Thursday, October 4, 2012

Durham prosecutors’ conspiracy on a grand scale against Crystal Mangum

Click on the following link to access the flog.  Grab some popcorn while you're at it as this is an especially long flog.  But it is in two sections, the first lasting 26 minutes and the second 20.  Allow a bit of uploading time between shifting from Part One to Part Two.

LINK:  http://www.justice4nifong.com/direc/flog/flog22/flog22.html

Word count: 5,309

In the North Carolina State Bar’s regulation, under Advocate, is Rule 3.8, “Special responsibilities of a prosecutor.” It states: “The prosecutor in a criminal case shall refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause.”

Further on, in this same document it reads: “A prosecutor has the responsibility of a minister of justice and not simply that of an advocate, the prosecutor’s duty is to seek justice not merely to convict. This responsibility carries with it specific obligations to see that the defendant is accorded procedural justice and that guilt is decided upon the basis of sufficient evidence.”

These flowery idealistic statements can be comforting to civilians living under the North Carolina justice system, however they are not worth a hill of pinto beans if these tenets are not adhered to, and they represent nothing more than show without substance.

The Durham County prosecutors have not only disregarded these codes of professional conduct, but have violated them to the extreme by acting as criminals themselves in framing an innocent person for crimes that she did not commit… all as payback for a perceived slight against three Duke Lacrosse student/athlete/partygoers in 2006.

Not only that, but the prosecutors are attempting to place this innocent person and single mother of three, Crystal Gail Mangum, in prison for life without the possibility of parole. The harshness of the retribution sought is not only due to the fact that she accused three lacrosse players from families of wealth, power, and prestige, but because she is an African American.

The reason the Durham prosecutors feel at ease bringing such baseless charges to bear against Ms. Mangum is due to the fact they feel that they can count on the cooperation from various other sectors in depriving Mangum of justice and her liberty.

Prosecutors, in seeking a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole against Crystal Mangum heavily relied on the following four conspiratorial consorts: (1) the medical examiner; (2) the defense attorney; (3) the mainstream media; and (4) the enablers.

The main objective of the Durham prosecutors and their conspirators was to keep the truth about the bogus charges against Ms. Mangum hidden from Durhamians, Tar Heelians, and all Americans. Secreting the true realities from the public allows the injustices to take root and grow. The conspiracy’s purpose is to hide from the people the prosecutors’ crimes being committed against Crystal Mangum.

It is the truth that will set Crystal Mangum free… and that is why the Durham prosecutors and their allies are doing their best to conceal, confuse, mislead, and cover-up the events concerning their malicious prosecution. If Americans knew the truth and extent of the flagrant injustices against Ms. Mangum, they would be enraged and in an uproar to demand swift rectification.

BACKDROP: THE 2006 DUKE LACROSSE CASE AND THE 2010 ARSON CASE

In early 2006, Crystal Mangum, a North Carolina Central University student and mother of two, was making ends meet and supporting her family by working for an escort service and performing as an exotic dancer.

In early 2006, the Duke University lacrosse team had a well-deserved reputation for being obnoxious, irreverent, boisterous, and basically out of control. Nearly a third of the team had a run-in with the law, usually misdemeanor alcohol-related offenses including disorderly conduct, under-aged drinking, driving with open alcoholic containers, and urinating in public. The team’s coach, Mike Pressler, had even been ordered by Duke University President Richard Brodhead to rein in his players.

On March 13, 2006, the Duke Lacrosse team hosted one of its notorious beer-guzzling parties at a rental house on Buchanan Street. The entertainment was to consist of two strippers, for which one of the team members made arrangements. He misled the escort service by using a false name and claiming he wanted the dancers for a small bachelor party of four or five… not for the Duke lacrosse team and their invitees which would number fifty or more.

For reasons unknown, the escort service assigned two African American females for the gig, despite the specific request for Caucasian dancers. One of the dancers was Crystal Mangum.

Misinformation about the number of guests at the event resulted in no body guards being scheduled to accompany the dancers.

Once the two dancers began to perform, the raucous partygoers started shouting degrading and dehumanizing comments, and making obscene gestures. This prompted the scheduled two hour performance to be reduced to several minutes after the dancers abruptly quit because of the unwarranted and humiliating reception. They hurriedly retreated to the bathroom for temporary sanctuary… and what transpired from that point on until a police report was taken hours later, which included accusations of sexual assault by Mangum, is in dispute.

What is not in dispute regarding the party is that there was under-aged drinking involved, and that some of the partygoers shouted the “N-word” epithet at the two African American women.

Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong prosecuted the case against three suspected Duke lacrosse players identified by Mangum as being the ones who sexually assaulted her. These young men came from well-heeled families, were bailed out and never spent a day in jail, and their high-powered defense teams put up a rigorous defense, which included frequent press conferences wherein evidence and information was released to the media.

Not long after the prosecution into the case was launched, the State Bar began its own investigation into D.A. Nifong about questionable prejudicial statements he may have made before the media. A complaint filed by the Bar itself against Nifong forced him to step down as prosecutor before a trial date had even been set.

The prosecution’s case was turned over to the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office and it began its own review. After several month of investigation by the Attorney General’s Office, the attorney general, Roy Cooper, was prepared to make its intentions known as to what course it would take.

Before his announcement, two of his assistant attorney generals, James J. Coman and Mary Winstead, met with Brad Bannon, a defense attorney with the prestigious Joseph B. Cheshire law firm… which represented one of the Duke Lacrosse defendants. During this meeting, Mr. Bannon impressed upon the assistant A.G.s the importance of the attorney general to specifically pronounce the defendants to be “innocent” and to claim that “nothing happened.”

On April 11, 2007, Attorney General Cooper made a promulgation during which he dismissed all criminal charges against the Duke Lacrosse defendants and stopped all criminal investigation into charges related to the party. But, he made the unprecedented move of proclaiming that the Duke Lacrosse defendants were “innocent,” that “nothing happened,” and that Ms. Mangum had made false and unreliable allegations.

Mr. Cooper added that the charges would not be brought against Ms. Mangum for falsely reporting a crime because he believed that she was mentally ill or had mental problems.

Subsequent to the Attorney General’s statement, Mike Nifong was forced from his elected position as Durham district attorney and he was later disbarred, making him the first prosecutor to be disbarred by the North Carolina State Bar since its inception in 1933. He was also sentenced to 24 hours in jail for contempt of court by Judge Osmond Smith III, and A.G. Cooper unsuccessfully sought to have the U.S. Department of Justice criminally investigate Mr. Nifong for depriving the three Duke Lacrosse defendants of their civil rights.

The mainstream media lionized the three defendants and celebrated their proclamations of innocence by the attorney general… all stories related to the Duke Lacrosse case or its participants including the mention that the boys were declared “innocent.” What the media fails to mention is that the proclamation of innocent by the attorney general is irrelevant and meaningless as Roy Cooper is a member of the executive branch and not judicial.

In addition, the Duke Lacrosse defendants and their attorneys were able to shake down Duke University for $20 million for each defendant without a fight. Their attempts to finagle the cash-strapped city of Durham out of $10 million each has met with some unexpected resistance. The greed-driven legal battle goes on as the media continues to coddle these young men who never spent a single day in jail, graduated from college, and have moved on with their lives.

The media’s treatment of Crystal Mangum was similar to that given to Mr. Nifong… she was vilified and demonized… labeled as the false accuser.

Over the ensuing years a culture had evolved in the Triangle Area and throughout the state that was hostile and unsympathetic towards Nifong, Mangum, their supporters, and others considered by the Powers-That-Be to be on the wrong end of the Duke Lacrosse case. Amidst this toxic environment, Crystal Mangum tried to move forward with her life, graduating from NC Central University in Durham, and enrolling in its graduate program. A single mother of three in 2010, she was employed, lived in an apartment with her children, helped care for her parents, and was independent.

Then, on February 17, 2010, the city of Durham, which had been targeting Mangum for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case, got its break when the city police received a 9-1-1 call from Crystal’s children. Earlier that evening, Ms. Mangum’s ex-boyfriend repeatedly punched her in the face in response to a disparaging remark she made about him. She retreated and fought back in self-defense as her children, fearing for her well-being and life, made the emergency call.

To summarize the outcome, Ms. Mangum was arrested under a slew of unsubstantiated charges including attempted murder, communicating threats, assault and battery, and identity theft, while her ex-boyfriend was neither charged nor arrested.

Ms. Mangum was held under an unreasonably high bail in the six figures, and after languishing in jail for three months, she was released from the detention center but placed under house arrest when a bail bondsman unexpectedly satisfied the $100,000 bond.

With their prize defendant no longer being held in jail, the prosecution moved forward with the trial against Mangum who was represented by a featherweight defense. She was convicted on three piddly misdemeanor charges and sentenced to time served. The jury deadlocked on the most serious felony arson charge, and Durham prosecutors decided not to retry her on it.

2011 VENDETTA PROSECUTION AGAINST CRYSTAL MANGUM

That the Durham prosecutors were not through with Crystal Mangum became plainly evident a year later. On April 3, 2011, in the early morning hours, Crystal Mangum and Reginald Daye, the man with whom she and her children shared his apartment, were embroiled in an argument fomented by his jealousy over the attention she had just given to a police officer acquaintance.

Inside his apartment over approximately the next hour, a highly intoxicated Mr. Daye intermittently punched Crystal Mangum in the face and head approximately ten times. He spit on her, he pulled out her hair, and when she sought refuge in a locked bathroom, he proceeded to kick in the door to get at her. He brought into the bedroom, where the assault was centered, steak knives from the kitchen and proceeded to throw them at her.

Daye was straddling her with his hands around her neck strangling her when she picked up a knife that was lying nearby and stabbed him once in the left torso. Once wounded, Daye got up from atop Mangum. She grabbed her purse and fled from the apartment with Daye quickly giving up pursuit.

Crystal Mangum went to Ms. Liddy Howard’s apartment in a nearby housing complex. A friend, Ms. Howard watched Crystal’s children at times, and she allowed her to get some rest until daybreak.

Hours later, police arrived and without investigative questioning of her, she was arrested and charged with assault with a deadly weapon with the intent to kill inflicting serious injury. Then she was told that anything she said could be used against her, so she declined to give an interview.

Despite physical evidence that Ms. Mangum had been beaten – with swelling to the lower lip, a small laceration around he left eye, a lesion to the back of her left hand, and clumps of her hair deposited at two sites – Reginald Daye was not charged or arrested for domestic violence, assault on a female, or false imprisonment.

EMS took Reginald Daye by ambulance to Duke University Hospital where his assessment revealed a blood alcohol level of 296 mg/dL, which induces stupor in a nonalcoholic adult male. His condition was considered stable enough for him to undergo several preoperative diagnostic tests, including x-rays and body scans.

Emergency surgery disclosed a laceration to the colon and a minor lesion to the spleen, both which were repaired. With the operation a success, Daye’s prognosis was for a full recovery.

Despite prophylactic treatment with sedatives to prevent delirium tremens, Mr. Daye began showing significant agitation and other signs of alcoholic withdrawal on the third postoperative day. This development resulted in his transfer to the surgical intensive care unit where a decision was made to intubate Daye in order to protect his airway and better deliver oxygen.

