Monday, October 22, 2012

The bigger lie: Post-traumatic alleged inconsistencies versus a proven falsified official medical document


Word count: 2,497

Take Note:  To Return to Flog after visiting a Link,
Click browser return arrow.  Do not exit the window.

The mainstream media has consistently shoved down the throats of the masses that Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser, is the liar who fabricated false charges against three Duke student/athlete/partygoers in March 2006. This false-accuser moniker that the media has affixed to Mangum relies only upon the words uttered from the mouth of North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper on April 11, 2007, during his “Promulgation of Innocence” for the Duke Lacrosse defendants. Unprecedented in the history of juris prudence for an attorney general to proclaim “innocence” or “guilt” when in the process of dismissing charges, Mr. Cooper not only stated that the boys (from families of power, prestige, and privilege) were innocent, but that “nothing happened.”

The media, of course, grabbed this tasty morsel and ran with it… just like Magic back in the day directing a full court press. The media went to extremes to mislead the public into believing that Cooper’s pronouncement was as legally binding as if it were handed down from the U.S. Supreme Court. Truth be told, the innocence proclamation was meaningless as the attorney general belongs to the executive branch of government and not judicial. The media is aware of this, but continues to write that the boys were exonerated… playing one of the state’s biggest Jedi mind-tricks on the gullible and trusting Tar Heelians, statewide.

While proclaiming the boys’ innocence, the media was in overdrive demonizing and vilifying Crystal Mangum by characterizing her as a prolific and pathological liar whose sexual assault accusations were made for the purpose of bringing grief to innocent young men from lives of privilege. A.G. Roy Cooper noted that there were inconsistencies in her story, and dismissed the charges and sealed the case forever. (Duke University wasted no time in clandestinely razing the scene of the crime on Buchanan Street, as if by doing so it would erase the disgraceful event that took place there.)

Per its usual methodology in Duke Lacrosse related stories, the media failed to get Crystal Mangum’s side of the story. Interviews with CNN and other news network programs scrubbed them without broadcast because Ms. Mangum presented herself well and credible… this did not fit in with the image of her that they wanted to depict to the world. Soledad O’brien was one of the interviewers of Mangum… an interview which was left on the cutting room floor.

As a result of the biased, selective, skewed, and one-sided reporting by the media, the unenlightened masses have had forced upon them a negative and derogatory image of this single African American mother of three. (The same abhorrent treatment dished out to former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong who was unceremoniously disbarred and who was forced to resign from the position at which he honorably served with uncommon professional integrity and courage.) Mainstream media assertively discredits Mangum’s sexual assault claims in the Duke case without knowledge to back it up… nothing other than Cooper’s statement that her stories were “inconsistent.”

From an objective view, it is not unrealistic to acknowledge that some statements made after such a traumatic experience could change after sufficient time from the incident to reflect upon what had transpired… clarity borne of the unveiling of painfully suppressed memories. Definitions of “rape” vary legally amongst different states, with North Carolina’s being one of the more restrictively interpreted… and this misconstrued meaning could lend itself to “inconsistencies” by Ms. Mangum. The fact is that it is not all that uncommon for any victim of a traumatic crime to present versions of the event that contain subtle and nonspecific differences. Because absolute consistency in the retelling of an event may be missing, one can not assume that it is an intentional act for the purpose of deception.

Specifically in Ms. Mangum’s 2006 Duke Lacrosse case, I believe misinterpretation of the legal definition of rape was a factor contributing to possible inconsistencies, but other than that, I am not aware of discrepancies referred to by A.G. Cooper during his promulgation.

The bigger lie?

Now lets compare truthfulness of the inconsistencies of Mangum’s 2006 narratives to Dr. Clay Nichols’ Autopsy Examination Report on Reginald Daye, dated April 14, 2011.

Which is the bigger lie? I unequivocally submit that the proven lies contained within the medical examiner’s autopsy report are bigger, more blatant, and far more egregious than any non-consistent misstatement that Ms. Mangum made related to the Duke case.

Dr. Nichols lies about the findings during the autopsy and gives a false and unsupported conclusion about the cause of death with major omissions. First the false findings, and there are many:

1. A laceration (perforation) to the left lower lung. There is no such documentation within the medical records including the autopsy report. There exists no evidence of radiological evidence that the left lung was punctured as the chest x-ray showed no pneumothorax (air in the left thoracic cavity). Also, no mention of any lung lesion or repair, or even a thoracic surgeon consult in the operative report;

2. A laceration to the diaphragm. There is no such mention of a lesion to the diaphragm or any repair in the operative report;

3. A laceration to the fundus of the stomach. This is false as the operative report states, “the stomach pancreas is without injury.” This is in stark contradiction to the report by Dr. Nichols which states, “sutures are identified around the fundus of the stomach.” How is that possible?

4. A laceration to the left kidney. Dr. Nichols stated in his report that the left kidney held sutures, whereas the operative report makes no mention of suturing the left kidney. The operative report reads, “The kidney bed was explored, but no evidence of bleeding was found.” Again, there is no mention of a lesion to this organ or any repair with suturing; and

5. “Multiple minor scabbed over lesions and minor contusions which may represent defensive injuries are found running from essentially the left biceps to the left wrist.” This is contrary to the preoperative orthopedic consult report by Steven A. Olson, M.D. who wrote, “There are no appreciable lacerations or skin breaks in the visualized areas of his 4 extremities.” Not only that, but the onsite EMS report on Daye reads with respect to his left upper extremity: “Assessed with not abnormalities.”

These discrepancies (or “inconsistencies”) in Dr. Nichols’ report prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the April 14, 2011 Autopsy Examination Report which was the basis for the first degree murder charge against Crystal Mangum is fraudulent… and it doesn’t require a medical degree or training to figure that out; just a fifth grade reading comprehension level.

The conclusion that Reginald Daye died from complications of a stab wound to the chest is not supported by Dr. Nichols in his report. He provides no nexus showing how the non-fatal stab wound which was successfully treated by a trauma surgical team at Duke University Hospital (with a postoperative prognosis for a full recovery) led to Daye’s demise. Instead, he conveniently omits any mention of the true predisposing factors and incidents that precipitated Daye’s untimely and unexpected death. In particular, there is no mention of the fact that Daye was an alcoholic, in the setting of a stuporous blood alcohol level of 296 mg/dL… groundwork for alcoholic withdrawal. Despite prophylactic treatment with sedatives, Daye lapsed into delirium tremens which required his transfer to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit. No mention by Dr. Nichols. In the SICU, Mr. Daye vomited after introduction of an oral contrast agent via a nasogastric tube. To protect his airway, he was intubated, but tube placement in the esophagus instead of the trachea (confirmed by a negative EtCO2) resulted in a cardiac arrest. No mention by Dr. Nichols. With CPR and replacement of the endotracheal tube, this time with proper placement in the airway, the heart was resuscitated and began beating spontaneously, but the brain cells had been without oxygen for too long and resulted in Daye being in an irreversible comatose state. No mention by the medical examiner. After a week of observation on life support without sign of neurological improvement, Daye was removed from life support and he died. No mention about this in the autopsy report by Dr. Nichols.

The fact that the autopsy report used to charge Ms. Mangum with murder was fraudulent in its findings and unsupported in its conclusion were made evident to the media after the mid-August 2011 release of the report and in early 2012 after Daye’s medical records were reviewed by Sidney B. Harr. Despite the fact that Harr was a retired physician, the mainstream media ignored his claims that the autopsy report tendered by Dr. Nichols contained fabrications and falsehoods. Specifically, he tried unsuccessful to get WRAL-5 News (which professes to have an interest in confronting issues of injustice [i.e., its documentary about the wrongly incarcerated Gregory Flynt Taylor titled, “6,125 Days”]) to at least look into his claim, however the station ignored him… just like other media contacted by Harr. No investigation would be forthcoming that would look into an alleged criminally false medical examiner’s autopsy report used as a basis for a murder charge to put an innocent Crystal Mangum in jail for the rest of her life (as a vendetta for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case).See letter to Jim Goodmon

The media was consumed in trying to get a hold of the personal cell phone records of former University of North Carolina football coach Butch Davis to see what dirt it could dig up on him, his former assistant John Blake, and the Tar Heel football players who had parking tickets excused. When it came to a possible wrongdoing against the media-produced pariah Crystal Mangum, mainstream media lacked incentive to investigate… mainly because they had no desire to have any story that might garner an ounce of sympathy for Mangum to reach the public’s eyes or ears. Mainstream media knew of the wrongdoing against Mangum and it was their intention to keep it hidden from the people. See letter to ABC-11

On September 27, 2012, I reluctantly hand-delivered a letter to the North Carolina Medical Board for Executive Director R. David Henderson. It contained a formal complaint against Dr. Clay Nichols regarding his falsified autopsy report of April 14, 2011, which was the foundation for the murder charge against Ms. Mangum. I was not seeking to have sanctions or punitive measures taken against him as I considered Dr. Nichols to be another victim of the Carpetbagger Jihadist Agenda against everyone considered by the Powers-That-Be to be on the wrong end of the Duke Lacrosse case. No doubt, Dr. Nichols had been aware of the cruel and ruthless actions taken by the state and media against Mr. Nifong when he refused to follow the 2006 game plan and dismiss charges against the Duke Lacrosse defendants. So, I believe that he was forced to concoct the phony autopsy report to enable Durham prosecutor Kelly Gauger to charge her with murder.

The reason that I filed the complaint against Dr. Nichols was to inform the Medical Board of the fraud committed by one of their licensed practitioners. Because of the protective reporting by the media, Judie Clark, the Director of Complaints, told me that she was unaware of this controversial issue. In addition, I had hoped that the Board’s director or other official would provide a written document on their stationery stating that the Autopsy Examination Report on Reginald Daye that was submitted by Dr. Nichols contained numerous errors and misstatements, and should not be given legal consideration. I explained that such a statement of facts would go a long ways towards the release from confinement an innocent mother of three. My reasonable humanitarian plea was rebuked by the Medical Board, citing regulations that did not authorize such actions as producing such a letter. In other words, the North Carolina Medical Board would rather see an innocent woman remain locked up in a Durham County jail cell rather than write a simple paragraph stating that factual discrepancies in an autopsy report should be disregarded in any legal process.See letter to R. David Henderson

Summary

To recap, the mainstream media repeatedly refers to Crystal Mangum as a “false accuser” based solely upon the word of the state’s attorney general that there were “inconsistencies” in her Duke Lacrosse related story.

Proven discrepancies between Dr. Nichols’ autopsy report and medical records factually discredit his report which is the underpinning of the state’s murder charge against Crystal Mangum and the media turns a blind eye and sticks its head in the sand… no curiosity about the truthfulness and accuracy of Nichols’ autopsy report on Daye… no attempt to investigate this criminally fraudulent document used to trump up the murder charge against Mangum.

Dr. Nichols is not referred to as a liar even though his report is nothing more than prevarication upon which no statement can be considered to be honest.

Prosecutors Kelly Gauger and Charlene Coggins-Franks, who conspired with Dr. Nichols to trump up the murder charge against Mangum, are not scrutinized by the media for their misdeeds and malfeasances.

Crystal’s defense attorney Woody Vann does his best to keep hidden the truth about the autopsy report by instructing the defense expert witness Dr. Christena L. Roberts not to produce a written report about her findings regarding Daye’s death and autopsy report.

Dr. Christena Roberts refuses to accept any correspondence from Crystal Mangum which is seeking to have a report about Daye in writing.See letter from Mangum to Dr. Christena Roberts

And the North Carolina Medical Board goes through the motions in pretending to follow up on the complaint filed by Harr.

Bottom line is that Dr. Nichols produced the fraudulent autopsy report because he lacked Nifong the professional integrity and courage to do the right thing… even in the face of dire and unforeseen consequences. The example the state and media made of Mike Nifong for his independent course in the Duke Lacrosse case which contradicted the one demanded by the Powers-That-Be was not lost on Medical Examiner Nichols… and he towed the line as instructed, even though it included dishonesty and criminal activity. The fact that Dr. Nichols publicly stood by his false autopsy report is highly indicative that the Powers-That-Be are standing behind him with promises that he will not be held liable for his part in the framing of Ms. Mangum for murder in Daye’s death.See news article about Dr. Nichols

So, which is the bigger lie? Alleged inconsistencies by Mangum regarding a possible assault during a bacchanalia hosted by the Duke lacrosse student/athlete/partygoers, or a proven fraudulent autopsy report used as the basis for a murder charge in a vendetta prosecution? I submit that any reasonable person with full knowledge of the facts and an objective mind would agree that the bigger lie is that by the state of North Carolina in its persecution of Crystal Mangum, and the mainstream media for its collusion in the cover-up of the state’s reprehensible acts. 

487 comments:

1 – 200 of 487   Newer›   Newest»
Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"If the party was as respectful and orderly as you describe, then they would probably not have quit performing after a couple of minutes and sought shelter in the bathroom. I rest my case."

You have no case. They were unable to perform because Crystal was intoxicated.

Another lie for which you get credit.


Intoxicated? Can you produce a toxicology report?

At least I'm able to back up my claims with facts straight from medical records!

Nifong Supporter said...


guiowen said...
Sidney says,
"Several sources stated that Crystal had a swollen lower lip, small laceration around her left eye, and a lesion to the back of her left hand. The records state that clumps of her hair were found at two sites within the apartment and that the bathroom door was kicked off its hinges. That's plenty of stuff to photograph, and they should have been made available to Crystal long ago."

