Sunday, July 13, 2014

Blogs on the news… 07-13-14


This blog is scheduled to be the last one prior to the return of the beloved interactive sharlogs.  Absence of the sharlog for all of these recent weeks was due in large measure to computer and software problems… problems which at last have been completely addressed and rectified.  The narrative on the next sharlog dealing with the Amtey autopsy report has been completed, and will most likely be narrated within 24 hours.  Its estimated date of posting will hopefully be by the end of the week.  The topic of the sharlog to follow will focus on the State and media witch-hunt that has been underway against Mike Nifong for seemingly an eternity.

 
Media discrediting Rashad McCants

Word count: 1,096

Well, the media is at it again… using one of its most effective weapons in its arsenal of devious tricks – discrediting an individual to minimize one’s message.  This was used for a lengthy period against me when I tried to alert the media and public of problems within the state’s medical examiner system… long before The News & Observer five-part series titled “Fatally flawed.”  The News & Observer in particular tried to mute my public service message by painting me as an interloper and troublemaker in Mangum’s recent murder case.  It repeatedly wrote about how the State Bar was investigating me… giving the impression that I was illegally practicing law.  Yes, I did attempt to lend what help I could for Mangum who I accurately predicted would be given the Judas Iscariot treatment by her defense attorney.  However, the most scathing and malicious article would come from The Indy Week of August 22, 2013 which was essentially nothing more than a hatchet job.  I knew that it would be shortly after I approached a writer with the weekly about doing a story about the problem with the medical examiner in Mangum’s case.  Instead, the focus of the article was focused on gossip related to issues that occurred one or two decades ago and having no relevance on North Carolina lives.  Although the excellent cover by Chris Williams accurately depicted my objectives and motivation (depicted as a caped superhero saving Lady Justice), the story was meant to have the opposite effect… one of discrediting and diminishing my influence.

Scott Fowler, a McClatchy sports commentary writer for the Charlotte Observer, in an article in the July 11, 2014 edition of The News & Observer titled “Jamison calls McCants a ‘clown’” does his best to discredit Rashad McCants, the UNC-CH basketball star who recently opened up to ESPN in an interview pertaining to the academic and athletic so-called scandal.  Specifically McCants, who was part of the 1995 Championship UNC team under popular head coach Roy Williams stated that his academic eligibility was in jeopardy and that Coach Williams helped insure that McCants, a star on the team, would remain eligible.  In being frank, McCants said that it was his belief that Coach Williams was aware that he was enrolled in fail-proof classes provided through the African and Afro-American Studies Department under the much maligned department head Julius Nyang’oro.

Antawn Jamison, a UNC-CH basketballer under Coach Williams began his collegiate career after McCants had left the university and credited his insights on McCants’ character as stemming from observing McCants during summer visits he would make to the Chapel Hill area.  For example, Jamison is said to have noticed McCants’ talents and lack of focus… whatever that means.  The article didn’t delve into what Jamison meant when he referred to McCants’ lack of focus.  Whether or not McCants was focused or lacked focus, that has nothing to do with McCants’ credibility.  When McCants says he didn’t write papers and didn’t attend class, I believe him.  When McCants said that he thought Roy Williams was aware of his academic situation, I believe that that is what he sincerely believed.  Whether that was reality is something else that only the coach can answer.  From what I have heard from McCants on interviews and from what I’ve read in the newspapers, I strongly am of the belief that Coach Williams was more involved with keeping his star performers academically eligible than he let has let on.

The newspaper article made it appear as though McCants’ statements covered widespread academic misconduct involving others as well as himself.  To my knowledge, though it may be limited, McCants talked exclusively about his situation and did not delve into that of his teammates and other players.

Fowler quotes Jamison as saying of McCants, “I just think he’s a clown.  I think he’s in a situation where he’s looking for attention.  It’s just sad.”  What does Jamison mean by his statement that he thinks McCants is a clown?  I don’t know.  Fowler doesn’t follow up on the statement.  For Jamison to state that he believes McCants’ actions are because he’s seeking attention is extremely weak and is quite often overused.  Many commenters to my blog site frequently accuse me of seeking attention when I attempt to bring attention to injustices in the State’s legal system.  The main reason I am forced to do so is because the mainstream media has failed to provide this important service for the people of North Carolina.  From what I’ve seen of McCants, it does not appear to me that he is seeking attention.  What would be his purpose for seeking attention?  What would be the purpose for me to seek attention?  Attention is the last thing I want, but one cannot be an effective advocate by being anonymous… and effective and credible advocate must lend his name in order to show commitment to the causes he supports.

Jamison is also quoted as accusing McCants of trying to “throw a black cloud over everyone who’s done it the right way.”  Again, Fowler journalistically fails to follow-up in order to understand the essence and accuracy of Jamison’s statement.  As I have stated, I have never seen or heard McCants denigrate others or even discuss the situation of other players academically or otherwise. 

Finally, Fowler, through Jamison, tries to make it appear that McCants’ interviews with ESPN and other media is vendetta-driven because of McCants’ relationship with the university… in particular, quoting Jamison as saying about McCants, “Don’t try to bring down a university because you don’t have a good relationship with the coaching staff.”  Where does Jamison come off making such a statement about an athlete with whom he didn’t play and whose observations come from occasionally seeing him every now and then during the summer?

It is clear to me that it’s not McCants who has an agenda in all of this, but Antwan Jamison.  He was not picked up after a lengthy 16-year NBA career, and is currently trying to latch on to play for the Charlotte Hornets for at least another year.  What better way to achieve that than by coming to the support of a beleaguered legendary and much loved basketball coach by helping to take the wind out of the sails of McCants whose motives in coming forward seem nothing more than altruistic to me.

I must hand it to Scott Fowler… he did an excellent job of subtly discrediting Rashad McCants.  It certainly wasn’t overkill like the August 22, 2013 Indy Week article about me.   nn


Follow-up on P. J. Hairston

Word count: 451

My last blog in defense of P. J. Hairston may have been a bit hasty.  Going solely by the account in The News & Observer, in which Hairston’s spokesperson said the high schooler  initiated the shoving and punching exchanges, I charged in to defend Hairston who has been unfairly targeted by the media.  However, as events have developed it seems as if there was no shoving during the match, and that the one or two punches thrown by Hairston were unprovoked, unanswered by the high school player, and occurred outside the heat of competitive sports battle.

