Thursday, April 12, 2012

Conspiracy in the charges against Crystal Mangum

(Link at end of the blog article)

There is no doubt in my mind that the flimsiness of the prosecution’s charges of first degree murder and larceny against Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser, that are associated with the death of Reginald Daye requires the collusion of both prosecution and defense attorneys in order to move forward. I believe that Chris Shella has allowed his client to sit in jail for more than a year with no end in sight because he is working with prosecutor Kelly Gauger to in effect have Crystal Mangum serve a sentence without even going to trial.

To date she has served one year… and for what? On April 3, 2011, Ms. Mangum was beaten by Reginald Daye, and in self defense she stabbed him with a small knife… once. Daye only sustained internal injuries to the splenic flexure of his colon and a small lesion to his spleen. On the third postoperative day, Daye, who was also fighting delirium tremens, was having respiratory difficulty and a decision was made to make diagnostic tests that required oral contrast. After the contrast was introduced through a naso-gastric tube (a tube that runs from the nose to the stomach), Daye had some emesis. In order to protect his airway and to administer high concentrations of oxygen, the decision was made to intubate Daye. Unfortunately the intubation tube was placed in the pharynx instead of the airway, and as a result oxygen was prevented from entering his lungs, and subsequently his bloodstream became oxygen deficient. The brain cells, which are extremely sensitive to oxygen deprivation, died quickly, whereas the cardiac heart cells responded to the decreased oxygen level by going into cardiac arrest. With the arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun and at this time the endotracheal tube which had been mis-positioned was removed, and another one re-inserted… however this tube was properly positioned. With the tube in the airway, oxygen flowed into the lungs once again and the blood received oxygen. The cardiac cells recovered with the fresh flow of oxygenated blood, but the brain cells had already died and could not be revived… accounting for Daye’s comatose state. After a week on life support, Daye’s family consented for the life support measures to be removed, and subsequently and as a proximal result, Daye died.

Daye’s death was due to his removal from life support. Daye’s brain death was due to medical staff error in placement of an endotracheal tube.

Recently I visited with Crystal Mangum at the Durham Detention Center in Durham, NC. She told me the following about the cashier’s check for which she was charged with two counts of larceny:
1. prior to Sunday, April 3, 2011, Reginald Daye purchased two cashier’s checks totaling $700 to pay for the rent of his apartment that he was sharing with Crystal and her children;
2. both cashier’s checks were made out to the apartment rental company and both had Reginald Daye listed as the remitter;
3. prior to Sunday, April 3, 2011, Mr. Daye gave both of the cashier’s checks to Crystal with the understanding that she would drop them off at the rental office on Monday, April 4, 2011… this arrangement necessary because Daye was scheduled to leave for work that day at six in the morning and would be returning home after five in the late afternoon. In other words, he would be at work during the office hours of the rental agency;
4. prior to Sunday, April 3, 2011, Ms. Mangum put both cashier’s checks in her purse for safekeeping;
5. late in the evening of Saturday, April 2, 2011, Daye and Mangum got into an argument about personal relationship issues. At no time was the argument about finances or money;
6. in the early hours of Sunday, April 3, 2011, the argument between Reginald Daye and Crystal Mangum turned physical, with him dragging her by her hair and punching her in the face;
7. in self-defense, she stabbed him once in the torso with a small kitchen knife, grabbed her purse (which contained the cashier’s checks), and quickly left the premises;
8. hours later, when police found Crystal Mangum at her aunt’s residence, she was taken into custody and the two cashier’s checks that were in her purse were confiscated;
9. despite the fact that: (a) both checks were given to Ms. Mangum by Reginald Daye; (b) their argument had nothing to do with money issues; and (c) due to the way the cashier’s checks were filled out, Ms. Mangum could not convert them to money for her own personal use, Durham prosecutor Kelly Gauger proceeded to charge Crystal Mangum with two counts of larceny… one for each cashier’s check.

Both criminal charges against Crystal Mangum are seriously flawed and any attorney worth his salt would have filed a motion immediately to have both charges dismissed. The murder charge should be dismissed because (1) Ms. Mangum acted in self-defense; (2) the autopsy reports were criminally fraudulent themselves; (3) Daye’s brain death was caused by error in endotracheal tube placement by Duke University Hospital staff and not related to the stab wound; and (4) Daye was electively removed from life-support with the consent of his family.

Regarding the larceny charge, it should be dismissed because both cashier’s checks were given to Mangum by Daye, and because they were useless to her as she could not convert them for her own use.

Other than the extreme weakness of the charges against Ms. Mangum, other issues suggestion collusion between the two parties is that no action has taken place on the prosecutor’s side, and there is nothing in play on the Court calendar in the foreseeable future. This reinforces my contention that prosecution’s plan is to have Ms. Mangum serve a sentence of as many years as possible without even being taken to trial (similar to the prosecution strategy used in the James Arthur Johnson case).

That Crystal’s defense attorney Chris Shella has not filed any motions on her behalf also speaks of his culpability in this nefarious scheme. Why has he not filed for the dismissal of these merit-less charges? She’s sat in jail for more than a year, and during that time, Crystal told me, Mr. Shella has been to visit her three or four times, and that the visits last from five to ten minutes. She said that even though she has requested since May 2011 to see all prosecutorial discovery, he has withheld much from her, including photographs.

That is why Ms. Mangum was desperately seeking assistance and asked me to help her with motions to have the charges dropped. In communicating through intermediaries, I asked her to send me the discovery so I could help her draft the motions, as she had no access to a law library, internet or laptop. She sent me the discovery and signed the documents, and because she was being held in jail and could not be allowed to walk to the courthouse to file the motions herself, I filed them on her behalf.

I strongly believe that Chris Shella was furious because the motions were filed, and that went against his agenda to keep Crystal Mangum isolated with no legal activity. Like the prosecutor, Mr. Shella wanted Ms. Mangum to quietly serve out her jail sentence of several years, and when time for trial could no longer be pushed back, force her to accept a stringent plea deal.

Now Chris Shella is seeking retribution against me by asking the North Carolina State Bar to investigate me for violating laws against practicing law without a license. But which is the bigger crime? Trying to help a young mother who has been vilified by the media and who is being falsely held in jail on bogus charges, or being party to a conspiracy to hold that innocent mother in jail, away from her three children? I submit the North Carolina State Bar should be directing its attention towards Chris Shella and Kelly Gauger, not me.


Click on the link below to access a directory to documents that support the fact that the Autopsy Examination Report, upon which the murder charge against Ms. Mangum is based, is false.
http://www.justice4nifong.com/legal/cgm/mddirec.htm

158 comments:

guiowen said...

Sidney,
I can't say I approve of what you did, but I certainly admire your gumption.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

It is certainly a lot of data to digest.

I still find it hard to believe that the Daye family would allow Crystal access to the medical records.

It says repeatedly in the records that the weapon that stabbed Mr. Daye was a steak knife, which is a bit larger and longer than a paring knife, which you have repeatedly insisted was the weapon.

More to come.

Anonymous said...

The records were not, i repeat not, obtained as harr as described. He is going to find himself in a world of trouble.

Anonymous said...

Hooray for the Bar. Harr is lying

Anonymous said...

If angum gave Harr this information without her attorney 's involvement, then she is now lying by saying she knew nothing about the motions etc. Harr has also violated a federal law by publishing Daye's records. I sincerely hope chrges are filed for what is learly a violation federal law.

Anonymous said...

Hey Kenny, since you talk with Crystal all the time, why don't you ask her to verify Sid's story?


"That is why Ms. Mangum was desperately seeking assistance and asked me to help her with motions to have the charges dropped. In communicating through intermediaries, I asked her to send me the discovery so I could help her draft the motions, as she had no access to a law library, internet or laptop. She sent me the discovery and signed the documents, and because she was being held in jail and could not be allowed to walk to the courthouse to file the motions herself, I filed them on her behalf."

Lance the Intern said...

On May 9 , 2011 you wrote:
"Around April 3, 2011, Crystal, using her money, purchased two money orders..."

Are you saying now that this is no longer true?

guiowen said...

Lance:
You can't expect Sidney to remember the details of everything he says. Money orders, cashier's checks, his money, her money, what's the difference?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

There is nothing on Crystal in your document directory except that she was taken to the ER. The EMS record says the complaint was headache. There is no record of her receiving treatment in the ER. That does not support your claim she was being assaulted by Mr. Daye.

The social work documents say that Mr. Day said he was assaulted by Crystal, and that he feared either she or her friends would attempt to harm him, once he was discharged.

Again, evidence is that Mr. Daye, not Crystal, was the victim.

Even more to follow.

Anonymous said...