Unfortunately, the endotracheal tube was positioned in the esophagus instead of the trachea which resulted in oxygen being delivered to the stomach instead of the lungs. The lack of oxygen resulted in death of sensitive brain cells and led to cardiac arrest. With cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) begun, the wayward endotracheal tube was removed and another endotracheal tube was introduced… this one properly placed in the trachea. After oxygen flow was reestablished to the lungs, the heart was successfully resuscitated and once again pumped spontaneously. The brain cells would not recover and Daye remained comatose.

Daye’s condition was monitored for a week, and on April 13, 2011, without showing improvement or signs of regaining consciousness, he was electively removed from life support after which he died.

An autopsy was performed on Reginald Daye the following morning of April 14, 2011, and the medical examiner concluded that Daye died of “complications of a stab wound to the chest,” although no nexus was established in the report.

The fraudulent Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011 was used as the basis of Durham prosecutor Kelly Gauger’s first degree murder charge against Crystal Mangum, and on April 18, 2011 she received a grand jury indictment against Mangum not only for the murder charge, but also two counts of larceny of chose in action. The two count larceny charge being an integral part of the first degree murder charge.

CONSPIRACY BY THE MEDICAL EXAMINER

In order for Prosecutor Kelly Gauger to charge Mangum with murder, she needs an autopsy report to falsely state that the knife wound was responsible for Reginald Daye’s death. She gets exactly that in the April 14, 2011 autopsy report by Dr. Clay Nichols with his conclusion that Daye died from “complications from a stab wound to the chest.”

Crystal Mangum was indicted for the murder of Mr. Daye based on a fraudulent autopsy report that not only contained an unsubstantiated and incorrect conclusion, but fabricated physical findings, as well. The Durham prosecution’s case against Ms. Mangum relied solely on a document totally lacking in credibility.

The medical examiner’s role in this conspiracy was crucial, as the murder charge could not have been brought against Mangum without his report.

Ironically, although the conspiratorial bridge between Prosecutor Gauger and the medical examiner was essential for the murder charge against Mangum, the contribution by the doctor represented the weakest link in the criminal case against her.

CONSPIRACY BY THE DEFENSE ATTORNEYS

In order for such a weak case as that against Mangum to even be brought before the court, prosecutors had to rely on significant cooperation from Mangum’s defense attorneys. Collusion by defense attorneys was mandatory if the prosecution of Mangum was to make any headway.

Any competent defense attorney, acting in the best interests of Ms. Mangum, could easily shred the prosecution’s case against her instantaneously. A motion to dismiss the charges, a motion to reduce bail, and a preliminary hearing are actions a defense attorney could have taken to minimize Mangum’s time behind bars following her arrest.

Although Mangum’s attorney Chris Shella did file several motions for bail reduction, he did not aggressively attack the weak case of the prosecution against his client.

Also, Mr. Shella allowed Judge Osmond Smith III to hear a bail reduction in March 2012 even though the black-rober should have recused himself, as he had presided over the pretrial phase of the Duke Lacrosse trial and had issued rulings against Mangum in it.

Durham prosecutors wanted Mangum to suffer, so her incarceration was a prominent part of their plan. They intended to move the case at a snail’s pace, which could be facilitated with cooperation by defense attorneys, while Ms. Mangum languished in jail.

Defense attorney Woody Vann, the court’s initially appointed attorney for Mangum, was reinstated approximately one year after her arrest when Mr. Shella voluntarily removed himself after supporters of Mangum drafted and filed motions for her and called a press conference.

After I met with Mr. Vann on May 24, 2012, and pointed out the discrepancies between the autopsy report and other medical records, he eventually retained the services of a forensic pathologist, Dr. Christena Roberts, to review Daye’s death. The court approved payment for the defense expert, and the report purportedly has been completed.

However, Mr. Vann has not given his client, Ms. Mangum, a copy of the Roberts’ report, and he has not shared all of the prosecution discovery and evidence, with Ms. Mangum… including photographs taken of Mangum’s injuries, of Daye’s injury, and of the evidence at the crime scene.

Because of the unanticipated involvement of Mangum’s supporters in her case, the prosecution-defense strategic objective has changed from an attempt to have Mangum convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without parole, to having Mangum accept a plea deal in exchange for a sentence of time served.

The defense attorney’s collaboration with prosecutors here is vital, as a lawyer usually holds a position of trust with his client relying on him to give advice and direction in his defendant’s best interests. The defense attorney Mr. Vann is best positioned to deliver to the prosecution the acceptance by Crystal Mangum of a plea deal that would bring a quick end to the out of control prosecution and relieve the state of any civil liability for its grievous wrongs against her. A plea deal would also dispense with the need for an open trial which could expose Duke University Hospital to damaging publicity.

Recently Mr. Vann allegedly told Ms. Mangum that she had a “weak case,” and suggested that she consider taking a plea deal from the prosecution… this without giving his client full access to the evidence and prosecution discovery. Although nothing has been offered in writing by prosecutors, Mr. Vann is testing the waters and shopping the plea deal offer to her. Undoubtedly, the desperation by the prosecutors is evident with Mr. Vann mentioning “time served.”

With Ms. Mangum’s defense essentially consisting of a traitorous mole, it is no wonder that the prosecution would bring such a merit-less case against her with the reasonable expectation of prevailing in putting an innocent person in jail for life without the possibility of parole.

CONSPIRACY BY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA

The ultimate goal of the prosecution centered conspiracy is to keep hidden from the public the sinister and illegal actions being taken against Crystal Mangum in an attempt to put her in prison for the rest of her life. If the singularly diabolical nature of the prosecution of Mangum had been revealed to the masses, a great possibility existed that there would have been an uproar to derail the prosecutors’ goals.

Even though the media had demonized Mangum to the point where people had little or no sympathy for her, the flagrant abuse of her within the legal system would elicit revulsion in most and unease in almost all.

What the Durham prosecutors wanted from the media is what the mainstream media has delivered thus far… a misleading fantasy with mischaracterizations of the main actors and total concealment of the truth with a disregard for logic and common sense.

The mainstream media has basically presented the criminal case as follows:

1. Crystal Mangum is a violent and mentally unstable liar who has a penchant for physically abusing her boyfriends.

2. Reginald Daye was portrayed a hardworking man who humanely took in Crystal Mangum and her three children… there being no mention of his alcoholism or past criminal history that included assault on a female.

3. On April 3, 2012, shortly after midnight, the two began arguing over two cashier’s checks which Mangum had no way of converting to her own personal use.

4. As a result of the argument, Mangum stabbed Daye and ran off with the two cashier’s checks, there being no mention of the injuries sustained by Mangum… no mention of clumps of her hair found at the scene… and no mention of the locked bathroom door being kicked in.

5. Reginald Daye died as a result of the stab wound which perforated six organs. There is no mention that Daye’s intubation was botched by Duke University Hospital staff which led to his brain death, and that he was in coma for a week. Neither is there any mention that he died after being electively removed from life support.

The misinformation above is what most unenlightened individuals, the majority of people, believe… courtesy of the mainstream media.

Another attack track taken by the media is to paint Mangum supporters as being troublemakers, interlopers, and self-serving legal obstructionists whose actions unintentionally work to her detriment.

Headlines even state that, with many of them emphasizing the series of feeble investigations against “Mangum supporters.”

The North Carolina State Bar investigation against Sidney B. Harr was even instigated by “more than one journalist.” To protect the journalistic complainants’ identity, the State Bar named itself as the complainant.

Then, once the Bar agreed to consider the complaint, the media was quick to jump on the story… the very one for which they were responsible.

The mainstream media’s biggest contribution to the conspiracy was its large scale cover-up in which it ignored the false findings of the all important autopsy report upon which the murder charge against Mangum was based. It also kept hushed about the cause of Reginald Daye’s death and the events surrounding it, with omissions of the pertinent facts regarding the misplaced endotracheal tube, the resultant brain death, Daye’s weeklong comatose course, and his removal from life-support which was the proximate cause of his death.

By concealment of these facts, the mainstream media purposely tried to shield Orange County Medical Examiner Clay Nichols, hide Duke University Hospital culpability in Daye’s death, mislead the public into believing that the stab wound was responsible for Daye’s death, and that Mangum supporters were interfering with the presentation of justice.

The media was well aware of the truth related to disparities in the autopsy report when compared with other medical documents… in other words, that the autopsy report was false and misleading.

The media was well aware of the truth regarding Reginald Daye’s death and that his demise had absolutely nothing to do with the stab wound he received.

Showing little curiosity about blatantly false statements in an autopsy report, the media exhibited marked apathy about the autopsy report as well as showing no desire to bring to the public’s attention the events surrounding Daye’s death at the Duke University facility.

Instead the media was busy focusing its investigative firepower into obtaining the personal cell phone records of former UNC head football coach Butch Davis, obtaining the collegiate academic record of professional UNC and professional gridiron great Julius Peppers, and learning the identities of Tar Heel football players who had their parking tickets dismissed.

Treachery by the legal profession against Ms. Mangum, Mike Nifong, their supporters, and others considered to be on the wrong end of the Duke Lacrosse case by the Powers-That-Be has been proven to be not newsworthy when it comes to the mainstream media.

In order for the prosecutorial cabal to be able to pull off such a merit-less prosecution against Mangum, it was mandatory that the mainstream media cooperate by obscuring and deceiving the public about what really transpired between Mangum and Daye the morning of the stabbing and about what happened to Daye during his hospitalization at Duke University Hospital.

The media has performed exceptionally in keeping the truth about the prosecution of Mangum buried beneath layers of omissions, diversions, selective and biased reporting, and overtly sloppy and inaccurate reporting.

Durham prosecutors, with their trumped up and fraudulent charges against Mangum, could not have asked for better cooperation from the mainstream media.

CONSPIRACY BY THE ENABLERS

My definition of an enabler is a person or organization that has position and standing to have an effect on a situation, but elects to remain silent and idle. In the face of injustice towards Mangum, many politicians, civil rights leaders and their organizations, clergy, and other community leaders have refused to lift a finger to confront the mistreatment of Ms. Mangum by the justice system.

Whether due to a deficiency of courage, a lack of will, or both, the enablers with their bully pulpit have consistently rebuffed my entreaties for them to engage in the matter even in the most minimal or superficial way. Enablers could have raised concerns about Ms. Mangum’s situation with the media or with Durham prosecutors themselves, but all of whom I contacted refused.

None of the many members of the North Carolina General Assembly who I reached out to were willing to get involved. Ms. Mangum’s political Durham representatives, specifically Senator Floyd McKissick Jr., Representatives Larry Hall and Mickey Michaux, and Congressman David Price all refused to help out their constituent.

The Durham City Council, likewise, declined to wade into the issue, even though taxpayer dollars used for the wrongful prosecution and incarceration were being wasted.

The NAACP on a local and national level would not speak out or take action against the injustice toward Mangum, but then again, the NAACP has a record of being extremely selective in whom it chooses to lend its support. Its tendency to shy away from any controversial issue was evidenced by its refusal to intercede on behalf of the wrongly accused Scottsboro Boys.

Although the NAACP did step in and help prevent Wilson prosecutors from railroading James Arthur Johnson more than it did, it is an institution that has proven to be timorous when it comes to getting involved in criminal justice issues in general.

The ACLU locally and nationally did not so much as give a response to letters sent to them seeking assistance for the great injustice against the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser.

Located in downtown Durham, the North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence, kept away from the Mangum fray despite the fact that evidence, common sense, and logic clearly supported her assertion that she was being physically abused and stabbed her assailant in self-defense.

In being rebuffed by the coalition, I was told that getting involved in any manner in Crystal Mangum’s case would be setting a precedent that the organization did not want to follow.

