The Ghost of Harvey Milk said... It is rather simple, Sid....You seem obligated by some vague sense of "going high" to remove a description of Victoria Peterson as a bigoted homophobe....When you are given proof from her own statements that she actually IS homophobic and bigoted against LGBT people, you state this site is not about Victoria Peterson.
This site IS "Justice4nifong", correct? Victoria Peterson IS a member of "Justice4nifong", correct?
If both statements are correct, then should we not, as commentators, feel free to correct YOU when you mistakenly edit a comment?
How can you rightly expect people to "move on", when you yourself cannot remain on topic, or look for any opportunity to throw shade on people not involved in any way with the current topic?
As YOU were.
November 22, 2018 at 7:37 AM
Hey, Ghost of Harvey Milk.
What I believe to be unfair is a commenter using a pseudonym attacking a private individual by name who is not even engaged in commentary on this site. I find your gratuitous ad hominem attacks against Ms. Peterson, by definition, to lack positive contribution to justice-issue conversation. From your comments about her, it appears as though your purpose is to defame and disparage the j4n member and co-founder rather than present enlightened opinion on subject matter.
Maybe your anti-Peterson comments might be welcomed on LGBTQ oriented blog sites.
Anonymous A Durham Observer said... So Sid, if not Rae Evans, who do you think could interfere with your secret projects?
November 22, 2018 at 3:15 PM
Hey, A Durham Observer.
Actually, I never had Rae Evans (mother of Duke Lacrosse defendant Dave) in consideration as one to interfere with my projects. To be honest, I do not believe, at this point, that anyone or any institution/organization is in position to derail goals of my projects.
That said, I merely mentioned the projects to give viewers/commenters an awareness to anticipate important pro-Mangum events in the very near future. Keep in mind that the events are not sinister, amoral, or criminal. In common, they just possess the element of surprise.
Anonymous Anonymous said... Hallo Dr. Harr. When is the next meeting of the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong?
November 23, 2018 at 9:46 AM
Anony, the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong does not hold scheduled meetings... at this time. One of the last official meetings was convened as a party for local members at which he was gifted a guitar. That was many years ago.
As this organization grows, and with an infusion of new leadership, I anticipate that an annual convention will be held for all members, nationally and internationally. My guesstimate is that establishment of such a gathering is a couple of years away.
I am surprised that you have not sued Duke Medical Center on behalf on Crystal. I understand that the law is well established that a medical provider owes a duty only to the patient (and the patient's estate in the event of their death) and not to any third parties. Contradictory precedent has never discouraged you from litigation in the past.
At the very least, I expect you to make the claim that Crystal should be compensated for the fact that she was held to be legally responsible for Daye's death when it was Duke's malpractice that caused his death. In addition, Crystal's self-defense claim was compromised because she was not able to cross-examine Daye during the trial and expose the inconsistencies in his statements to police. Kenny is unfair to Meier when he blames him for his failure to cross-examine Daye.
November 23, 2018 at 11:58 AM
Although I am a proponent of the Clive Cussler/Graham Brown novel "Zero Hour" phrase: "All things are impossible until they're proven otherwise," I do not (as promoted by the courts and mainstream media) indulge in frivolous and vexatious litigation. Clearly, Crystal Mangum had no direct involvement with the medical treatment (including malpractice) given to Daye by Duke University Hospital. Daye's family/estate has actionable cause against Duke, not Crystal Mangum... as you are aware.
What I believe to be unfair is you accusing me of ad hominem attacks to "defame and disparage the j4n member and co-founder" Victoria Peterson, when the comments I make are statements of fact proven by Victoria Peterson's own words.
And I'll further note here that you have neither gotten Victoria Peterson to attempt to clarify or at least distance herself from those statements, nor have you attempted to seek any clarification from her regarding those statements.
You simply brush it off as an "ad hominem" attack and move on.
I do find it rather sad that a founding J4N member fails to engage in discussion on this blog.
@ Guiowen : "She took my money and stabbed me" "He said he told her to get out of the house and she came at him with a knife" "I didn't want her to go out and do something stupid. I told her you don't know those men out there". Etc,etc.etc.
@ Guiowen: The context of my post was a request by you to point out glaring inconsistencies in Daye's statement to Bond; that being the his implausible version of the event. Unlike Crystal's version given under oath and subjected to withering examination by the Prosecution. Meier never stressed to the Jury all the inconsistencies in this statement.
Kenny, As usual, you manage to misunderstand anything I tell you. You are taking Reggie's statements out of context. Taken in context, they are quite reasonable.
@ Guiowen: For context, I invite readers to take Daye's direct quotes, given in response to Bond's questioning and also to Bond's paraphrasing of other responses that were given by him, in the chronological order that she reported them and see if they are reconcilable.
Kenny, If you have such powerful arguments, then: 1. come to Durham 2. Hire a lawyer. You might get Nifong, if you're lucky. 3. Explain to him what your arguments are. 4. Ask him to get Crystal out.
Anonymous Anonymous said... Hallo Dr. Harr. Have you finished the appeal of the malicious prosecution lawsuit?
December 1, 2018 at 8:56 AM
Anony, the Appeal, as you may know, is a long and arduous process which will not culminate in the immediate near future. Its status currently is that the plaintiff pro se's (Mangum) Proposed Record on Appeal has been served on the defendants. She is currently awaiting a response, if any, from the appellees. They have thirty days from receipt of service (November 20, 2018) by which to respond.
Anonymous The Ghost of Harvey Milk said... What I believe to be unfair is you accusing me of ad hominem attacks to "defame and disparage the j4n member and co-founder" Victoria Peterson, when the comments I make are statements of fact proven by Victoria Peterson's own words.
And I'll further note here that you have neither gotten Victoria Peterson to attempt to clarify or at least distance herself from those statements, nor have you attempted to seek any clarification from her regarding those statements.
You simply brush it off as an "ad hominem" attack and move on.
I do find it rather sad that a founding J4N member fails to engage in discussion on this blog.
November 26, 2018 at 7:28 AM
Hey, Ghost of Harvey Milk.
Even if statements you make about Ms. Peterson may be factual, that doesn't obviate them from being malicious. I respect her rights to her opinions even if I may consider them to be at variance with mine... or if I believe them to be inaccurate.
What I find objectionable about your comments about her is that there lacks basis for them... as she is not a commenter to this site, is not involved in the dialogue, and is not aware of your statements by which to mount a defense.
I believe that her statements, which you restated in your comment, are self-explanatory and require neither clarification nor justification. She's entitled to her beliefs.
Ms. Peterson is a strong activist for the Durham Community and I know that she is an extremely busy person... advocating not solely for Ms. Mangum, but for many civic and social justice causes. Furthermore, her schedule consists of taking college courses and attending to family. Following my blog site is most likely not even on the radar of her priorities. Keep in mind that Ms. Peterson is the one who, with persistence, convinced me to set up this blog site.
interesting, Sid -- So, TGOHM's statements are both "factual" and "malicous"? This is your argument?
What happened to your long-held belief that "the truth shall set you free"?
VP IS a founding member of J4N. If she chooses not to read the blog site of the committee she co-founded, well....That's on both her and you.
Why don't you take 1 minute out of your "busy schedule" to bring these comments to her attention? I'm sure that you could have texted/emailed her in the same length of time it took you to post your reply?
Dr. Harr -- I find Kwnhyderal's sexual innuendo posted at 10:21 to be inappropriate. As such, it should be removed, and the commenter Kenhyderal warned that behavior of this type will not be allowed.
Anonymous Anonymous said... Hallo Dr. Harr. Have you finished your secret projects?
December 6, 2018 at 3:13 AM
Hey, Anony.
There are several secret projects underway. One of them has been completed and is awaiting publication. Another project is still under development, and shortly, after submission of several documents by myself... which should be completed within several days, it should be evaluated for consideration. There's another project which I need to prepare but should be ready to present following the holidays.
In the meantime, I have just begun work on another shar-video. Am still writing the narrative for it at present.
