justice4nifong: Crystal Mangum denied a fair trial by Judge Paul Ridgeway

Monday, March 21, 2016

Crystal Mangum denied a fair trial by Judge Paul Ridgeway

329 comments:

1 – 200 of 329 Newer› Newest»

Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
If Kenny had any of these profiles, he could post the links - but once again Kenny is too lazy to actually do anything - he just talks, but expects others to do all the work for him.

And, Sid is clearly avoiding posting his failed filing.

N
Because of the anticipation hysteria associated with the "filing," I decided to expedite the posting by providing the documents without accompanying dialogue. It's pretty straightforward and should be readily understood by most. There's additional material to post that are not quite completed, but will be posted as soon as possible. With all of the stuff I've posted recently, commenters should be kept busy for a while.

Now it's back to work for me. I have a letter yet to draft and deliver!; March 21, 2016 at 8:48 AM
Fake Kenhyderal said...: This was your big "ides of March", "The ram has touched the wall" event?

The Judicial Standards Commission is responsible for handling charges of misconduct (think accepting bribes) or disability of a judge.

It doesn't review cases -- that's the job of the appeals court.

They wouldn't have touched your complaint with a 10-foot tongue depressor.; March 21, 2016 at 9:26 AM
guiowen said...: So, Sidney.
Did you actually expect any different outcome? Can't you stop beating a dead horse?
If you really want to help Crystal, I've already told you what you should do. Stop telling her that everything she's done is perfectly fine, because it isn't. Help her prepare for life after she gets out in 2026. At the age she will then have, I doubt she can survive as an escort.
Above all, stop thinking that I'm giving you poor advice. (Kenhyderal would say it's "disingenuous", but that's all Kenny can think of saying.); March 21, 2016 at 9:48 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricator shows he is also the purveyor of empty promises.; March 21, 2016 at 9:54 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricator fires another salvo of duds, just as I predicted. Now he is trying again, futilely, to institute personal posterior camouflage.

Thank you, harr, for living down to my expectstions.; March 21, 2016 at 9:58 AM
kenhyderal said...: Dr. Harr has exposed the utter unmitigated corruption of the North Carolina Justice System especially when it involves it's poor black citizens. It's a complete national disgrace.; March 21, 2016 at 10:06 AM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"Dr. Harr has exposed the utter unmitigated corruption of the North Carolina Justice System especially when it involves it's poor black citizens. It's a complete national disgrace."

No he hasn't.

It is not surprising that kenny hissy fit is so profoundly wrong again.

The only person who qualifies as a disgrace in North Carolina right now is harr the hypocrtical fabricator. However his lack of intellectual capability, his lack of status, his lack of any real accomplishments, his advocacy for injustice(getting murderers passes for their crimes) qualifies him only as a complete nothing.

kenny hissy fit obviously believes it was not a national disgrace to wrongfully prosecute innocent men for rape after crystal lied about being raped. Oops! I nearly forgot. kenny hissy fit believes they were not prosecuted for rape.

Hey kenny hissy fit. Provide evidence that crystal was raped. That male dna was found on her person via the rape kit is only evidence that she engaged is sex with unknown males.; March 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM
Anonymous said...: guiowen said...

"Above all, stop thinking that I'm giving you poor advice. (Kenhyderal would say it's "disingenuous", but that's all Kenny can think of saying.)"

kenny hissy fit aleo thought of saying, nifong did not prosecute the innocent Lacrosse players foor rape.; March 21, 2016 at 10:30 AM
Fake Kenhyderal said...: "No person providing information to the Commission shall disclose information
they have obtained from the Commission concerning the investigation, including the
fact that an investigation is being conducted, unless and until the Supreme Court
orders any disciplinary action taken against the respondent."

-- Rules of the Judicial Standards Commission

Sid - Since the was no disciplinary action taken against Judge Ridgeway, have you violated the confidentiality requirements of the Judicial Standards Commission by posting these documents?; March 21, 2016 at 11:41 AM
Anonymous said...: I would think there is no confidentiality related to the decision by the Commission not to undertake an investigation in response to a frivolous complaint .; March 21, 2016 at 11:53 AM
Anonymous said...: The title of this latest screed from harr the hypocritical fabricator is "Crystal Mangum denied a fair trial bySuperior Court Judge Paul Ridgeway.

Yet another fabrication by harr the hypocritical fabricator.; March 21, 2016 at 1:09 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Fake Kenhyderal said...
"No person providing information to the Commission shall disclose information
they have obtained from the Commission concerning the investigation, including the
fact that an investigation is being conducted, unless and until the Supreme Court
orders any disciplinary action taken against the respondent."

-- Rules of the Judicial Standards Commission

Sid - Since the was no disciplinary action taken against Judge Ridgeway, have you violated the confidentiality requirements of the Judicial Standards Commission by posting these documents?

Think, my friend. If that is the case, then that rule of the Judicial Standards Commission is in violation of Constitutional law... specifically the First Amendment which guarantees freedom of speech.

Judges are not saints... they're human beings who are undeserving of special treatment. The attempt to obscure complaints against judges is but a further assault on openness and transparency which is necessary for oversight in a so-called democratic society.

Let me know if further elucidation is required.; March 22, 2016 at 4:41 AM
Anonymous said...: Once again Sid makes a filing that cannot possibly work - they even told him that in their first response - they cannot review the cases, they are not an appellate court. Yet, to keep his emotional abuse of Crystal going, he keeps lying to her and pretending he is making progress, and keeps filing the same stuff over and over, knowing it cannot possibly work.

You are a sad, and pathetic abuser.; March 22, 2016 at 4:43 AM
Anonymous said...: At this point it's really kind of pathetic that Sid is still trying to bring up the Felony Murder Rule.; March 22, 2016 at 4:46 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Fake Kenhyderal said...
This was your big "ides of March", "The ram has touched the wall" event?

The Judicial Standards Commission is responsible for handling charges of misconduct (think accepting bribes) or disability of a judge.

It doesn't review cases -- that's the job of the appeals court.

They wouldn't have touched your complaint with a 10-foot tongue depressor.

Fake K, let me see if I understand your position. Bribes taken by a judge is misconduct, but a judge who deprives a defendant of a fair trial is not? My contention is that Judge Ridgeway deprived Crystal Mangum of a fair trial by personally withholding possible exculpatory evidence from her, refusing to act with knowledge that the state's star witness committed perjury and produced a fraudulent autopsy report which was the basis for the criminal complaint, failing to dismiss the Larceny of Chose in Action charge which was malicious and without probable cause, sustaining prosecution objections to defense queries related to Daye's proximate cause of death, allowing a biased juror to remain seated, and more.

Is it your position that the North Carolina Court of Appeals should be the body to discipline judges who act with professional misconduct in denying a defendant a fair trial?

I require further edification with regards to your position.; March 22, 2016 at 4:53 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid,

That plea offer/discussion you keep claiming happened is denied by Meier in his letter to Crystal. Are you saying he blatantly lied to his client, in writing, and the plea discussion happened in open court, but no one recorded it or anything else?

Call him a liar to his face - you've admitted you've had contact with him in the past.

And, if Crystal says he directly lied to her, she needs to consider a Bar Complaint (you cannot file one on her behalf due to attorney/client issues).; March 22, 2016 at 4:54 AM
Anonymous said...: for kenny hissy fit:

It is your contention that the lawyers who defended the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players conducted a smear campaign against crystal, and the purpose was to enable the lacrosse players to prosecute their lawsuits.

The alleged crime allegedly took place on the night of March 13/14 2006. The case ended on April 11, 2007. crystal was not identified as the false accuser until April 12, 2007 when the New York Post identified her(http://nypost.com/2007/04/12/let-the-liar-be-named-shamed/). Meanwhile, there was no media campaign on the part of the Lacrosse players' attorneys(http://thefederalist.com/2016/03/16/fantastic-lies-10-appalling-moments-from-the-duke-lacrosse-case/: "The players on the Duke team maintained their innocence, but also their media silence as they waited on their legal fate.)

Your claim, that the defense attorneys engaged in a media campaign to smear crystal is as bogus as your claim that nifong did not charge the Lacrosse players with rape.

Yet you want people to believe you know something about the Duke Rape Hoax.; March 22, 2016 at 4:56 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: guiowen said...
So, Sidney.
Did you actually expect any different outcome? Can't you stop beating a dead horse?
If you really want to help Crystal, I've already told you what you should do. Stop telling her that everything she's done is perfectly fine, because it isn't. Help her prepare for life after she gets out in 2026. At the age she will then have, I doubt she can survive as an escort.
Above all, stop thinking that I'm giving you poor advice. (Kenhyderal would say it's "disingenuous", but that's all Kenny can think of saying.)

gui, mon ami, I am not believing that your advice is poor, but rather that I believe an alternate course is attainable... despite the overwhelming odds. My beliefs are based on the fact that truth (in the form of prosecution discovery) and justice are on Mangum's side. Since that is the case, she will be released from prison long before 2026, and she will furthermore be exonerated.; March 22, 2016 at 4:59 AM
Anonymous said...: Another fabrication from harr the hypocritical fabricator:

from http://www.justice4nifong.com/newuse/uLinv01/inv02a.htm, harr says these are the facts of the case, that immediately after nifong started his wrongful prosecution of the Lacrosse players, the North Carolina Bar intervened in the case.

from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Nifong:

"On December 28, 2006, the North Carolina State Bar filed ethics charges against Nifong over his conduct in the case, accusing him of making public statements that were "prejudicial to the administration of justice" and of engaging in "conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresenta"

The NC Bar filed ethics charges against corrupt DA Nifong more than 8 months after he began his wrongful prosecution.

And you say you provide enlightenment.; March 22, 2016 at 5:04 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid,

That plea offer/discussion you keep claiming happened is denied by Meier in his letter to Crystal. Are you saying he blatantly lied to his client, in writing, and the plea discussion happened in open court, but no one recorded it or anything else?

Call him a liar to his face - you've admitted you've had contact with him in the past.

And, if Crystal says he directly lied to her, she needs to consider a Bar Complaint (you cannot file one on her behalf due to attorney/client issues).

First of all, Crystal is not going to file another complaint against Meier with the NC State Bar. That is a totally compromised agency.

With regards to Meier, I met him once in the Durham County Justice Building's District Attorney's Office waiting room where I introduced myself.

With regards to the plea deal, I was not in court and cannot say for a fact that the plea offer was made. That said, I have no reason to believe it was not. I did talk by phone with an individual who was at trial and confirmed to me that the offer was made. She told me she advised Mangum to accept it. Crystal also told me that Meier called her the evening before the plea offer was made in court to discuss that it would be presented in court and for her to consider whether or not to accept it. Phone records do exist that would corroborate this. Finally, Crystal told me that she discussed the plea offer with a bail bondsman friend prior to it being offered in court.

The reason I believe Meier lied is because almost everyone connected with the case lied... the medical examiner, Officer Curtis Knight, and Aykia Hanes. Meier did his best to sabotage Mangum's case... the only way that the prosecution could prevail. Meier also has a past history of selling out his clients (Spencer C. Young).

As far as calling Mr. Meier a "liar" to his face, I would have no qualms about doing so with the exception that I do not believe doing so would be civil and appropriate.

I hope I answered your question. Let me know if further elucidation is required.; March 22, 2016 at 5:12 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid:

You have 285 days to exonerate and free Mangum.

It has been seven days since the Ides of March and 3,202 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 22, 2016 at 5:23 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Anonymous Fake Kenhyderal said...
This was your big "ides of March", "The ram has touched the wall" event?

The Judicial Standards Commission is responsible for handling charges of misconduct (think accepting bribes) or disability of a judge.

It doesn't review cases -- that's the job of the appeals court.

They wouldn't have touched your complaint with a 10-foot tongue depressor."

"Fake K, let me see if I understand your position. Bribes taken by a judge is misconduct, but a judge who deprives a defendant of a fair trial is not?"

As is his wont, harr the hypocritical fabricator tries to cover his butt by dodging the issue rather than confronting it. harr has never established that crystal's trial was unfair.

