Well, as the saying goes, “All good things must come to an end,” – and so it is with Episode V of “The MisAdventures of Super-Duper Cooper.” But don’t despair, Episode VI will make its appearance, hopefully in the not too distant future. It will be titled “Carpetbagger Vengeance Full Throttle” and it will be based upon a true story… my experiences on the Duke University campus in 2010 when a malicious and premeditated attempt was made to have me arrested for the crime of being a Nifong supporter.
The next time the A.G. dons his cape, cowl, and buccaneer boots to protect the North Carolina tenet of “selective justice based on Class and Color,” will be in Episode VII, as of yet untitled. If you think Episode V was action packed, you’d better hold onto your hats for a pitched battle of the ages… and there is a good likelihood that Dame Justice will be in on the fray in that one.
In following a request by commenter guiowen, I have begun a new tradition with the strip, in which I will now depict faces of individuals in cameo roles or with speaking parts, such as I did with guiowen’s character in Part 17 of Super-Duper Cooper. Individuals need only to send me by e-mail a photo. (justice4nifong@gmail.com) The more views and expressions sent will provide a better chance of capturing the likeness of the person. There is also the opportunity for people to be placed on wanted posters in Cooper’s office… it just requires a frontal and profile photograph.
Any other information provided by the individual can be helpful, for example alumni of a specific college may be outfitted in clothing sporting that school’s logo.
Future episodes will continue to include post-strip commentary to provide the best educational experience possible for the strip’s viewers. In the near future, I do plan on uploading a version of Episode V on YouTube for the reading impaired.
Thank you for your interest in this educational comic strip, and know that I welcome all feedback.
Below is a Link to the final installment of Episode V. Enjoy.
LINK: http://justice4nifong.com/direc/sdcDirec/sdcEpv/sdc193.htm
90 comments:
You left out the prominent ugly-ass mole in the center of Disgraced-and-Disbarred Nifong's forehead.
You mean your next cartoon will be about your frivolous lawsuit, filed to coerce Duke to support your vendetta against the innocent Duke Lacrosse players.
Sidney Harr is a Racist Bigot
Crystal, You Give Love A Bad Name
Crystal, You Give Love A Bad Name
Sidney, what a miserable human being you are. You hate the Lacrosse players because they did not rape Crystal Mangum.
Sidney, here is where an analogy of yours breaks down. You compare Michael Nifong with Jesus Christ.
Jesus Christ, innocent of any crime, was arrested, prosecuted and sentenced to death.
Mr. Nifong had three people who were innocent of any crime(no crime had actually happened). Mr. Nifong had them indicted, charged and then attempted to put each of them in prison for 30 years.
Mr. Nifong had more in common with Annas, Caiaphas and Pontius Pilate.
If any ne had something with Jesus Christ, it was Mr. Nifong's innocent victims.
Happy Easter.
Sidney, to my previous comment, I add:
You claim Mr. Nifong did not manufacture any evidence in the Duke case. Indirectly you do admit he had no evidence of a rape. Your lame dodge that he prosecuted them for sexual assault, which could have happened without leaving evidence shows your total lack of legal savvy.
Without evidence, he tried to have the accuser(whom what evidence Mr. Nifong had showed was a false accuser) tried to have the victim identify assailants. After Ms. Mangum had failed to identify anyone, Mr. Nifong had an improper, tainted lineup procedure done.
Mr. Nifong tried to manufacture probable cause, which is morally equivalent to manufacturing evidence.
And remember, what rendered the accused innocent of the crime with which they were charged was the fact that said crime never happened.
They were charged with first degree rape, not underage drinking.
In my last post I should have said false accuser and phony victim.
Sorry
Sid -- You forgot to put a mustache on the angelic voiced Linwood Wilson....Other than that, it seemed pretty good.
Umm..Why is Linwood the subject of your cartoon, anyway?
What about a cartoon of drunk prostitute Crystal Mangum stabbing somebody to death.
Anonymous said...
