Wednesday, November 8, 2017

My vis-a-vis encounter with James Goodmon

287 comments:

1 – 200 of 287   Newer›   Newest»
Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous FakeKenhyderal said...
"Also, Crystal Mangum is no longer held in the Raleigh women's prison... visitation requires a 110 minute drive each way. A bit time consuming."


Sid -- I've asked you and Kenny multiple times now...Why was Crystal transferred?

Why do you refuse to answer this question?

November 8, 2017 at 1:07 PM


Hey, FakeK.

There are actually very few questions that I refuse to answer. I may not answer them as quickly as you would like, but I have been quite busy recently... not having time to spend on the comments.

As far as the transfer goes, Crystal had made the request to move from the Raleigh prison because the dormitories did not have air-conditioning. As to why the move was made when it was is unknown to me.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous A Lawyer said...
Unfortunately I have made many miscalculations and have subsequently suffered many disappointments.

Miscalculations and disappointments are to be expected when someone with no legal training attempts to practice law. If I were foolish enough to try to perform surgery on a trauma patient, I would make many miscalculations and the patient would suffer disappointments (or worse). That's why I don't practice medicine, and that's why you should stop trying to practice law.

Consider yourself elucidated.

November 8, 2017 at 12:08 PM


Hey, A Lawyer.

The situation is not as simple as you present it. First and foremost, all of the attorneys who have represented Crystal have undermined her case to protect Duke University Hospital and the medical examiner who produced a fraudulent autopsy report.

Secondly, Mangum and I made many attempts to obtain reliable decent legal representation, but we were met with no success. During post-conviction her appellate attorney Petersen sold her out dramatically. The Innocence Inquiry Commission refused to accept her case, as did the NC Center on Actual Innocence, and other innocence commissions out of state. The NAACP and ACLU both refused to provide any legal representation, much less listen to me explain the issues of the case. The NC Prisoner Legal Services never wrote a letter or filed a motion on Crystal's behalf and were anxious to abandon her. Crystal tried to get several private practice lawyers, and I wrote several lawyers from the private sector who refused to meet with me. The NC Central University Law School (from where Crystal graduated as an undergraduate) was quite hostile in refusing to help Crystal.

A Lawyer, Crystal is better off having me assist her than not having anyone... and she is better off having no one help her than having a turncoat attorney who will undermine and sabotage her case.

Consider yourself re-elucidated.

guiowen said...

In other words, there is nothing to be done. Only Sidney (well, possibly Kenny and TinFoil too) think Sid can actually accomplish anything. Well, at least she's in a nice air-conditioned facility.

Anonymous said...

I find it remarkably sad that for all the times it's been explained to him that the Larceny of Chose in Action had nothing to do with Felony Murder, and was not the basis for the 1st Degree Murder charge (because legally it could not be - and was never instructed to the jury as such), Sid still clings to that, and clearly has Crystal convinced of that as well.

You are either mentally ill, or intentionally lying - which is it Sid? That's an issue that's crystal clear (no pun intended) yet you still cling to it. Plus, those charges were not guilty, so they don't matter anymore anyway.

Anonymous said...

u no man sid.

u a deluded megalomaniac

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

In your latest screed you again decreed that Reginald Daye's death was due to the esophageal intubation whichwas done as treatment for DTs.

Again, Reginald Daye was being evaluated for an intra abdominal infection. He had been placed at risk of an intra abdominal infection when Crystal stabbed him and lacerated his colon. This is but another iteration of your belief that because you somehow got MD appended to your name, you are a medical expert. Considering your lack of training, your lack of experience, your lack of credentials, you are no medical expert, you are in no position to understand what happened to Reginald Daye.

Again, all you are doing is trying to get your favorite murderess/false accuser/victimizer a pass for her crimes.

And you call yourself a zealous advocate for justice. HAH!!!

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"Hey, A Lawyer.

The situation is not as simple as you present it. First and foremost, all of the attorneys who have represented Crystal have undermined her case to protect Duke University Hospital and the medical examiner who produced a fraudulent autopsy report."

Wrong Wrong Wrong. Duke University Hospital did not need protection from anything. You claim malpractice. You are not professionally competent to know whether or not malpractice had happened. You are not professionally competent to determine whether or not the Autopsy report was fraudulent, because you have never seen an autopsy let alone done one.

"Secondly, Mangum and I made many attempts to obtain reliable decent legal representation, but we were met with no success."

If Mangum did not get reliable decent legal representation, it was because you prevented her from doing so. You are not competent to determine whether or not Crystal received competent representation considering your years long record of filing and losing frivolous non meritorious lawsuits. The court, not you, e=determines whether or not your suits have meerit.

"During post-conviction her appellate attorney Petersen sold her out dramatically.'

No Peterson didn't.

The Innocence Inquiry Commission refused to accept her case, as did the NC Center on Actual Innocence, and other innocence commissions out of state."

Because she was found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt at a fair and impartial trial. In spite of your ranting and raving you have not demonstrated the trial was unfair.

"The NAACP and ACLU both refused to provide any legal representation, much less listen to me explain the issues of the case."

That was because you DO NOT understand the issues of the case. That you want your favorite false accuser/victimizer/murderess a pass for her crimes does not show you understand the issues.

"The NC Prisoner Legal Services never wrote a letter or filed a motion on Crystal's behalf and were anxious to abandon her."

You have never documented that the NC Prisoner Legal Services deliberately abandoned her. Another iteration of how you presume facts not in evidence.

"Crystal tried to get several private practice lawyers, and I wrote several lawyers from the private sector who refused to meet with me. The NC Central University Law School (from where Crystal graduated as an undergraduate) was quite hostile in refusing to help Crystal."

Probably because all these people were aware of your actions in sabotaging her her case by revealing confidential information about her case.

"A Lawyer, Crystal is better off having me assist her than not having anyone... and she is better off having no one help her than having a turncoat attorney who will undermine and sabotage her case."

Another manifestation of your delusional megalomania. You have never helped Crystal. You have only harmed her.

"Consider yourself re-elucidated."

Again, someone who is incapable of responding to elucidation is incapable of imparting elucidation.

FakeKenhyderal said...

Crystal Mangum's been fortunate in her past experiences with the law:

Her 2002 assault on a government official, larceny, speeding to elude arrest, and driving while impaired case netted her a total of serving three weekends in jail, paying $4,200 in restitution and fees, and being given two years' probation

Her 2010 contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile, injury to personal property and resisting a public officer case netted her a total of 88 days in jail (which she had already served) I should note that it did leave the custody decision of her children in the hands of social services.

What does her current case have that the previous ones were missing?

Sidney Harr.

She couldn't have chosen a worse "advocate". Maybe now that she's further away (and in a comfortable air-conditioned facility), Sid's influence will lessen.

Anonymous said...

Sidney said: "The WRAL-5 campus is very tastefully landscaped with broad-leafed trees casting shade from the sun onto the parking lot and the sidewalk. It provided a cool, lovely, and refreshing shortcut to my shopping destination, so I headed across the parking lot to the sidewalk."

You could have stayed on the sidewalk on Nazareth St. down to Centennial Parkway and been in the same shade. What you did is stalk the folks at WRAL hoping for some kind of encounter and it worked. You sue WRAL and then have the gall to walk on their property looking for any way to push your narrative. Quite immature of you, but we already knew that. Next time head to Dollar General around 2-4pm and stop in at the Holy Name Of Jesus Cathedral on Nazareth St. Once inside the main sanctuary, turn left and walk over to the first statue and reflect on your life and what you have accomplished.

Anonymous said...

Boom goes the dynamite!

Walt said...

Sid wrote: "Hey, A Lawyer.

The situation is not as simple as you present it. First and foremost, all of the attorneys who have represented Crystal have undermined her case to protect Duke University Hospital..."


No, they did not. The only people who undermined the case were Sid and Crystal. Sid did so by breaching the confidence that Crystal placed in him and revealing to the world that she did not have an expert to support her theory of medical malpractice. Crystal has undermined her case many times by firing attorneys, refusing to listen to them and filing blatantly meaningless briefs and motions when competent lawyers had much better briefs and motions.

"... and the medical examiner who produced a fraudulent autopsy report."

No. In fact the autopsy report's conclusions were supported by an independent medical examiner.

"Secondly, Mangum and I made many attempts to obtain reliable decent legal representation, but we were met with no success."

Wrong again.

"During post-conviction her appellate attorney Petersen sold her out dramatically."

No, she did not. Petersen's appeal was based on a reasonable argument to change the law. The only issue that was both preserved for appeal and had a chance of winning.

"The Innocence Inquiry Commission refused to accept her case, as did the NC Center on Actual Innocence, and other innocence commissions out of state."

That should give you a clue that no one thinks Crystal is actually innocent.

"The NAACP and ACLU both refused to provide any legal representation, much less listen to me explain the issues of the case."

Another clue.

"The NC Prisoner Legal Services never wrote a letter or filed a motion on Crystal's behalf and were anxious to abandon her."

Clue number three (3).

"Crystal tried to get several private practice lawyers, and I wrote several lawyers from the private sector who refused to meet with me."

Clue number four (4).

"The NC Central University Law School (from where Crystal graduated as an undergraduate) was quite hostile in refusing to help Crystal."

Clue number five (5).

"A Lawyer, Crystal is better off having me assist her than not having anyone..."

Not really.

... and she is better off having no one help her than having a turncoat attorney who will undermine and sabotage her case."

Sid, you are the only person who has sabotaged her case.

Five clues that Sid's take on the case is wrong. I have to say that this case has gotten way more attention than it deserves. Justice was done. A killer locked up. Hopefully for Crystal, she is working out whatever demons she has that cause her to resort to lying and violence when she becomes frustrated with men.

Walt-in-Durham

kenhyderal said...

Here are a few more additional clues. Duke University contributes six billion to the North Carolina economy. David Evans is the son of Rae Evans, a prominent lobbyist who boasts close links to the Bush family, and David Evans, a partner at one of the capital's most prominent law firms. They are large contributors to the Republican Party. DA Michael Nifong is the only North Carolina prosecutor ever disbarred even though there have been many instances of real prosecutorial misconduct leading to unjust convictions and long prison terms. Dr. Harr was kicked off the Duke Campus for handing out a justice4Nifong business card for so-called soliciting. Crystal Mangum is a poor black single mother. Duke Lacrosse Liestoppers has, on a daily basis for over a decade, been an apologist for the Duke Lacrosse Players.

guiowen said...

Kenny,
Is there any way we can keep you from whining?
Don't you realize how unpleasant you are?
Why don't you come to NC and actually do something?

Anonymous said...

Kenny:

Even if you hate Duke, and/or the lacrosse players and their families, it is still wrong to make false charges against them (regardless of skin color).

The fact that Nifong is only prosecutor to be disbarred should tell you how egregious and wanton his misconduct was.

There is no excuse or justification for what Mangum or Nifong did in accusing and prosecuting the lacrosse players for a crime that did not happen.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Here are a few more additional clues. Duke University contributes six billion to the North Carolina economy."

So?

"David Evans is the son of Rae Evans, a prominent lobbyist who boasts close links to the Bush family, and David Evans, a partner at one of the capital's most prominent law firms. They are large contributors to the Republican Party."

You left out that David Evans was falsely accused. And you manifest your resentment od a Caucasian man who is more accomplished and better off than you are.

'DA Michael Nifong is the only North Carolina prosecutor ever disbarred"

And he labored mightily to deserve that distinction.

"even though there have been many instances of real prosecutorial misconduct leading to unjust convictions and long prison terms."

Give references to some.

"Dr. Harr was kicked off the Duke Campus for handing out a justice4Nifong business card for so-called soliciting."

You are too stupid to realize you admitted that Sidney violated Duke's non solicitation policy. I guess you subscribe to Sidney's position, that Sidney, not Duke, decides what violates Duke's non solicitation policy, meaning you buy into Sidney's delusional megalomania.

"Crystal Mangum is a poor black single mother."

Who made all of her own troubles by becoming a criminal, a false accuser/victimizer and a murderess.

"Duke Lacrosse Liestoppers has, on a daily basis for over a decade, been an apologist for the Duke Lacrosse Players."

An apologist is someone who tries to justify the actions of another. And you claim that the people who you call Duke Lacrosse Apologists are trying to justify the Lacrosse players' rape of Crystal. Since it has been established by hard evidence as fact that Crystal lied about being raped, there is no criminal action to be justified.

The only people connected to Crystal who are trying to justify anything illegal are you and Sidney, trying to justify Crystal's false allegations, Crystal's murder of Reginald Daye.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

I add you also try to justify the utterly corrupt, criminal, unethical behavior of corrupt DA Nifong who prosecuted innocent men just to further his political agenda and enhance his retirement benefits.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

Like it or not you have a lot in common with the white supremacists who marched in Charlotte.

You hate David Evans just because of who he is.

You also act like a cop who indulges in racial profiling, believing David Evans is guilty just because he is different from you.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. Anonymous said : Give references to some.............................. Gell Prosecutors Hoke and Graves. Hoffman Prosecutors Honeycutt and Brewer

kenhyderal said...

Race obsessed Dr. A said: "You also act like a cop who indulges in racial profiling, believing David Evans is guilty just because he is different from you"...................................Only you would think racial profiling of people with white skin is a problem in America or an African American asking for racial equality in the Justice system is the equivalent of a Nazi Skinhead

guiowen said...

Kenny,
Profiling people just because they have white skin is obviously very racist. But it{s pretty much what we have come to expect of you.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Race obsessed Dr. A said: "You also act like a cop who indulges in racial profiling, believing David Evans is guilty just because he is different from you"...................................Only you would think racial profiling of people with white skin is a problem in America"

Read what I wrote. I said YOU are engaged in a practice of racially profiling a Caucasian man, David Evans, because he is Caucasian. That is the moral equivalent of a Police officer who presumes a Black man is a criminal.

"or an African American asking for racial equality in the Justice system is the equivalent of a Nazi Skinhead".

You are not a Black man asking for racial equality in the Justice system. You are a Black man presuming guilt on the part of a group white men, in the face of overwhelming evidence that the crime with which they had been charged did not happen. That does make you the moral equivalent of a Nazi skinhead. Heil Kenny.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous guiowen said...
In other words, there is nothing to be done. Only Sidney (well, possibly Kenny and TinFoil too) think Sid can actually accomplish anything. Well, at least she's in a nice air-conditioned facility.


