Saturday, April 16, 2011

Media spin shields public from facts about Daye’s death


To see a Flash version of this blog with audio, click the link below. The script of the blog follows.


LINK: http://www.justice4nifong.com/direc/flog/flog041511.html

Because the media has been vague and mysteriously silent about Reginald Daye, the professed boyfriend of the Duke Lacrosse case victim and accuser Crystal Mangum, I have contacted some of my sources to find out what they say happened. Mainstream media will not inform the public, so you can find out by accessing this blog site.

The following is based upon what I have been told, and is not firsthand knowledge. Bear that in mind. This is what I have been told, and what I believe to be true.

Ever since Ms. Mangum’s arrest in February 17, 2010 on trumped up charges, she lost her apartment, job, personal belongings, and independence. In addition her father passed away while she was incarcerated and her mother, who was suffering with dementia, was placed in a nursing home. Through the kindness of friends, Crystal and her children stayed at a house of a friend, while Crystal struggled to regain her independence. She and her children moved into an apartment with Reginald Daye, a 46 year old man, eleven years her senior.

On the night of April 3, 2011, Ms. Mangum and Mr. Daye got into a financial argument… she wanted to use money to pay the rent, and he had other ideas for how the money should be spent. The argument ensued and escalated, and I am uncertain as to the immediate circumstances which led to the stabbing of Mr. Daye.

The media was vague about the wounds Reginald Daye received, with ABC-11 reporting that he was stabbed seven times. Some reports stated he was stabbed multiple times. Evidently the stab wounds were to the torso, but whether to the chest and/or abdomen was not clear in any of the mainstream media reports I came across. It is my understanding that Mr. Daye underwent surgery for his wounds and that his recovery was unremarkable. That by Friday, April 8, 2011, he was awake, strolling around, talking, and making plans for his release.

Then, over the weekend, he unexpectedly lapsed into a coma from which he would never recover. His condition was so dire that a medical decision was made to remove him from life support. I was told that Mr. Daye may have died as early as Monday April 11th, or on Tuesday, April 12th. The media reports claim that he died the evening of Wednesday, April 13th.


I was furthermore informed that it is believed that he succumbed to a massive air embolism… which suggests that someone purposely injected a large volume of air into his intravenous tubing. If this is true, then Mr. Daye was murdered, and not by Crystal Mangum because she, like Alan Gell, was incarcerated at the time of the crime.

As I stated initially, I do not know if the above scenario is factual, but I believe it carries a lot of weight. Consider that the media has been hush about Mr. Daye’s condition. There was no mention of him lapsing into a coma over the weekend. Also, had Mr. Daye died of his injuries, it would most likely have occurred within a matter of days after he underwent surgery and was hospitalized. The fact that he was on the mend and ready for discharge also rules out that he died of the stab wound(s) he sustained. Finally, had Mr. Daye’s death been a proximate result of Ms. Mangum’s attack, she would already be charged with first degree murder, and it would have happened without a cabal of Durham prosecutors and police.

Instead of rushing to assign a murder charge against Ms. Mangum, the Durham prosecutors and police need to obtain an autopsy report, study its findings, and move on from there. Whatever the cause of death, be it medical negligence, medical malpractice, or intentional homicide, Crystal Mangum is not responsible for the death of Reginald Daye. 


To view Part 16 of comic strip click on the following link.


LINK: http://justice4nifong.com/direc/sdcDirec/sdcEpv/sdc187.htm


310 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 310 of 310
Anonymous said...

"Your analogy comparing the drug dealing participants with the Duke Lacrosse alleged assault is like comparing apples with eggplant. The drug people were both engaged in a criminal transaction. In the Duke Lacrosse case a victim accused others of assaulting her. To compare them is a quantum leap that even I cannot make."

The person you call the Duke "victim" was filing a false police report. That is a crime.

The Great Kilgo said...

QUACK

QUACK

QUACK

We just love these

Lacrosse Loving


L I E S T O P P E R S



QUACK

QUACK

QUACK



You are running out of gas, MotorMouth.