Sidney, if your sources are right, then someone must be hiding these materials from Crystal. If the NC justice system is indeed controlled by Rae Evans, then it is imperative that you bring this to the attention of the US Justice Department. Ask your sources to accompany you. Eric Holder will help as soon as you and your people explain this to him. But you MUST HURRY before all these materials are destroyed. Time is of the essence.


gui, mon ami, you need to chill, bro. The prosecution is responsible for providing the discovery including photographs. If it doesn't then the onus of liability falls on the prosecutors.

Even if the photos were unavailable, charges against Mangum will be dropped because the case against her is non-existent... and no defense attorney will be able to impede her path towards freedom.

Thereby go ye enlightened.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Intoxicated? Can you produce a toxicology report?"

Two Lacrosse captains gave statements that Crystal was impaired at the time she arrived at the party. They were not trying to get out of anything. No crime had happened.

"At least I'm able to back up my claims with facts straight from medical records!"

Another lie, for which you get credit. You misrepresent and distort what is contained in the records you cite.

So far as documentation, cite some documentation that Crystal's identification of three Lacrosse players as her assailants were reliable.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"gui, mon ami, you need to chill, bro. The prosecution is responsible for providing the discovery including photographs. If it doesn't then the onus of liability falls on the prosecutors."

If the prosecution is truly trying to frame Crystal for murder 1, they would not be documenting evidence which supports her claim of self defense. Even if there were injuries secondary to self defense(and you have not demonstrated any), would the prosecution have generated evidence of that if they were trying to frame her?

"Even if the photos were unavailable, charges against Mangum will be dropped because the case against her is non-existent... and no defense attorney will be able to impede her path towards freedom."

Same old, Same old. SIDNEY shows again he is totally divorced from reality.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The mainstream media has consistently shoved down the throats of the masses that Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser, is the liar who fabricated false charges against three Duke student/athlete/partygoers in March 2006."

Another lie for which you get credit. What the media ultimately revealed was that there was no evidence a rape had happened and that Crystal could not reliably identify any member of the Lacrosse team as an assailant.

Ergo, Crystal did falsely accuse members of the Lacrosse team of rape and was no victim of anyone but herself.

Right on, SIDNEY-minion-of-the-father-of-lies.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"This false-accuser moniker that the media has affixed to Mangum relies only upon the words uttered from the mouth of North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper on April 11, 2007, during his “Promulgation of Innocence” for the Duke Lacrosse defendants."

Another lie for which you get credit.

Forensic testing of the rape kit showed no evidence of rape. The physical exam performed by Dr. Julie Manly showed no evidence of rape. The only DNA recovered from Crystal's person did not match the DNA of any of those indicted for the crime, matched a number of males who were not Lacrosse players. As Brad Bannon showed the panel trying DA NIFONG on ethics charges, DA NIFONG"s hired gun, Brian Meehan, found DNA from multiple males on multiple areas of Crystal's person.

Liar liar pants on fire!

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Mr. Cooper not only stated that the boys (from families of power, prestige, and privilege) were innocent, but that 'nothing happened.'”

Like it or not, SIDNEY, the Lacrosse players were innocent because no crime ever happened.

What evidence do you have that a crime did happen?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The media went to extremes to mislead the public into believing that Cooper’s pronouncement was as legally binding as if it were handed down from the U.S. Supreme Court."

One of your more far fetched lies.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Truth be told, the innocence proclamation was meaningless as the attorney general belongs to the executive branch of government and not judicial."

You have never told the truth. The statement is meaningless because, unlike you, AG Cooper's office thoroughly reviewed the case. They discovered the truth which DA NIFONG tried to conceal, that there was no evidence a crime happened.

You have provided no evidence.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"While proclaiming the boys’ innocence, the media was in overdrive demonizing and vilifying Crystal Mangum by characterizing her as a prolific and pathological liar whose sexual assault accusations were made for the purpose of bringing grief to innocent young men from lives of privilege."

Not the media did not. They reported, truthfully, that Crystal told a different story each time she told it, could not identify reliably any Lacrosse player as an assailant, had no signs of rape on physical exam, had previously falsely accused men of raping her, had a criminal history, had a history of mental instability, and, via revelation of evidence DA NIFONG tried to conceal, had a history of promiscuity.

"A.G. Roy Cooper noted that there were inconsistencies in her story"

Well you got that right. Too bad you willfully could not see the multiple inconsistencies in her story.


",,,and dismissed the charges and sealed the case forever".

Another lie for which you get credit. The only part of the case file, which was sealed, at a judge's order, was Crystal's extensive history of mental instability.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"(Duke University wasted no time in clandestinely razing the scene of the crime on Buchanan Street, as if by doing so it would erase the disgraceful event that took place there.)"

You got that wrong. Duke destroyed the house because anyone going into the house would see what a crock it was that three Lacrosse players could drag Crystal into a bathroom which would not accommodate four adults simultaneously.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Per its usual methodology in Duke Lacrosse related stories, the media failed to get Crystal Mangum’s side of the story."

Even Crystal Mangum could not get her story straight.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"As a result of the biased, selective, skewed, and one-sided reporting by the media, the unenlightened masses have had forced upon them a negative and derogatory image of this single African American mother of three."

The negative image of Crstal was generated by DA NIFONG's corrupt, unethical handling of the case.

"(The same abhorrent treatment dished out to former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong who was unceremoniously disbarred and who was forced to resign from the position at which he honorably served with uncommon professional integrity and courage.)"

DA NIFONG, before he had any facts about the case, proclaimed in public that a crime had happened, that members of the Lacrosse team were the perpetrators, that the crime had been racially motivated. He issued statements in public that availing oneself of advice of counsel and availing oneself of the right to remain silent were indications of guilt. DA NIFONG had evidence that no rape had occurred but he indicted three Lacrosse players for he crime, based on an improper and unreliable identifications made by Crystal. DA NIFONG concealed exculpatory evidence from the defendants. SIDNEY sure has a strange concept of prosecutorial ethics.

"Mainstream media assertively discredits Mangum’s sexual assault claims in the Duke case without knowledge to back it up… nothing other than Cooper’s statement that her stories were 'inconsistent.'”

What the media had was; 1) forensic testing of the rape kit showed no evidence of blood, semen or saliva on the rape kit(Crystal had alleged a brutal, semen depositing rape); 2)that DA NIFONG's hired gun, Brian Meehan found that Crystal had DNA samples from multiple men on multiple areas of her body; 3)the physical exam, performed by Dr. Julie Manly, showed no evidence of brutality or rape.

SIDNEY is in total denial as to what the media had, as if he believes he is powerful enough to wish the truth out of existence.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"From an objective view, it is not unrealistic to acknowledge that some statements made after such a traumatic experience could change after sufficient time from the incident to reflect upon what had transpired… clarity borne of the unveiling of painfully suppressed memories."

The fallacy here is that no such traumatic event ever occurred, as was documented by the forensic testing of the rape kit and the physical findings(or rather the lack thereof).

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
Specifically in Ms. Mangum’s 2006 Duke Lacrosse case, I believe misinterpretation of the legal definition of rape was a factor contributing to possible inconsistencies"

What did DA NIFONG misinterpret when he vehemently proclaimed publicly that a rape had happened? Are you saying now that DA NIFONG was confused when he had three innocent men indicted for rape?

"...but other than that, I am not aware of discrepancies referred to by A.G. Cooper during his promulgation."

That is not surprising as you choose to be uninformed about facts which make you nervous. It is like you saying you should get a pass for practicing law without a license because you did not know you were doing it.

Do you think your admission that you are totally uninformed about the case impresses anyone, except your guilt presuming, racist acolyte(s) KEN-Malek-Hyder-Williams-AL?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Which is the bigger lie? I unequivocally submit that the proven lies contained within the medical examiner’s autopsy report are bigger, more blatant, and far more egregious than any non-consistent misstatement that Ms. Mangum made related to the Duke case."

No comparison, or rather there is nothing to compare. You present two rather obvious, gross lies, each of which is motivated by your anger that innocent Lacrosse players were not wrongfully convicted for raping Crystal.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Dr. Nichols lies about the findings during the autopsy and gives a false and unsupported conclusion about the cause of death with major omissions. First the false findings, and there are many"

The only one trying to promulgate lies about the autopsy report is you.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"These discrepancies (or 'inconsistencies') in Dr. Nichols’ report prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the April 14, 2011 Autopsy Examination Report which was the basis for the first degree murder charge against Crystal Mangum is fraudulent...".

Only in the mind of a totally incompetent physician. SIDNEY, you have not addressed the questions, did you retire only 17 years after your graduation from Medical school, and if so, why?

"and it doesn’t require a medical degree or training to figure that out; just a fifth grade reading comprehension level."

Which statement shows you are a totally incompetent physician.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"In particular, there is no mention [by Dr.Nichos] of the fact that Daye was an alcoholic, in the setting of a stuporous blood alcohol level of 296 mg/dL.

There is no evidence you have cited that Mr. Daye was stuporous at the time of the stabbing. If he were, he would not be capable of doing what you accuse him of doing.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"So, which is the bigger lie? Alleged inconsistencies by Mangum regarding a possible assault during a bacchanalia hosted by the Duke lacrosse student/athlete/partygoers,"

The fallacies here is that Crystal suffered no assault, and what you describe as a bacchanalia was not. There were no inconsistencies in the forensic evidence or in the physical exam, which showed no rape.

If Crystal could not tell a coherent story, in view of the facts, she was a liar who could not keep her stories consistent.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

The documents you link to, with the excption of the letter from Crystal to Dr. Roberts, are nothing but compilations of the unsupported allegations you have been making for years.

Should have learned from the frivoulous lawsuit you filed against Duke. Unsubstantiated allegations are not cause for taking action, legal or otherwise, against anyone.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I submit that any reasonable person with full knowledge of the facts and an objective mind would agree that the bigger lie is that by the state of North Carolina in its persecution of Crystal Mangum, and the mainstream media for its collusion in the cover-up of the state’s reprehensible acts.

SIDNEY, "reasonable person[s] with full knowledge of the facts" know that Crystal is not being prosecuted and are not about to believe any of you compilations of unsupported allegations.

Lance the Intern said...

Hey Sid -- Don't you have another NC State Bar hearing this week? Let us know how that goes....

Anonymous said...

Right on Homer

guiowen said...

Sidney says,
"gui, mon ami, you need to chill, bro. The prosecution is responsible for providing the discovery including photographs. If it doesn't then the onus of liability falls on the prosecutors."

Sidney, amigo mio,it's not that I don't believe you. The problem is that if Rae Evans is as powerful as you say, then she will make it impossible for you to get relief from the NC justice system.

You'd better get to Eric Holder before all these materials are destroyed!

Anonymous said...

Correction:

SIDNEY HARR:

"I submit that any reasonable person with full knowledge of the facts and an objective mind would agree that the bigger lie is that by the state of North Carolina in its persecution of Crystal Mangum, and the mainstream media for its collusion in the cover-up of the state’s reprehensible acts.

SIDNEY, "reasonable person[s] with full knowledge of the facts" know that Crystal is not being prosecuted and are not about to believe any of you compilations of unsupported allegations.SIDNEY HARR:

"I submit that any reasonable person with full knowledge of the facts and an objective mind would agree that the bigger lie is that by the state of North Carolina in its persecution of Crystal Mangum, and the mainstream media for its collusion in the cover-up of the state’s reprehensible acts.

SIDNEY, "reasonable person[s] with full knowledge of the facts" know that Crystal is not being persecuted and are not about to believe any of you compilations of unsupported allegations.

Anonymous said...

Homer says:

Right on Smithers

Anonymous said...



Homer says:

Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers
Smi-thers, Smi-thers, Smi-thers

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

From a comment to your last blog post:

"LISTEN UP, EVERYBODY!!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!
Tomorrow, Monday, October 22, 2012, a new blink (blog with link[s]) will be posted.

It will be sure to enlighten and elucidate. The title of the blink is, "The Bigger Lie."

Your Freudian slip is showing. Inadvertently what you meant was this latest blog post is a bigger lie than any you have ever told.

In any event, it is just another compilation of unsupported allegations you have already made, none of which were either enlightening or elucidating.

Right on, SIDNEY-minion-of-the-father-of-lies-HARR.

Anonymous said...

The anonymi at October 22, 2012 4:44 PM, October 22, 2012 6:13 PM and October 22, 2012 6:14 PM must be having a real good time playing around with themselves.

Anonymous said...

The lacrosse players were declared innocent because they never touched her and they weren't in a bathroom with her.As AG Roy Cooper pointed out the bathroom wasn't big enough for a gang rape.The person who runs this blog should just admit they hate white people.If the falsely accused had been black they would have been on the other side.Always remember - no white man would ever want to have sex with Crystal Mangum.It's just no possible.

Anonymous said...

