Crystal Mangum's Motions Hearing on Her Malicious Prosecution Complaint
30 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Sid, since you don't go back to other posts, I will post the comment here:
You say YOU don't think the Walker affidavit will help. But, every lawyer and everyone with legal knowledge has told you that without it the Court will deny the MAR, with it, they would at least order a review.
Again, you clearly don't care to help. You have been proven wrong on everything you believe, and everyone else has been proven right. You have something they say would help, so you choose to ignore it. Proof you aren't interested in helping.
A shar-video, like a sharlog, is produced by a Flash... however, unlike a sharlog, a shar-video is not interactive. In other words, there are no buttons to provide options to view documents, exhibits, or make other viewing decisions. Like a video, the shar-video progresses through to the end without stopping. The shar-video differs from a video mainly by the process by which it is produced... that is by use of the Flash program rather than a video-camera.
The decision to utilize the shar-video rather than sharlog is because I believe there is potentially more exposure by having it uploaded to YouTube. The shar-video, can be readily adapted to be converted into an interactive sharlog with the addition of buttons and files... with the overall content essentially unchanged. However, to do so is time and energy intensive, so such a process will not be frequently undertaken.
What is uploaded now is, for all intents and purposes, a sharlog without buttons.
The shar-video, however, must now be processed through a program to convert the flash file to a video file that can be uploaded to YouTube.
Anonymous Anonymous said... What is the shar-video about?
September 9, 2018 at 4:28 AM
This shar-video, as you will find out shortly, is not only about the Motions Hearing, but about how it was covered in the media, and about the increasing support for Crystal Mangum by individuals who learn the truths about her unjust prosecution and conviction.
I've tried the shar-video twice and had no trouble accessing the documentary. If you continue to have problems with the blog site version, I will have the YouTube loaded later this afternoon or early evening.
Also, if kenhyderal wishes me to act as an intermediary, that'll work with me.
guiowen said... Sorry, Sidney, but I can't open the sharvideo.
September 10, 2018 at 6:20 AM
gui, mon ami,
Sorry about that. As a matter of fact, I was unable to load the video because there's a restriction on the length, supposedly that prevented me from posting my shar-video... although other YouTube postings of Mangum's trial have lasted much longer.
Anyway, I am dividing the video into three parts of about fifteen minutes each, and will upload them hopefully by the end of the day.
You might try a DIRECT LINK and see if that works. Let me know if it does.
Anonymous Anonymous said... Sid, since you don't go back to other posts, I will post the comment here:
You say YOU don't think the Walker affidavit will help. But, every lawyer and everyone with legal knowledge has told you that without it the Court will deny the MAR, with it, they would at least order a review.
Again, you clearly don't care to help. You have been proven wrong on everything you believe, and everyone else has been proven right. You have something they say would help, so you choose to ignore it. Proof you aren't interested in helping.
September 9, 2018 at 9:08 AM
Hey, Anony.
Right now am concentrating on getting the shar-video on YouTube and in a format which is accessible to all. Getting an affidavit from Milton Walker is not on the front burner at this time.
Of course the affidavit is not on the front burner, because it's the one thing that could actually help, and it needs to be done before the MAR is ruled upon. You want to delay so the MAR is denied (which it will be, especially without that affidavit), and you can go back to just pretending to help, and blaming the system for your failures, instead of your true lack of willingness to help.
You like having Crystal captive, clearly, that way you can see her whenever you want and don't have to worry about where she goes.
What is Crystal going to do now that the judge ruled that she cannot file new actions against the DPD and the Durham district attorney without first getting court approval and the state bar is looking into your actions and may decide that you've violated your permanent injunction? I can't remember all of the details, but I seem to recall jail time for contempt and a $25,000 fine.
CBS17 kept referring to Sid as Sidney Hair.... https://www.cbs17.com/news/local-news/durham-county-news/duke-lacrosse-accuser-who-killed-her-boyfriend-has-lawsuit-dismissed/1373729273
Anonymous Anonymous said... CBS17 kept referring to Sid as Sidney Hair.... https://www.cbs17.com/news/local-news/durham-county-news/duke-lacrosse-accuser-who-killed-her-boyfriend-has-lawsuit-dismissed/1373729273
September 11, 2018 at 4:21 PM
I guess that goes to prove that I'm not as much a "public figure" as WRAL-5 News would paint me to be... another newscast can't properly pronounce my name. If anyone has visited my site with any regularity, the way I pronounce my name would be known as I mention it in third person all the time.
