Thursday, March 29, 2012

April 3rd… a truly sad anniversary

April 3, 2012 will mark the one year anniversary of yet another Durham tragedy… one that surely calls for no celebration. It will be a year since Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser has been in jail on bogus charges related to the stabbing of Reginald Daye. What this day will invoke, in people of enlightenment and good will, is a feeling of shame for yet another injustice based on the vendetta prosecution of Ms. Mangum. Like a pit-bull that won’t turn loose a leg of lamb, the Durham police and prosecutors continue to pursue to seek vengeance against the person, an African American female, who was responsible for what has been known as the Duke Lacrosse case.

The Carpetbagger families of the Duke Lacrosse defendants are not just satisfied with the $20 million payout that they each received in a shakedown of Duke University… they thirst for blood of all involved in the case. Rae Evans, mother of Duke Lacrosse defendant Dave Evans, made clear her vindictive streak by publicly stating that she wanted Mike Nifong to “pay every day for the rest of his life.” With her strong connections to the media, which includes more than a decade of working as an executive with CBS News, she has managed to direct the mainstream media into an all-out crusade to crush former Durham district attorney and Duke Lacrosse prosecutor Nifong, Crystal Mangum, Nifong supporters, and anyone considered by the Powers-That-Be to be on the wrong end of the Duke Lacrosse case.

This Carpetbagger Jihad agenda has been highly successful in manipulating the mainstream media to destroy the honorable careers of Mike Nifong, lab director Brian Meehan, and the then Durham Assistant District Attorney Tracey Cline… although, removed from her elected position as Durham district attorney using a little known-rarely used elastic law, the Jihadists’ work on Cline will not be completed until she is at least disbarred. Police detectives and officers who worked on the Duke Lacrosse case have also been put through the wringer by the media and courts, however, with the possible exception of Mike Nifong himself, no one has been exposed to as much media-spurred venom and wrath as Crystal Mangum.

It wasn’t enough that she was abused and exploited at the March 13, 2006 Duke Lacrosse beer-guzzling, stripper-ogling, under-aged drinking debauchery, the city of Durham pounced on its first opportunity to destroy her when she was in need of the services of Durham’s finest. On that February 17, 2010 night, being a victim of a domestic assault in which police were called to her apartment by her children who feared for her life, she ended up in jail on a multitude of trumped up charges. Among them was a felony arson charge for clothes set on fire in the bathtub, with Durham police being the only ones with the means, motive, and opportunity to commit the crime. Her three months of incarceration were interrupted only by the benevolence and generosity of a bail bondsman who had the courage to assist her by satisfying her $100,000 bail. With a mistrial on the most serious arson felony charge, Mangum was convicted on three frivolous and merit-less misdemeanors and sentenced to time served.

Having lost everything after her lengthy time in detention, Crystal Mangum had to virtually start from scratch. With her media-driven notorious past and arson charge, she was unable to find a landlord willing to rent to her, so she entered into a symbiotic relationship with Reginald Daye, a recently laid-off painter who was in arrears with his rent and facing eviction. Their arrangement was for her to help with paying the rent in exchange for her and her children to be allowed to secretly cohabitate in his apartment.

Unfortunately, Mr. Daye had a problem with alcohol and on the evening of April 2, 2011 he had been heavily drinking. An argument between Daye and Mangum ensued and proceeded into the early morning hours of April 3, 2011. It eventually became physical with him dragging her around by her hair and punching her in the face. In self-defense she stabbed him with a paring knife… once in the left torso, and then left the premises.

Daye was awake and walking around his apartment by the time first responders arrived. EMT noted no injuries other than the stab wound to the left torso that had minimal bleeding. They accessed his left upper extremity and found not lesions, contrary to the autopsy report of April 14, 2011… no “defensive wounds.” He was transported to Duke University Medical Center where, in addition to the stab wound, a blood alcohol lab test revealed a level of 296 mg/dL… enough to cause stupor in a normal individual.

When EMT later picked up Crystal Mangum, they noted a cut under her left eye and a swollen lower lip. In addition, at the scene, police recorded finding tufts of brown hair.

Mangum was arrested immediately for assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, despite her claims of self-defense, and forensic evidence to backup her claim.

Meanwhile, Reginald Daye, having successful emergency surgery to repair a lesion to the splenic flexure of his colon and a mild lesion to his spleen, required treatment for severe alcohol withdrawal… and was treated with benzodiazepine sedatives to control his symptoms of delirium tremens.

On the evening of the third postoperative day, April 6, 2011, Daye was having respiratory problems and a diagnostic procedure was ordered. However, while being prepped for the procedure, Daye sustained a severe and lengthy anoxic episode that induced a cardiac arrest and brain damage. These events were responsible for Daye lapsing into a deep coma which eventually brought about his elective removal from life support one week later. His brain death had absolutely nothing to do with the stab wound inflicted by Mangum, but rather the lack of oxygenated blood circulating to his brain which was directly responsible for the death of brain cells.

One year later, Mangum remains in jail for acting against Daye in self-defense. Compare this with the case in Sanford, Florida, where George Zimmerman shot and killed an unarmed seventeen year old boy because he “looked suspicious”… evidently defined as being a young black boy wearing a hoodie. In this case Zimmerman was obviously the aggressor and was in pursuit of the young black teen who was walking with iced tea and a bag of Skittles while talking on the cell phone with his girlfriend. There was no photographs released of Zimmerman, who alleges to have sustained a broken nose and a bloody wound to the back of his head. There was no indication of facial trauma on the recently released video of his visit to the police station immediately following the incident. There was no indication of any blood from Trayvon Martin on Zimmerman’s clothing; Martin who Zimmerman claims was on top of him when he shot Martin in the chest. Zimmerman’s story of self-defense doesn’t stand up, and yet he has remained free for more than a month since the incident happened.

Why is it then that Crystal Mangum has already served a one year sentence in jail for acting in self-defense in a state which has its own version of Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law? The answer is simple… it is because of race. Had the roles in Sanford, Florida been reversed and Zimmerman was an African American and Martin was white, then an arrest would have been made at the scene and the shooter would be in jail today and not awaiting for a grand jury to convene on April 10, 2012 to make a determination.

The problem is in large respect due to mainstream media and its inherent bias. The incident involving Trayvon Martin was of no interest to the mainstream media. It was the social media that brought national and worldwide attention to this outrage, and forced the mainstream media to get involved.

With the circumstances involving Crystal Mangum, she has been so vilified and demonized by the mainstream media that it is nearly impossible for her to get any sympathy from anyone. This is compounded by the NAACP, both locally and nationally, ignoring her plight. Also the African American politicians, especially in Durham, are turning a blind eye and deaf ear to this grave injustice. Senator Floyd McKissick, and Representatives Mickey Michaux and Larry Hall, as well as the entire North Carolina Legislative Black Caucus should be up in arms about the injustices that have plagued Crystal Mangum since February 2010. But they aren’t, and she continues to languish in jail… for a year now.

This is a truly tragic anniversary of incarceration of an innocent person, Crystal Mangum… and it is one that will not be repeated if the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong has anything to say about it.


157 comments:

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

Is this the earthshaking blog in which you would supposedly prove Crystal innocent of killing Reginald Daye?

It is more of the deluded megalomaniacal bullshit you have been trying to peddle as truth for a number of years. You have made allegations but have offered no proof.

I told you in a previous post your credibility had already taken a mortal blow when you refused to go to the authorities with your supposed information.

Meanwhile, while you are so concerne about false accuser/victimzer Crystal Mangum's jailing, why do you choose to remain ignorant of Leon Brown and Frankie Washington, innocent Black men who spent time injai after being falsely accused by incompetent Black former DA Tracey Cline"

Anonymous said...

SDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist),

In response to your claim that I would be enlightened by your newest blog post:

I have read your next blog which is but another manifestation of your deluded megalomania.

It also another lie filled, distorted expression of your hate-filled, racially motivated vendetta against the innocent men whom Crystal Mangum falsely accused of raping her.

A deluded megalomaniac is incapable of enlightening anyone, especially himself.

I posted this on your last blog post, about stealingfrom yourself.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

Prove the carpetbager jihad exists.

Lance the Intern said...

Sid -- How did you become aware of Reginald Daye's medical information?

I'm sure you're aware of HIPAA. I'm sure you're also aware of invasion of privacy (see here )

Lance the Intern said...

Sid -- I'll point out the obvious errors:

1) George Zimmerman is Latino.

I think there is a media bias -- but not the one you think. I believe the issue with the media is the lack of reporting for "minority-on-minority" crimes.

Let's be honest -- the highest percentage of homicides are "black on black" crimes, and in some states (Missouri, California and Michigan come to mind), these homicides are hardly (if ever) mentioned as news anymore.

