from a previous Kenhyderal comment -- IIRC, he even admitted using "artifact" here when he meant "artifice". Sid, are you sure this isn't someone pretending to be Kenhyderal? As "useful" as his comments may be, I've never seen him copy/paste like this before.=====This is my post. It's not a word for word repeat of any of my previous posts. Please excuse my misuse of the word artifact for artifice one again.; October 2, 2024 at 2:01 PM
kenhyderal said...: It seems to me that, perhaps, Surgeon Dr. Pascarella, with privleges at DMUC, may be reluctant to raise the issue of a suspected case of medical malpractice , by others, at his Institution , on his Patient Daye while treating him for a condition, ie. delirium tremens, unrelated to the stab wound he sucessfully repaired ; especially when it's a poor black marginalized African Ameican woman wrongfully convicted of murder and who, in the Public Forum, thanks to The Duke Lacrosse "Dream Team" of Lawyers ,who successfully sought to discredit her. The priciple of injustice to one American is injustice to all Americans, must apply. Here Dr. Pascarella should take to heart the African American adage and "do the right thing".; October 2, 2024 at 2:42 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...: I’ve commented multiple times asking the same. Sid won’t even approve my comments…You know he’s not going to provide any updates.; October 2, 2024 at 3:58 PM
Anonymous said...: It's not a lawsuit - this is related to the Judicial Standards lawsuit - Sid tried to subpoena Nelson, and he filed a Motion to Quash in Superior Court - Sid will whine, but that is the proper procedure.; October 2, 2024 at 4:07 PM
kenhyderal supporter said...: I’m proud to call kenhyderal my friend.; October 3, 2024 at 5:21 AM
dhall said...: The Judicial Standards lawsuit is Harr v. North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission. This (according to Dr. Harr's post) is Mangum v. Linda Nelson. It also appears to have a different case number. They (Mangum and Harr) are trying to subpoena Dr. Pascarella in order to get him to respond to 12 requests for admission.; October 3, 2024 at 6:25 AM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr's lawsuit against the NC JSC states that the NC JSC violated his civil rights. Although Dr. Harr hasn't provided it, it certainly appears that the Mangum lawsuit is about Judge Nelson violating Mangum's civil rights.
I ask you -- were Dr. Pascarella to respond to the requests for admission, how would his response show that the NC JSC violated Dr. Harr's civil rights? How would his response show that Judge Nelson violated Mangum's civil rights?; October 3, 2024 at 8:50 AM
Anonymous said...: Actually, you are right - he sued the Administrative Law Judge who dismissed the case. You can find the documents on Portal, but yes, he has never posted about this - probably because he knows we'd tell him it was going to fail.; October 3, 2024 at 9:51 AM
Kenhyderal Lay Advocate said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT INFORMATION!!

Those with the power to grant her a new trial will use every artifact available to them, to prevent that from happening. They fear the disgrace and repercussions to themselves. This is undeniable misconduct. All of them know she is innocent, all of them know the Jury was given provably false information. The medical records and the trial record confirm this. You yourself can, in fact, also do this, by simply looking at the records, as any jury of Crystal's peers could have done. No one can hold them responsible because they were given false information and not given the real facts. An inadequate Defence, ill-prepared and having done no research did not challenge the misinformation that was presented. In Canada that alone would have triggered a new trial. One day Crystal will be considered as a civil rights heroine. Hopefully given her lack of adequate medical treatment, I pray, she wont, like Emmett Till or Trayvon Martin end up as just one more Black American Martyr.

As you were.; October 3, 2024 at 2:25 PM
Kenhyderal Lay Advocate Supporter said...: Right on Kenhyderal Lay Advocate.; October 4, 2024 at 5:36 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...: kenhyderal,

Are you now posting as Kenhyderal Lay Advocate?; October 5, 2024 at 11:52 AM
Anonymous said...: Yo Sid, release the comets.; October 6, 2024 at 5:38 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: dhall
I can't find any information regarding Mangum v. Nelson. Can you post a link to the original lawsuit?
October 2, 2024 at 5:52 AM

Hey, dhall.

I believe the Mangum v. Nelson case, filed with the Wake County Superior Court, is a Petition for Judicial Review of Administrative Law Judge Linda Nelson's July 9, 2024 Final Decision.
I don't believe I have the Petition ready to upload/publish at this time. Have been busy... apologies.; October 7, 2024 at 6:38 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!

I believe that there's the potential to have significant movement in Mangum's case this month... which is why I have been extremely busy and haven't been taking much time to respond to comments. I really believe that it is possible that Crystal will freed by Halloween... especially if I get a long-overdue break.

As you were.; October 7, 2024 at 6:42 AM
dhall said...: I found a copy of the lawsuit (thanks, Anonymous @October 3, 2024 at 9:51 AM).
One big thing that stands out is that the case was filed in Wake County, and states that is was done "with the assistance of her advocate and fiance, Sidney B. Harr".

As we all know, The Wake County Superior Court permanently enjoined Harr from the practice of law in North Carolina, including enjoining him from "providing any legal services or giving legal advice or counsel to any other person, firm, or corporation, including but not limited to preparation of or filing any court pleadings for or on behalf of others or advising others, specifically including Crystal Mangum."

That alone is reason to have this case thrown out.
I can't help but wonder if Crystal Mangum is even aware of this lawsuit.; October 7, 2024 at 7:07 AM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr -
You "believe the Mangum v. Nelson case, filed with the Wake County Superior Court, is a Petition for Judicial Review..."?

You wrote it -- how could you NOT know what kind of case it is?