Anonymous said... What is Crystal going to do now that the judge ruled that she cannot file new actions against the DPD and the Durham district attorney without first getting court approval and the state bar is looking into your actions and may decide that you've violated your permanent injunction? I can't remember all of the details, but I seem to recall jail time for contempt and a $25,000 fine.
September 11, 2018 at 4:17 PM
The judge's Gatekeeper Ruling was unwarranted and has no bearing on her case that I can determine at present. The lawsuit she filed against Bond and the Durham D.A.'s Office is being appealed. The purpose of the judge's ruling on the Gatekeeper was specifically to protect Bond and the D.A.'s office from refiling of the complaint because the judge is aware of the liability of the defendants. Judge Thompson and the defendants are counting on the NC Court of Appeals to disregard the merits of Mangum's case and position and to automatically rule against her.
Keep in mind that Officer Bond committed a Class F felony with her perjury and Class H felony with her witness tampering. Governor Cooper, his appointee Judge Thompson, the media, and everybody else wants to protect Officer Bond... not prosecute her. They all want to prosecute Mangum who is innocent and black.
kenhyderal said... Thanks, Dr. Harr, for including a couple of my posts in your Shar-log.
September 11, 2018 at 2:55 PM
Hey, kenhyderal.
It is I who am indebted to you for your many wonderful comments throughout the years. You have clearly and concisely expressed the underlying truths about the egregious injustice to Crystal Mangum and the problems with the justice system in this country. Your comments make the shar-video and this blog site all the better. Thanks, again.
Anonymous Anonymous said... BTW, Sidney, as a reader of this blog, I hope you come through Florence OK, even if I do disagree with you about the Duke Lacrosse case...
September 10, 2018 at 6:08 PM
Hey, Anony.
Thanks for your words of kindness and concern. I really appreciate them. Though quite a bit inland, Raleigh is in the cross-hairs of the monster. I'm not in a flood prone area, and plan on staying inside during the worst. Don't need to dodge falling trees and flying debris.
Anonymous guiowen said... Sidney, What's going on? You tell us that Milton's telephone call is very powerful evidence, but then do nothing about getting him to testify.
September 10, 2018 at 12:03 PM
gui, mon ami, what was most urgent, in my opinion, was to have the recording of the Walker phone call preserved and set aside for review for the MAR. The Secretary of the Department of Public Safety was also notified about the recording... but have heard nothing from the courts or DPS since alerting them about it many months ago.
Right now, I have other things on which to focus... including my upcoming hearing in my libel lawsuit against WRAL.
HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP! IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!
kenhyderal made a suggestion that all comments be posted on this full length comment rather than on the other thirds shar-video. Well, when I receive comments, I merely press for them to be published. I don't believe that I have any say where they are posted... I believe they are all posted automatically at the most recent entry.
I am able to post on this full entry by going directly to its comment section. However, as I said, I think that all comments I receive, irrespective of which entry comment section you make your comment, will automatically post to the latest (or uppermost) entry comment.
I'm thinking that in the future I may not post shar-videos in the video version.
Thanks for bringing attention to that issue. I had thought about it briefly, too.
Have been busy working on my WRAL-5 lawsuit. A motions hearing is less than two weeks away.
I'm a senior citizen who believes that the state of North Carolina has harshly, excessively, and unjustly treated former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong.
30 comments:
Sid, since you don't go back to other posts, I will post the comment here:
You say YOU don't think the Walker affidavit will help. But, every lawyer and everyone with legal knowledge has told you that without it the Court will deny the MAR, with it, they would at least order a review.
Again, you clearly don't care to help. You have been proven wrong on everything you believe, and everyone else has been proven right. You have something they say would help, so you choose to ignore it. Proof you aren't interested in helping.
Anonymous Doogie Howser said...
Dr. Harr,
What is a shar-video?
September 9, 2018 at 7:08 AM
Hey, Doogie.
A shar-video, like a sharlog, is produced by a Flash... however, unlike a sharlog, a shar-video is not interactive. In other words, there are no buttons to provide options to view documents, exhibits, or make other viewing decisions. Like a video, the shar-video progresses through to the end without stopping. The shar-video differs from a video mainly by the process by which it is produced... that is by use of the Flash program rather than a video-camera.