"My contention is that Judge Ridgeway deprived Crystal Mangum of a fair trial by personally withholding possible exculpatory evidence from her, refusing to act with knowledge that the state's star witness committed perjury and produced a fraudulent autopsy report which was the basis for the criminal complaint, failing to dismiss the Larceny of Chose in Action charge which was malicious and without probable cause, sustaining prosecution objections to defense queries related to Daye's proximate cause of death, allowing a biased juror to remain seated, and more."

All of which is another compendium of fabrications from harr the hypocriti al fabricator. There was no exculpatory evidence. harr has not established that the autopsy was fraudulent or that Dr. Nichols committed perjury. I say again, harr is theminimal lytrained, minimally experienced medical school graduate who was never accepted into residency training, who never achieved medical specialty bard certification and who spent a truncated post medical school career losing a string of frivolous lawsuits. He has neither the medical expertise nor the legal expertise to make him qualified to make the stateemmts he has repeatedly made.

"Is it your position that the North Carolina Court of Appeals should be the body to discipline judges who act with professional misconduct in denying a defendant a fair trial?"

Agaon, dodging the issue rather than addressing it. Fake K did not say that was his position on the matter.

"I require further edification with regards to your position."

Someone who denies the truth the way harr the hypocritical fabricator is incapable of receiving edification of the kind he demands.; March 22, 2016 at 6:31 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"gui, mon ami, I am not believing that your advice is poor, but rather that I believe an alternate course is attainable... despite the overwhelming odds. My beliefs are based on the fact that truth (in the form of prosecution discovery) and justice are on Mangum's side. Since that is the case, she will be released from prison long before 2026, and she will furthermore be exonerated."

Presumes a fact not in evidence, that you are capable of telling the truth. Your screeds about Judge Ridgeway show you can not.; March 22, 2016 at 6:33 AM
Fake Kenhyderal said...: No, Sid- My position is exactly what I stated it was. That the Judicial standards Commission is responsible for handling charges of judicial misconduct and disability.

That you claimed judicial misconduct but presented no evidence to prove it is your fault, not mine.

Again you present your opinions and are upset when people don't accept them as fact. That speaks volumes about you as it does the (fake) real kenhyderal.; March 22, 2016 at 6:35 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid,

That plea offer/discussion you keep claiming happened is denied by Meier in his letter to Crystal. Are you saying he blatantly lied to his client, in writing, and the plea discussion happened in open court, but no one recorded it or anything else?

Call him a liar to his face - you've admitted you've had contact with him in the past.

"The reason I believe Meier lied is because almost everyone connected with the case lied... the medical examiner, Officer Curtis Knight, and Aykia Hanes. Meier did his best to sabotage Mangum's case... the only way that the prosecution could prevail. Meier also has a past history of selling out his clients (Spencer C. Young)."

The only one who has promulgated lies about the ReginaldDaye case is you, just like you promulgated lies about the Duke Rape Hoax.

"As far as calling Mr. Meier a "liar" to his face, I would have no qualms about doing so with the exception that I do not believe doing so would be civil and appropriate."

So? You had no qualms about calling the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players guilty, although all the evidence in the case(which you admit you have never reviewed even though it is in the public record) showed that crystal lied about being raped.

"I hope I answered your question."

As is your wont, you dodged the question rather than answering it.

"Let me know if further elucidation is required."

Someone like you, who lies and fabricates and dodges and makes empty promises is incapable of providing elucidation.; March 22, 2016 at 6:40 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"With regards to the plea deal, I was not in court and cannot say for a fact that the plea offer was made. That said, I have no reason to believe it was not."

Correction: You have no reason to believe it was.

"I did talk by phone with an individual who was at trial and confirmed to me that the offer was made. She told me she advised Mangum to accept it."

Who was that individual? Victoria Peterson, another fabricator?

Crystal also told me that Meier called her the evening before the plea offer was made in court to discuss that it would be presented in court and for her to consider whether or not to accept it."

crystal herself is not a credible source of information, as her behavior during the Duke Rape Hoax confirmed.

"Phone records do exist that would corroborate this."

So produce them.

"Finally, Crystal told me that she discussed the plea offer with a bail bondsman friend prior to it being offered in court."

Again, crystal is not a credible source of information.

Plus, your glaringly obvious history of being a fabricator and dodging causes me to doubt you are telling the truth here.; March 22, 2016 at 6:47 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Think, my friend. If that is the case, then that rule of the Judicial Standards Commission is in violation of Constitutional law... specifically the First Amendment which guarantees freedom of speech."

You are no expert on the First Amendment. The New Black Panthers, during the Duke Rape Hoax, conducted a loud demonstration at the Courthouse in which they proclaimed the defendants guilty and demanded they be summary conviction, you said that was free speech.Yet when AG Cooper expressed his opinion that the defendants innocent, you called that inappropriate, indicating he should nothave been allowed to express that opinion.

"Judges are not saints... they're human beings who are undeserving of special treatment. The attempt to obscure complaints against judges is but a further assault on openness and transparency which is necessary for oversight in a so-called democratic society."

In your case, no one is trying to obscure any complaint.You have not presented a valid complaint, only an allegation based on your distorted and invalid view of the case.

"Let me know if further elucidation is required."

Again, someone with your glaringly obvious history of lies, fabrications, misrepresentations, dodges and total lack of any medical or legal credentials is not capable of providing elucidation.; March 22, 2016 at 6:57 AM
kenhyderal said...: Dr. Anonymous said "It is your contention that the lawyers who defended the (declared) innocent, (falsely) accused Lacrosse players conducted a smear campaign against crystal, and the purpose was to enable the lacrosse players to prosecute their lawsuits"................................................. Initially, it was the common, albeit immoral, strategy, invariably, used by lawyers who are defending accused rapists in order to destroy the credibility of the accuser, by trashing her character. Later on it continued unabated in order to bolster avaricious civil suits; March 22, 2016 at 10:31 AM
Anonymous said...: Harr the hypocritical fabricator:

Why do you claim that the NC Bar took action immediately after nifong began the prosecution of the Lacrosse players. The NC Bar did not begin its investigation until months after nifong's prosecution began. It did not file the first set of ethics charges until December of 2006. It filed the second set of ethics charges in January of 2007. After the Bar filed the first set of ethics charges, it became known that nifong withheld exculpatory evidence from the defendants, after Brian Meehan testified under oath that he and nifong had agreed to conceal that evidence. It is all a matter f public record.

If you did not know that, then you were ignorant.

If you did know that, then you lied.

Ignorant or lying, in either case, why should anyone believe you are capable of providing elucidation.; March 22, 2016 at 10:36 AM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"Dr. Anonymous said "It is your contention that the lawyers who defended the (declared) innocent, (falsely) accused Lacrosse players conducted a smear campaign against crystal, and the purpose was to enable the lacrosse players to prosecute their lawsuits"................................................. Initially, it was the common, albeit immoral, strategy, invariably, used by lawyers who are defending accused rapists in order to destroy the credibility of the accuser, by trashing her character."

Like harr the hypocritical fabricator, kenny hissy fit tries to dodge the issue. He claimed the defense lawyers initiated a smear campaign against crystal as their defense strategy. The public did not know who the false accuser was until after the case, i.e. the wrongful prosecution against the innocent Lacrosse players, had ended.

"Later on it continued unabated in order to bolster avaricious civil suits"

The lawyers in the civil suits were not the lawyers who defended the innocent Lacrosse players. They did not mention crystal at all in their filings.

kenny hissy fit continues to accuse the Lacrosse players of raping crystal even though he has failed for years to provide any evidence that a crime against crystal ever happened in the first place. The best KENNY has been able to come up with when challenged to provide evidence is, it could have happened.

kenny hissy fit continues to prove to the world that he is either ignorant or a liar. In the best case scenario, he is not credible, or in a worse case scenario he is just stupid, or in the worst case scenario, he is just a guilt presuming racist .; March 22, 2016 at 10:53 AM
Anonymous said...: kenny hissy fit:

Here again, for you to duck, is the challenge, provide evidence that any crime against crystal ever happened on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

That male dna, which did not match the dna of the falsely accused is not evidence of a rape happening on the night of 13/14 March 2006. You yourself admit it can not be established that said dna was deposited on the night of 13/14 March 2006.; March 22, 2016 at 10:58 AM
Anonymous said...: kenny,

Please give us examples where the lawyers who represented the lacrosse players trashed Mangum. Or is this just another one of your many, many lies?; March 22, 2016 at 11:23 AM
Anonymous said...: kenny hissy fit:

Your claim is that the records of crystal's activity before the Lacrosse party establish she did not engage in sex before the party. That claim is specious and of no significance.

If crystalwere engaging in prostitution, would her agency keep recosrdsof it, knowing such activity was illegal, that records of such acticiy would be inculpatory evidence?

If she was noot engaging in sex for money on behalf of her agency, why would her agency need to keep records of it?

The bottom line is, the dna found on crystal's rape kit establishes only that crystal engaged in sex with unknown men.; March 22, 2016 at 11:41 AM
guiowen said...: As usual, Kenhyderal just repeats and repeats. If he repeats all this frequently enough, he thinks someone may actually believe him.; March 22, 2016 at 11:44 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocriticl fabricator, here's one for you.

You have made this statement on your blog, that the dna found on crystal via the rape kit was not exculpatory because it did not prove the lacrosse players had not committed rape.

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exculpatory_evidence:

"Exculpatory evidence is evidence favorable to the defendant in a criminal trial that exonerates or tends to exonerate the defendant of guilt."

Wikipedia cites The Free Dictionary by Farlex Definition of Exculpatory evidence.

So, the scenario is, nifong files charges of rape against the Lacrosse players. The rape, as described by the complaining witness in the ER at DUMC was a gang rape in which multiple assailants, who penetrated her and deposited their bodily fluids on her. In that kind of rape, male dna belonging to the perpetrators would be found. The only dna recovered from the rape kit did not match the dna of any of the Lacrosse players, including the three players nifong charged.

How could the dna found on crystal not exonerate or tend to exonerate the defendants?

If there is a rape, and the dna recovered from the victim does not match the dna of the accused, on multiple occasions in the past,it was proven the accused was not the rapist.

So why do you say the evidence was not exculpatory.

Nifong was obligated by law to turn over to the defendants in a timely manner the specific information that the dna recovered from crystal did not match the defendants' dna. He did not. He turned over the raw data months after he had received the specific information that the dna recovered from crystal did not match the dna of the accused.

So where do you get that nifong did not conceal exculpatory evidence from the defendants?

You allege that nifong acted with integrity. He did not. You have a rather perverted concept of integrity. I would not have brought this up had you not alleged in one of your letters you posted in this blog that nifong acted with integrity.; March 22, 2016 at 12:00 PM
A Lawyer said...: Dr. Harr:
For weeks you trumpeted that something you did was going to free Mangum by March 15, but you couldn't say what it was. It now turns out that all you did was write a letter to an agency that has no power to reverse any criminal conviction. Had you posted your intention here in advance, both Walt and I could have told you that the Judicial Conduct Commission couldn't possibly free Mangum or reverse her conviction, and we would have saved you a lot of time.
You are helping neither Mangum nor your credibility.; March 22, 2016 at 1:15 PM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricator
kenny hissy fit

Check this out:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1704517209820857&set=gm.520765734793704&type=3&theater; March 22, 2016 at 3:23 PM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricator:

In your letter t Judge Wanda Bryant, you said the commission's decision was an insult to your intelligence.

You again presume a fact not in evidence. You have made it obvious in your many posts to your blog that you lack intelligence.

Deluded megalomania is not intelligence.; March 22, 2016 at 4:29 PM
Anonymous said...: A Lawyer wrote: ""Dr. Harr:
For weeks you trumpeted that something you did was going to free Mangum by March 15, but you couldn't say what it was. It now turns out that all you did was write a letter to an agency that has no power to reverse any criminal conviction. Had you posted your intention here in advance, both Walt and I could have told you that the Judicial Conduct Commission couldn't possibly free Mangum or reverse her conviction, and we would have saved you a lot of time.
You are helping neither Mangum nor your credibility."

