justice4nifong: William Cohan interview on Diane Rehm Show

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

William Cohan interview on Diane Rehm Show

141 comments:

Nifong Supporter said...: kenhyderal said...
Attention Dr. Harr. Racist alert at 6:08

Thanks for the racist alert. The offensive comment has been destroyed.

The kenhyderal doctrine, adopted by this blog site, specifically prohibits blatantly gratuitous racist comments. They will be immediately eradicated... the tolerance for such bad behavior has long since expired.; May 6, 2014 at 8:03 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"The kenhyderal doctrine, adopted by this blog site, specifically prohibits blatantly gratuitous racist comments. They will be immediately eradicated... the tolerance for such bad behavior has long since expired."

So why do you permit blatant unrepentant racist KENHYDERAL to post his racially motivated lies about the Duke rape hoax?; May 6, 2014 at 8:13 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!!!
IMPORTANT NOTICE!

Just to give you an update on the next sharlog... which is going to be a doozie. I had completed writing it and was all set to narrate it when I came down with a cold. Ergo, I have not been able to proceed with work on it, as laying down the audio track usually precedes everything else. I hope to get it posted within the week. It will be extremely thought provoking.

In the meantime, enjoy this very informative interview of best-selling author William D. Cohan by Diane Rehm. Very enlightening... even though the haters are trying to bad-mouth the book.

As you were.; May 6, 2014 at 8:14 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"The kenhyderal doctrine, adopted by this blog site, specifically prohibits blatantly gratuitous racist comments. They will be immediately eradicated... the tolerance for such bad behavior has long since expired."

So why do you permit blatant unrepentant racist KENHYDERAL to post his racially motivated lies about the Duke rape hoax?

kenhyderal is not exempt from the kenhyderal doctrine. If he writes a blatantly racist comment, I will remove it quicker than a frog's tongue snaring a fly in mid-air. The point is that kenhyderal, to my knowledge, has never been in violation of the policy. I would be glad to look into any questionable comments which you feel are banned.; May 6, 2014 at 8:18 AM
Anonymous said...: It's harr's site. He can be a censor if he wishes. Who gives a rip!
Seems just a teeny bit hypocritical of Bro, though, to get his panties in a twist over racist statements while he continues to make nicey-nice with the homophobic bigot, Victoria Peterson. Oh well, they are only "fags", right, Bro? It's OK For Vicky Bigot to continue her bigotry.......sure; May 6, 2014 at 8:21 AM
Anonymous said...: Lovette's second appeal of his life-without-parole sentenced got denied. Good. I hope he rots in prison.
Only problem I have with his sentence is that he should be facing execution. I know, all the apologists and pro-criminal crowd wish he was out on the street, chillin' with his baby mama, waiting for his next opportunity to slaughter somebody. (like Carson and Mahato). Me, I would happily push the plunger and send this piece of xxxx straight to hell if I had the opportunity; May 6, 2014 at 8:26 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"kenhyderal is not exempt from the kenhyderal doctrine. If he writes a blatantly racist comment, I will remove it quicker than a frog's tongue snaring a fly in mid-air. The point is that kenhyderal, to my knowledge, has never been in violation of the policy. I would be glad to look into any questionable comments which you feel are banned."

De facto KENHYDERAL is.; May 6, 2014 at 8:46 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Just to give you an update on the next sharlog... which is going to be a doozie."

Everything you publish is a "doozie"-for all your errors and lies and deluded megalomania and your guilt presuming racism and your desire to deny the First Amendment right of free speech to AG Cooper, your belief that your declarations of the guilt of the Lacrosse players have any significance whatsoever.

Boy are you incredibly stupid.; May 6, 2014 at 8:49 AM
kenhyderal said...: Accusing me of so called "reverse" racism is absolutely ludicrous. I am totally color blind when it comes to race. I do not recognize the term Caucasian, either, that's so freely bandied about here. It's an archaic concept that belongs to the 18th Century. The time has long since past when people should be classified according to the color of their skin and this is especially so in a multi-ethnic immigrant society like the US. And, in the modern world, distance no longer separates people.; May 6, 2014 at 9:32 AM
Anonymous said...: kenny is color blind. kenny is not a racist. Hilarious.; May 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Accusing me of so called "reverse" racism is absolutely ludicrous. I am totally color blind when it comes to race."

Your insistence that innocent Caucasian men should be convicted because some black woman lied about being raped says very loudly otherwise.

"I do not recognize the term Caucasian, either, that's so freely bandied about here. It's an archaic concept that belongs to the 18th Century."

You also do not recognize innocence, false accusations, lack of probable cause, innocent until proven guilty, due process. All you do recognize is that innocent Caucasian men accused of raping a black woman, even when falsely accused, should be presumed guilty.

"The time has long since past when people should be classified according to the color of their skin and this is especially so in a multi-ethnic immigrant society like the US. And, in the modern world, distance no longer separates people."

So why do you think a black murderess should get a pass for her crimes?; May 6, 2014 at 10:27 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

Some of the doozies you have posted:

Crystal will never be convicted if I have anything to say about it. Mark my words.

I will humiliate the State Bar.

I will prevail in my frivolous lawsuit against Duke.

If anyone deserves $20 million from Duke it is me.

If I were you, I would avoid posting doozies.; May 6, 2014 at 10:30 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

Incidentally, I am not accusing you of reverse racism. I am accusing you of racism, period.

If you were not a racist, you would acknowledge that reverse racism does exist. It was manifested in Durham after Crystal accused three innocent Caucasian men of raping her.; May 6, 2014 at 10:32 AM
Anonymous said...: so ... there are other blogs you can complain on and about ya know that are more in-line with your views

egad - i've watched this troll for over a year now repeat this same argument at least once if not more a week

egad egad egad

so ...; May 6, 2014 at 11:28 AM
Anonymous said...: ... the book and book campaign is bs since he didn't mention the appeal and the issues with the murder trial and duke - nothing

so bs propoganda for duke as usual

so ... the fact that nifong hails from a dedicated dukie family makes his stint as the Durham DA suspect to corruption by duke in his actions in this case (as well as others concerning duke)

so ... Cohen is a transparent bs'er; May 6, 2014 at 12:03 PM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous May 6, 2014 at 11:28 AM

You are incredibly stupid.; May 6, 2014 at 12:38 PM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous May 6, 2014 at 12:03 PM

How incredibly stupid are you?; May 6, 2014 at 12:39 PM
Anonymous said...: not as incredibly stupid as you?

at least i don't approve of any of the bs - you sit there and troll and argue about that case for years on end (for what reason? who knows) and then cheer on even worse judicial conduct in the current murder case

you are a bs evil duke trollie

blah
blah
blah; May 6, 2014 at 12:54 PM
Anonymous said...: Hey, fongster-kisser, where did Nifong go to law school? And, please, tell us all, about the Howard case and the fongmonger's role in that corruption of justice; May 6, 2014 at 1:36 PM
Anonymous said...: AnonymousMay 6, 2014 at 12:54 PM

not as incredibly stupid as you?

No as you are much stupider.; May 6, 2014 at 2:09 PM
Anonymous said...: Cohan is a scumbag just like Nifong.He knows there was never any assault that night nor did any of the lacrosse players have any physical contact with Crystal Mangum.Who would want to?; May 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

Thank you for posting the interview with Diane Rehm.

I can think of nothing else which would tell the world that Cohan has no credibility than you posting that interview on your blog, than announcing to the world that you believe he has credibility.; May 6, 2014 at 4:14 PM
kenhyderal said...: It seems those who are so quick to label me a racist always give a pass to Posters like the ones at 2:30 PM and 3:00 PM. When I complain about these disgusting posts instead of support here's the reaction I get. "Don't you love it!!! Kenny Hissy has now become the self anointed race police! Hooray for Kenny. Of course, Kenny needs his race police shirt, his little badge, a great big billy club and some jack boots....so he and Bro can deal with the mean old racist posts on this ridiculous web site. Sic em, Kenny" Am I the only one who sees the irony in this?; May 6, 2014 at 4:38 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny:

As you know, several posters, such as Walt and A Lawyer, have also posted that the racists remarks have no place on this board. Most posters simply ignore the troll. With you whining, you encourage that behavior.