With the offices of the governor and the attorney general bemoaning the unacceptably high death rate in the Tar Heel state resulting from domestic violence, neither of them reacted to my concerns about how this victim of a domestic dispute who acted in self defense was now being unjustly charged with the murder of the abuser.

Had any of the aforementioned enablers taken a stand and raised awareness about the ostacles confronting Mangum in receiving a just and fair hearing within the criminal justice system, the vendetta conspiracy against her would have been brought down.

Since the enablers have remained inactive, the mainstream media has had no obligation to delve into the shenanigans being perpetuated against Mangum by the prosecutors.

Bottom line is that the cover-up by the mainstream media represents the bulwark to preventing the truth about Mangum’s ordeal from reaching the eyes and ears of the public… thereby stifling any outrage or opposition to her mistreatment.

With the public deaf and blind to what’s taking place in the courtroom, the defendant’s right to a fair and impartial trial can be severely compromised. The media has deftly provided the ear plugs and blinders in allowing Crystal Mangum to be ravaged by vindictive prosecutors and their conspiratorial accomplices.

RECAP: PUTTING THE CONSPIRATORIAL PIECES TOGETHER

The devious plot of Durham prosecutors Kelly Gauger and Charlene Coggins-Franks to transform Crystal Mangum from the victim of domestic violence that she was into a first degree murderer, all for misguided retribution for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case, required the contribution and cooperation from many sources… in general being the following four groups: (1) the medical examiner; (2) the defense attorneys; (3) the mainstream media; and (4) the enablers.

That the prosecution was prejudiced against Mangum is evidenced by its disregard for the evidence supporting the fact that Mangum was physically abused by an intoxicated Reginald Daye who had a past history of assault on a female, and that Reginald Daye was not arrested or charged with domestic violence, assault of a female, or unlawful imprisonment in this instance.

After Daye’s death due to medical malpractice, the prosecution’s bias was further displayed by its murder charge against Mangum. It went to fanatical extremes to make it a first degree murder charge by concocting a little known/rarely used “larceny of chose in action” charge in conjunction with the “felony-murder rule”… the alleged larceny not even filling the requisites needed for the charge.

Prosecutors then relied upon the medical examiner to provide the foundation upon which to build their murder charge by issuing an autopsy report concluding that Reginald Daye’s death was due to “complications of a stab wound to the chest.” This is totally false.

With such a weak and baseless case against Mangum, the prosecutors needed to have the full cooperation of the defense attorneys who represented her. Her lawyers were to go through the appearances of providing adequate counsel while intentionally accomplishing nothing of substance with their client Mangum languishing in jail under a high bail.

Any halfway competent defense attorney acting in good faith would have immediately challenged the prosecution’s case… the murder charge against Mangum would never have gotten off the ground.

The mainstream media was needed to keep the masses ignorant of the misdeeds and malfeasances of the prosecution in its vendetta case against Crystal Mangum. Media apathy was mandatory to keep from exposing the true cause of Daye’s death, the problems with the autopsy report, and to protect both Duke University Hospital and the Orange County Medical examiner.

Once Mangum supporters started to rally after her case remained in limbo for a year, the media was utilized to beat back their accusations of prosecutorial misconduct by placing these advocates in a bad light… presenting them as unstable, trouble-making interlopers.

With enablers’ muskets muzzled, compliant media-types kept the unscrupulous doings of the conspirators deeply buried, as no one, save Mangum supporters and members of the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong raised the alarm about the gross injustice taking place.

Corruption, conspiracy, and cover-up, all on a grand scale, are preventing Crystal Mangum from receiving true justice which she is due.

Mangum is not the only one on trial in this case… the bigger defendant is the North Carolina criminal justice system itself, and it is imperative that all Tar Heelians let their voices be heard in order to deliver a verdict that lives up to the promise of equal justice for all… even Crystal Mangum.



763 comments:

1 – 200 of 763   Newer›   Newest»
Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I guess sidney is tired of honey boo boo. He must be watching jefferson re-runs....or, perhaps, the beverly hillbillies.....since his tastes seem to run to cornball humor.


Never liked "The Jeffersons," or "All in the Family" for that matter. As far as comedies go, I like "The Honeymooners," and some of the earlier episodes of "Sanford and Son" (the later ones being too mean-spirited for me). Now what I like to watch whenever I get a chance and I have access to cable TV is "SpongeBob Square Pants." Very funny.

As far as "Here Comes Honey Boo Boo" I have no cable or satellite dish, so I don't watch it.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
Never liked "The Jeffersons," or "All in the Family" for that matter. As far as comedies go, I like "The Honeymooners," and some of the earlier episodes of "Sanford and Son" (the later ones being too mean-spirited for me). Now what I like to watch whenever I get a chance and I have access to cable TV is "SpongeBob Square Pants." Very funny.

As far as "Here Comes Honey Boo Boo" I have no cable or satellite dish, so I don't watch it."

The question is, how much time at the library do you spend on Honey Boo Boo's facebook page?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Judging from the title you have posted, this will reveal nothing new or startling in your campaign to keep Crystal out of court except more of your deluded, probably schizophrenic megalomania.

Anonymous said...

TL;DR. Sidney.

Lance the Intern said...

"The privileged Duke Lacrosse defendants, who never spent a single day in jail and who were able to shake down Duke University for $20 million each..."

It has been proven (I gave you the link) that the IRS lien upon which you base this "$20 million" figure was an ERROR.

I have challenged you to prove this statement (a challenge, I will note, you have FAILED to even acknowledge, let alone meet).

This statement is simply a LIE -- promulgated by you alone. Stop using it, and apologize for continuing to repeat it.

Anonymous said...

Same old bull. What a waste of bandwidth. Absolutely one lie after another. You have been called out, directly, with EVIDENCE to show that what you are saying is a LIE. Shame on you.
Keep it up, sidney......you are really helping mangum, aren't you,bro.....

Anonymous said...

you are a sick man. seriously, get some help.

Anonymous said...

LIAR. Since you persist in telling lies about Reginald Daye, I belive it is time to tell you exactly what you are.....which is...a SICK RACIST LIAR.
We all know the assault charge against Mr. Daye was dropped yet you continue to omit this FACT. LIAR.
We all know Mangum has an extensive criminal record including NINE convictions...plus numerous CHARGES. You fail to tell the truth about her record LIAR
We all know there is NO evidence that Mr. Daye was an alcoholic. LIAR
We all know there is No evidence that Duke Hospital improperly treated Mr. Daye and we all know he was not medically murdered. LIAR
We all know there is no evidence that Mr. Daye beat up, punched, choked, scratched, strangled or otherwise injured Mangum. LIAR
We all know that you KNEW exactly what HIPPA was when you illegally posted the confidential medical information about Mr. Daye. LIAR
Your LIES will copntinued to be pointed out each and every time you spew them.

Anonymous said...

This whole thing is downright comical. The overly dramatic music, the choice of photographs, the boorish voice, the silly opera-plot conspiracy, and the terminal hurl-inducing length and weight of the liar's barge......all adds up to eighth grade writing for those who failed ninth. Whew, what a pice of junk. And that's just Part One!
Please, if you are going to write satire, at least you can make some effort to be entertaining....and, for god sake, either stop doing your own narrations or take diction/speech lessons.

Gib Elohssa said...

Lance -- You likened Dr, Harr to Andy Kaufman in an earlier post...Don't you see that his repeated references to a "$20 million payout" to the Duke Lacrosse players is much like the Andy Kaufman videos sent to teach the people of Memphis how to use soap?

These statement are meant to draw ire...Much like Dr. Harr's statements that there will be "enlightenment" in his upcoming posts, when in reality they are simply old posts regurgitated in a new format.

Anonymous said...

Lordy, sidney, you've outdone yourself......it has been a long time since I read or heard a bigger lie. The Titanic of Falsehoods. The Triple Crown of Bullshit. The No-Bull Prize for Racist Ranting. The New Black Panther Evil Oppressor Award for Paranoia in Action. The Atticus Finch award for Legal Layperson wannabe Perry Award. The Pinocchio Lies Make my Nose Grow Award.
who, fella, take a chill pill or adjust your meds. This is trash.

Anonymous said...

Hey there Gib, if I thought Harr were intelligent enough to write good satire and smart enough to actually think in advance, I would credit the comment about "meant to draw ire". As it is, his writings reflect deficits you could drive a bling-mobile through. Bad writing, worse thinking......all leads to trash not even a bare-chest romance novel publisher would pick up.
but, I dig your name......suoiralih nipeelb!!

Gib Elohssa said...

Thank you -- It is a common name in my native Philippines.

Gib Elohssa said...

...And Canada

Anonymous said...

More belching than a Wagner opera ...more lies than Jesse Jackson's love child diary , more hot air than the Hindenberg, more sap than IHOP, more twisting than mangum's pole dance, more fruitcake than Cracker Barrel at Christmas

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"
Never liked "The Jeffersons," or "All in the Family" for that matter. As far as comedies go, I like "The Honeymooners," and some of the earlier episodes of "Sanford and Son" (the later ones being too mean-spirited for me). Now what I like to watch whenever I get a chance and I have access to cable TV is "SpongeBob Square Pants." Very funny.

As far as "Here Comes Honey Boo Boo" I have no cable or satellite dish, so I don't watch it."

The question is, how much time at the library do you spend on Honey Boo Boo's facebook page?


Didn't know she had a Facebook page until now, but I won't be visiting it as my computer time is severely limited.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
More fun from NCCU:
Ontario Wooden, a Dean at NCCU, has been arrested and charged with assault. He is supposed to have grabbed a woman's arm and pushed her causing minor injuries. He's out on 2K bail. Dean Wooden is black. Well, Sidney, gonna tell us now that Wooden's bail is too low or what? Did Durham, the home of Sidney's evil white oppressor conspiracy give a break to a black man? It's not clear whether Wooden has any priors. By the way, can we (like Sidney) now say FOREVER that Wooden has a history of being violent toward women as documented by this assault. Can we say this, EVEN if the charge gets dropped or he is found innocent? Huh, bro.....???


You bring up an excellent point. Mr. Wooden grabbed a woman by the arm and pushed her. Right? Follow me, now. Reginald Daye punches Crystal Mangum in the face and head about ten times, spits on her, pulls out her hair, knocks down the bathroom door to get at her, gouges at her left eye with his fingernails, brings in a set of steak knives and throws them at her, and is choking her at which time she grabs a knife and stabs him in self-defense... (a non-fatal wound). Add to that the fact that Mr. Daye is an alcoholic who is intoxicated, owns a set of brass knuckles, and has a past criminal history that includes assault on a female. Yet, he is not arrested or charged. Does that make any sence...? Of course it doesn't, and that is why the Tar Heelian justice system is in such disrepute.

Comprende, mi anonymous bro amigo?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Didn't know she had a Facebook page until now, but I won't be visiting it as my computer time is severely limited."

So is your intellect.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Right? Follow me, now. Reginald Daye punches Crystal Mangum in the face and head about ten times, spits on her, pulls out her hair, knocks down the bathroom door to get at her, gouges at her left eye with his fingernails, brings in a set of steak knives and throws them at her, and is choking her at which time she grabs a knife and stabs him in self-defense... (a non-fatal wound)."

Again you distort and misrepresent facts and make allegations which you can not support.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Add to that the fact that Mr. Daye is an alcoholic who is intoxicated, owns a set of brass knuckles, and has a past criminal history that includes assault on a female."