I called a friend who specializes in healthcare law. If sid got these documents as he describes, and has now put them on the internet, he is in major trouble re: HIPPA and disclosure of information. According to my friend, mangum had no authority to give the information to harr. If you read sid's story closely, you see a mention of others/ communicating information. This is why the media would not publish the documents.
Second, there is nothing , not one word, in these documents that supports sid's fantasy account. This is just a blast of paper, a whirlwind , signifying nothing.
Third, i happen to know one of the surgeons whose name appears in the documentation. A finer more experienced more credible physician you could not want. To compare sid and his so called ED medical career with the practicing experience of this surgeon is like comparing T ball to the world series.
Fourth i sincerely hope and expect that mangum gets a fair trial and that she gets whatever justice her behavior merits. The infamous Cline had a long history of overcharging to get convictions based on pleas.

Nifong Supporter said...


guiowen said...
Sidney,
I can't say I approve of what you did, but I certainly admire your gumption.

Thanks, Guiowen. That means a lot to me.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

It is certainly a lot of data to digest.

I still find it hard to believe that the Daye family would allow Crystal access to the medical records.

It says repeatedly in the records that the weapon that stabbed Mr. Daye was a steak knife, which is a bit larger and longer than a paring knife, which you have repeatedly insisted was the weapon.

More to come.

My sources had told me that Daye was stabbed with a paring knife. I believe the history given to hospital officials by police and others was that it was a steak knife. I forgot to ask Crystal directly on my last visit about the knife, but I will have clarification about it soon.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
If angum gave Harr this information without her attorney 's involvement, then she is now lying by saying she knew nothing about the motions etc. Harr has also violated a federal law by publishing Daye's records. I sincerely hope chrges are filed for what is learly a violation federal law.

Who stated that Crystal knew nothing about the motions? Her attorney? He's just saying that to cover his derriere. The question for Mr. Shella is why did he not file these motions on behalf of his client. For more than a year he has not filed a motion on her behalf, other than for bail reduction.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
On May 9 , 2011 you wrote:
"Around April 3, 2011, Crystal, using her money, purchased two money orders..."

Are you saying now that this is no longer true?

As Guiowen stated in the comment that followed yours, the point you are making is essentially moot. I will agree with you that the information I received was somewhat misleading. I believe that Crystal contributed money for the cashier's checks, but I believe they were actually purchased by Daye who then gave them to Crystal to take to the apartment rental office while he was at work on Monday, April 4, 2011.

During my visit with Crystal, she also clarified that the argument was about a personal relationship matter and had nothing whatever to do with finances, money, the cashier's checks, or buying beer. So, yes, I was incorrect with some of the info I provided earlier. This version is correct as it is directly from Crystal herself.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

There is nothing on Crystal in your document directory except that she was taken to the ER. The EMS record says the complaint was headache. There is no record of her receiving treatment in the ER. That does not support your claim she was being assaulted by Mr. Daye.

The social work documents say that Mr. Day said he was assaulted by Crystal, and that he feared either she or her friends would attempt to harm him, once he was discharged.

Again, evidence is that Mr. Daye, not Crystal, was the victim.

Even more to follow.

Crystal's injuries are noted on the second document that covers EMS evaluation of Mangum. It clearly states that she sustained facial injuries, and police reports, that I have but have not published, document the finding of clumps of brown hair in two places in the apartment.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Crystal's injuries are noted on the second document that covers EMS evaluation of Mangum. It clearly states that she sustained facial injuries, and police reports, that I have but have not published, document the finding of clumps of brown hair in two places in the apartment."

Yes they are. I stand corrected.

The EMS record states they were minor injuries, not requiring any treatment.

Has DNA testing been done to identify whose hair was found in the apartment?

It should also be noted that Crystal made the allegations of domestic abuse after Mr. Daye and Mr. Daye's nephew made statements that she had stabbed Mr. Daye. Could it be Crystal was trying to create an alibi for herself?

Do you think minor facial injuries which require no treatment are more significant than a 2 cm stab wound to the chest inflicted by a steak knife?

How about the reports that the weapon used was a steak knife, not a paring knife?

Anonymous said...

DUMC has been notified about Reginald Daye's treatment information posted here. If it reflects a HIPAA violation, I'm sure they'll proceed accordingly.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"During my visit with Crystal, she also clarified that the argument was about a personal relationship matter and had nothing whatever to do with finances, money, the cashier's checks, or buying beer. So, yes, I was incorrect with some of the info I provided earlier. This version is correct as it is directly from Crystal herself."

This is the same Crystal who was giving multiple, mutually conflicting accounts as to what happened to her on the night of 13/14 March 2006?

Again, it seems to me that Crystal, after the fact, is trying to institute personal posterior camouflage.

In KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL's terms, she is trying cya.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"During my visit with Crystal, she also clarified that the argument was about a personal relationship matter and had nothing whatever to do with finances, money, the cashier's checks, or buying beer. So, yes, I was incorrect with some of the info I provided earlier."

BULLSHIT!!!

You have changed the story to a totally different story to cya.

Anonymous said...

Back in 2006 when the Duke Rape Hoax was big news all of the mainstream media reported the story but now that Mangum killed someone nobody cares.If Crystal had been punished for making a false rape charge,and let's be honest no white man would ever touch her,Reginald Daye would still be alive.

Anonymous said...

Harr is going to find himself in a world of trouble.. Discovery material is evidence, as i understand from attorney friends. As such it is not considered the "property" of the accused.
Aside from the misbehavior of how he got the records, it is clear that there is nothing in any of tge documents that supports any of his silly attempts at playing CSI man.. Nothing.
It is onebthing to be a lunatic wingnut who tries to draw attention to himself however he can. It is entirely different when interference and unlawful disclosure of protected information is involved. I sincerely hope that duke and the daye family, along with the NC Bar, take action.

Anonymous said...

Was Kenny voted off the island?

Anonymous said...

Harr and mangum change their stories to fit the evidence........over and over. Chronic liars. Both

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"
There is no doubt in my mind that the flimsiness of the prosecution’s charges of first degree murder and larceny against Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser, that are associated with the death of Reginald Daye requires the collusion of both prosecution and defense attorneys in order to move forward."

This only shown how inadequately your mind works.

And, Crystal Mangum is the false accuser/victimizer in the Duke Lacrosse case. The public record shows there is no doubt about that.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Crystal's injuries are noted on the second document that covers EMS evaluation of Mangum. It clearly states that she sustained facial injuries, and police reports, that I have but have not published, document the finding of clumps of brown hair in two places in the apartment."

Yes they are. I stand corrected.

The EMS record states they were minor injuries, not requiring any treatment.

Has DNA testing been done to identify whose hair was found in the apartment?

It should also be noted that Crystal made the allegations of domestic abuse after Mr. Daye and Mr. Daye's nephew made statements that she had stabbed Mr. Daye. Could it be Crystal was trying to create an alibi for herself?

Do you think minor facial injuries which require no treatment are more significant than a 2 cm stab wound to the chest inflicted by a steak knife?

How about the reports that the weapon used was a steak knife, not a paring knife?

To my knowledge no DNA testing was done on the hair.

Regarding the knife, I will ask her about that during my next visit and relay the answer. The people at the hospital were obviously told that the wound was made by a steak knife, but they had no way of knowing for sure. The media never mentioned the knife was a steak knife.

Regarding her facial injuries, she can be punched and slapped around without much noticeable injury. The fact that she sustained swelling and a cut supports her self defense statement. Why else would she stab Daye?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"During my visit with Crystal, she also clarified that the argument was about a personal relationship matter and had nothing whatever to do with finances, money, the cashier's checks, or buying beer. So, yes, I was incorrect with some of the info I provided earlier. This version is correct as it is directly from Crystal herself."

This is the same Crystal who was giving multiple, mutually conflicting accounts as to what happened to her on the night of 13/14 March 2006?

Again, it seems to me that Crystal, after the fact, is trying to institute personal posterior camouflage.

In KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL's terms, she is trying cya.

I received only one consistent account from Crystal. The other account about the topic of the argument was from another source which was incorrect.

guiowen said...

Sidney: "The other account about the topic of the argument was from another source which was incorrect."

As incorrect as most of your sources seem to be.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I received only one consistent account from Crystal. The other account about the topic of the argument was from another source which was incorrect."

So how come, for so long, did you insist that the fight was over money, that Reginald Daye wanted to spend the rent money on drink?

You are changing your story because you were caught up in a falsehood you tried to pass off as the truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Regarding her facial injuries, she can be punched and slapped around without much noticeable injury. The fact that she sustained swelling and a cut supports her self defense statement. Why else would she stab Daye?"

