Sunday, December 23, 2018

Season's Greetings, my Friends.

89 comments:

Nifong Supporter Supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

We are still waiting to see the results of your secret projects. What is the reason for the delay? You are beginning to behave like kenhyderal. In other words, you talk a lot but produce no results.

Merry Christmas.

guiowen said...

Sidney,
You and Crystal look terrific@! Is there any way that they will let her out (under house arrest) for a few days at a time? Maybe if she promises to marry you, they'll give her some sort of leave.
In any case, Merry Christmas!

John Anderson said...

kenhyderal said...
"@ John Anderson: After insulting me, by calling me a horse's ass, are you sure you want to meet up with me? That might be problematic for you."

December 24, 2018 at 8:12 AM

Yes, I would like to meet with you, kenhyderal. I don't understand what would be problematic about the meeting. Please explain.

Anonymous said...

Why does Crystal Mangum look like a different person in every picture or video you post?

guiowen said...

John Anderson,
Be careful! Kenny is a FIGHTER! He told me so himself!

kenhyderal said...

Guiowen said: "You and Crystal look terrific@! ……………………………………….. On this I agree with poster Guiowen. They make a wonderful looking couple. I'm happy I introduced them.

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous poster denominating himself as John Anderson said: " I don't understand what would be problematic about the meeting"...……………...Use your imagination taking in to account the advice proffered by Guiowen. I'm not a person who, unlike Dr. Harr, reacts to being insulted by turning the other cheek.

guiowen said...

Kenny,
Wilson says "virtue signaling is better than the alternative." The alternative is to do your good deeds and not talk about them. (See Mathew's gospel, chapter 7.)

As for you, we've been hearing about how you're a fighter, a master debater, etc., for years now.
I'm sorry if you cannot remember all we've had to put up with since you came here. I realize everything you do, that does not reflect well on you, disappears because of context. Unfortunately the rest of us remember.

On a totally different topic, I notice you have no qualms about picking fights. I guess the "Kenhyderal doctrine" does not apply to you?

Dr. Caligari said...

Dr. Harr:
I wish you all the best for the Holiday Season. I appreciate that you host this site and allow views that differ from yours.

My wish for you for 2019 is that you devote your efforts on behalf of Crytal Mangum in a direction other than filing lawsuits. You do neither her nor the court system any favors by filing doomed-to-fail cases. You could do her much more good by trying to rally public opinion in her favor. Let's face it, you don't know law and you haven't learned any over many years in the courts.

Having said all that, best wishes for a happy and healthy new year.

kenhyderal said...

@ Guiowen: I have never ever stated that I am a "master debater". This was an appellation planted on me by you years ago. Ostensibly intended, not as a compliment but as a crude sophomoric double entendre. I have stated when I am attacked, that unlike Dr. Harr, I reflexively fight back. I recognize and usually say so that in this respect I'm lacking in the Christian virtue, of turning the other cheek, that is so evident in Dr. Harr

kenhyderal said...

Guiowen said: "Wilson says "virtue signaling is better than the alternative".... And the alternative he referred to was what he called "vice shaming". In no way was Dr. Wilson advocating "blowing ones own horn" about doing good deeds; behaviour that was censured by The Lord. He is after all a Theologian.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Nifong Supporter Supporter said...
Dr. Harr,

We are still waiting to see the results of your secret projects. What is the reason for the delay? You are beginning to behave like kenhyderal. In other words, you talk a lot but produce no results.

Merry Christmas.


December 24, 2018 at 6:14 AM


Hey, Nifong Double Supporter.

There are circumstances out of my control that determine when my secret projects will be ready for presentation. Some I am aware of and some which tend to be indefinite or vague. But the time frame is within a matter of weeks and months... not years.

I just mentioned them to give viewers and visitors to this site advance notice of proposed events to that they can be looking out for them.

Nifong Supporter said...


guiowen said...
Sidney,
You and Crystal look terrific@! Is there any way that they will let her out (under house arrest) for a few days at a time? Maybe if she promises to marry you, they'll give her some sort of leave.
In any case, Merry Christmas!

December 24, 2018 at 7:51 AM


Hey, gui, mon ami.

Thanks for the kind compliment.

I doubt very much where there is any condition under which the penal system will do anything that is humane or kindly towards Crystal Mangum. Just like Nifong, O.J. Simpson, and Colin Kaepernick, she has been targeted by the state, courts, and media.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
Why does Crystal Mangum look like a different person in every picture or video you post?

