Thursday, February 11, 2016

NC State Bar: A Force from the Dark Side




The correspondence above was posted on Tuesday, January 14, 2016
The correspondence above was posted on Tuesday, January 5, 2016
The correspondence above was posted on Friday, January 1, 2016
The correspondence above was posted on Saturday, December 29, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Saturday, December 19, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Thursday, December 17, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Tuesday, December 15, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Friday, December 11, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Wednesday, December 9, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Thursday, December 3, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Friday, November 27, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Wednesday, November 25, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Saturday, November 21, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Tuesday, November 17, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Thursday, November 12, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Monday, November 9, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Saturday, November 7, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Thursday, November 5, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Tuesday, October 27, 2015
The correspondence above was posted on Monday, October 26, 2015

323 comments:

1 – 200 of 323   Newer›   Newest»
guiowen said...

Very good, Sidney. But you've lost everything from the last three weeks. Any reaswon for that?

Anonymous said...



Sid:

You have 323 days to exonerate and free Mangum and 32 days until the Ides of March.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Anonymous said...

harr the hypocritical fabricator repeats the fabrication, that the stab wound was not the cause of death, that the esophageal intubation was the cause of death. Reginald Daye was put at risk for an intra abdominal infection by the laceration of his colon, the result of the stab wound. The aspiration and intubation came as part of an evaluation for an intra abdominal infection.

Knowledgeable physicians will tell you that a colon laceration will place a patient at risk of an intra abdominal infection. The patient remains at risk of infection after surgery. I speak from experience.

harr says that Reginald Daye was not at risk of infection. harr, who likes to call himself a retired physician is but a minimally trained, minimally experienced medical school graduate who was never accepted into residency training and never achieved medical specialty board certification. He is not a knowledgeable physician.

Anonymous said...

Guiowen,

This way he doesn't have to respond to or even acknowledge the proof that Mangum's specific allegation contained in her April 6, 2006, written statement is demonstrably false. The comment with the proof no longer exists.

Anonymous said...

guiowen:

The megablog has overwhelmed and consumed your puny comments. There is no prison that can withstand the raw power of the megablog.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Anonymous said...

Mangum falsely accused the defendants of raping her in 2006. The falsity of her specific allegation has been proven conclusively.

Nifong Supporter said...


guiowen said...
Very good, Sidney. But you've lost everything from the last three weeks. Any reaswon for that?


gui, mon ami,

I haven't really checked my past posts, but one thing I know is that when uploading folders and files you have to be very careful. Not long ago I lost an entire folder full of images when trying to upload a folder. I know that I was having problems creating a folder last night when I uploaded the megablog. I wasn't aware of any damage created until seeing your comment. I'll look into it a bit later. Thanks though for letting me know about it.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
harr the hypocritical fabricator repeats the fabrication, that the stab wound was not the cause of death, that the esophageal intubation was the cause of death. Reginald Daye was put at risk for an intra abdominal infection by the laceration of his colon, the result of the stab wound. The aspiration and intubation came as part of an evaluation for an intra abdominal infection.

Knowledgeable physicians will tell you that a colon laceration will place a patient at risk of an intra abdominal infection. The patient remains at risk of infection after surgery. I speak from experience.

harr says that Reginald Daye was not at risk of infection. harr, who likes to call himself a retired physician is but a minimally trained, minimally experienced medical school graduate who was never accepted into residency training and never achieved medical specialty board certification. He is not a knowledgeable physician.


First of all, I rarely mention the fact that I'm a retired physician except to lend credibility about the examination of the medical records of Daye's hospitalization.

Regarding Daye, it was never proven that he had an intraabdominal infection or any complications from the stab wound or its surgical repair. It was documented, however, and conceded by Dr. Roberts that the initial intubation of Daye was esophageal. That is catastrophic malpractice which will invariably result in brain death progressing to actual death if not recognized and corrected immediately.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Shouldn't a loser like hooker/murderer Crystal Mangum have to pay for accusing innocent white men of raping her when the facts show they all found her repulsive? Time and time again women who make false rape accusations are not punished in any way.If Magnum had been put in prison Daye would still be alive.


Calling Crystal a loser makes you sound like Donald Trump... I'd bet Trump is your presidential candidate of choice.

First of all, there is no proof that Crystal made any false rape allegations... and there is no proof, to my knowledge, that the Duke Lacrosse defendants found Mangum repulsive. Truth is that she's a very beautiful young lady with many good qualities who has been subjected to the most horrendous type of abuse and mistreatment imaginable by the state and the media.

John D. Smith said...

Sidney falsely claims: First of all, there is no proof that Crystal made any false rape allegations.

This statement is false.

I provided proof on the last thread (the one that was "inadvertently" removed).

On that thread, I noted that in the April 4, 2006, fatally flawed "identification" procedure, Magnum selected her alleged attackers. In her April 6, 2006, written statement, she alleged that her attackers had assaulted and penetrated her vaginally, anally and orally. She alleged that her attackers ejaculated and did not use condoms. Indeed, she alleged that one of the attackers ejaculated in her mouth, and she spit the ejaculate onto the floor.

As you know, she was examined within hours.

The failure to find any DNA that matched any of the defendants (or, for that matter, any of the players) in and on Magnum in the SANE exam proved conclusively that her allegation that the defendants had attacked her as she described in her written statement was false.

As a result, your statement that her allegation has not been proven false is also demonstrably false. This evidence has been discussed on this blog several dozen times. Sidney, you could scarcely be unaware of this evidence.

I believe that you owe your readers an explanation of how you can repeatedly make a statement that is so obviously inconsistent with the facts.

Moreover, as I cautioned you earlier, if you wish to assist Magnum, you must refrain from making such obviously false statements. People will not take you seriously if they believe that you are willing to make statements that are contradicted by the facts.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

kenhyderal said...

John D. said: "The failure to find any DNA that matched any of the defendants (or, for that matter, any of the players) in and on Magnum in the SANE exam proved conclusively that her allegation that the defendants had attacked her as she described in her written statement was false".......................... But there was DNA, extracted from sperm, found, un-explained by her easily verified consensual sexual history. Every hour of her life in the preceding week was detailed.

Anonymous said...

Nifong Supporter said...


"First of all, I rarely mention the fact that I'm a retired physician except to lend credibility about the examination of the medical records of Daye's hospitalization."

You frequently state you are a retired physician. What you do not state is that you were never accepted into residency training, that you never achieved medical specialty board certification, and you spent most of your abbreviated post medical school career filing and losing lawsuits. What it adds up to is you can not establish anything to the effect that you are a medical expert. You have established no credibility.

"Regarding Daye, it was never proven that he had an intraabdominal infection or any complications from the stab wound or its surgical repair."

Which further establishes you have no credibility s a medical expert, that you in fac are not a medical expert.The issue was, he was at risk of an intraabdominal infection. What put him at risk was the laceration of the colon inflicted by crystal. When he developed fever, tachycardia and disorientation, it was incumbent upon the treating physicians to evaluate him for it. The aspiration and esophageal inntubatio resulted from that evaluation. You proclaim negligence. What would have been negligence was what you advocate, to assume there was no infection and no chance of surgical complications. Yu are such an untrained, inexperienced medical school graduate, it is not at all surprising you can not recognize what is or is not negligence.

"It was documented, however, and conceded by Dr. Roberts that the initial intubation of Daye was esophageal."

What you refuse to recognize, thr esophageal intubation was a complication of the evaluation for an intra abdominal infection. You againprovide docmentation you are not any kind of medica expert.

"That is catastrophic malpractice which will invariably result in brain death progressing to actual death if not recognized and corrected immediately."

Again the scenario was, Daye aspirated, the vomitus obscured the upper airway, and under such circumstances it is difficult to get a rapid intubation. Yes it was catastrophic and tragic, but it did not rise to the level of malpractice And it never would have hapened had crystal not stabbed him. Your constant ranting on this point convinces me you really do not have much experience with intubation, that the reason why you rarely have had an esophageal intubation is tht you rarely have ever done an intubation. And if you have intubated a patient's esophagus when the view of the upper airway was not obstructed, then that would hzve been negligence.

John D. Smith said...

Kenny,

Thank you for your master debating comment.

The extraneous detail you provide is irrelevant to my conclusion: Mangum's selection of defendants in the identification procedure, together with the specific allegation made in her written statement, were proven demonstrably false when the DNA tests failed to find DNA that matched the defendants.

Because the allegation contained in Mangum's written statement/identifications is demonstrably false, Sidney's repeated claim (that there is no proof that any allegation was false) is also demonstrably false.

Your master debating does not change that.

I have noted previously that your master debating will do nothing to free Magnum. I have suggested what you could do that might actually help her. You refused. I thus am forced to conclude that you do not really care whether Magnum is freed.

John D. Smith
New York

Anonymous said...

Nifong Supporter said...


"First of all, there is no proof that Crystal made any false rape allegations"

Again you show how legally incompetent you are, that you do not comprehend the basic concept of our justice system, theat the obligation to prove rests woith the prosecution, to prove crystal was rape. There was no proof crystal was raped. The only thing one can deduce from the case is crystal lied about being raped. Another demonstration you are incapable of elementary deductive reasoning.

"... and there is no proof, to my knowledge, that the Duke Lacrosse defendants found Mangum repulsive."

First, you presume a fact not in evidence, that you are knowledgeable. Second, there is no proof that any member of the Lacrosse team found her attractive.

"Truth is that she's a very beautiful young lady with many good qualities who has been subjected to the most horrendous type of abuse and mistreatment imaginable by the state and the media."

The truth is, she is a victimizer, false accuser and murderess. She established herself as a criminal before she ever became the false accuser in the Duke Rape Hoax.

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...

"John D. said: "The failure to find any DNA that matched any of the defendants (or, for that matter, any of the players) in and on Magnum in the SANE exam proved conclusively that her allegation that the defendants had attacked her as she described in her written statement was false".......................... But there was DNA, extracted from sperm, found, un-explained by her easily verified consensual sexual history. Every hour of her life in the preceding week was detailed."