I echo the sentiment which has already been expressed - I am glad I never had to go to the ER when you were an ER physician. If you are going to claim that an individual can take a severe beating around the head and face and not show much evidence from it, I do call you incompetent, a malpractice suit waiting to happen.

As to why Crystal would stab Reginald Daye, he had money, he would not give it to her and she wanted it.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Regarding the knife, I will ask her about that during my next visit and relay the answer. The people at the hospital were obviously told that the wound was made by a steak knife, but they had no way of knowing for sure. The media never mentioned the knife was a steak knife."

The media probably never asked Mr. Daye or his nephew what the weapon was. Ergo they would never have published anything about the knife, other than it was a kitchen knife. ER personnel would have asked what kind of knife was used. If you do not realize it, I say again you must have been one incompetent ER physician.

As to the media, why did you keep insisting that the weapon was a paring knife? Your explanation, when someone pointed out the media called the weapon a kitchen knife was, a paring knife is a kitchen knife.

You keep conflicting yourself, SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), just the way Crystal contradicted herself just about every time she described the alleged assault she falsely accused the Lacrosse players of perpetrating.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The fact that she sustained swelling and a cut supports her self defense statement."

The fact that she sustained minor injuries which did not require treatment indicates she was not the victim of any significant assault.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"There is no doubt in my mind that the flimsiness of the prosecution’s charges of first degree murder and larceny against Crystal Mangum".

That statement creates a lot of doubt about your soundness of mind.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I received only one consistent account from Crystal. The other account about the topic of the argument was from another source which was incorrect."

So how come, for so long, did you insist that the fight was over money, that Reginald Daye wanted to spend the rent money on drink?

You are changing your story because you were caught up in a falsehood you tried to pass off as the truth.

It was not until I directly spoke to Crystal that I learned and reported that the fight was not over money or cashier's checks. Daye's nephew claims that from what he overheard it was, but I doubt its reliability. Besides, why would Crystal take cashier's checks that she couldn't convert to cash? Doesn't make sense.

Anonymous said...

so, sidney, one of you is lying. mangum continues to say she did NOT authorize the motions. you continue to say she did. which one of you is lying? how about both of you!
It is clear why she stabbed Daye....to anybody but a biased ractist wingnut. he had money. she wanted it. she stole it and stabbed him. by the way, mental giant, money orders can be altered and fraudulently cashed. It happens ALL the time. The bullcrap invented story about paying the rent is totally unsubstantiated.
The mug shot shows nothing. Mangum could have had some kind of minor scrape on her arm or face or whatever that had zero to do with fighting Daye. She had kids. You think women with kids don't get banged up? She was in the pole vaulting business. You think women who "dance" for tricks in motels for a living don't get occasional "professional marks"? you are either the world's dumbest retired physician or the world's dumbest liar.
The physician(s)who occasionally post here respond professionally in a manner that makes your dithering look like junior doctor, 101.
Can't wait for Duke to take action against you....

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"It was not until I directly spoke to Crystal that I learned and reported that the fight was not over money or cashier's checks. Daye's nephew claims that from what he overheard it was, but I doubt its reliability. Besides, why would Crystal take cashier's checks that she couldn't convert to cash? Doesn't make sense.

Very Nifongian of you. For months you do not talk to Crystal. During that time you say you had learned from reliable sources that the fight was about money. When you finally talk to Crystal you get a completely different story. That is what does not make sense.

You are just trying to cover your ass.

Anonymous said...

Amazing how really hilarous Harr can be.

Anonymous said...

We ALL know how completely truthful, trustworthy and outstandingly honest Mangum is! Why, my goodness, Durhma's resident-victim-in-chief would never tell a fib, now would she?????

Anonymous said...

wow, poor Sister had a hangnail after her huge bout with Daye! "superficial" abrasions not requiring treatment.....etc.etc. we are aghast at the dastardly Daye's severe beating of Sister. Goodness gracious....

read the notes that Harr illegally posted, folks. what a riot.

Anonymous said...

Had a surgeon friend of mine look at the documents Harr posted and then to tell me her thoughts on his conclusions. I quote: "are you sure this Harr guy was a physician?" and it goes downhill from there. needless to say, harr couldn't be any further off unless maybe he went to medical school in the NCCU equivalent of the NCCU law school where Cline got her outstanding training.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Both criminal charges against Crystal Mangum are seriously flawed and any attorney worth his salt would have filed a motion immediately to have both charges dismissed."

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), considering your continued support of MIKE NI(nny)FONG as a decent, honorable prosecutor, considering your own performance as an attorney in your frivolous lawsuit against Duke, it is obvious you are in no position to judge whether or not an attorney is "worth his salt".

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
so, sidney, one of you is lying. mangum continues to say she did NOT authorize the motions. you continue to say she did. which one of you is lying? how about both of you!
It is clear why she stabbed Daye....to anybody but a biased ractist wingnut. he had money. she wanted it. she stole it and stabbed him. by the way, mental giant, money orders can be altered and fraudulently cashed. It happens ALL the time. The bullcrap invented story about paying the rent is totally unsubstantiated.
The mug shot shows nothing. Mangum could have had some kind of minor scrape on her arm or face or whatever that had zero to do with fighting Daye. She had kids. You think women with kids don't get banged up? She was in the pole vaulting business. You think women who "dance" for tricks in motels for a living don't get occasional "professional marks"? you are either the world's dumbest retired physician or the world's dumbest liar.
The physician(s)who occasionally post here respond professionally in a manner that makes your dithering look like junior doctor, 101.
Can't wait for Duke to take action against you....

Let me just say this regarding the authorization of the motions... She signed them!!! I rest my case.

As for Duke, what action is it going to take against me?

Anonymous said...

speaking of resting cases, well, I guess that answers the question....as usual, Mangum is lying.....just like she has lied, so many times before. I guess both of you could be class as chronic, in the lying department.
If I were you, I would be worried about what action Duke is going to take. But, thank you god and little fishes, I am not you......I don't invesnt magic sources that shapechange, I don't invent evidence and then weasel out of prior stories.....I don't defame the dead ......and I don't consider homophobic amoral bigots like Victoria Peterson to be, as other posters have noticed you said, "courageous".

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Let me just say this regarding the authorization of the motions... She signed them!!! I rest my case.

As for Duke, what action is it going to take against me?"

The issue is whether or not you or Crystal or anyone had any legal right to publish Reginald Daye's medical records without permission of his family. Federal law(HIPPA) defines those records as confidential. Not even his physicians would have had authority to release those records to the public.

Any lawyer worth his salt would have told you that.

Anonymous said...

Every single time Harr posts derogatory comments about the LAX guys, as he did in his bizarre motions, he adds more fuel to their case against duke and durham for damages. Don't you love Harr's favorite phrase...."beer guzzling, stripper oogling" and debauchery.....".
Some of us have a few favorite phrases, too. Like:
1. Cline and her "conscious"
2. Mangum, they DID NOT use condoms...oh, well, maybe they DID
3. Mangum, it was eight guys, no, it was six, well, maybe it was three.
4. Peterson, "disease ridden perverts" (referring to gay people)
5. Nifong, "hooigans"
6. Cooper, "rogue prosecutor"
7. Unknown: "Mangum for DA, at least she knows where the jail is..."

I have a bumper sticker on my car....it is the LAX emblem and it reads, "Proud Duke Hooligan". Always will be, guys.

Anonymous said...

Oppps, "Hooligans.....not hooigans. sorry, poster.....it's funny either way.
thank you!

Anonymous said...

"Criminal penalties (up to a $250,000 fine and ten years in prison) may be imposed for "knowingly and improperly" disclosing information or obtaining information under "false pretenses", with higher penalties reserved for violations designed for financial gain or "malicious harm". In addition, of course, state laws may impose additional penalties for the same offenses, and most states would also allow common-law suits for torts such as invasion of privacy and infliction of emotional distress, among other causes of action. "
From Gov. HIPPA web site.... relates to disclosure of Protected Health Information. (PHI)....Geez, I hope the good doctor finds himself a better lawyer than the one who flopped in the Harr v. Duke suit.

guiowen said...

I do wish Sidney would tell us who his unimpeachable sources are. Some people have suggested that it's some disbarred lawyer sitting in his kitchen in his pajamas. I'm willing to believe his sources are better than that, though frankly their track record leaves much to be desired.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Let me just say this regarding the authorization of the motions... She signed them!!! I rest my case.

As for Duke, what action is it going to take against me?"

SIDN(inn)EY, if you had read anything about HIPPA, you would realize that Crystal's authorization is irrelevant. You have to have the written permission of Mr. Daye's family to view or publish Mr. Daye's medical record.

You, who once said you would never do anything illegal, did violate federal law.

Just ask your friend Professor Coleman.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

If you induced Crystal to give you access to Mr. Daye's medical record, you have induced Crystal to violate Federal Law.

