Click on link at end of blog to view official 2012 j4n Christmas card
In a few days we will be paying homage to the Man from Nazareth and his birth in a manger in Bethlehem… however, amid regaling, exchanging gifts, and feasting on succulent meals with family and dear friends, as is customary in this worldwide tradition, I implore that everyone takes time to think about what is truly important in life. I admit that some expensive and coveted items are nice, they are only objects… mere possessions. If you take a deep look into your soul, I am sure that you will conclude, as do I, that the truly most important things in life are freedom and loved ones. Freedom to roam about to take in the glories of nature that have been bestowed upon us, and the ability to share our hearts with dearly beloved family and friends are at the core of what fills the human kind with contentment and serenity.
It is extremely sad that freedom and family contact have been maliciously taken from Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser, by a biased and sadistic justice system all for the purpose of exacting payback against her for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case. This Christmas will mark Crystal Mangum’s 632nd day of incarceration within the Durham County correctional facility on trumped up murder and larceny charges that transpired in a crime in which she was the victim of domestic violence… approximately 21 months of wrongful incarceration by a justice system that is corrupted itself. A justice system gone awry wherein: (1) prosecutors collaborate with a medical examiner to concoct a criminally bogus autopsy report on Reginald Daye (received a non-fatal stab wound by Mangum in self-defense); (2) defense attorneys join the conspiracy to work against Mangum’s best interests by pretending to defend her while undermining her; (3) an expert defense witness refusing to provide a written report exculpatory to Mangum; (4) a biased media with an anti-Mangum agenda to keep the prosecutorial misdeeds and malfeasances hidden from the public; and (5) politicians, clergy, and civil rights and social organizations (NAACP, ACLU, North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence, etc.) lacking the will and/or courage to stand against blatant injustices.
The obvious question is why would Medical Examiner Dr. Clay Nichols, Mangum defense attorneys, a defense expert witness, the media, and social advocacy organizations work with Durham prosecutions in what is obviously a vendetta prosecution to mete out payback for Mangum’s role in the 2006 Duke Lacrosse case? The obvious answer to the question is that they all lack Nifongian courage… that exceedingly rare quality defined as the courage to do the right thing in the face of harsh and extreme consequences. Dr. Clay Nichols, Dr. Christena L. Roberts (defense expert witness), Mangum’s defense attorneys (Woody Vann and Chris Shella), media-types, men and women of the cloth, and politicians all witnessed what happened to former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong when he dared to do the right thing by prosecuting the Duke Lacrosse defendants against a torrent of opposition whipped up by the defense attorneys and the mainstream media. Nifong’s prosecution of the lacrosse defendants, who were positioned atop a pedestal by the media, placed his election bid for the D.A.’s office in severe jeopardy… but that did not dissuade him. It took all the might of the North Carolina State Bar to have Nifong tossed off the case. Because Mike Nifong stuck to his integrity-guns, the decision was made by the Powers-That-Be to stick it to him… and the State went about persecuting him without mercy. He was disbarred, sentenced to jail, deprived of immunity from civil action… all while being skewered in the media. For exhibiting Nifongian courage in the Duke Lacrosse case, Nifong suffered the most draconian and unimaginable of consequences. It is therefore no wonder why Dr. Nichols would prepare a criminally fraudulent autopsy report, Dr. Roberts would refuse to produce a written report, the media would keep wrongdoings concealed from the eyes and ears of the public, and the NAACP, ACLU, and other community groups would remain silent and idle… they all lack Nifongian courage.
In addition to loss of freedom, Mangum has been deprived of visitation rights with her beloved children by Family Court Judge Doretta Walker. Although acknowledging that Mangum is not an unfit mother to her three children, Judge Walker, in the summer of 2011, ordered that Mangum be denied visitation with her three children while she was in any detention center. This gratuitously malicious ruling coincides with other nonsensical legal actions in this trumped up case against Mangum.
So, this holiday season take measure of the things that are truly important… freedom, family, and friends, and place them before money and what it begets. I am sure that this is something that we call all agree upon… even the non-believers, naysayers, ill-willers, detractors, and others of that ilk.
And as we ring in the New Year, let us all be resolute in developing that special courage that requires an idealism, determination, and fortitude… the ability to do what is ethically right, even when doing so is unpopular and defies political correctness. In other words, let’s resolve to become individuals who are teeming with Nifongian courage. That is what would truly make this state, this nation, and this world a better place, and it would without doubt be the way to best pay homage to the Man from Nazareth.
ADDENDUM: Mangum Defense Fund
It has recently come to my attention that there are two online addresses for a website that is evidently soliciting contributions for a defense fund for Crystal Mangum. These URL addresses are http://www.cgmdefensefund.com, and http://www.crystalmangumdefensefund.com. My understanding is that these sites were set up by Attorney Mark Simeon, an acquaintance of Ms. Mangum. As of this point in time I have not visited these sites, however I plan to do so shortly.
I have never met Mr. Simeon, never spoke to him, never phoned him, and never tried to contact him. Through an intermediary I let him know that he has my permission to used this blog site as a resource for information about Ms. Mangum’s case or provide links on his site to information I collected and presented on this site and my website. That said, I want to make it clear that in no way do I, or the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong, condone, support, recommend, or have any affiliation with Mr. Simeon and his online sites. In general, I am not a fan of online solicitation because of its inherent problems with accountability. The Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong and I definitely do not receive any benefits from these sites.
As a refresher, the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong is nothing more than a grass-roots organization that is strictly self-supporting… in other words, it does not solicit donations, host fund-raising events, or engage in any activity for the purpose of procuring money. It is not a non-profit organization (does not have a 501 [c] 3 designation), with the brunt of expenses (tee-shirts, postage, travel, printing costs, etc.) being satisfied by me personally.