Exactly right.

With friends like Sid, Crystal doesn't need any enemies.

Walt-in-Durham; March 23, 2016 at 3:30 AM
Anonymous said...: for harr the hyppocritical fabricator:

Someone insulting tour intelligenceis like someone admiring the shape of the arms on the Venus de Milo; March 23, 2016 at 5:06 AM
Anonymous said...: Correction of typo:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

for harr the hypocritical fabricator:

Someone insulting your intelligence is like someone admiring the shape of the arms on the Venus de Milo; March 23, 2016 at 5:08 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid:

You have 284 days to exonerate and free Mangum.

It has been eight days since the Ides of March and 3,203 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 23, 2016 at 5:09 AM
Anonymous said...: Looks like Sid's ram was actually an ewe -- and instead of "touching the wall" it was being tupped by the wall.; March 23, 2016 at 6:50 AM
Anonymous said...: So, Kenny, do you fully support Harr spending his time and effort on things that have zero chance of working, or do you think he should actually listen and do some research before he lies to Crystal and gets her hopes up, and wastes time?

He claims to be intelligent - why is he incapable of understanding even basic concepts?

What do you think Kenny?; March 23, 2016 at 8:54 AM
guiowen said...: Anonymous 8:54,
Kenny thinks you're "disingenuous".; March 23, 2016 at 10:20 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid,

I missed the announcement. Was Crystal released and exonerated last week as you promised repeatedly?; March 23, 2016 at 2:12 PM
kenhyderal said...: This comment has been removed by the author.; March 23, 2016 at 3:12 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "What do you think Kenny?".................. I think The Justice System in North Carolina, where poor minorities are concerned, is constructed in such a way to thwart getting at the truth. Agencies hide behind protocol and use it as an excuse to bury miscarriages of justice. Then they can go on as if all is well. No, it's rotten to the core and anyone who claims ignorance of this is being DISINGENUOUS. Stop pretending; you all know Crystal Mangum did not murder Reginald Daye.; March 23, 2016 at 3:13 PM
guiowen said...: Anonymous 8:54,
See what I told you?
Anything Kenny doesn't like is "disingenuous" or "insulting".
Don't forget that as another Humpty Dumpty, he can make any word mean whatever he wants it to mean.; March 23, 2016 at 3:31 PM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"Anonymous said: "What do you think Kenny?".................. I think The Justice System in North Carolina, where poor minorities are concerned, is constructed in such a way to thwart getting at the truth. Agencies hide behind protocol and use it as an excuse to bury miscarriages of justice. Then they can go on as if all is well. No, it's rotten to the core and anyone who claims ignorance of this is being DISINGENUOUS. Stop pretending; you all know Crystal Mangum did not murder Reginald Daye."

A few things:

kenny hissy fit presumes a fact not in evidence, that he can think. He cannot think. That is evident from his posts.

What we all know is that crystal murdered Reginald Dye.

We also all know that crystal lied when she claimed she was raped. She lied about being raped in the DUMC ER before the FOUR improper lineups in which she participated.

We all know that kilgo's anonymous Larosse player does not exist.; March 23, 2016 at 3:43 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny whines: Stop pretending; you all know Crystal Mangum did not murder Reginald Daye.

We don't know that. Both you and Sidney have refused to provide evidence and case law to support your opinions. You demand that others accept your opinions as fact.; March 23, 2016 at 4:26 PM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"No, it's(the NC Justice System) rotten to the core and anyone who claims ignorance of this is being DISINGENUOUS. Stop pretending; you all know Crystal Mangum did not murder Reginald Daye."

Kenny hissy fit, someone who is either ignorant about the facts of the Duke Rape Hoax, or who lies about the facts of the Duke Rape Hoax, proclaims to everyone else that he tells the truth.

Does anyone not doubt that kenny hissy fit is incapable of thinking?; March 23, 2016 at 4:53 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny, that's not what Wikipedia says.; March 23, 2016 at 5:18 PM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

I agree the justice system is a mess. That doesn't excuse Sid for refusing to learn and for lying to Crystal. The question wasn't about the justice system - it was about Sid and his refusal to learn and doing things with no chance of success. So, do you support his refusal to learn and taking actions with no chance of success?; March 23, 2016 at 6:13 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous A Lawyer said...
Dr. Harr:
For weeks you trumpeted that something you did was going to free Mangum by March 15, but you couldn't say what it was. It now turns out that all you did was write a letter to an agency that has no power to reverse any criminal conviction. Had you posted your intention here in advance, both Walt and I could have told you that the Judicial Conduct Commission couldn't possibly free Mangum or reverse her conviction, and we would have saved you a lot of time.
You are helping neither Mangum nor your credibility.

Hey, A Lawyer.

"A meal is not consumed in one gigantic gulp, but rather in many small bites."

-- Harrism

In answer to your comment: clearly the reason I could not say anything is because the process in filing a complaint against a judge was to be confidential until a decision was made to take public action... so until a decision was made, I remained silent about my activity.

With regards to the NC Judicial Standards Commission, I was well aware that it had not the ability to overturn Mangum's conviction, but it did have the ability to reprimand Judge Ridgeway publicly... which is what I expected and what I had hoped would happen. With a rebuke in hand, it would make it that much simpler to bring pressures to bear in my effort to persuade the judge to do the right thing. Despite the Commission taking a second look at my complaint, it eventually caved in a second time and refrained from taking any action against Ridgeway.

So you see, my complaint filed against Judge Ridgeway was meant to be a small bite in the meal of justice rather than a gigantic gulp. Hope that this explanation provides edification for you and Walt.; March 23, 2016 at 6:48 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sid,

I missed the announcement. Was Crystal released and exonerated last week as you promised repeatedly?

Just for the record, I never promised that Mangum would be released by the Ides of March... only that I had expectations of a development that would work in favor of her release. What I expected around the Ides was a decision from the meeting convened on March 11, 2016 of the NC Judicial Standards Commission regarding my complaint against Judge Ridgeway. A couple of days ago I posted the complaint I filed with the Commission and its decision.; March 23, 2016 at 6:57 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Looks like Sid's ram was actually an ewe -- and instead of "touching the wall" it was being tupped by the wall.

Very funny. Hardy-har-har.; March 23, 2016 at 7:00 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "I agree the justice system is a mess. That doesn't excuse Sid for refusing to learn and for lying to Crystal. The question wasn't about the justice system - it was about Sid and his refusal to learn and doing things with no chance of success. So, do you support his refusal to learn and taking actions with no chance of success?".............. Legal protocol aside Dr. Harr has persuasively shown the injustice of Crystal Mangum's conviction to virtually every participant in this disgraced Justice System. That they hide behind esoteric rules and protocol to obscure the injustice demonstrates there is no desire to change a system that serves the vested interests and punishes the marginalized. All people deserve justice; so no, Dr. Harr is doing all he can, the best way he knows how, to obtain Justice for Crystal; March 23, 2016 at 9:23 PM
Anonymous said...: Sid:

You have 283 days to exonerate and free Mangum.

It has been nine days since the Ides of March and 3,204 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 24, 2016 at 2:36 AM
Anonymous said...: No, Kenny, by doing things that can't work, and continuing to push things that are clearly wrong (even you now admit that Felony Murder was never in play, yet Sid still pretends it was/is), he comes across as a loon, and is just further proof of the poor judgments Crystal makes, and her inability to learn and grow because she surrounds herself with enablers who feed her issues, rather than try to help her.; March 24, 2016 at 4:11 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Hey, A Lawyer.

"A meal is not consumed in one gigantic gulp, but rather in many small bites."

-- Harrism"

Another harrism: the Duke Lacrosse players raped crystal mangum. Tnat has been proven to br false. harr the hypocritical fabricator takes another hit to his already abysmally low credibility.

"In answer to your comment: clearly the reason I could not say anything is because the process in filing a complaint against a judge was to be confidential until a decision was made to take public action... so until a decision was made, I remained silent about my activity."

harr the hypocritical fabricator fabricates again and tries again to dodge the issue and institute personal posterior camouflage.

"With regards to the NC Judicial Standards Commission, I was well aware that it had not the ability to overturn Mangum's conviction,"

harr the hypocritical fabricator fabricates again. His correspondence and his blog posts establish that he hoped to get mangum freed.

"but it did have the ability to reprimand Judge Ridgeway publicly..."

Not on the basis of your non meritorious complaint.

"which is what I expected and what I had hoped would happen."

What you hoped was that mangum would be freed. You fabricate yet again.

"With a rebuke in hand, it would make it that much simpler to bring pressures to bear in my effort to persuade the judge to do the right thing."

The judge did the right thing.

"Despite the Commission taking a second look at my complaint, it eventually caved in a second time and refrained from taking any action against Ridgeway."

Which means only that the Commission decided twice that your complaint, just like your frivolous lawsuit against Duke, had no merit.

"So you see, my complaint filed against Judge Ridgeway was meant to be a small bite in the meal of justice rather than a gigantic gulp."

No, this was another attempt on your part to perpetrate injustice.

"Hope that this explanation provides edification for you and Walt."

You, who are either ignorant or a liar are incapable of providing edification to anyone. You didn't get nifong's law license restored, you haven't gotten crystal freed, as you promised, and you haven't prevailed in any of the frivolous lawsuits you have filed.

Again you have fabricated and dodged and made a futile attempt to institute personal posterior camouflage.; March 24, 2016 at 4:12 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Just for the record, I never promised that Mangum would be released by the Ides of March... only that I had expectations of a development that would work in favor of her release. What I expected around the Ides was a decision from the meeting convened on March 11, 2016 of the NC Judicial Standards Commission regarding my complaint against Judge Ridgeway. A couple of days ago I posted the complaint I filed with the Commission and its decision."

harr the hypocritical fabricator fabricates yet again.; March 24, 2016 at 4:14 AM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

Anonymous said: "I agree the justice system is a mess. That doesn't excuse Sid for refusing to learn and for lying to Crystal. The question wasn't about the justice system - it was about Sid and his refusal to learn and doing things with no chance of success. So, do you support his refusal to learn and taking actions with no chance of success?".............. Legal protocol aside Dr. Harr has persuasively shown the injustice of Crystal Mangum's conviction to virtually every participant in this disgraced Justice System."

No he hasn't. kenny hissy fit shows again he is either ignorant or a liar.

"That they hide behind esoteric rules and protocol to obscure the injustice demonstrates there is no desire to change a system that serves the vested interests and punishes the marginalized."

kenny hissy fit again shows he is either a liar or that he is ignorant.

"All people deserve justice;"

Another piece of hypocrisy on the part of kenny hissy fit, who believes the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players did not deserve justice. He believes they should have been convicted, even though he can not come up with any evidence that a crime ever actually happened.

"so no, Dr. Harr is doing all he can, the best way he knows how, to obtain Justice for Crystal"

No, harr the hypocritical fabricator is trying, like you, to get his favorite murderess/false accuser a pass for her crimes. And like you he proclaims, in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that crystal was raped.; March 24, 2016 at 4:24 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid said:

"Just for the record, I never promised that Mangum would be released by the Ides of March... only that I had expectations of a development that would work in favor of her release."

Regardless of how you characterize your prognostication, it didn't come to pass. Mangum wasn't released and nothing happened that worked in favor of her release. There wasn't even a basis for you to have a reasonable "expectation of a development that would work in favor of her release."

No matter how you look at it, you screwed the pooch on your "Ides of March" prediction.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 24, 2016 at 5:04 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny whines: Dr. Harr has persuasively shown the injustice of Crystal Mangum's conviction to virtually every participant in this disgraced Justice System.

Sidney has repeatedly expressed his opinion. He has been far from persuasive.

Both you and Sidney have refused to provide evidence and case law to support your opinions. Instead you merely demand that others accept your opinions as fact.; March 24, 2016 at 5:25 AM
Walt said...: Anonymous at 5:25 AM wrote: "Sidney has repeatedly expressed his opinion. He has been far from persuasive."

Sadly, he did mislead Crystal though into dropping the one issue on appeal (403(b) evidence) that could have lead to a new trial. With friends like Sid, Crystal doesn't need any enemies.