Anonymous said...

I'm no lawyer (and no physician), but I have worked with HIPPA and PHI related data for many years. What I find amazing is that Mangum had printed copies of these records in her possession and that she gave this information to Harr....and that he was ignorant enough of the law (being a so-called retired ED physician) to actually take these documents AND publish them! that's so astoundingly wrong, on so many levels, that it is hard to believe. As I understand it from lawyer friends who work with healthcare law, Mangum had no right to hand over these documents and, without question, Harr had no right to access/read/use or publish them. You can go to the internet and see reports that are public and filed, like the documents that are out there for Mangum's arrest. But the documents from DUH related to Daye's medical care while he was an inpatient are definitely PHI and, per my lawyer friends who apparently know one helluva lot mroe about this than Harr, are absolutely confidential. The apparent fact that Mangum "gave" the documents to Harr in no way releases him from liability. The fact that he claims to be a retired physician may make things worse....because he should have known that what he was doing was wrong.
Harr is entitled to his opinion, certainly, but doing something like this, in my humble opinion, crosses the line....

Anonymous said...

whenever harr gets backed into a corner on the real conflicts between his imaginary stories and the truth of what evidence shows, he always either (a)blames his "sources", or, (b(attempts to defame and personally discredit the provider of hard evidence. This happens over and over.

Anonymous said...

Not only is Sidney wrong about his conclusions and his methods for getting and posting documents......
the baseline issue is proximate cause.,,,,
the cause of death was complications from a stab wound inflicted by Mangum. Period.
And there is nothing in the documentation that shows Mangum stabbed the man in self defense. Because she had superficial (MINOR) abrasion that required no treatment is not exactly evidence that Daye was beating her!
Second degree, folks....

Anonymous said...

Sid Harr said:

"Let me just say this regarding the authorization of the motions... She signed them!!! I rest my case."

So, you are hitching your horse to the cart of a woman with a long history of mental illness, bizarre (and sometimes criminal) behavior and serial fabrication? Let us know how that works out for you.

Anonymous said...

By the way, Sidney, HIPPA applies to deceased persons as well as the living and the same rules/regulations for PHI release apply for deceased persons and their PHI.

Walt said...

Sid wrote: "Let me just say this regarding the authorization of the motions... She signed them!!! I rest my case."

Not so fast there. If you did anything beyond typing those motions, you practiced law. If you did so without the supervision of a duly licensed attorney, you violated the law. The fact that Crystal signed them only puts her on the hook for their content. That does not absolve you of the issue of unauthorized practice. Of course, Crystal says she didn't sign them, and I note that they are not notarized, so there is significant doubt as to the authenticity of the signature.

Walt-in-Durham

Nifong Supporter said...


Walt said...
Sid wrote: "Let me just say this regarding the authorization of the motions... She signed them!!! I rest my case."

Not so fast there. If you did anything beyond typing those motions, you practiced law. If you did so without the supervision of a duly licensed attorney, you violated the law. The fact that Crystal signed them only puts her on the hook for their content. That does not absolve you of the issue of unauthorized practice. Of course, Crystal says she didn't sign them, and I note that they are not notarized, so there is significant doubt as to the authenticity of the signature.

Walt-in-Durham

C'mon, Walt. You know that it's not required to sign motions in court. Besides, did she tell you she didn't sign them? I visited her in person, and that's not her story. Maybe Mr. Shella told you she didn't sign them. Maybe the newspaper said that. Do you consider the newspaper a credible source? The media is biased, Walt!!

Anonymous said...

If you falsified her signature, you are in deep XXXX. If she signed the documents, YOU are still in deep XXXX. Read the law sometime, sidney, and be enlightened.....as a certain wingnut often says.
What absolutely stinks about this situation is that YOU are doing this stunt just to draw attention to yourself and to further your own blind racist agenda agaainst the LAX guys, over and overe. Nifong in skin drag, fella. Your actions have no other motive than to inflate your own pathetic little ego. In fact, your behavior can backfire for Mangum and get her into even more trouble.
A disgrace to the medical profession......and to ethical and moral persons of color who find the conduct of individuals such as yourself to be reprehensible.

Lance the Intern said...

I don't see Sidney's actions backfiring on Crystal Mangum...She can always deny that she gave him the authority to submit these documents (something it appears she's preemptively done), and deny that the signature is hers.

Filing these documents may turn out to be the worst mistake Sid's made...

Anonymous said...

Yep, agree.
1. Filed documents
2. Published PHI on the internet
3. Has accused DUH of medical murder

Anonymous said...

Hmmm, so is Sidney now saying maybe Mangum didn't sign the motions, after all? Maybe he just "thought" she did, or was told she did, by one of his "sources"? Perhaps....a bit of sidestepping waffling?

Anonymous said...

well, one does wonder....??? Mangum signed her infamous "book" jacket, "Crystal G. Mangum". Not Crystal Gail Mangum.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

To Walt in Durham:

"The media is biased, Walt!!"

No it isn't, SIDN(inn)EY. You call it biased because it does not buy into your deluded megalomania.

Anonymous said...

I think most people with a brain would suggest that, if there is bias in the media, it is liberal bias.....which would favor Mangum. The bias Sidney is talking about is the media refusal to behave irresponsibly, i.e., to print/publish PHI documents. At least somebody has a regard for federal law......
If you want to see bias in the media, go back to 2006 and watch/listen/read the verbal and printed lynching of the LAX players by our local papers, the networks, the Independent, the NY Times, etc. Talk about bias!

Anonymous said...

The Federal Judge said.....

"This leaves the issue of Plaintiff's gratuitous and vile invective directed at this court. Such comments were totally unnecessary for, as explained above, the factual distinction Plaintiff pressed was wholly irrelevant to the legal issues raised by the motion to dismiss his complaint.*fn3 Neither the liberal pleading rules nor generous pro se practices of the courts has eliminated "the time honored notion that the law and the courts of the United States are important parts of American society worthy of respect." Theriault v. Silber, 579 F.2d 302, 303 (5th Cir. 1978) (dismissing an appeal with prejudice because the pro se appellant's notice of appeal contained "vile and insulting references to the trial judge"). Plaintiff's pro se status is not an excuse to engage in abusive conduct, and Plaintiff is warned against further personal attacks on the Magistrate Judge or any judicial officer of the federal courts. See id; 18 U.S.C. § 401(1) (providing power to punish misbehavior by fine or imprisonment, or both). The court will not hesitate in appropriate cases to exercise its full contempt and other powers in order to protect the dignity of the nation's judicial system as a forum for the thoughtful resolution of legitimate grievances. Plaintiff is admonished to conduct himself accordingly"
Don't know you, folks, but I'd say that Harr's lawyer is a first class jerk and this smackdown from a Federal Judge says it all....

Anonymous said...

If mangum stabbed Daye in self defense,it seems pretty damned nasty that she would leave with her purse ad run......a person who had fought in self defense and stabbed somebody, and who was a moral decent human.......would call 911.

Anonymous said...

One has to wonderwhy the infamous Ken Edwards (Kenny,BFF to Sister) has not swooped down in Durham, covered Mangum's bail, and freed her from the dungeon. Must be a slow day in Dubai.....

Anonymous said...

Interesting to me.....
Mangum, who has a criminal record that she blames entirely on somebody else (I didn't do it, they made me, I was framed, etc.), stabs a man "in self defense". then, she does what any normal person would do when they have been attacked and had to fight back? NOOOOOOO, she grabs her purse and flees. Does she call 911? NOOOOOOOO. She does remember to grab her purse, of course. Right, Sidney, right!

Idiotic nonsense fabricated by two people who share far more than the same skin color....what Harr and Mangum have in common is (a)a deep seated failure to accept responsibility for their own behavior, (b)an amoral, whatever works for me is fine, approach to life and living, and (c)a willingness to lie whenever a lie suits their version of the "truth".
Harr claims to be a socialist. I think "sociopath" fits both of them fairly well.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

Why do you believe your unilateral proclamation of Crystal's innocence carries any weight, legal or otherwise?

Anonymous said...

