justice4nifong: Murder at Duke University Hospital: The case for Reginald Daye's demise being intentional

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Murder at Duke University Hospital: The case for Reginald Daye's demise being intentional

The YouTube video below is Part One

668 comments:

1 – 200 of 668 Newer› Newest»

Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
People have criticizede for applying the terms Nazi and Nazi-istic to one of SIDNEY's followers.

The terms should have been applied to SIDNEY himself. It is obvious from his so called legal writings, SIDNEY egards himself as a law unto himself.

Well, that is how Uncle Adolf acted in Germany.

Nazi comparison..? That's just nuts. Adolf Hitler and I are nowhere's near alike... except that we're both vegetarians...(I will stray on the diet on occasions, however.)

To popular misguided belief by many commenters, I do not consider myself above the law, but rather a law-abiding citizen.; October 26, 2013 at 11:33 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
One of SIDNEY's claims is that since he was representing himself in his lawsuit against Duke, he should have been considered a lawyer and allowed to access resources maintained by the State Bar Association for the use of lawyers.

As I recall, SIDNEY refused to avail himself of legal representation, claiming any lawyer he retained would take his money and sell him out to Duke.

It seems SIDNEY is like a man who shot himself in the foot and then wanted to be compensated for his pain and suffering.

You failed to understand my point. My position is that any Pro Se litigant is acting as his/her own attorney, and in a Federal case should be allowed the same privileges as licensed attorneys. The rule keeping non-licensed Pro Se litigants from the law library in the Federal Courthouse is both prejudicial and arbitrary. The rule prohibiting Pro Se ligitants from using the library makes no sense.; October 26, 2013 at 11:38 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
yeah, right, hard. I can just see you jamming your nasty little recorder in the face of the security guard who was just "doing his job", as you put it......I can just see you getting your black obnoxious backside all bent up in a twist, trying to look all righteously wounded, trying to drum up a cause for your melodramatic indignation. bullshit. you are a cheap actor....a fraud....and a tired old man who wants nothing more than to get money out of white people.

You think that it's okay for the Duke lacrosse defendants to fleece Duke out of $20 million each... right?

The abuse, the threats, and the intimidation by the guard is on the recording. What more is there to say.; October 26, 2013 at 11:43 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Walt said...
Sid wrote: "I made no effort to conceal the recorder and in fact held in right in the face of the security guard as though I was conducting an interview. All concerned knew that I was recording the conversation."

Duke just looks better and better. As much as I hate to admit that.

Walt-in-Durham

Walt, if Duke felt as confident as you then they wouldn't be scared to go mano-a-mano with me. It's that simple.; October 26, 2013 at 11:45 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
Correction of typos:

SIDNEY HARR:

"Brubaker needs to direct his warning to Dr. Nichols. I'm not the person who authored a perjured autopsy report."

Another straw fisherman holding up a red herring.

I hope Dr. Nichols files suit against you. You would be forced to prove your allegations. Being an untrained incompetent physician, you will be unable to do so. When he wins a big judgment against you, will your J4N gang pay it? No.

Hah! Talk about living in a world of your fantasy... that'll never happen as Dr. Nichols knows that I am correct. His autopsy report on Reginald Daye is false and fraudulent... PERIOD.; October 26, 2013 at 11:48 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
to Lance

Sometimes I wonder why SIDNEY did not blame Tyrone Baker for the death of Demetrius Green. Tyrone Baker ran in front of the Green family's car while fleeing Shan Carter.

Silliness.; October 26, 2013 at 11:50 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...
""So, according to your interpretation of the law, it would've been okay for Carter to defend himself by using a knife or garrotte [sic]... just so long as it wasn't a firearm"

Demetrius Greene would still be alive if Carter had used a knife or garrote to kill Tyrone Baker.

Yeah, but Carter would be dead.

(Also, garrotte is also correctly spelled with two t's. I still appreciate your editing though. Enlightenment at all levels is good.); October 26, 2013 at 11:53 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
One does wonder why Harr just happened to have a recorder on him???? Perhaps because he knew he was going to create his little scene....and wanted to manufacture some idiotic grounds for extorting money.....

I think it's pretty obvious why I had a recorder at the event... I wanted to record the interview. That is precisely what I did.

Thought you'd caught me in some intrigue, huh? Nice try.; October 26, 2013 at 11:55 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Nazi comparison..? That's just nuts. Adolf Hitler and I are nowhere's near alike... except that we're both vegetarians...(I will stray on the diet on occasions, however.)

To popular misguided belief by many commenters, I do not consider myself above the law, but rather a law-abiding citizen.Nazi comparison..? That's just nuts. Adolf Hitler and I are nowhere's near alike... except that we're both vegetarians...(I will stray on the diet on occasions, however.)

To popular misguided belief by many commenters, I do not consider myself above the law, but rather a law-abiding citizen."

BULLSHIT!!!

Like Adolph, you believe you are above the law.Like Adolph you believe you are a law unto yourse,lf. Like Adolph you believe what you proclaim becomes truth.

Someone who intentionally practices law without a license is not a law abiding citizen.

Jdging from your screeds n Shan Carter, you do not understand the law well enough to abide by it. Unfortunately your ignorance of the law is no excuse.; October 26, 2013 at 12:26 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"
You failed to understand my point. My position is that any Pro Se litigant is acting as his/her own attorney, and in a Federal case should be allowed the same privileges as licensed attorneys. The rule keeping non-licensed Pro Se litigants from the law library in the Federal Courthouse is both prejudicial and arbitrary. The rule prohibiting Pro Se ligitants from using the library makes no sense."

What point is tere to understand here? This is but a graphic demonstration that you believe you are above the law, that what you proclaim as law trumps the actual law.

That, Mr. non law abiding citizen, is a Hitleristic characteristic.; October 26, 2013 at 12:29 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"You think that it's okay for the Duke lacrosse defendants to fleece Duke out of $20 million each... right?"

You got that wrong. Why am I not surprised? The Innocent, falsely accused Defendants(falsely accused by false accuser/victimizer Crystal Mangum) fleeced no one. Duke paid pff rather than having to defend against any lawsuit they might file.

Here you show the true motivation for your frivolous suit against Duke. You believed YOU could fleece Duke.

"The abuse, the threats, and the intimidation by the guard is on the recording. What more is there to say."

What is on the recording is that you picked a fight with the guard-probably in the erroneous belief you could use it as a cuse of action against Duke and extort money from them.; October 26, 2013 at 12:34 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Walt, if Duke felt as confident as you then they wouldn't be scared to go mano-a-mano with me. It's that simple."

Here you are again showing you do not comprehend the law. You had no case against Duke. Why should they waste time and money defending against you when you can not show you have a case in the first place.

Unlike the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players( falsely accused by victimizer Crystal Mangum), YOU HAD NO CASE AGAINST DUKE.

Except, maybe, in your Hitlerian excuse for a brain.; October 26, 2013 at 12:38 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Hah! Talk about living in a world of your fantasy... that'll never happen as Dr. Nichols knows that I am correct. His autopsy report on Reginald Daye is false and fraudulent... PERIOD."

SIDNEY, as a physician you are neither well trained enough or experienced enough to declare Dr. Nichols' report as fraudulent. PERIOD. EXCLAMATION POINT!; October 26, 2013 at 12:42 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Silliness."

You are not silly. You are absolutely pathetic in your Hitlerian deluded megalomania.; October 26, 2013 at 12:43 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Yeah, but Carter would be dead.

(Also, garrotte is also correctly spelled with two t's. I still appreciate your editing though. Enlightenment at all levels is good.)"

Carter would have been dead because of a violent conflict HE provoked. And Demetrius Green, who was an innocent boy and not a convicted felon, wold be alive.

You seem to think Demetrius Green was expendable.

HYPOCRITE!!!; October 26, 2013 at 12:46 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"I think it's pretty obvious why I had a recorder at the event... I wanted to record the interview. That is precisely what I did.

Thought you'd caught me in some intrigue, huh? Nice try."

You are to stupid to effectively carry on any kind of intrigue. What you caught yourself in was a recording showing you picked a fight with the guard. PERIOD. EXCLAMATION POINT!; October 26, 2013 at 12:49 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

Your latest screed should have been entitled NO case for Reginald Daye's demise being intentional>

You megalomaniacally elude yourself again if you believe you have.; October 26, 2013 at 12:51 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

I say you do not know what the upper aero-digestive tract looks like on a direct laryngoscopy. It is virtually impossible not to see an esophageal tube placement on direct laryngoscopy. Which leads me to believe you have never done an intubation in your life.

Dr.Anonymous

PS: In one way you are unlike Hitler. You have no charisma. You are incapable of mesmerizing crowds.; October 26, 2013 at 12:55 PM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: "Demetrius Greene would still be alive if Carter had used a knife or garrote to kill Tyrone Baker."

"Yeah, but Carter would be dead."

How do you figure that? If Carter had used a weapon (like a knife) to kill Baker, how would Carter be dead?; October 26, 2013 at 1:03 PM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: "The rule keeping non-licensed Pro Se litigants from the law library in the Federal Courthouse is both prejudicial and arbitrary"

Why don't you use the Supreme Court's library in Raleigh? It's on Morgan Street across from the Capitol.; October 26, 2013 at 1:09 PM
Anonymous said...: Sidney explains why he had a recorder: I wanted to record the interview.

You wanted to record the interview with Breyer? Is that against Duke's rules?; October 26, 2013 at 2:32 PM
Walt said...: Sid wrote: "Walt, if Duke felt as confident as you then they wouldn't be scared to go mano-a-mano with me. It's that simple."

The did go against you and beat you badly. Beat you so badly that you couldn't even get past go. And, you're going to get beat again for exactly the same reason.

Walt-in-Durham; October 26, 2013 at 2:49 PM
Walt said...: Sid posted his latest flog. Another epic fail. Turns out the medical record doesn't support his medical murder theory, so he changed the timeline. Unfortunately, he does so with no proof of a different timeline, he just invented it.

Sid often asks about Lt. Columbo. I think the issue here is clear. He is writing fiction, like the writers of the Lt. Columbo television shows. In fiction, the writer can change timelines, he can change or disregard laws, even laws of physics when they don't make his fictional story work. Well, that's what Sid is doing with Crystal. He changes facts or disregards them to make his story line work.

Unfortunately, that does not work in reality. In reality, Crystal needs to deal with the very real charges levied against her and make some tough decisions about how to proceed. Those decisions need to be made based on evidence and law. Sid isn't much help in that regard.

As I have written before, with friends like Sid, Crystal really doesn't need any enemies.

Walt-in-Durham; October 26, 2013 at 2:55 PM
Anonymous said...: W

H

E

R

E

I

S

K

E

N

N

Y
?; October 26, 2013 at 7:38 PM
Anonymous said...: about the new flog so far:

In the long summary version of the duke medical report where Dr. Harr, you point out the questionable time line occurance of events of the intubation as they are written - if you look down a few paragraphs - the report at that point is written for someone named Mr. Douglas not Mr. Daye. Perhaps it was a cut and paste job from another medical record that would 'work' for duke's desired results???; October 27, 2013 at 8:14 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

Contrary to what you have posted, you have not established Duke had a motive to murder Reginald Daye.

You cite the carpetbagger jihad. When challenged to prove the existence of the carpetbagger jihad, you say anyone who doubts the existence of said jihad has been fooled by a Jedi mind trick.When asked what proves the existence of a Jedi mind trick, you would say, people do not believe in the carpetbagger jihad.

If Duke wanted to wreak vengeance on Crystal, it would have been easier for Duke to insure that Reginald Daye survive to testify against Crystal.; October 27, 2013 at 8:25 AM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous October 27, 2013 at 8:14 AM:

Provide factual evidence to prove the allegations you make against Duke. If yo can not or will not, that suggests you are fabricating.; October 27, 2013 at 8:27 AM
Anonymous said...: look at the flog evil duke troll

that's the reference - it says so in the post; October 27, 2013 at 10:41 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny:

Who's your daddy?; October 27, 2013 at 11:06 AM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous October 27, 2013 at 10:41 AM:

"look at the flog evil duke troll

that's the reference - it says so in the post"

There is no evidence there, just deluded megalomaniacal ravings and rantings.; October 27, 2013 at 11:48 AM
Anonymous said...: Sidney,

Can you post a transcript of the flog? This is such an important post, I want a chance to review it in detail. The audio format is too time consuming.; October 27, 2013 at 11:59 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
Sidney,

Can you post a transcript of the flog? This is such an important post, I want a chance to review it in detail. The audio format is too time consuming.