I will come to your defense. I do not believe you are a racist. You are simply a troll, albeit one who is more clever than the troll who posts racist comments.

Although your technique is different, you both have the same objective: to annoy other posters. You make comments designed to annoy others and then refuse to engage in an honest discussion. You clearly do not care about convincing others.

One troll complaining about another troll. Am I the only one who sees the irony in that?; May 6, 2014 at 4:53 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny:

As you know, several posters, such as Walt and A Lawyer, have also posted that the racists remarks have no place on this board. Most posters simply ignore the troll. With you whining, you encourage that behavior.

I will come to your defense. I do not believe you are a racist. You are simply a troll, albeit one who is more clever than the troll who posts racist comments.

Although your technique is different, you both have the same objective: to annoy other posters. You make comments designed to annoy others and then refuse to engage in an honest discussion. You clearly do not care about convincing others.

One troll complaining about another troll. Am I the only one who sees the irony in that?; May 6, 2014 at 4:53 PM
Anonymous said...: DOCTOR HARR WHY ARE YOU IGNORING MY POST?

Doctor Harr,

kenhyderal has provided information on your blog confirming that Kilgo knows a witness at the lacrosse party who could verify Crystal's claims. This information is crucial to your efforts to find justice for Crystal. You must use your next sharlog to review kenhyderal's information regarding Kilgo and to begin the search for Kilgo.; May 6, 2014 at 7:05 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "You clearly do not care about convincing others"... Oh no I do care. I would like to convince people that they have been fed a completely distorted picture of Crystal Mangum, a person that I know and that they don't. It's a characterization with no basis in reality, whatsoever. This meta-narrative was skillfully disseminated far and wide to unjustly discredit her and to promote the preposterous idea that DCR were victims. If that makes me a troll what appellation would you now lay on author William Cohan. The way Crystal was dealt with, in being charged and convicted of murder, in a clear case of self-defence, is simply a sequelae of the successful campaign, waged for 8 years now, to discredit Crystal. It has caused most people, relying on hearsay and yellow journalism only to consider this good person to be a criminal. I try to present from first hand knowledge another side of the story.; May 6, 2014 at 8:47 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: DOCTOR HARR WHY ARE YOU IGNORING MY POST"... I hope you are not being facetious. I suspect that Dr. Harr is working on the immediate problem of getting Crystal's unjust murder conviction overturned. Exposing the truth about the events of 2006 will be accomplished all in good time but first things first. Perhaps author William Cohan will write a sequel when the witnesses come forth and all the facts come out.; May 6, 2014 at 8:54 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "Most posters simply ignore the troll. With you whining, you encourage that behavior"................... Racist rants need to challenged not ignored. Standing up and speaking out against racism is not whining. We need a mighty chorus of civilized men to shame this poor excuse for a human being and drive him back under the rock he crawled forth from.; May 6, 2014 at 9:06 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"If that makes me a troll what appellation would you now lay on author William Cohan."

You are a troll. In spite of your deluded, idealized picture of Crystal, the reality is, she was a convicted criminal and a false accuser before she ever went to the Lacrosse party. There is NO, I say again NO evidence that Crystal was raped, absolutely NONE. You have provided no evidence, just non credible explanations as to why you believe there is evidence.

Face it, KENNY. You are so besotted with your favorite false accuser/ murderess you believe that innocent Caucasian men should be convicted of raping her, wrongfully convicted. That makes you a blatant unrepentant racist as well as a troll.; May 7, 2014 at 3:39 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL

"...Dr. Harr is working on the immediate problem of getting Crystal's unjust murder conviction overturned."

Impossible since Crystal's murder conviction was proper and in accord with justice"

"Exposing the truth about the events of 2006 will be accomplished all in good time but first things first."

The truth about the events of 2006 is a matter of public record and has stood an 8 year test of time.

"Perhaps author William Cohan will write a sequel when the witnesses come forth and all the facts come out."

Don't count on it. There are no witnesses to come forth. I doubt any reasonable publisher will take another chance on Cohan, considering all the delusions and misstatements of facts in his book.; May 7, 2014 at 3:43 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Racist rants need to challenged not ignored. Standing up and speaking out against racism is not whining. We need a mighty chorus of civilized men to shame this poor excuse for a human being and drive him back under the rock he crawled forth from."

Wow! You have shown some insight as to why people target you with their posts. Now go back to Dubai or wherever and crawl back under your rock-just like race baiter al, race baiter jesse, wicked wendy murphy and nancy dis-grace, all former Crystal supporters who have distanced themselves from Crystal the false accuser.; May 7, 2014 at 3:46 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

You also seem to show a bit of self awareness.; May 7, 2014 at 3:47 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

Check this out:

http://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/celebrity/michael-jordan-admits-racism-i-was-against-all-white-people-n98971

Michael Jordan admitted at one time he had been racist because he hated all white people.

According to you and your academicians, this did not happen.; May 7, 2014 at 6:26 AM
Anonymous said...: Good ole' Kenny. The epitome of the self-loathing white person.; May 7, 2014 at 6:37 AM
Anonymous said...: Oh, hissy boy, we all see the irony in "this"..............which is.....you, the kettle, calling the pot black. You, the racist, ranting about racist posts. That, hissy boy, is the irony.; May 7, 2014 at 7:11 AM
Walt said...: Kenhyderal wrote: " I would like to convince people..."

Kenhyderal definitely wants to convince people. Of that there can be no doubt.

"... that they have been fed a completely distorted picture of Crystal Mangum, a person that I know and that they don't."

Unfortunately, it is Kenhyderal who wants to feed the completely distorted picture. Let's review the facts. Crystal was a prostitute. She lied multiple times in an effort to frame three innocent men. She was more than willing to change her story every time the state or the defense found out her previous story was contradicted by the facts.

"It's a characterization with no basis in reality, whatsoever."

Unsure which characterization you are writing about. But, Crystal's conduct, well documented and some of it admitted to by Crystal is bad enough. She stole a cab. She left her childredn for days at a time to engage in prostitution, drinking and drugs. She resorts to violence to solve her percieved problems. Those are the facts that characterize her.

"This meta-narrative was skillfully disseminated far and wide to unjustly discredit her and to promote the preposterous idea that DCR were victims."

It is preposerous to claim that David Evans, Reide Seligman and Colin Finnerty are not victims. They are the victims in this fiasco.

"The way Crystal was dealt with, in being charged and convicted of murder,..."

She killed her live in lover with a steak knife. She did so intentionally. That is murder.

"... in a clear case of self-defence,..."

That defense was rejected by the jury. They heard and saw the evidence, I watched the trial online. The jury was completely correct.

"... yellow journalism only to consider this good person to be a criminal."

Crystal was initially the beneficiary of a massive case of yellow journalism. However, once responsible people began reporting, it became more than clear that Crystal lied to frame three innocent men.

"I try to present from first hand knowledge another side of the story."

What you do, is distort the truth and present a series of lies. Fortunately, the record is well developed and the truth is available. It is necessary thought for the truthful to be alwasy vigilant against those who would distort to their own ends.

Walt-in-Durham; May 7, 2014 at 7:34 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYERAL:

You say you know Crystal. You do not know David Evans, Reade Seligman, or Colin Finnerty. Yet you think you have the right to condemn them.

As Walt, and others, Crystal's history as a disfunctional person and a criminal, is a matter of public record. But you insist that those of us who have viewed the public record do not know Crystal.

And you want us to take you seriously? The only place you need to be taken, seriously, is to analysis and treatment.

PS Someone who told you in an email he has a friend who was on the Lacrosse team in 2006 is nothing.; May 7, 2014 at 8:09 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

Both Durham in Wonderland and the appropriately named Liestoppers quote the Independent Weekly review of The Price of Silence saying that Cohan's book adds nothing to what we already know about the Lacrosse case.