You have established none of that as fact, except that Mr. Daye was charged with assault on a female. However you continue to ispaage a dead man by deliberately omitting to report that said charge was dismissed by the DA.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Yet, he(Reginald Daye) is not arrested or charged."

For what?

"Does that make any sence(sic)...?"

It makes sense(not "sence") since there was no probable cause to charge Mr. Daye with anything.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"In the North Carolina State Bar’s regulation, under Advocate, is Rule 3.8, 'Special responsibilities of a prosecutor.' It states: 'The prosecutor in a criminal case shall refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause.'”

So explain why DA NIFONG was not in violation of that regulation when he prosecuted, without any evidence of a crime, three innocent Caucasian Lacrosse players.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Further on, in this same document it reads: 'A prosecutor has the responsibility of a minister of justice and not simply that of an advocate, the prosecutor’s duty is to seek justice not merely to convict. This responsibility carries with it specific obligations to see that the defendant is accorded procedural justice and that guilt is decided upon the basis of sufficient evidence.'"

So explain how DA NIFONG complied with regulation when he made public, inflammatory, guilt presuming statements about the Lacrosse team before he knew any facts about the case.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"These flowery idealistic statements can be comforting to civilians living under the North Carolina justice system, however they are not worth a hill of pinto beans if these tenets are not adhered to, and they represent nothing more than show without substance."

Explain how DA NIFONG adhered to these tenets.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
The Durham County prosecutors have not only disregarded these codes of professional conduct, but have violated them to the extreme by acting as criminals themselves in framing an innocent person for crimes that she did not commit… all as payback for a perceived slight against three Duke Lacrosse student/athlete/partygoers in 2006."

What perceived slight. DA NIFONG wrongfully prosecuted the falsely accused Lacrosse players. Because they were not wrongfully convicted and incarcerated, you claim they were not harmed.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
Not only that, but the prosecutors are attempting to place this innocent person and single mother of three, Crystal Gail Mangum, in prison for life without the possibility of parole. The harshness of the retribution sought is not only due to the fact that she accused three lacrosse players from families of wealth, power, and prestige, but because she is an African American."

Wrong. She is being prosecuted because there is probable cause to believe she committed murder.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The reason the Durham prosecutors feel at ease bringing such baseless charges to bear against Ms. Mangum is due to the fact they feel that they can count on the cooperation from various other sectors in depriving Mangum of justice and her liberty.

Prosecutors, in seeking a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole against Crystal Mangum heavily relied on the following four conspiratorial consorts: (1) the medical examiner; (2) the defense attorney; (3) the mainstream media; and (4) the enablers."

How about you offer some facts to corroborate that allegation.

Anonymous said...

Sidney HARR:

"The main objective of the Durham prosecutors and their conspirators was to keep the truth about the bogus charges against Ms. Mangum hidden from Durhamians, Tar Heelians, and all Americans."

That is a fantasy of your deluded, probably schizophrenic, megalomaniacal mind>

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"It is the truth that will set Crystal Mangum free".

Crystal is still incarcerated. Ergo, you must not have been telling the truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"In early 2006, the Duke University lacrosse team had a well-deserved reputation for being obnoxious, irreverent, boisterous, and basically out of control. Nearly a third of the team had a run-in with the law, usually misdemeanor alcohol-related offenses including disorderly conduct, under-aged drinking, driving with open alcoholic containers, and urinating in public. The team’s coach, Mike Pressler, had even been ordered by Duke University President Richard Brodhead to rein in his players."

A bare faced lie.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Once the two dancers began to perform, the raucous partygoers started shouting degrading and dehumanizing comments, and making obscene gestures. This prompted the scheduled two hour performance to be reduced to several minutes after the dancers abruptly quit because of the unwarranted and humiliating reception."

Another barefaced lie SIDNEY has been trying to unsuccessfully promulgate as the truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"What is not in dispute regarding the party is that there was under-aged drinking involved, and that some of the partygoers shouted the “N-word” epithet at the two African American women."

One player directed a racial slur at dancer Kim Pittman/Roberts in response to a racial slur she hurled at him.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong prosecuted the case against three suspected Duke lacrosse players identified by Mangum as being the ones who sexually assaulted her."

That was done at a photo lineup on April 4, 2006, which was an improper lineup which violated DOJ and DPD guidelines for a lineup procedure.

Two of the men Crystal identified, Reade Seligman and Colin Finnerty, could prove with 100% certainty they had not been at the party at the time of the alleged crime.

Crystal claimed the third man, David Evans, had a mustache at the time he allegedly assailed her. David Evans never had a mustache.

DA NIFONG indicted the three innocent men based on faulty, unreliable identifications made at the improperly conducted lineup, a fact which SIDNEY deliberately tries to conceal.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Not long after the prosecution into the case was launched, the State Bar began its own investigation into D.A. Nifong about questionable prejudicial statements he may have made before the media. A complaint filed by the Bar itself against Nifong forced him to step down as prosecutor before a trial date had even been set."

Between the time of the alleged crime in March of 2006, and when DA NIFONG requested the AG to take over the case, DA NIFONG, in violation of the two sections of the guidelines for NC Prosecutors cited by SIDNEY, DA NIFONG made multiple guilt presuming statements and statements, that a crime had happened, that members of the team were the perpetrators, that the crime had been racially motivated. At the time he had no facts about the case, made multiple statements suggesting that retention of counsel by defendants, that defendants exercising their right not to talk to the authorities, these were indications of guilt on the part of players.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"[The Lacrosse Players'] high-powered defense teams put up a rigorous defense, which included frequent press conferences wherein evidence and information was released to the media."

Here SIDNEY himself implies their retention of counsel was a sign of guilt.

Why shouldn't their attorneys put up a vigorous defense. Their clients were prosecuted in spite of no evidence linking them to the alleged crime. The indicted Lacrosse players were innocent as a matter of fact since the crime for which they were indicted never happened.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Before his announcement, two of his assistant attorney generals, James J. Coman and Mary Winstead, met with Brad Bannon, a defense attorney with the prestigious Joseph B. Cheshire law firm… which represented one of the Duke Lacrosse defendants. During this meeting, Mr. Bannon impressed upon the assistant A.G.s the importance of the attorney general to specifically pronounce the defendants to be “innocent” and to claim that 'nothing happened.'”

Another unsupported allegation made by SIDNEY HARR.

Anonymous said...

9 entsfleSIDNEY HARR:

"On April 11, 2007, Attorney General Cooper made a promulgation during which he dismissed all criminal charges against the Duke Lacrosse defendants and stopped all criminal investigation into charges related to the party. But, he made the unprecedented move of proclaiming that the Duke Lacrosse defendants were 'innocent,' that “nothing happened,” and that Ms. Mangum had made false and unreliable allegations."

SIDNEY HARR deliberately refuses to mention that there in fact was no evidence that the crime had happened, that any Lacrosse player was involved. Crystal described a semen depositing rape. Forensic exam revealed NO semen on the rape kit. Exam of the rape kit by DNASI showed the only DNA on the rape kit belonged to men other than members of the Lacrosse team.

SIDNEY HARR misrepresents that AG Cooper proclaimed them innocent. In fact, he said that he and his investigators, after reviewing the case compiled by DA NIFONG, came to the conclusion that the indicted Lacrosse players were innocent.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Subsequent to the Attorney General’s statement, Mike Nifong was forced from his elected position as Durham district attorney and he was later disbarred, making him the first prosecutor to be disbarred by the North Carolina State Bar since its inception in 1933. He was also sentenced to 24 hours in jail for contempt of court by Judge Osmond Smith III".

SIDNEY HARR deliberately fails to mention that DA NIFONG was convicted of multiple violations of legal ethics in a due process proceeding before the State Bar. SIDNEY HARR also deliberately fails to mention that DA NIFONG had in his possession exculpatory evidence, evidence which he was legally bound to turn over to the defendants, and that he lied about it to the court.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
The mainstream media lionized the three defendants and celebrated their proclamations of innocence by the attorney general… all stories related to the Duke Lacrosse case or its participants including the mention that the boys were declared “innocent.” What the media fails to mention is that the proclamation of innocent by the attorney general is irrelevant and meaningless as Roy Cooper is a member of the executive branch and not judicial."

SIDNEY deliberately does not mention that the media coverage at the beginning of the case was virulently anti Lacrosse team. It turned against DA NIFONG only because it became glaringly obvious that DA NIFONG was deliberately, wrongfully prosecuting innocent men.

What made the Lacrosse players innocent was not the opinion of AG Cooper but the FACT that the crime of which they were accused DID NOT HAPPEN.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"In addition, the Duke Lacrosse defendants and their attorneys were able to shake down Duke University for $20 million for each defendant without a fight."

SIDNEY fails to recognize that Duke would not have settled with the Lacrosse players, except to avoid public lawsuits which Duke could not defend.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The greed-driven legal battle goes on as the media continues to coddle these young men who never spent a single day in jail, graduated from college, and have moved on with their lives."

What greed driven legal battle?

You call it coddling to wrongfully prosecute innocent men for a crime which never happened in the first place?

Why should they have spent any time in jail when the crime of which they were wrongfully accused never happened?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Crystal had a long and involved history of mental illness before she ever became infamous for falsely accusing the Duke Lacrosse players.

SIDNEY thinks it was not appropriate that she got a break rather than being prosecuted for her false allegations.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The media’s treatment of Crystal Mangum was similar to that given to Mr. Nifong… she was vilified and demonized… labeled as the false accuser."

She was the false accuser.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Over the ensuing years a culture had evolved in the Triangle Area and throughout the state that was hostile and unsympathetic towards Nifong, Mangum, their supporters, and others considered by the Powers-That-Be to be on the wrong end of the Duke Lacrosse case."

You are saying that wrongfully prosecuting innocent men was the right thing to do.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Not long after the prosecution into the case was launched, the State Bar began its own investigation into D.A. Nifong about questionable prejudicial statements he may have made before the media."

Another distortion of facts by SIDNEY HARR. The NC Bar did not begin investigating DA NIFONG until months after the phony Rape case became news.

There was nothing questionable about DA NIFONG's statements before the media. They were guilt presuming statements, statements made to incite racial animosity against the Lacrosse team, made to undermine the Constitutional rights of those made defendants.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Ms. Mangum’s ex-boyfriend repeatedly punched her in the face in response to a disparaging remark she made about him."

Did you learn this from Crystal, who lied to you about how Milton Walker's clothes caught fire?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"To summarize the outcome, Ms. Mangum was arrested under a slew of unsubstantiated charges including attempted murder, communicating threats, assault and battery, and identity theft, while her ex-boyfriend was neither charged nor arrested."

Crystal was convicted of a number of charges as a result of this incident. She was not acquitted of arson. The jury was deadlocked, 9 to 3 in favor of conviction. According to your reasoning, Crystal was never exonerated of the arson charge.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR;

We'll get back to this later.

However, it is self evident, you have presented more evidence than you ever have before that you are completely divorced from reality and probably schizophrenic.

You also present a lot of evidence of your de facto attitude, that black people like yourself and Crystal are above the law.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

I have scanned the rest of your repetitious ranting and raving.

You have given me a lot of opportunity to prove you are full of crap.

Stand by for further delineation of your demented ideas.

Anonymous said...

Harr is a liar and a racist. Period.

Anonymous said...

