To see a Flash version of this blog with audio, click the link below. The script of the blog follows.
LINK: http://www.justice4nifong.com/direc/flog/flog041511.html
Because the media has been vague and mysteriously silent about Reginald Daye, the professed boyfriend of the Duke Lacrosse case victim and accuser Crystal Mangum, I have contacted some of my sources to find out what they say happened. Mainstream media will not inform the public, so you can find out by accessing this blog site.The following is based upon what I have been told, and is not firsthand knowledge. Bear that in mind. This is what I have been told, and what I believe to be true.
Ever since Ms. Mangum’s arrest in February 17, 2010 on trumped up charges, she lost her apartment, job, personal belongings, and independence. In addition her father passed away while she was incarcerated and her mother, who was suffering with dementia, was placed in a nursing home. Through the kindness of friends, Crystal and her children stayed at a house of a friend, while Crystal struggled to regain her independence. She and her children moved into an apartment with Reginald Daye, a 46 year old man, eleven years her senior.On the night of April 3, 2011, Ms. Mangum and Mr. Daye got into a financial argument… she wanted to use money to pay the rent, and he had other ideas for how the money should be spent. The argument ensued and escalated, and I am uncertain as to the immediate circumstances which led to the stabbing of Mr. Daye.
The media was vague about the wounds Reginald Daye received, with ABC-11 reporting that he was stabbed seven times. Some reports stated he was stabbed multiple times. Evidently the stab wounds were to the torso, but whether to the chest and/or abdomen was not clear in any of the mainstream media reports I came across. It is my understanding that Mr. Daye underwent surgery for his wounds and that his recovery was unremarkable. That by Friday, April 8, 2011, he was awake, strolling around, talking, and making plans for his release.Then, over the weekend, he unexpectedly lapsed into a coma from which he would never recover. His condition was so dire that a medical decision was made to remove him from life support. I was told that Mr. Daye may have died as early as Monday April 11th, or on Tuesday, April 12th. The media reports claim that he died the evening of Wednesday, April 13th.
I was furthermore informed that it is believed that he succumbed to a massive air embolism… which suggests that someone purposely injected a large volume of air into his intravenous tubing. If this is true, then Mr. Daye was murdered, and not by Crystal Mangum because she, like Alan Gell, was incarcerated at the time of the crime.
As I stated initially, I do not know if the above scenario is factual, but I believe it carries a lot of weight. Consider that the media has been hush about Mr. Daye’s condition. There was no mention of him lapsing into a coma over the weekend. Also, had Mr. Daye died of his injuries, it would most likely have occurred within a matter of days after he underwent surgery and was hospitalized. The fact that he was on the mend and ready for discharge also rules out that he died of the stab wound(s) he sustained. Finally, had Mr. Daye’s death been a proximate result of Ms. Mangum’s attack, she would already be charged with first degree murder, and it would have happened without a cabal of Durham prosecutors and police.Instead of rushing to assign a murder charge against Ms. Mangum, the Durham prosecutors and police need to obtain an autopsy report, study its findings, and move on from there. Whatever the cause of death, be it medical negligence, medical malpractice, or intentional homicide, Crystal Mangum is not responsible for the death of Reginald Daye.
To view Part 16 of comic strip click on the following link.
LINK: http://justice4nifong.com/direc/sdcDirec/sdcEpv/sdc187.htm
310 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 310 of 310"Your analogy comparing the drug dealing participants with the Duke Lacrosse alleged assault is like comparing apples with eggplant. The drug people were both engaged in a criminal transaction. In the Duke Lacrosse case a victim accused others of assaulting her. To compare them is a quantum leap that even I cannot make."
The person you call the Duke "victim" was filing a false police report. That is a crime.
QUACK
QUACK
QUACK
We just love these
Lacrosse Loving
L I E S T O P P E R S
QUACK
QUACK
QUACK
You are running out of gas, MotorMouth.
QUACK
QUACK
QUACK
"By taking advantage of the truth I report..."
Sidney, you very very rarely ever report truth in your blog.
Even though there was no evidence that the Lacrosse players or any one else assaulted Ms. Mangum on the night of 13-14 March 2006, you continue to blog that they did assault her.
Even though Ms. Mangum did lie when she accused the Lacrosse players, you blog that she was not a false accuser.
