This blog is scheduled to be the last
one prior to the return of the beloved interactive sharlogs. Absence of the sharlog for all of these
recent weeks was due in large measure to computer and software problems…
problems which at last have been completely addressed and rectified. The narrative on the next sharlog dealing
with the Amtey autopsy report has been completed, and will most likely be
narrated within 24 hours. Its estimated
date of posting will hopefully be by the end of the week. The topic of the sharlog to follow will focus
on the State and media witch-hunt that has been underway against Mike Nifong
for seemingly an eternity.
Media discrediting Rashad McCants
Word count: 1,096
Well, the media is at it again… using
one of its most effective weapons in its arsenal of devious tricks –
discrediting an individual to minimize one’s message. This was used for a lengthy period against me
when I tried to alert the media and public of problems within the state’s
medical examiner system… long before The
News & Observer five-part series titled “Fatally flawed.” The
News & Observer in particular tried to mute my public service message
by painting me as an interloper and troublemaker in Mangum’s recent murder
case. It repeatedly wrote about how the
State Bar was investigating me… giving the impression that I was illegally
practicing law. Yes, I did attempt to
lend what help I could for Mangum who I accurately predicted would be given the
Judas Iscariot treatment by her defense attorney. However, the most scathing and malicious
article would come from The Indy Week
of August 22, 2013 which was essentially nothing more than a hatchet job. I knew that it would be shortly after I
approached a writer with the weekly about doing a story about the problem with
the medical examiner in Mangum’s case.
Instead, the focus of the article was focused on gossip related to
issues that occurred one or two decades ago and having no relevance on North
Carolina lives. Although the excellent
cover by Chris Williams accurately depicted my objectives and motivation
(depicted as a caped superhero saving Lady Justice), the story was meant to
have the opposite effect… one of discrediting and diminishing my influence.
Scott Fowler, a McClatchy sports
commentary writer for the Charlotte
Observer, in an article in the July 11, 2014 edition of The News & Observer titled “Jamison
calls McCants a ‘clown’” does his best to discredit Rashad McCants, the UNC-CH
basketball star who recently opened up to ESPN in an interview pertaining to
the academic and athletic so-called scandal.
Specifically McCants, who was part of the 1995 Championship UNC team
under popular head coach Roy Williams stated that his academic eligibility was
in jeopardy and that Coach Williams helped insure that McCants, a star on the
team, would remain eligible. In being
frank, McCants said that it was his belief that Coach Williams was aware that
he was enrolled in fail-proof classes provided through the African and
Afro-American Studies Department under the much maligned department head Julius
Nyang’oro.
Antawn Jamison, a UNC-CH basketballer
under Coach Williams began his collegiate career after McCants had left the
university and credited his insights on McCants’ character as stemming from
observing McCants during summer visits he would make to the Chapel Hill
area. For example, Jamison is said to
have noticed McCants’ talents and lack of focus… whatever that means. The article didn’t delve into what Jamison
meant when he referred to McCants’ lack of focus. Whether or not McCants was focused or lacked
focus, that has nothing to do with McCants’ credibility. When McCants says he didn’t write papers and
didn’t attend class, I believe him. When
McCants said that he thought Roy Williams was aware of his academic situation,
I believe that that is what he sincerely believed. Whether that was reality is something else
that only the coach can answer. From
what I have heard from McCants on interviews and from what I’ve read in the
newspapers, I strongly am of the belief that Coach Williams was more involved
with keeping his star performers academically eligible than he let has let on.
The newspaper article made it appear
as though McCants’ statements covered widespread academic misconduct involving
others as well as himself. To my
knowledge, though it may be limited, McCants talked exclusively about his
situation and did not delve into that of his teammates and other players.
Fowler quotes Jamison as saying of
McCants, “I just think he’s a clown. I
think he’s in a situation where he’s looking for attention. It’s just sad.” What does Jamison mean by his statement that
he thinks McCants is a clown? I don’t
know. Fowler doesn’t follow up on the
statement. For Jamison to state that he
believes McCants’ actions are because he’s seeking attention is extremely weak
and is quite often overused. Many
commenters to my blog site frequently accuse me of seeking attention when I
attempt to bring attention to injustices in the State’s legal system. The main reason I am forced to do so is
because the mainstream media has failed to provide this important service for
the people of North Carolina. From what
I’ve seen of McCants, it does not appear to me that he is seeking
attention. What would be his purpose for
seeking attention? What would be the
purpose for me to seek attention?
Attention is the last thing I want, but one cannot be an effective advocate
by being anonymous… and effective and credible advocate must lend his name in
order to show commitment to the causes he supports.
Jamison is also quoted as accusing
McCants of trying to “throw a black cloud over everyone who’s done it the right
way.” Again, Fowler journalistically
fails to follow-up in order to understand the essence and accuracy of Jamison’s
statement. As I have stated, I have
never seen or heard McCants denigrate others or even discuss the situation of
other players academically or otherwise.
Finally, Fowler, through Jamison,
tries to make it appear that McCants’ interviews with ESPN and other media is
vendetta-driven because of McCants’ relationship with the university… in
particular, quoting Jamison as saying about McCants, “Don’t try to bring down a
university because you don’t have a good relationship with the coaching
staff.” Where does Jamison come off
making such a statement about an athlete with whom he didn’t play and whose observations
come from occasionally seeing him every now and then during the summer?
It is clear to me that it’s not
McCants who has an agenda in all of this, but Antwan Jamison. He was not picked up after a lengthy 16-year
NBA career, and is currently trying to latch on to play for the Charlotte
Hornets for at least another year. What
better way to achieve that than by coming to the support of a beleaguered
legendary and much loved basketball coach by helping to take the wind out of
the sails of McCants whose motives in coming forward seem nothing more than
altruistic to me.
I must hand it to Scott Fowler… he
did an excellent job of subtly discrediting Rashad McCants. It certainly wasn’t overkill like the August
22, 2013 Indy Week article about me. nn
Follow-up on P. J. Hairston
Word count: 451
My last blog in defense of P. J.
Hairston may have been a bit hasty.
Going solely by the account in The
News & Observer, in which Hairston’s spokesperson said the high
schooler initiated the shoving and
punching exchanges, I charged in to defend Hairston who has been unfairly
targeted by the media. However, as
events have developed it seems as if there was no shoving during the match, and
that the one or two punches thrown by Hairston were unprovoked, unanswered by
the high school player, and occurred outside the heat of competitive sports
battle.
Like Pope Francis and the Man from
Nazareth, I do not condone violence, and it appears that Hairston was clearly
in the wrong. I find no fault in the
parents of the youth seeking out a warrant under the circumstances. It is my hope that this episode helps make
Hairston a better person… that he learns from his bad behavior and doesn’t
repeat it in the future.
Unlike politicians and many in the
media, I own up to my errors in judgment and have the courage to admit
them. Overall, my last blog about
Hairston missed the mark. See, I don’t
go around trying to make excuses. I
think that part of the problem is that many people think of me as being
perfect, so the important thing is to remember that I am a human being, just
like everyone else, and am therefore capable of making a mistake… on extremely
rare occasions.
The other stories in the news about
Hairston… switching his car with Cleveland Browns wide receiver Josh Gordon and
having an agent who is not registered should not be brought before the public
as character issues. So he switched cars
with an NFL bad boy… is that against the law?
And so what if his agent is not registered? Maybe he didn’t do his homework like he
should have in selecting him, but if anything it seems like he is the victim
here, if anything.
Even though Hairston disappointed me
in the YMCA pickup basketball game, that does not give the media the right to
scrutinize his every move. Instead of
trying to get the Hornets to fire him, why write and broadcast constructive
stories. During last year’s basketball
season the media had the chance to attack the parasitic NCAA cartel for its
draconian suspension of Hairston, but it didn’t. Fowler should’ve teed off on the avaricious
NCAA members and their self-serving policies that come at the expense of
student athletes. Had Fowler defended
Hairston’s right to play basketball last season, UNC might have made it to the
Final Four… maybe even winning the national title outright. nn
326 comments:
1 – 200 of 326 Newer› Newest»Anonymous said...
No, not if someone posts anonymously - they are intentionally not trying to draw attention.
Plus, and again, I know you believe Sid can't be wrong, I'm just pointing out things he is absolutely, completely, and totally wrong about - that's not ego, that's a fact. He needs to stop pushing the inadmissible evidence cause it makes him look like a fool, and convinces everyone that he isn't interested in the truth but his own agenda, so everything is discounted.
If I wanted this for my ego, I would admit that I'm just Kenny posting anonymously, but personally, I like having conversations with myself, so I post a lot, under different names, just for the hell of it.
You do know that other than you there are about 3 people who post - they just use different names to boost their egos and make people think others care.
Blah blah blah
I am more interested in content of the comments to this blog, and if doing so anonymously helps achieve this end, so much the better.
As an advocate, however, I have no such luxury and must put my name on what I do to give credibility to my commitment. An effective advocate cannot be unidentifiable.
Anonymous said...
I hope race traitor Mike Nifong has another diagnosis of prostate cancer and dies from it this time.Even better if Crystal Mangum gets stabbed to death in prison.It would save the taxpayers in North Carolina (i.e whites)a lot of money.
To the poster of the above comment,
I truly feel sorry for you and pity you for all of the hatred you carry in your heart. Although your comments are about the most despicable I've ever seen on my blog site, I, like Pope Francis and the Man from Nazareth, hold no contempt or ill will towards you. Definitely you are in need of help, and I pray that you get it so that you can be at peace with yourself.
You claim you own up to your mistakes, but you still refuse to admit you are wrong about the felony murder and Daye's inadmissible prior record.
So, you aren't an idiot, you are a hypocrit.
But, hey, I posted, so your ego got a boost.
Sidney,
Concerning that post you quoted above at 1:02, I'll just repeat what I said to Kenhyderal:
"It's too obvious that whoever wrote that wanted to make it seem that some white racist was responsible for it. Why else would the poster write 'race traitor' and 'taxpayers ... (ie. whites)'?
But it's a well-known trick: whenever you're losing an argument, get an agent provocateur to make the other side look bad."
yeah g... like you perchance
that posts smacks of the evil duke troll who has issues
like you for instance
Blah blah blah ... fix the tinfoil hat, it's slipped a bit.
However, the most scathing and malicious article would come from The Indy Week of August 22, 2013 which was essentially nothing more than a hatchet job. I knew that it would be shortly after I approached a writer with the weekly about doing a story about the problem with the medical examiner in Mangum’s case. Instead, the focus of the article was focused on gossip related to issues that occurred one or two decades ago and having no relevance on North Carolina lives.
Was there one single statement in that article which was untrue? You have certainly never identified one.
SIDNEY ARR:
"Well, the media is at it again… using one of its most effective weapons in its arsenal of devious tricks – discrediting an individual to minimize one’s message."
That might apply to some people who have a real message. It is obvious it does not apply to you.
"This was used for a lengthy period against me when I tried to alert the media and public of problems within the state’s medical examiner system… long before The News & Observer five-part series titled "Fatally flawed."”
No you did not. You ranted and raved about Dr. Nichols because he did an autopsy and determined that Reginald Daye died from the stab wound inflicted by Crystal Mangum,
"The News & Observer in particular tried to mute my public service message by painting me as an interloper and troublemaker in Mangum’s recent murder case."
You had no public service message to deliver and you are an iterloper and a trouble maker, albeit not very effective at being either.
"It repeatedly wrote about how the State Bar was investigating me… giving the impression that I was illegally practicing law."
You were filing motions on behalf of Crystal, which means you were trying to practice law without a license. Then you showed you were not very effective at practicing law without a license-you thought you could file pro se motions in a criminal case to which you were not a party. You showed you were stupid. So what else is new.
