Saturday, February 23, 2013

Durham prosecutors make fools of the Daye family

Word count: 613

Click on the LINK below to access the flog:
LINK:  http://www.justice4nifong.com/direc/flog/flog26/flog26re.html
Transcript of narrative below

The Durham Police and the Durham prosecutors have mocked Reginald Daye’s family by convincing them to play the role of aggrieved family members spewing hatred towards Crystal Mangum.

These family members, like most uninformed and unenlightened people hold Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser, responsible for the death of Reginald Daye… her boyfriend at the time.

Recently, when Mangum has appeared in court for a hearing, Daye’s family would show up in the courtroom pews and with their glares shoot daggers at this young woman who has been charged with first degree murder in his death.

According to news sources, Prosecutor Charlene Coggins-Franks has even made a point of publicly pointing out their presence to the Court… taking the extra step of suggesting that some were still so distraught as to be weeping during the hearing.

Whether or not these courtroom theatrics were orchestrated by the prosecution, which is most likely the case, or the misguided creation of the Daye family itself, is unknown… but its intent is the same. The goal being to garner animosity against Mangum.

Prosecutors in this case need every possible advantage, as their case is non-existent. Evidence has readily established that Ms. Mangum was the victim of domestic violence, assault on a female, and false imprisonment by an alcohol intoxicated Daye.

Evidence furthermore supports that she stabbed him in self-defense, and that the wound she inflicted was not life-threatening.

Intubation of the esophagus instead of the trachea by medical staff at Duke University Hospital, as a complication of delirium tremens, was responsible for Daye’s brain death and cardiac arrest.

His subsequent elective removal from life support by Duke hospital staff resulted in his death… a death in which Mangum played no role.

A fraudulent autopsy report by North Carolina Deputy Chief Medical Examiner Clay Nichols served as the underpinning for the bogus murder charge against Mangum, and with the cooperation of the mainstream media, it has served to mislead the masses into believing Mangum was directly and solely responsible for his death.

The Daye family has bought into this fantasy and has been injecting their venom at an innocent person, Ms. Mangum… who is also a victim of their kin, Reginald Daye.

Surely, the prosecutors have represented themselves to the Daye family as sympathetic and empathetic fellow mourners out to get justice for Reginald, a valued member of society… but this is where the foolery begins.

It is unreasonable for the Daye family to think that the Durham Police and/or its prosecutors give a whit about Reginald… an African American man with a criminal record.

The contempt the police and prosecutors had for Mr. Daye is evidenced in their choice of an alias for him… using the initials of his first and last name, they came up with the moniker Richard Dong.

“Dong” is a vulgar slang word that refers to male genitalia… and its use, for the so-called alleged victim who they cared so much about, was inappropriate, offensive, and racist. Totally uncalled for.

Duke University Hospital had the decency, after Reginald Daye was admitted, to change his alias from Richard Dong to Richard Douglas.

The Daye family needs to stop being a prosecution puppet in the vendetta prosecution of Mangum and come to grips with the reality that they are being used by the prosecution in carrying out an injustice against an innocent person, Mangum.

If the Daye family wants to vent its hostility about Reginald Daye’s death, they need to direct it where it belongs… at Reginald Daye himself and the Duke University Hospital.

And, they need to cease being pawns of the prejudice prosecutors. 

314 comments:

1 – 200 of 314   Newer›   Newest»
Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Maybe, if Crystal does not skip bail and goes to trial, she will call on SIDNEY as an expert witness. SIDNEY will launch one of his irrelevancy filled compilations of uncorroborated allegations. The Judge admonishes SIDNEY to confine himself to relevant testimony. SIDNEY refuses. The judge cites him for contempt and incarcerates SIDNEY for the duration of the trial. Now wouldn't that be the best break for Crystal?


No one can accuse this blog site of lacking in creative commenters. Anonymous, I would encourage you to go to Hollywood and see about doing screenplay for one of the soap operas. I think you would be very good.

Walt said...

Sid wrote: "His subsequent elective removal from life support by Duke hospital staff resulted in his death… a death in which Mangum played no role."

Again, you ignore the law that disagrees with you. That is not persuasive.

"A fraudulent autopsy report by North Carolina Deputy Chief Medical Examiner Clay Nichols served as the underpinning for the bogus murder charge against Mangum...."

Thanks to your breach of the attorney client privilege, we now know that the defense has testimony that the autopsy report is not fraudulent.

Walt-in-Durham

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"No one can accuse this blog site of lacking in creative commenters. Anonymous, I would encourage you to go to Hollywood and see about doing screenplay for one of the soap operas. I think you would be very good."

Totally irrelevant.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

All that can be said of your latest compilation of unproven allegations is, boy are you seriously deluded.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

The only reason that Reginal Daye might be held up to ridicule over any alias which was part of his confidential medical record is that you illegally accessed and published the information.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

What ever happened to your prediction that you would humiliate the NC State Bar when it sought an injunction against you?

Anonymous said...

Totally incorrect about the alias. The person who filled out the form intended that the four first letters of the last name be used....."doug". Not dong. Don't be an idiot, harr...if you can possibly avoid it. Nobody but a hate-filled racist, such as you, would try to make something out of nothing.....
I hope the Daye family attends every single hearing. I hope the entire family is there for every session. They have every right to be there and to express their outrage....and yes, their hatred, for the person who is accused of ending Mr. Daye's life. You are a totally low class individual for criticizing them for expressing their emotions. What a sorry asshat thing to do. You are running out of material, aren't you, harr.....so you have to resort to crap like this.

Anonymous said...

wow, I thought good old super sidney was gonna run roughshod over the Bar committee.......what happened sidney, rae evans show up and tell the judge to box your ears??

Anonymous said...

Sidney no longer wants to talk about the bar hearing, so he isn't going to tell his readers what happened.

Right now what Sidney would like to do is slime a dead man and his grieving family. Won't you join him?

Anonymous said...

Harr couldn't be any more full of sxxx if somebody reversed the polarity on his enema bag. What an absolutely tasteless cretin- like flub........piss and moan about the Daye family. Poor dear Mangum ......3

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:


"Durham prosecutors make fools of the Daye family"

Rather, this title shows what a consummate fool you are.

Anonymous said...

One of the sorriest pieces of trash produced by this phony. When all else fails, try to punk the family of a dead man. Oh brother.
You got your little asshat handed to you on a plate in the hearing so now you want to deflect from that embarrassment by trashing the Daye family. What a sorry excuse for a man you are......
I don't know whether Mangum will get convicted. That is for the jury to decide. But what I do know is that the Daye family has been smeared by you, that Reginald Daye has been smeared by you and that you are an unethical person who has no problem telling lies about a dead man.

Anonymous said...

Oh, I get it.....silly me. Having a criminal record automatically means you are the drunken wild woman beating jerk! right??? gosh, and here I was thinking that just because a person has a "criminal record" does not necessarily mean they are always guilty. but, golly, I guess this means.....now....that Mangum, who most definitely has a criminal record that puts Daye's infractions to shame...is automatically guilty. silly me......here I was thinking she was supposed to have a trial. but, since she has one helluva record, that automatically makes HER the knife totin' sewer mouthed, pole vaulting, man killer.

Anonymous said...

Dunno if Mangum is out of jail yet. I figure she is. could have sworn I saw her in a restaurant in Durham this weekend. Party time, I guess! If the person I saw was actually Mangum, she had a guy with her and she was, as they say, feelin' no pain. Probably was Mangum's evil twin, cloned by Rae Evans, and unleashed on Durhamites again, to wreck havoc.....

Anonymous said...

Harr actually has a good idea for a soap opera based on this site. Just think of the plot line possibilities. Victim Yet Again. Rae, the Evil One. BabyMoma goes to Hollywood. Don't Mess with Me. Dr.Phony tells all. Bathrobe Boy goes to camp.
Yep, endless fodder for the Jerry Springer trash edition.

Anonymous said...

Hmmm, somebody pointed out last week that Mangum's bond, for MURDER, was half that for the LAX guys...for rape....based on accusations that turned out to be big fat nasty lies. I can just hear whine-sidney now..."but the duke boys were rich white boys so they should have to pay". Or, "good, those rich white evil drunken whore-hiring (oops, can't say that....) dancer-hiring creeps should have had to spend the rest of their lives in prison.....even if they didn't rape her....but, well, because, as the dumbass NCCU student said, because of all the other shit white guys do to black women". (that's a crude quote, folks, but it's a true quote).
Between now and July we will get treated to sidney at this best, defending poor Mangum and making up excuse after excuse, IN ADVANCE.......Rae Evans picked the jury, the judge is crooked, the prosecutors are Rae's handpicked villans, and so on. Here it comes....get the barf bags ready.

Nifong Supporter said...


LISTEN UP! NEW POLICY IN PLACE!

The kenhyderal Policy will now be enforced on this blog site. It will knock into oblivion any comment that consists of one or two words repeated over and over again. In other words, from now on all commenters must possess a vocabulary of at least three words, and they must consist of at least a noun and a verb. And they must be arranged to form a cogent sentence.

It's sad that it's had to come to this, but that what happens when some commenters are too immature and unintelligent to make comments that contribute to the conversation.

Repetitive spam comments will be removed the nanosecond I come across them.

Nifong Supporter said...


Walt said...
Sid wrote: "His subsequent elective removal from life support by Duke hospital staff resulted in his death… a death in which Mangum played no role."

Again, you ignore the law that disagrees with you. That is not persuasive.

"A fraudulent autopsy report by North Carolina Deputy Chief Medical Examiner Clay Nichols served as the underpinning for the bogus murder charge against Mangum...."

Thanks to your breach of the attorney client privilege, we now know that the defense has testimony that the autopsy report is not fraudulent.

Walt-in-Durham


Walt, of course the autopsy report is fraudulent. How else do you explain the discrepancies? The autopsy report says there were perforations to the lung, diaphragm, left kidney, and stomach. The operative report states otherwise.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Sidney no longer wants to talk about the bar hearing, so he isn't going to tell his readers what happened.

Right now what Sidney would like to do is slime a dead man and his grieving family. Won't you join him?


Regarding the Bar hearings, there's not much to tell. Judge Carl Fox granted the Bar's injunction to prevent me from "lawyering" in Mangum's case. End of story. What more is there to tell?

Regarding Reginald Daye, I'm not the one who gave him the alias Richard Dong!!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Harr couldn't be any more full of sxxx if somebody reversed the polarity on his enema bag. What an absolutely tasteless cretin- like flub........piss and moan about the Daye family. Poor dear Mangum ......3


I am not the one who is taking advantage of the Daye family. The Daye family has no right to be upset with Crystal Mangum.

Anonymous said...