Walt-in-Durham; March 24, 2016 at 5:45 AM
Anonymous said...: To Anonymous at 5:25 AM:

Not only do Sid and Kenny refuse to provide evidence and case law to support their opinions, they refuse to acknowledge the facts, evidence and law that go against it.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 24, 2016 at 7:04 AM
Anonymous said...: You know - the blog used to be mildly amusing - but at this point it's just sad and pathetic. We are either watching Sid's calculated attempts to abuse and manipulate Crystal, or his total descent into mental illness. Neither of which are remotely amusing anymore.; March 24, 2016 at 9:44 AM
Anonymous said...: It seems Sid just keeps casting his net wider to find someone responsible for Crystal Mangum's incarceration.

Seems to be anyone except the person wielding the knife. How odd.; March 24, 2016 at 10:31 AM
Anonymous said...: Anyone notice the obvious similarities between the Akiel Denkins case and Sid's favorite child murderer, Shan Carter?; March 24, 2016 at 10:37 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricator:

Your most recent screed about Judge Ridgeway is about as meaningful as your assertion that corrupt da nifong, who wrongfully charged three innocent men in the Duke Rape Hoax and then withheld from them evidence which exonerated them, behaved with integrity.

I say again that you have a really warped, distorted concept of integrity. You would claim that Jack the Ripper acted with integrity.; March 24, 2016 at 5:59 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "No, Kenny, by doing things that can't work, and continuing to push things that are clearly wrong (even you now admit that Felony Murder was never in play".............It may never have been legally in play but I strongly suspect that at the time this obscure and meritless charge was laid it was done so with the misapprehension that it would elevate the charge to Murder 1. There can be no other explanation.; March 24, 2016 at 9:05 PM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"Anonymous said: "No, Kenny, by doing things that can't work, and continuing to push things that are clearly wrong (even you now admit that Felony Murder was never in play".............It may never have been legally in play but I strongly suspect that at the time this obscure and meritless charge was laid it was done so with the misapprehension that it would elevate the charge to Murder 1. There can be no other explanation."

Yes there can be.

You just lack the capability to realize that.; March 25, 2016 at 2:56 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Anyone notice the obvious similarities between the Akiel Denkins case and Sid's favorite child murderer, Shan Carter?

First of all, Shan Carter is not a child murderer. Your definition of a child murderer would be a distracted driver striking and killing a child who ran into the street in front of a vehicle.

As far as similarities between the Akiel Denkins case and Shan Carter's I fail to see any. Would you mind proving me and other visitors to this blog site some edification, elucidation, and/or enlightenment about your premise?; March 25, 2016 at 3:10 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
You know - the blog used to be mildly amusing - but at this point it's just sad and pathetic. We are either watching Sid's calculated attempts to abuse and manipulate Crystal, or his total descent into mental illness. Neither of which are remotely amusing anymore.

Thank you for your implied concern about my mental status, however, let me assure you that it is intact and operating at top level.

Unfortunately, Ms. Mangum has already been viciously abused by the State and the mainstream media... together with others in an unholy cabal have had her convicted in a kangaroo court under biased Judge Paul Ridgeway. There is nothing I could possibly do to make Mangum's situation worse than it is... everything I do, contrary to your view, can only help to bring her justice, freedom, and an exoneration.; March 25, 2016 at 3:17 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid:

You have 282 days to exonerate and free Mangum.

It has been 10 days since the Ides of March and 3,205 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 25, 2016 at 3:22 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Walt said...
Anonymous at 5:25 AM wrote: "Sidney has repeatedly expressed his opinion. He has been far from persuasive."

Sadly, he did mislead Crystal though into dropping the one issue on appeal (403(b) evidence) that could have lead to a new trial. With friends like Sid, Crystal doesn't need any enemies.

Walt-in-Durham

Hey, Walt.

Where have you been? Did you not know that the appeal (403(b) evidence) was heard by the Court of Appeals which denied it? Petersen took the weakest appeal possible to pursue, and did a half-hearted job at that.

The appeal she took was so slipshod that I actually had trouble sympathizing with it myself. There was no way in Hades that the NC Supreme Court would take action on a Petition for Discretionary Review based on it.

Tell me, Walt... Do you believe that Daye's spleen was removed during emergency surgery on April 3, 2011, or do you believe that it was present at his autopsy on April 14th? Give me an answer without equivocating!; March 25, 2016 at 3:24 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous said...

Sid:

You have 282 days to exonerate and free Mangum.

It has been 10 days since the Ides of March and 3,205 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Hey, Abe.

Thanks for the update.

Despite the recent setback, which I must admit really hurt, I have no doubt that Mangum's release is imminent.

(What are you doing up so early?); March 25, 2016 at 3:27 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"First of all, Shan Carter is not a child murderer. Your definition of a child murderer would be a distracted driver striking and killing a child who ran into the street in front of a vehicle."

What an incredible fabrication by harr the hypocritical fabricator this time.

Shan Carter went in pursuit of Tyrone Baker, firing an illegally possessded .357 magnum at Baker. One of the shots from Carter's illegally possessed hand gun struck an killed Demetrius Green. harr the hypocritical fabricator says Shan Carter did not murder Demetrius Green.

Does anyone now question harr's utter lack of morality?

Well, what can one expect from someone who claims that one of the most corrupt prosecutors in US legal history was a deceent, honorable minister of justice who acted with integrity.

Hey, harr the hypocritical fabricator, do you really think shootng a child with an illegally possessed .357 Magnum was not murder?; March 25, 2016 at 3:33 AM
Anonymous said...: Blogger Nifong Supporter said...

"Thank you for your implied concern about my mental status, however, let me assure you that it is intact and operating at top level."

So says harr the hypocritical fabricator who thinks shooting a child with an illegally possessed .357 magnum is not murder.

"Unfortunately, Ms. Mangum has already been viciously abused by the State and the mainstream media... together with others in an unholy cabal have had her convicted in a kangaroo court under biased Judge Paul Ridgeway."

Another fabrication from harr the hypocritical fabricator who believes that shooting a child with an illegally possessed .357 magnum is not murder.

"There is nothing I could possibly do to make Mangum's situation worse than it is... everything I do, contrary to your view, can only help to bring her justice, freedom, and an exoneration."

Yet another fabrication from harr the hypocritical fabricator who believes that shooting a child with an illegally possessed .357 magnum is not murder.; March 25, 2016 at 3:38 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Tell me, Walt... Do you believe that Daye's spleen was removed during emergency surgery on April 3, 2011, or do you believe that it was present at his autopsy on April 14th? Give me an answer without equivocating!"

The spleen is irrelevant. Whether or not the spleen was removed has no bearing on the fact that Reginald Daye died from complications of the stab wound.

I remind you, harr the hypocritical fabricator who believes that shooting a child with an illegally possessed .357 magnum is not murder, you are the minimally trained, minimally experienced medical school graduate who was never accepted into residency training, who never achieved medical board specialty certification and who spent a truncated post medical school career filing and losing frivolous lawsuits, are not capable of understanding what happened to Reginald Daye.

So far as equivocating, how about you, without equivocating and dodging and trying futile attempts to cover your exposed butt, tell us what evidence was there that crystal was raped.

Without equivocating or dodging or trying to use futile attempts to cover your exposed butt, explain why you were never accepted into residenct training and never achieved medical specialty board certification. In other words, explain why you are so woefully unqualified as a physician.; March 25, 2016 at 3:51 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Despite the recent setback, which I must admit really hurt, I have no doubt that Mangum's release is imminent."

Here harr the hypocritical fabricator who believes that shooting a child with an illegally possessed .357 magnum is not murder, shows ghe is also a delusional megalomaniac.; March 25, 2016 at 3:54 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny, regardless of what may have been going on when filed - even you now admit felony murder isn't an issue - Crystal was never in jeopardy from it - so why does Sid refuse to admit that? Can't you elucidate him?; March 25, 2016 at 4:20 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricator:

You allege Tyrone Baer was armed. You allege that Shan Carter hit Tyrone Bakr with his first two shots. The gun, wf which Shan Carterwas in illegal possession, was a .357 magnum. The .357 magnum round was designed as a man stopper. A man who has taken two hits from a .357 magnum, one in his thigh, one in his torso, most likely, would be unable to flee. You did admit that Tyrone Baker did flee.

If you are armed and one fires at you, you fire back. If you are unarmed, you get out of the line of fire. I learned that when I was in the Army.

The question is, if Tyrone Baker was armed, why did he not fire back, especially, as you have documented, he intended to kill the people who took the money from his apartment.

Tyrone Baker was not hit by Shnn Carter's first two shots. He was not armed. If Shan Carter is as intelligent as you claim, he had the capacity to know that.

Shan Carter chased after and continued to fire at an unarmed man. He shot that unarmed man while he was fleeing. He also shot Demetrius Green with the same gun he fired at Tyrone Baker.

Shan Carter did murder a child.

If Tyrone Baker was hit by Shan Carter's first two shots, consider this:

If Tyrone Baker was able to flee, he was also able to use a firearm. If he was armed, and considering his murderous intent towards Shan Carter, why did he not fire back?

And if he was wounded, then Shan Carter pursued and fired at a wounded man who should have been no threat to him. Had he not done so, he would not have killed Demetrius Green.

Let's have some more equivocating and dodging and butt covering from you on this one.; March 25, 2016 at 5:24 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid said:

"(What are you doing up so early?)"

I posted my comment at 6:22 am, EDT. I don't know anything about websites or the internet, but I think your website is set to a different time zone - maybe UTC.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 25, 2016 at 5:25 AM
Anonymous said...: "First of all, Shan Carter is not a child murderer."

Tell that to the mother of Demetrius Greene.; March 25, 2016 at 6:28 AM
Fake Kenhyderal said...: I thought Crystal had Peterson withdraw her appeal?; March 25, 2016 at 6:29 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Fake Kenhyderal said...
I thought Crystal had Peterson withdraw her appeal?

You thought wrong, Fake K. The NC Court of Appeals denied the feeble single-issue appeal presented by turncoat appellate defense attorney Petersen.

It made no sense to present the same rubbish to the NC Supreme Court in a Petition for Discretionary Review, so Mangum asked Petersen to withdraw her PDR (which was filed to supercede the strong PDR which was filed Pro Se by Mangum).; March 25, 2016 at 6:35 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sid said:

"(What are you doing up so early?)"

I posted my comment at 6:22 am, EDT. I don't know anything about websites or the internet, but I think your website is set to a different time zone - maybe UTC.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL

Raleigh is EDT also. Somehow, I was thinking that Chicago was CDT. 6:22 am, I agree, is not too early. (Keep in mind, I was assuming that you showered, shaved, and ate breakfast before sitting down at your computer.); March 25, 2016 at 6:38 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Nifong Supporter said...

"Tell me, Walt... Do you believe that Daye's spleen was removed during emergency surgery on April 3, 2011, or do you believe that it was present at his autopsy on April 14th? Give me an answer without equivocating!"

The spleen is irrelevant. Whether or not the spleen was removed has no bearing on the fact that Reginald Daye died from complications of the stab wound.

I remind you, harr the hypocritical fabricator who believes that shooting a child with an illegally possessed .357 magnum is not murder, you are the minimally trained, minimally experienced medical school graduate who was never accepted into residency training, who never achieved medical board specialty certification and who spent a truncated post medical school career filing and losing frivolous lawsuits, are not capable of understanding what happened to Reginald Daye.

So far as equivocating, how about you, without equivocating and dodging and trying futile attempts to cover your exposed butt, tell us what evidence was there that crystal was raped.

Without equivocating or dodging or trying to use futile attempts to cover your exposed butt, explain why you were never accepted into residenct training and never achieved medical specialty board certification. In other words, explain why you are so woefully unqualified as a physician.

So, let me get this straight. Your position is that it is okay for a person to purposefully lie while on the witness stand and under oath as long as the lie is not pertaining to what the testifier considers to be a relevant issue. Am I correct in my interpretation of your position?; March 25, 2016 at 6:42 AM
Anonymous said...: No, Sidney. You are not correct in your interpretation of the poster's position.

