Saturday, April 7, 2012

How Daye died… What the media doesn’t want you to know

Note: At end of blog is link to Mangum’s motions

In the January 29, 2012 issue of The Durham News, I contributed a guest column titled “Autopsy reports don’t add up.” It expressed why I felt that the April 13 and 14, 2011 autopsy reports on Reginald Daye were flawed. Mr. Daye was the man who was stabbed on April 3, 2011 by Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser Crystal Mangum, and who, three days following this incident and emergency surgery, lapsed into an unexplained coma at Duke University Hospital. After an unpublicized week in a deep comatose state, Mr. Daye was electively removed from life support and died. Shortly thereafter Ms. Mangum was charged in his death with first degree murder.

Recently I have had the fortune to examine many of Daye’s medical records, including his operative report, EMS reports, and physical examinations. To support the veracity of the facts presented and conclusions drawn, I have presented redacted and highlighted copies, with notations, of key medical records about Reginald Daye to some of the mainstream media-types.

It should be remembered that the April 13 and 14, 2011 autopsy reports concluded that Reginald Daye’s death was due to “complications secondary to a stab wound to the chest.” Both reports were vague, incomplete, misleading, factually incorrect, and gave no real inkling as to the true cause of Daye’s coma and death. My review of Daye’s hospitalization has removed from my mind the shroud of mystery covering Daye’s demise, and I will forthwith explain with 99.9% certainty the most likely scenario of what led to Reginald Daye’s comatose state and death.

The morning of April 3, 2011, within hours after being stabbed by Ms. Mangum, Mr. Daye had been transported to Duke University Hospital where he was evaluated and found to have a blood alcohol of 296 mg/dL… a stupor causing level in an average non-alcoholic individual. In order to deal with alcohol withdrawal complications, upon admission Daye was immediately begun on a sedative drug regimen to keep delirium tremens at bay. His condition was stable enough to permit the luxury of performing a preoperative radiological examination regarding his wound to the left torso which confirmed a lesion in the colon (large intestine). Daye underwent emergency abdominal surgery during which only a lesion to the splenic flexure of the colon and a minor lesion to the spleen were identified and repaired.

In the evening of April 4, 2011, the third postoperative day, Daye began experiencing respiratory problems and doctors ordered a diagnostic procedure requiring contrast dye. A tube was placed in his stomach through his nose, and the contrast agent was introduced through it. The contrast agent in the stomach most likely induced vomiting, and healthcare staff concern about possible aspiration and need for protecting the airway led to the decision to intubate him. The 8.0 mm diameter endotracheal tube, which was supposed to be inserted into the trachea to allow oxygen to flow into the lungs, was mispositioned, and instead of oxygen-enriched air gushing into his lungs, his lungs were being deprived of oxygen. Lack of oxygen to the lungs meant that the blood was being deprived of oxygen as well. The brain cells, which are extremely oxygen sensitive, die within a relatively short time once being starved of oxygen. Heart muscle cells are hardier than ones in the brain, but they, too, require oxygen. After a critical point, the heart muscles, working without sufficient oxygen, began to dysfunction, which led to a cardiac arrest. CPR was instituted which included the removal of the misplaced endotracheal tube and the reinsertion of a 7.5mm diameter endotracheal tube which was properly positioned and allowed effective ventilation of the lungs. With restoration of oxygen to the lungs, the blood, and eventually the tissues, the heart muscles received much needed oxygen and were able to recover. However, the brain cells had been without oxygen too long and could not be revived... thus accounting for his coma. Daye’s irreversible comatose state, as determined by the neurological specialists, led to the eventual decision to electively remove Daye, with his family’s consent, from life support… the proximate cause of his death.