Regarding the online defense fund sites, I merely advise potential donors to proceed with due diligence and caution as they would with any web-based site designed to solicit contributions.
Click on link below to view the official Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong 2012 Christmas card.
http://www.justice4nifong.com/ecard/hday/xmCard12.html
114 comments:
Anonymous said...
Anonymous: Harr is truly an idiot. If she puts her findings in writing, the written material will be in the hands of the prosecution. She is obviously trying not to let that happen. how dense do you have to be to not get this?
I find it amazing that you pretend not to understand Harr.
Based on his analysis of the report, which analysis he has posted on this blog repeatedly, Harr has concluded that Nichols committed criminal fraud and that Daye's death was the result of either negligence or medical murder by Duke Medical.
As a result, he is convinced that Roberts has reached the same conclusion, but, due to pressure from the Powers-That-Be, lied about her conclusions in her meeting with Crystal. Harr is further convinced that Roberts will not lie in a written report.
Harr is confident he is correct. He is willing to bet Crystal's freedom on it.
I believe we should encourage him to go for it. Have Crystal file a motion asking the Court to require Roberts to provide a written report.
You speak words of wisdom and enlightenment... You are exactly correct in your assessment. In a SuperFlog that I will post after Christmas I will present additional unseen discovery that will support my position.
Don't worry. Crystal shall proceed to try and obtain a written report.
Best Holiday Wishes.
Anonymous said...
Sidney,
I agree with other posters.
Call Roberts' bluff.
Convince Crystal to file a motion asking the Court to require that Roberts submit a written report To Crystal. She can provide it to you so that you can post it on this blog. Crystal will also be required to provide to the prosecution, and they will be forced to determine how to respond.
Another poster gave you similar advice over a week ago. Why have you done nothing?
As you may know, Judge Robert Hobgood already issued an order for Dr. Roberts to provide Crystal Mangum with a written report. It merely needs to be enforced.
SIDNEY HARR:
"In a SuperFlog that I will post after Christmas I will present additional unseen discovery that will support my position."
Considering all that you have posted, what I expect is more evidence unfavorable to your position which you have been trying to conceal.
SIDNEY HARR:
"As you may know, Judge Robert Hobgood already issued an order for Dr. Roberts to provide Crystal Mangum with a written report. It merely needs to be enforced."
What will you say when Dr. Roberts puts in writing a report which agrees with Dr. Nichols' report?
SIDNEY HARR:
"It is extremely sad that freedom and family contact have been maliciously taken from Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser, by a biased and sadistic justice system all for the purpose of exacting payback against her for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case."
I say again, the Man from Nazareth, according to John the Evangelist, said, I am the Truth. You repeat lies.
Crystal is the false accuser/victimizer of the phoney Duke rape case. What you call the vindictive justice system is the consequences Crystal has suffered solely as a result of her own less than ideal behavior.
SIDNEY HARR:
"And as we ring in the New Year, let us all be resolute in developing that special courage that requires an idealism, determination, and fortitude… the ability to do what is ethically right, even when doing so is unpopular and defies political correctness."
You vilify the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players and their families because they did just that.
Where does the Man from Nazareth express approval for hypocrisy?
SIDNEY HARR:
"I have never met Mr. Simeon, never spoke to him, never phoned him, and never tried to contact him."
If I am correct, Mark Simeon is an attorney who was advising the Mangum family before the Lacrosse case imploded. In my opinion, he was hanging around to see if he could collect a contingency fee by suing the innocent falsely accused Lacrosse players.
SIDNEY HARR:
"It is extremely sad that freedom and family contact have been maliciously taken from Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser, by a biased and sadistic justice system all for the purpose of exacting payback against her for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case."
You did not think the Durham justice system and corrupt DA NIFONG were maliciously prosecuting the innocent, falsely accused Duke Lacrosse players.
I ask you again. When did the Man from Nazareth ever condone such hypocrisy?
SIDNEY HARR:
"
The obvious question is why would Medical Examiner Dr. Clay Nichols, Mangum defense attorneys, a defense expert witness, the media, and social advocacy organizations work with Durham prosecutions in what is obviously a vendetta prosecution to mete out payback for Mangum’s role in the 2006 Duke Lacrosse case?"
The obvious answer is that there is no vendetta driven prosecution of Crystal.
"The obvious answer to the question is that they all lack Nifongian courage… that exceedingly rare quality defined as the courage to do the right thing in the face of harsh and extreme consequences."
Saying someone lacks Nifongian courage is like saying someone is not infected with the Bubonic plague.
SIDNEY HARR:
"A justice system gone awry wherein: (1) prosecutors collaborate with a medical examiner to concoct a criminally bogus autopsy report on Reginald Daye (received a non-fatal stab wound by Mangum in self-defense); (2) defense attorneys join the conspiracy to work against Mangum’s best interests by pretending to defend her while undermining her; (3) an expert defense witness refusing to provide a written report exculpatory to Mangum; (4) a biased media with an anti-Mangum agenda to keep the prosecutorial misdeeds and malfeasances hidden from the public; and (5) politicians, clergy, and civil rights and social organizations (NAACP, ACLU, North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence, etc.) lacking the will and/or courage to stand against blatant injustices."
All lies.
SIDNEY, when did the Man from Nazareth ever condone lies.
SIDNEY HARR:
If you think Dr. Nichols "concoct[ed] a criminally bogus autopsy report on Reginald Daye", why do you not write up your own report and submit it as a Friend of the Court?
Of course you would have to establish your credentials as an expert, and you are unwilling to make public what credentials make you an expert - probably because you have more skeletons than sardines in your closet.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Dr. Clay Nichols, Dr. Christena L. Roberts (defense expert witness), Mangum’s defense attorneys (Woody Vann and Chris Shella), media-types, men and women of the cloth, and politicians all witnessed what happened to former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong when he dared to do the right thing by prosecuting the Duke Lacrosse defendants".
