As I testified before Wake Superior Court Judge Clayton D. Somers on Friday, January 17, 2025, "Laws are not deified commandments handed down from the heavens like manna, but are manmade and therefore can be unfair, prejudicial, and cruel." Put another way, there are Rules of Law and Rules of Equity, and both should be taken into consideration by an adjudicator when imposing a ruling in a case.
Motive matters... and motivations for my actions in technically violating a manmade law should be taken into consideration as most actions do not occur in a vacuum. For an example, suppose a car is stopped at a red light and a mother pushing a stroller is walking across the street in a crossing when an SUV is careening out of control and would likely strike the two. By pulling into the intersection (against the light) the car takes the brunt of the impact and saves the lives of the mother and her child. Did the car driver break the law? Yes! Should he receive a citation for doing so? I would say no. But you and Judge Somers would say yes in going by strict interpretation of the law and ignoring the car driver's motives. The same is what happened at my hearing.
Under the repeated threats of additional contempt of court charges, my ability to present a defense was totally stifled.
Hope this provides sufficient edification for you.
You aren’t saving anyone’s life, Sid. If anything, you and your ridiculous lolsuits have made it more difficult for CGM. Your actions are simply to draw attention to yourself, not to help anyone.
Case in point, your “attempts” to get the NCIIC to help CGM.
Anyone out there - go to NCIICs website and try to get CGM assistance. You know what you’ll find? You can’t. Only the inmate themself can.
All you’ve managed to do is drive away her lawyers and make it difficult for her to get new ones.
The Governor Livingstone Alumni Association is not handed down from the heavens like manna, but is manmade and therefore can be unfair, prejudicial, and cruel.
Hope this provides sufficient edification for you.
Lance posted this in a previous blog: Show Cause hearings are very evidentiary based. The plaintiff must be able to show the judge the ways in which the opposing party (that would be you) has not complied with the order currently in place (the permanent injunction enjoining you from activities constituting the practice of law in North Carolina). The defendant (that would be you) must show the judge that the defendant has complied with the current order in place.
Nothing in your "defense" shows that you complied with the court's 2013 permanent injunction.
I'm a senior citizen who believes that the state of North Carolina has harshly, excessively, and unjustly treated former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong.
8 comments:
There was no need to put together this ridiculously long document when you’ve already admitted your guilt.
KENHYDERAL:
I HAVE INFORMATION REGARDING THE GOVERNOR LIVINGSTONE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION AND I AM WAITING TO HEAR FROM YOU.
Hey, Anony.
As I testified before Wake Superior Court Judge Clayton D. Somers on Friday, January 17, 2025, "Laws are not deified commandments handed down from the heavens like manna, but are manmade and therefore can be unfair, prejudicial, and cruel." Put another way, there are Rules of Law and Rules of Equity, and both should be taken into consideration by an adjudicator when imposing a ruling in a case.
Motive matters... and motivations for my actions in technically violating a manmade law should be taken into consideration as most actions do not occur in a vacuum. For an example, suppose a car is stopped at a red light and a mother pushing a stroller is walking across the street in a crossing when an SUV is careening out of control and would likely strike the two. By pulling into the intersection (against the light) the car takes the brunt of the impact and saves the lives of the mother and her child.
Did the car driver break the law? Yes!
Should he receive a citation for doing so? I would say no. But you and Judge Somers would say yes in going by strict interpretation of the law and ignoring the car driver's motives. The same is what happened at my hearing.
Under the repeated threats of additional contempt of court charges, my ability to present a defense was totally stifled.
Hope this provides sufficient edification for you.
You aren’t saving anyone’s life, Sid. If anything, you and your ridiculous lolsuits have made it more difficult for CGM.
Your actions are simply to draw attention to yourself, not to help anyone.
Case in point, your “attempts” to get the NCIIC to help CGM.
Anyone out there - go to NCIICs website and try to get CGM assistance. You know what you’ll find? You can’t. Only the inmate themself can.
All you’ve managed to do is drive away her lawyers and make it difficult for her to get new ones.
You should have left well enough alone.
With friends like you, CGM doesn’t need enemies.
The Governor Livingstone Alumni Association is not handed down from the heavens like manna, but is manmade and therefore can be unfair, prejudicial, and cruel.
Hope this provides sufficient edification for you.
" Rules of Law and Rules of Equity". Do you even know what you're talking about?
Aequitas sequitur legem
Lance posted this in a previous blog:
Show Cause hearings are very evidentiary based.
The plaintiff must be able to show the judge the ways in which the opposing party (that would be you) has not complied with the order currently in place (the permanent injunction enjoining you from activities constituting the practice of law in North Carolina).
The defendant (that would be you) must show the judge that the defendant has complied with the current order in place.
Nothing in your "defense" shows that you complied with the court's 2013 permanent injunction.
Play silly games, win stupid prizes.
Post a Comment