You have never provided any evidence that Nichols "purposefully lie[d] while on the witness stand." You have provided evidence only that statements were false, but not that Nichols intentionally lied. The poster noted correctly that the statements related to the spleen were unimportant to the determination of death. Thus, you are hard pressed to explain why Nichols would willfully commit perjury on unimportant subjects.

Moreover, you demonstrate your hypocrisy when you explain Nifong's false statements in court as mere "mistakes" despite the importance of such statements.; March 25, 2016 at 6:57 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid - you lie all the time, and refuse to learn, and are a disgrace and an abuser. You are hardly the right person to be accusing others of things.

Crystal ever give Meier permission to talk to you? What does he say?; March 25, 2016 at 7:13 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid said:

"Somehow, I was thinking that Chicago was CDT."

It is, but my business takes me all over the country. I am presently in Virginia.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 25, 2016 at 7:18 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"So, let me get this straight. Your position is that it is okay for a person to purposefully lie while on the witness stand and under oath as long as the lie is not pertaining to what the testifier considers to be a relevant issue. Am I correct in my interpretation of your position?"

harr the hypocritical fabricator who believes that someone who shoots a child and kills that child when he is trying to run down and kill someone else is not a child killer, you again equivocate and dodge and futilely try to cover yur exposed butt again, the issue is whether or not Dr. Nicholls intended too deceive anyone. You have not established that he had. In any event, the condition of the spleen, whether or not it was present, did not change the fact that Reginald Daye died from a stab wound inflicted by crystal, and crystal failed to establish that she acted in self defense.

That you can not understand complex medical problems is not surprising, considering you are but a minimally trained, minimally experienced medical school graduate who was never accepted into residency training, who never achieved medical board certification and who spent a truncated post medical school career filing and losing a string of frivolous, non meritorious lawsuits.

What is laughable and another fabrication on your part is that you try to pass yourself off as a medical expert.; March 25, 2016 at 7:49 AM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "Yes there can be"
(an explanation for the obscure and meritless Larceny of chose in action) And that explanation is?; March 25, 2016 at 8:22 AM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"Anonymous said: "Yes there can be"
(an explanation for the obscure and meritless Larceny of chose in action) And that explanation is?"

kenny hissy fit, that yoou can not understand comples legal issues is not surprising, considering your demonstrated ignorance of the facts of the Duke Rape Hoax.

Or maybe you just lied.; March 25, 2016 at 8:34 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid said:

"So, let me get this straight. Your position is that it is okay for a person to purposefully lie while on the witness stand and under oath as long as the lie is not pertaining to what the testifier considers to be a relevant issue. Am I correct in my interpretation of your position?"

Anonymous said no such thing. He said the spleen is irrelevant to any issue in the murder charge against Mangum. And he is right: the spleen is an issue you and only you have. It has nothing to do with Mangum's guilt or innocence.

Moreover, you have no idea whether the witness lied about Mr. Daye's spleen, much less whether it was purposeful. Both terms require a specific intent.

It is possible for a person to misstate something without it rising to the level of a lie, or a purposeful lie (which is redundant, since all lies are, by definition, purposeful). Memories and recollections (especially as to irrelevant details) fade over time, witnesses misperceive things all the time, people routinely misstate things w/o any intent to deceive and different people have different perceptions of things based on where they were when they witnessed the event, what was happening around them, light and weather conditions, their own personal biases and many other factors. Juries are free to place whatever weight they choose on a witness's testimony and to make their own determinations regarding a witness's credibility and truthfulness.

For example, a witness may testify that the defendant in a car accident case was wearing a blue dress with yellow polka dots. However, the dress was actually a blue dress with yellow roses on it. The witness didn't lie about the dress; that was his perception of it from 20 yards away. Likewise, a witness may forget the exact time or date of the accident incident he saw when he testifies about it six months later. That is not a lie and it certainly, on its own, does not negate his testimony about the accident.

As I stated earlier, the spleen is an issue that you and you alone have. It is not relevant to Mangum's guilt or innocence, you can't prove it's a lie and it's not anything a court is going to review or a governor will issue a pardon over. You will need much, much more than that to exonerate Mangum.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 25, 2016 at 9:06 AM
kenhyderal said...: Crystal was never given that consideration when questioned about the confrontation in the highly charged and violent confrontation with Daye before she was branded a liar; March 25, 2016 at 10:05 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny,

You realize you are a pathetic joke and no one takes anything you say seriously, right? You and Sid do all you can to abuse Crystal. It's sad.

Crystal's lawyers were fighting for her, which terrified you and Sid, because you knew if she went to prison she'd be much more receptive to your abuse and manipulations. Your only issue is she didn't get the LWOP you tried. Her attorneys couldn't overcome all of the damage you and Sid did, but at least they overcame enough so she can still have a life after prison.; March 25, 2016 at 10:13 AM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "Crystal's lawyers were fighting for her".................... What a joke.; March 25, 2016 at 10:24 AM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"Crystal was never given that consideration when questioned about the confrontation in the highly charged and violent confrontation with Daye before she was branded a liar"

Crystal was the aggressor in that confrontation.

She branded herself a liar before she ever murdered Reginald Daye.

She lied when she claimed she was raped by members of the Duke Lacrosse team.She lied before she ever participated in the FOUR improper lineup procedures, the last of which was when she accused three obviously innocent men of raping her.

She lied in her pathetic excuse of a memoir, when she gave an untrue account of wht happened when she stole the cab.; March 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

" Anonymous said: "Crystal's lawyers were fighting for her".................... What a joke."

kenny hissy fit said da nifong did not file rape charges against the lacrosse defendants.

kenny hissy fit said kilgo had an anonymous lacrosse player friend who witnessed the rape of crystal at the Lacrosse party. In the 10+ years since the Duke Rape Hoax, said anonymous lacrosse player friend of crystal has ever emerged.

kenny hissy fit said that crystal's account of the cab heft was true, ven though it is completely at odds with the police recoreds of the event, which were generated years before crystal became notorious for being the false accuser in the Duke Rape Hoax.

I would not call kenny hissy fit a joke. He is either pathetically ignorant,or he is a pathetically ineffective liar.; March 25, 2016 at 10:34 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny - you are the joke, and everyone here knows it. Even Sid knows you are a pathetic loser who hides behind his keyboard.

Either you are an idiot, a liar, an abuser, or just that dumb.

Which is it? Cause you can't carry a rational argument to save your life.; March 25, 2016 at 11:13 AM
Anonymous said...: kenny:

Mangum was given the same consideration that any witness is afforded when she unwisely chose to testify on her behalf. She had a chance to tell her side of the story to the jury and was subjected to cross examination by the opposition.

Mangum told a version of events that was contradicted by the evidence; she also strangely testified that Mr. Daye had never been violent towards her (which is odd given the claim that Mr. Daye was a wildly jealous, out of control and violent man). Her story collapsed under cross examination.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 25, 2016 at 11:22 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny thinks it is unfair that Crystal's testimony was subject to cross examination, but Daye's statement was not.; March 25, 2016 at 11:35 AM
Anonymous said...: Anonymous said...

"Kenny thinks it is unfair that Crystal's testimony was subject to cross examination, but Daye's statement was not."

Presumes a fact not in evidence, that kenny can think.; March 25, 2016 at 1:34 PM
A Lawyer said...: The NC Court of Appeals denied the feeble single-issue appeal presented by turncoat appellate defense attorney Petersen.

It made no sense to present the same rubbish to the NC Supreme Court in a Petition for Discretionary Review, so Mangum asked Petersen to withdraw her PDR (which was filed to supercede the strong PDR which was filed Pro Se by Mangum).

The NC Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to grant PDR on any ground which was not presented to the Court of Appeals. So Mangum, at your urging, withdrew a PDR which had some chance (perhaps only a slim one) of being granted, and substituted one which had zero chance of being granted. As Walt is wont to say, with friends like you, Mangum doesn't need enemies.; March 25, 2016 at 3:20 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "Crystal was the aggressor in that confrontation"........................It's unbelievable that anyone would actually think that is the case. A larger, drunken, jealous, chronic alcoholic who kicked down the bathroom door where Crystal sought refuge and dragged her out by the hair.; March 25, 2016 at 3:50 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said:Kenny - you are the joke, and everyone here knows it. Even Sid knows you are a pathetic loser who hides behind his keyboard. Either you are an idiot, a liar, an abuser, or just that dumb. Which is it? Cause you can't carry a rational argument to save your life"...............................................................Who is hiding, me or this anonymous poster. Ad hominin attacks are not rational arguments. Let's ask Dr. Harr what he thinks.; March 25, 2016 at 4:01 PM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"Anonymous said: "Crystal was the aggressor in that confrontation"........................It's unbelievable that anyone would actually think that is the case. A larger, drunken, jealous, chronic alcoholic who kicked down the bathroom door where Crystal sought refuge and dragged her out by the hair."

kenny hissy fit shows again he is either ignorant or he is a liar.; March 25, 2016 at 4:20 PM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"Anonymous said:Kenny - you are the joke, and everyone here knows it. Even Sid knows you are a pathetic loser who hides behind his keyboard. Either you are an idiot, a liar, an abuser, or just that dumb. Which is it? Cause you can't carry a rational argument to save your life"...............................................................Who is hiding, me or this anonymous poster. Ad hominin attacks are not rational arguments. Let's ask Dr. Harr what he thinks."

Presumes another fact not inevidence, that harr the hypocritical fabricator camn think. He can not.; March 25, 2016 at 4:22 PM
John D. Smith said...: Kenny whines: It's unbelievable that anyone would actually think that is the case. A larger, drunken, jealous, chronic alcoholic who kicked down the bathroom door where Crystal sought refuge and dragged her out by the hair.

Kenny,

This comment is intellectually dishonest. You deliberately misrepresent the opinions of virtually every commenter on this board and ignore relevant evidence and law.

There is no question that a larger Daye kicked down the bathroom door and dragged Crystal out by her hair. There is no question that Daye was the aggressor in the conflict at that point. No posters question that conclusion.

As you know, what happened later in the argument is in question. What happened later (and not at the outset) is critical in determining whether Crystal acted in self-defense. Despite its importance, you ignore this.

Daye claimed to have released Crystal and walked away, apparently deciding to throw Crystal out. Crystal claimed to have stabbed Daye while he was straddling her. The evidence generally supported Daye's version. The jury believed Daye and did not believe Crystal. The jury's determination of fact is not appealable.

We all understand that you disagree with the jury's conclusion. Sidney refuses to post the transcript and evidence, making detailed analysis more difficult. We also recognize that you have refused to provide a detailed analysis of the evidence, statements and testimony or provide a detailed argument, claiming that you do not want to show your hand for Crystal's defense in her retrial.

As a result, we recognize that, based on the arguments you and Sidney have made, the probability of a retrial is zero.

John D. Smith
New York, NY; March 25, 2016 at 5:12 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: John D. Smith said...
Kenny whines: It's unbelievable that anyone would actually think that is the case. A larger, drunken, jealous, chronic alcoholic who kicked down the bathroom door where Crystal sought refuge and dragged her out by the hair.

Kenny,

This comment is intellectually dishonest. You deliberately misrepresent the opinions of virtually every commenter on this board and ignore relevant evidence and law.

There is no question that a larger Daye kicked down the bathroom door and dragged Crystal out by her hair. There is no question that Daye was the aggressor in the conflict at that point. No posters question that conclusion.

As you know, what happened later in the argument is in question. What happened later (and not at the outset) is critical in determining whether Crystal acted in self-defense. Despite its importance, you ignore this.

Daye claimed to have released Crystal and walked away, apparently deciding to throw Crystal out. Crystal claimed to have stabbed Daye while he was straddling her. The evidence generally supported Daye's version. The jury believed Daye and did not believe Crystal. The jury's determination of fact is not appealable.

