justice4nifong: Dr. Harr v. NC Judicial Standards Commission: Complaint and Exhibits

Saturday, June 1, 2024

Dr. Harr v. NC Judicial Standards Commission: Complaint and Exhibits

153 comments:

Anonymous said...: Sid,

How many lawsuit have you filed since you organized J4N?; June 1, 2024 at 12:36 PM
Anonymous said...: The Senior Resident Judge can assign the MAR to himself. This is idiotic, even by your standards.; June 1, 2024 at 1:09 PM
kenhyderal said...: Once again Dr. Harr shows, completely and clearly, with many exhibits, the clear misconduct by the North Carolina Judicial Branch of the North Carolina Justice System, whose obvious purposeful misconduct is dircted towards denying justice to falsly charged, falsly convicted and falsly incarcerated Crystal Mangum. Any person, shown the irrefutable facts can come to no other conclusion but that Crystal Mangum is innocent of murder and is wronly imprisoned which is a violation of her human rights and violatinon the rights of Dr. Harr who, as a citizen, is legally seeking to force the Justice System to do the right and legal thing and correct this miscarriage.; June 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid,

How many lawsuit have you filed since you organized J4N?

June 1, 2024 at 12:36 PM

Hey, Anony.

Quite a few, but I haven't kept track of the number.; June 2, 2024 at 5:17 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
The Senior Resident Judge can assign the MAR to himself. This is idiotic, even by your standards.

June 1, 2024 at 1:09 PM

Hey, Anony.

I pointed out the statute that deals with post-trial motions and it clearly avers that the senior resident superior court judge is supposed to assign these motions to another superior court judge. When Senior Resident Judge Orlando Hudson received two MARs, he assigned them to another superior court judge. He did not rule on them himself.

Answer me this: Can you refer me to a N.C.G.S. statute that states a senior resident superior court judge has the option of taking administrative action him/herself?
I gave two examples of the senior resident judge complying with the statute and assigning Mangum's MAR to another superior court judge. Can you give at least one example, other than Judge O'Foghludha's actions in Mangum's cases, where any NC senior resident superior court judge violated the N.C.G.S. statute and took administrative action him/herself?

I eagerly await you response.; June 2, 2024 at 5:26 AM
Anonymous said...: And we provided many examples of Judge Hudson ruling on MARs himself. You just refuse to listen, because you don't really want to help Crystal.; June 2, 2024 at 5:45 AM
dhall said...: Tyrone Rugen provided an analysis of the statutes (rather than cherry picking them as you have done). You responded by stating that he misinterpreted them(!).

I provided you with an article showing that judge Hudson took some of the same actions in other cases you’ve complained about here. I’m willing to bet you NEVER sought any legal expert to help you bolster your claim. Instead, you rely on your “belief”.

Well, you’ve relied on your “beliefs” in the past WRT your legal actions. How’d that work out for you?; June 2, 2024 at 6:10 AM
Kenhyderal Lay Advocate said...: Any person, shown the irrefutable facts of Kenhyderal’s secret project can come to no other conclusion but that Crystal Mangum is innocent of murder and is wronly imprisoned which is a violation of her human rights and violatinon the rights of Kenhyderal, who, as a Canadian, is legally seeking to force the Justice System to do the right and legal thing and correct this miscarriage.; June 2, 2024 at 9:12 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: What’s the status on your motion to be reinstated as co-petitioner?

Surely Mangum/you have heard something by now…; June 2, 2024 at 1:12 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Sid stated in 2018:

"Milton Walker is hardly a peripheral witness. He was used as a 404(b) to suggest a pattern of behavior by Mangum. He is the only witness to put the knife in Mangum's hand in the 2010 incident... Even the two police officers did not make such a perjured statement. But the media picked up on it with the WRAL headline "Ex-boyfriend says Mangum threatened him with knife."

Also, what is significant is that he was threatened to lie by the police officer. That's witness tampering. And it is the same police officer who gave perjured testimony before the grand jury... and was the grand jury's sole witness."

Given that this is as true now as it was then, why in the world wouldn't someone seek an affidavit from Walker confirming this?; June 3, 2024 at 7:00 AM
kenhyderal said...: # KHLA : As a Canadian I am fully protected, in my homeland, by The Canada Charter of Rights and Freedoms where no treatment similar to that endured by Crystal could ever befall me. As a foreigner I can not legally force the broken and corrupt US Justice Sytem to do anything.; June 3, 2024 at 10:30 AM
Anonymous said...: Then what’s the purpose of your secret plan, Kenny?; June 4, 2024 at 3:15 PM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr -- The links to your various motions no longer work. Instead of the introduction text linking to the documents, I see a "broken link" symbol.

Clicking on that broken link symbol takes me to an "account suspended" page:
http://www.justice4nifong.com/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi

Is everything OK? Do you need any technical assistance?; June 5, 2024 at 7:16 AM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr -- Just a quick follow up...I wasn't familiar with blogger or its content policies.

You can find them here.

There is a section regarding Personal and Confidential Information that you should review.; June 5, 2024 at 7:28 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Sid --

"All proceedings before the Judicial Standards Commission are confidential, and all papers and pleadings filed with the Commission remain confidential unless the Supreme Court issues an order of public discipline, or in the case of disability, order of suspension or removal."(https://www.nccourts.gov/commissions/judicial-standards-commission/about-the-judicial-standards-commission)

So they can't provide you the relief you're seeking in this lolsuit.; June 5, 2024 at 8:57 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 6-4-24 I had no secret plan but I did have some knowledge that would have been helpful to Crystal at a new trial that I did not care to share with the State Prosecution before hand. Dr. Wecht;s expert opinion has, in reality, made this information less crucial.; June 5, 2024 at 10:08 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!
IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND MOVEMENT!!

In the NC Office of Administrative Hearings, on May 20, 2024 the Respondent filed a response to Ms. Mangum's Motion to Determine Sufficiency in her Requests for Admission.
LINK: Respondent's Response of May 20, 2024

On May 31, 2024, Administrative Law Judge Linda F. Nelson issued an order denying Ms. Mangum's Motion to Determine Sufficiency.
LINK: May 31, 2024 Order by Judge Nelson on Mangum's Motion to Determine

(When I last spoke to Ms. Mangum by phone today, June 5th, she had not yet received a copy of the Respondent's May 20th response or Judge Nelson's Order of May 31st.)

As you were.; June 5, 2024 at 5:41 PM
kenhyderal said...: I'll note that the late great Dr. Cyril Wecht, America's foremost Forensic Pathologist had no problem answering all in the affirmatives in the positive. Any person of reasonable intelligence who examines the Medical Records can easily see what the correct response to each one is. The NC JSC responded in a disingenuous matter to weasel out of admitting on record what is obvious and would clearly demonstrate the undeniable. They must realize Crystal is innocent but hope to pretend they don't. A clear case of Judicial misconduct.; June 5, 2024 at 8:55 PM
dhall said...: IMO, The order was correct.

Dr. Harr is not a co-petitioner for this case (although not posted, it appears his motion to be reinstated as co-petitioner has failed). He is not a lawyer. Only the petitioner or the petitioner's lawyer can file motions. His doing so violate OAH rules and administrative codes.

Dr. Harr could have done the proper research to ensure that OAH rules and other statutes weren't violated. Of course, he didn't, so he and Crystal Mangum have to live with his failure.

Don't be surprised when he is sanctioned for his actions.; June 6, 2024 at 5:46 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

What crucial information do you have?; June 6, 2024 at 5:53 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: "NC JSC"? Do you mean OAH tribunal response? The NC JSC only handles complaints against judges, and there's no response from the NC JSC posted here.; June 6, 2024 at 6:10 AM
Anonymous said...: "I did have some knowledge that would have been helpful to Crystal at a new trial that I did not care to share with the State Prosecution before hand. Dr. Wecht;s expert opinion has, in reality, made this information less crucial."

Did you share this "knowledge" with Sid? CGM has to actually GET a new trial before Wecht's opinion could be used.; June 6, 2024 at 7:20 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 6-6-24 7:20 AM Those with the power to grant her a new trial will use every artifact available to them, to prevent that from happening. They fear the disgrace and repercussions to themselves. This is undeniable misconduct. All of them know she is innocent, all of them know the Jury was given provably false information. The medical records and the trial record confirm this. You yourself can, in fact, also do this, by simply looking at the records, as any jury of Crystal's peers could have done. No one can hold them responsible because they were given false information and not given the real facts. An inadequate Defence, ill-prepared and having done no research did not challenge the misinformation that was presented. In Canada that alone would have triggered a new trial. One day Crystal will be considered as a civil rights heroine. Hopefully given her lack of adequate medical treatment, I pray, she wont, like Emmett Till or Trayvon Martin end up as just one more Black American Martyr.; June 6, 2024 at 5:09 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: dhall said...
IMO, The order was correct.

Dr. Harr is not a co-petitioner for this case (although not posted, it appears his motion to be reinstated as co-petitioner has failed). He is not a lawyer. Only the petitioner or the petitioner's lawyer can file motions. His doing so violate OAH rules and administrative codes.

Dr. Harr could have done the proper research to ensure that OAH rules and other statutes weren't violated. Of course, he didn't, so he and Crystal Mangum have to live with his failure.

Don't be surprised when he is sanctioned for his actions.

June 6, 2024 at 5:46 AM

Hey, dhall.

Crystal is deserving of effective legal support. She was abandoned by the NC Prisoner Legal Services on January 17, 2017. Also, multiple attempts have been made to get the NC Innocence Inquiry Commission to look at Crystal's case, but the executive director refused to meet or communicate with me about the injustices against her.

If the state agencies (i.e., NC Innocence Inquiry Commission and NC Prisoner Legal Services) won't provide Ms. Mangum with legal counsel, then what options does she have. As her fiancé, I believe that I should be allowed to give her assistance.; June 6, 2024 at 5:41 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Tyrone Rugen said...
"NC JSC"? Do you mean OAH tribunal response? The NC JSC only handles complaints against judges, and there's no response from the NC JSC posted here.

