Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Flog 18: Charges against Crystal Mangum - corruption, conspiracy, and cover-up

Click the link below to view the interactive flog:
http://www.justice4nifong.com/direc/flog/flog18.html

Flog 18: Crystal Mangum – corruption, conspiracy, and cover-up

Word count: 3,109
 In the beginning of March 2011, Reginald Daye, a man in his mid-forties, was back on the job after having been recently laid off work as a painter. Mr. Daye had seemed to have turned his life around from his earlier days of misdemeanor crimes. A couple of the crimes for which he was charged included assault… one assault on a female.

In addition to traffic violations and petty crimes, Reginald Daye had a history of drug use which he managed to kick over time… however, his addiction to alcohol was one which he had not been able to beat. According to Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser, he would consume a case of beer on weekdays and down a gallon of whiskey on weekends.


These drinking habits of Daye were observed by Crystal Mangum because around the beginning of March 2011, she and her three young children moved into Reginald Daye’s apartment at his invitation. Months prior to their cohabitation, Daye, attracted by Mangum’s notorious celebrity, sought a relationship with her, and around the middle of January 2011 he introduced himself to her.


After living together during the month of March 2011, their platonic relationship became an intimate one. According to Ms. Mangum, she brought some clothes along with a washing machine and dryer to the arrangement, and helped pay the rent.


It was after she had moved in with Daye that Crystal noticed his jealous nature as he confiscated her cell phone to monitor who she communicated with and for his own personal use.


Crystal Mangum noted that Reginald Daye had a pair of brass knuckles, and he admitted to her that he owned a gun, although she states that she never saw it. Daye also acknowledged to her that in the past he had been physically abusive with his girlfriends, but up until the morning of April 3, 2011, he never laid a hand on her.


On March 25, 2011, Reginald Daye purchased a cashier’s check for $300, and on April 1, 2011, he purchased a cashier’s check for $400, both checks totaling $700 to cover the rent. On both checks the payee was listed as the apartment’s owner and Reginald Daye’s name was down as the remitter.


On the days they were purchased, March 25th and April 1, 2011, Mr. Daye gave both cashier’s checks to Crystal. Because he was scheduled to be at work during the apartment office hours on Monday, April 4, 2011, he instructed Crystal to visit the office and deliver the April rent in the form of the two cashier’s checks. Crystal placed both checks in her purse for safekeeping at the time she received them.


In the late evening of Saturday, April 2, 2011, Reginald and Crystal attended a birthday party. Daye drank prior to their arrival at the party at 11:00 pm, and imbibed alcohol while at the party. Ms. Mangum’s alcoholic consumption consisted of two Jell-o shots (Jell-o made using gin), and a drink containing gin. After an hour or so, the two left the party and returned to the apartment they shared.


At the apartment, Crystal Mangum saw a police officer she knew who was on the apartment grounds. They greeted each other and began to chitchat. Reginald Daye became angry with the attention Mangum was giving the officer and began demanding that she leave and accompany him into the apartment. When Mangum stalled, Daye became enraged, and proceeded to engage her in a heated argument.


Crystal became frightened and concerned about Daye’s behavior and went to the officer and asked him to drive her to her aunt’s house. The officer refused and told Mangum and Daye to take their argument inside of their apartment.


While Daye was forcibly dragging Mangum up the stairs, she sustained a cut on her right knee.


Once inside the apartment, the terror for Crystal Mangum would begin and last approximately an hour, from around two to three in the morning. In the living room, he punched her in the face and spit on her. When she ran to the master bedroom, he pursued; tackling her with the two of them on the bed. Mangum clung tight to the mattress as Daye lifted her and it up and deposited them on the floor.


After Crystal managed to free herself from Daye she ran to the bathroom in the master bedroom and locked the door behind her. Daye proceeded to kick in the door knocking it off its hinges, and he grabbed Crystal by her hair and drug her back into the bedroom… clumps of her hair being deposited by the bathroom door and on the mattress.


Mangum tried to grab her purse in order to flee, but Daye blocked her. Sometime thereafter he demanded that Crystal get up and leave the apartment. Anxious to comply, Daye held her down and told her, “You’re not going anywhere.”


After a period of time, Daye went to another part of the apartment momentarily leaving her alone in the bedroom. He later returned with a pot of boiling water and then left again. When Daye returned minutes later, he had a set of steak knives and began to throw them at her as she tried to shield herself with the mattress.


Crystal stated that Reginald Daye then began eerily having a conversation with himself discussing whether or not to kill her and finally concluding to do so.


With steak knives strewn around the bedroom, Daye got on top of Crystal and he gouged at her left eye with his fingernails, leaving small lacerations. She tried to push him off but to no avail. He then put both of his hands around her neck and began to choke her.


Crystal’s head throbbing with the strangulation, she grabbed a steak knife that was lying about and stabbed Daye once in the left side of his torso. Daye then got up and yelled, “You stabbed me, Bitch!”


Crystal got up grabbed her purse, which contained the two cashier’s checks, and fled the apartment. Daye gave pursuit as Crystal ran for her life into the woods nearby the housing complex. She did not know exactly when Daye gave up the chase. Once free of imminent danger, Crystal Mangum began walking to her aunt’s residence.


Reginald Daye went to the apartment in the same complex in which Carlos Wilson, his nephew, lived and told him that Crystal had stabbed him. Evidently they both told police and investigators that Crystal took his money, then stabbed him and fled … the only version presented by the mainstream media.


Daye, who was walking around his apartment when EMS arrived, was instructed to sit down while the paramedics administered to his wound.


Meanwhile, Ms. Mangum arrived at her aunt’s house at 4:00 a.m., and according to her aunt’s statement to police, upon opening the door Crystal was crying and said, “He beat me.”


Police were directed to Crystal’s aunt’s house by Reginald Daye’s nephew as a place at which Ms. Mangum may have fled. Officers found Crystal lying on the floor and in enough distress to request their assistance in helping her stand up. Crystal was then arrested and taken to headquarters.


According to police notes, Crystal Mangum was cooperative in signing a consent to photograph her injuries and wanted to give a statement to police. However, after she was told that she was under arrest for assaulting Daye and read her Miranda Rights, and without any legal counsel present, Ms. Mangum wisely refused to say anything to the officer.


In other words, Ms. Mangum was placed under arrest before any investigating officer or police even took a statement from her about what had transpired. She was arrested without having a chance to give her side of the story, and placed under a $300,000 bail.


Two days later, on Tuesday, April 5, 2011, a police officer went to the apartment of Crystal’s aunt and retrieved from her the two cashier’s checks that Crystal had carried in her purse.


Confiscation of these two cashier’s checks would become the basis for the two count charge of larceny against Ms. Mangum.


After Reginald Daye’s arrival at the hospital by ambulance on Sunday, April 3, 2011, he was assessed to be stable enough for an abdominal CAT scan prior to rushing him into surgery. Contrast confirmed a perforation in the colon at the splenic flexure. A chest x-ray showed no sign of a pneumothorax or other lesion to the left lung.


In his preoperative orthopedic consultation, the doctor found that all four extremities were normal without any breaks in the skin or lacerations.


Reginald Daye underwent an emergency abdominal laparotomy the morning of April 3, 2011, during which a laceration to the colon was noted and repaired with sutures while a minor lesion to the spleen was observed and repaired with electrocautery and surgi-cel.


The operative report specifically states that the stomach was normal and that there was no bleeding or lesions in the left kidney bed. There was no mention of the diaphragm or left lung in the surgical report.


In addition to the stab wound, Daye was also noted to have an extremely high blood alcohol level of 296 mg/dL… which would put a non-alcoholic adult male in a stupor. To ward off any signs or complications of delirium tremens, Daye was begun on a regimen of benzodiazepine sedatives soon after his admission to the hospital.


Surgery for the stab wound was uneventful and Daye was expected to make a full recovery.


During the days immediately following surgery, Daye was noted to have episodes of agitation, which were attributed to his withdrawal from alcohol, and he received sedatives to treat them.


On Wednesday, April 6, 2011, Daye was noted to have some respiratory distress and a diagnostic procedure was ordered which required oral contrast. The contrast agent was introduced through a tube from the nose leading into the stomach and sometime thereafter, it triggered emesis.


Concern about protecting the airway and providing high concentrations of oxygen led to the decision to intubate. Daye was then intubated with an 8 mm diameter tube, however the confirmatory EtCO2 test for its proper placement was negative. This resulted in a visual inspection of the tube’s placement, which was deemed to be properly positioned, and the tube was left in place.


In actuality the tube was not in the trachea and the lungs were deprived of oxygen. Subsequently, the blood cells were unable to carry life-requiring oxygen to the cells of the body.


Cells of the brain are the most sensitive to oxygen deprivation, and they died relatively quickly. When the muscles and tissues of the heart were denied oxygen, a cardiac arrest ensued.


Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun at this time and the endotracheal tube that had been mis-positioned was removed, and a smaller 7.5 mm tube inserted. This time the confirmatory EtCO2 test for placement was positive. With oxygenated blood flow restored, most of the cells throughout the body began to recover, and as a result the heart was resuscitated. Unfortunately, the brain cells had been without oxygen too long… the outcome being that Daye was brain dead with a grim prognosis that he would never awaken from a comatose state.


Reginald Daye was placed on life support and kept alive for a week, during which time the media remained silent about his condition… never informing the public that Daye had lost consciousness and had been in a coma since April 6, 2011.


On Wednesday, April 13, 2011, after seven days of monitoring his comatose condition while on life support, the family of Reginald Daye consented to have him electively removed from procedures which had sustained his life for a week, and shortly thereafter he expired.


The media coverage of Daye’s death was vague, superficial, and did not go into specifics. Only one source even mentioned that his removal from life support preceded his death. In addition, the media lacked any curiosity about the nuts and bolts of Daye’s death.


Lacking an official autopsy report specifying the exact cause of death, Durham prosecutor Kelly Gauger got a grand jury to indict Crystal Mangum for the first degree murder of Reginald Daye. Mangum was also indicted on two counts of larceny, one for each of the two cashier’s checks that Daye had given to her and were in her possession following the incident of April 3, 2011… cashier’s checks which she could not have possibly converted to money for her own use.


Her bail was increased from $300,000 to $500,000 with the upgraded charge of murder. However, in June 2011, Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson reduced Mangum’s bail from half a million dollars to $200,000 after reasonably questioning whether the stab wound actually caused Daye’s death.


Although the single mother of three, Crystal Mangum was the victim of domestic violence, unlawful imprisonment by Daye, and a victim of malicious prosecution by the Durham prosecutor, the mainstream media portrayed her as a villain who was incapable of telling the truth, was mentally unstable, and preyed upon men, especially boyfriends.


Without exception, media accounts related to the April 3, 2011 incident devoted significant portions of their reports to the rehashing the Duke Lacrosse case and making false and misleading statements about the Duke Lacrosse defendants being exonerated and claiming as fact that Ms. Mangum lied about being sexually assaulted at the Duke Lacrosse beer-guzzling, stripper-ogling bacchanal.


Approximately four month later, in early August 2011, the autopsy report was released to the public which included findings not supported by the operative report and other medical records. For example, the Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011 falsely stated that the stab wound inflicted by Mangum punctured Daye’s left lung, diaphragm, left kidney, and the stomach. This is all fabrication, as the only internal injuries sustained by the stab wound were to the colon and a minor wound to the spleen. In addition, the autopsy report noted old wounds to the left upper extremity which were suspicious of being “defensive wounds,” however a preoperative examination by an orthopedic surgeon during a consultation reported “no appreciable lacerations or skin breaks in the visualized areas of his four extremities.”


The Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011 is false and misleading in concluding that Reginald Daye’s death was due to “complications of stab wound to chest.” There is no nexus established between the stab wound, which was successfully treated at surgery, and Daye’s brain death and removal from life support. This report fails to mention that Daye was comatose, was on life support, and that he died after being electively removed from life support.


The Investigative Autopsy Report of April 13, 2011 also came to a false and misleading conclusion attributing Daye’s death to “stab wound to chest” and declaring it was a homicide. This document is notable for its omissions in that it failed to mention that Daye was intubated prior to having a cardiac arrest, and it failed to mention that Daye passed away after being removed from life support.


Despite the fact that the prosecution’s case against Mangum for the murder and larceny charges was baseless, her attorney Chris Shella never filed a motion to dismiss the charges. After successfully getting bail reduced to $200,000 in June 2011, Mr. Shella attempted to get bail further reduced to $100,000 in November 2011, and again in March 2012.


The March 2012 bail reduction hearing was before Judge Osmond Smith III who was the judge in the Duke Lacrosse case and made what a reasonable person with full knowledge of the facts could be construed as a malicious ruling when he ordered Ms. Mangum to present Duke Lacrosse defense attorneys with results of a paternity test of her newborn after it had been ruled out by DNA and history that none of the Duke Lacrosse defendants could have possibly sired the baby. Despite this history, Judge Smith made no effort to recuse himself.


Having also sentenced former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong to 24 hours in jail in 2007, Judge Smith quickly denied Shella’s request for a reduced bail to $100,000 at the March hearing.


As the one year anniversary of her incarceration rolled around with no sign of any action by her attorney, Ms. Mangum sought help from Sidney B. Harr. A retired physician, Harr recognized serious problems and inaccuracies with the autopsy report and agreed to help Ms. Mangum draft some motions that she could file Pro Se.


Having no legal training and not being a lawyer, Harr was not aware that by assisting Mangum with the drafting of the motions that he would be in violation of North Carolina statutes.