Discrepancies exist between the April 13 and 14 Daye autopsy reports themselves and Daye’s medical records. The operative report specifically stated, “The stomach, pancreas was without injury.” This contradicts the autopsy report of April 14, 2011 that documented a lesion to the “fundus of the stomach.” In addition, no where in the operative report is there mention of any lesion or repair to the left lung or diaphragm which further contravenes the April 14th report. The left kidney and its immediate environs were found to be intact and without lesions according to the operative report. One inch gauze used to pack the incision wound at the time of surgery would help explain its post-mortem appearance of being open. Daye’s operative report coincides and validates in the April 14, 2011 autopsy examination report only the lesions to the splenic flexure of the colon and the spleen. The operative report rules out lesions to the left lung, diaphragm, left kidney, and fundus of the stomach as averred in the April 14th autopsy document.

The 14th report also reads: “.. multiple minor scabbed over lesions and minor contusions which may represent defensive injuries are found running from essentially the left biceps to the left wrist. These measuring up to 5 inches in greatest [length].” A Durham County EMS Patient care report on Daye of April 3, 2011 relates different findings, reading, “Left Arm/Hand: Assessed with No Abnormalities.” Also at odds with the April 14, 2011 autopsy report’s declaration of left upper extremity wounds is the consultation report of April 3, 2011 by orthopedic surgeon Christopher R. Jones which states under physical examination: “There are no appreciable lacerations or skin breaks in the visualized areas of his four extremities.”

Discrepancies in the autopsy reports, in conjunction with the convenient omission in Daye’s discharge summary and the April 13, 2011 autopsy investigative report that entubation followed emesis but preceded cardiac arrest is troublesome and would lead a reasonable person with knowledge of pertinent facts to conclude that the autopsy reports were bogus and used solely to support the prosecutor’s charge.

Medical examiners should be independent and objective in their autopsy examinations and should not be a part of the prosecution team, as it definitely is in the case against Crystal Mangum. Dr. Clayton Nichols, the author of the phony autopsy examination report, should not be held liable for the substandard and false document for two specific reasons. First, he did not take it upon himself to produce a false and misleading document for no reason whatsoever. Undoubtedly he received instructions from higher up to produce a document that would enable the prosecutor to charge Crystal Mangum with murder. Second, Dr. Nichols felt compelled to “go along with the plan” after seeing what happened to Duke Lacrosse prosecutor Mike Nifong. Dr. Nichols learned well from the example the state made of Mr. Nifong, and not wanting to put his personal and professional life at risk, producing the desired deceptive document was a no-brainer.

Unfortunately in the twenty-first century, the mainstream media is not as independent and objective as it should be. But the media’s actions and attitudes are often based on financial incentives. For example, Duke University, which harbors unbounded animosity and misdirected hostility toward Mike Nifong, Crystal Mangum, and Nifong supporters, is one of the state’s largest conglomerations. Duke University and its healthcare system advertise heavily in print and broadcast media… this cannot help but make an influence on how the media covers stories, who it demonizes, and who it places on pedestals. You can bet that when a story involves Duke University, the media, in bringing it before the public treads with the most extreme care.

In short, the media is trying to keep hidden from the public the following facts:
(1) Reginald Daye’s brain death was due to the misplacement of an endotracheal tube by Duke University Hospital staff;
(2) Reginald Daye was electively removed from life support by Duke University Hospital staff with the consent of Daye’s family;
(3) Crystal Mangum had nothing to due with events that transpired in Duke University Hospital and she is therefore not responsible for Daye’s death;
(4) the Autopsy Reports of April 13 and 14, 2011 are totally bogus and purposely reach the false conclusion that Daye’s death was “due to complications of a stab wound to the chest;”
(5) the Autopsy Reports of April 13 and 14, 2011 made their false conclusion for the purpose of making a foundation upon which to build a murder case against Crystal Mangum;
(6) Crystal Mangum sustained physical injuries at the hands of Daye and there is additional evidence to support her self-defense claim in the stabbing; and
(7) prosecutors lack any credible evidence to support the two counts of larceny against Crystal Mangum.