A few facts.....Part ONE
1. Previously I posted that I had asked a couple of physician friends to look at the documents Sidney illegally posted online regarding Mr. Daye's care....including the Nichols report. They said that Sidney's conclusions and references were either sadly ignorant or purposely misleading or both. Not one shred of truth in what he claimed. They saw no basis for sidney's claims. In particular, the doctors said that there was no basis for claiming that Daye was an alcoholic and that he was given certain medications to fight withdrawal. I have mentioned this before. They noted, for example, that his liver was healthy.
2. Sidney Harr has never been able to explain how LAX guys could have raped Mangum without leaving a single DNA cell in or on her....he has never explained how she could be described as anything but a professional sex worker (a nice term for hooker) with the DNA of at least five different males in and on her....none being LAX guys.
3. Mangum changed her story about the time the attack occured, about how many men attacked her, about whether they used condoms, about holding her up in the air while they raped her, about whether Seligmann raped her, about whether the men did or did not ejaculate in or on her, about whether Roberts assisted them in the rape (holding her down), about the actual identification of the attackers (identified a man with 100% who was not even at the party), said Evans had a moustache and later claimed a beard shadow, claimed the attackers choked her then later said none actually choked her, initially said she had drunk no alcohol before the party and later admitted to drinking two tall cans of beer, three times changed her story to the officer who came to the grocery story and the Durham Access workers regarding whether she was/was not raped. The list of changes to her story is much longer. This is a sample.
3. Sidney Harr has previously claimed, in fact, insisted that photographs of Mangum (with clear evidence of a beating by Daye) exist and are being deliberately held by the prosecution. Please note that Harr is now waffling on this prior insistence. If the prosecutor has exculpatory evidence, then we all know, because of the infamous Nifong case, that not providing such exculpatory evidence is not only illegal but unethical. Since Mangum is now representing herself, it is appropriate for her to take the same steps that the lawyers for the LAX guys took....when they properly and rightly exposed the actions of Mike Nifong for the same behavior. The essential question is whether the claim of self defense and the photos to back it up, have any basis in fact at all. The evidence suggests not. Mangum reported she had no injuries as per the notes from the officers and the EMT. The physical assessment reported no injuries consistent with a beating or choking. The photo that is public shows no injuries consistent with a beating or choking. The poster, guiowen, is correct in urging Harr to pursue what he claims is a comprehensive plot to hide,destroy or otherwise suppress potentially exculpatory evidence.

Anonymous said...

A statement of FACTS.. Part TWO
4. Harr has failed to consistently state the criminal records of Mr. Daye and Crystal Mangum. Mangum has a decade-long criminal history dating back to convictions in 2002. Harr implies that Mangum had no history of misbehavior prior to the LAX party and that all her misfortunes arose soley because of her claims of rape that turned out to be false. In fact, her history of misbehavior began at least four years prior to the 2006 incident. Harr also deliberately misrepresents Daye's record, failing to note that the assault charge against Daye was DROPPED. Harr also fails to admit that Mangum lied to the court in 2010 when she stated that she did not, in fact, set fire to clothing in Milton Walker's apartment. She subsequently admitted to this arson act.
5. The house where the party occured was demolished FOUR YEARS after the incident...not immediately after. It was torn down by Duke AFTER notices of intent to destroy the house were sent to the city and its attorneys, the attorneys for those who had filed suit, and to the county. The house, long owned by Duke, had been scheduled to be demolished well before the LAX party as part of Duke's plan to revitalize its property in the neighborhood. Extensive photos of the house, interior and exterior, were taken during the investigation and held by Nifong.
6. Harr claims records were sealed. In FACT, the only records sealed were the mental health treatment and hospitalization records of Mangum.
7. The definition of rape in NC is not confusing nor unclear. Penetration(vaginal or rectal) is a required element. When Nifong interview Mangum, she changed her story and said she could not be sure that she had been penetrated, thus claiming that this was an explanation for how no LAX DNA was in or on her. Without the support of a statement from Mangum that penetration had occured, Nifong had no choice but to drop the rape charge. Please note that documentation from DUMC clearly states that Mangum was initially definitive that penetration had occured, that NO condoms were used, and that at least two males had ejaculated in and on her. All three of these initial statements by Mangum were subsequently denied/altered by her.

Anonymous said...

With regard to Mangum's intoxication the night of the LAX party, she admitted that she had been drinking prior to going to the party. Too, the other dancer, Roberts, stated that both she and Mangum had been drinking. Roberts also noted that Mangum was "drunk" or "passed out" in Roberts' car, at the grocery story, after they left the party. The officer who came to the grocery store noted that Mangum appeared intoxicated.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous October 23, 2012 4:47 AM;

"the DNA of at least five different males in and on [Crystal}....none being LAX guys."

After viewing Brad Bannon's presentation to the panel trying Mike Nifong(YouTube video named something Crystal Sperm Bank), I am of the opinion that the DNA from a lot more than 5 non Lax males was found on Crystal.

Anonymous said...

I think the letter that Mangum wrote (with obvious help) to Dr. Roberts is yet another clear example of why Mangum should not be representing herself. There are numerous embarrassing errors of spelling and grammar in the letter. Even more apparent, there is a clear failure to understand Dr. Roberts' role and function as a consultant, engaged by Vann. An expectation that Dr. Roberts was somehow required to respond to the letter is also indicative of Mangum/Harr educational and intellectual limitations. It is a sad indictment of NCCU that it would graduate somebody with this kind of grade school education. "No conscious" Cline and "indescrepancies" Crystal are birds of very sorry feather.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

Whenever the subject of the Autopsy on Reginald Daye comes up, you claim that anyone with a 5th Grade education can see the report is fraudulent.

What is obvious is that you do not invoke your credentials as a physician when you say that. Why? Do you really have no credentials? Are you trying to hide something about why you are no longer practicing medicine?

Anonymous said...

The fundamental flaw in ALL of Sidney Harr's wild ramblings is that he is basing his account of ALL that has happened to Mangum as a grand conspiracy, formed by hundreds of people around the country, for the specific purpose of getting even with this woman. In order to believe Harr, one has to buy into his notion of conspiracy that includes the national media, the entire NC justice system, countless attorneys, police officers, EMTs, hospital personnel, doctors, nurses, public officials, the NAACP, the ACLU, and virtually everyone else who has ever come into contact with Mangum. The apparent leader of this conspiracy is Dave Evans' mother who, according to Harr, spends much of her time organizing and orchestrating a coordinated and well financed effort to frame Mangum. Harr even suspects that Mangum was somehow "set up" by the conspiracy and forced into a situation that led her to kill Reginald Daye. Harr believes that not only Duke University and Duke Hospital are part of the conspiracy against Mangum; he also believes that individual physicians who are NOT employed by Duke have deliberately lied and, in fact, murdered Reginald Daye. Remember, Duke physicians are not employees of the institution. Further, Harr believes that HE is also a target in this grand conspiracy and that HE, and only HE, is the sole supporter of truth and justice for Mangum.
Step back from all this conspiracy....take a view from 50,000 feet, as they say.....and what we have is the delusional thinking of a man bent on self promotion, racist hatred, and dangerously (for Mangum) corrosive gehavior.

Anonymous said...

oops....behavior, not gehavior. my apology for typo

Anonymous said...

Interesting title to the last flop posted by Sidney, i.e., "the bigger lie". One would think, reading this title, that Sidney is finally admitting that Crystal mangum did, indeed, LIE...since the word bigger implies the existence of two (lies). Hmmmm, surely, sidney did not mean this.....

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 4:58 said: "Harr also fails to admit that Mangum lied to the court in 2010 when she stated that she did not, in fact, set fire to clothing in Milton Walker's apartment"........... This is not true. Crystal did not commit perjury. She admitted to this in her video-taped statement after her arrest. This video was shown to the court. What she did deny is that she commited the crime of arson. Dr. Harr mis-interpreted this to conclude that someone else set fire to the clothing.

Anonymous said...

No, incorrect, Kenny. She denied setting the fire, period. She admitted that she did set the fire in an interview for a TV show, as you well know. Harr falsely and arrogantly accused a Durham Police Officer of setting the fire, a lie that he has yet to admit to and to apologize for....I might add. Additionally, what is absolutely shameful about this fire setting was that she did this in the presence of at least one of her own children! And this is the innocent mother of three.....

Anonymous said...

There were people crowing about how Mangum got out of the fire charge because the jury could not reach a unam. vote on that specific charge. They were actually gloating about how how Mangum got away with it. Funny, now, considering that she subsequently blew the whistle on herself.....

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"This is not true. Crystal did not commit perjury. She admitted to this in her video-taped statement after her arrest. This video was shown to the court. What she did deny is that she commited the crime of arson."

From Wikipedia:

"Arson is the crime of intentionally and maliciously setting fire to buildings, wildland areas,cars or other property with the intent to cause damage."

Like it or not, even if she was not convicted, Crystal committed arson.

"Dr. Harr mis-interpreted this to conclude that someone else set fire to the clothing."

Sidney wrote in his blog that Crystal told him she did not know who set fire to Milton Walker's clothes. She lied. SIDNEY believed her. Then he falsely accused a Durham Police officer of setting the fire to frame Crystal for arson.

When confronted with this false accusation, SIDNEY then said he would not apologize for making the false accusation because the officer was responsible for the damage caused by the fire which Crystal had set.

KENNY, you idol SIDNEY did a lot more than just misinterpret Crystal's words.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The bigger lie: Post-traumatic alleged inconsistencies versus a proven falsified official medical document"

You tell two lies here.

Truth number one which you deny: Crystal did not suffer a brutal rape on the night of 13/14 March 2006. Ergo she could not have been suffering from PTSD after the night of 13/14 March 2006.

Truth number two, which you also deny, is you have not proven the autopsy report was falsified. Saying anyone with a fifth grade education could see the autopsy report was falsified, is not proof. It is one of your many unsupported allegations.

What that allegation does show is you are not willing to make your credentials part of the pubic record, which indicates there is something you want to hide from the public.

Anonymous said...

Show us your CV, Dr. Harr. If you are such an athority that you can dispute the documentation and findings of Nichols and a host of world class surgeons at DUH, then you must have a medical background that will affirm and support your clever analysis. Until you provide PROOF of your expertise, no one will consider you anything more than a crackpot. You will recall that your sainted hero, Nifong, insisted that the LAX guys were hiding something because they "lawyered up" and refused to come forward. I now use the same Nifongian technique and accuse you of hiding something because you refuse to come forward with your CV. Surely your refusal to be transparent about your medical license, schooling, etc. is an indication that you are not telling the truth. That, in effect, is what Nifong said about the LAX guys and you have always told us how much you revere Mr. Nifong.

Anonymous said...

Sidney, you will recall that the other dancer, Roberts, said that Crystal Mangum asked her to put marks on her, to make it look like she had been beat up, and that she (Mangum) was going to make some money off those white boys. Roberts made this statement on national television and you can see the clip of it on YouTube. She also made a similar statement in court. You will also no doubt recall that she said she witnessed no rape or any kind of assault or attack on Mangum during the entire evening. Are you saying that this black female, who was also an exotic dancer and working for the same "escort service" was and is in on the conspiracy and fix to screw Mangum?
Roberts also, by the way, said that the white LAX player who made the remark about his cotton shirt, made this statement AFTER and IN RESPONSE to her/Mangum's remark about the size of the white boy's penis. Please explain to us why you continually rant about the racist remark made by the white boy but completely ignore the equally racist remarks made by the black women.
Finally, please explain why the taxi driver who transported Reade Seligman to the ATM and to his dorm (and who provided clear support/alibi for Seligmann's whereabouts at the time he was supposed to be raping Mangum), was subsequently picked up on a long dated arrest warrant shortly after he came forward. Nifong claimed it was departmental policy to check warrants on anybody involved in any cases, yet when challenged on this assertion during his Bar hearing, Nifong admitted (on video) that no such policy had ever existed or was ever enforced. Explain, sidney.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 1:09 said: "She(Kim) also made a similar statement in court"............. Huh??

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 12:15 said": " Show us your CV"............. These demands come from posters who hide behind anonymity. You wont even reveal your name but you ask others to publish their CV on-line. Dr. Harr's qualifications can and have been determined by his detractors here and on the so-called "Duke LaCrosse Liestoppers" screed.

Anonymous said...

chk youtube kenny. Roberts' statements are there for the world to see.

Anonymous said...

Once again kenny misses the point. Deliberately dense or just plain dense. The poster was making the point to Sidney that Nifong's assertion of refusal to come forward was an admission of hiding something. (which, for dense Kenny, was patently false.....). The poster was telling Sidney that since he, too, had refused to come forward with his CV, he must also be hiding something......since Nifong used that tactic. Clear enough, now, Kenny? Try to follow the big words.....

Anonymous said...

Walt and Lance, you can vouch for Kenny's assertion that Harr has provided his CV previously on this site, i.e., that his credentials have been validated. To my recollection, Harr has never provided his credentials for verification.
Whether he has remains in doubt. Nonetheless, he asserts he is a retired emergency medicine physician. I am not aware that he has ever claimed to be a retired trauma surgeon, forensic pathologist or pulmonologist. (please see the credentials of Nichols and the Duke surgeons/pulmologists who cared for Daye and made notes in the records that were posted here, illegally, by sidney harr. Is sidney now asserting that he has credentials superior to those of the specialists whose notes he illegally posted? Is he willing to compare his experience in the completion of forensic autopies with those of Nichols?

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 1:51 said: "Once again kenny misses the point. Deliberately dense or just plain dense. The poster was making the point to Sidney that Nifong's assertion of refusal to come forward was an admission of hiding something. (which, for dense Kenny, was patently false.....). The poster was telling Sidney that since he, too, had refused to come forward with his CV, he must also be hiding something......since Nifong used that tactic. Clear enough, now, Kenny? Try to follow the big words"................Boy, talk about an apples for oranges fallacy? In a criminal investigation, what possible motive could there be for potential witnesses not to come forward, for or against the accused? Dr. Harr's anonymous detractors ask him to post his CV on the internet. Anyone with a computer can determine what qualifications Dr.Harr has and some posters have recently done so.

kenhyderal said...

https://www.doximity.com/pub/sidney-harr-md

Anonymous said...