You assume a fact not in evidence, that there was detailed documentation in crystal's life prior to the lacrosse party. One thing which was documented was that, years before the Lacrosse party she stole a cabbie's keys, stole his cab, led the police on a high speed chase, she was legally drunk at the time, and she tried to run down a police officer. Then in her memoir she told a contrived story totally inconsistent with the police records of the incident, which records were generated before she became notorious as the false accuser/victimizer in the Duke Rape Hoax. So if her detailed history comes from her, it is from a non credible source.

So far as the non LAX dna found on crystal, for it to be evidence of a rape, you would have to establish it was deposited on the night of 13/14 March at the lacrosse party. The best you can come up with is, it could have been. That establishes of nothing. The fact, that alkaline phosphatase was not detected on the rape kit materials, by an overwhelming probability, says that the sperm fraction dna was not deposited o the night of 13/14 March 2006. To put it another way, it is an overwhelmingly small possibility that it was. The only logical, rational deduction is that crystal was not raped.

However you, like harr the hypocritical fabricator, are incapable of elementary deduction. Which is evidence that suggests ou are but another fabrication by harr.

John D. Smith said...

Anonymous complains about Kenny's master debating: The best you can come up with is, it could have been.

You misunderstand Kenny's master debating. Kenny is a master debater. As a master debater, he is able to make preposterous assertions and require those who care to discuss his assertions to prove with absolute certainty that his assertions could not possibly be true. If they cannot reach that standard of proof, irrespective of how ridiculous are his assertions, Kenny, as a master debater, wins the master debate.

In this case, I concede that it is theoretically possible that Magnum was brutally gang raped at the party by mystery rapists, but suffered no injuries; that the unmatched DNA was deposited by non-player attendees at the party, rather than Mangum's clients; that none of the players, including the defendants (who faced 30 year prison sentences, millions of dollars in legal fees and had their reputations dragged through the mud) chose to turn in the mystery rapists (even if they were not friends with them); that the mystery rapists turned up in none of the hundreds of pictures taken at the party; etc.

Nevertheless, it is theoretically possible. As a result, Kenny wins the master debate.

None of this suggests that Kenny's mystery rapists hypothesis is credible. It is utterly preposterous. Indeed, there is insufficient evidence to support this ridiculous theory even to justify an investigation by police into mystery rapists--even in Canada.

I suggest that you not debate with Kenny or suggest that he actually believes the ridiculous things he posts. I suggest that any interaction with Kenny should be limited to mockery or suggestions of what he should that might help Magnum. Master debating is simply his way of having fun.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

kenhyderal said...

John D. said: " Because the allegation contained in Mangum's written statement/identifications is demonstrably false, Sidney's repeated claim (that there is no proof that any allegation was false) is also demonstrably false."................. Sure, blame the victim for making false identifications on a improperly conducted photo line-up when she had been drugged and traumatized by a brutal sexual assault. As well, she was wrongly informed that her assailants were certainly among the subjects shown. John D. also said: "I have noted previously that your master debating will do nothing to free Magnum. I have suggested what you could do that might actually help her. You refused. I thus am forced to conclude that you do not really care whether Magnum is freed"........................................................... My "refusing" to follow your suggestions, which you imply are infallible, sincere and the singular path to Crystal's exoneration wrongly and arrogantly brings you to make false conclusions

John D. Smith said...

Kenny wrongly accuses me: Sure, blame the victim for making false identifications on a improperly conducted photo line-up

Your allegation is false. I did not "blame the victim" when I noted that the combination of her "identifications" and her written statement have been proven false. I merely noted that Sidney's repeated statement than none of Mangum's allegations had been proven false was itself demonstrably false.

I never suggested the advice I gave you was "infallible" or the "singular path" as you falsely suggest. My advice actually was sincere. The argument that upon which both you and Sidney rely is that the esophageal intubation cuts off Mangum's legal liability and that Walt and A Lawyer (and implicitly Shella, Vann, Holmes, Meier and Peterson) are incorrect in their conclusion that guidance from Welch and related cases is applicable. I believe that providing case law to support your opinion would be more compelling than your opinion alone. While I currently accept the legal opinion expressed by the lawyers and supported with case law over the legal opinion expressed by non-lawyers and not supported with case law, I am open to persuasion.

I welcome your corrections.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...


"Sure, blame the victim for making false identifications on a improperly conducted photo line-up when she had been drugged and traumatized by a brutal sexual assault."

There is no evidence said sexual assault ever happened. The improper lineup happened because corrupt da nifong wanted to prosecute members of the Lacrosse team for the non existent crime and had no evidence against them.

"As well, she was wrongly informed that her assailants were certainly among the subjects shown."

Which highlights the improper nature of the lineup. The alleged victim of the alleged crime should not be told that her assailants "were certainly among the subjects shown". The officer conducting the lineup should be an officer not involved inthe case. The improper lineup is evidence that no crime had occurred. It was evidence the DA knew he had no evidence of a crime.

John D. also said: "I have noted previously that your master debating will do nothing to free Magnum. I have suggested what you could do that might actually help her. You refused. I thus am forced to conclude that you do not really care whether Magnum is freed"........................................................... My "refusing" to follow your suggestions, which you imply are infallible, sincere and the singular path to Crystal's exoneration wrongly and arrogantly brings you to make false conclusions".

But you expect people to accept your presumption of guilt as infallible, your statement, unsupported by any evidence, that crystal was raped. What a hypocrite!

You have said, nifong prosecuted the Lacrosse players because he believed he had enough evidence to prosecute. If he had enough evidence to prosecute, explain why he ordered an improper lineup in which crystal was coached to identify men as her assailants, something you have just admitted.

Boy are you stupid.

Walt said...

Kenny wrote: "Sure, blame the victim for making false identifications on a improperly conducted photo line-up when she had been drugged and traumatized by a brutal sexual assault. As well, she was wrongly informed that her assailants were certainly among the subjects shown."

No one is blaming the victims, Reade Seligman, David Evans or Colin Finnerty. Crystal is the liar who made false accusations.

The drugging was done by Crystal, mixing beer and prescription medications.

There was no brutal sexual assault.

The only thing you got right was the misleading nature of the lineup. However an honest person or a real victim would have told the truth that she did not recognize any of her assailants in the lineup. Of course there were no assailants. There was only a victimizer, and her enablers.

Walt-in-Durham

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal said,
"But there was DNA, extracted from sperm, found, un-explained by her easily verified consensual sexual history. Every hour of her life in the preceding week was detailed."

Easily verified? I'm willing to believe that her agency had the names of her customers. How do you propose to verify that none of them had sexual relations with her? Will you go ask each of them for a DNA sample?

Nifong Supporter said...


HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

As it has been brought to my attention, a lot of recent posts have disappeared. After further investigation I learned that I must have inadvertently deleted them while in the process of uploading my recent megablog. I am going to try and see if there's a way to retrieve those posts. I am not concerned about the sharlogs and letters, but about the comments. I can always re-upload the posts, but I have not saved the comments.

When time permits, in the hopeful near future, I will place all the posts on an archival panel which will contain a full directory for easier access of past posts. It'll help unclutter my site, too.

Anyway, I hope to retrieve the posts and all comments which I value so much.

Carry on.

Anonymous said...


Sid:

You have 322 days to exonerate and free Mangum and 31 days until the Ides of March.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Anonymous said...

Sid:

What happens on the Ides of March?

guiowen said...

Remember, Kenhyderal told us that Sid is another Caesar. So, the Ides of March has me running scared

Anonymous said...

This is my first visit to this blog. Who is the clown who posts as kenhyderal?

guiowen said...

He is (a) a fighter,(b) a master debater, (c) Crystal Mangum's best friend. Do not offend him or he will come after you.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for the advice.

Anonymous said...


Anonymous Anonymous said @ February 13, 2016 at 4:31 PM

"This is my first visit to this blog. Who is the clown who posts as kenhyderal?"

kenhyderal is probably a fabrication of harr the hypocritical fabricator.

kenhyderal said...

Guiowen said: "He is (a) a fighter,(b) a master debater, (c) Crystal Mangum's best friend. Do not offend him or he will come after you"........................I am certainly in favor of justice. Dr. Sidney B. Harr is a outstanding example of a man who always fights for justice. I do always challenge the widespread lies and distortions that have been so immorally disseminated, far and wide, about Crystal Mangum, who is a kind person of good character and high moral standards who is being wrongly incarcerated. I can't claim to be Crystal's best friend but she is a longtime friend who, I believe, has been treated, in North Carolina, most deplorably, as payback, simply, because she dared, as a poor and vulnerable black woman, to seek justice for a sexual assault upon her by entitled son's of privilege. I introduced Dr. Harr to Crystal and they have become good friends. Characteristic of him he has taken up her cause. I trust he is a person of judgement who will see she eventually receives justice

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous Anonymous said: :"This is my first visit to this blog. Who is the clown who posts as kenhyderal?"......................................... I'm Ken Edwards. "A wise man can play the part of a clown, but a clown can't play the part of a wise man" ( Malcolm X)

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...

"I am certainly in favor of justice."

As you advocate that innocent men be summarily convicted of a rape which never happened, you most certainly are not.

"Dr. Sidney B. Harr is a outstanding example of a man who always fights for justice."

harr the hypocritical fabricator whoalsely accuses innocent men of a nonexistent rape, and advocates that murderers get passes for their crimes does not fight for justice.

"I do always challenge the widespread lies and distortions that have been so immorally disseminated, far and wide, about Crystal Mangum, who is a kind person of good character and high moral standards who is being wrongly incarcerated."

There were no "widespread lies and distortions that have been so immorally disseminated, far and wide, about Crystal Mangum". crystal was and is the perpetrator of falsehoods and distortions and a person of low moral standards, and is justly incarcerated for murdering Reginald Daye. She achieved the status of criminal years before she falsely accused innocent men of raping her in 2006.

"I can't claim to be Crystal's best friend but she is a longtime friend who, I believe, has been treated, in North Carolina, most deplorably, as payback, simply, because she dared, as a poor and vulnerable black woman, to seek justice for a sexual assault upon her by entitled son's of privilege."