Like Pope Francis and the Man from Nazareth, I do not condone violence, and it appears that Hairston was clearly in the wrong.  I find no fault in the parents of the youth seeking out a warrant under the circumstances.  It is my hope that this episode helps make Hairston a better person… that he learns from his bad behavior and doesn’t repeat it in the future.

Unlike politicians and many in the media, I own up to my errors in judgment and have the courage to admit them.  Overall, my last blog about Hairston missed the mark.  See, I don’t go around trying to make excuses.  I think that part of the problem is that many people think of me as being perfect, so the important thing is to remember that I am a human being, just like everyone else, and am therefore capable of making a mistake… on extremely rare occasions.

The other stories in the news about Hairston… switching his car with Cleveland Browns wide receiver Josh Gordon and having an agent who is not registered should not be brought before the public as character issues.  So he switched cars with an NFL bad boy… is that against the law?  And so what if his agent is not registered?  Maybe he didn’t do his homework like he should have in selecting him, but if anything it seems like he is the victim here, if anything.

Even though Hairston disappointed me in the YMCA pickup basketball game, that does not give the media the right to scrutinize his every move.  Instead of trying to get the Hornets to fire him, why write and broadcast constructive stories.  During last year’s basketball season the media had the chance to attack the parasitic NCAA cartel for its draconian suspension of Hairston, but it didn’t.  Fowler should’ve teed off on the avaricious NCAA members and their self-serving policies that come at the expense of student athletes.  Had Fowler defended Hairston’s right to play basketball last season, UNC might have made it to the Final Four… maybe even winning the national title outright.    nn

326 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 326 of 326
Anonymous said...

I do not take kindly to Ken Edwards re-posting my posts under his name. I've asked Dr. Harr to put a stop to it but to no avail. When I challenged Edwards and admonished him to desist he called me a coward. This person claiming to be a friend of Crystal and one of her supporters is a fraud and is only making mischief here. This is hurting Crystal's cause and making me very angry. I am not a violent person but I don't tolerate abuse and disrespect to myself and my friends very well

Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

guiowen said...

To all our friends here, please note it is our good friend Kenhyderal's belief that:
If Crystal were a prostitute, she would have been convicted of first-degree murder
If she were a virgin, she would have been convicted of involuntary manslaughter.
She was instead convicted of second-degree murder. Make of it what you will.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: "You are wrong. She was a prostitute"..... Is that you Dr. Anonymous? Readers please note that only cowardly anonymous posters make this slanderous accusation."

What slanderous accusation?

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Why did DNA Security's testing of Crystal's rape kit find DNA from multiple males on her person.

As no rape happened on the night of 13/14 March 2006, it was not because she was raped.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "As no rape happened on the night of 13/14 March 2006".... Because DNA deposition can not be timed, when it was deposited can not be ascertained just from it being found but since it was found it could well have been deposited then. There are other ways besides the timing of the DNA found. It involves old fashioned police work like the taking of a careful history of the consensual sexual activity and then verifying that history. Once the three charged Player's DNA was not found the investigation was aborted. Everyone present was a potential suspect if not for rape then for other wicked crimes. Among that grouping were non-Players who were never identified, but again with an adequate Police investigation they could have been.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "I do not take kindly to Ken Edwards re-posting my posts under his name"...... Malek if this is you, you are really pushing your luck. You need to reconsider the negative consequences that might result from it if this behaviour persists. A warning; I'm losing patience.

guiowen said...

Malek,
Be careful. Kenhyderal's threats are not idle. He is a fighter. He and his friends will wipe the floor with you.

Anonymous said...

James D. "Butch" Williams, a prominent Durham lawyer and sports agent, who represented Michael Vick, said the following about Ms. Mangum:

“C’mon, kids. She wasn’t this little poor North Carolina Central student working the fields. She was a whore.”

Ms. Mangum was working for a local escort service, Angels Escort Service (aka: Bunny Hole Entertainment), when she went to the Duke Lacrosse party. Lacrosse defense attorneys later found that Mangum was working for at least eight different "escort" agencies.

Lance the Intern said...

You've peaked my interest, Kenhyderal. What are the "negative consequences" you're speaking of?

dhall said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Because DNA deposition can not be timed, when it was deposited can not be ascertained just from it being found but since it was found it could well have been deposited then."

To make a case for rape, you have to establish beyond s reasonable doubt that the DNA WAS deposited then. That "it could well have been deposited then" hardly does that.

"There are other ways besides the timing of the DNA found. It involves old fashioned police work like the taking of a careful history of the consensual sexual activity and then verifying that history."

There is evidence Crystal did engage in consensual sex shortly before the party-she had appointments with multiple men in hotel rooms prior to the party. You say the men denied having sex with Crystal. That was meaningless. The only way to determine whether or not the DNA was deposited before the party or at the party would have been test every one with whom Crystal could have had sex. That included the men with whom she met before the party.

Then there is your claim was that Crystal was performing exotic dances for the men. So why at the party did she tell Kim Pittman/Roberts at the party that she had never before danced for men. This makes your claim not at all credible.

"Once the three charged Player's DNA was not found the investigation was aborted.

What was also aborted was any attempt on your part to understand why the investigation was aborted. The investigation was aborted because DA NIFONG did not want the world to know that the only DNA found on Crystal came from men who were not suspects. The only reason the world ever knew of the DNA was that the defense lawyers exposed DA NIFONG's attempt to conceal it.

"Everyone present was a potential suspect if not for rape then for other wicked crimes."

No one who was present was a suspect for rape since everyone who was there was identified and the forensic evidence excluded everyone who was present as a suspect.

"Among that grouping were non-Players who were never identified."

Again, what credible, factual evidence do you have that there were "non-Players who were never identified"? NONE!!!!

You can not even provide credible factual evidence that Kilgo ever told you about any party attendee said anything about non identified party attendees or about a sexual assault.


"but again with an adequate Police investigation they could have been."

That presumes that there were unidentified party attendees. You have provided no credible factual evidence that there were.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: "I do not take kindly to Ken Edwards re-posting my posts under his name"...... Malek if this is you, you are really pushing your luck. You need to reconsider the negative consequences that might result from it if this behaviour persists. A warning; I'm losing patience."

KENNY the blowhard huffs and puffs again.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "James D. "Butch" Williams, a prominent Durham lawyer and sports agent, who represented Michael Vick, said the following about Ms. Mangum"...........
Williams was reported saying this at some unspecified time and place in the Yaeger/Pressler book "It's Not About Truth" published over 7 years ago. I wonder whether he would go on the record and repeat this slander now.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"There are other ways besides the timing of the DNA found. It involves old fashioned police work like the taking of a careful history of the consensual sexual activity and then verifying that history."