Hey lance. You think Mangum will get second degree and less than eight?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:


Answer:2011 VENDETTA PROSECUTION AGAINST CRYSTAL MANGUM
Question: What can SIDNEY HARR not prove?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: CONSPIRACY BY THE MEDICAL EXAMINER

Question: What is a lie promulgated by SIDNEY HARR?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: CONSPIRACY BY THE MEDICAL EXAMINER

Question: What is an unsupported allegation by SIDNEY HARR that supports the belief that he is totally divorced from reality.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: CONSPIRACY BY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA(against Crystal Mangum)

Question: What does not exist?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: CONSPIRACY BY THE ENABLERS

Question: What has SIDNEY HARR not demonstrated in this latest rehash of his total divorcement from reality.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: RECAP: PUTTING THE CONSPIRATORIAL PIECES TOGETHER.

Question: What has SIDNEY HARR repeatedly failed to do in his 5 years or so of blogging for Justice for DA NIFONG.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Rule 3.8, “Special responsibilities of a prosecutor.”

Question: What did DA NIFONG blatantly violate in his wrongful prosecution of innocent Duke Lacrosse players?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: "A prosecutor has the responsibility of a minister of justice and not simply that of an advocate, the prosecutor’s duty is to seek justice not merely to convict."

Question: What is the part of "Special responsibilities of a prosecutor" which SIDNEY, in a brazen act of lying, claims DA NIFONG observed when he wrongfully prosecuted innocent Duke Lacrosse players?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: THE 2006 DUKE LACROSSE CASE

Question: What has SIDNEY continuously lied about since he started J4N?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: THE 2010 ARSON CASE

Question: In what incident did Crystal Magnum lie to SIDNEY HARR about who set fire to Milton Walker's clothes.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: "a perceived slight against three Duke Lacrosse student/athlete/partygoers in 2006"

Question: How does SIDNEY HARR describe DA NIFONG'S wrongful prosecution of innocent Duke Lacrosse players for a crime which did not happen.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: "In addition, the Duke Lacrosse defendants and their attorneys were able to shake down Duke University for $20 million for each defendant without a fight."

How does SIDNEY HARR explain why Duke settled with the innocent Lacrosse players rather than defend against Lawsuits they might file.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: $20 Million

Question: How much money does SIDNEY HARR wrongfully claim each Lacrosse player got from Duke?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Tax evasion

Question: Of what did SIDNEY HARR falsely accuse Reade Seligman.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Durham Police officer

Question 1: Who did SIDNEY HARR accuse of setting Milton Walker's clothes on fire?

Question 2: Who does SIDNEY HARR blame for the damage caused by the fire set by Crystal Mangum?

Question 3: To whom has never apologized for falsely accusing him of Arson?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: KENHYDERAL

Question: Who thinks two unreliable sources add up to one credible source?

Anonymous said...

Correction:

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Durham Police officer

Question 1: Who did SIDNEY HARR accuse of setting Milton Walker's clothes on fire?

Question 2: Who does SIDNEY HARR blame for the damage caused by the fire set by Crystal Mangum?

Question 3: To whom has SIDNEY HARR never apologized for falsely accusing him of Arson?

Lance the Intern said...

"Hey lance. You think Mangum will get second degree and less than eight?

I initially thought so...But with all of Sid's influence and assistance, she'll probably be burned at the stake, drawn and quartered, buried in an unmarked grave for 5 years, then dug up and hanged.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 2:16 said: "9 to 3 in favor of conviction" Wrong!! It voted 9 to 3 in favor of acquittal.

Anonymous said...

Well hissy boy you kinda missed the point about the fire. She has a record that includes arson.........since we are going to use the Harr method of recounting records.....I.e., his lie about daye's record on assault. She has a record that includes assault against an officer in 2002, grand larceny, too. If charges count as a record, whether dropped or whatever, then miss Mangum has FAR more serious criminal history than Daye or walker.
She admitted setting the fire, too, hissy, so the three jurors were RIGHT
I rechecked her criminal history and she has three assault charges! Wow thank you dr Harr for teaching how we really should be speaking about a person's record!!!!

Anonymous said...

Oh let's not forget multiple license suspension, three DUIs and attempted murder. .........

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous @ 2:16 said: "9 to 3 in favor of conviction" Wrong!! It voted 9 to 3 in favor of acquittal."

Yes I got that wrong. According to Wikipedia it was 9 to 3 in favor of conviction.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

What was your source for your information that Dr. Julie Manly was an "experienced gynecologist"?

Did you ever check the results of the physical exam she performed on Crystal before you cited Tara Levicy's line to the police that the exam showed injuries consistent with rape?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: "Durham prosecutors’ conspiracy on a grand scale against Crystal Mangum"

Question: What is the title of SIDNEY HARR's latest attempt at a work of fantasy fiction?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Crystal Mangum is a violent and mentally unstable liar who has a penchant for physically abusing her boyfriends.(how the media presents Crystal Mangum)"

Crystal has a history of violence which began before the Duke phony rape case, e.g. her attempt to run down a police officer. She has a history of criminal violations. Crystal did lie to you about how Milton Walker's clothes were set on fire.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Reginald Daye was portrayed a hardworking man who humanely took in Crystal Mangum and her three children… there being no mention of his alcoholism or past criminal history that included assault on a female."

You choose to be deliberately unaware of Reginald Daye's criminal history and you continue to misrepresent it. Why are you afraid to admit that said charge of assault against a female was dismissed by the District Attorney. Why are you fearful of the truth?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"As a result of the argument, Mangum stabbed Daye and ran off with the two cashier’s checks, there being no mention of the injuries sustained by Mangum".

Yes there was. The ER record, and Officer bond's report noted that Crystal had no evidence of serious injuries. Officer Bond reported one clump of hair was found in the bathroom, not clumps of hair throughout the apartment.

Why do you lie?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The fraudulent Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011 was used as the basis of Durham prosecutor Kelly Gauger’s first degree murder charge against Crystal Mangum".

Again you lie. There was no fraudulent autopsy report.

You must be a minion of Satan since you believe in accomplishing you goals by promulgation of outright, obvious lies.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"There is no mention that Daye’s intubation was botched by Duke University Hospital staff".

That is because the intubation was not botched. That is documented in the medical records you illegally posted.

You again try to promulgate a barefaced, obvious lie. Then you claim the truth you tell will set Crystal free.

Talking about being completely divorced from reality.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The mainstream media’s biggest contribution to the conspiracy was its large scale cover-up in which it ignored the false findings of the all important autopsy report upon which the murder charge against Mangum was based."

Again you lie. The results of the autopsy were not false.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Despite physical evidence that Ms. Mangum had been beaten – with swelling to the lower lip, a small laceration around he left eye, a lesion to the back of her left hand, and clumps of her hair deposited at two sites – Reginald Daye was not charged or arrested for domestic violence, assault on a female, or false imprisonment."

there was no evidence that Crystal was beaten Officer Bond reported there was one clump of hair in the bathroom.

Again, to show the absurdity of what you publish, you say the truth will set Crystal free but you publish lies.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"By concealment of these facts, the mainstream media purposely tried to shield Orange County Medical Examiner Clay Nichols, hide Duke University Hospital culpability in Daye’s death, mislead the public into believing that the stab wound was responsible for Daye’s death, and that Mangum supporters were interfering with the presentation of justice."

Another bare faced lie in this latest SIDNEY-the truth will set Crystal free-Harr has published in this blog post.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The media was well aware of the truth regarding Reginald Daye’s death and that his demise had absolutely nothing to do with the stab wound he received."

Indeed the media was. That is why they did not publish "that his demise had absolutely nothing to do with the stab wound", another lie promulgated by SIDNEY-minion of Satan_HARR has published.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Also, Mr. Shella allowed Judge Osmond Smith III to hear a bail reduction in March 2012 even though the black-rober should have recused himself, as he had presided over the pretrial phase of the Duke Lacrosse trial and had issued rulings against Mangum in it."

Document that Judge Osmond Smith issued rulings against Crystal in the course of DA NIFONG's wrongful prosecution of the innocent falsely accused Lacrosse players.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Unfortunately, the endotracheal tube was positioned in the esophagus instead of the trachea which resulted in oxygen being delivered to the stomach instead of the lungs."

The medical records SIDNEY-minion-of-Satan-HARR illegally accessed and posted documented that a direct laryngospy was done which documented that the endotracheal tube had been placed in the larynx.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
Once Mangum supporters started to rally after her case remained in limbo for a year, the media was utilized to beat back their accusations of prosecutorial misconduct by placing these advocates in a bad light".

What you mean to say is you are in a snit because your non news conference was treated for what it was - a non news event conducted by a deluded, probably schizophrenic, megalomaniac.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"With enablers’ muskets muzzled, compliant media-types kept the unscrupulous doings of the conspirators deeply buried, as no one, save Mangum supporters and members of the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong raised the alarm about the gross injustice taking place."

What is really happening is that Crystal has been exposed as a false accuser and a violent person and she does not have the support she had early in the phony Duke Lacrosse case.

This is another lie promulgated by SIDNEY-minion-of-Satan-HARR, who claims the truth he tells will set Crystal free.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"Right? Follow me, now. Reginald Daye punches Crystal Mangum in the face and head about ten times, spits on her, pulls out her hair, knocks down the bathroom door to get at her, gouges at her left eye with his fingernails, brings in a set of steak knives and throws them at her, and is choking her at which time she grabs a knife and stabs him in self-defense... (a non-fatal wound)."

Again you distort and misrepresent facts and make allegations which you can not support.


What distortions and misrepresentations did I make?

Could you please provide me with some elucidation by pointing them out?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"What distortions and misrepresentations did I make?"

Here are your own words:
"Right? Follow me, now. Reginald Daye punches Crystal Mangum in the face and head about ten times, spits on her, pulls out her hair, knocks down the bathroom door to get at her, gouges at her left eye with his fingernails, brings in a set of steak knives and throws them at her, and is choking her..."

According to Officer Bond and the ER records, Crystal was not punched, one clump of hair was found, there was no evidence of a gouge in her eye. The rest are all unsupported allegations.

These, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR are the distortions you have tried to promulgate as truth. Read them and be enlucidated.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

You lied when you accused a DPD officer of setting fire to Milton Walker's clothes.

You lied when you said each of the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse defendants received $20 million from Duke.

You lied when you say the innocent falsely accused Duke lacrosse defendants "shook down" Duke(you are probably resentful because you did not get a big payoff from your frivolous lawsuit against Duke).

You lied when you said Reade Seligman was guilty of tax evasion.

These facts put you more in the camp of the father of lies than in the camp of the man from Nazareth.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

It seems you have bugged out, which is an indication that you can't stand the truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

You also seem to hope that you can conceal the entire truth about the assault against a female charge filed against Reginald Daye. The entire truth is that the charge was filed but was dismissed by the DA.

That action is another one which puts you in the camp of the father of lies, not the Man from Nazareth.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

You have not responded to my challenge to show how DA NIFONG complied with North Carolina State Bar’s regulation, Rule 3.8 when he prosecuted the innocent, falsely accused Duke Lacrosse players.

That suggests you are unable to do so.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"On March 13, 2006, the Duke Lacrosse team hosted one of its notorious beer-guzzling parties at a rental house on Buchanan Street."

You lie when you say it was a "notorious beer-guzzling part[y]". There are time stamped photos of the party showing it was anything but.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The Durham County prosecutors have not only disregarded these codes of professional conduct, but have violated them to the extreme by acting as criminals themselves in framing an innocent person for crimes that she did not commit".

