justice4nifong: Crystal Mangum's Motion to Reinstate Sidney Harr as co-Petitioner and Other Equitable Relief

Sunday, April 28, 2024

Crystal Mangum's Motion to Reinstate Sidney Harr as co-Petitioner and Other Equitable Relief

62 comments:

Anonymous said...: I have been, and will be extremely busy working in preparation for that seminal week. Yesterday I filed a motion for Ms. Mangum with the NC Office of Administrative Hearings, and today I wrote to the warden. I will work on getting the 25-page brief with links to twelve exhibits uploaded as soon as possible

It was inevitable.; April 28, 2024 at 7:02 PM
dhall said...: This comment has been removed by the author.; April 29, 2024 at 6:59 AM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr -- Your new document simply does not meet the requirements laid out by NCGS 150B-2(6).

This statute plainly states that in order to be a petitioner, the administrative decision (Dr. Aurelius' decision not to change or alter Daye's autopsy report or death certificate) must have affected your person, property, employment, or any other legal rights.

Your argument that you are "mired in guilt" for giving her "wrong legal advice" does not make you a co-petitioner.

And as Anonymous @ April 28 so delightfully reminded us, this is another example of you doing something others find ridiculous. Again.

Inevitable, indeed.; April 29, 2024 at 6:59 AM
kenhyderal said...: Given this, clearly layed out recod by Dr. Harr, can anyone, reasonably, doubt that everyone involved in the N.C Justice System has gotten the word, you better make sure that any effort to correct the injustice meted out to Crystal Mangum is denied and you need to find some sort rationale for this denial. It's painfully obvious.; April 29, 2024 at 10:37 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous doubting my existence in the previous post, I replied only today in that older thread.; April 29, 2024 at 10:39 AM
dhall said...: "Given this, clearly layed out recod by Dr. Harr, can anyone, reasonably, doubt that everyone involved in the N.C Justice System has gotten the word, you better make sure that any effort to correct the injustice meted out to Crystal Mangum is denied and you need to find some sort rationale for this denial. It's painfully obvious."

I have no idea what this comment has to do with the motion to reinstate Dr. Harr as co-petitioner.

I can tell you (or you can read the statute) that this argument does not prove that Dr. Harr meets the requirements to be legally considered a "person aggrieved" in this NCOAH petitioned cased hearing.; April 29, 2024 at 2:03 PM
Anonymous said...: I don't doubt your existence, "kenhyderal". I doubt that you're who you claim to be.

CGM entered the Navy and went to bootcamp in the summer of 1997 and was discharged after less than 2 years -- which means she was out after the summer of 1998, but before the summer of 1999.

Now, on average Naval CONUS (Continental US) duty stations are minimum 24 months, and those who enlisted for more than 4 but less than 5 years are (per Navy policy and procedure) given no more than two assignments in different locations.

So...If Mangum's first duty station was in California, and Naval policy is that this duty assignment is a minimum of 24 months, How/when did CGM get moved to Kitsap?

The answer? She didn't.

Sure, Sid and CGM can confirm your identity -- but that identity will not be "Ken Edwards from Canada" (or the UAE, or wherever you currently claim to be).

You're likely one of his old cronies from the good ole J4N days. My money's on you being one of the Matherlys (Steve or Vikki).

This is why you refuse to contact anyone other than Sid. You know that once you do, they'll find out your true identity.

And no, I'm not " A Habba Esquire". I am who I say I am.

I am Anonymous.; April 29, 2024 at 3:23 PM
kenhyderal said...: @dhall 4-29-24 6:59 AM re: Anonymous 4-28-24; Both you and he have settled on your take on the wrongful conviction of Crystal for murder of Daye, being testimony of Walker he later claimed was coerced about a 14 yr old case where a charge of the attempted murder of Walker was dropped and she was aquitted of the charge of arson for burning his clothes in a bathtub but found guilty of property damage and child neglect for creating smoke in a home with children. At the trial the Judge stated all evidence presented in her defence convinced him she was a good mother and gave her time in custody. But, you chose to comletely ignore the only relevant evidence of Dr. Cyril Wecht's exonerating report; April 29, 2024 at 3:53 PM
dhall said...: Kenhyderal -- I'm not ignoring Dr. Wecht's report. I'm simply stating that his report alone WILL NOT get Crystal Mangum a new trial.

