Sunday, April 22, 2012

What really happened in the wee hours of April 3, 2011



 
The biased mainstream media has unfortunately flooded the newsprint and airwaves with false declarations that the stab wound inflicted by Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser Crystal Mangum during the early morning hours of Sunday, April 3, 2011, resulted in the death of Reginald Daye. This myth has been adequately debunked by the previously posted blog which has gone into depth with medical records about how and why Daye died. The short version is that an intubation tube was misplaced by the staff at Duke University Hospital, resulting in lack of oxygen to the lungs, bloodstream, and eventually the brain cells. The brain cells died and Daye lapsed into a comatose state… and unlike brain damaged inmates Joshua Wrenn and Timothy Helms, who both regained consciousness after months in a coma, Daye was removed from life support after only a week. He died shortly thereafter and as a proximate cause of its removal.


The medical examiner reached the conclusion that Reginald Daye died “secondary to complications of a stab wound to the chest” in order to provide Durham Prosecutor Kelly Gauger with a basis for charging Crystal Mangum with murder. He did so with full knowledge that the stab wound had nothing to do with Daye’s death, and made no attempt to develop a nexus between the stabbing and Daye’s brain death or actual death. The mainstream media, however, attributes Daye’s death to the stabbing, and does its best to keep hidden from the public the fact that a Duke University Hospital staff member is the one who should take the blame for Daye’s demise… not Crystal Mangum.
 


But, even if the stab wound was directly responsible for Daye’s death, there is plenty within the prosecutor’s discovery to support the fact that Crystal Mangum acted in self defense when she stabbed Daye. The two, who had been in a brief relationship at the time, were living together in Daye’s apartment along with Crystal’s three children. She contributed financially to help pay the rent for the apartment which had fallen into arrears due to a recent layoff at his job. However, he was now back at his job, and Daye purchased a money order on March 25, 2011, and one on April 1, 2011, both totaling $700.00 – rent for the month of April. Daye was scheduled to work on Monday, April 4, 2011, leaving at six in the morning and returning home after five in the afternoon. Because he would not be at home during the office hours of the rental company, he gave both cashier’s checks to Crystal prior to April 3rd with instructions to drop them off at the rental office the following Monday. Mangum placed both checks in her purse for safekeeping.

 
On Saturday, April 2, 2011, Crystal Mangum had a couple of drinks whereas Reginald Daye imbibed quite a bit of alcohol… enough to the point that he became heavily intoxicated. Daye became upset with Crystal because she was not totally attentive to him, and this led to an argument. Although Daye’s nephew stated that the two were fussing over rent and money, this was definitely not the case according to Ms. Mangum. The argument between the two was strictly due to personal relationship issues.


Early in the morning of Sunday, April 3, 2011, the argument became physical as Reginald Daye started punching Crystal in the face and pulling her by the hair. To escape him, she sought refuge in the bathroom and she locked the door behind her. An out of control Daye proceeded to kick in the bathroom door, then grabbed Crystal by her hair and took her to the bedroom. Sometime during this horrific altercation, Daye brought a bunch of steak knives from the kitchen and started throwing them, using Ms. Mangum as a target. These knives ended up being scattered all over the bedroom, as was noted in a later police report. The struggle came to an end as Daye was astride Mangum with both of his hands on her throat choking her. She managed to grab one of the steak knives that was lying around and stabbed him once in the left torso. No “defensive wounds” were sustained by Daye to his left upper extremity as was stated in the April 14, 2011 Autopsy Examination report.


Prosecution discovery documents scattered knives throughout the house, the damage to the bathroom door, notes clumps of Crystal’s hair by the bathroom door and in the bedroom, in addition to physical signs of injury she sustained which included a cut below her left eye, a swollen lower lip, a lesion to the back of her left hand, torn clothing, and blood on clothing (most likely from Daye when she stabbed him while he was atop her).



After stabbing Daye in self defense, Crystal grabbed her purse, which happened to contain the two cashier’s checks, and made her escape from Daye’s apartment and went to her aunt’s house. There she was later apprehended after calling 9-1-1, and the two cashier’s checks confiscated. The presence of these two cashier’s checks in Crystal Mangum’s possession would be the basis for Prosecutor Kelly Gauger to file two counts (one for each check) of larceny even though Daye gave them to Crystal, she did not take them from him, and she could not convert them to cash for her own personal use because she was not listed as the payee or remitter.


Daye’s blood alcohol was 296 mg/dL, a level which would put a non-alcoholic adult into a stupor. No alcohol, toxicology, or blood testing was conducted on Ms. Mangum, most likely due to lack of suspicion of her possibly being intoxicated.


That the stabbing was self defense is a logical conclusion from the evidence and investigation provided by the prosecution alone. Chris Shella, Mangum’s defense attorney, who claims to be working Pro Bono on her behalf, had not conducted any investigation into the incident, and the only thing he did was weaken the self-defense argument by seeking a mental health evaluation for his client.



The link below will connect to a directory of prosecution documents supporting the veracity of events as described above. When taken in conjunction with the previously posted blog and its link to the medical records, one cannot help but come to the following conclusions regarding the incident that occurred in the early morning of April 3, 2011:

(1) Crystal Mangum was the victim of domestic abuse at Reginald Daye’s hands;

(2) Crystal Mangum stabbed Reginald Daye in self-defense;

(3) the stab wound to Daye was non-life threatening;

(4) Duke University Hospital staff’s misplacement of the endotracheal tube was responsible for Daye’s brain death;

(5) Reginald Daye’s death was due to his elective removal from life support by Duke University Hospital staff with the consent of Daye’s family;

(6) the Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011, in listing injuries to Daye that were fabricated and not inflicted by the stab wound, did so to make the stab wound appear more serious than it actually was;

(7) the autopsy reports, in listing “complications due to a stab wound to the chest” as the cause of Daye’s death, did so fraudulently and for the purpose of providing a basis for first degree murder charge against Ms. Mangum;

(8) Daye gave the two cashier’s checks to Mangum with the intention that she would drop them off at the rental office while he was at work on Monday, April 4, 2011;

(9) Mangum could not have converted the checks to cash even if she wanted as she was not listed as the payee or remitter; and

(10) Crystal Mangum is innocent of the murder of Reginald Daye and both counts of larceny, and both charges against her should be dropped and she should be immediately released from custody.

 
The date of this blog posting, April 22, 2012, is day 385 of Crystal Mangum’s wrongful incarceration. This, more than any colorful language used by former Durham District Attorney Tracey Cline in her public feud with Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson, is what puts the Durham County and Tar Heel state’s justice system in disrepute. It is apparent to anyone with a modicum of knowledge about recent Durham history that the actions against Ms. Mangum are motivated by her role in the Duke Lacrosse case. Because this African American woman made accusations of sexual abuse against three student/athletes from families of wealth, power, and privilege, destroying her life and keeping her behind bars is the retribution being sought by these Carpetbagger families in their Jihadist agenda against those they deemed to be on the wrong end of the Duke Lacrosse case.


In order to carry out the diabolical plot against Mangum, many individuals had to collude in a grand conspiracy… some of the conspirators being as follows:

(1) Durham prosecutor Kelly Gauger who had Ms. Mangum indicted for murder on a fraudulently false autopsy report;

(2) Medical examiner Clay Nichols, M.D. who provided the April 14, 2011 Autopsy Examination Report that contained erroneous findings and conclusions;

(3) Dr. Andrew W. Buck who authorized the flawed autopsy report of April 14, 2011;

(4) the doctor who authored the April 13, 2011 Autopsy Investigative Report whose name was not typed on the report and whose signature was not legible. The conclusions he/she reached were misleading and in agreement with those of Dr. Nichols in supporting the prosecutor’s bogus murder charge against Mangum;

(5) defense attorney Chris Shella, who volunteered his Pro Bono services to Crystal Mangum, is an enabler who allowed Prosecutor Gauger to proceed with her prosecution of Ms. Mangum. Representation of Mangum by a capable and dedicated defense attorney would have been enough to prevent Gauger from pursuing the murder and larceny indictments, and would’ve brought the prosecution of Mangum to a halt;

(6) Judge Osmond Smith III, who should have recused and disqualified himself from hearing a motion by Shella for a bail reduction from $200,000 to $100,000, was predisposed to maintain Mangum’s bail at a high enough level to prevent her from satisfying bond; and

(7) the media, mainstream and otherwise, by heavily reporting the false conclusions of the autopsy-related documents that attributed Daye’s demise to the stab wound, and by fiercely keeping from the public the fact that the autopsy reports and their conclusions are spurious.



However, the media’s role is quite insidious and represents one of Prosecutor Gauger’s most powerful allies in the malicious, vindictive, and unfair war against Crystal Mangum. The media kept quiet for the entire week that Reginald Daye was in a coma, only mentioning it after he had died. The media showed absolutely no curiosity about the unexpected and unusual etiology of Daye’s lapse into a comatose state. The media even kept the fact that Daye was on life support hidden from the public and that it was only after he was electively removed from it that he died. The media has downplayed Reginald Daye’s state of intoxication the morning of the incident and has suppressed informing the masses of the injuries sustained by Mangum at Daye’s hand. The media did not attempt to find the basis for the charge of larceny. Because the case against Mangum was so weak, many of the media-types restricted reporting on the case in order to keep its weaknesses concealed. This accounts for a disproportionately large part of articles about Mangum/Daye being devoted to rehashing the Duke Lacrosse case… and reminding the people of Mangum’s role as the “false” accuser.



Although anti-Mangum media reporting is punitive in large measure to retaliate for her part in the Duke Lacrosse case, another significant motive is likely due to financial reasons. By blaming Daye’s death on Crystal Mangum’s actions, it takes away the real responsibility from Duke University Hospital for malpractice that led to the loss of Daye’s life… and Duke University advertises heavily in state’s media markets (with the exception of African American newspapers).

 
Politicians and so-called “civil rights organizations” which possess knowledge of the injustice against Ms. Mangum and elect to remain quiet and do nothing out of fear and/or apathy, are culpable in this conspiracy of enormous size and intensity. As long as the conspirators keep rank and their deeds remain secreted away, minorities will continue to suffer throughout North Carolina. As long as those with the knowledge of the injustices stay on the sidelines and apart from the struggle for equal justice for all, the unholy persecution of Crystal Mangum will continue, Erick Daniels and Shawn Massey will be deprived of the pardons they deserve, Duke University will continue to discriminate with impunity against Nifong supporters and African Americans, and the GOP will proceed with its onslaught against the Racial Justice Act.