Said assault never happened . That has been proven overwhelmingly. Falsely accusing men of rape, even if they are well off because of their ability and hard work, is not seeking justice. Here you again show how resentful you are of Caucasian men who are ore accomplished than you will ever be.

"I introduced Dr. Harr to Crystal(you refer to harr the hypocritical fabricator) and they have become good friends. Characteristic of him he has taken up her cause."

What is characteristic of harr the hypocritical fabricator is he tries to exploit the justice system for his own benefit.

"I trust he is a person of judgement"

Of poor, biased judgment.

"who will see she eventually receives justice"

She already has received justice.

So far as kenhyderal, it is probably just a fabrication of harr the hypocritical fabricator. All this adds up to is a mindless recitation of harr's delusions and resentments.

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...

"Anonymous Anonymous said: :"This is my first visit to this blog. Who is the clown who posts as kenhyderal?"......................................... I'm Ken Edwards. "A wise man can play the part of a clown, but a clown can't play the part of a wise man" ( Malcolm X)"

Whatever kenhyderal is, it is not a wise man. It does not play the part of a clown. It IS a clown.

Anonymous said...

kenny hissyfit, whoever or whatever you are, establish that the nonlax dna found on the rape kit was deposited on the night of 13/14 march 2006. All you have come up with is that it could have been deposited at that time. That is but an admission that you can not establish as fact the allegation you are making.

And again, the failure to detect alkaline phosphatase on the rape kit indicates the probability that semen was deposited on crystal's person on the night of 13/14 March 2006 is extremely low, so low that the only logical deduction is that semen was deposited.

Anonymous said...

fy evil duke troll it g ... insane hate-crime blog monger, and generally annoying, obnoxious, racist, and discredited crazymaking dukie

blah

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 6:03am:

Thank you for your insightful and informative comment. It is good to see a poster that relies on facts rather than ad hominem attacks.

Anonymous said...



Sid:

You have 321 days to exonerate and free Mangum and 30 days until the Ides of March.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...


Sid:

You have 321 days to exonerate and free Mangum and 30 days until the Ides of March.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL


Hey, Abe.

Thanks again for the updates. Things are progressing nicely. It won't be long now before Crystal is free and exonerated.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid:

What happens on the Ides of March?


I anticipate that on or about the Ides of March that I might have an important announcement to make. At this point and time I am not at liberty to disclose it.

Hope that sates your curiosity.

guiowen said...

Oh, is the CryBully here again?

Anonymous said...

harr the hypocritical fabricator and/or kenny hissy fit or maybe both posting anonymously again to create the delusion that people support their views.

Anonymous said...

harr the hypocritical fabricator and/or kenny hissy fit or maybe both post anonymously because they can not respond to the challeges issued to them, e.g. provide evidence that anyone raped crystal on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

John D. Smith said...

.

Sidney,

I am reposting my earlier comments. You must have "missed" it due to the activity on this thread. I provide the proof that at least one of Mangum's rape allegations has been proven demonstrably false. As a result, your repeated claim is also demonstrably false.



"Sidney falsely claims: First of all, there is no proof that Crystal made any false rape allegations.

This statement is false.

I provided proof on the last thread (the one that was "inadvertently" removed).

On that thread, I noted that in the April 4, 2006, fatally flawed "identification" procedure, Magnum selected her alleged attackers. In her April 6, 2006, written statement, she alleged that her attackers had assaulted and penetrated her vaginally, anally and orally. She alleged that her attackers ejaculated and did not use condoms. Indeed, she alleged that one of the attackers ejaculated in her mouth, and she spit the ejaculate onto the floor.

As you know, she was examined within hours.

The failure to find any DNA that matched any of the defendants (or, for that matter, any of the players) in and on Magnum in the SANE exam proved conclusively that her allegation that the defendants had attacked her as she described in her written statement was false.

As a result, your statement that her allegation has not been proven false is also demonstrably false. This evidence has been discussed on this blog several dozen times. Sidney, you could scarcely be unaware of this evidence.

I believe that you owe your readers an explanation of how you can repeatedly make a statement that is so obviously inconsistent with the facts.

Moreover, as I cautioned you earlier, if you wish to assist Magnum, you must refrain from making such obviously false statements. People will not take you seriously if they believe that you are willing to make statements that are contradicted by the facts.

John D. Smith
New York, NY"



Please do not repeat your demonstrably false claim.

John D. Smith
New York, NY










.




February 12, 2016 at 12:24 PM

Anonymous said...


Sid said:

"I anticipate that on or about the Ides of March that I might have an important announcement to make."

So, in the matter of a few weeks you go from "Beware the Ides of March" to "I anticipate that I might have an announcement to make on or about the Ides of March?" That's quite a hedge, Sid.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Anonymous said...

What BS.

Stop trying to claim my comments, you lying evil duke it troll.

Egad!

Anonymous said...

why evil duke troll it g...

copy and pasting to troll yourself again, eh?

... and you were doing so good this weekend

Anonymous said...

harr the hypocritical fabricator or kenny hissy fit or both posting anonymously again to create the delusion that they have support.

guiowen said...

Cry Bully cry!
You make Ken Edwards sigh:
He's old enough to know better.
So Cry Bully cry!

Anonymous said...


Sid:

You have 320 days to exonerate and free Mangum and 29 days until the Ides of March.

Time is flying by.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Anonymous said...

g ... i've already told you to stop copy and pasting posts that aren't even yours and then sitting there and trolling what you just posted.

seriously

get over yourself

troll doesn't even describe what you do any more g ... since you are seriously evil

DO NOT TROLL ME IN ANY WAY AT ALL AGAIN

thanks

guiowen said...

Cry Bully cry!
You make Ken Edwards sigh:
He's old enough to know better.
So Cry Bully cry!

Anonymous said...


Sid:

You have 319 days to exonerate and free Mangum and 28 days until the Ides of March.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Anonymous said...

harr the hypocritical fabricator or kenny hissy fit or both posting anonymously again to create the delusion that they and their cause have support.

Anonymous said...

Sid states: "I anticipate that on or about the Ides of March that I might have an important announcement to make. At this point and time I am not at liberty to disclose it."

Is this the same announcement you initially predicted for February 1?

Anonymous said...

I'm making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do... www.wallstreet34.com

Anonymous said...

One day, evil duke troll it g..., when you screw up really bad as you are bound to do by the way you act so evil on this blog, ... you will need assistance in defending yourself ... and then you will see perhaps what it is like to have someone like you be so evil in the face of your struggle for justice ... and if you are lucky ... you might just learn to understand the errors of your evil ways ... and you might even want to apologize at the time for what you are doing now ... so ... to save yourself time ... just stop and think bout that for awhile ... and you can apologize now if you want

p.s. stop trolling on this blog now ... thanks

guiowen said...

Help! The CryBully is after me!

Anonymous said...


Sid:

You have 318 days to exonerate and free Mangum and 27 days until the Ides of March.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Anonymous said...

harr the hypocritical fabricator or kenny hissy fit or both posting anonymously again too create the delusion that people support their views.

Nifong Supporter said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid states: "I anticipate that on or about the Ides of March that I might have an important announcement to make. At this point and time I am not at liberty to disclose it."

Is this the same announcement you initially predicted for February 1?



Not exactly the same. I stated earlier that on February 1st the ram would touch the wall. However, an incident, which I will not elaborate on at this time, resulted in me postponing any movement by the ram. On or about the Ides of March I am hoping for a breakthrough... one of which, if publicized, you will immediately recognize. I hope this adequately answers your question.

John D. Smith said...

Sidney,

I am reposting earlier comments. You must have "missed" them due to the activity on this thread. I provide the proof that at least one of Mangum's rape allegations has been proven demonstrably false. As a result, your repeated claim is also demonstrably false.


"Sidney falsely claims: First of all, there is no proof that Crystal made any false rape allegations.

This statement is false.

I provided proof on the last thread (the one that was "inadvertently" removed).

On that thread, I noted that in the April 4, 2006, fatally flawed "identification" procedure, Magnum selected her alleged attackers. In her April 6, 2006, written statement, she alleged that her attackers had assaulted and penetrated her vaginally, anally and orally. She alleged that her attackers ejaculated and did not use condoms. Indeed, she alleged that one of the attackers ejaculated in her mouth, and she spit the ejaculate onto the floor.

As you know, she was examined within hours.

The failure to find any DNA that matched any of the defendants (or, for that matter, any of the players) in and on Magnum in the SANE exam proved conclusively that her allegation that the defendants had attacked her as she described in her written statement was false.

As a result, your statement that her allegation has not been proven false is also demonstrably false. This evidence has been discussed on this blog several dozen times. Sidney, you could scarcely be unaware of this evidence.

I believe that you owe your readers an explanation of how you can repeatedly make a statement that is so obviously inconsistent with the facts.

Moreover, as I cautioned you earlier, if you wish to assist Magnum, you must refrain from making such obviously false statements. People will not take you seriously if they believe that you are willing to make statements that are contradicted by the facts.

John D. Smith
New York, NY
February 12, 2016 at 12:24 PM”



Please do not repeat your demonstrably false claim. Deliberate ignorance is not a valid excuse.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

February 14, 2016 at 10:18 AM

Anonymous said...

http://johnsville.blogspot.com/2007/06/crystal-gail-mangum-april-6-2006.html

Anonymous said...

Nifong Supporter said...

"Not exactly the same. I stated earlier that on February 1st the ram would touch the wall. However, an incident, which I will not elaborate on at this time, resulted in me postponing any movement by the ram. On or about the Ides of March I am hoping for a breakthrough... one of which, if publicized, you will immediately recognize. I hope this adequately answers your question."

All indications are this will be another harrian blowhard performance, as were his promises to reinstate nifong's law license, that he would humiliate the NC State Bar, that, if he had anything to say about it, the state would drop all charges against crystal and not tke her to trial.

To put it another way, harr the hypcritical fabricator has not money to put where his mouth is.

Fake Kenhyderal said...

Ides of March -- Isn't that when ESPN is going to air the 30 for 30 documentary "Fantastic Lies"?

guiowen said...