Hey, gui, mon ami.

The bright side is that she is in a better facility. However, what's in her best interests is foremost with me. Travel for visitation is definitely a down-side.

Let me say that "All is not yet lost." There are strategies ahead, of which I will not divulge, that I believe will succeed in seeing justice done in her case. Stay tuned.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
I find it remarkably sad that for all the times it's been explained to him that the Larceny of Chose in Action had nothing to do with Felony Murder, and was not the basis for the 1st Degree Murder charge (because legally it could not be - and was never instructed to the jury as such), Sid still clings to that, and clearly has Crystal convinced of that as well.

You are either mentally ill, or intentionally lying - which is it Sid? That's an issue that's crystal clear (no pun intended) yet you still cling to it. Plus, those charges were not guilty, so they don't matter anymore anyway.

November 9, 2017 at 4:32 AM


The Larceny of Chose in Action charge was bogus from the start. Clearly, because it is an automatic felony, it was lodged against her along with the murder charge during the April 18th Grand Jury indictment. If the charge was entered on its own legal merits, then she would have been charged with Larceny of Chose in Action along with the Assault with a deadly weapon charge.

Can you provide a reasonable reason for charging Mangum with Larceny of Chose in Action other than to upgrade the murder to first degree? .... I didn't think so.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
u no man sid.

u a deluded megalomaniac

November 9, 2017 at 5:37 AM


u have me confused with national political leader.

Anonymous said...

Kenhydesa:

"Dr. Anonymous said : Give references to some.............................. Gell Prosecutors Hoke and Graves. Hoffman Prosecutors Honeycutt and Brewer"


Jonathatan Hoffman is black. Alan Gell is white. Here is a link to a picture of Alan Gell: https://nccadp.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/IMG_2109-e1440183945703.jpg. These citations do not show that lack men are invariably treated worse in the Justice system. You forget, probably willfully the case of Michael Jermaine Burch, black man who did rape a white coed at a Duke university frat party. He was released on bail a lot lower than $400,000, the bail set for the innocent Duke Lacrosse players. He raped a second woman while out on bail. He was allowed to plead out to a lesser charge.

And there is the elephant in the room, that DA Nifong had no probable cause to charge anyone with raping Crystal Mangum. He accused members of the Lacrosse team of perpetrating the non existent crime and had three of them indicted anyway, to further his political agenda and to pad his retirement benefits. And you call that an injustice for Crystal. You are incapable of recognizing injustice when it happens.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"
Anonymous Anonymous said...
u no man sid.

u a deluded megalomaniac

November 9, 2017 at 5:37 AM


u have me confused with national political leader."

u have a lot in common with said national political leader. u are 2 stoopid 2 realize it.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney Harr:

In your latest screed you again decreed that Reginald Daye's death was due to the esophageal intubation whichwas done as treatment for DTs.

Again, Reginald Daye was being evaluated for an intra abdominal infection. He had been placed at risk of an intra abdominal infection when Crystal stabbed him and lacerated his colon. This is but another iteration of your belief that because you somehow got MD appended to your name, you are a medical expert. Considering your lack of training, your lack of experience, your lack of credentials, you are no medical expert, you are in no position to understand what happened to Reginald Daye.

Again, all you are doing is trying to get your favorite murderess/false accuser/victimizer a pass for her crimes.

And you call yourself a zealous advocate for justice. HAH!!!

November 9, 2017 at 5:38 AM


First, can we agree that the proximate cause of death (direct cause of brain-death) was the esophageal intubation that went unrecognized until Daye went into cardiac arrest? Can we not agree, furthermore, that had the initial intubation of Daye been tracheal instead of esophageal, then he would have been discharged from Duke University Hospital in an upright rather than supine position?

With regards to the phantom abdominal infection, it is obvious from the hospital records that the primary reason for transferring Daye to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit was due to his extreme agitation. The medical staff was aware of his propensity to slip into delirium tremens... the medical staff began prophylactic treatment for it following his admission to the emergency department.

What you need to ask yourself is why were no antibiotics given following his transfer to the S.I.C.U.? Also, why was no infectious disease specialist called for a consultation.

Your argument fails to pass the sniff test.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"
Anonymous guiowen said...
In other words, there is nothing to be done. Only Sidney (well, possibly Kenny and TinFoil too) think Sid can actually accomplish anything. Well, at least she's in a nice air-conditioned facility.


Hey, gui, mon ami.

The bright side is that she is in a better facility. However, what's in her best interests is foremost with me. Travel for visitation is definitely a down-side."

The bright side is that you have less access to her.

"Let me say that 'All is not yet lost.'"

Something you have been proclaiming for years, years in which you have yet to win anything.

"There are strategies ahead, of which I will not divulge, that I believe will succeed in seeing justice done in her case. Stay tuned."

Which is camouflage for, I have no strategies right now and am having a hard time dreaming up new strategies.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"
The Larceny of Chose in Action charge was bogus from the start. Clearly, because it is an automatic felony, it was lodged against her along with the murder charge during the April 18th Grand Jury indictment. If the charge was entered on its own legal merits, then she would have been charged with Larceny of Chose in Action along with the Assault with a deadly weapon charge.

Can you provide a reasonable reason for charging Mangum with Larceny of Chose in Action other than to upgrade the murder to first degree? .... I didn't think so."

Presumes a fact not in evidence, that you can think. You have documented on many occasions you are incapable of meaningful, rational thought.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney said: "The WRAL-5 campus is very tastefully landscaped with broad-leafed trees casting shade from the sun onto the parking lot and the sidewalk. It provided a cool, lovely, and refreshing shortcut to my shopping destination, so I headed across the parking lot to the sidewalk."

You could have stayed on the sidewalk on Nazareth St. down to Centennial Parkway and been in the same shade. What you did is stalk the folks at WRAL hoping for some kind of encounter and it worked. You sue WRAL and then have the gall to walk on their property looking for any way to push your narrative. Quite immature of you, but we already knew that. Next time head to Dollar General around 2-4pm and stop in at the Holy Name Of Jesus Cathedral on Nazareth St. Once inside the main sanctuary, turn left and walk over to the first statue and reflect on your life and what you have accomplished.

November 9, 2017 at 7:31 AM


WRONG-O!! I was the one who was stalked... by the WRAL-5 News security guard. He had absolutely no right to leave the WRAL property in order to follow me to the Dollar Tree (I may have inadvertently said Dollar General -- apologies) store.

Answer me this: Do you believe that the WRAL security guard acted appropriately by following me from his assigned property onto public property over which he had absolutely no jurisdiction?

If you Google map my route, you will see that the path I took was the most direct. And, at that time I had not been asked to keep off the WRAL property.

You accuse me of stalking the folks at WRAL, but you provide no proof. That is because there is none. That is because I was not stalking anyone.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney Harr:

"
Anonymous guiowen said...
In other words, there is nothing to be done. Only Sidney (well, possibly Kenny and TinFoil too) think Sid can actually accomplish anything. Well, at least she's in a nice air-conditioned facility.


Hey, gui, mon ami.

The bright side is that she is in a better facility. However, what's in her best interests is foremost with me. Travel for visitation is definitely a down-side."

The bright side is that you have less access to her.

"Let me say that 'All is not yet lost.'"

Something you have been proclaiming for years, years in which you have yet to win anything.

"There are strategies ahead, of which I will not divulge, that I believe will succeed in seeing justice done in her case. Stay tuned."

Which is camouflage for, I have no strategies right now and am having a hard time dreaming up new strategies.

November 10, 2017 at 4:19 AM


First, I have no less access to Mangum than I did previously... I just need to travel farther to get it.

As far as strategies... stay tuned.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"First, can we agree that the proximate cause of death (direct cause of brain-death) was the esophageal intubation that went unrecognized until Daye went into cardiac arrest? Can we not agree, furthermore, that had the initial intubation of Daye been tracheal instead of esophageal, then he would have been discharged from Duke University Hospital in an upright rather than supine position?"

The esophageal intubation happened because Reginald Daye was being evaluated for an intra abdominal infection, which he had been put at risk of because Crystal stabbed him and lacerated his colon. Even if it did rise to the level of medical malpractice, and you are not competent to determine that considering your lack of training and lack of experience, it would not have relieved Crystal of criminal responsibility for Reginald Daye's murder. The legal experts who have posted here have explained that to you. Further, a murder conviction would not have relieved Duke University Hospital of civil liability had there actually been negligence.

"With regards to the phantom abdominal infection, it is obvious from the hospital records that the primary reason for transferring Daye to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit was due to his extreme agitation."

Again you show how clinically incompetent you are. His symptoms, fever, tachycardia, disorientation, were all consistent with an infection, and considering his history of a laceration of he colon which went untreated for a number of hours, the time it tookto get him to the hospital and ready for surgery, the treating physicians would have been negligent had they not evaluated him for an intra abdominal infection. Again, an evaluation for an intra abdominal infection would not have been necessary had Crystal not stabbed him. And, if there were negligence, it would not have relieved Crystal of any criminal responsibility, and Crystal's criminal responsibility would not have relieved Duke University of civil liability had they actually been negligent.

"The medical staff was aware of his propensity to slip into delirium tremens... the medical staff began prophylactic treatment for it following his admission to the emergency department."

You forget, probably because you are clinically incompetent, that the medical staff had to also be aware of the possibility of intra abdominal infection in a patient who had suffered a penetrating wound of the colon. You seem to be echoing Kenny's argument, that the presence of DTs ruled out the possibility of an intra abdominal infection in this kind of scenario. More evidence of how clinically incompetent you are.

"What you need to ask yourself is why were no antibiotics given following his transfer to the S.I.C.U.?"

Why do you say that. I can assure you, from actual hands on experience in this kind of situation, something you never had, that it is routine to administer prophylactc anti biotics in a colon procedure.

"Also, why was no infectious disease specialist called for a consultation."

Irrelevant question. One does not need an infectious disease specialist to be aware of the possibility of an intra abdominal infection as a complication of a penetrating colon injury, the kind of injury Reginald Daye suffered when Crystal stabbed him.

You have just documented, yet again, why the courts do not consider you a medical expert.

Anonymous said...

SidneyHarr:

"First, I have no less access to Mangum than I did previously... I just need to travel farther to get it."

Having to travel farther is an admission you have less access, much to Crystal's benefit.

"As far as strategies... stay tuned."

For how long? It takes you an awful lot of time to come up with alternate strategies. Your alternate strategies in your frivolous, non meritorious lawsuits against Duke were to refile the lawsuits after they had been dismissed. Not exactly very imaginative alternative strategies, are they.

Nifong Supporter said...


Blogger Walt said...
Sid wrote: "Hey, A Lawyer.

The situation is not as simple as you present it. First and foremost, all of the attorneys who have represented Crystal have undermined her case to protect Duke University Hospital..."

No, they did not. The only people who undermined the case were Sid and Crystal. Sid did so by breaching the confidence that Crystal placed in him and revealing to the world that she did not have an expert to support her theory of medical malpractice. Crystal has undermined her case many times by firing attorneys, refusing to listen to them and filing blatantly meaningless briefs and motions when competent lawyers had much better briefs and motions.

"... and the medical examiner who produced a fraudulent autopsy report."

No. In fact the autopsy report's conclusions were supported by an independent medical examiner.

"Secondly, Mangum and I made many attempts to obtain reliable decent legal representation, but we were met with no success."

Wrong again.

"During post-conviction her appellate attorney Petersen sold her out dramatically."

No, she did not. Petersen's appeal was based on a reasonable argument to change the law. The only issue that was both preserved for appeal and had a chance of winning.

"The Innocence Inquiry Commission refused to accept her case, as did the NC Center on Actual Innocence, and other innocence commissions out of state."

That should give you a clue that no one thinks Crystal is actually innocent.

"The NAACP and ACLU both refused to provide any legal representation, much less listen to me explain the issues of the case."

Another clue.

"The NC Prisoner Legal Services never wrote a letter or filed a motion on Crystal's behalf and were anxious to abandon her."

Clue number three (3).

"Crystal tried to get several private practice lawyers, and I wrote several lawyers from the private sector who refused to meet with me."

Clue number four (4).

"The NC Central University Law School (from where Crystal graduated as an undergraduate) was quite hostile in refusing to help Crystal."

Clue number five (5).

"A Lawyer, Crystal is better off having me assist her than not having anyone..."

Not really.

... and she is better off having no one help her than having a turncoat attorney who will undermine and sabotage her case."

Sid, you are the only person who has sabotaged her case.

Five clues that Sid's take on the case is wrong. I have to say that this case has gotten way more attention than it deserves. Justice was done. A killer locked up. Hopefully for Crystal, she is working out whatever demons she has that cause her to resort to lying and violence when she becomes frustrated with men.

Walt-in-Durham

November 9, 2017 at 10:13 AM


Hey, Walt.

Let me present it to you in a simple way. In March 2006, Crystal Mangum was sexually assaulted by several men at a beer-guzzling/stripper-ogling party. In April 2011, Ms. Mangum was physically assaulted by an intoxicated alcoholic. Her action of stabbing her assailant was clearly self-defense. The media, through its demonizing coverage of Mangum have made her a target. She is not a killer... Come to your senses and admit that Daye's death was due to a catastrophic medical malpractice with intubation; a situation with no nexus to the stab wound inflicted by Mangum.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney said: "The WRAL-5 campus is very tastefully landscaped with broad-leafed trees casting shade from the sun onto the parking lot and the sidewalk. It provided a cool, lovely, and refreshing shortcut to my shopping destination, so I headed across the parking lot to the sidewalk."

You could have stayed on the sidewalk on Nazareth St. down to Centennial Parkway and been in the same shade. What you did is stalk the folks at WRAL hoping for some kind of encounter and it worked. You sue WRAL and then have the gall to walk on their property looking for any way to push your narrative. Quite immature of you, but we already knew that. Next time head to Dollar General around 2-4pm and stop in at the Holy Name Of Jesus Cathedral on Nazareth St. Once inside the main sanctuary, turn left and walk over to the first statue and reflect on your life and what you have accomplished.

November 9, 2017 at 7:31 AMWRONG-O!! I was the one who was stalked... by the WRAL-5 News security guard. He had absolutely no right to leave the WRAL property in order to follow me to the Dollar Tree (I may have inadvertently said Dollar General -- apologies) store."