Dr. Wecht's report is based on evidence available at the time of the trial (in essence, what he's done is the same thing that Dr. Roberts was hired to do).

Since his report doesn't meet the requirements laid out in N.C.G.S. 15A-1415(c) , where does that leave those with the desire to get Mangum a new trial?

Read my post from April 25, 2024 at 11:03 AM -- Walker's 404(b) testimony had material bearing on the jury's decision. Walker's testimony doesn't hinge on the guilt or innocence of Mangum in the 2010 trial -- it was about establishing her character traits and repeated patterns of behavior.

Getting him to recant that testimony is THE ONLY thing that will get her a new trial. Once she gets the new trial, THEN Dr. Wecht's report can be used as expert testimony.

If you believe otherwise, show me how Mangum will get this new trial (be sure to include your legal resources to back this claim).

Dr. Harr has been aware of the Walker phone call where he allegedly recanted his testimony since 2018. for 6 years, you and Dr. Harr have sat on this.

"A Lawyer" (I think now posting as Dr. Caligari) stated in April 2018 that Mangum should "Get an affidavit from Walker". Sid chose otherwise, and you let him. If either of you feel "mired in guilt", this should be the primary reason why.; April 30, 2024 at 10:05 AM
Anonymous said...: There is zero proof Walker has actually ever stated his testimony was coerced as neither you, nor Sid, will reach out to him to attempt to verify this, and get it in an affidavit, which could actually help Crystal.

Again, there is one step that can be taken which everyone has said could greatly help Crystal, and rather than even attempt it, you continue to justify everything that won't help.

It is very obvious that you and Sid don't want to actually help Crystal, you just want her to think you are. The two of you are just another in a long line of people who abuse Crystal.

It's sad.; April 30, 2024 at 10:53 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Kenny -- You should try reading the comments by others before you post about them. No one is saying that the so-called "wrongful conviction" is due to Walker's testimony. His 404(b) testimony by itself would never have gotten CGM convicted.

What they're saying is that if you want Crystal Mangum to get a new trial, that process requires Walker's affidavit stating that he was coerced by the prosecution into giving false testimony.; April 30, 2024 at 11:36 AM
Fake Kenhyderal said...: Hey Anonymous -- Everyone knows:

Kenhyderal = Jackie Wagstaff

Tinfoil Hat = Victoria Peterson; April 30, 2024 at 1:48 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous: 4--29-24 Just who is it you think I claim to be? To me it appears you've put too much faith in Wikipedia. Lawyers for the Duke Lacrosse accused, as have The Duke Lacrosse Liestopper apologists having solved the problem of Kilgo have long been trying to determine the what where and who of Ken Edwards. They've managed to destroy reputations and careers of many such as formwer DA Nifong, Police Sgt. Gotlieb, Detective Linwood Wilson, Dr. Manley, Nurse Levici. Lab-director Dr. Meehan Author Wm.Cohan and more.; April 30, 2024 at 3:01 PM
Anonymous said...: Who is it I think you claim to be? I think “Ken Edwards” is a random name you either made up or read somewhere.

Mike Nifong, Gotlieb, Linwood Wilson, Tara Levicy, and Dr. Meehan didn’t need “ Duke Lacrosse Liestopper apologists” to destroy their reputations. They did that on their own.

AFAIK, both Dr. Manley and William Cohan are both fine.

Now, “Kenhyderal”, what exactly did I get wrong that makes you claim I put to much faith in Wikipedia? Was I wrong in her timeline for entering/leaving the Navy? Was I wrong about the location of her first duty station?

Please enlighten us.; May 1, 2024 at 4:59 AM
Anonymous said...: "Lawyers for the Duke Lacrosse accused...have long been trying to determine the what where and who of Ken Edwards."

No they haven't.

If they wanted to find out this information, all they needed to do is subpoena Blogger for the IP information associated with your all important blogger account.

It's why your buddy Kilgo left, removed his account info and deleted all his comments.; May 1, 2024 at 12:25 PM
dhall said...: Apparently no comments have been approved since April 30th, but it doesn't appear that anyone has addressed the topic at hand -- Does Dr. Harr meet the requirements as laid out by NCGS 150B-2(6) to be a "person aggrieved" for this contested case?