He agreed to help Ms. Mangum because she had no access to the internet or a law library. In order to draft the motions he requested some of the prosecution’s discovery documents, including police reports and medical records. She sent the documents to Harr, and after he drafted the motion, she signed them. Because she was incarcerated, Harr physically took the motions to the Criminal Clerk of Court in Durham where they were filed.


With knowledge that the mainstream media had concealed true events of the case from the masses and made misleading statements putting Ms. Mangum in a negative light, Harr published some pertinent discovery documents online so that the public could get a more balance picture of events that transpired related to the April 3, 2011 self-defense stabbing incident.


Upon learning that his client had shared discovery with Harr, Attorney Shella asked the Court to release him from representing Crystal Mangum… a request which was granted.


Defense attorney Woody Vann has since been appointed to represent Ms. Mangum against the two charges now pending of first degree murder and larceny.


On Tuesday, May 22, 2012, Attorney Vann received from Mangum’s prior attorney Chris Shella, approximately seven or eight disks containing the prosecution’s discovery. He immediately recognized the discrepancies between the medical records and the autopsy report, and he is making it his top priority to obtain a consultation with a forensic pathologist to review the autopsy findings of the county medical examiner.


This action should have been executed by the defense attorney on day one… or shortly thereafter. Findings by the forensic pathologist will substantiate my assertion that the autopsy report, upon which the prosecution is basing its murder charge, is fraudulent and is totally lacking in credibility.


The forthcoming truth, as will be contained in the pathologist’s report, is one key to opening the jail doors and setting Crystal Mangum free. The report should be available in a matter of weeks…

429 comments:

1 – 200 of 429   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

Funniest writing YET!. I have read through this piece of trash just once and have already come up with NUMEROUS contradictions and differences in THIS account of the "hour of sheer terror" and the LAST account of the "hour of sheer terror". So, I guess Harr has been visiting Mangum again and now has a Version Two, the Sequel, Revised....for the intellectually impaired or the terminally bored....to read. Truly hilarious. Can;'t wait for Version Three, Sister Goes to Camp....Or Version Four, Sister finds Jesus.

Anonymous said...

Woody Vann must read to site.....and just laugh to himself.
Notice how harr is now playing "CYA" in reference to not knowing it was a violation of NC statutes, etc. play Atticus Finch Jr.....
So many fables, falsehoods and downright LIES in this poorly written fiction.....I wonder if Mangum or V. Clark is Ghost writing for the good doctor.???
Or, perhaps, we have bathrobe boy or the famous "unconscious" Cline penning this silliness.
Harr loves to spin yarns and this one is a doozy IF you believe in the tooth fairy

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Woody Vann must read to site.....and just laugh to himself.
Notice how harr is now playing "CYA" in reference to not knowing it was a violation of NC statutes, etc. play Atticus Finch Jr.....
So many fables, falsehoods and downright LIES in this poorly written fiction.....I wonder if Mangum or V. Clark is Ghost writing for the good doctor.???
Or, perhaps, we have bathrobe boy or the famous "unconscious" Cline penning this silliness.
Harr loves to spin yarns and this one is a doozy IF you believe in the tooth fairy

All you have to do is visit the links and review the documents to understand that all of the information is verified by documentation. Also, much of the information I got directly from Crystal herself... not secondhand. And Crystal should know what happened as she was there. Her version of events has always been consistent and logical.

How does the prosecution, or you for that matter, explain how the door to the bathroom was knocked off its hinges?

Anonymous said...

Since Harr and preacher kenny like to remind us that Sister is a graduate of that fine institution of higher learning, NCCU....here's info concerning admission requirements.
A GPA of 2.3, SAT of 750 and ACT of 16. ACT of 16? wow, must be really rough to pass Hooked On Phonics these days.
My senile grandmother could score 750 in the SAT.
Mangum, the mental giant, the college graduate.....apparently lacks that essential ingredient for living as a contributing member in society.....it's called Character.

Lance the Intern said...

Dr. Harr -- I suggest you look up "chain of causation" the next time you're in the library.

Anonymous said...

Points to Lance!
Proximate cause is well established in law.....using Harr's logic (or lack thereof), if Daye was up and walking down the hospital corridor, tripped on his IV pole tubing on the slick corridor floor, fell, cracked his skull and died right there....would harr blame Daye for being careless with his push pole? The company that makes IV tubing? The people who make slick flooring for the hospital?

Dr. Nichols has it right.....she stabbed him.....he died.

Anonymous said...

sooo, now we learn from harr that the daye family gave consent to have mr daye's life support removed........a far cry from the medical murder allegations of earlier posts when harr told us that the evil (read, white oppressors) at duke murdered daye in order to hang mangum.
this story changes more frequently than my ex husband's undershorts.

Anonymous said...

Mangum's version has always been consistent and logical???? Say whaaaaaaaa? like the logical consistent account of the DNA depositing rape that never happened? that logical crystal? Or the logical consistent sister who said, initially, that nine guys raped her? Or was it six, or five, or three? Or, the logical consistent crystal who insisted the men did NOT use condoms and, later, conveniently recollected that maybe they DID use condoms when the EVIDENCE did not support her LIES.
Oh, lord, sid , adjust your meds.....
there is no evidence at this time that shows (a)the extent of damage to any door, (b)WHO did damage,(c)WHEN damage, if any, was done, and (d)HOW it was done. major dumb, major dumb, sid. Please.
Consistent logical Crystal Mangum.......right, sid. you are delusional.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist)

"A couple of the crimes for which [Reginald Daye] was charged included assault… one assault on a female.'

SIDN(inn)EY, what you say about this charge of assault on a female is that the DA dismissed the charge.

I say again, you probably intentionally omitted this part of the said charge of assault on a female.

It was pointed out to you before. Yet you still think you can get away with this.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"All you have to do is visit the links and review the documents to understand that all of the information is verified by documentation. Also, much of the information I got directly from Crystal herself".

I visited and viewed the documents you illegally posted. They do not verify the charges you made.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR:

"These drinking habits of Daye were observed by Crystal Mangum because around the beginning of March 2011, she and her three young children moved into Reginald Daye’s apartment at his invitation."

Judging from her performance after she falsely accused three innocent men or raping her, Crystal is in no way capable of accurately observing anything.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist.

"According to Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser, he would consume a case of beer on weekdays and down a gallon of whiskey on weekends."

AG Cooper's investigators observed that when confronted with inconsistencies in her narrative, Crystal tried to improvise explanations.

As I said in my last quote, Crystal is anything but a credible witness. That Crystal might have claimed this, it does not in any way even closely establish it as fact.

Anonymous said...

SIDN9inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Months prior to their cohabitation, Daye, attracted by Mangum’s notorious celebrity, sought a relationship with her, and around the middle of January 2011 he introduced himself to her."

Judging from other things Crystal has said and from what Reginald Daye's nephew said the night Crystal stabbed Reginald Daye, that is not credible.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite):

"It was after she had moved in with Daye that Crystal noticed his jealous nature as he confiscated her cell phone to monitor who she communicated with and for his own personal use.


Crystal Mangum noted that Reginald Daye had a pair of brass knuckles, and he admitted to her that he owned a gun, although she states that she never saw it. Daye also acknowledged to her that in the past he had been physically abusive with his girlfriends, but up until the morning of April 3, 2011, he never laid a hand on her."

Again this comes from Crystal. Crystal is not a credible witness. She has shown she will make up stories to support her version of what happened.

With regard to Crystal saying Reginald Daye owned a gun, in a court of law that would be hearsay and would not establish that Reginald Daye did own a gun.

Ask your friend Professor Coleman.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"
On March 25, 2011, Reginald Daye purchased a cashier’s check for $300, and on April 1, 2011, he purchased a cashier’s check for $400, both checks totaling $700 to cover the rent. On both checks the payee was listed as the apartment’s owner and Reginald Daye’s name was down as the remitter.


On the days they were purchased, March 25th and April 1, 2011, Mr. Daye gave both cashier’s checks to Crystal."

Again that is Crystal's story. Can you come up with any facts to support it? I think not.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Reginald Daye became angry with the attention Mangum was giving the officer and began demanding that she leave and accompany him into the apartment. When Mangum stalled, Daye became enraged, and proceeded to engage her in a heated argument."

That is not the police account of the encounter.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Once inside the apartment, the terror for Crystal Mangum would begin and last approximately an hour, from around two to three in the morning. In the living room, he punched her in the face and spit on her. When she ran to the master bedroom, he pursued; tackling her with the two of them on the bed. Mangum clung tight to the mattress as Daye lifted her and it up and deposited them on the floor.


After Crystal managed to free herself from Daye she ran to the bathroom in the master bedroom and locked the door behind her. Daye proceeded to kick in the door knocking it off its hinges, and he grabbed Crystal by her hair and drug her back into the bedroom… clumps of her hair being deposited by the bathroom door and on the mattress.


Mangum tried to grab her purse in order to flee, but Daye blocked her. Sometime thereafter he demanded that Crystal get up and leave the apartment. Anxious to comply, Daye held her down and told her, “You’re not going anywhere.”


After a period of time, Daye went to another part of the apartment momentarily leaving her alone in the bedroom. He later returned with a pot of boiling water and then left again. When Daye returned minutes later, he had a set of steak knives and began to throw them at her as she tried to shield herself with the mattress.


Crystal stated that Reginald Daye then began eerily having a conversation with himself discussing whether or not to kill her and finally concluding to do so."

Again, this is Crystal's story. None of the documents you posted, some of them illegally, do not back up that story

Anonymous said...

The ever sweet humble hard-working innocent professional victim, Mangum, moved into Mr. Daye's apartment (how utterly evil of Mr. Daye to offer his home and food to Mangum and her brood). Mangum apparently observes the sodden Mr. Daye, drinking like a fish, and remains in his home........exposing her children to the horrors of living with such a violent abusive gentleman. then, Mr. Daye (who is a deadbeat) gives Mangum the rent money (HE earned without taking his clothes off) and poor unsuspecting Crystal, having shacked up with Daye by now, continues to enjoy all the comforts of HIS home.
Mangum gets in a brawl with Daye, BOTH drinking, and the neighbors hear it.....BUT, they do not hear the "hour of sheer terror". Mangum rolls around the floor with Daye for an hour and gets herself beaten silly.............ooops, no, story changes......Mangum gets a scratch from Daye and bumped knee. Knives are flying through the air and hot water is....well, hot water is doing something dreadful. Mangum grabs a machete, no, make it a steak, no, cleaver, no paring knife....and impales Daye. then, she grabs her purse (every woman knows how important it is never to leave home without her makeup and kleenex).....runs (read, staggers) to her aunt's apartment and instructs her child in exactly what to tell 911.
The lovely "showgirl" of Kenny's night dreams, now half bald from all that hair pulling, winds up in jail because the evil drunken Daye, who opened his home to shelter her and her children, turned maniac.
Let's see......Mangum criminal record....nine CONVICTIONS, including violence, drunk driving, theft, destruction of property, and child abuse. Daye, criminal record....a couple of driving related offenses and a DROPPED CHARGE involving a woman.
Doesn't exactly sound like Clyde was the ring leader over Bonnie Mangum.......

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Reginald Daye went to the apartment in the same complex in which Carlos Wilson, his nephew, lived and told him that Crystal had stabbed him. Evidently they both told police and investigators that Crystal took his money, then stabbed him and fled … the only version presented by the mainstream media."

What other version was there to present? The versions you present, including this one, is not credible.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist:

"According to police notes, Crystal Mangum was cooperative in signing a consent to photograph her injuries and wanted to give a statement to police".

Why did said photographs fail to show any evidence of a sever beating to the face and head?

According to you, such a beating can occur and not leave any evidence.

That should not be surprising to anyone since you believe a DNA depositing rape can occur and not leave any evidence on the rape kit.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011 is false and misleading in concluding that Reginald Daye’s death was due to “complications of stab wound to chest.” There is no nexus established between the stab wound, which was successfully treated at surgery, and Daye’s brain death and removal from life support. This report fails to mention that Daye was comatose, was on life support, and that he died after being electively removed from life support.


The Investigative Autopsy Report of April 13, 2011 also came to a false and misleading conclusion attributing Daye’s death to “stab wound to chest” and declaring it was a homicide. This document is notable for its omissions in that it failed to mention that Daye was intubated prior to having a cardiac arrest, and it failed to mention that Daye passed away after being removed from life support."

Keep in mind, as someone previously said, SIDN(inn)EY examined the documents. Dr. Nichols examined the body.

Also, Dr. Nichols is an experienced forensic pathologist. SIDN(inn)EY, although a retired physician, has no credentials as an expert in forensic pathology.

This renders his statements about the autopsy non credible.

Anonymous said...

Let's just say I am in an apartment with my lover, who is the bill-payer of our arrangement. He and I are drinking and we have a lover's quarrel. It's gets wild and I stab his drunk Axx in "sheer terror" for my life.
What do I do next?
Why, of course, I grab my purse and run, not to the next door neighbor with the nearest phone to call the police. No, I run to my relative's house and tell my CHILD to call 911.
Now, think about this, if any readers are females. Would you, having fought a drunk, and stabbed him.....not flee immediately with nothing in your hands but your clothing....and would not not run to the nearest person or door you could find, bang on it, and scream bloody murder for the police....and would you not do everything you possibly could to SHIELD and PROTECT your children from the possibility of the violent attacker FOLLOWING you and potentially hurting your babies?????
Why no, you run, with purse, to a place known by your lover (not knowing how dead he might be.....) and there, you immediately expose your child to this murderous madman's potential appearance.
GIVE ME A BREAK, HARR. Even for YOU, this crap is too stupid for network TV

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)SRR(acist):

"The operative report specifically states that the stomach was normal and that there was no bleeding or lesions in the left kidney bed. There was no mention of the diaphragm or left lung in the surgical report."