You again manifest your delusional megalomania. You yourself have documented on many occasions on this blog that no one considers you worth stalking.

"Answer me this: Do you believe that the WRAL security guard acted appropriately by following me from his assigned property onto public property over which he had absolutely no jurisdiction?"

So how do you know he went there to stalk you. He would have had no jurisdiction in the neighborhood in which he lived. According to you then, when he went home to his house at night he was stalking his neighbors.

"If you Google map my route, you will see that the path I took was the most direct. And, at that time I had not been asked to keep off the WRAL property."

So explain why a security guard for WRAL would be stalking you.

"You accuse me of stalking the folks at WRAL, but you provide no proof. That is because there is none. That is because I was not stalking anyone."

Yet you accuse the security guard of stalking you when you have no reason, other than your delusional megalomania, to believe anyone would go to the trouble to stalk you.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"Hey, Walt.

Let me present it to you in a simple way. In March 2006, Crystal Mangum was sexually assaulted by several men at a beer-guzzling/stripper-ogling party."

Neither you nor Nifong have any evidence of that. I remind you that Crystal in her statement to the police alleged a gang rape by members of the Lacrosse team in which multiple males deposited their bodily fluids, their DNA on her. The only DNA found on her person did not match the DNA of the men she and Nifong accused. There was no evidence semen was ever deposited on her at the party. That establishes beyond any and all doubt that Crystal LIED when she alleged she had been raped, your claim that she did not notwithstanding. And you say you have never formed an opinion as to whether or not the accused are guilty.

"In April 2011, Ms. Mangum was physically assaulted by an intoxicated alcoholic."

You have little to no evidence that Reginald Daye was an intoxicated alcoholic. The testimony that he was came from Crystal after she was facing a charge of Murder 1, making it not exactly credible.

"Her action of stabbing her assailant was clearly self-defense."

No it wasn't

"The media, through its demonizing coverage of Mangum have made her a target."

The media never demonized Crystal. They never knew who Crystal was until after the case imploded and it became obvious that the rape she alleged never happened.

"She is not a killer..."

Yes she is, as well as having become a convicted criminal before the Duke Rape HOAX ever became news, a false accuser, and a victimizer.

"Come to your senses and admit that Daye's death was due to a catastrophic medical malpractice with intubation; a situation with no nexus to the stab wound inflicted by Mangum."

Again, the esophageal intubation would never have happened had Crystal not stabbed Reginald Daye and lacerated his colon. If there had been malpractice, and you are not competent to know what malpractice is, it would not have relieved Crystal of criminal responsibility for Reginald Daye/s death and a criminal conviction would not have shielded Duke from civil liability if there had been malpractice, something you would know if you were clinically and legally competent.

Anonymous said...

Kenny and Sid clearly don't follow the news ... they keep saying Nifong is the only prosecutor ever disbarred ...

Tracey Kline (though only a 5 year suspension, but removed from office)
Steve Brewer - removed from office and disbarred
Wallace Bradsher - arrested, charged criminally, forced to resign, likely to be disbarred.
Craig Blitzer - arrested, charged criminally, forced to resign, likely to be disbarred.

Please stop pretending Nifong is the only DA to get in trouble.

Anonymous said...

Can you provide a reasonable reason for charging Mangum with Larceny of Chose in Action other than to upgrade the murder to first degree? .... I didn't think so.


Given that it COULD NOT upgrade the murder to first degree, and did not, that's not why it was charged. Why was it charged? Who knows, but the one thing that is absolutely clear to everyone but you and your delusional believers is that it was not charged to bring felony murder into play, because it couldn't.

You are an idiot.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous November 10, 2017 at 5:46 AM

"Given that it COULD NOT upgrade the murder to first degree, and did not, that's not why it was charged. Why was it charged? Who knows, but the one thing that is absolutely clear to everyone but you and your delusional believers is that it was not charged to bring felony murder into play, because it couldn't."

Correction:

It should have read your delusional BELIEVER. Kenny is the only person who really believes in Sidney.

Anonymous said...

Sid prevaricated:

"Let me present it to you in a simple way. In March 2006, Crystal Mangum was sexually assaulted by several men at a beer-guzzling/stripper-ogling party."

However, after a lengthy investigation then Attorney General Roy Moore concluded:


"Now, we approached this case with the understanding that rape and sexual assault victims often have some inconsistencies in their account of a traumatic event. However, in this case, the inconsistencies were so significant and so contrary to the evidence that we have no credible evidence that an attack occurred in that house on that night."

What's more, even the DPD and Mike Nifong realized there was no crime committed against Mangum.

When confronted with the accuser's conflicting stories of the supposed attack and informed that the prosecution intended to forge ahead, Durham police Investigator Ben Himan testified under oath that he asked other investigators, "With What?" When confronted with the same evidence at the conclusion of his investigation, Mike Nifong simply stated, "we're fucked."

Crystal lied about being assaulted. The evidence Mangum lied is obvious and irrefutable. The police knew it. Nifong and his team knew it and the Attorney General's investigation confirmed it. Why should anyone believe her self defense claims? Or Sid, kenny or anyone else who claims she was a crime victim.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. A said: " I can assure you, from actual hands on experience in this kind of situation, something you never had, that it is routine to administer prophylactc anti biotics in a colon procedure".......................... Is it also routine not to document this.

kenhyderal said...

Dr.A. said: "You have little to no evidence that Reginald Daye was an intoxicated alcoholic"...................... B.A.C. on admission 296mg/dl

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Dr. A said: " I can assure you, from actual hands on experience in this kind of situation, something you never had, that it is routine to administer prophylactc anti biotics in a colon procedure".......................... Is it also routine not to document this."

That Sidney claims it was not documented is irrelevant. Did you read the record? Did you review all the orders which were written, all the medication lists?

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Dr.A. said: "You have little to no evidence that Reginald Daye was an intoxicated alcoholic"...................... B.A.C. on admission 296mg/dl "

Which was probably a lab error. If you were not clinically incompetent you would know that lab errors are possible.

According to the records, Reginald Daye was awake and coherent before the surgery. Even a chronic alcoholic with a BAC that high would have been comatose, something you would have realized if you were not clinically incompetent.

If he was able to tolerate a BAC that high without losing consciousness, he would have had to be imbibing large amounts of alcohol daily for years. Liver damage is a function of alcohol consumption, the exposure of the liver to alcohol and the toxic metabolites of alcohol metabolism. Reginald Daye's liver was normal on autopsy. That you doubt the validity of that finding is irrelevant. Neither you nor Sidney are competent enough to understand an autopsy report. How many autopsies have you attended? How many have you performed. How many autopsy reports have you prepared? In the face of a years long daily consumption of large amounts of alcohol it is highly unlikely that his liver would be normal, which translates that it is highly likely he did not consume for years large amounts of alcohol. Just like it is highly unlikely, considering Crystal's statement to police that the rape kit materials would test negative for alkaline phosphatase, especially if semen had been present in Crystal's genital tract at the time the rape kit materials were taken.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

I add:

How many livers, normal or abnormal have you seen?

kenhyderal said...

@ Dr. A. 10:21 https://books.google.ca/books?id=MFbm2SRUUNsC&pg=PA358&lpg=PA358&dq=what+kind+of+blood+alcohol+readings+can+a+chronic+alcoholic+tolerate&source=bl&ots=e82e6Nb91I&sig=2WESadY5FipA-Wul-hLeuwP9hko&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwig9K3F-LTXAhUmhlQKHfuiANQQ6AEIYjAJ#v=onepage&q=what%20kind%20of%20blood%20alcohol%20readings%20can%20a%20chronic%20alcoholic%20tolerate&f=false See chapter 358

A Lawyer said...

Let me say that "All is not yet lost." There are strategies ahead, of which I will not divulge, that I believe will succeed in seeing justice done in her case. Stay tuned.

How many times have we heard that before?

FakeKenhyderal said...

Kenny your book doesn't prove one way or the other that the 296 mg/dl BAC wasn't the result of lab error.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"@ Dr. A. 10:21 https://books.google.ca/books?id=MFbm2SRUUNsC&pg=PA358&lpg=PA358&dq=what+kind+of+blood+alcohol+readings+can+a+chronic+alcoholic+tolerate&source=bl&ots=e82e6Nb91I&sig=2WESadY5FipA-Wul-hLeuwP9hko&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwig9K3F-LTXAhUmhlQKHfuiANQQ6AEIYjAJ#v=onepage&q=what%20kind%20of%20blood%20alcohol%20readings%20can%20a%20chronic%20alcoholic%20tolerate&f=false See chapter 358"

More documentation of your desperate attempts to conceal your lack of clinical competence and clinical experience.

Does not refute that someone who could tolerate such a high BAC is highly unlikely, no extremely highly unlikely to have a normal liver.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

I add:

You try to bullshit your way through and around the questions, how many livers have you actually seen, how many abnormal livers have you actually seen.

THE GREAT KILGO said...

UBES IS UP TO HIS OLD LIESTOPPER CRANK TRICKS ! ! !

SPIN UBES SPIN



QUACK


QUACK


QUACK

Fake Pubes said...

Stop making fun of Ubes.

Anonymous said...

Some anonymous imposter is posting as Kilgo to create the illusion that Kilgo really exists.

Could be that imposter is really Kenny, who claims Kilgo told him that some anonymous Lacrosse player told him that he had witnessed unidentified rapists at the Lacrosse party raped Crystal, something Kenny has been totally unable to document.

Anonymous said...

Kenny also claims, with zero documentation, that the appropriately named Liestoppers devotes itself in slandering Crystal, i.e. when Liestoppers documents that Crystal lied when she alleged she had been raped.

THE GREAT KILGO said...

YOU NEVER LEARN UBES.

I AM KILGO AND YOU ARE A LIESTOPPER CRANK.

QUACK

QUACK

QUACK





SPIN UBES SPIN

Anonymous said...

Anonymous imposter, pessibly Kenny posting as kilgo continues trying to create the illusion that kilgo exists.

Anonymous said...

Maybe Kenny is a figment of Kilgo'd imagination. After all, Kilgo. Kenny,neither entity adds up to anything.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous imposter, pessibly Ubes posting as a figment of Ube’d imagination.

Anonymous said...

The number of Sid’s Facebook fans is up to 12.

Doogie Howser said...

I am number 12.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Kenny and Sid clearly don't follow the news ... they keep saying Nifong is the only prosecutor ever disbarred ...

Tracey Kline (though only a 5 year suspension, but removed from office)
Steve Brewer - removed from office and disbarred
Wallace Bradsher - arrested, charged criminally, forced to resign, likely to be disbarred.
Craig Blitzer - arrested, charged criminally, forced to resign, likely to be disbarred.

Please stop pretending Nifong is the only DA to get in trouble.


November 10, 2017 at 5:44 AM


Anony, the lines of communication have become entangled. Let me attempt to undo some of the major knots.

My statement has consistently been that Mike Nifong is the only prosecutor to be disbarred by the North Carolina State Bar since its inception in 1933. The conditions under which this statement is made has to do with disbarment based on his professional actions. In the cases of Bradsher and Blitzer mentioned above, they were arrested for criminal acts, and it seems like they voluntarily gave up their law licenses. In other words they were not disbarred by the NC State Bar. They don't count.

From what I Googled, it appears that Steve Brewer was disbarred by the State of Texas. Again, this case doesn't count.

As far as Tracey Cline goes, she was not disbarred by the NC State Bar. Placing her on suspension is a lot different than being disbarred. If you don't believe me, ask Walt or A Lawyer.

Edification Accomplished!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
The number of Sid’s Facebook fans is up to 12.

November 11, 2017 at 5:02 AM


That's not bad... especially since I hardly ever visit the site. Don't have enough time to spend on it. But thanks, Doogie, for joining anyway.

Barry Sanders of the News & Observer ridiculed me in his July 22, 2008 column when he used my joke in response to his question about the number of members in the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong when I told him that if he joined then there would be three. Well, as we approach a decade of existence we boast approximately fifty members, and are an international organization.

Anyway, regarding the Facebook fans and other fans, I don't look for quantity... I cherish quality. Hah.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Kenhyderal:

"@ Dr. A. 10:21 https://books.google.ca/books?id=MFbm2SRUUNsC&pg=PA358&lpg=PA358&dq=what+kind+of+blood+alcohol+readings+can+a+chronic+alcoholic+tolerate&source=bl&ots=e82e6Nb91I&sig=2WESadY5FipA-Wul-hLeuwP9hko&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwig9K3F-LTXAhUmhlQKHfuiANQQ6AEIYjAJ#v=onepage&q=what%20kind%20of%20blood%20alcohol%20readings%20can%20a%20chronic%20alcoholic%20tolerate&f=false See chapter 358"

More documentation of your desperate attempts to conceal your lack of clinical competence and clinical experience.

Does not refute that someone who could tolerate such a high BAC is highly unlikely, no extremely highly unlikely to have a normal liver.

November 10, 2017 at 5:34 PM


Anony, Shirley you must be joking. How do you determine that Daye's liver was normal? By the autopsy report by the medical examiner who was fired and who, in Daye's autopsy, said the spleen was not available for examination then proceeded to describe it? That is exactly the point!! You can't trust anything in the autopsy report on Reginald Daye. Now this question might have been readily resolved had the medical examiner taken photographs of the liver per standard protocol. Just one more reason for not relying on the autopsy report!

Keep in mind that Dr. Roberts was not present at autopsy! Who knows what the true pathological state of Daye's liver was? Rhetorical question... Nobody knows.

Consider yourself enlightened big-time.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Kenhyderal:

"Dr.A. said: "You have little to no evidence that Reginald Daye was an intoxicated alcoholic"...................... B.A.C. on admission 296mg/dl "

Which was probably a lab error. If you were not clinically incompetent you would know that lab errors are possible.

According to the records, Reginald Daye was awake and coherent before the surgery. Even a chronic alcoholic with a BAC that high would have been comatose, something you would have realized if you were not clinically incompetent.

