Friday, September 9, 2016

Unabashed mainstream media bias against Nifong, Mangum, and Harr

Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

210 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 210 of 210
Walt said...

Sid wrote: "If I am not mistaken, prosecutorial immunity extends only if the prosecutor is properly performing her duties."

You are mistaken.

Walt-in-Durham

October 5, 2016 at 5:20 PM
Walt said...

Sid wrote: "Yesterday, October 4th, I filed an Informal Brief ...."

Filled with a lot of words, but no sense. Sid's brief is his usual lack of cogent argument and of course no Sid brief would be complete without an ad hominem attack on someone. In this case, The Attorney General of North Carolina. Sid does at least cite the correct parts of the state constitution and the District Attorney's act. Unfortunately, he draws an erroneous conclusion from the plain meaning of the statute. That will doom his appeal. Of course Sid doesn't really care about this appeal, it's all about wasting other people's time. If he cared, he'd haul himself over to the NCSU library and go to the fifth floor to look at a few law books or digests. Finally, Sid closes his ridiculous brief with the demand that Judge Flanagan be prohibited from sitting on his fool case. Sadly, all Sid does is demonstrate his unwillingness to learn.

What a waste.

Walt-in-Durham

October 5, 2016 at 5:36 PM
Anonymous said...


Sid:

You have 86 days to exonerate and free Mangum.

It has been 98 days since the end of June, 166 days since April 23rd, 205 days since the Ides of March and 3,400 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

October 6, 2016 at 3:01 AM
Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous A Lawyer said...
If I am not mistaken, prosecutorial immunity extends only if the prosecutor is properly performing her duties.

No one needs immunity for properly performing their duties. By definition, immunity shields prosecutors from judicial scrutiny for improper actions.


Hey, A Lawyer.

In Lorrin Freeman's case, her improper action was inaction by ignoring me. It's that simple.

October 6, 2016 at 3:43 AM
Nifong Supporter said...


Hey, A Lawyer.

Thanks for alerting me to the violation of the kenhyderal Doctrine. It has been addressed.

October 6, 2016 at 3:50 AM
Walt said...

Sid wrote: "In Lorrin Freeman's case, her improper action was inaction by ignoring me. It's that simple."

BBBZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT (Manual Buzzer Sound)
Run him. Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Walt-in-Durham

October 6, 2016 at 4:47 AM
Anonymous said...

Except as has been explained to you - she can ignore you. You just aren't that special. She is an elected official, if you don't like being ignored, you solve it through the political process.

October 6, 2016 at 6:48 AM
guiowen said...

Actually, Sidney, what you should do is find a lawyer (in your area) with political ambitions, and help him/her launch a campaign against Lorrin Freeman. I have no doubt that both Kenhyderal and Kilgo will contribute money to the campaign.
Once your protege has been elected DA, you will enjoy access to the DA's office.
Please start ASAP, since political campaigns take time.

October 6, 2016 at 10:04 AM
Anonymous said...

Sidney, how much have you spent in filing fees and related costs in your endeavors? I think you said it was $500 for one of the filing fees recently. I assume you cannot deduct any of these expenses for tax purposes.

October 6, 2016 at 2:27 PM
Anonymous said...

Anonymous 2:27 PM:

Sidney views filing fees and related costs as entertainment expenses.

He is achieving nothing if his objective were actually to win lawsuits, and the filing fees thus could be viewed as a waste of money if that were his objective. It is clear that winning lawsuits is not his real objective. Sidney's lay-legal activities offer self-amusement and the opportunity to annoy others, and every penny has been well spent.

October 6, 2016 at 3:00 PM
«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 210 of 210   Newer› Newest»

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)