You mis-read and mis-interpret numerous documents you posted illegally and which you should never have seen. Any healthcare professional knows about HIPPA and PHI. In particular, physicians know about this longstanding federal law. You are either not a physician or you are lying when you say you don't know about HIPPA and PHI. There were NO discrepancies in the reports and documentation. None. You made up false conclusions. For example you claim that Mr. Daye was an alcoholic and was in DTs. Not so. Not one shred of evidence supports alcoholism. Further, DTs were only suspected...and frankly, any physician would know that Daye's symptoms were far more likely to do abdominal infection, which was also suspected. Neither DTs nor infection were confirmed in the notes. The fact that Daye had been given Ativan, since Day ONE, you falsely linked to DT treatment. Incorrect. He was given Ativan from the first day of admission,and not started on Ativan as a result of suspicion of DTs days later. You have never confirmed any experience as a physician beyond medical school, years ago. You have no confirmed experience in forensics, pathology, pulmonology or trauma surgery. You have no confirmed experience in ever having completed a single autopsy....and those cadavers in medical school do not count, sidney. In short, your opinions about the illegally obtained and posted confidential medical information on Daye are not only incorrect, they are also irrelevant. Unless you are called as an expert witness during the trial and unless you, under oath, provide confirmation of your professional experience and expertise, these rantings about medical findings are worthless. Shame on you for putting this material on line. No reputable physician would EVER do this. Further, shame on you for butting into Mangum's case, to the detriment of her defense and her future.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
wow, I thought good old super sidney was gonna run roughshod over the Bar committee.......what happened sidney, rae evans show up and tell the judge to box your ears??


Truth be told, I actually believed that I had a right to contribute a petition as a Pro Se third party petitioner. I couldn't find a statute or rule to the contrary, and not being a lawyer I did not know. (Ms. Evans did not show up.)

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Totally incorrect about the alias. The person who filled out the form intended that the four first letters of the last name be used....."doug". Not dong. Don't be an idiot, harr...if you can possibly avoid it. Nobody but a hate-filled racist, such as you, would try to make something out of nothing.....
I hope the Daye family attends every single hearing. I hope the entire family is there for every session. They have every right to be there and to express their outrage....and yes, their hatred, for the person who is accused of ending Mr. Daye's life. You are a totally low class individual for criticizing them for expressing their emotions. What a sorry asshat thing to do. You are running out of material, aren't you, harr.....so you have to resort to crap like this.


Oh, so the person got the letter "u" mixed up with the letter "n"... which is basically an upside-down "u" - right?

I dou't thiuk so.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

What ever happened to your prediction that you would humiliate the NC State Bar when it sought an injunction against you?


I was wrong.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
One of the sorriest pieces of trash produced by this phony. When all else fails, try to punk the family of a dead man. Oh brother.
You got your little asshat handed to you on a plate in the hearing so now you want to deflect from that embarrassment by trashing the Daye family. What a sorry excuse for a man you are......
I don't know whether Mangum will get convicted. That is for the jury to decide. But what I do know is that the Daye family has been smeared by you, that Reginald Daye has been smeared by you and that you are an unethical person who has no problem telling lies about a dead man.


WRONG-O!! I did not smear Reginald Daye... it was the Durham Police and prosecutors who gave him the alias "Richard Dong." I didn't.

Nifong Supporter said...


LISTEN UP, EVERYBODY!! IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

This flog, and all future flogs will be available on YouTube! The only drawback with YouTube is that they are not capable of being interactive... but its viewship capability is much more promising.

Anonymous said...

Let's hope Mangum gets counsel before July. Otherwise she is in very deep trouble....of her own making.....and with the sorry assistance of sidney harr. I would feel sorry for her but , hey, she's a big girl....just ask her

Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...

"“Dong” is a vulgar slang word that refers to male genitalia… and its use, for the so-called alleged victim who they cared so much about, was inappropriate, offensive, and racist.",

There are approximately 9,000 people in the US with the surname "Dong". Are you suggesting that their name is offensive?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"LISTEN UP! NEW POLICY IN PLACE!

The kenhyderal Policy will now be enforced on this blog site. It will knock into oblivion any comment that consists of one or two words repeated over and over again. In other words, from now on all commenters must possess a vocabulary of at least three words, and they must consist of at least a noun and a verb. And they must be arranged to form a cogent sentence.

It's sad that it's had to come to this, but that what happens when some commenters are too immature and unintelligent to make comments that contribute to the conversation.

Repetitive spam comments will be removed the nanosecond I come across them."

It's about time.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Walt, of course the autopsy report is fraudulent. How else do you explain the discrepancies? The autopsy report says there were perforations to the lung, diaphragm, left kidney, and stomach. The operative report states otherwise."

You say the Autopsy report is fraudulent. I say someone who never completed a residency, never was board certified and who spent less than 20 years as a non-formally trained, board uncertified ER physician, is not competent to comment on an autopsy report.

Dr. Anonymous

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Regarding the Bar hearings, there's not much to tell. Judge Carl Fox granted the Bar's injunction to prevent me from "lawyering" in Mangum's case. End of story. What more is there to tell?"

Considering your boasts that you would humiliate the board with your brilliance, there is a lot more to tell.


"Regarding Reginald Daye, I'm not the one who gave him the alias Richard Dong!!"

No, but you are the one who illegally accessed the information and illegally posted it on line. That makes you the one responsible for exposing Mr. Daye to ridicule.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I am not the one who is taking advantage of the Daye family."

Maybe not, but you are defaming a dead man by concealing evidence about him, evidence that he was not a serial violent abuser of women.

"The Daye family has no right to be upset with Crystal Mangum."

Yes they do, since Mr. Daye did die of complications of the stab wound, which WAS NOT inflicted on Mr. Daye in self defense.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Truth be told, I actually believed that I had a right to contribute a petition as a Pro Se third party petitioner. I couldn't find a statute or rule to the contrary, and not being a lawyer I did not know. (Ms. Evans did not show up.)"

Either you did not know that one who is not a defendant can not file a pro se motion in that case, which means you are not at all close to brilliant. Or you did know and you ignored it, which means you believe you are above the law.

Most likely it is the latter, since now you di know and you insist you did nothing wrong.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"WRONG-O!! I did not smear Reginald Daye... it was the Durham Police and prosecutors who gave him the alias "Richard Dong." I didn't."

You have called Mr.Daye a serial violent abuser of women and have tried to conceal evidence he was not. That constitutes a smear.

I say again, you are the one who illegally accessed Mr. Dayes' information and illegally published it on the internet. That makes YOU responsible for any ridicule Mr. Daye might have suffered as a result of the alias.

You really are a sociopath.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"LISTEN UP, EVERYBODY!! IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

This flog, and all future flogs will be available on YouTube! The only drawback with YouTube is that they are not capable of being interactive... but its viewship capability is much more promising."

Which means you do not want any interaction. Judging from the number of views you have received on your YouTube Channel(154 total views for 3 videos in 3 years) you will not get much viewership. The ABC Nightline video on the dismissal has gotten almost 28,000 views in 3 years. The video in which Michelle Malkin humiliates Malik Shabazz has received almost 20,000 views.

You are seriously deluded.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Oh, so the person got the letter "u" mixed up with the letter "n"... which is basically an upside-down "u" - right?

I dou't thiuk so."

To be correct you would have to say, "I am incapable of thiuking."

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

What ever happened to your prediction that you would humiliate the NC State Bar when it sought an injunction against you?


I was wrong."

So expound on why you got it so wrong. Were you given advice from "reliable sources" who turned out to be unreliable?

Anonymous said...

Nobody thinks a damn thing about the alias except sidney. Nobody thinks the word dong refers to black male genitalia but the myopic racist sidney. in fact, it is a total non-issue. alias names are often changed, repeatedly, in institutions like hospitals. If harr were ever actually a physician, he would have known this. In some cases involving crimes like the Daye case, the alias gets changed frequently, just to keep records further secure.
I am proud of the Daye family for standing up for their dead relative and for exercising their right to attend these hearings. good for them! Mangum is innocent until proven guilty. However, the Daye family has an absolute right to be present and to hold their own views as to her guilt or innocence, so long as they behave themselves in court.
sidney harr did smear Daye. we all know it. He called Daye an alcoholic. He said Daye had a pattern of violence against women. He falsely characterized Daye's record, never admitting that the one charge of domestic violence was DROPPED. He never admitted that two women who had prior relationships with Mr. Daye said he was never violent with them. sidney claimed Daye had the DTs in the hospital. DTs were suspected, as was an abdominal infection, but never confirmed! Period. harr's false characterization of Mr. Daye as a raging woman beating alcoholic is without any substance and is a LIE.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr said:

"Walt, of course the autopsy report is fraudulent."

However, the only way for Crystal to make such an argument in court is thru the testimony of a competent expert. Unless or until a competent expert draws into question the credibility, veracity and accuracy of the autopsy report it is definitive with respect to the cause of Mr. Daye's death.

Thanks to your skilled lawyering we already know that an expert previously retained by the defense reviewed the report and corroborated its findings. So, unless Cystal has retained another expert and that expert is prepared to testify that the report is, indeed, fraudulent (or at least incorrect in its findings) she is stuck with the findings of the report and her sole argument will be whether she acted in self defense.

Of course, this analysis ignores the bigger point raised by Walt (I believe) which is that even if the hospital failed to treat Mr. Daye properly and that mistreatment contributed to his death, it does not absolve Crystal of culpability. It is as if I stabbed someone on the sidewalk and they stumbled into the road and got hit by a car driven by a drunk driver going the wrong way down a one way street. Just because it was the car accident that killed the victim doesn't relieve me of my culpability for stabbing him - a stabbing that directly led to his death.

But, you don't even get that far without an expert who is capable and willing to testify that the report is incorrect.

This case is going to be an absolute, unmitigated disaster for Crystal. On the bright side, at least Sidney will have some fun and maybe gain a little notoriety.

Anonymous said...

Love it......now sidney will have to expand his definition of censor-able posts. good job, poster. :)

Walt said...

Sid wrote: "Walt, of course the autopsy report is fraudulent. How else do you explain the discrepancies? The autopsy report says there were perforations to the lung, diaphragm, left kidney, and stomach. The operative report states otherwise."

You still have not addressed the legal issue I raised over 2 years ago. You continue to ignore it as such your claim to fraud is unpersuasive. Anonymous at 10:25 has the analysis right though. One more point, if Crystal does raise the issue through competent testimony, guess who's breach of the attorney client privilege is going to sink her expert?

Walt-in-Durham

Walt said...

Sid does make a good, if unintended, point though. There is a value to a legal education, especially when it comes to dealing with criminal matters. Sort of like there is a value to a medical education when it comes to dealing with sickness.

Walt-in-Durham

Walt said...

Sid wrote: "Truth be told, I actually believed that I had a right to contribute a petition as a Pro Se third party petitioner. I couldn't find a statute or rule to the contrary, and not being a lawyer I did not know. (Ms. Evans did not show up.)"

Really? After numerous posters have told you that you did not? Frankly your claim strains credulity.

Walt-in-Durham


Anonymous said...

Walt said:

"You still have not addressed the legal issue I raised over 2 years ago."

Sidney does so not only at his peril, but, more importantly, at Crystal's. The result will be the same as when he willfully ignored the issues regarding his unauthorized practice of law. And it's not like we are being coy about it. We are not only alerting him to the issues, we are shouting the answers in his ear. Yet, Sidney refuses to hear.

One question: Did the defense expert ever reduce her report corroborating the original autopsy to writing? I know Sidney was pushing hard for this (God only knows why), but I did not know if it had ever been done. For Crystal's sake I hope not.

Not to pick nits, but handling a felony level criminal case requires far more than a legal education. Nobody comes out of law school ready to try a felony. In my opinion, no lawyer with any less than 5 years of [extensive] experience in criminal law has any business first chairing a felony trial at any level. I didn't take my first felony case until I had been practicing for about 7 or 8 years and I felt like I was way in over my head. It was not until I had practiced for over 12 years that I felt comfortable taking and trying felony cases and even then I always found it a challenge.