Let's be truthful -- there's nothing you have done that will have Crystal Mangum out of jail in 3 weeks. Winning a civil lawsuit cannot free someone from jail.; October 7, 2024 at 7:19 AM
A Durham Man1 said...: Could it be? Will Abe be starting another countdown?; October 7, 2024 at 9:53 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...: Dr. Harr: Why are you not posting my comments?; October 7, 2024 at 7:45 PM
kenhyderal supporter said...: kenhyderal: Are you now posting as Kenhyderal Lay Advocate?; October 8, 2024 at 5:57 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: kenhyderal supporter
Dr. Harr: Why are you not posting my comments?
October 7, 2024 at 7:45 PM

Hey, kenhyderal supporter.

My intention is for this blog to be serious, but give allowances for levity on occasion. However, redundant silly posts bring the serious nature of the blog into question... such as "kenhyderal is my friend." I welcome comments that are relevant, thought-provoking, and even controversial as long as they are within bounds of the kenhyderal doctrine. So, instead of writing "kenhyderal is my friend," if you add a statement of substance, then the likelihood of your comment being published will be increased exponentially.; October 8, 2024 at 6:52 AM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr -- You stated "I believe that there's the potential to have significant movement in Mangum's case this month... I really believe that it is possible that Crystal will freed by Halloween..."

Which case? The only recent filings I've seen WRT Crystal Mangum's criminal case were the last MAR and the Writ of Coram Nobis -- IIRC, both failed.; October 8, 2024 at 7:05 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: dhall
Dr. Harr -
You "believe the Mangum v. Nelson case, filed with the Wake County Superior Court, is a Petition for Judicial Review..."?

You wrote it -- how could you NOT know what kind of case it is?

Let's be truthful -- there's nothing you have done that will have Crystal Mangum out of jail in 3 weeks. Winning a civil lawsuit cannot free someone from jail.
October 7, 2024 at 7:19 AM

Hey, dhall.

There are times when I can't recall for certain what case is filed where, and don't feel like looking it up, so I just add "I think."

What I believe is that you tend to view things as absolutes, whereas, I think in terms of shades of gray... even when extended to the law. There is no doubt in my mind that the possibility of Crystal being freed before Halloween is probable, especially in light of the fact that the State has failed to show a crime has been committed in Reginald Daye's death.

Facts prove that there is no legitimate medical or legal nexus between the nonfatal stab wound Mangum inflicted and Daye's death. In other words, the State has been unable to identify with certainty the nature of the alleged "complication" from the stab wound that led to her beau's death. For example can you name the specific complication?; October 8, 2024 at 7:06 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: dhall
I found a copy of the lawsuit (thanks, Anonymous @October 3, 2024 at 9:51 AM).
One big thing that stands out is that the case was filed in Wake County, and states that is was done "with the assistance of her advocate and fiance, Sidney B. Harr".

As we all know, The Wake County Superior Court permanently enjoined Harr from the practice of law in North Carolina, including enjoining him from "providing any legal services or giving legal advice or counsel to any other person, firm, or corporation, including but not limited to preparation of or filing any court pleadings for or on behalf of others or advising others, specifically including Crystal Mangum."

That alone is reason to have this case thrown out.
I can't help but wonder if Crystal Mangum is even aware of this lawsuit.
October 7, 2024 at 7:07 AM

Hey, dhall.

If the ultimate telos of the justice system is equity, why would you discard a pro se complaint by someone who had assistance from a non-lawyer? Keep in mind that Ms. Mangum is incarcerated with every possible disadvantage whereas the State has unlimited resources and Bar-accredited attorneys. Yet, the State fears me, a non-lawyer, because I possess a modicum of legal knowledge and have truth and justice on my side in assisting Ms. Mangum.

The reason the State runs to the Courts to seek a summary judgment to dismiss is because they are aware that going to trial would be an embarrassing loss for them. Right?; October 8, 2024 at 7:23 AM
dhall said...: "There is no doubt in my mind that the possibility of Crystal being freed before Halloween is probable, especially in light of the fact that the State has failed to show a crime has been committed in Reginald Daye's death."

...the State convinced a jury of her peers that Crystal Mangum committed a crime -- otherwise she wouldn't be in prison. So whether I agree with the conviction or not, the State has shown that a crime was committed.

Dr. Harr. I'm on record stating that it is my belief that Crystal Mangum did not commit manslaughter, but was guilty of a lesser felony - specifically the one she was originally charged with (assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill or inflicting serious bodily injury). I have no idea why you're asking me to name a "specific complication" from the stab wound, when I don't believe the stab wound was the cause of Daye's death.

Regardless -- Civil lawsuits CANNOT overturn a criminal conviction. You're quick to state your belief that she will be freed by Halloween, but you've never provided a reason for this belief.

On a completely different subject -- My brother (an engineer with Dominion Energy) has been in South and North Carolina working to restore power since Sep 29th. In his words, "I've never seen as much devastation".
I won't name specific charities, but I urge readers to check https://ncdoj.gov/protecting-consumers/charity/
If you have the means, there are people who need your help.; October 8, 2024 at 7:44 AM
dhall said...: In regards to your "assistance from a non-lawyer" comment, you are "providing legal services or giving legal advice or counsel" with your actions. That is something the Wake County Superior Court barred you from doing.