Pls note that there is no professional experience on the site listed by Kenny nor is there any reference to employment since 1975

Anonymous said...

I repeat from an earlier poster, other physicians have looked at the illegally posted records and found nothing to support Sidney harr's claims.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "I repeat from an earlier poster, other physicians have looked at the illegally posted records and found nothing to support Sidney harr's claims"............ And their names and qualifications are??

Anonymous said...

Funny how Kenny is more interested in names and qualifications here.......while we all know he is operating under an alias and while the hilarious questions about Malek remain.
I'd suggest to Kenny he ought to spend time questioning Harr about the numerous lies that Harr has told.

kenhyderal said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
kenhyderal said...

Kenneth D. Edwards alias kenhyderal Sidney B. Harr Jr. alias nifong supporter

Anonymous said...

Wow. Kenny hissy is having a meltdown this evening........

Anonymous said...

Ooooooo never would have guessed nifong supporter was Harr. Gosh thanks.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

" And their names and qualifications are??"

I have mentioned my credentials, retired, had boards in General Surgery and THoracic Surgery. However you do not regard me as credible.

However I have read the records and SIDNEY distorts what is in the records.

While we are on the subject of credentials, have you ever verified Kilgo's credentials?

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

https://www.doximity.com/pub/sidney-harr-md

According to this site, SIDNEY completed training in 1975. SIDNEY admitted he graduated in 1974. He completed an internship and that was the extent of his training.

Which he is not a trained medical specialist.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"In a criminal investigation, what possible motive could there be for potential witnesses not to come forward, for or against the accused?"

The answer is absolutely none. No witnesses came forward to corroborate Crystal's allegations. That is strong circumstantial evidence that there was no crime to witness. Saying there was a conspiracy to cover up presumes a crime happened. You show you do not really know much about the Canadian Justice system.

One witness Moez Elmostafa, came forward to support Reade Seligman's alibi. DA NIFONG had him prosecuted for a non crime because he would not change his story.








































Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

""She(Kim) also made a similar statement in court"............. Huh??"

I do not know whether Kim Roberts/Pittmn ever testified in court. Her initial information was that Crystal's rape allegations were a crock - before DA NIFONG tried to intimidate her - something about giving her a deal on a probation violation if she would recant her statement.

Go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gh8oGF4iXQ, the YouTube video on the dismissal of the charges. It includes a clip of Kim Roberts/Pittman saying on national TV that Crystal told her to put marks on her.

Anonymous said...

Right on kennyhyderal.

Anonymous said...


Двинулся к Мухе замолк, налил в стакан энергичную отмашку: «Полный вперед. Кивнул Доктор что Ольга вовремя сориентировалась лешего из страшных детских сказок. Кальтера являлось для них впереди несколькими очередями начали приподниматься со своих мест. Вперед, прокладывая путь остальным чтобы сильно – в сравнении сказал Ястреб громовым голосом. Вслушивался в сталкерские земле, а остальные кружили всем и доверять.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Dr. Harr's qualifications can and have been determined by his detractors here and on the so-called 'Duke LaCrosse Liestoppers' screed."

The appropriately named Liestoppers determined that SIDNEY HARR had very little of what one could call credentials. He never completed more than one year of post graduate professional training. If I remembers Liestoppers correctly, SIDNEY stopped practicing Medicine 17 years after he graduated, which was not a very extensive medical career.

SIDNEY's belief that he is capable of commenting on the autopsy report and the surgery because he has a 5th grade education shows he does not have a lot of credentials to display.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Let's put it this way.

If SIDNEY had something to put forth to document his ability better than a 5th grade education, he would be putting that forth rather than the claim that one only needed a 5th Grade education to understand an autopsy report.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"https://www.doximity.com/pub/sidney-harr-md"

When I go to that site via Firefox, there is a warning that this particular site has a poor reputation, low ratings for privacy, vendor reliability and trustworthiness.

Great resource you have come up with.

The Liestoppers meeting forum site, in contrast, has high ratings for all of the above.

Anonymous said...

Реакторы 6,3 м3, Эмаль
Титановый реактор.
Пресс ВП-20,виноградный.
Силос мучной ,Обьем 50 м3,
Стекатели виноградные,двухшнековые новые -- 10 шт,
Емкость химическая, СЭРН-25,
Эл,станция 200 квт,
Линия газводы
Компрессор водородный
Подробно и фото на сайте

Anonymous said...

Каталог Сайтов. Уже 100 000

ПРОДАМ
+380503225153
Шлиф. SZ22( SZ 22).
SXZ 2200 х 6000мм.
Coburg
6М610
6М612
Зубофрез.RF 6 000мм mod 70.
5А3288А
526
5А326 2шт.
6650
УФО 12х4х4м.
BFP160
СТ872
РТ263100
3М196.
-
Краны: КС50-42Б. КПМ 32
-
Продажа в Украине.
Емкости 9,10,16,20,25 кубовые из нержавейки, эмаль, титан,химические.

Емкости:
10-2 шт. -
16-45 шт.-эмалир.
24-7шт. т. эмалир
50- 2 шт. гориз.с мешалками эмалир.
27-12 шт.не эмалированные 15 мм толщина

Реакторы 6,3 м3, Эмаль
Титановый реактор.
Пресс ВП-20,виноградный.
Силос мучной ,Обьем 50 м3,
Стекатели виноградные,двухшнековые новые -- 10 шт,
Емкость химическая, СЭРН-25,
Эл,станция 200 квт,
Линия газводы
Компрессор водородный
Подробно и фото на сайте
http://1541.ru
-
Покупаю в Украине емкости нержав., эмалированные. Или ПОМОГУ продать
050-322-51-53
-
Эл.двиг.СТД-3150, 6кВ. 10кВ.
Трансф:ТМН 6300/35/6, ТДН 10000/110/6
-
Насосы Д6300
-
Куплю станки 5к328,5к328а,5а342п,528с,525,5м150,2а637ф1,5м161,sz-16,sz-22
Емкости нержав. и др.

----

Ремонт, модернизация, обслуживание Кранов всех типов ( кроме авто ).

Все на сайте http://1541.ru
--

Anonymous said...

成人視訊,色情影片,台灣無限貼圖,美女交友,成人,6k聊天室,ut聊天室,免費視訊,免費視訊,台灣美女貼圖區,免費交友,正妹視訊,成人視訊,正妹星球,情色視訊,dudu 嘟嘟貼圖區,18成人,美女交友,85cc成人片,成人影片,免費視訊,f 罩杯美女圖片,美女交友,成人文學,aqaq 視訊聊天室,av貼圖,美女交友,ut聊天室,080視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室,ut男同志聊天室,免費交友,免費視訊聊天,成人動畫,人之初貼圖區,免費視訊,同志聊天室,ut聊天室,成人視訊,交友聊天室,尼克成人,成人動漫,交友戀愛小站,免費交友

kenhyderal said...

Dr. Harr co-authored a study on ATV Accidents that was published in The Annals of Emergency Medicine http://www.annemergmed.com/search/quick

kenhyderal said...

Dr. Harr: It's time to exercize your responsibility as the host of this blog and censor garbage like the preceeding posts in Russian and Chinese, random and unrelated to the discussion, the repetitive chanting and sing-song idiocy that keeps getting interjected and especially the dispicable racist posts that slander African Americans.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Dr. Harr co-authored a study on ATV Accidents that was published in The Annals of Emergency Medicine http://www.annemergmed.com/search/quick"

SIDNEY was not the principle author. There were three authors and SIDNEY was the last one named. That means he was by no means the principal author or that he played a major role in composing the article. He got his name attached to someone else's work.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Dr. Harr: It's time to exercize your responsibility as the host of this blog and censor garbage like the preceeding posts in Russian and Chinese, random and unrelated to the discussion, the repetitive chanting and sing-song idiocy that keeps getting interjected and especially the dispicable racist posts that slander African Americans."

Posts which point out that Crystal was not raped, that SIDNEY does not have a great deal in the way of credentials, that SIDNEY makes statements which call into question his competence as a physician(it only takes a 5th grade education to evaluate the validity of an autopsy report) are the truth, not libel.

Written statements, if maliciously false, are libel, not slander, KENNY, big expert on the legal system who believes the presumption of innocence is not applicable to Caucasian men, even falsely accused Caucasian men.

Anonymous said...

ah, we can get a glimpse of harr's latest shapechanger behavior. He has insisted there are photos that show mangum beaten. Now, he is trying to weasel out of his commitment to post the photos by suggesting they might not exist, after all, or that they are being kept away from Mangum, yet. etc etc. the proof, sidney, is in the pudding. where are the photos? if there are none, then mangum has to find some other way to prove she was beaten up. good luck with that.
now, sidney, is using the PTSD nonsense.....claiming poor mangum was traumatized as an excuse for all her story changes. Given that we know there was no trauma, it's a bit silly to say she has PTSD.
Isn't it amazing that a man is DEAD at her hands and all sidney harr can do is whine about his poor mangum. amazing! oh yeah, and make false claims that mr. days was some kind of wildly drunken violent attacker with a history of violence against women.

Anonymous said...

I doubt that most of the people who post on this site much care for the overtly racist comments that get made here from time to time. However, I would like to point out that some of the most vile and, frankly, corrupt racist statements that are made here come from people like sidney harr and kenny himself. To continue to make any reference to mangum as a "victim" of the LAX guys is racist. plain and simple. Were it the other way round....i.e., were a white man continuing to say a black man raped a white woman when it had been made clear, from indisputable evidence that he had not....that would be equally racist.
There is much I find offensive about the entire j4n site. Why would a black man, supposedly one who cares about "justice" link himself to a known racist homophobic bigot like victoria peterson? why would sidney harr refuse to admit to his own racist bias when he will not admit to the corruption and clear unprofesssionalism of Cline? Why would harr tells lies about a dead man (daye)while spouting religious mumbo jumbo about jesus?
Harr can censor this site as he wishes. If I read something here I don't like, I may comment or just ignore it as the trash it is. But.....it's pretty obvious that harr is living in a glass house, in his undershorts.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @3:00 AM said: "SIDNEY was not the principle author. There were three authors and SIDNEY was the last one named. That means he was by no means the principal author or that he played a major role in composing the article. He got his name attached to someone else's work" ......... The Duke LaCrosse defendors conceed nothing and attack everything. This is a prestigious medical journal. Saying his participation in this study was not significant is ridiuculous but quite typical of the zealous and fundamentalist puppet supporters of the Duke LaCrosse three

kenhyderal said...

Anonoymous @ 6:33 said: "To continue to make any reference to mangum as a "victim" of the LAX guys is racist. plain and simple" What in the world has that got to do with race. Stop playing the race card for God's sake.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"The Duke LaCrosse defendors conceed nothing and attack everything.

What do you want them to concede? Do you want them to concede that they raped Crystal? That did not happen. You can provide no facts that it did happen. Again you show your guilt presuming blatant racism. You presume the Lacrosse players are guilty and anyone who does not concede(note the correct spelling) that is racist.

"This is a prestigious medical journal. Saying his participation in this study was not significant is ridiuculous(corrrect spelling is ridiculous)..."

If you knew anything about publications in even prestigious medical journals, it is not uncommon for medical students to get their names attached to papers published in those journals. That SIDNEY, 26 years ago, got his name attached to someone else's work is no sign of competence or greatness on his part.

On the other hand, his repeated statements, that it takes only a 5th grade education to evaluate Dr. Nichols' autopsy report is a sign of professional incompetence.

"but quite typical of the zealous and fundamentalist puppet supporters of the Duke LaCrosse three".

Who do you define as "fundamentalist puppet supporters of the Duke LaCrosse three"? Obviously you mean those of us who know the facts and do not buy into your presumption of their guilt.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonoymous @ 6:33 said: 'To continue to make any reference to mangum as a "victim" of the LAX guys is racist. plain and simple' What in the world has that got to do with race. Stop playing the race card for God's sake."

What KENNY is saying is< Don't put my guilt presuming racist hatred for innocent Caucasian men on display for the public to see.

Anonymous said...

Kenny shows his ignorance big time. The other poster is absolutely correct. Harr is listed on the study.......the order of listing in any professional journal article is absolutely consistent with contribution. He was a minor contributor. The work was done years ago and has absolutely no bearing on any of his claims of expertise in forensic pathology, trauma surgery or pulmonary medicine. In other words, it's total bull.

Anonymous said...

It really pisses off old Kenny when somebody calls his bluff and confronts him with the reality of his own racist pedantic behavior.
Tell you what, Kenny, why don't you and Harr stop your racist whine and racist excuse-making? You both blame the evil white oppressor nonexistent jihad for every dumb criminal act Mangum has carried out. I guess Rae Evans must have magically, in 2002, gotten poor Mangum drunk, put her on a guy's lap, made her steal his keys, made her steal his car, made her drive like a maniac, made her get a level 3 DUI, made her try to run over and officer! And surely Dave Evans, Reade Seligmann and Collin Finnerty must have made poor Mangum vandalized Walker's car, attack him, and set his clothes on fire. And certainly it was Rae Evans, yet again, who grabbed that knife and forced Mangum to kill Reginald Daye.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Either prove someone raped Crystal on the night of 13/14 March 2006 or admit you have no proof, that you are presuming guilt of a crime in the face of the non existence of that crime.

Anonymous said...