"You mean your next cartoon will be about your frivolous lawsuit, filed to coerce Duke to support your vendetta against the innocent Duke Lacrosse players."
Episode VI will attempt to find humor amidst the unprovoked, premeditated, and malicious attack upon me when I attended an event in 2010 on the Duke University campus as an invited guest.
Anonymous said...
"Sidney, what a miserable human being you are. You hate the Lacrosse players because they did not rape Crystal Mangum."
Let's face it, I did not shed many tears when the Duke Lacrosse team lost the championship, but I do not hate or dislike the Duke Lacrosse player currently or those in 2006.
I do not condone the 2006 team's behavior that earned them their shoddy reputation.
Anonymous said...
"Sidney, here is where an analogy of yours breaks down. You compare Michael Nifong with Jesus Christ.
Jesus Christ, innocent of any crime, was arrested, prosecuted and sentenced to death.
Mr. Nifong had three people who were innocent of any crime(no crime had actually happened). Mr. Nifong had them indicted, charged and then attempted to put each of them in prison for 30 years.
Mr. Nifong had more in common with Annas, Caiaphas and Pontius Pilate.
If any ne had something with Jesus Christ, it was Mr. Nifong's innocent victims.
Happy Easter."
Thank you for your Easter greeting.
Mike Nifong was persecuted by the State and NC State Bar, crucified in the media, and he will be resurrected through the efforts of people with good conscience and courage.
"Mike Nifong was persecuted by the State and NC State Bar, crucified in the media, and he will be resurrected through the efforts of people with good conscience and courage."
Sid, I leave you with this -- Every human being (you, Mike Nifong, me ) is conceived and born dead to God, is entirely predisposed to sin, is without inherent fear, love, or trust in God and is lacking in the ability or will to turn toward God, is entirely turned against God and is therefore under the sentence of eternal death and damnation.
Christ, by his perfect life and sacrificial death on the cross, has won the entire forgiveness of sins and eternal life for every human being.
My hope On this, the first Monday after Easter, is that your comments were in jest.
"I do not condone the 2006 team's behavior that earned them their shoddy reputation."
Syd, the problem is you continuously condone Nifong's lying to the court, concealing evidence, lying to the media and prosecuting a case for which he had no probable cause.
Walt-in-Durham
"Episode VI will attempt to find humor amidst the unprovoked, premeditated, and malicious attack upon me when I attended an event in 2010 on the Duke University campus as an invited guest."
Episode VI will be about how you, via a frivolous lawsuit, are trying to coerce Duke University into supporting your vendetta against the innocent Duke Lacrosse players.
"Let's face it, I did not shed many tears when the Duke Lacrosse team lost the championship, but I do not hate or dislike the Duke Lacrosse player currently or those in 2006."
The fact that you are carrying on a vendetta against them, although they are innocent of the crime with which they were charged, says otherwise.
What makes them innocent of that crime is the fact that said crime did not happen.
"Mike Nifong was persecuted by the State and NC State Bar, crucified in the media, and he will be resurrected through the efforts of people with good conscience and courage."
Mr. Nifong attempted to prosecute three innocent men for a crime which he should have known did not happen. If he did believe that a crime did happen and did not leave evidence, he is a highly incompetent lawyer.
He crucified himself in the media via his blatantly unethical misconduct. To borrow words from the good thief, he deserved what he got.
None of the sith mind tricks you unsuccessfully try to pull, none of the smoke and mirrors you try to conjure will change the facts.
Sith mind tricks only work on the weak minded. The only one your sith mind tricks are affecting is you.
Brought forward from previous thread:
Sidney: With regards to criminal records, it is my understanding that Reginald Daye's [record?] is extensive and includes acts of violence.
What a fucking prick you are.
Reginald Daye's record is easily-accessed public information. I suggest that you do so before you post such lies again.
I repeat, Sidney - you are a fucking prick.
Sidney: I believe the Durham Police should have conducted an investigation before arresting and charging her.