December 25, 2018 at 9:08 AM


Anony, she looks like the same person to me, but I believe that the difference might very well be attributed to her hair style. During the years Crystal has worn her hair in different arrangements... from straightened to braids to cornrows... you name it. I like them all.

Nifong Supporter said...


kenhyderal said...
Guiowen said: "You and Crystal look terrific@! ……………………………………….. On this I agree with poster Guiowen. They make a wonderful looking couple. I'm happy I introduced them.

December 25, 2018 at 1:58 PM


Hey, kenhyderal.

Thanks for the compliment. I hope that you and your family had a great Christmas. Now that it's over, it's back to the salt mines.

Nifong Supporter Supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

I do not understand why you allow kenhyderal to make threats of physical violence against other posters at your blog. Have you chosen not to apply your posting guidelines to kenhyderal? Do you condone his threats against others?

Nifong Supporter said...


Dr. Caligari said...
Dr. Harr:
I wish you all the best for the Holiday Season. I appreciate that you host this site and allow views that differ from yours.

My wish for you for 2019 is that you devote your efforts on behalf of Crytal Mangum in a direction other than filing lawsuits. You do neither her nor the court system any favors by filing doomed-to-fail cases. You could do her much more good by trying to rally public opinion in her favor. Let's face it, you don't know law and you haven't learned any over many years in the courts.

Having said all that, best wishes for a happy and healthy new year.


December 25, 2018 at 8:06 PM


Hey, Dr. Caligari.

Thanks for the kind words, and I wish the best in 2019 for you and your family.

Appreciation for your advice, however, I am of the "Nothing ventured, nothing gained" school of thought. For much of Mangum's prosecution and incarceration her legal counsel did nothing for her... did not file motions, did not conduct investigations, did not write letters, did not meet with me, etc. The failure to timely file the malicious prosecution complaint in civil court gave the State it's only issue upon which to mount a defense... and it clearly illustrates the abject refusal of Mangum's attorneys to move in a manner that is in their client's best interests.

True, I do not have formal legal training, however Crystal and my attempts to obtain representation for her has been futile. From the beginning of the murder trial (when the Durham Public Defenders Office refused to get involved) to the abandonment by the NC Prisoner Legal Services in January 2017, Mangum has been unsuccessful in getting counsel from NC Innocence Inquiry Commission, NC Center on Actual Innocence, innocence projects at NCCU Law School, NAACP, ACLU, and attorneys in the private sector.

I agree with you that rallying the public is possibly even more promising than the legal avenue with its political obstacles, but I see no disadvantage to doing both. I do not see how filing lawsuits, even if they are not successful, is in anyway detrimental.

Harr Supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

I agree with the last post by Nifong Double Supporter.

It is my impression that you have done everything in your power to create a warm and welcoming environment at your blog in which all posters can feel comfortable and at ease, regardless of the opinions they express. Recently, kenhyderal has destroyed what you have created by threatening to commit acts of senseless violence against one of the new posters at the site.

Shame on you kenhyderal.

And Dr. Harr, we are all waiting to see whether you will reprimand kenhyderal or whether you will allow his threats to stand unchallenged.

Anonymous said...

"Mangum has been unsuccessful in getting counsel from NC Innocence Inquiry Commission, NC Center on Actual Innocence, innocence projects at NCCU Law School, NAACP, ACLU, and attorneys in the private sector."

.....Because she's guilty as determined by a court of law and a jury of her peers.

kenhyderal said...

NS S said: "I do not understand why you allow kenhyderal to make threats of physical violence against other posters at your blog"...…..I've occasionally done so rhetorically only after being provoked by uncalled for gratuitous insults or by unwarranted epithets of racist, Nazi, liar, etc. These are deliberately thrown out with the express intent to anger and upset me. Most often this is done anonymously and in a cowardly fashion and often for their own sport

kenhyderal said...

Harr Supporter said: " Recently, kenhyderal has destroyed what you have created by threatening to commit acts of senseless violence against one of the new posters at the site"...…….I sense sarcasm. This anonymous Poster calling himself John Anderson asked to meet with me. When I suggested he e-mail me via Dr. Harr to work out the logistics of a meeting he insulted Dr. Harr by questioning his judgement and stating he did not trust giving him his contact information; this while at the same time asking me for my personal information. When I asked his motif for wanting to meet up with me he gratuitously insulted me. Following this exchange I suggested that given his hostile attitude meeting with me could be problematic. It was interloper Guiowen who suggested this was a physical threat. Who is the villain here? A serious contributor being baited, mocked and made sport of?

