Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Plea deals should be for the guilty

UPDATE ON SUPER-FLOG
Work is continuing on the flog... The reason the flog was initially damaged was due to my haste in finishing it.  As a result of cutting a few corners I managed to damage the document.  So I will cautiously proceed to complete it as soon as possible.  I am hoping to have it posted no later than next Sunday, January 13th.

Word count:  1,824

 There’s an exclusive front page news article in the December 27, 2012 issue of The Carolinian titled “Pardon sought for Johnson.”  In it, editor Cash Michaels begins with this paragraph:  “An ‘appropriate pardon’ is being sought for James A. Johnson, a young Wilson County African American man who, in 2004, told police about the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a 16 year-old girl by a friend of his, but was then arrested, charged and jailed over three years for the crime.”

According to the newspaper, NCCU law professor Irving Joyner presented the petition seeking an “appropriate pardon” before outgoing Governor Bev Perdue on December 14, 2012 – with less than a month left in office and with her simultaneously considering a pardon of innocence for the Wilmington Ten.

To recap the Johnson tragedy:  In 2004, 16 year-old Wilson County African American Kenneth Meeks kidnapped Caucasian 17 year-old Brittany Willis from a shopping mall, took her to an isolated spot where he raped her, and then shot her to death.  Meeks then confided what he had done with James Arthur Johnson, an 18 year-old African American who he had met only months earlier.  Johnson was a good student who shared the love of soccer with Brittany Willis, and had even received a soccer scholarship offer to attend college.  Johnson accompanied Meeks in the victim’s stolen vehicle to the killing field where he witnessed firsthand Meeks’ gruesome handiwork. 

During the next couple of days Johnson silently complied with the “no-snitch” laws of the street about the tragedy which by this time had grown to a major statewide news story.  The family and friends of Brittany Willis even offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the perpetrator.  Johnson then informed his father about his encounter with Meeks days earlier, at which time he was escorted be him to the police station sans attorney for the purpose of assisting with the criminal investigation.  Johnson named Meeks as the culprit at which time Wilson police knew the identity of their man.  Meeks was arrested and brought in for questioning.  Justifiable anger over the senseless murder of a young Wilson teen by the African American resulted in a transference of that anger towards African Americans in general… and the appetite by police to incarcerate as many black men as possible.  Somewhere during the interview with investigators Johnson admitted that he had wiped his fingerprints off the victim’s car… and the police knew they could charge him at least with “accessory after the fact.”  But they wanted more, so the interrogators went to Meeks and told him, “Your friend snitched on you.”  This evoked the anticipated response from the young Meeks, who feeling angered by betrayal, implicated Johnson as an active participant in the crime.  Police, without forensic evidence and relying on the words of Meeks alone, arrested Johnson and charged him with murder.  The official police story was that both Johnson and Meeks committed the crimes against Willis, and then Johnson turned over to police his partner in crime in order to collect the $20,000 reward. 

More than a year later, Meeks recanted… after which time prosecutors came up with two eyewitnesses (both with connections to the Wilson Police Department – one being a retired police officer).  These eyewitnesses were quickly jettisoned once the NAACP and Rev. Dr. William Barber, with the accompanying media scrutiny, became involved.  Trial was delayed for more than two years, and as it approached, the prosecutor Bill Wolfe began offering plea deals.  Johnson called Wolfe’s bluff, which led to the Wilson prosecutor backing down and referring the case to a special prosecutor.  Forsythe County assistant D.A. Belinda Foster was forced by District Attorney Tom Keith to take the assignment as special prosecutor, and she relented only on the condition that she not be forced to prosecute.  In a preordained charade, Foster dismissed the murder, rape, kidnapping, and armed robbery charges against Johnson and then charged him with “accessory after the fact”… this despite the fact that it was Johnson who was responsible for the case being solved.

Johnson instead of being heralded as a hero for solving the crimes against Brittany and being embraced by the Willis family, was vilified in the mainstream media and the State which led to a racial divide in the Wilson County.  After a lengthy search, a special prosecutor (W. David McFadyen) was found who was willing to waste taxpayer dollars in pursuing the baseless accessory charge against Johnson.  Professor Joyner was one of the attorneys representing Johnson against the special prosecutor’s rinky-dink charge. Although Johnson had been free on bond for several months to await trial, he was once again inundated by prosecutors to accept a plea deal.  This time, possibly on advice from his counsel, Johnson accepted the plea deal which resulted in his pleading guilty to misprision of felony in exchange for time served.  (Misprision of felony is a rarely used charge for someone who has knowledge of a crime and withholds it from authorities.  However, the crime for which Johnson pled guilty was exactly what he did not do, as he did go to authorities with his knowledge of the crimes by Meeks.)

An appropriate pardon?  According to Joyner, Johnson’s unjust 39 month stint in jail for solving the Willis murder has dogged him like a shadow on cloudless autumn afternoon.  He has been unable to obtain or hold down a job once his past comes to light before his employers.  Even though Johnson has left the state in hopes of leaving behind his personal nightmare, it follows him… and it continues to destroy his life.  It appears that Professor Joyner’s answer to the injustice against Johnson rested with some sort of pardon from Governor Bev Perdue.  Because of his plea deal, a pardon of innocence seems to be off the table… and Joyner never fully described what an “appropriate pardon” would be.

In my opinion, Johnson would not be in his current predicament and would not be requiring a pardon if he would have stood trial for the trumped up accessory charge.  My feeling is that Johnson was advised by his legal counsel to give serious consideration to the plea offer.  The special prosecutor was desperate to obtain a plea deal as he did not want to prosecute the frivolous case against Johnson despite having the backing of a supportive media.  Had I been an advisor in Johnson’s circle, I definitely would have advised against accepting any plea deal… I would have recommended that he accept nothing less than complete exoneration with dismissal of all charges related to that horrific incident.

The plea deal might be a good deal for the guilty, but it should not be a consideration for the innocent.  All too often in the state of North Carolina, prosecutors charge and arrest innocent individuals (usually disenfranchised, indigent, and people of color), and after they serve a significant time of incarceration, hold out a plea deal as the only realistic means of gaining their freedom.  Once an innocent person accepts a plea deal, then they automatically release the State from civil liability for malicious prosecution, and they give up any rights they may have for compensation and other forms of restorative justice.

Plea deal for Mangum?  Durham prosecutor Charlene Coggins-Franks, aware that the grand conspiracy against Crystal Mangum has been exposed, is now desperately desirous of a plea deal with Mangum in order to extricate itself from the position in which it now finds itself.  Despite the mainstream media’s cooperation in keeping the fraudulence of Medical Examiner Clay Nichols’ autopsy report quiet, concealing the esophageal intubation of Daye as being the direct cause of his brain death, and hiding the malevolent and malicious vendetta prosecution by the State, the Durham District Attorney’s Office and its staff know that they are not going to be able to carry out their initial goal of convicting Mangum with a life sentence.  The Durham D.A. team could not even convict Mangum of arson when she was represented with a featherweight defense in the 2010 trumped up case… so it knows that it stands no chance to prevail now that the extent of their conspiracy has been exposed.  Even with the defense expert witness refusing to put a report in writing, the defense attorneys withholding exculpatory evidence from her, and Mangum representing herself, prosecutors have come to the realization that they cannot prevail at trial, and that their only hope is to strike a plea deal with Mangum… and then leave it up to the media to spin the story to Mangum’s detriment (something with which it is very experienced).

If a plea deal is offered to Mangum, I would advise her not to accept it, because like James Arthur Johnson, the ill-effects will follow her for the rest of her life… only with a tenfold greater intensity.  It will be something, as in Johnson’s case, that no pardon could possibly remedy. 