SIDNEY HARR:
"However, the most scathing and malicious article would come from The Indy Week of August 22, 2013 which was essentially nothing more than a hatchet job."
According to what you have printed in your blog you were very eager to talk to the Indy Weekly. Now you gripe because you exposed yourself for the fraud you are.
SIDNEY HARR:
"I knew that it would be shortly after I approached a writer with the weekly about doing a story about the problem with the medical examiner in Mangum’s case."
The only person who had a problem with the Medical Examiner was you, a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD inappropriately appended to your name. Your problem was that Dr. Nichols found that Reginald Daye died from the stab wound inflicted by Crystal(which was confirmed by a review of the report by the defense expert). That runs counter to your philosophy that a black person who commits a crime should get a pass for it.
SIDNEY HARR:
" Although the excellent cover by Chris Williams accurately depicted my objectives and motivation (depicted as a caped superhero saving Lady Justice), the story was meant to have the opposite effect… one of discrediting and diminishing my influence."
What influence? The influence you believed you had when you proclaimed that the state had no case against Crystal and would dismiss the charges? The influence you believed you had when you said your J4N gang would get DA NIFONG's law license restored?
I ask again, what influence?
SIDNEY HARR:
"In being frank, McCants said that it was his belief that Coach Williams was aware that he was enrolled in fail-proof classes provided through the African and Afro-American Studies Department under the much maligned department head Julius Nyang’oro."
Shirley you jest. What classes. According to the news report, Julius Nyang-oro was paid $12,000 for teaching a class which never met, a class he therefore did not teach. I guess you believe it is ok for Colleges to hold classes for black people which require no meetings and no class work. Is that how you got through College and Medical School. It would explain why you ended up a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD inappropriately appended to his name?
Evil Duke Troll:
you make no sense at all since the issues with Dr. Nichols is readily seen if you take the time to actually read and compare the reports
you never even read what you criticize others unmercifully about continuously nonstop
you just deny anything and everything that doesn't fit your duke is great and they are victims all by everyone else in NC and the USA
what bs
duke exploits everyone in NC
as a matter of business policy
it is what they are and what they do
they are NOT the victims, although they pretend to be as a matter of business policy - harming any and all while they do
you just do the same thing
maybe if you actually read the reports and didn't keep denying what everyone else sees you would feel better, or at least stop trolling about it which makes absolutely no sense
The Nichols autopsy was a mess and sloppy. Unfortunately, while the autopsy itself was a mess, the conclusion was verified by an independent analysis - so not sure why you keep crying about it. If Dr. Roberts had concluded that the Nichols autopsy was a mess, and the cause of death was wrong, that would have been really good. Instead, she concluded it was a total mess, but he cause of death (which is all the State needed) was right, so it was bad for Crystal.
Is that really so hard for your delusional, tin-foil wrapped head to understand?
Nichols was a mess, and deserved to get fired, but he was right that the cause of death in this case was Crystal stabbing Daye - she should have just left - if she had, they'd both be alive, and she'd be free. Instead, she chose to run into the kitchen and get a knife and stab Daye. He's dead, she's in prison.
in your own little duke is great and is victims all world perhaps - in reality - that's not what happened
no - duke killed Mr. Daye to frame Ms. Mangum
in dukes world - you too could be their next victim
you do understand that right?
Anonymous July 13, 2014 at 4:09 PM
No one believes the propaganda you spout because you are incredibly and irredeemably stupid.
Now go ahead and again threaten to call me a hate criminal.
Don't you hate it when someone points out how stupid and impotent you are?
Regards edt
Anonymous July 13, 2014 at 4:36 PM
No one believes the propaganda you spout because you are incredibly and irredeemably stupid.
Now go ahead and again threaten to call me a hate criminal.
Don't you hate it when someone points out how stupid and impotent you are?
SDINEY HARR:
"Unlike politicians and many in the media, I own up to my errors in judgment and have the courage to admit them."
Why have you not owned up to lying about Crystal being the victim/accuser in the Duke Rape case? Crystal was and is the victimizer/false accuser.
You have not owned up to the fact that Shan Carter is a felony murderer. You keep insisting, falsely, that he acted in self defense.
You have not owned up to the fact that DA NIFONG was a corrupt prosecutor.
You have not owned up to the fact that there is no carpetbagger jihad or that Crystal is no victim of any vendetta.
Shirley you really delude yourself.
Guiowen said: "But it's a well-known trick: whenever you're losing an argument, get an agent provocateur to make the other side look bad"....... But the "trick" can't work here. Dr. Harr, as the blog owner, can tell the IP address it came from and he can tell if a poster with a user names is also posting anonymously. Guiowen disingenuously accused me of being such a provocateur. He knows better and he did that only to troll. Like the despicable poster, Guiowen is a wounded man consumed with hate.
KENHYDERAL:
"Like the despicable poster, Guiowen is a wounded man consumed with hate."
The pot calling the kettle black, KENHYDERAL who repeatedly posts that someone raped Crystal. He can provide no credible factual evidence that Crystal was raped but he insists innocent Cacasian men did it. He does this claiming he is fighting for justice. What a hypocritical example of unreasoning hate.
the only one that insists that she was raped by innocent white men is you
Anonymos July 14, 2014 at 3:41 AM
You are wrong. KENHYDERAL is not he only one who thinks Crystal was raped. SIDNEY HARR also beeleves it.
Kenny,
If not you, it's one of your friends.
SIDNEY HARR:
"The topic of the sharlog to follow will focus on the State and media witch-hunt that has been underway against Mike Nifong for seemingly an eternity."
So that is what you call it when it comes to light that DA NIFONG resorted to unethical tactics to pur Darryl Hall in jail for crimes he did not commit?
That's what you call it when it came to light when DA NIFONG wrongfully prosecuted three innocent men who were falsely accused of raping Crystal?
Maybe you can provide factual, credible evidence that Crystal was raped. Show beyond a reasonable doubt that Crystal was telling the truth when she alleged she was raped.
It repeatedly wrote about how the State Bar was investigating me… giving the impression that I was illegally practicing law.
You were illegally practicing law, as the court ultimately ruled.
Kenny said,
"But the "trick" can't work here. Dr. Harr, as the blog owner, can tell the IP address it came from and he can tell if a poster with a user names is also posting anonymously."
Well, Kenny, let's assume that's true. Would Sidney betray one of his few allies?
Anyway, you seem to have thought this out with some care. How do we know you didn't go down to the local library and use the internet there?
Maybe you can provide factual, credible evidence that Crystal was raped. Show beyond a reasonable doubt that Crystal was telling the truth when she alleged she was raped.
Even if she was raped, unless it was the 3 people arrested and charged for the crime, Nifong was wrong to keep prosecuting them unless he believed he could prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Once it became clear that the wrong people (at least in part) were identified, the charges against those mis-identified individuals should have been dismissed.
It's incredibly easy to spoof or mask IP addresses.
Anonymous said...
The Nichols autopsy was a mess and sloppy. Unfortunately, while the autopsy itself was a mess, the conclusion was verified by an independent analysis - so not sure why you keep crying about it. If Dr. Roberts had concluded that the Nichols autopsy was a mess, and the cause of death was wrong, that would have been really good. Instead, she concluded it was a total mess, but he cause of death (which is all the State needed) was right, so it was bad for Crystal.
Is that really so hard for your delusional, tin-foil wrapped head to understand?
Nichols was a mess, and deserved to get fired, but he was right that the cause of death in this case was Crystal stabbing Daye - she should have just left - if she had, they'd both be alive, and she'd be free. Instead, she chose to run into the kitchen and get a knife and stab Daye. He's dead, she's in prison.
Yeah, but Dr. Nichols also concluded that Sharad Amtey died of natural causes... (a heart attack) at the very time he was being strangled by his wife. Dr. Nichols concluded that she should be charged with assault and not murder. Do you agree with that conclusion?
Anonymous said...
SDINEY HARR:
"Unlike politicians and many in the media, I own up to my errors in judgment and have the courage to admit them."
Why have you not owned up to lying about Crystal being the victim/accuser in the Duke Rape case? Crystal was and is the victimizer/false accuser.
You have not owned up to the fact that Shan Carter is a felony murderer. You keep insisting, falsely, that he acted in self defense.
You have not owned up to the fact that DA NIFONG was a corrupt prosecutor.
You have not owned up to the fact that there is no carpetbagger jihad or that Crystal is no victim of any vendetta.
Shirley you really delude yourself.
I don't know that Crystal lied about events in the Duke Lacrosse case... ergo, I can't make such an admission.
Regarding Carter, he killed gang leader Baker in self-defense... It was Carter who was minding his own business when threateningly approached by Baker with a coat draped over his shooting arm. Had Carter not fired first, he most likely would have been killed by Baker.
Also, Mike Nifong is not a corrupt prosecutor. Bill Wolfe, Tom Ford, Tom Keith, and Michael Parker are... but not Nifong.
Mangum has been targeted since her identity became known... a vendetta launched most likely by the Carpetbagger Jihadists.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"The topic of the sharlog to follow will focus on the State and media witch-hunt that has been underway against Mike Nifong for seemingly an eternity."
So that is what you call it when it comes to light that DA NIFONG resorted to unethical tactics to pur Darryl Hall in jail for crimes he did not commit?
That's what you call it when it came to light when DA NIFONG wrongfully prosecuted three innocent men who were falsely accused of raping Crystal?
Maybe you can provide factual, credible evidence that Crystal was raped. Show beyond a reasonable doubt that Crystal was telling the truth when she alleged she was raped.
First of all, Darryl Hall is one of my favorite singers. Regarding Darryl Howard, I don't have all the facts about the case, but it is definitely a witch hunt. Bottom line is that even if Howard may have been innocent of the crime, Nifong's prosecution was done with integrity. Are you going to try and convince me that no other prosecutor in North Carolina history has ever convicted an innocent person and that person ended up serving decades wrongly? That Nifong's the only one? Gimme a break!
Anonymous A Lawyer said...
It repeatedly wrote about how the State Bar was investigating me… giving the impression that I was illegally practicing law.
You were illegally practicing law, as the court ultimately ruled.
Illegally practicing law is similar to the NCAA's impermissible benefits!! Whether or not I was practicing law, without doubt I was the only one acting in Mangum's best interests.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"In being frank, McCants said that it was his belief that Coach Williams was aware that he was enrolled in fail-proof classes provided through the African and Afro-American Studies Department under the much maligned department head Julius Nyang’oro."
Shirley you jest. What classes. According to the news report, Julius Nyang-oro was paid $12,000 for teaching a class which never met, a class he therefore did not teach. I guess you believe it is ok for Colleges to hold classes for black people which require no meetings and no class work. Is that how you got through College and Medical School. It would explain why you ended up a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD inappropriately appended to his name?
To my knowledge, enrollment in the class taught by Professor Nyang'oro was not restricted to African American students.
Don't you think that higher-ups at UNC knew about attendance requirements for the class? Face it... Nyang'oro was only teaching the class at the behest of the higher-ups so that UNC could field competitive football and basketball teams. Had McCants not been eligible to play during the '95 championship season, it is very likely that UNC would not have been national champions. Am I right?
A Lawyer said...
However, the most scathing and malicious article would come from The Indy Week of August 22, 2013 which was essentially nothing more than a hatchet job. I knew that it would be shortly after I approached a writer with the weekly about doing a story about the problem with the medical examiner in Mangum’s case. Instead, the focus of the article was focused on gossip related to issues that occurred one or two decades ago and having no relevance on North Carolina lives.
Was there one single statement in that article which was untrue? You have certainly never identified one.
It would be easier for you to refer to a specific statement that you believe to be true... then I will respond to it.
It would be easier for you to refer to a specific statement that you believe to be true... then I will respond to it.
Oh, please. Is that the best you can do? Identify any one statement in the article that you think is false. You never have, so I have to conclude that it's all true.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Yeah, but Dr. Nichols also concluded that Sharad Amtey died of natural causes..."