As I previously stated, this trial is going to be a complete disaster for Crystal. That isn't a prediction; it is a fact and I take no joy in saying it. Anyone who has practiced criminal law for any period of time and has read this blog knows what is about to happen. It isn't going to be pretty.

Anonymous said...

Mangy has no one to,blame but herself. Those of us who have put up with the poor victim crap for years are sick of her and Harr and the whole ugly mess. She deserves a fair trial. She insisted on representing herself. Fine. Trash in, trash out.

Anonymous said...

Mangum has had three different lawyers...all of whom were Rae Evans puppets according to wingnut Harr. All three are and were competent. How much more of this bull crap should we have to pay for?

Anonymous said...

I never saw any evidence that Dr. Roberts did a written report, at least as documented by Sidney on this site. She could very well have done one, however, and its results could have been embarrassing and highly negative for Mangum, so Sidney might have conveniently forgotten to comment on it here. Had Roberts done a written report, and, had her assessment supported Sidney's view of the world, I assure everyone we would have heard about it.

Anonymous said...

Remember, harr pushed Mangum to dump the original lawyer who took her case when the 2010 incident occurred. Over time, then, that's three lawyers who have been involved with Mangum......Vann (twice), Shella and the guy from the 2010 Walker incident...whose name I cannot recall. There was also a very brief dustup over some attorney in Louisburg (?) who showed up in court one time, had some exchange about fees, etc. and then disappeared as well. I suspect ANY attorney who would be involved with Mangum at this point....would absolutely refuse to take her case unless Harr and all his crowd were totally barred from having any contact with Mangum.....and that Mangum would have to, herself, agree to this condition. so, it looks like she is going to get exactly what we all fear will happen........having a fool for a client in July

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Let's hope Mangum gets counsel before July. Otherwise she is in very deep trouble....of her own making.....and with the sorry assistance of sidney harr. I would feel sorry for her but , hey, she's a big girl....just ask her


What Mangum does not need is a turncoat defense attorney who will prioritize protecting the medical examiner and Duke University Hospital above Mangum's best interests.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...
"“Dong” is a vulgar slang word that refers to male genitalia… and its use, for the so-called alleged victim who they cared so much about, was inappropriate, offensive, and racist.",

There are approximately 9,000 people in the US with the surname "Dong". Are you suggesting that their name is offensive?


Supreme Poster, The name itself is not offensive, however the use of the word for a surname in the context relevant to the case was inappropriate, offensive, and racist. Even Duke University Hospital agrees with me on this point... why else would they have initiated an alias name change?

Thereby go ye enlightened.


Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"LISTEN UP! NEW POLICY IN PLACE!

The kenhyderal Policy will now be enforced on this blog site. It will knock into oblivion any comment that consists of one or two words repeated over and over again. In other words, from now on all commenters must possess a vocabulary of at least three words, and they must consist of at least a noun and a verb. And they must be arranged to form a cogent sentence.

It's sad that it's had to come to this, but that what happens when some commenters are too immature and unintelligent to make comments that contribute to the conversation.

Repetitive spam comments will be removed the nanosecond I come across them."

It's about time.


Yeah... should've done it sooner. My bad.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

What ever happened to your prediction that you would humiliate the NC State Bar when it sought an injunction against you?


I was wrong."

So expound on why you got it so wrong. Were you given advice from "reliable sources" who turned out to be unreliable?


Show me in the statutes where it specifically states that a person cannot file a petition Pro Se as a third party.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"What Mangum does not need is a turncoat defense attorney who will prioritize protecting the medical examiner and Duke University Hospital above Mangum's best interests."

Mangum had competent attorneys. What she does not need is a delusional megalomaniac who thinks he is above the law, who thinks that a 5th grader is capable of evaluating medical records or an autopsy report.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Show me in the statutes where it specifically states that a person cannot file a petition Pro Se as a third party."

Show me where in the statutes it says that an individual who is not the defendant in or a party to a criminal case may file a pro se petition. Your deluded megalomaniacal paranoia did not make you a party to the Reginald Daye stabbing case.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Sidney Harr said:

"Walt, of course the autopsy report is fraudulent."

However, the only way for Crystal to make such an argument in court is thru the testimony of a competent expert. Unless or until a competent expert draws into question the credibility, veracity and accuracy of the autopsy report it is definitive with respect to the cause of Mr. Daye's death.

Thanks to your skilled lawyering we already know that an expert previously retained by the defense reviewed the report and corroborated its findings. So, unless Cystal has retained another expert and that expert is prepared to testify that the report is, indeed, fraudulent (or at least incorrect in its findings) she is stuck with the findings of the report and her sole argument will be whether she acted in self defense.

Of course, this analysis ignores the bigger point raised by Walt (I believe) which is that even if the hospital failed to treat Mr. Daye properly and that mistreatment contributed to his death, it does not absolve Crystal of culpability. It is as if I stabbed someone on the sidewalk and they stumbled into the road and got hit by a car driven by a drunk driver going the wrong way down a one way street. Just because it was the car accident that killed the victim doesn't relieve me of my culpability for stabbing him - a stabbing that directly led to his death.

But, you don't even get that far without an expert who is capable and willing to testify that the report is incorrect.

This case is going to be an absolute, unmitigated disaster for Crystal. On the bright side, at least Sidney will have some fun and maybe gain a little notoriety.


Dr. Roberts, the so-called defense expert witness, has not corroborated the autopsy report in writing, and she won't put anything in writing because she knows it will implicate Dr. Clay Nichols and Duke University Hospital.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"What Mangum does not need is a turncoat defense attorney who will prioritize protecting the medical examiner and Duke University Hospital above Mangum's best interests."

Mangum had competent attorneys. What she does not need is a delusional megalomaniac who thinks he is above the law, who thinks that a 5th grader is capable of evaluating medical records or an autopsy report.


Competent attorneys? You've got to be kidding. They were turncoat attorneys... of that, you can be sure.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I never saw any evidence that Dr. Roberts did a written report, at least as documented by Sidney on this site. She could very well have done one, however, and its results could have been embarrassing and highly negative for Mangum, so Sidney might have conveniently forgotten to comment on it here. Had Roberts done a written report, and, had her assessment supported Sidney's view of the world, I assure everyone we would have heard about it.


Believe you me, if I would have got my grubby little fingers on a written report by Dr. Roberts, I would post it at the earliest possible convenience. It it disagreed with me (and the truth), then I would point out its errors.

I do not run and hide from the truth.

Anonymous said...

you were told repeatedly that pro se in criminal cases is for defendants only. period.... you thought you could simply waste the court's time and get some notoriety for yourself. wrong.

Anonymous said...

Let me get this straight........Shella, a black man, working closely with Cline, a black woman, who was in Nifong's stable and, per Nifong, his "star"......turncoat??? Shella? Hmmmm...... so, if Shella was a turncoat, then I guess that means Cline was one, too.....and of course, Vann...and Jones. Hmmmm.

We are still waiting for you to provide proof of your expertise, experience and credibility to render an opinion that YOU claim is superior to other physicians of record who have significant expertise and experience. still waiting, sidney. until you can PROVE you have any credibility, at all, your opinions remain in the round file where they belong
technically, you have never established with documentation that you ever did actual work as a physician beyond a year or so......based on that record, you claim to be a "retired physician"? yep, technically true, perhaps. valid as a basis for saying you know more than outstanding trauma surgeons at duke, Nichols, Roberts, etc........not gonna fly, bro.
and, don't try to sidestep the issue by claiming somebody is trying to goad you into revealing your past. I could care less. Simply telling you, flat out, you have no tickets/no basis for your claims. I can say, as can anybody, that I am a retired brain surgeon. I refuse to prove it and prove my expertise, but I am. Nobody will believe me and nobody will care about my opinions....rightfully so. Your opinions are worth just as much as your hot air........

Anonymous said...

After Mangum's trial (and it will be a disaster....) is over, I wonder how long it will be before she starts rumbling about filing a law suit against Harr? She can't claim inadequate counsel as a reason to appeal. Perhaps she will say that she was under the influence of a bizarre doctor who led her astray, gave her bad advice, and that she was all drugged up and stressed out....and that will be her grounds for appeal. wouldn't it be fun to see harr get called as a witness by the prosecution?

Anonymous said...

Sidney said:

"Dr. Roberts, the so-called defense expert witness, has not corroborated the autopsy report in writing, and she won't put anything in writing because she knows it will implicate Dr. Clay Nichols and Duke University Hospital."

Even if you are right, it doesn't matter or change anything. You still have to deal with the original autopsy report. Unless Crystal is able to contest the findings in that report thru competent expert testimony, the report will stand as the only and definitive record regarding the cause of Mr. Daye's death.

You can talk about Rae Evans, carpetbagger jihads and turncoat lawyers all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that Crystal still has no basis to challenge the finding that it was her knife wound that caused Mr. Daye's death.

Even if you are able to find an expert at this late date who will contest the findings of the autopsy report and testify that the hospital's malpractice contributed to Mr. Daye's death, it makes no difference as a matter of law, for the reasons Walt has pointed out and you continue to ignore.

That leaves Crystal with a defense based solely on justification (i.e., self defense). There are serious problems with this defense, that i won't get into here.

It is one thing to risk having a civil injunction entered against you prohibiting you from filing pleadings in other people's court cases because of your ignorance of the law. However, it is quite another to risk having another person spend a good chunk (if not most) of their remaining life in prison because of your willful ignorance.

Crystal's case isn't going to go any better than your bar hearing, or your case against Duke. Sadly, it appears that you and Crystal will have to learn that the hard.



Anonymous said...

Harr has been so consistently, purposefully, willfully and powerfully intrusive into Mangum's case(s), that I begin to wonder if he is doing this.....with the intent to destroy her, for his own benefit. In some kind of twisted way, he may very deliberately trying to sabotage Mangum. I can think of no other explanation.....given the facts. He has over and over (Walker and now Daye) pushed her to dump competent counsel to her own peril, willfully disclosed information about her defense strategy, violated HIPPA, and given her terrible advice...over and over. Why would a man do this? Why? If sidney harr truly believes all the rubbish he publishes, then he is sick or suffering some kind of age-related dementia. It's the only plausible explanation for why a person would deliberately sabotage another in this way. I know it makes no sense at all. somebody maybe can offer a better explanation. Is he willfully truing to see to it that Mangum goes to prison for a long time? Is he demented? Is he such a racist and filled with so much hate that he would sacrifice her just to get his own name in the news? Is he being guided by Nifong? I just don't get it, folks. The true victims here, other than the obvious Reginald Daye, are the children of Mangum. I have zero sympathy for Mangum herself.

Anonymous said...

Go to the N C General statutes and look up pro se, sidney. It's there is black and white....as you have been told repeatedly.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Believe you me, if I would have got my grubby little fingers on a written report by Dr. Roberts, I would post it at the earliest possible convenience. It it disagreed with me (and the truth), then I would point out its errors."

After you have tried to distort the medical record regarding Mr. Daye, after you tried to conceal evidence favorable to Mr. Daye, after you have never told the truth?!!! Oh come now!