You're not asking for equity -- you're asking for special treatment.
If you had a modicum of legal knowledge, you'd know that.; October 8, 2024 at 7:59 AM
Kenhyderal Lay Advocate said...: I'm a citizen who believes that the commenters on this blog have harshly, excessively, and unjustly treated Crystal Mangum's close personal friend, Kenhyderal (Kenneth Edwards); October 9, 2024 at 7:20 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: "Yet, the State fears me, a non-lawyer, because I possess a modicum of legal knowledge.."

I think that's about the worst thing I've ever heard.

[pause]

How marvelous.

Anyone with even a correspondence-course level understanding of federal practice and procedure would recognize that your lolsuit is patently ludicrous and utterly and unequivocally without any merit whatsoever.; October 9, 2024 at 12:42 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...: "There is no doubt in my mind that the possibility of Crystal being freed before Halloween is probable"

You say there's no doubt in your mind, but you don't say WHY that is.
Why don't you tell us? What is being done about CGM's conviction that convinces you she'll be out of prison before Halloween?; October 10, 2024 at 8:03 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...: Dr. Harr:

Who appointed you as the final arbitrator of what is “serious?” Most of the posters here point out how your lawsuits are frivolous and will fail. In addition, I believe that all of your lawsuits have been dismissed. Yet, you consider yourself to be “serious.”

I post here to defend kenhyderal, who is subject to constant insults, such as being called the little man. Also, I have never posted “kenhyderal is my friend.” If you paid attention, you would know that I like to remind your readers that I am proud to call kenhyderal my friend.; October 10, 2024 at 8:06 AM
A Durham Man1 said...: Sid: Please explain why you believe Crystal will be released by Halloween.; October 12, 2024 at 6:26 AM
Anonymous said...: "There is no doubt in my mind that the possibility of Crystal being freed before Halloween is probable"

Sid's made so many foolish predictions over the years that no one who bothers to read his blog or the comments ever believes them. So why bother?

I could understand if the purpose of these comments were to spur some kind of discussion -- but he's shown that he's not interested in any. Look at the number of questions he's been asked on this blog entry alone he doesn't respond to.

I seriously doubt CGM has the ability to read his blog/comments. I doubt her family bothers to read it (surely they'd respond to the numerous comments about CGM by now if they read this blog).

SO, why bother? The only thing I can possibly think of is that he's stroking his own ego -- which doesn't make sense given the number of times he's been wrong. As they saying goes, "even a stopped clock is right twice a day." Sid's never been as accurate as a stopped clock WRT his predictions. Why does he keep making them?; October 12, 2024 at 9:16 AM
Anonymous said...: He won't. He will say it is top secret, then it won't happen, and he will blame someone else. This is all emotional manipulation/abuse of Crystal. It's sad.; October 12, 2024 at 1:08 PM
Anonymous said...: @KH Supporter: I can tolerate, easily identifiable, ad hominem attacks by trolls since they clearly show they are losing debates with me .Therefore I don't really need so- called supporters to stand up for me. What Dr. Harr, rightly, censors is the clearly frivolous , mocking and off topic posts, meant for sport, mockery and ridicule by non serious posters with zero empathy for an unjust conviction of an innocent African American that is an absolute disgrace for your Country. Please examine all the available facts that clearly show her innocence and then tell me if you do indeed support me why you have no outrage

. What Dr. Harr; October 13, 2024 at 4:46 PM
dhall said...: Anonymous @ October 13, 2024 at 4:46 PM (I assume you're Kenhyderal).

Do you agree with Dr. Harr's assessment that Crystal Mangum will be freed by Halloween? If so, why?
I think you (as her good friend and supporter) would have some knowledge of this pending freedom. What is being done now that would convince you that this will happen?; October 14, 2024 at 6:32 AM
kenhyderal said...: The post of Oct. 13 2024 at 4:46 PM, in reply to KH Supporter, shown as posted by Anonymous is mine .; October 14, 2024 at 8:43 AM
dhall said...: Kenhyderal - Why didn't you answer my questions?; October 15, 2024 at 6:35 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny won’t answer your questions for the same reason Sid doesn’t, dhall.
any answer they provide will show how nonsensical they are.

It is better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.

No, Kenny and Sid will not answer and Halloween will pass….Sid’s prediction will not come to fruition and they both will blame someone else.; October 16, 2024 at 5:01 AM
Anonymous said...: @ dhall: I have full confidence in Dr. Harr, the fiance of my friend Crystal. Both Crystal and I know that he is acting , against many State manufactured blocks, to see she gets justice. I have expectations that she will at some point be vindicated her and seeing those who all along knew of her innocence but for political reasons and political survival are exposed and disgraced, And if any remnant of equality remains in the broken US Justice System she will be properly compensated for what was stolen from her in terms of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.; October 17, 2024 at 8:59 AM
dhall said...: Kenhyderal (assuming that's you posting as Anonymous @ October 17, 2024 at 8:59 AM), I'll note that you did not answer my questions.

So I will ask again:

Do you agree with Dr. Harr's assessment that Crystal Mangum will be freed by Halloween? If so, why? (Keep in mind, keep in mind, winning a civil rights lawsuit cannot overturn a criminal conviction).

If you agree with his assessment, can you tell us what is being done now that convinces you that that Crystal Mangum will be free by Halloween?