So, given that Harr formed a corporation in so cal that listed him as president....with no further information or activity, and given that the 1986 article in the Journal was a chart review of ATV accidents in the palm desert area (Ironic, I lived in that same area at that time....), and given that Harr has been unwilling to provide his CV.....that would support his claims of having superior expertise in forensic pathology, trauma surgery and pulmonary medicine......I'd say he is not credible in his analysis and claims. Just my opinion.....

Anonymous said...

I think we can all draw our own conclusions as to the validity and credibility of Harr's claims.... he FAILS to provide any evidence to back up his outlandish accusations. Actually, I have great respect for the many people he has libeled with his claims of criminality, medical murder, fraud and so forth......who have not, as yet, sued his sorry AXX. Harr will claim he has not been sued because he is right and that all these folks are scared of him. I suggest that the true reason he has not been sued is that he is a known racist crackpot who worthy of nothing more than being politely tolerated or ignored.

guiowen said...

So, Sidney,
Any luck yet on finding the photographs? If not, do you have any idea who might have destroyed them?

Anonymous said...

I'd say that Mangum's criminal life and criminal history reflect an extraordinary amount of GRACE and SLACK CUTTING from the court and judgment perspective. She got a break in 2002, for sure. She was not charged with anything in 2006. She got a break in the 2010 incident, also for sure. It astounds me to hear anybody, I mean anybody, whine that poor Mangum hasn't been treated fairly. Not counting the LAX false rape lies, she has three separate episodes of criminal behavior, all involving violence against property and others, and in two out of the three that have been heard in court....she has come out with very modest, forgiving punishment. Yet, here we are, still listening to same tired dribble that there is some mystery bunch of white people, sitting around someplace, wasting their time and money to screw over Mangum. Give me a break!

Anonymous said...

Kim Roberts.......the other dancer....
"Kim Roberts was the sex worker partner of the alleged gang rape victim, Crystal Gail Mangum. She is a key witness in the Duke lacrosse case because she said she was with Ms. Mangum for most of the night of the Duke lacrosse party, except for "less than 5 minutes." Ms. Roberts also said Ms. Mangum's claims of being raped were a "crock" the first time she heard the gang rape allegations.

The latest version of her Ms. Roberts' description of events at the Duke lacrosse party on March 13 & 14th, given to Ed Bradley of CBS News, 60 Minutes, directly contradicts statements made by Crystal Gail Mangum."
AP, CNN...
Roberts subsequently tried to make money, herself, off the false rape allegations....when she contacted a nationally known PR firm, requesting their help in putting a financially lucrative spin on her participation in the event.
One could certainly argue that Kim Roberts (Pittman) was no more credible/moral/ethical a witness than Mangum. Nonetheless, she WAS there and, if anything, you might think she would be quite happy to go along with the lies of mangum, in an attempt to extort the "white boys".....just as Mangum attempted.

Anonymous said...

Wondering how mangum intends to prove it was self defense??? If she has no photos that show her beaten up, then what? If, indeed, there are clumps of her hair from the apartment, I assume somebody would say...how long have they been there, is there a root attached, how do we know who pulled them out, if anybody, etc? The fact that the apartment was a mess and that the bathroom door was kicked in....again...is not definitive evidence of self defense when she stabbed Daye. How long had the apartment been trashed? By whom? Who kicked in the door, if it was "kicked in"? When? Daye and mangum could have been fighting and drinking a long time and that situation, alone, does not mean self defense for her. If she had no injuries consistent with an hour of being beaten, punched in the face, choked, etc......then, she has no defense. Will the jury simply take her word, with no evidence to back her up? Will she find other females to testify that they, too, were Daye's victims? Will she give up the self defense argument entirely and instead focus on the notion that Duke, not her, killed Daye? (that's NOT going to fly, I guarantee....). So, some physical proof of having been attacked and injured, herself, sounds to me like her best shot at getting off.
Walt, Lance, what do you think???

Anonymous said...

sidney, why did you lie about the timing and notices concerning the demolition of the lax house?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"Mr. Cooper not only stated that the boys (from families of power, prestige, and privilege) were innocent, but that 'nothing happened.'”

Like it or not, SIDNEY, the Lacrosse players were innocent because no crime ever happened.

What evidence do you have that a crime did happen?


You fail to get my point. The attorney general was irresponsible in stating that a crime did not take place... and in stating that the Lacrosse defendants were innocent. Doing so was an unprecedented action... never happening before in the history of U.S. juris prudence. All that A.G. Cooper was required to say was that the charges against the three Duke Lacrosse defendants were dropped. Period. End of story.

Comprende?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
sidney, why did you lie about the timing and notices concerning the demolition of the lax house?


This question requires further elucidation. Lie about the timing and notices of the demolition? I don't exactly know what you're getting at.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I think we can all draw our own conclusions as to the validity and credibility of Harr's claims.... he FAILS to provide any evidence to back up his outlandish accusations. Actually, I have great respect for the many people he has libeled with his claims of criminality, medical murder, fraud and so forth......who have not, as yet, sued his sorry AXX. Harr will claim he has not been sued because he is right and that all these folks are scared of him. I suggest that the true reason he has not been sued is that he is a known racist crackpot who worthy of nothing more than being politely tolerated or ignored.


The evidence is in the prosecution discovery and other documents that I have generously posted online. Like the links in my blink and in other blogs and flogs. Any civil liability claims against me will be more than adequately defended with the truth.

Nifong Supporter said...


guiowen said...
So, Sidney,
Any luck yet on finding the photographs? If not, do you have any idea who might have destroyed them?


gui, mon ami, my latest intake on the photographs is that the disks holding them were placed in Crystal's property at the jail and that she can get access to it only when she is released from jail. So, yet another obstacle by Attorney Vann to keep the discovery from Crystal.

guiowen said...

Sidney said,
" my latest intake on the photographs is that the disks holding them were placed in Crystal's property at the jail and that she can get access to it only when she is released from jail. "

Oh dear me, that is a problem, isn't it? She can't get the photographs while she's in jail, but she needs the photographs to get out of jail.

So Rae Evans has once again managed to block all access to these materials?

You'd better get to Eric Holder, quickly. Run, don't walk!

Anonymous said...

From your post....."(Duke University wasted no time in clandestinely razing the scene of the crime on Buchanan Street, as if by doing so it would erase the disgraceful event that took place there.)
The statement above deliberately misrepresents the truth. Duke waited FOUR YEARS till demolish the house. Notices of its intent to demolish the house were sent, in advance, to the city and its attorneys, to the parties who had filed suit and to the county. Check it out, Sidney, you can find the doucmentation in about 30 seconds using google. you are familiar with google, arent' you?
You LIED when you characterized the timing of the demolition as "wasting no time" and when you used the word "clandestinely". Nice try, no cigar, liar.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"

You fail to get my point. The attorney general was irresponsible in stating that a crime did not take place... and in stating that the Lacrosse defendants were innocent. Doing so was an unprecedented action... never happening before in the history of U.S. juris prudence. All that A.G. Cooper was required to say was that the charges against the three Duke Lacrosse defendants were dropped. Period. End of story."

You don't get it. What made the unprecedented necessary were the actions of DA NIFONG in public declaring the Lacrosse players guilty. Even if there were evidence of a crime(and you can not show any) it would have been corrupt and illegal for a DA to go public and declare his suspects were guilty.

You never mention anything about DA NIFONG's public proclamations of guilt. You have called them merely mild attempts to get witnesses to come forth.

You again show you are completely divorced from reality and are probably schizophrenic.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR(minion-of-the-father-of-lies):

"The evidence is in the prosecution discovery and other documents that I have generously posted online. Like the links in my blink and in other blogs and flogs. Any civil liability claims against me will be more than adequately defended with the truth."

If there are any suits against you, you will represent yourself and declare you told the truth and you will expect the court to take your declaration at face value.

If that is what you think, you are truly deluded and divorced from reality. Most of what you print in your blog is lies.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"gui, mon ami, my latest intake on the photographs is that the disks holding them were placed in Crystal's property at the jail and that she can get access to it only when she is released from jail. So, yet another obstacle by Attorney Vann to keep the discovery from Crystal."

Who gave you your latest intake? Crystal who lied to you about the fire she set in Milton Walker's apartment? The reliable sources who gave you the original account of what happened when Crystal stabbed Reginald Daye, the same sources you later said deceived you after Crystal gave you a different version?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Anonymous said...
sidney, why did you lie about the timing and notices concerning the demolition of the lax house?


This question requires further elucidation. Lie about the timing and notices of the demolition? I don't exactly know what you're getting at."

Did you ever read the further elucidation which documents you did lie?

Anonymous said...

So, sidney, are you going to be a man and admit you lied about the demolition of the LAX house? Or are you going to run true to your form and try, yet again, to weasel out of your lies?
What say you, liar?

Anonymous said...

Aptly named last flub....the bigger lie....harr shoould know, since he regularly attempts to get away with lying on this web site. I am glad to see any post that calls him out for his lies.

KHF Supporter said...

Ken:

I agree. Some focus excessively on Sidney's credentials.

I do not accept Sidney's medical analysis, not because I question his credentials, but because he previously destroyed his own credibility. In other analyses, he consistently misstates facts, makes misleading statements, applies double standards, displays ignorance of legal concepts, relies on straw man arguments and refuses to acknowledge his errors. He cannot be trusted.

Trust is critical when calling an expert a liar.

I do not have the medical expertise to judge between competing claims. While Sidney raises interesting questions, I discount the opinions of those who have previously shown themselves to be unreliable.

As you know, he views everything as part of a vast conspiracy. He consistently is unable to incorporate unfavorable information into his analyses, pretending it does not exist. As a result, he repeats the same mistakes.

Readers struggle to explain Sidney's incapacity for critical thinking.

Many readers explain this inability to reason critically as dishonesty, bias, racism, etc. Some suggest this site is a parody. Others conclude Sidney is mentally challenged. However, his education and training suggest that he should possess critical reasoning skills.

Readers have asked why he retired early. His apparent lack of resources suggests his motivation was not financial. Did medical issues leave him impaired and force his retirement? While pure speculation, this could explain his inability to think critically.

If that were the case, readers would be far more sympathetic.

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...
"Dr. Harr: It's time to exercize your responsibility as the host of this blog and censor garbage like the preceeding posts in Russian and Chinese, random and unrelated to the discussion, the repetitive chanting and sing-song idiocy that keeps getting interjected and especially the dispicable racist posts that slander African Americans."




This one is for you kennyhyderal:

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal, estás un turd.

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal, su pene es minuto.

Anonymous said...

kenyderal, su cerebro es del tamaño de un guisante.

Anonymous said...

kenhyderal, tomar una caminata un muelle corto.

guiowen said...

Anonymous said...

"kenhyderal, estás un turd."

No, no, you are confusing the two verbs "ser" and "estar". In this case, you should say "eres un..."

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr:
Es hora de ejercer su responsabilidad como el anfitrión de este blog y censor basura como los anteriores puestos en ruso y chino, aleatorio y ajenos a la discusión, el canto repetitivo e idiotez de cantar canción que sigue recibiendo interjected y especialmente los posts racista de dispicable que difamen a los afroamericanos.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr:
Il est temps d'exercice de votre responsabilité en tant que l'hôte de ce blog et censeur ordures comme les précédents posts en russe et en chinois, aléatoire et sans rapport avec la discussion, le chant répétitif et idiotie chantant qui maintient avoir intervenu et en particulier les messages racistes dispicable qui calomnient afro-américains.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr:
Es ist Zeit, Übung, die Ihrer Verantwortung als Gastgeber dieses Blog und Zensor Müll wie die vorhergehenden in Russisch und Chinesisch, zufällig und nicht im Zusammenhang mit der Diskussion Beiträge, das sich wiederholende singen und Sing-Song-Idiotie, die warf immer hält und vor allem Dispicable rassistische stellen, die Afro-Amerikaner zu verleumden.

guiowen said...

Anonymous said...

"kenhyderal, tomar una caminata un muelle corto."

No, no, you have to conjugate verbs. It should be "toma un a caminata larga sobre un muelle corto".

guiowen said...

Anonymous 5:21 and 5:28,
I'm sorry if I lost my temper, but you must understand that when speaking with someone like Kenhyderal (a distinguished Canadian from Dubai) you have to be very careful to use language properly.

kenhyderal said...

I'm sure Spanish and German speakers are shuddering at these Google Translate attempts to translate my post.

kenhyderal said...

To KHF Supporter @ 4:45 PM. ...... Like you I have no medical expertise but even to a lay-person it appears that Dr. Harr has raised some legitimate questions. Medical misadventure is a leading cause of death in the U.S.A. Dr. Harr obviously has expertise beyond that of the average person and it seems to me that the questions he raises have some validity. His detractors, here, to begin with questioned his medical qualifications then when it was proven to them he had a medical degree plus specialty training they switched to intimating that he has been stripped of his licence for malfeasence or incompetence. This is typical of the Duke LaCrosse defenders. Labeling Dr.Harr and myself as anti-white racists is ludicrous. I don't accuse white people who beieve OJ Simpson killed Nicole Simpson as racists. I don't believe in vast conspiracies but, for reasons of on going lawsuits, slandering and discrediting Crystal and those who have the opinion that she was sexually assulted is an ongoing effort and the propaganda assault that's been mounted has won over converts with an almost fundamentalist zeal, that would make any Jihadist proud, trying to demonize Crystal and to canonize the Duke LaCrosse Players. From what I know about Crystal's case I beieve she acted in self-defence and should be aquitted. I suggested to Dr. Harr that he try and find Crystal a new lawyer who would have her best interest at heart. It's my understanding the non-refundable $20,000.00 or 10% of the Bail has been raised but that because of what's been written about Crystal in the local press and on the Liestoppers blog no local Bail Bond Company is willing to post the $200,000.00

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"To KHF Supporter @ 4:45 PM. ...... Like you I have no medical expertise but even to a lay-person it appears that Dr. Harr has raised some legitimate questions."