Nifong Supporter Supporter said...

kenhyderal,

How do we distinguish your rhetorical posts from your posts that are not rhetorical? Were your posts rhetorical when you claimed you exchanged email with Kilgo? Are you posts rhetorical when you claim that you are a close friend of Crystal's?

kenhyderal said...

NS S. said: How do we distinguish your rhetorical posts from your posts that are not rhetorical? "...… That requires a degree of discernment that could be beyond you. NS S. also said: "Were your posts rhetorical when you claimed you exchanged email with Kilgo? Are you posts rhetorical when you claim that you are a close friend of Crystal's?"...… No these were statements of fact. The feigned outrage expressed in your 5:48 AM post of 12-26-18 is either deliberate sarcasm or a lack of discernment

John Anderson said...

So, kenhyderal, if you promise not to assault me (and assuming your promise is not rhetorical), my offer still stands and I will meet you next month in Dubai for lunch.

Nifong Supporter Supporter said...

kenhyderal said...
NS S. said: How do we distinguish your rhetorical posts from your posts that are not rhetorical? "...… That requires a degree of discernment that could be beyond you.

December 27, 2018 at 1:33 PM

And would you explain to us why you feel you have the right to be upset when you receive gratuitous insults?

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal, you are always posingg as a fighter. You then threaten some poor guy who wants to visit you in Dubai. I warn him about your reputation as a fighter. In so doing I prevent a fight. You of course complain, probably because you hoped to grab the guy by surprise.

kenhyderal said...

@ Anonymous the Poster who calls himself John Anderson: What dates will you be in Dubai? Since you don't trust Dr. Harr, which seems "lame" to me, how do we connect without, for instance, me posting my e-mail address or my telephone number on this public forum? What is your Airline and flight number and date of arrival? I've given you a way to contact me which you seem to reject. Can you suggest a way I could contact you? January is fast approaching.

kenhyderal said...

NS S. said: "And would you explain to us why you feel you have the right to be upset when you receive gratuitous insults"...… Human nature?

Nifong Supporter Supporter said...

kenhyderal,

My question at 3:27 requires a degree of discernment that could be beyond you. I was pointing out to you that you hand out your share of gratuitous insults and, therefore, I was surprised to see that you would complain about being treated in kind.

kenhyderal said...

NS S said: "My question at 3:27 requires a degree of discernment that could be beyond you. I was pointing out to you that you hand out your share of gratuitous insults and, therefore, I was surprised to see that you would complain about being treated in kind.:...… Can you give an example?

Anonymous said...

You are a dirty old man, Sid.

Crystal's young enough to be your daughter.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
You are a dirty old man, Sid.

Crystal's young enough to be your daughter.

December 28, 2018 at 9:40 AM


Hah! Anony, Shirley you jest. Yes, she's young enough to be my daughter, but she's forty years old. Certainly I'm not robbing the cradle. And you're being a bit premature as our relationship so far has been strictly platonic.

Actually, there a many men married to women young enough to be their daughters... do you consider them as "dirty old men" too?

Some people can never be satisfied. For years Crystal's been criticized for her bad choice in men as mates. So she elects to be with a decent, responsible, respectful beau and now you're up in arms because I'm old enough to be her dad. Hah. Well at least I can guarantee our relationship will be no-drama and no-trauma.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
"Mangum has been unsuccessful in getting counsel from NC Innocence Inquiry Commission, NC Center on Actual Innocence, innocence projects at NCCU Law School, NAACP, ACLU, and attorneys in the private sector."

.....Because she's guilty as determined by a court of law and a jury of her peers.

December 26, 2018 at 11:28 AM


Newsflash, Anony: People who seek counsel from NC Innocence Inquiry Commission, NC Center on Actual Innocence, innoce ce projects at NCCU Law School, NAACP, ACLU, and attorneys in private sector have been determined to be guilty by a court of law and a jury of peers. If these individuals were found not guilty at trial, then they would not need the legal services of those named above.

Also, you might want to keep in mind that not all people who are determined to be guilty by a court of law are in fact guilty. There are many innocent people incarcerated in this state and country. Remember that Duke University tried to have me arrested on a trumped up charge. I only escaped incarceration due to a fortuitous meeting with James Coleman.