June 6, 2024 at 6:10 AM

Hey, Tyrone.

I am not sure I understand your question. I use the initials "NC JSC" to stand for North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission. My lawsuit against the NC JSC is because of its failure to provide good-faith oversight to my numerous complaints against Durham Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Michael J. O'Foghludha for his violations of N.C.G.S. statutes.

Hope that provides clarification.; June 6, 2024 at 5:48 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Prince Humperdinck said...
Sid --

"All proceedings before the Judicial Standards Commission are confidential, and all papers and pleadings filed with the Commission remain confidential unless the Supreme Court issues an order of public discipline, or in the case of disability, order of suspension or removal."(https://www.nccourts.gov/commissions/judicial-standards-commission/about-the-judicial-standards-commission)

So they can't provide you the relief you're seeking in this lolsuit.

June 5, 2024 at 8:57 AM

Hey, Prince.

All I asked of the NC JSC was for them to render a fair and good-faith review of Judge O'Foghludha's denials of Mangum's three post-trial motions. Clearly Judge O'Foghludha was in violation of N.C.G.S. statute 15A-1413(d) (I think) which deals with the assignment of post-trial motions.

Reasonable relief sought is for Mangum's post-trial motions to be re-assigned to other superior court judge(s)... and not O'Foghludha.; June 6, 2024 at 5:59 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: dhall said...
Dr. Harr -- The links to your various motions no longer work. Instead of the introduction text linking to the documents, I see a "broken link" symbol.

Clicking on that broken link symbol takes me to an "account suspended" page:
http://www.justice4nifong.com/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi

Is everything OK? Do you need any technical assistance?

June 5, 2024 at 7:16 AM

Hey, dhall.

The blog site was temporarily suspended because of my failure to address an alert warning of a payment due. So, until I made the payment, the site was off-line for several hours. The brief suspension had nothing to do with me violating any personal and/or confidential blogspot rules. My lawsuit against NC JSC is a public document, even though it may contain information which an organization may designate as confidential.; June 6, 2024 at 6:14 PM
Tyrone Rugen said...: Sid -- My response was to Kenny's post where he stated provided any evidence to support his response "Any person of reasonable intelligence who examines the Medical Records can easily see what the correct response to each one is. The NC JSC responded in a disingenuous matter to weasel out of admitting on record what is obvious and would clearly demonstrate the undeniable. They must realize Crystal is innocent but hope to pretend they don't. A clear case of Judicial misconduct." on June 5, 2024 at 8:55 PM.

I don't see any response from the JSC linked here (or in other posts) regarding Crystal Mangum. So I asked if by "The NC JSC" he meant the OAH response - the order from Judge Nelson.; June 7, 2024 at 4:56 AM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr -- My concern was that the blog site (or the site used for your links) had been suspended due to some alleged violation of Blogger's content policies -- which is why I posted the link. From the posted policies, I didn't see any violations, but it seems that these days, any report of violations (even those without proof) could result in a suspension. Blogger is owned by Google, after all.; June 7, 2024 at 5:34 AM
A Durham Man said...: Kenny:

What “artifacts” are being used to deny Crystal a new trial?; June 7, 2024 at 5:41 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: "All I asked of the NC JSC was for them to render a fair and good-faith review of Judge O'Foghludha's denials of Mangum's three post-trial motions."

They did.

"Clearly Judge O'Foghludha was in violation of N.C.G.S. statute 15A-1413(d) (I think) which deals with the assignment of post-trial motions."

He was not.

"As her fiancé, I believe that I should be allowed to give her assistance."

You believe you should be allowed to break the law. Okay...Don't be upset when those charged with enforcing the law believe otherwise.; June 7, 2024 at 8:12 AM
Anonymous said...: They are using 57,000-Year-Old Neanderthal markings found in a sealed French cave to deny Crystal a new trial.

How dare they!; June 7, 2024 at 8:16 AM
Anonymous said...: “ If the state agencies (i.e., NC Innocence Inquiry Commission and NC Prisoner Legal Services) won't provide Ms. Mangum with legal counsel, then what options does she have.”

Actually represent herself pro se, rather than have you file meaningless lolsuits for one.

Hire her a lawyer and let this lawyer do their job without your interference, for another.

Your interference in her legal matters are at least partly responsible for her current situation.; June 8, 2024 at 7:35 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ A Durham Man The NC Justice System recognizing that giving Crystal a new trial because all evidence shows, and always did, that she is innocent, are hoping to extirpate the knowledge that they have long been in pocession of these facts showing that she is innocent ; the knowledge of which would bring disrepute upon the System and public disgrace onto them personallty. They need to find ways to give plausibility for denial. I wrongly called these ways artifacts when I mean artifices. Please excuse my spoonerism.; June 8, 2024 at 10:21 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 6-8-24 7:35 No ! Without Dr. Harr's involvement everyone would have considered this to be an open and shut case of murder. It took his investigation to bring the facts to light. The public, thanks to the lack of honest investigative journalism and with a Jury that were misled, by being presented with provably false information, inefectively, unchallenged by legal representation, by assigned Lawyers without any interested in criminal justice, a costly time consuming bother, taking them away from more lucrative contract law. Ah, it's only an inconsequential black woman, wrongly incarecerated. Who cares? Those who allegedly sexually assaulted her had managed, by utilizing their influence over the media and with their costly, so called "dream team lawyers", who by falsly trashing the accuser and destroying her reputation, as a strategy for clearing them, had managed to get them off and get them, lucratively, compensated.; June 8, 2024 at 4:20 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny, Sid and his J4N gang are responsible for

Falsely filing motions with CGM’s forged name
Releasing attorney-client privileged communication on this blog
Causing Mangum to lose at least 2 attorneys
Filing numerous frivolous lolsuits on her behalf that have resulted in gatekeeper orders against her.

Sid refuses to have a lawyer that won’t treat him as “partner” in CGM’s legal pursuits, even though he’s not a lawyer.

And you encourage him to do so.

You and Sid are so beyond pity, you can’t even by considered pathetic…And you’re trying like hell to drag CGM with you.

With friends like you, CGM doesn’t need enemies.; June 9, 2024 at 5:53 AM
Anonymous said...: Hate to break it to you, Kenny, but everyone still considers this to be an open and shut case of murder. If they consider it at all.; June 9, 2024 at 5:57 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

This continues to be an open and shut case and Sid has done nothing of value for Crystal. Likewise, your posts at this blog accomplish nothing that benefits Crystal. But feel free to continue to waste your time.; June 9, 2024 at 2:58 PM
dhall said...: Serious question, Kenhyderal -

Why would you share information that would get a new trial for Crystal Mangum with the state prosecution?

Once she was proven guilty, the state prosecution is done with her case.

Any information that would get her a new trial should have been provided to her lawyer that represented her post-conviction.; June 10, 2024 at 5:40 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Malapropism not spoonerism.; June 10, 2024 at 5:43 AM
Kenhyderal Lay Advocate said...: Without Kenhyderal’s secret project everyone would have considered this to be an open and shut case of murder. It took his investigation to bring the facts to light. The public, thanks to the lack of honest investigative journalism and with a Jury that were misled, by being presented with provably false information.; June 10, 2024 at 7:04 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ The Prince 6-10-24 Thanks for the correction.; June 10, 2024 at 8:03 AM
dhall said...: Anonymous @ June 9, 2024 at 5:57 AM:

I'm on record stating that I thought the 2nd Degree murder charge was excessive (the Durham DA's prior to DA Deberry were well known for their excessive charges). IMO, she was guilty of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill that resulted in serious injury.

Granted, a Class C felony conviction is punishable by a standard prison sentence of 5 to 12 years and a maximum punishment of 19 years. So it's possible that, had Crystal Mangum been convicted of this felony, she would still be in prison.

All this is to say that I don't consider this an open and shut case of murder.

Let me add -- The DA's office under Deberry focus on actual crime rather than their statistical "wins" is the reason why she's the first district attorney that's been reelected in Durham County in 20 years.

Unsurprisingly, Dr. Harr filed a (failed) grievance with the NC State Bar against DA Deberry.

Of course, Dr. Harr sided WITH Tracy Kline (the DA at the time of Crystal Mangum's conviction) when she was removed from office for (among other things) "conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice." let that sink in for a minute.; June 10, 2024 at 8:19 AM
kenhyderal said...: @dhall 6-10-24. 6-10-24 5:40 AM : Crystal's appointed Appellate Attorney Ann Peterson, adamantly, refused to involve Duke's role in Daye's death as grounds for her appeal and, instead, would only concentrate on the self defense aspect and on the admission of Milton Walker's testimony from a previous incident. The self defense angle was always subjective; a "he said, she said", with her testimony being cross-examined, in court and his, self-serving, version, given to the Police and admitted into evidence unchallenged. Dr. Harr's investigation, as confirmed by Dr. Wecht's expert report, based on the all the medical records, on the other hand, shows, clear unassailable evidence, Daye's death could not have been a murder.; June 10, 2024 at 9:25 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: Anonymous June 9, 2024 at 5:53 AM:

Dr. Harr's supporters are quick to blame the "NC Justice System" for it's supposed wrong-doing, while completely disregarding the actual wrong-doings of Dr. Harr's and those of any other J4N members.; June 10, 2024 at 10:06 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Sid - I noticed you sent a letter Letter regarding case assignment on this lolsuit.

You going to enlighten us on the contents of that letter?; June 10, 2024 at 10:28 AM
dhall said...: Kenhyderal- The appeals courts do not consider new witnesses or new evidence. Appeals in criminal cases are based on arguments that there were errors in the trial procedure or errors in the judge's interpretation of the law.