Fact is that Crystal Mangum was a domestic violence victim of an intoxicated Reginald Daye (who had physically beaten her approximately one week prior to the self-defense stabbing).  On that fateful April 2011 morning, Daye repeatedly punched her in the face and head, pulled out her hair, spit on her, and broke down the door when she sought refuge from him there.  Then, after bringing in steak knives from the kitchen he proceeded to throw them at her, and in his final action against her, Daye placed his hands on her throat and began strangling her.  It was at this point that Mangum grabbed a knife within reach and stabbed Daye once… causing him to relent in his attack and allow her to make an escape.

I submit that after undergoing such a terrorizing ordeal Crystal Mangum should not have been charged and arrested for acting in self-defense and that she should not have to accept a plea deal in order to be released from an incarceration with no foreseeable end.  As of the date of this blog posting, Ms. Mangum has served 646 days in jail, and a court date has yet to be assigned.  Part of this lengthy incarceration is to force her to accept a plea deal and that is why her case has moved through the courts at a glacial pace… with inactivity on the prosecution and defense side.  Even Mangum’s attempts to file motions in representing herself have been delayed without cause.

Bottom line is that Crystal Mangum will prevail, as long as she stays strong and doesn’t give in to the slick deals by the prosecution.  I am sure that if James Arthur Johnson had it to do over again, he would not have accepted a plea deal and would have fought for his innocence.  A plea deal might be a good thing for the guilty, but it is a raw deal for the innocent.          nn

138 comments:

Anonymous said...

Same old same old same old.......all bull, no substance.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"When working with advanced and complicated documents in Flash, it is not that difficult to accidentally damage a document...."

Perhaps you need to do the Flash tutorial again? According to Adobe, there's only 5 steps.


Intern, it is obvious from your comment that you have never worked with Flash.

My documents are so advanced and complicated that it pushes the program beyond its limits!


Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Same old same old same old.......all bull, no substance.


You must be a speed reader... I just posted the blog!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"HEY.. LISTEN UP, EVERYBODY!!
Important Update on Superflog--"


SIDNEY is again desperately seeking attention.

"When working with advanced and complicated documents in Flash, it is not that difficult to accidentally damage a document. That's what happened last Friday as I was nearing completion of it. As a result I had to start over, but re-doing it has gone faster as the files were not damaged.. Currently I am back to the point I was when I lost the document."

It sounds more like you had to make unwanted revisions to your flog.

"All things considered, I hope to have the Super-Flog uploaded and available by Wednesday or Thurday of this week."

Yeah, right, and you will force the court to dismiss the harges against Crystal.

SIDNEY, you have a poor to non existent track record hen it comes to keeping tour promises.


How about that! I race to get the Super-Flog finished, and accidentally damage it in the process... And you belly-ache because I didn't finish it at the projected date? How's that for gratitude.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
The fact that sidney admits he has not followed the Burch case is PROOF of his hypocrisy. If a case does not fit HIS criteria, i.e., does not support his racist perspective, then he ignores it. One would think that a rape, at a party sponsored by Duke students, would have been significant to Harr. Nope, the rapist was black and the victim, white.....so racist sidney "doesn't know anything about Mr. Burch (the rapist) and will not investigate his case". Indeed, sidney.


My plate is full. I can only devote my time to a finite number of issues. Mr. Burch does not happen to be one of them. That's just the way it is!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Perhaps sidney would care to share with his occasional reads just exactly how many views of his infamous blog there actually are. I sometimes read his post itself, in text, but not waste one minute of my time, listening to him talking, or looking at his silly graphics. The over-the-top music melodrama is corny as all get out, as is the V reference.


Face it... you're just jealous.

Anonymous said...

According to Vann, and the prosecution, no plea deal has been put on the table or even discussed. As usual, you are full of hot air.

I find it very difficult to describe a two-time convicted rapist as "Mr."....how about scumbag burch?

you think a poster is jealous? funny little man .....sad little man......

Anonymous said...

I've spent several years working with Flash. It isn't complicated at all and, sidney, your efforts are pathetic and grade school level simple. The problem is operator error........

Lance the Intern said...

"
Intern, it is obvious from your comment that you have never worked with Flash.


Since my comment regarding the number of steps to develop a document came from the Adobe website, I think it's rather obvious who is more familiar with Flash.

It's your unfamiliarity with the tools, unfortunately, that are the root of your problem, not the tools themselves.

But true to form, you blame someone else (in this case, Adobe) for your own shortcomings.

I recommend picking up a class at your local community college on web development (with an emphasis on Flash).

Anonymous said...

Sidney, go to a book store. Look for a paperback book called Adobe for Dummies. Read it.

Anonymous said...

True to form indeed. It is always somebody else's fault in the professional victim's world.....that's where sidney lives and that's where Mangum lives. It's a world without personal responsibility or accountability....and it's a world where owning up to mistakes, saying you are sorry, admitting to lies, and making a honest effort to change........simply does not happen. Mangum has been blaming others all her life.........and she easily falls prey to the line of bullXXXX that harr slings because it suits her flawed character perfectly.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"How about that! I race to get the Super-Flog finished, and accidentally damage it in the process... And you belly-ache because I didn't finish it at the projected date? How's that for gratitude."

SIDNEY, just like you presume guilt on the part of the lacrosse defendants, you presume people should be grateful for your meaningless, attention seeking diatribes.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
Face it... you're just jealous."

NO one is jealous of you.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"My plate is full. I can only devote my time to a finite number of issues. Mr. Burch does not happen to be one of them. That's just the way it is!"

What is your plate full of? Garbage, like your crusade to convince people that Reginald Daye was an habitual violent abuser of women by concealing evidence he was not.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

James Johnson knew who killed Brittainy Willis but kept his mouth shut for more than three years out of supposed loyalty to the perp. That does not sound like heroism.

I agree with the Willis family, that he came forward hoping to profit from the situation, not bring about justice.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
Fact is that Crystal Mangum was a domestic violence victim of an intoxicated Reginald Daye (who had physically beaten her approximately one week prior to the self-defense stabbing). On that fateful April 2011 morning, Daye repeatedly punched her in the face and head, pulled out her hair, spit on her, and broke down the door when she sought refuge from him there. Then, after bringing in steak knives from the kitchen he proceeded to throw them at her, and in his final action against her, Daye placed his hands on her throat and began strangling her. It was at this point that Mangum grabbed a knife within reach and stabbed Daye once… causing him to relent in his attack and allow her to make an escape."

The fact is, you have established none of that as fact.

When Crystal was arrested she could have claimed self defense and did not. Months after Reginald Daye is dead and can not defend himself, Crystal claims she was abused. That is not credible.

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal points out that
"Meanwhile, of the twenty most profitable pharmaceutical manufacturers, only nine are from the United States — the rest are from western Europe, Japan, and Israel, all of which have universal health care systems that Corker so is opposed to."

What sort of argument is this supposed to be? Is this supposed to prove that Canada is good at pharma companies?

But I'm sure you can post a big sign: "Come to Canada. We do lung transplants."

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal,

Incidentally, since you point to insulin as proof of Canadian eminence in medicine:
Let me say that I agree it was a wonderful discovery. Banting and McLeod deserved the 1923 Nobel prize, and richly so, for this development.
Since then, however, how many Canadian Nobel laureates have there been, in medicine or physiology? (But please don't include Canadians who won the prize after moving to the United States.) Would 0 be a good guess?

Anonymous said...

wow, insulin in '23? Golly, Kenny, I bet somebody in Canada invented uses for reindeer antlers in 1822 and you would still be reaching back, like Lou Rawls, to stroll down memory lane to remind us of the Great Antler Discovery.
I have worked in healthcare for many many years and I can say, without one shred of doubt, that are running, I mean running, to come to the United States from Canada......and most definitely NOT for some huge pay difference. They are simply sick of being treated like a marginal commodity and told HOW to practice by some government employee who couldn't spell stethoscope. Kenny, you need to freshen your knowledge a bit........Canada may be a fine place to fish but it sure as hell is no medical mecca.