Nifong Supporter said...



Anonymous Harr Supporter said...
Dr. Harr,

I agree with the last post by Nifong Double Supporter.

It is my impression that you have done everything in your power to create a warm and welcoming environment at your blog in which all posters can feel comfortable and at ease, regardless of the opinions they express. Recently, kenhyderal has destroyed what you have created by threatening to commit acts of senseless violence against one of the new posters at the site.

Shame on you kenhyderal.

And Dr. Harr, we are all waiting to see whether you will reprimand kenhyderal or whether you will allow his threats to stand unchallenged.


December 26, 2018 at 11:26 AM


Hey, Harr Supporter.

I don't recall reading any untoward comments from kenhyderal. He is definitely a gentleman and I doubt that he would be involved in fisticuffs. Surely you must have misread or misinterpreted his comment.

After all, kenhyderal is the one responsible for forcing me to clean up this blog site by monitoring all comments prior to posting.

guiowen said...

Sidney,
It is clear that you feel the "Kenhyderal rule" does not apply to Kenhyderal.

Anonymous said...

Where is the little man?

little man said...

present and accounted for

udaman supporter said...

Udaman little man.

little man supporter said...

Udaman little man.

little man supporter said...

Where is the little man?

little man said...

Present and accounted for.

Nifong Supporter Supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

About a month ago, based on your reports that you were working on secret projects, I expressed the opinion that your next several shar-video would be historic. Now, I am beginning to wonder whether there was any substance to the secret projects you described.

You are testing our patience, Dr. Harr. When do you plan reveal the secret projects?

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Nifong Supporter Supporter said...
Dr. Harr,

About a month ago, based on your reports that you were working on secret projects, I expressed the opinion that your next several shar-video would be historic. Now, I am beginning to wonder whether there was any substance to the secret projects you described.

You are testing our patience, Dr. Harr. When do you plan reveal the secret projects?


January 9, 2019 at 3:37 PM



The secret projects are not solely manageable by me. One should be available within this month. Work on my current shar-video is nearly completed, but work on it has been interrupted due to efforts required for Mangum's and my legal appeals. Currently am ready to leave for Durham in hopes of setting up an appointment with the newly elected and recently sworn in district attorney.

Be patient. The secret projects will be revealed shortly.

kenhyderal supporter said...

kenhyderal,

Is it time for you to make a cogent comment?

kenhyderal said...

The time is not yet ripe for me to be commenting here but for Dr. Harr the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. are abt. "The time is always ripe for doing right"

Anonymous said...

Kenny,
So, according to this, you are unable to do right.
I can't say that I'm surprised.

kenhyderal supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

Please delete the post at 2:06. This is another instance in which a serious contributor is being baited, mocked and made sport of.

Kenhyderal supporter supporter said...

So:
(1) According to MLK, the time is always ripe to do the right thing.
(2) The time is not ripe for Kenny to say what he wishes to say.
(3) Ergo, Kenny's comments are not right.

kenhyderal supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

Please delete the post at 2:29. This is another instance in which a serious contributor is being baited, mocked and made sport of.

BB said...

Mike Nifong was disbarred because his attackers viewed him as breaking one of the "codes of the south" - actually it is a "code of racism maintained". He dared to charge white males with a charge of crimes against a Black Person - particularly sexual violations against a Black woman. The code of the south is that any white man can have his way with a Black woman, and Black people in general have no rights that a White man is bound to respect - a supreme court justice - Roger B. Taney code of the south imprinted in perpetuity.

So Mike Nifong's hapless error was that he dared to be fair and view Black people and white people equally, believe this Black woman, and appear to be - in the southern racists' minds who went after him - derailing the future of white guys for a Black woman's complaint.
I pray that Mike gets justice and his license to practice law back. But for the time, Satan is the Prince of this world, so, that is why Mike Nifong is suffering for the time being.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous BB said...
Mike Nifong was disbarred because his attackers viewed him as breaking one of the "codes of the south" - actually it is a "code of racism maintained". He dared to charge white males with a charge of crimes against a Black Person - particularly sexual violations against a Black woman. The code of the south is that any white man can have his way with a Black woman, and Black people in general have no rights that a White man is bound to respect - a supreme court justice - Roger B. Taney code of the south imprinted in perpetuity.