If he was able to tolerate a BAC that high without losing consciousness, he would have had to be imbibing large amounts of alcohol daily for years. Liver damage is a function of alcohol consumption, the exposure of the liver to alcohol and the toxic metabolites of alcohol metabolism. Reginald Daye's liver was normal on autopsy. That you doubt the validity of that finding is irrelevant. Neither you nor Sidney are competent enough to understand an autopsy report. How many autopsies have you attended? How many have you performed. How many autopsy reports have you prepared? In the face of a years long daily consumption of large amounts of alcohol it is highly unlikely that his liver would be normal, which translates that it is highly likely he did not consume for years large amounts of alcohol. Just like it is highly unlikely, considering Crystal's statement to police that the rape kit materials would test negative for alkaline phosphatase, especially if semen had been present in Crystal's genital tract at the time the rape kit materials were taken.

November 10, 2017 at 10:20 AM


Answered in my previous comment... How can you rely on the autopsy report by Dr. Nichols? Rhetorical question... You can't. There were no photographs taken of the liver, and, to my knowledge, no histological (or tissue) examinations done under microscope.

I seriously doubt that there was lab error involved... face it -- Daye was an alcoholic with a high tolerance. He was seriously drunk, and that is why Duke University Hospital had such a difficult time keeping his withdrawal symptoms under control.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Kenhyderal:

"Dr. A said: " I can assure you, from actual hands on experience in this kind of situation, something you never had, that it is routine to administer prophylactc anti biotics in a colon procedure".......................... Is it also routine not to document this."

That Sidney claims it was not documented is irrelevant. Did you read the record? Did you review all the orders which were written, all the medication lists?

November 10, 2017 at 10:11 AM


What is crystal clear in the medical records is that there was repeated documentation of the administration of boluses of sedatives -- Valium, to be specific... both on arrival and throughout his hospitalization. The medical staff knew of Daye's chronic alcoholism problem, but they just failed to get ahead of the problem.

Capisce?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid prevaricated:

"Let me present it to you in a simple way. In March 2006, Crystal Mangum was sexually assaulted by several men at a beer-guzzling/stripper-ogling party."

However, after a lengthy investigation then Attorney General Roy Moore concluded:


"Now, we approached this case with the understanding that rape and sexual assault victims often have some inconsistencies in their account of a traumatic event. However, in this case, the inconsistencies were so significant and so contrary to the evidence that we have no credible evidence that an attack occurred in that house on that night."

What's more, even the DPD and Mike Nifong realized there was no crime committed against Mangum.

When confronted with the accuser's conflicting stories of the supposed attack and informed that the prosecution intended to forge ahead, Durham police Investigator Ben Himan testified under oath that he asked other investigators, "With What?" When confronted with the same evidence at the conclusion of his investigation, Mike Nifong simply stated, "we're fucked."

Crystal lied about being assaulted. The evidence Mangum lied is obvious and irrefutable. The police knew it. Nifong and his team knew it and the Attorney General's investigation confirmed it. Why should anyone believe her self defense claims? Or Sid, kenny or anyone else who claims she was a crime victim.

November 10, 2017 at 8:05 AM


Tsk, tsk, Anony. Sid doesn't prevaricate.

I no more believe the accuracy of A.G. Roy Cooper (Moore was just a Freudian type slip) report on the Duke Lacrosse case than I do the autopsy report on Reginald Daye. I haven't criticized Cooper much because I desperately wanted him to become governor... and as governor, Mr. Cooper has not disappointed me. However, that is with the exception of his refusal to rectify the Crystal Mangum injustices. I understand that he had to comply with the Duke Lacrosse Myth in order to receive the gubernatorial nomination and to get elected. It is now time for him to do the just thing regarding justice.

Roy Moore is probably lying about the sexual assault of the 14-year old.
Three partygoers at the Duke Lacrosse case are probably lying as well.

Ms. Mangum, on the other hand, like other recent abused women who have finally had the courage to come forward against their abusers, I believe, told the truth.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anybody want to comment on whether or not they believe James Goodmon stabbed me in the back (figuratively speaking, of course) by his actions?

Any thoughts on the actions of the WRAL-5 security guard?

Does anyone believe that my actions warranted being trespassed from WRAL-5 property?

Walt said...

Sid wrote: "Hey, Walt.

Let me present it to you in a simple way. In March 2006, Crystal Mangum was sexually assaulted by several men at a beer-guzzling/stripper-ogling party."


No, she was not. In fact, she lied about that in total.

"In April 2011, Ms. Mangum was physically assaulted by an intoxicated alcoholic. Her action of stabbing her assailant was clearly self-defense."

That's not supported by the evidence. Again, Crystal lied making her a very unreliable witness. The physical evidence says otherwise. No one believes Crystal, except you and Kenny.

"The media, through its demonizing coverage of Mangum have made her a target."

Crystal had amply fawning media coverage, until they discovered she was a perpetual liar.

"She is not a killer."

The facts speak otherwise.

".. Come to your senses and admit that Daye's death was due to a catastrophic medical malpractice with intubation; a situation with no nexus to the stab wound inflicted by Mangum."

I have always assumed for purposes of the discussion that the intubation was medical malpractice. You misrepresent the law every time you mention medical malpractice. It has been explained to you countless times that medical malpractice is not an intervening cause. This has gone beyond an inability to learn. You are now actively lying about the law. It's no wonder you have no credibility. While you are entitled to your opinion, you are not entitled to your own set of facts. The fact is medical malpractice is not an intervening cause.

Walt-in-Durham

Doogie Howser said...

Udaman Sid.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"Answered in my previous comment... How can you rely on the autopsy report by Dr. Nichols? Rhetorical question... You can't. There were no photographs taken of the liver, and, to my knowledge, no histological (or tissue) examinations done under microscope."

Presumes a fact not in evidence, that you have knowledge.

"I seriously doubt that there was lab error involved..."

You seriously doubt that Crystal lied when she alleged she had been raped, even though there is zero evidence she ever told the truth. Enough said.

"face it -- Daye was an alcoholic with a high tolerance. He was seriously drunk, and that is why Duke University Hospital had such a difficult time keeping his withdrawal symptoms under control."

Since you never saw Reginald Daye in the hospital and you are incompetent to evaluate a clinical situation, this is nothing but more bullshit. More than enough said.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"What is crystal clear in the medical records is that there was repeated documentation of the administration of boluses of sedatives -- Valium, to be specific... both on arrival and throughout his hospitalization. The medical staff knew of Daye's chronic alcoholism problem, but they just failed to get ahead of the problem."

Does not change the FACT that Reginald Daye's symptoms were consistent with an infection, he was placed at risk of infection, specifically and intra abdominal infection when Crystal stabbed him. Had she not stabbed him there would have been no risk of an intra abdominal infection and the esophageal intubation would never have happened.

You again document how clinically incompetent you are.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"Tsk, tsk, Anony. Sid doesn't prevaricate.

I no more believe the accuracy of A.G. Roy Cooper (Moore was just a Freudian type slip) report on the Duke Lacrosse case than I do the autopsy report on Reginald Daye. I haven't criticized Cooper much because I desperately wanted him to become governor... and as governor, Mr. Cooper has not disappointed me. However, that is with the exception of his refbusal to rectify the Crystal Mangum injustices.

Totally irrelevant statement as Crystal has been the victim of no injustices. She did victimize others when she lied about being raped and falsely accused innocent men of the non existent crime.

"I understand that he had to comply with the Duke Lacrosse Myth in order to receive the gubernatorial nomination and to get elected. It is now time for him to do the just thing regarding justice."

Since there was no Duke Lacrosse myth(Crystal lied about being raped, she falsely accused innocent men and Nifong wrongfully prosecuted them. Those are FACTS), this is another totally irrelevant statement.

"Roy Moore is probably lying about the sexual assault of the 14-year old.
Three partygoers at the Duke Lacrosse case are probably lying as well."

Wrong. There is no evidence Crystal told the truth. Ergo, there is no evidence that anyone who attended the party lied when they truthfully said no rape had happened.

"Ms. Mangum, on the other hand, like other recent abused women who have finally had the courage to come forward against their abusers, I believe, told the truth."

Yet another totally irrelevant statement. There is no evidence anyone ever abused Crystal. There is no evidence Crystal ever told the truth when she alleged she had been raped.

Like your wacko-lyte Kenny, you are a guilt presuming racist, the moral equivalent of a Nazi skin head. Heil Sidney.

Anonymous said...

Sidney said: "Any thoughts on the actions of the WRAL-5 security guard?" "Does anyone believe that my actions warranted being trespassed from WRAL-5 property?"

Yes, since we know that you will sue anyone for anything. If I was WRAL and knew that you had already attempted to sue, then I would make sure that you did not go onto the WRAL property for any reason. Because you could slip on a wet path, fall down a slope, get hit by a car or whatever. And then the suing again starts. There is absolutely no reason for you to go on the WRAL property based on your history. WRAL had the security guard follow you because you are a risk. Meaning, that on your return trip from the Dollar Tree you could attempt another encounter on their property. They were trying to make sure you understood that you are not welcome. And since you have received a letter from their lawyer to stay away, this makes sense. You are like a terrorist and have to be tracked, otherwise, who knows what crazy action you will attempt. Just like Duke property, stay away from the WRAL property. It is as simple as that, Durham man...

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

"Anybody want to comment on whether or not they believe James Goodmon stabbed me in the back (figuratively speaking, of course) by his actions?

Any thoughts on the actions of the WRAL-5 security guard?

Does anyone believe that my actions warranted being trespassed from WRAL-5 property?"

Yes.

You are a delusional megalomaniac, a racist guilt presumer, and the moral equivalent of a Nazi Skinhead.

THE GREAT KILGO said...

THE LIESTOOPID UBES HAS BEEN BUSY TODAY.


SPIN UBES SPIN


QUACK

QUACK

QUACK


Anonymous said...

Whether or not Kilgo is a figment of Kenny's imagination or Kenny is a figment of Kilgo'imagination, it is obvious that whoever or whatever this entity is, it is overwhelmingly frustrated. Perhaps this entity is Sidney posting anonymously. He sure makes a fool of himself when he posts as Nifong Supporter.

THE GREAT KILGO said...

..


Oh No !


Ubes has lapsed into his

notorious Crank mode !






..

Anonymous said...

Sidney, your running into James Goodwin at WRAL by chance seems fishy. I believe you stalked the place and this is not the first time you have entered the property to see what you could find. Many trips to the Dollar Tree I bet. Anyway, in this day and age, someone like Mr. Goodwin cannot chance these type of encounters as who knows what someone might do. So, good for security to make sure you stay off the property and also follow you so you get the message. Your tactic of jumping out of no where and confronting people is not normal. It is called stalking.

kenhyderal said...

Walt said: "The fact is medical malpractice is not an intervening cause"............................Yes, if the medical malpractice occurred while he was being treated for complications to the stab wound. In Daye's case he was being treated for an intervening condition unrelated to the stab wound. Causation due to the stab wound breaks down into undetermined speculation. Check out Nicholl's testimony in Court; "obviously SOME SORT of infection" No mention, whatsoever, of alcohol withdrawal or of a grave medical error that would compel him, like Dr. A. to a link this to the stab wound. Here is a non-speculative chain of events, Daye's chronic alcoholism, when he was in hospital, deprived of his habituated dose of alcohol. He goes into life-threatening withdrawal and is transferred into intensive care. While treating him there, it was prudently decided to check for any other cause for his symptoms possibly related to his surgery. There is no record that any infection was ever present, only speculation on the part of Dr. Nicholls and Dr. A. Both want to disregard the obvious. The Physicians at Duke made the diagnosis of pending delirium tremens. Why do Dr. Nicholls, Dr. A. and even Dr. Roberts choose to ignore this. At least Dr. Roberts speculated his failure to respond to benzodiazepines precluded it. No one disagrees that medical malpractice, in the treatment of consequences of the wound or it's complications, is not an intervening cause but acute alcohol withdrawal as a consequence of chronic alcoholism is, even if malpractice was committed while trying to eliminate a cause possibly related to his recent successful surgery. Part of his treatment for acute alcohol withdrawal necessitated checking for any alternate causation

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

Part 1:

"Walt said: "The fact is medical malpractice is not an intervening cause"............................Yes, if the medical malpractice occurred while he was being treated for complications to the stab wound."

The adverse event happened because he had been placed at risk of an intra abdominal infection when Crystal stabbed him. It was a consequence of the stab wound eve if legal incompetent/clinical incomoetent Krnny declares it was not.

"In Daye's case he was being treated for an intervening condition unrelated to the stab wound. Causation due to the stab wound breaks down into undetermined speculation. Check out Nicholl's testimony in Court; "obviously SOME SORT of infection" No mention, whatsoever, of alcohol withdrawal or of a grave medical error that would compel him, like Dr. A. to a link this to the stab wound. Here is a non-speculative chain of events, Daye's chronic alcoholism, when he was in hospital, deprived of his habituated dose of alcohol."

Fiest, it has by no means established that Reginald Daye was a chronic alcoholic, and it certainly is not established when no clinical trainig, no clinical experience Kenny says so. And Legal incompetent Kenny points out that even if Reginald Daye were an alcoholic it would not relieve Crystal of criminal responsibility for his death. Why was he deprived of his daily dose of alcohol? Crystal stabbed him.

"He goes into life-threatening withdrawal and is transferred into intensive care. While treating him there, it was prudently decided to check for any other cause for his symptoms possibly related to his surgery. There is no record that any infection was ever present, only speculation on the part of Dr. Nicholls and Dr. A. Both want to disregard the obvious. The Physicians at Duke made the diagnosis of pending delirium tremens."


Another iteration of clinical incompetent Kenny saying the presumptive diagnosis diagnosis meant the possibility of intra abdominal infection was excluded. The adverse event happened because Reginald Daye aspirated contrast material which had been administered via ng tube. Administration of intra gastric contrast is not a part of treatment for DTs. It is given when an abdominal CT is done. Abdominal CT scans are not done for DTs. An abdominal CT woukd have been ordered to evaluate for an intra abdominal infection, for which Reginald Daye had been put at risk when Crystal stabbed him and laceratd his colon.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

Part 2:

""Why do Dr. Nicholls, Dr. A. and even Dr. Roberts choose to ignore this."

We don't. The issue is that clinical incompetent Kenny is unaware of the real clinical issues i this type of clinical scenario.