2) NC has no "speedy trial" law, and the DA at the time of Ms. Mangum's arrest was NOTORIOUS for over-charging defendants and keeping them locked up until a plea deal could be made.

You, in your impotent wisdom, have repeatedly defended this notorious DA -- even after she was removed from her job for conduct "prejudicial to the administration of justice".

3) Ms. Mangum could be out on bond at any time.
You, kenhyderal, and the "Justice4Crystal" gang simply need to cough up the $200,000.00 to make it so.

Anonymous said...

One word. BULL.

Anonymous said...

SIDN9inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

You are still ducking giving an explanation why your frivolous lawsuit against Duke was ignominiously bounced out of court.

Do you have any reliable sources who could explain it to you?

How about your friend, Professor Coleman?

Anonymous said...

Yep sad it is for mr daye and his family. Killed by a lying amoral woman .....who was enabled and excused by wingnuts like you. Mr daye's blood is on your hands.
Go ahead doctor.....take your documentation to mangum's lawyer. What a crock

Anonymous said...

I hope this woman finally is held accountable in a court of law. If found guilty, i hope she rots in prison. Somebody please empty the trash

Anonymous said...

SIDN9inn)EY H(ypocrite)AEE(acist):

"Meanwhile, Reginald Daye, having successful emergency surgery to repair a lesion to the splenic flexure of his colon and a mild lesion to his spleen, required treatment for severe alcohol withdrawal… and was treated with benzodiazepine sedatives to control his symptoms of delirium tremens."

That has not appeared before in your blog. Where did you get that information? From the Medical Record? If so, you have violated Federal aw by revealing it.

If it comes from your reliable sources, it is another undocumented allegation.

You make a lot of undocumented allegations which you try to pass off as truth.

Anonymous said...

EIDN(inn)EY, we are still waiting to hear from you about your resounding defeat in court.

Anonymous said...

Harr is lying as usual. The details of day's treatment such as the drugs he received AND the reasons for the medication use would NEVER be available except by one ofnthe following means: The patient's family or designated POA woulf reveal it to Harr or, the doctors or caregivers would reveal it to HArr at the direction of the family or POA, or, an employee would in violation of federal law give it to Harr , or, Harr would go to Duke desguised as a doctor, go on the unit, find the password to the electronic medical record at the bedside, and steal the information in violation of federal law.
Ok folks, which one of these methods do you think Harr used to get records of Daye's care? Harr is lying or he violated federal law and stole information. Which is it , sir? Are you a thief or a liar? Or both?
I dont know about the rest of the posters on this site, but i think Harr has crossed the line and that this information needs to be transmitted to Duke. I amsure they will be interested know that Harr is either lying or has stolen information . A major league HIPPA violation. By the way if some duke employee gave Harr information, thats a felony and will be prosecuted. Duke has strict policies about compliance with HIPPA and PHI violations always get max discipline.
I believe Harr is just a common liar. Nothing more nothing less.

Anonymous said...

Hey, SIDN(inn)EY

Have your reliable sources failed to tell you how to respond to the comments?

How about the court tossing out your frivolous lawsuit against Duke?

Anonymous said...

You da man, Sid, you da man.

Anonymous said...

The drugs Harr mentions ,and says given to Daye for DTs.........can be, and are routinely given, for a wide variety of symptoms. Harr ,by omission, fails to note all the many reasons a person could receive these drugs. Another example of lying.
Further harr asserts daye was dragging mangum by her hair. He offers no evidence and there is nothing in the police record. By the way , mangum has been photographed many times wearing hair weaves, plants and a wig. She does not have brown hair. The full head shots from her mugs taken during her arrest show zero evidence of facial trauma of any kind. More lies from Harr.

Anonymous said...

You da man, Sid, you da man.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Mangum was arrested immediately for assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, despite her claims of self-defense, and forensic evidence to backup her claim."

What forensic evidence? Are you referring to media reports which said Mr. Daye was stabbed with a paring knife?

Since when have you been concerned with forensic evidence? In the bogus Duke rape case, all the forensic evidence indicated that Crystal was not raped. You kept insisting Crystal could have been sexually assaulted in spite of the dearth of forensic evidence.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

Using the tragic Trayvon Martin incident to push your vendetta puts you on the same level as the Westboro Baptist Church> They are the folks who use the funerals of service people who have died in combat as a vehicle to broadcast their hateful message.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I hope this woman finally is held accountable in a court of law. If found guilty, i hope she rots in prison. Somebody please empty the trash

Unfortunately, you are but one of many misguided souls, seduced by mainstream biased media reporting.

Take the time to read and study my blog, and you, too, can become enlightened.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN9inn)EY H(ypocrite)AEE(acist):

"Meanwhile, Reginald Daye, having successful emergency surgery to repair a lesion to the splenic flexure of his colon and a mild lesion to his spleen, required treatment for severe alcohol withdrawal… and was treated with benzodiazepine sedatives to control his symptoms of delirium tremens."

That has not appeared before in your blog. Where did you get that information? From the Medical Record? If so, you have violated Federal aw by revealing it.

If it comes from your reliable sources, it is another undocumented allegation.

You make a lot of undocumented allegations which you try to pass off as truth.

I vouch 100 % for its accuracy by stating that it is first-hand information... Period.

Lance the Intern said...

Sid --I'm going to continue to repost this until you respond (thanks again to kenhyderal):

NASHVILLE, Tenn. – The district attorney prosecuting the rape case against three of Duke University’s lacrosse players received significant support from both black and white voters in the recent Durham primary, according to a voting analysis by Vanderbilt University political scientist Christian Grose.

“Given that about the same percentage of blacks and whites supported Michael Nifong, the results do not suggest a racially divided city,” Grose said. Nifong obtained felony indictments against white student-athletes accused of kidnapping and raping a black dancer hired to perform at a team party. Grose’s precinct-by-precinct analysis showed that Nifong received 44 percent of the black vote and 46.2 percent of the white/nonblack vote.

Just over half (50.6 percent) of the total number of white voters cast their ballots for Freda Black, the other white candidate in the race. She also received support from 25.2 percent of the black voters. Meanwhile, the only African-American candidate in the race for district attorney, Keith Bishop, received 30.8 percent of the black vote and 3.2 percent of the white/nonblack vote. “Bishop was endorsed by the Durham Committee on the Affairs of Black People, a powerful African-American group for endorsements,” said Grose, a Duke University graduate. “Many times, although not in this DA election, the committee can guarantee much black voter support.”

Nifong received a larger percentage of the black vote than the other two contenders, but he did not get a majority of the black vote. His percentage of the white vote was slightly less than 50 percent. “Nifong basically did well among both blacks and whites, demonstrating that Durham voters do not seem to be polarized along racial lines, at least on this issue,” Grose said. “In addition, the voting results suggest that Nifong’s high-profile attention to this case could have helped him with black voters.”

It has long been Sid's contention that the Duke LAX case (and his courting of "the black vote (Sid's words) did not help Nifong win the election. Here's an actual voting analysis that states wise.

Sid -- in the face of factual evidence here, what can you offer other than your opinion?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
EIDN(inn)EY, we are still waiting to hear from you about your resounding defeat in court.

I may have lost a skirmish, but the war is far from over. Need I say more?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Harr is lying as usual. The details of day's treatment such as the drugs he received AND the reasons for the medication use would NEVER be available except by one ofnthe following means: The patient's family or designated POA woulf reveal it to Harr or, the doctors or caregivers would reveal it to HArr at the direction of the family or POA, or, an employee would in violation of federal law give it to Harr , or, Harr would go to Duke desguised as a doctor, go on the unit, find the password to the electronic medical record at the bedside, and steal the information in violation of federal law.
Ok folks, which one of these methods do you think Harr used to get records of Daye's care? Harr is lying or he violated federal law and stole information. Which is it , sir? Are you a thief or a liar? Or both?
I dont know about the rest of the posters on this site, but i think Harr has crossed the line and that this information needs to be transmitted to Duke. I amsure they will be interested know that Harr is either lying or has stolen information . A major league HIPPA violation. By the way if some duke employee gave Harr information, thats a felony and will be prosecuted. Duke has strict policies about compliance with HIPPA and PHI violations always get max discipline.
I believe Harr is just a common liar. Nothing more nothing less.

Seem like you are more concerned about HIPPA and PHI violations than the truth about what caused Daye's death.

As far as Duke goes, it is very well aware of what caused Daye's death, as is Prosecutor Kelly Gauger.