I have tried to keep my blog format consisting of interactive panels only. However, what I can start doing is putting a link on to a site where I will start placing the transcripts. Would that work? Give me a few days to get it up and running.; October 27, 2013 at 12:09 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
about the new flog so far:

In the long summary version of the duke medical report where Dr. Harr, you point out the questionable time line occurance of events of the intubation as they are written - if you look down a few paragraphs - the report at that point is written for someone named Mr. Douglas not Mr. Daye. Perhaps it was a cut and paste job from another medical record that would 'work' for duke's desired results???

If you will recall, Durham Police initially gave Daye an alias of Richard Dong... with "Dong" being a disparaging slang word referring to male genitalia. Well, Duke University Hospital had the decency to change the last name from "Dong" to "Douglas."

There is not cutting and pasting or smoke and mirrors in what I publish and produce. It's all legit.; October 27, 2013 at 12:14 PM
Anonymous said...: Walt. I figure duke is well aware of Harry and his blathering about Daye. I doubt they would waste the time to come after him for making claims that they murdered Daye. On the other hand, such claims can cross the line and it seems to me Duke could take action against him,.......tho I doubt they would. There are crackpots everywhere who want to get money and attention by claiming such dribble.......I remember one time getting a certified letter from a patient who was certain that our doctors had planted a tracking device in his private parts because we wanted to tip off his wife. There is a line between fruitcake and just plain lying.; October 27, 2013 at 12:17 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Walt said...
Sid posted his latest flog. Another epic fail. Turns out the medical record doesn't support his medical murder theory, so he changed the timeline. Unfortunately, he does so with no proof of a different timeline, he just invented it.

Sid often asks about Lt. Columbo. I think the issue here is clear. He is writing fiction, like the writers of the Lt. Columbo television shows. In fiction, the writer can change timelines, he can change or disregard laws, even laws of physics when they don't make his fictional story work. Well, that's what Sid is doing with Crystal. He changes facts or disregards them to make his story line work.

Unfortunately, that does not work in reality. In reality, Crystal needs to deal with the very real charges levied against her and make some tough decisions about how to proceed. Those decisions need to be made based on evidence and law. Sid isn't much help in that regard.

As I have written before, with friends like Sid, Crystal really doesn't need any enemies.

Walt-in-Durham

Walt, I didn't change up the timeline... That was done by the person who drafted the hospital summary.

Regarding Mangum, I'm the best thing she's got going for her... if not the only thing.; October 27, 2013 at 12:17 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
Sidney explains why he had a recorder: I wanted to record the interview.

You wanted to record the interview with Breyer? Is that against Duke's rules?

There was no announcement that photographs or audio recordings were prohibited prior to the event. I wouldn't see why it would be prohibited.; October 27, 2013 at 12:20 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Walt said...
Sid wrote: "Walt, if Duke felt as confident as you then they wouldn't be scared to go mano-a-mano with me. It's that simple."

The did go against you and beat you badly. Beat you so badly that you couldn't even get past go. And, you're going to get beat again for exactly the same reason.

Walt-in-Durham

Hey, Walt. Using a football analogy, Duke had the ref determine them to be the winner before either team took the field. Had we had the opportunity to go against one another and slug it out in a courthouse, I would've clobbered 'em.; October 27, 2013 at 12:43 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...
"Demetrius Greene would still be alive if Carter had used a knife or garrote to kill Tyrone Baker."

"Yeah, but Carter would be dead."

How do you figure that? If Carter had used a weapon (like a knife) to kill Baker, how would Carter be dead?

Baker would've shot him with the firearm that was concealed beneath the coat draped over his gun hand.; October 27, 2013 at 12:45 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"I think it's pretty obvious why I had a recorder at the event... I wanted to record the interview. That is precisely what I did.

Thought you'd caught me in some intrigue, huh? Nice try."

You are to stupid to effectively carry on any kind of intrigue. What you caught yourself in was a recording showing you picked a fight with the guard. PERIOD. EXCLAMATION POINT!

You've got it all wrong. I was headed for the building's exit. The guard went out of his way to intercept me and he was the one who initiated the conversation by telling me that I had to leave the property. Please enlighten me as to how, under those circumstances, I could possibly have provoked him.; October 27, 2013 at 12:51 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Walt, I didn't change up the timeline... That was done by the person who drafted the hospital summary."

You are the one who changed the timeline.

"Regarding Mangum, I'm the best thing she's got going for her... if not the only thing."

If true, hat means Crystal has nothing going for her.; October 27, 2013 at 1:24 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"There was no announcement that photographs or audio recordings were prohibited prior to the event. I wouldn't see why it would be prohibited."

Just like you did not read Duke's policy on solicitation, you did not read Duke's rules about recording events.; October 27, 2013 at 1:26 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Hey, Walt. Using a football analogy, Duke had the ref determine them to be the winner before either team took the field. Had we had the opportunity to go against one another and slug it out in a courthouse, I would've clobbered 'em."

The football analogy is not relevant. In a lawsuit there is a preliminary phaae which includes discovery and pre trial conferencing with the judge. If the plaintiff can not demonstrate he has a case, the case does not go to trial. I have been both plaintiff and defendant in personal injury lawsuits.

Your filings show unequivocally you present no facts. You present allegations which you expect to be accepted as facts.; October 27, 2013 at 1:52 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Baker would've shot him with the firearm that was concealed beneath the coat draped over his gun hand."

Except Tyrone Baker never had a firearm. If he had a firearm, then why did he not fire back at Shan Carter instead of fleeing?; October 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"You've got it all wrong. I was headed for the building's exit. The guard went out of his way to intercept me and he was the one who initiated the conversation by telling me that I had to leave the property. Please enlighten me as to how, under those circumstances, I could possibly have provoked him."

If you were headed for the exit, and the guard was telling you to leave, then why did not you tell him you were leaving? You did not. You picked a fight with him. That is confirmed by the recording you posted.

Very ineffective attempt on your part at personal posterior camouflage.; October 27, 2013 at 1:56 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"I have tried to keep my blog format consisting of interactive panels only. However, what I can start doing is putting a link on to a site where I will start placing the transcripts. Would that work? Give me a few days to get it up and running."

Instead you should keep your garbage in your own can.; October 27, 2013 at 1:58 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"If you will recall, Durham Police initially gave Daye an alias of Richard Dong... with "Dong" being a disparaging slang word referring to male genitalia. Well, Duke University Hospital had the decency to change the last name from "Dong" to "Douglas."

There is not cutting and pasting or smoke and mirrors in what I publish and produce. It's all legit."

Nothing you have ever published is legitimate anything but legitimate bullshit.; October 27, 2013 at 2:00 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

Let's address the issue of whether or not the DPD could have put out the fire. The picture of the damage which you have shown shows that the fire was so intense that no one could have extinguished it except by incurring severe burns.

Quite characteristic of you that you would say a DPD officer should have risked serious injury just so Crystal would not be charged with arson.

You should explain why you FALSELY accused a Durham police officer of setting the fire. You have not apologized for that. Maybe you think a DPD officer should have incurred serious burns so you would not have to admit lying about who set the fire.; October 27, 2013 at 2:04 PM
Walt said...: Sid wrote: "Walt, I didn't change up the timeline... That was done by the person who drafted the hospital summary."

He who claims, must prove. The hospital record is the hospital record. You offered no proof for your fictional version of events. Thus, you failed to prove your claim. In fact, you are only advancing a supposition, nothing based on fact.

"Regarding Mangum, I'm the best thing she's got going for her... if not the only thing."

Then she's as good as convicted. You have repeatedly ignored the law and the facts. Remember, the defense has no - zero evidence of malpractice, let alone a medical murder. Hopefully Crystal is listening to her lawyers rather than you.

Walt-in-Durham; October 27, 2013 at 2:14 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

What would you do if Dr. Nichols did sue you? Scream that it is obvious to anyone with a 5th Grade education that the report is false and his claim should be dismissed?

You would have to prove your claim is true to defend yourself.

Dr, Nichols would probably not sue because you are judgment proof. I would go to the expense of filing suit against it. It would be worth it to force you into court to make a fool of yourself.

You have already made a fool of yourself by claiming the report is fraudulent. But it would be a delight to see you do it under oath.

It is highly likely your shenanigans would get you cited for contempt and put you behind bars for a bit of time. Now that would be one way you could benefit Crystal.; October 27, 2013 at 2:24 PM
Walt said...: Sid wrote: "Had we had the opportunity to go against one another and slug it out in a courthouse, I would've clobbered 'em."

Sid, this has been explained to you before, but you ignored the explanation. The role of a jury in a civil case is to determine facts. On 12(b)(6) the court must assume all the facts you put in your complaint as true. (Give you the benefit of all doubts.) Assuming that, the court then asks did you state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In your case, the answer is a most emphatic no.

You tried to proceed under section 1983 which gave you two problems. First, there is no vicarious liability under section 1983. Yet you sued Duke, Levy and Brodhead under vicarious liability. Thus, you lost.

Second, you claimed to have been discriminated against because you supported Nifong. Under section 1983 and frankly every other civil rights law, that is not a form of discrimination that is protected. Thus you lost. You had your day in court and you bungled it.

Walt-in-Durham; October 27, 2013 at 2:26 PM
Walt said...: Sid wrote: "Baker would've shot him with the firearm that was concealed beneath the coat draped over his gun hand."

There you go, making up stuff to fit your story. Problem is, this is not fiction. Made up "facts" don't work. There was no gun seen by any witness. There was no gun found by the police. The jury concluded there was no gun. You just made that up.

Walt-in-Durham; October 27, 2013 at 2:28 PM
Anonymous said...: sidney harr has sunk to new low levels......showing graphic photos of Mr. Daye....particularly the photo that appears to show Mr. Daye after his death. I have no idea how Harr got possession of those photos. It is a disgrace and, to me, an act bordering on criminality, for these photos to appear here. Harr has demonstrated yet again what a no-class asshat racist he really is. Shameful. Folks, i have shown this trash to physician friends and there is NOT ONE WORD OF TRUTH OR SUBSTANCE IN IT. Not one.
Pure dribble from nasty old man.....; October 27, 2013 at 6:55 PM
Anonymous said...: Dr. Harr,

You misunderstood what I said.

About the cut and paste job I mentioned in reference to Mr. Douglas, whereas it could be a 'decent' version of dong - it could also be a cut and paste from a Mr. Douglas who had the right terminology in his report to note what should have happened to Mr. Daye - but didn't - given the questionable time line of written events from one report to another. Does that make sense? I am saying - who ever wrote the summary needed the correct words to do it to say what they wanted it to say - and therefore maybe it is cut and paste - like a Mr. Douglas boiler plate medical report that is cut to pieces and parts taken out to put into other people's medical agenda reports.; October 27, 2013 at 7:47 PM
Anonymous said...: I agree with another poster. Showing photos of Daye in the hospital and apparently dead (the head shot)...is, without a doubt, one of the nastiest and most repugnant displays of racist amoral privacy invasion and disrespect....I have ever seen.
Someday Harr is going to be on his deathbed.....perhaps with tubes running out of his nose. I sincerely hope that somebody will take his picture, before and after his demise....and put it on a public web site. Then we can all view him under similar circumstances
"Who cares" about Reginald Daye? I tell you what, scumbag, it is clear YOU don't give a damn about this man. Just as you don't give a damn about a little boy, killed by a murdering drug dealer. Why don't you go steal a photo of Demetrius Green with a bullet hole in his head and post that picture here? Or, better yet got any photos of your dead relatives? Share those........; October 28, 2013 at 3:58 AM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous October 27, 2013 at 7:47 PM:

Dr. Harr,

You misunderstood what I said.

About the cut and paste job I mentioned in reference to Mr. Douglas, whereas it could be a 'decent' version of dong - it could also be a cut and paste from a Mr. Douglas who had the right terminology in his report to note what should have happened to Mr. Daye - but didn't - given the questionable time line of written events from one report to another. Does that make sense? I am saying - who ever wrote the summary needed the correct words to do it to say what they wanted it to say - and therefore maybe it is cut and paste - like a Mr. Douglas boiler plate medical report that is cut to pieces and parts taken out to put into other people's medical agenda reports."