QUACK

QUACK

QUACK

Anonymous said...

"By taking advantage of the truth I report..."

Sidney, you very very rarely ever report truth in your blog.

Even though there was no evidence that the Lacrosse players or any one else assaulted Ms. Mangum on the night of 13-14 March 2006, you continue to blog that they did assault her.

Even though Ms. Mangum did lie when she accused the Lacrosse players, you blog that she was not a false accuser.

Even though Mr. Nifong's conduct was blatantly obvious, you blog that he conformed to accepted standards of prosecutorial behavior.

Even though Mrs. Evans made her statement to 60 Minutes after all the criticism leveled against Mr. Nifong's unethical conduct, you say her statement is the cause of a carpetbagger jihad which resulted in the disbarment of Mr. Nifong.

You say the carpetbagger jihad is real, even though you have never been able to offer corroborating evidence.

Since when has the actual truth ever been important to you?

Anonymous said...

Sidney, why do you think Mr. Nifong should have arrested the three Duke defendants based on Ms. Mangum's faulty, tainteg identification of them?

Why do you think Crystal Mangum should not have neen arrested after Mr.Daye's statement to the police that Ms.Mangum stabbed him and took his money?

You have made a big deal of the Lacrosse players' behavior. Ms Mangum's prior behavior was one of documented criminality and violent behavior

Anonymous said...

kilgo, with regard to Crystal's money, the real situation was it was Lacrosse players' money which she tried improperly to take.

Anonymous said...

kilgo again shows he is incapable of commenting meaningfully on the woman who victimized the innocent Lacrosse players by falsely accusing them of rape.

Anonymous said...

kilo must be really desperate for female companionship. He indicates he loves the violent false accuser.

Anonymous said...

Sidney, getting back to the drug dealer analogy, what justification did Mr. Nifong have to accept Ms. Manhum's allegations?

I have read your unsupported allegations about the party and the Lacrosse team's behavior. None of that establishes probable cause to believe a rape had happened without corroborating evidence.

Mr. Nifong's extensive attempts to get corroborating evidence yielded nothing. He refused to consider alibi evidence.

A DA prosecuting you for drug dealing on the basis of the word of the would be buyer and nothing else would have been the same kind of misconduct Mr. Nifong committed.

The Great Kilgo said...

QUACK

QUACK

QUACK



You are getting to be a real Bore, MotorMouth.



QUACK

QUACK

QUACK



Please try to come up with some
more Original material.



QUACK

QUACK

QUACK

Anonymous said...

kilgo again shows he is incapable of meaningful comment regarding the woman who victimized the innocent Duke Lacrosse players by falsely accusing them of rape.

The Great Kilgo said...

QUACK

QUACK

QUACK



MotorMouth, who has never stepped foot
on the Duke Campus.



QUACK

QUACK

QUACK



MotorMouth, who was twelve years old
when the Lacrosse Boys held their drunken party.



QUACK

QUACK

QUACK




MotorMouth, be content in your

State of BLISSFUL IGNORANCE.





QUACK

QUACK

QUACK

Anonymous said...

kilgo again shows he is completely ignorant about the woman who victimized the innocent lacrosse players when she falsely accused them of raping her.

Anonymous said...

kilgo you are a blithering excuse for a blithering idiot.

Anonymous said...

kilgo, tell us what you know about the Duke false rape case.

Anonymous said...

As expected, deafening silence from kolgo

Anonymous said...

Hey Kilgo,
You have your deposition in hand yet?

Anonymous said...

kilgo is still silent

Anonymous said...

kilgo remains silent

Anonymous said...

Kilgo knows that Kilgo is getting (or already has been served) a subpoena. Everything Kilgo publishes here are merely the hollow musings of the condemned.

Anonymous said...

kilgo, you can't stand to face truth, can you.

The Great Kilgo said...

...


The Very Great and Compassionate Kilgo

takes Pity upon the Suffering MotorMouth.

The Very Great and Compassionate Kilgo

provides the Suffering MotorMouth the Key

to Relief from all his Mental Torment.