If the media doesn't already know the truth about Daye's death, it is trying to avoid it by playing ostrich.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
The drugs Harr mentions ,and says given to Daye for DTs.........can be, and are routinely given, for a wide variety of symptoms. Harr ,by omission, fails to note all the many reasons a person could receive these drugs. Another example of lying.
Further harr asserts daye was dragging mangum by her hair. He offers no evidence and there is nothing in the police record. By the way , mangum has been photographed many times wearing hair weaves, plants and a wig. She does not have brown hair. The full head shots from her mugs taken during her arrest show zero evidence of facial trauma of any kind. More lies from Harr.

Au contraire, mon ami. There are reports in EMS records that Crystal Mangum had a cut under her eye, and a swollen lower lip. These findings are corroborated in other documents. In addition the EMS and other documents recorded a lesion to the back of her left hand, some describing it as an abrasion, others as a laceration.

Lance the Intern said...

So -- How DID you get the Reginald Daye's medical information, Sid?

You seem somewhat unwilling to answer that question...

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

Using the tragic Trayvon Martin incident to push your vendetta puts you on the same level as the Westboro Baptist Church> They are the folks who use the funerals of service people who have died in combat as a vehicle to broadcast their hateful message.

I respectfully disagree. In fact, I think the comparison is quite fitting.

Lance the Intern said...

"I may have lost a skirmish, but the war is far from over. Need I say more?"

Not really -- we know that your discrimination case against Duke has been dismissed .

We also know that you've been admonished by the court to conduct yourself appropriately, or face fine, inprisonment, or both.

I don't see you conducting any legal action ( pro se or otherwise ) against Duke anytime soon.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
Sid --I'm going to continue to repost this until you respond (thanks again to kenhyderal):

NASHVILLE, Tenn. – The district attorney prosecuting the rape case against three of Duke University’s lacrosse players received significant support from both black and white voters in the recent Durham primary, according to a voting analysis by Vanderbilt University political scientist Christian Grose.

“Given that about the same percentage of blacks and whites supported Michael Nifong, the results do not suggest a racially divided city,” Grose said. Nifong obtained felony indictments against white student-athletes accused of kidnapping and raping a black dancer hired to perform at a team party. Grose’s precinct-by-precinct analysis showed that Nifong received 44 percent of the black vote and 46.2 percent of the white/nonblack vote.

Just over half (50.6 percent) of the total number of white voters cast their ballots for Freda Black, the other white candidate in the race. She also received support from 25.2 percent of the black voters. Meanwhile, the only African-American candidate in the race for district attorney, Keith Bishop, received 30.8 percent of the black vote and 3.2 percent of the white/nonblack vote. “Bishop was endorsed by the Durham Committee on the Affairs of Black People, a powerful African-American group for endorsements,” said Grose, a Duke University graduate. “Many times, although not in this DA election, the committee can guarantee much black voter support.”

Nifong received a larger percentage of the black vote than the other two contenders, but he did not get a majority of the black vote. His percentage of the white vote was slightly less than 50 percent. “Nifong basically did well among both blacks and whites, demonstrating that Durham voters do not seem to be polarized along racial lines, at least on this issue,” Grose said. “In addition, the voting results suggest that Nifong’s high-profile attention to this case could have helped him with black voters.”

It has long been Sid's contention that the Duke LAX case (and his courting of "the black vote (Sid's words) did not help Nifong win the election. Here's an actual voting analysis that states wise.

Sid -- in the face of factual evidence here, what can you offer other than your opinion?

The main problem that I have with the SurveyUSA poll sponsored by ABC-11 News was that it focused solely on Mike Nifong and the black vote. It ignored the white vote and the potential loss of white votes for Nifong due to his prosecution of the Duke Lacrosse case. Surely, the percentage and absolute numbers of white voters far outstripped the number of black voters.

Using past history, it is electorial suicide to try to win an election by wooing the black vote... except maybe in 1970's Harlem. Not only that, but Nifong didn't even get the endorsement of the Durham Committee on the Affairs of Black People.

Nifong, in prosecuting the Duke Lacrosse case was not pursuing the black vote or the white vote... he was pursing Justice!

Lance, thereby may you go enlightened.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"I may have lost a skirmish, but the war is far from over. Need I say more?"

Not really -- we know that your discrimination case against Duke has been dismissed .

We also know that you've been admonished by the court to conduct yourself appropriately, or face fine, inprisonment, or both.

I don't see you conducting any legal action ( pro se or otherwise ) against Duke anytime soon.

To paraphrase that great naval Revolutionary War hero John Paul Jones, "I have not yet begun to fight."

Lance the Intern said...

"Using past history, it is electorial suicide to try to win an election by wooing the black vote... except maybe in 1970's Harlem. Not only that, but Nifong didn't even get the endorsement of the Durham Committee on the Affairs of Black People.

Nifong, in prosecuting the Duke Lacrosse case was not pursuing the black vote or the white vote... he was pursing Justice!

Lance, thereby may you go enlightened."


So -- you admit that you have no argument other than your own personal opinion. Good.

Nifong did not get the endorsement of the DCABP, yet he garnered more of the black vote than the candidate that did.

Ask yourself "Why is that?"...If the answer you come up with is anything other than the Duke Lacrosse case, you're lying to yourself.

Now ask yourself -- why was it SO important that Mike Nifong prosecute these LAX players at this time?

If your answer is anything other than "To win the DA election", you are lying to yourself.

Thereby may you go enlightened.

Lance the Intern said...

"To paraphrase that great naval Revolutionary War hero John Paul Jones, 'I have not yet begun to fight.' "

Hope you got a better lawyer than the last one.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Take the time to read and study my blog, and you, too, can become enlightened."

What a deluded megalomaniacal statement that is!

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"vouch 100 % for its accuracy by stating that it is first-hand information... Period.(that Reginald Daye was under treatment for Delerium Tremens)"

So name your reliable source. If you can not establish your credibility, you have given us nothing more than an unproven allegation.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I may have lost a skirmish, but the war is far from over. Need I say more?"

Well, earlier you were describing your frivolous lawsuit as something as significant as the Watergate affair. That was no mere skirmish.

You did not just lose. You were completely, thoroughly, absolutely routed.

If you had any sense, you would refrain from saying more.

It goes back to the axiom, it is better to keep one's mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"
Seem like you are more concerned about HIPPA and PHI violations than the truth about what caused Daye's death.

As far as Duke goes, it is very well aware of what caused Daye's death, as is Prosecutor Kelly Gauger.

If the media doesn't already know the truth about Daye's death, it is trying to avoid it by playing ostrich."

You talk about playing ostrich after you have buried your head in the sand and kept it buried for years so you could claim ignorance about what Tracey Cline did to Leon Brown and Frankie Washington!

If you really know what caused Mr. Daye's death, you would be trying to go to court to present what exculpatory evidence you have. You are not, which speaks loud volumes about your credibility.

You seem to be more concerned about your deluded megalomania than about Crystal Mangum. As an earlier poster pointed out, if you and KEN(inny) and VIC(ious)TORIA and your J4N gang got together and paid Crystal's bail, she would not be in jail.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Au contraire, mon ami. There are reports in EMS records that Crystal Mangum had a cut under her eye, and a swollen lower lip. These findings are corroborated in other documents. In addition the EMS and other documents recorded a lesion to the back of her left hand, some describing it as an abrasion, others as a laceration."

So publish the docuents. That you do not again speaks volumes about your lack of credibility.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist:

Regarding the comparison of his use of the Trayvon Martin incident to the activities of the Westboro Church:

"I respectfully disagree. In fact, I think the comparison is quite fitting."

The comparison of you to the Westboro Baptist Church is what is quite fitting. You both take advantage of anything you can to spew out your racist venom.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

Regarding NI(nny)FONG's primary election victory:

"It ignored the white vote and the potential loss of white votes for Nifong due to his prosecution of the Duke Lacrosse case. Surely, the percentage and absolute numbers of white voters far outstripped the number of black voters."

If you ever compared the pre election poll with the election results, it would be obvious to you that MIKE NI(nny)FONG did not lose support among white voters. Rather his support increased.

You have not done this because you like to bury your head in the sand so you can justify your ignorance of the truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

Regarding his ignominous dismissal of his frivolous lawsuit against Duke:

"To paraphrase that great naval Revolutionary War hero John Paul Jones, 'I have not yet begun to fight.'"

SIDN(inn)EY), you are no John Paul Jones. You are more of a Jesse Eliot(read the story of the battle of Lake Erie).

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY,

To my last comment, I add, you are more of a Harry Flashman.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Nifong, in prosecuting the Duke Lacrosse case was not pursuing the black vote or the white vote... he was pursing Justice!"

SIDN(inn)EY shows his idea of justice is MIKE NI(nny)FONG prosecuting innocent, falsely accused men, without evidence, just so he can win an election and enhance his retirement benefits.