"At least Dr. Roberts speculated his failure to respond to benzodiazepines precluded it. No one disagrees that medical malpractice, in the treatment of consequences of the wound or it's complications, is not an intervening cause but acute alcohol withdrawal as a consequence of chronic alcoholism is,"

Here again clinical incompetent Kenny fails, probably willfully because he wants to get his favorite murderess/false accuser/victimizer a pass for her crimes, to realize that the adverse event was a consequence of he stab wound inflicted on Reginald Daye by Crystal.

"even if malpractice was committed while trying to eliminate a cause possibly related to his recent successful surgery. Part of his treatment for acute alcohol withdrawal necessitated checking for any alternate causation".

Here legally incompetent Kenny does admit that even if malpractice did happen, it would not relieve Crystal of criminal responsibility. There would havebeen no need to evaluate for "a cause possibly related to his recent successful surgery" had Crysta not stabbed him. The surgery happened because Crystal stabbed him.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr(from a previous comment):

"Roy Moore is probably lying about the sexual assault of the 14-year old.
Three partygoers at the Duke Lacrosse case are probably lying as well."


Hypocrite Sidney has claimed in many previous posts he has not formed an opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the Duke Lacrosse players. It is obvious he has.

There is zero evidence the alleged rape ever happened, that Crystal ever told the truth when she alleged she had been raped. Nifong prosecuted anyway, had three innocent men indicted and charged with first degree rape(Sidney's wacko-lyte Kenny has claimed Nifong did not charge them with rape). Nifong did it to stir up racial animosity towards the Caucasian men he wanted to charge with rape in the black electorate in Durham County believing that kind of thing would induce black voters to vote for him for DA and win him the election. Sidney supports Nifong's wrongful, illegal, unethical prosecution of these innocent men. That makes him, like Kenny, a guilt presuming racist, the moral equivalent of a Nazi skinhead.

Anonymous said...

Sid,

WRAL is private property - it doesn’t matter if you think your actions warrant being trespassed, they have the right to trespass you.

Anonymous said...

How long before Sid files a lawsuit over this incident, even though he has no basis?

Walt said...

KEnhyderal wrote: "[Regarding intervening cause]............................Yes, if the medical malpractice occurred while he was being treated for complications to the stab wound.

Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own set of facts. The law requires that an intervening cause be intentional. There is no such doctrine in the law of an intervening condition. The sooner you accept the law as it is, the sooner you will start to make cogent arguments. Given your track record, I'm not expecting cogency any time soon.

Walt-in-Durham

kenhyderal said...

Walt said: "The law requires that an intervening cause be intentional"................... Huh?? What law would that be? Intervening Cause:
"A separate act or omission that breaks the direct connection between the defendant's actions and an injury or loss to another person, and may relieve the defendant of liability for the injury or loss.
Civil and criminal defendants alike may invoke the intervening cause doctrine to escape liability for their actions: West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc.

Fake Pubes said...

Excellent work, Kenny.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Walt said: "The law requires that an intervening cause be intentional"................... Huh?? What law would that be? Intervening Cause:
"A separate act or omission that breaks the direct connection between the defendant's actions and an injury or loss to another person, and may relieve the defendant of liability for the injury or loss.
Civil and criminal defendants alike may invoke the intervening cause doctrine to escape liability for their actions: West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc."

It has been explained to you that what happened to Reginald Daye was a consequence of the stab wound inflicted by Crystal. Ergo, it was not an intervening cause.

Plus, a legal incompetent like you is incapable of knowing ehat an intervening cause is, as you have so often demonstrated since Reginald Daye was murdered.

Anonymous said...

From Kenhyderal:

"Civil and criminal defendants alike may invoke the intervening cause doctrine to escape liability for their actions: West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc."

Notice the statement says individuals MAY escape liability for their actions. Who determines whether what is cited as an intervening cause. The court does. Legal incompetents like Kenny and Sidney do not.

Anonymous said...

Correction:

From Kenhyderal:

"Civil and criminal defendants alike may invoke the intervening cause doctrine to escape liability for their actions: West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc."

Notice the statement says individuals MAY escape liability for their actions. Who determines whether what is invoked as an intervening cause which relieves a defendant of liability for that defendant's actions? The court does. Legal incompetents like Kenny and Sidney do not.

Fake Pubes said...

Excellent work, Ubes.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal,
It has already been determined that Crystal's action did, in fact, lead to Reginald Daye's death. This was determined in a court of law by a jury of 12 individuals. All your screaming and whining is not going to change that.
If and when sweet Crystal gets out of gaol, it might be a good idea for you and you allies to try to explain to her that she has to control her temper. This might require her to decrease her use of mood-altering drugs. Explain this to her if you really have her best interests at heart.
Had you explained this to her in 2010-2011 she might not be in her current straits.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. A. said: : Notice the statement says individuals MAY escape liability for their actions. Who determines whether what is invoked as an intervening cause which relieves a defendant of liability for that defendant's actions? The court does"................ In the Court that tried Crystal the Jury did not get that chance because both the Defence and the Prosecution withheld information about the chain of events that led to Daye's eventual death by elective removal from life support. They only heard Dr. Nichols speculation about some totally undocumented post-surgical infection. My guess is that an impartial lay jury given the whole picture would conclude Crystal did not murder Daye but that he died of an intervening cause. Dr. Nicholls obviously had no recollection of doing the autopsy and he relied and doubled down on his notes the quality of which both Dr. Harr and Dr. Roberts have criticized

kenhyderal said...

@ Anonymous 9:02. The only person in this case with an altered mood due to substance abuse (ie. maniacal drunken rage) was chronic Alcoholic Reginald Daye.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Dr. A. said: : 'Notice the statement says individuals MAY escape liability for their actions. Who determines whether what is invoked as an intervening cause which relieves a defendant of liability for that defendant's actions? The court does'................ In the Court that tried Crystal the Jury did not get that chance because both the Defence and the Prosecution withheld information about the chain of events that led to Daye's eventual death by elective removal from life support."

And you willfully and deliberately omit that Reginald Daye's brain death was a result if the stab Crystal inflicted upon him. If he was a chronic alcoholic and you, a legal and clinical incompetent have not established that, and neither has your fellow legal and clinical incompetent Sidney, it was the stab wound which put him in the hospital and deprived him of his alcohol, and it was the stab wound which put him at risk of intra abdominal infection which necessitated the evaluation in which the adverse event happened.

"They only heard Dr. Nichols speculation about some totally undocumented post-surgical infection."

No, they heard Dr. Nichols' expert opinion, which which the Defense expert concurred. Sidney Harr is incapable of rendering any expert opinion in this matter. And that Reginald Daye had signs and symptoms of an infection, the need for an evaluation was based on solid clinical indications(something you and Sidney, a pair of clinical incompetents are incapable of understanding, as you abundantly have documented) not speculation.

"My guess is that an impartial lay jury given the whole picture would conclude Crystal did not murder Daye but that he died of an intervening cause."

"Dr. Nicholls obviously had no recollection of doing the autopsy and he relied and doubled down on his notes the quality of which both Dr. Harr and Dr. Roberts have criticized"

Kenny, who criticizes Dr. Nichols for speculation speculates, no declares, he can read what was in Dr. Nichols' mind. And a total clinical incompetent is incapable of knowing, let alone understanding what a real medical expert would conclude. That his fellow total clinical incompetent, would criticize Dr. Nichols is like Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin criticizing people like Mother Teresa, or Desmond Tutu. Also, Sidney, like you is a guilt presuming racist, the moral equivalent of a Nazi skinhead.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"@ Anonymous 9:02. The only person in this case with an altered mood due to substance abuse (ie. maniacal drunken rage) was chronic Alcoholic Reginald Daye."

Another clinical opinion from Kenny, who has abundantly documented he is a clinical incompetent.

Another manifestation of how he is like a deaf blind man who claims he hears and sees everything better than anyone else.

Fake Pubes said...

Udaman Ubes.

Anonymous said...

Kenny, Sidney some links for you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqt9OX-oAtU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gh8oGF4iXQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4sZblFRBqI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff7E8QRCNWg.

At 2:35 of the video, then AG Cooper makes no proclamation of innocend. He says, based on the results of his investigation, he and his investigators believe the accused were innocent.

Go take advantage of the opportunity to be enlightened and elucidated and view the videos.

Probably you will not because you are cowards afraid of the truth

Kenny is too invested in believing Crystal was raped.

kenhyderal said...

I watched all 4 rehashed videos. Just so new readers can see where presenter KC Johnson is coming from here is a critique of his involvement in the case and how it is perceived. https://truthaboutkcjohnson.wordpress.com/ and also the interview with investigative author Wm. Cohan on C-Span https://www.c-span.org/video/?318803-1/qa-william-cohan

Anonymous said...

Hey, Sidney:

After reviewing your latest screed I find you admit that the treating physicians did recognize the errant intubation and made an attempt to treat it. The reason why the initial intubation was unsuccessful was that he vomited material blocked view of the airway, which had been noted by Dr. Robeerts.

Maybe you could explain how the administration of intra gastric contrast via ng tube is indicated in the treatment of DTs. This site, https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/166032-treatment, describes the treatment of DTs. It no where says that the placement of an ng tub and administration of contrast via that tub is indicated in the treatment of DTs. So why do you say that the aspiration and errant intubation is a consequence of suspected DTs.

Reginad Daye's symptoms were consistent with infection. He suffered a laceration of his colon which, because of the time it took to transport him to the hospital and prepare him for surgery, he suffered hours of colonic contamination of his abdomen which put him at risk for an intra abdominal infection. Intragastric contrast is given for an abdominal CT. An abdominal CT is indicated if an intra abdominal infection is suspected. The adverse event was a consequence of the need to evaluate Reginald Daye for an intra abdominal infection. What made that necessary was that Crystal stabbed him and lacerated his colon.

That you harp on an infectious disease consultant is meaningless. Any competent clinician would not need an infectious disease specialist to see the risk of intra abdominal infection in this situation.

And you are no competent clinician and you ever have been.

I am waiting to see how you will try to bullshit your way around and through this set of facts.

Anonymous said...

Krnhyderal:

"I watched all 4 rehashed videos. Just so new readers can see where presenter KC Johnson is coming from here is a critique of his involvement in the case and how it is perceived. https://truthaboutkcjohnson.wordpress.com/ and also the interview with investigative author Wm. Cohan on C-Span https://www.c-span.org/video/?318803-1/qa-william-cohan"

I have seen https://truthaboutkcjohnson.wordpress.com/ and it is garbage.

So far as https://www.c-span.org/video/?318803-1/qa-william-cohan, Cohan himself had admitted his book is not at all researched. He does claim that the documentation of his work is readily accessible on line. I have challenged you to provide links. So far you haven't, not surprising as you have presented zero evidence that Crystal was ever raped, zero evidence she ever told the truth when she alleged she had been raped.

And, if you truly did see the ABC Nightline video, you did hear the recording of Kim's call to 911. So explain why she did not report a rape. I again refer you to the statement Crystal had given the police, that she had told Kim she had been assaulted.

And why did Kim drive her not to a hospital or to a police station but to a grocery store parking lot to have a security guard forcibly remove her from her car.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr:

You again say Duke conspired to discriminate against you when you went to the Breyer event.

You claim that you sent letters to the President of Duke and the Dean of the Law School to inform them you were going to attend the Breyer event.

You have admitted you have no hard evidence that anyone in power ever read your letters. Yet you claim that any reasonable person would "surmise" that people in power had conspired to discriminate against you.

Now you claim, without evidence that people at WRAL were hostile towards you. Just like you picked a fight with the security guard at Duke, you went to WRAL to pick a fight with them.

No one considers you important to bother withm, let alone fight you.

Again you show you are a deluded megalomaniac. Why you have problems is that no one thinks Sidney Harr is as great as Sidney Harr thinks he is.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. A. said: "It no where says that the placement of an ng tub and administration of contrast via that tub is indicated in the treatment of DTs. So why do you say that the aspiration and errant intubation is a consequence of suspected DTs."..................... Stop being disingenuous and pretending we dispute the reason for the procedure. We concur it was to rule out other causes for Daye's symptoms, like a post-surgical infection. The condition diagnosed was acute alcohol withdrawal. To confirm this diagnosis it would be prudent to eliminate other potential causes for the symptoms. This prudence would all be part and parcel of treating his potentially life threatening disease delirium tremens. Now the question becomes, is ruling out a differential diagnosis part of the treatment for his intervening condition. Would such a course be followed even if he was admitted and deprived of alcohol for any reason even a non-surgical one.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Dr. A. said: "It no where says that the placement of an ng tub and administration of contrast via that tub is indicated in the treatment of DTs. So why do you say that the aspiration and errant intubation is a consequence of suspected DTs."..................... Stop being disingenuous and pretending we dispute the reason for the procedure."

You are dodging the issue, what caused the errant intubation? It was not was not DTs, even if there was a presumptive diagnosis of DTs. What we are disputing is whether or not the need to intubate was related to DTs. Google the treatment of alcohol withdrawl, DTs. I do not doubt that patients with DTs have required intubation. What is on the web indicates that intubation is not commonly necessary in the treatment of DTs.

"We concur it was to rule out other causes for Daye's symptoms, like a post-surgical infection."

What we do not concur upon is that the need to rule out an intra abdominal infection WAS a direct consequence of the stab wound inflicted upon Reginald Daye by Crystal, not a consequence of any presumptive diagnosis of DTs. The adverse event happened because he was at risk of an intra abdominal infection. Had Crystal not stabbed him, there would have been no indication for surgery. If there had been no need for surgery, there would have been norisk of intra abdominal infection, no need to evaluate him for a post surgical infection.

"The condition diagnosed was acute alcohol withdrawal."

Not the only condition which was diagnosed. Have you forgotten that what was diagnosed pre operatively was a penetrating injury of the abdomen;. Then, what was diagnosed at surgery was that he had a laceration of the colon. The condition which caused him to need surgery was that Crystal stabbed him and lacerated his colon. Again, what put him at risk of an infection was that Crystal lacerated his colon.

"To confirm this diagnosis it would be prudent to eliminate other potential causes for the symptoms. This prudence would all be part and parcel of treating his potentially life threatening disease delirium tremens."


What other condition would have been necessary to rule out? If there had been no surgery would there be a need to evaluate him for a post surgical infection. Obfiously, No.

And here you are showing that you are ignorant of the fact that an intra abdominal infection is life threatening. Whether or not he did have DTs, was irrelevant to the fact that he was at risk of a life threatening intra abdominal infection.