That the authors of the Autopsy Reports are working with the prosecution is evident. However, what is most troubling is that the media is heavily involved in this conspiracy as can be seen by its selective and skewed reporting about Mangum, Daye, and others involved in the case.


LINK to Mangum’s Motions:
http://www.justice4nifong.com/legal/cgm/cgmMo.htm

58 comments:

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)DER(acist)AL:

First, regarding Mr. Daye's admission and initial examination, I note you do not quote directly from the medical record.

Second, what was the radiologic procedure that revealed what you call a lesion in the colon. I once treated man with a perforation of the colon. The only thing a CT scan showed was free intraperitoneal air.

Third, just exactly was the diagnostic procedure ordered on April 4, 2011? Give the specific name of the test ordered. If a person is in respiratory distress, the first thing you do is intubate, not drop an ng tube and put contrast in the stomach. It sounds like to me you are distorting the record.

Fourth, abn autopsy examination is more thorough than an abdominal surgical procedure. I have done both laparotomies and autopsies. Itwould not at all be unusual for an autopsy to reveal injuries which were missed in surgery. How many laparotomies, how many autopsies have you personally done?

I say again, as a retired surgeon, your allegations are unsupported. I suspect from whatever records you have, you picked and chose what you present, similar to Mike NI(nny)FONG picking and choosing what he would tell the defendants about what Brian Meehan found on the Rape Kit.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)DER(acist)AL:

I have reviewed the motions you file which, according to her attorney, were not filed at her request.

You indulge in a a lot of false allegations - you insist Crystal was raped at the Lacrosse party, which she was not, and you insist there were a lot of racial epithets hurled at her, which there were not. Just like your frivolous lawsuit against Duke, you expect your megalomaniacal delusions to be accepted as truth with no proof.

The most telling thing about your motions is that you do not quote directly from thr record. You give only your interpretation of the record, which I would call a form of hearsay.

Are you going to claim Crystal gave you permission to access her records but not permission to quote from them.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Crystal Mangum had nothing to due with events that transpired in Duke University Hospital and she is therefore not responsible for Daye’s death;"

There you show your total lack of legal expertise. Had Crystal not stabbed Mr. Daye, he never would have been at risk of medical complications.

Just ask your friend Professor Coleman about this.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"That the authors of the Autopsy Reports are working with the prosecution is evident."

It is not evidnt. Your interpretation of whatever records you have is not factual evidence but opinion.

What you are doing is assuming facts which are not in evidence, which is something that was glaringly apparent in your frivolous lawsuit against Duke.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"...the media is heavily involved in this conspiracy as can be seen by its selective and skewed reporting about Mangum, Daye, and others involved in the case."

Again, your opinion is not factual proof of a conspiracy. You have to show that individuals got together and actually said something like, how can we get Crystal Mangum.

You would have to show that something like the Wannsee conference actually took place.

Just ask your friend Professor Coleman.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"You can bet that when a story involves Duke University, the media, in bringing it before the public treads with the most extreme care."

Give specific examples.

Again, your opinion is not factual proof.

Anonymous said...

You are just throwing out medical munbo,jumbo. You did not get access to any protected records. Bull crap. You are making claims, not presenting evidence. Bthis is total complete fabication folks.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)DER(acist)AL:

First, regarding Mr. Daye's admission and initial examination, I note you do not quote directly from the medical record.

Second, what was the radiologic procedure that revealed what you call a lesion in the colon. I once treated man with a perforation of the colon. The only thing a CT scan showed was free intraperitoneal air.

Third, just exactly was the diagnostic procedure ordered on April 4, 2011? Give the specific name of the test ordered. If a person is in respiratory distress, the first thing you do is intubate, not drop an ng tube and put contrast in the stomach. It sounds like to me you are distorting the record.