So show how DA NIFONG complied with "these codes of professional conduct" when he prosecuted innocent Duke Lacrosse players of a crime, a crime of which he had evidence that it had not happened in the first place.

I remind you, an allegation of a crime without evidence of said crime is no more than an unsupported allegation which is not probable cause to prosecute anyone.

You should be an expert on unsupported allegations. You have made so many of them.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

You lied when you said DA NIFONG's downfall was the result of a "carpetbagger jihad" orchestrated by Mrs. Rae Evans.

Months before Mrs. Evans ever made her statement to 60 Minutes, the NC Bar had voted to investigate DA NIFONG and then charge him with ethics violations.

You have been informed of your lie. Yet you continue to state it as the truth.

I point out again, you are the man saying that the truths you tell will set Crystal free.

Oh come now.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The harshness of the retribution sought is not only due to the fact that she accused three lacrosse players from families of wealth, power, and prestige, but because she is an African American."

Another lie you try to pass off as truth. What Crystal is facing is a consequence of her stabbing Reginald Daye and has nothing to do with the false allegations she made against the innocent Duke Lacrosse players

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Then, on February 17, 2010, the city of Durham...had been targeting Mangum for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case".

Another example of an unsupported allegation which you try to pass off as truth, which makes you a liar.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"But, he made the unprecedented move of proclaiming that the Duke Lacrosse defendants were “innocent,” that “nothing happened,” and that Ms. Mangum had made false and unreliable allegations."

It is not true that AG Cooper proclaimed the Lacrosse players innocent. What he said was, "We believe these men are innocent". Maybe the media like to use the term "proclaimed", but that is not what happened.

What evidence can you offer that something did happen and that Crystal's allegations were true?

The fact that Crystal made the allegations does not make them true.

You alleged that a police officer set Milton Walker's clothes on fire. Did that make the allegation true. No it did not, although I have no doubt you believed, on the basis of your allegation, the officer should have been prosecuted for arson.

Anonymous said...

Clarification:

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous @ 2:16 said: "9 to 3 in favor of conviction" Wrong!! It voted 9 to 3 in favor of acquittal."

Yes I got that wrong. According to Wikipedia it was 9 to 3 in favor of conviction.

Wikipedia was wrong. Wikipedia cited a source which said the vote was 9 to 3 in favor of acquittal.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"This prompted the scheduled two hour performance to be reduced to several minutes after the dancers abruptly quit because of the unwarranted and humiliating reception."

Wrong. Another lie you try to pass off as truth. The performance never came off because Crystal was too impaired to perform.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Treachery by the legal profession against Ms. Mangum, Mike Nifong, their supporters, and others considered to be on the wrong end of the Duke Lacrosse case by the Powers-That-Be has been proven to be not newsworthy when it comes to the mainstream media."

That was because there was no "Treachery by the legal profession against Ms. Mangum, Mike Nifong, their supporters, and others considered to be on the wrong end of the Duke Lacrosse case by the Powers-That-Be".

That is another distortion of fact which you try to pass off as truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Mr. Shella voluntarily removed himself after supporters of Mangum drafted and filed motions for her and called a press conference."

Mr. Shella asked to be removed after learning that Crystal had illegally shared confidential information with you, information which you had no legal right to access(look up HIPPA),and then illegally practiced law to file motions on Crystal's behalf without his knowledge. You compromised his efforts to defend her.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

So far, your response to my comments has been pretty feeble and downright impotent, which indicates you have no defense.

I will say more later. Meanwhile, go and obsess about Honey Boo Boo.

Walt said...

For once, Sid gets the law right. Unfortunately, he gets the application of it wrong. He's wrong on the facts and wrong on how to apply the law. Safe to say, the DHC was right, Nifong did violate Rule 3.8(a) and should have been disbarred.

Walt-in-Durham

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"The privileged Duke Lacrosse defendants, who never spent a single day in jail and who were able to shake down Duke University for $20 million each..."

It has been proven (I gave you the link) that the IRS lien upon which you base this "$20 million" figure was an ERROR.

I have challenged you to prove this statement (a challenge, I will note, you have FAILED to even acknowledge, let alone meet).

This statement is simply a LIE -- promulgated by you alone. Stop using it, and apologize for continuing to repeat it.


Intern, I did not pluck the $20 mil figure out of the sky... I got it from some CPA experts who were commenting on the taxes owed by Mr. Seligmann. Now if my figure is wrong, then what figure have you seen? Enlighten me, for a change.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Intern, I did not pluck the $20 mil figure out of the sky... I got it from some CPA experts who were commenting on the taxes owed by Mr. Seligmann. Now if my figure is wrong, then what figure have you seen? Enlighten me, for a change."

According to the story which broke, the IRS informed an accountant of a tax lien against Reade Seligman. When there is a problem with a tax return the IRS informs the taxpayer directly, not an accountant. I am speaking from personal experience. You should have been suspicious of the story and not relied on the data it contained.

Because you did, you did lie when you claimed each Lacrosse player received $20 million from Duke. You further lied when you say they did it via a shakedown of Duke University.

Further, you did falsely accuse Reade Seligman of tax evasion.

These occurrences did place you, not in the camp of the Man from Nazareth but in the camp of the father of lies.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"But, he made the unprecedented move of proclaiming that the Duke Lacrosse defendants were “innocent,” that “nothing happened,” and that Ms. Mangum had made false and unreliable allegations."

It is not true that AG Cooper proclaimed the Lacrosse players innocent. What he said was, "We believe these men are innocent". Maybe the media like to use the term "proclaimed", but that is not what happened.

What evidence can you offer that something did happen and that Crystal's allegations were true?

The fact that Crystal made the allegations does not make them true.

You alleged that a police officer set Milton Walker's clothes on fire. Did that make the allegation true. No it did not, although I have no doubt you believed, on the basis of your allegation, the officer should have been prosecuted for arson.


"Proclaim" "believe"...? You're playing semantics. Bottom line is that the media used the attorney general's statement to "proclaim" the Duke defendants innocent and exonerated. Why even mention it? Why not do like all other prosecutors and just say, "We're dropping the charges." End of story. Instead, Mr. Bannon, Cheshire's underling, persuaded the A.G. to capitulate.

Regarding evidence, most of that is being kept from Crystal by her attorney. The photographs of her injuries and findings at the crime scene would support her position of self defense.

Notify me if more elucidation is required.

Lance the Intern said...

"Intern, I did not pluck the $20 mil figure out of the sky... I got it from some CPA experts who were commenting on the taxes owed by Mr. Seligmann."

Except that the "taxes owed by Mr. Seligmann" were an error (see the bottom of the article ).

The fact is, the only people who know the settlement ain't talking, So no one has seen an accurate figure.

Thereby go ye enlightened.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"

"Proclaim" "believe"...? You're playing semantics. Bottom line is that the media used the attorney general's statement to "proclaim" the Duke defendants innocent and exonerated. Why even mention it? Why not do like all other prosecutors and just say, 'We're dropping the charges.'"

Why not?.

Reason number one is there was no crime committed, so there was no probable cause to indict the innocent Lacrosse players and charge them with the crime.

Reason number 2 is thar corrupt DA NIFONG, before he had any facts about the case, publicly proclaimed members of the Lacrosse team guilty of the crime. When evidence became public that no crime had happened, corrupt DA NIFONG continued to proclaim members of the Lacrosse team guilty.

Explain how publicly presuming suspects guilty is the act of an honorabe ethical prosecutor.

The bottom line is that the Lacrosse players WERE innocent as a matter of FACT, not proclamation.

Your attitude shows you have a vendetta against the innocent Lacrosse defendants. Further, you are resorting to lies and distortions in an attempt to convince the public that they are guilty.

Again, that places you on the side of the father of lies, not on the side of the Man from Nazareth.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Regarding evidence, most of that is being kept from Crystal by her attorney. The photographs of her injuries and findings at the crime scene would support her position of self defense."

Why do you continue to lie about what is documented in the ER records and in Officer Bond's report? There was no evidence that Crystal was assaulted(something confirmed by her mug shot, which is clear enough to show that except to someone who chooses to lie about it rather than see it). No photographs exist showing her injuries.

You again show you are a liar.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Regarding evidence, most of that is being kept from Crystal by her attorney. The photographs of her injuries and findings at the crime scene would support her position of self defense."

What does that have to do with the fact that DA NIFONG had no evidence that a rape had happened or that members of the Lacrosse team were perpetrators when he publicly proclaimed them guilty.

Straw fisherman holding up a red herring, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Your persistent lying about the amount each falsely accused Lacrosse player received from Duke, your failure to acknowledge that you falsely accused Reade Seligman of tax evasion, your persistent refusal to acknowledge the real, actual innocence of the Lacrosse players add up to an attempt on your part, via distortions and lies, to convince the public that the Lacrosse players are guilty.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

I have to ask:

If you truly believe the truth will set Crystal free, why do you persistently resort to lies, distortions of fact and disparagement of a dead man to make her case.

Digest that, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

What do you have against admitting that the Lacrosse players were falsely accused and wrongfully prosecuted. You have admitted you are unaware of any evidence which incriminated. The evidence is a matter of public record.

To claim the evidence is unavailable to the public is another lie you tell. You hope to keep the public for knowing what that innocence was.

Why else would you be defending corrupt DA NIFONG's attempt to conceal exculpatory evidence from the defendants?

Anonymous said...

Correction:

SIDNEY HARR:

What do you have against admitting that the Lacrosse players were falsely accused and wrongfully prosecuted. You have admitted you are unaware of any evidence which incriminated. The evidence is a matter of public record.

To claim the evidence is unavailable to the public is another lie you tell. You hope to keep the public for knowing what that evidence was.

Why else would you be defending corrupt DA NIFONG's attempt to conceal exculpatory evidence from the defendants?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Corruption, conspiracy, and cover-up, all on a grand scale, are preventing Crystal Mangum from receiving true justice which she is due."

Another lie you try to pass off as truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"But, he made the unprecedented move of proclaiming that the Duke Lacrosse defendants were 'innocent,' that 'nothing happened,' and that Ms. Mangum had made false and unreliable allegations."

What made the "unprecedented" necessary was DA NIFONG's public proclamation, before he had any facts, that Lacrosse players were guilty of raping Crystal, his insistence that some players were guilty when he had evidence that the alleged crime never took place.

Prove that Lacrosse players were guilty that something did happen.

Anonymous said...


Dr. Harr,

This comment from one of the most respected readers of your blog provides another example of the consipiracy by the main stream media. The media and Rae Evans continue to perpetuate a misleading fantasy with mischaracterizations of the main actors and total concealment of the truth with a disregard for logic and common sense. I'm sure that kenhyderal and Kilgo will work with you to expose the truth.


kenhyderal said...
"Here's my take on what happened, based on what I have been told by Crystal and by Kilgo. The assault on Crystal involved both Players and non-Players. The semen depositing rape was perpetrated by non-Players. At least two Players were also involved. The negative test for semen is not relevant since DNA extracted from sperm was detected. If sperm was found, semen by definition, as the vehicle for sperm, had to have been deposited regardless of the negative test results. Deposition of DNA can not be timed. Crystal gave her sexual history and it did not explain all the DNA that was found present. The defence cried promiscuity. No effort was made by the Police to identify the DNA once they got no match from the Players. Records from the Escort Agency were available. The only client proximate to her alleged rape refused to give his DNA but denied any sexual encounter with Crystal. No subpoena was issued. The DNA found was not submitted to the data bases and most likely it has not been retained."