When has Mangum EVER told the truth? When has she EVER accepted responsibility for her behavior? Her ungodly awful "book" is full, I mean full, of whining, blaming, self pitying bull.....it is everybody else's fault for the miserable choices SHE has made. I guess Mrs. Evans flew to Durham, ran into Daye's apartment, grabbed mangum's hand and forced the poor thing to stab Mr. Daye.
Making three babies, lying, using drugs, drinking, fighting in front of her children, pole vaulting, selling herself for money ( yeah, I know, she's just a dancer....right), and now, causing the death of a man.
Sure, Sidney, you go on selling your poor sister story...blaming everybody else.....because that is what you do yourself to justify YOUR actions.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
If you falsified her signature, you are in deep XXXX. If she signed the documents, YOU are still in deep XXXX. Read the law sometime, sidney, and be enlightened.....as a certain wingnut often says.
What absolutely stinks about this situation is that YOU are doing this stunt just to draw attention to yourself and to further your own blind racist agenda agaainst the LAX guys, over and overe. Nifong in skin drag, fella. Your actions have no other motive than to inflate your own pathetic little ego. In fact, your behavior can backfire for Mangum and get her into even more trouble.
A disgrace to the medical profession......and to ethical and moral persons of color who find the conduct of individuals such as yourself to be reprehensible.

I recently visited Crystal and can add the following clarifications: She's not sure what kind of knife it was that she used to stab Daye with, but that it could've been a steak knife.

In addition, there is a lot more information that I got from our conversation and I will post it with discovery documentation in a day or two. Don't miss it!!

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
I don't see Sidney's actions backfiring on Crystal Mangum...She can always deny that she gave him the authority to submit these documents (something it appears she's preemptively done), and deny that the signature is hers.

Filing these documents may turn out to be the worst mistake Sid's made...

Intern,
If helping someone draft and file court documents violates some state law, then, in the future I will cease and desist from doing so. Do you think it's a crime worthy of being tossed in the hoosegow?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
If mangum stabbed Daye in self defense,it seems pretty damned nasty that she would leave with her purse ad run......a person who had fought in self defense and stabbed somebody, and who was a moral decent human.......would call 911.

I didn't say that she didn't call 9-1-1, and in fact, I believe when I last spoke to her that she did... but only after getting away from Daye's apartment.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Interesting to me.....
Mangum, who has a criminal record that she blames entirely on somebody else (I didn't do it, they made me, I was framed, etc.), stabs a man "in self defense". then, she does what any normal person would do when they have been attacked and had to fight back? NOOOOOOO, she grabs her purse and flees. Does she call 911? NOOOOOOOO. She does remember to grab her purse, of course. Right, Sidney, right!

Idiotic nonsense fabricated by two people who share far more than the same skin color....what Harr and Mangum have in common is (a)a deep seated failure to accept responsibility for their own behavior, (b)an amoral, whatever works for me is fine, approach to life and living, and (c)a willingness to lie whenever a lie suits their version of the "truth".
Harr claims to be a socialist. I think "sociopath" fits both of them fairly well.

Further enlightenment will come anon. Whether or not you will open your cranium and allow it to filter in is but another question.

Anonymous said...

Uh huh, right, sure. Sidney, take your meds and continue to lie.

Let's see....I stab a man in self defense. Then, I make sure I get my purse. then, I run.
Oh, and now, I seem to remember that maybe I called 911.
Lordy, sidney, you are a riot!

Anonymous said...

Sidney, do yourself a favor. Look up the definition of the word, "barratry".

Anonymous said...

Practicing law without a license is illegal, Sid.
Illegally obtaining, reading, and publishing PHI is a felony, Sid.
Using Mangum to draw attention to your racist self may not be illegal but it is immoral.
You are a sad little man

Lance the Intern said...

Sid says "Intern, [ed. note how I've gone from "Lance" to "Intern"]
If helping someone draft and file court documents violates some state law, then, in the future I will cease and desist from doing so. Do you think it's a crime worthy of being tossed in the hoosegow?"


Sid - The thing is, it truly doesn't matter what I (or you) think. What matters is that there are laws that govern the type of work you're attempting to perform, and you've failed to educate yourself about them before doing the work.

By filing those documents, you've left yourself open to (by my count) 1 count of barratry and 3 cases of practicing law without a license.

If Ms. Mangum denies signing those documents (as she apparently already has), you can add 3 charges of forgery as well.

We may very well need a "Justice4Harr" blog soon.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"She's(Crystal, the Duke rape case false accuser/victimizer) not sure what kind of knife it was that she used to stab Daye with, but that it could've been a steak knife."

Why did you rather vehemently insist the media said it was a paring knife?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I received only one consistent account from Crystal. The other account about the topic of the argument was from another source which was incorrect."

You once described your sources as knowledgeable and reliable.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Further enlightenment will come anon. Whether or not you will open your cranium and allow it to filter in is but another question."

What enlightenment? In spite of all your claims you have enlightened no one, least of all yourself. Why should this time be any different.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

To my last comment I add, you are demanding that people believe in you after you have said nothing believable in all the years you have published this blog.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

"I didn't say that she didn't call 9-1-1, and in fact, I believe when I last spoke to her that she did... but only after getting away from Daye's apartment."

What the media reported was that Reginald Daye's nephew, not Crystal Mangum, made the 911 call.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

http://sports.rightpundits.com/?p=6131

"It was a nephew of Mr. Reginald who made the 911 call and told them Mangum allegedly stabbed his uncle".

http://abcnews.go.com/US/duke-lacrosse-rape-accuser-crystal-mangum-charged-murder/story?id=13375065#.T49T145J994:

"During a 911 call, a man requesting an ambulance to the residence said Mangum was the attacker."

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/sports/2014773108_apusdukelacrosseaccuser.html:

"'It's Crystal Mangum. THE Crystal Mangum,' Daye's nephew said in a 911 call after the stabbing at the apartment the couple shared."

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/04/05/duke-lacrosse-rape-accusers-new-trouble-crystal-mangum-arrested.html:

"Late Sunday night, a man called 911 in Durham, North Carolina, and told the dispatcher that his uncle, Reginald Daye, had just been stabbed in his apartment. When the dispatcher asked who had stabbed him, his nephew said, 'Crystal Mangum. The Crystal Mangum,' adding, 'I told him she was trouble from the very beginning.'”

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COzZJ8xkk1M

This is the you tube video in which you can hear part of the 911 call. The caller is not Crystal Mangum.

Anonymous said...

Ok now what sid? Now how are you going to try to rationalize and pity pot this sorry excuse for a human being? She did not call 911. But she got her purse with the checks and we all know how easily these checks can be altered.
So go ahead sid. Keep telling us all about poor victim mangum. You do it so well

Anonymous said...

Not being a physician, I thought it would be useful and informative to ask a surgeon friend of mine to look at the documents on this web site and to read Harr's conclusions. The overwhelming response from my friend was "bull" in reference to Harr.
Harr is doing nothing more than what he has always done. Lie.
Period. End of story.

Anonymous said...

Also, as a reminder, Harr essentially accuses Dr. Nichols of falsifying a document.....though he says Nichols was simply doing what he was told to do, "going along with the plan". This kind of charge against a physician, published on the internet, is a serious matter, an allegation of fraud and worse against Nichols. Harr seems to think he is above the law, accusing without basis, name calling, etc......from what I have heard, through my own Sidney-like "sources", Harr is about to find out that such behavior can and will get his backside in a world of trouble. I hope the rumors I have heard are true. Harr needs to be held accountable. Expressing an opinion is one thing; what Harr has said goes far beyond "opinion".

Anonymous said...

For going "far beyond "opinion'" SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) richly deserves all the honors he may be due to receive.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Practicing law without a license is illegal, Sid.
Illegally obtaining, reading, and publishing PHI is a felony, Sid.
Using Mangum to draw attention to your racist self may not be illegal but it is immoral.
You are a sad little man

I think that it is immoral to conspire to incarcerate an innocent person for an indefinite period of time. The Man from Nazareth would think so, too.

Lance the Intern said...

"The Man from Nazareth would think so, too.

Now you presume to know the mind of God, too.

You've truly gone off the rails, Sid.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"She's(Crystal, the Duke rape case false accuser/victimizer) not sure what kind of knife it was that she used to stab Daye with, but that it could've been a steak knife."

Why did you rather vehemently insist the media said it was a paring knife?

You see, what sets me apart from Duke University, the mainstream media, and others is that I will admit when I make a mistake. A source of mine obviously misinformed me as to the type of knife used. When I directly asked Crystal what type of knife she used to stab Daye she said she wasn't sure, but it could've been a steak knife... as he had brought up a bunch of them to the room and was throwing them, using her as target practice.

So, yes, I was mistaken when I previously said a paring knife. After talking with Crystal, I now believe that it was a steak knife that she used.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

"I didn't say that she didn't call 9-1-1, and in fact, I believe when I last spoke to her that she did... but only after getting away from Daye's apartment."

What the media reported was that Reginald Daye's nephew, not Crystal Mangum, made the 911 call.

Daye's nephew calling 9-1-1 does not exclude Crystal Mangum from doing so as well.

Lance the Intern said...

"I think that it is immoral to conspire to incarcerate an innocent person for an indefinite period of time"

Crystal Mangum has not been found innocent by either judge or jury. By your own definition, she can not be declared "innocent".