Gross misrepresentation on your part. See http://www.wral.com/questioned-autopsy-report-factored-in-cary-woman-s-release-a-year-after-husband-s-death/13803654/.
Dr. Nichols did not do the autopsy. Medical Examiner Sharon Covey did the initial investigation and concluded Sharad Amtey died of natural cuses. Dr.Lauren Scott did the autopsy under Dr. Nichols supervision and concluded that Sharad Amtey died of natural causes. Dr. Nichols signed off on the report. Then Dr. Scott amended her findings and concluded that possibly Sharad Amtey's death was possibly murder. Dr.Nichols signed off on the amended report. There was no gross misconduct here, something you are too stupid to realize.
"h(a heart attack) at the very time he was being strangled by his wife. Dr. Nichols concluded that she should be charged with assault and not murder. Do you agree with that conclusion?"
Yes. Having done autopsies in which the cause of death is not determined until after days pass, my opinion IS more meaningful than the opinion of a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD inappropriately appended to his name who has never done an autopsy in his life.
SIDNEY HARR:
"I don't know that Crystal lied about events in the Duke Lacrosse case... ergo, I can't make such an admission."
First off, the situation is you know nothing not only about about the Duke Lacrosse case but about anything. Ins spit of your admission about the Duke Lacrosse case you DO presume the accused were guilty.
Second the issue which must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt is that Crystal told the truth. The evidence gathered in the case shows beyond a reasonable doubt that she did not. She had no physical findings of a rape. There was no forensic evidence to show there was a rape. Her allegation was not credible. Her identifications of assailants were not reliable.
"Regarding Carter, he killed gang leader Baker in self-defense..."
No he didn't. He murdered him and he murdered Demetrius Green.
"It was Carter who was minding his own business when threateningly approached by Baker with a coat draped over his shooting arm.
Selling illegal drugs on the street while packing an illegally posssessed firearm is not minding his own business. Tyrone Baker approached him menacingly because Shan Carter robbed his apartment, which meant Shan Carter provoked the confrontation.
"Had Carter not fired first, he most likely would have been killed by Baker."
Shan Carter fired at the sidewalk according to his own testimony. Tyrone Baker then fled. Shan Carter, according to his own testimony then pursued Tyrone Baker and continued firing at him with his illegally possessed firearm. That was when he killed Tyrone Baker and Demetrius Green.
"Also, Mike Nifong is not a corrupt prosecutor. Bill Wolfe, Tom Ford, Tom Keith, and Michael Parker are... but not Nifong."
Wrong. DA NIFONG is the most corrupt of the lot.
"Mangum has been targeted since her identity became known... a vendetta launched most likely by the Carpetbagger Jihadists."
As there never was a Carpetbagger jihad there never was a vendetta against Crystal by any Csrpetbagger Jihadists.
SIDNEY HARR:
"To my knowledge, enrollment in the class taught by Professor Nyang'oro was not restricted to African American students."
The problem is the class never met and Professor Nyang'oro accepted $12,000 for not teaching the class which never met.
"Don't you think that higher-ups at UNC knew about attendance requirements for the class? Face it... Nyang'oro was only teaching the class at the behest of the higher-ups so that UNC could field competitive football and basketball teams."
Whether or not the higher ups knew about it, it was fraud for a professor and department head to accept money for teaching a class which never met. This is another iteration of your philosophy that Black people who commit crimes should get a pass because they are black.
"Had McCants not been eligible to play during the '95 championship season, it is very likely that UNC would not have been national champions. Am I right?"
You are correct. That is something different than being right. Being right requires one can distinguish between right and wrong and you can not.
SIDNEY HARR:
"It would be easier for you to refer to a specific statement that you believe to be true... then I will respond to it."
Dodge Dodge Dodge and then Dodge again.
The author said that when you left California you were bankrupt and had filed and lost a string of frivolous lawsuits.
If the author had said something like that about me and my medical career, I could document what he said was false. I would document with a vengeance.
And since you have tried to cover up your background, it seems likely you do not want your background known. It does not prove it but it does suggest the author is telling the truth.
Don't forget the Indy Weekly article happened because you responded to his invitation to speak.
SIDNEY HARR:
"
Illegally practicing law is similar to the NCAA's impermissible benefits!! Whether or not I was practicing law, without doubt I was the only one acting in Mangum's best interests."
Another iteration of duck the issue and DODGE DODGE DODGE.
It is also another iteration of black man SIDNEY HARR saying, as a black man he should get a pass for his illegal activity.
Anonnymous July 13, 2014 at 4:09 PM
No one believes the propaganda you spout because you are incredibly and irredeemably stupid.
Now go ahead and again threaten to call me a hate criminal.
Don't you hate it when someone points out how stupid and impotent you are?
Regards edt.
PS I am not guiowen.
no? but you are such a obssessive obnoxious lying hateful evil duke troll
and you actually continually insist that you are a doctor too - even after you appear to go insane weekly if not daily on this blog, cheer on other's suicides, and then continue to troll unmercifully even tho it is well known medical knowledge that doing so makes others sick - even to the point of suicide for some
explain yourself then
why do you keep doing it?
Yeah, but Dr. Nichols also concluded that Sharad Amtey died of natural causes... (a heart attack) at the very time he was being strangled by his wife. Dr. Nichols concluded that she should be charged with assault and not murder. Do you agree with that conclusion?
I know nothing about that case, but what is reported in the media (which is often erroneous), haven't investigated it, and consulted outside experts - so, unlike you I'm not willing to jump to dramatic conclusions and claim that anyone who disagrees is wrong, inept, or a liar.
I'd have to see both autopsy reports, and talk to Dr. Nichols and the others involved to see why they changed their mind to draw any conclusions.
It would be easier for you to refer to a specific statement that you believe to be true... then I will respond to it.
Unless you refute them, I believe them all to be true - the article is presumed true unless you demonstrate it's false. You won't/can't do that.
Anonymous July 14, 2014 at 3:55 PM
No one believes the propaganda you spout because you are incredibly and irredeemably stupid.
Now go ahead and again threaten to call me a hate criminal.
Don't you hate it when someone points out how stupid and impotent you are?
To Anonymous 3:55;
Here are some words from you friend and ally Kenhyderal:
"Dr. Harr, as the blog owner, can tell the IP address it came from and he can tell if a poster with a user names is also posting anonymously."
Why don't you ask Sidney whether the 3:21 and I are the same person?
does it matter since you are a bs obnoxious evil duke troll regardless?
Please mind your manners.
watching them g... you bs obnoxious evil duke troll you
watching them
Just mind your manners, that's all.
Anonymous July 14, 2014 at 5:37 PM
No one believes the propaganda you spout because you are incredibly and irredeemably stupid.
Now go ahead and again threaten to call me a hate criminal.
Don't you hate it when someone points out how stupid and impotent you are?
Regards edt
I am not guiowen.
Anonymous July 14, 2014 at 5:46 PM
"watching them g... you bs obnoxious evil duke troll you
watching them"
guiowne be not.
edt
why
your continuous bs obnoxious obssessive trolling is lauded by kc and allowed here
what grounds do you stand on to demand that ANYONE watch their manners g... when defending against your bs evil duke troll gang ways?
The harm i have witnessed because of duke's hatred for Ms. Mangum and people in general is beyond the crimes of the lacrosse case, although a symptom of the same evil hatred that affects duke to its core.
Watching duke, having killed Mr. Daye with malpractice and then continue to stay silent about the obvious ME discrepanicies and errors that have gone on to negatively effect other cases as well - as could be expected or at the least suspected as it has been proven to be - and then watch the evil duke troll gang continually lie, deny, harass, troll unmercifullessly and with no apparent intention of stopping even tho asked repeatedly to by many on these blogs and book reviews and now wikipedia is beyond what any would consider reasonable manners or behavior to expect or accept from Duke, or the duke affiliated, without holding them accountable for this additional harm they encourage and laud as if all a part of their rightful power plays and games ... just part of their rightfully earned spoils of 'war' ... that is what it appears to be ... it is what people express about what is happening ... and it is what the evil duke troll gang and duke choose to continually ignore and support and perpetuate by their continued silent approval and/or active participation in the harm they continue to subject others to - all a symptom of their rabid evil hate and prejudices against others who are not them and/or ones who are them but have not lied sufficiently about what they do for duke that would cause duke to have to hate them - to appear to have 'manners' - which is all they think may matter to their donors perhaps?
???
Anonymos July 14, 2014 at 6:51 PM
No one believes the propaganda you spout because you are incredibly and irredeemably stupid.
Now go ahead and again threaten to call me a hate criminal.
Don't you hate it when someone points out how stupid and impotent you are?
Sid wrote: "Like Pope Francis and the Man from Nazareth, I do not condone violence,..."
Except against 8 year old boys named Demetrius Green.
"... and it appears that Hairston was clearly in the wrong. I find no fault in the parents of the youth seeking out a warrant under the circumstances. It is my hope that this episode helps make Hairston a better person… that he learns from his bad behavior and doesn’t repeat it in the future."
I thought Ole Roy of the two rings had rehabilitated PJ last fall? Guess not.
"Unlike politicians and many in the media, I own up to my errors in judgment and have the courage to admit them."
You could fill more than one blog apologizing for your errors in judgment. Unfortunately for you and those around you, you don't apologize and you keep making the same errors. It does make for fun reading though.
"Overall, my last blog about Hairston missed the mark."
Yes it did. Credit where it is due, for once you recognized an error.
"The other stories in the news about Hairston… switching his car with Cleveland Browns wide receiver Josh Gordon and having an agent who is not registered should not be brought before the public as character issues."
But, just as you admit an error, you go and compound it.
"So he switched cars with an NFL bad boy… is that against the law?"
It's called negligent entrustment. Did PJ verify Gordon's driving privileges? Did he emphasize a strict no drunk driving policy? Did he verify insurance that would meet the NC minimum financial responsibility? If the answer to any of those questions is no, (and I already know that the answer on the insurance issue is no) then it is in fact negligent entrustment. Fortunately no one was injured. But, the results could have been significantly worse. And yes, taking that risk with other people's health is a really bad idea that deserves to be brought to the character table.
"And so what if his agent is not registered?"
I guess you didn't read the CBA. Not really a surprise, you never look at relevant sources before you make your pronouncements.
"Maybe he didn’t do his homework like he should have in selecting him,..."
Ya' think?
"... but if anything it seems like he is the victim here, if anything."
Maybe he should have stayed in college or paid attention in class. He hight have learned a few things. Still, PJ's over 18, he is and must be accountable for his own actions.
Walt-in-Durham
Anonymous A Lawyer said...
It would be easier for you to refer to a specific statement that you believe to be true... then I will respond to it.
Oh, please. Is that the best you can do? Identify any one statement in the article that you think is false. You never have, so I have to conclude that it's all true.
A lawyer, there are too many false and misleading statements for me to choose. Select the most egregious statements you believe to be true, and I will let you know if there's a scintilla of truth in them.
Lance the Intern said...
I've read the Indyweek article many times. You can find it posted here.
The only statement I have issue with is the following:
"Nifong declined to comment for this story. He and Harr have met only a handful of times, but there are parallels between them. Both men tried to take on Duke University..."
As we all know, and as one comment succinctly stated, "Nifong did not try to "take on Duke University." He falsely and maliciously prosecuted three innocent young men with no evidence, concealed exculpatory evidence, violated ethical canons, lied to the court, and conspired with a lying nurse from Duke to further his own political and personal agenda."
Hey, Lance. Thanks for pointing out just one of the many errors in the article. It goes to show how sloppy the research and inaccurate the statements are. But that's what you get with hatchet jobs.