Suffer no more, poor MotorMouth, you shall

gain Enlightenment with This Question.

What Evidence did the Durham Police present

to the Grand Jury to obtain the Indictments

of the Duke Defendants?

...

guiowen said...

Please don't feed the troll!

Anonymous said...

kilgo, a more appropriate question would be, what evidence did Mike Nifong withhold from the grand jury in order to get indictments against the innocent Duke lacrosse players whom Ms. Mangum falsely accused of rape?

Another appropriate question woud be why did Mr. Nifong seek indictments when he had evidence that no crime had happened?

A third question is, if you yourself had evidence which showed the Lacrosse players were guilty, why have you never come forth with it? Why did you withhold that evidence from Mr. Nifong?

Anonymous said...

kilgo yet again shows he can not comment meaningfully about the woman who victimized the innocent Duke Lacrosse players by falsely accusing them of rape.

Anonymous said...

kilgo, ask yourself what evidence was presented to the grand jury about Ms. Mangum and Mr. Daye that they returned an indictment against her for first degree murder?

Anonymous said...

"Two of the members of the Durham, North Carolina grand jury that indicted three Duke University lacrosse team members for the rape of a stripped hired to dance at a team party told ABC that they are not so sure they would vote to indict again. One juror told "Good Morning America" he had second thoughts about the initial vote to indict.
"I don't think I could have made a decision to go forward with the charges that were put before us. I don't think those charges would have been the proper charges, based on what I know now," he said.

The second juror interviewed anonymously on the television show said he did not regret voting to indict the players initially, but says he now has doubts based on what he has learned about the case since last Spring.

"I don't know for sure whether she was raped, you know, because of everything that … came out," he said. "I'm not sure, to tell you the truth."

kilgo, two members of the grand jury were interviewed on Good Morning America after evidence of Lacrosse players' innocence came out.

The question is, what evidence did Mr. Nifong withhold?

Anonymous said...

The poor little troll can not stomach the truth.

Anonymous said...

Sidney, I thought that in your past life you were a physician.

If you were, your lack of knowledge regarding chest trauma and the effects of air embolisms is truly astonishing.

I would hate to think of the damage you must have caused to your patients. Is that why you no longer practice? Were you struck off? Was it the Duke Lacrosse players that got you struck off?

Is this why you side with Nifong - partners in crime - so to speak?

Anonymous said...

Sidney, judging from your evasive responses to the hypothetical drug dealing scenario, you do not consider being falsely charged with a crime an opportunity to prove yourself innocent.

Anonymous said...

“Crystal Mangum, who falsely accused three Duke players of raping her in 2006, was charged with murder in the death of her boyfriend.”

Sidney, this is the latest from the New York Times about Ms. Mangum.

You know, the New York times of Duff Wilson who was virulently pro Nifong. Read Mr. Wilson's NYT article and then say the INNOCENT LACROSSE PLAYERS were all mediaa darlngs.

Anonymous said...

"Suffer no more, poor MotorMouth, you shall

gain Enlightenment with This Question.

What Evidence did the Durham Police present

to the Grand Jury to obtain the Indictments

of the Duke Defendants?"

kilgo knows darn well that NC Grand Jury prceedings are secret and no one knows what was or was not presented,except the presenters.

One of those presenters was Ben Himn. When asked at Mr. Nifong's ethics trial to reveal what he presented, Mr. Himan declined.

Why would he have declined to do so if what he had presented would have exonerated Mr. Nifong?

Why would Mr. Nifong not have revealed what was presented if it could have exonerated him.

Read my previous post. Two members of that Grand Jury have indicated evidence was withheld from them.

Anonymous said...

Cliche for kilgo:

If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen

Anonymous said...

If Ms. Mangum had gotten a conscience instead of a bunch of enablers, she might not have suffered o much stigma over falsely accusing innocent men of rape.

Anonymous said...

kilgo, maybe you did go to Mr. Nifong and even he did not think you were credible.

Anonymous said...

kilgo again is silent.

Anonymous said...

How much more deafening silence before kilgo issues his next meaningless statement?