In a laparotomy, the surgeon would not be able to visualize the lung, would not be able easily to visualize a laceration in the diaphragm. Remember that SIDN(inn)EY, in addition to having no experience in forensic pathology, also is totally lacking experience in surgery. That renders his comments on the surgery not credible or meaningful.

I say, as a former surgeon, it is conceivable that a hematoma around the kidney could have formed after the laparotomy.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

With regard to all your statements about the autopsy and the surgery, I point out again you have absolutely no experience in pathology, in forensic pathology or in surgery. This renders your statements speculation, not the opinion of an expert.

That you try to pass yourself off as an expert capable of making expert opinions regarding forensic autopsies and surgical procedures is another example of your deluded megalomania.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Having no legal training and not being a lawyer, Harr was not aware that by assisting Mangum with the drafting of the motions that he would be in violation of North Carolina statutes."

Which shows that, like his admirer KEN(inny), SIDN(inn)EY is not a very profound or astute thinker.

Like his delusion that he can render expert opinions regarding forensic autopsies and surgical procedures, SIDN(inn)EY does also think he can render expert opinions on legal matters.

His rather ignominious failure to push his frivolous lawsuit against Duke should have told him he was no legal eagle.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"He agreed to help Ms. Mangum because she had no access to the internet or a law library. In order to draft the motions he requested some of the prosecution’s discovery documents, including police reports and medical records."

Crystal had a competent lawyer who could have drafted motions for her, but Crystal's supporters drove him off the case.

SIDN(inn)EY, who claims he does nothing illegal, had no legal right to view or post those documents.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Concern about protecting the airway and providing high concentrations of oxygen led to the decision to intubate. Daye was then intubated with an 8 mm diameter tube, however the confirmatory EtCO2 test for its proper placement was negative. This resulted in a visual inspection of the tube’s placement, which was deemed to be properly positioned, and the tube was left in place.


In actuality the tube was not in the trachea and the lungs were deprived of oxygen. Subsequently, the blood cells were unable to carry life-requiring oxygen to the cells of the body."

Actually, SIDN(inn)EY, after repeated requests, described how he would document proper tube placement.

The people who treated Reginald Daye's cardiac arrest did a lot more than SIDN(inn)EY would have done to insure proper tube placement.

SIDN(inn)EY was not present to observe the code.

The allegation that the tube was improperly placed is not documented by the record SIDN(inn)EY posted, and is pure fantasy on SIDN(inn)EY's part.

Anonymous said...

Competent experienced surgeons and other currently working physicians have commented on harr's nonsense about daye's death. total baloney.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(innEY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Without exception, media accounts related to the April 3, 2011 incident devoted significant portions of their reports to the rehashing the Duke Lacrosse case and making false and misleading statements about the Duke Lacrosse defendants being exonerated and claiming as fact that Ms. Mangum lied about being sexually assaulted at the Duke Lacrosse beer-guzzling, stripper-ogling bacchanal."

The statements that the exoneration of the Lacrosse players were false and misleading is itself a falsification on the part of SIDN(inn)EY. The players committed no crime. Therefore they were innocent as a matter of fact. They were exonerated.

What is false and misleading is that the party on the night of 13/14 March was a "beer-guzzling, stripper-ogling bacchanal".

That SIDN(inn)EY would continue to post such false and misleading statements shows he believes the Innocent Lacrosse players are guilty and that he is conducting a vendetta against them. He does not care about Crystal. He cares only about his vendetta.

Anonymous said...

Know what.....I, like most reasonable people, want Mangum to have a fair trial. The question is not whether she caused his death. In spite of what harr says, Nichols' assessment is correct. She stabbed him and he died. I believe Walt and others have already commented on proximate cause and how it would apply in this case. I think most of us would agree that Walt knows far more about the law than harr.
The issue, then, is what kind of charge will ultimately stick? Is it first degree, second, manslaughter? I assume the defense will try to say mangum stabbed daye in self defense. that's all the excuse she has. so, ultimately the jury will decide.....not harr, not me, not any of us.
I am far more interested in hearing Walt and Lance comment on the whether they think first degree will stick, whether a lesser charge will be negotiated, etc. harr's opinions and wild fantasies hold no interest to me at all.
Cline has a well known history of over-charging in order to get convictions from plea deals. Perhaps we will see yet another example of her "unconscious" professionalism, even after she has, as they used to say about Elvis, "left the building"

Anonymous said...

Correction to my post of May 29, 2012 8:57 AM.

SIDN(inn)EY, what you DO NOT say about Reginald Daye being charged with assaulting a female is that the DA dismissed the charge.

I say again, that omission was probably intentional.

What shows you are not a very profound or astute thinker is that has been pointed out to you, but you still think you can get away with it.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"This action should have been executed by the defense attorney on day one… or shortly thereafter. Findings by the forensic pathologist will substantiate my assertion that the autopsy report, upon which the prosecution is basing its murder charge, is fraudulent and is totally lacking in credibility."

That supposes Woody Vann will be able to get a top notch forensic pathologist rather than some money hungry hired gun.

Remember, Willy Gary looked into the possibility of filing a civil suit on Crystal's behalf, then backed off and put distance between himself and Crystal. Crystal does not have much credibility.

Anonymous said...

One more for now, SIDN(inn)EY:

You claimed that this blog would be complete, accurate and definitive. It is not.

It is just more of the bullshit you have published on Sunday, May 6, 2012, Sunday, April 22, 2012, Thursday, April 12, 2012, and Saturday, April 7, 2012.

I have a suggestion for you. Have KEN(inny) cease reposting his comments and attributing them to Malek Williams.

Anonymous said...

Dear Malek.....
You get used more frequently than Mangum's pole grease. Kenny must like you.....ALOT

Anonymous said...

Funny how sid uses the word "stripper" will describing the hired women who he insists, at other times, to be innocent and doing nothing more than "dancing".
One wonders if sidney has a thang for our showgirl????

Anonymous said...

Same nonsense from the past five postings....except changed to fit.suit clear evidence that didn't support the last version of the "story".
Reminds me of Mangum, the lizard, changing her story (cover) to fit the evidence, over and over, when prior versions no longer fit. (didn't use condoms.....ooops, oh yes, they did)

The ONLY objective finding mentioned by the SANE was vaginal rediness and swelling....all the rest of the observations were subjective, as in, Mangum reporting Pain......and, in fact, the hospital reports showed no PHYSICAL manifestation of pain. Harr, supposedly an experienced doctor, should know/remember this.

Subsequently, the SANE had to admit that there could have been numerous causes for the redness and swelling she may have observed. To name a few....sexual contact, WHETHER CONSENSUAL OR NOT, use of a sex toy such as a vibrator (which mangum admitted using), a yeast infection which is not at all uncommon in women who are sexually active with multiple partners, excessive masturbation, etc. The simple presence of redness and swelling in a woman's vagina does NOT, by itself, indicate forced sexual contact. Ask any sexually active woman you know if she has ever had redness and swelling, say, on a long weekend with her partner.......and she is likely to laugh and say, "hell, yes, and it was wonderful getting it!!" Stupid to assume, as the SANE did, that rape was the conclusion. And ALL of this was brought out and clearly documented, when the SANE was discredited.

I say again that any sane woman, with children, who had just stabbed an attacker would run to the nearest/closest door/stranger, screaming bloody murder and yelling HELP. She would not, knowing that the attacker might follow, run to a location where her children were....and she sure as hell would not tell her CHILD to call 911. Also stupid of harr to attempt to make anybody believe mangum's so-called actions were/are remotely consistent with self defense.
in the words of my sainted grandma...bull balls!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"All you have to do is visit the links and review the documents to understand that all of the information is verified by documentation. Also, much of the information I got directly from Crystal herself".

I visited and viewed the documents you illegally posted. They do not verify the charges you made.

Not being a lawyer, there are many laws of which I am unfamiliar. Could you enlighten me as to which law I allegedly violated by posting some discovery online?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite):

"It was after she had moved in with Daye that Crystal noticed his jealous nature as he confiscated her cell phone to monitor who she communicated with and for his own personal use.


Crystal Mangum noted that Reginald Daye had a pair of brass knuckles, and he admitted to her that he owned a gun, although she states that she never saw it. Daye also acknowledged to her that in the past he had been physically abusive with his girlfriends, but up until the morning of April 3, 2011, he never laid a hand on her."

Again this comes from Crystal. Crystal is not a credible witness. She has shown she will make up stories to support her version of what happened.

With regard to Crystal saying Reginald Daye owned a gun, in a court of law that would be hearsay and would not establish that Reginald Daye did own a gun.

Ask your friend Professor Coleman.

I don't know whether or not Daye owned a gun or not. I believe that he told Crystal that he did. Whether this is hearsay or not, my flog is not a presentation in a court of law, but serves as a vehicle to educate and enlighten with information... especially since the mainstream media is bent on skewing the truth against Crystal.

Anyway, I find Crystal to be very credible. Her explanation makes sense, is logical and conforms to the evidence and prosecution discovery. Why, for example, would Mangum fight over two cashier's checks which are useless to her? Daye and his nephew's stories don't add up.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
sooo, now we learn from harr that the daye family gave consent to have mr daye's life support removed........a far cry from the medical murder allegations of earlier posts when harr told us that the evil (read, white oppressors) at duke murdered daye in order to hang mangum.
this story changes more frequently than my ex husband's undershorts.

I don't know how frequently your ex-husband changes his undershorts, so I have no point of reference. However, both scenarios are not incompatible. For example, hypothetically Daye's intubation may have been intentionally botched in a homicide attempt, which would not prevent Daye's family from deciding to remove their brain-dead relative from life support.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"
On March 25, 2011, Reginald Daye purchased a cashier’s check for $300, and on April 1, 2011, he purchased a cashier’s check for $400, both checks totaling $700 to cover the rent. On both checks the payee was listed as the apartment’s owner and Reginald Daye’s name was down as the remitter.


On the days they were purchased, March 25th and April 1, 2011, Mr. Daye gave both cashier’s checks to Crystal."

Again that is Crystal's story. Can you come up with any facts to support it? I think not.

I have no reason not to believe it... and it makes sense. According to Daye and his nephew, Crystal was in possession of the checks as Daye was allegedly trying to get them from her the morning of April 3, 2011. How else would she have the cashier's checks in her possession? Answer: He gave them to her!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Reginald Daye became angry with the attention Mangum was giving the officer and began demanding that she leave and accompany him into the apartment. When Mangum stalled, Daye became enraged, and proceeded to engage her in a heated argument."

That is not the police account of the encounter.


Actually, I have not seen a copy of the police officer's statement. I will see if I can get it.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Reginald Daye went to the apartment in the same complex in which Carlos Wilson, his nephew, lived and told him that Crystal had stabbed him. Evidently they both told police and investigators that Crystal took his money, then stabbed him and fled … the only version presented by the mainstream media."

What other version was there to present? The versions you present, including this one, is not credible.


For one thing, that statement is false as Crystal never took any money. The two cashier's checks may have been in her purse when she fled Daye's apartment, but the checks had been given to her by Daye and were in her purse prior to the argument... which was not financial or about the rent.

Remember, she was not charged with stealing money... so even the police did not believe Daye or his nephew!!

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I have no reason not to believe it... and it makes sense. According to Daye and his nephew, Crystal was in possession of the checks as Daye was allegedly trying to get them from her the morning of April 3, 2011. How else would she have the cashier's checks in her possession? Answer: He gave them to her!"

SIDN(inn)EY, you believe the innocent Lacrosse players are guilty of raping Crystal Mangum, you believe Crystal was the victim of the false rape case, you believe Mr. Nifong's downfall was the result of a carpetbagger jihad, the existence of which you can not prove. You may believe the story but that hardly gives it credibility.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)SRR(acist):

"The operative report specifically states that the stomach was normal and that there was no bleeding or lesions in the left kidney bed. There was no mention of the diaphragm or left lung in the surgical report."

In a laparotomy, the surgeon would not be able to visualize the lung, would not be able easily to visualize a laceration in the diaphragm. Remember that SIDN(inn)EY, in addition to having no experience in forensic pathology, also is totally lacking experience in surgery. That renders his comments on the surgery not credible or meaningful.

I say, as a former surgeon, it is conceivable that a hematoma around the kidney could have formed after the laparotomy.


So, in other words, your story is that the Duke Hospital surgeons missed a laceration to the diaphragm and the left lung... as well as missing a laceration to the stomach and the left kidney? I haven't seen any urine reports, but had the kidney been lacerated I am sure that there would have been plenty of blood in the urine.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

What you believe is true about the Reginald Daye stabbing will never make it into evidence unless Crystal herself takes the stand and testifies and opens herself to cross examination.

Maybe that is why you are so desperate to keep the case from going to trial.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(Acist):

"So, in other words, your story is that the Duke Hospital surgeons missed a laceration to the diaphragm and the left lung... as well as missing a laceration to the stomach and the left kidney? I haven't seen any urine reports, but had the kidney been lacerated I am sure that there would have been plenty of blood in the urine."

SIDN(inny), you apparently did not read my story. My story is you have absolutely no experience in surgery so what you claim about the surgery means nothing, just like your claims that the Innocent Falsely accused Lacrosse players were not exonerated.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011 is false and misleading in concluding that Reginald Daye’s death was due to “complications of stab wound to chest.” There is no nexus established between the stab wound, which was successfully treated at surgery, and Daye’s brain death and removal from life support. This report fails to mention that Daye was comatose, was on life support, and that he died after being electively removed from life support.