The only option available for the Mangum appeal was whether Milton Walker’s testimony should have been allowed.

However, evidence that would have garnered Mangum a new trial could have been the basis of a MAR, had you bothered to supply the lawyer at the time with this “information”.

Having that knowledge at the time and not sharing it with Mangum or her lawyer reflects poorly on you.; June 10, 2024 at 3:40 PM
kenhyderal said...: @dhall But, she was charged and convicted of 2nd degree murder. I've asked this before, is assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inclusive, when a defendant is found guilty of second degree murder and without having any need to to defend against that lesser charge. We both agree that the murder charge was excessive and you, I think, also believe she was not guilty of second degree murder but. perhaps, only of this lesser charge. Then, do you think the murder verdict need not be reversed and there is no necessity to re-charge and retry her? Keep in mind Dr. Wecht found that Daye's death was accidental, unrelated to the stab wound and all the medical evidence, easily dicernable, shows this to be true and shows that there is zero evidence to support what Dr. Nichols told the jury that Daye died as a result of the stab wound.; June 10, 2024 at 4:49 PM
Tyrone Rugen said...: Kenny didn't answer the questions from Anonymous @ June 6, 2024 at 7:20 AM:
"Did you share this "knowledge" with Sid?"

Or from dhall @June 10, 2024 at 5:40 AM
"Why would you share information that would get a new trial for Crystal Mangum with the state prosecution?"

It's simple -- Kenny has no knowledge (secret or not) that would help CGM. If he did, he would share it Sid.

And now that this "knowledge" is "less crucial", he'd share it here.

He hasn't done either, which makes his claim of this "knowledge" doubly suspect.; June 11, 2024 at 5:54 AM
kenhyderal said...: dhall said : "However, evidence that would have garnered Mangum a new trial could have been the basis of a MAR, had you bothered to supply the lawyer at the time with this “information”--- The new evidence (ie not heard by the jury) was the medical records. None of the Lawyers wanted to proceed using this evidence and and disuaded Crystal, even with threats of withdrawl, from going down this avenue. Aversion to taking on Duke ?? They closed their mind to what Dr. Harr was trying to appraise them of. It's so simple. Look at the leagal definition of "Cause of Death". Examine the medical record and then ask yourself was there a homicide. You and I and any Jury, doing so, could make the right determination. Answering the "Affirmatives" would also suffice. Pro Se defendant Crystal did, in her rejected MAR's, present this information, to no avail. Dr. Wecht's report is a confirmation of what Dr. Harr and Crystal have said all along.; June 11, 2024 at 9:53 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Tyrone. I have complete faith in Dr. Harr. He has capabilities to take on this miscarriage of Justice far beyond anything I would be capable of. I do have the knowledge, though, that Dr. Harr's was absolutely correct in this matter and he has the determination to, against all odds, see that justice will be served. He, early on, has shown me and I'm sure to anyone of goodwill that Crystal was wrongly convicted. I was able to see that immediately myself, and so can you and anyone else who takes the time to check. It was only bolstered and confirmed by Dr. Wecht's report, which, after checking the Medical record and checking on the legal definitions of "Cause of Death", you should re-read. It's "open and shut", absolutely accident and not homicide. The Jury was told Daye died as a result of the stab wound. Where can you find any evidence of this. Evidence to the contrary is clearly present.; June 11, 2024 at 10:16 AM
dhall said...: Kenhyderal -
"... is assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inclusive, when a defendant is found guilty of second degree murder and without having any need to to defend against that lesser charge...., do you think the murder verdict need not be reversed and there is no necessity to re-charge and retry her?"

I have no idea -- ask a lawyer.

A convicted criminal has options regarding post-conviction relief, but this relief process is complex, and shouldn't be attempted by a "legal lay advocate" with no true legal experience and who is unwilling to do the minimum amount of research regarding these options.

I'm betting that a significant amount of money has been spent on all the post-conviction lawsuits/motions on Crystal Mangum's behalf handled by Dr. Harr. For the money that's been spent, Crystal Mangum could have sat down with a lawyer, discussed what evidence she has, reviewed her options, come to a decision on what best remedy she has available to her, then acted upon it.

Dr. Harr has absolutely ruined this approach. Were you to ask a lawyer, I'm sure they would say that Crystal Mangum's inability to find a lawyer is a direct result of his activities.; June 11, 2024 at 11:14 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: "Keep in mind Dr. Wecht found that Daye's death was accidental..."

Keep in mind, it's Dr. Wecht's OPINION that Daye's death was accidental.

Opinions, like elbows, are generally right only half of the time.; June 11, 2024 at 1:20 PM
Tyrone Rugen said...: The motion to Determine Sufficiency was filed on 5/9, the defendant responded to the motion on 5/20, and the judge ruled on the motion on 5/31.

The motion for you to be reinstated as a co-petitioner was filed almost 2 weeks prior (4/26) to the motion to determine sufficiency.

Did you/CGM get a response? If so, what was it? If you got it, why haven't you posted it?; June 11, 2024 at 2:05 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

It’s time for you to come clean and share the secret information with us.; June 11, 2024 at 3:56 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Prince Humperdinck said...
Sid - I noticed you sent a letter Letter regarding case assignment on this lolsuit.

You going to enlighten us on the contents of that letter?

June 10, 2024 at 10:28 AM

Hey, Prince Humperdinck.

Am not sure which letter you reference. Could you be more specific, and include a date if possible. Most of my complaints have been in the Federal Court where the U.S. District Judge was reassigned from Judge Flanagan to Judge Dever.; June 12, 2024 at 5:01 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Tyrone Rugen said...
Anonymous June 9, 2024 at 5:53 AM:

Dr. Harr's supporters are quick to blame the "NC Justice System" for it's supposed wrong-doing, while completely disregarding the actual wrong-doings of Dr. Harr's and those of any other J4N members.

June 10, 2024 at 10:06 AM

Hey, Tyrone Rugen.

Wrongdoings of Harr and other J4N members? Such as...? Would you provide edification?; June 12, 2024 at 5:03 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
Kenny, Sid and his J4N gang are responsible for

Falsely filing motions with CGM’s forged name
Releasing attorney-client privileged communication on this blog
Causing Mangum to lose at least 2 attorneys
Filing numerous frivolous lolsuits on her behalf that have resulted in gatekeeper orders against her.

Sid refuses to have a lawyer that won’t treat him as “partner” in CGM’s legal pursuits, even though he’s not a lawyer.

And you encourage him to do so.

You and Sid are so beyond pity, you can’t even by considered pathetic…And you’re trying like hell to drag CGM with you.

With friends like you, CGM doesn’t need enemies.

June 9, 2024 at 5:53 AM

Hey, Anony.

Let me address each of your assertions:
(1) Falsely filing motions with CGM's forged name.
Forgery requires malicious intent. Besides many documents filed by the State are electronic.
(2) Releasing attorney-client privileged communications on this blog.
Vague and unsubstantiated. What privileged information do you refer? And what law makes publishing attorney-client "privileged" information on a blog site illegal?
(3) Causing Mangum to lose at least two attorneys.
Mangum elected on her own to dismiss her first attorney. Mangum's third attorney Scott Holmes wanted off the case, despite Mangum's objections. Chris Shella is the only attorney who abdicated, and he used Mangum's sharing of prosecution discovery as an excuse. Nothing I or any J4N members did forced him off the case.
(4) Filing numerous frivolous lolsuits on her behalf that have resulted in gatekeeper orders against her.
The sole gatekeeper order filed against Mangum, by Cooper-appointee Judge Carolyn Thompson in Mangum's malicious prosecution lawsuit, was baseless.

To provide clarification, I want any attorney representing Mangum to do so as her co-counsel because most, if not all of her previous lawyers have been, to some degree, turncoats and worked in the best interests of Duke University and/or the State.; June 12, 2024 at 5:28 AM
Anonymous said...: Forging someone's name on a motion they weren't even aware of (CGM even denied that she authorized you to do anything) is morally wrong. Claiming it's not forgery is simply a poor excuse to justify your actions.

The "vague and unsubstantiated" privileged communication issue is well documented, Sid. Chris Shella was quite vocal about it.

The gatekeeper order wasn't baseless. Gatekeeper orders require a long history of not just false allegations, but separate frivolous complaints. Mangum is guilty of both, because she let you file motions containing false allegations and file frivolous complaints.

"I want any attorney representing Mangum to do so as her co-counsel...". You're not a lawyer, so you can't be a co-counsel. It's this ridiculous demand that is preventing her from getting a lawyer. What's sad is that you know this.

I'll state again -- You are so beyond pity, you can’t even by considered pathetic…And you’re trying like hell to drag CGM with you.

With friends like you, CGM doesn’t need enemies.; June 12, 2024 at 6:49 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

We are waiting for the secret information.; June 12, 2024 at 8:08 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Sid -- I got the information about your letter from your favorite website, PacerMonitor.

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/53725724/Harr_v_North_Carolina_Judicial_Standards_Commission

Fri 05/31 8:33 AM
Letter from Sidney Harr regarding case assignment. (Collins, S)

As I stated, it was "letter regarding case assignment" -- not a complaint. You don't recall sending this letter?

On a different subject, were you were reinstated as a co-petitioner in Mangum's contested case?; June 12, 2024 at 8:18 AM
Anonymous said...: "Mangum elected on her own to dismiss her first attorney."

IIRC, Chris Shella was her first attorney and he withdrew from the case due to you and your J4N gang's interference with the case.

https://abc7chicago.com/archive/8643409/

"At a hearing on Shella's motion to withdraw Tuesday, Mangum said she didn't understand why Shella couldn't continue to represent her and said " it wasn't her fault her supporters shared the confidential information to the media."

Woody Vann (her 2nd lawyer?) was dismissed due to you and your J4N gang's influence.