In the post Duke Lacrosse era, Crystal Mangum has emerged the true victim of a broken North Carolina criminal justice system. Innocent of any crime and a victim of domestic abuse, she approaches 400 days in jail with a bail that is higher than Sanford, Florida’s George Zimmerman, who targeted, stalked, and killed 17 year-old Trayvon Martin. The media is generously providing its contribution by vilifying and demonizing Crystal Mangum while holding this revenge-driven grand conspiracy against her together.



LINK: http://www.justice4nifong.com/legal/cgm/pddirec.htm

284 comments:

1 – 200 of 284   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

"What really happened in the wee hours of April 3, 2011"?

If this were a Jeopardy answer, the question would be, to what does Sidney Harr not have a clue/

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"...that the stab wound inflicted by Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser Crystal Mangum during the early morning hours of Sunday, April 3, 2011, resulted in the death of Reginald Daye."

Crystal Mangum was and is the Duke Lacrosse victimizer/false accuser.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The medical examiner reached the conclusion that Reginald Daye died “secondary to complications of a stab wound to the chest” in order to provide Durham Prosecutor Kelly Gauger with a basis for charging Crystal Mangum with murder."

Sidney repeats again an unproven allegation. I have said this before. This is assuming facts which are not in evidence.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"...there is plenty within the prosecutor’s discovery to support the fact that Crystal Mangum acted in self defense when she stabbed Daye".

Again SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) calls something a fact which he has not established as fact(except in his deluded megalomaniacal imagination).

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
"What really happened in the wee hours of April 3, 2011"?

If this were a Jeopardy answer, the question would be, to what does Sidney Harr not have a clue/

I have more of a "clue" than you do as I spoke directly to one of the two people who knew what happened. The other person is dead, but not due to a stab wound... rather a mis-positioned endotracheal tube.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Although Daye’s nephew stated that the two were fussing over rent and money, this was definitely not the case according to Ms. Mangum."

This assumes Crystal is a credible person. From the Duke false rape case and from her criminal history, it has been established in the public record she is not.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The argument between the two was strictly due to personal relationship issues."

Earlier, SIDN(inn)EY was saying that reliable sources told him the argument was about money, that Mr. Daye wanted to spend the rent money on drink.

Now that SIDN(inn)EY has again been exposed as a charlatan, he is trying to institute personal posterior camouflage.

It is not very effective camouflage, SIDN(inn)EY.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"She(Crystal) managed to grab one of the steak knives that was lying around and stabbed him once in the left torso. No “defensive wounds” were sustained by Daye to his left upper extremity as was stated in the April 14, 2011 Autopsy Examination report.

Earlier SIDN(inn)EY was blogging that according to the media, a paring knife was the weapon with which Mr. Daye was stabbed. Someone pointed out to SIDN(inn)EY the media said it was a kitchen knife. SIDN(inn)EY's response was that a paring knife is a kitchen knife and therefore his statement was accurate.

Really, SIDN(inn)EY, do you think these pitiful attempts at CYA are enlightening anyone?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Prosecution discovery documents...[note] clumps of Crystal’s hair by the bathroom door".

Earlier, SIDN(inn)EY admitted that DNA testing had not been conducted on the clumps of hair. Therefore it has not been established that these clumps were Crystal's hair.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"in addition to physical signs of injury she sustained which included a cut below her left eye, a swollen lower lip, a lesion to the back of her left hand, torn clothing, and blood on clothing".

The ER record said that Crystal had minimal trauma to her face which did not require treatment.

Earlier SIDN(inn)EY, former ER physician, claimed that Crystal had taken a severe beating to the face and neck which left no findings.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"...[Crystal} was later apprehended after calling 9-1-1".

The news reports unanimously say that Mr. Daye's nephew called 911, not Crystal. Part of the 911 call can be accessed on Youtube by doing a Youtube search on "Reginald Daye 911 call:.

Earlier SIDN(inn)EY claimed that this did not rule out that Crystal also called 911. He provided no documentation that Crystal called 911.

It is obvious he is trying to pass off a falsehood as a fact.

SIDN(inn)EY, how can representing a lie as the truth enlighten anyone?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"That the stabbing was self defense is a logical conclusion from the evidence and investigation provided by the prosecution alone."

So says SIDN(inn)EY who has never shown any real knowledge of what is logical and what is not.

This is something he did in his frivolous lawsuit against Duke University. He claimed his assertions should be accepted as true simply because he considers them logical.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

I have not yet finished my review of the police documents.

There is nothing in there to indicate Crystal Mangum was attacked.

According to Mr. Daye's nephew, the argument was about money. Crystal's after the event claim that it was about relationship matters is not credible. She makes it but, just like in the phony rape charges she made against the innocent Duke Lacrosse players, she can not provide corroborating evidence.

The police recorded a 3-4 inch laceration which looked very deep and which was actively bleeding.

You are passing on your rather biased interpretation of the events as enlightenment. They are not.

So far as Crystal making the 911 call, the police records say she was calling 911. However if there is no record of the call, that claim is not credible.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

You have posted a number of pictures of Crystal Mangum. None of them show any of the injuries she alleged.

Why?

Anonymous said...

Interesting choice pf photos for sister. How about the one with her stoned and drunk on her backside, flailing at a pole? How about the mug shot when she had a drunken brawl with another man in front of the babies? How about the mug shot when she stole a man's wallet and tried to run over a police offcer? Nope we get the fake tears shot in her pseudo press release outfit, dressed by vincent clark. Now isnt that sweet. Precious all decked out and not looking like a tramp.
Spare me.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

The police report document OCA 14009831 said Crystal had the odor of alcohol on her when she was first interviewed.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

Case supplemental report OCA 11009831 quotes a Mrs. Howard saying she believed Crystal had been drinking.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

None of the police reports say anything about Reginald Daye throwing knives at Crystal. That is something Crystal probably told you, and it is a matter of public record that Crystal is not a credible person.

The Police Reports twice state that Reginald Daye said that Crystal had stabbed him and took his money. Mr. Daye's nephew stated he heard Mr. Daye tell Crystal to give him back his money.

None of this indicates Reginald Daye was the aggressor in this argument.

Anonymous said...

Not one word of this Harr bilge is true.

Mangum for DA......at least she knows where the jail is.

Anonymous said...

She was drinking. First harr lie. Her child called 911, not her. Second harr lie. No evidence that hair was hers. Third harr lie. No documentation that the tube was inserted improperly. Fourth Harr lie. By the way, sid, the emesis noted was not linked to the intubation. No documentation of knife throwing . Fifth harr lie. Argument was over money, not personal. Sixth harr lie.
And so on and so on. What a load of crap. I guess mangum could tell harr she is white and the daughter of george bush, and he would tell us that she's george's love child.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I have more of a "clue" than you do as I spoke directly to one of the two people who knew what happened. The other person is dead, but not due to a stab wound... rather a mis-positioned endotracheal tube."

You haven't got a clue. One of the people you talked to is Crystal, Duke Lacrosse case false accuser,hardly a credible witness, who is trying to save herself. Reginald Daye died of a stab wound

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

To my last comment I add, Reginald Daye did talk to authorities before he died. According to the police records you posted, Mr. Daye told them that Crystal stabbed him and took his money.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

I notice you again, Westboro Baptist Church fashion, attempt to exploit the tragic Trayvon Martin case to further your vendetta.

Anonymous said...

Tell you what,sid. The man from nazareth, as you so cutely refer to jesus, would suggest to you that the judge not,lest ye be judged, also applies to YOU.......who consistently, profoundly, and globally see the the world through racist blinders and who is nothing more than a mouthpiece for Nifong. Whenever you want to gag us all with your moral pontificating, you dredge up the WWJD reference. Pretty hypocritical coming from someone who condoned Houston Baker's invective to one of the LAX mothers that she had given birth to a farm animal. And of course we all know how pleased jesus must be with the likes of your courageous friend, victoria peterson, for calling gay people " disease ridden" perverts. You keep nice company for a man who supposedly knows so much about what jesus would do.

Anonymous said...

What would Jesus do.

If that were a Jeopardy answer, the question again would be To what does Sidney Harr not have a clue?

Anonymous said...

Another possible Jeopardy answer would be, Justice4Nifong.

Again, the appropriate question would be, what is something about which Sidney Harr does not have a clue.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy.

Jeopardy answer, Nothing.

Question, what happened at 610 North Buchanan Avenue, Durham SC, on the night of 13/14 March 2006

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy nothing.

An acceptable question to the Jeopardy answer, nothing, would be:

What does Kenhyderal know about the Duke Rape case.

or:

What does Kilgo know about the Duke rape case.

Lance the Intern said...

As I've noted before, Sid's continued use of the word "jihad" is most ironic, as the word best translates as "struggle" and when it appears in the Qur'an, it is most often found in the expression " al-jihad fi sabil Allah" or "striving in the way of Allah (God)"

I think he views the term "carpetbagger jihad" as an insult to the Duke LAX families. Quite the contrary.

Must Muslims, however, would find it offensive to use the term for a non-Muslim.

Lance the Intern said...

"In the post Duke Lacrosse era, Crystal Mangum has emerged the true victim of a broken North Carolina criminal justice system. Innocent of any crime and a victim of domestic abuse, she approaches 400 days in jail with a bail that is higher than Sanford, Florida’s George Zimmerman, who targeted, stalked, and killed 17 year-old Trayvon Martin."

1) North Carolina does not have a speedy trial statute (Florida does). NC used to have one that stated that the trial had to be within 120 days of arrest or indictment -- but it was repealed in 1992.

2) The average time to disposition was 528 days in 2008 (the last year I could find data).

3) There are a number of factors used to determine where a bond is set. These include the actual charges, criminal history, and likelihood of the person seeking bail to skip.

4) Until George Zimmerman is found guilty of any crimes, your charges that he "targeted, stalked, and killed 17 year-old Trayvon Martin" are unfounded. He has not been found guilty by judge or jury, so by your own logic, your statement is false.

Anonymous said...

Jeopardy answer: Carpetbagger jihad

Question: What is the non existent entity on which Sidney Harr blames Mike Nifong's disbarment?

Anonymous said...

Jeopardy answer: Crystal Mangum

Question: Who was not a victim in the Duke Lacrosse rape hoax?