Anonymous said...

....left a word out of my last post....sentence should have read, "without one shred of doubt, that physicians are running"...etc.

Anonymous said...

So, sidney, you told us more than a year ago that you were going to spring mangum out of the slammer. you also told us that you were going to prevail in your suit against big old bad duke. we are waiting......tick tick tick. your nonsensical ranting about the charges getting dropped......or is it a plea deal?.....or is it super sidney, stepping in the save the day?

Walt said...

Guilty pleas in NC can be accepted from people who do not believe they are in fact guilty. Those are called "Allen" pleas. In that situation the defendant admits the state "has sufficient evidence to prove his or her guilt." Otherwise, a defendant must allocute. That is, he or she must not only admit facts sufficient to prove the charges but also admit guilt. Most states do not allow "Allen" pleas but instead require an allocution.

If the defendant allocutes him or herself, that is the same as being found guilty by a jury. As I wrote above, NC allows an "Allen" plea which leaves the door open to some post conviction relief that is not available in other states. However, "Allen" pleas also leave the door open to a lot more prosecutorial misconduct than in other states. Of course, Sid's chief legal advisor is a major proponent of prosecutorial misconduct, having demonstrated nearly the full spectrum of such in one case.

Walt-in-Durham

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal,

Your "oracle" Zaid Jilani said back in 2009 that "Canada ... performs more lung transplant surgeries than the United States." I call him (or her) your "oracle", because you quote him approvingly to bolster your arguments. Note that he specifically says "more transplant surgeries".

I got the following from CBC:
"Canada's lung transplant rate is 5.3 per million population (PMP), compared to 4.7 PMP in the United States and 2.9 PMP in France."

So in fact, the United States performs about eight times as many of these surgeries as Canada. Jilani might have said "about 10% more lung transplants per inhabitant", which would have been true, but not very meaningful.

Please remember, Ken, that we are going to check all your "facts and figures" from now on.

Anonymous said...

Walt, over the past, say, ten to fifteen years, how frequently do you think defendants have used the "allen" plea?

The number of lung transplants peformed is actually meangingless. What happens is the outcome of the procedure. I suggest to Kenny that outcome measures, comparing Canada and the United States, demonstrate that providers in the USA are far more compentent, patients have better survival rates, with fewer complications, and fewer post surgical infections while hospitalized. In other words, in the practice of medicine, Kenny, quality means far more than quantity and rate....especially if you happen to be the patient.

Anonymous said...

I would also add that the performance of more transplant procedures (lung, heart, kidney, etc.) does not, by itself, mean much in terms of overall healthcare in a given population. In fact, there are serious ethical questions that arise when there are too many procedures being done........as in the case of lung transplant "mills" that turned up in France a few years ago.
The real measure of lung or any other organ transplant validity and success is, as another poster has noted, outcome(s)........not volumes.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

Canadian Frederick Banting was not the sole researcher involved in the discovery of insulin. It was a 50 year process which involved researchers from a number of countries, Germany, Poland, Romania.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insulin

guiowen said...

So, Kenhyderal,
What's this about bone marrow transplants? According to your oracle Zaid Jilani, "Canada ... developed bone marrow transplantations..." So far as I can see (from Wikipedia), these transplants were developed by Donnall Thomas (an American) at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. But I guess Seattle is so close to Canada that it might as well have been in Canada.

kenhyderal said...

100% coverage birth until death for all. Lower costs per capita. Greater longevity. Lower infant mortality. Lower deaths due to preventable causes.

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal,
I see you've decided to change the subject again. Don't you want to defend Zaid Jilani?

Anonymous said...

And so on, and so on........blah and blah and more canadian bias blah, Kenny. we all know you sing Oh, Canada every morning while you brush your teeth.
by the way, pal, did it EVER occur to you why the infant mortality rate is higher in the USA? Let me, as your guru would say, enlighten you. In the USA there are a far greater number of high risk conceptions and pregnancies that are brought much further along....to birth, and beyond. A larger percentage of those extremely high risk live births produce a larger number and greater severity of initial complications and longer term survival issues. In short, we try harder here to make conception, full term pregnancy and post-birth survival possible than any other country in the world. When you have a larger number and percentage of high risk pregnancies, continued with an effort toward full term live birth, you are going to have higher infant mortality rates. If you play it safer and more conservative......ending pregnancies and not even trying for conception in high risk mothers....then your pool of full term births is going to be, by definition , a pool with a better chance to survive. In short, we try harder to make and deliver and keep alive high risk babies....and,yes, with that effort comes failures. I suppose the alternative, such as is practices in Canada and other countries, of making it very difficult for high risk pregnancies to be supported.....might work for you. Not for us.

Anonymous said...

100% coverage birth till death. Right. Sounds great. If it's so bleepin great, it does make one wonder why patients wait months for imaging studies and procedures. God help you if you need a knee replacement in igloo land........the wait can be a year.

Lance the Intern said...

"During the next couple of days Johnson silently complied with the “no-snitch” laws of the street about the tragedy which by this time had grown to a major statewide news story."

Please read 18 USC § 4. It does NOT specify a time limit. Rather, it states that a person having knowledge of a felony should make that information known to the proper authorities "as soon as possible".

The question you should be asking Mr. Johnson is why he waited 3 days. If the answer is to "[comply] with the “no-snitch” laws of the street", then he is guilty of misprision of felony.

FYI -- Misprision of Felony was codified as a federal offense in 1909. (in the UK, it's been around since the 13th century). I'd like to see your reference for defining this as "rarely used".


guiowen said...

Kenhyderal,
I might add that Cuba also has 100% coverage. You might ask Hugo Chavez how that's working out.

Anonymous said...

100% coverage is a highly misguided myth in Canada. Coverage is available only AFTER not only the doctor but ALSO the government approves procedures, tests, diagnostics, etc. In other words, the entire country is one big government-run HMO. This situation would be OK if there were people making coverage approval decisions on a timely basis who are qualified to make these decisions. It would also be OK if there were enough doctors, nurses and hospitals to meet needs. NOPE, in either case. In Canada it is not at all unusual to wait months for a simple doctor's appointment, much less for an elective non-emergency surgery. Warts and all, I'll take American healthcare any day.

Anonymous said...

What proof, exactly, do you have sidney that.....the prosecution has offered a plea deal? Vann and the prosecutor say no such deal has been put on the table. Show your proof.

Anonymous said...

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Anonymous said...

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Anonymous said...

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

kenhyderal said...

I wonder if Lance the Intern has an opinion on this chanting idiot. He considers me a troll when I post supporting the views of Dr.Harr, defening Crystal Mangum or expressing opinions that are contrary to the conventional wisdom about the Duke Lacrosse Case. I also wonder why Guiowen would not be in favor of Dr.Harr censoring this kind of garbage that wastes time and space.

guiowen said...