Fourth, abn autopsy examination is more thorough than an abdominal surgical procedure. I have done both laparotomies and autopsies. Itwould not at all be unusual for an autopsy to reveal injuries which were missed in surgery. How many laparotomies, how many autopsies have you personally done?

I say again, as a retired surgeon, your allegations are unsupported. I suspect from whatever records you have, you picked and chose what you present, similar to Mike NI(nny)FONG picking and choosing what he would tell the defendants about what Brian Meehan found on the Rape Kit.

First, that may be correct.

Second, The preoperative exam was an abdominal CAT scan with contrast injected through the rectum. It showed pericolic extravasation of the contrast agent.

Third, I believe there were two studies being conducted, one of which was an abdominal CAT scan and the other to rule out a pulmonary embolism.

Fourth, I don't see how at the time of operation a lesion to the fundus of the stomach, the diaphragm, or the left kidney could be missed. The chest cavity wasn't entered, so there would be no assessment of it. Several sources at or around the time of the incident recorded that his left upper extremity was normal and without lesions. How do you explain the so-called "defensive wounds" to the left upper extremity?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
You are just throwing out medical munbo,jumbo. You did not get access to any protected records. Bull crap. You are making claims, not presenting evidence. Bthis is total complete fabication folks.

Of course I have access to the medical records because Crystal gave them to me to help her draft the three motions. I would not risk my credibility by making these statements without being able to prove them. The mainstream media has received copies from me, but because of their bias, they are reluctant to write about it.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Of course I have access to the medical records because Crystal gave them to me to help her draft the three motions."

It seems pretty implausible that Crystal, not being a relative and being the accused, would have access or copies of Mr. Daye's medical record.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Fourth, I don't see how at the time of operation a lesion to the fundus of the stomach, the diaphragm, or the left kidney could be missed."

Typical attitude of someone who has never done abdominal surgery.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Second, The preoperative exam was an abdominal CAT scan with contrast injected through the rectum. It showed pericolic extravasation of the contrast agent."

How much extravasation? A lot of extravasation?

A minor laceration of the colon may not show extensive extravasation.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Third, I believe there were two studies being conducted, one of which was an abdominal CAT scan and the other to rule out a pulmonary embolism."

It seems unusual, three days post repair of a colonic laceration in non prepped colon, the patient would be without an NG tube.

It seems unusual if the fellow was having respiratory difficulty that someone would try to insert and NG tube and put contrast in his stomach.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"I would not risk my credibility by making these statements without being able to prove them."

So why haven't you proven anything by quoting directly from thr record?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrit)ARR(acist):

"I would not risk my credibility by making these statements without being able to prove them."

In your frivolous lawsuit against Duke you made a lot of statements which you were not able to prove.

Anonymous said...

bULL. That is all this is. Total lying nonsense.

Anonymous said...

Have fun paying a large fine and possibly spending time behind bars for practicing law without a license. They take that seriously and I foresee a summons coming your way. Crystal has already publicly turned on you which could set forgery charges at your doorstep as well. Even redacted the medical records you claim to have most likely violate HIPAA. You site no legal precedents, give unfounded opinions by not actually quoting the records and Crystal's defense attorney of record disavows these motions. All I can say is take some carrots and potatoes with you because that water is hot and you're going to be stewing in it for a while.

Anonymous said...

Absolutely stunning. Here we finally have proof...of why I'm thankful I never had to make an ER visit while Sid was working.

Lance the Intern said...

Here's KC Johnson's take on Sid's recent legal activity

Lance the Intern said...

I must say, however, that these did prove to be as humorous as your Duke discrimination lawsuit documents.

I assume that your argument is that Crystal Mangum wrote these, and all you did was act as courier.

If so, good luck with that line of argument. I see 3 counts of unlawful practice of law in your future.

Anonymous said...

Reginald Daye died because a crazy car thief and drug addled prostitute named Crystal Mangum stabbed him to death.

Anonymous said...

We haven't heard from SIDN(inn)EY in a while.