You have got to be kidding. The 911 call, and a statement from the victim w/ 7 stab wounds, are more than sufficient probable cause for arrest. Have you seen the police report, Sidney?
Sidney: The media manufactured Crystal's record of violence by repeatedly spreading Durham police accusations that she assaulted her ex-boyfriend in February 2010.
Crystal's violent criminal record long predates February, 2010. Try to show at least a modicum of honesty, Sidney.
Sidney: The truth is that he initiated the physical confrontation by repeatedly punching her in the face.
That should be evident in contemporaneous pictures taken that night and the next day.
Funny, nothing shows in her mugshot, Sidney. She just looks like a fucked-up ho.
Have you also heard the reports that Crystal trashed everything in Reginald's appartment?
"I do not condone the 2006 team's behavior that earned them their shoddy reputation."
Sidney, you know nothing of what aall happened at 610 Buchanan Avenue on the night of 13-14 March, 2006. You were not there. The accusations of wild, out of control behavior came from Mr. Nifong and from people like the 88 Gangsters, which accusations were made before anyone knew any facts or evidence about the case.
"...people with good conscience and courage" do not conduct vendettas against wrongfully prosecuted innocent men. Nor do such people distort facts in order to defend the man who conducted the wrongful prosecution>
"Sidney: With regards to criminal records, it is my understanding that Reginald Daye's [record?] is extensive and includes acts of violence."
From Whatchoo talkin' 'bout, Sydney?
Sidney, you have shown you do not consult the facts. You make up allegations, allegations which you never support with facts, out of your imagination and your wishful thinking.
It is a matter of public record that Crystal Mangum manifested criminal, violent behavior before the night of 13-14 March 2006.
It is also a matter of public record that before the night of 13-14 March 2006 she accused three men of raping her, a rape which her own father said never happened.
If the past record of the Lacrosse team is so important, if Mr. Daye's past record is so important, why is Crystal Mangum's not important?
2nd Post --
Sid, I could find no criminal record information for Reginald Eugene Daye DOB 11/3/64 in NC.
What is your source for this information?
If you can't cite an independently verifiable source, you need to retract this statement and apologize to the Daye family.
I will be looking for the retraction and apology. If I don't see one in a timely manner, I will make the Daye family aware of your statements.
Anon @ 9:48 AM - "I could find no criminal record information for Reginald Eugene Daye DOB 11/3/64 in NC... and
I will be looking for the retraction and apology. If I don't see one in a timely manner, I will make the Daye family aware of your statements."
Daye's record is available, but it is nothing like Sidney suggests. Sidney has no excuse for posting such garbage.
Apology & retraction or not, I would make Daye's family aware of Sidney Harr's despicable comments.
Would you like Harr's home address and phone number to give to the Daye family?
If I was anyone of the lacrosse familes and now the Daye family, I would make sure my lawyer contacted Sidney about the lies and accusations found here. If not adjudicated, then "I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse"
Simple as that...
Sidney, you claim the Lacrosse defendants suffered no damage from the false accusations because they did not spend any time in prison.
Regarding the so called "unprovoked, premeditated, and malicious attack upon me when I attended an event in 2010...", like the Lacrosse defendants, you were never incarcerated.
Unlike the Lacrosse defendants, you were never formally arrested or charged with any crime.
So, please explain how you hope to make a case for damages in your lawsuit against Duke.
Let's have it, Sidney.
Via your remarks about the innocent Lacrosse defendants, you show your attitude towards their damages.
Via what you say rendered them damageless is a de facto admission that you did not suffer any damages by what you called an unprovoked vicious attack on you.
To collect compensation for damages, you have to show you were damaged.
Anonymous @ April 25, 2011 9:48 AM something regarding support for the allegations he makes:
Sidney says Professor James Coleman is his friend. He says Professor Coleman prevented his arrest by Duke University.
Then Sidney says he sees no need to call Professor Coleman as his witness.
Go figure.
Sidney, Mr. Nifong threatened to charge members of the Duke Lacrosse team with aiding and abetting if they would not come forward with information which would incriminate other members.