Some years ago, I suggested that Sidney Harr censor some of the posts. He told me quite clearly that he was not going to do so.
Let Sidney run his blog site in his own way.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymos @ 4:49 said: "100% coverage is a highly misguided myth in Canada. Coverage is available only AFTER not only the doctor but ALSO the government approves procedures, tests, diagnostics, etc. In other words, the entire country is one big government-run HMO. This situation would be OK if there were people making coverage approval decisions on a timely basis who are qualified to make these decisions. It would also be OK if there were enough doctors, nurses and hospitals to meet needs. NOPE, in either case. In Canada it is not at all unusual to wait months for a simple doctor's appointment, much less for an elective non-emergency surgery"........ Not a single word of this is true. It's the kind of propaganda the US Health Insurance Industry and their high paid lobbyists propagate. Note: In 2007, 85.7% of Canadians who received health care services were very or somewhat satisfied with the services they received. This percentage remained stable between 2000 and 2007.(Source Statistics Canada) Keep in mind this statistic takes in the entire population. In a Nov. 2012 Gallup poll conducted Nov. 15-18, it found only 41 percent rated U.S. healthcare coverage as excellent or good and a combined 58percent said their coverage was only fair or poor. I know there are lies damn lies and statistics but Healthcare Insurance Companies are bent upon pillorying the Canadian System hoping to convince gullible Americans to keep on paying twice as much as they should with equal or worse outcomes. It reminds me of what was done to Crystal by the Duke LaCrosse Trial Lawyers. Fortunately that gravey train has run off the tracks.

guiowen said...

Kenny,
I hope your data are better than the ones you gave us, from your oracle Jilani.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"It reminds me of what was done to Crystal by the Duke LaCrosse Trial Lawyers. Fortunately that gravey train has run off the tracks".

The Duke Trial lawyers did nothing to Crystal. Crystal hung herself by falsely accusing innocent men of raping her.

Instead of more unreasonable guilt presuming bias, why don't you provide hard evidence that Crystal told the truth when she said she was raped? Because you can not. Abd you want comments like this one banned because you can not provide any facts.

Anonymous said...

Comical response from Kenny. I agree with the poster. You keep your universal coverage. I will happily get my care from a doctor who is not considered a robot

Lance the Intern said...

"I wonder if Lance the Intern has an opinion on this chanting idiot.
Breaking my vow to not respond to you, Kenhyderal, one last time, I will simply state:

I ignore his posts, just as I ignore yours.

Anonymous said...

Lance or Walt, do you have any idea of the purpose of the next court appearance for Mangum? just wondering..... I heard rumors (emphasis, rumors....) that Roberts basically told the judge that she would submit something in writing ONLY if the court would take responsibility, i.e., relieve her of liability (HIPPA) if Mangum allows information to get into the hands of someone who might publish the report. (as in harr....) Knowing how costly HIPPA violations are, I don't blame her....

Anonymous said...

What's ironic about this Roberts report is that Harr will find himself in a rather awkward position if he does post her report....because, essentially, it completely invalidates his entire fantasy

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"[Lance] considers me a troll when I post supporting the views of Dr.Harr, defening Crystal Mangum or expressing opinions that are contrary to the conventional wisdom about the Duke Lacrosse Case."

SIDNEY HARR calls Crystal the "victim/accuser" of the Lacrosse case and she is neither. By defending SIDNEY's views, you are promulgating lies.

What you call your "opinions that are contrary to the conventional wisdom about the Duke Lacrosse Case" are your unreasonable biased presumptions of guilt in the face of overwhelming evidence that there was no crime for any Lacrosse player to be guilty of.

That makes your "opinions that are contrary to the conventional wisdom about the Duke Lacrosse Case" merely delusions.

I reword my challenge. Show again you can offer no evidence, circumstantial or otherwise, that Crystal was raped.

Anonymous said...

The moon is made of green cheese. OJ didn't do it. Madonna is a virgin. Nifong will get his law license back in NC and become Attorney General. Elvis is alive and working as a parking lot attendant in Vegas. Mangum is a sweet innocent single mother of three, never did a damn thing wrong in her entire life, never told a lie, works as a librarian, and sings in the church choir
Signed, the troll.

Anonymous said...

Crystal Mangum, as we all know, was and is the false accuser. She was no victim. She was no victim in the 2002 incident. She was no victim in the false rape claim of 2006. She was no victim in the 2010 Walker case. She was no victim in the Daye killing.
She has falsely accused many people in her life.........likely beginning with the false accusations of rape she made in her teens which were not substantiated. Mangum has a long and documented history victimizing others. For sidney harr to call her a victim is a lie.
Whether she will be convicted of murder or a lesser charge remains to be seen, so I will not call her a murderer. She IS a killer.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
According to Vann, and the prosecution, no plea deal has been put on the table or even discussed. As usual, you are full of hot air.

I find it very difficult to describe a two-time convicted rapist as "Mr."....how about scumbag burch?

you think a poster is jealous? funny little man .....sad little man......


Who, might I ask, are you referring to when you talk about a "two time convicted rapist?"

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"
Intern, it is obvious from your comment that you have never worked with Flash.

Since my comment regarding the number of steps to develop a document came from the Adobe website, I think it's rather obvious who is more familiar with Flash.

It's your unfamiliarity with the tools, unfortunately, that are the root of your problem, not the tools themselves.

But true to form, you blame someone else (in this case, Adobe) for your own shortcomings.

I recommend picking up a class at your local community college on web development (with an emphasis on Flash).


Intern,

Do you expect me to believe that you have worked with Flash? Send me a sample of your work and I would be happy to feature it on this blog site.

Any Sidneyophile worth his/her salt would know that I took computer classes (including a Flash class) at Wake Tech Community College.
So there!

Anonymous said...

Burch raped two women.... at least. These are the ones we know about. A true scumbag......
if you bothered to educate yourself, you would know this..... 8

Anonymous said...

oooooo, Wake Tech! wowowowowow......that must be a prep school for the NCCU law department.........

Anonymous said...

sidney took a class on Flash.........perhaps that's like Mangum getting a degree from NCCU during a year when she didn't show up for class, and dropped half her courses. Or perhaps it's like the Afro American studies program at UNC where students got high grade credits for courses that never met, never required a single paper and never offered any content.
Kinda hard to believe Mangum actually has a college level education when you look at samples of he
r writing, spelling, grammar and context in the so-called motions she filed. Looks a bit more like eighth grade than college......
and, of course, we have the lovely "no conscious Cline", another NCCU graduate who has trouble figuring out how to put subjects and verbs in sentences.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

James Johnson knew who killed Brittainy Willis but kept his mouth shut for more than three years out of supposed loyalty to the perp. That does not sound like heroism.

I agree with the Willis family, that he came forward hoping to profit from the situation, not bring about justice.


You, sadly have the facts mixed up. Johnson told police everything he knew about the crime two days after the killer confided in him... not three years.

Did the Willis family offer the reward with the thought that profiting would be the main motivator in coming forward with information? Johnson's father is the one who took him to the police station once he told his father what he knew about the crime. If anything, Johnson earned the reward, and the Willis family and friends show their lack of integrity by refusing to give it to him. They should be grateful to Johnson.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"
Fact is that Crystal Mangum was a domestic violence victim of an intoxicated Reginald Daye (who had physically beaten her approximately one week prior to the self-defense stabbing). On that fateful April 2011 morning, Daye repeatedly punched her in the face and head, pulled out her hair, spit on her, and broke down the door when she sought refuge from him there. Then, after bringing in steak knives from the kitchen he proceeded to throw them at her, and in his final action against her, Daye placed his hands on her throat and began strangling her. It was at this point that Mangum grabbed a knife within reach and stabbed Daye once… causing him to relent in his attack and allow her to make an escape."

The fact is, you have established none of that as fact.

When Crystal was arrested she could have claimed self defense and did not. Months after Reginald Daye is dead and can not defend himself, Crystal claims she was abused. That is not credible.


Fact is that after interviewing an intoxicated Daye and his cousin who wasn't even there, the Durham Police closed their investigation and arrested Mangum without seeking a statement from her.

Crystal has steadfastly maintained from Day One that she was the victim of domestic violence by Daye, but the biased mainstream media has refused to report about it.

Nifong Supporter said...