Could it be our boy is in the process of becoming a fugitive from justice?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The mainstream media has received copies [of Reginald Daye's medical records] from me, but because of their bias, they are reluctant to write about it."

Maybe the mainstream media did not find credible what you call copies of Mr. Daye's records.

As a retired Surgeon, I do not find your allegations credible, even though you got your information from Mr. Daye's records. Neither do a lot of other informed people.

Anonymous said...

We have seen the end of Sid's posts. Even he would not be so stupid to continue to argue his point under the nose of the NC State Bar...

Anonymous said...

Funniest stuff to come out of Harr in awhile. geez, I would hate to see the bigot-in-chief get his fanny spanked by the big bad evil white oppressors. (well, maybe it WOULD be kinda fun......). What a riot!
Actually, Mrs. Evans flew to Durham on her broom and off'ed Mr. Daye just to ensure that Sister Survivor faces the Big M. charge. Now THAT'S entertainment!
Harr, you get my vote.....Racist HalfWit of the Year.....

Anonymous said...

Riiiight, Sidney.....Crystal somehow persuaded the Daye family and Duke and the Durham Police and the DA to give YOU Daye's records. Of course she did, Sid. Of course. (liar liar, pants on fire....)
Mangum for DA, at least she knows where the jail is, and, apparently she hopes Sid can co-habit a cell with her.

Anonymous said...

Both Mangum's attorney AND Mangum deny having anything to do with the delusional Harr. Hilarious, wingnut Harr and his understudy, the infamous ethical cesspool, Nifong.
Oh, I guess maybe Kenny, the third wheel in the lunatic-limited bigotmobile, called up his, er, uh, "bosom" buddy, Crystal, and told her to make nice with Dr. Whacko.

Anonymous said...

I think it WOULD be a good idea for Harr, Nifong, Peterson, wahneeema, jackie w. Brodhead, the 88 and the phonics-queen Cline to All board the big (short) yellow bus and boogie on up to Canada. There they can join Kenny, I am in Dubai and I love Sister, and have themselves a great big old chicken fried sweet tea time.
Oh, Canada! We stand on guard for thee!......can't you just hear Sid and Crystal doin' a duet! Of course, from what I hear, it's a tad bit chilly in certain parts of the USA "attic", so Sister might need to add a few layers of, shall we say, costume to her pole vaulting attire.

Anonymous said...

Wow, seems as though Mangum's attorney is going to take action against Harr..... stay tuned, folks, this is going to be worth the price of a ticket.....

Anonymous said...

Hmmmm, anybody care to compare the "signature" of Sister on the three Harr comic installments (motions) with her "signature" on other documents? her infamous book jacket, etc?
Let's see.....Sister, in prison up state, somehow meets with Harr, who frequently tells us that he can't make it to Durham and has to ride the bus to the library.
Sister gives Harr access to her victim's medical records.
Sister tells Harr to file motions, without bothering to tell her attorney.
wow......this is some cool story. Dontcha just love Harr and his whackos!

Anonymous said...

ooooopsie, Sid.....the signatures on the motions, supposedly penned by Mangum, are, er, uh, questionable.....shall we say?
I hope the good doctor has some kind of proof that he met with Mangum at the prison and proof that she actually signed the documents. Perhaps one of Harr's famous vapor sources transmorphed to the jail

guiowen said...

You people don't seem to understand that Crystal is in mortal danger! Rae controls the entire justice system and this includes whatever prison Crystal is currently inhabiting. Under the circumstances it's only natural that Sidney, loving CGM as he does, should take a risk to get Crystal out of Rae's clutches. Wouldn't you do the same for a good friend?

Anonymous said...

Absolutely, Guiowen. Sidney should spirit her off to Canada, and there, reunite her with her best friend, Kenny. Sweeeeeet!!!

Anonymous said...