Or will kilgo, as he has done before, slink back into his pond and quack up?

Anonymous said...

How much more silent can the great silence of the great kilgo be?

How long will this go on?

Anonymous said...

We still as of now have heard nothing from kilgo today.

Whatchoo talkin' 'bout, Sydney? said...

Sidney: "...he was awake, strolling around, talking, and making plans for his release".

"...which suggests that someone purposely injected a large volume of air into his intravenous tubing."

Patients who are 'strolling around' don't have IVs, Sidney.

Do you really believe all this crap you post? lol

Looking forward to more 'truth' from you, bro; better than the funny papers.

Harr Supporter said...

Kilgo actually made a valid point for once.

Kilgo reminded us that the NC grand jury system is completely broken, and any grand jury indictments should be viewed with a heavy dose of skepticism. The grand jury is a rubber stamp.

In the lacrosse frame, Gottlieb and Himan testified for the first two indictments, and only Himan testified for the last. The grand jury spent only a couple of minutes on each indictment. There is no requirement to introduce exculpatory evidence. No record is kept, and there is no check on the accuracy of the testimony. In his DHC deposition, Gottlieb indicated that he testified that after the confusion at DUMC, Mangum was consistent in her allegations. Many observers found that close to an admission of perjury.

I advise readers not to put too much weight on the indictment of Mangum for murder. I would have preferred an arrest and a subsequent probable cause hearing at which evidence would initially be presented.

Whatchoo talkin' 'bout, Sydney? said...

Harr Supporter @ 11:57 AM: I would have preferred an arrest and a subsequent probable cause hearing at which evidence would initially be presented.

She is still entitled to a PC hearing, HS, due to her arrest prior to indictment.

You may recall that Nifong purposely avoided PC hearings in the DukeLAX hoax/frame by declining arrests for 1 - 2 months.

It could be months until a PC hearing is docketed, btw.

Harr Supporter said...

Thanks for the correction, Whatchoo.

Anonymous said...

Harr Supporter:

For what it is worth, there should be a probable cause hearing for Ms. Mangum.

Meanwhile, kilgo remains silent.

Anonymous said...

With regard to the NC grand jury system, kilgo thinks the grand jury indictments of the Lacrosse defendants indicated Mr. Nifong had probable cause to believe a crime had happened. kilgo does not seem to beieve there is probable cause to believe Ms. Mangum committed any crime. Neither does Sidney.

Anonymous said...

kilgo remains silent.

The Great Kilgo said...

...



Who likes to go Easter Egg Hunting ?


http://justice4nifong.blogspot.com/2009/04/north-carolina-can-learn-from-us.html



Happy Easter Everyone ! !




...

Anonymous said...

kilgo emerges to make another meaninglesx comment about the case in which a woman victimized innocent Duke Lacrosse players by falsely accusing them of rape.

Anonymous said...

kilgo, are you teaching lessons on how to commit prosecutorial misconduct?

Harr Supporter said...

Follow Kilgo's link. Gottlieb describes his grand jury testimony on page 185 of his DHC deposition. He claims he provided "facts" from his report (which did not exist at the time of the grand jury) and that Mangum did not change her story after she had calmed down.

I see why Kilgo was so insistent that we see what Gottlieb's testified. I can understand why Kilgo believes that Gottlieb committed perjury and that Nifong's case was built on lies.

Thanks, Kilgo.

Anonymous said...

kilgo's citation of Mark Gottlieb shows how bankrupt the J4N movement is.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Harr,

I read your most recent post with great interest. As a medical professional, I found your objective and thorough analysis of the facts to be very convincing. I look forward to reading your next post regarding Mr. Daye's death, and I hope that you will share your findings with the appropriate authorities.

Best regards.

Tara

Whatchoo talkin' 'bout, Sydney? said...

Anon @ 5:09 AM: As a medical professional, I found your objective and thorough analysis of the facts to be very convincing.

LOL, Tara was / is not in the medical business (Nursing, rather), and is anything but professional.

Good one.

Anonymous said...

Tara, pardon my slowness, but I just got it.