SIDNEY HARR:
"A lawyer, there are too many false and misleading statements for me to choose. Select the most egregious statements you believe to be true, and I will let you know if there's a scintilla of truth in them."
That would be impossible for you since there is less than a fraction of a scintilla of truth in you.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"Yeah, but Dr. Nichols also concluded that Sharad Amtey died of natural causes..."
Gross misrepresentation on your part. See http://www.wral.com/questioned-autopsy-report-factored-in-cary-woman-s-release-a-year-after-husband-s-death/13803654/.
Dr. Nichols did not do the autopsy. Medical Examiner Sharon Covey did the initial investigation and concluded Sharad Amtey died of natural cuses. Dr.Lauren Scott did the autopsy under Dr. Nichols supervision and concluded that Sharad Amtey died of natural causes. Dr. Nichols signed off on the report. Then Dr. Scott amended her findings and concluded that possibly Sharad Amtey's death was possibly murder. Dr.Nichols signed off on the amended report. There was no gross misconduct here, something you are too stupid to realize.
"h(a heart attack) at the very time he was being strangled by his wife. Dr. Nichols concluded that she should be charged with assault and not murder. Do you agree with that conclusion?"
Yes. Having done autopsies in which the cause of death is not determined until after days pass, my opinion IS more meaningful than the opinion of a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD inappropriately appended to his name who has never done an autopsy in his life.
What a wonderful Medical Examiner System we have in North Carolina. First the autopsy report on Sharad Amtey states the cause of death is natural causes... then later it is amended to be a homicide. Then the DHHS spokesperson says that there's nothing wrong with that?
Is this statement true?
"It is not well-known that after going broke in California, he bounced around with his wife, leaving a trail of sensational lawsuits marked by paranoia. Between 1985 and 1997, Harr was a party to at least 27 lawsuits in California, Arizona and Ohio. He sought hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation for civil rights violations, employment discrimination and fraud."
Please provide details that support your claim that it is false.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Hey, Lance. Thanks for pointing out just one of the many errors in the article. It goes to show how sloppy the research and inaccurate the statements are. But that's what you get with hatchet jobs."
Hey SIDNEY. I have been pointing out all the lies you try to pass off as truth, e.g. Shan Carter acted in self defense, Crystal Mangum is the victim/accuser in the Duke Lacrosse case, DA NIFONG acted as a decent honorable prosecutor when he prosecuted innocent men for a rape which never happened.
As I said in my previous comment, there is less than a fraction of a scintilla of truth in you.
SIDNEY HARR:
"What a wonderful Medical Examiner System we have in North Carolina. First the autopsy report on Sharad Amtey states the cause of death is natural causes... then later it is amended to be a homicide. Then the DHHS spokesperson says that there's nothing wrong with that?"
What a wonderful comment from a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD inappropriately appended to his name who has never done an autopsy in his life. What is right about that. Absolutely nothing.
Odd ... Sid is complaining that in this other case, the ME established a cause of death, but upon further investigation was willing to change it. Somehow he considers that completely and totally inappropriate. But, in Mangum's case, he wants them to go back, re-investigate, and change the cause of death.
So, Sid, are you mad because they can/do actually change their conclusions, or just because they didn't do it for Mangum (even though the independent investigation upheld the cause of death conclusion)?
You have so little morals, ethics, and knowledge of what is right and wrong, you can't even keep your outrages straight anymore.
Anonymous said: "Please provide details that support your claim that it is false".............. As Walt is so fond of pointing out to me "he who asserts must prove"
Kenny, Kenny, Kenny -- I have a whole article that supports the statement.
Sid says to select the statement you believe to be true, and he will "let us know" if there's any truth to it.
Sorry, that shit don't fly.
John Tucker did his homework, and much to Sid's chagrin, he can't lie his way out of it.
KENHYDERAL:
"Anonymous said: "Please provide details that support your claim that it is false(that SIDNEY, among other things, filed and lost a umber of frivolous lawsuits)".............. As Walt is so fond of pointing out to me "he who asserts must prove"
Funny. Well not really.
Regarding the issue of whether or not there were unidentified party guests at the Lacrosse party, you were challenged to prove there were. Your response to your challengers was they had to prove there were not.
HYPOCRITE!!!!
KENHYDERAL:
Apparently you believe when you assert, someone must disprove.
To the 4:06,
How dare you contradict Kenhyderal? Don't you realize that he's a master debater?
Please produce films of the lacrosse party, and identify everyone who appears there, proving that they are all lacrosse players. Otherwise Kenhyderal is necessarily correct.
Kenhyderal,
Aren't you happy to have my support?
No need to thank me, I'm only here to fight for the truth -- without question or pause.
Anonymous said: "Your response to your challengers was they had to prove there were not"..... Yeah and as I noted Walt's response to me was that I must prove. It's something that I intend to do. It will require eye-witnesses to the sexual assault to give sworn testimony. The guilty should know that even after all these years they are not free from the consequences of their crimes.
That's the way, Kenhyderal! Now you're showing them what a fighter you are.
KENHYDERAL:
"Yeah and as I noted Walt's response to me was that I must prove."
And your response to Wat and everyone else has been that they must dis prove.
"It's something that I intend to do. It will require eye-witnesses to the sexual assault to give sworn testimony."
And since there was no sexual assault, there were no eyewitnesses.
"The guilty should know that even after all these years they are not free from the consequences of their crimes."
And since there were no crimes there were no guilty.
You are again threatening to stone someone to death with popcorn at a range of 100 yards.
Can we say impotent empty threats, boys and girls?
Kenny,
HOW will you make these alleged eye-witnesses give sworn testimony? First, you'd have to identify who they are, then you'd have to figure out some way to get them to agree to testify under oath, and if they say they saw nothing, how, exactly, would you show they were lying?
You talk a big game, but you really have no way of doing anything that you claim you are going to do.
Of course, you either can't do it because it didn't happen, and you are simply wrong, or it's a vast anti-Crystal conspiracy.
Oh, and did you see that the Judge ordered the destruction of DNA and photos from at least 21 of the party-goers who were never accused? Is that a routine way to protect the innocent, or a nefarious attempt to make sure they can never be identified? Maybe they knew Kenny was coming for them and wanted to destroy any official proof they were there ...
Kenny said:
"The guilty should know that even after all these years they are not free from the consequences of their crimes."
Something that Mangum, Nifong and their ilk are, no doubt, reminded of every single day of their wretched lives.
Kenny:
After you find the eye witnesses to Mangum's assault you should help OJ find the people who killed his wife and Ron Goldman.
Can you tell us what you have done so far to find them?
Oh, Let Kenhyderal dream!
He just likes to fantasize. He'll get Daniel Meier to explain how it was impossible for him to give Crystal a reasonable defense. This will give Crystal a new trial. Kenny and Sidney together will then see to it that Crystal's acquitted.
After that, Kenny will locate The Great Kilgo, subpoena him, and force him to reveal the name of his lacrosse player friend, who will then be forced to reveal the names of the two lacrosse players who brought the three non-players to the party. These in turn will reveal the names of those three non-lacrosse players. Kenny then will help Crystal sue their pants off!
I realize I'm mocking him all the time, and at times I feel I should just leave him alone with his fantasies. It's just that he's such a tempting target!
Anonymous said...
Is this statement true?
"It is not well-known that after going broke in California, he bounced around with his wife, leaving a trail of sensational lawsuits marked by paranoia. Between 1985 and 1997, Harr was a party to at least 27 lawsuits in California, Arizona and Ohio. He sought hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation for civil rights violations, employment discrimination and fraud."
Please provide details that support your claim that it is false.
First of all, can you prove your statement that I went broke in California? On what do you base that?
Second, my wife and I did move from California but I would not use the term bounced.
Third, what trail of lawsuits? The "Indy Week" to my knowledge never mentioned one specifically.
Fourth, I may have been involved in a lawsuit or two, but 27? Keep in mind that the experiences with lawsuits helped prepare me for my advocacy work.
Get back to me when you've got some specifics!
Anonymous said...
Odd ... Sid is complaining that in this other case, the ME established a cause of death, but upon further investigation was willing to change it. Somehow he considers that completely and totally inappropriate. But, in Mangum's case, he wants them to go back, re-investigate, and change the cause of death.
So, Sid, are you mad because they can/do actually change their conclusions, or just because they didn't do it for Mangum (even though the independent investigation upheld the cause of death conclusion)?
You have so little morals, ethics, and knowledge of what is right and wrong, you can't even keep your outrages straight anymore.
The point I make is that the initial report by the medical examiner should be accurate and not a guess... to be possibly corrected by review weeks later. The medical examiner should've realized initially that Sharad Amtey died of strangulation and not natural causes. Again, a sign of ineptitude and unreliability.
SIDNEY HARR:
"...I may have been involved in a lawsuit or two, but 27? Keep in mind that the experiences with lawsuits helped prepare me for my advocacy work."
You mean your advocacy for murderers, trying to get them passes for their crimes because they were black, which advocacy includes lying, distortion of the truth, concealing information unfavorable to your advocacy.
SIDNEY HARR:
"The point I make is that the initial report by the medical examiner should be accurate and not a guess... to be possibly corrected by review weeks later. The medical examiner should've realized initially that Sharad Amtey died of strangulation and not natural causes. Again, a sign of ineptitude and unreliability."
No it isn't. It is a sign of difficulties evaluating autopsy findings.
You would know that except you are a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD inappropriately attached to your name.
You also show a lot of resentment towards physicians who are experienced and trained.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"...I may have been involved in a lawsuit or two, but 27? Keep in mind that the experiences with lawsuits helped prepare me for my advocacy work."
You mean your advocacy for murderers, trying to get them passes for their crimes because they were black, which advocacy includes lying, distortion of the truth, concealing information unfavorable to your advocacy.
First, I advocate for justice not color. I advocate for Mike Nifong who does not happen to be black.
Second, Shan Carter and Crystal Mangum, though unjustly convicted of murder, are not "murderers" in the eyes of Lady Justice.
Guiowen said: "Kenny then will help Crystal sue their pants off"...........No fantasy, they will be convicted of rape and sent to gaol. Reality is a bitch and she bites.
SIDNEY HARR:
"First, I advocate for justice not color."
Your concept of color blind justice means justice should be blind to black people who commit major crimes.
"I advocate for Mike Nifong who does not happen to be black."
You advocate for a thoroughly corrupt prosecutor who stirred up black on white racism to win an election by falsely accusing innocent men of a non existent rape. You advocate for him because the false accuser is a black woman. Prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she told the truth when she accused the innocent men.
"Second, Shan Carter and Crystal Mangum, though unjustly convicted of murder, are not "murderers" in the eyes of Lady Justice."
Shan Carter and Crystal Mangum were justly convicted of murder beyond a reasonable doubt.
You are no more an advocate for Lady Justice than Adolf Hitler was an advocate for humaane treatment of the Jewish people.
Blogger kenhyderal said...
Guiowen said: "Kenny then will help Crystal sue their pants off"...........No fantasy, they will be convicted of rape and sent to gaol. Reality is a bitch and she bites.
Except you have absolutely no way of making that happen. You don't know who Kilgo is, and even if you did - it would be hearsay if he said he heard from his cousin who heard it from a friend who ...
There is no mechanism to remotely accomplish what you want - you can whine and pretend all you want, but absent someone with direct evidence coming forward (assuming such a person exists, and if nothing happened, they obviously don't), there is no way to put anyone under oath and require anyone to answer any of your questions.
But, like Sid you are as good at avoiding/evading reality as anyone, so you can keep pretending you know what you are talking about/doing, and continue doing Crystal a disservice by telling her to ignore all the actual legal professionals she deals with, and instead trust a bunch of crackpots with their own agendas, to her own detriment.
The best thing you can do is leave her alone.