I await an actual response, rather than a reiteration of some previous post that has no substance to it.; October 17, 2024 at 1:26 PM
kenhyderal said...: To clarify . I believe Dr. Harr is the in the best position to make such a call. Therefore, like I did with Dr. Wecht's assesment, of the Cause of Death of Reginald Daye , I will accept his assesment. Like you, though, I am not privy to the information he has, or the actions he undertook prior to making this assesment but I'm hopefully confident this will be the case. However, it's probable those in Power, who desperately want to prevent it from happening, will use every trick available to them to thwart this.; October 18, 2024 at 6:32 AM
dhall said...: Kenhyderal -- Based on your comments and the information you've been provided:
1) You agree with Dr. Harr's assessment that Crystal Mangum will be freed by Halloween.
2) You agree because you believe he's in the best position to make this assessment.
3) You do not know what is being done to free Crystal Mangum.
4) You know that winning her civil rights lawsuit cannot overturn her criminal conviction.

Did I misrepresent anything?; October 18, 2024 at 10:03 AM
Anonymous said...: Based on past motions, I expect to see a motion filed by NCJSC today in Harr v. North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission.

Mangum v. Nelson is a petition for judicial review of Judge Nelson's final decision in the Mangum v. NCOAH case. I can't find any documentation beyond the original petition and the other documents Sid has posted here.; October 18, 2024 at 10:42 AM
kenhyderal said...: @dhall: Re your item #4 . Though wrongly convicted, falsely imprisoned and deprived of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, all situations known to the Justice System and to any American who examines the facts, including you. Sounds like a broken system, to me, that does not provide equal justice to all under " your" law.; October 20, 2024 at 6:27 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERY BODY... LISTEN UP!!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

Apologies for not responding to comments recently, but have been extremely busy. Several secret projects in the work, a few letters, and a couple of documents to be filed in the next week-ten days. Mangum's release by Halloween is a possibility if the stars align... but action by others is unfortunately out of my control.

Will keep you abreast of what, if anything, transpires.

As you were.; October 20, 2024 at 7:29 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Prince Humperdinck
"There is no doubt in my mind that the possibility of Crystal being freed before Halloween is probable"

You say there's no doubt in your mind, but you don't say WHY that is.
Why don't you tell us? What is being done about CGM's conviction that convinces you she'll be out of prison before Halloween?
October 10, 2024 at 8:03 AM

Hey, Prince Humperdinck.

Do you believe it is wise for a boxer to telegraph his punches? There may be State agents monitoring this blog site, and if that is the case, then it would provide the State with the opportunity to counteract my plans.; October 20, 2024 at 7:41 AM
DaHall said...: Kenhyderal- I don’t understand your response to #4 above. Civil lawsuits can’t override a criminal conviction- that’s true in any country with a common law legal system. that means the system is “broken” here, it’s broken in a lot of other countries as well. I shouldn’t have to explain this to you.

There are means to override criminal convictions. That Dr. Harr has mismanaged these means is his fault. It’s Crystal Mangum’s fault for letting him to do. It’s your fault for continuing to encourage him.; October 20, 2024 at 12:41 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...: "Do you believe it is wise for a boxer to telegraph his punches? "
No -- But I also believe a boxer should know what they're doing before they get in the ring. You, Sid, are no boxer.

There may be State agents monitoring this blog site..."
Yeah, and monkeys might fly out of your butt. I don't believe either -- no one with common sense would.

"... and if that is the case, then it would provide the State with the opportunity to counteract my plans.

Your lolsuits and petitions have no merit. Nothing you post here is going to change that, and nothing you post here is going to provide "the State" with any opportunity.; October 21, 2024 at 8:16 AM
dhall said...: That is my post from October 20, 2024 at 12:41 PM...I'd also note that the majority of Canada is a common law legal system (the exception is Quebec, which uses a civil code based on the Napoleonic Code).
Sorry Kenhyderal - A civil lawsuit can't override a criminal conviction in Canada, either. Even if Quebec.
Sounds like a "broken system" under "your" law in Canada. You should work on that.; October 21, 2024 at 8:34 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ DaHall: And her absolute innocence, known to all, is of no consequence? Those who have political power and are responsible for the Justice System know the prescribed means to overturn a wrongful conviction by an indigent pro-se defendant can, by them, be easily manipulated, using technicalities to deny, especially when it's the result they , to save themselves from political disgrace, fervently want.; October 21, 2024 at 9:00 AM
Anonymous said...: Where is Abe? It’s time for another countdown.; October 22, 2024 at 5:23 AM
dhall said...: I didn't say anything about her "innocence" being of no consequence, Kenhyderal. There are legal ways to overcome a criminal conviction. Dubious civil cases are not one of them.

It's not the "political powers" using technicalities that are responsible for Crystal Mangum's continued incarceration. These civil suits will not overturn her criminal conviction.

It's Dr. Harr (who admits he neither understands the law, nor bothers to research it while playing at being a lawyer) who's responsible.
It's Mangum's responsibility for letting him continue to act in this manner.
it's your responsibility for continuing to encourage him to do so.; October 22, 2024 at 6:50 AM
Anonymous said...: Looks like I was wrong about the NCJSC filing a motion in Harr v. North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission.
Sid filed one, though, for the Court to issue, (with exigency), a valid Clerk-signed subpoena -- I assume it's a subpoena for Dr. Pascarella.
What Dr. Pascarella has to to with the NCJSC violating his civil rights I have no idea.
I'm not familiar with exigent circumstances in CIVIL law. I know they are defined for criminal law (for example - preventing the destruction of evidence, preventing a felon's escape, or preventing bodily harm to somebody).
Sid -- please post your motion so we can see what exigent circumstances you've identified.; October 22, 2024 at 9:39 AM
Anonymous said...: I should add -- CGM's never been added as a co-plaintiff to Harr v. North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission.
Sid filed the motion to get her added, but nothing's come of that motion.; October 22, 2024 at 3:35 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ The Prince 10-21-24 You are naieve to believe Cooper and Stein are not closely monitoring this, since exposer of their failure to act, would certainly raise questions about the rationale behind this . And , such an expose would most likely spell severe damage to their political careers and lead to their universal disgrace. It would be a "what did they know and when did they know it" situation and would call into question what possible devious motives were envolved.; October 22, 2024 at 5:26 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous
Looks like I was wrong about the NCJSC filing a motion in Harr v. North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission.
Sid filed one, though, for the Court to issue, (with exigency), a valid Clerk-signed subpoena -- I assume it's a subpoena for Dr. Pascarella.
What Dr. Pascarella has to to with the NCJSC violating his civil rights I have no idea.
I'm not familiar with exigent circumstances in CIVIL law. I know they are defined for criminal law (for example - preventing the destruction of evidence, preventing a felon's escape, or preventing bodily harm to somebody).
Sid -- please post your motion so we can see what exigent circumstances you've identified.
October 22, 2024 at 9:39 AM