We all understand that you disagree with the jury's conclusion. Sidney refuses to post the transcript and evidence, making detailed analysis more difficult. We also recognize that you have refused to provide a detailed analysis of the evidence, statements and testimony or provide a detailed argument, claiming that you do not want to show your hand for Crystal's defense in her retrial.

As a result, we recognize that, based on the arguments you and Sidney have made, the probability of a retrial is zero.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

Hey, John.

First, you agree that Daye should have been charged with assault on a female... right? As you know, many men have been arrested on that charge for doing nothing more than shoving their female mate.

Also, although Daye initially stated he and Crystal were arguing over money, he later confessed that he was upset because she disrespected him. In actuality there really was not an argument, but rather a one-sided debasement of Crystal by a drunken and jealous Reginald Daye.

Facts of the case support Crystal's scenario in which she claimed that Daye was straddling her when she was on a mattress in the master bedroom when she stabbed him. Blood on the mattress confirmed that. The prosecution and Daye's version is that she stabbed Daye in the hallway as he was leaving... their version disregards the blood on the mattress based solely on the fact that the crime lab staff were unable to obtain DNA from the specimen.

Actually, a re-trial would be a waste of money, time, and resources. The State needs to exonerate Mangum and free her from custody... the sooner the better. End of story, Mr. Smith.; March 25, 2016 at 6:54 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous A Lawyer said...
The NC Court of Appeals denied the feeble single-issue appeal presented by turncoat appellate defense attorney Petersen.

It made no sense to present the same rubbish to the NC Supreme Court in a Petition for Discretionary Review, so Mangum asked Petersen to withdraw her PDR (which was filed to supercede the strong PDR which was filed Pro Se by Mangum).

The NC Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to grant PDR on any ground which was not presented to the Court of Appeals. So Mangum, at your urging, withdrew a PDR which had some chance (perhaps only a slim one) of being granted, and substituted one which had zero chance of being granted. As Walt is wont to say, with friends like you, Mangum doesn't need enemies.

Mangum needs me because I will get her out of this disgusting situation. What she did not need were the turncoat defense attorneys that she had supposedly representing her. They were pathetic.; March 25, 2016 at 6:57 PM
Anonymous said...: Had Mangum listened to he attorneys, she would probably be out of prison by now.; March 25, 2016 at 9:10 PM
kenhyderal said...: @ John D Smith: Daye's unexamined version defies logic. Remember, jealous Daye was trying to keep Crystal from leaving. He said so because he thought it dangerous for her to go out at night. His version then states he got off from on top of of Crystal because he suddenly became fearful for his life and he decided to flee his own apartment. He claims she ran to the kitchen got a knife and attacked him as he fled. His version gives no explanation for the myriad of knives strewn throughout the apartment; not to mention he was a knife throwing hobbyist. He admitted to being enraged because Crystal had disrespected him and while she was hiding in the locked bathroom she tried to call a male friend to come and rescue her which further enraged him. Crystal was afraid not angry.; March 25, 2016 at 9:33 PM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: Had Mangum listened to he attorneys, she would probably be out of prison by now"........ How? By pleading guilty to a crime she did not commit. By not taking the stand to tell under oath what happened to her. Where is the justice in that. Justice depends on truth. Confusing a witness and calling them a liar is not an attempt to seek justice. A court appointed Attorney who does minimal work and does a minimal relevant investigation of the case does not lead to an innocent person's acquittal. Pressure and coercion to keep almighty Duke untainted does not serve the interest of the poor and powerless.; March 25, 2016 at 9:48 PM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Hey, John.

"First, you agree that Daye should have been charged with assault on a female... right? As you know, many men have been arrested on that charge for doing nothing more than shoving their female mate."

Maybe so. However Crystal did murder Reginald Daye. That you are incapable of recognizing that fact is meaningless.

"Also, although Daye initially stated he and Crystal were arguing over money, he later confessed that he was upset because she disrespected him. In actuality there really was not an argument, but rather a one-sided debasement of Crystal by a drunken and jealous Reginald Daye."

There was an argument. harr the hypocritical fabricator fabricates again.

"Facts of the case support Crystal's scenario in which she claimed that Daye was straddling her when she was on a mattress in the master bedroom when she stabbed him. Blood on the mattress confirmed that. The prosecution and Daye's version is that she stabbed Daye in the hallway as he was leaving... their version disregards the blood on the mattress based solely on the fact that the crime lab staff were unable to obtain DNA from the specimen."

Crystal's version was the version at odds with the facts.harr the hypocritical fabricator fabricates again. He does not know the facts of the case, just like he does notknow the facts of the Duke Rape hoax.

"Actually, a re-trial would be a waste of money, time, and resources. The State needs to exonerate Mangum and free her from custody... the sooner the better. End of story, Mr. Smith."

So you admit a re trial would have had the same outcome. What you are saying is, dispense with a re trial and give your favorite murderess/false accuser a pass for her crimes. Just like you want the state to give felony murderer, child murderer shan carter a pass for his crimes.; March 26, 2016 at 2:58 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Mangum needs me because I will get her out of this disgusting situation. What she did not need were the turncoat defense attorneys that she had supposedly representing her. They were pathetic."

As I recall you were repeatedly claiming that the State had no case, that the state would never take crystal to trial, that the state would drop all charges. Recently you loudly trumpeted loud and long that crystal would be freed by the ides of March, your futile attempts at personal posterior camouflage notwithstanding.

You have failed to get her out of this disgusting situation before. You will fail again. Your promises are your empty self delusion.; March 26, 2016 at 3:04 AM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"@ John D Smith: Daye's unexamined version defies logic."

Hypocritical statement from someonewho has demonstrated he is incapable of logical thinking, i.e., his belief that kilgo has an anonymous Lacrosse player friend who witnessed a rape and who saw many non lacrosse player party attendees who perpetrated the alleged rape.

"Remember, jealous Daye was trying to keep Crystal from leaving. He said so because he thought it dangerous for her to go out at night. His version then states he got off from on top of of Crystal because he suddenly became fearful for his life and he decided to flee his own apartment. He claims she ran to the kitchen got a knife and attacked him as he fled. His version gives no explanation for the myriad of knives strewn throughout the apartment; not to mention he was a knife throwing hobbyist."

Who said he was a knife throwing hobbyist? crystal, after she was chargedwith thw murder of Reginald Daye. Not at all credible.

"He admitted to being enraged because Crystal had disrespected him and while she was hiding in the locked bathroom she tried to call a male friend to come and rescue her which further enraged him. Crystal was afraid not angry."

Crystal was angry, and she stabbed Reginald Daye when he tried to leave. kenny hissy fit fails again to get his and harr's favorite murderess a pass for her crime.; March 26, 2016 at 3:10 AM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"Anonymous said: Had Mangum listened to he attorneys, she would probably be out of prison by now"........ How? By pleading guilty to a crime she did not commit."

She did commit the crime. She also lied about being raped on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

"By not taking the stand to tell under oath what happened to her. Where is the justice in that. Justice depends on truth."

crystal was not obligated to take the stand. She did so against her attorney's advice. And she did not tell the truth as to what happened to her, just like she did not tell the truth about what happened to her on the night of 13/14 March 2006, just like she did not tell the truth about the incident in which she stole a cab.

"Confusing a witness and calling them a liar is not an attempt to seek justice."

Cross examining a witness and exposing consistencies in her testimony is not confusing the witness. Lying witnesses confuse themselves. Someone who tels the truth does notget confused on cross examination. A liar, who has to remember the details of a made up story which does not fit the facts does. You again are saying crystal should have gotten a pass for her crime, nothing more.

"A court appointed Attorney who does minimal work and does a minimal relevant investigation of the case does not lead to an innocent person's acquittal."

crystal was not innocent.

"Pressure and coercion to keep almighty Duke untainted does not serve the interest of the poor and powerless."

Except there was no attempt to keep Duke untainted in the Reginald Daye murder case.

However there was a such an attempt on the part of Duke when crystal falsely accused the Lacrosse players of raping her. I do not recall any objection on your part to that.; March 26, 2016 at 3:25 AM
Anonymous said...: Sidney,

Can you post the police reports with Daye's statement again? if not, can you give us the link where you posted it earlier? Thanks.; March 26, 2016 at 5:10 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney,

Can you post the police reports with Daye's statement again? if not, can you give us the link where you posted it earlier? Thanks.

Are you referring to the April 4, 2011 police interview with Officer Marianne Bond in which he admitted to giving the cashier's checks to Mangum and stating that they were arguing about her disrespecting him? Let me know if this is the one you want. I am busy trying to complete another blog which I hope to be uploaded today, but I'll try to get around to it shortly thereafter. Do not hesitate to keep reminding me until I do.; March 26, 2016 at 5:46 AM
Anonymous said...: How does Daye's version (of the relevant parts) defy logic?

He admits that Crystal locked herself in the bathroom (thus no matter what happened prior to that, she was no longer the aggressor);

He admits he kicked in the door, and drug her out by the hair (thus he was clearly the aggressor);

He then admits he let her go, and told her to leave - but she ran into the kitchen and grabbed a knife and came back at him (almost exactly as she had done with Milton Morgan)- stabbing him in the hallway.

His story makes perfect logical sense. Crystal agrees with him, except where the stabbing takes place - her story makes sense as well - except for lack of bruising on her neck. The Jury had 2 stories that both were plausible, and they chose the one they believed, and thus rejected self-defense.

Both stories are plausible, both stories painted Daye as the aggressor - the issue is that if he let Crystal go, and turned to leave, the fight "stopped." Unfortunately, from what Crystal says, he had never been violent or angry in the past, so she didn't really have any reason to fear he would pursue her, or abuse her later - had he had a pattern of abuse, even running to the kitchen may not have defeated self-defense (but it probably still would have).

Just because you disagree with Daye's version doesn't mean it's wrong. And, remember, for self-defense, whatever happened before Crystal entering the bathroom only went towards credibility, but the entire key is if he was on top of Crystal and choking her, or he let her go - and both were plausible, and both argued - the Jury believed Daye's version, not Crystal's, but Crystal's was argued.; March 26, 2016 at 6:17 AM
Anonymous said...: The Money Orders are a red herring - they had nothing to do with Felony Murder, the jury quickly rejected them as an issue. Sid's obsession with them and felony murder just shows how poor his advice to Crystal really is.; March 26, 2016 at 6:18 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sidney,

Can you post the police reports with Daye's statement again? if not, can you give us the link where you posted it earlier? Thanks.

Are you referring to the April 4, 2011 police interview with Officer Marianne Bond in which he admitted to giving the cashier's checks to Mangum and stating that they were arguing about her disrespecting him? Let me know if this is the one you want. I am busy trying to complete another blog which I hope to be uploaded today, but I'll try to get around to it shortly thereafter. Do not hesitate to keep reminding me until I do."

harr the hypocritical fabricator is waffling again.; March 26, 2016 at 7:03 AM
Anonymous said...: Correction:

kenhyderal said...

"@ John D Smith: Daye's unexamined version defies logic."

Hypocritical statement from someonewho has demonstrated he is incapable of logical thinking, i.e., his belief that kilgo has an anonymous Lacrosse player friend who witnessed a rape and who saw many non lacrosse player party attendees who perpetrated the alleged rape.

"Remember, jealous Daye was trying to keep Crystal from leaving. He said so because he thought it dangerous for her to go out at night. His version then states he got off from on top of of Crystal because he suddenly became fearful for his life and he decided to flee his own apartment. He claims she ran to the kitchen got a knife and attacked him as he fled. His version gives no explanation for the myriad of knives strewn throughout the apartment; not to mention he was a knife throwing hobbyist."

Who said he was a knife throwing hobbyist? crystal, after she was chargedwith thw murder of Reginald Daye. Not at all credible.

"He admitted to being enraged because Crystal had disrespected him and while she was hiding in the locked bathroom she tried to call a male friend to come and rescue her which further enraged him. Crystal was afraid not angry."

Crystal was angry, and she stabbed Reginald Daye when he tried to leave. kenny hissy fit fails again to get his and harr's favorite murderess a pass for her crime.

March 26, 2016 at 3:10 AM
Anonymous Anonymous said...

kenhyderal said...