Of course SIDN(inn)EY, defender of First Amendment rights NOT!, said the NBP Party trying to influence the outcome of a criminal trial is Constitutionally protected free speech but that AG Cooper's expression of his belief in the innocence of falsely accused men should have been suppressed.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

Quoting John Paul Jones in the Serapis/Bon Homme Richard battle might not be the best analogy for you.

More than half of Jones crew became casualties. Bon Homme Richard sunk. Jones did take Serapis and Countess of Scarborough, but was forced to turn over both of his prizes to the French.

Finally, the two British ships were escorting a valuable convoy from the Baltic, the loss of which would have been a disaster for Great Britain. While John Paul Jones was fighting the Serapis, the convoy made a clean escape.

So while John Paul Jones achieved a brilliant tactical victory against steep odds, strategically he accomplished nothing.

You did not even win a tactical victory. You were totally, completely, ignominiously defeated.

Shows how enlightened you are.

Lance the Intern said...

"The main problem that I have with the SurveyUSA poll sponsored by ABC-11 News was that it focused solely on Mike Nifong and the black vote...."

This is a study from Vanderbilt University -- NOT an ABC-11 poll.

Thereby go you enlightened.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

You are still ducking commenting about your ignominious defeat in court.

Anonymous said...

Face reality - no white man would ever want to have sex with Crystl Mangum.No even if he was passed out drunk and overdosed on Viagra at the same time.

Anonymous said...

You sre a liar sid. Nothing but a liar and a coward.

Anonymous said...

Total evasion and total bull. You are making up junk and flat out lying. We all know you for what you are.

Anonymous said...

Go ahead do another little side step sid. You are full of nothing but hot air. You are making up crap, not answering question, not providing documentation, and just plain lying. Again, mangum had zero marks on her face. Look at the photo. Even you ought to be able to see it. Of course mrs evans could have flown to durham on her broom and paid Cline to photoshop mangum's mugs. The EMS records are not public. Oso, once again, you lie.

Anonymous said...

Isn't it about time that we hear from copy and paste Kenny?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I may have lost a skirmish, but the war is far from over. Need I say more?"

Well, earlier you were describing your frivolous lawsuit as something as significant as the Watergate affair. That was no mere skirmish.

You did not just lose. You were completely, thoroughly, absolutely routed.

If you had any sense, you would refrain from saying more.

It goes back to the axiom, it is better to keep one's mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt.

My lawsuit against Duke has more importance than Watergate. The defendants Motion to Dismiss victory was but a skirmish in a much bigger war. Stay tuned.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Au contraire, mon ami. There are reports in EMS records that Crystal Mangum had a cut under her eye, and a swollen lower lip. These findings are corroborated in other documents. In addition the EMS and other documents recorded a lesion to the back of her left hand, some describing it as an abrasion, others as a laceration."

So publish the docuents. That you do not again speaks volumes about your lack of credibility.

Have patience. The truth will soon be revealed.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

Regarding his ignominous dismissal of his frivolous lawsuit against Duke:

"To paraphrase that great naval Revolutionary War hero John Paul Jones, 'I have not yet begun to fight.'"

SIDN(inn)EY), you are no John Paul Jones. You are more of a Jesse Eliot(read the story of the battle of Lake Erie).

Thanks for the historical reference. I'll google it when I get a chance.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

Quoting John Paul Jones in the Serapis/Bon Homme Richard battle might not be the best analogy for you.

More than half of Jones crew became casualties. Bon Homme Richard sunk. Jones did take Serapis and Countess of Scarborough, but was forced to turn over both of his prizes to the French.

Finally, the two British ships were escorting a valuable convoy from the Baltic, the loss of which would have been a disaster for Great Britain. While John Paul Jones was fighting the Serapis, the convoy made a clean escape.

So while John Paul Jones achieved a brilliant tactical victory against steep odds, strategically he accomplished nothing.

You did not even win a tactical victory. You were totally, completely, ignominiously defeated.

Shows how enlightened you are.

I am in but the opening salvos of a battle. The war is far from concluded. Stay tuned.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Go ahead do another little side step sid. You are full of nothing but hot air. You are making up crap, not answering question, not providing documentation, and just plain lying. Again, mangum had zero marks on her face. Look at the photo. Even you ought to be able to see it. Of course mrs evans could have flown to durham on her broom and paid Cline to photoshop mangum's mugs. The EMS records are not public. Oso, once again, you lie.

The great revelation is but around the corner. Hang on for a week or so, and enlightenment will be yours for the taking.

Harr Supporter said...

Sidney: My lawsuit against Duke has more importance than Watergate. The defendants Motion to Dismiss victory was but a skirmish in a much bigger war.

I suppose that mean that you are appealing the dismissal.

Will you finally address the legal issue involved or will you continue to ignore it and repeat your ad hominem attacks? As you know, that approach was unsuccessful with the district court.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"My lawsuit against Duke has more importance than Watergate. The defendants Motion to Dismiss victory was but a skirmish in a much bigger war. Stay tuned."

This is another manifestation of your deluded megalomania. If this is a war, what you have to look forward is more ignominious defeat.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"ave patience. The truth will soon be revealed."

In all the years you have never revealed any truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The great revelation is but around the corner. Hang on for a week or so, and enlightenment will be yours for the taking."

A deluded racist megalomaniac is incapable of enlightening anyone, least of all himself.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I am in but the opening salvos of a battle. The war is far from concluded. Stay tuned."

What you fired were not salvos but some rather feeble shots from a pop gun.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

Referring to my reference to Jesse Elior:

"Thanks for the historical reference. I'll google it when I get a chance."

Why haven't you used Google to learn about how Tracey Cline wrongfully prosecuted Frankie Washington and Leon Brown?

Anonymous said...

Sad anniversary is right.......12 months of total bull from socialist sid, the fabricator

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
"Isn't it about time that we hear from copy and paste Kenny?"

You da man, Kenny, you da man.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"This is a truly tragic anniversary of incarceration of an innocent person, Crystal Mangum… and it is one that will not be repeated if the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong has anything to say about it."

SIDN(inn)EY, as previous posters have suggested, to put it in other words, don't just talk the talk, walk the walk. Go out and raise the money for Crystal's bail.

That would truly show that your J4N gang of racists does truly care about Crystal.

Anonymous said...

Boring boring boring.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"In self-defense she(Crystal) stabbed him(Reginald Daye) with a paring knife… once in the left torso, and then left the premises."

SIDN(inn)EY again tries to pass off distortion as truth. The media never mentioned 'paring knife". The media said the weapon was a "kitchen knife".

According to SIDN(inn)EY, a paring knife qualifies as a kitchen knife so he was not distorting anything.

Anonymous said...

uh huh....poor defenseless mangum.....who has a record of violence against others.....who always seems to be the innocent one and turns out to be the liar. poor mangum, whose lies could have sent innocent men to prison. poor mangum who put her children in danger, in a drunken brawl with one of her many male "friends". poor mangum who tried to run over a police offer. poor mangum who was so drunk she passed out in her dancin partner's car in front of a grocery store. poor mangum who claimed "severe" pain from her supposed rape...and was back doing her pole vaulting routine less than one week later. (and caught on film....). poor mangum who said three men (no make that six, no, make that five....who didn't use condoms, no, well, yeah, they did use condoms).....and, poor mangum, who had DNA in and on her from five men....none of whom were ANY of the men at the party.
that poor mangum was just trying to pay the rent and the big old mean woman abusing drunken daye beat her up.
yep, sure thing, bro.

Anonymous said...

interesting.......there is not ONE word in any published document that is available to the general public that says anything about injury to mangum. sooooooo, sidney, either tell us all specifically where you got you so-called documentation or shut up.....because we all know you are lying

Anonymous said...

The police record of mangum's arrest when she stabbed Mr. Daye clearly says she stabbed him with a KITCHEN KNIFE. It does not specify what kind of knife. Of course, Harr wants us to believe it was a little bitty paring knife because he thinks that he can use this small size of the knife to justify his claim that the injury to Mr. Daye could not have happened when Sister used this little toothpick of a knife.
Of course, we also know that there is absolutely not ONE word in evidence that the knife was a paring knife. Perhaps it was a 12 inch butcher knife. Perhaps, a 10" boning knife that was super sharp and had a stilleto point. perhaps, it was a common butter knife. who the hell knows?
the point here is that harr, as he so often does, is once again lying.
sad little man with his sad little deceptions.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
interesting.......there is not ONE word in any published document that is available to the general public that says anything about injury to mangum. sooooooo, sidney, either tell us all specifically where you got you so-called documentation or shut up.....because we all know you are lying

You are absolutely correct, which goes to support my position that the mainstream media is biased against Crystal Mangum.