Anonymous Anonymous said... Dr. Harr -- I find Kwnhyderal's sexual innuendo posted at 10:21 to be inappropriate. As such, it should be removed, and the commenter Kenhyderal warned that behavior of this type will not be allowed.
Thank you
December 4, 2018 at 10:30 AM
Anony, I fail to see your interpretation. But, it sorta reminds me of a case where a psychiatrist was examining a patient. The psychiatrist drew a circle on a large pad and asked the patient what he saw in it. PATIENT: A naked woman lying down.
The psychiatrist drew a rectangle and asked the patient for an interpretation of the image. PATIENT: A naked woman standing up.
The psychiatrist drew a triangle and, again, asked the patient what it symbolized. PATIENT: A naked woman.
PSYCHIATRIST: Sir, you have a dirty mind.
PATIENT: Well, I'm not the one drawing the pictures!
Anonymous Anonymous said... interesting, Sid -- So, TGOHM's statements are both "factual" and "malicous"? This is your argument?
What happened to your long-held belief that "the truth shall set you free"?
VP IS a founding member of J4N. If she chooses not to read the blog site of the committee she co-founded, well....That's on both her and you.
Why don't you take 1 minute out of your "busy schedule" to bring these comments to her attention? I'm sure that you could have texted/emailed her in the same length of time it took you to post your reply?
December 3, 2018 at 8:01 AM
The comments of the Ghost of Harvey Milk may or may not be accurate, but they are malicious.
I do believe that the truth will set Crystal Mangum free, that is why I am doing my best to present the truths of her case. Unfortunately, Governor Roy Cooper, Attorney General Josh Stein, district attorneys of Orange/Wake/Durham counties, mainstream media and others are aware of the truths of her innocence, but don't want to be confronted with them. That is why they ignore me. However, slowly, but surely, the truths of Mangum's case will leak out and become known on a large scale.
As I have said, Victoria was responsible for me blogging in the first place as a means of presenting the truths of Mangum's case. She's never shown an interest in contributing blogs or writing comments. Her schedule is incredibly full and she probably lacks the inclination or desire to get involved.
Anonymous Anonymous said... Hallo Dr. Harr. Why are you censoring my posts? When do you predict that Crystal will be released?
December 9, 2018 at 9:05 AM
Hey, Anony.
I don't censor post, but I am forced to monitor them. With regards to your previous post, it is an exact replica of another post with which I have not had the time to respond, then I may not post the same comment a second time.
Regarding the question of when I anticipate that Crystal will be released... that is very difficult to predict because the State has shown lack of reason, lack of logic when it comes to Crystal Mangum. The State is extremely committed to keep Mangum incarcerated regardless of truths of her innocence. The State should have waved the white flag long ago when considering my release of facts of her wrongful imprisonment. They are extremely stubborn and recalcitrant in their zeal to punish Crystal.
I believe my secret projects will help prepare groundwork for her release which I would think would come shortly following a ruling by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on her Malicious Prosecution complaint. The appeals process takes time, so possibly at the earliest she won't be released before May or June 2019.
However, strength of my secret projects could possibly force an earlier release for Mangum.
Anonymous Anonymous said... "The comments of the Ghost of Harvey Milk may or may not be accurate, but they are malicious...."
I do believe The Ghost of Harvey Milk was referring to actual quotes from Victoria Peterson. So yes, they ARE accurate -- no "may or may not be...".
So apparently, on this site, quoting someone verbatim is now malicious.
I'll keep that in mind the next time you or Kenny quote someone.
December 8, 2018 at 6:52 PM
Anony, the point I was making is that I did not hear the alleged quote or read about it firsthand. That's why my statement in contingent. The media oft times is inaccurate with its quotes and statements about what individuals think or say. From my own personal experience, WRAL-5 News has incorrectly represented what I felt and what I believed. And when I subsequently confronted them about the misrepresentation it ignored me and allowed the inaccurate article to remain uncorrected.
Also, the mere act of quoting someone is not malicious unless it contains materially malicious content.
guiowen said... To Anony 5:08, I believe it will be February 2026.
December 8, 2018 at 10:39 AM
gui, mon ami, and ye of little faith,
Crystal will be released long before then. She should have been released from custody long ago. There is actually much more information that I am just recently learning that should expedite Mangum's release once it is known by the public. I will work to get it uploaded to this blog site as soon a possible.
HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP! IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!
I am in the early stages of working on a new and revealing shar-video... almost finished with the draft of the narrative. I am also working hard on secret projects for Crystal, so there may be a little longer lapse of time from when a comment is posted and when I am able to respond to it. So please be patient. I may not be able to respond on a daily basis but will do so as frequently as possible... no more than two or three days lag time. I will continue to post comments as soon as I receive them.
Anonymous Anonymous said... So, what profound new evidence have you learned that will somehow be different from all your other failures?
December 11, 2018 at 11:44 AM
Hey, Anony.
As you may know, since I first began advocating for Crystal on the murder charge, I had focused on the issues related to Reginald Daye's death. It was an extremely strong point on which to seek her exoneration and freedom.
Then, after lack of success, I looked into the Larceny of Chose in Action charge and found that it had a strong role in support of Mangum's innocence and criminal wrongdoing by a State witness.
Recently, I had begun talking to Crystal about the Duke Lacrosse case... something of which I had avoided in the past, believing that it had little to offer. However, was I wrong!!! There are revelations about the Duke Lacrosse case that will make your head spin. I will focus on them in the spar-video that follows the one I am currently producing.
So, yes... there is much new to be forthcoming about which you cannot even begin to comprehend.
How did Kilgo's comment clear your review? Or do your commenting policies not apply equally to everyone?
Abe Froman Chicago, IL
December 13, 2018 at 4:06 AM
Hey, Abe.
I believe that you're talking about the December 11, 2018 @ 7:20 p.m. comment. First of all, the comment did not contain any language that is obscene, profane, or racist. Secondly, it did not single out anyone by their real name... as did the comments by The Ghost of Harvey Milk (which I did, in fact, publish; but which I discourage and believe contravenes the kenhyderal doctrine). "Ubes," which is definitely not someone's real name or one that is universally identifiable, is not someone who can be identified. That's important. Thirdly, I did not find the content to be malicious... a point on which I give much leeway.
Keep in mind that I am not one who is quick to censor or not publish a comment. I am more likely to not publish a comment if it contains a real identifiable name that is subjected to gratuitous malicious content not related to the topic or social justice issues in general. Of course, all hate speech will not see the light of this blog site.
So nonsensical posts, general insults and ad hominem attacks aimed at entire groups of people (Liestoppers) or individuals you cannot identify (and do not agree with) are permitted?
Whether or not you are quick to censor, you are, in fact censoring comments. The double standard is interesting, though not surprising. That is what censorship is about at its core - eliminating expressions the censor does not agree with, and silencing people censor disdains.
"Recently, I had begun talking to Crystal about the Duke Lacrosse case... something of which I had avoided in the past, believing that it had little to offer. However, was I wrong!!! There are revelations about the Duke Lacrosse case that will make your head spin. I will focus on them in the spar-video that follows the one I am currently producing.
So, yes... there is much new to be forthcoming about which you cannot even begin to comprehend."
December 13, 2018 at 4:48 AM
Dr. Harr,
As kenhyderal has indicated, in order to confirm all of the facts of the Duke Lacrosse case, it is necessary to speak with Kilgo. You should check with kenhyderal and ask him how to contact Kilgo.
"Recently, I had begun talking to Crystal about the Duke Lacrosse case... something of which I had avoided in the past, believing that it had little to offer. However, was I wrong!!! There are revelations about the Duke Lacrosse case that will make your head spin. I will focus on them in the spar-video that follows the one I am currently producing.
So, yes... there is much new to be forthcoming about which you cannot even begin to comprehend."
December 13, 2018 at 4:48 AM
Dr. Harr,
As kenhyderal has indicated, in order to confirm all of the facts of the Duke Lacrosse case, it is necessary to speak with Kilgo. You should check with kenhyderal and ask him how to contact Kilgo.
December 16, 2018 at 7:26 AM
Hey, Nifong Double Supporter.