Walt said...
Guilty pleas in NC can be accepted from people who do not believe they are in fact guilty. Those are called "Allen" pleas. In that situation the defendant admits the state "has sufficient evidence to prove his or her guilt." Otherwise, a defendant must allocute. That is, he or she must not only admit facts sufficient to prove the charges but also admit guilt. Most states do not allow "Allen" pleas but instead require an allocution.

If the defendant allocutes him or herself, that is the same as being found guilty by a jury. As I wrote above, NC allows an "Allen" plea which leaves the door open to some post conviction relief that is not available in other states. However, "Allen" pleas also leave the door open to a lot more prosecutorial misconduct than in other states. Of course, Sid's chief legal advisor is a major proponent of prosecutorial misconduct, having demonstrated nearly the full spectrum of such in one case.

Walt-in-Durham


Hey, Walt.

Is it the Allen or Alford plea? Anyway, thank you for your enlightening comments.

However, you are mistaken in assuming that I have a legal advisor... I do not. All of my legal knowledge and expertise comes from my past experiences, reading legal works, and watching re-runs of "Perry Mason."

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"During the next couple of days Johnson silently complied with the “no-snitch” laws of the street about the tragedy which by this time had grown to a major statewide news story."

Please read 18 USC § 4. It does NOT specify a time limit. Rather, it states that a person having knowledge of a felony should make that information known to the proper authorities "as soon as possible".

The question you should be asking Mr. Johnson is why he waited 3 days. If the answer is to "[comply] with the “no-snitch” laws of the street", then he is guilty of misprision of felony.

FYI -- Misprision of Felony was codified as a federal offense in 1909. (in the UK, it's been around since the 13th century). I'd like to see your reference for defining this as "rarely used".


There were three young men who were not perpetrators who had knowledge of the crimes against Brittany Willis immediately following her homicide. Two of them went to the police and they were both arrested, charged with a crime(s), and served time in jail. The third person kept to himself and abided by the "no-snitch" rules of the street, was not arrested, charged, and did not serve any time in jail.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Burch raped two women.... at least. These are the ones we know about. A true scumbag......
if you bothered to educate yourself, you would know this..... 8


Thanks for the elucidation, but I am not interested in Mr. Burch's case. My present focus is on seeing that Mangum receives the justice to which she is due.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
What's ironic about this Roberts report is that Harr will find himself in a rather awkward position if he does post her report....because, essentially, it completely invalidates his entire fantasy


Roberts is bending over backwards like a soft pretzel to prevent from having to put her report in writing. If she does comply with legal pressure to produce such a report (which I'm sure will pull all kinds of punches), you can bet that I will publish it. I believe in enlightenment... not concealment and obfuscation.

Anonymous said...

poor sidney.....he fails to see the point with the Burch case. Once more.......
Burch raped a girl at a party sponsored by a black fraternity at Duke. Burch is black. His victim was white. I say you elect to ignore the Burch case, simply because he don't like the FACT that (a) a black man raped a white girl, (b)the FACT that a rape was commited and not manufactured, (c)the case does not fit with your racist mentality that all rich white boys are guilty as charged without evidence.....and all black boys are innocent, even though there is evidence of guilt. That's why you ignore Burch. Were he white and his victim black, you'd be frothing......

Anonymous said...

sidney believes in enlightenment, not concealment? really? like how he conveniently ignores evidence that Daye was NOT a woman beating drunk? Like evidence that a female voice was heard in the apartment, cursing and threatening Daye? that two women with whom he had had recent relationships said he was NOT abusive? what a liar you are, sidney

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Who, might I ask, are you referring to when you talk about a "two time convicted rapist?"

Michael Jermaine Burch, black man who was treated far more leniently than the innocent Duke Lacrosse players.

Lance the Intern said...

"Any Sidneyophile worth his/her salt would know that I took computer classes (including a Flash class) at Wake Tech Community College.
So there!"


I'd demand a refund.

As for posting MY work....Sid, I'm an IT professional - you only get my work if you pay me.

Anonymous said...

Burch is the lowest of the low......but, because he is black and because he raped a white woman, sidney has no interest. Guess what kind of disgusting crap we would hear from sidney if Burch were white and he had raped a black woman....
hypocrisy, thy name is harr.

Lance the Intern said...

"There were three young men who were not perpetrators who had knowledge...blahblahblah"

Here I'll simply note that you failed to address my post.
So I'll ask again -- Why did Mr. Johnson wait 3 days before reporting a murder he was aware of?

Put another way -- if you, Sid Harr were aware of a murder committed TODAY, would you wait 3 days to report it?

I'll also note that you have yet to provide a source for your claim that misprision of felony is a "rarely used" charge.



Anonymous said...

Actually, Johnson admitted that he waited longer than the three days, by a full day. He also changed his story a couple of times....saying that he had thought about coming forward earlier but didn't do so. How convenient.

Anonymous said...

sidney's feeble attempts at being cute are growing tiresome, old, stale and boring. Figure out some new material. sidney, you are a waste of time.

Anonymous said...

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll


Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr: It's time to exercize your responsibility as the host of this blog and censor garbage like the preceeding posts, random and unrelated to the discussion, the repetitive chanting and sing-song idiocy that keeps getting interjected and especially the dispicable racist posts that slander African Americans.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY ARR:

"Fact is that after interviewing an intoxicated Daye and his cousin who wasn't even there, the Durham Police closed their investigation and arrested Mangum without seeking a statement from her."

Not a fact. Crystal was arrested before the police interviewed Reginald Daye. Liar liar pants on fire.

"Crystal has steadfastly maintained from Day One that she was the victim of domestic violence by Daye, but the biased mainstream media has refused to report about it."

Crystal could have claimed self defense when she was arrested. She did not. Self defense was not an issue ubtil after Reginald Daye died and she was facing a charge of murder 1.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"You, sadly have the facts mixed up. Johnson told police everything he knew about the crime two days after the killer confided in him... not three years."

My mistake. I apologize.

"Did the Willis family offer the reward with the thought that profiting would be the main motivator in coming forward with information? Johnson's father is the one who took him to the police station once he told his father what he knew about the crime. If anything, Johnson earned the reward, and the Willis family and friends show their lack of integrity by refusing to give it to him. They should be grateful to Johnson."

So say you. Now, if you are really on Mr. Johnson's side, convince them. It is my understanding thy believe Mr. Johnson came forth to profit. They are not subject to tour "jurisdiction". Like most people, they do not accept you at face value. That is why you are p---ed off.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Roberts is bending over backwards like a soft pretzel to prevent from having to put her report in writing."

Because she does not want some unauthorized person, namely you, to use it to publish confidential information.

"If she does comply with legal pressure to produce such a report (which I'm sure will pull all kinds of punches), you can bet that I will publish it."

You presume it has already been decided, based on your evaluation, that Dr. Nichols' report was fraudulent. You have not established you have the credentials to question the report.

"I believe in enlightenment... not concealment and obfuscation."

That is one of the biggest lies you have published on your blog.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"However, you are mistaken in assuming that I have a legal advisor... I do not. All of my legal knowledge and expertise comes from my past experiences, reading legal works, and watching re-runs of "Perry Mason."

You have shown you have learned nothing from your study. Maybe that is why you were such an ineffective physician - you scan a few shallow sources and presume you know everything.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Intern,

Do you expect me to believe that you have worked with Flash? Send me a sample of your work and I would be happy to feature it on this blog site.

Any Sidneyophile worth his/her salt would know that I took computer classes (including a Flash class) at Wake Tech Community College.
So there!"

It is obvious you have learned nothing - just as it is obvious you learned nothing from your 4 years of medical chool or your 1 year of post graduate education.

Anonymous said...

The biggest racist on this site is sidney harr....followed closely by his little friend, kenny hissy. when the two of them stop spouting their racist bullshit, then they can rant about racist postings by others.