The Investigative Autopsy Report of April 13, 2011 also came to a false and misleading conclusion attributing Daye’s death to “stab wound to chest” and declaring it was a homicide. This document is notable for its omissions in that it failed to mention that Daye was intubated prior to having a cardiac arrest, and it failed to mention that Daye passed away after being removed from life support."

Keep in mind, as someone previously said, SIDN(inn)EY examined the documents. Dr. Nichols examined the body.

Also, Dr. Nichols is an experienced forensic pathologist. SIDN(inn)EY, although a retired physician, has no credentials as an expert in forensic pathology.

This renders his statements about the autopsy non credible.


Just be patient, mon anonymous ami. Attorney Vann is in the process of getting a forensic pathologist to review the autopsy reports. That should dispell any doubts you may have about my claims regarding the fraudulent nature of the autopsy reports.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"This action should have been executed by the defense attorney on day one… or shortly thereafter. Findings by the forensic pathologist will substantiate my assertion that the autopsy report, upon which the prosecution is basing its murder charge, is fraudulent and is totally lacking in credibility."

That supposes Woody Vann will be able to get a top notch forensic pathologist rather than some money hungry hired gun.

Remember, Willy Gary looked into the possibility of filing a civil suit on Crystal's behalf, then backed off and put distance between himself and Crystal. Crystal does not have much credibility.

Attorney Vann doesn't need to get a top notch forensic pathologist to review the autopsy reports... he needs to get any forensic pathologist. This is not that difficult as the problems with the autopsy reports are readily apparent.

As far as Willy Gary goes, I must've missed it. Could you enlighten me?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"...the checks had been given to [Crystal] by Daye and were in her purse prior to the argument... which was not financial or about the rent."

You originally said you had learned from reliable sources that the fight had been about alcohol. Crystal wanted to use the money to pay the rent but Mr. Daye wanted to use the money for alcohol.

Now you are saying is you got the wrong information. Was the original reliable source Crystal? I remind you, in the phony rape case she precipitated by falsely accusing the Lacrosse team members of raping her, Crystal changed her story just about every time she told it.

Did she change stories whenever she talked to you about the Daye stabbing. There is that likelihood.

In any event, if you are calling Crystal a reliable source, that is like calling the Grand Wizard of the KKK a great friend of the Black Community.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Competent experienced surgeons and other currently working physicians have commented on harr's nonsense about daye's death. total baloney.


What comments did they make? I explained what happened to Daye in this flog.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"...the checks had been given to [Crystal] by Daye and were in her purse prior to the argument... which was not financial or about the rent."

You originally said you had learned from reliable sources that the fight had been about alcohol. Crystal wanted to use the money to pay the rent but Mr. Daye wanted to use the money for alcohol.

Now you are saying is you got the wrong information. Was the original reliable source Crystal? I remind you, in the phony rape case she precipitated by falsely accusing the Lacrosse team members of raping her, Crystal changed her story just about every time she told it.

Did she change stories whenever she talked to you about the Daye stabbing. There is that likelihood.

In any event, if you are calling Crystal a reliable source, that is like calling the Grand Wizard of the KKK a great friend of the Black Community.


My original source about the argument was wrong. I got the correct version after talking directly to Crystal.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inny) H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Attorney Vann doesn't need to get a top notch forensic pathologist to review the autopsy reports... he needs to get any forensic pathologist. This is not that difficult as the problems with the autopsy reports are readily apparent.

As far as Willy Gary goes, I must've missed it. Could you enlighten me?"

If you do not know about Willy Gary's non involvement in the phony rape case, you haven't done much research. Why do you not use Google to find out? Is it the same reason why you do not use Google to find out what possibly soon-to-be-disbarred ex DA Tracey Cline did to Frankie Washington and Leon Brown.

As to Woody Vann's forensic pathologist, why do you cease trying to keep the case from getting to court and let said pathologist testify. Let's see what happens on Cross examination.

You seem fearful of Crystal being cross examined.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

If you truly believe your version of the truth will set Crysta free, why would she need a forensic pathologist as an expert witness.

I would like to read your answer. It should be interesting since you are so determined to keep the case from getting to court.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"What comments did they(experienced surgeons) make? I explained what happened to Daye in this flog."

No you didn't. You distorted what the records said, like your claim that the ET tube was placed in the esophagus.

Have any experienced surgeons supported your version of events?

I remind you you are not an experienced surgeon and are not competent to comment, at least in court, from a review of the records, on a surgical procedure.

Likewise, you have absolutely no experience in pathology, forensic or otherwise, and are not competent, at least in court, to comment on the accuracy of autopsy findings.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Just be patient, mon anonymous ami. Attorney Vann is in the process of getting a forensic pathologist to review the autopsy reports. That should dispell any doubts you may have about my claims regarding the fraudulent nature of the autopsy reports."

Is Mr. Vann planning on having his forensic pathologist testify in court and, thereby, submit to cross examination. If not, what he determines about the autopsy would not be admissable as evidence.

Do you recall a post in which I reminded you of the best evidence rule. If Mr. Vann tried to submit a written opinion of his pathologist as evidence, the court would say, produce the witness so he can be cross examined.

In any event, you seem to be dead set against the case going to court. The most likely reason is, I say, your account of what happened in the Reginald Daye stabbing would not be admissable unless Crystal testifies to it. That would open Crystal up to cross examination. A cross examination would be disastrous for Crystal.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"My original source about the argument was wrong. I got the correct version after talking directly to Crystal."

I believe your original source was Crystal and that she changed her story.

It is a pattern we have seen in the phony rape case which resulted from her false allegations that three Lacrosse players raped her.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"For example, hypothetically Daye's intubation may have been intentionally botched in a homicide attempt, which would not prevent Daye's family from deciding to remove their brain-dead relative from life support."

The records, which you had no legal right to view or publish establish the intubation was not botched. Therefore your hypothetical situation is irrelevant.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"...much of the information I got directly from Crystal herself... not secondhand. And Crystal should know what happened as she was there. Her version of events has always been consistent and logical."

If you really knew anything about the phony rape case which resulted from Crystal's false allegations of rape, you would realize that Crystal does not have a record of giving consistent and logical versions of events.

What she did in the cab stealing incident, steal a cab, lead the police on a high speed chase while drunk, attempting to run down a police officer, is a matter of public record, which record was compiled before the phony rape. Crystal recalls it as something entirely different.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(cist):

"Not being a lawyer, there are many laws of which I am unfamiliar. Could you enlighten me as to which law I allegedly violated by posting some discovery online?"

Any competent physician knows, under HIPPA, that one can not access or publish a patient's medical record unless he has the patient's written permission or the permission of the patient's family.

You reveal what a sorry excuse for a physician you are.

Anonymous said...

Harr never heard of HIPPA or PHI. He thinks it's some kinda of black record recording label and a fraternity at UNC. Give me a break, harr. You have told so many lies, you can't keep them straight.
There is a huge difference between opinion and fact. Harr presents as "fact" nothing more than HIS opinion (yeah, I know, no biased blogging on j4n....right.....) The man has not presented any FACTS or EVIDENCE except the publishing of confidential documents, including PHI, which should have NEVER, under any circumstances, appeared here. By the way, harr, HIPPA is a federal law......been around now, oh, say about ten years. Perhaps you may have heard of it. If not, push the little google button and enlighten yourself

Anonymous said...

I hope we all have noticed how harr conveniently fails to answer direct questions and pretends not to know.....etc. My favorite non-answer he gives is the one about, "I am not familiar with that, can you send me the link"....
or, the non-answer which often is "my sources told me".

notice how he focused on the poster's comment about the undershorts and frequency of change rather than the poster's REAL point, which was excellent, that shows how the harr version continues to morph....to suit evidence.

Evasive? Yes? Enlightening....pardon me, while I gag

Anonymous said...

Consistent and logical? Sister? That's right up there with "showgirl" Crystal....and hard working single mother, trying to go to college and sit in the front pew at church. Or, perhaps, it's poor professional victim Crystal. Or, maybe, it's Crystal, the pole vaulter who chugs beers, mixes and takes a stew of drugs, runs around in her underwear, uses a vibrator on herself in a motel, gives lap dances and steals cars...or perhaps it's just plain old chronic liar Crystal who lies for the fun of it

Anonymous said...

larceny is theft...cashier's checks are MONEY, harr. the checks did not belong to her. you now say daye was trying to get the checks back from her. another change to your story. you said the fight was over money or booze. now it isn't over money at all. It's a lover's quarrel. No, that's not right either. It's because daye observes an interaction with an officer. well, no, that's not it, either.....
geez, bro, make up your mind. or hers.....

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"According to Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser, he would consume a case of beer on weekdays and down a gallon of whiskey on weekends."

I must again correct you. Crystal is the victimizer/false accuser in the phony Duke rape case, in addition to being a non credible witness.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I don't know whether or not Daye owned a gun or not. I believe that he told Crystal that he did. Whether this is hearsay or not, my flog is not a presentation in a court of law, but serves as a vehicle to educate and enlighten with information... especially since the mainstream media is bent on skewing the truth against Crystal."

Nevertheless, Crystal's fate depends on the court. What you allege about the Reginald Daye stabbing would be hearsay if you tried to present it in court. Maybe that is why you are so reluctant to have the case go to court.

Incidentally, let me enlighten you, of burned out lightbulb of Raleigh. In all the years you have carried on your racially motivated vendetta against the innocent Lacrosse players, you have enlightened no one.

Anonymous said...

For KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

Where are the posts and comments from all of Crystal's supporters. In my opinion, Malek Williams does not count. You are reposting your own comments and attributing them to Malek Williams.

kenhyderal said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 5:07 said: " Where are the posts and comments from all of Crystal's supporters. In my opinion, Malek Williams does not count. You are reposting your own comments and attributing them to Malek Williams" Absolutely false. And what's worse is that you know that is not the case but maliciously post it anyhow. What's the definition of a troll again? I think Dr. Harr has posted an excellent analysis of this case and I an convinced that there is no way Crystal can be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of first degree murder and two counts of larcency. The extreme over-charging in this "non-case", which once again not properly investicated by the DPD, were designed to incarcerate Crystal and steal another year of her life.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY)pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"Absolutely false(that Ken(Iinny) is reposting his comments and crediting them to Malek Williams). And what's worse is that you know that is not the case but maliciously post it anyhow."

I find your denials not credible.

What is false is your contention that Crystal was raped on the night of 13/14 March 2006 but you continue to post it.

Why do you not ask the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players find that malicious?

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny(HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"I think Dr. Harr has posted an excellent analysis of this case and I an convinced that there is no way Crystal can be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of first degree murder and two counts of larcency."

If you think SIDN(inn)EY has posted an excellent analysis, then that shows you are not an astute or profound thinker.

Whether or not Crystal is found guilty is up to the court, not SIDN(inn)EY, yet SIDN(inn)EY believes his proclamation of innocence has more legal weight than anything the court finds.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"The extreme over-charging in this "non-case", which once again not properly investicated by the DPD, were designed to incarcerate Crystal and steal another year of her life."

What was a non case was the false accusations of rape Crystal made against innocent Caucasian men. You are unconcerned that via those false accusations, she tried to steal a number of years from their lives.

Consider that if you object to my naming you a hypocrite.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

Consider this:

We anonymi(as SIDN(inn)EY characterizes us) can not remove any posts we mess up. You can.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny), SIDN(inn)EY:

There are a number of posts on Liestoppers(read them if you are not afraid of the truth) which point out a number of similarities between Crystal's description of what happened in Reginald Daye's apartment and what happened in the House on 610 Buchanan Avenue.

Crystal's allegations of what happened on Buchanan Avenue has been proven to be absolutely false(even if KEN(inny) disputes this - KEN(inny) has repeatedly demonstrated he is not an astute or profound thinker).

Crystal is either not very creative or someone was coaching her.

Anonymous said...

3:35 i can't find the posts you mention on LS but i have heard there are remarkably similar stories from Mangum. She appears to have some kind of repeated fantasy about men overpowering her......this is at least the third time the same story elements have appeared. Sexual violence toward her that has been shown to be nonexistent.........two rape fantasies (the first in her teens that revealed no evidence of an attack) and now, blaming mr daye as an attacker based on fantasies about male jealousy.
I have no doubt there there was alcohol involved for both daye and mangum. I also think there was some kind of argument. Beyond that, who knows who did what to whom......when, for what reasons. It is pure speculation till the trial. Mangum can dream up all the story she wants. The truth lies in evidence.....not story...and certainly NOT in anything harr dribbles on this site

Anonymous said...

Harr reminds me of a childhood friend who loved to pretend he was, at various times, a fireman, a doctor, a football hero and, an astronaut. (he grew up to be a CPA). His role playing had elements of the authentic in it....he had a fireman's helmet, he had a stethoscope and he had a football. But he was playing and he knew the difference between play and reality. In Harr's case, he has lost all perspective, blinded by his own racial bias and hate.....he no longer sees his own limitations and he no longer is able to distinguish play from reality. It would be sad if his silliness at playing doctor and playing lawyer were limited to his own backyard. Unforunately, he has hurt Mangum's case.........definitely causing delays.....provoking the withdrawal of a very fine attorney...and lengthening time before trial. It is clear that Harr does NOT care about Mangum. He never has. What Harr cares about it himself, his own hate for white people and, apparently, his own self loathing. Years later, miles of documentation, reams of paper, ......being confronted with one harsh reality after another that Mangum lied, Nifong lied and....now....Mangum has killed........in the light of Daye, Harr is only blinded, yet again.
All the argument in the world will not enable Harr to admit to his own hate. What we can't see, we continue to run into. And that is Sidney Harr, stumbling over his own bigotry...and that is all there is to this huge storm of wind, piss and excitement. At its core....hate and bigotry.