Hey, Anony.

I will post below a link to my motion filed in federal court.; October 22, 2024 at 6:25 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

LINK: Harr's Motion for Court Order to Issue, with Exigency, a Valid Clerk-Signed Subpoena for Pro Se Litigant to Serve

Let me know what you think.

As you were.; October 22, 2024 at 6:30 PM
Anonymous said...: I find it odd that one of the things you ask for is that the court "to act with expediency as MANGUM's liberty is a dominant factor".
Mangum is NOT a party to Harr v. North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission.

There's already a response in opposition to your motion. Post it when you get a chance.; October 23, 2024 at 7:11 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Kenny @ October 22, 2024
I see -- since Cooper and Stein haven't proved they are not closely monitoring this blog, we must assume they are. Otherwise we're "naieve".

I believe your argument is called an "appeal to ignorance"

Here's the deal -- you provide proof that Cooper and Stein are monitoring this blog, and I'll agree with you and admit I am "naieve" for believing they aren't.; October 23, 2024 at 11:31 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ The Prince----Reductio ad absurdum. If you make the claim Stein and Cooper have not proved they monitor J4N then neither can it be proved that they do not, so monitor it. However, there is no question that they are fully aware of what the blog content states regarding Crystal Mangum as they have been presented directly with all this information. You are indeed naieve if you believe they never seen this information that was sent to them and to their minions and underlings by Dr. Harr. All of it which shows to anyone of normal intelligence that Crystal did not commit murder. If they did not see it they are derelict.; October 23, 2024 at 5:47 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...: You think Cooper and Stein read the cr@p on the CD’s Sid sent them? THAT is naive. Show us the proof that Cooper and Stein monitor this blog.; October 24, 2024 at 4:08 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: In your original filing, you claimed that the NC JSC violated your due process rights as protected by the 5th and 14th Amendments.

You claim these violations occurred when the NC JSC denied your complaints against Judge O'Fughludha (filed in Feb 2023, Sep 2023, May 2024). because they "did not find sufficient evidence of judicial misconduct".

You end this by asking the the court to do the following:

1) Compel NC JSC to fill out your RFA regarding it's ruling on Judge O'Fighludha
2) Review the 3 complaints against the judge and provide a written report to explain its reasoning in detail
3) Compel NC JSC to review your complain against Judge Berger and provide a detailed explanation

That's it.
Dr. Pascarella doesn't work for the NC JSC. he doesn't work for either judge identified in the lawsuit, nor is he being asked to do something in the event you actually win. No organization he works for is a defendant in this lawsuit.

His subpoena serves no purpose here.; October 24, 2024 at 3:46 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ The Prince : Proof positive that an innocent person has been wrongly convicted is hardly crap, Never mind that it can't shown Cooper and Stein read this blog . It has been positively shown that Crystal is innocent of murder. Even a perverse person like you knows this. There can be no cop-out by these State Officials claiming they never saw the information. That would either be an outright lie or a case of willful ignorance.; October 24, 2024 at 5:37 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...: "Never mind that it can't shown Cooper and Stein read this blog"

Kenny -- you're the one that stated "You are naieve to believe Cooper and Stein are not closely monitoring this [blog]"...
Now you're saying "Never mind that it can't shown..."

You can't even keep your story straight from 1 day to the next and people are supposed to believe you?

People that bother to read this, I can only say that you are "naieve" to believe anything coming from Kenny.; October 25, 2024 at 7:26 AM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr -- Are you going to post the NC JSC response to your latest motion (thanks, Anonymous @October 23, 2024 at 7:11 AM)?; October 25, 2024 at 9:34 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: dhall
Dr. Harr -- Are you going to post the NC JSC response to your latest motion (thanks, Anonymous @October 23, 2024 at 7:11 AM)?
October 25, 2024 at 9:34 AM

Hey, dhall.

I received a copy of the response from NC JSC in the mail the other day, but haven't even opened the envelope to look at it as I do not want to be distracted from my current project... which I hope to have completed by the end of the weekend. Then I will look at the response and consider uploading it.; October 25, 2024 at 5:29 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Tyrone Rugen
In your original filing, you claimed that the NC JSC violated your due process rights as protected by the 5th and 14th Amendments.

You claim these violations occurred when the NC JSC denied your complaints against Judge O'Fughludha (filed in Feb 2023, Sep 2023, May 2024). because they "did not find sufficient evidence of judicial misconduct".