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Dr. Roberts, the so-called defense expert witness, has not corroborated the autopsy report in writing, and she won't put anything in writing because she knows it will implicate Dr. Clay Nichols and Duke University Hospital."

You have never established as fact that Dr. Nichols or Duke University perpetrated any wrongdoing for Dr. Roberts to implicate them in. When asked what establishes the Autopsy report as fraudulent, you say only that any one with a 5th grade education could see it as fraudulent. That hardly establishes it as fraudulent.

Anonymous said...

It;s pathetic and comical how sidney was all smiles and gushy positive about Vann hiring Roberts....and how Roberts was this expert etc.......UNTIL Roberts said she couldn't find anything wrong with the report. THEN she became an Evans puppet, along with all the other evil white oppressors. hilarious, sidney.

Anonymous said...

I find the title of Harr's latest post to be so offensive......what kind of racist is this guy? To smear the Daye family? For exercising their right to come to public hearings? To condemn them because they are expressing their emotions and beliefs that Mangum is responsible for the death of Reginald Daye? Are you kidding? Ultimately, the jury will decide her guilt or innocence......but, until then, the Daye family has just as much right to hate Mangum and to glare at her in a courtroom as Harr does to spew lies about Daye on this web site. What is so damned hypocritical of Harr is that he assumes the Daye family is stupid and being manipulated by the prosecutor......as though none of the Daye family members have a brain. What an insult to these people

Anonymous said...

So far, it seems that SIDNEY will not get a chance to abuse the Raleigh Library computers today.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY, if the carpetbagger jihad is so powerful, why have they not hacked into the Raleigh Public Library and made them unuseable for you? The reason is that this all powerful carpetbagger jihad does not exist.

Anonymous said...

What a great day for the Raleigh Public Library. SIDNEY was not there to foul their computers with his grubby little hands.

Anonymous said...

I find it quite odd that our bro sidney has not made much notice of Mangum's having been sprung from the big house. You'd think he would be all over it. I would be willing to bet he didn't come up with the money to make it happen though.

Anonymous said...

And not only does Sidney use the Library's computers, he lives here based on his address showing up in one of the legal briefs he posted:

http://www.rhaonline.com/Carriage_House.htm

So, us taxpayers subsidize his housing also. And note that the Carriage House has a Computer Room, but you must have to pay to use it I guess.

I believe Sidney is well educated and could provide a lot of good to society, instead he is always taking and trying to make trouble. What a shame to live your life in such a manner.

Anonymous said...

I could care less that Harr has opinions, fabricates information, smears other people (including dead men) and rants endlessly. That's his privilege, I suppose. What does matter is how he has influenced Mangum. She is in deep trouble and has nobody to blame but herself for a series of terrible decisions and behaviors. Now she faces the strong likelihood of spending years in prison......years......without the help of a competent attorney to represent her. Three attorneys have been dumped because of Harr and his truly perverse racist bias. She is nothing to Harr but a surrogate for his own objectives. That is tragic.

Walt said...

Anon at 4:58 has an excellent point. While Crystal has made some terrible decisions, Sid has worked very hard to deny her competent counsel. I have written it before, but it is worth repeating, with friends like him, she doesn't need any enemies.

The cause of justice, yes justice for Crystal, cries out for the untrained and very biased Sidney and his gang of misfits to step aside and let someone competent advise Crystal through the fiasco that she has created for herself.

Walt-in-Durham

Anonymous said...

Mangum deserves a fair trial. She deserves her day in court. She deserves competent counsel. I simply cannot believe the damage that has been done by Sidney Harr. Mangum is accountable, too. I refuse to accept the false notion that she is a perpetual victim....whether it be the victim of some ridiculous white conspiracy, or, the victim of a very pathetic ignorant racist. Mangum isn't without blame and responsibility for getting rid or and/or running off highly qualified attorneys. However, she IS clearly void of any shred of maturity and judgment. Harr has taken advantage of the spectacle that is Mangum, just for the sole purpose of his own personal agenda.
I wish that somehow a judge could intervene and force two things: (a)force Mangum to accept counsel, and (b)force Mangum to have zero contact with Harr. I KNOW this is not going to happen; I just wish it would.....for HER sake. A sad and sorry state of affairs......

Anonymous said...

I think Sidney Harr is a very bitter man. For whatever the reason, whatever the real or imaginary injustices HE thinks were carried against him at some point in his life, Harr defines himself by the silly "vendetta" one-man-band, here to save the day, image. He frequently conjures up imaginary villans so that he can find targets for his hatred. Duke, the NC justice system, all lawyers, the LAX guys, Rae Evans, the national media, the NC Bar....you name it.....all, in his mind, wicked people. Nifong is the same as Mangum....to Harr. He needs both villans and victims in his fantasies. The tragedy is that Mangum is the one who is going to wind up HARR's victim, by her own hand.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Let me get this straight........Shella, a black man, working closely with Cline, a black woman, who was in Nifong's stable and, per Nifong, his "star"......turncoat??? Shella? Hmmmm...... so, if Shella was a turncoat, then I guess that means Cline was one, too.....and of course, Vann...and Jones. Hmmmm.

We are still waiting for you to provide proof of your expertise, experience and credibility to render an opinion that YOU claim is superior to other physicians of record who have significant expertise and experience. still waiting, sidney. until you can PROVE you have any credibility, at all, your opinions remain in the round file where they belong
technically, you have never established with documentation that you ever did actual work as a physician beyond a year or so......based on that record, you claim to be a "retired physician"? yep, technically true, perhaps. valid as a basis for saying you know more than outstanding trauma surgeons at duke, Nichols, Roberts, etc........not gonna fly, bro.
and, don't try to sidestep the issue by claiming somebody is trying to goad you into revealing your past. I could care less. Simply telling you, flat out, you have no tickets/no basis for your claims. I can say, as can anybody, that I am a retired brain surgeon. I refuse to prove it and prove my expertise, but I am. Nobody will believe me and nobody will care about my opinions....rightfully so. Your opinions are worth just as much as your hot air........


What "other physicians of record" are you referring to? That's the problem... no other physician, including Dr. Christena L. Roberts who was paid by the state, will put anything in writing for fear that it will implicate Dr. Clay Nichols for lying in his autopsy report.

It's as simple as that!!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I think Sidney Harr is a very bitter man. For whatever the reason, whatever the real or imaginary injustices HE thinks were carried against him at some point in his life, Harr defines himself by the silly "vendetta" one-man-band, here to save the day, image. He frequently conjures up imaginary villans so that he can find targets for his hatred. Duke, the NC justice system, all lawyers, the LAX guys, Rae Evans, the national media, the NC Bar....you name it.....all, in his mind, wicked people. Nifong is the same as Mangum....to Harr. He needs both villans and victims in his fantasies. The tragedy is that Mangum is the one who is going to wind up HARR's victim, by her own hand.


I would not describe myself as being "bitter." A better word would be "committed to the cause of rectifying injustice in North Carolina." Instead of sitting around "on my butt," as Governor McCrory would say, I'm doing something about it.

I am not a "vendetta-seeker" ... that title would be more appropriate for Rae Evans.

I am a "rectifier."

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Mangum deserves a fair trial. She deserves her day in court. She deserves competent counsel. I simply cannot believe the damage that has been done by Sidney Harr. Mangum is accountable, too. I refuse to accept the false notion that she is a perpetual victim....whether it be the victim of some ridiculous white conspiracy, or, the victim of a very pathetic ignorant racist. Mangum isn't without blame and responsibility for getting rid or and/or running off highly qualified attorneys. However, she IS clearly void of any shred of maturity and judgment. Harr has taken advantage of the spectacle that is Mangum, just for the sole purpose of his own personal agenda.
I wish that somehow a judge could intervene and force two things: (a)force Mangum to accept counsel, and (b)force Mangum to have zero contact with Harr. I KNOW this is not going to happen; I just wish it would.....for HER sake. A sad and sorry state of affairs......


Mangum needs to thank her lucky stars that I, and other fellow Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong members have come to her rescue. The legal defense representation that she's had in this case consisted of nothing more than turncoat attorneys trying to save the day for the Durham prosecution and protect Dr. Clay Nichols and Duke University Hospital.

Capeche?

If more elucidation is required, do not hesitate to let me know.

Nifong Supporter said...


Walt said...
Anon at 4:58 has an excellent point. While Crystal has made some terrible decisions, Sid has worked very hard to deny her competent counsel. I have written it before, but it is worth repeating, with friends like him, she doesn't need any enemies.

The cause of justice, yes justice for Crystal, cries out for the untrained and very biased Sidney and his gang of misfits to step aside and let someone competent advise Crystal through the fiasco that she has created for herself.

Walt-in-Durham


Walt, Mangum needs attorneys as much as she needs leprosy. The fact of the matter is that the prosecution's case against her is non-existent. She could prevail against the charges wearing a blindfold, both hands tied behind her back, and without any legal assistance because the case agaisnt her is non-existent. Not weak, but non-existent!

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
And not only does Sidney use the Library's computers, he lives here based on his address showing up in one of the legal briefs he posted:

http://www.rhaonline.com/Carriage_House.htm

So, us taxpayers subsidize his housing also. And note that the Carriage House has a Computer Room, but you must have to pay to use it I guess.

I believe Sidney is well educated and could provide a lot of good to society, instead he is always taking and trying to make trouble. What a shame to live your life in such a manner.


Actually, use of the computers at Carriage House is free, but I cannot access my blogsite because a low-life had it categorized as being hateful.

Ergo, I am forced to go to the public library.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I find the title of Harr's latest post to be so offensive......what kind of racist is this guy? To smear the Daye family? For exercising their right to come to public hearings? To condemn them because they are expressing their emotions and beliefs that Mangum is responsible for the death of Reginald Daye? Are you kidding? Ultimately, the jury will decide her guilt or innocence......but, until then, the Daye family has just as much right to hate Mangum and to glare at her in a courtroom as Harr does to spew lies about Daye on this web site. What is so damned hypocritical of Harr is that he assumes the Daye family is stupid and being manipulated by the prosecutor......as though none of the Daye family members have a brain. What an insult to these people


I am not smearing the Daye family. Instead, I am enlightening them. If anything, I am smearing the Durham Police and prosecutors for smearing Reginald Daye by giving him the alias surname of "Dong!"

Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...

"Actually, use of the computers at Carriage House is free, but I cannot access my blogsite because a low-life had it categorized as being hateful."

Throwing out names like "lowlife" and writing things like your entry here about the Daye family go a long way toward proving the so-called "lowlife" correct.

Also, the correct spelling is "Capisce". Capisce?

Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...

"She could prevail against the charges wearing a blindfold, both hands tied behind her back, and without any legal assistance because the case agaisnt[sic] her is non-existent..."
I recall hearing a similar argument somewhere else...Where was it? Maybe Sid's NC State Bar hearing? We all know how well that turned out.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"What "other physicians of record" are you referring to? That's the problem... no other physician, including Dr. Christena L. Roberts who was paid by the state, will put anything in writing for fear that it will implicate Dr. Clay Nichols for lying in his autopsy report.

It's as simple as that!!"

Boy are you the simpleton here. If no other physician will put down anything in writing which would "implicate Dr. Clay Nichols for lying in his autopsy report" it is because he did not lie.