Anonymous said...

Hmmm. "You're not going anywhere"....Mangum says, now, that Daye uttered those words.
Anybody remember the infamous quote she said was spoken to her by Dave Evans? It was, "Honey, you're not going anywhere".
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm........
Strangled, again?
locked in the bathroom, again?
Provoked by her own sexuality and attractiveness, again?
This is more fun than watching courageous vicky leaning over the rail at the Cline hearing.....!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Wouldn't it be interesting if SIDN(inn)EY testified at Tracey Cline's Bar hearing?

If he did, he would probably testify that Tracey Cline was being targeted by powerful forces who were trying to get her because of her support for fellow disgraced DA N(nny)FONG. Then SIDN(inn)EY would have to submit to cross examination, which would put into the public record his megalomaniacal delusions.

My guess, however, if Tracey asked him to testify, he would cut and run.

Of course, fellow disgraced DA NI(nny)FONG could testify. However he did not do so well on cross examination in his own Bar hearing.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous @ May 30, 2012 3:58 AM:

This is the thread on Liestoppers which describes all the similarities between Crystal's Buchanan Avenue Story and Crystal's Reginald Daye story. Go to Liestoppers discussion boards then go to the link "Duke Lacrosse.

"Mangum's latest version of the Daye story
(Buchanan St. redux?)"

kenhyderal said...

Anononymous @ 3:16 AM said: "We anonymi(as SIDN(inn)EY characterizes us) can not remove any posts we mess up. You can"...... I'm confused. You mean to say that no poster, other than me, can't delete a post they have made to make a correction to it and then re-post it? I do it all the time as a delete icon is found, for a time, following a post that I have made. Dr. Harr can you clarify this?

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 3:35 said: "There are a number of posts on Liestoppers(read them if you are not afraid of the truth) which point out a number of similarities between Crystal's description of what happened in Reginald Daye's apartment and what happened in the House on 610 Buchanan Avenue"...... This blog, so inaptly named, is a tool of the LaX Litigators and the main source of all the lies disseminated about Crystal. It's purpose is to aid and abet the obscene shake-down of the people of North Carolina, by way of their ongoing civil suits. If all goes accordingly they are anticipating another big pay-off.

Anonymous said...

Oh, kenny, bless your heart. what a vivid imagination you have.
In Texas when we are referring to someone who is, uh, "challenged" or a bit "special" in the brain department, we usually say, "oh, you know Earl, he is a little slow, bless his heart".
I love your scripting...."obscene shakedown".....
keep it up.... curly, larry and mo....you harr and malek.
wheeeeee

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 10:01 said: "you harr and malek"........ You've forgotten The Duke 88

Anonymous said...

""Having no legal training and not being a lawyer, Harr was not aware that by assisting Mangum with the drafting of the motions that he would be in violation of North Carolina statutes."

Dr. Harr, you have done much more than violate N.C. statutes; you may well have seriously compromised Ms. Magnum's defense.

At a minimum, you have given the prosecution a preview of her defense, which they would otherwise not have been entitled to, so they will have a much greater opportunity to poke holes in her story at trial.

At worst, if they can demonstrate that some fact stated in your "motion" is false, the prosecution can use the motion to argue that Ms. Magnum made what is called a "false exculpatory statement," which is admissible at trial as evidence of guilt.

Anonymous said...

Oh, the duke 88 have their own special place in whacko hell, as far as I'm concerned. right up there with jackie wagstaff, peterson, and burke.

Anonymous said...

I've always assumed "Malek" was DJ Register....

Anonymous said...

I would also add that by publishing PHI Harr has insulted the Daye family and the memory of Reginald Daye.....which further proves that (a)he is NO ethical physician or ever was one, and (b)does not give a damn about anybody but himself.
Details of medical records and treatment are protected by federal law for very specific reasons and there is/was no excuse or reason for Harr to obtain these records and to publish them.....but to draw attention to himself. The PHI belongs in court, in a highly structured and confidential environment and should NEVER have been exposed to public eyes.
I followed several high profile murder cases recently and, in your wildest imagination, would anyone have expected to see Ms. Taft's autopsy report or the report of the autopsy and related records from Eve Carson case published on the internet???? No decent professional provider, or any other person with even a modicum of ethical/conscience would publish PHI. I guess that explains it all though, doesn't it.
Harr wanted to draw attention to himself.
I cannot wait for the Bar to act, as well as Duke and the Daye family. Believe me, folks, the day is coming when Harr will be held accountable for his rotten behavior.

Anonymous said...

By the way, Harr, HIPPA applies to the deceased person's records as well as to living person's records. And the law is not only applicable to providers; it also covers people like you who obtain PHI illegally and publish it. Violations include fines and prison time. There is no circumstance in the law that would allow the PHI you obtained and published illegally to be excluded from consideration as a violation of HIPPA. The fact that you claim to be a retired physician puts you even more squarely in the spotlight of guilt because you KNEW what you were doing was illegal.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

If you truly believe your version of the truth will set Crysta free, why would she need a forensic pathologist as an expert witness.

I would like to read your answer. It should be interesting since you are so determined to keep the case from getting to court.


The charges against Crystal are so bogus and flimsy that one should not even dignify them by taking the case to trial.

The Durham prosecutors need to wave the white flag.

See, this sort of nonsense would not be happening if Mike Nifong were the Durham D.A.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"What comments did they(experienced surgeons) make? I explained what happened to Daye in this flog."

No you didn't. You distorted what the records said, like your claim that the ET tube was placed in the esophagus.

Have any experienced surgeons supported your version of events?

I remind you you are not an experienced surgeon and are not competent to comment, at least in court, from a review of the records, on a surgical procedure.

Likewise, you have absolutely no experience in pathology, forensic or otherwise, and are not competent, at least in court, to comment on the accuracy of autopsy findings.


It doesn't take a pathologist, surgeon, or any other specialist to understand what happened... and what is verified in the records. The endotracheal tube misplacement is confirmed by the negative EtCO2 result following the initial intubation. The fact that the second EtCO2 was positive verifies that the second intubation was successful. Period. End of story, chapter, and verse!

Anonymous said...

Harr, you violated HIPPA by illegally obtaining and publishing PHI? What will be your defense when you are charged with violations of HIPPA?

Anonymous said...

Wrong. Your incorrect analysis has already been discredited by other(s)....including Dr. Orgel, who cited specific references in support of his assertion that your interpretation and conclusions are completely and totally false.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"My original source about the argument was wrong. I got the correct version after talking directly to Crystal."

I believe your original source was Crystal and that she changed her story.

It is a pattern we have seen in the phony rape case which resulted from her false allegations that three Lacrosse players raped her.


Au contrare, mon ami... The original story that I received about the topic of the argument was from a source that turned out to be incorrect. As soon as I spoke directly with Crystal I learned the truth, and amended the narrative accordingly.

Anonymous said...

Mangum was an ugly hooker who had the DNA of several men in her nether regions but none of it was from the Duke lacrosse players because no white man would ever want to have sex with her.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
""Having no legal training and not being a lawyer, Harr was not aware that by assisting Mangum with the drafting of the motions that he would be in violation of North Carolina statutes."

Dr. Harr, you have done much more than violate N.C. statutes; you may well have seriously compromised Ms. Magnum's defense.

At a minimum, you have given the prosecution a preview of her defense, which they would otherwise not have been entitled to, so they will have a much greater opportunity to poke holes in her story at trial.

At worst, if they can demonstrate that some fact stated in your "motion" is false, the prosecution can use the motion to argue that Ms. Magnum made what is called a "false exculpatory statement," which is admissible at trial as evidence of guilt.


Ms. Mangum's defense has not been compromised in the least because her defense is the truth... something which the prosecution and the media does not want the public to know. That is why I published it.

It's amazing how you Mangum detractors are more concerned about alleged HIPPA violations than you are about fraudulent and false autopsy reports...

Get your perspectives in order, and then may ye thereby go enlightened.

Anonymous said...

It's amazing how wingnuts like you are more concerned with your own egos and your racism than respecting the LAW. Last time I checked HIPPA was still a federal LAW. Since you think the LAW does not apply to you, I can see why you do not respect it nor have any care that your violation has been hurtful to others.
You do not qualify to determine whether Mangum will be found guilty....that's not up to you. You will be held accountable for YOUR actions, which are reprehensible.
There is nothing fradulent or false about any of the medical records, decisions, care and treatment given to Reginald Daye. There is nothing, I repeat nothing, truthful about the fantasy account provided by you and Mangum. You can continue to blather on about your story......nobody gives a damn except peterson, the bigot and one or two other work-release halfwits. What matters in this case is not you; what matters is the evidence that will come out at trial and the ultimate JURY verdict. If you think Mangum should be released without a trial, why don't you get your bigoted Axx down to the courthouse and bail her out? Then, sit with Vann and tell him how YOU want the case to be handled and how YOU want to pay his fees. I am just certain he will comply with YOUR instructions.
What a bleepin' waste of bandwidth

Anonymous said...

by the way, harr, ignorance of the law is no excuse. Have you ever heard that phrase? It happens to be TRUE. I suggest you might want to find yourself a lawyer.......perhaps Cline would like to tackle your case when the Feds come after you for HIPPA violations.

Anonymous said...

Mangum for DA......"You're not going anywhere".....

Anonymous said...

Ken Edwards for DA.....Cut-n-paste justice is better than no conscious justice

Lance the Intern said...

Tracey Cline is likely to lose her license shortly, as the NC State Bar has filed a complaint identifying five separate acts that violated ethics rules...So it's doubtful that she'll be representing Dr. Harr.

Anonymous said...

Indeed......I read the complaint. It's pretty devestating and she is nailed with documentation. Perhaps Linwood would like to take a shot at helping out the good doctor.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Ms. Mangum's defense has not been compromised in the least because her defense is the truth... something which the prosecution and the media does not want the public to know. That is why I published it."

SIDN(inny), you have never published the truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist:

"Au contrare(sic), mon ami... The original story that I received about the topic of the argument was from a source that turned out to be incorrect. As soon as I spoke directly with Crystal I learned the truth, and amended the narrative accordingly."

Au contraire(please take note of the correct spelling. You seem to not use the same spell checker KEN(inny) does not use), SIDN(inn)EY, judging from Crystal's performance in past situation, I say it is credible that your original source WAS Crystal and that you changed your story when Crystal changed her story.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"It's amazing how you Mangum detractors are more concerned about alleged HIPPA violations than you are about fraudulent and false autopsy reports.."

You have not established as fact that the autopsy report was fraudulent and false. You only establish yourself as a somewhat less than an astute and competent physician.

And, when you published Reginald Daye's private medical records on line, you did violate federal law.

Do you believe, because you are black, you are above the law? It seems so to me.

Lance the Intern said...

"It's amazing how you Mangum detractors are more concerned about alleged HIPPA violations than you are about fraudulent and false autopsy reports..."

The only person claiming that the autopsy reports are fraudulent are you -- and...well, your acquaintance with the truth is passing (at best).

The pathologist who conducted the autopsy, Dr. Nichols, isn't "just" a pathologist. He's the NC Deputy Chief Medical Examiner. Prior to this position, he was the Director of the Dept of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the Medical College of South Carolina.

I think it's a safe bet that he forgotten more about performing autopsies than Dr, Harr has ever known.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"It doesn't take a pathologist, surgeon, or any other specialist to understand what happened... and what is verified in the records. The endotracheal tube misplacement is confirmed by the negative EtCO2 result following the initial intubation. The fact that the second EtCO2 was positive verifies that the second intubation was successful. Period. End of story, chapter, and verse!"

What is NOT verified in the record is that the endotracheal tube was misplaced. What IS verified between what is in the record and your statement as to how you confirmed tube placement, is that whoever intubated Mr. Daye did a whole lot more than you would have done to insure proper tube placement.

Your statement about what credentials one needs to be an expert on specific medical matters only shows, again, you are neither an astute nor competent physician.

If you are so sure of yourself, let's get the case to open court so you can testify in Crystal's behalf.

You are discouraging getting the case to court. Are you afraid of facing cross examination?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(yp0crite)ARR(acist:

"The charges against Crystal are so bogus and flimsy that one should not even dignify them by taking the case to trial."

That is up to the court to decide.Why are you so afraid to let the court decide that?

Your above proclamation has absolutely no legal weight, no basis in fact.

"See, this sort of nonsense would not be happening if Mike Nifong were the Durham D.A."

I agree with you there. Mike NI(nny)FONG would not have been able to buy the favor of Durham's Black population by prosecuting Crystal Mangum.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"This blog, so inaptly named, is a tool of the LaX Litigators and the main source of all the lies disseminated about Crystal. It's purpose is to aid and abet the obscene shake-down of the people of North Carolina, by way of their ongoing civil suits. If all goes accordingly they are anticipating another big pay-off."

KEN(inny), why are you afraid of the truth(which was published in the appropriately named Liestoppers discussion boards?

People who fear the truth do so because they do not tell the truth.

You have published a number of lies, like Crystal was raped on the night of 13/14 March 2006, that there were unidentified non-LAX attendees at the party who raped Crystal, that members of the Lacrosse team knew who they were but covered for them.