You end this by asking the the court to do the following:

1) Compel NC JSC to fill out your RFA regarding it's ruling on Judge O'Fighludha
2) Review the 3 complaints against the judge and provide a written report to explain its reasoning in detail
3) Compel NC JSC to review your complain against Judge Berger and provide a detailed explanation

That's it.
Dr. Pascarella doesn't work for the NC JSC. he doesn't work for either judge identified in the lawsuit, nor is he being asked to do something in the event you actually win. No organization he works for is a defendant in this lawsuit.

His subpoena serves no purpose here.
October 24, 2024 at 3:46 PM

Hey, Tyrone Rugen.

At issue is not the relevance or propriety of the subpoena to Dr. Pascarella, but whether or not a validly signed subpoena should be issued to me. If Dr. Pascarella deems a valid subpoena is inappropriate, then he has the ability to object and/or quash it. Yes, Dr. Pascarella is a third party in this action and is subsequently in no jeopardy legally in the matter, so I do not understand why he should not comply with a subpoena from me. Agree?; October 25, 2024 at 5:35 PM
Anonymous said...: Aren’t you under gatekeeper orders?; October 26, 2024 at 4:48 AM
Anonymous said...: Aren’t you under gatekeeper orders?; October 26, 2024 at 4:49 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: No Sid. Since you obviously can’t determine that your subpoena is relevant and proper, someone has to make that determination.

Why stop at Pascarella? Subpoena Cooper, Stein, Obama, Harris, Trump…..; October 26, 2024 at 5:34 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ The Prince 10-25-24 That statement stands; in light of the fact that they have received all the relevant information and they have a duty to respond to their Public . With proof absolute of the innocence of Crystal put forward on the blog and with the all relevant exhibits forwarded to them, it would appear to be incumbant upon them to look into the matter. I asume the must have seen what was directed to them by a constituent and therefore have looked into the matter, especially when posters such Dr. Harr and I are accusing them of dereliction. I believe it is naieve, on your part, to assume they have not. In this case they can have no plausable deniability of unawareness. The question then arises, what are their motives.; October 26, 2024 at 6:56 AM
dhall said...: Wasn't the "Pascarella's objection and motion to quash" you reference in this motion actually from the Mangum v. Nelson lawsuit and not your lawsuit against the NC JSC? There was yet another motion filed yesterday. You might want to read them.; October 26, 2024 at 8:17 AM
dhall said...: Kenhderal -- it's naive not "naieve". I'm pretty sure that's why Prince Humperdinck keeps putting it in quotes.

And quite frankly, it's naive of you to assume a given politician (regardless of party affiliation) has looked into any given matter.

Before you start your "corrupt US political system" blather, this is true for Canadian politicians as well (see reports from Canada's National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians, for example).; October 26, 2024 at 12:00 PM
A Durham Man1 said...: Kenny,

So are you telling us that you believe that the N.C. Governor and Attorney General are aware of your posts at this website accusing them of dereliction of duty? You truly are living on a different planet than the rest of us.; October 26, 2024 at 12:02 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ A Durham Man 1 : I'm telling you that, if they, or their minions, have not looked in to the information presented to them about the absolute innocence of Crystal they are derelict. I believe they, most reasonably, have and this is a rational, not other worldly, belief based on the nature of their office and the on the duties and responsibilities which that entails. If they have not it's
something citizens like you should be concerned about. A darker possibility is that they have but for political reasons wan't to keep her, albeit she is innocent, where she is. And darker yet they are influencing those appointed to deny any and all of Crystal's legal efforts to receive justice.; October 26, 2024 at 4:51 PM
kenhyderal supporter said...: A Durham Man1:

It is a well known fact that the Durham D.A. monitors kenhyderal’s posts at this blog. For this reason, kenhyderal has not posted his secret plans to win both a new trial for Crystal and compensation from North Carolina. Given the practices of the Durham D.A., it is only reasonable to conclude that the Governor and A.G. also monitor kenhyderal’s posts. Further, if the Governor and A.G. Are not monitoring this blog, this is something that citizens like you should be concerned about.

.; October 27, 2024 at 6:41 AM
Anonymous said...: "Absolute Innocence" is a perfume.

Do you mean "Actual Innocence"?

Who knows? Maybe you mean they are derelict in their failure to notice how CGM smells...; October 28, 2024 at 8:50 AM
Anonymous said...: Didn't mean to post twice on October 26, 2024...But since Sid never responded, I'll ask again:
Aren’t you under gatekeeper orders?; October 28, 2024 at 8:55 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous
Didn't mean to post twice on October 26, 2024...But since Sid never responded, I'll ask again:
Aren’t you under gatekeeper orders?
October 28, 2024 at 8:55 AM

Hey, Anony.

The Federal Court's Middle District of North Carolina did file a gatekeeper's prefiling injunction against me issued by District Judge Catherine Eagles in 2016 or 2017. Fortunately Ms. Mangum's cases are in the Eastern District.; October 28, 2024 at 6:00 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous
"Absolute Innocence" is a perfume.

Do you mean "Actual Innocence"?

Who knows? Maybe you mean they are derelict in their failure to notice how CGM smells...
October 28, 2024 at 8:50 AM

Not funny, Anony.

What distinguishes absolute innocence from actual innocence is that in absolute innocence the innocent is prosecuted and/or convicted of for a crime not committed. There are many examples of absolute innocence, such as the St. Louis woman who was convicted of poisoning her infant with anti-freeze when it was later learned that the baby had a genetic defect that produced the same chemicals as found in anti-freeze. Fortunately she gave birth to a second child while in prison who had the same defect, and thus same symptoms for which she could not have been responsible.; October 28, 2024 at 6:12 PM
Anonymous said...: This is Harr v. NC JSC that you filed this motion in - not one of Mangum’s lawsuits.; October 29, 2024 at 4:29 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid -- I can't find the term "absolute innocence" in any legal dictionary, and the first page of a google search shows nothing but perfume. Try googling it if you don't believe me.