You have called that a mild attempt to get witnesses to come forth.
Maybe Duke's action against you was a mild attempt to get you to comply with its solicitation policy.
Remember, you have to do more than assert it was an unprovoked vicious attack upon you. You have to prove it.
Anonymous @ April 25, 2011 10:20 AM:
If I were a member of Mr. Daye's family, I would be consulting an attorney about filing a wrongful death suit, consulting on whether Durham, Mr. Nifong, the Durham Police could be named as defendants.
Hey Sid -- I got a quote for you -- tell me if you agree:
``There are a lot of reasons that people kill...They kill for jealousy. They kill for revenge. But the worst possible motive for killing is money.....''
Mike Nifong, Herald-Sun May 10, 1995
Sid -- I suggest you make yourself familiar with the following:
http://www.eff.org/issues/bloggers/
legal/liability/defamation
Particularly the section on "Libel Per Se"... And begin writing that retraction...
Sidney, upon what evidence do you say that Crystal Mangum's allegations of rape were true?
Your usual dodge, that a sexual assault could have happened without leaving evidence, is legally meaningless.
How does this kind of thing, a crime could have happened without leaving evidence, establish probable cause that a crime did happen?
Sidney, you are really schizoid.
Even you admit that there was no evidence Crystal Mangum was raped. But you say her word and her identification of assailants was probable cause.
The police found Mr. Daye with multiple stab wounds. He gave them a statement as to who had stabbed him and that the assailant took his money. Although not quantified, from all indications he was certain. But you say that does not probable cause to arrest Ms. Mangum, who had a history of violent behavior which antedated 2006.
Sid - The last time I looked, North Carolina had much broader defamation laws than most other states. If I were you, I'd seriously consider generating both a retraction and apology.
Sidney,
I will also join the chorus.
Unless you provide definitive and independently verifiable (your FoCM friends don't qualify) evidence to support your allegation about Reginald Daye's "extensive" criminal record, I call on you to retract your comment and apologize to Mr. Daye's family.
You should offer the retraction and apology not out of a fear of being sued for defamation, but because it is the right thing to do. Making baseless allegations that tarnish the reputation of a recent murder victim is particularly despicable.
Sidney, your unsupported allegations against Mr. Daye show how full of hate you are.
Sidney, this is applicable to you:
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir?"
Joseph Welch to Senator Joseph McCarthy in the Army McCarthy hearings.
"...people with good conscience and courage" do not attack crime victims, especially dead crime victims.
From Sidney:
"With regards to criminal records, it is my understanding that Reginald Daye's is extensive and includes acts of violence."
It is also your understanding that the Lacrosse defendants raped Crystal Mangum even though evidence shows that crime never happened, that Ms. Mangum's allegations were false.
To my previous comment, I add:
Sidney it is your understanding that Mr. Nifong was disbarred because of a carpetbagger jihad initiated by Mrs. Evans statement to 60 Minutes.
This has been pointed out to you before. Mrs.Evans made her statement in January of 2007. The criticism of Mr. Nifong's prosecution emerged before January of 2007. Complaints to the State Bar were filed prior to January of 2007. The State Bar had almost completed its case against Mr. Nifong before Mrs. Evans made her statement.
What you understand is nothing.
Walt said...
"'I do not condone the 2006 team's behavior that earned them their shoddy reputation.'
Syd, the problem is you continuously condone Nifong's lying to the court, concealing evidence, lying to the media and prosecuting a case for which he had no probable cause.
Walt-in-Durham"
With all due respect, there is no doubt in my mind that Mike Nifong acted ethically in the Duke Lacrosse case. He did not withhold any evidence, providing thousands of pages of documents in triplicate for each defendant's team, within 24 hours of a defense motion. However, what you fail to mention is that the defense attorneys did not comply with reciprocal discovery when sought by the prosecution. Defense gave film clips and other "evidence" to the media to broadcast, but did not turn anything over to Mr. Nifong. Mr. Nifong never lied. If he made a statement that was incorrect, that does not constitute lying if what he stated was what he believed to be true. Finally, the Duke Lacrosse team had a well-earned reputation of debauchery, and in a beer-guzzling, stripper ogling atmosphere with underaged drinking, it is hardly a stretch to believe something untoward happened. Don't forget to throw in the racial epithets.