You completely misunderstand anything and everything you have ever read. That is why you fabricate.; October 28, 2013 at 4:36 AM
Anonymous said...: Harr is just a mentally disturbed old man, a failure, a seeker of other's people money through groundless law suits, and, above all, a racist immoral jerk......who posted pictures of a man in an ICU....on a public site. What other kinds of photos do you like to take when people are not looking? Do you enjoy peeping in bedroom windows, watching people die in hospital rooms, prowling around school yards with your camera?
What an absolutely miserable excuse for a human being.; October 28, 2013 at 5:45 AM
Anonymous said...: You know what, I wonder how sidney harr would feel if somebody had stolen a photo of his ailing wife, in an ICU, and posted it on a public site without his consent.....and put it in the context of wild and FALSE statements about somebody murdering her. How would he feel?
Apparently there is just no bottom to this man's character.....; October 28, 2013 at 5:52 AM
Anonymous said...: Such bullcrap, sidney. Such bullCRAP. Perhaps you should just go on and tell Mangum to fire her attorney and represent herself....and you could be her lay advisor. Why don't you just do that, bro? That way you could get all the attention you crave, those of us who live in Durham would have one less street worker to deal with, and the prison would have a new girlfriend for the butches.; October 28, 2013 at 9:11 AM
Anonymous said...: The point here is that all this bullshit about Duke murdering Daye, which is exactly what it is...BULLSHIT....means absolutely nothing. The law is clear. Read Welch, again, sidney. Either you cannot read or you are as dumb as a stump. Mangum is responsible. Period. What she now faces is whether to risk a self defense route....as Walt has repeatedly pointed out.
On the other hand, if Mangum wants to spend time in prison.....Harr should just tell her to can lawyer number four (or is it five) and have him sitting by her side in court. Oh yeah, and she should call him to testify as an expert. I would LOVE to see that circus!!!; October 28, 2013 at 9:56 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

Check this out:

https://www.google.com/search?q=view+of+the+glottis+on+direct+laryngoscopy&client=firefox-a&hs=yOY&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=9KtuUsDyOLO64AOk4oDQDA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1440&bih=676#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=BHQUw7tBtyod3M%3A%3Bm6-VhDxkFoYlyM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fupload.wikimedia.org%252Fwikipedia%252Fcommons%252F4%252F47%252FLarynx_endo_2.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fen.wikipedia.org%252Fwiki%252FLaryngoscopy%3B478%3B295

It is a photograph of the glottis as visualized on direct laryngoscopy. I bet this is the first time you have ever laid eyes on something like this.; October 28, 2013 at 11:28 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

What would you do if Dr. Nichols did sue you? Scream that it is obvious to anyone with a 5th Grade education that the report is false and his claim should be dismissed?

You would have to prove your claim is true to defend yourself.

Dr, Nichols would probably not sue because you are judgment proof. I would go to the expense of filing suit against it. It would be worth it to force you into court to make a fool of yourself.

You have already made a fool of yourself by claiming the report is fraudulent. But it would be a delight to see you do it under oath.

It is highly likely your shenanigans would get you cited for contempt and put you behind bars for a bit of time. Now that would be one way you could benefit Crystal.

Dr. Nichols won't sue me because he knows that what I say is the truth. I really don't hold him responsible for lying... I believe that he was coerced into doing it by the Powers-That-Be and the Carpetbagger Jihadists. He didn't want what happened to Mike Nifong to happen to him.; October 28, 2013 at 12:26 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

Let's address the issue of whether or not the DPD could have put out the fire. The picture of the damage which you have shown shows that the fire was so intense that no one could have extinguished it except by incurring severe burns.

Quite characteristic of you that you would say a DPD officer should have risked serious injury just so Crystal would not be charged with arson.

You should explain why you FALSELY accused a Durham police officer of setting the fire. You have not apologized for that. Maybe you think a DPD officer should have incurred serious burns so you would not have to admit lying about who set the fire.

Am I wrong to believe that patrol cars have fire extinguishers in them? If that is the case, I most definitely would've used one on the fire... if the faucets were inaccessible due to flames.

Did you note that it seems curious that the clothes on top of the bath tub seem to be in pretty good condition.... not charred, for example. Could they have been put there afterwards for the photo? Just a thought.; October 28, 2013 at 12:32 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
The point here is that all this bullshit about Duke murdering Daye, which is exactly what it is...BULLSHIT....means absolutely nothing. The law is clear. Read Welch, again, sidney. Either you cannot read or you are as dumb as a stump. Mangum is responsible. Period. What she now faces is whether to risk a self defense route....as Walt has repeatedly pointed out.
On the other hand, if Mangum wants to spend time in prison.....Harr should just tell her to can lawyer number four (or is it five) and have him sitting by her side in court. Oh yeah, and she should call him to testify as an expert. I would LOVE to see that circus!!!

So basically what you're saying is that it is possible for two people, Crystal Mangum, and the hospital personnel who intubated the esophagus to be charged with murder?; October 28, 2013 at 12:34 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
Such bullcrap, sidney. Such bullCRAP. Perhaps you should just go on and tell Mangum to fire her attorney and represent herself....and you could be her lay advisor. Why don't you just do that, bro? That way you could get all the attention you crave, those of us who live in Durham would have one less street worker to deal with, and the prison would have a new girlfriend for the butches.

Ever since the article in the Indy Week came out on August 21st, I have not heard from Mangum. It seems as though she decided to listen to the biased media rather than take my sage advice.; October 28, 2013 at 12:36 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
Harr is just a mentally disturbed old man, a failure, a seeker of other's people money through groundless law suits, and, above all, a racist immoral jerk......who posted pictures of a man in an ICU....on a public site. What other kinds of photos do you like to take when people are not looking? Do you enjoy peeping in bedroom windows, watching people die in hospital rooms, prowling around school yards with your camera?
What an absolutely miserable excuse for a human being.

I've had those photos for more than two years and refrained from publishing them. I did not relish so doing, but drastic times (with Mangum's trial on the horizon) require drastic measures.; October 28, 2013 at 12:39 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Am I wrong to believe that patrol cars have fire extinguishers in them? If that is the case, I most definitely would've used one on the fire... if the faucets were inaccessible due to flames."

You are wrong to believe that the size of a fire extinguisher carryable in a patrol car would be sufficient to put out the fire Crystal lit in Milton Walker's bathroom.

"Did you note that it seems curious that the clothes on top of the bath tub seem to be in pretty good condition.... not charred, for example. Could they have been put there afterwards for the photo? Just a thought."

Yes they could have been put there by someone who wanted to CHA for lighting thefire. The only such person would be Crystal.

And you have just shown a mimimal capacity for thinking.; October 28, 2013 at 12:40 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Walt said...
Sid wrote: "Baker would've shot him with the firearm that was concealed beneath the coat draped over his gun hand."

There you go, making up stuff to fit your story. Problem is, this is not fiction. Made up "facts" don't work. There was no gun seen by any witness. There was no gun found by the police. The jury concluded there was no gun. You just made that up.

Walt-in-Durham

Walt, clear the wax out of your ears and listen carefully... Renee Barnes, an acquaintance of Baker, ran up to him after he collapsed in the street and grabbed his coat and whatever it concealed (most likely a firearm), and took off before the police could arrive on the scene.; October 28, 2013 at 12:43 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"So basically what you're saying is that it is possible for two people, Crystal Mangum, and the hospital personnel who intubated the esophagus to be charged with murder?"

No that is not what he is saying. No one intubated the esophagus;. You have just provided more evidence that you have never intubated anyone in your life.; October 28, 2013 at 12:43 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Ever since the article in the Indy Week came out on August 21st, I have not heard from Mangum. It seems as though she decided to listen to the biased media rather than take my sage advice."

You have to be a sage before you can offer sage advice. I.e. a wise man, not an herb.; October 28, 2013 at 12:45 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"I've had those photos for more than two years and refrained from publishing them. I did not relish so doing, but drastic times (with Mangum's trial on the horizon) require drastic measures."

Haven't you repeatedly said Vrystal would never go to trial? You seem to admit she will; October 28, 2013 at 12:47 PM
Walt said...: Sid wrote: "Walt, clear the wax out of your ears and listen carefully... Renee Barnes, an acquaintance of Baker, ran up to him after he collapsed in the street and grabbed his coat and whatever it concealed (most likely a firearm), and took off before the police could arrive on the scene."

That is rank supposition on your part. Not proof. And, as the jury had the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses, I'll defer to their judgment.

Further, you have never replied to my question about the reasonableness of Carter's belief that deadly force was required. Specifically, I posed the question if Carter was a white police officer who shot an african-american man whith a coat over his right arm, would you argue that was a reasonable use of force?

Walt-in-Durham; October 28, 2013 at 1:04 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Walt, clear the wax out of your ears and listen carefully... Renee Barnes, an acquaintance of Baker, ran up to him after he collapsed in the street and grabbed his coat and whatever it concealed (most likely a firearm), and took off before the police could arrive on the scene."

If Columbo or Perry Mason were real people istead of fictional char acters, both would tell you that does not establish that Tyrone Baker had a gun.

If Tyrone Bake had a gun, why did he not return fire instead of fleeing?

Even if he did have a gun it would not change the facts that Shan Carter provoked the confrontation, that Shan Carter pursued him and fired at him while he was fleeing.; October 28, 2013 at 1:15 PM
Walt said...: Sid wrote: "Ever since the article in the Indy Week came out on August 21st, I have not heard from Mangum."

Good for her! At least she's got some sense.

"It seems as though she decided to listen to the biased media..."

You are right though, the media is biased against people who make wild and unsubstantiated claims. At least those with a clear track record of unsubstantiated claims that cannot be verified by one single solitary source other than the claimant.

"...rather than take my sage advice."

Sage? You have been wrong at every turn in this case. From firvolous motions that got you disciplined and then enjoined to ignoring the law (can you say Welch and Holesclaw) to undermining the defense. Your advice has been anything but sage. Instead, you have damaged Crystal's defense, such as it is. You violated the attorney client privilige and in violation of that privilige, you just recently published photos of the dead or dying Reginal Daye.

Walt-in-Durham; October 28, 2013 at 1:16 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"I've had those photos for more than two years and refrained from publishing them. I did not relish so doing, but drastic times (with Mangum's trial on the horizon) require drastic measures."

Haven't you repeatedly said Vrystal would never go to trial? You seem to admit she will

If the State had any sense, it would not take the case to trial, although if they do so it will be because they have confidence that Mangum's attorney will play nice and sabotage her case with his priority being to protect Duke University Hospital and the medical examiner.; October 28, 2013 at 1:42 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"If the State had any sense, it would not take the case to trial, although if they do so it will be because they have confidence that Mangum's attorney will play nice and sabotage her case with his priority being to protect Duke University Hospital and the medical examiner."

You again show you are delusional.; October 28, 2013 at 1:48 PM
Anonymous said...: I will say it straight out......you are total scumbag for posting those photographs. A no class racist ass. Too bad somebody does not have photos of your wife in similar circumstance, lying in a hospital bed.....so these could be posted without your consent.
You are scum......; October 28, 2013 at 2:11 PM
Anonymous said...: It's one thing for harr to run his ignorant mouth endlessly on the internet. Who gives a damn what this jerk thinks! It is another thing entirely to abusively and cruelly post photos of a dead man......in a highly disrespectful and shameful manner.....without his family's consent. What an ass you are. I have no idea whether they can do anything at all about this, but I sure as hell hope that someday you have to face the sight of your dead spouse on a cheap blog..........; October 28, 2013 at 2:39 PM
Anonymous said...: It's a cute little fairy tale.......unforunately there is not one word in the medical record that supports the fantasy. Not one. I particularly enjoy reading the LIES about how Daye has a "criminal record" and was an "alcoholic". Absolutely not true.......
The person with the criminal record is Mangum. The person with the documented history of drug and alcohol abuse is Mangum.
Sidney Harr is a liar.; October 29, 2013 at 4:49 AM
Anonymous said...: As we all know, Daye had ONE CHARGE of domestic violence against him a number of years ago. THE CHARGE WAS DROPPED. DROPPED. At least two women with whom he had prior intimate relationships said, point blank, that he was not abusive or violent with them. The other charges on his record have to do with driving infractions, etc. THERE ARE NO CRIMINAL CHARGES. NO DUIs, etc. There is not one shred of evidence that Daye was an alcoholic. Not one. Was he drinking that day? Yes, he was. SO WAS MANGUM.