Now -- is this a real definition or something you made up?; October 29, 2024 at 5:33 AM
Anonymous said...: Oh how the broken U.S. Justice System loves to rely on semantics . It's one of the reasons America has more Lawyers per capita than any other country, to the detriment of true justice . It allows for the easy manipulation of laws so that desired results rather than just results can be obtained, all at the expense of common sense and it's one of the reasons, in America, a once honorable profession is now so despised.; October 29, 2024 at 8:53 AM
dhall said...: I'm not sure what your current project is (there's no new posting here on your blog). Do you plan to load the NC JSC motions? I would like to read them.; October 29, 2024 at 9:36 AM
kenhyderal said...: You may have guessed, post by Anonymous, 10-29-24 8:53 AM, is mine .; October 29, 2024 at 3:05 PM
Nifong Supporter Supporter said...: Dr. Harr:

Will Crystal be released by Halloween?; October 30, 2024 at 4:14 AM
Anonymous said...: Seeing that it's Oct 30 (and there was no NAMATH-guarantee), the odds that CGM will NOT be released by Halloween are 100%.

As you were.; October 30, 2024 at 8:54 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Nifong Supporter Supporter
Dr. Harr:

Will Crystal be released by Halloween?

October 30, 2024 at 4:14 AM

Hey, Nifong Double Supporter.

Sadly, I will not reach my self-imposed telos by Halloween.

Unfortunately I have no control over actions by others and must tolerate the pace, regardless of how slow, in order not to cause offense. I should have been able to have Crystal freed long before Halloween had the stars aligned. I am extremely confident she will spend this Thanksgiving with her family, however, as I have a toe-hold on the situation and should be able to get a foot in the door by next week.; October 30, 2024 at 9:56 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous
Sid -- I can't find the term "absolute innocence" in any legal dictionary, and the first page of a google search shows nothing but perfume. Try googling it if you don't believe me.

Now -- is this a real definition or something you made up?
October 29, 2024 at 5:33 AM

Hey, Anony.

The term "absolute innocence" is what you would call a "Harrism." I made up the term and its definition, which is why you ill not find it in a legal reference book. I believe it will eventually be accepted legal jargon, though.; October 30, 2024 at 10:07 AM
Anonymous said...: Ah -- So "absolute innocence" is an example of semantics you and Kenny love to rely on.
And no, it's what you'd call a "Harrism".
I'd call it "word salad" -- a term made up of actual words that in fact has no meaning to anyone other than the person(s) using it.; October 30, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: "I have a toe-hold on the situation and should be able to get a foot in the door by next week.
Exactly - If Sid wants to get ahead he'll have to iron out the remaining bottlenecks. His work for CGM has allowed him to spread his wings and really blossom.; October 30, 2024 at 11:50 AM
Anonymous said...: I found your comments interesting, Dr. Harr.

As best I can tell, there's been no additional filing in the Mangum v. Nelson case, and there's nothing new filed by you in the Harr b. NC JSC case. Even if she were to win her case and/or you to win yours, it wouldn't have freed her.

You've stopped mentioning the "secret project" that started roughly this same time last year (you know -- the one you were going to inform everyone about in September). IIRC, this "secret project" wasn't even yours -- so if that were to work, it wouldn't be you freeing Crystal Mangum.

You stated "I should have been able to have Crystal freed long before Halloween had the stars aligned".
What were you doing that would have freed her?; October 30, 2024 at 1:05 PM
Tyrone Rugen said...: "Mangum's release by Halloween is a possibility.."

I think that's about the worst thing I've ever heard.
[pause]
How marvelous.

"Those who have knowledge, don't predict. Those who predict, don't have knowledge."
- Lao Tzu; October 31, 2024 at 6:43 AM
Nifong Supporter Supporter said...: Dr. Harr:

Why are you extremely confident that Crystal will be released by Thanksgiving?; November 2, 2024 at 5:51 AM
Anonymous said...: Looks like Sid filed a response in Harr v. North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission.
Sid -- When are you going to post these motions (both yours and the defendants)?; November 2, 2024 at 7:50 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: Since I’m in a quoting mood, Nifong Supporter Supporter, I’ll tell why Sid is so confident.

To quote JM Barrie, “All the world is made from faith and trust and pixie dust.”

Sid’s simply inhaled too much pixie dust.; November 2, 2024 at 11:22 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous
Looks like Sid filed a response in Harr v. North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission.
Sid -- When are you going to post these motions (both yours and the defendants)?
November 2, 2024 at 7:50 AM

Hey, Anony.

I am going to probably have both briefs posted before the end of the weekend.; November 2, 2024 at 3:27 PM
Anonymous said...: “The question put to the State is to prove that a crime was committed in Reginald Daye's death.”