So Mike Nifong's hapless error was that he dared to be fair and view Black people and white people equally, believe this Black woman, and appear to be - in the southern racists' minds who went after him - derailing the future of white guys for a Black woman's complaint.
I pray that Mike gets justice and his license to practice law back. But for the time, Satan is the Prince of this world, so, that is why Mike Nifong is suffering for the time being.

January 13, 2019 at 10:00 AM


Hey, BB.

Thanks for your insightful and courageous comments. I concur fully with the points that you made. What you refer to as the "codes of the south" are so deeply entrenched that even African Americans are reticent about speaking up against them.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous kenhyderal supporter said...
Dr. Harr,

Please delete the post at 2:29. This is another instance in which a serious contributor is being baited, mocked and made sport of.

January 13, 2019 at 8:24 AM


Hey, kenhyderal supporter.

I cannot delete comments willy-nilly, especially if they are not in violation of the kenhyderal doctrine. From the 2:29 post, I cannot really observer serious malice. My main concern regarding vicious personal attacks deals with those directed at real life individuals mentioned by name. I consider rude commentary about someone using a moniker and not identifiable in real life as not so much of an egregious affront. However, I appreciate your concerns.

Nifong Supporter said...


kenhyderal said...
The time is not yet ripe for me to be commenting here but for Dr. Harr the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. are abt. "The time is always ripe for doing right"

January 11, 2019 at 9:50 AM


Hey, kenhyderal.

Thanks for sharing the King quote. I like it.

Nifong Supporter said...


guiowen said...
Sidney,
It is clear that you feel the "Kenhyderal rule" does not apply to Kenhyderal.

December 29, 2018 at 8:12 AM


Hey, qui, mon ami.

The kenhyderal doctrine applies to everyone... myself included. However, I do not see anywhere in his comments what I would consider a violation. I do not want to tamp down robust and vigorous debate by imposing sanctions excessively.

It is my belief that arguments can be made with passion and yet maintain respectfulness and civility. I hope that is something which constitutes what commenters to this site consistently strive.

Nifong Supporter said...


HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

This is to let you know that progress is being made on my latest shar-video. I am nearing completion on it now. My schedule calls for it to be completed by this Wednesday as I plan on utilizing it on Thursday. Will probably work on it night and day until completed.

The shar-video that follows the one I am currently working on is the one that will be most groundbreaking and provide heretofore unheard of information.

Also, I must share time working on the two appellate lawsuits to assure that deadlines are met.

Still waiting for one secret project to become available. Additional secret projects will come to fruition once I clear my current slate of activities. At any rate, the shar-video upon which I am now completing should be posted, at the latest, by the end of the week... Saturday, January 19th.

As you were.

Anonymous said...

Sid,

Do you think anyone cares?

Nifong Supporter Supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

How many secret projects do you have?

Anonymous said...

Sid said,

"My main concern regarding vicious personal attacks deals with those directed at real life individuals mentioned by name."

Thus, posts consisting of vicious personal attacks directed against "Duke lacrosse players," "Duke lacrosse apologists," "carpetbagger jihadists," "corrupt, avaricious, turncoat attorneys" and similar insults aimed at specific, easily identifiable people who Sid does not care for pass muster under Sid's censorship framework. And criticisms of people who agree with him are banned.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Anonymous said...


Sid says:
"Also, you might want to keep in mind that not all people who are determined to be guilty by a court of law are in fact guilty. There are many innocent people incarcerated in this state and country..."

By your own definition, Sid no one is innocent until found innocent by....

..."jury or judge, in lieu of a jury".

kenhyderal said...

@ Abe 8:33 1-14-19 You should re-read the so-called kenhyderal rule. Disagreeing here with the declaration of innocence, with all that implies is not a violation. Disagreeing with those of you who believe that no crime was perpetrated on Crystal is not a violation. Believing that powerful people of privilege who defend their own can prevail against poor minority is not a violation. Believing that Court appointed defence Lawyers provided Crystal with poor representation is not a violation. Even the ANONYMOUS epithets hurled at me eg "KENHYDERAL is a blind, hypocritical, blatant unrepentant racist" Is not a violation I can defend myself. As can Dr. Harr. The disgusting posts against Crystal though are.

kenhyderal supporter said...

Right on kenhyderal.

Anonymous said...

Ken,

So I'd like to know where, you got the notion.

Anonymous said...

Sid,

It’s Sunday and you have not posted your new shar-video. What’s the problem? Still working on the secret projects?

Anonymous said...