If you are waiting for Cohan to write a sequel, well, go on waiting for that while you are waiting for Kilgo's imaginary Lacrosse player friend to emerge.; May 7, 2014 at 8:15 AM
Anonymous said...: I have a friend who says it was Kenny who did the evil deed to Sister. How about that! My friend lives under a bridge and appears/disappears from time to time, whenever I need to conjure him up. My friend knows that Kenny did "it" to Sister because my friend says that he has a friend who has a friend who saw Kenny do it. So, there you have it.........guilty; May 7, 2014 at 9:28 AM
kenhyderal said...: Walt said: " Crystal was a prostitute" She stole a cab. She left her childredn for days at a time to engage in prostitution, drinking and drugs" .............Walt these statements are all untrue. They are all lies and gossip that you've picked up from the blogs and from the "yellow press" . You've then gone on to disseminate these distortions. When CPS did a through assessment on Crystal before she regained custody of her children after the Walker incident they found none of those things to be true. Crystal has never been charged with prostitution and neither has anyone ever come forward to say they paid her for sex despite the Trial Lawyers futile attempts to uncover such things. The taxi incident charge was misdemeanor larceny not grand theft auto. The charge related only to the taking of the keys. Crystal maintains that the keys were handed to her by the driver and apparently the prosecutor believed her.; May 7, 2014 at 9:47 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Walt these statements are all untrue. They are all lies and gossip that you've picked up from the blogs and from the 'yellow press' . You've then gone on to disseminate these distortions."

The truth odf these charges became part of the public record BEFORE the Duke rape hoax.

"When CPS did a through assessment on Crystal before she regained custody of her children after the Walker incident they found none of those things to be true. Crystal has never been charged with prostitution and neither has anyone ever come forward to say they paid her for sex despite the Trial Lawyers futile attempts to uncover such things."

So what was she doing on all those appointments to which her driver took her before she showed up, already impaired, at the Lacrosse party? Do you call performing with a vibrator for money for a client not prostitution?

"The taxi incident charge was misdemeanor larceny not grand theft auto. The charge related only to the taking of the keys. Crystal maintains that the keys were handed to her by the driver and apparently the prosecutor believed her."

According to the police records compiled BEFORE the rape hoax, Crystal stole the keys, stole the cab, drove recklessly and tried to run down a police officer. She was given a break afterwards. What Crystal maintains in her self serving memoir years AFTER the event is nothing but a self serving attempt at personal camouflage, probably thought up by her mentor.

I say again, KENNY, you sure must enjoy embarrassing yourself. You promulgate obvious lies as truth while trying to pass off the truth as a concoction brewed up by a non existent conspiracy against Crystal.; May 7, 2014 at 10:44 AM
Anonymous said...: Because she has never been charged with prostitution, that means she is not a prostitute? Really, Kenny? Really??? How bleepin dumb can you get.....
five (or more) male samples in and on her, being hauled to motels to visit clients (and staying an average of one hour), using a vibrator on herself and getting paid to allow others to watch, coming to the Daye apartment with several hundred dollars (from "friends") after being out at night........... excuse me while I hurl.
Crystal Mangum was paid to be a sex worker. The fact that she has no charges for prostitution on her record means she never got caught. Tell you what, Kenny, either Mangum was a common whore or she was world class friendly with multiple partners AT THE SAME TIME. (five samples....none from LAX guys).
If you want to continue to be an idiot and claim poor Sister is the victim of the evil white conspiracy, go ahead. The dunce hat on your head looks kinda cute; May 7, 2014 at 12:52 PM
Anonymous said...: PS....forgot my favorite part. Ms. Purity Mangum was a working girl for the Bunny Hole Escort Service,pal. I saw the photo(s) of her on-line...with my own eyes. She was straddling a chair, wearing street trash costume, and looking like she had about a pound of lip gloss on her mouth.
Not a prostitute? Right.....; May 7, 2014 at 12:54 PM
kenhyderal said...: Crystal worked, on commission, for an Agency that booked exotic performances. This was a legal and licenced business and can not be legally defined as prostitution The customers can not be charged with a crime. The unidentified DNA came from a sexual assault, not by LaX Players but by attendees at their Party and most likely with some Player assistance. DNA from Crystal's consensual sexual history was found.; May 7, 2014 at 4:44 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"The unidentified DNA came from a sexual assault, not by LaX Players but by attendees at their Party and most likely with some Player assistance. DNA from Crystal's consensual sexual history was found."

The unidentified DNA found on Crystal was not deposited at the party on the night of 13/14 March of 2006. The rape kit materials tested negative for acid phosphatase, the marker for semen deposition. That meant only that there was no semen deposited on the night of 13/14 March of 2006. Whatever DNA found on Crystal was deposited at another time.

Contrary to your misguided belief, the timely connection and preservation of materials from the rape kit would have revealed the presence of semen.

I say again, you must sure enjoy demonstrating how stupid you are.; May 7, 2014 at 4:59 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

What is the basis of your case that there were mystery rapists at the party?

One we have covered. DNA not matching any member of the Lacrosse team or any one identified at the party was found on Crystal.

The second is that someone who called himself Kilgo told you he had a friend on the Lacrosse team who was present at the party and told him an assault had taken place.

Kilgo's friend is a piece of hearsay, and the existence of this friend can not be verified. Nor can the credibility of Kilgo be verified.

Again the forensic evidence definitively ruled out the occurrence of a rape.

Your attitude, that you can not imagine that Kilgo would lie, is meaningless.

It comes down to, you can not prove a rape happened. Which means you are a guilt presuming racist. The basis of you case comes down to, you dislike the accused, you have some kind of infatuation with the black accuser. So you insist that something happened.

I ask again, do you enjoy making it obvious you are an imbecile?; May 7, 2014 at 5:09 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

Correction to my comment of May 7, 2014 at 4:59 PM:

"Contrary to your misguided belief, the timely connection and preservation of materials from the rape kit would have revealed the presence of semen, HAD SEMEN BEEN PRESENT.; May 7, 2014 at 5:11 PM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: DOCTOR HARR WHY ARE YOU IGNORING MY POST"... I hope you are not being facetious. I suspect that Dr. Harr is working on the immediate problem of getting Crystal's unjust murder conviction overturned. Exposing the truth about the events of 2006 will be accomplished all in good time but first things first. Perhaps author William Cohan will write a sequel when the witnesses come forth and all the facts come out.

And I can only assume that you are being facetious. Sid has a greater chance of being hit by a meteor tonight than he does of overturning the conviction. Further, there is no reason to believe that a sequel written by Cohan will be any less shoddy than his first attempt to write about the lacrosse case.; May 7, 2014 at 6:09 PM
Anonymous said...: Right on kennyhyderal. Anyone who actually knows Crystal rejects completely the vicious slander, that emananated from The Duke Lacrosse Defence, in an effort to destroy her credibility. These lies are ongoing and widely beleived. None of those who post their poison here have ever met Crystal. I ask them, don't you find it strange that her friends, her professors, her classmates her teachers, her pastor, etc. all have a favorable opinion of her and have provided her with character references. Hearing these references caused Judge Abraham Jones to declared that, from the evidence he heard, he beleived her to be "a good mother" Crystal is not and never was a prostitute. Crystal is not and never was a drug addict or an alcoholic. Crystal was a responsible parent. Crystal was a responsible member of her community. Crystal, having come from humble circumstances, was working hard to build a better like for herself and her children. Her Pastor advised her not to choose exotic dancing and escorting as a way to support herself because, regardless of her character,such a choice can be fraught with peril..; May 7, 2014 at 7:09 PM
Lance The Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: A not-so-glowing review of Cohan's book can be found at Indy Week.