Lance the Intern said...

A minor correction -- North Carolina's speedy trial statute was repealed in 1989, (not 1992 as I had posted).

Anonymous said...

Jeopardy answer: Decent and Honorable

Question: What is Mike Nifong not?

Anonymous said...

Jeopardy answer: Crystal Mangum in jail

Question: What is the result of the J4N Committee's and the Friends of Crystal Mangum's failure to post bond for Crystal Mangum?

Walt said...

Sid wrote: "I have more of a "clue" than you do as I spoke directly to one of the two people who knew what happened. The other person is dead, but not due to a stab wound... rather a mis-positioned endotracheal tube." That is what is called felony murder, not excusable homicide. With friends like you Sid, Crystal doesn't need any enemies.

Walt-in-Durham

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The argument between the two was strictly due to personal relationship issues."

Earlier, SIDN(inn)EY was saying that reliable sources told him the argument was about money, that Mr. Daye wanted to spend the rent money on drink.

Now that SIDN(inn)EY has again been exposed as a charlatan, he is trying to institute personal posterior camouflage.

It is not very effective camouflage, SIDN(inn)EY.

As I stated before, my sources gave me incorrect evidence about the reason for the argument, which I passed along in good faith. When I spoke directly with Crystal I learned the truth about the nature of the argument. The argument was definitely not about money!! I stand corrected after talking with Crystal.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Prosecution discovery documents...[note] clumps of Crystal’s hair by the bathroom door".

Earlier, SIDN(inn)EY admitted that DNA testing had not been conducted on the clumps of hair. Therefore it has not been established that these clumps were Crystal's hair.

I think a reasonable person would conclude that the brown hair belonged to Crystal, especially after her history that he grabbed her by the hair after he kicked in the bathroom door.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

I have not yet finished my review of the police documents.

There is nothing in there to indicate Crystal Mangum was attacked.

According to Mr. Daye's nephew, the argument was about money. Crystal's after the event claim that it was about relationship matters is not credible. She makes it but, just like in the phony rape charges she made against the innocent Duke Lacrosse players, she can not provide corroborating evidence.

The police recorded a 3-4 inch laceration which looked very deep and which was actively bleeding.

You are passing on your rather biased interpretation of the events as enlightenment. They are not.

So far as Crystal making the 911 call, the police records say she was calling 911. However if there is no record of the call, that claim is not credible.

If the wound to Daye was 3 to 4 inches, you can bet the media would've recorded it as so... as would the medical examiner. Truth is that it was a little less than three quarters of an inch in length... which would correspond with a stab wound by a steak knife.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

You have posted a number of pictures of Crystal Mangum. None of them show any of the injuries she alleged.

Why?

Because I do not have any photos in my possession. Crystal has requested the photos from her attorney, but has not received them... along with some other prosecution discovery documents she has requested.
When and if I get the photos you can rest assured that I will post them.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

The police report document OCA 14009831 said Crystal had the odor of alcohol on her when she was first interviewed.

That begs the question... why did authorities not obtain a blood alcohol level from Crystal? I'd like to hear your thoughts.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

None of the police reports say anything about Reginald Daye throwing knives at Crystal. That is something Crystal probably told you, and it is a matter of public record that Crystal is not a credible person.

The Police Reports twice state that Reginald Daye said that Crystal had stabbed him and took his money. Mr. Daye's nephew stated he heard Mr. Daye tell Crystal to give him back his money.

None of this indicates Reginald Daye was the aggressor in this argument.

Keep in mind that the two counts of larceny against Crystal are for the two cashier's checks (neither of which she could convert to cash for her own use) which were given to her by Daye, and not for stealing money!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
She was drinking. First harr lie. Her child called 911, not her. Second harr lie. No evidence that hair was hers. Third harr lie. No documentation that the tube was inserted improperly. Fourth Harr lie. By the way, sid, the emesis noted was not linked to the intubation. No documentation of knife throwing . Fifth harr lie. Argument was over money, not personal. Sixth harr lie.
And so on and so on. What a load of crap. I guess mangum could tell harr she is white and the daughter of george bush, and he would tell us that she's george's love child.

Some people just prefer to dwell in the darkness with their eyes tightly closed to the truth.

Bro, open your eyes and even you shall become enlightened.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

To my last comment I add, Reginald Daye did talk to authorities before he died. According to the police records you posted, Mr. Daye told them that Crystal stabbed him and took his money.

True, Crystal did stab Daye. That is not in question. However, if she stole his money, don't you think the prosecutor would have charged her with armed robbery (forcefully taking something using a weapon)? She wasn't charged with armed robbery, was she?

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"In the post Duke Lacrosse era, Crystal Mangum has emerged the true victim of a broken North Carolina criminal justice system. Innocent of any crime and a victim of domestic abuse, she approaches 400 days in jail with a bail that is higher than Sanford, Florida’s George Zimmerman, who targeted, stalked, and killed 17 year-old Trayvon Martin."

1) North Carolina does not have a speedy trial statute (Florida does). NC used to have one that stated that the trial had to be within 120 days of arrest or indictment -- but it was repealed in 1992.

2) The average time to disposition was 528 days in 2008 (the last year I could find data).

3) There are a number of factors used to determine where a bond is set. These include the actual charges, criminal history, and likelihood of the person seeking bail to skip.

4) Until George Zimmerman is found guilty of any crimes, your charges that he "targeted, stalked, and killed 17 year-old Trayvon Martin" are unfounded. He has not been found guilty by judge or jury, so by your own logic, your statement is false.

Intern,
Regarding (1)thanks for the enlightenment.

Regarding (2) again, thanks for the enlightenment. But don't you think this statistic is atrocious. If someone without money is charged, not convicted of a murder, then they'll automatically serve more than one year in jail before even having a jury reach a verdict. An outrage!

Regarding (3)Crystal is no flight risk.

Regarding (4) Zimmerman targeted Trayvon Martin because he was a young black male wearing a hoodie.
After being told not to follow Martin, Zimmerman stalked him.
Fact is that Zimmerman shot and killed Martin. That is not in dispute.

I rest my case.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"When I spoke directly with Crystal I learned the truth about the nature of the argument. The argument was definitely not about money!! I stand corrected after talking with Crystal."

It is impossible to learn the truth from Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse false accuser.

Maybe you think you have because you are a deluded megalomaniac.

Lance the Intern said...

"However, if she stole his money, don't you think the prosecutor would have charged her with armed robbery (forcefully taking something using a weapon)? She wasn't charged with armed robbery, was she?"

No -- she was charged with 2 counts of larceny.

For "armed robbery", I believe that the harm to the person being robbed has to be in regard to the robbery itself.

Since the harm to Mr. Daye allegedly came from a quarrel due to relationship issues, the theft of the money is unrelated to the harm caused -- thus larceny.

Someone other than Sid, feel free to correct me here.

I'm not saying that I don't trust Sid's legal expertise, but....

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Because I do not have any photos in my possession. Crystal has requested the photos from her attorney, but has not received them... along with some other prosecution discovery documents she has requested.
When and if I get the photos you can rest assured that I will post them."

In other words, just like there is no photo of David Evans with a mustache, there is no photo of Crystal Mangum showing head and facial injuries.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I think a reasonable person would conclude that the brown hair belonged to Crystal, especially after her history that he grabbed her by the hair after he kicked in the bathroom door."

Crystal is the one who gave the history after she was arrested in the case. Who ever said you, the believer in the carpetbagger jihad, is a reasonable man? That is like saying the Taliban is a great group of ecumenists.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Keep in mind that the two counts of larceny against Crystal are for the two cashier's checks (neither of which she could convert to cash for her own use) which were given to her by Daye, and not for stealing money!"

That has nothing to do with who was the aggressor.

You remember Mary Winkler? She killed her husband with a shotgun. After she was arrested and charged with Murder 1, she claimed her husband was an abusive husband.

After Crystal was arrested and charged with murder, she claimed Reginald Daye was abusive. It sounds like she is trying to pull a Mary Winkler, otherwise described ans she said, he's dead.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"That begs the question... why did authorities not obtain a blood alcohol level from Crystal? I'd like to hear your thoughts."

Why don't you ask the authorities. You seem afraid of obtaining information which does not agree with your deluded megalomania.

Lance the Intern said...

"Regarding (3)Crystal is no flight risk."

Conveniently ignoring her past criminal history and the seriousness of the charges doesn't help your argument.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Some people just prefer to dwell in the darkness with their eyes tightly closed to the truth.

Bro, open your eyes and even you shall become enlightened."

SIDN(inn)EY, that describes you perfectly, except as a deluded megalomaniac, you are incapable of becoming enlightened.

Anonymous said...

Lance the Intern:

"I'm not saying that I don't trust Sid's legal expertise, but...."

What legal expertise?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"That begs the question... why did authorities not obtain a blood alcohol level from Crystal? I'd like to hear your thoughts."

Whether or not a blood alcohol was done, the note of the investigating officer and the statement of Crystal's aunt are circumstantial evidence that Crystal had been drinking.

If you remember your frivolous lawsuit against Duke, you put a lot of emphasis on the value of circumstantial evidence.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Keep in mind that the two counts of larceny against Crystal are for the two cashier's checks (neither of which she could convert to cash for her own use) which were given to her by Daye, and not for stealing money!"

What has that to do with your allegation that Reginald Daye was throwing knives at Crystal?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"
Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

To my last comment I add, Reginald Daye did talk to authorities before he died. According to the police records you posted, Mr. Daye told them that Crystal stabbed him and took his money."

SIDN(inn)EY, in a previous post, you sad you did not have the opportunity to talk to Mr. Daye. Nevertheless, there is a record of what Mr. Daye said, and this was contemporaneous with the incident, not post incident as is your information from Crystal Mangum.

You are skeptical of George Zimmerman's self defense claim(for what it's worth so am I). Why should Crystal's claim of self defense, made after she is in custody facing a murder rap, be accepte without question?

Anonymous said...

'way to dodge the truth, BRO.......
You re lying. We all know it BRO.

Anonymous said...

I dont give a cracker what sid says OR what the infamous liar,sister, has to say. Sounds like mangum and daye had an argument. The argument turned violent and she stabbed him. Whetherit was self defense is for the jury to decide....NOT some wingnut from raleigh who believes nifong is mother teresa is bad drag.
Ocure presty

Anonymous said...