Mangum, on the other hand, has NINE CONVICTIONS, INCLUDING A LEVEL III DUI. SHE ALSO HAS VIOLENCE RELATED CHARGES, CHILD ENDANGERMENT, ETC. There is a documented history of substance abuse and alcohol abuse. WAS SHE DRINKING ON THE DAY SHE STABBED DAYE? YES SHE WAS.

When confronted with exposure of the LIES, Harr frequently dodges.....changes to another topic...and pretends to play dumb. Make no mistake, Sidney Harr is a liar.; October 29, 2013 at 4:54 AM
Walt said...: Sid wrote: "...although if they do so it will be because they have confidence that Mangum's attorney will play nice and sabotage her case..."

The only person who has sabotaged Crystal's case is Sid Harr. Sid breached the attorney client confidence and published the conclusions of the defense independent medical examiner. In doing so, Sid clarified for all that there is no evidence of medical malpractice or medical murder. Further, Sid made sure the State knew that Crystal had no expert evidence to upset the autopsy. Ever since that collasal error of judgment, Sid has been trying to cover up his own wrongdoing in this case. The reprehensible posting of the late Mr. Daye's dying and deathbed photos is just Sid's latest effort to obfuscate his sabotage of Crystal's defense. It appears that she has figured that out. While I have no contact with her, I do with some of the J4N crowd. And, they have figured that Sid is more of a hinderance than a help.

Walt-in-Durham; October 29, 2013 at 5:26 AM
Anonymous said...: I have no idea whether anybody in the Daye family is aware of...or reads this web site. It's ashamed that they probably don't have the resources to retain a lawyer and to come after Sidney Harr for his last despicable posting, including the photos of Mr. Daye. That is WAY over the line and WAY beyond any form of propriety and human decency. I used to think of Harr as nothing but a fraud, lunatic, and loud-mouth asshat. Now, my opinion has changed. sidney harr is a fullblown, 100% SOB. I think every person who reads this web site ought to tell him to go xxxx himself.....; October 29, 2013 at 5:50 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
I have no idea whether anybody in the Daye family is aware of...or reads this web site. It's ashamed that they probably don't have the resources to retain a lawyer and to come after Sidney Harr for his last despicable posting, including the photos of Mr. Daye. That is WAY over the line and WAY beyond any form of propriety and human decency. I used to think of Harr as nothing but a fraud, lunatic, and loud-mouth asshat. Now, my opinion has changed. sidney harr is a fullblown, 100% SOB. I think every person who reads this web site ought to tell him to go xxxx himself.....

This blog site is about justice, crime, and law in the State of North Carolina. Crimes include murders and death and certain realities that can't be sugar-coated. This site is for mature adults, with the emphasis on mature. The sensibilities of commenters do not dictate the truths that are presented on this site.; October 29, 2013 at 7:13 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"This blog site is about justice, crime, and law in the State of North Carolina."

No, it is about SIDNEY's delusions about :justice, crime, and law in the State of North Carolina", e.g. Shan Carter was just minding his own business when he shot and killed Tyrone Baker and Demetrius Green.

"Crimes include murders and death and certain realities that can't be sugar-coated."

So why do you sugarcoat Shan Carter's crimes as self defense?

"This site is for mature adults, with the emphasis on mature. The sensibilities of commenters do not dictate the truths that are presented on this site."

What truths? You present nothing but lies.; October 29, 2013 at 7:26 AM
Anonymous said...: Mature adults? You mean like you? the pathetic attention seeking asshat who wears his little yellow t-shirt and runs around trying to get money out of organizations with loser-law suits? that kind of maturity? thank god and little fishes I am IMMATURE then.............
you are an SOB; October 29, 2013 at 9:28 AM
Anonymous said...: This sorry excuse for a blog site has nothing to do with truth or justice. It is simply a forum for a weak-minded failure of a man to spew his racist lies.
I agree with other posters. You truly are despicable.........; October 29, 2013 at 9:30 AM
Anonymous said...: Posting a head shot of a dead man, filling the screen has absolutely nothing to do with anything.......except your own desire to hurt others. What an absolutely lousy thing to do. You should go to work for some sleazy sex outfit and take creeper shots of people through their bedroom windows. Hey, there's an idea!!! You and Mangum could form a partnership....she vamps, you video......what a money maker.; October 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM
Anonymous said...: I think common decency would have dictated that pictures of Mr. Daye NOT appear anywhere on this site........obviously his family did NOT consent to these photos having been taken. The question in my mind is .....who took them....with or without consent.....and how did Harr get them? Perhaps Harr himself went to Duke and walked into the unit and took the photos. THAT sort of sleazy behavior, totally in violation of Duke Hospital policy, by the way.........is exactly what Harr would do.
Creep; October 29, 2013 at 9:40 AM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous October 29, 2013 at 9:40 AM:

You are disparaging all the creeps i the world.; October 29, 2013 at 10:00 AM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: For all his posturing, this site is nothing more than a reflection of its creator -- crass and unseemly.

Look at it this way -- Sid has managed to drive away Crystal Mangum...How vile do you have to be for that?; October 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM
A Lawyer said...: The sensibilities of commenters do not dictate the truths that are presented on this site.

You can tell your version of the "truth" without posting pictures of the dead and dying. Your behavior on this thread has been unconscionable.; October 29, 2013 at 11:12 AM
Anonymous said...: Photos of Daye, taken and posted without his or his family's consent, should have NEVER appeared here. Shame on you....a truly scumbag thing to do.
You have shown your true character so many times before........but I don't think I had any idea just what kind of truly despicable person you really are....until now.
Not only a liar, but also a cowardly and utterly vile violation of a dead man's privacy.; October 29, 2013 at 11:45 AM
Anonymous said...: The medical records do NOT, in any way, support any aspect of Harr's stupid hospital homicide fantasy. In fact, the medical records clearly and fully show an entirely different picture.
I would like to point out that Daye began showing symptoms that could have been attributed to, as the record indicated, DTs. However.....what Harr (in his usual sleazy manner) fails to mention is that the medical records shows that the same symptoms were noted to be also plausible for infection. In fact, the differential diagnosis "trail" that was followed, the appropriate diagnostic imaging and treatment, was clearly for infection....NOT DTs! Daye had developed an infection and this infection was the root cause of his agitation and fever elevation. Any second year medical student could read the record and see that DTs were suspected and RULED OUT....because the subsequent care was clearly focused on an infection. With a stab wound in the gut, it was absolutely feasible that he would develop an infection, post-op, on the second or third day following his surgery. There is not one bit of evidence to show that Daye was an alcoholic. Sidney Harr is a liar.; October 29, 2013 at 12:50 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "Any second year medical student could read the record and see that DTs were suspected and RULED OUT....because the subsequent care was clearly focused on an infection"....... The subsequent care did not seem rule-in the differential diagnosis of an infection. The notes do not indicate that the presumptive diagnosis of delirium tremens was abandoned. Anonymous also said: "There is not one bit of evidence to show that Daye was an alcoholic"...... That is untrue. His blood alcohol reading on admission, while still conscious and functioning, show a high tolerance for alcohol that's indicative of a chronic alcoholic. So does his drinking history as observed by Crystal.; October 29, 2013 at 1:30 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"The subsequent care did not seem rule-in the differential diagnosis of an infection. The notes do not indicate that the presumptive diagnosis of delirium tremens was abandoned. Anonymous also said: "There is not one bit of evidence to show that Daye was an alcoholic"...... That is untrue. His blood alcohol reading on admission, while still conscious and functioning, show a high tolerance for alcohol that's indicative of a chronic alcoholic. So does his drinking history as observed by Crystal."

Let's go over your ignorance again. An individual who could tolerate a Blood Alcohol level of almost 300 would have had to have been consuming large amounts of alcohol for a long period of time. Such a person, in spite of your having read a source that says some alcoholics have a normal liver, would not have had a normal liver. Liver damage in alcoholism is a consequence of the toxic metabolites of alcohol. A person who could have tolerated such a high level would have been exposing his liver to high levels of liver toxins for years. The most likely explanation for the high blood alcohol is a lab error.

So far as Crystal's account of Mr. Daye's drinking habits, she never gave that account until after she was charged with murder one and facing a possible sentence of life without parole. Her account of Daye's drinking was most likely a feeble attempt to cha.; October 29, 2013 at 2:38 PM
Anonymous said...: kenny hissy little boy, you are totally wrong. crystal's report? hers? hilarious. the lying pole vaulting child endangering killer? that crystal? pardon me while I throw up; October 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM
Anonymous said...: the scans done (imaging for you, third grade grill) clearly indicated concern for infection process, as did elevated temp. No further indication of DTs AT ALL. what a dumb ass....; October 29, 2013 at 3:01 PM
kenhyderal said...: Symptoms of DTs typically start 2-4 days after the last drink in someone with prior heavy and prolonged consumption of alcohol. Earliest signs of DTs can be the three T's—temperature elevation, tremor and
tachycardia (rapid heartbeat). The affected individual can experience anxiety, restlessness, nausea, and
impaired sleep" http://www.cordingleyneurology.com/deliriumtremens.html; October 29, 2013 at 4:01 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "in spite of your having read a source that says some alcoholics have a normal liver"......... Some? Approximately 10 to 35 percent of heavy drinkers develop alcoholic hepatitis, and 10 to 20 percent develop cirrhosis.
Usually alcoholic cirrhosis develops after more than a decade of heavy drinking, but that is not always the case. Due to genetic factors some heavy drinkers can develop cirrhosis much sooner. Some people have livers that are much more sensitive to alcohol.
Likewise, the amount of alcohol that can injure the liver varies greatly from person to person. http://alcoholism.about.com/cs/liver/a/aa001016a.htm; October 29, 2013 at 4:08 PM
Break the Conspiracy said...: Sidney,

A number of posters have criticized you for your so-called insensitivity for your recent flogs and comments. For example, some readers object to your decision to post pictures of a dead Reginald Daye. Others complain that you underestimate the pain that Demetrius Greene's death caused his family and friends.

You can demonstrate how wrong these posters are about your sensitivity.

I suggest that you contact the families of Reginald Daye and Demetrius Greene with plans to dedicate flogs on each of their lives. You can provide a link to this site so that they can see the quality of your work firsthand.

You can tell Daye's family that your flog will provide a compassionate and understanding narrative of living with a chronic alcoholic and violent habitual criminal. You don't blame Daye for his disease. You don't blame him for beating Mangum and earlier girlfriends. You can tell them you realize the conflict they feel knowing that Mangum had no choice but to stab him. You understand their pain and want to make sure that your readers empathize as you do.

Similarly, you can tell D'April Greene that you want to tell the story of Demetrius' accident. Demetrius was so proud of his good grades and so enthusiastic. How tragic that his young life was snuffed out by a freak ricochet of Carter's bullet. You can tell them how badly you feel, but you know they realize that Carter had no way of knowing that he would cause such a freak accident when he recklessly shot several times as Baker fled down a street crowded with innocent people. Such bad luck.

I am certain that both families will be anxious to talk with you.; October 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM
Anonymous said...: Nope wrong again. Kenny hissy is playing doctor.....cute, really cute. Not correct, but cute. The followup course of treatment clearly showed the differential was toward an infectious process.
By the way, troll, last time I checked, it wasn't against the law to be an alcoholic. Sooooo, canada boy, even if Daye had been an alcoholic (which he wasn't), HE was not the one (a)with the criminal record, (b)convicted of Level III DUI, (c)stabbing his drunk assed shackup with a knife.
I'd suggest you go to medical school before you hang out your little shingle......and I do mean little shingle
Daye had ZERO history of drinking problems, by the way, troll. Oh I forgot.....Sister claimed, AFTER he DIED, that he was a drunk. Now isn't that convenient.; October 29, 2013 at 4:56 PM
Anonymous said...: Hey, troll, you got any dead relatives? If you do, why don't you send a photo of them to Harr, so he can post them on his web site. .......preferably while they lay dying someplace. How about that, troll boy?; October 29, 2013 at 4:57 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: "in spite of your having read a source that says some alcoholics have a normal liver"......... Some? Approximately 10 to 35 percent of heavy drinkers develop alcoholic hepatitis, and 10 to 20 percent develop cirrhosis.
Usually alcoholic cirrhosis develops after more than a decade of heavy drinking, but that is not always the case. Due to genetic factors some heavy drinkers can develop cirrhosis much sooner. Some people have livers that are much more sensitive to alcohol.
Likewise, the amount of alcohol that can injure the liver varies greatly from person to person. http://alcoholism.about.com/cs/liver/a/aa001016a.htm "

It is still highly unlikely Reginald Daye could have been that severe a chronic alcoholic and have a normal liver at autopsy. Your ignorance shows again.; October 29, 2013 at 5:11 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Symptoms of DTs typically start 2-4 days after the last drink in someone with prior heavy and prolonged consumption of alcohol. Earliest signs of DTs can be the three T's—temperature elevation, tremor and
tachycardia (rapid heartbeat). The affected individual can experience anxiety, restlessness, nausea, and
impaired sleep" http://www.cordingleyneurology.com/deliriumtremens.html"

However, by history, Reginald Daye was not a chronic abuser of alcohol. Neither SIDNEY, nor you nor Crystal are qualified to make a diagnosis of alcoholism.; October 29, 2013 at 5:13 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

From which institution did you get your medical degree?