Anonymous said...

Anonymous who said:

" I'm sure that kenhyderal and Kilgo will work with you to expose the truth."

You put your faith in people who know nothing about the truth.

Anonymous said...

To the same anonymous who places faith in KENHYDERAL and Kilgo:

From KENHYDERAL:

"The semen depositing rape was perpetrated by non-Players."

Forensic testing of the rape kit taken from Crystal definitively proved that no semen depositing rape took place.

KENHYDERAL argues that the finding of DNA from sperm on Crystal confirms that semen was deposited. However, he also says that timing of semen deposition can not be done. Then he says it can not be proven that semen was not deposited on Crystal on the night of 13-14 March 2006.

You have put your faith in someone who distorts facts and pushes lies as the truth.

Ergo, you must be very confused.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous who trusts KENHYDERAL:

KENHYDERAL dismisses anonymous sources as non credible.

Yet he gives Kilgo credibility even though he does not know who Kilgo actually is. He says Kilgo has a friend, an anonymous Lacrosse player, who told him what happened at the party on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

If you are not another incarnation of KEN-Malek-HYDER-Williams-AL, and this is doubtful, then you are more confused and deluded than either of them.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"Intern, I did not pluck the $20 mil figure out of the sky... I got it from some CPA experts who were commenting on the taxes owed by Mr. Seligmann."

Except that the "taxes owed by Mr. Seligmann" were an error (see the bottom of the article ).

The fact is, the only people who know the settlement ain't talking, So no one has seen an accurate figure.

Thereby go ye enlightened.


Hah! You take that feeble aside from another news article that only quotes Seligmann's attorney as being authoritative? Shirley, you jest.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The devious plot of Durham prosecutors Kelly Gauger and Charlene Coggins-Franks to transform Crystal Mangum from the victim of domestic violence that she was into a first degree murderer, all for misguided retribution for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case, required the contribution and cooperation from many sources".


A couple of lies here.

There is no plot to wreak retribution on Crystal, the false accuser in the phony Duke Rape case.

Records you posted show Crystal was not the victim of domestic violence.

Right on, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous who trusts KENHYDERAL:

Right on KEN-Malek-HYDER-Williams_AL

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

I have to ask:

If you truly believe the truth will set Crystal free, why do you persistently resort to lies, distortions of fact and disparagement of a dead man to make her case.

Digest that, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR.


First of all, I do not disparage Mr. Daye... I tell the truth about him. Unfortunately, the truth can sometimes be ugly.

Also, I do not resort to lies... I publish plenty of documents to support my assertions, unlike the mainstream media and other blog sites.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Hah! You take that feeble aside from another news article that only quotes Seligmann's attorney as being authoritative? Shirley, you jest."

SHIRLEY, no one is jesting, except maybe you, and your so called jests, like everything else you do or have done, are pretty impotent.

The article confirms that Reade Seligman did not commit tax evasion and did not receive $20 million from Duke.

SIDNEY-minion-of-Satan-HARR, you are jealous because your frivolous lawsuit against Duke was tossed out of court and you did not collect money.

Nifong Supporter said...


LISTEN UP, EVERYBODY!
Important Comment-

Has everyone noticed, as have I, how quiet Durham-In-Wonderland has been about the recent turn of events in Crystal's case?

KC Johnson has been so overwhelmed by my bombardment of logic and reason that he is for all intents and purposes dumbstruck. That's the only possible explanation.

Also, I am of the understanding that Dr. Christena L. Roberts, who was paid to review Dr. Nichols' autopsy report, has not produced a written report... rather has only spoken verbally with Mangum's defense attorney Woody Vann.

Not only that, but his reason for not obtaining a written report was so that the prosecution could not get its hands on it. Does that make any kind of sense?

According to the oral report from Dr. Roberts, she confirmed that the endotracheal tube was misplaced and led to oxygen depletion, and that she has no explanation for the lesions in the diaphragm, left kidney, or stomach.
(The only reasonable explanation being that the autopsy report by Dr. Nichols is fraudulent!)

Stay tuned for more, but for the time being, allow this little nugget to provide you with much enlightenment.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"First of all, I do not disparage Mr. Daye... I tell the truth about him. Unfortunately, the truth can sometimes be ugly."

Yes you do disparage Reginald Daye.

When you say you tell the truth about Reginald Daye, it is another lie you promulgate.

Yes to some people the truth is ugly. You have amply demonstrated that via the multiple times you have recoiled from the truth by publishing lies.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Has everyone noticed, as have I, how quiet Durham-In-Wonderland has been about the recent turn of events in Crystal's case?

KC Johnson has been so overwhelmed by my bombardment of logic and reason that he is for all intents and purposes dumbstruck. That's the only possible explanation."

Again you show how deluded you are, how divorced from reality you are, that you are probably a schizophrenic megalomaniac.

You have never demonstrated any capacity for logic and reason, just unreasoning hatred of the innocent falsely accused Lacrosse players. Since you have no capacity for logic and reason, you are incapable of bombarding anyone.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Also, I am of the understanding that Dr. Christena L. Roberts, who was paid to review Dr. Nichols' autopsy report, has not produced a written report... rather has only spoken verbally with Mangum's defense attorney Woody Vann.

Not only that, but his reason for not obtaining a written report was so that the prosecution could not get its hands on it. Does that make any kind of sense?"

That would make sense only if Dr. Roberts' report supports Dr. Nichols' report. It is logical and reasonable that the Defense would not want it known that its expert agreed with the Medical Examiner.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"According to the oral report from Dr. Roberts, she confirmed that the endotracheal tube was misplaced and led to oxygen depletion, and that she has no explanation for the lesions in the diaphragm, left kidney, or stomach.
(The only reasonable explanation being that the autopsy report by Dr. Nichols is fraudulent!)"

There is no way Christena Roberts could have determined from reviewing Dr. Nichols report that the endotracheal tube was misplaced. The only reasonable reason she would not have an explanation for the listed lesions is that she could not prove that Dr. Nichols findings were fraudulent.

In any event, an oral report, even if Dr. Roberts were to present it herself(that is the only way it could be presented to the court) it probably would not be considered credible.

Really, do you think Woody Vann would have settled for an oral report if he could have had a which he could have entered into evidence?

I said you had no capacity for logic or reason. You have just proved it.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Stay tuned for more, but for the time being, allow this little nugget to provide you with much enlightenment."

Which probably means you are going to spend the rest of your library time looking at Honey Boo Boo's facebook page.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"LISTEN UP, EVERYBODY!
Important Comment-"

Another lie for which you receive credit. Nothing in the comment which followed was momentous or important, it was just another collection of delusions and unsupported allegations.

Right on, SIDNEY-minion-of satan-Harr!

Anonymous said...

Correction:

SIDNEY HARR:

"According to the oral report from Dr. Roberts, she confirmed that the endotracheal tube was misplaced and led to oxygen depletion, and that she has no explanation for the lesions in the diaphragm, left kidney, or stomach.
(The only reasonable explanation being that the autopsy report by Dr. Nichols is fraudulent!)"

There is no way Christena Roberts could have determined from reviewing Dr. Nichols report that the endotracheal tube was misplaced. The only reasonable reason she would not have an explanation for the listed lesions is that she could not prove that Dr. Nichols findings were fraudulent.

In any event, an oral report, even if Dr. Roberts were to present it herself(that is the only way it could be presented to the court) it probably would not be considered credible.

Really, do you think Woody Vann would have settled for an oral report if he could have had a written report which he could have entered into evidence?

I said you had no capacity for logic or reason. You have just proved it.

Anonymous said...


Right on Dr. Harr.


Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

Anonymous said...

Sidney: "According to the oral report from Dr. Roberts, she confirmed" all of the conclusions Sidney has alleged on this blog.

This is interesting information.

I am surprised that Vann allowed you to sit in when Roberts presented her oral report. Otherwise, you should explain why you believe that your source is credible. As you know, some of your sources have provided you inaccurate information in the past.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Also, I do not resort to lies... I publish plenty of documents to support my assertions, unlike the mainstream media and other blog sites."

Another lie for which you receive credit.

You publish documents which do not support you assertions, e.g. the assertion that Crystal had injuries from a beating. Then you lie about what is contained in the documents.

Well done, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR!

Anonymous said...

"Anonymous Anonymous said...


Right on Dr. Harr.


Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

October 6, 2012 9:07 AM"

Right on, KEN-Malek_HYDER-Williams-AL

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

I will answer this question for you:

"Really, do you think Woody Vann would have settled for an oral report if he could have had a written report which he could have entered into evidence?"

The only logical reason Woody Vann would not have asked for a written report would have been that he did not want a written report which could be entered into evidence.

Anonymous said...

It's time for another Lax party.

Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL seems unwilling to post under his own name today.

Can it be he is unwilling to effectively address the issues with which he has been presented?

Anonymous said...

It's time for another Lax party.

Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty
Par-ty, Par-ty, Par-ty

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Has everyone noticed, as have I, how quiet Durham-In-Wonderland has been about the recent turn of events in Crystal's case?

KC Johnson has been so overwhelmed by my bombardment of logic and reason that he is for all intents and purposes dumbstruck. That's the only possible explanation."

The only possible explanation for this comment is you would dearly like Professor Johnson to pay attention to you, and you resent that he does not consider worth of his attention.

Why don't you pull the pro se act again and try to sue him for causing you mental anguish for not paying attention to you?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

I repeat my charge. Prove that Duke Lacrosse players raped Crystal Mangum.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Stay tuned for more, but for the time being, allow this little nugget to provide you with much enlightenment."

What little nugget is now providing you with enlightenment?

Glass Houses, SIDNEY

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"The only possible explanation for this comment is you would dearly like Professor Johnson to pay attention to you, and you resent that he does not consider worth of his attention.

Why don't you pull the pro se act again and try to sue him for causing you mental anguish for not paying attention to you?"


What a witty fellow you are.

Anonymous said...

What I should have said:
SIDNEY HARR:

"Has everyone noticed, as have I, how quiet Durham-In-Wonderland has been about the recent turn of events in Crystal's case?

KC Johnson has been so overwhelmed by my bombardment of logic and reason that he is for all intents and purposes dumbstruck. That's the only possible explanation.'

The only possible explanation for this comment is you would dearly like Professor Johnson to pay attention to you, and you resent that he does not consider you worth his attention.

Why don't you pull the pro se act again and try to sue him for causing you mental anguish for not paying attention to you?

Anonymous October 6, 2012 9:49 AM

What a lame excuse for a comment!

What a witty fellow you are not.

Anonymous said...

Keep up the good work Homer.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Ms. Mangum’s ex-boyfriend repeatedly punched her in the face in response to a disparaging remark she made about him."

Another lie for which you get credit.

Documents which you have posted which claim support your allegations show that Crystal had not been beaten.

Well done, SI.DNEY-mimion-of-satan-HARR

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The defense attorney’s collaboration with prosecutors here is vital, as a lawyer usually holds a position of trust with his client relying on him to give advice and direction in his defendant’s best interests."

Another lie, for which you get credit, is that Crystal's lawyer is "in cahoots" with the prosecution. You have only presented non evidence to support that allegation, namely claims that the lawyer is not doing what you want him to do.

Right on, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Recently Mr. Vann allegedly told Ms. Mangum that she had a “weak case,” and suggested that she consider taking a plea deal from the prosecution… this without giving his client full access to the evidence and prosecution discovery."