I'm just worried about the Ides of march because Kenhyderal told us that Sidney is another Caesar.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous John D. Smith said...
Sidney,

I am reposting earlier comments. You must have "missed" them due to the activity on this thread. I provide the proof that at least one of Mangum's rape allegations has been proven demonstrably false. As a result, your repeated claim is also demonstrably false.


"Sidney falsely claims: First of all, there is no proof that Crystal made any false rape allegations.

This statement is false.

I provided proof on the last thread (the one that was "inadvertently" removed).

On that thread, I noted that in the April 4, 2006, fatally flawed "identification" procedure, Magnum selected her alleged attackers. In her April 6, 2006, written statement, she alleged that her attackers had assaulted and penetrated her vaginally, anally and orally. She alleged that her attackers ejaculated and did not use condoms. Indeed, she alleged that one of the attackers ejaculated in her mouth, and she spit the ejaculate onto the floor.

As you know, she was examined within hours.

The failure to find any DNA that matched any of the defendants (or, for that matter, any of the players) in and on Magnum in the SANE exam proved conclusively that her allegation that the defendants had attacked her as she described in her written statement was false.

As a result, your statement that her allegation has not been proven false is also demonstrably false. This evidence has been discussed on this blog several dozen times. Sidney, you could scarcely be unaware of this evidence.

I believe that you owe your readers an explanation of how you can repeatedly make a statement that is so obviously inconsistent with the facts.

Moreover, as I cautioned you earlier, if you wish to assist Magnum, you must refrain from making such obviously false statements. People will not take you seriously if they believe that you are willing to make statements that are contradicted by the facts.

John D. Smith
New York, NY
February 12, 2016 at 12:24 PM”


Please do not repeat your demonstrably false claim. Deliberate ignorance is not a valid excuse.

John D. Smith
New York, NY


Hey, John D. Smith.

To my understanding, Attorney General Cooper sealed all evidence related to the Duke Lacrosse case. I do not take for granted as being truthful anything said by authorities in the Duke Lacrosse case as I have proven doubts about their credibility in the Mangum murder case. As you are aware, unlike the Duke Lacrosse case, the investigation by j4n has been an open one from day one. The lies of the medical examiner are readily discernible by the many discrepancies between what he said and wrote when compared with medical documents.

Because I have prosecution discovery from the Mangum murder case and not from the Duke Lacrosse case, and because the verdict in the Mangum murder case has current ramifications whereas the Duke Lacrosse case does not, I have dedicated my efforts on the murder case.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Fake Kenhyderal said...
Ides of March -- Isn't that when ESPN is going to air the 30 for 30 documentary "Fantastic Lies"?


It is my understanding that the ESPN so-called documentary is going to air on March 13th, two days before the Ides of March.

Nifong Supporter said...



Blogger guiowen said...
I'm just worried about the Ides of march because Kenhyderal told us that Sidney is another Caesar.


gui, mon ami,

Thanks for your concern, but I think kenhyderal was referring to ideology with the Caesar reference. The more I learn of him, the more I admire him. Caesar was like the Bernie Sanders of his day... he was a champion of the people, not the royalty.

Anonymous said...

Nifong Supporter said...


"To my understanding, Attorney General Cooper sealed all evidence related to the Duke Lacrosse case."

Presumes a fact not in evidence, that you are capable of understanding. You ave shown on many occasions you are not. Nothing was seales except crystal's mentalhealth record. What you call yur understanding is but an admission on your part that you have no evidence to suport the claim youmake that crystal was raped.

"I do not take for granted as being truthful anything said by authorities in the Duke Lacrosse case as I have proven doubts about their credibility in the Mangum murder case."

Irrelevant as you have demonstrated on multiple occasions you do not recognize the truth. In what you admit was the "Mangum murder case" you have prven nothing other than that you are not knowledgeable in matters medical or legal.

"As you are aware, unlike the Duke Lacrosse case, the investigation by j4n has been an open one from day one. The lies of the medical examiner are readily discernible by the many discrepancies between what he said and wrote when compared with medical documents."

More fabrications fromharr the hypocritica fabricator.

"Because I have prosecution discovery from the Mangum murder case and not from the Duke Lacrosse case, and because the verdict in the Mangum murder case has current ramifications whereas the Duke Lacrosse case does not, I have dedicated my efforts on the murder case."

You again admit it was the "Mangum murder case", and it has no ramifications other than it shows you are not knowledgeable about law or medicine. You have de facto abandoned the Duke Rape Hoax because of your repeated claims that crystal was a victim you have no evidence to prove that.

Anonymous said...

fy evil duke troll it g...

blah

Note: feel free to plagerize and repeat the above after every one of your posts ... just for amusement and all ... g...

guiowen said...

Cry Bully cry!
You make Ken Edwards sigh:
He's old enough to know better.
So Cry Bully cry!

Anonymous said...

harr the hypocritical fabricator or kenny hissy fit or both continue to post anonymously, trying to created the illusion that people support their views.

Anonymous said...


Sid:

You have 317 days to exonerate and free Mangum and 26 days until the Ides of March.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

John D. Smith said...

Sidney,

I have posted three comments, all of which have registered, but have subsequently vanished. Do you know what is going on?

John D. Smith
New York, NY

John D. Smith said...

Sidney,

Given the problems with blogger accepting my comments, apparently if they exceed a particular length, I will repost the comment, breaking it into two parts. Hopefully, that will work.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

John D. Smith said...

Sidney,

Part 1 vanished, but part 2 apparently has remained.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

John D. Smith said...

Sidney,

Part 2 just vanished as well.

Blogger has now removed 5 of my comments.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

John D. Smith said...

Sidney,

I will try again, breaking the comment into 4 parts. Hopefully, blogger will accept the parts.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

John D. Smith said...

(Part 1 of 4)
Sidney,

Thank you for your February 17, 2016 12:48 PM response. However, I found it disingenuous at best.

I find it remarkable that you repeat a demonstrably false statement in responding to a complaint about another demonstrably false statement.

As you know, in NC, as in other states, discovery is not subject to the freedom of information act. Discovery is seldom released outside of a trial. Consistent with this practice, AG Cooper did not release discovery with his summary report.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

John D. Smith said...

(Part 2 of 4)
Sidney,

Nevertheless, as you know (because it has been discussed here), much of the relevant discovery is available. This evidence was included in defense filings or provided at Nifong's disbarment hearing, including Himan's written case notes: Gottlieb's written report; the transcript and video of the April 4 "identification" procedure; written statements by Roberts, Magnum, the captains, Bissey, Elmostafa and others; DNA reports from SBI and DNASI; photographs from the party; and phone records of players identified by Magnum as attendees who were not present.

As result, your statement that "Attorney General Cooper sealed all evidence related to the Duke Lacrosse case" is demonstrably false. Much of the evidence is available (even if Cooper did not provide it). You repeat this statement despite its obvious falsity.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

John D. Smith said...

(Part 3 of 4)
Sidney,

Moreover, you failed to respond to the proof I provided that at least one of Mangum's allegations has been proven false. As such, that makes your claim (that none of Mangum's allegations have been proven false) demonstrably false.

As you know, Mangum made specific allegations in her April 6 written statement. Magnum "identified" her alleged assailants in an April 4 procedure. Finally, DNA tests found no matches to any of the defendants Magnum claimed sexually assaulted her vaginally, anally and orally without using condoms. This evidence proves with virtual certainty that this specific allegation was false.

The statement can be found at the following link:

http://johnsville.blogspot.com/2007/06/crystal-gail-mangum-april-6-2006.html

John D. Smith
New York, NY

John D. Smith said...

(Part 4 of 4)
Sidney,

You question Cooper’s credibility, yet you provide no evidence to support this, limiting yourself to conspiracy theories.

Sidney, as I indicated previously, your advocacy for Magnum suffers significantly when you repeatedly make demonstrably false statements. Those to whom you appeal for support will not take you seriously if they believe that you are either a Magnum apologist, delusional or a liar.

You owe your readers an explanation of why you believe you help Magnum when you make demonstrably false statements in your advocacy. I will continue to post this comment until you have responded to the proof I provided and provided the explanation I requested.

Thank you.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

Anonymous said...

evil duke troll it g... tinfoil hat hatemonger blogmonger:

WHAT about don't troll, cyberbully, or post to me or about me EVER again DON'T you understand?

Anonymous said...

is there a specific reason that you continue to repost that copied post, and all the other copied posts you repost, evil duke troll it g...?

what's your point?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 6:04,

Stop shouting. You are hurting my ears.

Anonymous said...

and there it is again

... evil duke troll it g... in pure g... form being evil duke troll it g... tinfoil hat hatemonger in pure g... form (again)

DO you EVER stop g...?

...

(just wondering)

...

blah

Anonymous said...

good ol' evil duke troll it g...

trolling on

blah

Anonymous said...

fy evil duke troll it g...

blah

Note: feel free to plagerize and repeat the above after every one of your posts ... just for amusement and all ... g...

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 6:07,

Ow! You are hurting my ears with all this shouting

Anonymous said...

hey evil duke troll it g... trolling along as usual

isn't there something else you could be doing other than going insane on this blog This weekend Too?

Note: last 11 posts courtesy of g... regurgitated copied posts so that it has something to troll and go insane about this weekend

blah

troll on evil duke troll it g...

troll on ... go insane ... have fun

egad
sheesh louise and heloise
and
blah

Anonymous said...

blah

blah

blah

(in case anyone, (Dr. Harr), wonders - the evil duke troll it is on a roll again (for its own amusement as self-professed by it)

Anonymous said...

Here - copy and paste the following updated post when you get the urge to troll yourself again next time:


just watch your manners you bs evil duke troll it g... tinfoil hat hatemonger who harrassess, trolls, slanders, commits hate crimes and then demands to be loved by their 'target' for committing redundant self-trolling in order to troll others and the 'target', pretends to be a retired doc, duke dad, and various other characters at whim, including the tin hat and tinfoil hat for the purposes of trolling itself repeatedly with others' copied/pasted posts especially on the weekends to keep itself amused, treats people like slaves, and commits abusive crazy making tactics by baiting and then blaming the persons you troll for defending themselves or others from your constant duke centered bullying, trolling, and hate crime commissions directed at anyone who does not conform to your bs evil ways and beliefs

blah ...
blah ...
blah ...
blah

guiowen said...