Where did you do your post graduate professional training?; October 29, 2013 at 5:16 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

Tell me. If you had a serious illness would you go to a physician with the qualifications and training of SIDNEY HARR. I remind you, SIDNEY never did a residency, never obtained board certification and spent most of his post medical school career filing and losing frivolous lawsuits.

I bet you would go to him for legal advice, you are that astute NOT!!!; October 29, 2013 at 5:50 PM
Anonymous said...: This whole nonsense anout Daye's care by Duke is total bull. It is just Harr manufacturing dribble in an attempt to cover up his own stupid blundering interference with Mangum. He has screwed her over, time after time, as Walt has correctly pointed out. Now he is just running his mouth with conspiracy theory crap.
According to the documentation which Harr so inappropriately posted, Duke's care of Mr. Daye was completely on target. They did all they could to save his life. There is nothing extraordinary about a person developing an infection after a stab wound.....unforunately it does happen. But Welch is clear......and Mangum is responsible. Period. Bitch all you want, Harr.....she killed him.; October 29, 2013 at 6:21 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "Neither SIDNEY, nor you nor Crystal are qualified to make a diagnosis of alcoholism"......... I certainly am not, no more then any lay-person. Unlike Dr.Harr, I have no medical training. Crystal is certainly entitled to her opinion, on that question, as she lived with him and observed behaviour, in him, consistent with chronic alcoholism. Duke University Hospital certainly considered this as a possibility, in it's approach to him as a patient. Since I have no expertise and did not know Reginald Daye I, myself, would not presume to label him as such. All I can say is from what I have heard from those I trust and having read what Dr. Harr and others have written. The possibility that he was an alcoholic seems likely. Perhaps Dr. Anonymous or Dr. Orgel can convince me of the impossibility of this.; October 29, 2013 at 9:37 PM
Anonymous said...: I would not call shacking up with a man for a few weeks "living with him"....as in a long term relatinship where behavior patterns could be observed for a significant time period. Nor would I consider sidney harr to be a qualified physician. His record is now known and it is quite clear that he was a marginally trained physician, working as a physician for a short time, years ago......never having completed a residency.....never board certified....with virtually no research citations....and with ZERO experience in ANY of the fields relevant to the Daye case. (surgery, trauma, pulmonology, pathology, forensics, etc) Harr has been unwilling and/or unable to establish ANY credential or ANY experience that would qualify him to comment on ANY aspect of Daye's care. His opinion is worth nothing more than a lay person's opinion.......such as yours. In fact, I believe it is worth far less than most....because he is racist, biased, sees boogiemen under every bush in Durham, has a now substantiated history of filing suits to extort money, and is a proven liar. If you are any kind of decent human being as you claim to be, you ought to be telling Harr to shove it ......because of his horrible decision to post deathbed photos of Reginald Daye.; October 30, 2013 at 2:58 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"I certainly am not, no more then any lay-person. Unlike Dr.Harr, I have no medical training."

SIDNEY HARR has minimal medical training, so minimal he is not competent to render a medical opinion on anything.

"Crystal is certainly entitled to her opinion, on that question, as she lived with him and observed behaviour, in him, consistent with chronic alcoholism."

Crystal's opinion is motivated by her desire to sha from a charge of murder one and a possible life sentence without parole. That hardly makes it objective.

"Duke University Hospital certainly considered this as a possibility, in it's approach to him as a patient."

Considering it a possibility is not the same as making it a diagnosis.

"Since I have no expertise and did not know Reginald Daye I, myself, would not presume to label him as such."

So why did you?

"All I can say is from what I have heard from those I trust and having read what Dr. Harr and others have written."

You trust people like Kilgo's anonymous lacrosse player who does not exist. SIDNEY HARR may have graduated from medical school but, unlike Dr. Nichols, he does not have the training or the expertise to comment meaningfully about the autopsy.

"The possibility that he was an alcoholic seems likely. Perhaps Dr. Anonymous or Dr. Orgel can convince me of the impossibility of this."

Neither I nor Dr. Orgel have any responsibility to convince you of the impossibility of this. Why don't you try to convince us and other people that he was an alcoholic. Judging from the reason you believe Crystal was raped, it is impossible to convince you that a situation that is not possible is in fact not possible.

Dr. Anonymous; October 30, 2013 at 3:02 AM
Anonymous said...: So what if Daye had been an alcoholic? What the hell does that have to do with anything? We already know that both he and Mangum were drinking the day she stabbed him? We already know she had a history of taking drugs and drinking. We already know she had a level III DUI. We already know she had multiple convictions, including crimes involving violence against property. We already know she threatened to stab Walker. We already know two women stated that Daye was never violent with them. We already know he had NO criminal history involving violence against anybody.
And…..importantly, we already know Daye and Mangum got into a argument that got out of hand. We already know there is zero evidence of the beating Harr claims Daye put on Mangum.
What we do not yet know is whether Mangum is going to try to escape responsibility for killing Daye with a self defense claim.
The question of whether Reginald Daye was an alcoholic is misdirection, of no relevance, and just a silly failed attempt at playing junior doctor on the part of Harr; October 30, 2013 at 4:07 AM
Anonymous said...: I looked up Daye's record. His record includes infractions related to driving, license, etc. Years ago he was charged with domestic violence. Repeat, CHARGED…. The CHARGE was DROPPED. Do I think Daye was some kind of angel, perfect, ready to be the new deacon at the AME church? No, of course not. But to paint him as some kind of drunken wild man, with a criminal record, showing violence against women, is just a dirty lie. Harr has proven himself capable of the worst kind of mud-slinging, folks. From now on, every single word that comes out of his nasty mouth needs to be considered as contaminated.; October 30, 2013 at 5:06 AM
Anonymous said...: Who has convictions for violent behavior? Mangum
Who has a history of drug abuse and alcohol abuse? Mangum.
Who has a history of threatening violence with a knife? Mangum.
Who has a criminal record involving public drunkenness? Mangum
Who is a proven liar? Mangum.
Who has a proven history of changing her stories to fit evidence? Mangum.
Who had no physical evidence of any kind of beating that she claims to have experienced at the hands of Daye? Mangum.
Who never mentioned any sort of self defense story until AFTER Daye was dead…and could not defend himself? Mangum.
Who is lying….again?; October 30, 2013 at 5:11 AM
Walt said...: Anonymous at 4:07 AM raises a good question: "So what if Daye had been an alcoholic?"

A pre-existing condition is not an intervening cause under the NC (or for that matter any jurisdiction's) felony murder rule. See Welch and Holesclaw. If the late Reginald Daye had been an alcoholic, it is meaningless to the law. However, I see only that DUHS considered that as a possible diagnosis but rejected it. The medical record shows he died of an infection brought about by a stabbing.

Of course, Sid knows that. This is an attempt to cover up his sabotage of Crystal's defense. Shame on him. Shame on him for sabotaging her defense and shame on him for denigrating the late Reginald Daye. A man who now has no voice in this matter. A man who seems to be expendable to Sid. Shame on him.

Walt-in-Durham; October 30, 2013 at 5:31 AM
Anonymous said...: One person SIDNEY seems to think was expendable was Demetrius Green.; October 30, 2013 at 6:13 AM
Anonymous said...: Demetrius Green, in Harr's deluded view, would be nothing more than collateral damage....trash to be swept under the rug....while a scumbag convicted drug dealing, murdering felon would be free to pollute our air again.
Tsk Tsk....these nasty little annoyances like dead little boys.....what a nuisance Green must be to Harr. Oh, and Daye, we can just write him as a violent drunken woman beating alcoholic....yeah, that's it.....just blame him after he is dead......that'll work.
To twisted people like Harr, victims are always just in the way.....to be ignored, maligned, dismissed, or otherwise thrown in the trash. The LAX guys? Falsely accused? Dismiss them. Dead Mr. Daye? That drunk? Malign him. Dead little Demetrius Green? Why, goodness, his head was just in the way and, after all, it was his mother's fault for bringing him outside while the scumbag drug dealers conducted business.
That's good old sidney at his best............"throw em in the trash heap" Sidney! Yep, that's a nice title for him; October 30, 2013 at 7:03 AM
Anonymous said...: ...from the Indy article.....
"In an 88-page civil rights complaint, for example, he (Harr) claimed that more than 50 defendants, including hospital staff, "fraudulently misrepresented him as being wanted by the FBI for art fraud and drug trafficking ... committing acts of assault, battery, and kidnapping against him." The complaint detailed a high-speed Mercedes Benz crash, a love tryst, bomb threats, FBI impersonators and a conspiracy to commit murder. Parts of the complaint read less like an accusation than a cry for help from a man who'd lost his way."
So, bro, let's see......you were a party to somewhere between27 and 30 suits, per the Indy article. You got yourself in trouble with the IRS. You tried to collect millions in law suits......NONE of which you EVER won.
You never finished a residency, never were board certified. Apparently were sixth in citation on one, repeat one, minor psuedo-research paper. THAT is your distinguished medical career. Oh, and by the way, based on your claimed age, you would have graduated during a time when the university did not, repeat did not, hold any kind of significant national ranking for its medical school. Not a bad school, but certainly not, top ranked, by any means.
So, tell us all....again...how YOU, the zero qualified, zero documented, zero evidenced, zero credential lunatic who has spent years running around in four states filing frivolous law suits.....juw how YOU are qualified to discredit Nichols autopsy report.
Speak up, or are you busy creeping around taking pictures of dead people?; October 30, 2013 at 7:14 AM
A Lawyer said...: Break the Conspiracy once again shows himself to be the master of deadpan comedy. Someday Dr. Harr will get the joke.; October 30, 2013 at 7:21 AM
Anonymous said...: A Lawyer, right!!!! Hilarious.....and wonderfully well written.....; October 30, 2013 at 7:37 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
I think common decency would have dictated that pictures of Mr. Daye NOT appear anywhere on this site........obviously his family did NOT consent to these photos having been taken. The question in my mind is .....who took them....with or without consent.....and how did Harr get them? Perhaps Harr himself went to Duke and walked into the unit and took the photos. THAT sort of sleazy behavior, totally in violation of Duke Hospital policy, by the way.........is exactly what Harr would do.
Creep

It is obvious that the photos are from prosecution discovery... as the defense attorneys for Mangum haven't conducted any investigation.

What I'll do in the future is put up an advisory warning that some of the images require viewer discretion.; October 30, 2013 at 9:32 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Walt said...
Anonymous at 4:07 AM raises a good question: "So what if Daye had been an alcoholic?"

A pre-existing condition is not an intervening cause under the NC (or for that matter any jurisdiction's) felony murder rule. See Welch and Holesclaw. If the late Reginald Daye had been an alcoholic, it is meaningless to the law. However, I see only that DUHS considered that as a possible diagnosis but rejected it. The medical record shows he died of an infection brought about by a stabbing.

Of course, Sid knows that. This is an attempt to cover up his sabotage of Crystal's defense. Shame on him. Shame on him for sabotaging her defense and shame on him for denigrating the late Reginald Daye. A man who now has no voice in this matter. A man who seems to be expendable to Sid. Shame on him.

Walt-in-Durham

Walt, did the infection cause Daye to go into cardiac arrest? Did the infection result in Daye's comatose state? Can you tell me how many antibiotics Daye was given during the week he was in a coma?