No one believes your racist hypocritical rantings, KEN(inny), except maybe for false accuser Crystal Mangum or fellow liar SIDN(inn)EY.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"I'm confused. You mean to say that no poster, other than me, can't delete a post they have made to make a correction to it and then re-post it? I do it all the time as a delete icon is found, for a time, following a post that I have made. Dr. Harr can you clarify this?"

That you are seriously confused has been apparent for some time now.

After all the reposts of your previous comments, attributed to Malek Williams but posted as anonymous comments, should have shown you that anonymous posters can not delete their comments after they are posted.

Why do you delete so many posts?

Anonymous said...

"Lance the Intern said...

"It's amazing how you Mangum detractors are more concerned about alleged HIPPA violations than you are about fraudulent and false autopsy reports..."

The only person claiming that the autopsy reports are fraudulent are you -- and...well, your acquaintance with the truth is passing (at best).

The pathologist who conducted the autopsy, Dr. Nichols, isn't "just" a pathologist. He's the NC Deputy Chief Medical Examiner. Prior to this position, he was the Director of the Dept of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the Medical College of South Carolina.

I think it's a safe bet that he forgotten more about performing autopsies than Dr, Harr has ever known."

SIDN(inn)EY, is this why you are afraid to testify in open court, to offer as evidence the claims you have made in your blog?

This posting by Lance the Intern should be a warning to you - if you did testify in open court about what you believe about the autopsy, you would be shredded into little tiny bits. You do not have the expertise or the experience to comment meaningfully.

Actually, your comment that began with something like, it doesn't take a pathologist, shows how lacking in authority you are in this situation.

kenhyderal said...

"The man who fears no truth has nothing to fear from lies" Thomas Jefferson Anonymous @ 2:22 said: "KEN(inny), why are you afraid of the truth(which was published in the appropriately named Liestoppers discussion boards"....... "The man who fears no truth has nothing to fear from lies" Thomas Jefferson. I have no fear of the truth but what I do fear is the irretrievable calumny such a deceptive purveyor of lies and distortions like The Duke LaCrosse Liestoppers Blog can so successfully disseminate. Supporting their favoured sons is one thing but doing so by cruelly trashing Crystal is another.(A cut & pasted quote apropos to what they do) "They come together like the Coroner's Inquest, to sit upon the murdered reputations of the week." Congreve, William

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA)cist)L:

"'The man who fears no truth has nothing to fear from lies' Thomas Jefferson"

That leaves you and SIDN(inn)EY out, KEN(inny).

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"I have no fear of the truth but what I do fear is the irretrievable calumny such a deceptive purveyor of lies and distortions like The Duke LaCrosse Liestoppers Blog can so successfully disseminate."

Yes you do fear the truth, as is demonstrated by your screed against the Liestoppers Blog and their forums.

One purveyor of lies is Crystal, via her false accusations of rape against three innocent men, and you try to further her deceptions.

Another purveyor of lies was DA NI(nny)FONG, via his declaration, before he had any evidence, that Lacrosse players were guilty of a racially motivated gang rape. Let's not forget his failed attempt to intimidate a witness(Moez Elmostafa) or his ignominious attempts to conceal exculpatory evidence from the accused.

Finally, there is SIDN(inn)EY who tries to promulgate lies, that Crystal was raped, that the Lacrosse players are guilty, that NI(nny)FONG's downfall was due to some non existent carpetbagger jihad(he has never offered any proof of that) and not his own quite obvious corruption.

KEN(inny) I again name you hypocrite.

Anonymous said...

Ken, i asked you questions on the last thread in response to your comment that the DPD failed to conduct a valid investifgation. You failed to answer.

I repeat the post below and ask one more question.


Ken: Your conclusion that this indicated a frame of the Players is not the one I would draw.

Ken, if this was not a frame, then why were Evans, Finnerty and Seligmann indicted with what Nifong later conceded was "no credible evidence" to support the charges?

Ken, if this was not a frame, why would the DPD not investigate if they had "no credible evidence" to support the charges?

Ken, do you really believe that Gottlieb, Himan, Clayton, Ripberger, Lamb, Hodges, Chambers and other officers are all grossly incompetent?

Why is the attempt to hold the DPD responsible for its failure to conduct a bona fide investigation, either through malice (a deliberate frame) or gross incompetence, considered to be an "obscene" response?

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"Supporting their favoured sons is one thing but doing so by cruelly trashing Crystal is another."

Crystal would not be the object of attention of a blog like liestoppers had she not attempted to trash the reputations of three innocent men, a fact which you choose to overlook.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"'They come together like the Coroner's Inquest, to sit upon the murdered reputations of the week.' Congreve, William"

A perfect description of what SIDN(inn)EY, you, and Kilgo have been doing to the innocent Lacrosse players in this blog. Kilgo, of course, lost his stomach for it once he exposed himself as a fraud.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

I call it an indicator of your own moral degeneration that you use a phony like Kilgo as a reliable source of information.

Anonymous said...

Kenny has temporarily abandon his reverend routine and is now in his literary mode. Ooooooooo, we are all so impressed, kenny. Golly gee whiz. As my favorite characters once said,
" There they go and I must hasten after them, for I am their leader". From Pogo
He who uses a four dollar word when a nickel will do is lacking in clarity of thought and appreciation of simplicity. Einstein
She stabbed him. He died.
Nichols

Lance the Intern said...

While we're tossing out quotes:

"Harr’s blog and website are an appropriate tribute to Nifong [and Crystal Mangum], in terms of both tone and intellectual quality."
KC Johnson

Anonymous said...

That's what we love about the Professor.......brillant

Lance the Intern said...

Brad Bannon recently spoke to Broughton High School about DNA and the Duke LAX case. It's an excellent explanation about the exculpatory nature of the DNA in the case. You can read it here.

kenhyderal said...

Thanks Lance for that link. I found it informative and came to the conclusion that, once DNA from Evans could not definitely link him to an assult on Crystal, he was satisfied.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 6:22 said: That's what we love about the Professor.......brillant"....... Here is another view of the Professor. http://truthaboutkcjohnson.wordpress.com/

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 4:31 SAID: "Ken, if this was not a frame, then why were Evans, Finnerty and Seligmann indicted with what Nifong later conceded was "no credible evidence" to support the charges?
......THE KEY WORD HERE IS "LATER"
Ken, if this was not a frame, why would the DPD not investigate if they had "no credible evidence" to support the charges? BEACAUE OF THEIR SLOPPY INITIAL INVESTIGATION THEY REALIZED THAT CREDIBLE EVIDENCE WOULD NOW BE DIFFICULT TO OBTAIN AND BESIDES THE DA'S OFFICE WAS COMING TO THE CONCLUSION THAT DUE TO THIS INITIAL SLOOPY POLICE WORK THEY COULD NEVER GET A CONVICTION
Ken, do you really believe that Gottlieb, Himan, Clayton, Ripberger, Lamb, Hodges, Chambers and other officers are all grossly incompetent" WELL THEY DIDN'T COVER ALL THE BASES. THEY DIDN'T REALIZE THAT THE PLAYERS WOULD BE ABLE TO MOUNT A "DREAM TEAM" AND
SECURE AN AQUITTAL
Why is the attempt to hold the DPD responsible for its failure to conduct a bona fide investigation, either through malice (a deliberate frame) or gross incompetence, considered to be an "obscene" response? BECAUSE COMPROMISING JUSTICE IS AN OBCENITY

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 5: 03 said: She stabbed him. He died.
Nichols...... She stabbed him (in self-defence) He died ( following a medical misadventure at DUH) Harr

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"'... Anonymous @ 6:22 said: That's what we love about the Professor.......brillant'....... Here is another view of the Professor. http://truthaboutkcjohnson.wordpress.com/"

KEN(inny) so you found someone who does not like Professor Johnson because he tells the truth about the phony accusations against the Duke Lacrosse players. As I said before you actually fear and hate the truth because you do not tell the truth, and your gloating over this meaningless blog is proof of it.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite(DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"Anonymous @ 5: 03 said: She stabbed him. He died.
Nichols...... She stabbed him (in self-defence) He died ( following a medical misadventure at DUH) Harr"

SIDN(inn)EY did not establish that Mr. Daye died of a medical misadventure. His claim that a record, which he illegally posted, confirms this only confirms that SIDN(inn)EY is neither an astute nor a knowledgeable physician.

There is no evidence that Crystal acted in self defense.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"WELL THEY DIDN'T COVER ALL THE BASES. THEY DIDN'T REALIZE THAT THE PLAYERS WOULD BE ABLE TO MOUNT A 'DREAM TEAM' AND SECURE AN AQUITTAL".

Since you are a Canadian, I guess that you are unaware that in the United States, those suspected of a crime are entitled to representation by counsel.

What NI(nny)FONG and his DPD minions did not comprehend is that the falsely accused Lacrosse players would retain adequate counsel and fight the patently false allegations rather than cave in to the bullying.

This quote does seem to support my opinion of you and SIDN(inn)EY, namely, you believe the innocent Lacrosse players should have been convicted because they were Caucasians who were accused by a black woman. That they were innocent as a matter of fact is irrelevant.

That is one reason why I name you and SIDN(inn)EY racist.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"BEACAUE OF THEIR SLOPPY INITIAL INVESTIGATION THEY REALIZED THAT CREDIBLE EVIDENCE WOULD NOW BE DIFFICULT TO OBTAIN AND BESIDES THE DA'S OFFICE WAS COMING TO THE CONCLUSION THAT DUE TO THIS INITIAL SLOOPY POLICE WORK THEY COULD NEVER GET A CONVICTION"

KEN(inny), what you say is more of your deluded racist ranting.

If DA NI(nny)FONG realized he could never get a prosecution, for whatever reason, he was ethically and legally obligated not to prosecute. Yet, in spite of no evidence to convict, he proceeded.

That you do not recognize this as a wrongful prosecution is yet more evidence you are afraid of the truth.

Anonymous said...

Harr excuses for breaking the law
1. I didnt know about the law and so i didnt know it was wrong
2. The end justifies the means. It was ok to illegally publish information because it was what i thought i needed to do
3. It was ok tomdo what i did because somebody gave me information and said it was ok to do what I did

Harr braoke federal law when he illegally obtained and published PHI

Anonymous said...

The court jury will decide whether it was self defense. Proximate cause applies in this case. Daye died because mangum stabbed him. period.

Anonymous said...

Bannon is first rate. Cannot believe the deceit of nifong and the lab director. The side the scientists should be on is science! What a statement lance

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"Why is the attempt to hold the DPD responsible for its failure to conduct a bona fide investigation, either through malice (a deliberate frame) or gross incompetence, considered to be an "obscene" response? BECAUSE COMPROMISING JUSTICE IS AN OBCENITY"

Yet you do not think Crystal compromised justice for falsely accusing three innocent Lacrosse players of raping her(she was the one who picked them out on the improper lineup procedure - she could have honestly said she did not recognize anyone), or that DA NI(nny)FONG compromised justice when he prosecuted them in the face of definitive evidence that the rape did not occur.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"Anonymous @ 4:31 SAID: 'Ken, if this was not a frame, then why were Evans, Finnerty and Seligmann indicted with what Nifong later conceded was "no credible evidence' to support the charges?
......THE KEY WORD HERE IS 'LATER'.

Indeed the key word is "LATER". What is key is DA NI(nny)FONG "LATER" admitted he attempted to frame the defenders.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"BEACAUE OF THEIR SLOPPY INITIAL INVESTIGATION THEY REALIZED THAT CREDIBLE EVIDENCE WOULD NOW BE DIFFICULT TO OBTAIN AND BESIDES THE DA'S OFFICE WAS COMING TO THE CONCLUSION THAT DUE TO THIS INITIAL SLOOPY POLICE WORK THEY COULD NEVER GET A CONVICTION"

So, KEN(inny) why was DA NI(nny)FONG making public statements that he was certain a racially motivated gang rape happened and that members of the Lacrosse team were the perpetrators?

Why did DA NI(nny)FONG tell the crowd at the NCCU forum that the case was not going away?

Why did DA NI(nny)FONG have the police conduct an improper lineup procedure to get Crystal to identify people he could indict?

Why did DA NI(nny)FONG indict three innocent men against whom he had no credible evidence?

That all spells attempted frameup.

That all adds up to an OBSCENE COMPROMISE OF JUSTICE!!!

You are not the least upset about such an OBSCENE COMPROMISE OF JUSTICE. You demonstrate again your deluded racist hypocrisy.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

You describe the police work as "SLOOPY".

Are you saying that the police work was like a single masted sailing vessel with a mainsail and jib.

If so, you better teach yourself what police work is all about.

How can you condemn police work when you show you do not even know how to describe it.

You don't use the same spelling checker which SIDN(inn)EY does not use.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"WELL THEY DIDN'T COVER ALL THE BASES. THEY DIDN'T REALIZE THAT THE PLAYERS WOULD BE ABLE TO MOUNT A "DREAM TEAM" AND SECURE AN AQUITTAL(sic)"

First, you demonstrate again you do not know how to use a spell checker.

If they truly did not believe that the players would retain competent counsel and defend themselves, they truly are incompetent. It shows the Durham Police lacked a basic knowledge of the Constitutionally guaranteed right to counsel. That is pathetic.

Could it be, because the police officers(Gottlieb, Himan, Clayton, Ripberger, Lamb, Hodges, Chambers and other officers), because they did not realize the players had a basic Constitutional right to counsel, believed they could file false charges and then the players would cave in to them?

If so, it was an attempted frame up.