KENHYDERAL:
"Guiowen said: "Kenny then will help Crystal sue their pants off"...........No fantasy, they will be convicted of rape and sent to gaol. Reality is a bitch and she bites."
And you are totally out of touch with reality.
Can we say again, impotent empty threats boys and girls?
Kenny:
Your persistent and malicious lies to the contrary notwithstanding, it has been conclusively determined that Mangum lied about being raped and the lacrosse players are innocent. In fact, the falsely accused lacrosse players were awarded many millions of dollars because of whatthey were forced to endure as a result of the false claims made against them. It is they - not Mangum - who were the victims of wrong doing.
Your continued lies don't change anything. They only reveal your ignorance and the depth of your depravity, and expose you to continued ridicule.
Oh, Sid...."a lawsuit or two"? You know everything is online these days. Like your court cases from Washington State through California ( Indio, Palm Springs, San Diego--just to name a few) into Bullhead City, Arizona. Then into Texas, Ohio, and Delaware...And finally right here in NC.
You don't need to be shy about them.
Anonymous said: " In fact, the falsely accused lacrosse players were awarded many millions of dollars because of whatthey were forced to endure as a result of the false claims made against them"........ Awarded by who and for what? Not even Cohan could ascertain that. Duke or their Insurance Company have never given an accounting of what specifically was done to them by Duke and what they were compensated. I know their reputation in the eyes of many, understandably so, is permanently and irredeemably damaged. On the other hand Crystal will eventually be vindicated and her reputation restored despite the many years of deliberate lies disseminated to discredit her.
KENHYDERAL:
"Anonymous said: " In fact, the falsely accused lacrosse players were awarded many millions of dollars because of whatthey were forced to endure as a result of the false claims made against them"........ Awarded by who and for what?"
It is public knowledge, which you choose to ignore, that Duke University did settle with each of the falsely accused Lacrosse players.
"Not even Cohan could ascertain that."
What you choose not to notice is that investigative journalist NOT cohan was able to ascertain NOTHING meaningful about the phoney rape case.
"Duke or their Insurance Company have never given an accounting of what specifically was done to them by Duke and what they were compensated."
Something else which is public knowledge which you choose to ignore is that Duke insisted upon confidentiality as part of the settlement, meaning neither Duke nor its insurance company had to explain why it settled.
Something else you choose not to consider is, would Duke have settled if it could have successfully defended in court.
"I know their reputation in the eyes of many, understandably so, is permanently and irredeemably damaged."
Again you ignore something which is obvious. That their reputation is still damaged is investigative journalist NOT cohan has published his screed about the Lacrosse case claiming that SHIT(Something Happened In There) happened.
"On the other hand Crystal will eventually be vindicated and her reputation restored despite the many years of deliberate lies disseminated to discredit her."
Crystal's reputation is product of her own reckless behavior which began with her theft of the cab and her attempted rundown of a police officer-that was documented by police records compiled at the time, not by any deliberate attempt to discredite her. I say, you can not provide any credible, factual evidence that anyone tried to discredit her. You cite Liestoppers. That only confirms you do not read the appropriately named Liestoppers. Only a very small content on the appropriately named Liestoppers over the years has dealt with Crysta.
At making up lies, you show yoursef to be very adept NOT NOT NOT.
KENJYDERAL:
Considering your last post, I say you must really enjoy making an ignorant fool of yourself.
Did - Did you or did you not file for bankruptcy in California in 1991? Did the state of California take out thousands of dollars in liens against you?
KENHYDERAL:
"I know their reputation in the eyes of many, understandably so, is permanently and irredeemably damaged."
The statement is incomplete. Their reputations were damaged because they were falsely accused and wrongfully prosecuted for a crime which never happened.
Do you think that is justice?
Your insistence that the crime did happen when you can provide no credible factual evidence it did is not justice and you are not a fighter for justice.
SIDNEY HARR:
I direct your attention to the Duke phony rape case. People on your blog claimed the Lacrosse players could not have proven their innocence in court.
They did not have to. It was up to DA NIFONG to prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. However, the defense attorneys turned up a slew of evidence that the Lacrosse players were innocent, no physical evidence of rape, no forensic evidence of rape, Crystal's inability to reliably identify anyone as an assailant, Crystal's multiple mutually conflicting accounts of what happened.
So John H. Tucker is obliged to prove his allegations and he has not. However we are in the court of public opinions and you could, like the innocent Lacrosse defendants, provide facts which make your case for you. You do not. Whenever someone suggests you do, you tell them to go ask John H. Tucker.
Why do you insist on prosecuting cases that have been completed for years in the court of public opinion in the first place? That's not justice for anyone either.
Why do you insist on prosecuting ANY case in the court of public opinion?
You complain and complain and complain then turn right around and insist that others do for you the same thing you complain about other people doing. Makes no sense. You even do it like you are owed these things by others. Seriously, you've been hanging out at Duke too long obviously. You've caught their hypocrite decease. Has Duke found a cure for it yet, or are they still reasearching it?
Anonymous July 17, 2014 at 6:59 AM
Why do you not ask why corrupt DA NIFONG tried to prosecute the innocent Lacrosse players in the court of public opinion.
Why do SIDNEY HARR and KENHYDERAL continue to prosecute innocent men in the court of public opinion.
Then why do the SIDNEY lovers and the KENHYDERAL lovers and the NIFONG lovers insist their boys be not be prosecuted in the court of public opinion?
Anonymous July 17, 2014 at 7:06 AM
No one believes the propaganda you spout because you are incredibly and irredeemably stupid.
Now go ahead and again threaten to call me a hate criminal.
Don't you hate it when someone points out how stupid and impotent you are?.
I already know why Mr. Nifong did what he did with the papers. I never agreed with it because I never thought it was justice and because enormous harm was done to many.
Noone is prosecuting them on this blog. You do more harm by continuing to nonprosecute them or whatever you are doing on this blog then anyone on this blog who tries to defend against your constant trolling (for reasons to cause harm for your own entertainment as you have stated before).
The one thing that the public actually needs to know about the ME system because the ME system can affect all is the one thing you refuse to acknowledge even tho the facts are there for all to read and see that you don't know what you are talking about even tho you insist on trolling endlessly on about it. You beat up people on this blog because of the corrupt justice system in NC while cheering on the same corrupt justice system as it harms Ms. Mangum and the entire state.
You refuse to see that in both cases, Duke's own actions of harm have caused their own problems - not Ms. Mangum.
and on and on and on
What do you hope to achieve?
Anonymous July 17, 2014 at 7:31 AM
"I already know why Mr. Nifong did what he did with the papers. I never agreed with it because I never thought it was justice and because enormous harm was done to many."
I question whether you really do.
"Noone(sic) is prosecuting them on this blog. You do more harm by continuing to nonprosecute them or whatever you are doing on this blog then anyone on this blog who tries to defend against your constant trolling (for reasons to cause harm for your own entertainment as you have stated before)."
How blind you are. SIDNEY has been prosecuting the innocent Lacrosse players since he started this blog. KENHYDERAL has been prosecuting them ever since he started posting here. Both hold up william cohan's book of falsehoods as a definitive account of the Lacrosse case, which is a form of prosecuting them.
"The one thing that the public actually needs to know about the ME system because the ME system can affect all is the one thing you refuse to acknowledge even tho the facts are there for all to read and see that you don't know what you are talking about even tho you insist on trolling endlessly on about it."
The person to inform the public about the problems with the ME system(and the integrity of the medical examiners is not part of those problems) is minimslly trained, minimally experienced SIDNEY HARR whose medical background or lack threof renders him incapable of commenting meaningfully on any medical topic.
You beat up people on this blog because of the corrupt justice system in NC while cheering on the same corrupt justice system as it harms Ms. Mangum and the entire state.
"You refuse to see that in both cases, Duke's own actions of harm have caused their own problems - not Ms. Mangum."
Yes I do see that. What I do not see as reality are your fantasies about Duke.
"and on and on and on
What do you hope to achieve?"
To force you to show the world you are an idiot and I am succeding grandly at that.
Anonymous July 17, 2014 at 6:59 AM
"Why do you insist on prosecuting cases that have been completed for years in the court of public opinion in the first place? That's not justice for anyone either."
You are incredibly and irredeemably stupid.
First SIDNEY and KENHYDERAL are defending cases in the court of public opinion, cases which have already been decided, i.e. that Crystal lied about being raped, that NIFONG is a corrupt prosecutor, that Crystal is guilty of murder, that Shan Carter is guilty of two counts of felony murder.
And they are still prosecutng in the court of public opinion the innocent Lacrosse players who were falsely accused.
"Why do you insist on prosecuting ANY case in the court of public opinion?"
You should ask that question of SIDNEY, of KENHYDERAL, of william cohan, not me. Why are you afraid to do so?
you were the one complaining bout it
you are never wrong in your own mind are you?
Anonymous said: "Why do SIDNEY HARR and KENHYDERAL continue to prosecute innocent men in the court of public opinion"......As a member of the public I am entitled to express my opinion that not all attendees, Players and non-Players, were innocent of crimes perpetrated against Crystal. It's an opinion held by many besides me but one that usually elicits a hysterical overreaction by the Duke Lacrosse apologists and lackeys
Anonymous said: "Then why do the SIDNEY lovers and the KENHYDERAL lovers and the NIFONG lovers insist their boys be not be prosecuted in the court of public opinion" Huh? "be not be" ?? What are you trying to say here?
that duke is evil?
they have a devil for their mascot and proud bout it - they are the ones claiming to be evil - i'm just agreeing
Anonymous July 17, 2014 at 9:44 AM
"you were the one complaining bout it"
Not the only one. in case you haven'tnotuced
"you are never wrong in your own mind are you?"
Most of the time I am not. E.G. unlike SIDNEY I never refer to corrupt DA NIFONG as a decent honorable prosecutor.
KENHYDEERAL:
"Anonymous said: 'Why do SIDNEY HARR and KENHYDERAL continue to prosecute innocent men in the court of public opinion'......As a member of the public I am entitled to express my opinion that not all attendees, Players and non-Players, were innocent of crimes perpetrated against Crystal."
Except there never were any crimes perpetrated against Crystal on the night of 13/14 March 2006. So there are no perpetrators. Which boils down to, you are prosecuting in the media innocent men for a crime which never existed.
"It's an opinion held by many besides me"
Name someone besides you and SIDNEY and investigative journalist NOT william Cohan who has expressed a belief that the crime happened. You will notice that erstwhile supporters like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, William Barber, Nancy Grace, Wendy Murphy do not believe any more. Further the group of 88 are trying to conceal their involvement in supporting Crystal.
"but one that usually elicits a hysterical overreaction by the Duke Lacrosse apologists and lackeys"
So you define as an hysterical reaction the facts that no crime happened, that you can provide no factual credible evidence that it ever happened but that you insist that someone is guilty of perpetrating said crime.
But you believe that your opinion, that the crime, for which you can provide no credible factual evidence as a logically held opinion.
KENHYDERAL you are seriously out of touch with reality.
KENHYDERAL:
"Anonymous said: "Then why do the SIDNEY lovers and the KENHYDERAL lovers and the NIFONG lovers insist their boys be not be prosecuted in the court of public opinion" Huh? "be not be" ?? What are you trying to say here?"
It was a typo, the second time you have picked up one of my typos and givrn me te opportunity to correct you. I thank you. I also say you never learn.
Correction:
Then why do the SIDNEY lovers and the KENHYDERAL lovers and the NIFONG lovers insist their boys not be prosecuted in the court of public opinion.
Anonymous said...
Oh, Sid...."a lawsuit or two"? You know everything is online these days. Like your court cases from Washington State through California ( Indio, Palm Springs, San Diego--just to name a few) into Bullhead City, Arizona. Then into Texas, Ohio, and Delaware...And finally right here in NC.
You don't need to be shy about them.