I have done something my past two visits which I had not done during the past six or seven years... and that is discuss the Duke Lacrosse case and its aftermath with Crystal. Well, I have done that now, and am shocked by the revelations. My attention had been so focused on the second-degree murder conviction that I failed to see the enormity of the big picture.
The shar-video which I will produce following the one I am currently working on will provide details of which were never before heard. I hope to have the current shar-video completed within a week. (At present I am beginning to lay down the narrative soundtrack.)
So nonsensical posts, general insults and ad hominem attacks aimed at entire groups of people (Liestoppers) or individuals you cannot identify (and do not agree with) are permitted?
Whether or not you are quick to censor, you are, in fact censoring comments. The double standard is interesting, though not surprising. That is what censorship is about at its core - eliminating expressions the censor does not agree with, and silencing people censor disdains.
Abe Froman Chicago, IL
December 13, 2018 at 5:33 AM
Hey, Abe.
As you are aware, I was forced to monitor comments before posting... I would have preferred not to have been put in that position as it is time-consuming to say the least. With all due respect, Abe, I believe that I have been extremely lax when it comes to publishing comments. There are very few exceptions where I have not published comments... and certainly all serious comments made in good-faith... even when marginally related to the topic at hand or issues related to social justice. I value contrary and opposing commentary as it encourages deeper thought and makes the debate of interest.
Abe, I do not believe that I have "censored" any of your comments. If I am mistaken, feel free to re-submit.
"How does anything related to the Duke Lacrosse case help Crystal in her incarceration?"
Sidney has moved from a legal solution for Mangum's release, to a truth shall set her free approach. Thus, the Duke Lacrosse case that started it all, will be restarted. Once the public sees what really happened to Mangum in the Duke Lacrosse case, it will start a ground swell of public opinion to have her released.
Kenhyderal, Por faoe, ven ya a Durham!. Ya encontre a tu amigo el gordo Kilgo, pero Sonnosciuto dice que no lo soltara a menos de que tu vengas a poner la cara por el. Ven pronto a Durham, y avisame en donde te vas a hospedar. Rapido!
When will you post the new shar-video? Will the shar-vide contain information that exonerates Mike Nifong?
December 18, 2018 at 3:15 AM
Hey, Papa John.
I am currently on the last phase of production, which is laying down images to the soundtrack. This is the most time-consuming and creatively challenging part of the process. I currently have completed the prologue... a new format, and have 87 paragraphs to cover with graphics. It'll probably take close to seven days to complete... and then a day or two to prepare it to be uploaded online.
The shar-video which I am currently working on will not have any bearing on Mike Nifong... at least of significance. However, the shar-video that is to follow will most definitely exonerate not only Mike Nifong, but Crystal Mangum, as well. It'll be an eye-opener containing information never before presented... and that is because I have just recently became aware of it.
I am convinced that your next shar-video will be historic. Please don’t let us down.
December 17, 2018 at 3:32 PM
Hey, Nifong double-Supporter.
Most assuredly, the shar-video to follow the one on which I am currently working, will be a watershed entry on this blog site. It will destroy the Duke Lacrosse Myth like a pound of C4 leveling a twenty-foot butter statue. I doubt very much that you will be disappointed.
The upcoming shar-video features a new format which I believe will improve the product. Throughout the years of production of these mini-documentaries, there have been strides, I believe, that have made them better. I am particularly pleased with the improved audio, which was extremely problematic early-on.
Anonymous Anonymous said... "How does anything related to the Duke Lacrosse case help Crystal in her incarceration?" Sidney has moved from a legal solution for Mangum's release, to a truth shall set her free approach. Thus, the Duke Lacrosse case that started it all, will be restarted. Once the public sees what really happened to Mangum in the Duke Lacrosse case, it will start a ground swell of public opinion to have her released.
December 16, 2018 at 5:55 PM
Hey, Anony.
Your explanation to the question is spot on. Shirley the gigantic flaws pinning blame on Crystal Mangum is the nidus upon which the entirety of the vindictive prosecution against her is based... that, and the fact that she's an African American.
Revealing that the Duke Lacrosse premise, reported ad nausea by the biased mainstream media (that Mangum falsely claimed that she was sexually assaulted at the Duke Lacrosse party), is, itself, false, will provide her with much greater credibility... and she will be accurately viewed as a victim of assault rather than as an evil false accuser trying to destroy lives with lies.
Like you predict, I believe that Mangum will finally get the support that has been denied her once the truths of her case get passed onto the public.
Sid -- I will note here that you let 2 comments pass "monitoring" that were basically copies of old "Kilgo" posts from back in 2009 -- with the names changed.
Yet you censored a 3rd that was yet again a copy -- with the names changed.
Why is that?
Either they are all worth censorship, or none of them are.
@ Anonymous 12-18-18 2:17 PM: I only wish those, here only to mock and make mischief, would go elsewhere, allowing contributors who want to seriously discuss the important issues relating to justice and it's miscarriage, post on this blog without these meaningless distractions. They should either get lost or get a life
@ kenhyderal 12-19 9:50 AM: I can only say that you can wish in 1 hand and crap in the other and see which one fills fastest.
Further, I'll say that you can (roughly) divide the world into 2 camps...."Doers" and "Complainers".
I see a lot of complaining from you -- but very little (if any) actual "doing". You don't like the so-called "miscarriages of justice" in Durham? Actually do something about it. (That means more than pissing and moaning on this blog). Come to Durham and do something.
There's several events scheduled in Jan 2019 -- For example, The Durham County Legislative Delegation Swearing In Ceremony is scheduled for early Jan.
Come to the event, take some time to bring your issues to the attention of the new legislative delegates.....Or get lost / get a life.
The choice is yours. Let me know how I can find you at the event.
If I were to attend, and that would be a big "if", given my family and employment obligations, my location and my personal means, would you then identify yourself? If so why do you post anonymously here? That being said, speaking out against gross injustice and morally supporting a selfless champion in the fight against injustice like Dr. Harr , given my present circumstances, is doing my small part. If I can’t do anything personally about the broken American Justice System, at least I’ll be vocal about it's failures. Perhaps, maybe then I’ll get support from some from those who hear me and are in a position to help. Maybe even some who frequent this blog. At least, for now, nobody can confuse me with those who tolerate it in silence.
@ Guiowen Quote: "Virtue signalling is better than vice signalling. First, if you have ever encountered misogyny, anti-semitism, racism, threats of violence, white supremacy or the like online, you will know that there is plenty of vice signalling out there; even if you have objections to Black Lives Matter, I’m sure you can agree that it’s far, far better than saying Black Lives Don’t Matter. Second, it is worth acknowledging and appreciating the fact that our society, divided as it often is, still regards justice, tolerance, empathy, inclusion, care for the poor and so on as virtues. Many civilisations haven’t (and, as Nietzsche would warn us, it is very possible that after our Christian foundations have eroded a bit further, our civilisation [sic] won’t either). So yes, virtue signalling is irritating. But it is much better than the alternative" Dr. Andrew Wilson; ( Teaching Pastor at King's Church London. He has a theology degrees from Cambridge, a (MA) from, London School of Theology (MTh), and from King's College London a (PhD). He is a columnist for the newspaper Christianity Today
Kenny, Here's your way of telling us how great you are:
"speaking out against gross injustice and morally supporting a selfless champion in the fight against injustice like Dr. Harr , given my present circumstances, is doing my small part. If I can’t do anything personally about the broken American Justice System, at least I’ll be vocal about it's failures. Perhaps, maybe then I’ll get support from some from those who hear me and are in a position to help. Maybe even some who frequent this blog. At least, for now, nobody can confuse me with those who tolerate it in silence."
Anonymous Nifong Supporter Supporter said... Dr. Harr,
What can we do to ensure that the mainstream media does not ignore your new shar-videos?
December 19, 2018 at 3:33 AM
Hey, Nifong Double-Supporter.