Sid -- In your first motion ("motion to dismiss first degree murder charge"), you identify the State of North Carolina as the "plaintiff".

In criminal cases, there are no "plaintiffs".

Ask your buddy Mike Nifong, or your close personal friend, Doctor James Coleman.

Anonymous said...

Only in Durham........gooseville central.

Anonymous said...

Come on, Sid......we can't wait. You and dingbat Peterson can rush right down to the courthouse steps, hold a big press conference, and tell us how you are going to lawyer Mangum free.

Mark Orgel said...

Referring to Crystal Mangum as a "victim" of the Duke Lacrosse scandal is just wrong. There is not a scintilla of evidence to suggest that a crime was committed against Mangum. She was the victimizer, ultimately costing three young men their reputations.

As to the "discrepancies" between operative and autopsy reports, your logic is flawed. Apparently Mr. Daye had an abdominal surgery to repair his intraabdominal injuries. Since the lungs reside in the thoracic cavity, it would be impossible for any lung lesion to be noted in the operative report. As to the lesion in the fundus of the stomach, no conclusions can be drawn without more information. The stomach is a hollow organ, and it is likely that the stomach lesion was inside the stomach, and also would not be visible during an abdominal surgery. Anyone who drinks as much alcohol as Daye apparently did would be expected to have evidence of gastritis, a condition only visible via endoscopy, or at autopsy, where the internal organs are opened and examined. So your statement that the operative report "rules out lesions to the left lung, diaphragm, left kidney, and fundus of the stomach" is absurd.

"Scabs and contusions" both require time to form. Any contusions that Daye suffered while defending himself from Mangum's murderous attack would have not appeared for hours to days afterwards, and the fact that they were not visible on the night of the stabbing is to be expected. The autopsy report states that these injuries were "minor", and could have been easily overlooked in a patient with a stab wound to the abdomen.

Your indignation at the production of "a false and misleading document for no reason whatsoever" is particularly ironic given that producing false and misleading documents was apparently the chief pastime of Mike Nifong, the person your blog claims to seek justice for.

As to what happened on the night of Daye's intubation, there is not enough information in your post to reach any conclusion. When was he intubated? When was the position of the endotracheal tube noted? What were his oximetry readings?

Your conclusions are not supported by even the cherry-picked items you present in your post.

Nifong Supporter said...


Mark Orgel said...
Referring to Crystal Mangum as a "victim" of the Duke Lacrosse scandal is just wrong. There is not a scintilla of evidence to suggest that a crime was committed against Mangum. She was the victimizer, ultimately costing three young men their reputations.

As to the "discrepancies" between operative and autopsy reports, your logic is flawed. Apparently Mr. Daye had an abdominal surgery to repair his intraabdominal injuries. Since the lungs reside in the thoracic cavity, it would be impossible for any lung lesion to be noted in the operative report. As to the lesion in the fundus of the stomach, no conclusions can be drawn without more information. The stomach is a hollow organ, and it is likely that the stomach lesion was inside the stomach, and also would not be visible during an abdominal surgery. Anyone who drinks as much alcohol as Daye apparently did would be expected to have evidence of gastritis, a condition only visible via endoscopy, or at autopsy, where the internal organs are opened and examined. So your statement that the operative report "rules out lesions to the left lung, diaphragm, left kidney, and fundus of the stomach" is absurd.

"Scabs and contusions" both require time to form. Any contusions that Daye suffered while defending himself from Mangum's murderous attack would have not appeared for hours to days afterwards, and the fact that they were not visible on the night of the stabbing is to be expected. The autopsy report states that these injuries were "minor", and could have been easily overlooked in a patient with a stab wound to the abdomen.

Your indignation at the production of "a false and misleading document for no reason whatsoever" is particularly ironic given that producing false and misleading documents was apparently the chief pastime of Mike Nifong, the person your blog claims to seek justice for.