I suggest everyone take an opportunity to read it.; May 7, 2014 at 7:35 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: Contrary to your misguided belief, the timely connection and preservation of materials from the rape kit would have revealed the presence of semen, HAD SEMEN BEEN PRESENT"................ Not necessarily so. Here is a response to this question by an expert on a Yahoo Forensic Science Discussion Board "False negatives can occur for several reasons. The proteins may have
degraded or be dilute to the point that they are not detectable. In the case of a cervical swab, the spermatozoa can be present long after the proteins are gone. The technique is not very sensitive, so semen may be present, but the acid phosphatase is not detectable; May 7, 2014 at 9:16 PM
kenhyderal said...: Lance said: "A not-so-glowing review of Cohan's book can be found at Indy Week"....... It's not as skewered as the number they did on Dr. Harr; May 7, 2014 at 9:19 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: " Sid has a greater chance of being hit by a meteor tonight than he does of overturning the conviction"... “Long is the way, and hard, that out of hell leads up to light” ---- John Milton; May 7, 2014 at 9:33 PM
Anonymous said...: quick man the meteor umbrella; May 8, 2014 at 12:25 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Not necessarily so. Here is a response to this question by an expert on a Yahoo Forensic Science Discussion Board "False negatives can occur for several reasons. The proteins may have
degraded or be dilute to the point that they are not detectable. In the case of a cervical swab, the spermatozoa can be present long after the proteins are gone. The technique is not very sensitive, so semen may be present, but the acid phosphatase is not detectable".

Unfortunately for you, none of those scenarios applied to the Duke rape hoax situation. If semen had been deposited on Crystal on the night of 13/14 March 2006, the way she described, the rape kit would have tested positive for alkaline phosphatase. It did not.; May 8, 2014 at 3:30 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Lance said: "A not-so-glowing review of Cohan's book can be found at Indy Week"....... It's not as skewered as the number they did on Dr. Harr".

I think you meant skewed. Whatever you meant, the Indy's article on SIDNEY HARR was factual, not skewed. That SIDNEY did not like reading the truth did not make the article skewed.; May 8, 2014 at 3:31 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: " Sid has a greater chance of being hit by a meteor tonight than he does of overturning the conviction"... “Long is the way, and hard, that out of hell leads up to light” ---- John Milton"

Has no relevance to the validity of the quoted anonymous comment.

Let's say SIDNEY has a greater chance of being hit by a meteor or or winning the Powerball than you do in proving that Crystal was raped.; May 8, 2014 at 3:34 AM
Anonymous said...: Walt stated: "Kenhyderal definitely wants to convince people. Of that there can be no doubt."

I disagree. I do not believe Kenny is genuinely interested in convincing anyone of anything. I believe he is interested only in annoying others.

He argues from the premise that everything he says must be taken as true unless one can prove that it cannot possibly be true and any criticism must be taken as false unless there is no other explanation even remotely possible. This premise itself is designed to annoy others.

As you know, Kenny's comments are remarkably unpersuasive. He repeatedly states his opinions, but (except for unimportant details) declines to provide support--either evidence or detailed analysis. When readers raise objections, noting inconsistencies with evidence or weaknesses in his narrative, he ignores the substance of the objections, preferring to address only superficial points. He makes no attempt to modify his arguments in response to criticism. Readers who were not convinced earlier are not persuaded by repetition.

I do not believe Kenny is as stupid as he acts. As a result, I conclude that he does not,intend to persuade--only annoy.; May 8, 2014 at 4:32 AM
Anonymous said...: The Bunny Hole booked exotic performances! Damn. Walt, here's a candidate for the Ding DingDing award....funniest post of the week. Right, Kenny, right. Oh. My. Lord.

Five or more males were real friendly with Sister....at least five....problem was, none of the, uh, samples belonged to the LAX guys....including those who the Fongster wanted to fxxx in order to get certain folks in Durham to vote for him. doggone it, if only the LAX guys had cooperated with the plot.......Nifong would be in office today, fxxxxx others, Sister would be a professor of gender-sex-class at Rutgers, Linwood would be singing on the Gaither Homecoming Hour, no-conscious Cline would be playing kissy-face with the fongster, Victoria Bigot would be out bashing evil homos, Wahneeeeema would be writing her "forthcoming" paper, Brodhead would be married to Bob Steel,Kenny would be holding hands with Abdul, and asshat Harr would be writing his flop entitled
"attention4sidney".; May 8, 2014 at 6:27 AM
Walt said...: attention4sidney

Classic!; May 8, 2014 at 6:48 AM
Anonymous said...: seriously, why don't ya'll apply for a SANE job or somethan

or ... ya'll could go yap it up at kc's blog or liestoppers where ya'll have plenty of fellow company; May 8, 2014 at 7:33 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
It's harr's site. He can be a censor if he wishes. Who gives a rip!
Seems just a teeny bit hypocritical of Bro, though, to get his panties in a twist over racist statements while he continues to make nicey-nice with the homophobic bigot, Victoria Peterson. Oh well, they are only "fags", right, Bro? It's OK For Vicky Bigot to continue her bigotry.......sure

You are quick to make accusations about Victoria, but can you back them up with facts? It's easy to label people... but backing up the labels with substance is not as easy.; May 8, 2014 at 8:21 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"Just to give you an update on the next sharlog... which is going to be a doozie."

Everything you publish is a "doozie"-for all your errors and lies and deluded megalomania and your guilt presuming racism and your desire to deny the First Amendment right of free speech to AG Cooper, your belief that your declarations of the guilt of the Lacrosse players have any significance whatsoever.

Boy are you incredibly stupid.

I would say more naïve than stupid... to believe that others would act reasonably and logically. The vendetta prosecution of Mangum is an outrage of which I thought a civilized society would be incapable.; May 8, 2014 at 8:24 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
May 6, 2014 at 2:30 PM

kenhyderal Doctrine eradicated!; May 8, 2014 at 8:29 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
DOCTOR HARR WHY ARE YOU IGNORING MY POST?

Doctor Harr,

kenhyderal has provided information on your blog confirming that Kilgo knows a witness at the lacrosse party who could verify Crystal's claims. This information is crucial to your efforts to find justice for Crystal. You must use your next sharlog to review kenhyderal's information regarding Kilgo and to begin the search for Kilgo.

It's not that I'm ignoring you, but I'm not a gumshoe. I'm an enlightener. Why don't you find Kilgo and direct him to me?; May 8, 2014 at 8:32 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
KENHYDERAL:

Both Durham in Wonderland and the appropriately named Liestoppers quote the Independent Weekly review of The Price of Silence saying that Cohan's book adds nothing to what we already know about the Lacrosse case.

If you are waiting for Cohan to write a sequel, well, go on waiting for that while you are waiting for Kilgo's imaginary Lacrosse player friend to emerge.

The Indy Week
is obviously biased against Mangum, Nifong, and me. That is clearly evident by the hatchet job August 22, 2013 article it did on me. It receives buku bucks in advertising from Duke University... so what do you expect with regard to the review on Cohan's insightful book?; May 8, 2014 at 8:38 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Lance The Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...
A not-so-glowing review of Cohan's book can be found at Indy Week.

I suggest everyone take an opportunity to read it.

Like I said in my previous comment... What do you expect from The Indy Week?; May 8, 2014 at 8:42 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
KENHYDERAL:

"Lance said: "A not-so-glowing review of Cohan's book can be found at Indy Week"....... It's not as skewered as the number they did on Dr. Harr".

I think you meant skewed. Whatever you meant, the Indy's article on SIDNEY HARR was factual, not skewed. That SIDNEY did not like reading the truth did not make the article skewed.

There is a difference between gossip and facts. I present facts by using documents from prosecution discovery to back up my allegations. The Indy Week article was nothing but hearsay misstatements, falsehoods, and innuendos maliciously made to impugn my character.; May 8, 2014 at 8:48 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"You are quick to make accusations about Victoria, but can you back them up with facts? It's easy to label people... but backing up the labels with substance is not as easy."

When have you ever backed up any of your allegations with facts? Never. Have you proven the existence of the Carpetbagger jihad with facts? No. Your support of the existence of the Carpetbagger jihad is the claim that anyone who does not believe in said jihad is the victim of a Jedi mind trick. What fact do you use to back up your claim that Jedi mind tricks exist? You say, people do not believe in the Carpetbagger jihad.; May 8, 2014 at 8:50 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

Update on next sharlog: The narrative has been completed... now for the demanding and tedious task of putting images to the verbal accounting. I would estimate a posting date of next Tuesday, the 13th... optimistically.