But no crime was committed against Mangum, kenny. Claiming otherwise, without evidence (and ignoring the massive amounts of evidence to the contrary) is despicable. The only crime that happened is that Mangum falsely accused three demonstrably innocent young men of a horrific crime that did not happen. That, too, is despicable. When you behave despicably, you should not be surprised when people treat you accordingly.

It is also puzzling that you would continue to push the false rape claim. It is irrelevant to Mangum's current legal predicament. The fact that she and you continue to repeat it speaks directly to your lack of character.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Nifong Supporter Supporter said...
Dr. Harr,

How many secret projects do you have?

January 13, 2019 at 5:40 PM


I would say about three or four. One is totally out of my control, one requires my involvement, and two are totally reliant on me. The one out of my control is long overdue and I will just have to wait, along with everyone else.

One project requires much time and effort and I have not even begun it yet... except for mental conceptualizations. I will identify the secret projects as they unfold so there is no doubt as to what they are.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid said,

"My main concern regarding vicious personal attacks deals with those directed at real life individuals mentioned by name."

Thus, posts consisting of vicious personal attacks directed against "Duke lacrosse players," "Duke lacrosse apologists," "carpetbagger jihadists," "corrupt, avaricious, turncoat attorneys" and similar insults aimed at specific, easily identifiable people who Sid does not care for pass muster under Sid's censorship framework. And criticisms of people who agree with him are banned.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

January 14, 2019 at 8:33 AM


Hey, Abe.

Actually I believe that I am quite tolerant when it comes to monitoring comments. If a comment doesn't contain a cuss/curse word there is a high probability that it will be published. Although I do not like to see commenters to this site or private individuals attacked, I do allow it usually as long as the criticisms are not too malicious.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sid says:
"Also, you might want to keep in mind that not all people who are determined to be guilty by a court of law are in fact guilty. There are many innocent people incarcerated in this state and country..."

By your own definition, Sid no one is innocent until found innocent by....

..."jury or judge, in lieu of a jury".

January 16, 2019 at 2:02 PM


.. and that includes the three Duke Lacrosse defendants.

Nifong Supporter said...


kenhyderal said...
@ Abe 8:33 1-14-19 You should re-read the so-called kenhyderal rule. Disagreeing here with the declaration of innocence, with all that implies is not a violation. Disagreeing with those of you who believe that no crime was perpetrated on Crystal is not a violation. Believing that powerful people of privilege who defend their own can prevail against poor minority is not a violation. Believing that Court appointed defence Lawyers provided Crystal with poor representation is not a violation. Even the ANONYMOUS epithets hurled at me eg "KENHYDERAL is a blind, hypocritical, blatant unrepentant racist" Is not a violation I can defend myself. As can Dr. Harr. The disgusting posts against Crystal though are.

January 16, 2019 at 9:47 PM


Hey, kenhyderal.

Thanks for answering Abe's comment with much better clarity than I.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid,

It’s Sunday and you have not posted your new shar-video. What’s the problem? Still working on the secret projects?

January 20, 2019 at 4:00 AM


Hey, Anony.

I am on the verge of completion of the shar-video and by today's end will be in the equivalent of a post-production phase. Should have it posted either later today or by Tuesday.

Nifong Supporter said...


HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

I apologize for my absence recently regarding comments, but I've been busy on projects; both secret and non-secret. I've only several hours to go before completing the shar-video, which will be one of the longest in duration and most perceptive... containing much information.

Because of deadlines involving two lawsuits in the Court of Appeals, it had been necessary for me to divert my attention from the shar-video, so that is why it has not already been uploaded. But I expect that it will be posted no later than tomorrow, Tuesday the 22nd.

As you were.

Anonymous said...

Sid,

Judges and juries don't find people "innocent." Such a verdict does not exist. Innocence is presumed. You are aware of this, aren't you?

The charges against the Duke lacrosse players were dismissed. They are innocent, both as a matter of law and fact. Moreover, given the gross misconduct by Nifong in the investigation and prosecution of the case, the media attention given to it case and the negative publicity heaped on the Duke lacrosse defendants, the Attorney General took the extraordinary step of declaring that the decision to drop the charges against the players was because his investigation found that they were innocent and that no crime had been committed. He presented those finding in a detailed report.

Claiming the defendants in the Duke lacrosse case are anything other than innocent because a jury did not find them innocent is a vicious lie, and not a Christian thing to do.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Anonymous said...

Ken,

Said I'd like to know where you got the notion.

kenhyderal said...