You da man, Sid, you da man.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Reade Seligman, Colin Finnerty, David Evans

Question: Who were the victims of Crystal Mangum's false accusations of rape.

Question: Who did corrupt prosecutor Mike Nifong wrongfully prosecute,

Or(most appropriate question): Against whom is Sidney Harr conducting his racially motivated vendetta.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Enlightenment

Question: What is Sidney Harr incapable of providing.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"However, if she stole his money, don't you think the prosecutor would have charged her with armed robbery (forcefully taking something using a weapon)? She wasn't charged with armed robbery, was she?"

No -- she was charged with 2 counts of larceny.

For "armed robbery", I believe that the harm to the person being robbed has to be in regard to the robbery itself.

Since the harm to Mr. Daye allegedly came from a quarrel due to relationship issues, the theft of the money is unrelated to the harm caused -- thus larceny.

Someone other than Sid, feel free to correct me here.

I'm not saying that I don't trust Sid's legal expertise, but....

Hey, Lance.
I'm no attorney, nor do I pretend to be, but I believe that armed robbery has to do with taking something from someone by force using a weapon. I don't think it requires injury.
The problem with the larceny charge is that Daye voluntarily gave the cashier's checks to Mangum. The police reports suggest Mangum stole Daye's money, but she was not charged with stealing money... just for stealing the two cashier's checks.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Keep in mind that the two counts of larceny against Crystal are for the two cashier's checks (neither of which she could convert to cash for her own use) which were given to her by Daye, and not for stealing money!"

That has nothing to do with who was the aggressor.

You remember Mary Winkler? She killed her husband with a shotgun. After she was arrested and charged with Murder 1, she claimed her husband was an abusive husband.

After Crystal was arrested and charged with murder, she claimed Reginald Daye was abusive. It sounds like she is trying to pull a Mary Winkler, otherwise described ans she said, he's dead.

This point is directed solely to debunk the two-count larceny charge against Ms. Mangum.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"Regarding (3)Crystal is no flight risk."

Conveniently ignoring her past criminal history and the seriousness of the charges doesn't help your argument.

Lance, please! What past criminal history. The 2010 trumped up arson incident was totally without merit. It was a travesty of justice and a waste of taxpayer dollars to prosecute.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"That begs the question... why did authorities not obtain a blood alcohol level from Crystal? I'd like to hear your thoughts."

Whether or not a blood alcohol was done, the note of the investigating officer and the statement of Crystal's aunt are circumstantial evidence that Crystal had been drinking.

If you remember your frivolous lawsuit against Duke, you put a lot of emphasis on the value of circumstantial evidence.

Crystal admits to having a couple of alcoholic drinks, and I do not conceal that fact either. However, she was by no means intoxicated.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Lance, please! What past criminal history. The 2010 trumped up arson incident was totally without merit. It was a travesty of justice and a waste of taxpayer dollars to prosecute."

So how come she was found guilty of criminal charges. She was not acquitted of the arson charge. The jury could not come to a verdict, then the charge was dismissed.

Her stealing the cab, leading the police on a high speed chase then trying to run down a police officer was not trumped up. Neither was the blood alcohol finding showing she was intoxicated at the time.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Crystal admits to having a couple of alcoholic drinks, and I do not conceal that fact either. However, she was by no means intoxicated."

How do you know if you do not have a blood alcohol to confirm it? By your standards, Crystal was not exonerated of being intoxicated.

Sauce for the goose, SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

To my last comment I add, Reginald Daye did talk to authorities before he died. According to the police records you posted, Mr. Daye told them that Crystal stabbed him and took his money."

SIDN(inn)EY, in a previous post, you sad you did not have the opportunity to talk to Mr. Daye. Nevertheless, there is a record of what Mr. Daye said, and this was contemporaneous with the incident, not post incident as is your information from Crystal Mangum.

You are skeptical of George Zimmerman's self defense claim(for what it's worth so am I). Why should Crystal's claim of self defense, made after she is in custody facing a murder rap, be accepte without question?

I don't know what Daye told the police, but Daye could have lied or the officer making the report could've lied. Evidently Daye never mentioned how much money Mangum allegedly stole. $10? $100? $1,000? The fact is that Crystal did not take any of Daye's money. The larceny charge against her is not for money... but for taking the cashier's checks.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I'm no attorney, nor do I pretend to be".

When you filed those motions on behalf of Crystal, you were pretending to be an attorney.

In any event, you pretend you know more about the law than any trained attorney.

One would think you would have learned something from your utter rout in your frivolous lawsuit against Duke.

Lance the Intern said...

"Hey, Lance.
I'm no attorney, nor do I pretend to be, but I believe that armed robbery has to do with taking something from someone by force using a weapon. I don't think it requires injury.
The problem with the larceny charge is that Daye voluntarily gave the cashier's checks to Mangum. The police reports suggest Mangum stole Daye's money, but she was not charged with stealing money... just for stealing the two cashier's checks."


I think you pretty much answered your own question here -- Mr. Daye gave Mangum the checks (with the expectation she would drop them off to pay the rent). Ergo, no armed robbery.

She apparently kept them rather than dropping them off or leaving them with Mr. Daye. Larceny.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I don't know what Daye told the police, but Daye could have lied or the officer making the report could've lied."

It seems you don't know about Reginald Daye's statements to the police for the same reason you do not know about black deposed DA Tracey Cline's wrongful prosecutions of Leon Brown and Frankie Washington. You buried your head in the sand and pretended the statements weren't there.

Judging from Crystal's history, it is more likely she is the one who is lying, something you are aiding and abetting.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The larceny charge against her is not for money... but for taking the cashier's checks."

So you are saying that if someone altered the checks to make them payable to him/her(not an impossibility) that person would not be guilty of wrongfully taking the other person's money.

Anonymous said...

More jeopardy:


Answer: expert on the law

Question: What does Sidney Harr pretend to be but actually is not.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Prosecute every prosecutor except Nifong.

Question: What is the real meaning of PAPEN?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

Quoting me:

"'You are skeptical of George Zimmerman's self defense claim(for what it's worth so am I). Why should Crystal's claim of self defense, made after she is in custody facing a murder rap, be accepte[d] without question?'"

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), answer the question.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Credibility

Question: What does Sidney Harr not possess?

Another Question: What does Crystal Mangum not possess?

Yet another Question: What is a quality about which kenhyderal does not have a clue.

Anonymous said...

bottom line here, folks, is that sidney is just stirring the pot to draw attention to HIMSELF. This whole silly fantasy account from the proven liar, mangum, is just a waste of time. What's the point of argument over Harr's nonsense when that is ALL IT IS? Sheer claptrap.

Anonymous said...

Mangums's behavior concerning the taking of the personal property (checks) of Daye, meets the test of a larceny charge if the prosecutor can prove she had an intent to steal the property. Given that it is very common for thieves to attempt to alter cashier's checks for their own personal use, it's possible that the larceny charges could stick. There is no documentation in any of the police records that backs up Mangum's story about how she had possession of the checks.

But, focusing on the larceny charges, with Mr. Daye dead from a stab wound inflicted by Mangum, is like focusing on who moved the deck chairs before the Titanic went down. There is zero evidence in ANY of the documents that were inappropriately and wrongfully posted on this site that Daye died from any cause(s) other than complications of the stab wound. Harr can rattle his cage all he wants; loud wind is still only moving air.
I find it disgusting and reprehensible that Mangum should be sniveling and whining about her poor victimized self.....yet again. It amazes me that one of her children was put in the horrible position of calling 911, not once, but TWICE, because she was engaged in violence and, from all accounts, drinking.
All this dribble is going to wash away and the essential question is whether Mangum will be found guilty.....and if so, found guilty of what level/type of charge. I assume her attorney will try to say it was self defense. We will just have to wait and see whether she finally gets held accountable. Personally, I hold a bunch of people responsible for Mr. Daye's death......not just her.....including the famous 88 from Duke, Cooper who didn't charge her for her lies, and all the other Durham liberal halfwits who apologized for, made excuses for, and covered for Mangum. Jesse Jackson said he would pay for her college expenses, whether the rape charges were true OR NOT! Unbelievable. Where is Jesse now? What has Jesse done for the Daye family? What have Peterson, Harr, Wagstaff and the other crackpots done for the victims of Mangum's criminal behavior? What have ANY of them done for the children?
The answer is nothing......because NONE of them give a damn.

Anonymous said...

Just to present FACTS regarding Mangum's history.
in June 2002, conviction, suspended sentence, probation and community service for:
speeding to elude arrest, assault on a police officer, DWI Level 3, and larceny.
She also had convictions associated with the other assault and child abuse episode in 2010 when one of her children called 911. (Not sure of date)
This woman is no sweetheart......yes, I know, that last statement is an opinion, mine.

Anonymous said...

Another FACT: At his contempt hearing, the amoral Nifong said there was "no credible evidence that any of the young men commited any crime against the accuser". (2007). I guess that statement was another of his "lies". huh, Sidney?
perhaps Nifong made that statement in yet another feeble attempt to weasel out of being held accountable. Oooops, didn't work....

Anonymous said...

more FACTS
By 2002 Mangum had returned to Durham and was working as a stripper. In 2003, she was arrested on ten charges after stealing the taxicab of a customer she had given a lap dance. This prompted a police pursuit at moderate speeds of up to 70 miles per hour, though occasionally in the wrong lane. After being stopped, she attempted to run over a police officer, succeeding only in hitting his patrol vehicle. She was found to have a BAC of just over twice the legal limit. Ultimately, she pled guilty on four counts, serving three weekends in jail, paying $4,200 in restitution and fees, and being given two years probation.[1]
from Wikipedia, verified by NC criminal record DOC

Anonymous said...

More FACTS on Mangum....

"On December 17, 2010, Mangum was convicted of five misdemeanor charges involving child abuse. She was also convicted of injury to personal property and resisting a public officer. The jury deadlocked 9-3 for conviction on the felony arson charge but was unable to reach a decision on it.[7] After the verdict, Judge Abe Jones sentenced Mangum to 88 days in jail, which she had already served, and granted custody of her children.[8] Durham Assistant District Attorney Mark McCullough announced on January 21, 2011, that he would not retry Mangum on arson charges.[9]"

Anonymous said...

If Mangum isn't a flight risk, why hasn't the J4N gang posted her bail?

Anonymous said...