The only way to have done that was to test ALL the men with whom she could have had sex. When the party attendees were all cleared as suspects, the police should have tested any other men with whom Crystal could have had sex.

Just taking the word of Crystal's contacts is not a reliable way of doing that.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Anonymous said: "James D. "Butch" Williams, a prominent Durham lawyer and sports agent, who represented Michael Vick, said the following about Ms. Mangum"...........
Williams was reported saying this at some unspecified time and place in the Yaeger/Pressler book "It's Not About Truth" published over 7 years ago. I wonder whether he would go on the record and repeat this slander now."

What slander?

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: " KENNY the blowhard huffs and puffs again"............... http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-spZZL-gtQ1o/T9oPvazGHII/AAAAAAAACes/_0OqAZCyTGs/s320/just%2Bwait%2Band%2Bsee.jpg

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: "James D. "Butch" Williams, a prominent Durham lawyer and sports agent, who represented Michael Vick, said the following about Ms. Mangum"...........
Williams was reported saying this at some unspecified time and place in the Yaeger/Pressler book "It's Not About Truth" published over 7 years ago. I wonder whether he would go on the record and repeat this slander now."

Kilgo did not, according to you, did not make his claim to you about his anonymous Lacrosse player friend until at least two years after the party. Since then he has disappeared. No one has come forth in over 8 years to say he was the witness.

How is this credible, factual evidence that there were unidentified party attendees, especially considering your disregard of Butch Williamson's statement?

kenhyderal said...

Dr. Anonymous said: "What slander"...... The same one you made. Only Williams attached his name to it. At least a second hand report said he did.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. Anonymous said: "How is this credible, factual evidence that there were unidentified party attendees, especially considering your disregard of Butch Williamson's statement?"..... Dr. A. your erratic though processes once again cause you to make comparisons where none exist. I'm not disregarding Williams statement if he did in fact make it nor should you disregard the statement made by Kilgo. I'm asking Williams and Kilgo to go public with their statements and let them both suffer the consequences

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Dr. Anonymous said: "What slander"...... The same one you made. Only Williams attached his name to it. At least a second hand report said he did."

What slander?

Slander is something like accusing innocent men of crime which never happened.

Since you show no knowledge of what slander is, you should not feel offended if someone likes me tests you to see if you understand the concept.

So far you have flunked three times.

kenhyderal said...

For you to call Crystal a prostitute is slander and if you can be identified you could be held accountable.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Dr. A. your erratic though processes once again cause you to make comparisons where none exist."

Your denials of the fact that you have no factual credible evidence to support your accusations emerge again.

"I'm not disregarding Williams statement if he did in fact make it nor should you disregard the statement made by Kilgo."

What statement made by Kilgo? How have you documented by factual credible evidence that Kilgo ever made that statement.

"I'm asking Williams and Kilgo to go public with their statements and let them both suffer the consequences".

Williams has already gone public, according to you. You have never documented that Kilgo has any statement to go public with.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"For you to call Crystal a prostitute is slander"

There is no evidence in the public record of that.

"and if you can be identified you could be held accountable."

By whom? KENNY the blowhard who can't even huff and puff?

Kenny "Mystery Rapists" Hyderal Supporter said...

Kenny "Mystery Rapists" Hyderal claimed: Once the three charged Player's DNA was not found the investigation was aborted.

Kenny is mistaken. Nifong and the DPD never commenced a bona fide investigation. There was no investigation to "abort."

kenhyderal said...

Dr. A. said: "Williams has already gone public, according to you"........... No, he hasn't. That is what I am questioning. This was a third party report, un-sourced, that he said this about Crystal. Kilgo of course deleted nearly all his posts on this blog including those where he referred to the witness. My suspicion is that he was sourced and scared off.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Here is something for you to consider, the reason why the Police(under the direction of DA NIFONG) did not identify from whom the unidentified DNA.

The DA is supposed to uncover the truth, not just seek convictions, or don't they have that kind of legal ethic in Canada?

Identifying the source of the unknown DNA as the men with whom Crystal had appointments on the night of the party, would have established that the DNA deposition could not have been the night of 13/14 March 2006.

So why would the DA want not to do that? The most likely explanation would be the DA and police did not want to come up with more exculpatory evidence, more than they had and were concealing already.

The bottom line is the finding of non lax DNA on Crystal does not even establish the suspicion of rape.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Dr. A. said: "Williams has already gone public, according to you"........... No, he hasn't. That is what I am questioning. This was a third party report, un-sourced, that he said this about Crystal."

You did admit that Butch Williams went public. Now you are claiming he did not. If he did not, he did not commit slander. Ergo, if you are wanting him to make the statement now, you want him to commit slander. I think it would be a form of entrapnent.

"Kilgo of course deleted nearly all his posts on this blog including those where he referred to the witness."

Which is an admission on your part that you can not document that Kilgo ever made that claim.

"My suspicion is that he was sourced and scared off."

So. Your suspicions do not document anything.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. A. said: "By whom"..... By Crystal the aggrieved party. With, I might add, the help of her Lawyer and the support of her friends.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. A. Said: "The bottom line is the finding of non lax DNA on Crystal does not even establish the suspicion of rape"......... That assumes that only two non-players were present. Something never established.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. A. said: "You did admit that Butch Williams went public:... You should re-read my statement.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Dr. A. said: "By whom"..... By Crystal the aggrieved party. With, I might add, the help of her Lawyer and the support of her friends."

What lawyer. After she treated her defense lawyers do you think any lawyer would want to deal with Crystal?

What friends? You and SIENEY? You two are the only ones speaking up for her. Neither one of you is going to scare anyone.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Dr. A. Said: "The bottom line is the finding of non lax DNA on Crystal does not even establish the suspicion of rape"......... That assumes that only two non-players were present. Something never established."

You are still mixed up. Try to understand this, something you seem to have forgotten. You are asserting there were more than two non lax party attendees. You are therefore obliged to prove there were more than two. You haven't.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Dr. A. said: "You did admit that Butch Williams went public:... You should re-read my statement."

Here is your statement.

"Williams was reported saying this at some unspecified time and place in the Yaeger/Pressler book "It's Not About Truth" published over 7 years ago"

How could Butch Williams have been reported as saying this if he did not go public with it?

Here is the rest of your statement:

" I wonder whether he would go on the record and repeat this slander now."

If Mr. Williams did not make the statment, there was not slander. You want him to make the statement now. So you are trying to entrap him in committing slander. Of course that presumes the statement is slanderous, which is in doubt.