Anonymous said...

Harr uses what I would call accomodation.....when evidence proves him wrong (as it does, over and over).....he accomodates by adjusting his version of "facts". He adjusts by saying his "sources" were wrong, or, he talked to Mangum and "now" he presents the next version of the "truth". He accomodates by excusing his tactics as necessary to get at what he perceives to be some superior form of analysis, expertise, etc. He accomodates by repeatedly dodging the meat of a question and focusing, instead, on the insignificant or the unimportant. His evolution theories of how Mangum could keep changing her story without demonstrating that she is LYING are truly comical.
It is helpful at times to take a step back, to look from a long view, at Harr and why he does what he does. This cheap blob is his attempt to get in the limelight and to get behind a microphone. the man is desperate for attention. That's really all this is and if you see it for what it really is.....then all the rest of his antics can be judged accordingly. The laughable "press conference" was nothing more than a mike, amp, and three wingnuts standing on the sidewalk....talking in front of a couple of media folks. The silliness with the duke case got him a very sharp reprimand from a senior judge......but, to harr, it brought what he wanted.....attention. remember, bad attention beats no attention....and harr wants, more than anything , to be noticed.
Every comment he makes should be taken as lightly as it the hot air that blows out of his mouth.
Let's hope that he enjoys the attention he will undoubtedly get from the consequences of illegally obtaining and publishing confidential/restricted information.

Anonymous said...

oops, kenny alert......I think I misssss-spelllled some words in the last post. but, there was no cut-n-paste, quote man.....
signed, malek....;)

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"Thanks Lance for that link. I found it informative and came to the conclusion that, once DNA from Evans could not definitely link him to an assult on Crystal, he was satisfied."

Now, explain why DA NI(nny)FONG indicted him, even though Crystal could not reliably identify him(she claimed David Evans had a mustache - he never had a mustache)?

If that is a not a deliberate attempt to frame David Evans, which is an OBSCENE PERVERSION OF JUSTICE, then what is?

That you do not recognize David Evans' indictment as an OBSCENE PERVERSION shows again that you are a deluded racist hypocrite.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite(DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"Thanks Lance for that link. I found it informative and came to the conclusion that, once DNA from Evans could not definitely link him to an assult on Crystal, he was satisfied."

Let me rephrase. What would David Evans be satisfied about if the DA, who had no evidence to link him to an alleged assault on Crystal, would use a flawed, unreliable identification as an excuse to indict him?

This statement of yours is another indication as to how flawed and deluded your thinking is.

Anonymous said...

The Bannon notes (from the link Lance provided) are, even now, startling....Bannon did a masterful job of sorting through reams of paper to find the very real and unlawful coverup and conspiracy. NOT the false conspiracy that harr has nightdreams about.....but the REAL conspiracy among nifong, the lab, nifong's henchmen. To KNOW those guys could not have possibly carried out a DNA depositing attack without leaving a single shred of DNA in,on, or around Mangum...and STILL go forward with their prosecution.....is, frankly, still shocking. I will never forget the Bannon portion of the Nifong hearing.....and watching nifong's face. ("We're Fxxxxx")
remember the investigator? priceless......
One thing that experienced proved was that , absent character (translated, ethics), any corruption of the law is possible , justifiable and able to be rationalized.

Anonymous said...

I say again that we want a fair trial for Mangum. She deserves it. I find it the height of hypocrisy for Harr to be whining that Mangum ought to be released on HIS version of events...the evolving lizard, ever changing "truth"......and yet Harr, to this day, whines that the LAX guys should have been taken to trial.
In fact, if Harr were her attorney and if Harr could produce HARD EVIDENCE that was TOTALLY EXCULPATORY, then Harr could push for letting Mangum go without a trial. No such evidence exists, and Vann has made no such demand.
There are three questions that, to this lay person's simple mind, must be settled in a trial.
1. Did she stab him, does proximate cause stand up, etc.? (survey says....yep)
2. Was it first degree? (survey says....doubt first degree, bet it might be lesser)
3. Self defense? (survey says....unknown and will depend on the EVIDENCE presented at trial)
Before Kenny gets all lathered up and attacks the "survey" credibility......it's a phrase on a dumb network TV show, quote-man.

by the way, Harr.....where's all your hard evidence concerning all this hair pulling that was supposed to have been carried out, by Daye, during the so-called hour of terror? and where is the evidence to prove it was her hair, pulled out by the root, at that specific time?
I DARE you to explain, without playing your usual dodgeball, how the LAX guys could have carried out a DNA depositing rape, attack, forced suspension in the air, stragulation, oral, anal and vaginal rape....with ejaculation....in a very small bathroom WITHOUT LEAVING ONE TINY SPLAT OF THEIR DNA ANYWHERE. And I dare you to explain how Mangum could be considered remotely credible when she lied to the officers who questioned her by saying that her last sexual contact prior to the party was one week prior, with her boyfriend.......only to have the DNA testing to show that there were multiple male samples in and on her. I dare you to explain how Mangum could be considered credible when she CHANGED HER STORY on whether the men used condoms.....just so it would fit the evidence.
Come on, Harr......give us another sample of your tap dancin'

Lance the Intern said...

Kenhyderal stated "Thanks Lance for that link. I found it informative and came to the conclusion that, once DNA from Evans could not definitely link him to an assult on Crystal, he was satisfied."

I'm not sure what you're saying here -- do you mean to say that the ONLY conclusion you came to is that the DNA could not link Evans to an assault? No conclusion about the exculpatory nature of the DNA results that were withheld from the defense?

Or are you insinuating that the defense team (and Brad Bannon in particular) stopped looking further at the DNA results once their particular clients were no longer linked to the DNA. Thus denying Crystal the opportunity to clearly identify her "attackers"?

If it's the former, I suggest you re-read the article.

If it's the latter, I'm not quite sure how to respond. The defense team's responsibility WAS proving that the defendants did not commit a crime. They had no responsibility beyond that. The exculpatory nature of the DNA tests went a long way toward proving the defendants' innocence.

If your conclusion is that the DNA evidence could have identified Crystal's true attackers, but wasn't pursued, that is the failure of the "minister of justice" Mike Nifong, who showed his true colors by attempting to incarcerate 3 innocent men rather than find these so-called "attackers". All in an effort to further his political career.

Anonymous said...

Further to Lance's point, the lab and Nifong attempted to rationalize their failure to disclose ALL the results from the testing was that THEY did not want to involve/expose etc, "others". THEY claimed that there was no reason to hand over the full results (that showed multiple male samples, NONE of which were from ANY of the LAX players)....was because they wanted to, in effect, protect and shield others. (which was bull.....since, in fact, the results that NIfong failed to turn over were an attempt to hide the truth.......which was that the LAX guys did NOT rape/attack/molest/play doctor with Mangum

Anonymous said...

I just came from Liestoppers(KEN(inny), run the way Dracula runs whenever he sees the cross). A poster named Sceptical makes a point, that SIDN(inn)EY has telegraphed to the prosecution what Crystal's defense will be, allowing the prosecution to prepare to demolish it.

Actually, SID)inn)EY has put two different accounts of what happened. The public record has further impaired Crystal's almost non existent credibility.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

Consider this quote from Anonymous @ May 31, 2012 6:51 AM:


"they(Nifong and Meehan) wanted to, in effect, protect and shield others. (which was bull.....since, in fact, the results that NIfong failed to turn over were an attempt to hide the truth.......which was that the LAX guys did NOT rape/attack/molest/play doctor with Mangum.

The point is, if anyone tried to shield Crystal's unknown attackers(I say again the presence of such unknowns has not been established as fact) it was DA NI(nny)FONG and Brian the obfuscator Meehan.

Anonymous said...

Agreed 100% with you......nifong should be kenny hissy's real villan.

kenhyderal said...

I've always had a disagreement with Former DA Nifong about his handling of the case. The thrust of which, never was justice for the victim, Crystal. The last time I had this discussion with Lance he defended Nifong saying he had more knowledge about the case then I did.

Anonymous said...

Smokey the bear has more knowledge about the case than you do kenny. I think lance might agree with me

Anonymous said...

Nifong had one goal in mind.....election as the DA. Period. Screw justice screw the accused. Screw mangum. Anybody who lives in this town knows that is ALL he wants.......and he got his axx caught, thank god.
I will also point to the obvious.....there was not one shred of hard evidence that anybody raped mangum......

Lance the Intern said...

FWIW, I still think Nifong has more knowledge about the case than you do. Case in point -- he never relied on Sidney or Kilgo for "information".

Nifong at least had the information ("We're f*cked"), and chose to ignore it and/or hide it in order to prosecute 3 innocent men.

You, on the other hand, have done nothing more than create a fictitious "one-armed man" scenario to somehow justify your claim that Crystal was attacked.

You've started with a conclusion ("Crystal was raped")and worked your way backward in an attempt to validate your conclusion. I believe there's a term for that...

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"I've always had a disagreement with Former DA Nifong about his handling of the case. The thrust of which, never was justice for the victim, Crystal. The last time I had this discussion with Lance he defended Nifong saying he had more knowledge about the case then I did."

Why don't you copy and paste what Lance said. It seems to work well enough in getting "Malek Williams" comments on the blog.

Besides you got it wrong. Crystal was the victimizer who falsely accused three innocent men of rape. Justice for her would have been a criminal conviction and a jail term, in the least.

Forensic testing of the rape kit established definitively that Crystal was not raped on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

Anonymous said...

As one of the few women who apparently read and post here, i will say that i find hiring strippers ,using harr's word, to be morally repugnant but it is not against the law. I also think prostitution is reprensible but i remind harr tht mangum was selling herself and clients were buying. You dont call that prostitution, I sure as hell do.
I will also add that mangum's story about her behavior the night of the lax party and the night of the daye incident is totally inconsistent with what rape victims do. Read the research, harr, if you dare. Nothing about mangum's actions says rape victim.

Anonymous said...

As one of the few women who apparently read and post here, i will say that i find hiring strippers ,using harr's word, to be morally repugnant but it is not against the law. I also think prostitution is reprensible but i remind harr tht mangum was selling herself and clients were buying. You dont call that prostitution, I sure as hell do.
I will also add that mangum's story about her behavior the night of the lax party and the night of the daye incident is totally inconsistent with what rape victims do. Read the research, harr, if you dare. Nothing about mangum's actions says rape victim.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist:

"Au contrare(sic), mon ami... The original story that I received about the topic of the argument was from a source that turned out to be incorrect. As soon as I spoke directly with Crystal I learned the truth, and amended the narrative accordingly."

Au contraire(please take note of the correct spelling. You seem to not use the same spell checker KEN(inny) does not use), SIDN(inn)EY, judging from Crystal's performance in past situation, I say it is credible that your original source WAS Crystal and that you changed your story when Crystal changed her story.


Thank you for enlightening me about the proper spelling of "contraire." Since I never took a French course, I was unfamiliar with its spelling.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"It's amazing how you Mangum detractors are more concerned about alleged HIPPA violations than you are about fraudulent and false autopsy reports.."

You have not established as fact that the autopsy report was fraudulent and false. You only establish yourself as a somewhat less than an astute and competent physician.

And, when you published Reginald Daye's private medical records on line, you did violate federal law.

Do you believe, because you are black, you are above the law? It seems so to me.


It seems to me that you are playing the race card. What does the fact that I am black have to do with me being "above the law?"

kenhyderal said...

Lance @ 10:45 said: "FWIW, I still think Nifong has more knowledge about the case than you do. Case in point -- he never relied on Sidney or Kilgo for "information"........ I rely on Crystal.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"I'm confused. You mean to say that no poster, other than me, can't delete a post they have made to make a correction to it and then re-post it? I do it all the time as a delete icon is found, for a time, following a post that I have made. Dr. Harr can you clarify this?"

That you are seriously confused has been apparent for some time now.

After all the reposts of your previous comments, attributed to Malek Williams but posted as anonymous comments, should have shown you that anonymous posters can not delete their comments after they are posted.

Why do you delete so many posts?


For the record I have only deleted one post, and it was at the behest of someone who stated that the anonymous commenter had libeled them. Since the commenter was anonymous and the individuals named were defamed and claimed to suffer as a result of the comment, I removed it.

It is against policy of this blogsite to delete comments without sufficient cause, as in the example aforementioned.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
While we're tossing out quotes:

"Harr’s blog and website are an appropriate tribute to Nifong [and Crystal Mangum], in terms of both tone and intellectual quality."
KC Johnson


Thank you, KC. I take that as a compliment.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"I rely on Crystal."

Then you rely on an individual who is neither a credible nor reliable witness.

Upon which part of Crystal's story do you rely - do you rely on the story that 3 men raped her, that 5 men raped her, that 20 men raped her, that she was levitating in the bathroom when she was raped?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
As one of the few women who apparently read and post here, i will say that i find hiring strippers ,using harr's word, to be morally repugnant but it is not against the law. I also think prostitution is reprensible but i remind harr tht mangum was selling herself and clients were buying. You dont call that prostitution, I sure as hell do.
I will also add that mangum's story about her behavior the night of the lax party and the night of the daye incident is totally inconsistent with what rape victims do. Read the research, harr, if you dare. Nothing about mangum's actions says rape victim.


Thank you for your comments. I hope that many women join in the conversation in the future, if they already have not.

The focus of my current flog is on the incident of April 3, 2011, which led to the state's outrageous charges of first degree murder and two-count larceny against Ms. Mangum. I am not interested in debating the Duke Lacrosse case... however, with regards to the exotic dancing or stripping, or whatever you choose to call it, it is honest and legal work, and I respect Crystal for doing it to help support herself and her family. Keep in mind that she went to that assignment based on false pretext made by a Duke Lacrosse player that it was to be entertainment for a small bachelor party of four or five.