Another lie. As corrupt DA NIFONG knew right off the bat he had no evidence a crime had occurred, he did the WRONG thing when he prosecuted the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players.
I ask you again when the Man from Nazareth ever condoned such lying.
SIDNEY HARR:
"[DA NIFONG] was disbarred, sentenced to jail, deprived of immunity from civil action… all while being skewered in the media. For exhibiting Nifongian courage in the Duke Lacrosse case, Nifong suffered the most draconian and unimaginable of consequences.
Again you lie.
DA NIFONG conducted a blatantly unethical wrongful prosecution of innocent men. If his punishment was out of proportion to his actions, it was because it was not severe enough.
I ask yet again, when did the Man from Nazareth ever condone blatant, outright lies?
SIDNEY HARR:
From the appropriately named Liestoppers regarding Mark Simeon. The author was William Anderson
"
Let us not forget that Mark Simeon, who was struggling as a lawyer, stood to gain a LOT of money by having the LAX case pursued. He was representing Crystal when she conveniently managed to finger her three "attackers" from the highest-income zip codes of the Duke players. Now, I am sure that was just a coincidence, and that Simeon was giving her excellent legal advice with lots and lots of integrity."
This is why I am of the opinion Mark Simeon was hanging around Crystal hoping to eventually collect a big contingency fee.
SIDNEY HARR:
"let’s resolve to become individuals who are teeming with Nifongian courage. That is what would truly make this state, this nation, and this world a better place, and it would without doubt be the way to best pay homage to the Man from Nazareth."
That's like wishing for a total body case of shingles.
Becoming Nifongian is also a way of blaspheming, not paying homage to, thr Man from Nazareth, Who does not condone either lies or hypocrisy.
SIDNEY HARR:
Neither of the Crystal Defense fund sites exist. Until and unless they do, my opinion is that Mark Simeon has given up on getting a big contingency fee via Crystal Mangum.
Sidney,
Did you notice that saying in Spanish in one of the postings?
Isn't that great? You're going to have a multilingual blog! Soon you'll also have things in French and German. I'd try to post something in Russian, except my computer doesn't have Cyrillics.
SIDNEY HARR:
Auf Deutsch:
Crystal ist eine Dirne!
Isn't this the same lawyer that kenny claimed to have given money to for Mangum's bail> I smell a rat......or perhaps, a possum....
SIDNEY HARR:
Mehr auf Deutsch:
Wenn SIDNEY HARR spricht, macht er nur SchweinMist.
Oh, Sidney, I'm so happy for you!
Spanish and German -- not to mention some Latin that Kenny used a few months ago! You are really going to break all records, and I'm so proud to be a part of it!
C'est la vie.
Dai? Mi prendi In giro?
Spanish, German, French, Italian! Isn't that fantastic?
Sidney, you have really broken all records!
Hopefully Crystal will be spending many more years behind bars for all the crimes she has committed.If she had been prosecuted for falsely accusing the Duke lacrosse players for a rape that never happened Reginald Daye would still be alive.
Я могу, я могу, я могу по руский!
How wonderful! Anonymous 8:26 was able to use Cyrillics!
I don't think any other blog will even come close to this one! (And to think this wouldn't have happened if good old Kenhyderal hadn't given us the idea! Thank you, Kenny; You are really the best!
Anonymous said: "Isn't this the same lawyer that kenny claimed to have given money to for Mangum's bail> I smell a rat......or perhaps, a possum"....The money I gave Barrister Simeon towards Crystal's bail is in his trust account. I would be agreeable for this money to be used towards her expenses in defending herself.
Gajan Kristnaskon al ĉiuj homoj de bona volo
The question is, who are the men of good will?
"guiowen said...
The question is, who are the men of good will?"
One answer is neither SIDNEY nor KENHYDERAL.
" Anonymous said...
Isn't this the same lawyer that kenny claimed to have given money to for Mangum's bail> I smell a rat......or perhaps, a possum....
December 23, 2012 3:19 PM"
No, just a contingency fee hungry lawyer who hoped to get rich off the misery of the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players.
"These URL addresses are http://www.cgmdefensefund.com, and http://www.crystalmangumdefensefund.com. My understanding is that these sites were set up by Attorney Mark Simeon, an acquaintance of Ms. Mangum. As of this point in time I have not visited these sites, however I plan to do so shortly."
While Mark Simeon may have purchased the web site addresses, there is nothing currently set up on them.
I think it's kinda cheesy and transparent for sidney to put links on his post that he knows do not work. It's his cute little junior high school mentality at work. Silliness and a waste of time.
Shame on you sidney.......
you've done nothing but make things worse for Mangum.
Kenny is a troll.
Ken Edwards = Malek Williams
KENHYDERAL:
"The money I gave Barrister Simeon towards Crystal's bail is in his trust account. I would be agreeable for this money to be used towards her expenses in defending herself."
I wouldn't count on that.
Since Simeon is not her attorney, how do you think she is going to get the money that is in her fund? Does make one wonder, doesn't it? Will sidney see that there are dollars in this "fund" and announce to Crystal that he should get the money and that he should decide what she needs to do with it? hmmmmmm
of course, the huge sum sitting in her "trust" could be $19.99
I guess Simeon will offer (to Crystal) that he will represent her. The problem is Sidney has already convinced Crystal that none of the attorneys in Durham will represent her honestly. It might be interesting as Simeon and Sidney vie for Crystal's confidence. Of course this assumes that there is more than $19.99 in her trust fund.
I thought Kenny said he had transferred thousands of dollars to Simeon.
Yes. That's what he SAID.