Yep, the judge did, in fact, say he thought Mangum was a "good mother".
Let's see......that was after nine convictions since 2002 and before she stabbed Mr. Daye.
Oh yeah, right......

Anonymous said...

Since poor sidney seems unable to come up with any other photos of Mangum except the one where she looks like she is about to tune up....taken with her in her pants suit outfit from vincent clark....which she wore at her "book" press release.....
here are the simple instructions on how to view "other" sides/photos of Mangum. go to google...type in her name...and click "images". You will find some interesting mug photos there, sidney. You claim to be fair and non-judgmental in your writings, so how about we all take a look at the arrest photos of Mangum and not just the one where Clark tried to make her look like Missy Coed from Shaw University...

Anonymous said...

Mangum must be a graduate of the "it's ok for your babies to see you drunk and disorderly" school of parenting.....
I hope that Judge who said he thought she was a good mother is really proud of himself. Excellent insight and judgment there, pal.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

Crystal's mug shot taken shortly after her arrest does not show any evidence of facial trauma.

Anonymous said...

Sid you are not only a racist, you are a bogoted fool. Zimmerman has been convicted of any crime against martin. To say he targeted, stalked and killed martin is idiotic. He is innocent until proven guilty, as is mangum. You hypocritical liarp

Anonymous said...

Hey Sid, where is your towel boy, Kenny?

Anonymous said...

I believe the poster meant to say zimmerman has NOT been convicted of any crime against Martin. I agree with the poster.

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Paring knife

Question: What was not used to stab Reginald Daye?

Or:

What did Sidney Harr say was used to stab Reginald Daye

Anonymous said...

Sometimes I wonder if this whole silly J4N nonsense is nothing but Nifong poking fun....using Harr, who apparently has hooks in his limbs where the puppet strings are attached......for his own purposes. It IS comical, you have to admit.....this heehaw evil white people/oppressor grand conspiracy bilge that Harr spews.
Durham has, sadly, gotten itself quite a national reputation for its clowns in the DA office, its homophobic citizenry, and its Duke-condoned gender/class/race diddlebrains. Harr, like Nifong, Cline, Peterson, Wilson, Brodhead, H. Baker, Wahneeeeema L., and others.....is comic fodder. You'd have to watch network soap opera for more bad acting and lousy melodrama. "As the stomach turns"....

Anonymous said...

Since Cline had a well documented history of overcharging, in order to get plea deals and conviction rates moved in her favor, it's not surprising that Mangum was charged with first degree murder. Whether it sticks will be decided in court, by the jury.....not by Harr. If the prosecution can prove all the elements of first degree, then we will see how the jury decides. I bet it will be second degree or something less. But, no way was this self defense.....

Anonymous said...

Blacks defending a murderer just because of her skin color even though her victim was also black.I guess Dr.James Watson's theories of racial IQ differences are correct.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I'm no attorney, nor do I pretend to be".

When you filed those motions on behalf of Crystal, you were pretending to be an attorney.

In any event, you pretend you know more about the law than any trained attorney.

One would think you would have learned something from your utter rout in your frivolous lawsuit against Duke.

Au contrare, mon ami. My lawsuit against Duke is ongoing!

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"Hey, Lance.
I'm no attorney, nor do I pretend to be, but I believe that armed robbery has to do with taking something from someone by force using a weapon. I don't think it requires injury.
The problem with the larceny charge is that Daye voluntarily gave the cashier's checks to Mangum. The police reports suggest Mangum stole Daye's money, but she was not charged with stealing money... just for stealing the two cashier's checks."

I think you pretty much answered your own question here -- Mr. Daye gave Mangum the checks (with the expectation she would drop them off to pay the rent). Ergo, no armed robbery.

She apparently kept them rather than dropping them off or leaving them with Mr. Daye. Larceny.

Just a little clarification, Lance. The checks dated March 25th and April 1st were given to Crystal prior to April 3rd. She placed them for safekeeping in her purse. She was to deposit them at the rental office on Monday, April 4th. However, after Daye assaulted her the morning of April 3rd, she grabbed her purse and escaped. Keep in mind that she could not convert the checks for her personal use!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The larceny charge against her is not for money... but for taking the cashier's checks."

So you are saying that if someone altered the checks to make them payable to him/her(not an impossibility) that person would not be guilty of wrongfully taking the other person's money.

This is what I call "grasping at straws!"

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
More jeopardy:


Answer: expert on the law

Question: What does Sidney Harr pretend to be but actually is not.

I don't claim to be an expert on the law.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Just to present FACTS regarding Mangum's history.
in June 2002, conviction, suspended sentence, probation and community service for:
speeding to elude arrest, assault on a police officer, DWI Level 3, and larceny.
She also had convictions associated with the other assault and child abuse episode in 2010 when one of her children called 911. (Not sure of date)
This woman is no sweetheart......yes, I know, that last statement is an opinion, mine.

I am not familiar with the 2002 incident. One day I will ask her about it. I'm concentrating on the 2011 incident, and I know that the 2010 incident was trumped up, too.

Thereby, go ye enlightened.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Au contrare, mon ami. My lawsuit against Duke is ongoing!"

Your lawsuit against Duke is dead.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I am not familiar with the 2002 incident. One day I will ask her about it. I'm concentrating on the 2011 incident, and I know that the 2010 incident was trumped up, too."

You do not know about Crystal's criminal history because you bury your head in the sand and refuse to look at it.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"[Crystal] was to deposit them at the rental office on Monday, April 4th. However, after Daye assaulted her the morning of April 3rd, she grabbed her purse and escaped."

There is no evidence Reginald Daye assaulted Crystal. There is evidence that Crystal did stab Mr. Daye and thereby caused his death.

Your opinion on what happened in the hospital is horse hockey.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I don't claim to be an expert on the law."

De facto, when you made your preposterous claims against Duke University, when you filed those motions in the Crystal Mangum case, you were claiming to know more about the law than any lawyer or judge.

Anonymous said...

Convenient isn't it, that this halfwit "isn't familiar" with Mangum's criminal record. Perhaps he is also "not familiar" with the expression BULLXXXX.

Anonymous said...

So, here we have Harr's crap again.....Mangum, the center of the victim universe in Durham, was somehow framed for the five convictions from 2010. Of course she was, sidney. right.
and of course, she didn't lie about being raped years and years ago....another framing from her childhood. and of course she was somehow framed for her behavior in 2002, FOUR YEARS before the lie she told in 2006. and of course she is telling the truth now about how big bad daye beat her up.
right.
you are an idiot.

Lance the Intern said...

Crystal Mangum's name wasn't on the 2 checks -- apparently only Reginald Daye's and whomever they were made out to were.

Taking something that doesn't belong to you is theft, Sid.

I'm sure your parents taught you that somewhere between the ages of 2 and 5 years old -- and I'm (fairly) sure your taught your own children the same.

Anonymous said...

There is no evidence that Daye GAVE the checks to mangum. That's Harr's convenient fantasy to excuse Mangum for having the checks in her purse. It's also his way of trying to answer the witness reports that the argument was over money. Now, he claims that the argument was over personal matters, not money, and that Daye gave the checks to Mangum. by the way, the nonsense about Daye working and therefore unable to deliver his rent checks in a timely manner, holds no water, either....given that the checks were dated several days prior to the stabbing.
For anybody to think that cashier's checks can't be, and are not altered by thieves, is silly. It can be done and it is done. Prisons are full of check artists.

Anonymous said...

And, as said before, the issue here is MURDER....not larceny. Harr is doing his same old tap dance in order to draw attention to himself. that's all this whole j4n web site is........harr's monument to his own stupidity and racist blatherings.

Anonymous said...

Mangum for DA.....at least she knows where the checks are.....

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy:

Answer: Knowledgeable about the law.

Question: What Sidney Harr does pretend to be but is not?

Anonymous said...

Basically ignoring the totality of the lie-based fantasy spun by Harr and Mangum.......
Lance and Walt, do you think the charge of first degree will stand up?

Lance the Intern said...

Anonymous said "Lance and Walt, do you think the charge of first degree will stand up?"

My opinion only, but I think it will be plead down to 2nd degree and with her prior criminal record, she'll receive the presumptive sentence, 14-18 years....And they'll take time served into consideration.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @12:27 PM said "Lance and Walt, do you think the charge of first degree will stand up?"................. My, unsolicited, opinion is that Crystal will refuse to plea bargain and will plead not guilty to the unsustainable first degree murder charge and the ridiculously laid larcency charges and when this finally goes to court she will be found not guilty. The only question I have is will Attorney Shella embrace the participation of Dr. Harr, who in my mind has pointed out an obvious winning defense strategy even if it's unacknowledged.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"The only question I have is will Attorney Shella embrace the participation of Dr. Harr, who in my mind has pointed out an obvious winning defense strategy even if it's unacknowledged."

Again KEN(inny) shows how inadequately his so called mind works.

Anonymous said...

I notice that Wendy Murphy, who was staunchly pro Crystal in 2006, has not involved herself in Crystal's defense.

It says something that someone who was fervently pro Crystal now distances herself from her.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"The only question I have is will Attorney Shella embrace the participation of Dr. Harr, who in my mind has pointed out an obvious winning defense strategy even if it's unacknowledged."

And George Custer, prior to June 25, 1876, probably said, Thousands of Indians, no problem, I have a winning strategy.

SIDN(inn0EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) thought he had the winning legal strategy in his dead frivolous lawsuit against Duke.

Anonymous said...

OK, so once again it is time for the blowhards either put up or shut up. Let's see how they wiggle out of this, yet again, shall we.....
If Mangum's attorney is so terrible, I suggest she fire him.
Then, Harr and his crew of halfwits should donate, FROM THEIR OWN RESOURCES, money for her defense! Harr could personally pick an attorney for Mangum and he could serve as the private consultant on a no-fee basis. Peterson could donate $$$$$ as could all the Duke 88. In fact, Harr could call up Nancy Grace and ask her to donate. And, of course, Jesse and Al S. would be first ine line to spring for a lawyer!!!!!
Geez, guys, ya'll ought to be rolling in $$$$$ for Sister.
SO QUIT YOUR WHINING AND DO SOMETHING FOR HER. TELL HER TO FIRE HER LAWYER, FIND HER ONE YOU THINK WILL BE ATTICUS FINCH AND PAY FOR IT!

Anonymous said...