My guess is that Crystal would take no legal action because the statement is not slanderous.

Anonymous said...

Dr. A:

You are forgetting the rules of this blog. Sidney and his acolytes (the most prominent of whom is Kenny) are permitted to make any allegation they wish and their critics are obligated to prove that the allegation could not possibly be true.

You have failed to do this.

It is theoretically possible that sperm could have been deposited on the night of the part and the test was a false negative. It is theoretically possible that there were more non-players at the party. It is theoretically possible that the three defendants and the rest of their teammates would fail to turn on the mystery rapists. It is theoretically possible that Crystal was violently raped and beaten, but suffered no injuries. It is theoretically possible that Mystery rapists really did rape Crystal at the party.

Remember that probability is not a valid concept on this blog. Any possible explanation, no matter how implausible and remote, must be given equal weight with all other explanations (but only when that explanation is advanced by Sidney or an acolyte).

I suggest you apologize.

I recognize that these rules stifle an honest debate. However, those are the rules. If you don't wish to participate on that basis, I suggest you post on a blog that values honest debate.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Here is a rephrase.

You say it has never been established that there were only two non lax player party attendees.

Who ever claimed there were more than two. Only you.

How have you established that there were more than two.

More of your perverted sense of justice based on your presumption of guilt on the part of innocent men. You make a statement which you do not prove. You claim if no one can disprove your unproven statement, said unproven statement must be accepted as true.

Is that a Canadian principle of justice?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous July 21, 2014 at 5:14 PM

I apologize.

I am truly sorry that KENHYDERAL and SIDNEY are such self important idiots.

Anonymous said...

Kenny ... if calling Crystal a prostitute is slander, why didn't Crystal sue Butch? Mybe she knows truth is n absolute defense.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. Anonymous said: "Williams was reported saying this at some unspecified time and place in the Yaeger/Pressler book "It's Not About Truth" published over 7 years ago"
............If his words were accurately reported that is slander. If he repeats those words he will be liable.

guiowen said...

Wow! Kenhyderal the fighter! And a master debater to boot!
Let's see you in action!

kenhyderal said...

Dr. A said: "If Mr. Williams did not make the statment, there was not slander. You want him to make the statement now. So you are trying to entrap him in committing slander. Of course that presumes the statement is slanderous, which is in doubt.
.............. A typical disjointed pronouncement from Dr. A. Lets dissect. If Mr. Williams did not make the statment, there was not slander. Yes you are correct but it was reported here that he did make it. You want him to make the statement now. So you are trying to entrap him in committing slander. Here you tacitly admit it was slanderous but you quickly hasten to tack on the proviso " Of course that presumes the statement is slanderous, which is in doubt" If he said it and he does not believe it is slander let him repeat it and he'll find out.

kenhyderal said...

Or better yet repeat the accusation you made here and sign your name to it.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Dr. Anonymous said: "Williams was reported saying this at some unspecified time and place in the Yaeger/Pressler book "It's Not About Truth" published over 7 years ago"
............If his words were accurately reported that is slander. If he repeats those words he will be liable."

Not if it is the truth. You are not capable of proclaiming it slander-just like you have shown yourself incapable of proclaiming the existence of mystery rapist party guests.

Anonymous said...

KENHYERAL:

"A typical disjointed pronouncement from Dr. A."

No, an intellectual concept of which KENHYDERAL is incapable of understanding.

"Lets dissect. If Mr. Williams did not make the statment, there was not slander. Yes you are correct but it was reported here that he did make it."

Ergo it was reported that he did go public with it.

"You want him to make the statement now."

No, you do.

"So you are trying to entrap him in committing slander."

No, you do.

"Here you tacitly admit it was slanderous but you quickly hasten to tack on the proviso ' Of course that presumes the statement is slanderous, which is in doubt'"

Which proviso says it is in doubt that the statement is slanderous.

"If he said it and he does not believe it is slander let him repeat it and he'll find out."

So you admit if he does believe it, the statement is not slanderous.

You dissect as well as Jack the Ripper.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Or better yet repeat the accusation you made here and sign your name to it."

First you provide credible factual evidence that the accusations you make are true.

Saying that no one has provided proof that there were only two non Lacrosse players at the party is not factual credible evidence. Since you say there were more than two you have to establish there were more than two.

Anonymous said...

Ken Edwards, you are really pushing your luck. You need to reconsider the negative consequences that might result from it if this behaviour persists. A warning; I'm losing patience.

Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

kenhyderal said...

Attention Dr. Harr I see the racist post of July 19 @ 7:25 is still up. You have promised that you would censor these egregious posts. As far as the Anonymous poster who signs his posts Malek Williams, if he continues to plagiarize me it's going to be either him or me. In my opinion he is really adding nothing to your blog and he is here not for any constructive purpose but only to create mischief. Everyone here recognizes that but some of them are taking pleasure in seeing me mocked. But, hey, it's your blog and your choice.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Attention Dr. Harr I see the racist post of July 19 @ 7:25 is still up. You have promised that you would censor these egregious posts. As far as the Anonymous poster who signs his posts Malek Williams, if he continues to plagiarize me it's going to be either him or me. In my opinion he is really adding nothing to your blog and he is here not for any constructive purpose but only to create mischief. Everyone here recognizes that but some of them are taking pleasure in seeing me mocked. But, hey, it's your blog and your choice."

What are you adding to this blog other than a number of allegations you can't prove?

guiowen said...

Heavens, Kenhyderal, are you threatening Sidney?

kenhyderal said...

@ Guiowen. I know you are one of those getting vicarious pleasure from my discomfort but if Williams persists in plagiarizing me, I'm asking Dr. Harr to make a choice.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"I know you are one of those getting vicarious pleasure from my discomfort but if Williams persists in plagiarizing me, I'm asking Dr. Harr to make a choice."

SIDNEY has never shown any great concern all the previous times you have threatened to leave this blog. Why do you think he will now?

guiowen said...

Actually, Kenhyderal, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. What you should say is, "Look, everyone, my writing is so good that even Malek Williams copies it."

Anonymous said...

Blogger kenhyderal said...

Or better yet repeat the accusation you made here and sign your name to it.



If it were made here, and a name signed to it, what is your plan? Get Crystal to sue them for defamation, and make her go under oath to prove she never had sex with someone in exchange for money?

Crystal is smart enough to complain but not actually sue people. Though, since you clearly aren't, and you are advising her, maybe she would follow more bad advice from you.