I have no idea of the accounting of the money Barrister Simeon has in trust. I contibuted what I could and he told me in an e-mail that the amount he had was close to satisfying the, non-refundable, 10% fee for a bail bond company to post the bail which would be close to $20,000.00
well, then, Mangum ought to have 20K at her disposal , for use, as she wishes. All those who think there is actually 20K sitting someplace that mangum can and will use wisely to hire a competent lawyer.....please raise your hand. Let's see....one, two, three........no, kenny, you cannot raise both hands. so the vote is now two! sidney and kenny.....
I was just noticing the title for sidney harr's latest posting........Celebrating the Man from Naz/Mangum Defense Fund. The title, as written, implies celebration of the Mangum Defense Fund as well as the birth of Christ. Of course, one might assume, then, that sidney had pulled the cobwebs out of his wallet and given some money to some kind of fund for hiring a lawyer for Mangum. Nope.......
Victoria Peterson wanted to cast a vote but she is busy out picketing New Town Connecticut funerals along with all the other homophobic wingnut "christians" from the Westboro Baptist Church.
That's ok......someday Vickie will come over to our side.....we have cookie! LOL
KENHYDERAL:
"I have no idea of the accounting of the money Barrister Simeon has in trust."
How do you know he intends to use said money for Crystal's benefit?
yeah, kenny. you are one weird dude. you swear by kilo and his bizarre nonsensical fable about the rape-that-never-happened. You trust this wing nut to be right, just because he says so? A person who may not even exist?
You send money to an attorney you have never met, know nothing about, who has provided you no accounting of how funds are being transmitted on to Mangum, since bail apparently isn't happening.
YET.....when confronted with hard core physical evidence....such as the DNA report (no lax DNA in or on Mangum_......you blow it off as though it were conjured from a stickpin doll in Jamaica!
Although I don't have a lot of confidence in the North Carolina State Bar Association, because of the way they dealt with DA Nifong and Dr.Harr, I understand that they have severe penalties for the misuse of Trust Funds as well as insurance to replace any funds that have been misappropriated.
KENHYDERAL:
"Although I don't have a lot of confidence in the North Carolina State Bar Association, because of the way they dealt with DA Nifong and Dr.Harr, I understand that they have severe penalties for the misuse of Trust Funds as well as insurance to replace any funds that have been misappropriated."
So you approve of unethical wrongful prosecutions of people you do not like. And you think SIDNEY should get a pass for practicing law without a license, for using that illegal activity to access and publish confidential information.
You have no moral compass.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"In a SuperFlog that I will post after Christmas I will present additional unseen discovery that will support my position."
Considering all that you have posted, what I expect is more evidence unfavorable to your position which you have been trying to conceal.
Thanks for your interest in the upcoming Super Flog. It is still a few days away from being posted... it is a very time and effort intensive project. But it is one that is worth the wait.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"As you may know, Judge Robert Hobgood already issued an order for Dr. Roberts to provide Crystal Mangum with a written report. It merely needs to be enforced."
What will you say when Dr. Roberts puts in writing a report which agrees with Dr. Nichols' report?
I won't 'cause she won't. There will be nothing for me to say because Dr. Roberts is not going to put a report in writing as she's trying to protect Dr. Nichols... as is Woody Vann. If she is ever forced to put anything in writing, it will be contrary to Dr. Nichols' report.
It's that simple.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"As you may know, Judge Robert Hobgood already issued an order for Dr. Roberts to provide Crystal Mangum with a written report. It merely needs to be enforced."
What will you say when Dr. Roberts puts in writing a report which agrees with Dr. Nichols' report?
The Man from Nazareth does not condone lies. We are in agreement there. Ergo, he does not condone the Nichols' Autopsy Report or the vendetta prosecution against Mangum upon which it is based.
Anonymous said...
Hopefully Crystal will be spending many more years behind bars for all the crimes she has committed.If she had been prosecuted for falsely accusing the Duke lacrosse players for a rape that never happened Reginald Daye would still be alive.
You need to stop drinking the "HaterAde." Can't you show a scintilla of compassion during the Holiday season?
" If she is ever forced to put anything in writing, it will be contrary to Dr. Nichols' report.
Now, that is some tortured logic, Dr. Harr.
Here's the deal -- Dr. Roberts gave an oral report because she had concerns about violating medical information disclosure laws. Why did she have these concerns? I think she knows that any information given to Mangum in writing will appear here, on this blog.
I think that if Crystal can guarantee that PMI information will not end up on this site, then she'll get her written report -- which will simply be a written version of the oral report she's already received. A report that states that the autopsy findings were correct.
Anonymous said...
I think it's kinda cheesy and transparent for sidney to put links on his post that he knows do not work. It's his cute little junior high school mentality at work. Silliness and a waste of time.
Shame on you sidney.......
you've done nothing but make things worse for Mangum.
Actually, the link does work... but it seems that the main content of the intended post has yet to be uploaded. As I believe I stated, I had not visited either site prior to posting my Blink, so I did not know what was on the sites at the time I posted links to them.
Please let me know if further elucidation is required.
Lance The Intern said...
" If she is ever forced to put anything in writing, it will be contrary to Dr. Nichols' report.
Now, that is some tortured logic, Dr. Harr.
Here's the deal -- Dr. Roberts gave an oral report because she had concerns about violating medical information disclosure laws. Why did she have these concerns? I think she knows that any information given to Mangum in writing will appear here, on this blog.
I think that if Crystal can guarantee that PMI information will not end up on this site, then she'll get her written report -- which will simply be a written version of the oral report she's already received. A report that states that the autopsy findings were correct.
Intern,
You can't be serious. You're saying that Dr. Roberts is afraid that I will post her report on my blog site? Why should that be of any concern to her... unless of course it fraudulently supports Dr. Nichols' report.
Not to worry... If Dr. Roberts is ever forced to provide a written report, rest assured that it will be more accurate and believable than what Dr. Nichols concocted.