And since Kenny is Sister's BFF, you would think he would be on a plane from camel-land, right on over here to sit by her side and hold her hand. And, since Kenny wants us to believe that he has insider information about "all things Crystal", I think he and Vincent Clark should co-author a book together entitled, "How to be a professional Victim", subtitled, "blame white people for everything and be held accountable for nothing".

Anonymous said...

I agree with the challenge to Harr and his crew. If you and Sister think her attorney is such a loser, quit your bitching and get her some money so she can hire somebody else. Always whining and criticizing. Always blaming others. Always avoiding responsibility. Get off your aXX and get her counsel that meets your high standards and agrees to do your bidding...... since you KNOW that your star witness, Sister the ever Truthful, is completely innocent.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, BRO. Call Rev. Jesse and Rev Barber.....I bet they would donate big bucks.

Anonymous said...

I would point out one reason I call SIDN(inn)EY a hypocrite. He moans about Crystal being incarcerated but does nothing to bail her out.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
Crystal Mangum's name wasn't on the 2 checks -- apparently only Reginald Daye's and whomever they were made out to were.

Taking something that doesn't belong to you is theft, Sid.

I'm sure your parents taught you that somewhere between the ages of 2 and 5 years old -- and I'm (fairly) sure your taught your own children the same.

Lance, let's try a little hypothetical here. Suppose you are homeless, and I agree to let you stay in my basement. Suppose I get two money orders made out to the bank for the mortgage and with my name as the remitter. Suppose I have to go to work all day Monday, and on Saturday I give you the money orders with instructions to drop them off at the bank for me on Monday. Suppose you take the money orders I give you and put them in your wallet. Are you still following? Suppose on Sunday night I drink a fifth of whiskey and for no reason beat the crap out of you... and in fear for your life you flee the house with your wallet in your back pocket which contains my money orders. You took my money orders! But, are you guilty of theft?

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Suppose on Sunday night I drink a fifth of whiskey and for no reason beat the crap out of you... and in fear for your life you flee the house with your wallet in your back pocket which contains my money orders. You took my money orders! But, are you guilty of theft?"

Unfortunately, SIDN(inn)EY, in spite of all your pontificating, there is no evidence that anything like that happened when Crystal stabbed Reginald Daye.

Anonymous said...

Suppose Sister wanted Daye to give her the cash value of the cashier's checks, for her own use, and he refused. Suppose she threatened him....as she has threatened others. Suppose they BOTH were drinking. Suppose she figured out that, if she stabbed him, she could steal not only the checks (which could be altered) AND steal any other cash he had on hand. Suppose she did just that, stabbed him, grabbed her purse, and ran to her aunt's house. Suppose she was drunk on her ass, laying on the living room floor, with a superficial mark on her left hand (which she got from banging on his door), suppose she was incoherent with booze. suppose her CHILD called up 911 and was TOLD, word for word, a LIE to cover her ass.
Suppose that hypothetical, BRO!

Anonymous said...

Suppose there is not one piece of evidence to back up the hypothetical that Harr lays out? Rather, suppose there is all kinds of evidence to support Daye's version (his statement to police), the neighbor witness statement, the fact that Sister had his checks in her purse? Suppose Sister had BLACK hair, not brown, as Sidney lies? Suppose Daye's liver showed no evidence of chronic alcohol abuse? Suppose Sister has a criminal record that includes NINE prior convictions?
Suppose Harr is making up this silly fabrication to draw attention to himself and to continue his lamebrained halfwit tirade....

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @3:02 said: "Again KEN(inny) shows how inadequately his so called mind works" and again at 5:01 said " And George Custer, prior to June 25, 1876, probably said, Thousands of Indians, no problem, I have a winning strategy"....... Huh? Comparing Crystal's defence strategy, against the over charges she is facing, to Custer's last stand seems to indicate a rather curious mind-set; as does his penchant for playing word games with peoples names. It's not exactly condusive to thoughtful discourse.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)hy9pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"Huh? Comparing Crystal's defence strategy, against the over charges she is facing, to Custer's last stand seems to indicate a rather curious mind-set; as does his penchant for playing word games with peoples names. It's not exactly condusive to thoughtful discourse."

Again KEN(inny) shows how inadequate his mind is.

So what else is new?

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)hy9pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

The word is conducive, not condusive.

Have you ever heard of a spell checker?

Anonymous said...

Sid is ignoring the calls for him to give money for an attorney for mangum. Sid is not ony a racist liar, he is also cheap and would rather whine than open his wallet. So much for his credibility........
Kenny where is your donation to the mangum defense fund? Come on, cut n paste, put up or shut up

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...
"My, unsolicited, opinion is that Crystal will refuse to plea bargain and will plead not guilty to the unsustainable first degree murder charge and the ridiculously laid larcency charges and when this finally goes to court she will be found not guilty. The only question I have is will Attorney Shella embrace the participation of Dr. Harr, who in my mind has pointed out an obvious winning defense strategy even if it's unacknowledged."


Hey Kenny boy, what legal credentials and experience do you have that makes you qualified to evaluate anyone's defense strategy?

Anonymous said...

It's no surprise that Kenny is tripping over himself to sing Sid's praises. What else would you expect from Sid's towel boy?

Anonymous said...

More Jeopardy

Answer: Presumption of innocence.

Question: What does Sidney Harr believe should not be accorded to the falsely accused Duke Lacrosse defendants(they ARE innocent because no crime was committed)?

Anonymous said...

More Jeoparde

Answer: Sidney Harr's lawsuit against Duke.

Question: What is frivolous?

Another question: What is dead?

Lance the Intern said...

Sid -- Your little hypothetical scenario begs a question -- why didn't you (or any of the other J4N gang) offer Crystal Mangum and opportunity to "stay in [your] basement"?

If you had, Reginald Daye would still be alive, and Crystal would not be incarcerated.

No - I think you are using Crystal like so many others to further your (and by "your" I mean Nifong's) goals, with little to no real concern about her.

Shame on you.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I would point out one reason I call SIDN(inn)EY a hypocrite. He moans about Crystal being incarcerated but does nothing to bail her out.

Crystal Mangum doesn't need to be bailed out... she needs to have the charges against her dismissed!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
OK, so once again it is time for the blowhards either put up or shut up. Let's see how they wiggle out of this, yet again, shall we.....
If Mangum's attorney is so terrible, I suggest she fire him.
Then, Harr and his crew of halfwits should donate, FROM THEIR OWN RESOURCES, money for her defense! Harr could personally pick an attorney for Mangum and he could serve as the private consultant on a no-fee basis. Peterson could donate $$$$$ as could all the Duke 88. In fact, Harr could call up Nancy Grace and ask her to donate. And, of course, Jesse and Al S. would be first ine line to spring for a lawyer!!!!!
Geez, guys, ya'll ought to be rolling in $$$$$ for Sister.
SO QUIT YOUR WHINING AND DO SOMETHING FOR HER. TELL HER TO FIRE HER LAWYER, FIND HER ONE YOU THINK WILL BE ATTICUS FINCH AND PAY FOR IT!

The truth will set Crystal Mangum free. Problem is that the media is trying to keep the truth hidden from the public... and doing a good job. The charges against Crystal are bogus as the prosecution is obviously vendetta-driven.
Attorneys are not the answer... Truth is the answer! And the truth will set Crystal Mangum free. Remember these words of enlightenment.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
Anonymous said "Lance and Walt, do you think the charge of first degree will stand up?"

My opinion only, but I think it will be plead down to 2nd degree and with her prior criminal record, she'll receive the presumptive sentence, 14-18 years....And they'll take time served into consideration.

What crime did Crystal commit? She stabbed Daye in self defense. Daye should have been arrested and charged with Assaulting a Female.
Furthermore, Daye did not die due to complications of a stab wound. He died because an endotracheal tube was misplaced by a Duke University Hospital staff... which led to his brain death... which led to him being taken off life support... which led to his death.

Thereby, go ye into the darkness with enlightenment.

Anonymous said...

Harr is tap dancing....tap...tap....tap. Harr does not give a damn about Mangum. Nor does he care about anybody else...except himself. He attempts to draw attention to himself with this idiotic web site, and he pretends to be concerned about Mangum. If he thinks her counsel is lousy, then Harr should round up the other bigots and loons that he touts on his web site, get some money, and get her different attorney. He will never do this because he is cheap and because he is using Mangum. Kenny is too dense to even understand the situation. Pathetic
Harr is laughable.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Crystal Mangum doesn't need to be bailed out... she needs to have the charges against her dismissed!"

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) does not want to put his money where his mouth is.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"What crime did Crystal commit? She stabbed Daye in self defense. Daye should have been arrested and charged with Assaulting a Female.
Furthermore, Daye did not die due to complications of a stab wound. He died because an endotracheal tube was misplaced by a Duke University Hospital staff... which led to his brain death... which led to him being taken off life support... which led to his death."

There is probable cause to believe Crystal stabbed Reginald Daye in an attempt to steal money from him. There is no probable cause to believe Mr. Daye assaulted Crystal, except in the deluded megalomaniacal mind of SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist).

Had Crystal not stabbed Reginald Daye, he never would have been exposed to the medical complications which SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) enumerates.

Speaking metaphorically, say SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) ran down someone with a motor vehicle, and that victim died in the hospital from a complication of medical treatment, SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist): would be arguing the medical complication would relieve him of responsibility for the victim's death.

It does not work that way, SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist). Just ask your friend Professor Coleman.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The truth will set Crystal Mangum free. Problem is that the media is trying to keep the truth hidden from the public"

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), you are the only one around here who had been trying to conceal the truth.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Furthermore, Daye did not die due to complications of a stab wound. He died because an endotracheal tube was misplaced by a Duke University Hospital staff... which led to his brain death... which led to him being taken off life support... which led to his death."

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), your analysis of the Reginald Daye stabbing convinces me the world became immensely safer from Medical negligence the day you stopped practicing.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Truth is the answer! And the truth will set Crystal Mangum free. Remember these words of enlightenment."

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), since you have devoted most of your energy to trying to distort the truth, it is impossible that anything you do will ever set Crystal free.

Lance the Intern said...

"She stabbed Daye in self defense...."

Reginald Daye died as a proximal result of being stabbed by Crystal Mangum.