"Now the question becomes, is ruling out a differential diagnosis part of the treatment for his intervening condition. Would such a course be followed even if he was admitted and deprived of alcohol for any reason even a non-surgical one."

Irrelevant statement. If he had been admitted for a non surgical condition there would have been no need to evaluate him for a post surgical infection, as I have already told you. And you again forget that, even if he was in DTs, and he had lost his access to alcohol,what deprived him of access to alcohol was the stab wound inflicted upon him by Crystal.

Once again you show how clinically incompetent you are, how you try to bullshit your way through and around facts which do not mesh need to deny that your favorite murderess/false accuser is a convicted felon.

Anonymous said...

Poor old Kenny: nobody believes anything he says.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. A. and many others are desperate to link Daye's death without any intervening factors to a non-existent murder. It's highly indicative of their consuming hatred for Crystal. Crystal stabbed Daye in self-defence. Saying he had an infection was a way they could implicate Crystal and exonerate Duke in Daye's death. The wound she administered did not kill Daye nor did any consequence of that wound. Medical malpractice by Duke killed Daye. If Daye's symptoms, that brought him into a situation where he had to be evaluated, were caused by an infection resulting from his penetrated colon then there is a nexus to the wound administered by Crystal. But no, Daye was brought to the critical care unit by acute alcohol withdrawal and impending delirium tremens, clearly an intervening condition. Had he not had this condition he would not have needed to be evaluated for anything and he would have been discharged. Just like he was the last time he was stabbed, something the jury never heard about and something the prosecution and the defence didn't bring forth about good old Reggie. Answer this question. Was there or was there not a intra-abdominal infection? Dr. Nichols proclamation she stabbed him he died is all the jury ever got.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "Poor old Kenny: nobody believes anything he says"......................Don't be too sure of that. I know this is something the Duke Lacrosse Apologists hope is the case.

Anonymous said...

Wow! Kenny the fighter!

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

Part 1:

"Dr. A. and many others are desperate to link Daye's death without any intervening factors to a non-existent murder."

Wrong. Crystal did murder Reginald Daye.

It's highly indicative of their consuming hatred for Crystal. Crystal stabbed Daye in self-defence."

Wtong. It was not sslf defense.

"Saying he had an infection was a way they could implicate Crystal and exonerate Duke in Daye's death. The wound she administered did not kill Daye nor did any consequence of that wound."

Wrong yet again. What I said was that Reginald Daye had signs and symptoms of an infection. It is fact that he suffered a laceration of the colon when Crystal stabbed him, that the interval between the stab wound and the surgery, an unavoidable interval resulted to hours of colonic contamination of his abdomen, which put him at risk of intra abdominal infection, and that he was undergoing an evaluation for an intra abdominal infection when the adverse event happened. An example of Kenny tryng to bullshit his way through and around facts he does not like, another example of Kenny behaving like the quintessential morally blind deaf man who claims he sees and hears everything better than anyone else. I add, even had there been malpractice, convicting Crystal of murder would not have relieved Duke of civil liability had there been malpractice, and it takes a lot more than the opinion of a clinical incompetent like Kenny to establish malpractice.

"Medical malpractice by Duke killed Daye."

Wrong yet again, Kenny. Even if it did rise to the level of malpractice, and I say again, it would not hav relieved Crystal of criminal responsibility. Reginald Daye would never have been exposed to any risk of medical malpracticr ha Crystal not stabbed him.

"If Daye's symptoms, that brought him into a situation where he had to be evaluated, were caused by an infection resulting from his penetrated colon then there is a nexus to the wound administered by Crystal."

Kenny continues to be wrong. As I have repeatedly explained, explanations rejected by Kenny because he refuses to believe his favorite murderess/false accuser is a murderess. You are batting .000 so far, Kenny.

Anonymous said...

Oh, Kenny, you're so rugged.

Anonymous said...

Kenhydral:

Part 2;

"But no, Daye was brought to the critical care unit by acute alcohol withdrawal and impending delirium tremens, clearly an intervening condition."

Tryto comprehend this again, but I have minimal expectation you will. Reginald Daye was brought to the Hospital because Crystal stabbed him and lacerated his colon. You said Reginald Daye kwent into DTs because he was deprived of his daily dose of alcohol. If that were the case, would he have been so deprived had Crystal not stabbrd him. No.

"Had he not had this condition he would not have needed to be evaluated for anything and he would have been discharged."

The implication of this is, he would have been sent home with an untreated penetrating wound of the abdomen which, as has been demonstrated, resulted in a laceration of his colon, in which scenario he would have died. That would have been malpractice, sending a patient home with an unevaluated, untreated penetrating wound of the abdomen. You have just documented you do not understand what malpractice is.

"Just like he was the last time he was stabbed, something the jury never heard about and something the prosecution and the defence didn't bring forth about good old Reggie."

Provide the details. When did this happen. Where was he stabbed. Was it a penetrating wound of the abdomen. If it was, it would be unlikely he would have been treated and discharged. If it was a superficial wound, a wond which did not penetrate deeper than say muscle, than that would have been completely different from a stab wound which penetrated a body cavity and put him at risk of a major infection.

Answer this question. Was there or was there not a intra-abdominal infection? Dr. Nichols proclamation she stabbed him he died is all the jury ever got."

Irrelevant question. I repeat, not for your edification but for those who may read this so they can see how clinically and totally incompetent you are. Reginald Daye suffered a penetrating stab wound of the abdomen which resulted in a laceration of his colon and hours of colonic contamination of his abdomen, which put him at risk of an intra abdominal infection. He manifested symptoms of infection which mandated he be evaluated. The adverse event was the result of the evaluation, not the presumptive diagnosis of DTs. Said evaluation would not have been necessary had Crystal not stabbed him.

Anonymous said...

Hey Kenny, Didney:

You obviously have heard recently about Kevin Spacey, Harvey Weinstein, Roy Moore and how others have come forward to accuse them

It has been more than11 r=years since the Duke Lacrosse plat=yers were FALSELY accused of eape. No one has since come forward to accuse them of anything.

Why?

BECAUSE THEY WERE INNOCENT, THEY WERE GUILTY OF NOTHING, YOU GUILT PRESUMING RACISTS, YOU PAIR OF NAZI SKINHEAD EQUIVALENTS!!!

kenhyderal said...

Dr A. quoted me and wrote: (KH said) "Just like he was the last time he was stabbed, something the jury never heard about and something the prosecution and the defence didn't bring forth about good old Reggie." (Dr.A. replied) "Provide the details. When did this happen. Where was he stabbed. Was it a penetrating wound of the abdomen".......... My apologies. His previous surgically repaired, penetrating wound to the abdomen was not a stab wound. I forgot that it was a gunshot wound.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Dr A. quoted me and wrote: (KH said) "Just like he was the last time he was stabbed, something the jury never heard about and something the prosecution and the defence didn't bring forth about good old Reggie." (Dr.A. replied) "Provide the details. When did this happen. Where was he stabbed. Was it a penetrating wound of the abdomen".......... My apologies. His previous surgically repaired, penetrating wound to the abdomen was not a stab wound. I forgot that it was a gunshot wound."

So, provide the details.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal, right now this sounds like your response to, when did kilgo ever told you a Lacrosse player told him he had witnessed unidentified, non lacrosse team members rape Crystal. First you said that he posted it on J4N, then disappeared from J4N taking down all his posts. Then you claimed he told you that in an email but you lost the email.

So provided the details,

A Lawyer said...

But no, Daye was brought to the critical care unit by acute alcohol withdrawal and impending delirium tremens, clearly an intervening condition. Had he not had this condition he would not have needed to be evaluated for anything and he would have been discharged.

If he were being treated for DTs, and hadn't been stabbed in the colon, he would not have had to evaluated for an infection. If he had been stabbed in the colon but didn't have DTs, he would have had to be evaluated for an infection. So the evaluation, and subsequent bad outcome, were only because Mangum stabbed him.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. A Said: So provide the details"..................From Operative report on Daye April 3 2011: INDICATION FOR PROCEDURE: This is a 46 year-old gentleman who came to our emergency department status post a left flank stab wound. The patient had a CT scan with rectal contrast and the findings were consistent with extravasation of contrast at the level of splenic flexure. His past medical history was consistent with a PREVUOUS GUNSHOT WOUND TO THE ABDOMEN (caps mine) that required an exploratory laparotomy about 15 years ago.

Anonymous said...






Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny






Anonymous said...

Kenhyderl:

"Dr. A Said: So provide the details"..................From Operative report on Daye April 3 2011: INDICATION FOR PROCEDURE: This is a 46 year-old gentleman who came to our emergency department status post a left flank stab wound. The patient had a CT scan with rectal contrast and the findings were consistent with extravasation of contrast at the level of splenic flexure. His past medical history was consistent with a PREVUOUS GUNSHOT WOUND TO THE ABDOMEN (caps mine) that required an exploratory laparotomy about 15 years ago."

So why did he have extravasation of contras from his splenic flexure? Crystal stabbed him.

This has no relevance to the intragastric administration of contrast via NG tube. His symptoms post op were consistent with infection. The op report confirms what I have been saying, that he had suffered hours of colonic contamination from the stab wound inflicted on him by Crystal, and that did put him at risk of infection. Crystal was responsible for his death. No stab wound, no risk of infection, no indication for the procedure which resulted in the adverse event.

That he survived a procedure15 years ago is totally irrelevant.

Anonymous said...

Udaman Ubes

kenhyderal said...

I only raised this to illustrate that good ol' Reggie was probably not the friendly happy go lucky boy Coggins-Franks, with help from selected witnesses portrayed. Crystal's domestic dispute with Milton Walker was played up to the hilt; a tactic that even Milton found misleading. Of course Meier didn't raise any questions or do any investigation about Daye's previous encounter where there was violence. We're talking about Reggie the knife thrower and possessor of brass knuckles. The guy who kicks down a door to get at someone he's angry at. Were talking about a guy that drags women by the hair. Were talking about someone who chokes a women. Were talking about the chronic alcoholic who despite being stabbed and with a BAC of 296mg/dl is still walking and talking. Hard to believe this guy would suddenly come to his senses and break off his attacks. But let's give Reggie the benefit of the doubt and deny that to the accused. After all she is the Duke Lacrosse accuser.

Anonymous said...

Kenny,
Please stop screaming!
Nobody here believes any of your tall tales.

Anonymous said...

Kenny,

You do realize that Meier raised the question of Daye's temper and violent tendencies, and Crystal denied it all. A neighbor testified that she heard Daye yelling, and thought he would get violent with Crystal. Crystal was asked about it and said it never happened. Until this day, she had never seen Daye angry, or upset, or violent.

No one denied the accuser - the accuser denied the allegations of prior violence.

And, you love to talk about what Meier did, or did not, do - do you have any proof, or is this all just made up speculation that you conclude must be true, because if not, you think Meier would come on this board and refute your baseless allegations?

Crystal is the one who denied Daye had a temper or violent tendencies.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"I only raised this to illustrate that good ol' Reggie was probably not the friendly happy go lucky boy Coggins-Franks, with help from selected witnesses portrayed."

The shooting happened 15 years before he was murdered by Crystal. What you posted reveals no details of the shooting. Was he shot because someone robbed him? Was he shot by a stray bullet in a drive by shooting. Was he shot the same way Deemetius Greene was shot by Shan Carter? You are presuming guilt again. Not at all surprising.

"Crystal's domestic dispute with Milton Walker was played up to the hilt; a tactic that even Milton found misleading. Of course Meier didn't raise any questions or do any investigation about Daye's previous encounter where there was violence."

Crystal got a break with Milton Walker. She did threaten to kill him. She was not cleared of the charge of arson. The jury was hung and a sympathetic judge dismissed the charge. You admit you do not know the circumstances of the shooting. You admit you are presuming guilt. Not at all surprising.

"We're talking about Reggie the knife thrower and possessor of brass knuckles. The guy who kicks down a door to get at someone he's angry at."

Said testimony about "Reggie the knife thrower and possessor of brass knuckles" came from Crystal after she had been arrested and was facing a charge of murder 1. By a definition you fashioned regarding the Duke Rape Hoax, that is self serving testimony, nothing more.

"Were talking about a guy that drags women by the hair. Were talking about someone who chokes a women."

We are talking about one incident, as deplorable as it may have been, but it was not unprovoked and it was not indicative of a pattern of violence. There is nothing to indicate that Reginald Daye precipitated the incident which resulted in the gunshot wound. You did not even get it right the first time you referred to the previous surgery. You called it a stab wound. You probably beieive Demetrius Greene deserved what he got.

"Were talking about the chronic alcoholic who despite being stabbed and with a BAC of 296mg/dl is still walking and talking."

The fact you just have admitted, that Reginald Daye was walking and talking in spite of his BAC of 296 indicates he was not a chronic alcoholic, combined with the fact that his liver was normal on autopsy says the BAC was a lab error. That Sidney has no knowledge of what the condition of the liver was is irrelevant. Sidney has no knowledge of anything, as he has abundantly documented in his posts on his blog.

"Hard to believe this guy would suddenly come to his senses and break off his attacks."

Well, that is what happened, according to the evidence. Harder to believe you have even a miniscule modicum of what would be called intelligence, considering the ineffective way you try to bullshit your way around and through facts.

"But let's give Reggie the benefit of the doubt and deny that to the accused."

Kind of hypocritical coming from a person who denies the overwhelming facts that Crystal lied about being raped. No doubt should be accorded the innocent falsely accused members of the Lacrosse team because Kenny dislikes them and because he gets a charge out of believing this woman, whom he claims he likes and respects, was the victim of a brutal gang rape.

"After all she is the Duke Lacrosse accuser."

Correction: she was the Duke Lacrosse FALSE accuser.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. A said: "We are talking about one incident, as deplorable as it may have been, but it was not unprovoked and it was not indicative of a pattern of violence. There is nothing to indicate that Reginald Daye precipitated the incident which resulted in the gunshot wound. You did not even get it right the first time you referred to the previous surgery. You called it a stab wound"..................................... Provoked?? What precipitated the incident was she spoke to an acquaintance who was a Police Officer. This precipitated a jealous rage in Daye. Not the kind of provocation one could reasonably use to justify becoming violent. Yes I had forgotten the source of the repaired abdominal wound. I only remembered reading this in the medical record. We do not know the details behind this incident and whether it was sinister or not. This is something Meier should have investigated and when Crystal gets a new trial it is something that will be pursued.