Scott Holmes had to withdraw due to a conflict of interest -- not because he "wanted off the case".

https://abc11.com/archive/9224812/

More info regarding motions filed without CGM's knowledge or authorization:

https://www.wral.com/story/lawyer-lacrosse-accuser-didn-t-file-motions-in-murder-case/10948797/; June 12, 2024 at 9:15 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: "Hey, Tyrone Rugen.

Wrongdoings of Harr and other J4N members? Such as...? Would you provide edification?"

They are well known -- a simple google search shows this. Of course, that would require you to do your own research. Something we know you're loathe to do.; June 12, 2024 at 10:00 AM
Anonymous said...: "Vague and unsubstantiated. What privileged information do you refer? And what law makes publishing attorney-client "privileged" information on a blog site illegal?

I never stated that your releasing of Mangum's privileged information was illegal.

I said your were responsible for the release of this information. Changing the discussion to the legality of this action is a straw man argument, and I'm not falling for it.

Are you denying you released attorney-client privileged information? Crystal Mangum herself stated otherwise.

Are you lying or is she?; June 12, 2024 at 10:54 AM
kenhyderal said...: The Prince 6-11-24 said : "Opinions, like elbows, are generally right only half of the time"
You, like so many of the Crystal haters, blinded by that hatred, have the temeritty to challenge the late great Forensic Pathologist and Medical-legal scholar's expert opinion. But hey, just look at the legal definition of "Cause of Death" yourself then check the Medical Record and then see if you can still support a conviction of Murder. Also carefully examine all the available evidence to see if you can find any evidence that the stab wound causesed the death of Daye. Right 1/2 the time, eh. In the jurisdiction of most civilized countries an accused gets the benefit of the doubt. Take self-defence, no chance whatever that, enraged, drunken, violent Daye's version was self-serving. Take cause of death, no chance it was accident and not homicide. Take the trial, where the Jury never heard the words, delerium tremens, esophogeal intubation. cerebral anoxia, brain death.elective removal from life support. All they heard was that Daye died as a result of the stab wound easily shown, even to you, to be wrong.; June 12, 2024 at 11:03 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT INFORMATION!!

Today, June 12th, Ms. Mangum and I became aware of an order filed on June 4th by the administrative law judge in Mangum's contested case to reschedule the hearing previously set for July 19th three weeks later, on August 9th.
LINK to Judge Nelson's June 4, 2024 Notice and Amendment to Reschedule

To my knowledge the Respondent's did not request a continuance... and it was likely one of her several sua sponte orders. Although it provides an extra three weeks for Mangum to prepare for the hearing, it unfortunately means that she will spend an extra three weeks longer in confinement.

Unfortunately, the order still insists on Ms. Mangum participating in her hearing remotely... despite the fact the women's prison is approximately seven miles from the Office of Administrative Hearings building. Representing herself remotely from prison places her at a distinct disadvantage, but, as in all of her hearings, a level playing field is not a judicial priority.

As you were.; June 12, 2024 at 7:29 PM
Anonymous said...: What do you mean that this delay "means that she will spend an extra three weeks longer in confinement"?

As has repeatedly been explained to you, there is literally nothing that the OAH or this latest joke of a lawsuit can do that would lead to her release. That's not how it works, that has been shown to you.

The fact you post something like that shows you are continuing to lie to Crystal and abuse and manipulate her into thinking you are actually trying to help her.

It's abusive and sad.; June 13, 2024 at 3:40 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

Why won’t you share your secret information with us?; June 13, 2024 at 5:28 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Kenny --

She stabbed him, he died.

Mangum's self-defense argument failed, because she stabbed him as he was leaving.

I get it -- you don't like the jury's decision.

You had "information" that you did not care to share with the State Prosecution (or her defense). That's on you, not on the jury.; June 13, 2024 at 5:42 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: Well -- According to the notice Sid just posted, Crystal Mangum is the only petitioner, so I think it's safe to say that his motion to be reinstated as co-petitioner failed.

I'm not sure what Sid means by "it unfortunately means that she will spend an extra three weeks longer in confinement.". Even is she wins contested case hearing, she's not getting released.

I'm also not sure why Sid is stating that CGM appearing remotely provides a disadvantage, as all marked exhibits will be exchanged by June 28. She will have access to all submitted documents.

Knowing Sid, this will be the first time she's seen any of the exhibits "she" submitted, so having an extra 6 weeks may not be enough time to familiarize herself with all of them.; June 13, 2024 at 6:33 AM
A. Habba Esquire said...: kenhyderal,

Your credibility is suffering because of your refusal to share with us the information you withheld from the District Attorney and the defense attorney.; June 14, 2024 at 5:08 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ The Prince, quoting Dr. Nichols, you said : "She stabbed him, he died." These two events were, totally, unrelated. Do you disagree with the finding of Dr. Wecht that, carefully, shows this to be true? All medical evience clearly shows that there was no nexus. What qualifictions do you have for the contrary opinion? What part of that evidence, you've seen, indicates this to you? Daye claims, in his un-examined statement, he was fleeing, Crystal claims she was the one trying to escape to safety. He said, she said. What ever happened to reasonable doubt going to the accused? The Defence would not entertain any of the medical evidence preferring to stick only to the self-defence. Even threatening, because of Dr. Roberts, to withdraw if Duke's role was entered in. I don't like the Jury's decision but I don't blame them. They were given false information,that was easily provable to be false and they were withheld information that easily proves Daye's death was an accident and not a homicide. And because of no nexus, as, clearly, explained by Dr. Wecht, a Welch or Holsclaw precident is non-operative.; June 14, 2024 at 10:33 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: 1. She stabbed him.
2. He went to the hospital.
3. Due to a series of events (that certainly could be considered malpractice) he died.

Would Reginald Daye have gone to the hospital if he weren’t stabbed? No.

Without #1, #’s 2-3 don’t happen.

And there’s more than “he said, she said” evidence that clearly shows the stabbing was not self defense. You refuse to recognize that evidence. That’s your prerogative, but it doesn’t mean that the evidence doesn’t exist.; June 15, 2024 at 11:50 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ A. Habba Esq. At he time of the Trial, I did not have the information. After this information came to my attention I was loath to bring it to the attention of anyone, prematurely, as the Brady rule would then apply which could possibly give a Prosecution time to prepare counter arguments that might be able to confuse a Jury. Neverltheless, presently, Dr. Wecht's report make the information less crucial as he shows, conclusively, there was no homicide. It's information that's easily confirmed by anyone looking at the evidence. It's completely disengenuous for anyone to pretend otherwise; that there is still a question the Jury, given false information and having exculpatory information witheld made the correct decision. Again, I say see for yourself, with an open mind, then draw your conclusion.; June 15, 2024 at 3:33 PM
A Durham Man said...: Kenny,

Are you sure you understand the Brady rule? Your last post indicates otherwise.; June 16, 2024 at 5:29 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ The Prince, 6-15-24 11:50 AM: Re-read Dr. Wecht's take on that. I take it you believe he was "out to lunch" on his interpretation and is unaware of North Carolina's statutes on proximate cause, in considering, for medicolegal purposes, determination of cause of death. You disagree with him that Daye's cause of death was accident since Crystal's action sent him to hospital. Pay attention to the section of his report entitled "Medicolegal Questions". This would have been the case if Daye's death would have been from complications of the wound; something Dr. Nichols stated but something that Dr. Wecht shows, from all the evidence, is absolutely untrue. Look at the evidence yourself. What is the basis for your disagreement on this? What are your qualifications?; June 16, 2024 at 9:01 AM
Inigo Montoya said...: “ as the Brady rule would then apply…”

You keep using those words. I do not think they mean what you think they mean.; June 16, 2024 at 12:40 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Kenny-

Would Reginald Daye have gone to the hospital if he weren’t stabbed?; June 16, 2024 at 12:43 PM
Dr. Caligari said...: After this information came to my attention I was loath to bring it to the attention of anyone, prematurely, as the Brady rule would then apply which could possibly give a Prosecution time to prepare counter arguments that might be able to confuse a Jury.

What in the wide world of sports are you talking about?; June 16, 2024 at 4:19 PM
A. Habba Esquire said...: kenhyderal,

I do not understand your post on June 15 at 3:33 PM.; June 17, 2024 at 10:02 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Inigo,The Prince and Dr. Caligari: Excuse my ignorance of matters legal in America but does the Brady rule not say the Defence must inform the Prosecution of the names of any witness they intend to call and if they do so away ahead of the Trial, instead of at the last minute, this would let the Prosecution know they need to prepare to possibly counter this witness?; June 17, 2024 at 10:18 AM
Kenhyderal Lay Advocate said...: As a Canadian, Kenhyderal is fully protected, in his homeland, by The Canada Charter of Rights and Freedoms where no treatment similar to that endured by Crystal could ever befall him. As a foreigner he cannot be legally forced to understand the US Justice Sytem's selectively applied criteria set forth in the legalese definition of "Brady rule"; June 17, 2024 at 1:40 PM
Anonymous said...: The Brady rules applies to prosecutors turning over data to the defense, not the other way around. For as long as Kenny and Sid have played lawyer, they are still bad at it, which is why most of us believe it is intentional at this point. They only want Crystal to think they are helping, they don't really want to help. She's right where Sid wants her - a literal captive audience for his nonsense.; June 17, 2024 at 2:31 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous. I am not a Lawyer and I don't play one. I have had zero criminal encounters with the legal systems,, in any jurisdictions, and I have never sued or been sued.; June 18, 2024 at 10:06 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: In the FWIW department, a NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding the NC JSC's Notice of Appearance was filed by the court, as the certificate of service did not reflect that copies of the document were provided to Sid.

Sid, who is not electronic filer, doesn't receive notices of electronic filings through the Case Management/Electronic Case Files system.

The Counsel for the defendant has been directed to file an amended certificate of service evidencing provision of service to Sid.

On a related note -- when are you going to enlighten us on the contents of the case assignment letter?