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Also, as a reminder, Harr essentially accuses Dr. Nichols of falsifying a document.....though he says Nichols was simply doing what he was told to do, "going along with the plan". This kind of charge against a physician, published on the internet, is a serious matter, an allegation of fraud and worse against Nichols. Harr seems to think he is above the law, accusing without basis, name calling, etc......from what I have heard, through my own Sidney-like "sources", Harr is about to find out that such behavior can and will get his backside in a world of trouble. I hope the rumors I have heard are true. Harr needs to be held accountable. Expressing an opinion is one thing; what Harr has said goes far beyond "opinion".

The proof is in the pudding. The operative report mentions nothing about a laceration or a repair to the fundus of the stomach, the diaphragm, or the left lung. Furthermore, the operative report stated the kidney bed was without blood and there was no lesion to the left kidney. Furthermore, the EMS report and the ortho consult on Daye describe a left upper extremity without lacerations or lesions... no "defensive wounds" as noted on the autopsy examination report.

Thereby go ye enlightened.

Anonymous said...

Oh boy, here with go with the jesus deal again. If all else fails, Harr invokes God. wow, sid. running outta wiggle room these days?
What YOU think about Mangum's guilt or innocence is immaterial. Opinions and elbows...we all have them.
so now you say Mr. Daye was throwing knives at Mangum for target practice? I assume Sister (known widely for her truthfulness) told you that story. Of course, Sid.
The same documents have been read by others, FAR more qualified than you....who say you are full of bull.
I hope you are able to find yourself a competent lawyer soon.

Lance the Intern said...

From the urban dictionary (www.urbandictionary.com):

The proof is in the pudding:
A phrase that, when uttered, instantly identifies the speaker as being incredibly stupid and illiterate.

The adage is correctly stated "the proof of the pudding is in the eating"

Thereby go ye enlightened.

Anonymous said...

Well gee whiz, what's a girl to do? She has just stabbed a wild attacker who is throwing knives at her. Does she run to the nearest neighbor door and scream for help, for the police, for an ambulance? Uh,no. She gets her purse and boogies. Does she call 911. No. Does she call the police? No. Nice.
She has minor superficial scratches that dont need treatment.......the kind most of us get working in the yard, messin with our kids, bumpin into the refrigerator door or having a little fun in the sack. When she sees the EMS guy, her vital signs are normal......no wildly frightened agitation from escaping the clutches of a knife throwing drunken woman abusing man.
But mr daye eventually is dead. Very dead. Wingnut Harr says poor sister was the victim,, Yep just like the rape that didnt happen, the attempted running over of a police officer, assault, child abuse, and, oh yeah, the poor dear getting booted out of NC school for the grammar disabled. Poor thing. Ever the victim. Never the perp.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I think that it is immoral to conspire to incarcerate an innocent person for an indefinite period of time. The Man from Nazareth would think so, too."

Yet you think it was honorable and decent for MIKE NI(ncompoop)FONG to try and incarcerate three innocent falsely accused lacrosse players from Duke.

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), you are truly amoral.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Daye's nephew calling 9-1-1 does not exclude Crystal Mangum from doing so as well."

Lameanswer, SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), extremely lame.

Your belief that she did does not establish that she did.

You must have heard a JCAHO "rule", In God we trust but all others must document. And you must have heard, if you did not document you can not prove.

Can you provide documentation that Crystal did call 911?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The proof(that Dr. Nichols falsified the autopsy report) is in the pudding."

If you are sued, SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), it would be interesting to see what pudding you can serve. So far your puddings have all been without substance(except in your deluded megalomaniacal mind).

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"You see, what sets me apart from Duke University, the mainstream media, and others is that I will admit when I make a mistake. A source of mine obviously misinformed me as to the type of knife used. When I directly asked Crystal what type of knife she used to stab Daye she said she wasn't sure, but it could've been a steak knife... as he had brought up a bunch of them to the room and was throwing them, using her as target practice.

So, yes, I was mistaken when I previously said a paring knife. After talking with Crystal, I now believe that it was a steak knife that she used."

BULLSHIT OF A MOST RANK AND UNBELIEVABLE VARIETY!!!!

You vouched for your sources a reliable.

You said the media reported that the weapon was a paring knife. The media reported it was a kitchen knife.

You claimed you were being truthful in reporting the weapon as a paring knife because a paring knife is a kitchen knife.

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), you have been caught with your pants down after fabricating what the media said. Now you are pitifully and ineffectively trying to cover your butt.

And, as other commenters have pointrd out, Crystal has established in the public record she is neither reliable nor credible.

kenhyderal said...

Is this the actual knife (@1:43) or is it simply a stock photo dishonestly placed in this hateful video that attempts to discredit Crystal? Perhaps it's just one more "big lie" disseminated by that dishonest blog inaptly namesd " Duke Lacrosse Liestoppers" dedicated to the ongoing vendetta. http://vimeo.com/22785024

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)ER(acist)AL:

Like your boy SIDN(inn)EY, you have shown yourself to be totally incapable of recognizing truth, as is your acceptance of phony blowhard Kilgo as a reliable source of information as to what happened on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

The truth, which you run from like Dracula runs from a cross, is that Crystal falsely accused innocent men of rape.

Anonymous said...

Kenny boy, now that you have re-emerged from under your rock, please address this post:


"Hey Kenny, since you talk with Crystal all the time, why don't you ask her to verify Sid's story?


'That is why Ms. Mangum was desperately seeking assistance and asked me to help her with motions to have the charges dropped. In communicating through intermediaries, I asked her to send me the discovery so I could help her draft the motions, as she had no access to a law library, internet or laptop. She sent me the discovery and signed the documents, and because she was being held in jail and could not be allowed to walk to the courthouse to file the motions herself, I filed them on her behalf.'"

April 12, 2012 6:01 PM

Anonymous said...

Ah the dubai flash returns. Now we are focusing on liestoppers? Another attempt to deflect from the truth? Mangum stabbed the man. He died as a result of complications from the stab wound. Proximate cause applies. The only question is whether this is second degree. If her attorney convinces the jury it was self defense, then so be it. My bet is that she will go to prison this time, but in durham funnyland, you never know.
Let the games begin......

Mark Orgel said...

Nifong supporter, you make it soooo easy to show that your position on Ms. Mangum is indefensible...you said "I think that it is immoral to conspire to incarcerate an innocent person for an indefinite period of time. The Man from Nazareth would think so, too." Isn't that exactly what Mangum, Nifong and others to the LAX team with their constantly changing stories, illegal lineups and lies to the media? Why do you continue to support people who are, by your own definition, immoral?

Face it, Mangum has not spoken a word of truth about anything since the night of the LAX party. There is literally no evidence that anything happened to Mangum that night other than having a racial epithet tossed her way (in response to a racial epithet she tossed at one of the party-goers), and that she somehow managed to get semen from at least 4 men inside her, none of whom were on the Duke LAX team.

You have hitched your wagon to a habitual liar, and a man whose prosecutorial misconduct was so outrageous that he became the only DA in state history to be disbarred. How can you possibly expect anyone to take you seriously when your every argument in defense of Mangum and Nifong are the same ones that they exploited in order to falsely indict three innocent Duke students? You can call them pigs all you want, but there is no law against hiring a stripper or drinking beer, but when you stab someone and they die, that is murder.

kenhyderal said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
kenhyderal said...

Mark Orgel said: "in response to a racial epithet she tossed at one of the party-goers" ........... This is not true. ............. Mark Orgel also said " she somehow managed to get semen from at least 4 men inside her, none of whom were on the Duke LAX team" This is also wrong. If her allegation is true the DNA found could have come from non-players who were present. A totally inadequate Police investigation failed to identify all persons who were there and the source of the DNA found. The flawed Police line-up caused them to charge the wrong persons with rape. Other crimes that were committed were not investigated.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

Quoting

"'in response to a racial epithet she tossed at one of the party-goers'"........... This is not true. .............".

It is not true in that no racial epithets were hurled at Crystal, except in her imagination. A racial epithet was hurled at Kim Pittman/Roberts in response to her hurling a racial epithet at a Lacrosse player.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)CER(acist)AL:

"Mark Orgel also said ' she somehow managed to get semen from at least 4 men inside her, none of whom were on the Duke LAX team' This is also wrong."

Mark Orgel is correct. The DNA identified on Crystal's person, from multipemal sources, did not match the DNA of any Lacrosse player.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"If her(Crystal's) allegation is true the DNA found could have come from non-players who were present."

KEN(inny) remains in denial. The evidence is overwhelming that Crystal's allegations were untrue.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"A totally inadequate Police investigation failed to identify all persons who were there and the source of the DNA found."