A Lawyer said...

when Crystal gets a new trial it is something that will be pursued.

When is Crystal going to get a new trial?

And how is that going to be achieved? Her appeals are over, she lost her chance to file an MAR due to Dr. Harr's bungling, and her habeas petition was denied.

kenhyderal said...

Dr. A. said: "The fact you just have admitted, that Reginald Daye was walking and talking in spite of his BAC of 296 indicates he was not a chronic alcoholic, combined with the fact that his liver was normal on autopsy says the BAC was a lab error.".................It's not something I have admitted it's a fact. And if he was walking and talking with that level of alcohol in his blood, no non-habituated individual who had not developed a tolerance, after years of heavy drinking, would be that functional. It is a clear indication that he was a chronic alcoholic. As I have pointed out in the past, with references, some chronic alcoholics can have a normal liver but given the gross deficiencies in Nicholls autopsy who knows what condition his liver was in. It may have been like the disappeared spleen he weighed. Like all Duke Lacrosse apologists you adopt the strategy of disputing any evidence that does not fit into a metanarrative and come up with theories to explain it away and you will embrace eagerly any evidence that supports your position. In this matter, here is the choice; either Daye was a chronic alcoholic or the Duke lab made an error. For the latter it requires that this error to be shown. It can not be something for just speculation. Show us it was an error not just what you desiderate.

kenhyderal said...

@ A Lawyer "Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light.- George Washington" Most poor, wrongly convicted, will have no one to expend the pain and effort like Dr. Harr has to get someone justice. Certainly not the majority of Lawyers who have sold-out their idealism

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "the accuser denied the allegations of prior violence"............. The key word here being prior. Crystal does not lie under oath. She naively believed if she took the stand and told the truth she would be exonerated.

Anonymous said...

dKenhyderal:

"Dr. A said: "We are talking about one incident, as deplorable as it may have been, but it was not unprovoked and it was not indicative of a pattern of violence. There is nothing to indicate that Reginald Daye precipitated the incident which resulted in the gunshot wound. You did not even get it right the first time you referred to the previous surgery. You called it a stab wound"

Kenny, as is your wont you get this wrong. Look at your previous comments. First you said that Reginald Daye had previously treated for a stab wound. I challenged you to give details. You then said, no, it was a gun shot wound. I again challenged you to give details. You quoted from Reginald Daye's medical record, that 15 years previously he had undergone a laparotomy for a gunshot wound. Then you said, and I quote, "I only raised this to illustrate that good ol' Reggie was probably not the friendly happy go lucky boy Coggins-Franks, with help from selected witnesses portrayed". De facto you did say that Reginald Daye provoked the attack 15 years earlier in which he was shot.

"Provoked?? What precipitated the incident was she spoke to an acquaintance who was a Police Officer. This precipitated a jealous rage in Daye. Not the kind of provocation one could reasonably use to justify becoming violent."

It was more than that. Crystal was going out with other men and then bringing home money. While she was living off the bounty of Reginald Daye who was not only supporting her but also her children, she was turning tricks. Regardless of your beliefs, all indications are Crystal WAS a hooker. And, like it or not, Reginald Daye did back off and then try to leave and that was when Crystal stabbed him and lacerated his colon and caused his death.

"Yes I had forgotten the source of the repaired abdominal wound. I only remembered reading this in the medical record. We do not know the details behind this incident and whether it was sinister or not. This is something Meier should have investigated"

Why? That Reginald Daye was shot 15 years previously does not, in and of itself indicate he was a violent man. Consider all the people who were shot in Las Vegas, all the people who were shot in the First Baptist Church in Sutherlannd Texas, all those who were shot recently in California, should they be suspected of being violent people?

"and when Crystal gets a new trial it is something that will be pursued."

First, Crystal will not get a new trial. I do hope this would get pursued because when the details come out you and Sidney will once again go down in flames.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

Part 1:

"Dr. A. said: "The fact you just have admitted, that Reginald Daye was walking and talking in spite of his BAC of 296 indicates he was not a chronic alcoholic, combined with the fact that his liver was normal on autopsy says the BAC was a lab error.".................It's not something I have admitted it's a fact."

What you have admitted is that Reginald Daye was walking and talking. That is not consistent with a BAC OF 296. Even in a chronic alcoholic that BAC would have rendered him unconscious.

"And if he was walking and talking with that level of alcohol in his blood, no non-habituated individual who had not developed a tolerance, after years of heavy drinking, would be that functional. It is a clear indication that he was a chronic alcoholic."

As his liver was found to be normal on autopsy, and what you believe about Dr. Nichols, and what Sidney does not have knowledge of, are irrelevant, it is evidence against chronic alcoholism. Yes, some chronic alcoholics are found to have normal livers. That someone could consume enough alcohol over a period of years to make him tolerant to such a BAC would be overwhelmingly unlikely to have a normal liver.

"As I have pointed out in the past, with references, some chronic alcoholics can have a normal liver"

I do concede that.

"but given the gross deficiencies in Nicholls autopsy"

There no gross deficiencies. Some irregularities maybe but no gross deficiencies. That a couple of total clinical incompetents like you and Sidney allege there were is meaningless. Dr. Roberts agreed with Dr. Nichols' opinion. That is significant. Has any other competent medical expert come forward to dispute the report? No. I remind you Sidney Harr is not and never was a competent medical expert.

"who knows what condition his liver was in."

Neither you nor Sidney do.

"It may have been like the disappeared spleen he weighed."

If you had followed the case you would know that the Courts have decided that the spleen issue raised by clinical incompetent Sidney Harr is a non issue.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

Part 2:

"Like all Duke Lacrosse apologists you adopt the strategy of disputing any evidence that does not fit into a metanarrative and come up with theories to explain it away and you will embrace eagerly any evidence that supports your position."

Another irrelevancy. You are the one preaching a metanarrative, that Crystal was raped at the Lacrosse party and was the victim of a vendetta. You have provided zero evidence that Crystal was ever raped, you have presented zero evidence that Crystal ever told the truth. There is evidence she did lie, Kim's actions when she drove Crystal away from the party, the lack of medical evidence of a rape, the lack of any DNA evidence documenting any intimate contact between Crystal and those who were accused of raping her, Crystal could not reliably any of the accused as an attacker, her multiple, mutually conflicting accounts of the alleged rape. You are coming up with no theories to support your metanarrative. Theories are based on empirical data. You have offered none.

The only apologists involved in the Duke Rape HOAX are you and Sidney. An apologist is one who tried to justify the actions of others. Defending innocent men is not trying to justify inappropriate behavior on their part. You and Sidney try to justify the actions of Crystal who falsely accused innocent men of rape, corrupt Nifong who wrongfully prosecuted them to further his political agenda, to pad his retirement benefits.

"In this matter, here is the choice; either Daye was a chronic alcoholic or the Duke lab made an error."

Correct.

"For the latter it requires that this error to be shown. It can not be something for just speculation."

It is not a matter of speculation. It is based on the actual documented, clinical evidence. That you are incapable of recognizing clinical evidence, that you ignore the evidence you do not like, shows only that you, again, are clinically incompetent.


"Show us it was an error not just what you desiderate."

Show us it was a true result. You are asserting, without the expertise to know, that it was a valid result. I say again, I am expressing an opinion, based on all the evidence and my clinical experience. Plus there were statements taken from women interviewed by the police that Reginald Daye was not a chronic alcoholic, that Reginald Daye was not violent.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"@ A Lawyer "Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light.- George Washington" Most poor, wrongly convicted, will have no one to expend the pain and effort like Dr. Harr has to get someone justice. Certainly not the majority of Lawyers who have sold-out their idealism".

Crystal was not wrongfully convicted.

And since legal and clinical incompetent Sidney Harr is pushing that the Lacrosse players raped Crystal(he recently posted he believed the Lacrosse Players lied) and pushing that Nifong's wrongful prosecution of the Lacrosse players was the act of a decent, honorable minister of justice, he has never advocated for justice.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Anonymous said: "the accuser denied the allegations of prior violence"............. The key word here being prior. Crystal does not lie under oath."

Crystal has a history of lying. She lied when she claimed she had been raped.

"She naively believed if she took the stand and told the truth she would be exonerated."

Correction: she believed Sidney that if she spun some tale inconsistent with the evidence she would get a pass for murdering Reginald Daye.

Doogie Howser said...

Dear Mr. Kenhyderal,

I have been visiting justice4nifong for two months and I look forward every day to reading your thorough and well written posts. You have the courage to stand up for what you believe in and defend your friend and you do not back down from the the little people who constantly try to drown out your voice. Keep your spirits up and continue to fight the good fight.

kenhyderal said...

Thank you Dr. Howser for the encouragement. Now you are a Physician I'd rather put my trust in than the close-minded, opinionated and arrogant Dr. A.

kenhyderal said...

One more time The Drug Abuse Handbook 5.3.2.3 https://books.google.ca/books?id=MFbm2SRUUNsC&pg=PA358&lpg=PA358&dq=alcohol+tolerance+over+300mg/dl&source=bl&ots=e82ebJaa9A&sig=NpO2DIrIB5FM_ygSFVATW8i6qIw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj4noeMp8LXAhUJ3GMKHaa4B7QQ6AEISTAH#v=onepage&q=alcohol%20tolerance%20over%20300mg%2Fdl&f=false

Anonymous said...

ssKenhyderal:

"One more time The Drug Abuse Handbook 5.3.2.3 https://books.google.ca/books?id=MFbm2SRUUNsC&pg=PA358&lpg=PA358&dq=alcohol+tolerance+over+300mg/dl&source=bl&ots=e82ebJaa9A&sig=NpO2DIrIB5FM_ygSFVATW8i6qIw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj4noeMp8LXAhUJ3GMKHaa4B7QQ6AEISTAH#v=onepage&q=alcohol%20tolerance%20over%20300mg%2Fdl&f=false"

Said reference says that a chronic alcoholic may not show any signs of intoxication. However, you do claim that Reginadl Daye, at the time he was stabbed showed signs of a drunken rage. You refute yourself.

Said reference says nothing about liver damage in chronic alcoholics.

This does: https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/000281.htm:

"Alcoholic liver disease occurs after years of heavy drinking. Over time, scarring and cirrhosis can occur. Cirrhosis is the final phase of alcoholic liver disease.

Alcoholic liver disease does not occur in all heavy drinkers. The chances of getting liver disease go up the longer you have been drinking and more alcohol you consume. You do not have to get drunk for the disease to happen."

I repeat, "lcoholic liver disease occurs after years of heavy drinking."

For Reginald Daye to have been able to tolerate a BAC of 296 he would have had to indulge in years of heavy drinking. In that kind of scenario, years of heavy drinking, it is extremely unlikely that he would have a normal liver at the time he cluld have tolerated a BAC of 196. That neither you or Sidney believe the autopsy report is nifongian, namely, ignore and suppress evidence which does not support your view.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Thank you Dr. Howser for the encouragement. Now you are a Physician I'd rather put my trust in than the close-minded, opinionated and arrogant Dr. A."

You are unaware that Dr. Howser is a TV character. Not surprising.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

Regarding your belief that Reginald Daye was shot as a result of his violent temper:

You will recall that Sidney once claimed that Reginald Daye was charged with assault on a woman. Reginald Daye's criminal criminal record was available on line. There were a number of misdemeanors and traffic violations. Said assault charges were dropped and he was never prosecuted. In another nifongian move, Sidney did not present that evidence. Sidney tried to suppress facts which did not agree with his opinions.

The criminal record mentions nothing about said gunshot wound. Had Reginald Daye been suspected of violent criminal behavior in that incident, the police would have interrogated him in the wake of that incident. There is no evidence they did.

Nifong did try to fabricate evidence against the men he had accused of perpetrating the crime, the rigged, improper lineup in which Crystal could not reliably identify any member of the Lacrosse team as an assailant. So, like Nifong, you are trying to fabricate evidence against Reginald Daye.

Further, that Nifong, who arranged the rigged lineup, included only members of the Lacrosse team. That is an indication that Nifong did not believe there were any non Lacrosse players at the party. Stew on that while you are getting your gratification from believing this woman you supposedly like and support had been gang raped.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

If Nifong did believe there were non lacrosse player attendees at the party who raped Crystal, then why did he have conducted a rigged lineup procedure in which Crystal could only have identified Lacrosse players as her assailants? How is it justice to accuse and have indicted men he knew were not the assailants?

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

Check this out:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096569/

nd this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doogie_Howser,_M.D.

Anonymous said...

Kenny:

Do you believe the 600+ people shot in Las Vegas last month all had violent tempers, or do you acknowledge that it is possible to be shot and not have a violent temper?

What admissible evidence do you have to corroborate your/Crystal's claim that Daye had a history of violence, was a knife thrower, an alcoholic or any of your other smears?

You can't just shart your way thru a legal case.

Anonymous said...

And, remember, Kenny says Crystal always testifies truthfully - and she said, under oath, that Daye was not a violent man, was kind, and gentle, she'd never heard him yell or raise his voice and was never aggressive towards her or anyone else.

Now, Kenny and Sid originally said Daye had sent Crystal to the doctor the week before, but they seem to have dropped that.

But, Kenny, why do you contend Daye was such a violent person when Crystal said those who said that (like the neighbor who heard yelling and fights) were lying and he was gentle?

Yes, he got mad that night, clearly, and he admits that - the jury heard that - it's no secret Daye kicked down the door in a rage and drug her out by her hair - he admitted that, the jury heard that - but Crystal says that was totally out of character for him.

Why do you want to keep saying it wasn't? You aren't implying Crystal lies are you?

kenhyderal said...

@ Dr. Anonymous 2:56 and Anonymous 11:46 - Regardless of what some of you Duke Lacrosse Apologists believe I am from Planet Earth. From time to time I've been known to be sarcastic. I guess my sarcasm went over the head of you two.

kenhyderal said...

@ Anonymous 2:47 Flying into a drunken, murderous, maniacal rage one time is once too often.

Doogie Howser said...

I am confident that I am as qualified as the self-proclaimed medical experts who post their opinions on this blog.

guiowen said...

Stabbing some poor man one time is once too often.

guiowen said...