Bravo

Anonymous said...

Check out the clown Malek who is posting comments at the one of the CGM sites. Could this be Kilgo?


http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6092743671120776158&postID=7604681474273499163&isPopup=true

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
"Sidney, getting back to the drug dealer analogy, what justification did Mr. Nifong have to accept Ms. Manhum's allegations?

I have read your unsupported allegations about the party and the Lacrosse team's behavior. None of that establishes probable cause to believe a rape had happened without corroborating evidence.

Mr. Nifong's extensive attempts to get corroborating evidence yielded nothing. He refused to consider alibi evidence.

A DA prosecuting you for drug dealing on the basis of the word of the would be buyer and nothing else would have been the same kind of misconduct Mr. Nifong committed."


Your analogy, I am afraid, has too many loose ends. In the Duke Lacrosse case, Ms. Mangum was at the party physically, Ms. Mangum was lured there under false pretenses (expecting to be entertaining a small bachelor party of four or five), there was under-aged drinking at the party... a crime, there were racial epithets tossed at Ms. Mangum. Under these circumstances, picking out three individuals with 100 % certainty establishes probable cause.

Now in your analogy, if I am in the vicinity of the dealer, if I am in possession of the drug being sold, if I have a history of drug dealing or drug use, then that might at least warrant an interview as to my whereabouts, etc. But the variables are too many for a good comparison with your analogy.

Thanks for the interesting premise.

Anonymous said...

Calling kilgo a clown is an insult to all the clowns in the world.

Anonymous said...

"...there were racial epithets tossed at Ms. Mangum."

Sidney, get your facts straight. There were no racial epithets tossed at Ms. Mangum. A racial epithet was said to Kim Roberts. Kim Roberts admitted she provoked the racial epithet.

Nifong Supporter said...


I would like to thank you all for your interesting comments.

I wish I had the opportunity and time to address more of the differing points of views. Many of which are quite thought provoking... others, not.

I am uploading the finale of Episode V a day early. I hope that you enjoy it. I will provide a link in the blog that I am uploading presently about the strip.

On Monday or Tuesday following Easter, I hope to upload a very important flog (Flash blog) which can be accessed here. It will again deal with the current incident involving Crystal Mangum.

Anonymous said...

"...there was under-aged drinking at the party... a crime"

Sidney, again, Mr. Nifong did not charge anyone with underage drinking.

Are you saying underage drinking is probable cause to believe a rape took place?

Or are you admitting that whatever happened at the party, crime or otherwise, it was not the gang rape Ms. Mabngum and Mr. Nifong alleged?

Anonymous said...

"Under these circumstances, picking out three individuals with 100 % certainty establishes probable cause."

So, please explain why two of the individuals she picked out with 100% certainty were individuals who could prove with 100% certainty they were not at the party at the time of the alleged crime with which they were charged, why Mr. Nifong did not want to look at alibi evidence.

Explain why David Evans, who never had a mustache, was indicted after Ms. Mangum identified a man with a mustache as her third assailant?

Explain why Ms. Mangum identified Brad Ross as a party attendee when Brad Ross was not in Durham at the time?

In the past, you have ducked all these questions.

Anonymous said...

"But the variables are too many for a good comparison with your analogy."

You ignore that in the analogy you could prove you were not the drug dealer but you were indicted anyway.

In the Lacrosse false rape case, the Lacrosse players were charged with a crime when the evidence indicated the crime had not happened, the identifications were faulty and tainted, and at least two of them had evidence to show they had not been at the crime scene at the time of the alleged crime. There was no probable cause.

In the analogy the situation would have been much the same. You would have been charged with a crime, even though there was no probable cause.

Anonymous said...

Sidney, you seem to be saying you have first hand knowledge of what happened at the Lacrosse party.

Were you present at the Lacrosse party? That is the only way you could have had first hand knowledge.

Or, did what you call knowledge come from sources, just like what you call your knowledge of why Reginald Daye died?

Anonymous said...