"Anonymous said: Had Mangum listened to he attorneys, she would probably be out of prison by now"........ How? By pleading guilty to a crime she did not commit."

She did commit the crime. She also lied about being raped on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

"By not taking the stand to tell under oath what happened to her. Where is the justice in that. Justice depends on truth."

crystal was not obligated to take the stand. She did so against her attorney's advice. And she did not tell the truth as to what happened to her, just like she did not tell the truth about what happened to her on the night of 13/14 March 2006, just like she did not tell the truth about the incident in which she stole a cab.

"Confusing a witness and calling them a liar is not an attempt to seek justice."

Cross examining a witness and exposing INCONSISTENCIES in her testimony is not confusing the witness. Lying witnesses confuse themselves. Someone who tels the truth does not get confused on cross examination. A liar, who has to remember the details of a made up story which does not fit the facts does. You again are saying crystal should have gotten a pass for her crime, nothing more.

"A court appointed Attorney who does minimal work and does a minimal relevant investigation of the case does not lead to an innocent person's acquittal."

crystal was not innocent.

"Pressure and coercion to keep almighty Duke untainted does not serve the interest of the poor and powerless."

Except there was no attempt to keep Duke untainted in the Reginald Daye murder case.

However there was a such an attempt on the part of Duke when crystal falsely accused the Lacrosse players of raping her. I do not recall any objection on your part to that.; March 26, 2016 at 7:04 AM
The Great Kilgo said...: kenhyderal: I have the information you are looking for. Why are you ignoring me?; March 26, 2016 at 7:21 AM
The Great Kilgo said...: Oh No !

Ubes has lapsed into his

notorious Crank mode !; March 26, 2016 at 7:32 AM
Anonymous said...: Daye never said he feared for his life - he said he let her go and turned to go (likely back to the bedroom - Crystal had a free path to the door - the State said he was turning to leave the apartment, the Defense noted he was just going back to the bedroom - he wasn't scared for his life, and never said he was).; March 26, 2016 at 7:33 AM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: " but the entire key is if he was on top of Crystal and choking her, or he let her go - and both were plausible"............In which case, the Judge's instructions on reasonable doubt should have accrued to Crystal; March 26, 2016 at 7:58 AM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"Anonymous said: " but the entire key is if he was on top of Crystal and choking her, or he let her go - and both were plausible"............In which case, the Judge's instructions on reasonable doubt should have accrued to Crystal"

No it wouldn't. There was no evidence that Reginald Daye was on top of crystal choking her. She was examined by para medics after the incident and they found no evidence of trauma.

On the other hand, there was no doubt that the Lacrosse players were innocent. kenny hissy fit still prsumes them guilty. He does not feel they should have benefited from the overwhelming evidence that crystal was not raped.; March 26, 2016 at 8:03 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricator and/or kenny hissy fit or possibly both posting anonymously again trying to delude people into believing they have support.; March 26, 2016 at 8:05 AM
kenhyderal said...: Which anonymous post was that?; March 26, 2016 at 8:44 AM
kenhyderal said...: Anonymous said: "There was no evidence that Reginald Daye was on top of crystal choking her".......................................... Just the angle of penetration.; March 26, 2016 at 8:46 AM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

Which anonymous post was that?"

Just one of several for which you or harr or both of you are responsible.; March 26, 2016 at 8:48 AM
Anonymous said...: kenhyderal said...

"Anonymous said: "There was no evidence that Reginald Daye was on top of crystal choking her".......................................... Just the angle of penetration."

Who testified that the angle of penetration showed Reginald Daye was ontopof crystal choking her, Provide a url.; March 26, 2016 at 8:50 AM
Anonymous said...: Kenny, whether it should have or not - the Jury decided they believed Daye beyond a reasonable doubt - that is their right, and the Courts won't overturn that. Since Crystal's full story was presented, and rejected - the decision of the jury is final and won't be challenged by a Judge.

Read the law and stop whining.; March 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid:

You have 281 days to exonerate and free Mangum.

It has been 11 days since the Ides of March and 3,206 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 26, 2016 at 9:50 AM
Anonymous said...: kenny hissy fit:

While we are on the subject of evidence, provide evidence crystal was raped on the night of 13/14 March 2006.

You proclaim she was, but you have been unable to provided any evidence.; March 26, 2016 at 10:10 AM
Walt said...: Sid wrote: "Hey, Walt.

Where have you been? Did you not know that the appeal (403(b) evidence) was heard by the Court of Appeals which denied it? Petersen took the weakest appeal possible to pursue, and did a half-hearted job at that.

The appeal she took was so slipshod that I actually had trouble sympathizing with it myself. There was no way in Hades that the NC Supreme Court would take action on a Petition for Discretionary Review based on it."

Hey Sid, I"ve been paying attention. Something you rather obviously don't do. A petition for discretionary review only reviews matters raised in the court below. That's the point. Of course, you would rather ignore the law to harm Crystal than do anything to help.

"Tell me, Walt... Do you believe that Daye's spleen was removed during emergency surgery on April 3, 2011, or do you believe that it was present at his autopsy on April 14th? Give me an answer without equivocating!"

My beliefs are irrelevant. The facts are. The Independent Medical Examiner and the Medical Examiner agree on the cause of death. That is the only evidence, uncontroverted evidence at that, in the record.

To put it quite simply, you mislead Crystal, to her detriment.

Walt-in-Durham; March 26, 2016 at 11:31 AM
Anonymous said...: kenny hissy fit:

harr te hypocritical fabricator:

The ESPN documentary notes that at the time crystal was supposedly being raped, she was making a cell phone call-it was from her cell phnre records. It was not a 911 call.

So why do the two iof you continue to lie about crystal being raped.

A plausible explanation is, the two of you are guilt presuming racists.

An implausible explanation is that crystal was being raped at the time.; March 26, 2016 at 1:13 PM
Anonymous said...: kenny hissy fit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvTtJ4LxZPI

At the 1:45:18 mark da nifong says all the people at the Lacrosse party were Duke Lacrosse players.

So what about the mystery rapists?

Tere weren't any.; March 26, 2016 at 1:19 PM
Anonymous said...: kenny hissy fit:

correction:

It was at the 1:14:39 mark. All the party sttendees were Duke Lacrosse players.; March 26, 2016 at 1:23 PM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricator:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvTtJ4LxZPI

A link to the ESPN documentary on YouTube.

At the 1:37:-05 mark Professor Coleman says that nifong did crystal a disservice, that he out this emotionally unstable person in a tought situation in which she fell apart.

You say nifong acted with integrity. Professor Coleman says he definitely did not.

Now we know why you do not like the ESPN documentary.

You are afraid of the truth, aren't you.; March 26, 2016 at 2:57 PM
Anonymous said...: More f0r harr the hypocritical fabricator:

At the 1:38:26 mark comes the statement of Jim Coman, who investigated the case for AG Cooper. William Cohan says that nifong told him he and another investigator felt they had been sandbagged when AG Cooper expressed his belief that the Lacrosse players were innocent. Mr. Cohan definitely did not. Cohan never talked to Mr. Coman. Cohan was not at all interested in publishing a true account of the case. Which explains why AG Cooper would not release the contents of the file to him. Like you, Cohan is not interested in the truth.; March 26, 2016 at 3:07 PM
Anonymous said...: Yrt more for harr the hypocritical fabricator:

At the 1:38:44 mark we get to AG Cooper's press conference. At the 1:39:18 mark, what AG Cooper says is, "we believe that these individuals are innocent". He proclaimed nothing. He and his investigators reviewed the evidence(siomething you never did), found that no crime had happened, and, therefore, came to the belief that the accused were innocent.

What really galls you is that they were innocent.You would rather believe that crystal had been brutally raped.

That does not mark you of any friend of crystal.; March 26, 2016 at 3:15 PM
Anonymous said...: for kenny hissy fit:

You also would rather believe crystal had been brutally raped. That also marks you as no friend of crystal.; March 26, 2016 at 3:17 PM
Anonymous said...: More for harr the hypocritical fabricator:

At the 1:42:18 mark:

"In 2014, a man imprisoned for murder for 20 years was granted a new trial based on EVIDENCE WITHHELD BY NIFONG(emphasis added)", the da whom you call a decent, honorable minister of justice who acted with integrity.

And you say you provide enlightenment and elucidation.

Consider yourself enlightened.; March 26, 2016 at 3:27 PM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricator:

kennyhissy fit:

Time for one r both of you to post an anonymous comment to delude people into believing in your non existent goodness and decency.; March 26, 2016 at 3:29 PM
Anonymous said...: One more for harr the hypocritical fabricator:

At the 1:42:37 mark:

"The Innocence Project is campaigning for Nifong's past prosecutions to be reviewed".; March 26, 2016 at 3:34 PM
A Lawyer said...: Mangum needs me because I will get her out of this disgusting situation.

How?; March 26, 2016 at 6:50 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous A Lawyer said...
Mangum needs me because I will get her out of this disgusting situation.

How?

Through enlightenment of the masses. People, other than those who visit this blog site, are ignorant of the truths about Mangum's case. What I need to do is enlighten not just the relatively few who visit this site, but all Tar Heelians, Americans, and Earthians. The mainstream media has been fighting against the enlightenment by suppressing the truth about the case. That, in a nutshell is how Crystal will be freed and exonerated.; March 27, 2016 at 3:52 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
One more for harr the hypocritical fabricator:

At the 1:42:37 mark:

"The Innocence Project is campaigning for Nifong's past prosecutions to be reviewed".

Really? How lame is that? Can you give me a source for that tidbit of information? Thanks.; March 27, 2016 at 3:54 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Yrt more for harr the hypocritical fabricator:

At the 1:38:44 mark we get to AG Cooper's press conference. At the 1:39:18 mark, what AG Cooper says is, "we believe that these individuals are innocent". He proclaimed nothing. He and his investigators reviewed the evidence(siomething you never did), found that no crime had happened, and, therefore, came to the belief that the accused were innocent.

What really galls you is that they were innocent.You would rather believe that crystal had been brutally raped.

That does not mark you of any friend of crystal.

Just because Roy Cooper proclaimed (.. or said) that the Duke Lacrosse defendants were innocent does not make them innocent. What he did was uncalled for and unprecedented. Never has an attorney general, district attorney, or in-the-trenches prosecutor ever made such a statement when dropping the prosecution of a defendant. And for the mainstream media to take the statement as gospel is blasphemous.; March 27, 2016 at 3:58 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
harr the hypocritical fabricator:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvTtJ4LxZPI

A link to the ESPN documentary on YouTube.

At the 1:37:-05 mark Professor Coleman says that nifong did crystal a disservice, that he out this emotionally unstable person in a tought situation in which she fell apart.

You say nifong acted with integrity. Professor Coleman says he definitely did not.

Now we know why you do not like the ESPN documentary.

You are afraid of the truth, aren't you.

Hah! Me, afraid of the truth? Preposterous.

I like James Coleman... as you know, he's a friend of mine. But when it comes to the Duke Lacrosse case we could have no more of a divergent view. I believe Mr. Nifong acted in good faith to prosecute perpetrators of an alleged injustice... which, by the way, happens to be his job description.

Let me assure you that Crystal Mangum is far from being emotionally unstable. The media has shamefully helped to label her as such. Mentally she is quite tough... much stronger than I am.

Anyway, back to the point. Coleman is a Duke University law school professor. For some reason that institute of higher learning has determined that Mangum, Nifong, and anyone connected with or supportive of them or the prosecution team in the Duke Lacrosse case are the "enemy."; March 27, 2016 at 4:09 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Walt said...
Sid wrote: "Hey, Walt.

Where have you been? Did you not know that the appeal (403(b) evidence) was heard by the Court of Appeals which denied it? Petersen took the weakest appeal possible to pursue, and did a half-hearted job at that.

The appeal she took was so slipshod that I actually had trouble sympathizing with it myself. There was no way in Hades that the NC Supreme Court would take action on a Petition for Discretionary Review based on it."

Hey Sid, I"ve been paying attention. Something you rather obviously don't do. A petition for discretionary review only reviews matters raised in the court below. That's the point. Of course, you would rather ignore the law to harm Crystal than do anything to help.