Abe said: "But no crime was committed against Mangum, kenny. Claiming otherwise, without evidence (and ignoring the massive amounts of evidence to the contrary) is despicable. The only crime that happened is that Mangum falsely accused three demonstrably innocent young men of a horrific crime that did not happen. That, too, is despicable. When you behave despicably, you should not be surprised when people treat you accordingly. It is also puzzling that you would continue to push the false rape claim. It is irrelevant to Mangum's current legal predicament. The fact that she and you continue to repeat it speaks directly to your lack of character"...……....……… I have seen, what I consider to be, strong evidence, both direct and circumstantial and that, combined with what Crystal has told me, convinces me that she was sexually assaulted. False accusations are despicable, as are sexual assaults. You are convinced of the former I of the latter. No trial was ever held. As biased and misguided as I believe you to be, I do not consider you to be despicable. Crystal is a kind, beautiful and moral person. Anyone who knows her is truly offended by her being characterized as despicable. It's this unjust and unwarranted characterization, perpetrated by The Duke Lacrosse Defence, a construct that many find immoral, which is a standard tactic used by Defence Attorneys to discredit accusers in cases of sexual assault. In the case of Crystal it's a canard that has been "bought" into by so many and is at the root of all her subsequent difficulties. When your reputation has been destroyed, albeit unjustly, your path forward is fraught with pitfalls. I know the Duke Lacrosse Team and their supporters would like to see this go away and be put to rest but Crystal's future may depend on it being adjudicated.

Anonymous said...

SO we agree that CGM isn't innocent.

That's a start.

guiowen said...

Kenny,
Why don't you just shut up? Nobody believes a word you say.

Anonymous said...

Kenny, the Duke Lacrosse case is done. It’s well past any civil statute of limitations, and the criminal charges will never come back even if your fake mystery friend comes forward to say it happened. If her future depends on it being litigated, she has no future. And spare me the jury finding anyone innocent that’s not what juries do. They say the state failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That’s all.

Anonymous said...

kenny,

The claim that you have seen evidence and spoken to witnesses is tired and stale. The case is over. The time for bringing your secret evidence and mystery witnesses forward has long passed.

I do not know Mangum and won't pass judgment on her (or anyone else) as a person. What I can say is that what she did to those lacrosse players was wrong and despicable. Doing so does not characterize her as person. It only characterizes the bad acts she committed. If Mangum is as you claim, then she would have acknowledged and apologized for those acts.

Continuing to advance the provably false claim that she was assaulted at the Duke lacrosse party does nothing to help her in her present situation. All it does is make anyone who might be sympathetic to her current plight less likely to believe and support her. But keep on being you. It's worked out well so far. Another 7 or so years of the same and Mangum will be free.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

kenhyderal said...

Abe said: "Continuing to advance the provably false claim that she was assaulted at the Duke lacrosse party does nothing to help her in her present situation. All it does is make anyone who might be sympathetic to her current plight less likely to believe and support her"...…………………………………………… No Abe, Crystal's claim has not been proven false. That would of had her charged and proven guilty of making a false charge to the Police. Something the Duke Lacrosse Defence did not want to risk happening. They only wanted to see the case dropped and disposed of. With that accomplished they would not care to risk ongoing disclosures. But, once Cooper, under relentless political pressure, "proclaimed" their innocence, they saw a lucrative opportunity to sue. Their excuse, for not wanting to proceed against her, of "compassion", after having trashed her reputation, is ludicrous. Crystal, in this case, has, without a doubt, never done anything despicable. Not true of some.

guiowen said...

Kenny
Don't you understand that none of us believe anything you say?

Anonymous said...

The Duke lacrosse defense had no say in deciding whether or not Mangum was charged. That was solely up to the AG. And he was clear why he opted not to bring charges against Mangum for what his team determined was clearly and obviously a false report.

You probably weren't around at the time or interested in the story, but the pressure was on to charge the boys from the moment Mangum first made the false claim. It was several years before the public finally began to realize that the charges had been fabricated and no crime was committed.

Mangum, I will note, has never sued anyone for assaulting her (even though attorneys would be lined up at her door to do so, if she had a viable case) and no one has ever been sued for defamation for properly identifying her as the false accuser in the Duke lacrosse case.

Being known as a false rape accuser is something that will follow her for the rest of her life and beyond. As much as you dislike it, she will always and forever be known as the woman who falsely accused three men of a rape that never happened.