Common sense will tell that Daye did not die of an infection... besides, I give Duke trauma surgeons credit for being competent.; October 30, 2013 at 9:37 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Break, just read your comment but have no more time on computer. Will reply tomorrow.; October 30, 2013 at 9:40 AM
Anonymous said...: Posting these photos violates every standard of common decency. Shame on you. Truly reprehensible thing to do.; October 30, 2013 at 9:43 AM
Anonymous said...: I am reminded of the type of sensationalist yellow journalism that has made the National Enquirer the favorite rag at the grocery store checkout line. Posting photos of dead people is their stock in trade.......and they do it to sell their crap. There is no justification at all for having Daye's photos on this web site. Makes me sick....and I agree with other posters. Harr, go xxxx yourself; October 30, 2013 at 9:45 AM
Anonymous said...: I wish somebody from the Daye family would just happen to locate Harr somewhere so that they could have a friendly little chat about harr's posting of Reginald Daye's deathbed photos on this web site. I really do wish that could happen.; October 30, 2013 at 9:47 AM
Anonymous said...: Uh, so mangum gave you the photos and you, being the total scumbag you are, thought it would be just so nifty to post a full screen headshot of Mr. Daye.....and other shots of him in obvious distress. You thought that would be just keen, didn't you!
I thought you were a nut job. Now I know you are also an SOB; October 30, 2013 at 9:49 AM
Anonymous said...: Nobody gives a damn about what you think, bro. Nobody gives one tiny little damn. go play doctor or watch Columbo; October 30, 2013 at 9:52 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
I wish somebody from the Daye family would just happen to locate Harr somewhere so that they could have a friendly little chat about harr's posting of Reginald Daye's deathbed photos on this web site. I really do wish that could happen.

I would be more than happy to talk with any member of the Daye family to try and enlighten them about the death of their loved one. For example, why does the Attorney General's Office refuse to conduct an investigation? Why does the media refuse to conduct an investigation into Daye's death and autopsy report and report about it?

The Daye family is being misled and abused by the prosecution. Crystal Mangum is not responsible for Daye's death. Daye was more likely than not a victim of a hospital homicide.; October 30, 2013 at 9:57 AM
Anonymous said...: so you think duke trauma surgeons are competent? they are competent murderers apparently.....wow, that's pretty cool there, harr. they killed daye competently.....wouza; October 30, 2013 at 9:59 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Break the Conspiracy said...
Sidney,

A number of posters have criticized you for your so-called insensitivity for your recent flogs and comments. For example, some readers object to your decision to post pictures of a dead Reginald Daye. Others complain that you underestimate the pain that Demetrius Greene's death caused his family and friends.

You can demonstrate how wrong these posters are about your sensitivity.

I suggest that you contact the families of Reginald Daye and Demetrius Greene with plans to dedicate flogs on each of their lives. You can provide a link to this site so that they can see the quality of your work firsthand.

You can tell Daye's family that your flog will provide a compassionate and understanding narrative of living with a chronic alcoholic and violent habitual criminal. You don't blame Daye for his disease. You don't blame him for beating Mangum and earlier girlfriends. You can tell them you realize the conflict they feel knowing that Mangum had no choice but to stab him. You understand their pain and want to make sure that your readers empathize as you do.

Similarly, you can tell D'April Greene that you want to tell the story of Demetrius' accident. Demetrius was so proud of his good grades and so enthusiastic. How tragic that his young life was snuffed out by a freak ricochet of Carter's bullet. You can tell them how badly you feel, but you know they realize that Carter had no way of knowing that he would cause such a freak accident when he recklessly shot several times as Baker fled down a street crowded with innocent people. Such bad luck.

I am certain that both families will be anxious to talk with you.

Hey, Break.

That is an idea that I would give consideration to, but they would have to contact me and let me know they would like me to do that. As it is, I don't have their contact info.

I think it would be easier to do one on Demetrius Green considering his past life was pretty much unblemished. Daye's would be more of a challenge... like HBO trying to do a made for TV movie about the Duke Lacrosse case and making the lacrosse players come out smelling like a rose. It was such a challenge HBO went through several writers and I don't know if the project is still going forward or not.

Anyway, regardless of what I do or say, many posters will always have negative thoughts for me and I'll never be able to reach them.; October 30, 2013 at 10:06 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
so you think duke trauma surgeons are competent? they are competent murderers apparently.....wow, that's pretty cool there, harr. they killed daye competently.....wouza

The trauma surgeons at Duke treated Daye's stab wound... they did not take care of his delirium tremens and intubate him on the third postoperative day.; October 30, 2013 at 10:07 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
I am reminded of the type of sensationalist yellow journalism that has made the National Enquirer the favorite rag at the grocery store checkout line. Posting photos of dead people is their stock in trade.......and they do it to sell their crap. There is no justification at all for having Daye's photos on this web site. Makes me sick....and I agree with other posters. Harr, go xxxx yourself

I haven't picked up a National Enquirer for years... so I really can't comment.; October 30, 2013 at 10:09 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
...from the Indy article.....
"In an 88-page civil rights complaint, for example, he (Harr) claimed that more than 50 defendants, including hospital staff, "fraudulently misrepresented him as being wanted by the FBI for art fraud and drug trafficking ... committing acts of assault, battery, and kidnapping against him." The complaint detailed a high-speed Mercedes Benz crash, a love tryst, bomb threats, FBI impersonators and a conspiracy to commit murder. Parts of the complaint read less like an accusation than a cry for help from a man who'd lost his way."
So, bro, let's see......you were a party to somewhere between27 and 30 suits, per the Indy article. You got yourself in trouble with the IRS. You tried to collect millions in law suits......NONE of which you EVER won.
You never finished a residency, never were board certified. Apparently were sixth in citation on one, repeat one, minor psuedo-research paper. THAT is your distinguished medical career. Oh, and by the way, based on your claimed age, you would have graduated during a time when the university did not, repeat did not, hold any kind of significant national ranking for its medical school. Not a bad school, but certainly not, top ranked, by any means.
So, tell us all....again...how YOU, the zero qualified, zero documented, zero evidenced, zero credential lunatic who has spent years running around in four states filing frivolous law suits.....juw how YOU are qualified to discredit Nichols autopsy report.
Speak up, or are you busy creeping around taking pictures of dead people?

So you're actually admitting that you believe everything in the August 21st hatchet-job article about me? Hah! Nothing more than gossip. (People believe what they want to believe.); October 30, 2013 at 10:12 AM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: "So you're actually admitting that you believe everything in the August 21st hatchet-job article about me? Hah! Nothing more than gossip."

You've stated this a number of times, but haven't provided any proof to back it up.

I'll take you for your word, however -- which of the claims from the article (the 88 page civil rights complaint, the numerous suits filed, getting into trouble with the IRS) are false?
A Yes/No will suffice.; October 30, 2013 at 10:40 AM
Anonymous said...: Not correct, the surgeons were, in their role as Intensivists in the ICU, providing oversight care throughout Daye's hospitalization. I doubt you even know what an Intensivist is.....google it, harr, if you can figure out how to do a google search. Apparently you are saying that only certain people at duke were the actual murderers, i.e., the respiratory therapist was a murderer but not the surgeons? wow, I bet the RT Department would be glad to know they have a killer on their staff who apparently works for Rae Evans and her jihad.

too bad you haven't read the grocery story tabloids lately. I bet they would have a job opening for a guy like you...who posts pictures of people on their deathbeds.

Whether I believe what I read is none of your business. Fact is, you have provided zero documentation to support denial of anything stated in the article. Do so, then we can discuss whether the Indy statements were true. Otherwise, stuff it.; October 30, 2013 at 10:50 AM
Anonymous said...: "people believe what they want to believe"......well, there you have it.....Harr reveals his entire psychic disturbance....Harr believes what he wants to believe. Amen, asshat, amen.; October 30, 2013 at 10:52 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"I would be more than happy to talk with any member of the Daye family to try and enlighten them about the death of their loved one. For example, why does the Attorney General's Office refuse to conduct an investigation? Why does the media refuse to conduct an investigation into Daye's death and autopsy report and report about it?"

There is nothing for the AG's office to investigate. I say again, although you have an MD after your name, you are minimally trained and minimally experienced and not competent to render an expert medical opinion about anything. As for legal opinions, your record for filing and losing frivolous lawsuits shows you are no legal expert.

"The Daye family is being misled"

By you.

"and abused by the prosecution. Crystal Mangum is not responsible for Daye's death. Daye was more likely than not a victim of a hospital homicide."

Yes she is. You have presented no evidence that this was a hospital homicide. You have not given a credible motive why Duke would have wanted to kill Reginald Daye.; October 30, 2013 at 11:32 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"It is obvious that the photos are from prosecution discovery... as the defense attorneys for Mangum haven't conducted any investigation.

What I'll do in the future is put up an advisory warning that some of the images require viewer discretion."

It is more obvious you had no right to access those photos or publish them. And you call yourself a law abiding citizen.

Can we say VIGILANTE, boys and girls.; October 30, 2013 at 11:35 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Hey, Break.

That is an idea that I would give consideration to, but they would have to contact me and let me know they would like me to do that. As it is, I don't have their contact info."

Probably they would never give it to you.

"I think it would be easier to do one on Demetrius Green considering his past life was pretty much unblemished."

So long as you admit his death was a felony murder committed by Shan Carter.

"Daye's would be more of a challenge..."

For you it would be a challenge for you to distort his history and make him out to be a drunken, violent serial abuser of women. You must be saying it would be a challenge for you to think of more libel to publish about him.

:like HBO trying to do a made for TV movie about the Duke Lacrosse case and making the lacrosse players come out smelling like a rose. It was such a challenge HBO went through several writers and I don't know if the project is still going forward or not."

According to you they deserved to be falsely accused of rape and wrongfully convicted because they committed underage drinking. Compared to roses, what corrupt DA NIFONG did and what false accuser/victimizer Crystal did smells like the rottenest garbage in the world. These are two sows ears you have devoted years to in a fruitless attempt to convince the world they are silk purses.

Also, you would not have published those remarks if you did not believe the Duke Lacrosse team members were guilty.

"Anyway, regardless of what I do or say, many posters will always have negative thoughts for me and I'll never be able to reach them.'

That is because you never say anything positive about good people. You say good things only about your favorite false accuser, your favorite convicted murderer and your favorite corrupt DA.; October 30, 2013 at 11:44 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"The trauma surgeons at Duke treated Daye's stab wound... they did not take care of his delirium tremens and intubate him on the third postoperative day."

Neither did you.

Yet you believe, in spite of your lack of training, your lack of experience, you know better than anyone what happened.

I say again, you have probably never done an intubation in your life.; October 30, 2013 at 11:47 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Walt, did the infection cause Daye to go into cardiac arrest? Did the infection result in Daye's comatose state? Can you tell me how many antibiotics Daye was given during the week he was in a coma?"

You show your lack of medical expertise. An infection can cause septic shock and cause cardiac arrest. I have seen it happen.

Walt probably can not tell you what antibiotics were administered because like you he does not illegally access confidential records. Law abiding citizen HAH!!!

"Common sense will tell that Daye did not die of an infection... besides, I give Duke trauma surgeons credit for being competent."

Sinse you have shown yourself completely lacking in common sense(as is evidenced by your defense of convicted murderer Shan Carter), you are in no position to make that statement.; October 30, 2013 at 11:53 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"I haven't picked up a National Enquirer for years... so I really can't comment."

Which means the National Enquirer has been fre of soilage from your filthy hands for years.; October 30, 2013 at 11:55 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"So you're actually admitting that you believe everything in the August 21st hatchet-job article about me? Hah! Nothing more than gossip. (People believe what they want to believe.)"

You believe the Indy Weekly would have accepted your unproven allegations without checking your credibility.

It did and found you had none.; October 30, 2013 at 11:57 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"The trauma surgeons at Duke treated Daye's stab wound... they did not take care of his delirium tremens and intubate him on the third postoperative day."

There is no evidence he went into DTs. There is no evidence he had an esophageal intubation.

I repeat my belief. You probably never done an intubation in your life, not even an unsuccessful one.; October 30, 2013 at 12:00 PM
kenhyderal said...: Who never mentioned any sort of self defense story until AFTER Daye was dead…and could not defend himself? Mangum......... You should re-read Reginald Daye's statement to Officer Bond at Duke Hospital where he admitted he dragged her by the hair and kicked in the bathroom door.; October 30, 2013 at 1:11 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"It is obvious that the photos are from prosecution discovery... as the defense attorneys for Mangum haven't conducted any investigation.

What I'll do in the future is put up an advisory warning that some of the images require viewer discretion."