Even though Mr. Nifong's conduct was blatantly obvious, you blog that he conformed to accepted standards of prosecutorial behavior.
Even though Mrs. Evans made her statement to 60 Minutes after all the criticism leveled against Mr. Nifong's unethical conduct, you say her statement is the cause of a carpetbagger jihad which resulted in the disbarment of Mr. Nifong.
You say the carpetbagger jihad is real, even though you have never been able to offer corroborating evidence.
Since when has the actual truth ever been important to you?
Sidney, why do you think Mr. Nifong should have arrested the three Duke defendants based on Ms. Mangum's faulty, tainteg identification of them?
Why do you think Crystal Mangum should not have neen arrested after Mr.Daye's statement to the police that Ms.Mangum stabbed him and took his money?
You have made a big deal of the Lacrosse players' behavior. Ms Mangum's prior behavior was one of documented criminality and violent behavior
kilgo, with regard to Crystal's money, the real situation was it was Lacrosse players' money which she tried improperly to take.
kilgo again shows he is incapable of commenting meaningfully on the woman who victimized the innocent Lacrosse players by falsely accusing them of rape.
kilo must be really desperate for female companionship. He indicates he loves the violent false accuser.
Sidney, getting back to the drug dealer analogy, what justification did Mr. Nifong have to accept Ms. Manhum's allegations?
I have read your unsupported allegations about the party and the Lacrosse team's behavior. None of that establishes probable cause to believe a rape had happened without corroborating evidence.
Mr. Nifong's extensive attempts to get corroborating evidence yielded nothing. He refused to consider alibi evidence.
A DA prosecuting you for drug dealing on the basis of the word of the would be buyer and nothing else would have been the same kind of misconduct Mr. Nifong committed.
QUACK
QUACK
QUACK
You are getting to be a real Bore, MotorMouth.
QUACK
QUACK
QUACK
Please try to come up with some
more Original material.
QUACK
QUACK
QUACK
kilgo again shows he is incapable of meaningful comment regarding the woman who victimized the innocent Duke Lacrosse players by falsely accusing them of rape.
QUACK
QUACK
QUACK
MotorMouth, who has never stepped foot
on the Duke Campus.
QUACK
QUACK
QUACK
MotorMouth, who was twelve years old
when the Lacrosse Boys held their drunken party.
QUACK
QUACK
QUACK
MotorMouth, be content in your
State of BLISSFUL IGNORANCE.
QUACK
QUACK
QUACK
kilgo again shows he is completely ignorant about the woman who victimized the innocent lacrosse players when she falsely accused them of raping her.
kilgo you are a blithering excuse for a blithering idiot.
kilgo, tell us what you know about the Duke false rape case.
As expected, deafening silence from kolgo
Hey Kilgo,
You have your deposition in hand yet?
kilgo is still silent
kilgo remains silent
Kilgo knows that Kilgo is getting (or already has been served) a subpoena. Everything Kilgo publishes here are merely the hollow musings of the condemned.
kilgo, you can't stand to face truth, can you.
...
The Very Great and Compassionate Kilgo
takes Pity upon the Suffering MotorMouth.
The Very Great and Compassionate Kilgo
provides the Suffering MotorMouth the Key
to Relief from all his Mental Torment.
Suffer no more, poor MotorMouth, you shall
gain Enlightenment with This Question.
What Evidence did the Durham Police present
to the Grand Jury to obtain the Indictments
of the Duke Defendants?
...
Please don't feed the troll!
kilgo, a more appropriate question would be, what evidence did Mike Nifong withhold from the grand jury in order to get indictments against the innocent Duke lacrosse players whom Ms. Mangum falsely accused of rape?
Another appropriate question woud be why did Mr. Nifong seek indictments when he had evidence that no crime had happened?
A third question is, if you yourself had evidence which showed the Lacrosse players were guilty, why have you never come forth with it? Why did you withhold that evidence from Mr. Nifong?
kilgo yet again shows he can not comment meaningfully about the woman who victimized the innocent Duke Lacrosse players by falsely accusing them of rape.
kilgo, ask yourself what evidence was presented to the grand jury about Ms. Mangum and Mr. Daye that they returned an indictment against her for first degree murder?
"Two of the members of the Durham, North Carolina grand jury that indicted three Duke University lacrosse team members for the rape of a stripped hired to dance at a team party told ABC that they are not so sure they would vote to indict again. One juror told "Good Morning America" he had second thoughts about the initial vote to indict.