As to what happened on the night of Daye's intubation, there is not enough information in your post to reach any conclusion. When was he intubated? When was the position of the endotracheal tube noted? What were his oximetry readings?

Your conclusions are not supported by even the cherry-picked items you present in your post.

Hey, Mark.

First, it's so refreshing to get a commenter who has the courage to use his name.

Regarding the autopsy report, it mentions sutures in the fundus of the stomach. The operative report on the other hand doesn't even mention a lesion to the stomach or a repair to the stomach.

I will present copies of the prosecutor's discovery and medical records to support the statements that I made.

Thanks again for your comments and I look forward to hearing from you in the future.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Sid -- In your first motion ("motion to dismiss first degree murder charge"), you identify the State of North Carolina as the "plaintiff".

In criminal cases, there are no "plaintiffs".

Ask your buddy Mike Nifong, or your close personal friend, Doctor James Coleman.

Keep in mind that this motion was by Crystal Mangum, with a little help from me, and neither of us are attorneys. I certainly do not pretend to be.

Anonymous said...

Harr had zero access to any records other than those that were posted on the internet and available to anyone. For this man to assert that he got his hands on Daye's medical records, through Mangum or otherwise, is a flat out LIE. Neither Mangum nor her attorney would have, under ANY circumstance, authorized Harr to view any records that THEY might have had. That Duke itself would allow Harr to view records is so silly that it is laughable. Perhaps he wants to claim that the Daye family gave him the records? Sure they did! Harr is lying, just as he has so many many times. He will claim that he had "sources" or some other nonsense. He bases his false conclusions on information to which he has never been and never will be privy. Stupid waste of time to consider him anything other than than the sorry excuse for a retired doctor that he claims to be. A pathetic little man looking for attention for himself. No intelligence, no ethics and the moral fiber of a doorknob. Anybody who calls Victoria Peterson "courageous" is a bigoted buffoon.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Sid -- In your first motion ("motion to dismiss first degree murder charge"), you identify the State of North Carolina as the "plaintiff".

In criminal cases, there are no "plaintiffs".

Ask your buddy Mike Nifong, or your close personal friend, Doctor James Coleman.

Stay tuned. The records will be posted soon, taking away all doubt, and thereby enlightening thee.

Anonymous said...

No, the motion was NOT filed by Mangum. Neither she nor her attorney authorized the filings. You are lying

Anonymous said...

SID(ninn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Keep in mind that this motion was by Crystal Mangum, with a little help from me, and neither of us are attorneys. I certainly do not pretend to be."

BULLSHIT!!!

Anonymous said...

SID(ninn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Stay tuned. The records will be posted soon, taking away all doubt, and thereby enlightening thee."

That's what you said about this blog entry. As is the case with a deluded megalomaniacal hypocrite, you have failed to enlighten anyone.

Anonymous said...

Harr is already in deep doo-doo over this latest escapade. Gonna be fun to watch.
Notice how he is already changing his tune? A couple of days ago, HE filed the motions on her behalf, etc....taking credit for HIMSELF. Now we have him saying that the motion was filed by MANGUM, with help from him. Interesting sniveling and cowardly kind of sidestep, don't you think!

Anonymous said...

SID(ninn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Regarding the autopsy report, it mentions sutures in the fundus of the stomach. The operative report on the other hand doesn't even mention a lesion to the stomach or a repair to the stomach."

Quote what both the autopsy report and the operative report actually said.

Anonymous said...

The "lay advocate" filed motions with a supposed Mangum signature that neither Mangum nor her attorney say was authorized, nor that they knew anything about. somebody is lying....... care to take a wild guess who that might be???

Anonymous said...

SID(ninn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"...neither of us(Crystal or SIDN(inn)EY) are attorneys. I certainly do not pretend to be."

But you pretend to be a truthful, enlightening blogger.

Anonymous said...

Harr is a liar

Anonymous said...