There is nothing to do to make the mainstream media take a serious look at my shar-videos, sharlogs, or other evidence that is supportive of Crystal Mangum's innocence. The media, like Governor Roy Cooper and others in governmental positions, are aware of the truths in Mangum's case but don't want to be confronted by them. The Duke Lacrosse Myth would not be perpetuated without mainstream media involvement... and had the mainstream media acted objectively and with journalistic integrity and ethics, Crystal Mangum would most likely would have never been taken to trial... much less convicted. The media, if not a conspirator, was at the least complicit in the injustices that have enabled the wrongful incarceration for more than seven years of a single black mother of three. It is disgraceful.
The following is a post of 12-21-18 at 9:41 AM by Anony that has been edited with deletion of an objectionable word:
guiowen: "Why don't you actually do something instead of just virtue signalling?" Kenhyderal: "OMG that would be WAAAAAY too much work!"*
*goes back to posing on J4N
In the future I will not take the time and effort to edit comments containing an objectionable word. So, please remove all cuss words and objectionable words from comments. It will be much appreciated as I must use my precious time working on the shar-video.
Guiowen said: "Kenny,Here's your way of telling us how great you are"...."my small part"..."If I can't do anything personally"...."at least I'll be vocal"...…"Perhaps maybe then I'll get support".... "maybe even some".....At least for now"
Guiowen said: "Your recent citation (9:16) tells us that hypocrisy is good. Please read what you write"...…… Please explain to us where you find the thesis that hypocrisy is good in theologian Dr. Wilson's words
Sid, you should just stop editing/blocking comments. People can ignore the objectionable ones. The only reason people whined about you editing them is they know it takes time, and so they post a lot of things you won't like so that you have to waste time reviewing each one and they can whine.
I assume you realized long ago that everyone here is just trolling you and treats this as a Joke, including Kenny - who has never actually done anything helpful.
Kenny, since you like to quote the bible, here is something about virtue-signaling:
So when you give to the needy, do not sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be praised by men. Truly I tell you, they already have their full reward. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. And your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.…
Durham Observer, Kenny doesn't lie. He specifically told me so back in 2017. The trouble is that, because of context, he frequently forgets or misinterprets things.
I am anonymous @9:50pm....The link I posted was edited (I assume by Sid) so it no longer references the link it was originally pointing to. The link was to a wiktionary definition of the word "sh*tposting".
I assume, even though I used the word "here" without actually stating Sid's "objectionable word", he will edit this as well.
@ John Anderson: What is your motive for wanting to meet with me in person? What is your motive for anonymity on this blog. Since you have signed with an appellation why do you still post anonymously Are you a supporter of Crystal. Why are you uncomfortable in using Dr. Harr as our intermediary?
Kenny, Christ says "when you give to the needy, do not sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do "
This is precisely what we call "virtue-signaling".
Just because some guy has a Ph. D. in theology, don't think I'm going to accept his words. Can you understand what I'm saying, or is this too difficult for you? Is it, maybe, out of context for you?
Guiowen said: "Can you understand what I'm saying, or is this too difficult for you?"...…. No, as usual, I can't understand your convoluted arguments. I fail to see in that quote, from Dr. Wilson, where he boasts about his own charitable works or he boasts about his moral belief that charitable giving is good. In no way does he imply that boasting about such works is good or only seeking acclaim for doing such work is good nor is he expressing undue piety about his own morality.
Since I will be in Dubai, I wanted to meet you and see if you really are as big a horse's ass as your posts indicate. Given the judgment Sid shows in litigating frivolous claims, I don't trust him with any of my contact information.
Kenny, good old Wilson tells us that virtue signaling is good. This does not mean that he's boasting about it. What he is saying is that it's good for people to go about signaling their virtue. For example, he feels it's good to go about saying "black lives matter" because it's better than saying "black lives don't matter". What he does not seem to realize is that it would be better to say neither of those catch phrases. I imagine Wilson is a good guy - much better, certainly, than you -- but he's saying that it's good for other people, impotent braggarts like you, to tell us how great you are. This is a mistake on his part. Just to see if you understand English: I'm not saying Wilson is a bad guy! I'm saying he's mistaken, and his mistakes lead people like you to feel good at being hypocrites. I wish I could explain it all in words of one syllable (perhaps you would understand), but I just don't see sufficiently many monosyllabic words!
A Guiowen: No Guiowen you are wrong Dr. Wilson is not saying it's good for braggarts to tell us how great they are. How you've made that skewed interpretation escapes me. Can you show us anywhere and anytime, here, where I have proclaimed or even intimated "how great" I am? Do I sense projection. Father Lawrence Lovasik said " a sarcastic person has a superiority complex that can be cured only by the honesty of humility".
Kenny, Wilson says "virtue signaling is better than the alternative." The alternative is to do your good deeds and not talk about them. (See Mathew's gospel, chapter 7.)
As for you, we've been hearing about how you're a fighter, a master debater, etc., for years now. I'm sorry if you cannot remember all we've had to put up with since you came here. I realize everything you do, that does not reflect well on you, disappears because of context. Unfortunately the rest of us remember.
On a totally different topic, I notice you have no qualms about picking fights. I guess the "Kenhyderal doctrine" does not apply to you?
I'm a senior citizen who believes that the state of North Carolina has harshly, excessively, and unjustly treated former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong.
324 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 324 of 324@ Abe and Guiowen: Judge for yourself. http://www.justice4nifong.com/legal/cgm/blink/blink112912/docu09.htm
Hallo Dr. Harr. When is the next meeting of the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong?
Kenny,
I don't see any inconsistencies. I realize that, because of context, you are doubtless seeing many such.
The Ghost of Harvey Milk said...
It is rather simple, Sid....You seem obligated by some vague sense of "going high" to remove a description of Victoria Peterson as a bigoted homophobe....When you are given proof from her own statements that she actually IS homophobic and bigoted against LGBT people, you state this site is not about Victoria Peterson.
This site IS "Justice4nifong", correct?
Victoria Peterson IS a member of "Justice4nifong", correct?
If both statements are correct, then should we not, as commentators, feel free to correct YOU when you mistakenly edit a comment?
How can you rightly expect people to "move on", when you yourself cannot remain on topic, or look for any opportunity to throw shade on people not involved in any way with the current topic?
As YOU were.
November 22, 2018 at 7:37 AM
Hey, Ghost of Harvey Milk.
What I believe to be unfair is a commenter using a pseudonym attacking a private individual by name who is not even engaged in commentary on this site. I find your gratuitous ad hominem attacks against Ms. Peterson, by definition, to lack positive contribution to justice-issue conversation. From your comments about her, it appears as though your purpose is to defame and disparage the j4n member and co-founder rather than present enlightened opinion on subject matter.
Maybe your anti-Peterson comments might be welcomed on LGBTQ oriented blog sites.
Anonymous A Durham Observer said...
So Sid, if not Rae Evans, who do you think could interfere with your secret projects?
November 22, 2018 at 3:15 PM
Hey, A Durham Observer.
Actually, I never had Rae Evans (mother of Duke Lacrosse defendant Dave) in consideration as one to interfere with my projects. To be honest, I do not believe, at this point, that anyone or any institution/organization is in position to derail goals of my projects.
That said, I merely mentioned the projects to give viewers/commenters an awareness to anticipate important pro-Mangum events in the very near future. Keep in mind that the events are not sinister, amoral, or criminal. In common, they just possess the element of surprise.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Hallo Dr. Harr. When is the next meeting of the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong?
November 23, 2018 at 9:46 AM
Anony, the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong does not hold scheduled meetings... at this time. One of the last official meetings was convened as a party for local members at which he was gifted a guitar. That was many years ago.
As this organization grows, and with an infusion of new leadership, I anticipate that an annual convention will be held for all members, nationally and internationally. My guesstimate is that establishment of such a gathering is a couple of years away.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Dr. Harr,
I am surprised that you have not sued Duke Medical Center on behalf on Crystal. I understand that the law is well established that a medical provider owes a duty only to the patient (and the patient's estate in the event of their death) and not to any third parties. Contradictory precedent has never discouraged you from litigation in the past.