I stand by my comments that he does not. Can anyone offer an argument otherwise?; May 3, 2024 at 11:04 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: "Respondent's actions in this case did not substantially affect Dr. Harr's person, property, or employment. Petition has not alleged facts or evidence to support the conclusion that Dr. Harr is a "person aggrieved".

Accordingly, the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction over Dr. Harr because he has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, he does not have standing and he is not the real party in interest."; May 3, 2024 at 2:41 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 5-1-24-4:59 : It matters not a whit you believe my blog name was created only for the purpose of posting here and it is not my birth registered name. Believe what you will. Your dates may be correct but that does not negate the fact that I met Crystal socially in Bremerton Washington and I only reconnected with her after her name became public in the Duke Lacrosse Case.; May 4, 2024 at 9:36 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Since Sid never posted the original complaint, I don't think he's ever outright stated the facts showing how CGM was harmed by the State agency. (This is, as dhall pointed out, the job of the NCOAH. They can't rule that the Nichols autopsy report was fraudulent, nor can they free CGM). The ONLY thing the contested hearing can determine is whether or not Dr. Aurelius/NCDHHS:

1) Exceeded its authority or jurisdiction
2) Acted erroneously
3) Failed to use proper procedure
4) Acted arbitrarily or capriciously
5) Failed to act as required by law or rule

He can't prove, and never provided proof that the DHHS committed 1-3 and 5. So the only argument he has is that they acted "arbitrarily or capriciously".

From what I've read, his argument appears to be that they acted "arbitrarily or capriciously" by not responding to his "affirmatives".

He's tried using his "affirmatives" in the cases he's already lost (Harr v. NCOAH, Mangum v. Aurelius, multiple MARs and the Writ of Coram Nobis). If the courts that dealt with these cases haven't accepted his argument that, in failing to respond to his "affirmatives", the NCDHHS/Dr. Aurelius acted "arbitrarily or capriciously", no one should expect the NCOAH to accept this argument either.

So -- I predict this current motion to fail (for reasons already stated), and this case to be dismissed.; May 4, 2024 at 9:41 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 5-1-24 - 12:56 PM. No trial pending. No crime involved. No mechanism to force Google or Dr. Harr, Blog host, to provide anyone with such information.; May 4, 2024 at 9:44 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...: Right on kenhyderal.; May 5, 2024 at 4:33 PM
Anonymous said...: You’re the one that made the ridiculous claim that "Lawyers for the Duke Lacrosse accused...have long been trying to determine the what where and who of Ken Edwards."

Never happened. Just like CGM was never posted at Kitsap.

…And never met you in Bremerton.; May 6, 2024 at 4:45 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...: I’m proud to call kenhyderal my friend.; May 6, 2024 at 5:33 AM
Anonymous said...: So....What's happening the seminal week of July 15, 2024? Does anyone know?; May 6, 2024 at 6:57 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid

Release the kraken!

While you're at it -- release the comments, too.; May 6, 2024 at 8:26 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: Hey -- I just noticed that Sid states in this document that Dr. Wecht is now fully retired and is now longer available as a witness.

It's my understanding that, generally, an affidavit that has not been subjected to cross examination cannot be used for "the truth of the matter asserted". So there goes the Wecht report and affidavit....

Any lawyers out there able to confirm this?; May 6, 2024 at 11:55 AM
Anonymous said...: Where are all the comments?; May 7, 2024 at 5:32 AM
dhall said...: Anonymous May 6, 2024 at 6:57 AM, I'm pretty sure the week of July 15, 2024 is when the NCOAH contested case hearing is scheduled.

Is it a "seminal week"?

No, for reasons already identified.

Again, all this case CAN determine is that Dr. Aurelius/NCDHHS violated specific criteria (see Prince Humperdinck's post from May 4, 2024 at 9:41 AM).

Even if they make the absurd decision that one or more of those criteria were met, it doesn't give Mangum a new criminal trial, and certainly doesn't free her.

Telling Crystal Mangum that this contested case does either of those things is simply setting unrealistic expectations.; May 7, 2024 at 8:33 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 5-6-24 4:45. Re: Duke Lacrosse Defence Lawyers: I have circumstantial evidence that says otherwise and re: Crystal: you make inferences and claims about her as if you have insights into her life history. Obviously you rely heavily on what has been written about her, mostly by non-sympathetic observers, with a lot of it lies, having it's origin from The Duke Lacrosse Defence with a deliberate, evil and dishonest purpose of trashing the reputation of Crystal, the "me too heroine" who had the courage to accuse their delinquent clients.; May 7, 2024 at 8:48 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Comment from Sid from January 8, 2024:

"Information about the secret project will be released as soon as I received clearance from the project director to do so. This project was not originated by me, but one which I believed will be of immense help in getting Ms. Mangum released."