CryBully Tinfoil,
Is there any way we can get you to stop whining?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 6:12 stated:
blah ...
blah ...
blah ...
blah


I am not sure that I understand. Can you please elaborate?

kenhyderal said...

John D. said: "The failure to find any DNA that matched any of the defendants (or, for that matter, any of the players) in and on Magnum in the SANE exam proved conclusively that her allegation that the defendants had attacked her as she described in her written statement was false............................. Stop being disingenuous. Because she identified the wrong perpetrators in the flawed Police photo line-up, that does not "prove conclusively" that what she described did not happen to her. It only proves that those she identified were not the ones who deposited the DNA, extracted from sperm and unexplained by her detailed consensual sexual history, in the sexual assault upon her at the Duke Lacrosse party

guiowen said...

The trouble is no one believes the details of her "detailed" consensual sexual history.

Anonymous said...


Sid:

You have 316 days to exonerate and free Mangum and 25 days until the Ides of March.

Carry on.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

John D. Smith said...

Kenny,

The failure to find DNA that matched the defendants proved conclusively that the defendants did not attack her as she described. That is a fact. That is all I stated.

A bona fide investigation would have been required to identify the males who deposited the DNA. They apparently did not even run the DNA against a data base. The failure of Nifong and the DPD to conduct such an investigation suggests that they did not believe Mangum had been raped at the party by mystery rapists, but rather that they believed that the DNA had been deposited earlier in consensual encounters.

I am not being disingenuous. You are. You owe me an apology.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sid:

You have 316 days to exonerate and free Mangum and 25 days until the Ides of March.

Carry on.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL


Hey, Abe.

Thanks for the update.

Not to worry... things are moving along nicely.

By the way, if you haven't already, start thinking about what color crying towel you would like me to send you when Crystal is exonerated and free. The default color is Duke Blue Devil blue.

Anonymous said...

Wow! harr the hypocritical fabricator osr kenny hissy fit or both are really going crazy posting anonymously trying to delude the public into thinking that people support thir views.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous John D. Smith said...
(Part 1 of 4)
Sidney,

Thank you for your February 17, 2016 12:48 PM response. However, I found it disingenuous at best.

I find it remarkable that you repeat a demonstrably false statement in responding to a complaint about another demonstrably false statement.

As you know, in NC, as in other states, discovery is not subject to the freedom of information act. Discovery is seldom released outside of a trial. Consistent with this practice, AG Cooper did not release discovery with his summary report.

John D. Smith
New York, NY


Not only did he not release it, but to my understanding he sealed it. The reason for sealing something is to conceal it... to hide it. The objective being opaquification.
With transparency comes true credibility... and that is why my investigations are totally open. I do not try to hide issues related to Mangum's trial.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous John D. Smith said...
(Part 2 of 4)
Sidney,

Nevertheless, as you know (because it has been discussed here), much of the relevant discovery is available. This evidence was included in defense filings or provided at Nifong's disbarment hearing, including Himan's written case notes: Gottlieb's written report; the transcript and video of the April 4 "identification" procedure; written statements by Roberts, Magnum, the captains, Bissey, Elmostafa and others; DNA reports from SBI and DNASI; photographs from the party; and phone records of players identified by Magnum as attendees who were not present.

As result, your statement that "Attorney General Cooper sealed all evidence related to the Duke Lacrosse case" is demonstrably false. Much of the evidence is available (even if Cooper did not provide it). You repeat this statement despite its obvious falsity.

John D. Smith
New York, NY


Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't William Cohan, in preparing for his book about the Duke Lacrosse case, attempt to obtain information but was denied access to the Duke Lacrosse case files by the Attorney General? Sure, some of the discovery may be available to the public, but the nuts and bolts of the case are sealed.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous John D. Smith said...
(Part 3 of 4)
Sidney,

Moreover, you failed to respond to the proof I provided that at least one of Mangum's allegations has been proven false. As such, that makes your claim (that none of Mangum's allegations have been proven false) demonstrably false.

As you know, Mangum made specific allegations in her April 6 written statement. Magnum "identified" her alleged assailants in an April 4 procedure. Finally, DNA tests found no matches to any of the defendants Magnum claimed sexually assaulted her vaginally, anally and orally without using condoms. This evidence proves with virtual certainty that this specific allegation was false.

The statement can be found at the following link:

http://johnsville.blogspot.com/2007/06/crystal-gail-mangum-april-6-2006.html

John D. Smith
New York, NY


John D. Smith, as you are probably aware by now, my efforts are focused on the trumped up murder case and conviction which has placed Mangum behind bars and separated her from her children. I have not deeply researched the Duke Lacrosse case and have no intention of wasting my time looking into it as it has no direct relevance to her current predicament and offers no means of rectification of the injustice.

I will therefore leave the Duke Lacrosse debate up to others while working on her unjust murder conviction.

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...

"Stop being disingenuous."

Kenyhyderal, THY name is disingneuous", even if you are too ignorant to realize it.

"Because she identified the wrong perpetrators in the flawed Police photo line-up, that does not 'prove conclusively' that what she described did not happen to her."

An example of your stupidity. The prosecution, even in Canada, has the obligation to prove what did happen to her.


"It only proves that those she identified were not the ones who deposited the DNA, extracted from sperm and unexplained by her detailed consensual sexual history, in the sexual assault upon her at the Duke Lacrosse party"

All that proves is that crystal engaged in sex with male partners. The prosecution had to prove there was a sexual assault at the Duke Lacrosse party in which male assailants deposited their sperm on crystal. crystal alleged a violent assault by multiple assailants. That should have left evidence of trauma. The physical exam revealed no evidence of trauma. The failure to detect alkaline phosphatase is evidence that semen was not deposited on her person on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

There is NO EVIDENCE a violent sexual assault ever happened. The best you have come up with is, a sexual assault could have happened without leaving evidence. That is only evidence that you are a guilt presuming racist. You believe guilt should be presumed because the accuser was balack and her alleged assailants were caucasian.

Anonymous said...

Nifong Supporter said...


"Not only did he not release it, but to my understanding he sealed it."

TJotally irrelevant statement. you have shown on repeated occasions you are incapable of understanding anything.

"The reason for sealing something is to conceal it... to hide it. The objective being opaquification."

There is no evidence that AG Cooper has tried to conceal anything. You have provided evidence only that you do not believe AG Cooper.


"With transparency comes true credibility... and that is why my investigations are totally open. I do not try to hide issues related to Mangum's trial."

You try to fabricate issues about crystal's trial.

Anonymous said...

Nifong Supporter said...


"Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't William Cohan, in preparing for his book about the Duke Lacrosse case, attempt to obtain information but was denied access to the Duke Lacrosse case files by the Attorney General?"

William Cohan quoted corrupt nifong s saying that AG Cooper's investigators felt they were sandbagged by the AG when he expressed his belief that the Lacrosse players were innocent. AG Cooper's investigators then denied that and said they had told AG Cooper that they believed the accused were innocent. Cohan's claim, that he tried to obtain the facts in the case is spurious.

"Sure, some of the discovery may be available to the public, but the nuts and bolts of the case are sealed."

Another fabrication by harr the hypocritical fabricator.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous John D. Smith said...
(Part 4 of 4)
Sidney,

You question Cooper’s credibility, yet you provide no evidence to support this, limiting yourself to conspiracy theories.

Sidney, as I indicated previously, your advocacy for Magnum suffers significantly when you repeatedly make demonstrably false statements. Those to whom you appeal for support will not take you seriously if they believe that you are either a Magnum apologist, delusional or a liar.

You owe your readers an explanation of why you believe you help Magnum when you make demonstrably false statements in your advocacy. I will continue to post this comment until you have responded to the proof I provided and provided the explanation I requested.

Thank you.

John D. Smith
New York, NY


John D. Smith, let me preface my remarks by stating that I support Roy Cooper for governor of North Carolina because I believe he will do a much better job than Pat McCrory. That is not to say that I believe that he did a good job as the State A.G. when it comes to Duke Lacrosse related issues. I believe that when it comes to the Duke Lacrosse case he was definitely biased in his approach. He proclaimed the Duke Lacrosse defendant innocent which is totally unprecedented. He asked the federal Department of Justice to conduct a criminal investigation of Mike Nifong for allegedly violating the civil rights of the three Duke Lacrosse defendants. And he ignored my formal complaint about the perjury committed by medical examiner Dr. Clay Nichols... perjury being a Class F felony. In addition to sealing the some of the Duke Lacrosse investigation to keep its truths from being known, he has failed to call for an investigation into Dr. Nichols' role in the Mangum murder case to keep from exposing truths favorable to Mangum's exoneration.

Hope you find my explanations edifying and enlightening.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous John D. Smith said...
Sidney,

Given the problems with blogger accepting my comments, apparently if they exceed a particular length, I will repost the comment, breaking it into two parts. Hopefully, that will work.

John D. Smith
New York, NY


I have found out that when commenting on blog sites size matters. There is a limit in the amount of characters that comments to the site will carry. As you surmised, that might have been the problem with posting your comment. Rest assured that I will not delete any comment, unless, of course, it blatantly violates the kenhyderal doctrine.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Wow! harr the hypocritical fabricator osr kenny hissy fit or both are really going crazy posting anonymously trying to delude the public into thinking that people support thir views.


Actually it is not necessary to fabricate comments in support of my positions, as I am dedicated to providing enlightenment rather than converting nonbelievers. I just want viewers and visitors to this site to be able to receive the truth rather than the misleading lies spewed by the media-types. What opinions they derive subsequently is up to them... irregardless, at least they will have been informed.

Anonymous said...

Nifong Supporter said...


"I believe that when it comes to the Duke Lacrosse case [AGE Cooper] was definitely biased in his approach."

Which is but more evidence that you are a biased guilt presuming racist. It is also a meaningless statement in view of your recent admission that you are not and never were knowledgeable about the facts of the Duke rape hoax.