Burning some poor guy's clothes one time is once too often.

guiowen said...

Stealing a taxi cab is once too often

Anonymous said...

Running over a policeman is once too often.

guiown said...

Falsely accusing young men of rape is once too often.

guiowen said...

Giving rappers blow jobs in the VIP lounge at the Platinum Club is once too often.

Anonymous said...

Udaman g.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: Running over a policeman is once too often.........................Don't mischaracterize it. The exact charge was assault on a government official. It's the same charge you would get for spatting on a cop at a protest. Historically that's when they usually lay this obscure charge. The circumstances were that she was stopped for speeding (70mph in a 60 mph zone) and while backing up to park the vehicle on to the shoulder she brushed into the approaching officer. He was unhurt. Calling it running down a Policeman is disingenuous. As for Guiowen at 5:43 that's libel pure and simple and I caution him that there may be a day of reckoning for him. Crystal's claim was that the drunk taxi driver asked her to drive his taxi home and told her to take his keys from his checked coat. When questioned fearing retribution from his employer he denied that. Obviously the Judge did not believe him but found her guilty of misdemeanor larceny, for taking his keys, not grand theft auto for stealing a taxi. The Duke Lacrosse apologists have played this incident when she was 23 up to the hilt. For this she served 3 weekends in gaol.

guiowen said...

I've no idea who wrote the 5:43 comment. I did write two of the recent comments.
I realize you want us all to believe Crystal's explanations. You'll forgive me but she's led so much about so many things that we're not going to accept her self-serving explanations.

guiowen said...

By the way, Kenny, is the 5:43 comment wrong? Do you feel that giving rappers blow jobs should be done more than once?

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"@ Dr. Anonymous 2:56 and Anonymous 11:46 - Regardless of what some of you Duke Lacrosse Apologists believe I am from Planet Earth. From time to time I've been known to be sarcastic. I guess my sarcasm went over the head of you two."

Wrong.

You did not realize Doogie Howser was a fictional TV character.

And the only apologists involved in the duke rape Hoax are you and Didney, both of you trying to justify the abominable behavior of Crystal and Nifong.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"@ Anonymous 2:47 Flying into a drunken, murderous, maniacal rage one time is once too often."

Irrelevant statement as Reginald Daye was not in a drunken rage.

And you advocate that innocent men falsely accused of and wrongfully prosecuted for a crime which never happened should have been convicted and incarcerated, because they were Caucasian and the accuser was black.

You are a gross hypocrite.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous:

"Doogie Howser said...

I am confident that I am as qualified as the self-proclaimed medical experts who post their opinions on this blog."

Whoever or whatever Doogie Howser is, he has admitted he is as incredibly stupid as Kenny and Sidney.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Anonymous said: Running over a policeman is once too often.........................Don't mischaracterize it."

Actually she tried to run over a policeman.

"The exact charge was assault on a government official. It's the same charge you would get for spatting on a cop at a protest. Historically that's when they usually lay this obscure charge."

So. like when she threatened to kill Milton Walker and set his apartment on fire, she got a break. And Kenny says blackpeople do not gt breaks in court.

"The circumstances were that she was stopped for speeding (70mph in a 60 mph zone) and while backing up to park the vehicle on to the shoulder she brushed into the approaching officer. He was unhurt. Calling it running down a Policeman is disingenuous."

Calling the account Crystal gave in her memoir the truth is a lie. Crystal came up with that account AFTER she had been outed as the false accuser in the Duke Rape Hoax and already had a criminal history. Can we say Self Serving, boys and girls. Crystal was drunk, she had no valid driver's license at the time, she stole the cab, drove 70 mph in 60 mph while she was drunk, and did try to run down the officer.

"As for Guiowen at 5:43 that's libel pure and simple and I caution him that there may be a day of reckoning for him."

Who is going to reckon him. You? That is laughable.

"Crystal's claim was that the drunk taxi driver asked her to drive his taxi home and told her to take his keys from his checked coat. When questioned fearing retribution from his employer he denied that."

Another self serving account from discredited Crystal. Crystal herself was drunk and had no valid driver's license at the time, and if she was the responsible person Kenny claims she was she would have declined. Did anyone do a BAC on the driver?

Obviously the Judge did not believe him but found her guilty of misdemeanor larceny, for taking his keys, not grand theft auto for stealing a taxi.

She got a break. And hypocrite Kenny continues to claim black people do not get breaks in court.

"The Duke Lacrosse apologists have played this incident when she was 23 up to the hilt. For this she served 3 weekends in gaol."

The only apologists in the Duke Rape Hoax are Sidney and Kenny trying to justify the illegal and unethical actions of Crystal and Nifong, Crystal who lied about being raped to avoid involuntary commitment for detox, and Nifong who wrongfully and deliberately prosecuted the innocent men for a crime that never happened.

And Crystal got a break. Kenny still insists black people do not get breaks from the courts.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

This is from a post I put up on November 12, 2012:

"SIDNEY HARR:

Earlier I posted:

You gleefully published that Reginald Daye had, 20-25 years prior to his stabbing, slapped a woman.

YOU DID NOT PUBLISH THAT TWO, I REPEAT TWO, WOMEN WHO HAD KNOWN MR. DAYE PRIOR TO CRYSTAL TESTIFIED THAT HE WAS NOT, REPEAT WAS NOT, A VIOLENT MAN, THAT ONE HAD SAID SHE WOULD BE A CHARACTER WITNESS FOR MR. DAYE."

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

When I copy and paste a heading from one of your post I get:

"Blogger kenhyderal said..."

This wa from one of your posts on this blog.

When I copy and paste the heading of one of Walt's posts I get:

"Blogger Walt said..."

When I copy and paste from a genuine Guiowen post I get:

"Blogger guiowen said..."

When I copy and paste from the 5:43 PM post I get:

"Anonymous guiowen said..."

Could it be someone else posted in Guioween's Name? Could it be you did it. Considering your propensity for distortion and Bullshit, I would not put it past you.

Anonymous said...

I have no doubt Daye was in a drunken rage that night. There was a period of time where Crystal had the right to self defense. The issue is, and always has been - did Daye let her go after dragging her out (as he says) and she ran into the other room and got a knife and came back at him - which would negate self defense, or was he laying on her and choking her (as she says) - which would have still been self defense.

Despite Kenny’s claims, the juries heard both versions, and there was no dispute that Daye was in a rage (drunk or not). The entire despite came down to whether he was holding Crystal down when stabbed, or had let her go and turned to leave. The jury heard both sides, and they chose to believe Daye’s version of events not Crystal’s. But both versions include Daye in a rage, kicking down a door, and dragging her by the hair. There is no dispute on that.

Fake Pubes said...

Udaman Ubes.

Anonymous said...

Knny's comment at November 16, 2017 at 3:14 PM describing me comes from a man who once said he would rather go to total clinical incompetent Sidney Harr for treatment rather than to a genuine Physician. Enough said.

guiowen said...

Kenny,
So tell me what it is you dislike about the 5:43 comment yesterday. What makes it libelous?

Anonymous said...

Kenny:

While you are at it, explain how Crystal, a convicted murderer, proven liar and false accuser, and well known to be a prostitute, was damaged by anything guiowen said in his comment at 5:43.

Thank you for your consideration.

guiowen said...

So, Kenny,
Can't you answer my question of 7:52?

Anonymous said...

Kenny:

Don't forget me.

Even if you think something guiowen said was untrue, how do you libel a convicted murderer and a proven liar and false accuser? What damage to their reputation, current relationships and future prospects can an incarcerated murderer, proven liar and false accuser suffer? Who do you imagine would represent someone like Crystal in such a frivolous lawsuit?

At this point, there is probably nothing anyone could say about Crystal that would libel her or damage her reputation any worse than she has damaged it herself. She is libel proof.

kenhyderal said...

Pretending it was a general statement is disingenuous. You will have a hard time selling that in a court of law. You might possible limit your liability by declaring here that you were not in any way referring to Crystal.

kenhyderal said...

@ Anonymous 3:15 You think? Time will tell. Like Guiowen you craft your defamation in a such way you think will make it difficult to hold you guilty of libel. It's a "well-known" tactic of cowards who post anonymously

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Pretending it was a general statement is disingenuous. You will have a hard time selling that in a court of law. You might possible limit your liability by declaring here that you were not in any way referring to Crystal."

So says Kenny who for years has been trying to sell the story that Crystal had been raped in the face of zero evidence that she had been raped, and trying to sell the story that unidentified party goers raped Crystal in the face of zero evidence that there were none.

More of Kenny hurling pop corn from a distance of 100 yards and thinking he can intimidate you.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"@ Anonymous 3:15 You think? Time will tell. Like Guiowen you craft your defamation in a such way you think will make it difficult to hold you guilty of libel. It's a "well-known" tactic of cowards who post anonymously"

Kenhyderal manifesting his frustration over his inability to intimidate people.

Anonymous said...

Regarding the last two posts from Kenny:

These come from a man who accuses members of the Lacrosse team of raping Crystal in the face of zero evidence that Crystal had ever been rape. Yet he thinks he knows what libel is.

guiowen said...

Kenny,So explain what you consider libelous. Is that too much to ask of you?

Anonymous said...

Kenny:

I am not crafting or couching my words in any way:

Crystal is a murderer.

She is a proven false accuser and a liar.

The evidence that she was a prostitute is overwhelming. Therefore, I am certain that she was, in fact, a prostitute.

Neither I, nor anyone else, will ever be sued by anyone for these views or for expressing them. There is nothing you can do about it.

guiowen said...

But Kenny is a fighter!

kenhyderal said...

@ Anonymous 5:46PM: Tell us your name then.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderl:

"@ Anonymous 5:46PM: Tell us your name then."

Kenny once again ducking issues, like why there is zero evidence that Crystal ever told the teuth when she alleged she gad been raped.

THE GREAT KILGO said...

RIGHT BEFORE OUR EYES

UBES IS LAPSING INTO ANOTHER ONE OF HIS NOTORIOUS LIESTOPPER CRANK MELTDOWNS

SPIN UBES SPIN

QUACK

QUACK

QUACK

Anonymous said...

Kenny is posing as kilgo or kilgo has been posing as Kenny.

Either way either one or the other is a figment of someone's imagination.

Maybe they are both figments of Sidney's imagination.

THE GREAT KILGO said...



OH LITTLE UBES

YOU MUST BE ABLE TO COME UP WITH SOMETHING BETTER THAN YOUR LAST COMMENT

SPIN UBES SPIN


QUACK

QUACK

QUACK



THE GREAT KILGO said...



AND KENHYDERAL

I HAVE THE INFORMATION YOU ARE LOOKING FOR

MEET ME IN LUMBERTON

YOUR TIME IS RUNNING OUT



Doogie Howser said...

Labeling Crystal as mentally ill was an integral part of a strategy by the Duke Lacrosse Defence to discredit her and to call in to question her accusation of rape. Crystal has had no major mental illness that would detach her from reality but like a large minority of the population she has had some treatable exogenous anxiety and depressive symptoms. As well she did suffer post traumatic stress after her sexual assaults

Fake Doogie Howser said...

The Duke Lacrosse defendants were told by their Defence Team to say absolutely nothing. The Defence Team was clever enough themselves to use proxies in their single-minded campaign to discredit Crystal. Evan's Lawyer Cheshire did some forth long afterwards at the release of Crystal's book and what he said is quite revealing

Fake kenhyderal said...

Escort services and exotic entertainment is not illegal. Prostitution is. Crystal did not engage in prostitution. Her Agency kept records and got paid 1/2 for the service they booked and Crystal provided She gave a complete history of her consensual sexual encounters, one, a week before, the other a day before and the DNA from those two encounters was found. There were no "others". All clients gave names and addresses and in many cases credit cards.

desconocido said...

Evans , Finnerty and Seligmann asked that she not be pursued criminally, Cheshire said, because, "We felt sorry for her, and we felt to some degree, she had been victimized by the process."

"We wanted it to be over, and clearly she doesn't want it to be over," Cheshire added.

Inconnu said...

Kenhyderal,
Ton ami le gros Kilgo s'est echappe'. Viens vit a Lumberton si tu veux cette information!

kenhyderal said...

@ Dr. Howser: You should provide a citation when you are quoting me. Are you any relation to the plagiarizing, imposter Malek Williams?

kenhyderal said...

@ Inconnu Las cabezas se rodarán si voy a Lumberton!

kenhyderal said...

@ the person purporting to be Kilgo ---------Why Lumberton?

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"@ the person purporting to be Kilgo ---------Why Lumberton?"

Kenny trying to conceal Kilgo is a figment of his imagination.

THE GREAT KILGO said...


KENHYDERAL:

HOW CAN YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN LUMBERTON?

IT IS WHERE YOU ASKED MALEK WILLIAMS TO MEET YOU SEVERAL YEARS AGO.

MAYBE YOU ARE NOT THE REAL KENHYDERAL?

Inconnu said...

Kenhyderal,
Tu m'excuseras: je ne parle pas l'espagnol.

kenhyderal said...

The person purporting to be Kilgo said: "HOW CAN YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN LUMBERTON?"..............And your connection to Malek Williams is?

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "Kenny trying to conceal Kilgo is a figment of his imagination"..................What about Dr. A. Dr. Harr, Walt, and lots others who were here along with him? Was he a figment of their imagination as well? Both Kilgo and the three I cited predated my arrival. You like all Duke Lacrosse apologists in Pavlovian fashion attack everything.

kenhyderal said...

Inconnu said: " Tu m'excuseras: je ne parle pas"............¿Cuándo vas a dejar de jugar?

Inconnu said...

Pardon, Kenny, je ne te comprends pas.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal:

"Anonymous said: "Kenny trying to conceal Kilgo is a figment of his imagination"..................What about Dr. A. Dr. Harr, Walt, and lots others who were here along with him? Was he a figment of their imagination as well? Both Kilgo and the three I cited predated my arrival. You like all Duke Lacrosse apologists in Pavlovian fashion attack everything."

You refer to a kilgo imposter. I say that version of kilgo is a figment of your imagination.

The only apologists in the Duke Rape Hoax are you and Sidney, who try to justify Crystal lying about being raped and Nifong wrongfully prosecuting innocent men who were falsely accused of perpetrating the non existent rape of Crystal.

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 287   Newer› Newest»