It's now May. You got that clearance yet?

If not, why not?; May 7, 2024 at 9:20 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid,

Do you have any news to share with us about Mikey Nifong?; May 7, 2024 at 10:42 AM
Anonymous said...: Tyrone, you are correct -it will not be admissible. The only affidavit that could get Crystal a hearing for a new trial is one from Milton Walker, as has been explained to Sid/Kenny for years - and that is the one they refuse to even attempt to get.

Crystal is exactly where Sid wants her - he knows she will have nothing to do with him once she's released. She is literally a captive audience for his nonsense.; May 8, 2024 at 4:18 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid,

Isn’t it time for a little justice for Mikey Nifong?; May 8, 2024 at 7:33 AM
A Durham Man said...: Kenny,

Why won’t you share your circumstantial evidence with us?; May 8, 2024 at 7:35 AM
Anonymous said...: "I have circumstantial evidence that says otherwise..."

Just like I have circumstantial evidence you're not really Ken Edwards.

Funny -- I didn't see you mentioned in CGM's book, and I don't recall Bremerton mentioned either.; May 8, 2024 at 10:41 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: Anonymous @ May 7, 2024 at 10:42 AM:

If Sid's spoken to Mikey at all, it hasn't been in the last 14 years.; May 8, 2024 at 11:07 AM
dhall said...: Kenhyderal -- Why don't you address the topic at hand rather than the unrelated issues about whether the Duke LAX lawyers tried to identify you, or where you met Crystal Mangum?

Why should the NCOAH grant this newest motion, when they've removed him as a petitioner (because his role as "advocate" does not satisfy the definition of "a person aggrieved") once already?

What has changed regarding this contested case since July 2023 that should allow him to be a co-petitioner now?; May 8, 2024 at 11:48 AM
kenhyderal said...: @dhall: 5-8-24 : All gobbledygook! A typical, artifact, created by a corrupt system that can be selectively applied whenever a rationale to deny is needed; the kind of thing that makes people so scornful of the Justice System. Describing Dr. Harr, whose fiancee has been wrongfully convicted and wrongfully incarcerated, who advocates for her to receive Justice, as a person not aggrieved is just plain ludicrous to any ordinary person.; May 9, 2024 at 8:47 AM
kenhyderal said...: Dr. Harr, did you receive my reply to dhall's post of 5-8-24 11:48 AM ?; May 10, 2024 at 7:03 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

We are waiting to see your circumstantial evidence.; May 11, 2024 at 6:10 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

Where is the circumstantial evidence?; May 11, 2024 at 8:56 AM
dhall said...: "All gobbledygook! A typical, artifact, created by a corrupt system that can be selectively applied whenever a rationale to deny is needed; the kind of thing that makes people so scornful of the Justice System. Describing Dr. Harr, whose fiancee has been wrongfully convicted and wrongfully incarcerated, who advocates for her to receive Justice, as a person not aggrieved is just plain ludicrous to any ordinary person."

Kenhyderal -- You obviously don't understand the purpose of the NCOAH, what it is allowed to adjudicate, and what it's limits are under the law.

Read again Prince Humperdinck's post from May 4, 2024 at 9:41 AM, and show all of us with evidence how Dr. Harr has proved that Dr. Aurelius or the DHHS violated any of the things the NCOAH is allowed to adjudicate.

You've also been provided with the legal definition of "person aggrieved". Dr. Harr simply does not meet these requirements as has been argued here on this blog, as well as determined by the NCOAH.