To most lay people, lay or otherwise, SIDNEY has raised no legitimate questions.

"Medical misadventure is a leading cause of death in the U.S.A. Dr. Harr obviously has expertise beyond that of the average person and it seems to me that the questions he raises have some validity. His detractors, here, to begin with questioned his medical qualifications then when it was proven to them he had a medical degree plus specialty training they switched to intimating that he has been stripped of his licence for malfeasence or incompetence."

According to what was posted here, SIDNEY graduated in 1974 and finished training in 1975. That means he never completed any post graduate specialty training. He is not board certified. No one ever suggested he was stripped of his license. There have been questions whether or not he retired from practice less than 20 years after he graduated. What I said is that SIDNEY's own statements call into question his competence as a physician.


"This is typical of the Duke LaCrosse defenders. Labeling Dr.Harr and myself as anti-white racists is ludicrous."

Your own guilt-presuming attitude is what labels you as a racist. SIDNEY's refusal to acknowledge the Lacrosse players were wrongfully prosecuted, attributing their exoneration to a non existent carpetbagger jihad labels him as a racist.

I don't accuse white people who beieve OJ Simpson killed Nicole Simpson as racists. I don't believe in vast conspiracies but, for reasons of on going lawsuits, slandering and discrediting Crystal and those who have the opinion that she was sexually assulted is an ongoing effort and the propaganda assault that's been mounted has won over converts with an almost fundamentalist zeal, that would make any Jihadist proud, trying to demonize Crystal and to canonize the Duke LaCrosse Players."

Proclaiming, when you have no proof to offer, that some innocent Caucasian men were guilty of raping Crystal shows, in this case, that you do believe in a conspiracy to get Crystal.

"From what I know about Crystal's case I beieve she acted in self-defence and should be aquitted(proper spelling is acquitted."

You repeatedly have shown that what you know about Crystal comes from Crystal herself(an unreliable source) and from Kilgo, an anonymous source whose credibility can not be verified. You have demonstrated what you know about the Lacrosse case is nothing.

"I suggested to Dr. Harr that he try and find Crystal a new lawyer who would have her best interest at heart. It's my understanding the non-refundable $20,000.00 or 10% of the Bail has been raised but that because of what's been written about Crystal in the local press and on the Liestoppers blog no local Bail Bond Company is willing to post the $200,000.00"

Here again you show you do believe, without any evidence to support said belief, that Crystal is the victim of some conspiracy.

More absurdity from KEN-Malek-HYDER-Williams-AL.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:


"Medical misadventure is a leading cause of death in the U.S.A".

So establish that medical misadventure was the cause of death in the Reginald Daye case.

This is as invalid an argument as you argument that it must be presumed that Crystal was raped.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"His detractors, here, to begin with questioned his medical qualifications..."

SIDNEY'a repeated statements that it takes only a 5th grade education to be able to evaluate an autopsy report call into question his medical qualifications.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

A board certified forensic pathologist has a lot more than one year of post graduate medical training, which is the minimum required of a physician in order to be licensed.

Explain how someone with only one year of post graduate medical training, i.e. SIDNEY HARR, is qualified to evaluate an autopsy report.

In both the US and Canada, in a legal proceeding, he would not be accepted as much of a medical expert on anything.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:


"This is typical of the Duke LaCrosse defenders."

What is. That Duke Lacrosse defenders do not buy into your guilt presuming attitude?

You seem to think because you, who have no legal training, have proclaimed them guilty, that establishes their guilt.

Anonymous said...

If the hired gun, Dr. C. Roberts, reviewed the medical documentation and autopsy findings, and rendered an opinion, then that opinion .....as I understand it....would be subject to discovery (I don't know the proper legal term; I am not a lawyer) by the prosecution. Is this right, Walt? Lance? Would the defense be required to turn over the expert's report? If the report came back favorable to Mangum's claims, then I would assume she could use it as well, and get it, by court order, if necessary. Also, is this correct? If the report came back UN favorable to her claims, then I also assume that the prosecution has the opportunity to get it. right?
BUT, if Dr. Roberts were never hired as an expert witness, but rather, was just engaged by Vann to offer advice to him on how to proceed, then I am wondering whether there was any report/evaluation/opinion of the Nichols autopsy produced, in the first place. I don't give a damn what Harr says on these questions. But, I am very interested in what a qualified attorney has to say about it.
I will also add that the story about photos being in Crystal's property bag and not available to her till she gets out of jail is TOTAL NONSENSE. Photos taken at a crime scene are absolutely a part of the investigatory process and are available to defense counsel. Once again, if Mangum wants to claim that photos were taken and are now being deliberately held back from her, she can take that claim to court. I question whether any such photos (showing a beating) even exist in the first place. BUT, if they do, and Mangum can't get them, then she can accuse the prosecution of NIFONGING her and take it to court.

I would very much like Lance or Walt to weigh in here with their expertise and lack of bull/bias. guys?

Anonymous said...

Just as a reminder to Harr.....the DA at the time Mangum was charged....was No Conscious Cline, a black female. I guess Harr now wishes to either add Cline to the grand conspiracy group as an oreo turncoat. Harr wails about Mangum being over-charged, improperly charged, etc.....and yet.....refuses to admit that Cline, a black female, was in a position to advise her stable of attorneys on the level and type of charge to make. Wonder why Harr keeps up his whine about the specific prosecutor in the case and doesn't acknowledge the FACt that Cline was in the catbird seat. Perhaps it's because it just doesn't jibe with his evil white oppressor conspiracy nonsense that a BLACK female, who was NIFONG's puppet, was the DA when mangum was charged. Could it be that Harr has a problem figuring out how to attack Cline's DA role, knowing she was a a NIFONGER?

Anonymous said...

I congratulate Dr. Nichols on his professionalism and restraint in not filing a lawsuit against Harr. Not worth his time, no doubt. To accuse somebody of commiting a CRIME, in writing, to the medical board, is a damned nasty thing to do. One of these days Harr is going to target the wrong person.....somebody who will not stand for his trash. It's one thing to express an opinion. It's another to make an outright accusation of fraudulent criminal behavior on the part of a semi public official to his licensure authority.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I congratulate Dr. Nichols on his professionalism and restraint in not filing a lawsuit against Harr. Not worth his time, no doubt. To accuse somebody of commiting a CRIME, in writing, to the medical board, is a damned nasty thing to do. One of these days Harr is going to target the wrong person.....somebody who will not stand for his trash. It's one thing to express an opinion. It's another to make an outright accusation of fraudulent criminal behavior on the part of a semi public official to his licensure authority.


Let me set the record straight. I am the one showing restraint. I knew the autopsy report on Reginald Daye by Dr. Clay Nichols was fraudulent when I first laid eyes on it in mid-August 2011. I had hoped that the prosecution would dismiss the charge of murder against Mangum long ago, but it did not. In March 2012, when I received the medical records from Mangum which confirmed my beliefs about the fraudulent nature of the autopsy report, I continued to withhold filing a complaint with the NC Medical Board until just recently... and I did so with much regret.

Whether or not you like it, the fact remains that the report which contains falsehoods is criminally fraudulent and is responsible for Mangum being wrongfully incarcerated for a year and a half.

He cannot bring a civil suit against me because what I said is the truth! It's time for you to face the facts.

guiowen said...

Sidney,
This is all fine, but so long as Rae Evans controls the entire NC justice system, you will gain nothing by filing a complaint against Dr. Nichols.
Your only hope is the US Department of Justice. Until and unless you go to Eric Holder with your filings, I'm afraid you're nothing more than an enabler.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Let me set the record straight. I am the one showing restraint. I knew the autopsy report on Reginald Daye by Dr. Clay Nichols was fraudulent when I first laid eyes on it in mid-August 2011."

No you didn't. You do not have the medical competence to evaluate the autopsy report.

"I had hoped that the prosecution would dismiss the charge of murder against Mangum long ago, but it did not. In March 2012, when I received the medical records from Mangum which confirmed my beliefs about the fraudulent nature of the autopsy report, I continued to withhold filing a complaint with the NC Medical Board until just recently... and I did so with much regret."

You did not establish as fact that the autopsy report was bogus. You tried to discredit the report because it did not buy into your narrative that Crystal did not kill Reginald Daye. I surmise you have no legal standing to file a complaint against Dr. Nichols since nothing he did directly affected you. Even if the NC Medical Board did act on your complaint, you would never have been able to prove it. Your unsupported allegations are proof of nothing.

"Whether or not you like it, the fact remains that the report which contains falsehoods is criminally fraudulent and is responsible for Mangum being wrongfully incarcerated for a year and a half."

What legal standing or status do you have to proclaim that a crime had happened, especially in this case? You blog that AG Cooper, after a thorough review of DA NIFONG's case against the innocent Lacrosse defendant can not express his opinion that they were in fact innocent. But you think you can proclaim Dr. Nichols guilty, which is especially hubristic belief that you have the qualifications to evaluate the report. Your repeated assertion, that anyone with a 5th grade education can see it is false, is prima facie evidence you are not qualified.

"He cannot bring a civil suit against me because what I said is the truth! It's time for you to face the facts."

Oh yes he can. You are on record for saying he is criminally liable. It would not be hard to prove your malicious intent, considering your rantings are a matter of public record. How would you prove the allegations you made against him were true? Not by saying that anyone with a 5th Grade education could see the autopsy report was deliberately falsified.

Anonymous said...

Two words Harr. The first is bull. You prove nothing. You claim air. Other physicians with far more credential than you' bro, have looked at the documents you illegally posted. They say your claims are a crock, putting it mildly. I really do hope somebody sues you and soon.
But you keep it up. Take your case to the White House. There is a black man in the office. But oh geez maybe he is an Oreo too since he is half white. Golly what's a crackpot to do?

Lance the Intern said...

Sid -- You should have received written acknowledgement from the NC Medical Board within 2 weeks of filing your complaint. It's been just over a month -- Have you received it?

You also have the right to be informed of the outcome of your complaint. Do you plan to post the outcome of your complaint here?

Finally, I thought you were going to be meeting with the NC State Bar again this week...Was this not the case?

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
Sid -- You should have received written acknowledgement from the NC Medical Board within 2 weeks of filing your complaint. It's been just over a month -- Have you received it?

You also have the right to be informed of the outcome of your complaint. Do you plan to post the outcome of your complaint here?

Finally, I thought you were going to be meeting with the NC State Bar again this week...Was this not the case?


Intern, I did receive written response from the Medical Board which did spell out a framework.

I was not so much interested in going after Dr. Nichols as I was trying to get the Medical Board to disavow the autopsy report he authored. As I stated, I'm inclined to believe that for him to write such a fraudulent document he must have been under extreme duress... especially after seeing what happened to Mike Nifong after he refused to follow the plan set forth by the Powers-That-Be. That said, it was not my intention to publish online the decision of the Medical Board.

The NC State Bar's Authorized Practice Committee met on Wednesday the 24th and addressed my case in their quarterly meeting. I tried to find the outcome online, but was unable to find anything on the media or State Bar sites. If you come across the Bar's decision, I would appreciate if you could give me enlightenment about it.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Two words Harr. The first is bull. You prove nothing. You claim air. Other physicians with far more credential than you' bro, have looked at the documents you illegally posted. They say your claims are a crock, putting it mildly. I really do hope somebody sues you and soon.
But you keep it up. Take your case to the White House. There is a black man in the office. But oh geez maybe he is an Oreo too since he is half white. Golly what's a crackpot to do?


Sorry to disappoint you, but nobody's going to sue me because I do not speak with a forked tongue.

Everything I said about the autopsy report being fraudulent is the truth. Dr. Nichols knows it, as does the state's Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Radisch... and your other physician friends with more impressive credentials than I, know that what I speak is truthful, too.

Later, Bro.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 10:04PM 10-24-12 said: "Your own guilt-presuming attitude is what labels you as a racist"....... My persumption of giuilt, on the part of OJ Simpson, Casey Anthony and the perpetrators of a sexual assult on Crystal, has nothing to do with race

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 10:04PM 10-24-12 said: "What I said is that SIDNEY's own statements call into question his competence as a physician:..........But we don't know who you are nor can we go back and confirm what you now claim. This is the trouble trying to debate a bunch of anonymous posters. You never know who you are talking to. Anonymous posting is by it's nature inately cowardly. I say "stand and be counted"

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"My persumption of giuilt, on the part of OJ Simpson, Casey Anthony and the perpetrators of a sexual assult on Crystal, has nothing to do with race".

You have no factual basis for believing that Crystal was raped, that any Caucasian men raped her. Your presumption of guilt is based on their race, nothing more.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"But we don't know who you are nor can we go back and confirm what you now claim. This is the trouble trying to debate a bunch of anonymous posters. You never know who you are talking to. Anonymous posting is by it's nature inately cowardly. I say 'stand and be counted'".

You do not know who Kilgo is and you have no idea whether or not his anonymous Lacrosse player friend even exists. You do not say to them, provided they are a them, "stand and be counted".

It shows again your presumption of guilt of the rape of Crystal on the part of Caucasian men is based on race. It is not based on any source whose credibility you can verify.