With that I must bid adieu... as my computer online time at the library is through.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Thanks for your interest in the upcoming Super Flog. It is still a few days away from being posted... it is a very time and effort intensive project. But it is one that is worth the wait."
Just like after having unprotected sex, it is well worth the wait to find out if you have contracted AIDS.
SIDNEY HARR:
"I won't 'cause she won't. There will be nothing for me to say because Dr. Roberts is not going to put a report in writing as she's trying to protect Dr. Nichols... as is Woody Vann. If she is ever forced to put anything in writing, it will be contrary to Dr. Nichols' report."
Since you believe you can read Dr. Roberts mind, why do you not put a report in writing, submit it to the court, and claim that this was what Dr. Roberts actually found when she reviewed Dr. Nichols' autopsy.
SIDNEY HARR:
"The Man from Nazareth does not condone lies. We are in agreement there. Ergo, he does not condone the Nichols' Autopsy Report or the vendetta prosecution against Mangum upon which it is based."
We are not in agreement on one point, that the Man from Nazareth would condone the lies you tell.
So far as Dr. Nichols' report, you have not established that it is a criminal misrepresentation of the findings. Unsupported allegations establish nothing.
Further, you have not established that the prosecution of Crystal Mangum is based on a vendetta.
SIDNEY HARR:
"You need to stop drinking the "HaterAde." Can't you show a scintilla of compassion during the Holiday season?"
Why have you shown no compassion for the innocent, falsely accused Duke Lacrosse defendants? Because, like KENHYDERAL, you are an unreasonable, guilt presuming, blatant unrepentant racist.
The Man from Nazareth would not condone your blatant unrepentant racism.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Actually, the link does work... but it seems that the main content of the intended post has yet to be uploaded. As I believe I stated, I had not visited either site prior to posting my Blink, so I did not know what was on the sites at the time I posted links to them.
Please let me know if further elucidation is required."
The pages contain no content. How about YOU let ME know when you need further elucidation.
SIDNEY HARR:
"
Intern,
"You can't be serious. You're saying that Dr. Roberts is afraid that I will post her report on my blog site? Why should that be of any concern to her... unless of course it fraudulently supports Dr. Nichols' report.
Not to worry... If Dr. Roberts is ever forced to provide a written report, rest assured that it will be more accurate and believable than what Dr. Nichols concocted.
With that I must bid adieu... as my computer online time at the library is through."
You have not established that Dr. Nichols report is fraudulent. For that matter, you have not established your credentials to comment on said report.
You, like DA NIFONG before you are trying to suborn perjury. You are trying to pressure Dr. Roberts into writing up a phoney report which supports your unsupported allegations about Dr. Nichols' report.
SIDNEY HARR:
"With that I must bid adieu... as my computer online time at the library is through."
My computer time, however, is unlimited. The next time you get to the library, read this and weep.
SIDNEY HARR:
"
You need to stop drinking the 'HaterAde.'"
You have been the largest supplier of very potent haterade on the blogosphere.
"You can't be serious. You're saying that Dr. Roberts is afraid that I will post her report on my blog site? Why should that be of any concern to her... unless of course it fraudulently supports Dr. Nichols' report."
Yes -- I thought it was fairly evident from my post that I was saying that Dr. Roberts is concerned that her report will end up posted here on your blog site. Apparently, being a licensed physician in the state of North Carolina, she has more regard for HIPAA and other privacy laws than you do.
Not to worry MISTER Harr -- I'm sure that any report DOCTOR Roberts produces will match her already given oral report.
DOCTOR Roberts has every right to be very concerned. Violation of HIPPA carries huge individual fines for doctors. If she handed over a written report to Mangum, knowing as she does....the history of the Mangum-Harr relationship and prior violations......she could be at risk. She should never hand over a single piece of paper unless she gets a signed release of some type. If the judge ordered her to hand it over, then I suppose she could fall back on the order itself as offering her some kind of protection. I don't know; obviously not a lawyer. BUT, I think she would put up one helluva good fight with any judge in this case because she is a licensed professional....with is required by federal law.....to behave in a highly regulated environment. Sidney is not a licensed physician. Being a retired physician gives him no standing in court or otherwise. His opinions hold as much medical weight as mine in court....and I am not a doctor......because he is not licensed.
I agree 100% with Lance and others who have said, simply, that Roberts and Vann are trying to keep Roberts report out of the hands of the prosecution because she found NOTHING wrong with Nichols work or Duke's care and documentation. Period. All the bullshit about conspiracy is nonsense and it is just sidney harr trying to grab attention for himself. Unforunately he influences the weak minded Mangum. Bottom line here, then, is that Roberts may write a report, hand it over, and when it nails Mangum's case shut, she will have nobody to blame but herself and MISTER harr.
Hey Lance, trying to recall.......seems to me the judge ordered Roberts to provide a report. Period. I don't remember seeing the word "written" in front of the word "report". Apparently sidney doesn't understand that reports are often provided in oral form....especially in situations where the content can be damaging, as in this case.
If I were Roberts, I might have my own lawyer provide the report, in written form, to the judge who ordered it.....and make it HIS liability for handing it over to Mangum-Harr.
Wouldn't it be funny if, in the end, it turns out that sidney has actually been trying, all these years, to put Mangum away in prison? What if she rejected him as a customer years ago and bruised his ego so bad, that he swore he would get even........and now, acting in the guise of her advocate, he has actually done everything he could to get even. Sounds every bit as plausible as the bullcrap he has pitched here for years.
Perhaps he and Little Lord Fauntleroy, Kenny, have been in cahoots all along..............
Here's an excellent summary of the 4th circuit ruling, offered by KC Johnson. I figure sidney will be pontificating about the ruling.....so thought it fair to give an analysis that has been prepared by someone who actually is competent to review the ruling.