You have accused him of lying. You have also demonstrated you are incapable of evaluating an autopsy report.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I would not describe myself as being 'bitter.' A better word would be 'committed to the cause of rectifying injustice in North Carolina.' Instead of sitting around 'on my butt,' as Governor McCrory would say, I'm doing something about it.

I am not a 'vendetta-seeker' ... that title would be more appropriate for Rae Evans.

I am a 'rectifier.'"

Boy are you deluded.

You may not be sitting on your butt but you have left it totally uncovered.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Actually, use of the computers at Carriage House is free, but I cannot access my blogsite because a low-life had it categorized as being hateful.

Ergo, I am forced to go to the public library."

What you mean is that someone with a true concern for justice has exposed you for what you are.

As I said earlier, you may not be sitting on your butt but you have left it totally exposed.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I am not smearing the Daye family."

No, you are smearing Mr. Daye.

"Instead, I am enlightening them."

HUH???!!! You are condemning Mr. Daye as a violent serial abuser of women and concealing evidence he is not. And you call that enlightenment.

"If anything, I am smearing the Durham Police and prosecutors for smearing Reginald Daye by giving him the alias surname of 'Dong!'"

Said alias surname would not have become public knowledge had a certain totally incompetent, totally unethical person with an MD degree not illegally published the information.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Mangum needs to thank her lucky stars that I, and other fellow Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong members have come to her rescue. The legal defense representation that she's had in this case consisted of nothing more than turncoat attorneys trying to save the day for the Durham prosecution and protect Dr. Clay Nichols and Duke University Hospital."

That is like saying that the Jewish people should have been grateful to Adolf Hitler for taking an interest in them.

"Capeche?"

Obviously you do not.

"If more elucidation is required, do not hesitate to let me know."

One who has never provided elucidation in the first place can not provide further elucidation.

Comprende? Obviously you are incapable of such action.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR(courtesy of Lance the Intern):
"She could prevail against the charges wearing a blindfold, both hands tied behind her back, and without any legal assistance because the case agaisnt[sic] her is non-existent..."

I recall several boasts on the part of the author of this sentence that he would humiliate the NC State Bar, that he would prevail in a lawsuit against Duke.

Anonymous said...

Excuse me. I apologize to Anonymous Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment for using his erstwhile screen name, Lance the Intern.

Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...

No need to apologize, Anonymous...I took the "Supreme Poster of Enlightenment" moniker when Sid stated that he was in a "comparable league regarding talent" with Leonardo Da Vinci. I figured that if Sid can appoint himself Da Vinci's equal, I can appoint myself the supreme poster of enlightenment.

Although, now that I look back on it, Sid actually compared himself to Leonardo di Vinci....Who knows? He might actually be this Leonardo's equal....
I'll return to "Lance the Intern" when Sid can provide proof that one of my enlightening posts is factually incorrect.

Anonymous said...

Lance, you are going to wait a long long long long long long time before reverting to Lance the Intern.

Is SIDNEY going to ban me for my repetitive use of "long"?

Walt said...

Sid wrote: "Walt, Mangum needs attorneys as much as she needs leprosy."

Sid, you do not normally write such foolishness. Nifong, on the other hand frequently does.

"The fact of the matter is that the prosecution's case against her is non-existent."

Really? The defense own expert disagrees. Further, thanks to your breach of the attorney client privilege, we and the state know that.

"She could prevail against the charges wearing a blindfold, [yadda, yadda, yadda]...."

We've heard that song and dance from you before. At this point, your judgment is highly suspect. You made the same claim with regard to Duke. In fact, you had a good claim against Duke, but you fouled that up completely and on your own. You made the same claims with regard to the Bar administrative hearing. And we know how that turned out. You made the same claim about the injunction hearing. You will recall I told you to "enjoy the injunction." You made the same claim with regard to disqualifying Judge Fox. You didn't prevail on that spurious claim either.

To put it plainly, Sid, your legal judgment is not very persuasive.

"Actually, use of the computers at Carriage House is free, but I cannot access my blogsite because a low-life had it categorized as being hateful."

Your name calling leads me to think they are onto something there.

Walt-in-Durham

Anonymous said...

No word from SIDNEY today. Does anyone think that the same "low life who got to the computers at Carriage House has gotten to the computers at the Taleigh Public Library? Let's hope so.

Anonymous said...

OOPS!!!

Correction:

No word from SIDNEY today. Does anyone think that the same "low life who got to the computers at Carriage House has gotten to the computers at the Raleigh Public Library? Let's hope so.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...
"Actually, use of the computers at Carriage House is free, but I cannot access my blogsite because a low-life had it categorized as being hateful."

Throwing out names like "lowlife" and writing things like your entry here about the Daye family go a long way toward proving the so-called "lowlife" correct.

Also, the correct spelling is "Capisce". Capisce?


Thank you for enlightening me about the correct spelling. My Italian isn't that good.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"What "other physicians of record" are you referring to? That's the problem... no other physician, including Dr. Christena L. Roberts who was paid by the state, will put anything in writing for fear that it will implicate Dr. Clay Nichols for lying in his autopsy report.

It's as simple as that!!"

Boy are you the simpleton here. If no other physician will put down anything in writing which would "implicate Dr. Clay Nichols for lying in his autopsy report" it is because he did not lie.

You have accused him of lying. You have also demonstrated you are incapable of evaluating an autopsy report.


What do you feel is the reason that Dr. Roberts refuses to put a report in writing?

Obviously, she refrains in order to protect Dr. Nichols and Duke University Hospital... it's definitely not to protect Mangum.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Lance, you are going to wait a long long long long long long time before reverting to Lance the Intern.

Is SIDNEY going to ban me for my repetitive use of "long"?


Seriously, I have been extremely tolerant of those exhaustive repetitive one-two word phrases which were introduced as comments. They were an annoyance not only to kenhyderal, but to me as well as others... including many anonymi.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"I am not smearing the Daye family."

No, you are smearing Mr. Daye.

"Instead, I am enlightening them."

HUH???!!! You are condemning Mr. Daye as a violent serial abuser of women and concealing evidence he is not. And you call that enlightenment.

"If anything, I am smearing the Durham Police and prosecutors for smearing Reginald Daye by giving him the alias surname of 'Dong!'"

Said alias surname would not have become public knowledge had a certain totally incompetent, totally unethical person with an MD degree not illegally published the information.


So your answer is that I should not have exposed the contemptuous and racist attitude of the Durham Police and prosecutors towards Reginald Daye... Right? It should have just been kept a secret that the public and Daye's family did not know about!

I don't think so.

Nifong Supporter said...


Walt said...
Sid wrote: "Walt, Mangum needs attorneys as much as she needs leprosy."

Sid, you do not normally write such foolishness. Nifong, on the other hand frequently does.

"The fact of the matter is that the prosecution's case against her is non-existent."

Really? The defense own expert disagrees. Further, thanks to your breach of the attorney client privilege, we and the state know that.

"She could prevail against the charges wearing a blindfold, [yadda, yadda, yadda]...."

We've heard that song and dance from you before. At this point, your judgment is highly suspect. You made the same claim with regard to Duke. In fact, you had a good claim against Duke, but you fouled that up completely and on your own. You made the same claims with regard to the Bar administrative hearing. And we know how that turned out. You made the same claim about the injunction hearing. You will recall I told you to "enjoy the injunction." You made the same claim with regard to disqualifying Judge Fox. You didn't prevail on that spurious claim either.

To put it plainly, Sid, your legal judgment is not very persuasive.

"Actually, use of the computers at Carriage House is free, but I cannot access my blogsite because a low-life had it categorized as being hateful."

Your name calling leads me to think they are onto something there.

Walt-in-Durham


Walt, I may have lost a few legal skirmishes, but the war will be won when the Durham prosecutors are forced to drop charges against Mangum. It's only a matter of time.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Thank you for enlightening me about the correct spelling. My Italian isn't that good."

Neither is your grasp of reality.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Seriously, I have been extremely tolerant of those exhaustive repetitive one-two word phrases which were introduced as comments. They were an annoyance not only to kenhyderal, but to me as well as others... including many anonymi."

You must be desperate for followers if you are trying to get someone like KENHYDERAL to come back. If he resurfaces, I bet Malek Williams will also resurface.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"So your answer is that I should not have exposed the contemptuous and racist attitude of the Durham Police and prosecutors towards Reginald Daye... Right? It should have just been kept a secret that the public and Daye's family did not know about!"

You are the one who exposed Reginald Daye to ridicule. This statement is a red herring, a futile attempt to deny your responsibility.

"I don't think so."

You do not think, period.. You are incapable of meaningful thinking.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"What do you feel is the reason that Dr. Roberts refuses to put a report in writing?

Obviously, she refrains in order to protect Dr. Nichols and Duke University Hospital... it's definitely not to protect Mangum."

There is nothing from which Dr. Nichols or Duke University needs to be protected. Ergo, that is obviously not the reason Dr. Roberts did not produce a written report.

Why don't you produce your own written report an see how much credibility it receives.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Walt, I may have lost a few legal skirmishes, but the war will be won when the Durham prosecutors are forced to drop charges against Mangum. It's only a matter of time."

SIDNEY, you have been unable even to put up any credible semblance of a skirmish, let alone go to war.

Are you going to violate the injunction? I hope so. Your incarceration would be a good thing for Crystal.

Anonymous said...

Very bad news, Sidney! Duke is no longuer trying to subpoena KC Johnson's notes. But every cloud has a silver lining, and the good thing in your case is that he won't take up space at the Ecuadorean Embassy, so there'll be room there for you when the NC Bar comes after you! Isn't that great?

Walt said...

Sid wrote: "Walt, I may have lost a few legal skirmishes,..."

Make that every legal skirmish you have entered into. And, you have lost them through your ignorance of the law. That should tell you something.

"... but the war will be won when the Durham prosecutors are forced to drop charges against Mangum."


That may happen, but your conduct has made it much less likely. Further, you have complicated Mangum's defense by compromising the attorney client privilege and revealing that the defense holds evidence that the state's expert is correct in his conclusions. Not only are you a bad advocate, but you have demonstrably harmed the cause you claim to support. A dubious claim given your conduct.

Walt-in-Durham

Anonymous said...

Anonymous March 2, 2013 at 1:18 AM

"Very bad news, Sidney! Duke is no longuer trying to subpoena KC Johnson's notes. But every cloud has a silver lining, and the good thing in your case is that he won't take up space at the Ecuadorean Embassy, so there'll be room there for you when the NC Bar comes after you! Isn't that great?"

I bet Rae Evans is behind it all :-).

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Anonymous March 2, 2013 at 1:18 AM

"Very bad news, Sidney! Duke is no longuer trying to subpoena KC Johnson's notes. But every cloud has a silver lining, and the good thing in your case is that he won't take up space at the Ecuadorean Embassy, so there'll be room there for you when the NC Bar comes after you! Isn't that great?"

I bet Rae Evans is behind it all :-).


Thank you for the good news. I'm glad my bud, KC, no longer has to continue trying to evade subpoenas from Duke U.

As far as the Ecuadorian embassy goes, it's nice to have it as a backup, but the NC State Bar is not coming after me. Hadn't you heard... that thing about the injunction has been resolved.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"Walt, I may have lost a few legal skirmishes, but the war will be won when the Durham prosecutors are forced to drop charges against Mangum. It's only a matter of time."

SIDNEY, you have been unable even to put up any credible semblance of a skirmish, let alone go to war.