At the very least, I expect you to make the claim that Crystal should be compensated for the fact that she was held to be legally responsible for Daye's death when it was Duke's malpractice that caused his death. In addition, Crystal's self-defense claim was compromised because she was not able to cross-examine Daye during the trial and expose the inconsistencies in his statements to police. Kenny is unfair to Meier when he blames him for his failure to cross-examine Daye.
November 23, 2018 at 11:58 AM
Although I am a proponent of the Clive Cussler/Graham Brown novel "Zero Hour" phrase: "All things are impossible until they're proven otherwise," I do not (as promoted by the courts and mainstream media) indulge in frivolous and vexatious litigation. Clearly, Crystal Mangum had no direct involvement with the medical treatment (including malpractice) given to Daye by Duke University Hospital. Daye's family/estate has actionable cause against Duke, not Crystal Mangum... as you are aware.
What I believe to be unfair is you accusing me of ad hominem attacks to "defame and disparage the j4n member and co-founder" Victoria Peterson, when the comments I make are statements of fact proven by Victoria Peterson's own words.
And I'll further note here that you have neither gotten Victoria Peterson to attempt to clarify or at least distance herself from those statements, nor have you attempted to seek any clarification from her regarding those statements.
You simply brush it off as an "ad hominem" attack and move on.
I do find it rather sad that a founding J4N member fails to engage in discussion on this blog.
@ Guiowen : "She took my money and stabbed me" "He said he told her to get out of the house and she came at him with a knife" "I didn't want her to go out and do something stupid. I told her you don't know those men out there". Etc,etc.etc.
Sorry, Kenny, you're taking things out of context, as usual.
@ Guiowen: The context of my post was a request by you to point out glaring inconsistencies in Daye's statement to Bond; that being the his implausible version of the event. Unlike Crystal's version given under oath and subjected to withering examination by the Prosecution. Meier never stressed to the Jury all the inconsistencies in this statement.
Kenny,
As usual, you manage to misunderstand anything I tell you. You are taking Reggie's statements out of context. Taken in context, they are quite reasonable.
@ Guiowen: For context, I invite readers to take Daye's direct quotes, given in response to Bond's questioning and also to Bond's paraphrasing of other responses that were given by him, in the chronological order that she reported them and see if they are reconcilable.
@kenny: I did. They are.
@ Guiowen ("No Where Man") "He's as blind as he can be
Just sees what he wants to see"--The Beatles
Dr. Harr:
Why did you publish the ad hominem attack by kenhyderal at 1:27 PM?
A sarcastic man is a wounded man.
Kenny,
If you have such powerful arguments, then:
1. come to Durham
2. Hire a lawyer. You might get Nifong, if you're lucky.
3. Explain to him what your arguments are.
4. Ask him to get Crystal out.
I have no interest in arguing with you.
By the way, Kenny, those lyrics from the Beatles certainly apply to you.
Right on kenhyderal.
Hallo Dr. Harr. Have you finished the appeal of your lawsuit?
Hallo Dr. Harr. Have you finished the appeal of the malicious prosecution lawsuit?
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Hallo Dr. Harr. Have you finished the appeal of the malicious prosecution lawsuit?
December 1, 2018 at 8:56 AM
Anony, the Appeal, as you may know, is a long and arduous process which will not culminate in the immediate near future. Its status currently is that the plaintiff pro se's (Mangum) Proposed Record on Appeal has been served on the defendants. She is currently awaiting a response, if any, from the appellees. They have thirty days from receipt of service (November 20, 2018) by which to respond.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Dr. Harr:
Why did you publish the ad hominem attack by kenhyderal at 1:27 PM?
November 27, 2018 at 2:26 PM
Anony, I fail to see an ad hominem attack by kenhyderal in the mere quotation of lyrics from a Beatles song.
Anonymous The Ghost of Harvey Milk said...
What I believe to be unfair is you accusing me of ad hominem attacks to "defame and disparage the j4n member and co-founder" Victoria Peterson, when the comments I make are statements of fact proven by Victoria Peterson's own words.
And I'll further note here that you have neither gotten Victoria Peterson to attempt to clarify or at least distance herself from those statements, nor have you attempted to seek any clarification from her regarding those statements.
You simply brush it off as an "ad hominem" attack and move on.
I do find it rather sad that a founding J4N member fails to engage in discussion on this blog.
November 26, 2018 at 7:28 AM
Hey, Ghost of Harvey Milk.
Even if statements you make about Ms. Peterson may be factual, that doesn't obviate them from being malicious. I respect her rights to her opinions even if I may consider them to be at variance with mine... or if I believe them to be inaccurate.
What I find objectionable about your comments about her is that there lacks basis for them... as she is not a commenter to this site, is not involved in the dialogue, and is not aware of your statements by which to mount a defense.
I believe that her statements, which you restated in your comment, are self-explanatory and require neither clarification nor justification. She's entitled to her beliefs.
Ms. Peterson is a strong activist for the Durham Community and I know that she is an extremely busy person... advocating not solely for Ms. Mangum, but for many civic and social justice causes. Furthermore, her schedule consists of taking college courses and attending to family. Following my blog site is most likely not even on the radar of her priorities. Keep in mind that Ms. Peterson is the one who, with persistence, convinced me to set up this blog site.
Sid,
That’s quite a rationalization that you constructed in your post at 5:12.
interesting, Sid -- So, TGOHM's statements are both "factual" and "malicous"? This is your argument?
What happened to your long-held belief that "the truth shall set you free"?
VP IS a founding member of J4N. If she chooses not to read the blog site of the committee she co-founded, well....That's on both her and you.
Why don't you take 1 minute out of your "busy schedule" to bring these comments to her attention? I'm sure that you could have texted/emailed her in the same length of time it took you to post your reply?
Where is the little man?
@ Anonymous 3:11 -- "Biggie", your irony is inappropriate.
Dr. Harr -- I find Kwnhyderal's sexual innuendo posted at 10:21 to be inappropriate. As such, it should be removed, and the commenter Kenhyderal warned that behavior of this type will not be allowed.
Thank you
Present and accounted for.
Right on Little Man.
My friends call me kenhyderal.
Hallo Dr. Harr. Have you finished your secret projects?
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Hallo Dr. Harr. Have you finished your secret projects?
December 6, 2018 at 3:13 AM
Hey, Anony.
There are several secret projects underway. One of them has been completed and is awaiting publication. Another project is still under development, and shortly, after submission of several documents by myself... which should be completed within several days, it should be evaluated for consideration. There's another project which I need to prepare but should be ready to present following the holidays.
In the meantime, I have just begun work on another shar-video. Am still writing the narrative for it at present.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Dr. Harr -- I find Kwnhyderal's sexual innuendo posted at 10:21 to be inappropriate. As such, it should be removed, and the commenter Kenhyderal warned that behavior of this type will not be allowed.
Thank you
December 4, 2018 at 10:30 AM
Anony, I fail to see your interpretation. But, it sorta reminds me of a case where a psychiatrist was examining a patient. The psychiatrist drew a circle on a large pad and asked the patient what he saw in it.
PATIENT: A naked woman lying down.
The psychiatrist drew a rectangle and asked the patient for an interpretation of the image.
PATIENT: A naked woman standing up.
The psychiatrist drew a triangle and, again, asked the patient what it symbolized.
PATIENT: A naked woman.
PSYCHIATRIST: Sir, you have a dirty mind.
PATIENT: Well, I'm not the one drawing the pictures!
Anonymous Anonymous said...
interesting, Sid -- So, TGOHM's statements are both "factual" and "malicous"? This is your argument?
What happened to your long-held belief that "the truth shall set you free"?
VP IS a founding member of J4N. If she chooses not to read the blog site of the committee she co-founded, well....That's on both her and you.
Why don't you take 1 minute out of your "busy schedule" to bring these comments to her attention? I'm sure that you could have texted/emailed her in the same length of time it took you to post your reply?
December 3, 2018 at 8:01 AM
The comments of the Ghost of Harvey Milk may or may not be accurate, but they are malicious.
I do believe that the truth will set Crystal Mangum free, that is why I am doing my best to present the truths of her case. Unfortunately, Governor Roy Cooper, Attorney General Josh Stein, district attorneys of Orange/Wake/Durham counties, mainstream media and others are aware of the truths of her innocence, but don't want to be confronted with them. That is why they ignore me. However, slowly, but surely, the truths of Mangum's case will leak out and become known on a large scale.