"I don't think I could have made a decision to go forward with the charges that were put before us. I don't think those charges would have been the proper charges, based on what I know now," he said.
The second juror interviewed anonymously on the television show said he did not regret voting to indict the players initially, but says he now has doubts based on what he has learned about the case since last Spring.
"I don't know for sure whether she was raped, you know, because of everything that … came out," he said. "I'm not sure, to tell you the truth."
kilgo, two members of the grand jury were interviewed on Good Morning America after evidence of Lacrosse players' innocence came out.
The question is, what evidence did Mr. Nifong withhold?
The poor little troll can not stomach the truth.
Sidney, I thought that in your past life you were a physician.
If you were, your lack of knowledge regarding chest trauma and the effects of air embolisms is truly astonishing.
I would hate to think of the damage you must have caused to your patients. Is that why you no longer practice? Were you struck off? Was it the Duke Lacrosse players that got you struck off?
Is this why you side with Nifong - partners in crime - so to speak?
Sidney, judging from your evasive responses to the hypothetical drug dealing scenario, you do not consider being falsely charged with a crime an opportunity to prove yourself innocent.
“Crystal Mangum, who falsely accused three Duke players of raping her in 2006, was charged with murder in the death of her boyfriend.”
Sidney, this is the latest from the New York Times about Ms. Mangum.
You know, the New York times of Duff Wilson who was virulently pro Nifong. Read Mr. Wilson's NYT article and then say the INNOCENT LACROSSE PLAYERS were all mediaa darlngs.
"Suffer no more, poor MotorMouth, you shall
gain Enlightenment with This Question.
What Evidence did the Durham Police present
to the Grand Jury to obtain the Indictments
of the Duke Defendants?"
kilgo knows darn well that NC Grand Jury prceedings are secret and no one knows what was or was not presented,except the presenters.
One of those presenters was Ben Himn. When asked at Mr. Nifong's ethics trial to reveal what he presented, Mr. Himan declined.
Why would he have declined to do so if what he had presented would have exonerated Mr. Nifong?
Why would Mr. Nifong not have revealed what was presented if it could have exonerated him.
Read my previous post. Two members of that Grand Jury have indicated evidence was withheld from them.
Cliche for kilgo:
If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen
If Ms. Mangum had gotten a conscience instead of a bunch of enablers, she might not have suffered o much stigma over falsely accusing innocent men of rape.
kilgo, maybe you did go to Mr. Nifong and even he did not think you were credible.
kilgo again is silent.
How much more deafening silence before kilgo issues his next meaningless statement?
Or will kilgo, as he has done before, slink back into his pond and quack up?
How much more silent can the great silence of the great kilgo be?
How long will this go on?
We still as of now have heard nothing from kilgo today.
Sidney: "...he was awake, strolling around, talking, and making plans for his release".
"...which suggests that someone purposely injected a large volume of air into his intravenous tubing."
Patients who are 'strolling around' don't have IVs, Sidney.
Do you really believe all this crap you post? lol
Looking forward to more 'truth' from you, bro; better than the funny papers.
Kilgo actually made a valid point for once.
Kilgo reminded us that the NC grand jury system is completely broken, and any grand jury indictments should be viewed with a heavy dose of skepticism. The grand jury is a rubber stamp.
In the lacrosse frame, Gottlieb and Himan testified for the first two indictments, and only Himan testified for the last. The grand jury spent only a couple of minutes on each indictment. There is no requirement to introduce exculpatory evidence. No record is kept, and there is no check on the accuracy of the testimony. In his DHC deposition, Gottlieb indicated that he testified that after the confusion at DUMC, Mangum was consistent in her allegations. Many observers found that close to an admission of perjury.
I advise readers not to put too much weight on the indictment of Mangum for murder. I would have preferred an arrest and a subsequent probable cause hearing at which evidence would initially be presented.
Harr Supporter @ 11:57 AM: I would have preferred an arrest and a subsequent probable cause hearing at which evidence would initially be presented.
She is still entitled to a PC hearing, HS, due to her arrest prior to indictment.
You may recall that Nifong purposely avoided PC hearings in the DukeLAX hoax/frame by declining arrests for 1 - 2 months.