Harr Supporter said...

Lance: I'll also note that you have yet to provide a source for your claim that misprision of felony is a "rarely used" charge.

"Rarely used" comes from the Dictionary of Harr. It is used to refer to a legal doctrine of which Sidney is not aware. As you know, because he does not have internet at home, we cannot expect him to do any research.

You should read Sidney's posts on the case of Shan Carter, a case he was championing a couple of years ago. The Court invoked the "rarely used" doctrine of transferred intent in the shooting death of an innocent bystander.

Shan Carter stole money from a drug dealer, who later threatened him. Not knowing whether the dealer had a gun, Carter pulled his gun and shot the dealer in "self defense." As the drug dealer ran away down a crowded street, Carter fired an additional 4 to 6 shots at the dealer as he continued to act in "self defense." The drug dealer and an innocent bystander, an 8 year old boy, were killed.

Shockingly, the Court rejected Carter's self defense plea, apparently concluding that he acted recklessly in firing multiple shots in a crowded street at a target running away from him. The Court invoked the "rarely used" doctrine of transferred intent in finding Carter guilty of murder of the boy. As Sidney noted, the boy's death was nothing but a tragic accident. Carter did not intend to kill him.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 5:20 said: "The biggest racist on this site is sidney harr....followed closely by his little friend, kenny hissy. when the two of them stop spouting their racist bullshit, then they can rant about racist postings by others" ....... What "race" is it that Dr.Harr and myself are predjudice against? Utter and complete nonsense. The idea that African Americans are racist is a projection used by over emotional, over sensitive, weak and insecure people upset that their dominance in society is dwindling. Relax,non-Hispanic Americans of Northern and Eastern European ancestry will still be in the majority until 2050Quit being so reactionary and accept the fact that not all things last forever including your 19th and 20th Century position of privilege and power.

guiowen said...

So you are a racist!

Anonymous said...

Regardless of what the racial makeup of the country will be in the future it doesn't change the fact that no white man would ever want to have sex with Crystal Mangum.There's just no way it would ever happen.

Anonymous said...

Ken Edwards last post proves, without question, his fundamentally flawed character, his base hatred, and his blind ugly racism. From this post forward, every word he writes will be seen clearly for what it is.....
This is the last time I will comment on or respond to any post by this weak minded and shamefully bitter individual.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"What "race" is it that Dr.Harr and myself are predjudice against? Utter and complete nonsense."

What is completely ridiculous and racistis your and SIDNEY's unreasonable presumption that Caucasian men should be convictes of raping Crystal because of who and what they are. You have never provided evidence that Crystal was raped.

"The idea that African Americans are racist is a projection used by over emotional, over sensitive, weak and insecure people upset that their dominance in society is dwindling."

The ongoing reaction to Crystal's false allegations of rape against Caucasian men say otherwise.



Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Intern said...
"There were three young men who were not perpetrators who had knowledge...blahblahblah"

Here I'll simply note that you failed to address my post.
So I'll ask again -- Why did Mr. Johnson wait 3 days before reporting a murder he was aware of?

Put another way -- if you, Sid Harr were aware of a murder committed TODAY, would you wait 3 days to report it?

I'll also note that you have yet to provide a source for your claim that misprision of felony is a "rarely used" charge.

Hey, Intern.
If I were aware of a murder today, then I would report it to authorities immediately, taking care not to let them entrap me because I'm an African American. Keep in mind, however, that I am a senior citizen and not a teenager... and I don't abide by the "no-snitch rules" of the street. Regarding the Misprision of Felony rule, I don't recall where I learned that it was rarely used, but tell me... are you aware of anyone else being charged with it? I didn't think so.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Burch is the lowest of the low......but, because he is black and because he raped a white woman, sidney has no interest. Guess what kind of disgusting crap we would hear from sidney if Burch were white and he had raped a black woman....
hypocrisy, thy name is harr.


Fact is that the Burch case was not covered here in Raleigh, to my knowledge. Like I said earlier, I am busy trying to see that Mangum gets justice.

Give me a good reason for investing my valuable time and energies looking into the Burch case. Has there been an injustice in it that I could right? More elucidation is required.

Anonymous said...

taking care not to let them entrap me because I am an african american......well, there you go....another example of racist thinking......sidney, you are a transparent fool. The point is not how many times a charge is made,sidney....the point is whether the charge is valid and, thankfully, that is not up to you to decide.
since you don't recall where you learned that misprision of felony is "rarely used", we will all assume that you have, yet again, created one of your infamous air sources. liar.

Anonymous said...

An injustice that you can right? wow, mr. ego, give us one single example, just one, of an "injustice you have righted". we can't wait!!
you want an injustice in the burch case? I will give you one.....the rapist creep may actually get out of prison soon.......so he can, no doubt, rape again. Hope the next victim isn't anybody in your family, sidney

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"Roberts is bending over backwards like a soft pretzel to prevent from having to put her report in writing."

Because she does not want some unauthorized person, namely you, to use it to publish confidential information.

"If she does comply with legal pressure to produce such a report (which I'm sure will pull all kinds of punches), you can bet that I will publish it."

You presume it has already been decided, based on your evaluation, that Dr. Nichols' report was fraudulent. You have not established you have the credentials to question the report.

"I believe in enlightenment... not concealment and obfuscation."

That is one of the biggest lies you have published on your blog.


What has Roberts got to worry about? I've already put online all of the pertinent hospital records I could find. All I want to publish is her opinions about the autopsy report and Daye's death... something about which she's extremely reluctant to relate.

Regarding the Nichols autopsy report on Daye, it doesn't take a medical degree to recognize discrepancies between it and the other medical records.

As far as bloggers go, I am the Supreme Blogger of Enlightenment! That's not bragging... that's a fact.

Nifong Supporter said...


Harr Supporter said...
Lance: I'll also note that you have yet to provide a source for your claim that misprision of felony is a "rarely used" charge.

"Rarely used" comes from the Dictionary of Harr. It is used to refer to a legal doctrine of which Sidney is not aware. As you know, because he does not have internet at home, we cannot expect him to do any research.

You should read Sidney's posts on the case of Shan Carter, a case he was championing a couple of years ago. The Court invoked the "rarely used" doctrine of transferred intent in the shooting death of an innocent bystander.

Shan Carter stole money from a drug dealer, who later threatened him. Not knowing whether the dealer had a gun, Carter pulled his gun and shot the dealer in "self defense." As the drug dealer ran away down a crowded street, Carter fired an additional 4 to 6 shots at the dealer as he continued to act in "self defense." The drug dealer and an innocent bystander, an 8 year old boy, were killed.

Shockingly, the Court rejected Carter's self defense plea, apparently concluding that he acted recklessly in firing multiple shots in a crowded street at a target running away from him. The Court invoked the "rarely used" doctrine of transferred intent in finding Carter guilty of murder of the boy. As Sidney noted, the boy's death was nothing but a tragic accident. Carter did not intend to kill him.


Unfortunately rarely used laws are discriminately used against the poor, disenfranchised, and people of color.

Shan Carter did not fire as many rounds as you suggested, he fired in self defense, and the fact that a bullet richoceted and struck an eight year-old boy in the head is a real tragedy... but, it was none the less, an accident and definitely unintentional.

Anonymous said...

Hey Lance, would you say that all charges of accessory after the fact in felony cases, due to failure to disclose, are misprision of felony?
Johnson clearly failed to come forward until he had a lucrative reason to do so.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
An injustice that you can right? wow, mr. ego, give us one single example, just one, of an "injustice you have righted". we can't wait!!
you want an injustice in the burch case? I will give you one.....the rapist creep may actually get out of prison soon.......so he can, no doubt, rape again. Hope the next victim isn't anybody in your family, sidney


Again, I am unfamiliar with the Burch case. Why is he getting out of jail soon... has he served his sentence? Is it your position that all convicted rapists should spend the rest of their lives in jail? More elucidation is required.