"He proclaimed the Duke Lacrosse defendant innocent which is totally unprecedented."

One of the earliest fabrications by harr the hypocritical fabricator. AG Cooper proclaimed nothing. He stated he and his office investigated the case(something harr the hypocritical fabricator admitted he never did), found no evidence that a crime never happened and therefore believed the accused were innocent. harr the hypocritical fabricator is a guilt presuming racist.

"He asked the federal Department of Justice to conduct a criminal investigation of Mike Nifong for allegedly violating the civil rights of the three Duke Lacrosse defendants."

harr the hypocritical fabricator can not comprehend that making inflammatory guilt presuming statements, calling invoking their constitutionally guaranteed right to remain silent evidence of guilt, calling the invoking their constitutionally guaranteed right to counsel as evidence of guilt, ARE violations of their civil rights. harr obviously believes white males have no civil rights. More evidence of his guilt presuming racism.

"And he ignored my formal complaint about the perjury committed by medical examiner Dr. Clay Nichols... perjury being a Class F felony."

harr the hypocritical fabricator ignores the established facts that he is incapable of knowing what perjury is, of knowing what truth is.

"In addition to sealing the some of the Duke Lacrosse investigation to keep its truths from being known,"

Another fabrication from harr the hypocritical fabricator.

"he has failed to call for an investigation into Dr. Nichols' role in the Mangum murder case to keep from exposing truths favorable to Mangum's exoneration."

Yet another fabrication from harr the hypocritical fabricator, who as a minimally trained, minimally experienced medical school graduate who was never accepted into residency training and who never achieved medical specialty board certification and who sent most of his post medical school career filing and losing frivolous non meritorious lawsuits, is incapable of knowing the truths in mangum's murder trial.

"Hope you find my explanations edifying and enlightening."

Ignores that harr the hypocritical fabricator is an ignorant, unenlightened individual who can provide neither enlightenment or edification.

John D. Smith said...

Sidney,

A number of your understandings are incorrect.

1. Cooper did not "seal" the discovery from the lacrosse frame. Courts have the power to "seal" evidence; AGs do not. The court sealed Mangum's mental health records.

Discovery from criminal trials is not public information. Cooper could have received permission from the court to release it, but elected not to do so.

It is not subject to freedom of information requests. N.C.G.S. § 132-1.4 (a) states that records of criminal investigations conducted by public law enforcement agencies or records of criminal intelligence information compiled by public law enforcement agencies are not public records.

2. As I indicated, the "nuts and bolts" of the discovery are publicly available. I listed some of the information that is available. Your statement that the "nuts and bolts are sealed" is demonstrably false.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

John D. Smith said...

Sidney,

3. Cooper's comments that he and the special prosecutors had concluded that the defendants were "innocent" is not "totally unprecedented" as you claim. I provided other examples several years ago.

4. I understand that you currently are more interested in reversing Mangum's murder conviction than in discussing her false accusations. However, you cannot use this excuse to avoid acknowledging your false statements. If you are unwilling to address the frame, I suggest that you refrain from making false statements about it.

I ask that you acknowledge and apologize for your inaccurate statements.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

Walt said...

John D. Smith wrote: "4. I understand that you currently are more interested in reversing Mangum's murder conviction than in discussing her false accusations. However, you cannot use this excuse to avoid acknowledging your false statements. If you are unwilling to address the frame, I suggest that you refrain from making false statements about it."

Ding-Ding-Ding, ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner!

Walt-in-Durham

Walt said...

Kenhyderal wrote: " Because she identified the wrong perpetrators in the flawed Police photo line-up, that does not "prove conclusively" that what she described did not happen to her."

What it does prove is she lied about who allegedly did it to her. The conclusive proof that her description of the events is untrue combines the DNA evidence and the rest of the physical evidence. None of which confirms her story. Thus, the whole story Crystal told is a lie.

Walt-in-Durham

kenhyderal said...

Walt you are being just as disingenuous as John D. Picking the wrong perpetrators from a flawed Police photo line-up, when she was told that the persons who raped her were present in that line-up, does not constitute a lie. The DNA extracted from sperm and unexplained by her consensual sexual history is evidence that she was raped. No attempt was made to verify her statements regarding her consensual sexual history. Once it was shown that entitled Duke Lacrosse Players had not left DNA nothing more was ever pursued. Players in a different state at the time of the rape were tested for DNA. I was told by Kilgo that scores of non-Players were present at the party. Only two non-Players who by chance appeared in cell phone photos of the girls dance were tested. If she told the truth about her consensual sexual history then she was raped. Records and time-lines were available so an adequate Police investigation could have answered this question

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal said,
"If she told the truth about her consensual sexual history then she was raped."

That's a pretty big "if", isn't it?
To use your favorite word, you are being VERY disingenuous.

John D. Smith said...

Kenny,

I am not being disingenuous.

I used "false" in the context of "not true." In other words, Mangum's claim that Finery, Evans and Seligmann sexually assaulted her vaginally, anally and orally and did not use condoms is "false" because the failure to find DNA that matched the defendants proved that it was not true.

I did not attempt to explain WHY the accusation is false. There are three possible explanations: (1) Magnum lied (the explanation adopted by Walt and most other commenters); (2) Magnum is delusional (the explanation adopted by Cooper as he explained why he chose not to charge Magnum with filing a false report); or (3) Magnum was raped by mystery rapists and she misidentified the perpetrators. There is credible evidence to support (1) and (2). I have conceded that, although it is patently ridiculous and is not supported by any credible evidence, (3) is theoretically possible and that you win the master debate.

You now owe me two apologies.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

The Great Kilgo said...

Kenhyderal, please help me! Ubes is holding me at apartment 4B of the building at 264 F ipvcxdiikc

Ubes said...

How do you like that? I'm going to have to scold the guards at my complex. How could they let Kilgo get to the computer?

guiowen said...

Hey, Kenny,
Good news. You now know that Kilgo's being held at apartment 4B of some building at 264 F street. Here's what you can do,
1. Notify Durham police about a kidnapping
2. Look for 264 of some street that starts with F. (There can't be that many in Durham).
3. If this address is a building with at least 4 floors, then you've found your friend. Just have the police go up to 4B.
4. Be very careful. Don't try to go there by yourself. You really need police help.
Good luck!

Ubes said...

Guiowen,
Please don't help Kenhyderal! I've got problems enough without him sniffing around my complex.

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...

"Picking the wrong perpetrators from a flawed Police photo line-up, when she was told that the persons who raped her were present in that line-up, does not constitute a lie."

First off, the concept of "wrong perpetrators" is ridiculous. Either someone perpetrated a crime or that person did not. Your statement implies that those accused of raping crystal should have been presumed guilty, even if you are too dense to realize it. . Did you ever think, why would the police conduct an improper lineup, a lineup which would have resulted of any identification of perpetrators, if they had any real probable cause to believe a rape happened?

"The DNA extracted from sperm and unexplained by her consensual sexual history is evidence that she was raped."

It is not. It is only evidence that she had sex with multiple partners.

"No attempt was made to verify her statements regarding her consensual sexual history."

You are willfully, disingenuously wrong. Between the physical exam and the rae kit an effort was made to determine if she had been raped. It yielded no evidence she had been raped.

"Once it was shown that entitled Duke Lacrosse Players"

Irrelevant statement. There were no entitled Duke Lacrosse players. Only Duke Lacrosse players whom kenny resented because they were far more intelligent and far more accomplished than he ever would be.

"had not left DNA nothing more was ever pursued. Players in a different state at the time of the rape were tested for DNA."

Again, you are willfully and disingenuusly stupid if you do not ask, why would the police go after the Lacrosse players if actually was probable cause to believe someone else had raped crystal. There was actually no probable cause to believe crystl had been raped. But corrupt da nifong wnted to prosecute members of the Lacrosse tem in order to get elected to a full term as DA.

"I was told by Kilgo that scores of non-Players were present at the party."

Which, again is like a deaf blind man saying I see and hear everything. You have never established that kilgo is a credible witness, that kilgo does know anything about the party.

"Only two non-Players who by chance appeared in cell phone photos of the girls dance were tested."

Who were the only people outside of the Lacrosse team to be identified as having been present. You have not established that there were ever any mystery rapists. You can retort that no one can prove there were not. You have made the assertion so you should prove it. So far you haven't. That is the bottom line.

"If she told the truth about her consensual sexual history then she was raped. Records and time-lines were available so an adequate Police investigation could have answered this question>"

So, explain why there was no attempt on the part of the Police to verify her sexual history. I remind you, for months the only person who knew that the only male dna recovered from crystal's person did not match the dna of any member of the Lacrosse team were corrupt nifong and Brian Meehan. Brian Meehan admitted under oath that he and nifong conspired to conceal that evidence. Which is evidence that nifong and the police did not believe that crystal had been raped, that nifong's agenda was to prosecute members of the Lacrosse team for a non existent crime.

When there was no evidence of trauma which one would expect to be present if there had been a brutal gang rape, and when alkaline phosphatse could not be detected on the rape kit materials, the only reasonable conclusion is that crystal was not raped.

Unbekannte said...

Kenhyderal,
Ubes 9:58 is ein falscher Ubes. Ich bin der echte Ubes. Glaube nicht, was er dir sagt.
Hast du verstanden?

kenhyderal said...

Schwachsinn!

Desconocido said...

Kenhyderal,
Creo que ya se donde esta tu amigo kilgo. Ese tipo Ubes lo tiene escondido. Apenas tenga pruebas definitivas, te vuelvo a escribir.

Inconnu said...

Kenn7y,
Cela n'a pas ete facil, mais je crois qu'entre Descono et moi, on est a point de resoudre ton mystere. Attends seulement jusqu'au 14 mars.

kenhyderal said...

@ Desconocido: No se moleste

kenhyderal said...

@ Kenn7y: C’est vraiment des conneries!

Desconocido said...

Y por que me tratas de "usted"? Yo pensaba que eramos amigos.

Inconnu said...

Salut, Kenny!
Quand est-ce que tu viens me voir?

guiowen said...