So again I ask, What has changed regarding this contested case since July 2023 that should allow him to be a co-petitioner now?; May 11, 2024 at 9:04 AM
kenhyderal said...: @dhall 5-11-24 9:04 AM: Oh yeah, of course, sorely aggrieved Dr. Harr has, in reality, suffered loss, injury and unfair treatment because of the 2023 decision having been made which negatively affects his interest of seeing justice for his fiancee, even though it does not meet the weasel-word, selectively applied criteria set forth in the legalese definition of a "person aggrieved" and conveniently utilized to give some sort of ratioale for the decision. Guess why almost nobody trusts the legal system in much of the good old U.S.A.; May 11, 2024 at 3:51 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymouses 5-11-24 6:10 and 8:56; For obvious strategic reasons, I am not, presently sharing this information on-line. You will just have to speculate about it's nature. Or, if you care to, you can decide, that since I wont reveal it, it does not exist.; May 11, 2024 at 4:04 PM
Little Man Supporter said...: I am confident that kenhyderal will reveal the circumstantial evidence when he posts his secret plans for winning a new trial and compensation for Crystal.; May 11, 2024 at 4:11 PM
Anonymous said...: “For obvious strategic reasons, I am not, presently sharing this information online.”

Bahahahahaha

Bahahahahaha; May 12, 2024 at 3:00 PM
A. Habba Esquire said...: kenhyderal,

Do your “strategic reasons” relate to litigation or a claim you are considering?; May 12, 2024 at 3:46 PM
dhall said...: No Kenhyderal, neither Dr. Aurelius or the DHHS made an administrative decision that affected Dr. Harr’s person, property, employment, or any other legal rights.

Apparently, you have difficulty understanding the words “person”, ”property”, “employment”, and “legal rights”. Rather than call them “weasel-word legalese”, you should try looking them up in a dictionary.

Let’s say (in the interest of discussion) that “Dr. Harr has, in reality, suffered loss, injury and unfair treatment because of the 2023 decision”. That decision was not made BY either Dr. Aurelius or the DHHS.

You are entitled to your own opinions, of course, but not your own facts. The facts are that any decision made by Dr. Aurelius or the DHHS did not affect any of Dr. Harr’s legal rights.; May 12, 2024 at 4:10 PM
Tyrone Rugen said...: Wait....
Circumstantial evidence requires drawing additional reasonable inferences in order to support the claim that these lawyers have been "trying to determine the what where and who of Ken Edwards."

Why would they need to determine that, if you've already told us? Why would any lawyer need this information if there's "No trial pending. No crime involved"?; May 13, 2024 at 5:38 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: The laws are what the laws are, Kenny -- even in Canada. You can consider a particular law "sorely aggrieving" you. That doesn't mean your entitled to contest a particular judicial or administrative decision.

In fact, The "person aggrieved" expression is generally understood to refer to any person, other than “[…]a mere busybody who is interfering in things which do not concern him […]”, who has a genuine legal grievance. Sid simply doesn't meet the requirements of a "person aggrieved" in your country, either.

Based on your comments, you consider this a "legalese definition of a "person aggrieved" and conveniently utilized to give some sort of ratioale for [a] decision."

Guess that's why almost nobody trusts the legal system in much of good old Canada....; May 13, 2024 at 7:43 AM
Kenhyderal Lay Advocate said...: Indeed, Little Man Supporter.
Kenyderal has been extremely busy working in preparation for that new trial and compensation for Crystal. The importance of Kenhyderal's secret plans cannot be over-emphasized. I think his secret plans have potential to lead to Crystal's release from prison and her exoneration.; May 13, 2024 at 7:53 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

I apologize for not being more involved with the comments, but as I stated before I am extremely busy at this point in time. I am not only working on several projects, but am trying to get prepared for the mid-July hearing.

I will try to make responses to comments within the next several days.

As you were.; May 13, 2024 at 10:25 AM
Anonymous said...: https://apnews.com/article/cyril-wecht-pathologist-jfk-dead-80ddc0a642cb4eb39dc763400e330a38; May 13, 2024 at 1:26 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Everybody, today is a very sad day for me and Crystal. Not long ago I learned that Dr. Cyril Wecht passed away at the age of 93.

Dr. Wecht was not only a brilliant man, but one of rare courage and integrity. When I first contacted his office in 2012 and spoke to his receptionist, I was surprised when he returned my call personally and discussed Crystal's case over the phone for fifteen minutes. Many years later I sent out thirty questionnaires (about Crystal Mangum's case) to celebrities, legal analysts, and famed attorneys, and his response was one of two that were filled out and returned to me in a self-addressed stamped envelope.