Anonymous said...

If Kenny will leave if we all make posts under his name, we should all just start making posts under his name.

What kind of threat is "I will stop posting here"? Are you 3?

Anonymous said...

I suggest we discuss Kenny's claim that posters who claim that Mangum was a prostitute face potential legal ensure.

Mangum likely is a public figure. See NY Times v Sullivan.

The plaintiff must prove the publisher knew the statement was false or acted in reckless disregard of the truth. Because of the high burden on proof and the difficulty of proving the defendant's knowledge or intention, cases with public figures seldom succeed.

Few know that the statement is false. Does the circumstantial evidence (escort work, drivers, dates in hotel rooms, other statements, money after dates, unexplained DNA, etc.) overcome reckless disregard?

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: What kind of threat is "I will stop posting here"? Are you 3?".....(Not posed as a question but as an insult) I will not contribute to a blog where the blog director allows flagrant plagiarism of my words. Those of you cheering Malek on should reflect on the serious problems this blog tries to address and ask yourself what value is this troll bringing here. On the subjects this blog deals with there are two sides to most of the arguments and I try to give a different point of view, then the one held by many here; otherwise, it ends up like Durham in Wonderland as nothing more then an echo chamber for the meta-narrative KC Johnson tried to sell in his jealous rivalry with Richard Broadhead or, at very least, ad hominem attacks on Dr. Harr, who persistently turns the other cheek to disrespectful insults by Duke Lacrosse apologists. The lawsuits are all put to rest now. No need for you all continuing to go ballistic at any hint or suggestion that that Crystal was violated.

Anonymous said...

Attention Dr. Harr As far as the Anonymous poster who signs his posts kenhyderal, if he continues to plagiarize me it's going to be either him or me. In my opinion he is really adding nothing to your blog and he is here not for any constructive purpose but only to create mischief. Everyone here recognizes that but some of them are taking pleasure in seeing me mocked. But, hey, it's your blog and your choice.


Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: What kind of threat is "I will stop posting here"? Are you 3?".....(Not posed as a question but as an insult) I will not contribute to a blog where the blog director allows flagrant plagiarism of my words."

Plagiarism of your words is like writing a book on the authenticity of the Piltdown man. Junk.

"Those of you cheering Malek on should reflect on the serious problems this blog tries to address and ask yourself what value is this troll bringing here."

The "problem" this blog tries to address was that Crystal was exposed as a liar who falsely accused innocent men of raping her. Let's see her sue someone for slander over that statement.

"On the subjects this blog deals with there are two sides to most of the arguments and I try to give a different point of view, then the one held by many here;"

Another way of saying that innocent people should be punished for crimes which never happened.

"otherwise, it ends up like Durham in Wonderland"

No way that this trash blog could end up as classy as Durham in Wonderland. It says something about the lack of class of the person who suggests this could be so.

"as nothing more then an echo chamber for the meta-narrative KC Johnson tried to sell in his jealous rivalry with Richard Broadhead"

KC Johnson has no rivalry with Richard Brodhead. KC is a classy college professor. Brodhead is a crass, craven coward.

"or, at very least, ad hominem attacks on Dr. Harr, who persistently turns the other cheek to disrespectful insults by Duke Lacrosse apologists."

"Dr." Harr is a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD degree appended to his name. What is said to him is hardly disrespectful since he has done nothing to merit any respect. The so called Duke Lacrosse apologists resist the idea that innocent members of the Lacrosse team because a Prostitute falsely accused them of rape(and I sincerely believe the false accuser is and was a Prostitute.

"The lawsuits are all put to rest now. No need for you all continuing to go ballistic at any hint or suggestion that that Crystal was violated."

How about you going ballistic over the truth that Crystal was not violated. Repeatedly I have challenged you to provide factual credible evidence that Crystal was violated. Repeatedly you have not just failed but failed spectacularly.

This is all another iteration of your perversion of the concept of justice, your belief that the innocent Lacrosse players should be presumed guilty because they were accused by a black woman.

This same black woman is a murderess whom you think should receive a pass for her crimes simply because she is black.

Anonymous said...

Clarification:

"Dr." Harr is a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD degree appended to his name. What is said to him is hardly disrespectful since he has done nothing to merit any respect. The so called Duke Lacrosse apologists resist the idea that innocent members of the Lacrosse team should be convicted of a crime and imprisoned because a Prostitute falsely accused them of rape(and I sincerely believe the false accuser is and was a Prostitute.

kenhyderal said...

The cowardly Dr. Anonymous said: The so called Duke Lacrosse apologists resist the idea that innocent members of the Lacrosse team because a Prostitute falsely accused them of rape(and I sincerely believe the false accuser is and was a Prostitute"............ Your slander is not as anonymous as you believe. You can be identified

guiowen said...

Tremble, Dr. Anon! The Master Debater has you in his sights!

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"

The cowardly Dr. Anonymous said: The so called Duke Lacrosse apologists resist the idea that innocent members of the Lacrosse team because a Prostitute falsely accused them of rape(and I sincerely believe the false accuser is and was a Prostitute"............ Your slander is not as anonymous as you believe. You can be identified"

Clarification:

The so called Duke Lacrosse apologists resist the idea that innocent members of the Lacrosse team should be prosecuted and convicted of rape because a Prostitute falsely accused them of rape:.

More impotent empty threats from KENHYERAL, the apologist for murderess/convicted criminal Crystal Mangum.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

You again have ducked an issue, an issue you raised.

You say that the Lacrosse apologists go ballistic over your contention that Crystal was violated.

Why do you go ballistic over the fact that Crystal was not violated, at least on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

Why do you obsess so much on the idea of a woman you know being raped?

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

butch Williams reported Crystal was a prostitute.

The bouncer at the Platinum reported Crystal was a prostitute.

Crystal had appointments with a number of men in their hotel rooms before the Lacrosse party. You say she went those appointments to perform exotic dances. But, at the party Crystal told Kim Pittman/Roberts she had never before danced before men.

DNA Security's testing of the rape kit found the DNA of multiple men on Crystal's person.

There is plenty of reason for anyone to believe Crystal was a prostitute.

Anonymous said...

Blogger kenhyderal said...

The cowardly Dr. Anonymous said: The so called Duke Lacrosse apologists resist the idea that innocent members of the Lacrosse team because a Prostitute falsely accused them of rape(and I sincerely believe the false accuser is and was a Prostitute"............ Your slander is not as anonymous as you believe. You can be identified




So, Kenny, the statement was made yesterday, the Statute of Limitations is 1 year. Are you saying that Crystal will be filing a lawsuit from prison over this, are you actually talking with her, or are you just making this all up?