It is more obvious you had no right to access those photos or publish them. And you call yourself a law abiding citizen.

Can we say VIGILANTE, boys and girls.

A vigilante I am not. I am an advocate... and a rectifier.; October 30, 2013 at 1:17 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...
"So you're actually admitting that you believe everything in the August 21st hatchet-job article about me? Hah! Nothing more than gossip."

You've stated this a number of times, but haven't provided any proof to back it up.

I'll take you for your word, however -- which of the claims from the article (the 88 page civil rights complaint, the numerous suits filed, getting into trouble with the IRS) are false?
A Yes/No will suffice.

I have filed a civil rights complaint in the past... the number of pages I don't remember, nor do I know how many suits I filed... and what would be your interpretation of numerous. With regards to the IRS, I have no idea. Why don't you contact the author of that article, John Tucker, and request more elucidation about that.; October 30, 2013 at 1:24 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

Can you post a link to the statement and DPD reports? I know Sidney included them in an earlier post, but I can't find them. Apparently the link to Brooklyn Nine-Nine is more important.; October 30, 2013 at 1:34 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Who never mentioned any sort of self defense story until AFTER Daye was dead…and could not defend himself? Mangum......... You should re-read Reginald Daye's statement to Officer Bond at Duke Hospital where he admitted he dragged her by the hair and kicked in the bathroom door."

I have.

Crystal never tried to plead self defense until afterReginald Daye was dead and she had been charged with Murder 1. In fact, after being read her Miranda rights, she refused to say anything.; October 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"A vigilante I am not. I am an advocate... and a rectifier."

BULLSHIT!!!!

You are an advocate only for what is untrue(e.g. Shan Carter acted in self defense) and for replacement of the law of the land with your misguided idea of what t should be.; October 30, 2013 at 1:56 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"

"I have filed a civil rights complaint in the past... the number of pages I don't remember, nor do I know how many suits I filed..."

Why don't you read the Indy Weekly article and enlighten yourself.

"and what would be your interpretation of numerous."

What other interpretation of numerous be other than numerous.

"With regards to the IRS, I have no idea. Why don't you contact the author of that article, John Tucker, and request more elucidation about that."

You did at one time state in your blog you were investigated for tax evasion. Why was that. Calling it a trumped up charge is no explanation.; October 30, 2013 at 2:01 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ Anonymous 1:34....... http://www.justice4nifong.com/legal/cgm/blink/blink112912/docu09.htm; October 30, 2013 at 2:08 PM
A Lawyer said...: and what would be your interpretation of numerous

Would you say I have a plethora of pinatas?; October 30, 2013 at 2:08 PM
A Lawyer said...: Left this link off my last post:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mTUmczVdik; October 30, 2013 at 2:10 PM
Anonymous said...: Simple. Sidney Harr is a liar. Period.; October 30, 2013 at 2:34 PM
Anonymous said...: Well, come on, asshat, tell us when you are gonna sue the IndyWeek for writing something about you that isn't true. Seems to me that when somebody sees something written about them that they can PROVE is false, they demand a retraction….and, if they don't get it, they sue. So, speak up, asshat, and tell us when you are gonna sue.; October 30, 2013 at 2:37 PM
Anonymous said...: I think this entire web site has degraded to the point that it is nothing but a disgraceful and truly shameful exhibition of terrible behavior by Sidney Harr. He has shown himself to be a liar, a truly characterless jerk by posting those photos of Daye. That is the final straw in what most of us, I think, would consider his meltdown and full exposure . Nobody with a shred of decency would have posted those photos. He had no right to do so. They proved nothing except what a total song of a Bxxxx this man really is. There is absolutely no redeeming value in this kind of purulent trash on the internet.
As somebody said, I think he deserve to be told what he can do with his damn jihad.; October 30, 2013 at 3:14 PM
Anonymous said...: Perhaps Harr decided to expose himself (along with these shameful photos) because he is just nothing more than a pissed off old man who has been scorned by Mangum, the pole vaulter. There really is no other explanation for why someone who claims to be a Christian and who claims to be a physician and who claims to be a widower…..would do something so vile. Otherwise, Harr really is advancing further into some kind of paranoid dementia.
There was no reason to put those photos on this site except to cause shock and hurt…….to the Daye family. How pathetic.; October 30, 2013 at 5:25 PM
kenhyderal said...: Nifong Supporter said: "Crystal Mangum is not responsible for Daye's death. Daye was more likely than not a victim of a hospital homicide.".................. Unlike Dr. Harr I do not believe Reginald Daye was deliberately put to death. I believe this was an entirely preventable death, though, and that medical misadventure was to blame. This, it seems, was followed by the unethical concealment of the errors in care that he received by practitioners there at Duke Hospital. With proper care emesis of contrast, causing aspiration, should not happen but if it does, with proper action to maintain the airways it can be handled . Misplacement of an endo-tracheal tube is a dangerous mistake. Even using a wrong size is in itself a mistake. This whole cascade of events that lead to Reginald's cardiac arrest and brain death represents a critical failure in the care that he was provided. This tragic error played right into the hands of those who wished to punish Crystal. The long-delayed autopsy completely ignored all the events that really led to Daye's death. In medicine, unlike in law where intervening causes can be dismissed, cause of death is a progression. The immediate cause of death was of course the elective removal from life-support. He was on life support because of a coma brought about by cerebral anoxia. The cerebral anoxia was brought about by circulatory collapse, brought about by cardiac arrest, brought about by cardiac arrhythmia brought about by lack of oxygen to the myo-cardium, brought about by an obstructed airway, brought about by aspiration into the trachea, brought about by emesis, brought about by the introduction of contrast media into the stomach. Was he being treated for an infection caused by his wounds or by delirium tremens. In ascertaining the cause of death Dr. Nichols should not have ignored everything beyond the stab wound that Daye was successfully treated for. Crystal wounded Daye while fending off a strangulation that she though was going to end in her demise.; October 30, 2013 at 9:32 PM
Anonymous said...: Then you do not know duke. They are mean as sheat - and proud of it - it is a game to them. They have the durham/duke/nc/usa justice system to back them up afterall.; October 31, 2013 at 2:46 AM
Anonymous said...: Dear troll,
Read Welch. You might learn something.

There is not one shred of evidence in the medical record that Daye was improperly intubated. Not one.

You can posture all you want……not one single physician who has reviewed the record, including a physician Harr called an expert, found anything wrong with the record.

Mangum stabbed Daye. She is responsible. That, troll, is the law. Whether you like it is not relevant.

Mangum can claim whatever she wishes. Not up to you and scumbag Harr to decide her fate, thank god.; October 31, 2013 at 4:10 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Unlike Dr. Harr I do not believe Reginald Daye was deliberately put to death. I believe this was an entirely preventable death, though, and that medical misadventure was to blame."

You believe incorrectly. Complications of medical treatment happen, even inthe best of circumstances. I myself suffered complications of medical treatment which happened in spite of excellent treatment.

"This, it seems, was followed by the unethical concealment of the errors in care that he received by practitioners there at Duke Hospital. With proper care emesis of contrast, causing aspiration, should not happen but if it does, with proper action to maintain the airways it can be handled."

I say again, even with proper care, complications can happen.

"Misplacement of an endo-tracheal tube is a dangerous mistake. Even using a wrong size is in itself a mistake."

There was no evidence of misplacement of the endotracheal tube. SIDNEY HARR presented none. I say again, SIDNEY has probably never done an intubation in his life. Why he claims an esophageal intubation was done raises questions about whether he has ever done an intubation.

"This whole cascade of events that lead to Reginald's cardiac arrest and brain death represents a critical failure in the care that he was provided."

This whole cascade of events was precipitated by the stab wound inflicted by Crystal. No stab wound, no risk of complications.

"This tragic error"

You are too stupid and too biased to realize a complication is not necessarily an egregious error.

"played right into the hands of those who wished to punish Crystal."

No one has tried to punish Crystal.

"The long-delayed autopsy completely ignored all the events that really led to Daye's death. In medicine, unlike in law where intervening causes can be dismissed, cause of death is a progression. The immediate cause of death was of course the elective removal from life-support. He was on life support because of a coma brought about by cerebral anoxia. The cerebral anoxia was brought about by circulatory collapse, brought about by cardiac arrest, brought about by cardiac arrhythmia brought about by lack of oxygen to the myo-cardium, brought about by an obstructed airway, brought about by aspiration into the trachea, brought about by emesis, brought about by the introduction of contrast media into the stomach. Was he being treated for an infection caused by his wounds or by delirium tremens."

Again, he was not diagnosed with DTs. This whole cascade of events was a consequence of the stab wound inflicted by Crystal

"In ascertaining the cause of death Dr. Nichols should not have ignored everything beyond the stab wound that Daye was successfully treated for."

Why don't you list the credentials that render you competent to say what Dr. Nichols should have listed as cause of death. Because you have none to list.

"Crystal wounded Daye while fending off a strangulation that she though was going to end in her demise."

You again show you believe in lies. There was no evidence Crystal was assaulted or subjected to deadly force.

I add all this uncorroborated speculation from someone who believes Crystal was raped because of hearsay from a non existent source. More than enough said about KENHYDERAL.; October 31, 2013 at 4:21 AM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous October 31, 2013 at 2:46 AM:
:Then you do not know duke. They are mean as sheat - and proud of it - it is a game to them. They have the durham/duke/nc/usa justice system to back them up afterall."

More uncorroborated allegations from the fabricator.; October 31, 2013 at 4:24 AM
Anonymous said...: I'd like to see duke prove their not mean as sheat and proud of it; and that it is not all a game to them; and that they don't have the justice system in their political network, etc.. That would be a change of pace and face don't you think?; October 31, 2013 at 4:48 AM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous October 31, 2013 at 4:48 AM

"I'd like to see duke prove their not mean as sheat and proud of it; and that it is not all a game to them; and that they don't have the justice system in their political network, etc.. That would be a change of pace and face don't you think?"

The principle is he who asserts must prove. You arec asserting but not proving. Rather you are refusing to prove. That suggests you are fabricating.; October 31, 2013 at 5:33 AM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: "
I have filed a civil rights complaint in the past... the number of pages I don't remember, nor do I know how many suits I filed... and what would be your interpretation of numerous. With regards to the IRS, I have no idea. Why don't you contact the author of that article, John Tucker, and request more elucidation about that."

For the questions asked, it appears we have a "qualified yes", a "yes" and an "I don't know" for answers. (Honestly, who doesn't know if they've ever been in trouble with the IRS?).

So far, Sid, it certainly appears that John Tucker was telling the truth in his article. The truth is hardly grounds for calling it a "hatchet job".

Why haven't you filed a libel suit against Tucker and the Indy News?; October 31, 2013 at 5:44 AM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: " cause of death is a progression. The immediate cause of death was of course the elective removal from life-support. He was on life support because of a coma brought about by cerebral anoxia. The cerebral anoxia was brought about by circulatory collapse, brought about by cardiac arrest, brought about by cardiac arrhythmia brought about by lack of oxygen to the myo-cardium, brought about by an obstructed airway, brought about by aspiration into the trachea, brought about by emesis, brought about by the introduction of contrast media into the stomach.
Hey Ken -- why was contrast media used on Mr. Daye? Remember, cause of death is a progression....; October 31, 2013 at 5:48 AM
Anonymous said...: To cause him to asphixiate so that they could introduce a reason for Mr. Daye to become brain dead?

???

Why else would they do it when the risk of his asphixiation was so high at that point when he was already in need of medical assistance - not more tests - he needed to calm down and breath - not become chemically immobilized after careless cause of asphixiation and therefore need for intubation by duke's unnecessary at the time asphixiation risky procedure.; October 31, 2013 at 6:20 AM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: "To cause him to asphixiate [sic] so that they could introduce a reason for Mr. Daye to become brain dead?"

a) I was addressing Kenhyderal, not you.

b) it's "asphyxiate" not "asphixiate"

c) You're a dumbass.

Not necessarily in that order.; October 31, 2013 at 6:33 AM
Anonymous said...: and your an immature jerk - so what?; October 31, 2013 at 6:43 AM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: Anonymous @ 6:43 AM:

I know you are, but what am I?; October 31, 2013 at 6:52 AM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous October 31, 2013 at 6:20 AM.

"To cause him to asphixiate so that they could introduce a reason for Mr. Daye to become brain dead?

???