Are you going to violate the injunction? I hope so. Your incarceration would be a good thing for Crystal.


I'm not going to violate the injunction... after all, I'm a law-abiding citizen.

Nifong Supporter said...


Walt said...
Sid wrote: "Walt, I may have lost a few legal skirmishes,..."

Make that every legal skirmish you have entered into. And, you have lost them through your ignorance of the law. That should tell you something.

"... but the war will be won when the Durham prosecutors are forced to drop charges against Mangum."


That may happen, but your conduct has made it much less likely. Further, you have complicated Mangum's defense by compromising the attorney client privilege and revealing that the defense holds evidence that the state's expert is correct in his conclusions. Not only are you a bad advocate, but you have demonstrably harmed the cause you claim to support. A dubious claim given your conduct.

Walt-in-Durham


Walt,
Why don't you face it? You know I'm the best thing that could possibly have happened for Crystal. The charges against her will be dismissed. Mark my words.

Harr Supporter said...

Sid: Thank you for the good news. I'm glad my bud, KC, no longer has to continue trying to evade subpoenas from Duke U.

A blogger with any integrity would have taken the position that KC as blogger was acting as a journalist and is entitled to all protections offered to journalists in keeping sources confidential.

You didn't take that position.

Rather, you insisted that KC should make all of his confidential sources known. You indicated that you would make all information available to prosecutors and would hide nothing.

Fine.

Identify your sources for your initial reporting on the Daye stabbing.

Those sources you now claim provided unreliable information. Remember?

Those sources who claimed the fight was about money and that Crystal was entitled to the cashier's checks because she had paid for them. Remember?

Those sources who obviously had (or falsely claimed to have) inside information that could only have come from Crystal. Remember?

Those sources should explain where they received their information. Those sources can further explain whether Crystal originally gave a different account before she settled on her self-defense plea.

Come on, Sid. Enlighten us. Provide further elucidation.

We know you are willing to provide this information to the prosecutors. You told us so.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Thank you for the good news. I'm glad my bud, KC, no longer has to continue trying to evade subpoenas from Duke U."

You are seriously deluded if yo think Professor Johnson considers you a bud.

"As far as the Ecuadorian embassy goes, it's nice to have it as a backup, but the NC State Bar is not coming after me. Hadn't you heard... that thing about the injunction has been resolved."

So tell us how it was resolved.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I am not the one who is taking advantage of the Daye family."

Yes you are.

"The Daye family has no right to be upset with Crystal Mangum."

Gee, she stabbed him and he died of the stab wound and they have no right to be upset.

You can not show that Crystal acted in self defense.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I'm not going to violate the injunction..."

Well, you continued to practice law without a license after you promised the Bar you would not.

"after all, I'm a law-abiding citizen."

HAH!!! A law abiding citizen would not have illegally accessed Mr.Daye's medical information, would not have illegally published that information.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR(to Walt in Durham):

"Walt,
Why don't you face it? You know I'm the best thing that could possibly have happened for Crystal. The charges against her will be dismissed. Mark my words."

Boy is SIDNEY deluded.

Walt said...

Sid wrote: "Walt,
Why don't you face it? You know I'm the best thing that could possibly have happened for Crystal. The charges against her will be dismissed. Mark my words."


That's a lot of bravado for a guy with your track record.

Walt-in-Durham

Anonymous said...

Sidney:

What motion(s) has Crystal filed to seek dismissal of the charges against her and what is the legal basis of the motion(s)? If she hasn't filed any motions yet, what motions will she file, and when will she file them? Or is it expected that the prosecution is going to dismiss the charges on its own?

Anonymous said...

Harr has become a parody of himself.

Anonymous said...

Harrmag filed motions to,dismiss.....illegally, as we now know, and nothing happened. As was appropriate. I cannot wait to see how long it is going to take before Harr violates the injunction and then screams about freedom of speech or conspiracy or some,other of his usual bull nonsense.

Anonymous said...

Harr seems to be running a little stale on material. He has to resort to attacking the Daye family, of all tacky nonsense, in order to have something to say. So, bro, tell us this.....you have said for more than a year now.....that the charges would be dropped against Mangum. You filed motions to get the charges dismissed. You said the prosecutor was holding out a plea deal to Mangum. None of this...not ONE word has come true. No motions accepted and granted. No dismissed charges. No plea deal.
You got your non-case thrown out of court in the Duke incident. You got your butt handed to you by the judge for your crude language. Every single one of your so-called motions and letters have gone nowhere. You got yourself in hot water with the NC Bar practice committee and got slapped with an injunction and, tho you won't admit it, maybe a financial penalty as well. Mangum"s trial date is set and, if you play lawyer again, you might spend some time in jail.
I can't wait to hear the next big prediction......since you are batting a thousand, for failures and falsehoods, the next one will, no doubt, be more of the same.

Anonymous said...

......Here's Professor Johnson's quick bio....."I am from Higgins Beach, in Scarborough, Maine, six miles south of Portland. After spending five years as track announcer at Scarborough Downs, I left to study fulltime in graduate school, where my advisor was Akira Iriye. I have a B.A. (1988 ) and Ph.D. (1993) from Harvard, and an M.A. from the University of Chicago (1989). At Brooklyn College and the CUNY Graduate Center, I teach classes in 20th century US political, constitutional, and diplomatic history; in 2007-8, I was Fulbright Distinguished Chair for the Humanities at Tel Aviv University."...
Now, sidney, wanna tell us just exactly how yours shapes up? No? I didn't think so.......

Anonymous said...

Anonymous March 4, 2013 at 5:37 AM:

"if youSIDNEY) play lawyer again, you might spend some time in jail."

If that did happen, it would be the best thing SIDNEY could ever do for Crysta-. Go to jail, that is.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Harr seems to be running a little stale on material. He has to resort to attacking the Daye family, of all tacky nonsense, in order to have something to say. So, bro, tell us this.....you have said for more than a year now.....that the charges would be dropped against Mangum. You filed motions to get the charges dismissed. You said the prosecutor was holding out a plea deal to Mangum. None of this...not ONE word has come true. No motions accepted and granted. No dismissed charges. No plea deal.
You got your non-case thrown out of court in the Duke incident. You got your butt handed to you by the judge for your crude language. Every single one of your so-called motions and letters have gone nowhere. You got yourself in hot water with the NC Bar practice committee and got slapped with an injunction and, tho you won't admit it, maybe a financial penalty as well. Mangum"s trial date is set and, if you play lawyer again, you might spend some time in jail.
I can't wait to hear the next big prediction......since you are batting a thousand, for failures and falsehoods, the next one will, no doubt, be more of the same.


"The road of life is not always smooth... there may be potholes along the way. What is important is that you arrive at your destination intact." - Harrism.

The goal of this current legal journey involving Crystal Mangum is for her full acquittal on all charges, or their dismissal... the latter of which is most likely.

The fact that I have failed, or suffered defeats, as you have pointed out, will make the ultimate victory of Mangum's being cleared of charges all the more sweeter.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Anonymous March 4, 2013 at 5:37 AM:

"if youSIDNEY) play lawyer again, you might spend some time in jail."

If that did happen, it would be the best thing SIDNEY could ever do for Crysta-. Go to jail, that is.


Sorry to disappoint you, but I have no intention of going to jail as I am a law-abiding citizen. When I filed the petitions, I did so believing that it was legal. Really.

Anonymous said...

I strongly encourage the Daye family to flag your youtube videos as a violation of the Youtube community guidelines for hate speech and for invasion of privacy.

Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...

From the Youtube community guidelines:

"Things like.... harassment, intimidation, invading privacy, revealing other people’s personal information...are taken very seriously. Anyone caught doing these things may be permanently banned from YouTube."

Seems like Sid's Youtube career may be shorter than his career as Crystal Mangum's lawyer.

Anonymous said...

He has been reported. Bet on it.

Anonymous said...

Mangum needs a lawyer. And one who has the courage to say to her, point blank.........I will be your lawyer on the following condition....NO contact, of any kind, with sidney harr or anybody in his lunatic band. No lawyer worth her salt would take mangum on as a client with anything less than this condition.

Anonymous said...

I thinking preaching that the Daye family needs to vent its hostility against Reginald Daye is one of the most insensitive and contemptible comments I have heard in many years. Jerk is just too nice a word for sidney harr.

Walt said...

Sid wrote: " When I filed the petitions, I did so believing that it was legal. Really."

That dog just don't hunt.

Walt-in-Durham

Anonymous said...

gosh, officer, I didn't know the speed limit was 25: I believed it was 40....so, you can't write me a ticket".
Let's remember that sidney harr had two run-ins with the NC Bar committee....they warned him the first time to cut it out...he said he would cut it out....and, then, he did it again.........practice law, without a license, that is. he knew exactly what he was doing. that whole nonsense about not knowing the pro se limitation is ridiculous.

Anonymous said...

the "law" sidney was "practicing" should be more clearly defined as "half assed ignorant attempts at playing perry mason in order to get attention for himself"---law

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"'The road of life is not always smooth... there may be potholes along the way. What is important is that you arrive at your destination intact.' - Harrism."

This from the man who thinkscorrupt DA Nifong showed courage when he whipped up racist turmoil in his attempt to wrongfully convict three innocent men.

"The goal of this current legal journey involving Crystal Mangum is for her full acquittal on all charges, or their dismissal... the latter of which is most likely."

No it is not.

"The fact that I have failed, or suffered defeats, as you have pointed out, will make the ultimate victory of Mangum's being cleared of charges all the more sweeter."

What victory?

Anonymous said...

'The road of life is not always smooth... there may be potholes along the way. What is important is that you arrive at your destination intact.' - Harrism."

"A pig in a prom dress is....a pig"...Anonmoism.

It's one thing to hold opinions. It's another to interfere with another person's legal affairs when they are facing a murder charge and a very long time in prison. It's one thing to make an absolute fool of oneself in front of a judge; it's another thing to illegally publish confidential information.
It's one thing to hold oneself out as some kind of expert. It's another to accuse reputable professionals of conspiracy, fraud, lies, and outright criminal behavior.
You and Mangum have much in common.....including an absence of character.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I strongly encourage the Daye family to flag your youtube videos as a violation of the Youtube community guidelines for hate speech and for invasion of privacy.


Shirley, you joust.

What hate speech? My flog contains nothing but enlightenment, and the Daye family should be grateful to me for exposing the shameful behavior of the Durham police and prosecutors.

Nifong Supporter said...


Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...
From the Youtube community guidelines:

"Things like.... harassment, intimidation, invading privacy, revealing other people’s personal information...are taken very seriously. Anyone caught doing these things may be permanently banned from YouTube."

Seems like Sid's Youtube career may be shorter than his career as Crystal Mangum's lawyer.


Supreme Poster, I bet that if you found something in the Bible that you disagreed with, you would try to get that book censored, too.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"'The road of life is not always smooth... there may be potholes along the way. What is important is that you arrive at your destination intact.' - Harrism."

This from the man who thinkscorrupt DA Nifong showed courage when he whipped up racist turmoil in his attempt to wrongfully convict three innocent men.

"The goal of this current legal journey involving Crystal Mangum is for her full acquittal on all charges, or their dismissal... the latter of which is most likely."

No it is not.