You know, the letter I found out you sent here.; June 18, 2024 at 1:29 PM
Tyrone Rugen said...: You didn't attempt to help your friend because you had a misinformed belief regarding the Brady rule?

I think that's about the worst thing I've ever heard.

[pause]

How marvelous.; June 18, 2024 at 2:32 PM
A Habba Esquire said...: kenhyderal,

In light of your post on June 18 at 10:06 AM, why should we believe that your understanding of the Welch case is any better than your understanding of the Brady rule?; June 19, 2024 at 5:29 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: A Habba Esquire - Kenny hasn't (and currently isn't) doing anything to help CGM. If he had any "information", he would have at least shared it with Sid.

He's not going to bother researching Welch, Brady or any other legal rule or precedent to even attempt to understand them.; June 20, 2024 at 6:53 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid @ June 12, 2024 at 5:28 AM

(1) Falsely filing motions with CGM's forged name.
Forgery requires malicious intent. Besides many documents filed by the State are electronic.

3 things --
1) We know you or your j4n gang signed CGM's signature to several legal motions -- it's been reported. I'm glad to see you're admitting to it.

2) Filing a legal motion with CGM's name without their knowledge is malicious. It's intent is to "trick" the court into thinking she is filing them, fully aware of their purpose. It caused harm to CGM, as it was one of the myriad reasons her lawyer at the time asked to be removed from the case.

3) The State's electronically filed documents ARE signed. All documents submitted under an attorney’s login and password via CM/ECF are automatically considered signed by that attorney.; June 20, 2024 at 7:19 AM
Anonymous said...: " I want any attorney representing Mangum to do so as her co-counsel..."

WHo would be the other co-counsel?

Crystal Mangum can't be represented by anyone who is not an attorney.

She (as pro se litigant) can be assisted by a lawyer who drafts pleadings and gives advice without making an appearance in any proceedings. That lawyer wouldn't be considered "co-counsel".; June 20, 2024 at 2:58 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
" I want any attorney representing Mangum to do so as her co-counsel..."

WHo would be the other co-counsel?

Crystal Mangum can't be represented by anyone who is not an attorney.

She (as pro se litigant) can be assisted by a lawyer who drafts pleadings and gives advice without making an appearance in any proceedings. That lawyer wouldn't be considered "co-counsel".

June 20, 2024 at 2:58 PM

Hey, Anony.

Where to you get your information... or do you make it up as you go along? Where does it say in any statute or rule that a pro se party (counsel for oneself who is not an accredited attorney) cannot have an attorney assist with his/her representation at trial as a co-counsel?; June 21, 2024 at 4:53 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
Sid @ June 12, 2024 at 5:28 AM

(1) Falsely filing motions with CGM's forged name.
Forgery requires malicious intent. Besides many documents filed by the State are electronic.

3 things --
1) We know you or your j4n gang signed CGM's signature to several legal motions -- it's been reported. I'm glad to see you're admitting to it.

2) Filing a legal motion with CGM's name without their knowledge is malicious. It's intent is to "trick" the court into thinking she is filing them, fully aware of their purpose. It caused harm to CGM, as it was one of the myriad reasons her lawyer at the time asked to be removed from the case.

3) The State's electronically filed documents ARE signed. All documents submitted under an attorney’s login and password via CM/ECF are automatically considered signed by that attorney.

June 20, 2024 at 7:19 AM

Hey, Anony.

My signing of Ms. Mangum's name to documents is a matter of convenience and not malice. If you are unaware, let me make clear that the intra-prison delivery of mail is unreliable at best. Sending a document to Ms. Mangum for her signature could be delayed beyond deadlines if delivered at all. Then there is the matter of her mailing the signed copy of the document back to me, which would only delay things that much longer.; June 21, 2024 at 4:59 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Dr. Caligari said...
After this information came to my attention I was loath to bring it to the attention of anyone, prematurely, as the Brady rule would then apply which could possibly give a Prosecution time to prepare counter arguments that might be able to confuse a Jury.

What in the wide world of sports are you talking about?

June 16, 2024 at 4:19 PM

Hey, Dr. Caligari.

Could you cite the phrase to which you are referring? Thanks.; June 21, 2024 at 5:03 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Prince Humperdinck said...
1. She stabbed him.
2. He went to the hospital.
3. Due to a series of events (that certainly could be considered malpractice) he died.

Would Reginald Daye have gone to the hospital if he weren’t stabbed? No.

Without #1, #’s 2-3 don’t happen.

And there’s more than “he said, she said” evidence that clearly shows the stabbing was not self defense. You refuse to recognize that evidence. That’s your prerogative, but it doesn’t mean that the evidence doesn’t exist.

June 15, 2024 at 11:50 AM

Hey, Prince Humperdinck.

What you fail to consider is that if the fatal malpractice (unrecognized esophageal intubation) had not taken place, Mr. Daye would more likely not have become brain-damaged and therefore electively removed from life-support. The intervening cause of Daye's death (fatal malpractice) cannot be attributed to Ms. Mangum.; June 21, 2024 at 5:08 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid stated:
"My signing of Ms. Mangum's name to documents is a matter of convenience and not malice. If you are unaware, let me make clear that the intra-prison delivery of mail is unreliable at best. Sending a document to Ms. Mangum for her signature could be delayed beyond deadlines if delivered at all. Then there is the matter of her mailing the signed copy of the document back to me, which would only delay things that much longer."

I'm specifically referring to the motions from early in her trial (before she was found guilty and sent to prison). The one's that contained her signature, even though she wasn't even aware of them.

THAT was forgery.

Now you're admitting you're signing legal documents with her signature that she is (hopefully) aware of. That is suspect as well -- you should hope no defendant or court actually reads this blog site.

With regards to legal documents - why is she sending them to you, when she can send them directly to the court? As long as it is timestamped on the envelope with a date before the deadline, it has met the requirements for being on time.; June 21, 2024 at 9:03 AM
kenhyderal supporter said...: Dr. Harr,

Do you agree with kenhyderal’s interpretation of the Brady rule?; June 21, 2024 at 9:33 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid asked:
"Where to you get your information... or do you make it up as you go along? Where does it say in any statute or rule that a pro se party (counsel for oneself who is not an accredited attorney) cannot have an attorney assist with his/her representation at trial as a co-counsel?"

Let's start with some simple definitions:

Pro Se: A person represents himself/herself in court when either filing an action or responding to an action without the assistance of an attorney.

Counsel: The attorney (whether paid for or court-assigned) representing a person in court.

Now, to answer your questions:

In North Carolina, A defendant must choose either representation by counsel or self-representation.(N.C.G.S. 1-11)

There is no right to appear both pro se and also by counsel.(State v. Parton, 303 N.C. 55, 61, 277 S.E.2d 410, 415 (1981) )

Where is this stated (other than sources I just identified)? Here is one reference.

Didn't they teach you how to use Google at Wake Tech?; June 21, 2024 at 9:38 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Sid -- What you fail to consider is that if CGM hadn't stabbed Daye, the fatal malpractice (unrecognized esophageal intubation) would not have taken place, because he wouldn't have been in the hospital. No admission to the hospital, no fatal malpractice.

It's SIMPLE.; June 21, 2024 at 9:52 AM
Anonymous said...: And, under North Carolina law - because medical malpractice is a reasonably foreseeable event if someone is sent to the hospital, it does not break the proximate cause chain for liability.

This has been explained to you many times, you just refuse to learn/listen.; June 21, 2024 at 10:37 AM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr --

I'm not Dr. Caligari, but I think this is the part of Kenhyderal's comment he was asking about:
"....I was loath to bring it to the attention of anyone, prematurely, as the Brady rule would then apply which could possibly give a Prosecution time to prepare counter arguments..."

As Anonymous @June 17, 2024 at 2:31 PM rightly points out, "The Brady rules applies to prosecutors turning over data to the defense, not the other way around."

Any supposed information in Kenhyderal's possession could (and should) have been shared with the defense, with no concern regarding the Brady Rule.

In Canada, there is a similar rule (the Stinchcombe standard, IIRC).; June 21, 2024 at 11:01 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Sid --
When are you going to enlighten us on the contents of the letter regarding case assignment you sent to the court in the Harr v. North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission lolsuit?

Maybe Kenny or one of your j4n gang sent it and just, ya know, signed your name on it -- so things wouldn't get delayed....; June 21, 2024 at 1:39 PM
Tyrone Rugen said...: Wow, Sid. Looks like Anonymous @ June 21, 2024 at 9:38 AM did their homework.
Providing easily understandable, short definitions,General Statute, current court decision, and referencing the Prosecutors Manual…

You could certainly take some lessons on how to put together your legal arguments….

And it appears we’ve identified why you can’t find a lawyer. You might wanna let CGM know.; June 22, 2024 at 6:11 AM
R. Henry, esq said...: Think I’ll write the court asking them to stop Sid from filing any new lolsuits for CGM, or any more motions in any current lolsuit and sign CGM’s name on them. As a matter of convenience and not malice, of course.

Sending that document to Ms. Mangum for her signature could be delayed, if delivered at all. Then there is the matter of her mailing the signed copy of the document back to me, which would only delay things that much longer.; June 22, 2024 at 9:35 AM
Nifong Supporter Supporter said...: Dr. Harr,

Have you considered filing another MAR? kenhyderal has confirmed that he withheld critical evidence from Crystal because he misunderstood the Brady rule and, therefore, Crystal was denied a fair trial.; June 23, 2024 at 5:48 AM
Kenhyderal Lay Advocate said...: "For as long as Kenny and Sid have played lawyer, they are still bad at it, which is why most of us believe it is intentional at this point."

You, like so many of the Crystal haters, blinded by that hatred, have the temeritty to challenge Kenhyderal's secret plan and expert opinion.; June 24, 2024 at 5:24 AM
Anonymous said...: Where is kenhyderal?; June 25, 2024 at 5:28 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: I'm guessing Sid isn't going to respond to any comments here, as he is too busy getting CGM all the documents with her forged signature to her, so she knows what she'll be talking about at her contested case hearing.