Anonymous said...
"'Episode VI will attempt to find humor amidst the unprovoked, premeditated, and malicious attack upon me when I attended an event in 2010 on the Duke University campus as an invited guest.'
Episode VI will be about how you, via a frivolous lawsuit, are trying to coerce Duke University into supporting your vendetta against the innocent Duke Lacrosse players."
I have no animus nor a vendetta against the Duke Lacrosse players. My cause is justice for Mike Nifong. And because Duke University, with premeditation and malice attempted to arrest me for the sole reason of being a supporter of Mike Nifong, I feel that I am entitled to some restorative justice.
The comic strip's purpose is not just to entertain, but to educate.. and having it featuring me will only lead to plenty of self-depricating humor.
Anonymous said...
"Sidney, your unsupported allegations against Mr. Daye show how full of hate you are."
I am not full of hate, especially for Mr. Daye. My allegations, which come from reliable sources who are in possession of certain documents, are meant to educate the public. The biased mainstream media will shield the public from the truth. The truth will be posted on my flog/blog tomorrow...
Producing a Flash blog is a bit time consuming. Visitors to the blog site will have the opportunity to read the blog or watch the flog... which is about twenty minutes in length.
"He [Nifong] did not withhold any evidence, providing thousands of pages of documents in triplicate for each defendant's team, within 24 hours of a defense motion."
The facts are dangerous things Syd. Nifong was asked in May if he had turned over all the evidence to the defence. He said he had, but in fact he had not. Further, he knew he had not. He was again asked in September. Again in court and again he said he had turned over the evidence to the defense when he had not. It was only after being asked twice in court and after a second defense motion, that Nifong turned over the evidence. That is what is called lying to the court.
"However, what you fail to mention is that the defense attorneys did not comply with reciprocal discovery when sought by the prosecution. Defense gave film clips and other "evidence" to the media to broadcast, but did not turn anything over to Mr. Nifong."
The fiasco was not a civil case, and reciprocal discovery was not an issue. Besides, the defense offered Nifong the evidence and he refused to look at it. That is certanly different from how Nifong and you are characterizing the situation now. Unfortunately for Nifong, the facts are stubborn things. But, the deceit continues to come from Nifong. That proves that he needs further rehabilitation that can only be provided by the Department of Corrections in a long term incarceration. Too bad Nifong weaseled out of the rehabilitation he so obviously needs.
Walt-in-Durham
Sid - I know you are a physician, so I'll assume your comments regarding "reciprocal discovery" (where did you hear that term anyway?) were made from ignorance rather than an outright attempt to lie to your readers.
GS §15A‑905 (Disclosure of evidence by the defendant – Information subject to disclosure) makes clear that the defense has no such obligation to turn over evidence in their files.
Oooooo, certain documents from reliable sources.....wow, I can't wait! Sid, your ego continues to grow.
shame on you for defaming a dead man! what's your point, sid? Poor Scarlett, once again the victim of an ever-growing circle of perps who are out to get her? So, he smacked her around and she stabbed him seven times? she has not one single bruise or mark and he is full of stab wounds. come on, sid.....enlighten us lemmings. I can't wait!!
"I am not full of hate, especially for Mr. Daye."
Why do you accuse him of being a criminal? That does not show any love for him.
What justification do you have to accuse him?
The police had Mr. Daye's word and the word of his nephew that Crystal Mangum stabbed him and took his money. That was probable cause to take her into custody.
"I have no animus nor a vendetta against the Duke Lacrosse players."
Then why do you continue to insinuate, without proof, tahat they raped Crystal Mangum?