"The fact that I have failed, or suffered defeats, as you have pointed out, will make the ultimate victory of Mangum's being cleared of charges all the more sweeter."

What victory?


Keep in mind that Nifong was not the one who repeatedly shouted the N-word at Crystal Mangum.

Victory will be in the form of a dismissal of all criminal charges against Mangum.

Nifong Supporter said...


Walt said...
Sid wrote: " When I filed the petitions, I did so believing that it was legal. Really."

That dog just don't hunt.

Walt-in-Durham


Walt, the dog may not hunt. I'm merely relating what happened and what I believed.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
He has been reported. Bet on it.


"All ye who lacketh the mental agility to withstand words of brilliance must seek the assistance of the censor to assuage your battered egos."
- Harrism

Nifong Supporter said...


HEY, EVERYONE. LISTEN UP!!
A new flog is now in production. You don't want to miss it. Naturally it will be on YouTube, as well!

It should be posted by week's end!

Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...

"Supreme Poster, I bet that if you found something in the Bible that you disagreed with, you would try to get that book censored, too."

No Sid, I am just pointing out to you that there are guidelines (just as I pointed out to you guidelines on a number of other legal matters). You have this unfortunate belief that these laws and guidelines do not apply to you. Further, you have this belief that if you're not aware of the laws, then they do not apply. I am simply making you aware. Consider yourself enlightened

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"What hate speech? My flog contains nothing but enlightenment, and the Daye family should be grateful to me for exposing the shameful behavior of the Durham police and prosecutors."

Why don't you ask them if they are grateful? Probably because you know and are afraid of the answer.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Keep in mind that Nifong was not the one who repeatedly shouted the N-word at Crystal Mangum."

Keep in mind that no one, no Lacrosse player ever shouted the n word at Crystal.

"Victory will be in the form of a dismissal of all criminal charges against Mangum."

Boy are you deluded.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Supreme Poster, I bet that if you found something in the Bible that you disagreed with, you would try to get that book censored, too."

Straw Fisherman holding up a red herring, SIDNEY>

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Walt, the dog may not hunt. I'm merely relating what happened and what I believed."

SIDNEY, you are trying to plead ignorance of the law excuses from practicing law without a license. You believe you are above the law.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"HEY, EVERYONE. LISTEN UP!!
A new flog is now in production. You don't want to miss it. Naturally it will be on YouTube, as well!

It should be posted by week's end!"

So you are going o contaminate YouTube again.

Anonymous said...

Sidney thinks his weak attempts at wit are clever. I've seen better writing grading fifth grade book reports.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.....perhaps you need to write that little phrase down and stick it in your little pocket, sidney.
we will all be waiting for the dropped charges, sidney. tick tick tick.
It has been a long time since the "man from glad" bible references cropped up in sidney's perpetually repeating stable of canned responses. here we go again.....

Anonymous said...

nobody repeatedly shouted the n word at Magnum. another harr lie. the truth is that one witness said he heard one lax guy call the other stripper a nxxxxx AFTER and as a reply to, her racist remark to him about his race in reference to the size of his genitals. Since sidney is the all-knowing source of knowledge about words like "dong" that are, according to him, racist references to black male genitalia size, I assume he is fully aware of the equally ugly slur that was hurled at the white lax player by the second dancer.
we ALL know there was ugliness between the strippers and some of the lax guys. so what??? well, in sidney's warped little brain that automatically means the LAX guys were rapists. sure, sidney, you betcha.....

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"'All ye who lacketh the mental agility to withstand words of brilliance must seek the assistance of the censor to assuage your battered egos.'" - Harrism

Another Harrism: Reginald Daye must be considered an habitual violent abuser because I have concealed evidence he was not.

Another Harrism: The Duke Lacrosse players must not be regarded as innocent because I have decreed AG Cooper is not authorizes to express his opinion.

Another Harrism: The carpetbagger jihad exists because I have decreed it so.

Anonymous said...

Another Harrism: SIDNEY HARR versus Duke is one of the most critical court cases of the century.

Another Harrism: I will make fools of the North Carolina Bar.

Anonymous said...

Well, Chavez is dead. I guess Sidney will be in mourning for his hero. Chavez, plain and simply was a hardcore criminal, a thug and a despicable murderer of innocent citizens who dared resist. Good riddance.

Anonymous said...

Well, Chavez is dead. I guess Sidney will be in mourning for his hero. Chavez, plain and simply was a hardcore criminal, a thug and a despicable murderer of innocent citizens who dared resist. Good riddance.

Anonymous said...

Sidney reminds me of Obama.....endlessly running his mouth about what he says is going to happen, how the sky is going to fall on the prosecutor, how the evil white oppressors with their Klan leader, rae evans, are behind some giant conspiracy to ruin Mangum, how he alone is the bearer of truth, etc. etc Of course, none of his nonsense happens.....he didn't whip Duke, he didn't whip the Bar, Mangum is still going to trial, there is no plea deal on the table, and the Daye family is still angry as hell. Poor sidney, running out of material.....

Anonymous said...

Chavez is dead. Jimmy Carter is sad. Enough said.

Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...

In a claim worthy of Sidney, Venezuelan Vice President Nicolas Maduro has stated that President Hugo Chavez was infected with cancer by "imperialist" enemies.

He didn't mention Rae Evans or the Carpetbagger jihad by name.....

Anonymous said...

Oh, Lance, you once again get the funniest post of the month award. Howling at this one...........:)

Anonymous said...

Let me see if I have this straight:

1. Sidney's ignorance of the law excuses him from the unauthorized practice of law but does not
disqualify him from representing Crystal.

2. Crystal did Mr. Daye's family a favor by stabbing him. Theys hopuld appreciate it and her and stop being so darned angry and hurt that a loved one is dead.

Anonymous said...

Anon, you got it! Sidney, that highly successful lawyer wannabe, who has done so well in the prosecution of his cases against the Bar and against Duke, now is the ONLY person on the planet who can successfully rescue our sweet innocent hard-workin mother of three, Sister Survivor herself.

Anonymous said...

Bet not too many folks know that Cline's almater, that outstanding school of law, was originally called the National Religious Training School and Chatagwa (spelling??) for People of the Colored Race. Victoria Peterson probably was alive when it was founded and named it, being the oustanding example of Christian love and charity we all know her to be

A lawyer said...

Mr. Harr:

Speaking as a lawyer who has tried criminal cases, I cannot emphasize strongly enough how important it is for Ms. Mangum to get trial counsel. It doesn't matter that you think the prosecution has no evidence. The prosecutors could offer tons of inadmissible and spurious evidence, but if the defendant does not understand the (often very technical) rules of evidence well enough to frame the proper objections, that evidence will be admitted and the jury will hear it.

Anonymous said...

Sidney Harr has done everything he could to run off three different qualified lawyers. Mangum is now bare nekkid, as we say, as she supposedly prepares her defense for the trial. It is absurd that she would have allowed Harr to get away with the deliberate sabotage of her ability to be represented by counsel. Now she is in deep trouble. I have zero sympathy for this woman. We can rightfully rant at Harr till the conspiracy cows come home but the truth is that Mangum is a grown woman, with the morals of a house cat and judgment of a thirteen year old, who has to be held accountable! She thinks she can defend herself. Fine. Great. Swell. As a taxpayer, I am sick of this woman and her serial crimes....and sick of seeing how court system wasting time while she plays lawyer roulette.

Anonymous said...

Now that you mention it, Lance, how long will it take SIDNEY to "prove" that the carpetbagger jihad orchestrated Hugo Chavez'death.

Anonymous said...

Any second now I expect we will see a memorial to chavez, a tribute to the great leader........perhaps a poem by harr entitle, Why I love Chavvie the Socialist.

Anonymous said...

I did not realize that being a socialist savior was so financially rewarding. Hugo Chavez apparently was worth more than $1 billion when he died.

I am sure there is no corruption. Chavez simply made good investments.

http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-politicians/hugo-chavez-net-worth/

Anonymous said...

Is SIDNEY going to claim that Clay Nichols' autopsy report and Christena Roberts' report on the report were contributory to the death of Hugo Chavez?

Nifong Supporter said...


A lawyer said...
Mr. Harr:

Speaking as a lawyer who has tried criminal cases, I cannot emphasize strongly enough how important it is for Ms. Mangum to get trial counsel. It doesn't matter that you think the prosecution has no evidence. The prosecutors could offer tons of inadmissible and spurious evidence, but if the defendant does not understand the (often very technical) rules of evidence well enough to frame the proper objections, that evidence will be admitted and the jury will hear it.


A lawyer, thank you for your words of wisdom. I agree with you on the point you make, however, the problem with Crystal Mangum's case is that any attorney that she is likely to get will put the medical examiner and Duke University Hospital ahead of Crystal's best interest.

Neither Shella nor Vann conducted any investigation. Essentially they did nothing to help her. Mr. Vann even sabotaged the so-called expert witness Dr. Roberts into seeing that no written report has been provided. That's an outrage.

Bottom line is that I feel Mangum is better off representing herself than being represented by a turncoat defense attorney.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
I did not realize that being a socialist savior was so financially rewarding. Hugo Chavez apparently was worth more than $1 billion when he died.

I am sure there is no corruption. Chavez simply made good investments.

http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-politicians/hugo-chavez-net-worth/


You can't believe everything you read. I doubt very seriously that Chavez was a billionaire. I have no doubt that he was a humanitarian. It is not surprising that captitalists would want to mar his image by painting him to be as greedy as they.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Sidney Harr has done everything he could to run off three different qualified lawyers. Mangum is now bare nekkid, as we say, as she supposedly prepares her defense for the trial. It is absurd that she would have allowed Harr to get away with the deliberate sabotage of her ability to be represented by counsel. Now she is in deep trouble. I have zero sympathy for this woman. We can rightfully rant at Harr till the conspiracy cows come home but the truth is that Mangum is a grown woman, with the morals of a house cat and judgment of a thirteen year old, who has to be held accountable! She thinks she can defend herself. Fine. Great. Swell. As a taxpayer, I am sick of this woman and her serial crimes....and sick of seeing how court system wasting time while she plays lawyer roulette.


As a taxpayer you have a right to be upset about the court wasting money on this case, but your hostility is misdirected. You need to direct your anger at the Durham prosecutors for bringing the rinky-dink, non-existent, vendetta-driven criminal case against Mangum. I share in your outrage.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Any second now I expect we will see a memorial to chavez, a tribute to the great leader........perhaps a poem by harr entitle, Why I love Chavvie the Socialist.


I am truly saddened by the passing of a great man and friend of the poor... Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela. I am not alone in expressing my admiration for Chavez as director Oliver Stone, actor Sean Penn, and Rep. Joseph Kennedy have all expressed their adoration of him.

If I could come up with the proper tribute, I'm not much of a poet, I would be quick to memorialize the great man.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Well, Chavez is dead. I guess Sidney will be in mourning for his hero. Chavez, plain and simply was a hardcore criminal, a thug and a despicable murderer of innocent citizens who dared resist. Good riddance.


Because of Hugo Chavez and his Venezuelan oil, many Americans are able to stay warm during the cold winter months. Need I say more?

Anonymous said...

"A 2010 report from Criminal Justice International Associates (CJIA), a global risk assessment and threat mitigation firm estimated that the Chavez family assets totaled between $1 and $2 billion USD. The vast majority of these assets are oil related and were controlled by Hugo himself prior to his death. The head of the CJIA, Jerry Brewer, asserted that since Hugo's rise to power in 1999, the extended family has amassed its fortune through both legal and illegal methods."