That question was answered…In 2012. No silly civil lolsuit is going to change that answer.; November 2, 2024 at 5:00 PM
Nifong Supporter Supporter said...: Dr. Harr:

Who is listening to you?; November 3, 2024 at 6:06 AM
Anonymous said...: "What makes a difference now is that I am more focused on following up rather than waiting for responses."
Without a response from *someone*, what is there to follow up on?
What even are you "following up on"?; November 3, 2024 at 9:23 AM
Anonymous said...: If anyone can explain, to my satisfaction, how these civil lawsuits will free Crystal Mangum, I would be willing to provide him/her with a cashier's check in the amount of fifty dollars. The explanation must be based on facts of the cases and not Harr-esque conspiracy-like rumors.; November 3, 2024 at 9:30 AM
Anonymous said...: Looks like Sid is as accurate about posting the motions from Harr v. NS JSC as he is about Mangum getting out of prison.; November 4, 2024 at 6:34 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 11-3-24 Here are some facts. Crystal Mangum did not murder Reginald Daye. All evidence shows this to be true, Daye did not die of complications from the stab wound as the Jury was wrongly told by Dr. Nicholls. Nicholls testimony is provably false. It was the opinion of Dr. Cyril Wecht that a Welch or Holsclaw precident does not exist because he was being treated for an unrelated medical condition, therefore his death was due to Accident in treating that unrelated medical condition. Dr. Harr's civil suits have been the only way these facts were exposed. All those with the power to correct this have, thanks to the Civil Suits, this information, just like you do. As a citizen you have the duty to call for such a miscarrige of Justice to be fixed or can you provide any facts that say Crystal was rightly convicted?; November 4, 2024 at 10:41 AM
dhall said...: "The question put to the State is to prove that a crime was committed in Reginald Daye's death. "

Dr. Harr -- I agree with Anonymous @November 2, 2024 at 5:00 PM on this. The State found Crystal Mangum guilty of 2nd degree murder. They did prove a crime was committed. Crystal Mangum would not be in prison otherwise.

You state "The question put to the State...".
Who put this question to the State?
In what manner was this question put to the state?; November 4, 2024 at 11:44 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous
Looks like Sid is as accurate about posting the motions from Harr v. NS JSC as he is about Mangum getting out of prison.
November 4, 2024 at 6:34 AM

Hey, Anony.

I could have posted the briefs on this site by Sunday, but instead I thought I would put more effort into the post and include exhibits within the narrative itself rather than providing links. This new format, I believe, will be more interesting and enlightening, but also, unfortunately, be a little more time-consuming. But, as always, I want to present the best possible product for viewers to this blog site. Tomorrow will be especially busy for me, so please expect it to be uploaded sometime before the end of this week.; November 4, 2024 at 5:59 PM
Anonymous said...: She stabbed Daye. He died. A jury of her peers found her guilty of 2nd degree manslaughter. A subsequent appeal was lost. Subsequent MARs and other actions have also failed.
A criminal conviction means that the court has accepted the evidence against the defendant. A defendant cannot re-litigate these facts in a civil case. A 1 minute google search will show you this, with more details than any of Sid’s lawsuits and motions.

As a friend of Crystal Mangum, you have the duty to call Sid out for his ridiculous actions. Or can you provide any facts that say a civil lawsuit will free Mangum?; November 5, 2024 at 4:48 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

If you haven't already, be sure to vote today for Kamala Harris.

Also, have a fab Guy Fawkes Day.

As you were.; November 5, 2024 at 6:30 AM
kenhyderal said...: dhall said : "The State found Crystal Mangum guilty of 2nd degree murder. They did prove a crime was committed. Crystal Mangum would not be in prison otherwise" ===== No they did not prove it. The information they presented to the Jury. from their expert wittness, Dr. Nicholls, was provably false. Thanks to the correct information, made available to the State by Dr. Harr and, confirmed by all the available medical informatio, they now, also, know that it is false. This information is irrefutable and easily understandable by anyone. It was clearly explained and presented by famed Forensic Pathologist Dr. Cyril Wecht. You, dhall, I daresay, also know this and it is quite pervese, on your part, to insist that Crystal was rightly convicted of murder. Everyone who looks at the information knows this not to be so and keeping Crystal locked up is a pervesion of justice.; November 5, 2024 at 8:51 AM
dhall said...: Why celebrate Guy Fawkes day?
It's National Redhead Day!!; November 5, 2024 at 11:30 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenhyderal at November 4, 2024 at 10:41 AM -- Sid's apparently afraid to post my response to you. The short version is that you failed to win the $50.00.

If you want to read the long version that explains why you failed, tell Sid to post my comment.; November 5, 2024 at 11:44 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenhyderal -- Regardless of you feelings on the matter. The State DID prove, to a jury of her peers, that Crystal Mangum committed 2nd degree murder.

If you (or Dr. Harr, or even myself) were on that jury that may not have happened. But we weren't.

What Dr. Harr is attempting to do WILL NOT WORK to free Crystal Mangum. He (as Anonymous @ November 5, 2024 at 4:48 AM correctly points out) simply cannot re-litigate her criminal conviction in a civil case. Understand that -- if you can't understand that, seek guidance elsewhere.
I'm simply not going to waste my time with you when you refuse to ignore reality and attempt to substitute your own.

There are proper ways to seek Crystal Mangum's freedom. That those ways have been ignored or outright mishandled is something YOU should consider perverse. To not encourage Crystal Mangum to use those methods correctly and instead rely on a self-proclaimed "legal layperson" with no true legal education and self-admittedly does not bother to even research the law is perverse.

With friends like you and Dr. Harr, Crystal Mangum doesn't need enemies.; November 6, 2024 at 5:33 AM
dhall said...: That was my reply I just posted. I didn't realize I wasn't signed in to Blogger.; November 6, 2024 at 5:38 AM

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Tuesday, October 1, 2024

Third Party Objections and Motion to Quash Subpoena / Crystal Mangum's Response in Opposition

115 comments:

Facebook Badge

Subscribe!

Labels

Blog Archive

About Me