I imagine Crystal doesn't really care what is said about her on a random blog, and likely won't do anything, but you seem sure that people are facing lawsuits ... is she planning on filing them, or is this more wild rantings from you?

Anonymous said...

You know it is slander to say that on this blog. You have no proof. You think that she can be raped or assualted at duke and then duke can continue to harrass and harm her and kill others in order to frame her when she has to defend herself against the abuse they wholeheartedly support when flung - and you and others can abuse EVERYONE with your insane evil trolling with no consequence? This is the very thing most complain about Duke - their arrogance to harm and then harm some more if anyone complains or asks for accountability for their actions and responsibility for their harm - and then they expect everyone and the universe to go along with that too. Things don't work that way.

Nifong Supporter said...


The offensive post of July 19, 2014 will be removed forthwith per the kenhyderal doctrine.

Nifong Supporter said...


HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!

Just wanted to let you know that I've had an incompatibility problem with my scanner. The problem has been resolved, but set back the date of posting my latest sharlog. Sorry for any inconvenience. I will be working hard to get it completed and posted as soon as possible.

As you were.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous July 23, 2014 at 6:50 AM

No one believes the propaganda you spout because you are incredibly and irredeemably stupid.

Now go ahead and again threaten to call me a hate criminal.

Don't you hate it when someone points out how stupid and impotent you are?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The offensive post of July 19, 2014 will be removed forthwith per the kenhyderal doctrine."

How about now you remove all the offensive slanderous posts KENHYDERAL has put up on your blog, which posts falsely accuse innocent men of raping Crystal Mangum.

Anonymous said...

Kenny:

Mangum was a prostitute (or escort, if you prefer that nomenclature) and she was not assaulted by the lacrosse players or anyone else for that matter. The evidence on these matters is overwhelming and incontrovertible. Nobody will ever be sued for acknowledging these facts.

Rigby said...

Sid's gonna drop his balls when he sees how good we posted these comments! He's gonna be all like, "Oh no, mah gumballs!"

Mordecai said...

We-oo! We-oo! We-oo! Quick, Doctor Harr. Both of these buttcheeks are unrecognizable! If we want anybody to recognize this as a butt in the future, then we're gonna have to do a complete butt transplant, STAT!

Mordecai said...

I have to tell you the truth...I have a condition that makes me forget everything in times of extreme stress. But
Kenhyderal doesn't have the condition...he's just an idiot.

Rigby said...

Looks like Pajama Sisters II is bombing! But it's doing better than Kenhyderal did with Crystal. OOOOOHHHHH!!!

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Ray Charles

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr,

Other respected posters at this blog agree with me that kenhyderal is making threats to harm Malek. Why do you continue to ignore kenhyderal's actions?







Nifong Supporter said...


"I don't think that kenhyderal would make threats against anyone... including other posters. He's not that kind of person. Why don't you be more specific about what post you find to be questionable?"





Dr. Harr,

These posts are nothing but thinly veiled threats to harm Malek Williams. Also, kenhyderal is obviously taunting Malek by misspelling his name.





kenhyderal said...
So Malek, you think I'm a coward? Tell me, do you live in Lumberton? Can I or one of my friends pay you a visit. There is this little matter of plagiarism I'd like to take up with you.

June 29, 2014 at 3:00 PM




kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "Anyone looking for Kilgo and the mystery witness should visit Lumberton"....... I think that would be following up a dead-end lead but, hey, if you do go there on the search you might just as well look up Malik and let him know he can expect a surprise visit one day. That way the trip wouldn't be a total waste.

July 19, 2014 at 9:15 AM



July 20, 2014 at 5:48 PM

guiowen said...

Sidney,
I agree that these are definite threats. What's more Kenhyderal has told me that he is definitely not bluffing.
Well, you're the blog owner, you'll decide what to do.

Anonymous said...

In other news:

Senators for NC were supporting an additive given to hogs right before they are slaugtered in order to increase muscle vs. fat. However, the additive causes agression and other abnormal behavior disturbances and is banned in 160 other countries, including China, some of whom (Chinese) now own hog farms in NC. Seems some hogs in NC might be getting a change in diet in the future.

Funny how a possible leading cause of agression and abnormal behavior disturbances originates from a top hog producing state that also is a leader in the research and development of meds it pushes on all of dubious health benefit and known severe, lethal, and disturbing side effects in its billion dollar enterprise to sale meds to control agression and other abnormal behaviors, or that cause additional 'undesireable' behaviors and outcomes.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous July 24, 2014 at 2:23 AM

No one believes the propaganda you spout because you are incredibly and irredeemably stupid.

Now go ahead and again threaten to call me a hate criminal.

Don't you hate it when someone points out how stupid and impotent you are?

Nifong Supporter said...


HEAR YE! HEAR YE!
HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!

WHAT?: MAJOR POSTING

WHEN?: Tuesday, July 29th

TIME?: By 12:00 Noon

WHERE?: This blog site, of course!

DON'T MISS IT!

As you were.

Anonymous said...

Let me guess ...

Sid is always perfect and never wrong (except when he is like Daye's prior record; felony murder; and most everything else);

If only we'd all listen to Sid we'd all be fine;

All the attorneys are corrupt and incompetent because they won't listen to Sid;

Anyone who disagrees with Sid is lying.

Ha ... saved you all the work on the flog.

Anonymous said...

Then you won't be reading it will you?

So ... the evil duke troll will have nothing else to say about it, and if it does, it will only be more bs obnoxious trolling ... like always.

Too bad for you evil duke troll cuz now all others have reason to call bs on you too since they KNOW you will not read it and therefore can only be spouting ... yup ya got it ... more of your obnoxious bs trolling.

go figure

Anonymous said...

Anonymous July 26, 2014 at 12:30 PM

No one believes the propaganda you spout because you are incredibly and irredeemably stupid.

Now go ahead and again threaten to call me a hate criminal.

Don't you hate it when someone points out how stupid and impotent you are?

Regards edt.

PS I did not post the comment of Anonymous July 26, 2014 at 9:30 AM

Ray Charles.

Anonymous said...

Correction from edt:

I did not post the comment of July 26, 2014 at 9:30 AM

Regards edt

Ray Charles

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"HEAR YE! HEAR YE!
HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!

WHAT?: MAJOR POSTING

WHEN?: Tuesday, July 29th

TIME?: By 12:00 Noon

WHERE?: This blog site, of course!