Forensic examination of Crystal's rape kit, using sensitive, specific tests for semen, found that no semen had been deposited on the rape kit. Ergo, no one at the Lacrosse party, LAX team member or not, could have deposited DNA on Crystal on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

KEN(inny)'s retort is that the tests do have a false negativity rate, which is true. He shows his lack of intellectual capacity by arguing that does not rule out the presence of semen conclusively. Ergo, the DNA could have been deposited on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

The sequence of testing which can be verified, Acid Phosphatase assay at the SBI Crime lab, followed by PSA assay at DNA Security does conclusively rule out the presence of semen.

The presence of Semen on the rape kit can not be inferred unless some tests rules it in.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"A totally inadequate Police investigation failed to identify all persons who were there and the source of the DNA found."

Both prosecution and defense in this case were in agreement that every attendee at the party had been identifies. KEN(inny)'s argument is that the presence of Male DNA not matching any Lacrosse player, says unidentified males were here. That totally ignores the fact that no semen, no other male bodily fluid was identified on the rape kit.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Other crimes that were committed were not investigated."

KEN(inny) has not hard evidence that any other crimes were committed.

One which he alleges is that Crystal was given a drink at the party which contained a date rape drug. Tox screen revealed no such drugs in Crystal's system.

KEN(inny) then alleges that Crystal was given a substance, Chloral Hydrate, which could not be detected. He says that Crystal was sober when she arrived at the party and was intoxicated when she left. That has not been established. According to KEN(inny), Crystal's driver said she was not impaired when she arrived at the party, He never observed Crystal in the house. Two Lacrosse players observed her in the house and said she was impaired when she arrived. KEN(inny)'s response to that is that the testimony of members of the Lacrosse team should be discarded.

There is also the issue of Crystal's money. Whether or not it was Crystal's money is legally questionable. She was paid for performing for two hours. She was too impaired to perform. David Evans tried to recover "her"money. What he recovered the police confiscated.

Anonymous said...

With KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL, he basically hangs his case on his belief that Crystal was raped. Even though Crystal has been proven to be a false accuser, KEN(inny) believes her. That shows the level, or the lack thereof, of KEN(inny)'s intellectual capacity.

KEN(inny) also cites a character named Kilgo. Ken(inny) says Kilgo told him he knew a Lacrosse player who told him that Crystal had been raped at the party.

Kilgo used to post on this blog that he knew more about the Lacrosse case than any other human being. Whenever challenged to back up his claims, Kilgo always backed down. Kilgo has not posted on this blog for over a couple of years, probably because he could not back up what he claimed.

Our boy Ken(inny) regards Kilgo's second hand hearsay as reliable evidence, again showing how defective his intellect is.

Anonymous said...

Finally, this is Ken(inny)'s hypothesis as to what happened on the night of 13/14 March 2006:

There were unknown, unidentified men, not members of the Lacrosse team, at the party. They raped Crystal. Members of the Lacrosse team knew who these unknown men were. But they covered up for them inthe face of Mike NI(ncompoop)FONG's threats, in the face of said Mr. NI(ncompoop)FONG's indictment and blatant wrongful prosecution of three team members.

Ken(inny) has implied that Reade Seligman, Colin Finnerty and David Evans knew who the assailants were and covered up for them rather thn identifying them.

Anonymous said...

Correction:

"KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

Quoting

"'in response to a racial epithet she tossed at one of the party-goers'"........... This is not true. .............".

It is not true in that no racial epithets were hurled at Crystal, except in her imagination. A racial epithet was hurled at Kim Pittman/Roberts in response to her hurling a racial epithet at a Lacrosse player."

I shoud have said: It is true in that no racial epithets were hurled at Crystal, except in her imagination. A racial epithet was hurled at Kim Pittman/Roberts in response to her hurling a racial epithet at a Lacrosse player.

Anonymous said...

What a bleepin waste of time........to endlessly rehash the flase rape nonsense, There will always be intellectual cripples and self infatuated crackpots like Harr and this ken edwards who like to swoon over who killed kennedy, where crop circles come from, did booth shoot lincoln, was lbj gay and did the fbi plan 911. These two will never, repeat, never admit to what they know is the truth. They are nothing but clone thinkers..........spewing nifong "something happened that night" bull. Harr is limited by his racist blinders and kenny hissy fit, by his overblown sense of himself. Both are comical.

Anonymous said...

You da man, Kenny, you da man.

Anonymous said...

So, I see that copy and paste Ken is back.

kenhyderal said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 4:40 said: "Our boy Ken(inny) regards Kilgo's second hand hearsay as reliable evidence, again showing how defective his intellect is"........... As far as I know, no one, on this blog, other then Dr.Harr, myself and Kilgo have spoken directly to anyone who was there present. I'm guessing for the rest, their information comes from the various blogs whose purpose is to discredit DA Nifong and the alleged victim, Crystal. I stand to be corrected, though, if anyone here has spoken to anyone who was actually there.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 4:46 sdaid: "Ken(inny) has implied that Reade Seligman, Colin Finnerty and David Evans knew who the assailants were and covered up for them rather thn identifying them" ........... I do not imply that Seligman and Finnerty have direct knowledge of who did what.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @4:03 AM said "These two will never, repeat, never admit to what they know is the truth"....... Huh??? Could you explain what this statement means?

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL

"As far as I know, no one, on this blog, other then Dr.Harr, myself and Kilgo have spoken directly to anyone who was there present. I'm guessing for the rest, their information comes from the various blogs whose purpose is to discredit DA Nifong and the alleged victim, Crystal. I stand to be corrected, though, if anyone here has spoken to anyone who was actually there.

All that means, regarding SIDN(inn)EY and Kilgo is that you have talked to a couple of questionably truthful sources. There is no evidence that Kilgo ever spoke to anyone at the party except his own assertion, and Kilgo has never backed up any of his assertions.

What KEN(jnny) says about those "blogs whose purpose is to discredit DA Nifong and the alleged victim, Crystal", is garbage. Crystal was the victimizer, not the victim(remember, KEN(inny), there is no evidence that anyone assauted Crystal at the party). Mike NI(ncompoop)FONG deserved to be discredited for knowingly prosecuting three innocent men, just for his own political advantage.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Anonymous @ 4:46 sdaid: 'Ken(inny) has implied that Reade Seligman, Colin Finnerty and David Evans knew who the assailants were and covered up for them rather thn identifying them' ........... I do not imply that Seligman and Finnerty have direct knowledge of who did what.

I believe you did imply that.

Are you beginning to realize how implausible your hypothesis is?

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Anonymous @4:03 AM said 'These two will never, repeat, never admit to what they know is the truth'....... Huh??? Could you explain what this statement means?"

I think the poster intended to say neither you nor SIDN(inn)EY will never admit that what you claim to know is not the truth.

You keep asserting Crystal was raped when the evidence overwhelmingly shows she was not. SIDN(inn)EY insists Mike NI(compoop)FONG was a decent, honorable prosecutor, when the evidence is he tried to perpetrate ne of the grossest wrongful prosecutions in American History.

SIDN(inn)EY also asserted he would never break the law. He broke Federal Law by accessing and publishing Reginaldc Daye's medical records without the permission of Mr. Daye's family.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Anonymous @4:03 AM said 'These two will never, repeat, never admit to what they know is the truth'....... Huh??? Could you explain what this statement means?"

Or, maybe what the poster meant is, you know what the truth is, that Crystal was never raped, that NI(ncompoop)FONG was a corrupt prosecutor, but you run away from the truth just like Dracula runs away from a cross.

Anonymous said...

Kenny, let me say it again, in simpler words. You and Harr will not admit what you KNOW to be the truth. The truth is that Mangum Lied, Nifong Lied, and the Lax guys did not do a damn thing to her. The truth is that they were stupid for having underage drinking going on (horrors, the sin of the century!!!!) and they were, in my humble opinion, kinda jerky for hiring strippers. It is NOT against the law to hire strippers. I just happen to think it is degrading to women. However, they did not do damn thing to Mangum. THAT, my challenged fellow, is the TRUTH you will not admit to.....in fact, I'd say you would not know the truth if it bit you in the posterior.
Further, you can hold on to your silly who-gives-a-rip fantasy that poor Sister was done in by the mystery guest at the party if you wish. Nobody cares, Kenny. Face it, nobody cares......except maybe Harr.....and that speaks volumes about his limited capacity.
Keep it up. Keep telling us your stories. They are definitely funny

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Kenny boy, now that you have re-emerged from under your rock, please address this post:


"Hey Kenny, since you talk with Crystal all the time, why don't you ask her to verify Sid's story?