North Carolina Statute § 14 17 states:
A murder which shall be perpetrated by means of…poison, lying in wait, imprisonment, starving, torture, or by any other kind of willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing, or which shall be committed in the perpetration or attempted perpetration of any arson, rape or a sex offense, robbery, kidnapping, burglary, or other felony committed or attempted with the use of a deadly weapon shall be deemed to be murder in the first degree, a Class A felony….All other kinds of murder…shall be deemed murder in the second degree, and any person who commits such murder shall be punished as a Class B2 felon.

IF it can be proven that Crystal Mangum stabbed Mr. Daye in the attempt of committing a felony, she could be found guilty of 1st degree murder.

That's a chance I wouldn't risk -- even with the full weight of Sid's legal expertise backing her up.

I think her lawyer will claim (as Sid does) "battered spouse syndrome", and try to get the charges negotiated down to voluntary manslaughter.

And, in the end, due to Crystal's past record, they'll end up settling somewhere in the middle.

Barring any minimum sentence (ans assuming she doesn't get into any "incidents" while in prison), she'll be eligible for parole in 3-4 years.

Maybe Sid will let her live in his basement then.

Anonymous said...

Agreed lance. She is not going to get out of it altogether unless we have an OJ jury of wahneeeema clones. I bet it is gonna be manslaughter.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"She stabbed Daye in self defense...."

Reginald Daye died as a proximal result of being stabbed by Crystal Mangum.

North Carolina Statute § 14 17 states:
A murder which shall be perpetrated by means of…poison, lying in wait, imprisonment, starving, torture, or by any other kind of willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing, or which shall be committed in the perpetration or attempted perpetration of any arson, rape or a sex offense, robbery, kidnapping, burglary, or other felony committed or attempted with the use of a deadly weapon shall be deemed to be murder in the first degree, a Class A felony….All other kinds of murder…shall be deemed murder in the second degree, and any person who commits such murder shall be punished as a Class B2 felon.

IF it can be proven that Crystal Mangum stabbed Mr. Daye in the attempt of committing a felony, she could be found guilty of 1st degree murder.

That's a chance I wouldn't risk -- even with the full weight of Sid's legal expertise backing her up.

I think her lawyer will claim (as Sid does) "battered spouse syndrome", and try to get the charges negotiated down to voluntary manslaughter.

And, in the end, due to Crystal's past record, they'll end up settling somewhere in the middle.

Barring any minimum sentence (ans assuming she doesn't get into any "incidents" while in prison), she'll be eligible for parole in 3-4 years.

Maybe Sid will let her live in his basement then.

Lance, what felony was Crystal allegedly committing when she stabbed Daye? She stabbed Daye in self-defense!! What part of "She did not commit murder" do you not understand.

My next blog, on Sunday or Monday, will bring further enlightenment to the masses bumbling in the darkness.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"My next blog, on Sunday or Monday, will bring further enlightenment to the masses bumbling in the darkness."

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), you have never provided any enlightenment in any of your previous blog posts. Ergo, your next blog post can not provide "further" enlightenment. Since you probably run true to form, your next blog will provide as much enlightenment as a burned out light bulb.

Please explain metaphor to KEN(inny), who will probably ask what lightbulbs have to do wirh Crystal.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"Lance, what felony was Crystal allegedly committing when she stabbed Daye? She stabbed Daye in self-defense!! What part of "She did not commit murder" do you not understand."

There is no evidence that Crystal was acting in self defense. There are Mr. Daye's statements and his nephew's statements that Crystal stabbed Mr. Daye and took his money. There is more probable cause to believe Crystal committed a felony than there was to believe the innocent Lacrosse players committed one.

So far as the phrase, "She did not commit murder" is readily understandable. Considering who is constantly repeating the phrase, no one believes it. Right now, both Reginald Daye and his nephew have more credibility than you do.

Anonymous said...

Harr is a fraud. He will not put his money where his mouth is. Repeating: If mangum's lawyer is trash, give her your money to hire somebody else. Stop your bitching, Harr. You have zero credibility and even less respect. You are using Mangum. We all know it.......except Ken Edwards, who ought to be sending her money, too, being her BFF
Nobody who reads this silly blog finds Harr credible, witty, intelligent or much of anything except racist and self serving. Nifong's puppet.

Anonymous said...

Mangum has nine prior convictions. A JURY of durham citizens found her guilty of the most recent five. Not conspirators......just common citizens. I guess harr will say mrs evans bought the jury

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Mangum has nine prior convictions. A JURY of durham citizens found her guilty of the most recent five. Not conspirators......just common citizens. I guess harr will say mrs evans bought the jury

The prosecution stemming from the February 2010 incident was vendetta motivated just like the current one was. She should not have been convicted of anything, as she was a victim of abuse in that instance too. The jurors in that case were not independent and objective, but rather zombie jurors... ignoring all logic and reason in reaching a verdict.

Lance the Intern said...

Sid says :"Lance, what felony was Crystal allegedly committing when she stabbed Daye? She stabbed Daye in self-defense!! What part of "She did not commit murder" do you not understand."

Sid -- What part of the law do you not understand? Oh yeah...I guess that would be all of it.

But, in an attempt to answer your question (provide you some enlightenment, as it were). IF it can be proven to a jury of her peers that Crystal Mangum stabbed Mr. Daye while attempting to steal the cashier's checks (money orders, whatever -- they've been identified BY YOU as several different things, and I can't keep up) -- then that is indeed the felony known as 1st degree murder (since Mr. Daye died as a proximal result of the stabbing.)

If it can be proven that she stabbed him without intent to steal the money, then you're looking at second degree murder.

It really is that simple. Of course, this is Dur'm, and the biggest small word in the English language is "If". A jury of her peers may agree with you, and let her go with no punishment other than time served.

If that is the case, I assume she'll be living in your basement.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"The prosecution stemming from the February 2010 incident was vendetta motivated just like the current one was. She should not have been convicted of anything, as she was a victim of abuse in that instance too. The jurors in that case were not independent and objective, but rather zombie jurors... ignoring all logic and reason in reaching a verdict."

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist) gives us an example of why no one considers him credible.

Anonymous said...

Indeed. DA snds for so many things........as in district attorney and ignorantosterior. Sid is just trying to act tupid to get attention. Thats all this is......pure bullXXXT.

Anonymous said...

Last poster...... Must be typing on an IPAD. :). But i got your point anyway and agree 100%!!!!

Anonymous said...

Sid is making even himself laugh with this comical mangum pity pot party. Poor sister, the entire world is out to get her apparently. Funny stuff, Harr.
I wonder if the Daye family is laughing?

Anonymous said...

I heard rumor this past weekend that Harr and Mangum are going to be in trouble for passing and publishing the PHI documents. Sure do hope the rumor is true. You would think a "physician" would (a)know better, and (b)have respect for the deceased and his family. But Harr has never demonstrated any sense of ethics consistent with what he claims to be his professional background.
Soooo, Sidney, raised any money yet to give Mangum the opportunity to buy herself a lawyer who meets your high standards?

Anonymous said...

Just as a point of clarification and in the interst of TRUTH....
Harr has, in the past, tried to bone up his contention that Nifong is/was an honorable man because he, Nifong, turned the investation over to the AG......in other words, implying that it was Nifong's independent ethical action, unaccompanied by any personal motive, that led Nifong to hand over the case to the AG.
NOT TRUE, folks. Let's look at the calendar to get the truth of what transpired.
In December the Bar notified Nifong, in writing, that it was undertaking an investigation of his action in handling certain aspects of the case.
AFTER Nifong got notice that he was under investigation by the Bar, THEN he handed over the case to the Bar. He did not make this move on the basis of calling in an outside unbiased resource as an integrity measure. He made this move, running for cover! He already knew he was in trouble and he knew that the AG's investigation would put him in deep doo-doo.
All in the way you look at things, isn't it.
This site may be titled "justice4nifong".......but, in truth, a more accurate title would be "Distortions4nifong"

Anonymous said...

error in last post....."handed over the case to the Bar"....should have read, "handed over the case to the AG.

Anonymous said...

WHERE


OH


WHERE


IS


LITTLE


kenhyderal?

Anonymous said...

Want to read something that is sound, well researched, intelligently written and fact-based? Check out the latest piece on DIW. Worth it, guys.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

Your latest diatribe is at least 24 hours overdue. Have you finally given up on expecting the real word to buy into your deluded megalomania?

Anonymous said...

According to a Liestoppers post today, Chris Shella has withdrawn as Crystal's counsel. Does anyone really wonder why?

So now let's see whom SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist), the J4N gang and the Friends of Crystal can do for her.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

Your latest diatribe is at least 24 hours overdue. Have you finally given up on expecting the real word to buy into your deluded megalomania

I had to arrange a press conference unexpectedly and was kept busy with it. In addition, there is more that I want to add to the blog's link, so it will probably be posted later this week... hopefully by Friday.

Believe me, the upcoming blog will be well worth the wait.

Anonymous said...

ooooooo, a "press conference" no less. gosh, gee, dang, wow.....

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

"I had to arrange a press conference unexpectedly and was kept busy with it. In addition, there is more that I want to add to the blog's link, so it will probably be posted later this week... hopefully by Friday."

Who of any consequence is going to attend? You, your J4N gang and the Friends of Crystal are not people of any consequence.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

Is your boy KEN(inny) going to make it in from Dubai for the press conference? He seems likely someone who will blow what an airline ticket would cost to come such a non event.

kenhyderal said...

nonymous @ 4":54 said: "Want to read something that is sound, well researched, intelligently written and fact-based? Check out the latest piece on DIW. Worth it, guys".................. Well researched, and fact-based" I don't thing so. Let me quote K.C.Johnson inthat piece " (2) that after her 2010 conviction for arson-related charges, Mangum was expelled from her graduate studies at North Carolina Central. Falsely accusing people of rape, apparently, doesn’t affect a student’s status at NCCU; conviction on misdemeanor arson charges does" She was not foung guilty of arson.

Anonymous said...

SIDN(inn)EY H(ypocrite)ARR(acist):

You mean you are going to present something to the media you call biased and inaccurate? Can we say inconsistency, boys and girls?

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

"She(Crystal) was not foung(sic) guilty of arson."

You got it wrong. The jury could not come to a verdict. After the jury could not do so, the judge dismissed the charges.

Ergo, she was NOT found not guilty.

Incidentally, the word is found, not foung. Learn how to use a spell checker.

Anonymous said...