"
Now in your analogy, if I am in the vicinity of the dealer, if I am in possession of the drug being sold, if I have a history of drug dealing or drug use, then that might at least warrant an interview as to my whereabouts, etc"

Precisely.

My point was, in this hypothetical situation, although none of that happened, you would have been charged with the crime. The only basis for charging you was the word of the buyer. That would not have been, you obviously agree, enough to justify charging you.

In the Lacrosse situation, there was no evidence that a crime had happened. The only basis for charging the Lacrosse players was the word of the alleged victim. Her word was in no way enough to justify charging them.

Your failure to appreciate the hypothetical illustrates how warped and biased your thinking about the case is.

Anonymous said...

"Under these circumstances, picking out three individuals with 100 % certainty establishes probable cause."

I ask again, how can you establish that you have first hand knowledge that these circumstances actually were the circumstances

Anonymous said...

"Under these circumstances, picking out three individuals with 100 % certainty establishes probable cause."

Sidney, the lineup procedure did not include fillers. A proper lineup would have include fillers.

Are saying, if Ms. Mangum had identified three fillers with 100% certainty that would have been probable cause to indict them?

I point out again, Ms. Mangum identified Brad Ross with 100% certainty as a party attendee and Brad Ross had not been in Durham that night.

That indicates that Ms. Mangum's certainty was not at all reliable.

Anonymous said...

Sidney, to my last comment I add, Ms. Mangum's id of Brad Ross suggests she might have identified a filler with 100% certainty.

We will not know because whoever arranged the lineup arranged to exclude fillers.

Anonymous said...

"Under these circumstances, picking out three individuals with 100 % certainty establishes probable cause."

How does this establish probable cause for gang rape?

How does this establish probable cause in the face of an allegation which was not credible and a total lack of evidence to establish a crime?

Anonymous said...

Nothing from kilgo today?

Anonymous said...

Still nothing from kilgo.

Not that kilgo ever gave us anything meaningful.

Anonymous said...

You know, Sidney has never said anything rational on this blog.

Anonymous said...

We can make 300 comments. Don't quit now.

Anonymous said...

300...Go, Go, Go.

Anonymous said...

.






























.

Anonymous said...

Still nothing from kilgo.

Anonymous said...

kilgo still has nothin to say.

RUN KILGO RUN

DUCK KILGO DUCK

QUACK KILGO QUACK

Anonymous said...

300

Yes we can, yes we can.

Anonymous said...

277

Anonymous said...

278

Anonymous said...

279

Anonymous said...

280

Anonymous said...

we

Anonymous said...

can

Anonymous said...

284

Anonymous said...

285

Anonymous said...

we

Anonymous said...

can

Anonymous said...

289

Anonymous said...

290

Anonymous said...

Go

Anonymous said...

Go

Anonymous said...

Go

Anonymous said...

Yes

Anonymous said...

we

Anonymous said...

can

Anonymous said...

297

Anonymous said...

298

Anonymous said...

299

Anonymous said...

300

Here's to you, Sid.

Anonymous said...

300 comments and kilgo has yet to say anything meaningful.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
"'Your analogy comparing the drug dealing participants with the Duke Lacrosse alleged assault is like comparing apples with eggplant. The drug people were both engaged in a criminal transaction. In the Duke Lacrosse case a victim accused others of assaulting her. To compare them is a quantum leap that even I cannot make.'

The person you call the Duke 'victim' was filing a false police report. That is a crime."


It has never been legally determined that Mangum's claim of sexual assault was false. Attorney General Roy Cooper had only the ability to dismiss charges, not enter a verdict.

Nifong Supporter said...


Anonymous said...
"Sidney, why do you think Mr. Nifong should have arrested the three Duke defendants based on Ms. Mangum's faulty, tainteg identification of them?

Why do you think Crystal Mangum should not have neen arrested after Mr.Daye's statement to the police that Ms.Mangum stabbed him and took his money?

You have made a big deal of the Lacrosse players' behavior. Ms Mangum's prior behavior was one of documented criminality and violent behavior"


I believe that Ms. Mangum should be treated like anyone else. I believe the Durham Police should have conducted an investigation before arresting and charging her.