At least she doesn't have to worry about any new documents filed in this hearing, as nothing can be filed that is derived from Sid's "unauthorized practice of law".; June 25, 2024 at 9:20 AM
Kenhyderal Lay Advocate said...: Anonymous Nifong Supporter Supporter said...

"Have you considered filing another MAR? kenhyderal has confirmed that he withheld critical evidence from Crystal because he misunderstood the Brady rule and, therefore, Crystal was denied a fair trial."

It is my firm believe that, in the event some forum presents itself which is not averse to hearing the truthful testimony of Kenhyderal and his secret plan in support of Mangum's innocence in her wrongful conviction, then Kenhyderal will testify.; June 25, 2024 at 11:11 AM
Anonymous said...: Just an observation. For what Sid paid just to file this lolsuit, he could have paid for 2-4 hours of consultation with a lawyer for CGM.

This lawyer could have reviewed the pleadings in this contested case hearing and given her advice without making an appearance in any proceedings, thus keeping CGM's pro se status.; June 25, 2024 at 11:31 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Nifong S-S 6-23-24 Yes, I did not understand the Brady rule. Again, I state, I have no knowledge of things legal. In this case, I fully trust Dr. Harr but because of what was said by commentators here, pre-trial, about wittnesses, supposedly Lawyers, or people familiar with State Law, that her case was damaged because of pre-knowledge by the Prosection of her defence strategy. I speculated that perhaps the appearance of a suprise "bombshell" wittness who had first-hand knowledge of Daye's non-lethal medical situation would take aback the Prosecution and convince a Jury.; June 25, 2024 at 6:52 PM
dhall said...: " I fully trust Dr. Harr but because of what was said by commentators here, pre-trial, about wittnesses, supposedly Lawyers, or people familiar with State Law, that her case was damaged because of pre-knowledge by the Prosection of her defence strategy."

Kenhyderal - What knowledge the prosecution had of Crystal Mangum's defense strategy was due to Dr. Harr.

As Chris Shella stated in his motion to withdraw, "Ms. Mangum has provided documents and information that I have directed her must be kept confidential to individuals who are not covered by attorney-client privilege. By doing this, she has compromised the ability of her attorney to adequately represent her in this case. Moreover, these individuals have disclosed these documents to the general public along with the potential defense theory of the case. " (italics mine)

Given that Dr. Harr was responsible for this disclosure, why would you fully trust him?; June 26, 2024 at 7:56 AM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Just out of curiosity, who do you think is the surprise "bombshell" witness that had first-hand knowledge of Daye's medical situation?; June 26, 2024 at 8:56 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny, what you still fail to acknowledge and realize is that no one disagrees that the initial stab wound was expected to be non-fatal and successfully treated. Unfortunately, there was medical malpractice at Duke which ultimately led to his death. However, under the law of NC, medical malpractice is not an independent intervening act that cuts off liability or proximate cause.

Had Crystal not stabbed him, he would not have been in the hospital, Duke would not have been able to commit malpractice, Daye would not have died.

This is undisputed. You just don't like the law, but unfortunately, it is the law.

It's like if you punch someone, which is non-fatal usually, and they fall and hit their head on the corner of the table and fracture their skull and die - you are responsible for that death.

This isn't complicated, it's just a bad law, and an unfortunate set of circumstances.

But, had Crystal not stabbed Daye, he would not have been in the hospital, he would not have required the medical intervention of Duke, they would not have committed malpractice, and he would not have died.

The law is clear - mere negligence does not cut off the proximate cause chain. Unless Duke intentionally killed Daye (which has not been shown or alleged), Crystal is responsible for the ultimate death since she started that chain of event.; June 26, 2024 at 9:08 AM
dhall said...: Before CGM's trial, commenters here stated that her case was damaged "because of pre-knowledge by the Prosection of her defence strategy."?

Which commenters? Can you link to the blog post(s)?

Are you referring to comments made here about Dr. Harr's actions before (and during) the trial?; June 26, 2024 at 12:56 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny - you keep focusing on she didn't intend to kill Daye - and 2nd degree murder is explicitly not intentional. It's engaging in an inherently dangerous act that could start a chain of events leading to death - like stabbing someone and sending them to the hospital.

Crystal is responsible because she sent Daye to the hospital where Duke made a reasonably foreseeable mistake which led to his death.

Like I said, you may not like the law, but that's what it is - so all your screaming and hollering doesn't change that.

No one disputes that Crystal did not intend to kill him. The Jury specifically found there was no intent to kill, so you constantly crying about that is meaningless.; June 26, 2024 at 2:29 PM
Dr. Caligari said...: Hey, Dr. Caligari.

Could you cite the phrase to which you are referring? Thanks.

I was amazed at the idea that anyone thought the Brady rule had any application to the defense. It of course only applies to the prosecution.; June 26, 2024 at 5:22 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous: 6-26-24 Please re-read Dr. Wecht's take on this. Was he wrong? My understanding is, your take would only apply had Daye suffered the medical malpractice, that killed him, if he was being treated, at the time of the malpractice, for complications to the stab wound but not for, inadequately treated, withdrawal in a pre-existing chronic alcoholic. Your example is un-appicable. If the fractured skull, or his being treated for it involved malpractice and that was the cause of death, Yes, it would apply. Dr. Wecht carefully outlined all this. Do you disagree? Are you a Lawyer? What about other Lawyers here? Who is correct this Anonymous poster or the late great eminent Dr.Cyril Wecht.; June 27, 2024 at 10:37 AM
dhall said...: A quick follow up -- I did find this comment from June 28, 2012 from "Lance The Intern":

Lance the Intern said...
Sid -- You need to stop "assisting" Crystal with these motions. The argument in the motion to dismiss the murder charge regarding self-defense can only be made during the trial. This motion will definitely fail because it is procedurally wrong.

By making the motion now, she's basically telling the DA's office "here's my defense"...

So I have to agree with Kenhyderal -- some commenters here thought that the prosecution had knowledge of Mangum's defense strategy.

What Kenhyderal isn't saying is that it appeared to this (legal?) "Intern" that Dr. Harr is responsible for making this information known to the prosecution.; June 27, 2024 at 12:34 PM
dhall said...: Kenhyderal - Why aren't you responding to my questions? I am truly interested in your thoughts regarding you "fully trusting" Dr. Harr with Mangum's legal issues, and your thoughts about the prosecution having pre-knowledge (prior knowledge?) of Mangum's defense.

Are you waiting for your Lay Advocate to respond for you?; June 27, 2024 at 12:47 PM
Anonymous said...: Your understanding is wrong under NC law Kenny, as has repeatedly been explained to you.

Wecht stated the law as it exists in many jurisdictions, but not NC.; June 27, 2024 at 3:13 PM
Prince Humperdinck said...: Sid will enjoy this.

Following last night's debate, Business Insider (a left-leaning news organization that focuses primarily on financial, business and tech news) published an article named "7 Democrats who could replace Biden if he drops his 2024 reelection bid".

One of the 7 Democrats named in this article? Gov. Roy Cooper of North Carolina.; June 28, 2024 at 8:54 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ dhall: I trust Dr. Harr to act, as he see it, in the best interest of his fiancee. He is a capable, intelligent and pricipled man. Crystal is an intelligent woman and I know she also places full trust in him, knowing, full well, he would never act in such a way as to harm her. Those here, who criticize and mock him, are hardly doing so with goodwill. They have a vested interest in denying that a fix is in to thwart having the criminal mistreatment of Crystal, by the System exposed. That would open a "can of worms" for politicians going all the way back to The Duke|Lacrosse Players and their advocate,s as well as to the wrongful treatment of the other victim, DA Nifong.; June 28, 2024 at 9:37 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 6-27-24 3:13 PM : I, reasonably, assumed a highly experienced, Law Professor and Medico-legal expert like Dr. Wecht would have, always, taken into account the State variations, in cases he is consulting on. Are you claiming he failed to do so and is "dead" wrong in Daye's case, under NC Stae Law. Are you a Lawyer? Any other Lawyers here care to disagree with Dr. Wecht? If not has Crystal been wrongly convicted? Is there any evidence, whatsoever, that Daye died of complications to the stab wound, something the Jury was told by disgraced ME Nichols?; June 28, 2024 at 9:54 AM
dhall said...: I honestly don’t understand how you can say in one sentence:
“… her case was damaged because of pre-knowledge by the Prosection of her defence strategy."

Then later state:
“ I trust Dr. Harr to act, as he see it, in the best interest of his fiancee. He is a capable, intelligent and pricipled man. Crystal is an intelligent woman and I know she also places full trust in him, knowing, full well, he would never act in such a way as to harm her.”

We know thanks to Chris Shella and others that J4N (led by Dr. Harr) interfered with her trial, and we know to what extent this was done. We know he wrote and filed the lawsuit that ended with a gatekeeper order against her. We know these actions were detrimental to her.

While Dr. Harr may think his actions are in her best interest, they have proven in fact not to be. An objective assessment of his actions confirms this.

A true friend would do this analysis. A true friend would discuss these actions before they take place and offer guidance and correction when needed.; June 29, 2024 at 8:37 AM
A Durham Man said...: All you need to know about Kenny:

He thinks Mike Nifong is a victim.

He thinks the Brady Rule applies to all parties.