The proof will be forthcoming. Stay tuned, and hang in there.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
uh huh....poor defenseless mangum.....who has a record of violence against others.....who always seems to be the innocent one and turns out to be the liar. poor mangum, whose lies could have sent innocent men to prison. poor mangum who put her children in danger, in a drunken brawl with one of her many male "friends". poor mangum who tried to run over a police offer. poor mangum who was so drunk she passed out in her dancin partner's car in front of a grocery store. poor mangum who claimed "severe" pain from her supposed rape...and was back doing her pole vaulting routine less than one week later. (and caught on film....). poor mangum who said three men (no make that six, no, make that five....who didn't use condoms, no, well, yeah, they did use condoms).....and, poor mangum, who had DNA in and on her from five men....none of whom were ANY of the men at the party.
that poor mangum was just trying to pay the rent and the big old mean woman abusing drunken daye beat her up.
yep, sure thing, bro.

Daye was drunk, and that has been established by his blood alcohol level. According to reports related to the investigation of the April 3, 2011 incident, Mangum was physically abused by Daye. Believe me... I have documentation to back up this. The media, as a previous commenter stated, has refused to mention the fact that Mangum was beaten up. That is because the media is in collusion to help the vendetta prosecution saddle Mangum falsely with a first degree murder charge and to weaken her claim of self-defense.

Enlightenment is but days away.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist).

"You are absolutely correct, which goes to support my position that the mainstream media is biased against Crystal Mangum."

So how did you happen to come up with your so called reliable truthful information. And why aren't you using it to get the charges against Crystal dismissed.

That you publish unsubstantiated allegations in your blog rather than seek a court appearance in which what information you claim to have says you really have no reliable information.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Enlightenment is but days away."

You were saying that several days ago.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

Where is your commentary about your resounding ignominious defeat in court?

Your posturing about the fight just beginning is not commentary.

You should watch Monty Python and the Holy Grail, the fight between King Arthur and the Black Knight. You would be playing the role of the Black knight.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)"

"Daye was drunk, and that has been established by his blood alcohol level".

If Daye really had such a high level, you and KEN(inny) notwithstanding he would have been comatose and unable to assault Crystal.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

Clarfication:

I said:

"That you publish unsubstantiated allegations in your blog rather than seek a court appearance in which what information you claim to have says you really have no reliable information."

I should have said:

That you publish unsubstantiated allegations in your blog rather than seek a court appearance in which what information you claim to have ouuld be presented says you really have no reliable information.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"According to reports related to the investigation of the April 3, 2011 incident, Mangum was physically abused by Daye. Believe me... I have documentation to back up this."

Until you present credible documentation, that is just another unsubstantiated allegation.

You seem to have a problem presenting documentation. You say only your information comes from reliable sources which remain anonymous because you do not reveal who or what they are.

In any event, if you really have hard evidence which would exonerate Crystal, you would be taking it to her lawyer and trying to get a hearing in open court rather than publishing it in your blog.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

"Enlightenment is but days away."

On multiple occasions in the past year you have promised enlightenment and have failed to deliver. Why should we believe this time will be any different?

Lance the Intern said...

"...media is in collusion to help the vendetta prosecution saddle Mangum falsely with a first degree murder charge and to weaken her claim of self-defense"


So -- In your mind, Tracey Cline (the supervisor of the "vendetta prosecution" ) was in collusion with the media? How do you justify that?

FWIW, I agree with that the 1st degree murder charge is excessive, and is most likely being used in an attempt to force a plea bargain (probably for 2nd degree murder or voluntary manslaughter).

The thing to keep in mind, however, is that the proportion of defendants entering pleas to crimes as charged or to lesser charges dramatically increased under Cline -- It WAS her policy that drove this.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous @ April 2, 2012 8:08 AM:

"The police record of mangum's arrest when she stabbed Mr. Daye clearly says she stabbed him with a KITCHEN KNIFE. It does not specify what kind of knife. Of course, Harr wants us to believe it was a little bitty paring knife because he thinks that he can use this small size of the knife to justify his claim that the injury to Mr. Daye could not have happened when Sister used this little toothpick of a knife."

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) said the media report of a kitchen knife was an attempt on the part of the media to delude and mislead the public.

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)'s justification of calling the weapon a "kitchen knife" was that a paring knife was a type of kitchen knife and therefore he was not deceptive and misleading when he reported a paring knife as the weapon.

Yet SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) says he can enlighten people.

Anonymous said...

What "reports" sidney? your friend victoria calling you up and ranting? Your secret spy in the duke hospital? your source in the jail? your snoop in the police department? geez, we just can't wait for the bull shXX to continue.
what a crock.......

Anonymous said...

Lance is correct. Over charging by the Durham DA is/was an ADMITTED strategy on the part of Cline to get what she described as "a decent conviction rate". to "get the numbers right". So, hot shot Sid, explain to us, now, how you can be such a hypocrite as to whine about Cline's removal, while you boohoo about poor sister victim.

guiowen said...

It's easy to understand the present situation.
First, you must remember that the entire Durham justice system, with the single exception of Tracey Cline, is controlled by the carpetbaggers, who are led by Rae Evans. She is an incredibly powerful woman since she worked for 10 years at CBS.
When Crystal injured Mr. Daye with her nail file, Rae Evans pounced upon the opportunity this gave her to punish CGM once and for all. Accordingly, she had CGM arrested. The subsequent death of Daye made it all the more likely that CGM could be sent away for all time. Accordingly, Mrs. Evans saw to it that CGM was accused of murder.
Tracey Cline, realizing that a trial was the only possible way to have CGM proved innocent, therefore had her indicted for murder. It would then be easy to have CGM declared innocent in a jury trial.
Unfortunately, Cline did not realize the incredible power Rae Evans has. In a moment, Kerry Sutton (who was no doubt deathly afraid to go against Evans) filed charges against Cline. Judge Hobgood (seemingly another servant of the Carpetbagger Jihad) had Cline removed from office.
The hero of the case, the only member of the Durham justice establishment to dare raise her voice against Evans, was judge Marcia Morey.
The consequences could not be more dire. CGM is now in mortal danger as she can no longer count on Cline's benevolent handling of the case. The only hope now is that Sidney, Kenhyderal and their stalwart friends mount a crusade for justice, not just for Nifong, but also for Cline (and, it goes without saying, for CGM).

I hope this enlightens you all

guiowen said...

It's easy to understand the present situation.
First, you must remember that the entire Durham justice system, with the single exception of Tracey Cline, is controlled by the carpetbaggers, who are led by Rae Evans. She is an incredibly powerful woman since she worked for 10 years at CBS.
When Crystal injured Mr. Daye with her nail file, Rae Evans pounced upon the opportunity this gave her to punish CGM once and for all. Accordingly, she had CGM arrested. The subsequent death of Daye made it all the more likely that CGM could be sent away for all time. Accordingly, Mrs. Evans saw to it that CGM was accused of murder.
Tracey Cline, realizing that a trial was the only possible way to have CGM proved innocent, therefore had her indicted for murder. It would then be easy to have CGM declared innocent in a jury trial.
Unfortunately, Cline did not realize the incredible power Rae Evans has. In a moment, Kerry Sutton (who was no doubt deathly afraid to go against Evans) filed charges against Cline. Judge Hobgood (seemingly another servant of the Carpetbagger Jihad) had Cline removed from office.
The hero of the case, the only member of the Durham justice establishment to dare raise her voice against Evans, was judge Marcia Morey.
The consequences could not be more dire. CGM is now in mortal danger as she can no longer count on Cline's benevolent handling of the case. The only hope now is that Sidney, Kenhyderal and their stalwart friends mount a crusade for justice, not just for Nifong, but also for Cline (and, it goes without saying, for CGM).

I hope this enlightens you all

Anonymous said...

Bravo, Guiowen! Your theory is far more interesting and entertaining than Harr's. The evil white oppressors are plotting hourly to destroy Sister. The J4N gang must rally round Miss Innocence and the literacy-challenged Cline. God bless socialism.
Mangum for DA, at least she knows where the jail is......

Anonymous said...

Typical Harr. Notes the anniversary of a man's death at the hands of proven liar, conficted child abuser and charged killer........and focuses on the killer, not the victim. Typical. Stupid. Shamefully disrespectful. Typical of a pathetic little man who thinks racists bigots are courageous.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist).

"You are absolutely correct, which goes to support my position that the mainstream media is biased against Crystal Mangum."

So how did you happen to come up with your so called reliable truthful information. And why aren't you using it to get the charges against Crystal dismissed.

That you publish unsubstantiated allegations in your blog rather than seek a court appearance in which what information you claim to have says you really have no reliable information.

I have faith that the charges against Ms. Mangum will be dismissed... sooner rather than later.

Also, please keep in mind that my plate is full and I can't focus on quenching your curiosity and answering questions. I must devote most of my time to doing important things.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

Where is your commentary about your resounding ignominious defeat in court?