As you were.; May 8, 2014 at 8:52 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"I would say more naïve than stupid... to believe that others would act reasonably and logically. The vendetta prosecution of Mangum is an outrage of which I thought a civilized society would be incapable."

Except that the prosecution was not vendetta based. You have not backed up your claim of a vendetta against Crystal with any facts. You, like your acolyte KENHYDERAL, believe that your favorite murderess, because she is black, should get a pass for her crimes.

With regard to facts, the facts you presented about Shan Carter show he did not act in self defense. You are stupid.; May 8, 2014 at 8:53 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"It's not that I'm ignoring you, but I'm not a gumshoe. I'm an enlightener. Why don't you find Kilgo and direct him to me?"

SIDNEY cops out again. If he really did believe that Crystal was a victim of something at the Lacrosse party, an idea aka Something Happened In There, he would waste no effort to track down someone who could lead him to a witness who could confirm the SHIT hypothesis.; May 8, 2014 at 8:56 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"There is a difference between gossip and facts. I present facts by using documents from prosecution discovery to back up my allegations."

BULLSHIT!!!! You distort the facts or present only part of the facts you found in prosecution documents. Prosecution documents contained statements from two women that Reginald Daye was not violent. You did not present them. You only presented a story that years ago Reginald Daye did hit a woman but then took responsibility for it.

"The Indy Week article was nothing but hearsay misstatements, falsehoods, and innuendos maliciously made to impugn my character."

You did a pretty good job of impugning your character when you posted your recording of what happened at Duke when you were ejected. The recording made it clear that you picked a fight with a security guard. Your denial of that fact does not negate it.; May 8, 2014 at 9:00 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"HEY, EVERYBODY... LISTEN UP!
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!

Update on next sharlog: The narrative has been completed... now for the demanding and tedious task of putting images to the verbal accounting. I would estimate a posting date of next Tuesday, the 13th... optimistically.

As you were."

In Walt's words, the next edition of attention4Sidney is about to be posted.

I would call it PleasePayAttention2Sidney.; May 8, 2014 at 9:02 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Like I said in my previous comment... What do you expect from The Indy Week?"

Not much but certainly more truth and facts that you have ever provided.; May 8, 2014 at 9:04 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"
The Indy Week is obviously biased against Mangum, Nifong, and me. That is clearly evident by the hatchet job August 22, 2013 article it did on me. It receives buku bucks in advertising from Duke University... so what do you expect with regard to the review on Cohan's insightful book?"

What insightful book? The last insightful book about the Duke Lacrosse hoax was Until Proven Innocent.; May 8, 2014 at 9:06 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

I need to amend a previous post.

I said you posted facts which showed Shan Carter did not act in self defense. I was wrong. You actually posted distortions and lies by which you tried to convince the public that Shan Carter did act in self defense.

The actual facts are elsewhere:

http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/sc/opinions/2003/479-01-1.htm

The facts are, Shan Carter fired at Tyrone Baker, Tyrone Baker then fled, Shan Carter pursued him and kept firing at him. He fired the lethal shots at Tyrone Baker while Tyrone Baker was fleeing. He also killed Demetrius Green while he was firing his illegally possessed firearm at a fleeing Tyrone Baker.; May 8, 2014 at 9:40 AM
Anonymous said...: In 2003, she [Victoria Peterson] testified before the County Commissioners to urge them not to extend [same-sex] partnership benefits because: “Many of them are infected with diseases, and their lifestyles are very, very dangerous,” Peterson told the board. “Many don't live to be senior citizens. Who's going to pay this expense if they get sick in their gay lifestyle?” And here's another gem of her reasoning: “The gay community makes plenty of money. Just because of how you have sex, does not mean anyone is entitled to special rights.”

Let me know if you need more proof about your resident homophobe.; May 8, 2014 at 9:41 AM
Lance The Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: "The Indy Week
is obviously biased against Mangum, Nifong, and me. "

The Indy Week endorsed Nifong for election in 2006. If this is indicative of your idea of bias against someone, you need to reconsider.; May 8, 2014 at 9:51 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"It's not that I'm ignoring you, but I'm not a gumshoe. I'm an enlightener. Why don't you find Kilgo and direct him to me?"

You say, "I'm an enlightener." That is not a fact. It is a lie.; May 8, 2014 at 10:02 AM
Anonymous said...: Does Cohan mention in his book that Crystal claimed she had been raped by twenty men in a bathroom that was too small and that she was suspended in mid-air or that she was attacked by other lacrosse players in the backyard? She is one crazy "stripper."; May 8, 2014 at 10:50 AM
A Lawyer said...: The Indy Week article was nothing but hearsay misstatements, falsehoods, and innuendos maliciously made to impugn my character.

You have never identified a single false statement in the Indy Week article about your litigious past. Care to try again? Name one statement in that article which is false.; May 8, 2014 at 11:30 AM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous said:

"Doctor Harr,

kenhyderal has provided information on your blog confirming that Kilgo knows a witness at the lacrosse party who could verify Crystal's claims. This information is crucial to your efforts to find justice for Crystal. You must use your next sharlog to review kenhyderal's information regarding Kilgo and to begin the search for Kilgo."

As has been explained before (and the record amply demonstrates), Sid is not going to waste a second of his time or spend a penny of his money pursuing any of the claims advanced on his blog.; May 8, 2014 at 12:08 PM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

Anonymous said...
DOCTOR HARR WHY ARE YOU IGNORING MY POST?

Doctor Harr,

kenhyderal has provided information on your blog confirming that Kilgo knows a witness at the lacrosse party who could verify Crystal's claims. This information is crucial to your efforts to find justice for Crystal. You must use your next sharlog to review kenhyderal's information regarding Kilgo and to begin the search for Kilgo.

It's not that I'm ignoring you, but I'm not a gumshoe. I'm an enlightener. Why don't you find Kilgo and direct him to me?

So Dr. Harr, the question is do you believe kenhyderal and what he claims to have been told by Kilgo regarding the lacrosse party?; May 8, 2014 at 7:35 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

Here's a great insight from insightful William Cohan.

William Cohan claims until his book no one was aware of Tara Levicy's report on Crystal.

On you own blog, years ago, your acolyte KENHYDERAL posted comments which showed he was aware of Tara Levicy's report.

I guess you did non know that because you are not very insightful. So what else is new.

How can a deluded megalomaniac who lacks insight rate a book as insightful?; May 9, 2014 at 8:07 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

Have you noted what SIDNEY is doing about Kilgo? NOTHING!!!!! He wants other people to find Kilgo.

That would indicate he does not believe in Kilgo's Lacrosse player friend.; May 9, 2014 at 11:08 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous A Lawyer said...
The Indy Week article was nothing but hearsay misstatements, falsehoods, and innuendos maliciously made to impugn my character.

You have never identified a single false statement in the Indy Week article about your litigious past. Care to try again? Name one statement in that article which is false.

It would be less taxing to name one statement that was true. Give one specific so-called "fact" in the article and I will comment on it. Broad sweeping statements such as "going around the country ruining people's lives" is not a fact... it's gossip. Be specific and point to someone's life I allegedly ruined.; May 9, 2014 at 12:58 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
KENHYDERAL:

Have you noted what SIDNEY is doing about Kilgo? NOTHING!!!!! He wants other people to find Kilgo.

That would indicate he does not believe in Kilgo's Lacrosse player friend.

Believe it or not, producing sharlogs is extremely labor and time intensive. I'm busy working trying to get Mangum freed and her conviction overturned. Haven't got time to waste with regards to Kilgo. Comprende?; May 9, 2014 at 1:01 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

I need to amend a previous post.

I said you posted facts which showed Shan Carter did not act in self defense. I was wrong. You actually posted distortions and lies by which you tried to convince the public that Shan Carter did act in self defense.

The actual facts are elsewhere:

http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/sc/opinions/2003/479-01-1.htm

The facts are, Shan Carter fired at Tyrone Baker, Tyrone Baker then fled, Shan Carter pursued him and kept firing at him. He fired the lethal shots at Tyrone Baker while Tyrone Baker was fleeing. He also killed Demetrius Green while he was firing his illegally possessed firearm at a fleeing Tyrone Baker.