Anonymous said...

How many years should a rapist serve? How many years should a multiple-victim rapist serve? Hmmmmm....How about a multiple-victim rapist who, while raping/sodomizing and ripping open his victims...also beat the living daylights out of them? How much time should an animal serve who tore open the private parts of his victims?
I guess maybe a slap on the wrist, huh, sidney?
Shan Carter an extensive criminal record before he murdered two people in 1997. His record included multiple felony convictions. He shot the adult male victim IN THE BACK and shot at him as the victim was RUNNING AWAY past a car where the little boy was. The adult victim was shot SIX TIMES. Look it up, sidney....

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Hey Lance, would you say that all charges of accessory after the fact in felony cases, due to failure to disclose, are misprision of felony?
Johnson clearly failed to come forward until he had a lucrative reason to do so.


First of all, the purpose of a reward is to provide a financial incentive for individuals to come forward with information.

Second, it was Johnson's information that resulted in the criminal case being cracked... had Johnson kept his mouth closed, the Willis murder might be unsolved today.

Thirdly, the one person who kept his knowledge of the crime to himself, came out best, in that he was not arrested, not charged, and did not spend any time behind bars.

Fourthly, Johnson should have been lauded as a hero, and the Willis family should have embraced him.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
How many years should a rapist serve? How many years should a multiple-victim rapist serve? Hmmmmm....How about a multiple-victim rapist who, while raping/sodomizing and ripping open his victims...also beat the living daylights out of them? How much time should an animal serve who tore open the private parts of his victims?
I guess maybe a slap on the wrist, huh, sidney?
Shan Carter an extensive criminal record before he murdered two people in 1997. His record included multiple felony convictions. He shot the adult male victim IN THE BACK and shot at him as the victim was RUNNING AWAY past a car where the little boy was. The adult victim was shot SIX TIMES. Look it up, sidney....


I will enlighten the masses about Shan Carter's case later. Currently I am working to get justice for Mangum.

UPDATE ON THE SUPER-FLOG!!
I am pleased to announce that the flog is nearly completed... then all that will need to be done is to put together the directory of documents. Should be completed and posted this weekend.

Anonymous said...

My question was directed to Lance, not you, sidney. feel free to respond, though, with your usual lies.

Anonymous said...

Key FACTS about Carter.
1. Convicted felon who was in the middle of selling drugs on a street corner when the incident with his adult victim occurred.
2. Five witnesses saw him RUNNING AFTER his adult victim, shooting at him, including the mother of the little boy hit by Carter.
3. The bullet that killed the child was not a ricochet...he fired toward his adult male, aiming literally through the car and shot the child in the head.
4. He was found guilty of multiple home burglaries, assaults, and other felonies that occurred in the days leading up to the murder of his two victims. He was a convicted felon who was illegally carrying a firearm, had extensive drugs in his possession. He admitted during his testimony that he "had to shoot (his adult victim) before he got shot himself".....the first shot, and then he admitted that he ran after the adult victim, still shooting, "to make sure".
ANOTHER SCUMBAG IN PRISON WHERE HE BELONGS.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"If I were aware of a murder today, then I would report it to authorities immediately, taking care not to let them entrap me because I'm an African American."

SIDNEY HARR shows the black on white racism which KENHYDERAL says does not exist. If bad things happen to him(e.g. Duke University objects to his violation of its no solicitation policy) it is because he is an African American.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
Fact is that the Burch case was not covered here in Raleigh, to my knowledge. Like I said earlier, I am busy trying to see that Mangum gets justice.

Give me a good reason for investing my valuable time and energies looking into the Burch case. Has there been an injustice in it that I could right? More elucidation is required."

You want to ignore the Burch case because he is African American and you believe African Americans are above the law.

You believed murderers Atwater and Lovette were above the law because they were black.

Lance the Intern said...

"Shan Carter did not fire as many rounds as you suggested, he fired in self defense, and the fact that a bullet richoceted and struck an eight year-old boy in the head is a real tragedy... but, it was none the less, an accident and definitely unintentional.

Shan Carted did IN FACT fire 4-6 shots -- it's well-documented in the legal documents, STATE of North Carolina, v. Shan CARTER.

Secondly, there was no "richocet" that struck "the boy". It was characterized as a "stray" bullet". There IS a difference.

By the way, Sid, "the boy" had a name -- Demetrius Greene. He had a mother, D'April Greene. He had a family. This bag of shit, Shan Carter, took him away from that family. To the best of MY knowledge, Shan Carter NEVER sought forgiveness from them for what he did.

"...it was none the less, an accident and definitely unintentional."

For the last g*ddamn time, Sid, look up the laws regarding transferred intent.

It DOESN'T MATTER that Shan Carter killed Demetrius Greene unintentionally. What MATTERS is that he killed Demetrius Greene while committing a felony




Anonymous said...

Amen, Lance. Amen

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Shan Carter did not fire as many rounds as you suggested, he fired in self defense, and the fact that a bullet richoceted and struck an eight year-old boy in the head is a real tragedy... but, it was none the less, an accident and definitely unintentional."

I hope you realize what you have written. Shan Carter opened fire in a scenario in which a drug deal he was trying to make went bad. He did not intend any of the bullets to ricochet and kill an innocent 8 yeat old bystander. So, because Shan Hall is black, he should have gotten a pass for the incident.

Another manifestation of SIDNEY's racism, which KENHYDERAL says does not exist.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"What has Roberts got to worry about? I've already put online all of the pertinent hospital records I could find."

That was a crime and Dr. Roberts has scruples about aiding and abetting you in the commission of a similar crime.

"All I want to publish is her opinions about the autopsy report and Daye's death... something about which she's extremely reluctant to relate."

Probably because she was retained by the defense as an expert witness and her opinions would not aid the defense.

"Regarding the Nichols autopsy report on Daye, it doesn't take a medical degree to recognize discrepancies between it and the other medical records."

Another statement on SIDNEY's part which confirms he was and is a totally incompetent physician.

As far as bloggers go, I am the Supreme Blogger of Enlightenment! That's not bragging... that's a fact."

That is a delusion on your part.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
First of all, the purpose of a reward is to provide a financial incentive for individuals to come forward with information.

Second, it was Johnson's information that resulted in the criminal case being cracked... had Johnson kept his mouth closed, the Willis murder might be unsolved today.

Thirdly, the one person who kept his knowledge of the crime to himself, came out best, in that he was not arrested, not charged, and did not spend any time behind bars.

Fourthly, Johnson should have been lauded as a hero, and the Willis family should have embraced him."

So prove to the Willis family that James Johnson deserves the reward. You can not. Unsupported allegations and mere opinions are not proof of anything.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"
Again, I am unfamiliar with the Burch case. Why is he getting out of jail soon..."

It is because the Durham DA office, under the leadership of DA NIFONG did not make as much of a fuss over true black rapist Michael Jermaine Burch as it did over the falsely accused innocent Caucasian Lacrosse players. So Michael Jermaine was allowed to plead to lesser offenses. Like OJ Simpson, he got a break rather than justice for his crimes.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

SIDNEY's latest series of posts are manifestations of his pro black racism.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 4:41 said: "Ken Edwards last post proves, without question, his fundamentally flawed character, his base hatred, and his blind ugly racism. From this post forward, every word he writes will be seen clearly for what it is.....
This is the last time I will comment on or respond to any post by this weak minded and shamefully bitter individual"................. Dear Anonymous how will we know that is the case?

Anonymous said...