So, Kenny,
Have you yet got in touch with the Durham police? Remember, they owe it you to help, after the way they fouled up things 10 years ago.

Anonymous said...

Wall Street-tax is such bullshit. ..in the end, the investors will take it back from their customers (private sector, consumers, public sector), so the "Wall Street"-tax is actually hidden tax for consumers, even for the US Government itself= after Wall Street tax is implemented, US Government and States, consumers, small businesses etc. etc. will have to pay more for goods and services, because of this tax and the big Wall Street sharks won't be affected it by it very much if at all. ..They might even benefit from it, cause the new costs will drive people off the market, leaving more playground for the people who can afford it.This is what went on in REAL WORLD if this tax-thing goes through:First, "they" create the financial crisis of 2008 (derivatives and insurance frauds, LIBOR-scandal rate rigging etc.)and the market crash resulting from this (RIGHT NOW TAKING PLACE) ..so, now when stocks are falling the insiders will buy everything of value for a cheap price ..and AFTER ALL THIS IS DONE, they will implement a "Wall Street tax" to keep the competition at a distance. Clever. ..and in the end the consumer will pay the tax in raised prices at the local store, or as raised bank fees, in stock prices and what have you.. = = In Finland, this is what happened when the Gov made the banks to pay a small tax; the banks raised interests % on loans, fees for different kind of services etc.. Yeah, thanks Gov for taxing "the banks"!! It's bullshit under these rules, cause the people "on top of the pyramid" can pass the tax downwards, to their customers.Get rid off private banks all together and the stock market, if you wanna make a difference. When the people are issuing all the loans, there is no need for a stock market ..the Bern wouldn't even dream of suggesting anything this bold, so the small people will end up paying because of his bull shit WS-tax...But HELL YEAH FOR FREE-COLLAGE PARTIES!!! EDUCATION. FORNICATION AND YOU'RE CRADUATED!..Wall Street didn't feel a fukkin thing and the shit goes on till the next bail-out and QE! Hoorraaahhh for Bern's "the scandinavian model of socialism"= a lie by the establishement. We in Scandinavia start to see past the bullshit. It's a rich man's con-game= First the working man build everything up anew after the havoc of WWII now all the infra is on the market for privatization, health care, electric grid statre companies all of it...no bank or stock market tax will stop this corruption.Nomen Klatura-leftist "gate keeper"-scam the whole WS- tax, if you ask me. = Corrupt left colluding with the WS

Anonymous said...

ken hisssy fi

You acknowledge that crystal has had many partners. So explain why the finding of male dna on her person establishes that she was raped.

The lack of the kind of trauma which would by a brutal rape. the failure to detect alkaline phosphatase on the rape kit materials say that no dna was deposited on crystal's person on the night of 13/14 March 2006. That the dna did not match the dna of any of her known partners means only that not all of her partners were known.

guiowen said...


the partners were known. Kenhyderal assures us that Crystal's agency kept full records about her customers. The problem is that the police didn't try to get their DNA.

kenhyderal said...

@ Desconocido 3:34 :Sigues mintiéndome y eso a mí no me agrada

desconocido said...

Bueno, por lo menos fuiste capaz de tutearme.
Que es lo que te tiene tan enfadado? Yo nunca digo mentiras.

kenhyderal said...

@ Inconnu: Jusqu'au douzième jour du mois de jamais

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said :"You acknowledge that crystal has had many partners. So explain why the finding of male dna on her person establishes that she was raped.................... Crystal gave the name of her TWO consensual sexual encounters and their DNA was found.

guiowen said...

Correction. Crystal gave the name of two of her consensual sexual partners.

Inconnu said...

Mais, Kenny,
Tu ne veux donc pas que je t'aide a trouver Kilgo?

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...

"Anonymous said :"You acknowledge that crystal has had many partners. So explain why the finding of male dna on her person establishes that she was raped.................... Crystal gave the name of her TWO consensual sexual encounters and their DNA was found."

You again attempt rather pathetically to dodge the issue. The finding of that dna on crystal indicates only 1) she had sex with males and 2) not all her sex partners were known. There is no evidence that anyone raped crystal on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

Anonymous said...


Sid:

You have 315 days to exonerate and free Mangum and 24 days until the Ides of March.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Anonymous said...

kenny hissy fit:

regarding point number 2 above:

There is no evidence which establishes that the dna found on crystal was actually deposited at the Lacrosse party on the night of March 13/14 2006. You admit that. The best retort you have is, it could have been.

Should you be accused of a felony and presumed guilty just because you could have done it?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 5:42am:

You don't understand. Kenny is master debating. According to the master debating rules, if Kenny shows something could have happened (even if highly remote), Kenny wins the master debate.

John D. Smith said...

Kenny,

Wikipedia provides the following summary. They link to the DNA results.

"At Nifong's subsequent ethics trial on June 14, 2007, the complete DNA findings were revealed during defense attorney Brad Bannon's testimony. According to conservative estimates, the lab had discovered at least two unidentified males' DNA in Mangum's pubic region; at least two unidentified males' DNA in her rectum; at least four to five unidentified males' DNA on her underpants; and at least one identified male's DNA in her vagina."

My question for you is this: You have stated that Magnum was brutally raped by three mystery rapists. If so, how did the DNA from the other men get into her rectum,underpants and vagina? Or were there at least nine mystery rapists and Mangum lost count?

Thanks.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

The Great Kilgo said...

KENHYDERAL, PLEASE HELP MPPPOD

kenhyderal said...

@ Inconnu 9:35 ; Je me demande votre sincérité

kenhyderal said...

@ John D. Smith: Assuming 9 individual profiles; three rapists and several other perpetrators of kidnapping and sexual assault. Perhaps even Players, who left no DNA A "gang-bang"

Inconnu said...

Mais qu'est-ce que tu as? Apres tout ce que j'ai fait pour trouver ton ami Kilgo, tu me parles comme ca?

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...

"@ John D. Smith: Assuming 9 individual profiles; three rapists and several other perpetrators of kidnapping and sexual assault. Perhaps even Players, who left no DNA A 'gang-bang'"

Irrelevant statement since there was no evidence that said rape, said sexuaal assault, said kidnapping never happened.

Your guilt presuming racism does not establish that a crime happend.

crystal's unsupported allegations do not establish that a crime happened.

That a woman with multiple sex partners would have male dna on her body does not establish that a crime happened.

Anonymous said...

Correction of typo:



kenhyderal said...

"@ John D. Smith: Assuming 9 individual profiles; three rapists and several other perpetrators of kidnapping and sexual assault. Perhaps even Players, who left no DNA A 'gang-bang'"

Irrelevant statement since there was no evidence that said rape, said sexuaal assault, said kidnapping EVER happened.

Your guilt presuming racism does not establish that a crime happend.

crystal's unsupported allegations do not establish that a crime happened.

That a woman with multiple sex partners would have male dna on her body does not establish that a crime happened.

February 20, 2016 at 9:28 AM

desconocido said...

Hola, Kenny,
Entonces, quieres que te de esos datos?

John D. Smith said...

Anonymous 9:28/9:30:

You continue to misunderstand Kenny's master debating.

Under the rules for master debating, Kenny is not required to prove anything. You are required to prove that his assertions cannot possibly be true. Even if the chances he is correct are highly, highly remote, Kenny wins the master debate.

In the same way that a rape by three mystery rapists is theoretically possible (although ridiculous), a rape by three mystery rapists aided and abetted by six or more mystery assailants is also theoretically possible (although even more ridiculous). As a result, Kenny wins the master debate.

John D. Smith
New York, NY


kenhyderal said...

A desconocido 12:51 : Por qué no?

kenhyderal said...

@ John D. Under the rules of your US Legal System The accused is not required to prove anything either. If a court says not guilty that does not eliminate all possibility of guilt. It theoretically remains they are not innocent.

John D. Smith said...

Kenny,

I understand what the justice system requires. I also recognize that you make no attempt to engage in an honest discussion. You are not required to do so because you are a master debater and you seek to win the master debate.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

Anonymous said...

Kenny:

In our system of justice everyone is innocent until proven guilty. If a verdict of not guilty is returned after a trial has been commenced, then the defendant remains innocent. Moreover, jeopardy attaches and they can't be tried again for the same crime, so a verdict of not guilty permanently eliminates any possibility of guilt.

In the Mangum rape case, it didn't even get to a trial because there wasn't any evidence that a crime had been committed against Mangum, much less that the innocent lacrosse players committed it. They, too, are totally and completely innocent. The case is over, Mangum is in prison and there is not even a theoretical possibility that any of them are guilty of any crime against Mangum. Lying about it only makes you look like an idiot.

Go away.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL


Anonymous said...

Of course there wasn't any evidence for a lawful trial to take place. This is the Duke justice system you are talking about remember. Compare the current case to the lacrosse case, there is no difference in how the Duke / Durham / NC justice system behaved in either case, except in the current case the media is mostly silent since there is no political gain to made for Duke if people understand just how corrupt Duke and this state are when they are involved in anything.

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...

"@ John D. Under the rules of your US Legal System The accused is not required to prove anything either. If a court says not guilty that does not eliminate all possibility of guilt. It theoretically remains they are not innocent."

Irrelevant statement. No crime, ever happened to crystal on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

desconocido said...

Kenny,
Mandame entonces tu correo. Por ningun motivo voy a poner estos daros en un sitio publicio.

Anonymous said...

There was a crime if ya'll expected her to be a prostitute at your party like you continue to complain about because she wasn't. Also, the crime of disrupting the peace since ya'll were yelling racist comments on the street in a racially diverse neighborhood to some victimized race persons. What about under age drinking, hmmm. Duke is supposed to be helping out with their research on that. Maybe ya'll were just their guinea pigs after all. The whole thing was just another experiment in how far can a false flag racial event be taken from all appearances, for the benefit of the black vote to obtain their agenda goals, namely Obama Care. Ya'll were used and abused by Duke big time. Is that why ya'll continue to rant on about it, or are ya'll just reminiscing because of the looming anniversary of the fateful date?

Don't you think it is rather foolish to ignore that Duke killed Mr. Daye with malpractice to frame Ms. Mangum for murder with the willing and dedicated service and assistance of the Duke corrupted NC justice system after they did what they did to ya'll in the lacrosse case?