........." this appeal terminated the process at its inception (before discovery even occurred). That is, the 4th Circuit held that the falsely accused lacrosse players had no federal civil rights claim. The message the three-judge panel sent was clear: in towns and cities in the 4th Circuit, it's possible to frame innocent people without incurring federal civil rights violations, provided that the police are candid in discussions with the prosecutor that no evidence exists against the innocent people (even if, at the same time, at least one police officer misleads the grand jury and violates departmental guidelines and confines a photo array or lineup to suspects); and that the police can claim the prosecutor made the decision to indict."
There is nothing in this ruling that vindicates Nifong or gives any credibility to Mangum. Nothing. The judges apparently were far more concerned about protecting the "club" than they wereabout protecting the rights of citizens.
Anonymous December 28, 2012 5:30 AM:
Amen
On December 16, an anonymous poster asked: Any update on the Bar's communication with you and your brilliant response?
On December 16, 2012 12:40 PM, you responded:
As a matter of fact, I just concluded my response, and the court documents should be posted here within 48 hours.
It has now been 12 days. Any update?
http://www.justice4nifong.com/ecard/hday/xmCard12.html
AKA the J4N rogues' gallery.
Anonymous said...
"yeah, kenny. you are one weird dude. you swear by kilo and his bizarre nonsensical fable about the rape-that-never-happened. You trust this wing nut to be right, just because he says so? A person who may not even exist?
You send money to an attorney you have never met, know nothing about, who has provided you no accounting of how funds are being transmitted on to Mangum, since bail apparently isn't happening.
YET.....when confronted with hard core physical evidence....such as the DNA report (no lax DNA in or on Mangum_......you blow it off as though it were conjured from a stickpin doll in Jamaica!"
December 26, 2012 2:07 PM
Kenny's posts over the past couple of years have made it clear that he has the intelligence of a tree stump.
Yep, Merry Christmas from Durham's very own resident bigot, Victoria Peterson. How appropriate! Another perfect example of sidney harr's world class hypocrisy. He heads a post with his typical self righteous crap about man from naz, and then, he insults the Christian faith by linking himself to an outspoken, Westboro Baptist Church clone, Victoria Peterson. Folks, I urge you to research Victoria Peterson's historic quotes about gays and lesbians in Durham. Talk about enlightenment. The reason I keep pounding on this is that harr's linkage to, and implied endorsement of, Peterson's rabid homophobia is an offense to all his rants on about his social justice crap. I guess social justice only extends to certain people HE decides are worthy of equal treatment under the law. In other words, screw the gay people.....but run your mouth, incessantly, about how you are Captain Social Justice. Give us all a break, harr, and admit your flaming bigotry. Either that.....or denounce Peterson totally, completely, and remove her from ALL your silly web nonsense. You are the worst kind of hypocrite, i.e., one who thinks his hypocrisy is invisible and one who believes himself superior.
Put a sock in it, pal.
Anonymous said...
"Wouldn't it be funny if, in the end, it turns out that sidney has actually been trying, all these years, to put Mangum away in prison? What if she rejected him as a customer years ago and bruised his ego so bad, that he swore he would get even........and now, acting in the guise of her advocate, he has actually done everything he could to get even. Sounds every bit as plausible as the bullcrap he has pitched here for years.
Perhaps he and Little Lord Fauntleroy, Kenny, have been in cahoots all along.............."
December 27, 2012 6:04 PM
Sid's (and Kenny's) fascination with CGM is bizarre. Someday, maybe we will learn what it is all about.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"Actually, the link does work... but it seems that the main content of the intended post has yet to be uploaded. As I believe I stated, I had not visited either site prior to posting my Blink, so I did not know what was on the sites at the time I posted links to them.
Please let me know if further elucidation is required."
The pages contain no content. How about YOU let ME know when you need further elucidation.
For your edification, the link that I posted does go to a site. The link works. I, however, have no control over the content that is on that website because it does not belong to me.
As I said initially, I listed the links (with expectation that there was content on them) prior to visiting them myself. So I was surprised to find essentially an empty page, too.
Maybe the content will be uploaded in the near future... but I have no control of the site. It's out of my hands.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"
Intern,
"You can't be serious. You're saying that Dr. Roberts is afraid that I will post her report on my blog site? Why should that be of any concern to her... unless of course it fraudulently supports Dr. Nichols' report.
Not to worry... If Dr. Roberts is ever forced to provide a written report, rest assured that it will be more accurate and believable than what Dr. Nichols concocted.
With that I must bid adieu... as my computer online time at the library is through."
You have not established that Dr. Nichols report is fraudulent. For that matter, you have not established your credentials to comment on said report.
You, like DA NIFONG before you are trying to suborn perjury. You are trying to pressure Dr. Roberts into writing up a phoney report which supports your unsupported allegations about Dr. Nichols' report.
Dr. Roberts was paid $3,000 taxpayer dollars to investigate and provide a written report. Are you of the opinion that she was paid to investigate and only mete out verbal findings and conclusions? That's ridiculous. She needs to provide a written report... end of story.
Lance The Intern said...
"You can't be serious. You're saying that Dr. Roberts is afraid that I will post her report on my blog site? Why should that be of any concern to her... unless of course it fraudulently supports Dr. Nichols' report."
Yes -- I thought it was fairly evident from my post that I was saying that Dr. Roberts is concerned that her report will end up posted here on your blog site. Apparently, being a licensed physician in the state of North Carolina, she has more regard for HIPAA and other privacy laws than you do.
Not to worry MISTER Harr -- I'm sure that any report DOCTOR Roberts produces will match her already given oral report.
Hey, Intern. What already given oral report? She's said so many contradictory things that were not recorded that it will be impossible to compare any forthcoming written report to what she's already allegedly orally reported.