WE don't give a damn whether you know if a poster is responding to anything YOU have to say, racist.

Anonymous said...

I guess the two bastards who kidnapped, assaulted and murdered Eve Carson ought to get a pass, too. She was white; they are black....so, golly, surely they were framed and surely they deserve to be out on the streets. right, sidney? Yep, thought so.......

Lance the Intern said...

" I don't abide by the "no-snitch rules" of the street."

Where would one find these so-called "rules of the street"? Are they codified somewhere?

Of course not -- they do not exist, other than in the minds of those who use them in a pitiful excuse to excuse the crimes of others.

" are you aware of anyone else being charged with it[misprision of felony]? I didn't think so."

Stop presuming to know what I may or may not know.

I'm aware of people as disparate as Louisiana parish presidents to Catholic Priests to drug dealers being charged with misprision of felony.

What do they all have in common? They were all aware of a felony being committed and didn't report it.



Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...

"As far as bloggers go, I am the Supreme Blogger of Enlightenment! That's not bragging... that's a fact."

Something is a fact if it matches objective reality. For something to be objective, it must be outside of the mind and not be based on feelings or biases.

So what do you have outside of your own mind, not based upon feelings or bias that allows you to state that this is a fact?

Do you, perhaps have an award from some outside organization?

Anonymous said...

Perhaps by comparison we might look at the national awards won by KC Johnson for his blogs......and the honors from Harvard. Of course those don't count though.....because Sidney's sources have informed him that Johnson is white and the entire Harvard organization hates black people.......and, well, you get the picture. So poor Sidney is a hero in his own racist mind.......and that's all that counts.
Meantime, Mangum is due in court .

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr was named the 2012 Supreme Blogger of Enlightenment of the Year by the Dubai Society of Internet Trolls. In announcing this prestigious award, DSIT noted that "Dr. Harr has done more for Crystal Mangum than any of her Court appointed Lawyers. He has given much of his time and energy in an effort to get justice for her."

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous @ 9:36 said: "WE don't give a damn whether you know if a poster is responding to anything YOU have to say, racist".... Of course it's who, not if, I was speculating about. When someone responds to what I post that's obvious but without a user-name I can only guess who they are. Fighting with phantoms presents certain challenges.

guiowen said...

kenhyderal said...

"Anonymous @ 9:36 said: 'WE don't give a damn whether you know if a poster is responding to anything YOU have to say, racist'.... Of course it's who, not if, I was speculating about. When someone responds to what I post that's obvious but without a user-name I can only guess who they are. Fighting with phantoms presents certain challenges."

You sound like Jeremiah Wright. Why don't you just come out and say, "America, your chickens are coming home to roost!"?

Anonymous said...

Who you respond to matters not to anybody but you. Nobody gives a rip about your silly racist troll trash

Anonymous said...

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

Kenny is a troll

kenhyderal said...

@ Guiown re: the Rev Wright. Prior to the "Surge" and while the US was distracted in Iraq, a war our country was against, our troops were suffering greater casualties as a percentage of their population then were Americans in Afghanistan. As an ally We did our bit to avenge the harboring of El Qaeda by the Taliban. God bless America and save it from it's right wing extremists.

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal,
That's not what your 9:50 posting sounded like.

Anonymous said...

Is unattractive drunk prostitute Crystal Mangum ever going to be put on trial for killing an innocent person? In the good old days she already would have been hanged.

Anonymous said...

KENHYDERAL:

"God bless America and save it from it's right wing extremists."

How about save the US from ALL extremists, both left and right wing.

Anonymous said...

God bless America and protect us from the arrogance and pathetic whining of others for,whom we lay down our lives. Spare us the bragging overblown squeaking of those who envy us and who try desperately to cover their own weakness by pointing out what they perceive to be the flaws in us. Lead us toward doing better , trying harder, giving more, using less......not because some self righteous academic toad tells us we must, but because we trust in you and because we know that in our imperfection, there is an honest abiding truth that makes our country and its people great.

Anonymous said...

Canadian losses in Afghanistan = 158.

Canadian Population = 34,482,779

US losses in Afghanistan > 1,700.

US Population = 311,591,917

Do the math.

Troll.

kenhyderal said...

Pre-surge?

Anonymous said...

2002-2011

Look it up, troll.

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal said:
"God bless America and save it from it's right wing extremists."

I can see you'd just love to have America taken over by the left wing extremists.

Anonymous said...

Sid, Is this more of the Rae Evans-driven crusade by the mainstream medial to discredit Crystal?


http://www.thedurhamnews.com/2012/10/27/213604/mangum-risk-it-all-to-represent.html

Anonymous said...

W
H
E
R
E

I
S

K
E
N
N
Y

T
H
E

T
R
O
L
L
?

Anonymous said...

Is Ken Edwards a Communist?

Nifong Supporter said...


HEY! LISTEN UP, EVERYBODY!

Update on Super-Flog

I am pleased to announce that the actual animated flog has been completed, and all that remains is to get the directory set up with all of its documents. Setting up a directory is a lot less time consuming and less labor-intensive than doing the blog. I had hoped to have it ready for posting today, but it looks like the earliest will be tomorrow, Monday morning.

I feel like I owe it to visitors to this blog site to give them the best product possible, so I refuse to sacrifice quality for the sake of speed. It would be like asking Leonardo Di Vinci to paint Mona Lisa faster. As you will see, hopefully by tomorrow, this Super-Flog will indeed be a masterpiece.

guiowen said...

We're anxiously awaiting this superflog!

Anonymous said...

Blah blah blah, Sidney.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I feel like I owe it to visitors to this blog site to give them the best product possible, so I refuse to sacrifice quality for the sake of speed. It would be like asking Leonardo Di Vinci to paint Mona Lisa faster. As you will see, hopefully by tomorrow, this Super-Flog will indeed be a masterpiece."

Only in your deluded dreams are you comparable to Leonardo DaVinci.

Anonymous said...

sidney is deliberately being a buffoon and trying to provoke response to his pseudo arrogance. Just another attention-getting device. sidney, you are a great bore.

Anonymous said...

It continues to amaze me that so little attention and focus has been given to the victim, Reginald Daye, in this case. Of course Sidney disputes that Daye was the victim, claiming that the killer, Mangum, was the "real" victim. We all know his bias and his consistent MO of blaming others. That being said, the rest of us.....will await the jury's decision.....and avoid leaping to conclusions. By all accounts Daye was a decent man, trying to be good to Mangum. She admitted this. I believe they both were drinking and I believe they both were in a push-shove match. There is NO evidence that Mangum was beaten. None. If she comes forward with evidence of a beating, then the jury will hear it. The infamous trip to a clinic, for a supposed prior beating, never produced any evidence either. Her story is full of holes and the prosecution's case, which we have not yet seen fully, is going to look straight into those holes.
The intent of this post is not to pay any respect to sidney or mangum. It is, however, to remember and to pay respect to a man who was killed.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR is practicing the nifongian method of proving guilt. Proclaim the accused guilty then conceal evidence that the accused is innocent.

Lance the Intern said...

Well...We're waiting.

Anonymous said...

Of course he will completely deny it, but the truth is that Harr needs to be, and should be, extremely careful what he says concerning Mangum. The NC Bar, thought by some to be a bunch of wimps, may have had enough of Harr and his lawyer impersonation skits. I certainly hope so.

Anonymous said...

Depending on what the NC Bar committee determined to be their appropriate course of action against Harr, he may himself in a world of trouble if he continues to behave as he has in the past. Personally, I think Harr's pressure on Mangum has led her down a terrible path.....the unwise ignorant blind leading the amoral deceiver. That's a bad combination and, of course, Mangum is the one who is eventually going to pay the price. I do NOT feel sorry for her.