Present evidence to back up your claims. Something like, what else can it be, is not evidence but another unsubstantiated allegation.

I bet the father of lies is cheering on your efforts.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Despite physical evidence that Ms. Mangum had been beaten"

What physical evidence. Your claim that there are photos showing she had been beaten is another unsubstantiated allegation, not evidence.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: SIDNEY HARR

Question 1: Who is desperate for attention from Professor KC Johnson?

Question 2: Who does Professor KC Johnson believe is not worth serious attention?

Question 3: Who is in a major snit because KC Johnson thinks he is not worth serious attention?

Anonymous said...

More great work Homer.

kenhyderal said...

Your uninventive and unfunny attemps at satire using the quiz show Jeopardy format are becoming quite tiresome.

Anonymous said...

Right on kennyhyderal.

Anonymous said...

I agree Ken. Your refusal to discuss questions raised by your theory is also tiresome.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Your uninventive and unfunny attemps at satire using the quiz show Jeopardy format are becoming quite tiresome."

So go to another blog - maybe KC Johnson's truly enlightening Durham in Wonderland or, maybe, the appropriately named liestoppers.

Anonymous said...

Give 'em hell Homer.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Liestoppers

Question 1: What is an appropriately named blog?

Question 2: What is an enlightening blog?

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Your uninventive and unfunny attemps at satire using the quiz show Jeopardy format are becoming quite tiresome."

Not to me. I am having a great time p----ng you off and leaving you speechless.

Anonymous said...

You da man Homer you da man.

Anonymous said...

More jeopardy:

Answer: Malek Williams

Question: Whose existence can neither KENHYDERAL nor SIDNEY HARR prove?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: the father of lies

Question: In the battle between good and evil, to whom does SIDNEY HARR give his allegiance?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer KENHYDERAL

Question: Who thinks SIDNEY HARR, serial liar, can credibly vouch for the existence of Malek Williams.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The harshness of the retribution sought is not only due to the fact that she accused three lacrosse players from families of wealth, power, and prestige, but because she is an African American."

Another lie for which SIDNEY gets credit.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Subsequent to the Attorney General’s statement, Mike Nifong was forced from his elected position as Durham district attorney and he was later disbarred, making him the first prosecutor to be disbarred by the North Carolina State Bar since its inception in 1933."

SIDNEY is not exactly telling the truth here. The State Bar started its case against DA NIFONG before the AG stepped in, at SIDNEY's request. The NC Bar ethics panel, in a fair and honest trial, something DA NIFONG did not want to afford the innocent men he had indicted for a non existent crime, DA NIFONG was found guilty of multiple ethics charges. That he was the first and only DA in NC disbarred was a distinction he labored mightily to deserve.

SIDNEY HARR calls DA NIFONG's glaringly obvious ethical violations compliance with NC standards for a prosecutor.

Right on, SIDNEY-minion-of-satan-HARR

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"None of the many members of the North Carolina General Assembly who I reached out to were willing to get involved."

That is an indication of the respect, or lack thereof, they have for you. Said lack of respect is something they share with most "Durhamians" and "Tar Heelians"

Anonymous said...

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The media was well aware of the truth related to disparities in the autopsy report when compared with other medical documents… in other words, that the autopsy report was false and misleading."

Are you saying the media actually believes the unsubstantiated allegations you have made?

If so, you are telling another lie.

Anonymous said...

Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer
Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer Ho-mer




Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Showing little curiosity about blatantly false statements in an autopsy report, the media exhibited marked apathy about the autopsy report as well as showing no desire to bring to the public’s attention the events surrounding Daye’s death at the Duke University facility."

No wonder there was "little curiosity about blatantly false statements in [the] autopsy report" since SIDNEY's allegation is totally without factual support.

Saying anyone with a 5th grade education could see the report was bogus is not factual evidence. It is another one of SIDNEY's unsupported allegations.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"That the prosecution was prejudiced against Mangum is evidenced by its disregard for the evidence supporting the fact that Mangum was physically abused by an intoxicated Reginald Daye".

The factual evidence, posted by SIDNEY HARR himself, recorded no evidence of physical abuse of Crystal.

Another lie to SIDNEY HARR's credit.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Misinformation about the number of guests at the event resulted in no body guards being scheduled to accompany the dancers."

Nevertheless the dancers, Kim and Crystal, were eager to perform, circumstantial but powerful evidence that the party was the out of control, beer guzzling orgy SIDNEY describe it as.

This is another lie for which SIDNEY takes credit.

Anonymous said...

Hey anonymous.

I am leaving now.

You have time for posting another column of Homers.

Go to it. I am enjoying your manifestation of impotence.

Anonymous said...

Hey anonymous.

To my last comment, your frustration is obvious.

So go to it. Drive up your frustration level while you manifest your impotence.

Anonymous said...

I thought you were leaving

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 3:24 said: "circumstantial but powerful evidence that the party was the out of control, beer guzzling orgy SIDNEY describe it as"......................... Perhaps our resident "Amature Psychiatrist" can comment on whether this was a "freudian slip" instead of the usual pontifications posted on the mental health of those who have a different point of view from him or her.

Anonymous said...

Bull xxxx. Hired gun witnesses do not give oral reports. They testify in court. Period. I have worked with such medical professionals for years. Never ever heard or seen any such bull. Sidney Harr is manufacturing statements. The law requires full disclosure; the state will have the Roberts report, if it exists, no matter its contents. Vann would not disclose the nature of the report, at this point under any circumstance. Medical expert witnesses follow a very strict protocol for their own reputation's sake. They do NOT make interpretative statements , orally or other wise, one way or the other.......except under oath in testimony.......for obvious reasons. An expert witness in this case would not be giving an opinion about ANY aspect of the care provided by the hospital. .......only about the wound itself, in relation to any Claim of self defense. (Angle, force, etc). The witness would also not be making any judgment about daye's alcohol history except to note his blood alcohol results. ......no inference of alcoholism can be drawn from the single lab results. Also note that there is likely much more medical documentation in the record than is shown on this web site. Under no circumstance should any of this information ever have been made public per trial.

Anonymous said...

Correction:

SIDNEY HARR:

"Misinformation about the number of guests at the event resulted in no body guards being scheduled to accompany the dancers."

Nevertheless the dancers, Kim and Crystal, were eager to perform, circumstantial but powerful evidence that the party was not the out of control, beer guzzling orgy SIDNEY describe it as.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Perhaps our resident "Amature Psychiatrist" can comment on whether this was a "freudian slip" instead of the usual pontifications posted on the mental health of those who have a different point of view from him or her."

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to correct my error.

Anonymous said...

Correction:

KENHYDERAL:

"Perhaps our resident "Amature Psychiatrist" can comment on whether this was a "freudian slip" instead of the usual pontifications posted on the mental health of those who have a different point of view from him or her."

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to correct my error and achieve my goal of debunking another one of your and SIDNEY's lies.

Anonymous said...

Corrected Correction:

Correction:

KENHYDERAL:

"Perhaps our resident "Amature Psychiatrist" can comment on whether this was a "freudian slip" instead of the usual pontifications posted on the mental health of those who have a different point of view from him or her."

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to correct my error and achieve my goal of debunking another one of your and SIDNEY's lies.

I would never been able to do it without you.

Right on KENHYDERAL

Anonymous said...

More jeopardy

Answer: amateur

Question: What word did KENHYDERAL misspell in his last comment?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: "Amature" psychiatrist

Question: Whose error did Kenhyderal correct, allowing said "amature" psychiatrist to further debunk SIDNEY HARR's lies and distortions about the phony Duke Lacrosse case?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy

Answer: Right on, KENHYDERAL

Question: What did the "amature" psychiatrist say to thank KENHYDERAL for correcting his error.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

From the online Urban Dictionary:

"Amature

A word used by those of a lesser intelligence to berate those of higher intelligence".

Right on, KENHYDERAL. Maybe you did use the correct spelling.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Glass House

Question: In what kind of structure does KENHYDERAL live?

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Your Freudian slip is showing.

Anonymous said...

Bring it on Homer

Anonymous said...

Anonymous October 7, 2012 5:07 AM

"Amature

A word used by those of a lesser intelligence to berate those of higher intelligence"

It seems you, like KENHYDERAL are calling me "amature".

Isn't it about time for another column of homers?

Or are your hands cramped from typing your last column of homers?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous October 7, 2012 5:07 AM

Or, like SIDNEY HARR is desperate to be noticed by Professor KC Johnson, are you desperate to be noticed by me.

You are, so go ye and be gratified.

Anonymous said...

Who's Homer?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
What I should have said:
SIDNEY HARR:

"Has everyone noticed, as have I, how quiet Durham-In-Wonderland has been about the recent turn of events in Crystal's case?

KC Johnson has been so overwhelmed by my bombardment of logic and reason that he is for all intents and purposes dumbstruck. That's the only possible explanation.'

The only possible explanation for this comment is you would dearly like Professor Johnson to pay attention to you, and you resent that he does not consider you worth his attention.

Why don't you pull the pro se act again and try to sue him for causing you mental anguish for not paying attention to you?


Actually, I consider KC to be like a misguided friend, and I recently realized that in addition to be dumbfounded at the brilliance of my flog, in addition he is also under duress of the on-going Duke Lacrosse avaricious lawsuits... I understand Duke University wants to depose him... am I right?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Correction:

SIDNEY HARR:

"Misinformation about the number of guests at the event resulted in no body guards being scheduled to accompany the dancers."

Nevertheless the dancers, Kim and Crystal, were eager to perform, circumstantial but powerful evidence that the party was not the out of control, beer guzzling orgy SIDNEY describe it as.


If the party was as respectful and orderly as you describe, then they would probably not have quit performing after a couple of minutes and sought shelter in the bathroom. I rest my case.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Bull xxxx. Hired gun witnesses do not give oral reports. They testify in court. Period. I have worked with such medical professionals for years. Never ever heard or seen any such bull. Sidney Harr is manufacturing statements. The law requires full disclosure; the state will have the Roberts report, if it exists, no matter its contents. Vann would not disclose the nature of the report, at this point under any circumstance. Medical expert witnesses follow a very strict protocol for their own reputation's sake. They do NOT make interpretative statements , orally or other wise, one way or the other.......except under oath in testimony.......for obvious reasons. An expert witness in this case would not be giving an opinion about ANY aspect of the care provided by the hospital. .......only about the wound itself, in relation to any Claim of self defense. (Angle, force, etc). The witness would also not be making any judgment about daye's alcohol history except to note his blood alcohol results. ......no inference of alcoholism can be drawn from the single lab results. Also note that there is likely much more medical documentation in the record than is shown on this web site. Under no circumstance should any of this information ever have been made public per trial.


So you're saying that expert defense witnesses do not produce a written report? Is that what you're trying to say? Could you please provide more elucidation?

Thanks.

Lance the Intern said...

"Hah! You take that feeble aside from another news article that only quotes Seligmann's attorney as being authoritative? Shirley, you jest.

What do you base your claim on? Nothing more than a news article that has been proven false.

As I stated, the only people who know the actual settlement amount aren't talking.

So -- I've given you my proof that the lien was in error. Where's your proof?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"If the party was as respectful and orderly as you describe, then they would probably not have quit performing after a couple of minutes and sought shelter in the bathroom. I rest my case."

You have no case. They were unable to perform because Crystal was intoxicated.

Another lie for which you get credit.

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 763   Newer› Newest»