Friday, August 11, 2023

North Carolina V. Crystal Mangum: Defendant Pro Se's Motion for Writ of Coram Nobis

Posted by at
Labels: , , , , ,

12 comments:

guiowen said...

Sidney,
Is this blog still alive?

August 14, 2023 at 2:07 AM
Anonymous said...

Why does it look like the last part of the texts to Woody Vann from "9192158069@vzpix.com"
were removed, and someone (Sid?) wrote in "to knife wound"?

August 15, 2023 at 8:34 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...

kenhyderal,

Please respond to the post on August 15.

August 16, 2023 at 7:00 PM
Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous guiowen said...
Sidney,
Is this blog still alive?

August 14, 2023 at 2:07 AM


Hey, gui, mon ami.

Yeah. It's alive and kickin'.

Been busy getting ready for Mangum's hearing scheduled for October 2nd.

August 17, 2023 at 8:19 AM
Anonymous said...

"Been busy getting ready for Mangum's hearing scheduled for October 2nd"

Is this the OAH hearing? Your posted scheduling order shows the date for that to be September 25th.

Oh -- Dr. Aurelius filed a Memorandum in Opposition to your July 17th Motion for Summary Judgment.

This memorandum was filed along with 2 attachments:

Att 1 : Exhibit Defendants' Objections to RFA
Att 2 : Exhibit 062823 E-mail to Dr. S. Harr

August 17, 2023 at 1:30 PM
Nifong Supporter said...



Anonymous Anonymous said...
Why does it look like the last part of the texts to Woody Vann from "9192158069@vzpix.com"
were removed, and someone (Sid?) wrote in "to knife wound"?

August 15, 2023 at 8:34 AM


Hey, Anony.

Yes, that is the way 0the e-mail was in prosecution discovery. I don't know who wrote in "to knife wound."

August 17, 2023 at 6:58 PM
Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
"Been busy getting ready for Mangum's hearing scheduled for October 2nd"

Is this the OAH hearing? Your posted scheduling order shows the date for that to be September 25th.

Oh -- Dr. Aurelius filed a Memorandum in Opposition to your July 17th Motion for Summary Judgment.

This memorandum was filed along with 2 attachments:

Att 1 : Exhibit Defendants' Objections to RFA
Att 2 : Exhibit 062823 E-mail to Dr. S. Harr

August 17, 2023 at 1:30 PM


Hey, Anony.

On Wednesday, August 9th, the Defendants filed a Motion for Hearing Date in the Office of Administrative Hearings court and provided three dates which would work best for them... the last one being Monday, October 2nd. On Friday, August 11th, the Court filed a Notice of Hearing setting the date for October 2nd at 10:00 a.m.

A motion for expedited hearing filed months ago by Mangum was never considered by the court.

Today, August 17th, Mangum filed a Reply to Defendants' Response to Mangum's Motion for Summary Judgment in the U.S District Court's Eastern Division.

It is important to keep in mind that Dr. Aurelius never filed responses to Mangum's Requests for Admission in the U.S. District Court... it only being filed in the Office of Administrative Hearings.

August 17, 2023 at 7:19 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...

A writ of coram nobis is used to call the court’s attention to facts that would have changed the judgment but were outside the record and unknown to the court at the time of judgment.

None of the arguments in this document were "outside the record and unknown to the court at the time of judgment."

The contents of Dr. Nichol's autopsy and other documents were known. Dr. Nichols testified during the trial. There's nothing new here.

Wecht's opinion is based on documents readily available at the time of trial. There's nothing new here.

This is yet another in a long line of sad, pitiful attempts you are using to convince CGM you are trying to help her.

August 18, 2023 at 5:45 AM
Nifong Supporter said...


HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT INFORMATION!


LINK: Notice of Hearing for Office of Administrative Hearings

As you were.

August 18, 2023 at 6:20 AM
Anonymous said...

"It is important to keep in mind that Dr. Aurelius never filed responses to Mangum's Requests for Admission in the U.S. District Court... it only being filed in the Office of Administrative Hearings."

It's also important to keep in mind that you failed to properly serve the Defendants in the Mangum v. Aurelius lawsuit.

As you were.

August 18, 2023 at 8:43 AM
Anonymous said...

"Hey, Anony.

Yes, that is the way 0the e-mail was in prosecution discovery. I don't know who wrote in "to knife wound." "

WRT the email to Woody Vann, you should look up the definition & admissibility of hearsay.

Of course, this would require you to do some actual legal research, so I doubt you'll do it.

August 18, 2023 at 8:58 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...

Based off the latest order in the Mangum v. Aurelius case, Sid should expect to see something similar here shortly, since this document plainly states "with the assistance of her advocate and fiancé Sidney B. Harr, M.D."

September 12, 2023 at 8:48 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)