I'm not shy about them. So, what questions do you have about any of them?
Anonymous said...
Did - Did you or did you not file for bankruptcy in California in 1991? Did the state of California take out thousands of dollars in liens against you?
1991? That was 23 years ago. I really don't remember. Why don't you refresh my memory?
Also, Donald Trump declared bankruptcy if I'm not mistaken.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
I direct your attention to the Duke phony rape case. People on your blog claimed the Lacrosse players could not have proven their innocence in court.
They did not have to. It was up to DA NIFONG to prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. However, the defense attorneys turned up a slew of evidence that the Lacrosse players were innocent, no physical evidence of rape, no forensic evidence of rape, Crystal's inability to reliably identify anyone as an assailant, Crystal's multiple mutually conflicting accounts of what happened.
So John H. Tucker is obliged to prove his allegations and he has not. However we are in the court of public opinions and you could, like the innocent Lacrosse defendants, provide facts which make your case for you. You do not. Whenever someone suggests you do, you tell them to go ask John H. Tucker.
I am not going to follow anyone else's agenda. My agenda is to bring justice to Mike Nifong, Crystal Mangum, Shan Carter, and others deprived of it by the State.
Tucker, in his zeal to discredit and demonize me probably devoted a lot of energy into looking into my ancient background. Ergo, if anyone wants to delve into that nonsense, he would be a good reference.
I'm definitely not going to do homework to help someone try and come up with garbage about me. My time is too valuable to be wasting it like that.
HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!
UPDATE ON SHARLOG!!!
Just an update. The dialog has been written and narrated (had to re-narrate it a second time because the audio quality was poor on the initial).
The Flash format has been laid out.
Remaining: laying out the audio, putting together the exhibits, and then filling in the animation.
My energy has been somewhat sapped... I'm not able to work at all hours of the day and night like I used to. Anyway, the new estimated time of posting is realistically around the middle of next week.
As you were.
Oh,Sid --
You filed for bankruptcy in California -- That meets my definition of "going broke".
If you weren't "bounced" from California, why did you move?
You've filed at least 1 lawsuit in EVERY city you've lived in. That, my friend, is a trail.
In regards to your multiple lawsuits, you say "1 or 2" and John Tucker says "27". By my count (which doesn't include any documents you've attempted to file on behalf of someone else - i.e. Crystal Mangum), you've filed at least 14 different lawsuits. Doesn't that seem to be the least bit odd?
My question regarding these lawsuits are simple:
a) What purpose did these lawsuits serve?
b) Did you win ANY of them?
SIDNEY HARR:
"I'm not shy about them. So, what questions do you have about any of them?"
So you admit you spent a lot of post medical school time filing lawsuits rather than learning how to care for patients.
SIDNEY HARR:
"1991? That was 23 years ago. I really don't remember. Why don't you refresh my memory?"
It sounds like you don't want your memory jogged.
"Also, Donald Trump declared bankruptcy if I'm not mistaken."
Not personal bankruptcy according to this:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-filed-bankruptcy-times/story?id=13419250
Four of his companies have filed for bankruptcy. Donald Trump remains fabulously wealthy, something you have not
SIDNEY HARR:
"I am not going to follow anyone else's agenda. My agenda is to bring justice to Mike Nifong, Crystal Mangum, Shan Carter, and others deprived of it by the State.
No you are not. You are trying to get these people passes for their wrongdoing, in the cases of Shan Carter and Crystal Mangum, for Murder.
"Tucker, in his zeal to discredit and demonize me probably devoted a lot of energy into looking into my ancient background. Ergo, if anyone wants to delve into that nonsense, he would be a good reference."
Why did you not want anyone delving into your background, which confirms you are a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD appended to his name who spent a large part of his post medical school career filing and losing frivolous lawsuits. In other words spending a good part of your post medical school career trying to exploit the legal system to enrich yourself.
"I'm definitely not going to do homework to help someone try and come up with garbage about me. My time is too valuable to be wasting it like that."
Which is an admission you would like to keep your background covered up.
At this point it is obvious that everything in the Tucker article is true. There is likely additional, unflattering information about Sid that Tucker either did not discover, or chose not to reveal, that Sid does not want to discuss or disclose.
No wonder Sid is drawn to Mangum.
Anonymous said: "Correction:
Then why do the SIDNEY lovers and the KENHYDERAL lovers and the NIFONG lovers insist their boys not be prosecuted in the court of public opinion........ I still don't understand what you are getting at. Who are the Sidney, Ken and Mike lovers you refer to and what is it they are insisting doesn't happen?
SIDNEY HARR:
"HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!
UPDATE ON SHARLOG!!!"
SIDNEY's next attempt to convince the world that corrupt DA NIFONG who admitted on two occasions that he had no credible evidence that the people he wrongfully prosecuted ever committed any crime.
J"ust an update. The dialog has been written and narrated (had to re-narrate it a second time because the audio quality was poor on the initial).
The Flash format has been laid out.
Remaining: laying out the audio, putting together the exhibits, and then filling in the animation."
Then SIDNEY will dump more of his garbageinto the blogosphere.
"My energy has been somewhat sapped... I'm not able to work at all hours of the day and night like I used to. Anyway, the new estimated time of posting is realistically around the middle of next week."
Personally I believe you are under your bed curled up n a fetal position in shock because you have been confirmed as a minmally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD appended tohis name who devoted his post medical school career to filing and losing frivolous lawsuits.
KENHYDERAL:
"Then why do the SIDNEY lovers and the KENHYDERAL lovers and the NIFONG lovers insist their boys not be prosecuted in the court of public opinion........ I still don't understand what you are getting at."
You don't get anything.
"Who are the Sidney, Ken and Mike lovers you refer to and what is it they are insisting doesn't happen?"
So you admit that except for you and SIDNEY and corrupt DA NIFONG, no one ever believed Crystal ws raped.
On two separate occasions since the phony rape case imploded,DA NIFONG has admitted he had no credible evidence anyone raped Crystal.
Anonymous said: "So you admit that except for you and SIDNEY and corrupt DA NIFONG, no one ever believed Crystal ws raped"......I've made no such admission. You make all sorts of assumptions. I'm sure I'm not the only person here that has a hard time following your train of thought and when I seek clarity you question my intelligence and then quickly change the subject. Are you by chance the self described accomplished and greatly experienced Dr. Anonymous.
KENHYDERAL:
"Anonymous said: 'So you admit that except for you and SIDNEY and corrupt DA NIFONG, no one ever believed Crystal ws raped'......I've made no such admission."
Yes you have.
"You make all sorts of assumptions."
No I don't.
"I'm sure I'm not the only person here that has a hard time following your train of thought and"
Yes you are.
"when I seek clarity you question my intelligence"
What intelligence?
"and then quickly change the subject."
No I don't. You do to avoid answering.
"Are you by chance the self described accomplished and greatly experienced Dr. Anonymous."
What do you think? I am more experienced and more accomplished than minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD appended to his name SIDNEY HARR.
In matters medical I am more accomplished and more experienced than you. That is why you resent me so much.
KENHYDERAL:
You never learn, do you?
Dr. A said: "What do you think? I am more experienced and more accomplished than minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD appended to his name SIDNEY HARR"............But Dr. Harr is more clear sighted, more discerning and much more kind-hearted. In the great tradition of Dr. King he works to correct injustices. Like Dr. King he has to face people looking to dredge up things to try and discredit him. "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice". You don't have a J.Edgar Hoover Day
KENHYDERAL:
"But Dr. Harr is more clear sighted, more discerning and much more kind-hearted."
Condemning innocent men for a crime which never happened is not exactly discerning and kind-hearted.
"In the great tradition of Dr. King he works to correct injustices."
Trying to get felony murderer Shan Carter a pass for his crimes is not working to correct injustice. That you call something like this as correcting injustice shows you are incapable of discernment.
"Like Dr. King he has to face people looking to dredge up things to try and discredit him."
SIDNEY has discredited himself, by advocating against the innocent Lacrosse players, by advocating for a totally corrupt prosecutor, by advocating for passes for black people who commit felonies like murder. Mainly he has discredited himself by devoting most of his post mecical school career to trying to exploit the legal system for his personal enrichment.
"'The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice'".
Which means only that SIDNEY HARR is far off course from the arc of the moral universe. Your advocacy against innocent men and for a false accuser/convicted murderess shows how far off from the arc of the moral universe you are. You are totally deluded if you think anyone, except maybe SIDNEY and william cohan, thinks you have a moral compass.
"You don't have a J.Edgar Hoover Day".
And if you think either SIDNEY or you compare favorably to J. Edgar Hoover you are not capable of thinking.
KENHYDERAL:
Your last post was a really pitifully weak attempt to excuse why SIDNEY is a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD appended to his name rather than an accomplished, well trained, experienced physician.
KENHYDERAL:
If SIDNEY is so clear sighted why does he insist there is a carpetbagger jihad? When asked to prove the existence of said jihad he responds that people do not believe in the jihad because they have been affected by jedi mind tricks. He never explains how that could be since jedi mind tricks exist only in the fictional Star Wars universe.
That's not being clear sighted. That is being willfully deluded.
"In the great tradition of Dr. King he works to correct injustices."
Really? How many frivolous lawsuits did Dr. King file? How many child killers did Dr. King advocate for?
Comparing Sid to Dr. King is a tremendous insult to Dr. King and his legacy. You should be ashamed.
Anonymous said: "And if you think either SIDNEY or you compare favorably to J. Edgar Hoover you are not capable of thinking"........... Is that you Dr. A. ? Why am I not surprised that you think favorably of J. Edgar Hoover?
Dr. A. said: "Your last post was a really pitifully weak attempt to excuse why SIDNEY is a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD appended to his name rather than an accomplished, well trained, experienced physician"....... Like you I suppose. Arrogance is not a quality I would look for in a physician.
KENHYDErAL:
"Is that you Dr. A. ? Why am I not surprised that you think favorably of J. Edgar Hoover?"
In saying that either you could compare favorably to J. Edgar Hoover, I am hardly expressing admiration for Mr. Hoover. I am expressing even less admiration for you or SIDNEY.
Not very perceptive, are you.
KENHYDERAL:
"Arrogance is not a quality I would look for in a physician."
Well, in addition to being a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with n MD degree appended to his name, SIDNEY is one arrogant SOB, via his proclamations that Crystal would never go to trial if he had anything to say about it, via his statements he would prevail over the State Bar because of his brilliance, via his preposterous claims he advocates for the correction of injustice, e.g. trying to prove corrupt DA NIFONG was unfairly disbarred, his claims that murderers Shan Carter and Crystal Mangum should be given passes for their crimes.
You are not very perceptive about arrogance in a physician. Except SIDNEY is just a minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD degree and can not seriously be considered a competent physician. Which makes his arrogance even grosser and your lack of perception of it even more glaring.
If you had appendicitis, would you rather have SIDNEY try to remove your appendix or a trained, experienced surgeon whom you perceive as arrogant because you resent his qualifications?
Dr. A said: "In saying that either you could compare favorably to J. Edgar Hoover, I am hardly expressing admiration for Mr. Hoover. I am expressing even less admiration for you or SIDNEY".... Perhaps you would like to re-write this. This time with a little more care
KENHYDERAL:
This is a supreme manifestation of arrogance by SIDNEY HARR. SIDNEY may deny this but it did happen. He did publish on his blog that he could know what Christ was thinking on the Cross.
You know, the Man from Nazareth who once said that if someone causes a child to sin, then he should be cast into a body of water with a stone around his neck. SIDNEY says the death of Darius Greene was an unfortunate accident-the Darius Greene Shan Carter shot and killed while he was chasing Tyrone Baker for the purpose of gunning him down.