Your posturing about the fight just beginning is not commentary.

You should watch Monty Python and the Holy Grail, the fight between King Arthur and the Black Knight. You would be playing the role of the Black knight.

Fact is that the "defeat" I suffered was in nothing more than a skirmish in a small battle. The war is far from finished. I have not yet begun to fight.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)"

"Daye was drunk, and that has been established by his blood alcohol level".

If Daye really had such a high level, you and KEN(inny) notwithstanding he would have been comatose and unable to assault Crystal.

Because Daye was functioning so well on such a high alcohol level is due to his tolerance and reinforces the premise that he is an alcoholic. Had I registered a blood alcohol level of 296 mg/dL, I would most likely be passed out.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"According to reports related to the investigation of the April 3, 2011 incident, Mangum was physically abused by Daye. Believe me... I have documentation to back up this."

Until you present credible documentation, that is just another unsubstantiated allegation.

You seem to have a problem presenting documentation. You say only your information comes from reliable sources which remain anonymous because you do not reveal who or what they are.

In any event, if you really have hard evidence which would exonerate Crystal, you would be taking it to her lawyer and trying to get a hearing in open court rather than publishing it in your blog.

Irrefutable evidence exists to explain how Daye became comatose, to backup my allegations that the April 14, 2011 Autopsy report was bogus, that Crystal Mangum was physically abused prior to stabbing Daye. Hold on to your suspenders as you are on the threshold of a revelation of enlightenment.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"...media is in collusion to help the vendetta prosecution saddle Mangum falsely with a first degree murder charge and to weaken her claim of self-defense"


So -- In your mind, Tracey Cline (the supervisor of the "vendetta prosecution" ) was in collusion with the media? How do you justify that?

FWIW, I agree with that the 1st degree murder charge is excessive, and is most likely being used in an attempt to force a plea bargain (probably for 2nd degree murder or voluntary manslaughter).

The thing to keep in mind, however, is that the proportion of defendants entering pleas to crimes as charged or to lesser charges dramatically increased under Cline -- It WAS her policy that drove this.

Lance, mi amigo, the Durham prosecution will not be able to go forward with a first degree murder charge, a second degree murder charge, or a manslaughter charge. They need to cut their losses, give up their vendetta prosecution, and dismiss all charges against her.

When the Revelation of Enlightenment presents itself shortly, Mr. Intern, you will ask yourself, "How did I not see the light?"

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Lance is correct. Over charging by the Durham DA is/was an ADMITTED strategy on the part of Cline to get what she described as "a decent conviction rate". to "get the numbers right". So, hot shot Sid, explain to us, now, how you can be such a hypocrite as to whine about Cline's removal, while you boohoo about poor sister victim.

FYI, Tracey Cline is not, was not, and will not be the prosecutor of Crystal Mangum in this case involving Daye. Kelly Gauger has always been Mangum's prosecutor in this case. Since Cline is not Mangum's prosecutor, your question is moot.

Anonymous said...

pardon me while I throw up......put up or shut up, Harr.
by the way, Mr. Daye's liver was completely normal. No wonder you left medicine. Can we say incompetent?

Nifong Supporter said...


guiowen said...
It's easy to understand the present situation.
First, you must remember that the entire Durham justice system, with the single exception of Tracey Cline, is controlled by the carpetbaggers, who are led by Rae Evans. She is an incredibly powerful woman since she worked for 10 years at CBS.
When Crystal injured Mr. Daye with her nail file, Rae Evans pounced upon the opportunity this gave her to punish CGM once and for all. Accordingly, she had CGM arrested. The subsequent death of Daye made it all the more likely that CGM could be sent away for all time. Accordingly, Mrs. Evans saw to it that CGM was accused of murder.
Tracey Cline, realizing that a trial was the only possible way to have CGM proved innocent, therefore had her indicted for murder. It would then be easy to have CGM declared innocent in a jury trial.
Unfortunately, Cline did not realize the incredible power Rae Evans has. In a moment, Kerry Sutton (who was no doubt deathly afraid to go against Evans) filed charges against Cline. Judge Hobgood (seemingly another servant of the Carpetbagger Jihad) had Cline removed from office.
The hero of the case, the only member of the Durham justice establishment to dare raise her voice against Evans, was judge Marcia Morey.
The consequences could not be more dire. CGM is now in mortal danger as she can no longer count on Cline's benevolent handling of the case. The only hope now is that Sidney, Kenhyderal and their stalwart friends mount a crusade for justice, not just for Nifong, but also for Cline (and, it goes without saying, for CGM).

I hope this enlightens you all

Guiowen, mon Ami, your comments are more entertaining than enlightening. You have a marvelous imagination and you should go to Hollywood and write plots for movies. They'd be blockbusters.

Regarding Mangum, Lady Justice has tolerated enough of this as she is going to take and she will soon fly into action to see that Crystal receives justice.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Typical Harr. Notes the anniversary of a man's death at the hands of proven liar, conficted child abuser and charged killer........and focuses on the killer, not the victim. Typical. Stupid. Shamefully disrespectful. Typical of a pathetic little man who thinks racists bigots are courageous.

Fact check: the anniversary of Daye's death is April 13th, not April 3rd. Furthermore, the anniversary I speak of is the year Crystal has wrongly been in jail. She stabbed Daye in self-defense and evidence supports that. George Zimmerman, on the other hand, stalked, confronted, and shot to death an unarmed 17 year old boy more than a month ago, and he has yet to be arrested.

Something's wrong with this picture.. right?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I have faith that the charges against Ms. Mangum will be dismissed... sooner rather than later.

Also, please keep in mind that my plate is full and I can't focus on quenching your curiosity and answering questions. I must devote most of my time to doing important things."

You also had faith that you would prevail in your frivolous lawsuit against Duke.

You are making excuses and dodging the issues.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Fact is that the "defeat" I suffered was in nothing more than a skirmish in a small battle. The war is far from finished. I have not yet begun to fight."

The fact is you characterized your frivolous lawsuit as something more than a skirmish when you were proclaiming you would prevail. You were ignominiously kicked out of court.

If you intend to fight on, you had better show more intelligence and common sense than you did in your utter defeat in court.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Because Daye was functioning so well on such a high alcohol level is due to his tolerance and reinforces the premise that he is an alcoholic. Had I registered a blood alcohol level of 296 mg/dL, I would most likely be passed out."

It seems you have been passed out for years, considering the trash you try to pass off as truth.

The fact is, alcoholic or not, with a BAC of 296/dl, Mr. Daye would have been comatose.

If he were such a serious alcoholic, his liver would have shown damage, which it did not.

Have you ever heard of repeating a lab test after such a finding, just to confirm the result was valid? I was taught to do that many years ago when I was an intern.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Irrefutable evidence exists to explain how Daye became comatose, to backup my allegations that the April 14, 2011 Autopsy report was bogus, that Crystal Mangum was physically abused prior to stabbing Daye. Hold on to your suspenders as you are on the threshold of a revelation of enlightenment."

You were saying this current blog post of yours would be enlightening. It has been nothing more than repetition of your unsubstantiated allegations.

If such proof exists, you still have not explained why you are reluctant to have a court hear the evidence.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

To Lance the intern:

"When the Revelation of Enlightenment presents itself shortly, Mr. Intern, you will ask yourself, 'How did I not see the light?'"

Promises, promises. Most likely youe revelations will be more repetition of your unsupported allegations.

Otherwise you would not br so reluctant to have your evidence presented in court.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

to Guiowen:

"Regarding Mangum, Lady Justice has tolerated enough of this as she is going to take and she will soon fly into action to see that Crystal receives justice."

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), that sounds an awfully lot like the bombastic proclamations you were making before your frivolous lawsuit was ignominiously tossed out of court.

Lance the Intern said...

"FYI, Tracey Cline is not, was not, and will not be the prosecutor of Crystal Mangum in this case involving Daye. Kelly Gauger has always been Mangum's prosecutor in this case. Since Cline is not Mangum's prosecutor, your question is moot."

But it was Cline's policy of over charging defendants that (IMO) lead to the 1st degree murder charge.

Why you continually fail to address this, and continually support Cline despite her record in these matters is truly baffling.

But then, "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds".

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"[Crystal] stabbed Daye in self-defense and evidence supports that. George Zimmerman, on the other hand, stalked, confronted, and shot to death an unarmed 17 year old boy more than a month ago, and he has yet to be arrested."

And the family of George Zimmerman is proclaiming loud and long the facts will show he acted in self defense.

It sounds and awful lot like what SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) is saying about Crystal.

Here we have SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) again trying to use the tragic death of Trayvon Martin as an excuse to spew out his racist venom.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist): defender of First Amendment rights - NOT!!!