I don't dispute the events in your last paragraph... however, the first two shots Shan fired at Baker struck Baker while he was facing and advancing at him with Baker's gun hand covered by a heavy coat.

Second, Shan ran a few steps in the direction of the fleeing and wounded Baker to take away the side of the grocery store as cover from which Baker could possibly return fire.

Third, Shan fired the remainder of shots in Baker's general direction... none of which struck Baker. He fired them to persuade Baker to keep moving. Unfortunately, one of the bullets ricocheted of a steering wheel of a parked car and struck the boy who was sitting in the front passenger seat of the car. A freak accident and obviously unintentional.

Hopefully, more edification is not required.; May 9, 2014 at 1:08 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

"There is a difference between gossip and facts. I present facts by using documents from prosecution discovery to back up my allegations."

BULLSHIT!!!! You distort the facts or present only part of the facts you found in prosecution documents. Prosecution documents contained statements from two women that Reginald Daye was not violent. You did not present them. You only presented a story that years ago Reginald Daye did hit a woman but then took responsibility for it.

"The Indy Week article was nothing but hearsay misstatements, falsehoods, and innuendos maliciously made to impugn my character."

You did a pretty good job of impugning your character when you posted your recording of what happened at Duke when you were ejected. The recording made it clear that you picked a fight with a security guard. Your denial of that fact does not negate it.

Wrong-O! I did not pick a fight with the guard. I was walking to the exit of the building minding my own business when he came up to me and asked me to leave. All I tried to find out is why he was asking me to leave. The only thing he could tell me is that he did not know the reason... that he was only following orders of the "building manager." Never gave me the name of the person who ordered my removal or the reason why. So, how is it that I picked a fight with the security guard? Doesn't even make sense.; May 9, 2014 at 1:12 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"
It would be less taxing to name one statement that was true. Give one specific so-called "fact" in the article and I will comment on it. Broad sweeping statements such as "going around the country ruining people's lives" is not a fact... it's gossip. Be specific and point to someone's life I allegedly ruined."

SIDNEY is futilely trying to institute personal posterior camouflage again. He fears the truth.; May 9, 2014 at 1:34 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Believe it or not, producing sharlogs is extremely labor and time intensive. I'm busy working trying to get Mangum freed and her conviction overturned. Haven't got time to waste with regards to Kilgo. Comprende?"

What everyone comprehends is that you will not chase down Kilgo, probably because you do not believe in KENNY's fantasy in an anonymous Lacrosse player. Again you do not want to admit the truth, Crystal was not raped.; May 9, 2014 at 1:36 PM
Anonymous said...: You say the next homage to Sidney's ego you call a sharlog will contains excerpts of the trial transcript. Have you obtained the transcript, and if so will you post it so people can see for themselves or will this be transcripts you made up, and just want people to trust you?; May 9, 2014 at 1:43 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"I don't dispute the events in your last paragraph... however, the first two shots Shan fired at Baker struck Baker while he was facing and advancing at him with Baker's gun hand covered by a heavy coat."

If Tyrone Baker had been struck by two slugs from a .357 Magnum he would not have been able to flee. Ergo, he was not struck by the first two bullets Shan Carter fired from his illegally possessed hand gun. Shan Carter himself testified he fired the first two shots at the pavement.

"Second, Shan ran a few steps in the direction of the fleeing and wounded Baker to take away the side of the grocery store as cover from which Baker could possibly return fire.

Third, Shan fired the remainder of shots in Baker's general direction... none of which struck Baker. He fired them to persuade Baker to keep moving."

Baker crumpled and fell and died when he was struck by two .357 magnum slugs which Shan Carter fired at him while he was chasing Baker while Baker was fleeing.

"Unfortunately, one of the bullets ricocheted of a steering wheel of a parked car and struck the boy who was sitting in the front passenger seat of the car. A freak accident and obviously unintentional."

It would not have happened had Shan Carter not been chasing a fleeing Tyrone Baker and firing an illegally posseessed hand gun at him. It was a bit more than a "freak accident". It was felony murder. Wonderful attitude you have to the unjustified killing of an innocent boy by a convicted felon who was firing an illegally possessed handgun.

"Hopefully, more edification is not required."

What would edify you would be that Shan Carter get a pass for murdering two people and that Crystal get a pass for murdering Reginald Daye. You really a morally bankrupt lump of Pig S--t.; May 9, 2014 at 1:46 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Wrong-O! I did not pick a fight with the guard. I was walking to the exit of the building minding my own business when he came up to me and asked me to leave. All I tried to find out is why he was asking me to leave. The only thing he could tell me is that he did not know the reason... that he was only following orders of the "building manager." Never gave me the name of the person who ordered my removal or the reason why. So, how is it that I picked a fight with the security guard? Doesn't even make sense."

In your megalomaniacal delusions you think your word changes reality. It does not. The recording indicates, beyond any doubt, you picked a fight with the security guard. You are now trying to lie your way out.

Well done, SIDNEY, minion of the father of lies.; May 9, 2014 at 1:48 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

The fight happened because you refused to comply with Duke's non solicitation policy. You did admit that yourself. Only you think you,not Duke, sets Duke's non solicitation policy and that should give you a pass.

Typical of a deluded self deceiving megalomaniac who believes he is a law unto himself and above the law of the land.

What is your factual basis for believing in the Carpetbagger jihad.; May 9, 2014 at 1:51 PM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

Why have you not responded to this?

William Cohan says no one was aware of what was in Tara Levicy's report until he reported it in his book.

Yet, a number of people, including KENHYDERAL have manifested awareness of what was in Levicy's report.

Maybe in your deluded megalomania, you believe if you ignore the truth then the truth will go away.

That is what blind as a bat insightful William Cohan thought. It is not working.; May 9, 2014 at 1:55 PM
Lance The Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...: "Broad sweeping statements such as "going around the country ruining people's lives" is not a fact... it's gossip. Be specific and point to someone's life I allegedly ruined."

The statement "going around the country ruining peoples lives" was a quote from Dr. Dwight James, whose signature you had forged on a contract selling a portion of an Indio, California health clinic to you for a dollar..

It was not a statement by the author of the article, John Tucker.

But you knew this.

Perhaps you don't view causing someone to pay 10s of thousands of dollars to defend themselves from your bogus lawsuits "ruining peoples lives", but I would.

If you were the victim of a lawsuit that caused you to pay that much money, I'm sure you would consider it an attempt to ruin your life.; May 9, 2014 at 3:19 PM
Anonymous said...: Seriously, that book and everything else is just a repeat of the same arguments you make on this blog almost daily for years.

All your questions have been answered by Dr. Harr before. He seems very busy on other more important things right now, so truly, why do you keep trolling him over and over and over again except to annoy him and everyone else (except your fellow evil duke troll gang who cheers your harrassment on perhaps).

Dr. Harr, if I may give you just a bit of advice which I'm sure you already know, ignore the troll. The troll(s) do not deserve your time while you have more important things to think about.

Anyway, the trolls are as annoying as the gov. pushing the 10 billion dollar coal ash cleanup on consumers, (wonder why they didn't store the ash the right way to begin with ya know and WHY does it cost 10 Billion), while its revealed that duke energy will be one of the main consumers of natural gas, and a new pipeline and immediate drilling on state owned lands is on the push table. Ya know, that's so fracked up, makes a person want to knock on the door at the gov. mansion and ask the man why, ya know, why are ya'll so greedy and why are so many public school teachers resigning, and do you give a damn about anything but duke, but, hey, he might not like that one would assume.

anyway ... that was just in the news ...

so ... yeah the troll(s) are as annoying as that on purpose, and they think it's a.o.k. to do what they do cuz it's duke just like the gov.

Duke wants people to be naive about them obviously as shown by the coverup in this case. It is disturbing to watch them in action that is a fact that unfortunately more and more will finally realize, hopefully before it is too late. One can only hope, but mother nature is always so much more powerful and unpredictable, ya just never know what might happen. Course then duke will charge the consumers 20 billion to clean up their destruction, probably ...

How to stop them is the 64 billion dollar question.