Once again, kenny boy misses the giant point, on purpose, by focusing on the miniscule. Mangum has NINE prior convictions since 2002. I'd say dodging a bullet, with a jury that hung on the clothes-fire setting, while getting spanked GUILTY with five other charges is rather more important. I stand by my comment....DIW is outstanding. This site is crap

Anonymous said...

Harr, the challenge remains, pal. Give Sister money to hire an attorney YOU think is suitable. Bail her Axx out and let her live in your garage. come on, BRO....show us your humanity

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

In case you hadn't noticed, the blog entry to which referred was posted on April 27, 2012, which does not at all mention Crystal. Your quote yor say comes from "K.C.Johnson inthat(sic) piece" actually comes from an entry Professor Johnson posted on April 07, 2012. How much research did you do before you submitted your last post? Evidently, none.

Judging from the motion SIDN(inn)EY filed, Crystal was expelled from NCCU.

If you want an example of a poorly researched document, read SIDN(inn)EY's motion. It asserts as fact a number of things about the prosecution of the innocent Duke Lacrosse players which have been dis proven by the evidence in the case.

Of course, you dismiss the evidence in the case because it does not support your ridiculous implausible belief about the case.

Anonymous said...

Correct 9:51. As usual, Kenny Hissy Boy looks for the cut-n-paste answer every time.
Mangum finished a degree at NCCU.....which, according to faculty friends, was a pity degree, given to her because of pressure from folk like Rev. Jackson and Barber. Her attendance as well as actual grades magically "disappeared". She also lied on her application, conveniently failing to note her prior convictions from the 2002 crimes. Nice. NCCU must be just so proud of its famous grads.....let's see Burke, Mangum, Cline. Can you say "the UNconscious Hall of Fame"!!
I can't wait for the reports from the "press conference". Just think.....Peterson, dressed all in her Christian Crusader finest, will attend. Yea!!! Go Bigots....Let's go beat up a fag!
Now, the wonderful Harr....in his cute little yellow t-shirt. Good color for him, don't you think? Appropriate, too.
So, if the rumors are true.....and Shella has told them to shove it, perhaps Cline will pick up the ball....

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 9:40 said" " Once again, kenny boy misses the giant point, on purpose, by focusing on the miniscule" What about your fellow Anonymous; the guy who plays childish word games with people's names, who focuses on my typos and spelling mistakes.

Anonymous said...

Or, as Hilarious Harr has suggested, Mangum should just go to Canada and have a meetup with Kenny, her BFF. Kenny and Harr could figure out how to get her relocated to Dubai. They just LOVE people like Mangum over there in camel land.....especially the pole vaulting female types. I would love to see Mangum doing her exotic dances for a club full of Dubai's finest good ol boys.

Anonymous said...

You are just so much fun, BFF to Mangum. Trying so hard to be erudite.....and, oooops, forgetting to fact-check.

Anonymous said...

Mangum for DA.....at least she could take Cline in a bar room brawl.

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

Read my post today from 9:51 AM.

I ask again, how much research did you do before your post at 9:28 AM?

It seems you did not do much. You shot from thr hip and hit yourself in the foot(another metaphor).

Anonymous said...

WRAL has a brief non-headline story on Shella's decision to take a powder. glad to see this was not THE headline news story of the day.
Now, we can all look forward to Harr's pontificating....
anyone care to bet that he tries to make it out that he and Mangum fired Shella?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

Read my post today from 9:51 AM.

I ask again, how much research did you do before your post at 9:28 AM?

It seems you did not do much. You shot from thr hip and hit yourself in the foot(another metaphor).

May 1, 2012 11:01 AM

Hey. KEN(inny), you caught me with a typo. What I should have said was:

Anonymous said...

KEN(inny)HY(pocrite)DER(acist)AL:

Read my post today from 9:51 AM.

I ask again, how much research did you do before your post at 9:28 AM?

It seems you did not do much. You shot from the hip and hit yourself in the foot(another metaphor).

Anonymous said...

Awww, heck, I find Kenny Boy's little flubs here and there kinda sweet actually. It's just that he uses such B-I-G words that I have to get out my Hooked on Phonics primer in order to keep up.
Let's take a Vote: Candidates for Mangum's next attorney
1. Linwood Wilson
2. Atticus Finch
3. Cline the "Conscious" One
4. Daniel Webster
5. Al Sharpton's lawyer from the drug conviction days
6. Metta World Peace's lawyer
7. Victoria Peterson, in drag
8. Bin Laden's now unemployed lawyer
9. Joe Biden
10 _____________write in
Harr is not a candidate because he would rather sit on the sidelines and whine.

Anonymous said...

If you go to ABC 11's website they have a news story from the noon news complete with video of the "news conference" ---Sidney and VPete speaking their mess.

Anonymous said...

Curly, Larry, Moe and The Christian Bigot....all FOUR mighty warriors! Wow, what a turnout. Hilarious. Nice shirts and cute hats, too. Hurling sounds, folks, this is better than Survivor....
Shella is absolutely correct to quit. Harr and Mangum and the three stooges, together again.
My business associates and legal friends say Harr is the prosecutor's best friend......
what a world class idiot

Anonymous said...

The news conference was more of the same unsupported allegations SIDN(inn)EY has been making in this case.

I say VIC(ious)TOR(acist)IA lied. She said they were not there to vilify Reginald Daye. It was obvious they were.

As I predicted, no one of any consequence was there.

SIDN(inn)EY and his J4N gang have not tried to raise bail for Crystal.

So far as a new attorney for Crystal, I nominate, as #10 other, Wicked Wendy Murphy. Let's see if she is wiling to put her money where her big mouth was in 2006.

KEN(inny), tell us how much real research you did prior to your post of May 1, 2012 9:28 AM?

Anonymous said...

I wonder how SIDN(inn)EY will get Crystal out of charges that she violated federal law regarding confidentiality of medical records?

Chris Shella's motion to be relieved as Crystal's counsel states she did reveal confidential records to people not authorized to see those records.

Anonymous said...

There you go........add Wendy to the list of candidates! Oh, of course, the wonderful Nancy Grace........
I betcha one of those wingnuts from the Duke 88 is an attorney. Maybe he or she would like to quit their sterling academic careers and be Mangum's champion. tha'ts not likely to happen because it might actually involve WORK.

Anonymous said...

If I were Shella, I would be (a)laughing my backside off, and (b)drinking a beer in a sigh of relief.

Mark Orgel said...

So now Sid and his band of assorted nuts have succeeded in dealing CM's defense a severe blow. She now has to find a new attorney, and what attorney is going to take the case now? Congratulations. You have set CM's case back by months, and she will be in jail that much longer before her trial. You can forget about the charges being dropped, never going to happen.

Question...does what Sid and the rest of TFOCM have done constitute obstruction of justice? Certainly laws were broken when Daye's medical records were published online. Harr also stated at the news conference that the autopsy report was fabricated. That sounds like defamation of character to me.

Maybe Sid should be more concerned with finding his own legal representation, as it seems to me that he will be needing it in the near future.

Anonymous said...

Mark Orgel:

"Maybe Sid should be more concerned with finding his own legal representation, as it seems to me that he will be needing it in the near future."

Let's hope he will.

Anonymous said...

"Ergo, she was NOT found not guilty."

Sidney would phrase it differently:

CRYSTAL MANGUM IS NOT INNOCENT OF FIRST DEGREE FELONY ARSON.

Anonymous said...

To see harr standing by the nastiest, most racist, most hate mongering bigot in durham makes me sick. His explanation? Well, geez, he cant be responsible for statements about other matters. In other words, harr accepts gay hate as an ok tradeoff to get this miserable illiterate halfwit to take the nifong pledge. And who were the other work release nuts loitering behind harr and fred phelps in drag?
Mangum has nobody to blame but herself. I think most of us are sick of paying taxes to pay for her attorney, give her a jail cell, provide her welfare dole, cover her health care and clean up her crap. Dont want to be down on mr daye. My axx! Harr is trash just like mangum. That is clear now. Just the same whining excuse making leech on the rest of us who try to obey the law, go to work and pay our taxes without running into pond scum like mangum, harr, and peterson

Anonymous said...

Again just for the TRUTH......i spoke to a friend who woks who says there were NO people at this,uh, er, press conference except a handful of news peope who happened to be far more interested in other stories and the FOUR halfwits. Big turnout for this earthshaking news event. Now mangum is getting another court appointed attorney. Shela was one of the better in the stable. Oh well, harr got to show us his little tshirt and ball cap,

Anonymous said...

Sid's just doing his best to guarantee that there's another black person on death row in North Carolina for him to bitch about. His last attempt at drumming up sympathy (for child killer Shan Carter) failed so miserably, it appears he's now manufacturing his own.

Nice work, Sid.

Anonymous said...

Theft and misuse (as in publication) of PHI is a violation of federal law . The penalties are steep,,,,,prison time and fines. I hope it isnt much longer until the coming action is taken to charge harr and others with major HIPPA violations. Would make most of us very happy to see him pay for his wanton disrespect of a dead man and his family.

guiowen said...

Well, look at it this way: Sidney feels (and has convinced CGM) that Shella was just another agent of the Carpetbagger Jihad, aka Rae Evans. Now all he has to do is find some lawyer in Durham or the surrounding area who is not controlled by Rae. Are there any such? Maybe he can get Marcia Morey to take the case.

Good luck on that, Sid! And I hope you stay out of jail.

Anonymous said...

Not me, I sincerely hope Harr gets exactly what he deserves for appropriating information, violating every ethical principle around the PHI disclosure, defaming Nichols and others, and accusing Duke of medical murder. I realize that we are talking about civil versus criminal behavior here, with the exception of the PHI question. Even if no action is taken, it is clear what kind of character-less individual this man is.

Anonymous said...

From the news story yesterday, "mangum said it was not her fault her supporters shared the information with the public". Absolutely amazing, isn't it!!!!
Has this woman EVER, in her entire life, taken personal responsibility for one single lousy thing she has EVER done?
I guess Rae Evans flew into town and twisted Mangum's arm and MADE her give Harr the confidential documents! What an absolute bottom feeding wind-sucking parasite this woman is. Living off of all the rest of us....black, white, brown, or plaid....who try to live a reasonably law abiding life and who do our best to accept blame, personally, when we mess up.
Harr, bail her victim backside out and haul her to Canada. Somebody, please, empty the trash!

Anonymous said...

Mangum for DA...... she got her legal training from NCCU!

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 284   Newer› Newest»