Dr. Anonymous said: "If you had appendicitis, would you rather have SIDNEY try to remove your appendix or a trained, experienced surgeon whom you perceive as arrogant because you resent his qualifications"..... I'd be more concerned about the qualification and experience of the anesthesiologist. I wouldn't want to be esophageally intubated. It probably wouldn't be the hole in my belly that would kill me.
KENHYDERAL:
"Perhaps you would like to re-write this. This time with a little more care."
Why? Because you are incapable of understanding? Not hardly.
If you notice the arc of the moral universe bending away from you, you are on the wrong side of justice. Kenny and Sid would do well to keep this in mind as the arc continues bending away from Mangum, Nifong and their ilk.
KENHYDERAL:
"I'd be more concerned about the qualification and experience of the anesthesiologist. I wouldn't want to be esophageally intubated. It probably wouldn't be the hole in my belly that would kill me."
Totally irrelevant answer.
Besides, an anesthetist could intubate you properly. But if SIDNEY were to operate on you, you would be dead before you had a chance to wake up.
You really have no perception, do you?
I'd be more concerned about the qualification and experience of the anesthesiologist. I wouldn't want to be esophageally intubated. It probably wouldn't be the hole in my belly that would kill me.
It wasn't an anesthesiologist who did that ...
Oh, and if Sid is so perfect (as both you and he proclaim) - why does he still refuse to admit that at least some of his attacks and proof about Crystal's attorneys being turncoats and traitors are completely wrong and off base, as has been discussed here repeatedly. Instead of admitting his mistake, Sid just keeps bringing up the same stuff he is demonstrably wrong on, and Kenny, Tinfoil hat, and others, continue to side with him.
KENHYDERAL:
You will probably notice I used Anesthitist instead of Anesthesiologist. The last time I had surgery, I had a nurse anesthetist. Some nurse anesthetists are better than anesthesiologists.
Dr. A said: "You know, the Man from Nazareth who once said that if someone causes a child to sin, then he should be cast into a body of water with a stone around his neck. SIDNEY says the death of Darius Greene was an unfortunate accident-the Darius Greene Shan Carter shot and killed while he was chasing Tyrone Baker for the purpose of gunning him down"............ It's nice to see that you are taking the words of the Lord to heart. Unfortunately you've misapplied His words to this situation. Carter did not cause Darius to sin he killed him by accident.
Demetrius Greene. Never forget it.
Oh yeah -- Intent follows the bullet, shithead.
Shan Carter killed Demetrius Greene, but it wasn't an accident.
KENHYDERAL:
"It's nice to see that you are taking the words of the Lord to heart. Unfortunately you've misapplied His words to this situation. Carter did not cause Darius to sin he killed him by accident."
SHAN CARTER did not kill Darius Greene by accident. He murdered Darius Greene when he chased down and murdered Tyrone Bakere with an illegally possessed firearm. So whether or not Shan Carter caused Darius Greene to sin is irrelevant and you are totally lacking in comprehension.
Try reading it again and try understanding whom I was saying was not following the words of the Lord. Here's a hint. It was not Shan Carter.
KENHYDERAL:
Here's another hint, written to compensate for your obvious lack of ability to think things through.
Did the Lord mean He particularly cared about children when He uttered those words?
Did SIDNEY HSRR show he particularly cared about children when he called the murder of Demetrius Greene by Shan Carter an unfortunate accident?
Dr.A. wrote: "Try reading it again and try understanding whom I was saying was not following the words of the Lord. Here's a hint. It was not Shan Carter"...... " but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea". Assuming Darius to be the little one in your comparison who was the one that led Darius to sin? It seems as usual, to use a baseball analogy, which you are fond of using, you're way off base.
Lance the Intern said...
Sid -- You mentioned being a fan of Daryl Hall....If you get a chance, check out his web show Live From Daryl's House.
Check the archives for the Fitz and the Tantrums and Sharon Jones (Dap-Kings) shows. Enjoy!
Hey, Lance.
Thanks for the reference to Daryl Hall. Definitely "I can go for that." I signed up for the updates, and I might even put a link on my blog site for it.
Really appreciate your thoughtfulness.
KENHYDERAL:
"Dr.A. wrote: "Try reading it again and try understanding whom I was saying was not following the words of the Lord. Here's a hint. It was not Shan Carter"...... " but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea". Assuming Darius to be the little one in your comparison who was the one that led Darius to sin? It seems as usual, to use a baseball analogy, which you are fond of using, you're way off base."
KENHYDERAL again shows he is completely incapable of understandig. So what else is new.
KENHYDERAL:
Let's see if you can get it on a second attempt, although I admit I am not optimistic about you.
When Jesus Christ spoke about those who cause children to sin, did HE or did HE not show His concern for children?
When SIDNEY HARR dismissed the murder of Demetrius Greene as an unfortunate accident, was he or was he not showing Christ like concern for children?
He was not!!!
Don't you think it was a bit arrogant for SIDNEY to claim he is a follower of Jesus Christ and yet show such un Christ like behavior?
Anyone looking for Kilgo and the mystery witness should visit Lumberton.
Dr. A. said: "Let's see if you can get it on a second attempt, although I admit I am not optimistic about you"....... So Dr. A. , tell us, since you've said it's not Carter, do you think it would be appropriate if Dr. Harr was thrown into sea with a mill-stone tied around his neck for believing that Carter killed Darius, accidentally or even maliciously. I think it's you who doesn't get the message that The Lord has imparted here.
Anonymous said: "Anyone looking for Kilgo and the mystery witness should visit Lumberton"....... I think that would be following up a dead-end lead but, hey, if you do go there on the search you might just as well look up Malik and let him know he can expect a surprise visit one day. That way the trip wouldn't be a total waste.
KENHYDERAL:
"So Dr. A. , tell us, since you've said it's not Carter, do you think it would be appropriate if Dr. Harr was thrown into sea with a mill-stone tied around his neck for believing that Carter killed Darius, accidentally or even maliciously. I think it's you who doesn't get the message that The Lord has imparted here."
My lci of optimism in you was not displaced. That is not what I said.
Your lack of comprehension is truly extraordinarily pitiful.
KENHYERAL:
"I think"
That presumes you can think and you have shown you can't.
"that would be following up a dead-end lead but, hey, if you do go there on the search you might just as well look up Malik and let him know he can expect a surprise visit one day. That way the trip wouldn't be a total waste."
To show you can't think, you still think your quest for mystery guests, mystery rapists has not been a waste of time these past 8 years.
I remind you, you have no credible factual evidence to present that Kilgo actually did say to you he has a friend who was at the Lacrosse party.
Dr. Harr,
Are you aware that kenhyderal is using your blog to make threats against other posters?
Threats of what?
Dr. Anonymous said: "My lci of optimism in you was not displaced. That is not what I said".....Let's consider for a moment how disjointed your thought process is. We all know what you said Quote. "You know, the Man from Nazareth who once said that if someone causes a child to sin, then he should be cast into a body of water with a stone around his neck. SIDNEY says the death of Darius Greene was an unfortunate accident-the Darius Greene Shan Carter shot and killed while he was chasing Tyrone Baker for the purpose of gunning him down" You also said that it wasn't Shan Carter who "caused a child to sin" . That only leaves Dr. Harr or Tyrone Baker. You've intimated that it was Dr.Harr. Keep in mind Darius is unfortunately deceased and Carter and Baker are by no means innocent children. But anyway keep on reading "The Good Book". There are many pronouncements of The Lord you would do well to adopt. A good start for you would be "The Beatitudes"
KENHYDERAL:
"Let's consider for a moment how disjointed your thought process is."
It isn't. Yous is.
"We all know what you said Quote. 'You know, the Man from Nazareth who once said that if someone causes a child to sin, then he should be cast into a body of water with a stone around his neck. SIDNEY says the death of Darius Greene was an unfortunate accident-the Darius Greene Shan Carter shot and killed while he was chasing Tyrone Baker for the purpose of gunning him down""
Well, you do know how to copy and paste. I'll give you that much.
You also said that it wasn't Shan Carter who "caused a child to sin" . That only leaves Dr. Harr or Tyrone Baker. You've intimated that it was Dr.Harr."
I did not say anyone caused a child to sin. I said compared to Jesus Christ's compassion and concern for children, SIDNEY's is sorely lacking.
"Keep in mind Darius is unfortunately deceased and Carter and Baker are by no means innocent children."
What Shan Carter did, which you don't seem to notice is that Shan Carter shot and killed Demetrius Greene(I mistakenly called him Darius) while he was chasing down and shooting at a man who was fleeing.
"But anyway keep on reading "The Good Book". There are many pronouncements of The Lord you would do well to adopt. A good start for you would be 'The Beatitudes'"
One passage you and SIDNEY should take to heart is Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor. Who is your neighbor? Read the parable of the Good Samaritan.
Claiming on a public blog that someone raped Crystal is not consistent with Thou shalt not bear false witness. Since Crystal was not raped, you are, in effect, bearing false witness against your neighbors.
I say again, you are seriously lacking in comprehension. I am not optimistic that your situation is curable.
KENHYDERAL:
"Threats of what?"
You have been making threats against people whom you believe raped Crystal.
Since no one raped Crystal, you ARE bearing false witness.
You are also, like corrupt DA NIFONG before you, attempting to suborn perjury.
Corrupt DA NIFONG threatened to arrest and charge with aiding and abetting anyone who did not come forth with testimony which incriminated those he wanted to prosecute. Since those whom he wanted to prosecute were innocent(there was no crime of which they could have been guilty) corrupt DA NIFONG was attempting to force people to give perjured testimony.
I bet you will be unable to comprehend this. Your comprehension skills are non existent, as you have proven in your posts these past two days.
5400Dr. Anonymous said: "You have been making threats against people whom you believe raped Crystal"..... I didn't realize any of them were posters on this blog. Dr. Anonymous also said: "I did not say anyone caused a child to sin. I said compared to Jesus Christ's compassion and concern for children, SIDNEY's is sorely lacking" Not to begin with, you didn't. You only said that after it was pointed out to you that the quote didn't seem to fit. Realizing it, you modified things to make it seem so. I was talking about what you said at the time not what you went on to say or what you claim you meant.
kenny is Sid's sock puppet.
KENHYDERAL:
"Dr. Anonymous said: "You have been making threats against people whom you believe raped Crystal"..... I didn't realize any of them were posters on this blog."
There are a lot of things you do not realize such as what I actually say.
Posters or not you were issuing threats against people. You believed, wrongly, that those people had committed crimes. And you were doing it in a way that amounted to attempted subornation of perjury. And you think you were an advocate of justice.
"Dr. Anonymous also said: "I did not say anyone caused a child to sin. I said compared to Jesus Christ's compassion and concern for children, SIDNEY's is sorely lacking' Not to begin with, you didn't."
Yes to begin with I did.
"You only said that after it was pointed out to you that the quote didn't seem to fit. Realizing it, you modified things to make it seem so."
No I didn't.
"I was talking about what you said at the time not what you went on to say or what you claim you meant."
Someone as incapable as you is not capable of knowing what someone like me is saying, someone who is far more knowledgeable and accomplished than you are.
KENHYDERAL:
"I was talking about what you said at the time not what you went on to say or what you claim you meant."
Point out specifically when I ever said that Shan Carter, Tyrone Baker or SIDNEY HARR had caused Demetrius Greene to sin.
Here - you were saying ... (what?):
"KENHYDERAL:
This is a supreme manifestation of arrogance by SIDNEY HARR. SIDNEY may deny this but it did happen. He did publish on his blog that he could know what Christ was thinking on the Cross.
You know, the Man from Nazareth who once said that if someone causes a child to sin, then he should be cast into a body of water with a stone around his neck. SIDNEY says the death of Darius Greene was an unfortunate accident-the Darius Greene Shan Carter shot and killed while he was chasing Tyrone Baker for the purpose of gunning him down.