You have important work to do with what your doing on these current cases.; May 9, 2014 at 3:35 PM
Anonymous said...: Kilgo phone home.; May 10, 2014 at 4:51 AM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous May 10, 2014 at 4:51 AM

Kilgo does not phone home becausse he has no phone. He believes his imaginary Lacrosse player friend took it and never returned it.; May 10, 2014 at 5:42 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
Seriously, that book and everything else is just a repeat of the same arguments you make on this blog almost daily for years.

All your questions have been answered by Dr. Harr before. He seems very busy on other more important things right now, so truly, why do you keep trolling him over and over and over again except to annoy him and everyone else (except your fellow evil duke troll gang who cheers your harrassment on perhaps).

Dr. Harr, if I may give you just a bit of advice which I'm sure you already know, ignore the troll. The troll(s) do not deserve your time while you have more important things to think about.

Anyway, the trolls are as annoying as the gov. pushing the 10 billion dollar coal ash cleanup on consumers, (wonder why they didn't store the ash the right way to begin with ya know and WHY does it cost 10 Billion), while its revealed that duke energy will be one of the main consumers of natural gas, and a new pipeline and immediate drilling on state owned lands is on the push table. Ya know, that's so fracked up, makes a person want to knock on the door at the gov. mansion and ask the man why, ya know, why are ya'll so greedy and why are so many public school teachers resigning, and do you give a damn about anything but duke, but, hey, he might not like that one would assume.

anyway ... that was just in the news ...

so ... yeah the troll(s) are as annoying as that on purpose, and they think it's a.o.k. to do what they do cuz it's duke just like the gov.

Duke wants people to be naive about them obviously as shown by the coverup in this case. It is disturbing to watch them in action that is a fact that unfortunately more and more will finally realize, hopefully before it is too late. One can only hope, but mother nature is always so much more powerful and unpredictable, ya just never know what might happen. Course then duke will charge the consumers 20 billion to clean up their destruction, probably ...

How to stop them is the 64 billion dollar question.

You have important work to do with what your doing on these current cases.

Thank you for your intelligent and insightful comments.

Not to worry about the trolls... I am troll-proof.; May 10, 2014 at 8:28 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Lance The Supreme Poster of Enlightenment said...
"Broad sweeping statements such as "going around the country ruining people's lives" is not a fact... it's gossip. Be specific and point to someone's life I allegedly ruined."

The statement "going around the country ruining peoples lives" was a quote from Dr. Dwight James, whose signature you had forged on a contract selling a portion of an Indio, California health clinic to you for a dollar..

It was not a statement by the author of the article, John Tucker.

But you knew this.

Perhaps you don't view causing someone to pay 10s of thousands of dollars to defend themselves from your bogus lawsuits "ruining peoples lives", but I would.

If you were the victim of a lawsuit that caused you to pay that much money, I'm sure you would consider it an attempt to ruin your life.

So, Supreme Poster, you are gullible enough to believe that I would try to fraudulently obtain property by forging the owner's name on a bill of sell? Like I said... gossip. Where's the proof?

The difference between the hatchet-job Indy Week article and my sharlogs is that I back up my statements with documentation, such as medical records, police reports, correspondence, etc. I lay it all out in the open.; May 10, 2014 at 8:35 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:

The fight happened because you refused to comply with Duke's non solicitation policy. You did admit that yourself. Only you think you,not Duke, sets Duke's non solicitation policy and that should give you a pass.

Typical of a deluded self deceiving megalomaniac who believes he is a law unto himself and above the law of the land.

What is your factual basis for believing in the Carpetbagger jihad.

The solicitation excuse, as pitiful and pathetic as it is, was the best excuse that Duke University could come up with in defense of its abusive mistreatment of me.

Face the facts, Duke University, aware that I planned on attending the event, attempted to ambush me and have be thrown in jail long before I even arrived on campus that morning. Fortunately for me, I ran into Law Professor James Coleman.; May 10, 2014 at 8:39 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...
You say the next homage to Sidney's ego you call a sharlog will contains excerpts of the trial transcript. Have you obtained the transcript, and if so will you post it so people can see for themselves or will this be transcripts you made up, and just want people to trust you?

The transcripts are quite extensive... I think more than 1,500 pages. The value for me has to do with the jury selection which was not included on the video versions of the trial.

For now, posting the transcripts would be very exhausting and take too much of my time.; May 10, 2014 at 8:44 AM
Anonymous said...: crazy deluded deceitful spiteful liar afraid-to-respond sidney harr de harr harr:

I can only conclude from your posts over the past several days that you do not believe kenhyderal's story about Kilgo and the mystery witness who attended the lacrosse party. Am I correct?; May 10, 2014 at 8:52 AM
Anonymous said...: Where did you obtain the transcripts?; May 10, 2014 at 9:35 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"Thank you for your intelligent and insightful comments.

Not to worry about the trolls... I am troll-proof."

You are dumber than incredibly stupid if you call that comment insightful. Of course you call William Cohan insightful even though he tells lies about the Duke rape hoax.; May 10, 2014 at 10:19 AM
Anonymous said...: When Sidney called the comment insightful, despite that troll intentionally confusing Duke Energy with Duke University, Sidney was admitting that he too is a troll.

Most of the posters who remain are trolls. There is almost no meaningful discussion that takes place here.; May 10, 2014 at 10:24 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"So, Supreme Poster, you are gullible enough to believe that I would try to fraudulently obtain property by forging the owner's name on a bill of sell?"

You are gullible enough to think you can convince us you didn't. What can you expect from someone who believes in a non existent Carpetbagger Jihad.

"Like I said... gossip. Where's the proof?"

The proof accepted by the court was the forged signature on the document which purportedly gave you title to the clinic.

"The difference between the hatchet-job Indy Week article and my sharlogs is that I back up my statements with documentation, such as medical records, police reports, correspondence, etc. I lay it all out in the open."

First off, the Indy Week article was not a hatchet job. Secondly, you DO NOT back up your statements with facts and documentation. You distort the facts and you lie.; May 10, 2014 at 10:24 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"The solicitation excuse, as pitiful and pathetic as it is, was the best excuse that Duke University could come up with in defense of its abusive mistreatment of me."

Duke did not mistreat you. Your own recording made it clear you picked a fight with the security guard who was trying to enforce Duke's non solicitation policy.

"Face the facts, Duke University, aware that I planned on attending the event, attempted to ambush me and have be thrown in jail long before I even arrived on campus that morning."

Your proclamation that this is the truth has no legal, moral or ethical weight whatsoever.

"Fortunately for me, I ran into Law Professor James Coleman."

Your recording showed that you tried to dragoon Professor Coleman into interfering for you and that he was trying to put as much distance between himself and you.; May 10, 2014 at 10:28 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

"The transcripts are quite extensive... I think more than 1,500 pages. The value for me has to do with the jury selection which was not included on the video versions of the trial."

The value for you is it gives you more facts to distort and misrepresent.

"For now, posting the transcripts would be very exhausting and take too much of my time."

Then, by all means and in the interest of truth and justice, just refrain from posting anything.

You would have the added benefit of avoiding looking once again like the racist idiot you are.; May 10, 2014 at 10:32 AM
Anonymous said...: SIDNEY HARR:

You have yet to provide any hard evidence that the Carpetbagger jihad exists. Face it. It is a figment of your megalomaniacal deluded imagination. Just like Kilgo's imaginary Lacrosse player friend is a figment of KENHYDERAL's imagination.; May 10, 2014 at 10:48 AM
Anonymous said...: It is tempting, though wrong, to conflate mental illness with lack of intelligence. Sid may be nuts, but he isn't stupid.