Harr claims Mangum gave him copies of "the medical records". All those who think Mangum, herself, had copies of Mr. Daye's operative reports and Duke Hospital records, which she gave to Harr......please raise your hand.
All those who think Harr is a liar, raise your hand.
The count is as follows:
Mangum gave the records to Harr = 1 (kenny)
Harr lied = all the rest of the sane world.

Anonymous said...

so, Sidney, just EXACTLY why do you claim that you and Mangum shared records and that you "helped her" file motions while SHE and her ATTORNEY say they know absolutely nothing about this....and had no awareness of it...? don't try to dodge, sidney. you are lying or both of them are lying. which is it??

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Harr had zero access to any records other than those that were posted on the internet and available to anyone. For this man to assert that he got his hands on Daye's medical records, through Mangum or otherwise, is a flat out LIE. Neither Mangum nor her attorney would have, under ANY circumstance, authorized Harr to view any records that THEY might have had. That Duke itself would allow Harr to view records is so silly that it is laughable. Perhaps he wants to claim that the Daye family gave him the records? Sure they did! Harr is lying, just as he has so many many times. He will claim that he had "sources" or some other nonsense. He bases his false conclusions on information to which he has never been and never will be privy. Stupid waste of time to consider him anything other than than the sorry excuse for a retired doctor that he claims to be. A pathetic little man looking for attention for himself. No intelligence, no ethics and the moral fiber of a doorknob. Anybody who calls Victoria Peterson "courageous" is a bigoted buffoon.

The dawn of enlightenment is drawing nigh. In but a day or two, you, too, will be able to view the evidence and realize that what I have said all along is the unfettered truth.

Exercise a bit of patience, mis amigos.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)AR(acist):

"The dawn of enlightenment is drawing nigh. In but a day or two, you, too, will be able to view the evidence and realize that what I have said all along is the unfettered truth."

Are you going to present evidence or just your version of the evidence. You seem to be very nifongian in your approach to evidence. You think the only valid evidence is evidence which supports your pre conceived notions.

Anonymous said...

More bull. Answer the question. Who lied? You or mangum and her attorney?

Anonymous said...

Harr is manufacturing "evidence". The mug photo of Mangum shows ZERO evidence of injury to her face. None. Zip.
Harr has no access to Daye's medical records. He is claiming he has access. He does not.
Harr is claiming an entire storyline about what transpired between Daye and Mangum without one SHRED of evidence to back it up.
Harr is falsifying document/motions, claiming he "helped" Mangum. Mangum and her attorney categorically deny any involvement. Harr is lying.
Harr dodges direct questions....manufactures differences that have no distinction and no relevance....same behavior as he was soundly smacked down for by the judge in his pseudo case against duke. (the timing of the handout of business cards....)
Harr is simply seekly self gratification and attention by doing his usual lunatic stunts.
Harr is a sad little man.

Anonymous said...

crystal mangum does NOT have mr daye's medical records. How stupid can you get, Harr? do you honestly expect people to believe your bull? That Mangum, in jail, got her hands on the confidential medical records of her victim? Please don't continue to make such statements....you are only embarrassing yourself and proving only ONE thing....that you are a fraud.

Anonymous said...

Explain, Sidney.
Both Mangum and her attorney say they did NOT authorize you to file motions, did NOT give you records, did NOT have any involvement.
Mangum's attorney has stated he is in touch with the Bar concerning your actions.
Explain.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Explain, Sidney.
Both Mangum and her attorney say they did NOT authorize you to file motions, did NOT give you records, did NOT have any involvement.
Mangum's attorney has stated he is in touch with the Bar concerning your actions.
Explain.

Of course I had Mangum's authorization as she asked me to help her with the motions and to get them filed. How else would I have copies of discovery and how else would the motions be signed by Crystal? Think about it.

The time for enlightenment has come. In a moment I will post a new blog, at the end of which is a link to documents in the discovery that show that the Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011 is false.

Thereby go ye enlightened.