That's the problem!!! Her report is not in writing.
Anonymous said...
On December 16, an anonymous poster asked: Any update on the Bar's communication with you and your brilliant response?
On December 16, 2012 12:40 PM, you responded:
As a matter of fact, I just concluded my response, and the court documents should be posted here within 48 hours.
It has now been 12 days. Any update?
Sorry about the delay. I decided to place the documents in a super flog that Ive been working on... Hopefully I will have it posted by mid-week. It'll knock your socks off... if you're wearing any. It'll be the kind of flog that you'll never find on any other blog site.
Anonymous said...
Wouldn't it be funny if, in the end, it turns out that sidney has actually been trying, all these years, to put Mangum away in prison? What if she rejected him as a customer years ago and bruised his ego so bad, that he swore he would get even........and now, acting in the guise of her advocate, he has actually done everything he could to get even. Sounds every bit as plausible as the bullcrap he has pitched here for years.
Perhaps he and Little Lord Fauntleroy, Kenny, have been in cahoots all along..............
Hah! Love it! What an imagination. You should consider being a screenwriter for a television show or movie studio.
SIDNEY HARR:
"
For your edification, the link that I posted does go to a site. The link works. I, however, have no control over the content that is on that website because it does not belong to me.
As I said initially, I listed the links (with expectation that there was content on them) prior to visiting them myself. So I was surprised to find essentially an empty page, too.
Maybe the content will be uploaded in the near future... but I have no control of the site. It's out of my hands."
There is an awful lot of guilt presuming dirtON your hands.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Dr. Roberts was paid $3,000 taxpayer dollars to investigate and provide a written report. Are you of the opinion that she was paid to investigate and only mete out verbal findings and conclusions? That's ridiculous. She needs to provide a written report... end of story."
Establish that she was specifically paid to provide a written report. So far that is just one more of your tntc unsupported allegations.
You want her to provide a written report which states that Dr. Nichols' report is criminally fraudulent. Judging from what has been reported, she has not found that Dr.Nichols' report was fraudulent.
Ergo, the story which is not ending is you are pressuring Dr.Roberts to produce a perjured report. You are p---ed off that she has the integrity not to do so.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Hey, Intern. What already given oral report? She's said so many contradictory things that were not recorded that it will be impossible to compare any forthcoming written report to what she's already allegedly orally reported.
That's the problem!!! Her report is not in writing."
Incorrect.
The problem you are having is that Dr. Roberts will not produce a report which supports your uncorroborated allegation that Dr.Nichols report fraudulent.
You are trying to suborn perjury. Another thing which p---es you off is that you intimidate no one.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Sorry about the delay. I decided to place the documents in a super flog that Ive been working on... Hopefully I will have it posted by mid-week. It'll knock your socks off... if you're wearing any. It'll be the kind of flog that you'll never find on any other blog site."
That is only because other blog sites have more class than does yours.
SIDNEY HARR(commenting on the comment that he has actually been trying to have Crystal put away):
"Hah! Love it! What an imagination. You should consider being a screenwriter for a television show or movie studio."
Nevertheless, whether or not you decline to admit it, you have done more to facilitate Crystal's conviction of Murder 1 than any other person alive.
yep sidney ignore the Peterson linkage all you want..... I have news for you......not all whores are women and we all know what you are selling.
Hey, sidney.....I'm all for mangum going after a written report from roberts, handing it over to you, and having you post it here. and I am all for you showing up in court, with your J4N t shirt on, and acting as her lay lawyer. go for it. you think you are right? you think she is an innocent victim? you think mangum needs to go free? then go for it? publish it all here. and push her into a jury trial. go for it!!!!!!
sidney, you do not know anything, at all, about the process of creating a defense in a murder case. You simply do not. Vann had the correct approach with Roberts. There were two very strong reasons for Roberts not to create a written report. First, the question of HIPPA and PHI, given your behavior of illegally posting medical information you obtained from Mangum. Second, her findings simply did not support Mangum's claims nor yours. The fact that you think otherwise is of no import at all. You have no standing in the case nor in the court. You are not a physician in the state of NC. You are a private citizen. Your so-called medical opinion means nothing. It is a lay opinion. You are not licensed and you have no professional history or experience with which to establish any expertise. You are a private citizen. that's it.
I find your behavior pathetic and very hurtful to Mangum.
Gee, Sidney, can't you get Charlene Coggins to understand that the jig is up? After 635 days to think it over, you'd think she'd realize that she has to cut her losses. What are you doing wrong? Do you think perhaps Kenhyderal could come and talk some sense into her?
"She's said so many contradictory things that were not recorded"
Just because she doesn't agree with you doesn't mean she's contradicted herself.
After all, you weren't present at the meeting, and as you say -- it was not recorded.
"Hey, Intern. What already given oral report?
Really, Sid? Don't you read your own blog entries? You stated you were even expecting a verbal report only.
W
H
E
R
E
I
S
K
E
N
N
Y
?
SIDNEY HARR:
Why do you not furnish us with a written report about the so called trumped up criminal charge which was filed against you and what you had to do to settle the matter.
Let's hope the new year brings Crystal a chance for rehabilitation.
So long as she believes SIDNEY's crap that she is a victim of a vendetta, she will continue down the same self destructive path.
Anonymous said...
yep sidney ignore the Peterson linkage all you want..... I have news for you......not all whores are women and we all know what you are selling.
You may think you know what I'm selling, but I haven't the foggiest idea of what you are saying.
Anonymous said...
Hey, sidney.....I'm all for mangum going after a written report from roberts, handing it over to you, and having you post it here. and I am all for you showing up in court, with your J4N t shirt on, and acting as her lay lawyer. go for it. you think you are right? you think she is an innocent victim? you think mangum needs to go free? then go for it? publish it all here. and push her into a jury trial. go for it!!!!!!