As I have said, Victoria was responsible for me blogging in the first place as a means of presenting the truths of Mangum's case. She's never shown an interest in contributing blogs or writing comments. Her schedule is incredibly full and she probably lacks the inclination or desire to get involved.
Hallo Dr. Harr. Have you finished your appeal of the WRAL case?
Anonymous said...
Hallo Dr. Harr. Have you finished your appeal of the WRAL case?
December 7, 2018 at 3:28 AM
It is a long drawn out process. Right now I am awaiting a response to my Proposed Record on Appeal.
Hallo Dr. Harr. When do you predict that Crystal will be released?
To Anony 5:08,
I believe it will be February 2026.
"The comments of the Ghost of Harvey Milk may or may not be accurate, but they are malicious...."
I do believe The Ghost of Harvey Milk was referring to actual quotes from Victoria Peterson. So yes, they ARE accurate -- no "may or may not be...".
So apparently, on this site, quoting someone verbatim is now malicious.
I'll keep that in mind the next time you or Kenny quote someone.
Say it ain’t so Joe.
I’ proud to call kenhyderal my friend.
Where is the little man?
Present and accounted for.
Hallo Dr. Harr. Why are you censoring my posts? When do you predict that Crystal will be released?
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Hallo Dr. Harr. Why are you censoring my posts? When do you predict that Crystal will be released?
December 9, 2018 at 9:05 AM
Hey, Anony.
I don't censor post, but I am forced to monitor them. With regards to your previous post, it is an exact replica of another post with which I have not had the time to respond, then I may not post the same comment a second time.
Regarding the question of when I anticipate that Crystal will be released... that is very difficult to predict because the State has shown lack of reason, lack of logic when it comes to Crystal Mangum. The State is extremely committed to keep Mangum incarcerated regardless of truths of her innocence. The State should have waved the white flag long ago when considering my release of facts of her wrongful imprisonment. They are extremely stubborn and recalcitrant in their zeal to punish Crystal.
I believe my secret projects will help prepare groundwork for her release which I would think would come shortly following a ruling by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on her Malicious Prosecution complaint. The appeals process takes time, so possibly at the earliest she won't be released before May or June 2019.
However, strength of my secret projects could possibly force an earlier release for Mangum.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
"The comments of the Ghost of Harvey Milk may or may not be accurate, but they are malicious...."
I do believe The Ghost of Harvey Milk was referring to actual quotes from Victoria Peterson. So yes, they ARE accurate -- no "may or may not be...".
So apparently, on this site, quoting someone verbatim is now malicious.
I'll keep that in mind the next time you or Kenny quote someone.
December 8, 2018 at 6:52 PM
Anony, the point I was making is that I did not hear the alleged quote or read about it firsthand. That's why my statement in contingent. The media oft times is inaccurate with its quotes and statements about what individuals think or say. From my own personal experience, WRAL-5 News has incorrectly represented what I felt and what I believed. And when I subsequently confronted them about the misrepresentation it ignored me and allowed the inaccurate article to remain uncorrected.
Also, the mere act of quoting someone is not malicious unless it contains materially malicious content.
guiowen said...
To Anony 5:08,
I believe it will be February 2026.
December 8, 2018 at 10:39 AM
gui, mon ami, and ye of little faith,
Crystal will be released long before then. She should have been released from custody long ago. There is actually much more information that I am just recently learning that should expedite Mangum's release once it is known by the public. I will work to get it uploaded to this blog site as soon a possible.
HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!
I am in the early stages of working on a new and revealing shar-video... almost finished with the draft of the narrative. I am also working hard on secret projects for Crystal, so there may be a little longer lapse of time from when a comment is posted and when I am able to respond to it. So please be patient. I may not be able to respond on a daily basis but will do so as frequently as possible... no more than two or three days lag time. I will continue to post comments as soon as I receive them.
As you were.
Where is the little man?
Present and accounted for.
So, what profound new evidence have you learned that will somehow be different from all your other failures?
IS UBES STILL HANGING OUT WITH THE LIESTOPPER CRANKS?
SPIN UBES SPIN
QUACK QUACK QUACK
What's gret is that Kilto has learned 8 new words!
Welcome back Kilgo. kenhyderal wants to contact you but he lost your email address. What is the best way for kenhyderal to reach you?
Sid,
How did Kilgo's comment clear your review? Or do your commenting policies not apply equally to everyone?
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
Anonymous Anonymous said...
So, what profound new evidence have you learned that will somehow be different from all your other failures?
December 11, 2018 at 11:44 AM
Hey, Anony.
As you may know, since I first began advocating for Crystal on the murder charge, I had focused on the issues related to Reginald Daye's death. It was an extremely strong point on which to seek her exoneration and freedom.
Then, after lack of success, I looked into the Larceny of Chose in Action charge and found that it had a strong role in support of Mangum's innocence and criminal wrongdoing by a State witness.
Recently, I had begun talking to Crystal about the Duke Lacrosse case... something of which I had avoided in the past, believing that it had little to offer. However, was I wrong!!! There are revelations about the Duke Lacrosse case that will make your head spin. I will focus on them in the spar-video that follows the one I am currently producing.
So, yes... there is much new to be forthcoming about which you cannot even begin to comprehend.
Anonymous said...
Sid,
How did Kilgo's comment clear your review? Or do your commenting policies not apply equally to everyone?
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
December 13, 2018 at 4:06 AM
Hey, Abe.
I believe that you're talking about the December 11, 2018 @ 7:20 p.m. comment. First of all, the comment did not contain any language that is obscene, profane, or racist. Secondly, it did not single out anyone by their real name... as did the comments by The Ghost of Harvey Milk (which I did, in fact, publish; but which I discourage and believe contravenes the kenhyderal doctrine). "Ubes," which is definitely not someone's real name or one that is universally identifiable, is not someone who can be identified. That's important. Thirdly, I did not find the content to be malicious... a point on which I give much leeway.
Keep in mind that I am not one who is quick to censor or not publish a comment. I am more likely to not publish a comment if it contains a real identifiable name that is subjected to gratuitous malicious content not related to the topic or social justice issues in general. Of course, all hate speech will not see the light of this blog site.
Hope that provides you with some clarification.
So nonsensical posts, general insults and ad hominem attacks aimed at entire groups of people (Liestoppers) or individuals you cannot identify (and do not agree with) are permitted?
Whether or not you are quick to censor, you are, in fact censoring comments. The double standard is interesting, though not surprising. That is what censorship is about at its core - eliminating expressions the censor does not agree with, and silencing people censor disdains.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
Udaman Abe udaman.
Where is the little man?
Present and accounted for.
IS KENYDERAL STILL HANGING OUT WITH THE JUSTICE4NIFONG CRANKS?
SPIN KENHYDERAL SPIN
QUACK QUACK QUACK
Welcome back Ubes. Where have you been?
Dr. Harr,
You should ignore Abe’s comments. He obviously is trying to cause mischief and distract you. kenhyderal will respond to him in due course.
Abe,
Stop trolling Dr. Harr.
Right on Dr. Harr.
Nifong Supporter said...
"Recently, I had begun talking to Crystal about the Duke Lacrosse case... something of which I had avoided in the past, believing that it had little to offer. However, was I wrong!!! There are revelations about the Duke Lacrosse case that will make your head spin. I will focus on them in the spar-video that follows the one I am currently producing.
So, yes... there is much new to be forthcoming about which you cannot even begin to comprehend."
December 13, 2018 at 4:48 AM
Dr. Harr,
As kenhyderal has indicated, in order to confirm all of the facts of the Duke Lacrosse case, it is necessary to speak with Kilgo. You should check with kenhyderal and ask him how to contact Kilgo.
Anonymous Nifong Supporter Supporter said...
Nifong Supporter said...