The decision to utilize the shar-video rather than sharlog is because I believe there is potentially more exposure by having it uploaded to YouTube. The shar-video, can be readily adapted to be converted into an interactive sharlog with the addition of buttons and files... with the overall content essentially unchanged. However, to do so is time and energy intensive, so such a process will not be frequently undertaken.
What is uploaded now is, for all intents and purposes, a sharlog without buttons.
The shar-video, however, must now be processed through a program to convert the flash file to a video file that can be uploaded to YouTube.
I will put it on YouTube later today.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
What is the shar-video about?
September 9, 2018 at 4:28 AM
This shar-video, as you will find out shortly, is not only about the Motions Hearing, but about how it was covered in the media, and about the increasing support for Crystal Mangum by individuals who learn the truths about her unjust prosecution and conviction.
Doogie Howser said...
Dr. Harr,
Can you help me get in touch with kenhyderal?
September 9, 2018 at 7:42 AM
Doogie, I would suggest that you leave him a comment on this site. I am sure that he will read it, and appropriately respond.
Dr. Harr,
The shar-video does not run.
Anonymous Doogie Howser said...
Dr. Harr,
The shar-video does not run.
September 9, 2018 at 9:30 AM
Hey, Doogie.
I've tried the shar-video twice and had no trouble accessing the documentary. If you continue to have problems with the blog site version, I will have the YouTube loaded later this afternoon or early evening.
Also, if kenhyderal wishes me to act as an intermediary, that'll work with me.
Sorry, Sidney, but I can't open the sharvideo.
guiowen said...
Sorry, Sidney, but I can't open the sharvideo.
September 10, 2018 at 6:20 AM
gui, mon ami,
Sorry about that. As a matter of fact, I was unable to load the video because there's a restriction on the length, supposedly that prevented me from posting my shar-video... although other YouTube postings of Mangum's trial have lasted much longer.
Anyway, I am dividing the video into three parts of about fifteen minutes each, and will upload them hopefully by the end of the day.
You might try a DIRECT LINK and see if that works. Let me know if it does.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid, since you don't go back to other posts, I will post the comment here:
You say YOU don't think the Walker affidavit will help. But, every lawyer and everyone with legal knowledge has told you that without it the Court will deny the MAR, with it, they would at least order a review.
Again, you clearly don't care to help. You have been proven wrong on everything you believe, and everyone else has been proven right. You have something they say would help, so you choose to ignore it. Proof you aren't interested in helping.
September 9, 2018 at 9:08 AM
Hey, Anony.
Right now am concentrating on getting the shar-video on YouTube and in a format which is accessible to all. Getting an affidavit from Milton Walker is not on the front burner at this time.
Of course the affidavit is not on the front burner, because it's the one thing that could actually help, and it needs to be done before the MAR is ruled upon. You want to delay so the MAR is denied (which it will be, especially without that affidavit), and you can go back to just pretending to help, and blaming the system for your failures, instead of your true lack of willingness to help.
You like having Crystal captive, clearly, that way you can see her whenever you want and don't have to worry about where she goes.
Sidney,
What's going on? You tell us that Milton's telephone call is very powerful evidence, but then do nothing about getting him to testify.
48 minute video? Who's got time for that?
BTW, Sidney, as a reader of this blog, I hope you come through Florence OK, even if I do disagree with you about the Duke Lacrosse case...
Right on kenhyderal.
Thanks, Dr. Harr, for including a couple of my posts in your Shar-log.
What is Crystal going to do now that the judge ruled that she cannot file new actions against the DPD and the Durham district attorney without first getting court approval and the state bar is looking into your actions and may decide that you've violated your permanent injunction?
I can't remember all of the details, but I seem to recall jail time for contempt and a $25,000 fine.
CBS17 kept referring to Sid as Sidney Hair....
https://www.cbs17.com/news/local-news/durham-county-news/duke-lacrosse-accuser-who-killed-her-boyfriend-has-lawsuit-dismissed/1373729273
Anonymous Anonymous said...