Anonymous said...

CryBully asks: ya'll just reminiscing because of the looming anniversary of the fateful date?

No. Sidney restarted the discussion of the attempted frame when he repeated false statements.


Anonymous said...

Your not just copy and pasting plagerized comments so that you can troll yourself in order to look like a victim to give you reason to troll and cyberbully others even more than you already are without those type games this time evil duke troll it g... crybully hatemonger blogmonger. What's up with that? ???

Anonymous said...

Socialism seems like a system that might work after a war when no one has anything left - to eat, a place to sleep, a job, etc. If it is done now, wouldn't the only real result be that the super rich (the 1%) are made even richer and Everyone else pays until all are poor and can't afford anything? Doesn't make much sense.

Anonymous said...

harr the hypocritical fabricator or kenny hissy fit or both posting anonymously again trying to create the illusion that people believe them.

Anonymous said...

What the frack is going on here? I leave for a little while and come back hoping to be elucidated by a nice megashlog, but all I find are these evil, mean, hate-filled, nonsensical, crazy making comments from a bunch of insane hate-crime blog mongers.

blah

blah

blah

Anonymous said...

It's just that Tinfoil has been bullying and threatening us again! I'm about to cry.

desconocido said...

Kehyderal,
Alfin me vas a mandar tu direccion electronica?

Anonymous said...

February 20, 2016 at 7:01 PM

What threat? How are you bullied in any way?

???

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr,

I have broken my boycott of your blog (due to overwhelming cyberbullying by the evil duke troll gang that seems to find amusement in terrorizing your blog on a daily basis) today to discuss briefly a few of your latest posts.

Above I have discussed very briefly my concerns about Mr. Sander's plans for social democracy. There are many other concerns I have with his proposals, but mainly I cannot understand how what he is planning is not going to destroy the entire middle class so that the very rich have no competition left and no one can survive except them.

The sharlog about the problems with the Appeal - could you please post the text transcript that goes with it?

Did Ms. Mangum receive a decision from the State Bar yet about her complaint of the Appeals defense attorney yet?

Thank you in advance for your time in consideration of my requests, questions, and concerns.

kenhyderal said...

@ desconocido 7:08 Primero dime tu nombre. Soy Ken Edwards.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure all of the DNA found in and on Crystal came from black guys.No way would any white man want to have sex with her even if she was the one paying.

Anonymous said...

Too bad Crystal didn't get the same punishment as Jodi Arias since she committed the same crime.I guess some black lives like Mr. Daye's really don't matter.

Anonymous said...

To the 8:51,
Didn't you see that post at 5:05? I feel threatened and am about to start crying. Is there a blog police to whom I could report that bully?

desconocido said...

Kenhyderal,
Yo soy Ricardo Fajardo.

Anonymous said...

harr the hypocritical hypocritical fabricator or kenny hissy fit or both going crazy posting anonymously in a futile attempt to convince others that someone supports them.

Anonymous said...


Sid:

You have 314 days to exonerate and free Mangum and 23 days until the Ides of March.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Anonymous said...

February 20, 2016 at 10:47 PM

What about that post threatens you and why in the world would you feel like crying over it? Are you insane or are you just the evil duke troll it g... crybully hatemonger blogmonger?

Anonymous said...

It's crazy making hate blogging by a tinfoil troll it cyberbullying blogmonger.

blah

Anonymous said...

yeah well maybe if you stop pretending to be someone other than the evil duke troll it g... crybully and tinfoil hatemonger blogmonger, stop pretending like your threatened by your own cyberbullying and that now you are going to cry about someone calling you out for your own bullying of yourself, AND stop bullying yourself by copying and pasting plagiarized posts of an encounter between the so called tinfoil poster and your cyberbullying self when you played that insane crazymaking cyberbullying tactic back then to try to make this blog into something that no one took seriously, and stop the continuous cyberbullying to further that aim on a daily basis for years on end ... maybe than you wouldn't cry about it.

blah to you too

blah

Anonymous said...

tinfoil,

Here are some periods:

. . . . . . . . . . .

Feel free to put them in your 6:18 AM post.

blah

Anonymous said...

February 21, 2016 at 6:35 AM

Why don't you - you will find they are not needed since it was one sentence outlining the many cyberbullying things you need to obviously stop doing in order to stop feeling like crying apparently.

ya like the blah eh?

Anonymous said...

tinfoil,

I like my paragraphs like I like my women - short, easy to look at and with regular periods.

blah

Anonymous said...

yeah well we are ALL so glad to hear about that on this blog since it is the absolutely perfect place (sic) for you to go that low in showing us ALL your level of judgement about what to talk about on such serious blogs as this and your inability to comprehend what you read unless it's written in some elementary reading primer style.

Anonymous said...

tinfoil,

If you believe this blog is serious, then you should use properly constructed sentences when posting here.

Anonymous said...

February 21, 2016 at 7:09 AM

Doesn't work that way troll, if you can't comprehend what you read unless it is written in elementary reading primer style maybe you should stop crying and cyberbullying endlessly on this blog and try to really comprehend why this blog is talking about serious issues that affect ALL (and I mean ALL) NEGATIVELY. Try doing that for a change.

Anonymous said...

tinfoil,

You seem to be the only person who can't along with anyone. Everyone else seems to be doing just fine. Isn't there another website you can enshitten with your blogdroppings?

blah

guiowen said...

To the 7:55,
TinFoil just enjoys fighting and insulting people. He has no interest in getting along with the other posters here.

guiowen said...

Actually, TinFoil was having a lot of fun insulting people at Durham-in-Wonderland. Unfortunately KC closed that site, so TinFoil had to come here.

Anonymous said...

What a liar you are evil duke troll it g...

Ya'll are evil duke trolls - that's why NO ONE gets along with you who isn't part of your gang - ya'll are simply seriously evil - and have NEVER stopped evil duke trolling - not even for a day - in the past couple of years that I've seen.

Anonymous said...

Does anyone really believe that Crystal will (or even can) be freed by the Ides of March? Kenny, even you have to know that the only 2 ways for Crystal to be freed are by the Governor or by the Court, and both require filings, and the Court would require hearings.

Sid (and Crystal) have admittedly filed nothing - so nothing has been scheduled, so nothing will happen. Even if something is filed, pay attention to the news, and the rest - these hearings take months, or years.

Do you suppose Sid is being honest with Crystal, or do you think he is lying to her and pretending she might actually be freed soon through nothing more than his blog - which has zero chance of working, because only the Governor or Court can do anything, and they have formal processes to follow.

Sid, you are an abusive disgrace, and Kenny is an enabler. Tin Foil is just pathetic.

Anonymous said...


Does anyone seriously believe that Mangum will (or even can) be freed this year? Or next? Or the year after that? Or anytime before serving her sentence?

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Anonymous said...

Some of us believe that you will spend every day this year counting down until (or if) Ms. Mangum is freed Abe. Does that count?

Fake Kenhyderal said...

"yeah well we are ALL so glad to hear about that on this blog since it is the absolutely perfect place (sic) for you to go that low in showing...."

"(sic)" does not mean what you think it does.

How ironic that you use it posting about someone else's inability to comprehend.

Anonymous said...

harr he hypocriical fabricator or kenny hissy fit or both going really ballistic posting anonymous posts, trying to delude people that they have support for their views.

Anonymous said...

What views? All ya'll do is rage on trolling this and that and about whoever does has a view other than ya'lls trolling view. It is all you do, troll on and on and on, that is your view from what anyone can tell. That you are a troll and it is what you do - that's your view. On that view - you have my support.

Anonymous said...

February 21, 2016 at 12:20 PM

It is called creativity and it amuses me to use it that way - would you feel better with a (sick) instead of a (sic)? But sure, that will be too hard to comprehend or get for the likes of someone who has trouble comprehending in the first place I could imagine.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr,


Socialism seems like a system that might work after a war when no one has anything left - to eat, a place to sleep, a job, etc. If it is done now, wouldn't the only real result be that the super rich (the 1%) are made even richer and Everyone else pays until all are poor and can't afford anything? Doesn't make much sense.

When you think about it, weren't all the bailouts made with promises of a "trickle effect" - that the wealth would flow down to the 99% from that bailout. How can Mr. Sanders (or anyone) think that if he now taxes these same persons who were supposed to "trickle down" the wealth, that they won't open the flood gates and let the tax sheat flow down with a roar and a destructive force too powerful to stop before all are flooded and can no longer survive?

Note: I am posting some of this again in this post, along with the post containing my questions and concerns and request regarding your most recent posts below. I do this in case you miss in among all the trolling chatter that the evil duke troll gang attacks me with (as usual). My boycott for that reason, (the trolls), is temporary to ask you these questions, concerns, and requests. Thank you again in advance for your time in consideration.

Dr. Harr,

I have broken my boycott of your blog (due to overwhelming cyberbullying by the evil duke troll gang that seems to find amusement in terrorizing your blog on a daily basis) today to discuss briefly a few of your latest posts.

Above I have discussed very briefly my concerns about Mr. Sander's plans for social democracy. There are many other concerns I have with his proposals, but mainly I cannot understand how what he is planning is not going to destroy the entire middle class so that the very rich have no competition left and no one can survive except them.

The sharlog about the problems with the Appeal - could you please post the text transcript that goes with it?

Did Ms. Mangum receive a decision from the State Bar yet about her complaint of the Appeals defense attorney yet?

Thank you in advance for your time in consideration of my requests, questions, and concerns.

Anonymous said...

kennyhissy fit

The physical exam performed on crystal on the morning of 14 March 2006 showed no evidence of a brutal assault. The testing of the rape kit showed no sexual assault. The finding of male dna on crystal's person indicated only that crystal had engaged in sexual intercourse with multiple male partners. There was no evidence said sexual intercourse was rape.

Anonymous said...

Has anyone thought of asking Obama to pardon Crystal before he leaves office? I guess it wouldn't work since Obama supported the lacrosse team and endorsed a civil right investigation of Nifong.

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 323   Newer› Newest»