Sid likely knows that Kilgo isn't real. However, Kilgo's claim that Mangum was assaulted is important to Sid, Kenny and their ilk. Sid knows this. To that end, it is far better for him to say "Look, I just don't have the time to find Kilgo" than to admit that Kilgo is a prevarication.; May 10, 2014 at 2:56 PM
Anonymous said...: With all due respect, the way SIDNEY thinks he can pass off obvious distortions and lies as the truth, he is stupid.; May 10, 2014 at 3:44 PM
Anonymous said...: Does Cohan mention the fact that Crystal once claimed she was raped by twenty men in the tiny bathroom?; May 10, 2014 at 4:14 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "Sid likely knows that Kilgo isn't real"...... Wrong, Kilgo was a frequent poster on this blog at the time I showed up and continued to post frequently until until late 2011.; May 10, 2014 at 4:20 PM
Anonymous said...: Nifong probably did believe at first there had been a gang rape but by the end of March,2006 he couldn't possibly have believed it.He doesn't sound like a very intelligent person just like anyone else who actually believed Crystal.; May 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "Does Cohan mention the fact that Crystal once claimed she was raped by twenty men in the tiny bathroom?".......... The size of the bathroom is a complete red herring. Harping on it is so indicative of the Duke Lacrosse Defence strategy of using every possible excuse as to why this crime could not have happened. They ludicrously say, "how could big burly Lacrosse Players, like us, jam ourselves, like sardines, into a bathroom and attempt a sexual assault. Here's the more likely scenario. Perpetrators took turns to defile Crystal while some others restrained her and held her in the air by her legs. Meanwhile leering voyeurs probably, frequently stuck there heads through the door to see the show.; May 10, 2014 at 4:42 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Wrong, Kilgo was a frequent poster on this blog at the time I showed up and continued to post frequently until until late 2011."

And he bugged out because he was exposing himself as a phoney.; May 10, 2014 at 5:23 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

" Here's the more likely scenario. Perpetrators took turns to defile Crystal while some others restrained her and held her in the air by her legs."

The true scenario, considering that there is an never was any evidence of a rape(neither KENNY nor SIDNEY have ever provided any) is that Crystal lied about being raped and continues to lie.; May 10, 2014 at 5:29 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny "Mystery Rapist" Hyderal is one of the mystery rapists.; May 10, 2014 at 5:54 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

Have you ever considered how loathsome person you have become with all your wishful thinking that Crystal had been violently raped. I can't imagine any normal human being who would wish that on any woman.; May 10, 2014 at 6:03 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

De facto you do wish Crystal had been violently raped so you can have an excuse to condemn people you do not like.; May 10, 2014 at 6:05 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "I can't imagine any normal human being who would wish that(a violent sexual assault) on any woman"........
Or worse yet partake in such an outrage; I concur.; May 10, 2014 at 9:12 PM
Anonymous said...: Or worse falsely accuse someone of such a crime or prosecute innocent young men when Nifong knew they were innocent.; May 10, 2014 at 9:39 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "De facto you do wish Crystal had been violently raped so you can have an excuse to condemn people you do not like".....The opposite is true. Crystal is a dear friend of mine. It's you that wishes she made up what happened to her You have naïvely bought into the idea these guys were a bunch of outstanding and moral young men when in reality they were nothing but thugs And yes I condemn those violent perpetrators. I hate what they did to Crystal; May 10, 2014 at 9:40 PM
Anonymous said...: kenhydral - Crystal always said she was gang raped by several men at the same time inside the tiny bathroom which of course was impossible.The only place a gang rape ever happened was in Crystal's imagination.; May 10, 2014 at 9:41 PM
Anonymous said...: ken - you know just like Nifong did that nobody ever touched Crystal because none of the lacrosse players wanted to have sex with her.She was photographed leaving the house with a smile on her face at 12:31 A.M.; May 10, 2014 at 9:44 PM
Anonymous said...: Cohan has admitted that there was no gang rape in the miniscule bathroom and the three men who were falsely accused were innocent.; May 10, 2014 at 9:45 PM
Anonymous said...: The Duke lacrosse team finished the season 13-3.Let's all wish them the best in national championship tournament tomorrow.; May 10, 2014 at 9:47 PM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: "I can't imagine any normal human being who would wish that(a violent sexual assault) on any woman"........
Or worse yet partake in such an outrage; I concur."

The question is, why do you obsess on Crystal being gang raped, especially in the face of overwhelming evidence that she was not. Whether you intended it or not, you say something about your thought processes.; May 11, 2014 at 4:20 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"The opposite is true. Crystal is a dear friend of mine. It's you that wishes she made up what happened to her".

What happened to her. You have offered up no evidence that she actually was the victim of a brutal gang rape.

"You have naïvely bought into the idea these guys were a bunch of outstanding and moral young men when in reality they were nothing but thugs"

The idea I buy into is that they were falsely accused of raping Crystal. I say again, you have provided no evidence, no factual evidence, that Crystal was gang raped. So why do you obsess over what you imagine happened?

"And yes I condemn those violent perpetrators. I hate what they did to Crystal".

You have provided absolutely no factual evidence that anyone did anything to Crystal except Crystal herself. So, again, why do you obsess over a violent gang rape which never happened?; May 11, 2014 at 4:25 AM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous May 10, 2014 at 9:41 PM

"kenhydral - Crystal always said she was gang raped by several men at the same time inside the tiny bathroom which of course was impossible.The only place a gang rape ever happened was in Crystal's imagination."

Correction: The other place it happened was in KENHYDERAL's imagination.; May 11, 2014 at 4:27 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

" Here's the more likely scenario. Perpetrators took turns to defile Crystal while some others restrained her and held her in the air by her legs."

You have hung yourself. If that is what happened, it would have impossible for the perpetrators not to have left evidence on the rape kit, your pseudoscience ramblings notwithstanding. There was no evidence of a rape on the rape kit.

I ask again, why do you spend so much of your time thinking about a gang rape for which there is absolutely no factual evidence. There is such a thing as a Freudian Slip. Unintentionally you do reveal your actual mental state.; May 11, 2014 at 4:30 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

I say you do reveal that you expend a lot of time thinking of violent gang rapes.; May 11, 2014 at 4:32 AM
Anonymous said...: There is only one way Kenny could know so many details.

Kenny is one of the mystery rapists.; May 11, 2014 at 5:25 AM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: " There is such a thing as a Freudian Slip. Unintentionally you do reveal your actual mental state"........ The amateur psychiatrists are at it again. The brutalization of Crystal continues on to this very day. Since the physical assault of 2006 it's switched to a character assassination. The cowardly anonymous who partake in this, all in an effort to shield evil doers, are themselves guilty of perpetrating an outrage on a vulnerable person and her children.; May 11, 2014 at 8:33 AM
Anonymous said...: KENHYDERAL:

"Anonymous said: "'There is such a thing as a Freudian Slip. Unintentionally you do reveal your actual mental state........ The amateur psychiatrists are at it again."

It doesn't take a psychiatrist, amateur or otherwise to see that you are spencding a lot of time thinking about a gang rape which never happened.

"The brutalization of Crystal continues on to this very day."

There was and is no brutalization of Crystal, except maybe by Crystal herself and by people like SIDNEY who exploit her.

"Since the physical assault of 2006 it's switched to a character assassination."

Crystal's character was already terminal by 2006, in which year there was no physical assault upon her. KENHYDERAL has never provided any factual, credible evidence that such an assault ever took place, and continues to dodge doing so.

"The cowardly anonymous who partake in this, all in an effort to shield evil doers, are themselves guilty of perpetrating an outrage on a vulnerable person and her children."

Since there was no assault on Crystal, there was nothing to conceal, ergo, no alleged evil doers to shield. The only ones guilty of anything are Crystal, who falsely accused people of raping her, and KENHYDERAL, who is promulgating the lie that Crystal was assaulted.

Why does KENNY spend so much time poring over a gang rape which never happened. Why does he have such fascination for he subject?; May 11, 2014 at 8:52 AM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "Reginald Daye did die of complications of his surgery and not of DTs or alcohol withdrawal"......... Then we should of heard that from those who treated him. Neither you or I were there when the treatments he was receiving killed him. I would like to have heard what the surgeons, who accomplished his wound repair, would have had to say about this. Keep in mind it was the treatment of those complications (knife wound or alcohol withdrawal) and not the condition per se; May 15, 2014 at 3:12 PM

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

William Cohan interview on Diane Rehm Show

141 comments:

Facebook Badge

Subscribe!

Labels

Blog Archive

About Me