With regards to criminal records, it is my understanding that Reginald Daye's is extensive and includes acts of violence. The media manufactured Crystal's record of violence by repeatedly spreading Durham police accusations that she assaulted her ex-boyfriend in February 2010. The truth is that he initiated the physical confrontation by repeatedly punching her in the face.

Whatchoo talkin' 'bout, Sydney? said...

Sidney: With regards to criminal records, it is my understanding that Reginald Daye's [record?] is extensive and includes acts of violence.

What a fucking prick you are.

Reginald Daye's record is easily-accessed public information. I suggest that you do so before you post such lies again.

I repeat, Sidney - you are a fucking prick.


Sidney: I believe the Durham Police should have conducted an investigation before arresting and charging her.

You have got to be kidding. The 911 call, and a statement from the victim w/ 7 stab wounds, are more than sufficient probable cause for arrest. Have you seen the police report, Sidney?


Sidney: The media manufactured Crystal's record of violence by repeatedly spreading Durham police accusations that she assaulted her ex-boyfriend in February 2010.

Crystal's violent criminal record long predates February, 2010. Try to show at least a modicum of honesty, Sidney.

Sidney: The truth is that he initiated the physical confrontation by repeatedly punching her in the face.

That should be evident in contemporaneous pictures taken that night and the next day.

Funny, nothing shows in her mugshot, Sidney. She just looks like a fucked-up ho.

Have you also heard the reports that Crystal trashed everything in Reginald's appartment?

Anonymous said...

"I believe that Ms. Mangum should be treated like anyone else. I believe the Durham Police should have conducted an investigation before arresting and charging her."

In the Duke case, there was an investigation which produced evidence that the alleged crime had never happened. That evidence was either ignored or suppressed.

Is that how Ms. Mangum should be treated?

Anonymous said...

"The media manufactured Crystal's record of violence by repeatedly spreading Durham police accusations that she assaulted her ex-boyfriend in February 2010."

What about the incident, prior to 2010 and prior than 2006 in which Ms. Mangum stole a car, lead police on a high speed chase, and tried to run one of them down with the stolen vehicle?

Anonymous said...

"The truth is that he initiated the physical confrontation by repeatedly punching her in the face."

Sidney, you are fabricating this. You have no access to any information that would allow you to make any such allegation.

LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE

Anonymous said...

"The truth is that he initiated the physical confrontation by repeatedly punching her in the face."

And you have been saying the truth is that the Lacrosse players are guilty of raping Ms. Mangum, even though there is no evidence of a crime.

And yes you do believe they are guilty.

Anonymous said...

"I believe that Ms. Mangum should be treated like anyone else."

Ms. Mangum was treated like every other complaining witness in a rape case except for one thing. The prosecutor neglected to interview her until more than 9 months after the alleged crime.

Anonymous said...

"It has never been legally determined that Mangum's claim of sexual assault was false. Attorney General Roy Cooper had only the ability to dismiss charges, not enter a verdict."

Sidney, you have a distorted view. The issue was whether or not Ms. Mangum's allegations of rape were true. Mr. Nifong had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the allegation was true. No one had to prove the allegation was false.

Mr. Cooper concluded, based on thorough review of the evidence, that her claims were not true. Then he expressed his belief that the accused were innocent. What else could they be if the accuser's allegation was not true.

Further, I will repeat, Ms. Mangum alleged a rape, not a sexual assault but specifically a rape, in which the assailants would have left evidence. Forensic testing revealed no such evidence.

The forensic testing of the rape kit revealed as a fact that Ms. Mangum had not been raped.

Ms. Mangum alleged she had been raped.

She could not, with any real degree of certainty identify any assailant.

That establishes her as a false accuser, regardless of what meaningless rationalization you try to brew up.

Anonymous said...

"With regards to criminal records, it is my understanding that Reginald Daye's is extensive and includes acts of violence."

Do you base your understanding on the same sources upon which you base your allegation that someone else killed Mr. Daye?

Anonymous said...

312

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 310 of 310   Newer› Newest»