Are death threats Constitutionally protected free speech?

New Black Panther Party, while involved in what you called Constitutionally protected free speech, made death threats against Reade Seligman.

Lance the Intern said...

"George Zimmerman...has yet to be arrested."

That's because he hasn't been charged with a crime. You somehow view this as Mr. Zimmerman's fault.

interesting that someone on the side of "justice" would call for the arrest of someone who hasn't been charged with a crime, don't you think?

Perhaps you're living up to your socialist views in practice as well as in theory.

Anonymous said...

Well, excuuuuuuussse me. Mr. Daye's death on the wrong death! Way to focus on the important stuff, Harr. (like your obsession with the timing of the business card pass-out which the court THREW OUT as totally irrevelant. The POINT here, mental giant, is that you focused on the killer, not the victim.
what a crock.....
the black panther idiots also issued a bounty of 10K for capture of Zimmerman. Nice. Really nice.

Anonymous said...

death on the wrong day......another typo from butterfingers.....but my point is clear.....even for you, Harr

Anonymous said...

Of course.....the victim was black and the shooter was white, with a jewish last name and Hispanic. Sid has big problems understanding the basics of the law. I expect Zimmerman will face charges IF the evidence warrants an arrest. I think it is disgusting and completely in character with the scumbags who offered a bounty for Zimmerman and who printed up and SOLD hoodies with his face on them....and a bull's eye.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

Isn't awfully curious that you know so much about the bogus Duke Lacrosse case which happened in Durham. You know so much about the two incidents in which criminal charges were filed against Crystal Mangum, both of which happened in Durham, but you know nothing about Frankie Washington and Leon Brown, innocent Black men who were wrongfully prosecuted by disgraced Black ex DA Tracey Cline?

Your excuse for your ignorance regarding those two men is that the incidents happened in Durham, you live in Raleigh, and can not be expected to know what goes on in Durham.

Anonymous said...

Sid claims to know more than he actually knows. most of his information is nothing but what comes off the internet. his google key must be worn out. he has ZERO insiders, he has ZERO "sources". That's nothing more than plain old lying.
I agree with you, poster. Harr's interest in "justice" extends to tip of his bigoted nose.

Anonymous said...

I strongly recommend Durham In Wonderland, folks. It is everything is site is NOT...as in, intellectually stimulating, informative, inclusive, WELL written, topical and timely. This site is the laughingstock of the blog community that follows the LAX case.....because it is written by and maintained by a racist, self inflated, and bigoted man with his own silly agenda. Don't waste your time here unless you need a good laugh

kenhyderal said...

D.I.W will be great for those who only want to hear things that reinforse their preconceived views. You won't find any alternate possibilities presented there. But, as Lance suggested in quoting Emerson keeping an open mind is important. Here's a different view of the vaunted D.I.W. blog http://truthaboutkcjohnson.wordpress.com/

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"But, as Lance suggested in quoting Emerson keeping an open mind is important. Here's a different view of the vaunted D.I.W. blog http://truthaboutkcjohnson.wordpress.com/"

KEN(inny) as an example of an open mind? Hardly. KEN(inny) has convinced himself, despite all the hard evidence to the contrary, that Crystal was raped on the night of 13/14 March 2006. Why does he believe this? Crystal, who has been demonstrated by the overwhelming evidence to be a false accuser, says she was raped. Plus a totally unreliable source named Kilgo told KEN(inny) someone told him she had been raped.

How does he deal with the evidence. He says the evidence is faulty. Why is the evidence fauty? Because it does not support KEN(inny)'s pre conceived notion that Crystal was raped.

The blog to which he refers is the work of another individual who knows nothing about the Duke bogus rape case.

guiowen said...

I notice Kenny hasn't commented on my explanation. He has not, especially told us whether he will join the "Justice 4 Nifong, Cline, and Mangum" effort.

Anonymous said...

Spread the word: copy and paste Ken has returned.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 6:36 said : " Spread the word copy and paste Ken has returned"..........................Cut and pasted from Kryteria " Don't let nobody stop you now.
So the world has labelled you a fraud.
Here they come, they'd even pay to see you fall.
Now, before they have you stigmatized, ridiculed and petrified,
go slam the truth right in their face. It ain't over. "

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Cut and pasted from Kryteria 'Don't let nobody stop you now.
So the world has labelled you a fraud. Here they come, they'd even pay to see you fall. Now, before they have you stigmatized, ridiculed and petrified, go slam the truth right in their face. It ain't over.'"

What you do not recognize is that "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH", you avoid the truth. What you try to slam in peoples' faces is nothing but crap.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

To my last comment I add, slamming crap in people's faces is hardly being open minded.

Anonymous said...

Open minded? This nonsense from harr, peterson, kenny? Wow. Harr, who thinks dave evans' mother is the grand dame of the global conspiracy? Kenny, who lies that he is bosom buddies with sister sufferer? Peterson, who thinks gay people are pond scum?
Wow, if that's open, give me shut.......
Funny, kenny, DIW has won highly prestigious national awards. By the way, the author is a liberal democrat who supports Obama. He is not some kind of right wing whacko that you so badly want himto be. But, good old bigoted Harr keeps on spewing bilge loaded with racist content and he keeps on praising the likes of victoria peterson and tracey cline. Shame

Anonymous said...

The new J4N slogan

"J4N....DAsforDAs.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

to Guiowen:

"Regarding Mangum, Lady Justice has tolerated enough of this as she is going to take and she will soon fly into action to see that Crystal receives justice."

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), that sounds an awfully lot like the bombastic proclamations you were making before your frivolous lawsuit was ignominiously tossed out of court.

The action taken against my lawsuit was nothing more than a speed bump... a very small one. The lawsuit, as anyone of enlightenment would know by now, is not over.

I have not yet begun to fight.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I strongly recommend Durham In Wonderland, folks. It is everything is site is NOT...as in, intellectually stimulating, informative, inclusive, WELL written, topical and timely. This site is the laughingstock of the blog community that follows the LAX case.....because it is written by and maintained by a racist, self inflated, and bigoted man with his own silly agenda. Don't waste your time here unless you need a good laugh

Poor misguided soul, this blog site is the only place where you will find the truth... Truth that the mainstream media is trying to keep hidden from the people.

Enlightenment is but hours away.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"George Zimmerman...has yet to be arrested."

That's because he hasn't been charged with a crime. You somehow view this as Mr. Zimmerman's fault.

interesting that someone on the side of "justice" would call for the arrest of someone who hasn't been charged with a crime, don't you think?

Perhaps you're living up to your socialist views in practice as well as in theory.

Lance, the problem is that he hasn't been charged with a crime. On the other hand, Crystal Mangum was a victim of domestic violence and stabbed Daye as a result, and yet she's arrested. Reginald Daye should have been charged with domestic abuse, and Ms. Mangum should not have been charged or arrested... much less jailed.

Facts will be released shortly to back up my assertions.

Thereby, go ye enlightened.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The action taken against my lawsuit was nothing more than a speed bump... a very small one. The lawsuit, as anyone of enlightenment would know by now, is not over.

I have not yet begun to fight."

Bullshit. You got kicked out of court for having no case and you still have no case. You are making noise to distract from your ignominy.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Facts will be released shortly to back up my assertions."

You are probably going to tell us you have more reliable sources.

No one believes you now. What makes you think any one will believe any more of your BS unsubstantiated allegations.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Poor misguided soul, this blog site is the only place where you will find the truth... Truth that the mainstream media is trying to keep hidden from the people.

Enlightenment is but hours away."

Examples of the "truths" found on SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)s blog:

There is a carpetbagger jihad.

The Seligman family paid off Moez Elmostafa.

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)'s frivolous lawsuit is a more significant event than Watergate.

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) is fighting for First Amendment rights.

MIKE NI9nny)FONG's inflammatory pre indictment statements were simply mild attempts to get witnesses to come forward.

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), your racist, venomous vendetta has consisted of no truth.

Why aren't you trying to present your information in court?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Facts will be released shortly to back up my assertions."

The same way you presented facts to back up your frivolous lawsuit against Duke?

Lance the Intern said...

“But the most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly and with unflagging attention. It must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.”

This appears to be a lesson Sid has learned well....

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):


"The action taken against my lawsuit was nothing more than a speed bump... a very small one. The lawsuit, as anyone of enlightenment would know by now, is not over."

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) you have yet to demonstrate you are a person of enlightenment.

Walt said...

Lance is correct. Sid has become a propagandist when it comes to Crystal's latest case. He has been told what the felony murder rule is and what an intervening factor is and he continues to ignore those concepts. Further, as a propagandist, he does not try to distinguish them from Crystal's case. He simply ignores them and repeats his propaganda.