"Recently, I had begun talking to Crystal about the Duke Lacrosse case... something of which I had avoided in the past, believing that it had little to offer. However, was I wrong!!! There are revelations about the Duke Lacrosse case that will make your head spin. I will focus on them in the spar-video that follows the one I am currently producing.
So, yes... there is much new to be forthcoming about which you cannot even begin to comprehend."
December 13, 2018 at 4:48 AM
Dr. Harr,
As kenhyderal has indicated, in order to confirm all of the facts of the Duke Lacrosse case, it is necessary to speak with Kilgo. You should check with kenhyderal and ask him how to contact Kilgo.
December 16, 2018 at 7:26 AM
Hey, Nifong Double Supporter.
I have done something my past two visits which I had not done during the past six or seven years... and that is discuss the Duke Lacrosse case and its aftermath with Crystal. Well, I have done that now, and am shocked by the revelations. My attention had been so focused on the second-degree murder conviction that I failed to see the enormity of the big picture.
The shar-video which I will produce following the one I am currently working on will provide details of which were never before heard. I hope to have the current shar-video completed within a week. (At present I am beginning to lay down the narrative soundtrack.)
Anonymous Anonymous said...
So nonsensical posts, general insults and ad hominem attacks aimed at entire groups of people (Liestoppers) or individuals you cannot identify (and do not agree with) are permitted?
Whether or not you are quick to censor, you are, in fact censoring comments. The double standard is interesting, though not surprising. That is what censorship is about at its core - eliminating expressions the censor does not agree with, and silencing people censor disdains.
Abe Froman
Chicago, IL
December 13, 2018 at 5:33 AM
Hey, Abe.
As you are aware, I was forced to monitor comments before posting... I would have preferred not to have been put in that position as it is time-consuming to say the least. With all due respect, Abe, I believe that I have been extremely lax when it comes to publishing comments. There are very few exceptions where I have not published comments... and certainly all serious comments made in good-faith... even when marginally related to the topic at hand or issues related to social justice. I value contrary and opposing commentary as it encourages deeper thought and makes the debate of interest.
Abe, I do not believe that I have "censored" any of your comments. If I am mistaken, feel free to re-submit.
How does anything related to the Duke Lacrosse case help Crystal in her incarceration?
"How does anything related to the Duke Lacrosse case help Crystal in her incarceration?"
Sidney has moved from a legal solution for Mangum's release, to a truth shall set her free approach. Thus, the Duke Lacrosse case that started it all, will be restarted. Once the public sees what really happened to Mangum in the Duke Lacrosse case, it will start a ground swell of public opinion to have her released.
Kenhyderal,
Por faoe, ven ya a Durham!. Ya encontre a tu amigo el gordo Kilgo, pero Sonnosciuto dice que no lo soltara a menos de que tu vengas a poner la cara por el. Ven pronto a Durham, y avisame en donde te vas a hospedar.
Rapido!
Dr. Harr,
I am convinced that your next shar-video will be historic. Please don’t let us down.
Dr. Harr,
When will you post the new shar-video? Will the shar-vide contain information that exonerates Mike Nifong?
Papa John said...
Dr. Harr,
When will you post the new shar-video? Will the shar-vide contain information that exonerates Mike Nifong?
December 18, 2018 at 3:15 AM
Hey, Papa John.
I am currently on the last phase of production, which is laying down images to the soundtrack. This is the most time-consuming and creatively challenging part of the process. I currently have completed the prologue... a new format, and have 87 paragraphs to cover with graphics. It'll probably take close to seven days to complete... and then a day or two to prepare it to be uploaded online.
The shar-video which I am currently working on will not have any bearing on Mike Nifong... at least of significance. However, the shar-video that is to follow will most definitely exonerate not only Mike Nifong, but Crystal Mangum, as well. It'll be an eye-opener containing information never before presented... and that is because I have just recently became aware of it.
Nifong Supporter Supporter said...
Dr. Harr,
I am convinced that your next shar-video will be historic. Please don’t let us down.
December 17, 2018 at 3:32 PM
Hey, Nifong double-Supporter.
Most assuredly, the shar-video to follow the one on which I am currently working, will be a watershed entry on this blog site. It will destroy the Duke Lacrosse Myth like a pound of C4 leveling a twenty-foot butter statue. I doubt very much that you will be disappointed.
The upcoming shar-video features a new format which I believe will improve the product. Throughout the years of production of these mini-documentaries, there have been strides, I believe, that have made them better. I am particularly pleased with the improved audio, which was extremely problematic early-on.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
"How does anything related to the Duke Lacrosse case help Crystal in her incarceration?"
Sidney has moved from a legal solution for Mangum's release, to a truth shall set her free approach. Thus, the Duke Lacrosse case that started it all, will be restarted. Once the public sees what really happened to Mangum in the Duke Lacrosse case, it will start a ground swell of public opinion to have her released.
December 16, 2018 at 5:55 PM
Hey, Anony.
Your explanation to the question is spot on. Shirley the gigantic flaws pinning blame on Crystal Mangum is the nidus upon which the entirety of the vindictive prosecution against her is based... that, and the fact that she's an African American.
Revealing that the Duke Lacrosse premise, reported ad nausea by the biased mainstream media (that Mangum falsely claimed that she was sexually assaulted at the Duke Lacrosse party), is, itself, false, will provide her with much greater credibility... and she will be accurately viewed as a victim of assault rather than as an evil false accuser trying to destroy lives with lies.
Like you predict, I believe that Mangum will finally get the support that has been denied her once the truths of her case get passed onto the public.
Sid -- I will note here that you let 2 comments pass "monitoring" that were basically copies of old "Kilgo" posts from back in 2009 -- with the names changed.
Yet you censored a 3rd that was yet again a copy -- with the names changed.
Why is that?
Either they are all worth censorship, or none of them are.
Dr. Harr,
What can we do to ensure that the mainstream media does not ignore your new shar-videos?
@ Anonymous 12-18-18 2:17 PM: I only wish those, here only to mock and make mischief, would go elsewhere, allowing contributors who want to seriously discuss the important issues relating to justice and it's miscarriage, post on this blog without these meaningless distractions. They should either get lost or get a life
Be careful, everyone! Good old Kenny is liable to get angry at you (angry enough to come to Durham)!
Right on kenhyderal.
Kenny,
If those who are here only to mock and make mischief were to leave, who would be left?
@ kenhyderal 12-19 9:50 AM: I can only say that you can wish in 1 hand and crap in the other and see which one fills fastest.
Further, I'll say that you can (roughly) divide the world into 2 camps...."Doers" and "Complainers".
I see a lot of complaining from you -- but very little (if any) actual "doing". You don't like the so-called "miscarriages of justice" in Durham? Actually do something about it. (That means more than pissing and moaning on this blog). Come to Durham and do something.
There's several events scheduled in Jan 2019 -- For example, The Durham County Legislative Delegation Swearing In Ceremony is scheduled for early Jan.
Come to the event, take some time to bring your issues to the attention of the new legislative delegates.....Or get lost / get a life.
The choice is yours. Let me know how I can find you at the event.
If I were to attend, and that would be a big "if", given my family and employment obligations, my location and my personal means, would you then identify yourself? If so why do you post anonymously here? That being said, speaking out against gross injustice and morally supporting a selfless champion in the fight against injustice like Dr. Harr , given my present circumstances, is doing my small part. If I can’t do anything personally about the broken American Justice System, at least I’ll be vocal about it's failures. Perhaps, maybe then I’ll get support from some from those who hear me and are in a position to help. Maybe even some who frequent this blog. At least, for now, nobody can confuse me with those who tolerate it in silence.
You're very good at virtue-signaiing, Kenny. No one here believes you.
More blah blah blah from Kenny boy.
So you're a complainer.
Thanks for the clarification.