Why do you have such heartburn over Mr. Cooper's belief, based on a thorough review of the case, that they are innocent?
"With all due respect, there is no doubt in my mind that Mike Nifong acted ethically in the Duke Lacrosse case."
Then there is something wrong with your mind.
The facts of the case show he either deliberately or negligently prosecuted three innocent men for a crime that never happened.
Whether it was due to malice or negligence, it added up to prosecutorial misconduct.
"And because Duke University, with premeditation and malice attempted to arrest me for the sole reason of being a supporter of Mike Nifong, I feel that I am entitled to some restorative justice."
Sidney, you have to do more than assert that. You have to prove it.
And, applying the same standards to you which you applied to the innocent Lacrosse defendants, I say you admit you suffered no damages.
So, right now you are entitled to nothing. Let's see what the court thinks.
There is no doubt in my mind you are, via a frivolous lawsuit, trying to coerce Duke to support your vendetta against the innocent Lacrosse players.
There is also no doubt in my mind you hate the Lacrosse players because they did not rape Crystal Mangum.
"He did not withhold any evidence, providing thousands of pages of documents in triplicate for each defendant's team, within 24 hours of a defense motion."
Mr. Nifong did not give the suspects a REPORT of what resulted from the NTO. Under North Carolina Law he was required to do so.
"My allegations, which come from reliable sources who are in possession of certain documents, are meant to educate the public."
Why do you not tell us exactly who your sources are?
Why do you just refer to those documents instead of quoting them?
Months ago, one of your posters claimed that a Lacrosse player had given a sworn statement that someone said, We wanted white girls, not n-----s. I asked for his source. He gave me a page in Until Proven Innocent.
What was on that page was that aLacrosse player recalled hearing someone make that statement. That was anything but a sworn statement.
So, what's in your sources?(acknowledgement to the Capital One Barbarians)
"Defense gave film clips and other "evidence" to the media to broadcast, but did not turn anything over to Mr. Nifong."
If thosefilm clips were turned over to the media to broadcast, how would that have concealed their content from Mr.Nifong?
When Mr. Nifong learned of those film clips, did he subpoena them?
Lacrosse players offered to show Mr. Nifong evidence which would exonerate them.Mr. Nifong refused to review that evidence. If a prosecutor has credible evidence which exonerates a defendant, he is ethically obligated to not prosecute.
Mr. Nifong, contrary to the usual procedure when his office investigated a rape complaint, did not allow the defendants a probable cause hearing. At such a hearing, the Defense would have presented exculpatory evidence. Is it ethical for a DA to deny suspects a probable cause hearing?
"My allegations, which come from reliable sources who are in possession of certain documents, are meant to educate the public."
I say, your allegations are meant to cast slurs and aspersions upon Mr. Daye.
"My cause is justice for Mike Nifong."
Sidney, I agree with you, Mr. Nifong did not receive justice. Rather he received a grat deal of mercy.
If he had received Justice, he would have gotten a criminal conviction, a lengthy prison term, and/or a hefty fine.
Let's see what discovery in the lawsuits shows. By the standard advocated by some of your supporters, Mr. Nifong does not want the opportunity to exonerate himself in court.
Neither does the "cash strapped" city of Durham.
Duke University certainly did not want the opportunity to exonerate themselves in court.
Personally, I would like Mr. Daye's family to sue over Sidney's allegations, just to force Sidney to provide those so called documents from those so called reliable sources.
"Finally, the Duke Lacrosse team had a well-earned reputation of debauchery..."
The people who accused the Lacrosse team of debauchery were Mr. Nifong and the 88 gangsters. The accusation was made before anyone had any facts or evidence.
"...and in a beer-guzzling, stripper ogling atmosphere with underaged drinking, it is hardly a stretch to believe something untoward happened."
Sidney, were you at the event. Did you directly witness anything that would make yo "believe something untoward happened"?
If not, you are making an unsupported allegation.
You make a lot of unsupported allegations which you expect to be accepted as the truth.