It could be months until a PC hearing is docketed, btw.
Thanks for the correction, Whatchoo.
Harr Supporter:
For what it is worth, there should be a probable cause hearing for Ms. Mangum.
Meanwhile, kilgo remains silent.
With regard to the NC grand jury system, kilgo thinks the grand jury indictments of the Lacrosse defendants indicated Mr. Nifong had probable cause to believe a crime had happened. kilgo does not seem to beieve there is probable cause to believe Ms. Mangum committed any crime. Neither does Sidney.
kilgo remains silent.
...
Who likes to go Easter Egg Hunting ?
http://justice4nifong.blogspot.com/2009/04/north-carolina-can-learn-from-us.html
Happy Easter Everyone ! !
...
kilgo emerges to make another meaninglesx comment about the case in which a woman victimized innocent Duke Lacrosse players by falsely accusing them of rape.
kilgo, are you teaching lessons on how to commit prosecutorial misconduct?
Follow Kilgo's link. Gottlieb describes his grand jury testimony on page 185 of his DHC deposition. He claims he provided "facts" from his report (which did not exist at the time of the grand jury) and that Mangum did not change her story after she had calmed down.
I see why Kilgo was so insistent that we see what Gottlieb's testified. I can understand why Kilgo believes that Gottlieb committed perjury and that Nifong's case was built on lies.
Thanks, Kilgo.
kilgo's citation of Mark Gottlieb shows how bankrupt the J4N movement is.
Dr. Harr,
I read your most recent post with great interest. As a medical professional, I found your objective and thorough analysis of the facts to be very convincing. I look forward to reading your next post regarding Mr. Daye's death, and I hope that you will share your findings with the appropriate authorities.
Best regards.
Tara
Anon @ 5:09 AM: As a medical professional, I found your objective and thorough analysis of the facts to be very convincing.
LOL, Tara was / is not in the medical business (Nursing, rather), and is anything but professional.
Good one.
Tara, pardon my slowness, but I just got it.
Bravo
Check out the clown Malek who is posting comments at the one of the CGM sites. Could this be Kilgo?
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6092743671120776158&postID=7604681474273499163&isPopup=true
Anonymous said...
"Sidney, getting back to the drug dealer analogy, what justification did Mr. Nifong have to accept Ms. Manhum's allegations?
I have read your unsupported allegations about the party and the Lacrosse team's behavior. None of that establishes probable cause to believe a rape had happened without corroborating evidence.
Mr. Nifong's extensive attempts to get corroborating evidence yielded nothing. He refused to consider alibi evidence.
A DA prosecuting you for drug dealing on the basis of the word of the would be buyer and nothing else would have been the same kind of misconduct Mr. Nifong committed."
Your analogy, I am afraid, has too many loose ends. In the Duke Lacrosse case, Ms. Mangum was at the party physically, Ms. Mangum was lured there under false pretenses (expecting to be entertaining a small bachelor party of four or five), there was under-aged drinking at the party... a crime, there were racial epithets tossed at Ms. Mangum. Under these circumstances, picking out three individuals with 100 % certainty establishes probable cause.
Now in your analogy, if I am in the vicinity of the dealer, if I am in possession of the drug being sold, if I have a history of drug dealing or drug use, then that might at least warrant an interview as to my whereabouts, etc. But the variables are too many for a good comparison with your analogy.
Thanks for the interesting premise.
Calling kilgo a clown is an insult to all the clowns in the world.
"...there were racial epithets tossed at Ms. Mangum."
Sidney, get your facts straight. There were no racial epithets tossed at Ms. Mangum. A racial epithet was said to Kim Roberts. Kim Roberts admitted she provoked the racial epithet.
I would like to thank you all for your interesting comments.
I wish I had the opportunity and time to address more of the differing points of views. Many of which are quite thought provoking... others, not.
I am uploading the finale of Episode V a day early. I hope that you enjoy it. I will provide a link in the blog that I am uploading presently about the strip.
On Monday or Tuesday following Easter, I hope to upload a very important flog (Flash blog) which can be accessed here. It will again deal with the current incident involving Crystal Mangum.
"...there was under-aged drinking at the party... a crime"
Sidney, again, Mr. Nifong did not charge anyone with underage drinking.
Are you saying underage drinking is probable cause to believe a rape took place?