Walt-in-Durham

Anonymous said...

Sidney has been busy.

http://www2.nbc17.com/news/2012/apr/05/
crystal-mangum-files-motions-dismiss-
murder-charge-ar-2130695/

Lance the Intern said...

Except Sid didn't get the approval of either Chris Shella or Crystal Mangum to file these....

guiowen said...

Having seen the incredible extent of Rae Evans' power, Sidney is doing the only thing he can do -- try to move the trial as far from Durham as possible. It seems however that only a move to Canada would help. (At least in Canada they can count on Kenhyderal's help.)
Good luck, Sidney!

Whatchoo talkin' 'bout, Sidney? said...

Per WRAL:

"The North Carolina State Bar said its Authorized Practice Committee would look into whether the man (Harr) overstepped his bounds by filing the motions on Mangum's behalf."

lol

Anonymous said...

If that is SIDN(inn)EY's earthshaking walking the walk on Crystal's behalf, it is awfully hard to feel the tremors.

Just as he did in his frivolous lawsuit against Duke, he presents no evidence but makes only unsubstantiated allegations.

So far as KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL is concerned, his hypotheses are so off base he would help no one but the prosecution.

Anonymous said...

Whatever happened to the principle that if it happened in Durham then the trial should be in Durham?

Anonymous said...

Maybe Judge Osmond Smith III should allow SIDN(inn)EY argue his motions in court.

Give someone enough rope and he will hang himself

Anonymous said...

URL:

http://www.heraldsun.com/view/full_story/18139506/article-Nifong-supporter-files-motions-for-Mangum-

According to the Herald Sun, "A superior court clerk confirmed that Harr filed the motions, and she said that each of the three motions had a signature on them that said Crystal Mangum." but "Mangum’s attorney, Chris Shella, didn’t sound as though he thought it was a joke that Harr had filed the motions for Mangum.

“He did not do that with my authorization,” Shella said. 'We have nothing to do with that.'

Shella went on to say, several times, that neither he nor Mangum gave Harr authorization to file motions on her behalf."

Read more: The Herald-Sun - Nifong supporter files motions for Mangum

From Mack the Knife: "Could it be our boy's done something rash" - like forgery?

Lance the Intern said...

Sid -- While you have every right to represent yourself in court ("pro se"), representing someone else would generally fall under the guidelines of "Unauthorized Practice of Law".

I would like to read the motions, however -- My guess is that they're every bit as entertaining as your Duke Discrimination motions.

Anonymous said...

In North Carolina, practicing law without a license is a Class I misdemeanor.

Lance the Intern said...

Here's another take on Sid's situation from a decidedly pro-Duke source.

kenhyderal said...

Which (Dukecheck.com) contains three inaccurate assertions and one outright slander.

Anonymous said...

Ken: "Which (Dukecheck.com) contains three inaccurate assertions and one outright slander."

Please identify the inaccurate assertions, the outright slander and provide evidence to support your claims that the statements are inaccurate or constitute slander.

Lance the Intern said...

Kenhyderal says "Which...contains three inaccurate assertions and one outright slander."

Well -- one man's slander is another man's satire. Just ask Sid.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

His comment on the recent post on Dukecheck.com:

"Which (Dukecheck.com) contains three inaccurate assertions and one outright slander."

KEN(inny) has shown himself to be not very good at discriminating between truth and inaccuracy, between truth and slander.

KEN(inny) insists Crystal was raped at he Lacrosse party. How does he know. Because proven false accuser Crystal Mangum said she had been raped.

Anonymous said...

One thing KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL may identify as an inaccuracy is the account of Crystal's run in with the Durham police when she stole a cab, led the police on a high speed chase, and then tried to run down a Durham police officer. According to KEN(inny), that incident was exaggerated and blown out of proportion.

Why does he say that. Because proven false accuser Crystal Mangum says the incident did not happen that way.

Contemporary police records say it did.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)ER(acist)AL, showing his legal acumen, said the Dukecheck.com contained a "slander". If a false accusation happens in print, it is lible.

Now, KEN(inny), since you have been enlightened you could persuade SID(inn)EY, legal eagle NOT!!!, to file a lawsuit on behalf of Crystal against Dukecheck.com for libel.

guiowen said...

I believe the "slander" is the reference, near the top of the article, to "the corrupt DA Mike Nifong". As I'm sure all readers of this blog are aware, Mike should instead be referred to as "a true minister of justice".
As to the three "inaccurate" statements, one is of course the statement that Crystal "tried to mow over a cop with a taxicab"; this is inaccurate as she only meant to scare him. It is also inaccurate to say she had stolen the cab; she had only borrowed it and had every intention of returning it, if only the cop had not interfered by standing in front of the taxi.
As for the third inaccuracy, I'm not certain, but it could possible the statement that she's "safely" in jail, since as you know the Carpetbagger Jihad could harm her any time Rae Evans requires it.

Walt said...

No, guiowen, corrupt covers Nifong's conduct fairly well. Inept is another term.

Walt-in-Durham

Anonymous said...

I knew the first time I saw a photograph of Crystal Mangum the lacrosse players were completely innocent.As a Duke co-ed explained at the time - those guys could get any girl they wanted,they would never have to stoop that low.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

On March 31, 2012 9:11 AM Sidney promised the truth would be revealed.

On March 31, 2012 9:19 AM Sid said a great revelation would be coming.

On April 2, 2012 8:20 AM Sid said proof of Crystal's innocence would be forthcoming.

On April 2, 2012 8:27 AM Sid said enlightenment would be coming.

On April 3, 2012 8:10 AM Sid said he had "irrefutable" evidence as to why Mr. Daye became comatose.

On April 3, 2012 7:58 AM Sid said that the chargesagainst Ms. Mangum woud be dismissed sooner rather than later.

On April 4, 2012 4:31 PM Sid said enlightenment was but hours away.

On April 4, 2012 4:37 PM Sid said he woul shortly release facts to back up his allegations.

What did all this add up to? SIDN(inn)EY presented his unsupported allegations to court as motions to dismiss the charges, have the judge dismissed an for a change of venue for which he is going to get into more difficulty with the courts.

You would think a man who could earn an MD degree could learn not to repeat mistakes.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
URL:

http://www.heraldsun.com/view/full_story/18139506/article-Nifong-supporter-files-motions-for-Mangum-

According to the Herald Sun, "A superior court clerk confirmed that Harr filed the motions, and she said that each of the three motions had a signature on them that said Crystal Mangum." but "Mangum’s attorney, Chris Shella, didn’t sound as though he thought it was a joke that Harr had filed the motions for Mangum.

“He did not do that with my authorization,” Shella said. 'We have nothing to do with that.'

Shella went on to say, several times, that neither he nor Mangum gave Harr authorization to file motions on her behalf."

Read more: The Herald-Sun - Nifong supporter files motions for Mangum

From Mack the Knife: "Could it be our boy's done something rash" - like forgery?

Forgery? Nah, that's against the law.

However, I did file the three motions on Crystal's behalf, as she was incarcerated and couldn't get a pass to go to the Justice Building and file the motions herself. In filing the motions, I was nothing more than a courier carrying documents to the Clerk of Court's Office for filing.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
Sid -- While you have every right to represent yourself in court ("pro se"), representing someone else would generally fall under the guidelines of "Unauthorized Practice of Law".

I would like to read the motions, however -- My guess is that they're every bit as entertaining as your Duke Discrimination motions.


Hey, Lance. The next blog, which I will post shortly, will contain a link at the end to the three motions.

Walt said...

Friendly Sid, the courier. He rides the bus from Raleigh to see Crystal in jail. Then he hoofs over to the Court House to file some motions on her behalf. Sid, be real. If Crystal needed someone to file her motions she could just throw a stamp on them and the post man would take care of it. BTW, who wrote them up? You or Nifong?

Walt-in-Durham

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"However, I did file the three motions on Crystal's behalf, as she was incarcerated and couldn't get a pass to go to the Justice Building and file the motions herself. In filing the motions, I was nothing more than a courier carrying documents to the Clerk of Court's Office for filing."

So why does Crystal's lawyer say neither he nor Crystal authorized you to file the motions?

Anonymous said...

Walt @ April 7, 2012 8:37 AM:

I think it is obvious that SID(ninn)EY wrote the motions. They contain many of the preposterous claims he made in his frivolous lawsuit against Duke.

Anonymous said...

Lance the Intern:

"would like to read the motions, however -- My guess is that they're every bit as entertaining as your Duke Discrimination motions."

They are.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Forgery? Nah, that's against the law."

Since when have you ever been concerned with what is against the law?

It violates the highest law of the land, the US Constitution, in many respects to knowingly, wrongfully prosecute innocent men. Yet you applaud Mke NI(nny)ONG for doing so.