I predict, if and when your lawsuit comes up to trial, all you will be able to offer is unsupported allegations.
Sidney, under GS §15A‑905 (Disclosure of evidence by the defendant, the defense is obligated to turn evidence to the prosecution only under certain circumstances. There is some dependance on whether or not the case is actually going to trial.
One of Mr.Nifong's defenses to the charge of concealing evidence was that no trial had been scheduled.
Sidney, should you testify in Ms. Mangum's defense, would you testify about documents from reliable sources.
If so, you would probably have to produce such documents.
If you did not do so, your testimony would be deemed not credible.
"The biased mainstream media will shield the public from the truth. The truth will be posted on my flog/blog tomorrow..."
What you publish in your blog are unsupported allegations. Such allegations are not credible.
Publishing non credible statements is not publishing the truth.
Publishing unsupported non credible allegations indicates you do not know the truth.
Sidney, tell us what is the truth.
Yeah, Sid, us lemmings are just dying to know how YOU, Oh, enlightened one, are the sole bearer of truth, justice and wisdom from your "sources". who needs off-shore drilling.....we have the greatest source of untapped natural gas right here in our midst....Sid, the "Crystal Ball....
There is no way any lacrosse player would have wanted to have sex with Crystal Man-gum.I doubt they would even be able to physically function with somebody that hideous.Instead of locking her up and wasting the taxpayers money,she should be put on boat and sent back to Africa.
Anon @ 3:32 - Instead of locking her up and wasting the taxpayers money,she should be put on boat and sent back to Africa.
Now now, there's no call for that kind of language.
Africa has problems enough without Crystal in their midst.
@Anonymous: April 26, 2011 3:32 PM There is no way any lacrosse player would have wanted to have sex with Crystal Man-gum.I doubt they would even be able to physically function with somebody that hideous.Instead of locking her up and wasting the taxpayers money,she should be put on boat and sent back to Africa.
Now why would you want to do that? Why should Africa be made responsible for the USA's culture of black entitlement? Put her in a Texan chain gang (bang)!
I was born and raised in Africa and I can assure you that scummy drug addled hos like her would not be welcome. For that matter, nor would racist bigoted black ex physicians.
Sidney, let's get back to the issue of reciprocal discovery.
One scenario in which GS §15A‑905 mandates reciprocal discovery is, the Defense plans to offer an alibi defense.
Mr. Seligman's attorneys did offer to show Mr. Nifong the evidence to support Mr. Seligman's alibi. He refused to see it.
Awitness came forth with a statement supporting Mr. Seligman's alibi. Mr. Nifong had him arrested on a weak charge of aiding a shoplifter. When that witness refused to change to change his statement, Mr. Nifong had him tried.
Congratulations, Sidney. You have highlighted another example of how Mr. Nifong did not comply with acceptable standards of behavior for a prosecutor.
That last sound we just heard was Sidney falling because his foot was stuck in his mouth.
Sidney, how are you going to prove your case against Duke University?
Unsupported allegations, like your allegation of a carpetbagger jihad, are not proof.
"There are a lot more people out there who know about the Duke Lacrosse Case than maybe we think."
That comes from Liestoppers this morning.
Sidney obviously is not one of those people.
Neither is kilgo.
k k k
Who needs the K K K
when we have the
L I E S T O P P E R S ! !
Whoopee ! !
k k k
ah, kilgo is back to again show he is not one of the people who know anything about the Duke Lacrosse players who were falsely accused of rape.
Who needs the new black panthers when we have Sidney and kilgo?
"Don't forget to throw in the racial epithets."
Do you mean the racial epithet Kim Roberts directed at the Duke Lacrosse player?
Ms.Rberts did admit that her epithet provoked the epithet which was directed at her.
Or are you referring to Ms. Roberts' call to the police in which she falsely alleged that someone hollered n----r at her and her girlfriend while they were either walking or driving by 610Buchanan Avenue?
The house was empty at the time she made her accusation.
Sidney: He (Nifong) did not withhold any evidence...
