As I see it: 1) The NC JSC is correct in that you prematurely filed your motion seeking a subpoena.
2) You are correct WRT the Court not conducting the Rule 26(f) meeting in a timely manner.
Your issue is with the District Court - not the NC JSC.
IMO, the court should deny your motion, and conduct a Rule(26) conference as soon as possible. Once the conference has completed, you should be allowed to re-submit your motion.
I'm a senior citizen who believes that the state of North Carolina has harshly, excessively, and unjustly treated former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong.
1 comment:
As I see it:
1) The NC JSC is correct in that you prematurely filed your motion seeking a subpoena.
2) You are correct WRT the Court not conducting the Rule 26(f) meeting in a timely manner.
Your issue is with the District Court - not the NC JSC.
IMO, the court should deny your motion, and conduct a Rule(26) conference as soon as possible.
Once the conference has completed, you should be allowed to re-submit your motion.
Post a Comment