Or are you admitting that whatever happened at the party, crime or otherwise, it was not the gang rape Ms. Mabngum and Mr. Nifong alleged?
"Under these circumstances, picking out three individuals with 100 % certainty establishes probable cause."
So, please explain why two of the individuals she picked out with 100% certainty were individuals who could prove with 100% certainty they were not at the party at the time of the alleged crime with which they were charged, why Mr. Nifong did not want to look at alibi evidence.
Explain why David Evans, who never had a mustache, was indicted after Ms. Mangum identified a man with a mustache as her third assailant?
Explain why Ms. Mangum identified Brad Ross as a party attendee when Brad Ross was not in Durham at the time?
In the past, you have ducked all these questions.
"But the variables are too many for a good comparison with your analogy."
You ignore that in the analogy you could prove you were not the drug dealer but you were indicted anyway.
In the Lacrosse false rape case, the Lacrosse players were charged with a crime when the evidence indicated the crime had not happened, the identifications were faulty and tainted, and at least two of them had evidence to show they had not been at the crime scene at the time of the alleged crime. There was no probable cause.
In the analogy the situation would have been much the same. You would have been charged with a crime, even though there was no probable cause.
Sidney, you seem to be saying you have first hand knowledge of what happened at the Lacrosse party.
Were you present at the Lacrosse party? That is the only way you could have had first hand knowledge.
Or, did what you call knowledge come from sources, just like what you call your knowledge of why Reginald Daye died?
"
Now in your analogy, if I am in the vicinity of the dealer, if I am in possession of the drug being sold, if I have a history of drug dealing or drug use, then that might at least warrant an interview as to my whereabouts, etc"
Precisely.
My point was, in this hypothetical situation, although none of that happened, you would have been charged with the crime. The only basis for charging you was the word of the buyer. That would not have been, you obviously agree, enough to justify charging you.
In the Lacrosse situation, there was no evidence that a crime had happened. The only basis for charging the Lacrosse players was the word of the alleged victim. Her word was in no way enough to justify charging them.
Your failure to appreciate the hypothetical illustrates how warped and biased your thinking about the case is.
"Under these circumstances, picking out three individuals with 100 % certainty establishes probable cause."
I ask again, how can you establish that you have first hand knowledge that these circumstances actually were the circumstances
"Under these circumstances, picking out three individuals with 100 % certainty establishes probable cause."
Sidney, the lineup procedure did not include fillers. A proper lineup would have include fillers.
Are saying, if Ms. Mangum had identified three fillers with 100% certainty that would have been probable cause to indict them?
I point out again, Ms. Mangum identified Brad Ross with 100% certainty as a party attendee and Brad Ross had not been in Durham that night.
That indicates that Ms. Mangum's certainty was not at all reliable.
Sidney, to my last comment I add, Ms. Mangum's id of Brad Ross suggests she might have identified a filler with 100% certainty.
We will not know because whoever arranged the lineup arranged to exclude fillers.
"Under these circumstances, picking out three individuals with 100 % certainty establishes probable cause."
How does this establish probable cause for gang rape?
How does this establish probable cause in the face of an allegation which was not credible and a total lack of evidence to establish a crime?
Nothing from kilgo today?
Still nothing from kilgo.
Not that kilgo ever gave us anything meaningful.
You know, Sidney has never said anything rational on this blog.
We can make 300 comments. Don't quit now.
300...Go, Go, Go.
.
.
Still nothing from kilgo.
kilgo still has nothin to say.
RUN KILGO RUN
DUCK KILGO DUCK
QUACK KILGO QUACK
300
Yes we can, yes we can.
277
278
279
280
we
can
284
285
we
can
289
290
Go
Go
Go
Yes
we
can
297
298
299
300
Here's to you, Sid.
300 comments and kilgo has yet to say anything meaningful.
Anonymous said...
"'Your analogy comparing the drug dealing participants with the Duke Lacrosse alleged assault is like comparing apples with eggplant. The drug people were both engaged in a criminal transaction. In the Duke Lacrosse case a victim accused others of assaulting her. To compare them is a quantum leap that even I cannot make.'
The person you call the Duke 'victim' was filing a false police report. That is a crime."
It has never been legally determined that Mangum's claim of sexual assault was false. Attorney General Roy Cooper had only the ability to dismiss charges, not enter a verdict.
Anonymous said...