Kenny is either a fool or a troll, although I am not sure which.; June 29, 2024 at 2:11 PM
kenhyderal said...: @dhall I acknowledge that Crystal's case was disadvantaged due to fore-knowledge by aggressive pit-bull prosecutor Coggins-Franks, who is more far more interested in winning cases than in ever seeing Justice prevail. Given that deplorable situation; if and when any new trial ever happens I would like to see no repeat of that. I've learned now that Prosecution win's, at any cost, is an accepted part of the American Justice System, one that favors gaoling ciizens, especially Black Citizens, in support of it's "prison-industrial complex".; June 30, 2024 at 8:46 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ A Durham Man I don't understand how not being familiar with Americal Law, something which the misconception of has now been pointed out to me, and my opinion that DA Nifong was mistreated, which may be in your opinion foolish, makes me a fool or a troll. cf Matthew 5:22; June 30, 2024 at 9:00 AM
dhall said...: "I acknowledge that Crystal's case was disadvantaged due to fore-knowledge by aggressive pit-bull prosecutor Coggins-Franks, who is more far more interested in winning cases than in ever seeing Justice prevail"

You acknowledge her case was "disadvantaged due to fore-knowledge by aggressive pit-bull prosecutor Coggins-Franks"...That's a start.

Do you acknowledge that Dr. Harr and J4N were the reason for this "fore-knowledge"?

If not, why not?

If so, why do you "trust Dr. Harr to act, as he see it, in the best interest of his fiancee.". His actions during and since the trial have done nothing except disclose Mangum's defense theory and result in a gatekeeper order against her.

Coggins-Frank was an assistant DA under both Tracey Kline and Mike Nifong -- both DA's notorious for their focus on conviction rate rather than pursuit of justice. Assistant DAs work under the guidance of the DA -- I find it odd that you call out Coggins-Frank, and don't recognize the same with "mistreated" Nifong or Kline.; July 1, 2024 at 6:03 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny -- You should read Proverbs (specifically 10-19) before you read Matthew.; July 1, 2024 at 6:12 AM
A Habba Esquire said...: kenhyderal,

What is the basis for your claim that DA Nifong was mistreated? Please provide documented evidence.; July 2, 2024 at 5:32 AM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 7-1-24 6:12-----I am in complete agreement with the wise advice of King Solomon in Proverbs 10-19. Do you agree with the words of Jesus, warning in very stong terms, those who, like you, call their "brother" a fool"; July 2, 2024 at 5:17 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ dhall : The Gatekeeper Order was one more tool used by the Justice system to thwart correcting the wrongful conviction of Crystal. Throughout your Justice System Prosecutors, adversarially, focus on conviction, contrary to the stated requirement, to see that justice prevails; a situation in your broken System that desperately need reform. Meanwhile, getting the truth out, which should be the objective, Dr. Harr's revelations ended up assisting Coggins Franks in her objective to to convict/win. DA Nifong disbarrment was excessive and unprecidented. He made the mistake of trying to get Justice for Crystal,; July 2, 2024 at 5:58 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY. LISTEN UP.
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT.

Sorry for lapse in responding to comments, but have been extremely busy. Lots of exciting new developments have been taking place that I believe will lead to justice soon. Of course I cannot explain them to you, but trust me.

As far as my blog site goes, I will next work on uploading my current lawsuit in Federal Court against the NC Judicial Standards Commission. Should be ready for viewing in about a week as it is lengthy and has plenty of exhibits.

Have a Fab Fourth, all.

As you were.; July 3, 2024 at 9:35 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: dhall said...
"I acknowledge that Crystal's case was disadvantaged due to fore-knowledge by aggressive pit-bull prosecutor Coggins-Franks, who is more far more interested in winning cases than in ever seeing Justice prevail"

You acknowledge her case was "disadvantaged due to fore-knowledge by aggressive pit-bull prosecutor Coggins-Franks"...That's a start.

Do you acknowledge that Dr. Harr and J4N were the reason for this "fore-knowledge"?

If not, why not?

If so, why do you "trust Dr. Harr to act, as he see it, in the best interest of his fiancee.". His actions during and since the trial have done nothing except disclose Mangum's defense theory and result in a gatekeeper order against her.

Coggins-Frank was an assistant DA under both Tracey Kline and Mike Nifong -- both DA's notorious for their focus on conviction rate rather than pursuit of justice. Assistant DAs work under the guidance of the DA -- I find it odd that you call out Coggins-Frank, and don't recognize the same with "mistreated" Nifong or Kline.

July 1, 2024 at 6:03 AM

Hey, dhall.

It is my opinion that the defense strategy in representing Mangum was for the attorney to put on an Oscar-worthy performance of appearing to legally advocate on her behalf while at the same time undermining her case to assure, at minimum, a second-degree murder conviction. Defense strategy was never about winning an acquittal, which would have been easily doable by an attorney who was at least semi-competent.; July 3, 2024 at 9:47 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Prince Humperdinck said...
Sid will enjoy this.

Following last night's debate, Business Insider (a left-leaning news organization that focuses primarily on financial, business and tech news) published an article named "7 Democrats who could replace Biden if he drops his 2024 reelection bid".

One of the 7 Democrats named in this article? Gov. Roy Cooper of North Carolina.

June 28, 2024 at 8:54 AM

Hey, Prince Humperdinck.

I believe the Dems should stick with Joe, but if Roy Cooper could beat Trump for president, that would be all that matters. Definitely I would have no problem with it. In fact, if Cooper was president it would increase stock in my comic strip "The MisAdventures of Super-Duper Cooper." I believe Cooper has served NC well as governor, but his treatment of Crystal Mangum has been atrocious. Realistically though, can you think of another politician running for governor who would treat Ms. Mangum any better than Cooper? Certainly not Lt. Governor Mark Robinson.

Also, unlike Trump, I am not a person consumed with the need for retribution.; July 3, 2024 at 9:59 AM
kenhyderal said...: Dear Dr. Harr: Did my reply to dhall and Anonymous/A Habba Esq. on July 2 go astray?; July 3, 2024 at 10:12 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
Kenny, what you still fail to acknowledge and realize is that no one disagrees that the initial stab wound was expected to be non-fatal and successfully treated. Unfortunately, there was medical malpractice at Duke which ultimately led to his death. However, under the law of NC, medical malpractice is not an independent intervening act that cuts off liability or proximate cause.

Had Crystal not stabbed him, he would not have been in the hospital, Duke would not have been able to commit malpractice, Daye would not have died.

This is undisputed. You just don't like the law, but unfortunately, it is the law.

It's like if you punch someone, which is non-fatal usually, and they fall and hit their head on the corner of the table and fracture their skull and die - you are responsible for that death.

This isn't complicated, it's just a bad law, and an unfortunate set of circumstances.

But, had Crystal not stabbed Daye, he would not have been in the hospital, he would not have required the medical intervention of Duke, they would not have committed malpractice, and he would not have died.

The law is clear - mere negligence does not cut off the proximate cause chain. Unless Duke intentionally killed Daye (which has not been shown or alleged), Crystal is responsible for the ultimate death since she started that chain of event.

June 26, 2024 at 9:08 AM

Hey, Anony.

When Reginald Daye was admitted to the hospital he had two medical conditions requiring attention: (1) an acute nonfatal stab wound to his left side; and (2) chronic alcoholism with acute intoxication. The first medical issue was successfully treated, but the second condition was not adequately handled and led to delirium tremens. It was during treatment for this second condition, unrelated to the stab wound and its treatment, when he was errantly intubated in his esophagus... it going unrecognized until he was in a brain-dead comatose state. The stab wound had nothing to do with Daye's brain-dead comatose state, and because his family did not want him to kept alive in a vegetative state, he was electively removed from life-support after a week of observation without neurological improvement, and he died.

It wasn't being taken to the hospital that resulted in Daye's death... it was the esophageal intubation that went unrecognized until he went into cardiac arrest. Daye would very likely had survived his hospitalization had his initial intubation been properly placed in his trachea instead of esophagus.

Hope this provides much needed elucidation.; July 3, 2024 at 10:13 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Just an observation. For what Sid paid just to file this lolsuit, he could have paid for 2-4 hours of consultation with a lawyer for CGM.

This lawyer could have reviewed the pleadings in this contested case hearing and given her advice without making an appearance in any proceedings, thus keeping CGM's pro se status.

June 25, 2024 at 11:31 AM

Hey, Anony.

Can't think of a bigger waste of money.; July 3, 2024 at 10:17 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: R. Henry, esq said...
Think I’ll write the court asking them to stop Sid from filing any new lolsuits for CGM, or any more motions in any current lolsuit and sign CGM’s name on them. As a matter of convenience and not malice, of course.

Sending that document to Ms. Mangum for her signature could be delayed, if delivered at all. Then there is the matter of her mailing the signed copy of the document back to me, which would only delay things that much longer.

June 22, 2024 at 9:35 AM

Hey, R. Henry, esq.

Why would you write the court to ask me to stop helping MANGUM? The problem Mangum has is that NC Prisoner Legal Services abandoned her as a client and NC Innocence Inquiry Commission refuses to discuss her case with me. Is it your position that Mangum should not have representation by a NC State Bar-accredited attorney? Unfortunately the reality is that no accredited attorney will accept her as a client... ergo, I've stepped up to fill the breach.

Comprende?; July 3, 2024 at 11:09 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Nifong Supporter Supporter said...

Dr. Harr,

Have you considered filing another MAR? kenhyderal has confirmed that he withheld critical evidence from Crystal because he misunderstood the Brady rule and, therefore, Crystal was denied a fair trial.

June 23, 2024 at 5:48 AM

Hey, Nifong Double-Supporter.

Currently it makes to sense to file a MAR because Senior Resident Superior Court Judge O'Foghludha refuses to assign them to another superior court judge per the rules, and the NC Judicial Standards Commission allows him to blatantly violate the rules.; July 3, 2024 at 11:17 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid asked:
"Where to you get your information... or do you make it up as you go along? Where does it say in any statute or rule that a pro se party (counsel for oneself who is not an accredited attorney) cannot have an attorney assist with his/her representation at trial as a co-counsel?"

Let's start with some simple definitions:

Pro Se: A person represents himself/herself in court when either filing an action or responding to an action without the assistance of an attorney.