You are an unspeakably dishonest person, Sidney.
providing thousands of pages of documents in triplicate for each defendant's team, within 24 hours of a defense motion.
You are also unimaginably obtuse.
Just to let you know, Sidney, I have sent letters to several members of Reginald Day's family, making them aware of your unconscionable libel of their deceased relative.
In addition to several libelous quotes from you, I gave them your street address, phone #, DOB, and SS#.
Shame on you, Sidney. I don't know, and YOU don't know....whether Mangum will be found guilty of murder. You, sir , are no more informed, enlightened, intelligent, well read, literate, or otherwise superior to anybody else. My grandmother once told me, "Every human being has three things that are not worth a hoot to anybody else....elbows, an xxxhole, and opinions". You suffer from the delusion that your so-called "sources" are bonafide, just because YOU say so, and your "opinions" are FACTS because you say so. You are certainly entitled to your opinions, Sid. If you think Mangum is an innocent victim, if you think she was raped that night, if you think the entire state of North Carolina is out to get her, if you think Duke is so scared of you that they are trying to have you unjustly locked up, if you think Nifong was railroaded....Fine. But do NOT expect the rest of us to drink your brand of kool-aid, sid. My grandmother, bless her heart, was right.........we do not give a hoot about your sources or your opinions.
Sidney, consider this.
Crystal Mangum's attorney might subpoena you to testify in her defense. If you are ordered to produce your documents from your reliable sources, what will you do?
Let's have some opinions. What will happen if Sidney is subpoenaed and required to furnish hos documents from reliable sources?
If Sidney is not subpoenaed, what does that say about what Crystal's attorney thinks of Sidney's reliable sources?
..
Why lookee here. It's our Durham Lawyer, Walt,
hanging out with the Lie KKK Stoppers.
"The two things that is sure about Nifong is he is a liar and a rotten lawyer. It's possible he knew about the frame earlier, but there is scant evidence of that. I will say this though, the frame had many helping hands, Nifong's among them."
Walt-in-Durham
..
Anonymous said...
"Yeah, Sid, us lemmings are just dying to know how YOU, Oh, enlightened one, are the sole bearer of truth, justice and wisdom from your "sources". who needs off-shore drilling.....we have the greatest source of untapped natural gas right here in our midst....Sid, the "Crystal Ball...."
If the mainstream media was conducting business responsibly and fairly, there would be no need for me to inform the public about what I have been told, which is what believe to be extremely reliable.
You will learn the truth by checking out my latest flog, which I will upload, along with the blog for those who prefer to read. I recommend the flog, however.
Please give me your feedback.
"If the mainstream media was conducting business responsibly and fairly, there would be no need for me to inform the public about what I have been told, which is what believe to be extremely reliable."
Sidney, no one in the public considers you reliable.
Sidney: there would be no need for me to inform the public about what I have been told, which is what believe to be extremely reliable.
That is no defense for libel, Sidney.
You are absolutely wrong about Reginald Daye's record.
Shame on you.
kilgo again shows he is incapable of meaningful comment
"You will learn the truth by checking out my latest flog, which I will upload, along with the blog for those who prefer to read."
No one has ever learned the truth from what you have published.
You have continuously insinuated that the Lacrosse players raped Crystal Mangum. The evidence showed the crime never happened. The truth is that the Lacrosse players are innocent of the crime with they were charged.
You have repeatedly denied that truth
"If the mainstream media was conducting business responsibly and fairly, there would be no need for me to inform the public about what I have been told, which is what believe to be extremely reliable."
I should have said, Sidney,is that no one considers you either fair or reliable.
I ask again , Sidney, what will happen if you are subpoenaed and ordered to produce your records.
If Mr. Daye's family were to se you for libel, your only defense would be to show that you told the truth. If you were to not produce the documents from your "reliable" sources, you would not be showing you told the truth.
"You will learn the truth by checking out my latest flog..."
Sidney, we doubt that will happen.
Post a Comment