DON'T MISS IT!

As you were."

SIDNEY will be posting another compendium of fantasy as to why DA NIFONG should not have been prosecuted for falsely charging three men with raping Crystal, for lying to the court, for making statements prejudicial to the people he accused of the non existent crime(early in the controversy DA NIFONG proclaimed that a crime had happened, it was racially motivated and that members of the Lacrosse team were the perpetrators).

We've heard it before SIDNEY. You did not tell the truth then. Why should anyone believe you will tell the truth now?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

I forgot to mention that DA NIFONG willfully concealed exculpatory evidence. Judging from the Daryl Howard case it was not the first time he did that.

Anonymous said...

oh, so the evil duke troll IT is still trying to impress it's KC evil duke troll gang members with spelling and grammer ....

egad ... how sad to watch you do your bs obnoxious trolling ... are you EVER going to get over that case ... you should sue Duke for making you so sick with their lies, distortions, and political games that created that case as it was and is that has harmed so many

make it a class action suit and include all people with all views of the case who were harmed. you could actually become like that saint that turned - once you were an evil duke troll IT but then turned into a compassionate enlightened believer in the fact that duke suxs big time and with your audacious help - they might just be 'saved'

go for it

Anonymous said...

Anonymous July 26, 2014 at 12:59 PM

No one believes the propaganda you spout because you are incredibly and irredeemably stupid.

Now go ahead and again threaten to call me a hate criminal.

Don't you hate it when someone points out how stupid and impotent you are?

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr,

One of the posters has demonstrated that kenhyderal is using this blog to make threats against other posters. Why are you ignoring this serious problem?

Otto said...

It's K-k-k-kenny. He's c-c-c-coming to k-k-k-kill me!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"HEAR YE! HEAR YE!
HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!

WHAT?: MAJOR POSTING

WHEN?: Tuesday, July 29th

TIME?: By 12:00 Noon

WHERE?: This blog site, of course!

DON'T MISS IT!

As you were."

SIDNEY will be posting another compendium of fantasy as to why DA NIFONG should not have been prosecuted for falsely charging three men with raping Crystal, for lying to the court, for making statements prejudicial to the people he accused of the non existent crime(early in the controversy DA NIFONG proclaimed that a crime had happened, it was racially motivated and that members of the Lacrosse team were the perpetrators).

We've heard it before SIDNEY. You did not tell the truth then. Why should anyone believe you will tell the truth now?


The posting on Tuesday is not strictly informative... it is designed to shape history.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Dr. Harr,

One of the posters has demonstrated that kenhyderal is using this blog to make threats against other posters. Why are you ignoring this serious problem?


I do not believe I'm dense, but I'm having trouble understanding the nature of the alleged threat kenhyderal is making. So, I'm not ignoring the problem, I'm having trouble understanding it. I require further elucidation on the matter.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

I forgot to mention that DA NIFONG willfully concealed exculpatory evidence. Judging from the Daryl Howard case it was not the first time he did that.


I don't know anything about the Howard case, as I've been busy working to free Mangum. However, I do know that Mike Nifong did not withhold any evidence... exculpatory or otherwise... from the defense attorneys of the Duke Lacrosse defendants. What information they learned about the DNA tests was gleaned from evidence turned over by Nifong's prosecution team.

If you know of any evidence that Nifong withheld in the Duke Lacrosse case, would you let me know what it is? Verification would be a bonus.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Let me guess ...

Sid is always perfect and never wrong (except when he is like Daye's prior record; felony murder; and most everything else);

If only we'd all listen to Sid we'd all be fine;

All the attorneys are corrupt and incompetent because they won't listen to Sid;

Anyone who disagrees with Sid is lying.

Ha ... saved you all the work on the flog.


As I mentioned earlier in a response to a comment, the posting scheduled by high noon tomorrow is not strictly informative... its purpose is to shape history.

With regards to that posting, it is still under production, however it appears that the posting deadline will be met.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The posting on Tuesday is not strictly informative... it is designed to shape history."

Wrong.

It is designed to distort history into your lying account of it.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I do not believe I'm dense, but I'm having trouble understanding the nature of the alleged threat kenhyderal is making."

Not so surprising since KENHYDERAL probably does not understand. He is just posturing because no one really takes him seriously.

"So, I'm not ignoring the problem, I'm having trouble understanding it. I require further elucidation on the matter."

Which means you will never understand because you are resistant to elucidation. You would rather believe your megalomaniacal delusions.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I don't know anything about the Howard case, as I've been busy working to free Mangum."

Because like a lot of misconduct in Durham, you choose to be ignorant. People thousands of miles away from Durham are aware of it.

"However, I do know that Mike Nifong did not withhold any evidence... exculpatory or otherwise... from the defense attorneys of the Duke Lacrosse defendants."

You may deny it. That does not mean that corrupt DA NIFONG did not withhold exculpatory evidence or lie to the court about it. He did.

"What information they learned about the DNA tests was gleaned from evidence turned over by Nifong's prosecution team."

Here you show how willfully ignorant you are of North Carolina law. DA NIFONG's team was required by North Carolina law to turn over a REPORT of evidence obtained via an NTO to each and every subject of the NTO in a timely manner. He turned over raw data to the Lacrosse defense months after he had a report. He obtained the finding of the non LAX DNA found on Crystal because he wanted to see if he could find DNA on Crystal which matched the DNA of any of the Lacrosse team members.

"If you know of any evidence that Nifong withheld in the Duke Lacrosse case, would you let me know what it is?"

What the exculpatory evidence is, is part of the public record, a public record which you willfully choose to lie about.

"Verification would be a bonus".

It has been verified. You prefer to lie about it rather than acknowledge it.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"As I mentioned earlier in a response to a comment, the posting scheduled by high noon tomorrow is not strictly informative... its purpose is to shape history."

And as I responded earlier, what you call shaping history is actually lying about history.

"With regards to that posting, it is still under production, however it appears that the posting deadline will be met."

Not at all surprising.

It reminds me of a Judge Judyism(unlike Perry Mason, Judge Judy is real):

It is easier to tell the truth than to lie. When you lie you have to remember every facet of your lie in order to keep your story straignt. That is not necessary when you tell the truth.

It sounds to me like you have to struggle to keep your story straight.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I do not believe I'm dense...".

You are dense, too dense to realize how transparent your lies are.

Another truth you try to deny.

Anonymous said...

Poor Sid --
First, here's the legal definition of exculpatory evidence:

"evidence which may justify or excuse an accused defendant's actions, and which will tend to show the defendant is not guilty or has no criminal intent."