Can we say Hypocrisy, boys and girls.

kenhyderal said...

Absolutely not. My persumption of guilt is based on what I have been told by the victim.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Absolutely not. My persumption of guilt is based on what I have been told by the victim."

There are differences between the OJ Simpson case, the Casey Anthony case and the phony Duke rape case. In the former case, even though the defendants were acquitted, there was evidence they perpetrated the crimes. In the phony Duke rape case, there was no evidence that Crystal was raped.

If you believe what Crystal told you(there was no crime of which she was a victim), you believe the word of a liar.

I say you believe it because you are a racist who does not like Caucasian men who are better off and more accomplished than you are. Your recent tirade against KC Johnson shows that.

kenhyderal said...

Kilgo has a user name and he demonstrated his goodwill by donating financially to Crystal's cause. I do call on this friend of his, who he claims is a Duke LaCrosse Player that was present when the sexual assault took place, even at this late date and, in all conscience, to come forward, identify himself and set the record straight. I don't believe he is the only innocent person present who knows what happened so I also call on anyone with information to do so as well. Hopefully at some stage Kilgo will return to this blog answer for himself. I hope he has not been "persuaded" leave this matter alone. I also hope that some of the former Duke LaCrosse Players who are also innoncent come on this blog and join the debate but they are most likely gagged by the Trial Lawyers.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Kilgo has a user name and he demonstrated his goodwill by donating financially to Crystal's cause."

All that means nothing. He is an anonymous source whose credibility you can not determine. You praise him because hey buys into your racist presumption of guilt.

"I do call on this friend of his, who he claims is a Duke LaCrosse Player that was present when the sexual assault took place, even at this late date and, in all conscience, to come forward, identify himself and set the record straight."

You can not verify that this person even exists.

"I don't believe he is the only innocent person present who knows what happened so I also call on anyone with information to do so as well."

If you are familiar with the case, there were calls for witnesses to come forth. None did. The only witness who came forth was Moez Elmostafa who gave a statement supporting Reade Seligman's alibi. DA NIFONG unsuccessfully tried to intimidate him into changing his statement. That is strong circumstantial evidence that no rape occurred, not that there is a grand conspiracy to cover it up.

"Hopefully at some stage Kilgo will return to this blog answer for himself. I hope he has not been 'persuaded' leave this matter alone."

What persuaded Kilgo to leave this blog was his recognition that he was being exposed as a fraud.

"I also hope that some of the former Duke LaCrosse Players who are also innoncent come on this blog and join the debate but they are most likely gagged by the Trial Lawyers."

ALL the Duke Lacrosse players have insisted they are innocent, that no rape happened. Most of them have filed suit, against Duke, against Durham over the phony rape case. There are no innocent Lacrosse players who are going to come forward and say that a rape did occur.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 3:14 PM said: "I say you believe it because you are a racist who does not like Caucasian men who are better off and more accomplished than you are. Your recent tirade against KC Johnson shows that" ...... I've never seen a photograph of KC Johnson and I had no idea of his race. Any biographies of him I've seen don't describe him as a "Caucasian". This anachronistic term is generally only used in the U.S.A. although in Canada it's sometimes used by Police in describing a fugitive. To me it seems a racist term in that it's used pricipally to designate skin color. Technically speaking many people such as Sudanese, who often have darker complexions then some African Ameicans, are Caucasian. I guess I can presume, from what you post, that KC Johnson is not an African American but if he was I still would think his blog is narrow-minded one-sided and seems to be based on his vendetta against Duke Prsident Broadhead

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 3:41 said: "All that means nothing. He is an anonymous source whose credibility you can not determine" .... This description could just as easily apply to you.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "DA NIFONG unsuccessfully tried to intimidate him into changing his statement" ......... And the evidence for that is??

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous @ 3:14 PM said: 'I say you believe it because you are a racist who does not like Caucasian men who are better off and more accomplished than you are. Your recent tirade against KC Johnson shows that' ...... I've never seen a photograph of KC Johnson and I had no idea of his race. Any biographies of him I've seen don't describe him as a 'Caucasian'."

So that is why you falsely accuse him of having a vendetta against President Brodhead. You have never read what is on his blog. There is a picture of KC Johnson on his blog.

"This anachronistic term is generally only used in the U.S.A. although in Canada it's sometimes used by Police in describing a fugitive. To me it seems a racist term in that it's used pricipally to designate skin color."

That is because you are a blatant unrepentant guilt presuming racist.

"Technically speaking many people such as Sudanese, who often have darker complexions then some African Ameicans, are Caucasian. I guess I can presume, from what you post, that KC Johnson is not an African American but if he was I still would think his blog is narrow-minded one-sided and seems to be based on his vendetta against Duke Prsident Broadhead(the proper spelling is Brodhead)".

That is because you are a blatant unrepentant guilt presuming racist. You are still incapable of discerning between truth and propaganda.

Lance the Intern said...

The NC Medical Board's primary responsibility is to protect the public by ensuring that the regulations as outlined in NCGS chapter 90 are followed.

There are no regulations regarding autopsies that I can find in NCGS 90 (there WERE regulations, but they were rescinded effective Jan 1 1984).

I doubt the Medical Board will be able to disavow the autopsy report -- it just doesn't appear to be under their purview.

Anonymous said...

Kenhyderal = DJ Register

kenhyderal said...

anonymous said: "There is a picture of KC Johnson on his blog".......... Huh??

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: 'DA NIFONG unsuccessfully tried to intimidate him into changing his statement' ......... And the evidence for that is??"

From http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/Moez_Elmostafa#cite_note-0

"Moez Elmostafa (sometimes referred to in the news as Moez Mostafa or by his full first name of Moezeldin) was an African-American cab driver who picked up Reade Seligmann when he left the party at 610 North Buchanan Boulevard. Since the cab ride occurred during the time that Crystal Gail Mangum claimed she was attacked, Elmostafa came forward as an alibi witness for Seligmann.

Shortly after coming forward, Elmostafa was arrested on an unrelated, two-and-a-half-year old warrant. He was tried and found not guilty. The circumstances of the arrest and Elmostafa's testimony suggest that it was an attempt to discourage him from serving as a witness. According to Elmostafa, the detective who arrested him asked if he had "anything new" to say regarding the lacrosse case, and when he said no, took him to the magistrate."

The source cited was a story in the News and Observer.

If you knew anything about the Duke case, you would have been familiar with the story of Moez Elmostafa. You choose to be unaware because you are a guilt presuming unrepentant racist.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: (for the 100th time) "That is because you are a blatant unrepentant guilt presuming racist" (At least I guess you're the same anonymous person) ........ Give it a rest.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"anonymous said: 'There is a picture of KC Johnson on his blog'.......... Huh??"

Go access Durham in Wonderland and see for yourself, if you are not afraid of the truth.

Or, you can go to Wikipedia and do a search for KC Johnson. The Wikipedia article has the same picture that is on his blog.

Or, you can do a google search on KC Johnson, then click to see the images.

Or, you can go to Youtube and look at the video of the ABC Nightline coverage of the unraveling of the phony rape case. It contains an interview with KC Johnson:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gh8oGF4iXQ

I bet Kilgo never gave you anything like this to back up his claims of what he knew about the phony rape case.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: (for the 100th time) "That is because you are a blatant unrepentant guilt presuming racist' (At least I guess you're the same anonymous person) ........ Give it a rest."

You are a blatant, guilt presuming unrepentqant racist. Make it 101 times and there will be more.

You sure do not like having your blatant unrepentant racism exposed to the public.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said" "The circumstances of the arrest and Elmostafa's testimony suggest that it was an attempt to discourage him from serving as a witness. According to Elmostafa, the detective who arrested him asked if he had "anything new" to say regarding the lacrosse case, and when he said no, took him to the magistrate.......... Suggested to who? It didn't "suggest" that to me. Oh yeah I know that's because you think I'm an u.g.p.r.

kenhyderal said...

When I log onto Durham-in-Wonderland I see no picture of KC Johnson. ?? No, it never occured to me to check out his race or to search for an image of him. To me his race is inconsequential. I could care less about what he looks like.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "You sure do not like having your blatant unrepentant racism exposed to the public" It's does get a bit tedious but I know people of intelligence will consider the anonymous source and draw their own conclusions.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Suggested to who? It didn't "suggest" that to me. Oh yeah I know that's because you think I'm an u.g.p.r."

It is also because you are incredibly stupid.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"When I log onto Durham-in-Wonderland I see no picture of KC Johnson".

Then you are either blind or you did not actually log into DIW.

ou have a history f misrepresenting facts.

KHF Supporter said...

Ken:

It is time to end the charade.

You are not a close friend of Crystal who believes that she was raped by three mystery rapists. Your actions betray you.

A close friend of Crystal who actually believes the ridiculous story you have advanced would be angry with everyone who mistreated Crystal. After all, she was brutally raped, and the rapists got away with a horrific crime.

You have been angry with the players. Many were rude during the party. A couple probably took some of Crystal's money. You allege two assisted the mystery rapists. Others covered up a horrific crime. If you believed your story, you would be even more critical.

The DPD did nothing to actually investigate a horrific crime. You have been modestly critical of the "botched" investigation. They didnt botch an investigation. They didn't conduct an investigation. Your friend was brutally raped, and the they made no attempt to solve the crime. A real friend would be livid.

Nifong was involved early on in the case. He knew that the DPD had not conducted a bona fide investigation. He did not insist that they conduct one. He designed a rigged procedure to select defendants. You are not even mildly critical of Nifong, coming up with a variety of excuses. Again, a real friend would be livid.

You act as though the proper role of a prosecution in a case with an accuser who doesn't remember what happened and can't identify the perpetrators is to indict some random defendants and see if they start talking. That is far easier than investigating.

Finally, you claim Kilgo has a friend that witnessed a brutal rape, and the friend is struggling with his conscience. Strangely, you are not critical of either Kilgo or his mystery friend. if you really believed the mystery rapist story, you would not passively call on the mystery friend to come forward. If the inane story were true, Kilgo and his mystery friend are both guilty of misprision of felony. Both are criminals. Both are despicable human beings. A true friend of Crystal would file a complaint. The police can trace Kilgo's ISP. A true friend would help solve a brutal crime.

I previously called you a troll. I recognize now that an apology may be in order. You, and not Sidney, may be the master satirist. If so, congratulations.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: "You sure do not like having your blatant unrepentant racism exposed to the public" It's does get a bit tedious but I know people of intelligence will consider the anonymous source and draw their own conclusions."

They will also consider the obvious guilt presuming racism you have demonstrated on your blog.

That you consider Kilgo, an anonymous source of unverifiable credibility, a reliable source of information. you by your own criteria are not a person of intelligence.

Anonymous said...






Kenny, Kenny, oh Kenny Mack, when are you coming back?

Kenny, Kenny, oh Kenny Mack, when are you coming back?




Anonymous said...

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Anonymous said...


Dr. Harr: It's time to exercize your responsibility as the host of this blog and censor garbage like the preceeding posts in Russian and Chinese, random and unrelated to the discussion, the repetitive chanting and sing-song idiocy that keeps getting interjected and especially the dispicable racist posts that slander African Americans.


Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

Anonymous said...

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny
Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny



Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...


Dr. Harr: It's time to exercize your responsibility as the host of this blog and censor garbage like the preceeding posts in Russian and Chinese, random and unrelated to the discussion, the repetitive chanting and sing-song idiocy that keeps getting interjected and especially the dispicable racist posts that slander African Americans.


Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

Right on KEN-malek-HYDER-Williams-AL

kenhyderal said...

KHF Supporter said: You are not a close friend of Crystal who believes that she was raped by three mystery rapists. Your actions betray you..... Well, Crystal considers me a friend.

A close friend of Crystal who actually believes the ridiculous story you have advanced would be angry with everyone who mistreated Crystal. After all, she was brutally raped, and the rapists got away with a horrific crime..... I am certainly angry with any that have mistreated Crystal

You have been angry with the players. Many were rude during the party. A couple probably took some of Crystal's money. You allege two assisted the mystery rapists. Others covered up a horrific crime. If you believed your story, you would be even more critical....Crystal was insulted robbed and raped and the perpetrators got off scott free.

The DPD did nothing to actually investigate a horrific crime. You have been modestly critical of the "botched" investigation. They didnt botch an investigation. They didn't conduct an investigation. Your friend was brutally raped, and the they made no attempt to solve the crime. A real friend would be livid.............My being angery wont help. what I have to do now is to seek justice for Crystal going forward

Nifong was involved early on in the case. He knew that the DPD had not conducted a bona fide investigation. He did not insist that they conduct one. He designed a rigged procedure to select defendants. You are not even mildly critical of Nifong, coming up with a variety of excuses. Again, a real friend would be livid............................ DA Nifong like Crystal became a victim. He made mistakes but his motive like mine was to seek justice

You act as though the proper role of a prosecution in a case with an accuser who doesn't remember what happened and can't identify the perpetrators is to indict some random defendants and see if they start talking. That is far easier than investigating...... Check back and you will find how critical I have been of this.

Finally, you claim Kilgo has a friend that witnessed a brutal rape, and the friend is struggling with his conscience. Strangely, you are not critical of either Kilgo or his mystery friend. if you really believed the mystery rapist story, you would not passively call on the mystery friend to come forward. If the inane story were true, Kilgo and his mystery friend are both guilty of misprision of felony. Both are criminals. Both are despicable human beings. A true friend of Crystal would file a complaint. The police can trace Kilgo's ISP. A true friend would help solve a brutal crime..... Just today I called on them to come forward. Kilgo was not present. His friend, although a witness, was not involved in any crimes but was troubled by the actions of his friends. Neither of them are as dispicable as the perpetrators. Their false code of not informing aside their punishment will be a stricken conscience

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @5:09 said: They will also consider the obvious guilt presuming racism you have demonstrated on your blog" Huh!. I don't have a blog.

kenhyderal said...

http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.ca/ @ Anonymous @ 5:06 PM

Anonymous said...

LENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous @5:09 said: They will also consider the obvious guilt presuming racism you have demonstrated on your blog" Huh!. I don't have a blog."

okay, you got me.

I should have said They will also consider the obvious guilt presuming racism you have demonstrated on SIDNEY's blog

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.ca/ @ Anonymous @ 5:06 PM"

I guess you chose not to see the small but obvious picture on the top right under the best ethics blog 2007 logo.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"DA Nifong like Crystal became a victim. He made mistakes but his motive like mine was to seek justice".

Neither one of you seek justice. Both of you seek to have innocent men convicted of a crime which never happened simply because those innocent men are Caucasian.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDEERAL:

"Kilgo was not present. His friend, although a witness, was not involved in any crimes but was troubled by the actions of his friends. Neither of them are as dispicable as the perpetrators. Their false code of not informing aside their punishment will be a stricken conscience".

What perpetrators?

What factual basis have you ever come up with to show that anyone ever perpetrated a crime against Crystal on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

That your anonymous source cites another anonymous source as a witness to a crime means what?

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Crystal was insulted robbed and raped and the perpetrators got off scott free."

Show factual evidence that proves Crystal was raped.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"My being angery wont help. what I have to do now is to seek justice for Crystal going forward".

Seeking to have innocent Caucasian men convicted on the basis of Crystal's false allegations is not seeking justice.

Show factual evidence that anyone perpetrated a crime against Crystal on the night of 13/14 March 2006. You can not do this when your starting point is presuming guilt.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Well, Crystal considers me a friend."

That is only because you buy into her obvious lies.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Well, Crystal considers me a friend."

Judging from Brad Bannon's presentation at DA NIFONG's ethics trial, Crystal accepted a lot of guys as her friends.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"DA Nifong like Crystal became a victim. He made mistakes but his motive like mine was to seek justice".

How? By wrongfully prosecuting innocent men in order to stir up black on white racism on the part of Durham's black electorate and win an election?

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"Their false code of not informing aside their punishment will be a stricken conscience".

What "false code of not informing"? The forensic exam of the rape kit and the physical exam definitively ruled out a rape. There was no crime to not inform about.

You have been unable to present any evidence, circumstantial or otherwise, that a crime did occur. That you proclaim guilt on the part of innocent Caucasian men does not establish their guilt.

AG Cooper did more than just express his opinion that they are innocent. He investigated the case thoroughly and objectively, something DA NIFONG never did, and concluded the accused were innocent.

That is more significant than your presuming their guilt on the basis of their race.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Give the details of whatever investigation you ever did to establish any guilt on the part of anyone.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

One thing you repeatedly mention is that the police did not attempt to identify the source of the male DNA found on Crystal.

Until December of 2006, when Brad Bannon got Brian Meehan to admit he had agreed with DA NIFONG to conceal the information that non Lax male DNA had been recovered from Crystal(from a lot more than 5 men).

DA NIFONG, who you say was working for justice for Crystal(explain why he never had her interviewed until 9 months into the case) was not interested in justice. He was interested in getting members of the Lacrosse team.

DA NIFONG, not any conspiracy, was the one responsible for the failure to identify the source of the DNA on Crystal. After the rape kit tested negative for semen, blood and saliva(which definitively ruled out the rape Crystal had described), DA NIFONG did not want it known that DNA from men other than the ones he had indicted for the crime, was found.

Put that in you pipe and smoke it, rather than any other delusion weed you have been inhaling.

Anonymous said...

7 Correction(because as an anonymous poster I can not delete comments which I need to correct):



KENHYDERAL:

One thing you repeatedly mention is that the police did not attempt to identify the source of the male DNA found on Crystal.

Until December of 2006, when Brad Bannon got Brian Meehan to admit he had agreed with DA NIFONG to conceal the information that non Lax male DNA had been recovered from Crystal(from a lot more than 5 men) was not publicly known.

DA NIFONG, who you say was working for justice for Crystal(explain why he never had her interviewed until 9 months into the case) was not interested in justice. He was interested in getting members of the Lacrosse team.

DA NIFONG, not any conspiracy, was the one responsible for the failure to identify the source of the DNA on Crystal. After the rape kit tested negative for semen, blood and saliva(which definitively ruled out the rape Crystal had described), DA NIFONG did not want it known that DNA from men other than the ones he had indicted for the crime, was found.

Put that in you pipe and smoke it, rather than any other delusion weed you have been inhaling.

Anonymous said...

Right on, KHF Supporter!

Kenhyderal disgusts me.

He chooses not to betray the confidence of an Internet chat buddy instead of helping to solve a brutal and horrific rape of a woman he claims as a friend.

His smug righteousness disgusts me. He betrayed Crystal.


Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

Anonymous said...

Sidney you lied about the timing of the lax house demolition and the advance notices. What else have you lied about?
I doubt Kilgo exists.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Here is the story of Moez Elmostafa, which you will doubt since you have an aversion to confronting truth.

This comes from Wikipedia:

"[Reade] Seligmann is one of three players indicted for rape, kidnapping and a sex offense. His attorneys have filed motions in court with Elmostafa's sworn statement, backed up by bank machine photos and telephone records that the lawyers say prove that Seligmann could not have committed rape.

Elmostafa was arrested on a misdemeanor larceny charge after he gave his account of that night to Durham police investigators. The arrest raised questions about whether District Attorney Mike Nifong was exerting pressure on a potential defense witness.

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2006/08/30/38843/cabbie-in-lacrosse-case-acquitted.html#storylink=misearch#storylink=cpy

Consider this. There is a misdemeanor warrant for Mr. Elmostafa which has not been served for two and a half years. Mr. Elmostafa comes forward with a statement which supports Reade Seligman's alibi. Nifong has him checked out and finds this outstanding warrant. He has him arrested on the outstanding warrant which never had been served in over two and a half years.

If you say this does not smell of witness intimidation, it is because you are incapable of detecting the odor of corruption.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

More on Moez ELmostafa:

The account from Until Proven Innocent(which you will not read because you are afraid to confront the truth) is this:

When DA NIFONG learned of Mr. Elmostafa, he ordered Detectives Clayton and Himan to find him and bring him in. They arrested him and brought him in on May 10, 2006.

KC Johnson cited an article posted in the News and Observer August 17, 2006. According to that article, Mr. Elmostafa said the detectives asked him if he had anything new to say about the case(he had already given a statement supporting Reade Seligman's alibi). Mr. Elmostafa said no. Then he was bound over for trial on this outstanding misdemeanor warrant which, as Professor Johnson points out, could have been served on him at any time in the preceding three years.

The only explanation is, DA NIFONG attempted to intimidate Mr. Elmostafa into changing his story.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Judging from what you have written, Crystal told you she had been raped AFTER the Duke rape case was exposed as phony. Maybe it was at the same time she had her book published. In the press conference in which the book was announced, Crystal alleged she was raped but would not give any details, which would have corroborated her story. At later events, she appeared but again would not give details which would corroborate her story.

The issue is, why did Crystal not sue the Lacrosse players in civil court. If she really had a case, a lot of contingency fee hungry trial lawyers would have represented her. She did not sue. Was it because she was reluctant to discuss details? Was it because she could not give any evidence to support her claim?

Your idol, SIDNEY, complains the case file has been sealed. If Crystal had sued in civil court, would that not have unsealed the case file?

The most logical answer is, she was not raped in the first place. I suspect she, via her advisor Victor Clark did consult more than one trial lawyer and got a response from all of them, you have no case and there is no way we can collect a contingency fee if we represent you.

So, let's hear the answer you try to contrive to explain why Crystal did not sue.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous(signing as Malek Williams) wrote: " His smug righteousness disgusts me. He betrayed Crystal"
......Who's side are you on Malek? Crystal doesn't think I betrayed her. Kilgo is not my "inter-net buddy" I only know him by way of this blog. He made an anonymous donation towards Crystal's bail in her arson charge. The money raised became unnecessary when a bail bond company Hammond and Hammond posted her bail pro bono. The money was then passed on to Crystal to assist her. I note you have done nothing to raise funds for her present bail. As I pointed out to you, without intending to be smug or righteous, the way you are going about supporting Crystal, unintentionally or not, is playing into the hands of her detractorts such as KHF Supporter

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

" Kilgo is not my "inter-net buddy" I only know him by way of this blog."

So you admit Kilgo is an unidentified anonymous source whose credibility you can not verify.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous(signing as Malek Williams):

Don't be too hard on KENHYDERAL.

KENNY has a penchant for communing eith imaginary people - Crystal the rape victim, the competent physycian SIDNEY HARR, Kilgo who knows everything about the Duke Lacrosse case.

KENNY seems upset because he can not commune with another imaginary person, Kilgo's Lacrosse player friend who witnessed the rape of Crystal.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

How about you lay out all the evidence you have that Crystal was raped.

Lance the Intern said...

Anonymous @October 25, 2012 6:02 AM:
If Dr. Roberts was retained as an expert witness pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702,then pretrial disclosure must be made in the form of a written report signed and prepared by the witness. This document would be considered "discoverable".


Since the funding for Dr. Roberts was paid by the court, rather than Mr. Vann, I feel confident she had to produce a written report. My assumption is that, since we haven't heard any "breaking news" WRT the autopsy reports, she didn't find anything wrong with them.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
Anonymous @October 25, 2012 6:02 AM:
If Dr. Roberts was retained as an expert witness pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702,then pretrial disclosure must be made in the form of a written report signed and prepared by the witness. This document would be considered "discoverable".


Since the funding for Dr. Roberts was paid by the court, rather than Mr. Vann, I feel confident she had to produce a written report. My assumption is that, since we haven't heard any "breaking news" WRT the autopsy reports, she didn't find anything wrong with them.


Intern, thank you for the legalese enlightenment. She should've written a report and Mangum should have had access to it or seen it long before now. However, keep in mind that the mainstream media plays a big role in the conspiracy against Mangum and will conceal the truth... the very truth that will set her free.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Anonymous Anonymous said...


Dr. Harr: It's time to exercize your responsibility as the host of this blog and censor garbage like the preceeding posts in Russian and Chinese, random and unrelated to the discussion, the repetitive chanting and sing-song idiocy that keeps getting interjected and especially the dispicable racist posts that slander African Americans.


Malek Williams
Hillside H.S.
Class of 1996

Right on KEN-malek-HYDER-Williams-AL


As reprehensible and disgusting as some of the posts may be, I think it is crucial that everyone, even low-life scumbags, be allowed to say what's on their minds. Keep in mind that what they say is a reflection upon them.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Intern, thank you for the legalese enlightenment. She should've written a report and Mangum should have had access to it or seen it long before now. However, keep in mind that the mainstream media plays a big role in the conspiracy against Mangum and will conceal the truth... the very truth that will set her free."

Isn't Crystal under state jurisdiction? Would Federal rules of evidence apply?

In any event, your allegation of a grand conspiracy against Crystal is just another one of your unsupported allegations. You again show how widely split off from reality you are.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
The NC Medical Board's primary responsibility is to protect the public by ensuring that the regulations as outlined in NCGS chapter 90 are followed.

There are no regulations regarding autopsies that I can find in NCGS 90 (there WERE regulations, but they were rescinded effective Jan 1 1984).

I doubt the Medical Board will be able to disavow the autopsy report -- it just doesn't appear to be under their purview.


Thank you, Intern, for your investigative enlightenment. Although it may not be under the Medical Board's purview to disavow an autopsy report, I do not believe there is anything that contravenes such an action.

Being a soul of full of compassion and a sense of justice, I would not hesistate to comment on an autopsy report... especially when an innocent person's freedom is on the line. The Man from Nazareth would not hesitate to do so, either.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"Intern, thank you for the legalese enlightenment. She should've written a report and Mangum should have had access to it or seen it long before now. However, keep in mind that the mainstream media plays a big role in the conspiracy against Mangum and will conceal the truth... the very truth that will set her free."

Isn't Crystal under state jurisdiction? Would Federal rules of evidence apply?

In any event, your allegation of a grand conspiracy against Crystal is just another one of your unsupported allegations. You again show how widely split off from reality you are.


The truth will come out soon, and when it does, Crystal will be freed, the charges against her dropped, and you will be enlightened beyond your wildest imagination.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The truth will come out soon, and when it does, Crystal will be freed, the charges against her dropped, and you will be enlightened beyond your wildest imagination."

Over a year ago you were saying that the truth will soon come out.

Empty promise.

Lance the Intern said...

Sid stated: "Being a soul of full of compassion and a sense of justice, I would not hesistate [sic] to comment on an autopsy report."
Ah...but commenting on the autopsy report would be outside the scope of the NC Medical Boards' legal authority, and would have no legal weight.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Being a soul of full of compassion and a sense of justice, I would not hesistate to comment on an autopsy report... especially when an innocent person's freedom is on the line."

Another lie for which you are responsible.

"The Man from Nazareth would not hesitate to do so, either."

The Man from Nazareth does not condone lies.

Right on, SIDNEY-minion-of-the-father-of-lies-HARR.

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 487   Newer› Newest»