"Sidney, why do you think Mr. Nifong should have arrested the three Duke defendants based on Ms. Mangum's faulty, tainteg identification of them?
Why do you think Crystal Mangum should not have neen arrested after Mr.Daye's statement to the police that Ms.Mangum stabbed him and took his money?
You have made a big deal of the Lacrosse players' behavior. Ms Mangum's prior behavior was one of documented criminality and violent behavior"
I believe that Ms. Mangum should be treated like anyone else. I believe the Durham Police should have conducted an investigation before arresting and charging her.
With regards to criminal records, it is my understanding that Reginald Daye's is extensive and includes acts of violence. The media manufactured Crystal's record of violence by repeatedly spreading Durham police accusations that she assaulted her ex-boyfriend in February 2010. The truth is that he initiated the physical confrontation by repeatedly punching her in the face.
Sidney: With regards to criminal records, it is my understanding that Reginald Daye's [record?] is extensive and includes acts of violence.
What a fucking prick you are.
Reginald Daye's record is easily-accessed public information. I suggest that you do so before you post such lies again.
I repeat, Sidney - you are a fucking prick.
Sidney: I believe the Durham Police should have conducted an investigation before arresting and charging her.
You have got to be kidding. The 911 call, and a statement from the victim w/ 7 stab wounds, are more than sufficient probable cause for arrest. Have you seen the police report, Sidney?
Sidney: The media manufactured Crystal's record of violence by repeatedly spreading Durham police accusations that she assaulted her ex-boyfriend in February 2010.
Crystal's violent criminal record long predates February, 2010. Try to show at least a modicum of honesty, Sidney.
Sidney: The truth is that he initiated the physical confrontation by repeatedly punching her in the face.
That should be evident in contemporaneous pictures taken that night and the next day.
Funny, nothing shows in her mugshot, Sidney. She just looks like a fucked-up ho.
Have you also heard the reports that Crystal trashed everything in Reginald's appartment?
"I believe that Ms. Mangum should be treated like anyone else. I believe the Durham Police should have conducted an investigation before arresting and charging her."
In the Duke case, there was an investigation which produced evidence that the alleged crime had never happened. That evidence was either ignored or suppressed.
Is that how Ms. Mangum should be treated?
"The media manufactured Crystal's record of violence by repeatedly spreading Durham police accusations that she assaulted her ex-boyfriend in February 2010."
What about the incident, prior to 2010 and prior than 2006 in which Ms. Mangum stole a car, lead police on a high speed chase, and tried to run one of them down with the stolen vehicle?
"The truth is that he initiated the physical confrontation by repeatedly punching her in the face."
Sidney, you are fabricating this. You have no access to any information that would allow you to make any such allegation.
LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE
"The truth is that he initiated the physical confrontation by repeatedly punching her in the face."
And you have been saying the truth is that the Lacrosse players are guilty of raping Ms. Mangum, even though there is no evidence of a crime.
And yes you do believe they are guilty.
"I believe that Ms. Mangum should be treated like anyone else."
Ms. Mangum was treated like every other complaining witness in a rape case except for one thing. The prosecutor neglected to interview her until more than 9 months after the alleged crime.
"It has never been legally determined that Mangum's claim of sexual assault was false. Attorney General Roy Cooper had only the ability to dismiss charges, not enter a verdict."
Sidney, you have a distorted view. The issue was whether or not Ms. Mangum's allegations of rape were true. Mr. Nifong had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the allegation was true. No one had to prove the allegation was false.
Mr. Cooper concluded, based on thorough review of the evidence, that her claims were not true. Then he expressed his belief that the accused were innocent. What else could they be if the accuser's allegation was not true.
Further, I will repeat, Ms. Mangum alleged a rape, not a sexual assault but specifically a rape, in which the assailants would have left evidence. Forensic testing revealed no such evidence.
The forensic testing of the rape kit revealed as a fact that Ms. Mangum had not been raped.
Ms. Mangum alleged she had been raped.
She could not, with any real degree of certainty identify any assailant.
That establishes her as a false accuser, regardless of what meaningless rationalization you try to brew up.
"With regards to criminal records, it is my understanding that Reginald Daye's is extensive and includes acts of violence."
Do you base your understanding on the same sources upon which you base your allegation that someone else killed Mr. Daye?
312
Post a Comment