Why else would they do it when the risk of his asphixiation was so high at that point when he was already in need of medical assistance - not more tests - he needed to calm down and breath - not become chemically immobilized after careless cause of asphixiation and therefore need for intubation by duke's unnecessary at the time asphixiation risky procedure."

You showcase your total ignorance.; October 31, 2013 at 6:57 AM
kenhyderal said...: Lance said: "Hey Ken -- why was contrast media used on Mr. Daye? Remember, cause of death is a progression"......So he could be receive a CT scan of the chest and abdomen to rule out infection or pulmonary embolism as a possible cause of his symptoms other then the presumed delirium tremens; October 31, 2013 at 9:13 AM
Anonymous said...: Why did Daye have an infection or possible DTs , Kenny?; October 31, 2013 at 9:58 AM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: ".So he could be receive a CT scan of the chest and abdomen to rule out infection or pulmonary embolism ..."

You're almost there Ken. I'll give you a little help.

Why was Mr. Daye in the hospital in the first place?

Remember, "cause of death is a progression"....; October 31, 2013 at 10:34 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"So he could be receive a CT scan of the chest and abdomen to rule out infection or pulmonary embolism as a possible cause of his symptoms other then the presumed delirium tremens"

DTs were part of the differential. It was not the presumed diagnosis. You again show your total lack of ability to comment meaningfully on medical situations.

You are like someone who reads a book on a 747 and then declares himself capable of piloting a 747.; October 31, 2013 at 11:13 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

A common cause of DTs is sudden unanticipated hospitalization for a problem such as a stab wound.

If Reginald Daye did have DTs, it would not absolve Crystal of criminal liability for his death.

Just like your piece of hearsay from an anonymous non existent source does not establish that Crystal was raped.; October 31, 2013 at 11:20 AM
Anonymous said...: It doesn't matter what he had given the fact that he was made brain dead by duke's medical treatment - now he's dead - that fixes whatever problem he had - right?; October 31, 2013 at 11:41 AM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: "...given the fact that he was made brain dead by duke's medical treatment - now he's dead - that fixes whatever problem he had - right?"

The proper use of "given the fact" is:
Given the fact that (some true statement), (conclusion that follows from that statement).

Your statement that Mr. Daye was "made brain dead by duke's medical treatment" is not a true statement. As Ken pointed out, cause of death is a progression. Mr. Daye's death started with the stabbing by Crystal Mangum. All subsequent events progressed from there.

As such, your conclusion is incorrect.

But I suspect you know that.; October 31, 2013 at 12:12 PM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous October 31, 2013 at 11:41 AM:

"It doesn't matter what he had given the fact that he was made brain dead by duke's medical treatment - now he's dead - that fixes whatever problem he had - right?"

What matters is that Reginald Daye would not have been subjected to the risks of medical treatment had Crystal not stabbed him. State vs. Welch.; October 31, 2013 at 12:15 PM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: For those of you that haven't watch Sid's video or read the transcript, I'll save you some time.

Here's the takeaway:

"I cannot say with complete certainty that Reginald Daye's death was the result of homicide at the hands of staff at Duke University Hospital".
- Sid Harr

The rest is just fluff.; October 31, 2013 at 12:24 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...
"
I have filed a civil rights complaint in the past... the number of pages I don't remember, nor do I know how many suits I filed... and what would be your interpretation of numerous. With regards to the IRS, I have no idea. Why don't you contact the author of that article, John Tucker, and request more elucidation about that."

For the questions asked, it appears we have a "qualified yes", a "yes" and an "I don't know" for answers. (Honestly, who doesn't know if they've ever been in trouble with the IRS?).

So far, Sid, it certainly appears that John Tucker was telling the truth in his article. The truth is hardly grounds for calling it a "hatchet job".

Why haven't you filed a libel suit against Tucker and the Indy News?

Why should I file a lawsuit against Tucker? Even though he did a hatchet job on me that was malicious gossip, I still like the guy. And at least the Indy Week covered the story albeit tangentially. I have more respect for Indy Week than any of the other media outlets who have their heads buried in the sand on this issue.; October 31, 2013 at 1:13 PM
Anonymous said...: So is the take away about duke that you can be killed there by lack of proper medical care - so don't get sick or get in an accident and go there - else it will be 'your fault' for selecting duke for your medical treatment or for getting in a situation that causes you to have to be taken there. same logic; October 31, 2013 at 1:14 PM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: "So is the take away about duke that you can be killed there by lack of proper medical care - so don't get sick or get in an accident and go there - else it will be 'your fault' for selecting duke for your medical treatment or for getting in a situation that causes you to have to be taken there. same logic"

No -- the takeaway is that Sid admits there is no verifiable truth behind his claims that Duke is responsible for Mr. Daye's death.

Is English your second language?; October 31, 2013 at 1:24 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Why should I file a lawsuit against Tucker? Even though he did a hatchet job on me that was malicious gossip, I still like the guy. And at least the Indy Week covered the story albeit tangentially. I have more respect for Indy Week than any of the other media outlets who have their heads buried in the sand on this issue."

Sounds like a lame attempt on your part to avoid denying what Mr.Tucker wrote, which in turn is something of an admission that what he wrote was not a hatchet job.; October 31, 2013 at 1:27 PM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: "Why should I file a lawsuit against Tucker? Even though he did a hatchet job on me that was malicious gossip, I still like the guy."

"Gossip: reports about other people, typically involving details that are not confirmed as being true."

So far, none of what John Tucker has reported can be considered "gossip". I can see why you haven't filed a lawsuit...And it has nothing to do with "liking the guy".; October 31, 2013 at 1:29 PM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous said...

Anonymous October 31, 2013 at 1:14 PM:

:So is the take away about duke that you can be killed there by lack of proper medical care - so don't get sick or get in an accident and go there - else it will be 'your fault' for selecting duke for your medical treatment or for getting in a situation that causes you to have to be taken there. same logic"

The takeaway is that Medical care, even in the best circumstances, has inherent risks. If Crystal had not stabbed Reginald Daye, he would not have been exposed to those risks.; October 31, 2013 at 1:30 PM
Anonymous said...: yes and if you don't drive in nc then you will not be exposed to the risk of being airlifted to duke for medical treatment in case you get into a car accident while your driving in nc - same logic

so - is it 'your' fault for driving in nc - or duke's fault for providing faulty medical treatment?; October 31, 2013 at 1:57 PM
kenhyderal said...: Lance said: "Remember, "cause of death is a progression" Correct; but then what was the reason the Medical Examiner was brought in and why did it take months for him to reach that "no-brainer". What was it in the autopsy that showed to him the stab wound was the underlying cause of death. As Dr. Harr is fond to say any 5th grader can figure that out. That is, if you ignore all the myriad of antecedent causes. To quote Dr. Nicholls "he was stabbed he died" No need to bother with or consider all the intervening circumstances. Yeah, I know about the Evans case but I don't think the decision there is a precedent can be universally applied and especially not in this case.; October 31, 2013 at 2:37 PM
kenhyderal said...: Oops I missed a "that" after precedent; October 31, 2013 at 2:39 PM
Anonymous said...: Sidney and Kenny,

Are you planning on attending Crystal's trial? I would think that your support would mean so much to her. I would not want to face a trial for first degree murder without my dear friends in attendance,; October 31, 2013 at 2:57 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Lance said: "Remember, "cause of death is a progression" Correct; but then what was the reason the Medical Examiner was brought in"

Crystal stabbed Reginald Daye. She was arrested.Reginald Daye died of complications of medical treatment. That is ample indication for a forensic autopsy.

"and why did it take months for him to reach that 'no-brainer'."

Any autopsy is a rather meticulous procedure. Sometimes it does take months to determine a cause of death. In the Reginald Daye death, there was an added burden on the Medical examiner.

"What was it in the autopsy that showed to him the stab wound was the underlying cause of death. As Dr. Harr is fond to say any 5th grader can figure that out."

That statement on the part of SIDNEY shows only that SIDNEY is not qualified or competent to make the statement.

"That is, if you ignore all the myriad of antecedent causes. To quote Dr. Nicholls 'he was stabbed he died' No need to bother with or consider all the intervening circumstances. Yeah, I know about the Evans case but I don't think the decision there is a precedent can be universally applied and especially not in this case."

Dr.Nichols' statement is a concise summary of what the autopsy revealed. Any competent Medical Professional can understand that. That leaves out you and SIDNEY.

You should take this advice. Better to keep your mouth and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt; October 31, 2013 at 3:24 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Yeah, I know about the Evans case but I don't think the decision there is a precedent can be universally applied and especially not in this case."

The fallacy here is you presume you can think.; October 31, 2013 at 3:25 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

Maybe you should document what in the background of SIDNEY, a person with an MD degree who never did a residency(which suggests he could not be accepted into a residency), never achieved Board certification in any specialty, who never performed a surgery, who never performed an autopsy, who probably can not describe how a surgical procedure or an autopsy is done, establishes him as competent to evaluate an autopsy report.; October 31, 2013 at 3:30 PM
Anonymous said...: so if duke hates me, and i accidently run into you on the highway cuz you just ran into a deer that jumped into traffic that is speeding along 70 miles an hour, and although you survived the deer attack, you were harmed by my car naturally plowing into yours at 70 miles an hour when the deer attacked you a second beforehand, so duke then kills you with their medical treatment because they hate me so much that they want me to go through the hell of being charged with manslaughter because the deer attacked you - is it the deers fault, my fault, or duke's fault you are now DEAD i say DEAD!!!; October 31, 2013 at 4:28 PM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous October 31, 2013 at 4:28 PM:

"so if duke hates me, and i accidently run into you on the highway cuz you just ran into a deer that jumped into traffic that is speeding along 70 miles an hour, and although you survived the deer attack, you were harmed by my car naturally plowing into yours at 70 miles an hour when the deer attacked you a second beforehand, so duke then kills you with their medical treatment because they hate me so much that they want me to go through the hell of being charged with manslaughter because the deer attacked you - is it the deers fault, my fault, or duke's fault you are now DEAD i say DEAD!!!"

It seems to me what you call your mind is dead, and not because of Duke. Is it because of what you have been smoking or snorting?; October 31, 2013 at 4:32 PM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous October 31, 2013 at 4:28 PM:

I say the real problem is that you hate Duke.; October 31, 2013 at 4:33 PM
Anonymous said...: fy evil duke troll

just anything to put me down and falsly accuse me right - nothing you say means anything anyway - since you basically sit here and troll anything and everything that anyone says on this blog that is anyway truthful about duke - everything to you is bully and troll and falsly accuse and disparage others

new low for you - or are you always this mean and stupid - oh wait - you are just trying to prove my point that duke is mean - it is a game to them - and they do not care how evil they are - as long as they feel like they 'win'

right evil duke troll? right.; October 31, 2013 at 4:39 PM
Anonymous said...: perhaps it should bother everyone that duke makes people dislike them because they hate and harm the people first - and that they will kill some to frame others whom they hate - and apparently they hate many - so - many could be killed in order to frame many others by duke if that is their way of doing 'things'; October 31, 2013 at 4:45 PM
Lance the Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: "so if duke hates me, and i accidently run into you on the highway cuz you just ran into a deer that jumped into traffic that is speeding along 70 miles an hour, and although you survived the deer attack, you were harmed by my car naturally plowing into yours at 70 miles an hour when the deer attacked you a second beforehand, so duke then kills you with their medical treatment because they hate me so much that they want me to go through the hell of being charged with manslaughter because the deer attacked you - is it the deers fault, my fault, or duke's fault you are now DEAD i say DEAD!!!"

Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.; October 31, 2013 at 5:00 PM
Anonymous said...: I also think that if this is duke's policy to kill one to frame another - that ALL judicial cases involving duke would have to be tried in a different state - given the undue burden of threat to life and limb of any who crosses duke or crosses the path in accidental mishap of any who has crossed duke in anyway deeming them deserving of duke framing actions - because all who drive in any way in NC are under the same threat of duke's revenge and fear mongering hatred (and they hate to lose - and they hate many).

This is too important not to be investigated and properly dealt with because of this fact of life and duke in NC.

There are a lot more people at risk from duke's nefarious actions than from Ms. Mangums i assure you.; October 31, 2013 at 5:07 PM

«Oldest ‹Older 1 – 200 of 668 Newer› Newest»

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Murder at Duke University Hospital: The case for Reginald Daye's demise being intentional

668 comments:

Facebook Badge

Subscribe!

Labels

Blog Archive

About Me