@ Guiowen Quote: "Virtue signalling is better than vice signalling. First, if you have ever encountered misogyny, anti-semitism, racism, threats of violence, white supremacy or the like online, you will know that there is plenty of vice signalling out there; even if you have objections to Black Lives Matter, I’m sure you can agree that it’s far, far better than saying Black Lives Don’t Matter. Second, it is worth acknowledging and appreciating the fact that our society, divided as it often is, still regards justice, tolerance, empathy, inclusion, care for the poor and so on as virtues. Many civilisations haven’t (and, as Nietzsche would warn us, it is very possible that after our Christian foundations have eroded a bit further, our civilisation [sic] won’t either). So yes, virtue signalling is irritating. But it is much better than the alternative" Dr. Andrew Wilson; ( Teaching Pastor at King's Church London. He has a theology degrees from Cambridge, a (MA) from, London School of Theology (MTh), and from King's College London a (PhD). He is a columnist for the newspaper Christianity Today
It would be better if you actually did something, Kenny. Instead you sit on the beach and ell us how great you are.
HYPOCRISY is GOOD!
@ Guiowen 3:18 and 3:11: Hypocrisy good? Not according to Jesus. (Matthew 23:10-29) B.t.w., can you show any post where I've boasted about my virtue?
Kenny,
Your recent citation (9:16) tells us that hypocrisy is good. Please read what you write.
Kenny,
Here's your way of telling us how great you are:
"speaking out against gross injustice and morally supporting a selfless champion in the fight against injustice like Dr. Harr , given my present circumstances, is doing my small part. If I can’t do anything personally about the broken American Justice System, at least I’ll be vocal about it's failures. Perhaps, maybe then I’ll get support from some from those who hear me and are in a position to help. Maybe even some who frequent this blog. At least, for now, nobody can confuse me with those who tolerate it in silence."
Anonymous Nifong Supporter Supporter said...
Dr. Harr,
What can we do to ensure that the mainstream media does not ignore your new shar-videos?
December 19, 2018 at 3:33 AM
Hey, Nifong Double-Supporter.
There is nothing to do to make the mainstream media take a serious look at my shar-videos, sharlogs, or other evidence that is supportive of Crystal Mangum's innocence. The media, like Governor Roy Cooper and others in governmental positions, are aware of the truths in Mangum's case but don't want to be confronted by them. The Duke Lacrosse Myth would not be perpetuated without mainstream media involvement... and had the mainstream media acted objectively and with journalistic integrity and ethics, Crystal Mangum would most likely would have never been taken to trial... much less convicted. The media, if not a conspirator, was at the least complicit in the injustices that have enabled the wrongful incarceration for more than seven years of a single black mother of three. It is disgraceful.
The following is a post of 12-21-18 at 9:41 AM by Anony that has been edited with deletion of an objectionable word:
guiowen: "Why don't you actually do something instead of just virtue signalling?"
Kenhyderal: "OMG that would be WAAAAAY too much work!"*
*goes back to posing on J4N
In the future I will not take the time and effort to edit comments containing an objectionable word. So, please remove all cuss words and objectionable words from comments. It will be much appreciated as I must use my precious time working on the shar-video.
Udaman Kenny.
Guiowen said: "Kenny,Here's your way of telling us how great you are"...."my small part"..."If I can't do anything personally"...."at least I'll be vocal"...…"Perhaps maybe then I'll get support".... "maybe even some".....At least for now"
Guiowen said: "Your recent citation (9:16) tells us that hypocrisy is good. Please read what you write"...…… Please explain to us where you find the thesis that hypocrisy is good in theologian Dr. Wilson's words
In this instance, the "objectionable word" meant exactly what it was supposed to. See here for details.
I do like your use of the word "posing", however.
Kenny,
I am unwilling to believe anything you post at this blog until you provide convincing proof that you communicated with Kilgo.
Sid, you should just stop editing/blocking comments. People can ignore the objectionable ones. The only reason people whined about you editing them is they know it takes time, and so they post a lot of things you won't like so that you have to waste time reviewing each one and they can whine.
I assume you realized long ago that everyone here is just trolling you and treats this as a Joke, including Kenny - who has never actually done anything helpful.
Kenny,
Virtue signaling, from someone like you who has never done anything virtuous, is tantamount to hypocrisy.
Kenny, since you like to quote the bible, here is something about virtue-signaling:
So when you give to the needy, do not sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be praised by men. Truly I tell you, they already have their full reward. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. And your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.…
Durham Observer,
Kenny doesn't lie. He specifically told me so back in 2017. The trouble is that, because of context, he frequently forgets or misinterprets things.
kenhyderal,
I will be traveling to Dubai next month and I would like to meet with you. Please confirm a time and place.
I am anonymous @9:50pm....The link I posted was edited (I assume by Sid) so it no longer references the link it was originally pointing to. The link was to a wiktionary definition of the word "sh*tposting".
I assume, even though I used the word "here" without actually stating Sid's "objectionable word", he will edit this as well.
So be it.
@ John Anderson: Give me your e-mail address via Dr. Harr and we can work out the logistics of a meet-up. Are you a supporter of Crystal?
@ Guiowen: Wonderful guidance from our Lord Jesus concerning charity but it's not really related our duty to come out against injustice
kenhyderal,
I am not comfortable giving my contact information to Sidney Harr. How can I get in touch with you?
Well, Kenny, I hope you've seen whom He considers hypocrites.
@ Guiowen: 10:14: Yes I have and I do not think Dr. Andrew Wilson's words are an example of what Jesus was admonishing.
@ John Anderson: What is your motive for wanting to meet with me in person? What is your motive for anonymity on this blog. Since you have signed with an appellation why do you still post anonymously Are you a supporter of Crystal. Why are you uncomfortable in using Dr. Harr as our intermediary?
Kenny,
Christ says
"when you give to the needy, do not sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do "
This is precisely what we call "virtue-signaling".
Just because some guy has a Ph. D. in theology, don't think I'm going to accept his words.
Can you understand what I'm saying, or is this too difficult for you? Is it, maybe, out of context for you?
Guiowen said: "Can you understand what I'm saying, or is this too difficult for you?"...…. No, as usual, I can't understand your convoluted arguments. I fail to see in that quote, from Dr. Wilson, where he boasts about his own charitable works or he boasts about his moral belief that charitable giving is good. In no way does he imply that boasting about such works is good or only seeking acclaim for doing such work is good nor is he expressing undue piety about his own morality.
kenhyderal,
Since I will be in Dubai, I wanted to meet you and see if you really are as big a horse's ass as your posts indicate. Given the judgment Sid shows in litigating frivolous claims, I don't trust him with any of my contact information.
As usual, Kenny cannot understand. That's why he never gets anything ndone.
Kenny, good old Wilson tells us that virtue signaling is good. This does not mean that he's boasting about it. What he is saying is that it's good for people to go about signaling their virtue. For example, he feels it's good to go about saying "black lives matter" because it's better than saying "black lives don't matter". What he does not seem to realize is that it would be better to say neither of those catch phrases. I imagine Wilson is a good guy - much better, certainly, than you -- but he's saying that it's good for other people, impotent braggarts like you, to tell us how great you are. This is a mistake on his part.
Just to see if you understand English: I'm not saying Wilson is a bad guy! I'm saying he's mistaken, and his mistakes lead people like you to feel good at being hypocrites.
I wish I could explain it all in words of one syllable (perhaps you would understand), but I just don't see sufficiently many monosyllabic words!
A Guiowen: No Guiowen you are wrong Dr. Wilson is not saying it's good for braggarts to tell us how great they are. How you've made that skewed interpretation escapes me. Can you show us anywhere and anytime, here, where I have proclaimed or even intimated "how great" I am? Do I sense projection. Father Lawrence Lovasik said " a sarcastic person has a superiority complex that can be cured only by the honesty of humility".
@ John Anderson: After insulting me, by calling me a horse's ass, are you sure you want to meet up with me? That might be problematic for you.
Kenny,
Wilson says "virtue signaling is better than the alternative." The alternative is to do your good deeds and not talk about them. (See Mathew's gospel, chapter 7.)
As for you, we've been hearing about how you're a fighter, a master debater, etc., for years now.
I'm sorry if you cannot remember all we've had to put up with since you came here. I realize everything you do, that does not reflect well on you, disappears because of context. Unfortunately the rest of us remember.
On a totally different topic, I notice you have no qualms about picking fights. I guess the "Kenhyderal doctrine" does not apply to you?
Post a Comment