CBS17 kept referring to Sid as Sidney Hair....
https://www.cbs17.com/news/local-news/durham-county-news/duke-lacrosse-accuser-who-killed-her-boyfriend-has-lawsuit-dismissed/1373729273
September 11, 2018 at 4:21 PM
I guess that goes to prove that I'm not as much a "public figure" as WRAL-5 News would paint me to be... another newscast can't properly pronounce my name. If anyone has visited my site with any regularity, the way I pronounce my name would be known as I mention it in third person all the time.
Anonymous said...
What is Crystal going to do now that the judge ruled that she cannot file new actions against the DPD and the Durham district attorney without first getting court approval and the state bar is looking into your actions and may decide that you've violated your permanent injunction?
I can't remember all of the details, but I seem to recall jail time for contempt and a $25,000 fine.
September 11, 2018 at 4:17 PM
The judge's Gatekeeper Ruling was unwarranted and has no bearing on her case that I can determine at present. The lawsuit she filed against Bond and the Durham D.A.'s Office is being appealed. The purpose of the judge's ruling on the Gatekeeper was specifically to protect Bond and the D.A.'s office from refiling of the complaint because the judge is aware of the liability of the defendants. Judge Thompson and the defendants are counting on the NC Court of Appeals to disregard the merits of Mangum's case and position and to automatically rule against her.
Keep in mind that Officer Bond committed a Class F felony with her perjury and Class H felony with her witness tampering. Governor Cooper, his appointee Judge Thompson, the media, and everybody else wants to protect Officer Bond... not prosecute her. They all want to prosecute Mangum who is innocent and black.
kenhyderal said...
Thanks, Dr. Harr, for including a couple of my posts in your Shar-log.
September 11, 2018 at 2:55 PM
Hey, kenhyderal.
It is I who am indebted to you for your many wonderful comments throughout the years. You have clearly and concisely expressed the underlying truths about the egregious injustice to Crystal Mangum and the problems with the justice system in this country. Your comments make the shar-video and this blog site all the better. Thanks, again.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
BTW, Sidney, as a reader of this blog, I hope you come through Florence OK, even if I do disagree with you about the Duke Lacrosse case...
September 10, 2018 at 6:08 PM
Hey, Anony.
Thanks for your words of kindness and concern. I really appreciate them. Though quite a bit inland, Raleigh is in the cross-hairs of the monster. I'm not in a flood prone area, and plan on staying inside during the worst. Don't need to dodge falling trees and flying debris.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
48 minute video? Who's got time for that?
September 10, 2018 at 1:58 PM
I am working on dividing the shar-video into three parts. They should all be ready for posting to YouTube before the weekend.
Actually, Crystal Mangum's Hearing lasted about 46 minutes on YouTube.
Anonymous guiowen said...
Sidney,
What's going on? You tell us that Milton's telephone call is very powerful evidence, but then do nothing about getting him to testify.
September 10, 2018 at 12:03 PM
gui, mon ami, what was most urgent, in my opinion, was to have the recording of the Walker phone call preserved and set aside for review for the MAR. The Secretary of the Department of Public Safety was also notified about the recording... but have heard nothing from the courts or DPS since alerting them about it many months ago.
Right now, I have other things on which to focus... including my upcoming hearing in my libel lawsuit against WRAL.
Dr. Harr,
Feel free to include one or more of my posts in your next shar-video.
You should tell Crystal you have more important things to do than getting an affidavit for Milton...
What hearing is upcoming in the WRAL libel suit? You refile that suit, so they refiled the motion to dismiss?
You are going to lose that hearing as well.
For as many lawsuits as you've filed or been a part of, have you ever won so much as a single hearing?
@ Dr. Howser 4:36, 9-12-18: If you were to say something cogent, for a change, he probably will
Good old Kenhyderal! He always says something cogent!
Re: Guiowen @ 1:38: He needed to label that S.I.
HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!
kenhyderal made a suggestion that all comments be posted on this full length comment rather than on the other thirds shar-video. Well, when I receive comments, I merely press for them to be published. I don't believe that I have any say where they are posted... I believe they are all posted automatically at the most recent entry.
I am able to post on this full entry by going directly to its comment section. However, as I said, I think that all comments I receive, irrespective of which entry comment section you make your comment, will automatically post to the latest (or uppermost) entry comment.
I'm thinking that in the future I may not post shar-videos in the video version.
Thanks for bringing attention to that issue. I had thought about it briefly, too.
Have been busy working on my WRAL-5 lawsuit. A motions hearing is less than two weeks away.
As you were.
Post a Comment