Now that we are in agreement about what exculpatory evidence is, let's look at what Mike Nifong did:

The State Bar cited findings from April 2006 that a second set of DNA tests found excluded all of the Duke University lacrosse players as potential contributors.

It also states that Nifong and Dr. Brian Meehan, the director of DNA Security, which conducted the tests, agreed only to report to defense attorneys positive DNA matches to certain pieces of evidence. They also agreed to knowingly omit DNA matches to other men found on the accuser.

The defense requested at least four different times for Nifong to hand over all the testing.
In court hearings, Nifong told defense attorneys and the judge presiding over the case that he had released all of the evidence that would potentially benefit the defense.

He deliberately withheld the DNA evidence that tended to show that the accused were innocent.

That is why he was found guilty of misconduct and eventually disbarred.

Lance the Intern said...

Sid -- Here you go - reading this article shouldn't take more than 5-10 minutes out of your busy schedule.

What's really sad is that, despite all of your claims to support "Lady Justice", here's an example of a truly innocent person (as opposed to either Crystal Mangum or Shan Carter) you ignore because it doesn't fit your "Mike Nifong as victim" paradigm.

You should be ashamed.

Anonymous said...

It appears that,in Sid's world, it's OK for Nifong to employ underhanded tactics...Even if the black and poor are impacted.

Anonymous said...

really?

where'd you get that from?

he said he was working on the current case - you however are trolling with bs as your bait - as usual

Anonymous said...

Where'd I get that from? Did you read Lance's link to the Howard case? An innocence black man in prison for 19 years thanks to Sid's hero Mike Nifong withholding exculpatory evidence.

There's also the fact that the innocence project is asking for an audit of ALL of Mike Nifong's cases.

Sid has made the claim multiple times that Mike Nifong "...has prosecuted in good faith to uphold equal justice for all". -- As we see with Daryl Howard, this just IS NOT TRUE.

I can't wait for the results of the Nifong case audit.

Anonymous said...

so what

he said he is busy on the current case

go troll on liestoppers vs. here for a (long) while why don't you

you are as much a fracking obnoxious bs evil duke troll it today as you were and have been for the past year that i've watched you do your thing

STOP FRACKING TROLLING HERE

we got it - you are a troll

happy?

Anonymous said...

"he said he is busy on the current case"

You're a moron if you believe that. Any reputable lawyer wouldn't let Sid touch this case with a 10-ft tongue depressor.

I call you a troll because that's what you are.

Anonymous said...

"you are as much a fracking obnoxious bs evil duke troll it today as you were and have been for the past year that i've watched you do your thing"

Here's a trick I was taught long ago. Read your sentence out loud to yourself (or another person -- if you have any friends, that is).

If it doesn't make sense to you or your friends, there's probably something wrong with it. Like the extra "it" you placed here.

Moron.

Anonymous said...

you are a fracking it



Anonymous said...

I know you are, but what am I?

Anonymous said...

yeah that's about the level of your posts

evil duke troll it

Anonymous said...

I know you are, but what am I?

Anonymous said...

so what

he said he is busy on the current case

go troll on liestoppers vs. here for a (long) while why don't you

you are as much a fracking obnoxious bs evil sid troll it today as you were and have been for the past year that i've watched you do your thing

STOP FRACKING TROLLING HERE

we got it - you are a troll

happy?

Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

Walt said...

Lance the intern wrote: "What's really sad is that, despite all of your claims to support "Lady Justice", here's an example of a truly innocent person (as opposed to either Crystal Mangum or Shan Carter) you ignore because it doesn't fit your "Mike Nifong as victim" paradigm.

You should be ashamed."


Ding-Ding-Ding, Ladies and Gentlemen - We have a winner!

Walt-in-Durham

Anonymous said...

He might be innocent, but it so, why did the innocence commission leave him in jail for two years after they discovered his innocence instead of trying to free him then?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

He might be innocent, but it so, why did the innocence commission leave him in jail for two years after they discovered his innocence instead of trying to free him then?


The innocence commission (and this is not the State group you've heard of in the Greg Taylor case) cannot free people. They have to go through the process, file the papers, and get a hearing. Those things take time. He couldn't be freed until a Judge set aside the conviction, which Judge Hudson has done, but he is not free yet because the Order and the Bond are on appeal to the Supreme Court.

Anonymous said...

Why didn't they file the papers two years ago?

Lance the Intern said...

"He might be innocent, but it so, why did the innocence commission leave him in jail for two years after they discovered his innocence instead of trying to free him then?

Why did Mike Nifong put an innocent man in jail in the first place? If Nifong had done his job, if he had "...prosecuted in good faith to uphold equal justice for all", this would never have happened.

There's an old saying, "One is incident. Two is a coincidence. Three is a pattern.". If the Innocence Project gets the audit they want, I feel certain a pattern will emerge.

Anonymous said...

Why don't ya'll set up your own free blog and call it Trolls who Hate Mr. Nifong or something?

Anonymous said...

Why don't ya'll set up your own free blog and call it Trolls who Hate Mr. Nifong or something?


Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

Lance the Intern said...

"Why don't ya'll set up your own free blog and call it Trolls who Hate Mr. Nifong or something?

Why? I think our goals are ultimately in line with this blog -- that is, justice for Mike Nifong.

Anonymous said...

It - if you agree with what is said then why do you lie and make it look like Mr. Williams agrees instead?

Anonymous said...

It - if you agree with what is said then why do you lie and make it look like Mr. Williams agrees instead?

Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

Anonymous said...

This blog's objective at the moment is to help free Ms. Mangum and other issues of that case.

Ya'll hate her as much as Mr. Nifong, and you troll endlessly on about that too - so go do it on your own free blog and name it Durham In Wonderland II or something.

Lance the Intern said...

"Why didn't they file the papers two years ago?

FWIW, Daryl Howard’s attorneys brought all of this same information to the attention of Tracey Cline. But the DA and former Nifong “top deputy” refused to reopen the case or conduct any further investigation.

This delayed Howard's case for at least 2 years.

Anonymous said...

Go create your own "Justice4Mangum" blog and rant there. Maybe we'll come visit.

Then again, maybe not.

Anonymous said...

This blog's objective at the moment is to help free Ms. Mangum and other issues of that case.

Ya'll hate her as much as Mr. Nifong, and you troll endlessly on about that too - so go do it on your own free blog and name it Durham In Wonderland II or something.

Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 326 of 326   Newer› Newest»