I look forward to your comments in the future.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Thank you for enlightening me about the proper spelling of "contraire." Since I never took a French course, I was unfamiliar with its spelling."

I have never taken a French course but I was familiar with the correct smelling. You could have familiarized yourself with the proper spelling had you done a google search. You did not.

Just like you never did a google search on the names Frankie Washington and Leon Brown. Then you plead ignorance when asked if you were familiar with Tracy Cline's mistreatment of them.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Keep in mind that she went to that assignment based on false pretext made by a Duke Lacrosse player that it was to be entertainment for a small bachelor party of four or five."

Keep in mind that Crystal acted under false pretenses, that she was white. The Duke Lacrosse players asked for white dancers. Crystal did not meet that qualification.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"For the record I have only deleted one post, and it was at the behest of someone who stated that the anonymous commenter had libeled them. Since the commenter was anonymous and the individuals named were defamed and claimed to suffer as a result of the comment, I removed it.

It is against policy of this blogsite to delete comments without sufficient cause, as in the example aforementioned."

SIDN(inny), if you had read the comment, I had asked KEN(inny), not you, why he deleted comments.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn(EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

You are black.

Judging from many of your posts, your statements, e.g. your legally meaningless claim that the charges against Crystal are baseless, your statement that you should not be held accountable for illegally publishing Reginald Daye's medical record, says loud and clear you believe you are above the law.

I am asking if it is because you are black.

It is also my opinion you believe Crystal is above the law because she is black.

You also seem to espouse the position that the innocent Caucasian Lacrosse players should have been wrongfully convicted becuse they were accused by a black woman.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"It seems to me that you are playing the race card.

In claiming that NI(nny)FONG's downfall was orchestrated by a carpetbagger jihad because of outrage over a black woman accusing white men, are you saying that you have not played the race card.

You have played and continue to play the race card.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I am not interested in debating the Duke Lacrosse case".

If that is true it is because you have lost the stomach to face the criticism of the ridiculous nature of the allegations you make, most of which are false, like Crystal was the victim in the Duke Lacrosse case.

Lance the Intern said...

Kenhyderal said" I rely on Crystal."

Really? To the best of my knowledge, Crystal has yet to claim that someone other than the Duke LAX players assaulted her. That little gem was (to the best of my knowledge) first espoused by Kilgo and you continued to trumpet it.

With that said, by all means please continue to rely on Crystal. I'm sure Kenneth McNeill, Richard Ramseier, Milton Walker (whom she threatened to stab, BTW) and Reginald Daye (whom she DID stab) all relied upon her at some point as well.

For all the good it did them.

kenhyderal said...

Lance said: "Really? To the best of my knowledge, Crystal has yet to claim that someone other than the Duke LAX players assaulted her. That little gem was (to the best of my knowledge) first espoused by Kilgo and you continued to trumpet it"........... Crystal, had no way of knowing whether a person was a Player or a Guest. Kilgo's friend and informant was a Player. This Player, according to Kilgo, claimed he had no involvement whatsoever but was a wittness to the rape, perpetrated by non-Player, Guests. He claimed the perpetrators were aided and abetted by certain Players who helped restrain Crystal. If this is so, these Players are guilty, as well, of kidnapping and sexual assult. When DNA results failed to implicate any of the Players the threats of DA Nifong to prosecute those who withheld information held little fear. It's my understanding that it's not fear of prosecution but conscience(à la Raskolnikov) that is causing Kilgo's friend this moral dilemma betwenn loyalty to his former team mates, jeopardizing the on-going civil suits and "doing the right thing"

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA)cist)L:

"Kilgo's friend and informant was a Player."

Kilgo's friend and informant is not existent.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

By again citing Kilgo, you admit you rely on sources even less credible than false accuser Crystal.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"This Player, according to Kilgo, claimed he had no involvement whatsoever but was a wittness(KEN(inny) again fails to use a spell checker) to the rape, perpetrated by non-Player, Guests."

This is proof that said player does not exist.

Forensic examination of the rape kit conclusively proved that no rape took place at the Lacrosse party. Ergo, no one at the party could have witnessed a rape.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"He(Kilgo's non existent Lacrosse player) claimed the perpetrators were aided and abetted by certain Players who helped restrain Crystal".

We have further proof that this Lacrosse player does not exist.

It was definitively proven, via the forensic testing of the rape kit, that no rape happened.

Ergo, no one at the party could have abbetted a rape.

kenhyderal said...

Lance also said: "With that said, by all means please continue to rely on Crystal. I'm sure Kenneth McNeill, Richard Ramseier, Milton Walker (whom she threatened to stab, BTW) and Reginald Daye (whom she DID stab) all relied upon her at some point as well" No she relied on them because of her vulnerability and she was let down. Richard has custody of their son and daughter and once Crystal is found innocent I hope she can regain custody of them.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"When DNA results failed to implicate any of the Players the threats of DA Nifong to prosecute those who withheld information held little fear."

Your statement is pathetically incomplete. The truth is, DNA results, forensic testing of the rape kit, conclusively proved that no rape had taken place. No one at the party could have withheld information about a crime when the crime never happened.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"When DNA results failed to implicate any of the Players the threats of DA Nifong to prosecute those who withheld information held little fear."

You forget to mention that DA NI(nny)FONG showed a willingness to intimidate witnesses into giving incriminating testimony against the people he wanted to convict of the non-existent crime. I would say that was a concern to the innocent Lacrosse players, the indicted and the unindicted.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"It's my understanding that it's not fear of prosecution but conscience(à la Raskolnikov) that is causing Kilgo's friend this moral dilemma betwenn loyalty to his former team mates, jeopardizing the on-going civil suits and 'doing the right thing'."

Then you admit you have no capacity to understand anything. If you were capable of understanding, you would realize that Kilgo's Lacrosse player friend does not exist.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"If this is so(Lacrosse team players aided and abetted rapistsa), these Players are guilty, as well, of kidnapping and sexual assult."

KEN(inny), you again show you are incapable of understanding anything. There is overwhelming clear and conclusive evidence that no rape occurred, the Forensic exam of the rape kit. The Lacrosse players could not have aided or abetted any thing, since no crime happened.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 3:20 said: "Your statement is pathetically incomplete. The truth is, DNA results, forensic testing of the rape kit, conclusively proved that no rape had taken place. No one at the party could have withheld information about a crime when the crime never happened"...... You should read Attorney Brad Bannon's talk which Lance gave a link to.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Thank you, KC. I take that as a compliment."

There is a scene in Tom Clancy's Red Storm Rising of Marines being scornful of an Air Force officer because he does not realize he is being insulted.

Consider this scene, SIDN(inn)EY. You might understand why distinguished Blogger Professor Johnson has little respect for you.

People listen to Professor Johnson when he speaks. When you speak, people laugh at you.

Except maybe KEN(inny). And KEN(inny) has shown on many occasions he is not an astute or a profound speaker.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous Said: "Kilgo's Lacrosse player friend does not exist" ...... You wish.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"No she relied on them because of her vulnerability and she was let down."

It would be more correct to say, Crystal tried to exploit these people because they were vulnerable.

You seem to have claimed Crystal was impossibly attractive and sexy. If so, she used her attributes to exploit lonely, vulnerable men.

Too bad for her the innocent Lacrosse players proved to be not so vulnerable.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"Anonymous Said: 'Kilgo's Lacrosse player friend does not exist' ...... You wish."

I and a lot of others know.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

Have you ever seen Kilgo's Lacrosse player friend?

Neither has Kilgo.

kenhyderal said...

Anonyymous said" (he is not) "a profound speaker" Profound speaker?? Curious words. I do try to speak the truth, though, as I see it.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"Kilgo's friend [has] this moral dilemma betwenn loyalty to his former team mates, jeopardizing the on-going civil suits and 'doing the right thing'".

If Kilgo really had such a friend, and if that friend came forth and testified that he witnessed a rape which members of the Lacrosse team aided and abetted, he would not be doing the right thing. He would be committing perjury.

Of course, the issue is moot because to anyone, except some deluded hypocritical racist ninny, that Kilgo's friend does not exist.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

You know, the words, "Yoy wish", are proof of nothing.

Of course, considering what an astute and profound thinker you are NOT, maybe you do not comprehend that.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "Have you ever seen Kilgo's Lacrosse player friend" We've all seen him in the mug-shots of the team . All we can do is speculate on which one he is. I have never seen Kilgo but I've exchaned posts with him on this blog and also by private e-mails. What he reports, second hand, coresponds with what Crystal claims happened.

Anonymous said...

KEN(innY)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"What he(Kilgo) reports, second hand, coresponds with what Crystal claims happened."

Which means nothing other than Kilgo read what Crystal claims happened and then fabricated a story to support it.

It is obvious, from the forensic exam of the rape kit, Crystal's claims were false allegations of a rape.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"We've all seen him(Kilgo's Lacrosse player friend) in the mug-shots of the team . All we can do is speculate on which one he is."

No we haven't He doesn't exist.

Extremely lame response, KEN(inny)>

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Having no legal training and not being a lawyer, Harr was not aware that by assisting Mangum with the drafting of the motions that he would be in violation of North Carolina statutes."

SIDN(inn)EY reveals, in his blog, he was negligent. As a physician, he should have been aware of federal law on confidentiality of medical records.

Every new patient is a medical treatment facility has to sign a HIPPA statement and give consent if he wants the provider to share information. Some offices require the patient to specify exactly to whom he can share the patient's information.

Negligence, SIDN(inn)EY is not a defense to your violation of Federal Law.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(deluded)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"Anonyymous said" (he is not) "a profound speaker" Profound speaker?? Curious words. I do try to speak the truth, though, as I see it."

You have never seen the truth, therefore you are incapable of speaking it, profoundly or otherwise.

You say Crystal was raped, which has been proven to be false.

KHF Supporter said...

BREAKING NEWS

I have confirmation that Ken/Kilgo's allegation is true.

I heard from Newport on the old TalkLeft blog and he provided information that corroborates Ken/Kilgo's story. Three non-player guests at the party did rape Crystal.

Newport provided information that filled in some of the gaps in Ken/Kilgo's story. He also has an anonymous source.

The three guests are all familiar to those who followed the Duke Lacrosse Frame: Mark Gottlieb, Ben Himan and Richard Clayton. The three DPD officers arrived in response to a noise complaint, but offered to give a warning if the players let them stay for the performance and gave them food and booze.

The officers were outraged when the performance was canceled due to the boorish behavior of the players. They retrieved their anatomically correct biohazard suits for their attack. These suits explain the lack of DNA and Crystal's difficulty in identifying her attackers, although Gottlieb is heavy-set as Crystal described. These suits also confirm Crystal's initial statement that the attackers did not use condoms.

After the strippers left, the officers threatened the players to ensure their silence. They reminded the players of the noise violation and possible underage drinking charges. They went even further, saying that they could use their influence to have the season canceled and the coach fired. These ominous threats explain why none of the players broke their silence, including the defendants who spent millions of dollars fighting charges, were vilified in the media and faced potentially long prison terms.

This also explains Gottlieb's interest in taking over the case and the DPD's failure to investigate. The officers wanted to hide their role in the attack. They expected that their non-investigation would make the case go away, but Nifong, the "honorable" prosecutor that we grew to respect in this case, refused to let it drop, always seeking justice for "his" victim.

I hope these additional details help.

I know that it is difficult to accept a pseudonymous poster's claim that another pseudonymous poster has an anonymous source, but two such claims from separate sources cannot be disputed.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

"You should read Attorney Brad Bannon's talk which Lance gave a link to."

I have read Brad Bannon's discussion. There is nothing in that talk which supports your allegation,that a rape happened.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DE(luded)RA(cist)L:

Let's have some fun. Why don't you specify what it is in Brad Bannon's talk that you find so interesting.

No that should be interesting.

Lance the Intern said...

Kenhyderal said " Crystal, had no way of knowing whether a person was a Player or a Guest."

Yet she identified 3 PLAYERS. She could have easily stated "the men who attacked me are not in these photos". She did not.

Since you rely on Crystal, ask her why that is so.

While you're at it, ask her why her rape/attack accusations in the 3 different stories she's told (thus far -- those being the one when she was a teenager, the Duke LAX case, and now with Reginald Daye) are all eerily similar....Even down to the language used.

Lance the Intern said...

Kenhyderal -- I'll note that you've yet to answer my question about your response to the Brad Bannon article.

Do you now believe that the DNA evidence in the case was exculpatory? I believe you that you have disputed this in the past.

Do you believe that it was somehow the defendants' lawyers legal responsibility to identify the "attackers"?

Walt said...

Sid, you have written the same thing so many times about the medical issues and been exactly wrong the same way every time that I have just given up on you ever writing anything truthful about this case.

Walt-in-Durham

Anonymous said...

A parting shot before I go on vacation for a week.

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Charges against Crystal Mangum - corruption, conspiracy, and cover-up

Question: What is a non existent situation?

Answer: Distinguished forensic pathologist

Question: What is Sidney Harr not?

Answer: Fabrication of Ronald Daye autopsy result.

Question: What never happened?

SIDN(inn)EY, KEN(inny), Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Anonymous said...

Mike Nifong knew all along that drunk prostitute Crystal Mangum had never been raped.This was proven at his disbarrment trial.Even a race traitor like Nifong wouldn't want to have sex with her.

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 429   Newer› Newest»