'That is why Ms. Mangum was desperately seeking assistance and asked me to help her with motions to have the charges dropped. In communicating through intermediaries, I asked her to send me the discovery so I could help her draft the motions, as she had no access to a law library, internet or laptop. She sent me the discovery and signed the documents, and because she was being held in jail and could not be allowed to walk to the courthouse to file the motions herself, I filed them on her behalf.'"

April 12, 2012 6:01 PM

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 12:23 said "You (- and Harr) will not admit what you KNOW to be the truth"............ You are wrong. I firmy believe Crystal was drugged, assulted and robbed. Once again, you're suggesting that I am a troll, who is trying to provoke people by putting forth things I know are untrue. This is simply not the case. Like, former, DA Nifong I am firmly convinced "that something did happen"

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Anonymous @ 12:23 said 'You (- and Harr) will not admit what you KNOW to be the truth'............ You are wrong. I firmy believe Crystal was drugged, assulted and robbed."

What you believe is not the truth. The truth is, no one at the party drugged Crystal. She drugged herself. She was not raped at the party.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Once again, you're suggesting that I am a troll, who is trying to provoke people by putting forth things I know are untrue. This is simply not the case. Like, former, DA Nifong I am firmly convinced 'that something did happen'"

This statement confirms you do not know the truth. The truth is, nothing happened in there.

Anonymous said...

Kenny, your reputation is spreading across the internet. They love you in the DIW comment section.

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...
"You are wrong. I firmy believe Crystal was drugged, assulted and robbed....Like, former, DA Nifong I am firmly convinced "that something did happen"

Bahahahahaha. Bahahahahaha. Bahahahahaha.

Kenny, you're not a troll, you're a tool.

Anonymous said...

ken edwards is nothing by a self ballooned, self important, cut n paste commenter who has not had an original thought since 2006. He just throws out statements, occasionally tries to wow us with his big words, and conveniently forgets to credit other people's writing. In other words, a Harr-Nifong clone.
who cares.................

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
"ken edwards is nothing by a self ballooned, self important, cut n paste commenter who has not had an original thought since 2006. He just throws out statements, occasionally tries to wow us with his big words, and conveniently forgets to credit other people's writing. In other words, a Harr-Nifong clone.
who cares................."

April 21, 2012 2:07 PM

You got that right.

kenhyderal said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @1:15 said : "They love you in the DIW comment section"..... Yeah and to illustrate the lack of gravitas on that vaunted screed these posters, of all things, are questioning whether I'm a Communist. Well, no, like President Obama I am not but in Canada Communists do run for Parliament. They hardly ever win but, hey, we're really not afraid of them

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL

You failed to mention the description on DIW of your implausible hypothesis as to what happened on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

Are you now trying to distance yourself from that hypothesis?

Anonymous said...

Oooooo. Here we go with the words, guys. Gravitas, no less. Kenny is trying to impress us with his hooked on phonics vocabulary.

Anonymous said...

Kenny fantasizes looking at pictures of CGM in an orange jump suit.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 6:35 said: "Here we go with the words, guys"...... and Anonymous @ 2:07 said: "He just throws out statements, (and) occasionally tries to wow us with his big words"....... Just adhering to the stereotype, which every time illicits a Pavlovian like responce from those who aren't bright enough to realize they're being put-on by my affectation.

Anonymous said...

No actually we think your attempts are funny,, kenny.....not clever, not witty, not sophisticated.........just plain silly-funny. Just like Harr, a self absorbed person who posts what he knows is nonsense just to get a rise out of others. .......in order to draw attention to himself. My favorite bullcrap line of yours is your story about being friends with Mangum. Hilarious

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Just adhering to the stereotype, which every time illicits(sic) a Pavlovian like responce from those who aren't bright enough to realize they're being put-on by my affectation."

KEN(inny), the word you wanted to use was elicit, not illicit.

Illicit means illegal. It is an adjective, not a verb.

Examples of illicit activity include but are not limited to:

Stabbing someone with a knife and killing him;

Falsely accusing innocent men of raping you:

Prosecuting said innocent men for rape when you know no rape happened;

As your boy SIDN(inn)EY is fond of saying, go ye and be enlightened.

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...
"Yeah and to illustrate the lack of gravitas on that vaunted screed these posters, of all things, are questioning whether I'm a Communist."

What's your point, Kenny? Are you suggesting that copying paragraph-long passages from other websites and posting them as your own establishes your gravitas?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous April 22, 2012 7:27 AM:

"What's your point, Kenny? Are you suggesting that copying paragraph-long passages from other websites and posting them as your own establishes your gravitas?"

I think it establishes KEN(inny)'s gravitas in that it shows he is a fathead.

kenhyderal said...

This charge of plagerism is getting rather old. Let's review the facts. I'm the person who provided the link to the source of my statements. An anonymous poster going to that link noted I had reported it verbatim, without citing the journalist's name who had written the article. This Anonymous poster has been harping on this for months.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @6:05 said : "KEN(inny), the word you wanted to use was elicit, not illicit" .......... I stand corrected. Spelling was never my forte. Like ex-DA Cline I've, once again, been busted by the Spelling Police.

guiowen said...

Incidentally, Kenhyderal, don't worry about people asking whether you're a communist. There's a troll at DIW who, every time he sees that people particularly dislike some individual, thinks it is extremely amusing to ask whether that individual is a communist. So, nobody really thinks you're a communist. On the other hand, there are lots of people who really dislike you.

Anonymous said...

Kenny, while you are reviewing the "facts," you should review the two posts below. Please point us to your posts where you provided links to the sources of your statements.



From Kenny's post of 11/15/11 at 5:11 p.m.:

"...This law made Upper Canada the first British colony to abolish slavery. The Act remained in force until 1833 when the British Parliament's Slavery Abolition Act abolished slavery in all parts of the British Empire."


From Wikipedia entry titled "Act Against Slavery":

"...This law made Upper Canada the first British colony to abolish slavery. The Act remained in force until 1833 when the British Parliament's Slavery Abolition Act abolished slavery in most parts of the British Empire."




From Kenny's post of 9/18/11 at 2:08 p.m.:

"A blood alcohol level of about 300-400 mg per 100 ml will usually cause loss of consciousness. However, highly tolerant individuals may show only moderate drunkeness at 400 mg per 100 ml, the normal LD50."

From Yahoo Answers, Why do people vomit when they dring a lot?:

"A blood alcohol level of about 300-400 mg per 100 ml will usually cause loss of consciousness. However, highly tolerant individuals may show only moderate drunkeness at 400 mg per 100 ml, the normal LD50."

Nifong Supporter said...


Prepare for Enlightenment. A blog about the physical abuse Crystal Mangum sustain is about to be posted!

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"I stand corrected. Spelling was never my forte."

That has been obvious ever since you started posting.

What is also obvious is that objective truth is not your forte.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Prepare for Enlightenment. A blog about the physical abuse Crystal Mangum sustain is about to be posted!"

Your latest blog is not enlightenment. It is more of the BULLSHIT!!! with which you very ineffectively try to baffle your readers.

kenhyderal said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
kenhyderal said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 2:08 PM said In quoting kenhyderal "A blood alcohol level of about 300-400 mg per 100 ml will usually cause loss of consciousness. However, highly tolerant individuals may show only moderate drunkeness at 400 mg per 100 ml, the normal LD50.".......... My bad: I should have quoted that illustrious author and jouralist Stephen Fry, a contributor to "Yahoo Answers" and who judged to have given the best answer to the question by one vote, He, himself, cites "the entire medical profession as his source. What is no longer in dispute, though, is Dr.Harr's assertion, criticized univerally as libellous, by all here, that Daye was an alcoholic and the blood alcohol reading reported was probably erroneous. It seems according to the documents Dr.Harr has published that he was diagnosed as as an alcoholic at Duke Medical Center and was treated for alcohol withdrawl and delerium tremens.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"It seems according to the documents Dr.Harr has published that he was diagnosed as as an alcoholic at Duke Medical Center and was treated for alcohol withdrawl and delerium tremens."

In the documents SIDN(inn)EY released, there is nothing saying, Ronald Daye is a chronic alcoholic.

According to the police records, Mr. Daye did not behave as if he were intoxicated. On the other hand, a police investigator did detect the odor of alcohol on Crystal, and Crystal's aunt said Crystal had been drinking.

You fail to explain why Mr. Daye's liver was found at autopsy to be normal. If Ronald Daye was such an alcoholic he could tolerate the level of alcohol that was detected, he would have had liver damage. That he did not act drunk and that he did not have liver damage suggest that the Blood alcohol level was an erroneous lab result.

The "Doctor" Harr which you have cited claimed Crystal could have been beaten severely on the head and neck without showing any physical findings consistent with the beating.