July 18, 2014 at 9:52 AM"
KENHYDERAL:
When did I specifically say, SIDNEY HARR caused Demetrius Greene to sin?
When did I specifically say, Shan Carter caused Demetrius Greene to sin?
When did I specifically say, Tyrone Baker caused Demetrius Greene to sin?
ah ... you were just sermonizing with no real context or meaning
got it
watch it evil duke troll - you're setting yourself up for a dip with a rock tied round your neck per your sermon - hope you know how to swim - and that you haven't just pissed off some kid with your abusive, racist, sexist, hateful, mean and cruel comment that Dr. Harr will probably eventually delete to try to save that kid and any others from any sin that may be caused by his/her anger and confusion caused by YOU.
You should apologize immediately, but not sure if God will forgive you. Maybe you should pray too for forgiveness and stop doing it like you've been asked many times on this blog to do.
Dr. Anonymous and his pathetic efforts to convince us all that he did not misapply the Biblical quotation to the Shan Carter case and to Dr. Harr's advocacy on Carter's behalf is just not cutting it. I ask the readers to read his words from right from the start and then his back-tracking, after he was called out on it and then decide for themselves.
Dr. Anonymous said: " Read the parable of the Good Samaritan:..... I have and I try my best to heed it's lesson. I hope and pray that all Americans take this parable to heart in dealing with the women and children from Central America who are in desperate need, who are presenting themselves at the US border.
God does not exist.
KC Johnson declares "mission accomplished" Durham in Wonderland throws in the towel but not before saying, with Bush like bravado, that the Cohan book has now been consigned to the “ash heap of history” so it therefore seems to him "an appropriate time to bring his blog to a close". The effort to get justice for Crystal goes on and it's DIW that is now "history" Don' despair Guiowen.
oops sticky "t" in don't
KENHYDERAL:
"
"Dr. Anonymous and his pathetic efforts to convince us all that he did not misapply the Biblical quotation to the Shan Carter case and to Dr. Harr's advocacy on Carter's behalf is just not cutting it. I ask the readers to read his words from right from the start and then his back-tracking, after he was called out on it and then decide for themselves."
KENHYDERAL dodges the question because he can not answer it. That is typical behavior for him.
I notice he does not take my explanation for what I wrote but asks others what I wrote. More indication that he knows he is wrong and is afraid to admit it.
What can one expect from someone who likes to make impotent empty threats? Not much.
KENHYDERAL:
"Dr. Anonymous said: " Read the parable of the Good Samaritan:..... I have and I try my best to heed it's lesson."
You do not when you aid and abet people like Crystal and DA NIFONG who bear false witness against people who are your and their neighbors.
"I hope and pray that all Americans take this parable to heart in dealing with the women and children from Central America who are in desperate need, who are presenting themselves at the US border."
So do I
KENHYDERAL:
"KC Johnson declares "mission accomplished" Durham in Wonderland throws in the towel but not before saying, with Bush like bravado, that the Cohan book has now been consigned to the “ash heap of history” so it therefore seems to him "an appropriate time to bring his blog to a close".
The piece of trash authored by investigative journalist william cohan has never gotten out of the ash heap of history.
"The effort to get justice for Crystal goes on"
Crystal got justice when she was convicted of murder. Efforts to camouflage this are injustice, as is your impotent empty threats to have innocent men prosecuted for the non existent rape she falsely alleges happened.
"and it's DIW that is now "history"
Yeah, just like memorable events like Rosa Parks, the martyrdom of Viola Liuzzo, the liberation of Europe from the Nazis in ZWWII, the landing on the Moon. KC Johnson is in good company, company you and SIDNEY will never approach.
"Don' despair Guiowen."
You are too stupid to despair, even when you can not provide any factual evidence of the crime you allege was inflicted on Crystal.
KENHYDERAL:
From your ranting and raving and dodging over my posts on Jesus Christ and how unlike Him sidney is, we have a clue as to why you believe there were witnesses to the non existent sexual assault on Crystal.
If Kilgo said anything to you, it was probably, if there was an assault there would have been at least one witness.
Which you believe to be Kilgo saying there was a witness.
Way to go, kenny.
Correction:
I should have said:
The piece of trash authored by investigative journalist NOT william cohan has never gotten out of the ash heap of history.
kenhyderal, stop being disingenuous. You have threatened to harm Malek Williams.
KENHYDERAL:
"I ask the readers to read his words from right from the start and then his back-tracking, after he was called out on it and then decide for themselves."
You ask the readers to decide the meaning of what I wrote. De facto that means you do not know. Since you de facto admit you do not know wht I wrote, you are in no position to say I backtracked.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Dr. Harr,
Are you aware that kenhyderal is using your blog to make threats against other posters?
I don't think that kenhyderal would make threats against anyone... including other posters. He's not that kind of person. Why don't you be more specific about what post you find to be questionable?
SIDNEY HARR:
"I don't think that kenhyderal would make threats against anyone... including other posters. He's not that kind of person."
You don't know KENHYDERAL.
"Why don't you be more specific about what post you find to be questionable?"
On at least two occasions, KENHYDAL has issued threats that the perpetrators of the sexual assault will be nrought to justice. As there sas no sexual assault against Crystal, there were not perpetrators. So KENHYDERAL has been threatening innocent people with wrongful prosecution.
Not that impotent empty threats are as threatening as a gun in the hand of a drug dealer who is chasing and shooting at another drug dealer who is fleeing.
Sorry, Kenny --
KC Johnson has set the standard for those who attempt to follow, Sid included.
In that sense, KC and DIW will never be "history".
DIW is considered an authoritative source on Wikipedia. Can you say the same for this pathetic blog site?
Kenhyderal said
"Don' despair Guiowen."
Don 't worry, Kenny. I don't need KC Johnson's help to point out your inadequacies.
Nifong Supporter said...
"I don't think that kenhyderal would make threats against anyone... including other posters. He's not that kind of person. Why don't you be more specific about what post you find to be questionable?"
Dr. Harr,
These posts are nothing but thinly veiled threats to harm Malek Williams. Also, kenhyderal is obviously taunting Malek by misspelling his name.
kenhyderal said...
So Malek, you think I'm a coward? Tell me, do you live in Lumberton? Can I or one of my friends pay you a visit. There is this little matter of plagiarism I'd like to take up with you.
June 29, 2014 at 3:00 PM
kenhyderal said...
Anonymous said: "Anyone looking for Kilgo and the mystery witness should visit Lumberton"....... I think that would be following up a dead-end lead but, hey, if you do go there on the search you might just as well look up Malik and let him know he can expect a surprise visit one day. That way the trip wouldn't be a total waste.
July 19, 2014 at 9:15 AM
To the 5:48,
I agree it sounds like a threat, and Kenny has told us on several occasions that he's a fighter. I think however he's just a blowhard.
Guiowen said: "Kenny has told us on several occasions that he's a fighter. I think however he's just a blowhard"............... You do, do you? Seriously though, I do not take kindly to Malek Williams re-posting my posts under his name. I've asked Dr. Harr to put a stop to it but to no avail. When I challenged Williams and admonished him to desist he called me a coward. This person claiming to be a classmate of Crystal and one of her supporters is a fraud and is only making mischief here. This is hurting Crystal's cause and making me very angry. I am not a violent person but I don't tolerate abuse and disrespect to myself and my friends very well.
KENHYDERAL:
"Guiowen said: "Kenny has told us on several occasions that he's a fighter. I think however he's just a blowhard"............... You do, do you? Seriously though, I do not take kindly to Malek Williams re-posting my posts under his name. I've asked Dr. Harr(the minimally trained, minimally experienced person with an MD appended to his name) to put a stop to it but to no avail. When I challenged Williams and admonished him to desist he called me a coward. This person claiming to be a classmate of Crystal and one of her supporters is a fraud and is only making mischief here. This is hurting Crystal's cause and making me very angry."
Crystal's cause, which is your cause and SIDNEY's cause is convicting innocent men of a crime which never happened, a crime she lied about happening, and getting herself a pass for her crimes. That is not mischief???!!!
"I am not a violent person but I don't tolerate abuse and disrespect to myself and my friends very well."
But you do tolerate abuse n disrespect of the legal process, i.e. the prosecution and conviction of innocent men for a crime which never happened.
What you call disrespect to yourself and your friends is outrage over the injustice you advocate. Had you a true sense of what is right and what is wrong, what you misidentify as disrespect would not be an issue.
Guiowen wrote: "I think however he's [kenhyderal] just a blowhard."
DING-DING-DING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE HAVE A WINNER!
Walt-in-Durham
For those who actually care about and enjoy reading intelligent truthful ...well written....information about the Duke non-case and related.......KC's final post on DIW is available. It's wonderful! Check it out, folks......
Anonymous said...
No white man would ever want to have sex with Crystal Mangum much less go to all the trouble of raping her in a bathroom that was too small.The only place white men would ever have sex with her was in her imagination.
That kind of racist bull$hit has no place on this blog (or anywhere). Mangum was making a good living as an "escort," and I'm sure she had white clients.
The main rationale for the KC Johnson's blog was his jealous and obsessive vendetta against Duke President Richard Broadhead. He saw an opportunity to discredit Broadhead by joining in with the Duke Lacrosse supporters and supporting their greedy lawsuit against Duke. He failed. I say about his blog, "good riddance to bad rubbish".
@ A LAWYER....I've consistently asked Dr. Harr to censor this jerk's repetitive posts. He started to but he misses many time. He needs to be more vigilant in this regard. And to you I say Crystal when she worked as an escort did not engage in prostitution.
Walt said: "DING-DING-DING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE HAVE A WINNER".................. Blowhards are bluffers, Walt. Time will tell if I am bluffing. If Williams calls me on this he may be in for a big surprise.
Sidney,
I'm afraid this really is a threat. You own this blog; you'll know what to do.
KENHYDERAL:
"The main rationale for the KC Johnson's blog was his jealous and obsessive vendetta against Duke President Richard Broadhead."
No it wasn't.
"He saw an opportunity to discredit Broadhead by joining in with the Duke Lacrosse supporters and supporting their greedy lawsuit against Duke."
Brodhead, like Crystal befre him, discredited himself. I remind you Duke paid off the Lacrosse players rather than defend against them which was de facto admission of wrongdoing.
"He failed."
How?
"I say about his blog, "good riddance to bad rubbish'".
You who advocate for a pass for a convicted murderess who falsely accused three innocent men of raping her, do you really think you can identify trash?
HAH!!!!
KENHYDERAL:
"@ A LAWYER....I've consistently asked Dr. Harr to censor this jerk's repetitive posts.
You mean SIDNEY HARR, the minimally trained, minimally deluded arrogant person with an MD appended to his name.
"He started to but he misses many time. He needs to be more vigilant in this regard."
That would say, rather, that SIDNEY does not put a great deal of importance on what you want.
"And to you I say Crystal when she worked as an escort did not engage in prostitution."
You are wrong. She was a prostitute, which explains why she had DNA from multiple men on her person when she was examined for the rape which never happened.
KENHYDERAL:
"Walt said: "DING-DING-DING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE HAVE A WINNER".................. Blowhards are bluffers, Walt. Time will tell if I am bluffing."
Time has already told you are bluffing, over 8 years worth of time.
"If Williams calls me on this he may be in for a big surprise."
Yeah. You will try to stone him to death with popcorn from a range of 50 yards rather than 100 yards.
KENHYDERAL:
"So Malek, you think I'm a coward? Tell me, do you live in Lumberton? Can I or one of my friends pay you a visit."
What makes you think you have any friends?
Guiowen said: "I'm afraid this really is a threat" .... Threat of what?
Anonymous said: "You are wrong. She was a prostitute"..... Is that you Dr. Anonymous? Readers please note that only cowardly anonymous posters make this slanderous accusation.
Post a Comment