Thank you for the encouragement. I hope to have information posted soon about the injunction filed against me by the State Bar. My hope is that the prosecution will come to its senses and drop the charges against Mangum before going to trial.
Anonymous said...
sidney, you do not know anything, at all, about the process of creating a defense in a murder case. You simply do not. Vann had the correct approach with Roberts. There were two very strong reasons for Roberts not to create a written report. First, the question of HIPPA and PHI, given your behavior of illegally posting medical information you obtained from Mangum. Second, her findings simply did not support Mangum's claims nor yours. The fact that you think otherwise is of no import at all. You have no standing in the case nor in the court. You are not a physician in the state of NC. You are a private citizen. Your so-called medical opinion means nothing. It is a lay opinion. You are not licensed and you have no professional history or experience with which to establish any expertise. You are a private citizen. that's it.
I find your behavior pathetic and very hurtful to Mangum.
The reason that Roberts doesn't want to put anything in writing is because she doesn't want to lie in supporting Dr. Nichols, and she doesn't want to put the truth in writing and implicate Nichols report as being fraudulent. She's in a dilemma... between a boulder and a hard place.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
Why do you not furnish us with a written report about the so called trumped up criminal charge which was filed against you and what you had to do to settle the matter.
That's old news and diversionary. This is not about me and what happened decades ago in California. This is about Crystal Mangum and the Carpetbagger Jihad conspiracy against her. That is where my focus is... on the present... the here and now... not the past.
Lance The Intern said...
"Hey, Intern. What already given oral report?
Really, Sid? Don't you read your own blog entries? You stated you were even expecting a verbal report only.
The last thing Roberts wants to do is provide a written report. That's why I predicted that she would not put anything down in writing... even though ordered to by Judge Hobgood.
IMPORTANT UPDATE:
The most likely estimated date for posting of the Super-Flog about me and the State Bar will most likely be Thursday at the earliest. Work is going on around the clock to have it online as soon as possible.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Thank you for the encouragement. I hope to have information posted soon about the injunction filed against me by the State Bar. My hope is that the prosecution will come to its senses and drop the charges against Mangum before going to trial."
A question comes up: if it is so obvious that Dr. Nichols report is fraudulent, why does the defense need its own expert witness to discredit it. Why can't they call you as a witness, since you believe you have thoroughly discredited the Nichols report.
SIDNEY HARR:
"The reason that Roberts doesn't want to put anything in writing is because she doesn't want to lie in supporting Dr. Nichols, and she doesn't want to put the truth in writing and implicate Nichols report as being fraudulent. She's in a dilemma... between a boulder and a hard place."
The question is, again: if you have so thoroughly discredited the Nichols report, what need do you have of a report by Dr. Roberts?
Are you afraid you will be cross examined if you were to testify that you have shown the Nichols report is fraudulent.
You really do not believe the Nichols report is fraudulent. You display quite glaringly you yourself can not discredit the Nichols report. That is why you are pressuring Dr. Roberts to produce a fraudulent report to discredit Dr. Nichols.
SIDNEY HARR:
"That's old news and diversionary. This is not about me and what happened decades ago in California."
It is relevant since you set yourself up as an expert able to evaluate the Nichols report. If you were to reveal the details of the "trumped up charge" it would discredit you as a physician - which is really a moot issue since you have demonstrated already you are a thoroughly incompetent physician.
"This is about Crystal Mangum and the Carpetbagger Jihad conspiracy against her."
Correction: "This is about Crystal Mangum and the [nonexistent] Carpetbagger Jihad conspiracy against her [and my attepts to help Crystal avoid accountability for her actions]."
"That is where my focus is... on the present... the here and now... not the past."
Which means, if and when Crystal is found guilty of something(and when is becoming more and more likely) you will still be carrying on your racist vendetta against the innocent Lacrosse players whom Crystal falsely accused.
SIDNEY HARR:
"The last thing Roberts wants to do is provide a written report. That's why I predicted that she would not put anything down in writing... even though ordered to by Judge Hobgood."
You got it wrong. The last thing Dr. Roberst would want to do is perjure herself by producing a fraudulent written report in response to the pressure you are trying to exert on her.
Very Nifongian of you(which means you are totally and thoroughly corrupt).
If you really believed in the Man from Nazareth, you would be crying, LORD, cleanse me of by blatant unrepentant racism!
SIDNEY HARR:
"The most likely estimated date for posting of the Super-Flog about me and the State Bar will most likely be Thursday at the earliest. Work is going on around the clock to have it online as soon as possible."
You mean that is when we will get to read your latest screed about the non existent carpetbagger jihad coming after you because you support corrupt DA NIFONG and false accuser Crystal Mangum.
Your screed will be less gratifying than bilateral kidney stones.
You state "The reason that Roberts doesn't want to put anything in writing is because she doesn't want to lie in supporting Dr. Nichols, and she doesn't want to put the truth in writing and implicate Nichols report as being fraudulent"
While Dr. Roberts states (according to you)"concerns about the privacy rights of the deceased Reginald Daye"
So...Whom should we believe regarding Dr. Roberts thoughts regarding any reports -- you or her?
in what is obviously a vendetta prosecution to mete out payback for Mangum’s role in the 2006 Duke Lacrosse case?
According to Sidney, poor Crystal is not responsible for anything thats happened to her. It stopped being funny YEARS ago
"She's said so many contradictory things that were not recorded that it will be impossible to compare any forthcoming written report to what she's already allegedly orally reported.
Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.
W
H
E
R
E
I
S
K
E
N
N
Y
?
You da man, Sid, you da man.
Happy New Year, Sidney.
When are you going to act in Crystal's best interest and butt out of her legal situation?
I Agree! Justice will be served!
Post a Comment