Long before I retained him in July 2019, he had always treated me respectfully and spent time to work with me as an independent expert witness. What is shameful is how the media ignored his exonerative October 25, 2019 report on Mangum's murder case.

Dr. Wecht had planned to testify via telecommunications at the NC Office of Administrative Hearings scheduled for October 2, 2023, and unfortunately once the administrative law judge learned of his willingness to be a witness for Mangum, the hearing date was indefinitely postponed.

Just as unfortunate is the fact that CBS-17 News Skype 20-minute interview with Dr. Wecht conducted on November 25, 2019 was erased without it being aired, archived, or shown to the general public. Its deletion, I feel, was the destruction of exculpatory evidence favorable to Ms. Mangum.

Around March 2024, I became aware of Dr. Wecht's failing health and decided that it would not be in his best interest to try and arrange for him to testify. My only hope was that I would be able to free Crystal in time to take her to Pittsburgh, PA to meet the great man. I am sorry that is no longer possible, but I can only be grateful for my opportunity to meet with him in his office for half an hour and discuss Mangum's case with him.

Dr. Cyril H. Wecht exemplified integrity and courage, and I will greatly miss him.; May 13, 2024 at 8:02 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Sid -
You will, of course, not be considered a co-petitioner in the contested case. As dhall pointed out, the decision by Dr. Aurelius or the DHHS not to change Daye's autopsy report or death certificate did not affect any of your legal rights.

Nor will you be allowed represent CGM as her "lawyer".

The details for medical expert witness can be found here.

You don't meet the requirements to be an expert witness.

Expect your motion to fail.; May 14, 2024 at 6:27 AM
Anonymous said...: This may seem like a silly question....Why haven't we seen Crystal Mangum's family here in support of Sid's efforts?

IIRC, there was some concern about your monopolization of CGM's visit time ( I believe North Carolina inmates are allowed two visits per week, each lasting 30 minutes).

Sid, are you purposely excluding them?; May 14, 2024 at 6:45 AM
kenhyderal said...: Extremely unfortunate. Sad news for those who desire that injustices are exposed and truth lights the path foreward towards real justice. I suspect those, who knowingly have been covering up this clear case of injustice, in order to conceal their own culpability and protect their own reputations, are heaving a sigh of relief at the passing of Dr. Wecht the
great man, who was a person of unimpeachable expertise who could have, clearly, shown, to anyone, willing to listen, the truth, easily accessible, easily understandable and quite obvious to all; thereby expoing the disgraceful conduct of those, who also know the truth but have a vested interest keeping the wrongful conviction of Crystal concealed.; May 14, 2024 at 9:00 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...: Little Man Supporter:

Keep in mind that there are many lurkers at this site, including the Governor, Attorney General, Durham District Attorney, members of the Duke Lacrosse defence team and Rae Evans, all of whom are tracking kenhyderal’s posts. They will stop at nothing in their efforts to gain a strategic advantage over kenhyderal. For this reason, kenhyderal has no choice other than to be discrete and carefully limit the information that he shares with us. In due course, however, kenhyderal will reveal everything.; May 14, 2024 at 3:47 PM
Kenhyderal Lay Advocate said...: I suspect those, who knowingly have been covering up this clear case of injustice, in order to conceal their own culpability and protect their own reputations, are upset that Kenhyderal, the great man, a person of unimpeachable expertise will, clearly, show, to anyone, willing to listen, the truth, easily accessible, easily understandable and quite obvious to all; with his secret plans thereby expoing the disgraceful conduct of those, who also know the truth but have a vested interest keeping the wrongful conviction of Crystal concealed.; May 15, 2024 at 8:43 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...: Kenhyderal Lay Advocate:

It is clear that you are a fighter for justice.; May 16, 2024 at 5:28 AM
Kenhyderal Lay Advocate said...: Kenhyderal supporter:
My only hope is that I will be able to go to Bremerton to meet the great man.; May 16, 2024 at 12:13 PM
kenhyderal supporter said...: Kenhyderal Lay Advocate:

I am sorry to report that kenhyderal has left our hood in Bremerton and you will have to travel to Dubai to meet him.; May 18, 2024 at 9:46 AM

Sunday, April 28, 2024

Crystal Mangum's Motion to Reinstate Sidney Harr as co-Petitioner and Other Equitable Relief

62 comments:

Facebook Badge

Subscribe!

Labels

Blog Archive

About Me