As time passes and the moral arc of the universe continues its inevitable bend toward justice, it is interesting to see the trajectory the lives of the participants in the Duke lacrosse drama have taken. The falsely accused young men are having successful and rewarding lives, and each have huge settlements that will insure the financial stability of them and their families for the rest of their days, while Mangum, Nifong and their enablers haven't fared quite as well (to be charitable). That is exactly how it should be.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: If her future depends on it being litigated, she has no future. And spare me the jury finding anyone innocent that’s not what juries do. They say the state failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That’s all."...…...I was referring it to be adjudicated in the "Court of Public Opinion"; so, finally, all can come to the realization Crystal is a genuine "Me too Martyr" and society owes her much atonement

Anonymous said...

Ken-ny, Ken-ny, Ken-ny

Nifong Supporter said...


HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!!

As I noted, the shar-video was expected to be large, but I didn't realize the magnitude of its file size until I tried to test the movie. It was much larger than any other sharlog or shar-video that I ever created, so I am forced to break it into two parts. I've worked with it enough to realize I can do it by basically breaking down the original into two sections... in other words, it shouldn't be necessary for me to re-assemble it from scratch -- which would be a painstaking and time-consuming task to say the least.

It shouldn't take long for me to get the shar-video into two part, but due to time constraints related to my lawsuit against WRAL, I must put my mediate attention towards preparation of documents to enable me to file the Record on Appeal. Photocopying and page tabulation is all that's required... busy work, not mental. Ergo, if I am able to file today before closing, I should be able to begin work on the shar-video. Sorry for the inconvenience and thank you for your patience.

As you were.

Anonymous said...

Mangum lost her case in the court of public opinion, too. She loses everytime she, you or Sid repeat her false claims. It is silly to try to characterize her as a "Me Too Martyr." The facts and evidence are too strong. And whatever she claims happened to her at the lacrosse party (does anyone know what she is claiming today?) it is not a defense for stabbing Mr. Daye.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

kenhyderal said...

@ Abe. Crystal's defence for stabbing Daye was "self" defence. This is a defence that always plays to the disadvantage of the poor and marginalized. For American "cops" all they have to say is I "thought" they were reaching for a weapon. In Crystal's case, she was beaten, choked, dragged by the hair and had knives thrown at her by a violent raging drunk more than twice her size who claimed he decided to stop choking her and leave; his side of the story, unexamined.

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal,
Don't you understand that no one here (except maybe Sidney) believes your tall stories?

Anonymous said...

Kenny, did you watch any of the trial? His side was examined, as was hers.

The problem is, the blood in the hallway, the angle of attack, the lack of bruising on her neck, and her past history with Milton ... the jury believed his story that he let her go, and rather than leave, she ran into the kitchen and got a knife and stabbed him, not her story, that she was lying on the ground as he was choking her, when she found a knife lying on the floor and stabbed him.

Cry and whine all you want (and I'm sure you will), the jury heard both versions, and they chose to believe Daye's version, not Crystal's, but stop pretending her version wasn't presented. It was testified to, and argued, extensively.

The jury simply didn't believe her. That's why the Milton testimony was so damaging, even though Sid destroyed her chance at having the Supreme Court review it.

You and Sid are Crystals real abusers and her worst enemies.

kenhyderal said...

@ Anonymous 4:48 Crystal's version of the event was presented, under oath, by her on the witness stand and extensively, aggressively and minutely examined by Coggins-Franks, throughout accusing her of being a liar. The self-serving account given to Officer Bond by Daye was never cross-examined by Meier for the myriad inconsistencies it contained. The angle of the puncture was absolutely consistent with Crystal's version. Even Walt in Durham acknowledged that, here. Where blood spatter occurs, in a clothed individual, with such a puncture wound, it does not indicate the point at where it was inflicted. The idea that a frightened Daye fled and a coldly calculating Crystal then set about calmly staging the crime scene by scattering knives around the apartment and stabbing an armchair with such force as to break the knife, force you could likened to the force Daye exhibited in battering down the bathroom door and dislodging it from it's door frame, rather then her version that Daye, a known knife throwing enthusiast, was hurling knives, with deadly intent, at her. It's the corrupt American Justice system that has abused Crystal not her friends or her true advocate Dr.Sid Harr

guiowen said...

Kenhyderal,
Could you please stop whining?
I'm willing to forgive your racism, if you'll only stop whining.