You really are a moron, Harr.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"A lawyer, thank you for your words of wisdom. I agree with you on the point you make, however, the problem with Crystal Mangum's case is that any attorney that she is likely to get will put the medical examiner and Duke University Hospital ahead of Crystal's best interest.

"Neither Shella nor Vann conducted any investigation. Essentially they did nothing to help her. Mr. Vann even sabotaged the so-called expert witness Dr. Roberts into seeing that no written report has been provided. That's an outrage."

Boy are you delusional.

"Bottom line is that I feel Mangum is better off representing herself than being represented by a turncoat defense attorney."

And you felt you would humiliate the NC Bar and prevail in your frivolous suit against Duke.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I am truly saddened by the passing of a great man and friend of the poor...Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela."

You haven' mentioned anyone here who can legitimately be considered a "great man and friend of the poor".

"I am not alone in expressing my admiration for Chavez as director Oliver Stone, actor Sean Penn, and Rep. Joseph Kennedy have all expressed their adoration of him.

Oliver Stone and his cockamamie hypothesis about the JFK assassination. Sean Penn who has assaulted a number of people. Rep. Joseph Kennedy who tried to bully hi former wife into accepting an annulment so he could remarry and not offend the Catholic Church. Now there is a distinguished company.

"If I could come up with the proper tribute, I'm not much of a poet, I would be quick to memorialize the great man."

Neither are you much of a physician, nor much of a legal expert, nor much of a crusader for justice.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"You can't believe everything you read. I doubt very seriously that Chavez was a billionaire. I have no doubt that he was a humanitarian. It is not surprising that captitalists would want to mar his image by painting him to be as greedy as they."

This from the man who has tried to paint Reginald Daye as an habitual violent abuser of women by concealing evidence he was not.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"As a taxpayer you have a right to be upset about the court wasting money on this case, but your hostility is misdirected. You need to direct your anger at the Durham prosecutors for bringing the rinky-dink, non-existent, vendetta-driven criminal case against Mangum. I share in your outrage."

This from the man who does believe members of the Duke Lacrosse team were guilty of rapijng Crystal Mangum, even though there was evidence that said rape had never happened.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HAR:

"Because of Hugo Chavez and his Venezuelan oil, many Americans are able to stay warm during the cold winter months. Need I say more?"

Anonymous March 7, 2013 at 8:53 AMhas said the more which you needed to say but did not.

A lawyer said...

"Bottom line is that I feel Mangum is better off representing herself than being represented by a turncoat defense attorney."

If Ms. Mangum represents herself, she will be convicted. Don't say you and she weren't warned.

A lawyer said...

"Bottom line is that I feel Mangum is better off representing herself than being represented by a turncoat defense attorney."

If Ms. Mangum represents herself, she will be convicted. Don't say you and she weren't warned.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Prosecutors in this case need every possible advantage, as their case is non-existent. Evidence has readily established that Ms. Mangum was the victim of domestic violence, assault on a female, and false imprisonment by an alcohol intoxicated Daye."

The evidence you have released casts doubt on Crystal's claim of self defense. If you were the brilliant legal strategist and tactician you believe yourself to be, you would have realizes this.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
"A 2010 report from Criminal Justice International Associates (CJIA), a global risk assessment and threat mitigation firm estimated that the Chavez family assets totaled between $1 and $2 billion USD. The vast majority of these assets are oil related and were controlled by Hugo himself prior to his death. The head of the CJIA, Jerry Brewer, asserted that since Hugo's rise to power in 1999, the extended family has amassed its fortune through both legal and illegal methods."

You really are a moron, Harr.


The key word is "estimated." How about some facts! Not only that, but it's not about Hugo's personal wealth, but his family's. Maybe he has a large family. Not only that but the estimate might be off plus or minus $500,000?

Not too convincing for me. CEOs of American Oil companies and other business have personal fortunes much larger than the "estimated" assets of the Chavez family.

I'm not impressed or convinced. Sorry.

Nifong Supporter said...


A lawyer said...
"Bottom line is that I feel Mangum is better off representing herself than being represented by a turncoat defense attorney."

If Ms. Mangum represents herself, she will be convicted. Don't say you and she weren't warned.


A lawyer, I disagree. I feel that she is more likely to get convicted because what representation she gets will be by a turncoat attorney, most likely.

The case against Mangum is non-existent, and whether or not she represents herself or not, it will be difficult for her to be convicted. Keep in mind, despite the feather-weight defense she received in 2010, she still was not convicted of first degree felony arson (for a few articles of clothing burned in a bathtub).

I would bet that the charges against Mangum would be dismissed and the case not even going to trial.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"As a taxpayer you have a right to be upset about the court wasting money on this case, but your hostility is misdirected. You need to direct your anger at the Durham prosecutors for bringing the rinky-dink, non-existent, vendetta-driven criminal case against Mangum. I share in your outrage."

This from the man who does believe members of the Duke Lacrosse team were guilty of rapijng Crystal Mangum, even though there was evidence that said rape had never happened.


You're putting words in my mouth. I never said I believed the Duke Lacrosse defendants were guilty. I don't have access to the discovery and other evidence to make an informed decision on that case.

However, I do have prosecution discovery in the current case against Mangum to know that it's not weak... it's non-existent.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"I am truly saddened by the passing of a great man and friend of the poor...Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela."

You haven' mentioned anyone here who can legitimately be considered a "great man and friend of the poor".

"I am not alone in expressing my admiration for Chavez as director Oliver Stone, actor Sean Penn, and Rep. Joseph Kennedy have all expressed their adoration of him.

Oliver Stone and his cockamamie hypothesis about the JFK assassination. Sean Penn who has assaulted a number of people. Rep. Joseph Kennedy who tried to bully hi former wife into accepting an annulment so he could remarry and not offend the Catholic Church. Now there is a distinguished company.

"If I could come up with the proper tribute, I'm not much of a poet, I would be quick to memorialize the great man."

Neither are you much of a physician, nor much of a legal expert, nor much of a crusader for justice.


I forgot to include Michael Moore.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"The key word is "estimated." How about some facts! Not only that, but it's not about Hugo's personal wealth, but his family's. Maybe he has a large family. Not only that but the estimate might be off plus or minus $500,000?

Not too convincing for me. CEOs of American Oil companies and other business have personal fortunes much larger than the "estimated" assets of the Chavez family.

I'm not impressed or convinced. Sorry."

What makes you think it means anything whether or not you are impressed.

Nifong Supporter said...


UPDATE ON LATEST FLOG:
Almost halfway completed with video part for YouTube... then I'll have to do an interactive Flog version. Hopefully it will be ready for posting no later than Monday.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"The key word is "estimated." How about some facts! Not only that, but it's not about Hugo's personal wealth, but his family's. Maybe he has a large family. Not only that but the estimate might be off plus or minus $500,000?

Not too convincing for me. CEOs of American Oil companies and other business have personal fortunes much larger than the "estimated" assets of the Chavez family.

I'm not impressed or convinced. Sorry."

What makes you think it means anything whether or not you are impressed.


Sorry, less than two minutes remaining on the library computer. Will try to remember to reply to your statement during my next session tomorrow.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"A lawyer, I disagree. I feel that she is more likely to get convicted because what representation she gets will be by a turncoat attorney, most likely."

She has never been represented by a turncoat attorney. Most importantly, you, in spite of your delusions, have never offered Crystal anything closely resembling effective representation. You haven't offered yourself effective representation.

"The case against Mangum is non-existent, and whether or not she represents herself or not, it will be difficult for her to be convicted. Keep in mind, despite the feather-weight defense she received in 2010, she still was not convicted of first degree felony arson (for a few articles of clothing burned in a bathtub)."

So says SIDNEY, who at one time claimed he would humiliate the NC State Bar, who at another time claimed he would prevail after filing a frivolous lawsuit against Duke.

"I would bet that the charges against Mangum would be dismissed and the case not even going to trial."

You have been betting that for over a year and that hasn't happened, has it?

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"You're putting words in my mouth. I never said I believed the Duke Lacrosse defendants were guilty."

De facto, you HAVE blogged they are guilty.

"I don't have access to the discovery and other evidence to make an informed decision on that case."

AG Cooper did have access to said evidence, yet you disparage him because he concluded the defendants were innocent.

"However, I do have prosecution discovery in the current case against Mangum to know that it's not weak... it's non-existent."

And you have shown, in your dealings with Duke and the NC State Bar, you can not recognize a weak case when it is glaring in your face.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I forgot to include Michael Moore."

Michael Moore, like you, is a nobody clammoring to be a somebody.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"UPDATE ON LATEST FLOG:
Almost halfway completed with video part for YouTube... then I'll have to do an interactive Flog version. Hopefully it will be ready for posting no later than Monday."

You are the only one here who is hopeful of that.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"Sorry, less than two minutes remaining on the library computer. Will try to remember to reply to your statement during my next session tomorrow."

Judging from your past behavior, it will be another straw fisherman holding up an irrelevant red herring. That is if you do reply.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"You're putting words in my mouth. I never said I believed the Duke Lacrosse defendants were guilty."

De facto, you HAVE blogged they are guilty.

"I don't have access to the discovery and other evidence to make an informed decision on that case."

AG Cooper did have access to said evidence, yet you disparage him because he concluded the defendants were innocent.

"However, I do have prosecution discovery in the current case against Mangum to know that it's not weak... it's non-existent."

And you have shown, in your dealings with Duke and the NC State Bar, you can not recognize a weak case when it is glaring in your face.


I deal in facts... not de factos.

Anonymous said...

SIDNEY HARR:

"I deal in facts... not de factos."

What you call a fact is that Reginald Daye was an habitual violent abuser of women. You tried to establish that by concealing evidence he was not.

You deal in facts. HAH!!!! You distort facts because you do not like them.

Anonymous said...

W
H
E
R
E

I
S

K
E
N
N
y
?

Anonymous said...

Where did the You Tube link go?

Anonymous said...


Anonymous March 9, 2013 at 7:23 PM

"Where did the You Tube link go?"

Hopefully where the sun never shines.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...

Anonymous March 9, 2013 at 7:23 PM

"Where did the You Tube link go?"

Hopefully where the sun never shines.


I was trying to do a little edit on the YouTube video to make it better, however, I made a mistake and messed it up. The video is still available directly from YouTube, but I'll have to replace the video link when I have a little time.

Right now I am busy working on a flog and its video. Hopefully will have it completed soon.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"I deal in facts... not de factos."

What you call a fact is that Reginald Daye was an habitual violent abuser of women. You tried to establish that by concealing evidence he was not.

You deal in facts. HAH!!!! You distort facts because you do not like them.


The facts that I use are directly from the prosecution discovery itself... police reports and medical records.

As far as Mr. Daye is concerned, he was intoxicated the night of April 2-3, 2011...(fact: He had a blood alcohol of 296 mg/dL).

Daye did abuse Ms. Mangum in early April 3, 2011. She had photo-documented swelling and puncture wounds, there's a photo do document that Daye busted down the locked bathroom door to get at Mangum, and he admitted to dragging her by her hair... (With clumps of her hair found at two sites.)

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 314   Newer› Newest»