Counsel: The attorney (whether paid for or court-assigned) representing a person in court.

Now, to answer your questions:

In North Carolina, A defendant must choose either representation by counsel or self-representation.(N.C.G.S. 1-11)

There is no right to appear both pro se and also by counsel.(State v. Parton, 303 N.C. 55, 61, 277 S.E.2d 410, 415 (1981) )

Where is this stated (other than sources I just identified)? Here is one reference.

Didn't they teach you how to use Google at Wake Tech?

June 21, 2024 at 9:38 AM

Hey, Anony.

Thanks for the links. The N.C.G.S. Civil Procedure statute reads: "§ 1‑11. How party may appear.
A party may appear either in person or by attorney in actions or proceedings in which he is
interested."

I find this answer to be vague and less than comprehensive. But you did present a valid response about which I will give future consideration.; July 3, 2024 at 11:35 AM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr -- I doubt "R. Henry,esq" is even a real person, but I see what they're doing.

It's called Reductio ad absurdum (or "illustrating the absurd with absurdity" )

It's a known fact that there were motions filed with Mangum's forged signature (you admitted to signing Mangum's name to documents as "a matter of convenience and not malice"), It's also true that you are responsible for filing motions with her signature that she wasn't even aware of.

Your signing and filing motions without Crystal Mangum's knowledge is absurd. It's unreasonable and inappropriate for you or anyone to do so.

"R. Henry,esq" picked an absurd scenario to illustrate how unreasonable and inappropriate your actions are.

If you feel that your actions weren't and aren't absurd, you can't fault "R. Henry,esq" for proposing to do the same thing.

Comprende?; July 3, 2024 at 11:44 AM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr --

It is my opinion that the defense representing Mangum was hamstrung by you and your J4N gang making the DA's office aware of the defense strategy before the case even got to trial.

The Defense strategy was about winning an acquittal, which would have been easily doable had a "lay advocate" who was at least semi-competent let the defense do their job.

Who's opinion is correct? I have confirmation from Mangum's own attorneys supporting my opinion. I have years of failed lawsuits filed by you to support my opinion.

What facts do you have to support your opinion?; July 3, 2024 at 12:01 PM
dhall said...: One more...You stated:

"Thanks for the links. The N.C.G.S. Civil Procedure statute reads: "§ 1‑11. How party may appear.
A party may appear either in person or by attorney in actions or proceedings in which he is
interested."

I find this answer to be vague and less than comprehensive. But you did present a valid response about which I will give future consideration."

Why did you focus on just the general statute, and not look at the court case referenced, or the ncpro.sog link provided?

How "vague and less than comprehensive" did you find these statements:

"Additionally, there is no right to representation by a lay person who is not a licensed attorney. State v. Sullivan, 201 N.C. App. 540 (2009); State v. Phillips, 152 N.C. App. 679 (2002)."

"A defendant must choose between representation by counsel or self-representation. There is no right to appear both pro se and also by counsel. See State v. Thomas, 331 N.C. 671 (1992) (defendant has only two choices—to appear pro se or by counsel); State v Porter, 303 N.C. 680 (1981) (“[I]n this jurisdiction, an accused has the right to appear in propria persona or, in the alternative, by counsel. Since defendant […] elected to retain the services of his court-appointed attorney, the trial court properly denied his motion to participate as co-counsel”); State v. Glenn, 221 N.C. App. 143, 155 n.1 (2012) (“Defendant has no right to appear both by himself and by counsel.”), quoting State v. Grooms, 353 N.C. 50 (2000). "

This has long been an issue with you -- you cherry-pick only what you want to see, and ignore the rest.; July 3, 2024 at 12:24 PM
Tyrone Rugen said...: Sid @ July 3, 2024 at 9:35 AM:

"I will next work on uploading my current lawsuit in Federal Court against the NC Judicial Standards Commission."

You do realize the blog you're commenting on actually contains your current lawsuit against the NC Judicial Standards Commission, right?; July 3, 2024 at 12:52 PM
Anonymous said...: If CGM hadn't stabbed Daye, he wouldn't have died following an esophageal intubation that went unrecognized until he went into cardiac arrest.; July 3, 2024 at 2:04 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Tyrone Rugen said...
Sid @ July 3, 2024 at 9:35 AM:

"I will next work on uploading my current lawsuit in Federal Court against the NC Judicial Standards Commission."

You do realize the blog you're commenting on actually contains your current lawsuit against the NC Judicial Standards Commission, right?

July 3, 2024 at 12:52 PM

Hey, Tyrone Rugen.

You are absolutely correct. It was a Biden-esque Debate Statement... i.e., I was not adequately focused and my attention was diverted elsewhere. I had forgotten that I already uploaded that brief and its exhibits, and because commenters did not address its issues directly, I didn't realize that. Thank you for letting me know about it because I was about to begin work on it.

There is another document which I am now considering uploading.; July 4, 2024 at 4:42 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
If CGM hadn't stabbed Daye, he wouldn't have died following an esophageal intubation that went unrecognized until he went into cardiac arrest.

July 3, 2024 at 2:04 PM

Hey, Anony.

You got it wrong. If Duke Hospital staff had not intubated Daye in his esophagus while treating his delirium tremens and failed to timely recognize the mistake, then Daye wouldn't have become brain-dead and in a comatose state. Daye died after being electively removed from life-support.; July 4, 2024 at 4:49 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Blogger dhall said...
One more...You stated:

"Thanks for the links. The N.C.G.S. Civil Procedure statute reads: "§ 1‑11. How party may appear.
A party may appear either in person or by attorney in actions or proceedings in which he is
interested."

I find this answer to be vague and less than comprehensive. But you did present a valid response about which I will give future consideration."

Why did you focus on just the general statute, and not look at the court case referenced, or the ncpro.sog link provided?

How "vague and less than comprehensive" did you find these statements:

"Additionally, there is no right to representation by a lay person who is not a licensed attorney. State v. Sullivan, 201 N.C. App. 540 (2009); State v. Phillips, 152 N.C. App. 679 (2002)."

"A defendant must choose between representation by counsel or self-representation. There is no right to appear both pro se and also by counsel. See State v. Thomas, 331 N.C. 671 (1992) (defendant has only two choices—to appear pro se or by counsel); State v Porter, 303 N.C. 680 (1981) (“[I]n this jurisdiction, an accused has the right to appear in propria persona or, in the alternative, by counsel. Since defendant […] elected to retain the services of his court-appointed attorney, the trial court properly denied his motion to participate as co-counsel”); State v. Glenn, 221 N.C. App. 143, 155 n.1 (2012) (“Defendant has no right to appear both by himself and by counsel.”), quoting State v. Grooms, 353 N.C. 50 (2000). "

This has long been an issue with you -- you cherry-pick only what you want to see, and ignore the rest.

July 3, 2024 at 12:24 PM

Hey, dhall.

Crystal's case is singular, and I doubt that you can cite a similar case. Specifically, Crystal has been denied an attorney by two State agencies with mandates to represent her: (1) The North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services abandoned her as a client; and (2) The North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission refused to even discuss Mangum's case despite repeated attempts directed to three different executive directors.

It is apparent that many attempts were made to obtain legal representation by attorneys from civil rights/social justice groups (NAACP and ACLU), innocence programs, and the private sector.

Answer me this: If I do not legally help Ms. Mangum, who will?; July 4, 2024 at 4:59 AM
Tyrone Rugen said...: "You are absolutely correct. It was a Biden-esque Debate Statement... i.e., I was not adequately focused and my attention was diverted elsewhere. I had forgotten that I already uploaded that brief and its exhibits, and because commenters did not address its issues directly, I didn't realize that. Thank you for letting me know about it because I was about to begin work on it."

What's to address in your NCJSC lawsuit anyway? It's just you complaining that the NCJSC violated your rights because they didn't agree with you that the complaints you lodged against various judges were valid.

There's NOTHING in either the complaints against the judges or this lolsuit worth commenting on.
It's going to fail like all your other lolsuits, giving you and Kenny something else to whine about.; July 5, 2024 at 11:28 AM
Anonymous said...: The North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services abandoned Mangum as a client due to your ridiculous lawsuits. The North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission refuses to discuss Mangum's case with you because you're not a lawyer. When has she contacted them without your involvement?

The NAACP and ACLU do not provide attorneys for criminal trials, just civil actions. CGM has never had a valid claim against anyone for civil rights violations.; July 5, 2024 at 12:10 PM
Anonymous said...: You asked where I got my information regarding Mangum and legal counsel (after implying that I "make it up as I go along").

I gave you my sources. Dhall quoted from those sources.

Rather than attempt to counter those sources, you can only claim that "Crystal's case is singular, and I doubt that you can cite a similar case."?

The singularity of her case doesn't change any of the court's decisions or any of the current statutes or regulations regarding her options for legal representation.

You can't represent her as counsel or "co-counsel". You're not a licensed attorney.

Mangum has to chose between representation by counsel OR self-representation. She can't participate as "co-counsel".

She can be assisted by a lawyer who drafts pleadings and gives advice without making an appearance in any proceedings. That lawyer wouldn't be considered "co-counsel", as Mangum would still be representing herself in court.

The end.

"Answer me this: If I do not legally help Ms. Mangum, who will?"
The lawyer she's willing to pay.

¿Comprende?; July 5, 2024 at 1:29 PM
dhall said...: Dr. Harr -- There's nothing I can add in response to your question from July 4, 2024 at 4:59 AM that aren't addressed by Anonymous(es?) at July 5, 2024 at 12:10 PM and July 5, 2024 at 1:29 PM; July 6, 2024 at 10:40 AM

Saturday, June 1, 2024

Dr. Harr v. NC Judicial Standards Commission: Complaint and Exhibits

153 comments:

Facebook Badge

Subscribe!

Labels

Blog Archive

About Me