"Tell me, Walt... Do you believe that Daye's spleen was removed during emergency surgery on April 3, 2011, or do you believe that it was present at his autopsy on April 14th? Give me an answer without equivocating!"

My beliefs are irrelevant. The facts are. The Independent Medical Examiner and the Medical Examiner agree on the cause of death. That is the only evidence, uncontroverted evidence at that, in the record.

To put it quite simply, you mislead Crystal, to her detriment.

Walt-in-Durham

Hah! Gotcha, Walt! Can't bring yourself to admit that Dr. Nichols, the star witness for the prosecution and author of the fraudulent autopsy report upon the prosecution of Mangum was based, committed perjury in Mangum's trial.

Ding-a-ling.

Actually, I did not mislead Crystal. She's aware that Nichols committed perjury, and she's aware that her turncoat attorneys, especially Daniel Meier, sold her out... Meier being a bigger betrayer than Iago was to Othello.; March 27, 2016 at 4:15 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
Daye never said he feared for his life - he said he let her go and turned to go (likely back to the bedroom - Crystal had a free path to the door - the State said he was turning to leave the apartment, the Defense noted he was just going back to the bedroom - he wasn't scared for his life, and never said he was).

Daye's and the prosecution's story not only does not make any sense, but is incoherent. First Daye tells police that they were arguing over money... an obvious lie. Right then, that brings into question Daye's credibility. Am I correct?

Next step, if I am correct, then can we agree upon what the alleged conflict was about. Give me your opinion.; March 27, 2016 at 4:22 AM
Anonymous said...: I think the conflict (and it wasn't alleged - even Crystal admits the conflict) was about what Meier said it was about in his arguments: jealousy. Daye had finally told Crystal he loved her, and took her to meet his family. He thought they had reached a turning point in their relationship, then as soon as they get home, she starts talking to an officer out in front of the apartment - which Daye perceives as flirting, and then Crystal says she is going to go out. Daye was jealous and angry - that's what the defense argued, and that seems to make the most sense.

The money was never an issue - it's a red herring designed to distract the easily distractable from the real issues - and it works. Look at your obsession with it - you still pretend Crystal was facing 1st Degree due to Felony Murder, and she wasn't - but you used, and continue to use, that myth to further your alleged conspiracies and betrayals of Crystal because her attorneys weren't focused on it.

This case was self-defense - Crystal stabbed Daye - there is no dispute about that - the issue is where. Unfortunately the jury believed Daye, not Crystal.; March 27, 2016 at 4:47 AM
Anonymous said...: I also have no doubts that as Daye was throwing Crystal out he may well have yelled "give me my money back" since he wanted her gone. It doesn't change anything - the issue is if he was choking her, or he let her go and she ran into the kitchen. That's what the self-defense case comes down to, and the Jury believed him.; March 27, 2016 at 6:35 AM
John D. Smith said...: Sidney falsely claims: Just because Roy Cooper proclaimed (.. or said) that the Duke Lacrosse defendants were innocent does not make them innocent. What he did was uncalled for and unprecedented. Never has an attorney general, district attorney, or in-the-trenches prosecutor ever made such a statement when dropping the prosecution of a defendant. And for the mainstream media to take the statement as gospel is blasphemous.

This statement is false. You know that it is false. Commenters on this blog have provided a handful of examples of attorneys general and other prosecutors who proclaimed defendants to be innocent when they either dropped charges or asked a court to reverse a conviction.

Although this unfortunately occurs too infrequently, there is precedent.

Sidney, I ask that you apologize for deliberately misleading your readers.

John D. Smith
New York, NY; March 27, 2016 at 7:12 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Anonymous A Lawyer said...
Mangum needs me because I will get her out of this disgusting situation.

How?"

"Through enlightenment of the masses."

You have never enlightened anyone.

"People, other than those who visit this blog site, are ignorant of the truths about Mangum's case."

you and kenny hissy fit are the only ones ignorant of the truths about crystal mangum. That is because you choose to be willfully ignorant.

"What I need to do is enlighten not just the relatively few who visit this site, but all Tar Heelians, Americans, and Earthians."

You have enlightened no one. You are incapable of enlightening anyone, least of all yorself.

"The mainstream media has been fighting against the enlightenment by suppressing the truth about the case. That, in a nutshell is how Crystal will be freed and exonerated."

Tat in a nutshell is why you are a lying deluded megalomaniac.; March 27, 2016 at 8:40 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Yrt more for harr the hypocritical fabricator:

At the 1:38:44 mark we get to AG Cooper's press conference. At the 1:39:18 mark, what AG Cooper says is, "we believe that these individuals are innocent". He proclaimed nothing. He and his investigators reviewed the evidence(siomething you never did), found that no crime had happened, and, therefore, came to the belief that the accused were innocent.

What really galls you is that they were innocent.You would rather believe that crystal had been brutally raped.

That does not mark you of any friend of crystal."

"Just because Roy Cooper proclaimed (.. or said) that the Duke Lacrosse defendants were innocent does not make them innocent."

That is true. What makes them innocent is that the crime with they were charged never happened.You surely have provided no evidence the crime ever happened, and that is because there was no evidence.

"What he did was uncalled for and unprecedented."

What you think was called for was that he proclaimed them guilty.You are p---ed because he did not.

"Never has an attorney general, district attorney, or in-the-trenches prosecutor ever made such a statement when dropping the prosecution of a defendant."

Never has an attorney general ever had to deal with such a gross case of wrongful prosecution.

"And for the mainstream media to take the statement as gospel is blasphemous."

No, what is blasphemous is your guilt presuming racism directed against the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players, your insistence on proclaiming them guilty on the face of overwhelming evidence that no crime happened.; March 27, 2016 at 8:47 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

Walt said...
Sid wrote: "Hey, Walt.

Where have you been? Did you not know that the appeal (403(b) evidence) was heard by the Court of Appeals which denied it? Petersen took the weakest appeal possible to pursue, and did a half-hearted job at that.

The appeal she took was so slipshod that I actually had trouble sympathizing with it myself. There was no way in Hades that the NC Supreme Court would take action on a Petition for Discretionary Review based on it."

Hey Sid, I"ve been paying attention. Something you rather obviously don't do. A petition for discretionary review only reviews matters raised in the court below. That's the point. Of course, you would rather ignore the law to harm Crystal than do anything to help.

"Tell me, Walt... Do you believe that Daye's spleen was removed during emergency surgery on April 3, 2011, or do you believe that it was present at his autopsy on April 14th? Give me an answer without equivocating!"

My beliefs are irrelevant. The facts are. The Independent Medical Examiner and the Medical Examiner agree on the cause of death. That is the only evidence, uncontroverted evidence at that, in the record.

To put it quite simply, you mislead Crystal, to her detriment.

Walt-in-Durham"

"Hah! Gotcha, Walt! Can't bring yourself to admit that Dr. Nichols, the star witness for the prosecution and author of the fraudulent autopsy report upon the prosecution of Mangum was based, committed perjury in Mangum's trial."

HAH! You are too stupid to see you got no one but yourself.Dr.Nichols did not produce a fraudulent autopsy. Dr.Nichols did not commit perjury. The only fraudulent things here are your attempt to portray yourself as a knowledgeable physuician, your attempt to portray yourself as a self taught legal expert, and your attempt to portray yourself as a truth teller.

"Actually, I did not mislead Crystal. She's aware that Nichols committed perjury, and she's aware that her turncoat attorneys, especially Daniel Meier, sold her out... Meier being a bigger betrayer than Iago was to Othello."

Yes you did mislead crystal. Nichols did not commit perjury. Daniel Meier was not a turncoat. Te biggest,grossest traitor to crystal is the person you see eachh and every time you look in to a mirror. Provided yu have the nerve to look in the mirror and see such a lying,hypocritical fabricator,such a delusional megalomaniac, such a gross out and out fraud.; March 27, 2016 at 8:55 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Anonymous Anonymous said...
Daye never said he feared for his life - he said he let her go and turned to go (likely back to the bedroom - Crystal had a free path to the door - the State said he was turning to leave the apartment, the Defense noted he was just going back to the bedroom - he wasn't scared for his life, and never said he was)."

"Daye's and the prosecution's story not only does not make any sense, but is incoherent."

No they weren't

"First Daye tells police that they were arguing over money... an obvious lie."

No it wasn't. Your posts on this blog show you are totally incapable of distinguishing truth from a lie.

"Right then, that brings into question Daye's credibility. Am I correct?"

No, you are an hypocritical fabricator, a deluded megalomaniac, and you have never been correct about anything in your life.

"Next step, if I am correct,"

You were not correct.You never have been.

"then can we agree upon what the alleged conflict was about. Give me your opinion."

No. No truthful insightful person woud ever agree with a lying hypocritical fabricator who has told so many lies.; March 27, 2016 at 9:01 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricator:

What do you think of the fact that crystal, at the time she was allegedly being raped, was actually making a cell phone call, a routine cell phone cal, not a 911 call to report a rape?; March 27, 2016 at 9:05 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricator:

Maybe you canexplain.

When no crime was committed in the first place, how can the person charged with the non existent crime be anything but innocent?; March 27, 2016 at 9:55 AM
Anonymous said...: Crystal Mangum made false rape accusations against the Duke LAX players AND she is guilty of 2nd degree murder.

BOOM! Goes the dynamite!; March 27, 2016 at 10:15 AM
Fake Kenhyderal said...: When Shan Carter pulls a gun and shoots a known drug dealer while they're running away (killing a chid in the process), he's innocent....When officer Twiddy shoots the drug dealer without injuring any bystanders, he's guilty.

You've got a very twisted sense of right and wrong, Sid.; March 27, 2016 at 10:24 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid,

Crystal ever give Meier permission to speak with you, or does she want to let your attacks go unresponded to?; March 27, 2016 at 11:48 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid:

You have 280 days to exonerate and free Mangum.

It has been 12 days since the Ides of March and 3,207 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 27, 2016 at 11:56 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricator:

In your latest screed about Akiel Denkins:

You credit yourself with the following:

Thoughtful Common Sense, the Wisdm of Confucius, the Judgement of Solomon, the Deductive Reasoning and Harrian aanalysis.

In the Duke Rape Hoax, crystal mangum alleged a brutal gang rape in which multiple males assaulted her, penetrated on her, ejaculated on her person and left specimens of their bodily fluids. Physical exam revealed no evidence of the physical trauma such an attack would have left. Testing of the Rape kit yielded no dna evidence tying any of the people nifong wanted to charge to the alleged rape. Testing of the rape kit materials by DNA Security revealed that the only male DNA found on crystal's person did not match any of the men nifong charged with the crime. When nifong's investigator interviewed crystal months after the rape she could not recall being penetrated.

If you truly had the qualities with which you credit yourself, you would have realize that no crime had taken place. But you continue to refer to crystal as the "victim/accuser" in the Duke Rape Case.

It is apparent from that you are totally lacking in the qualities with which you credit yoursef and that your analysis of the Akiel Denkins case is totally without merit, the analysis of a totally incompetent, guilt presuming delusiona megalomaniac.

So why should anyone believe your opinions on anything, The Duke Rape Hoax, Shan Carter's convictions on two counts of felony murder, the murder of Reginald Daye, you are incapable of understanding anything.; March 27, 2016 at 12:00 PM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

Your take on Shan Carter shows you totally lack the qualities with which yu credit yourself.

Shan Carter chased down and shot an unarmed man who was fleeing and in the process shot and killed Demetrius Green. You say that Shan Carter acted in self defense and that the killing of Demetrius Green was an unfortunate accident and not murder.

Would the incident have ever happened had Shan Carter not broken into and stole thousands of dollars from Tyrone Baker's apartment?

Would the incident have happened if Shan Carter not gone out in public to deal illegal drugs packing an illegally possessed firearm knowing Tyrone Baker had made violent threats?

Would the incident have ever happened had Shan Carter gone to the police, turned himself in and given up the tens of thousands of drug profits he took?; March 27, 2016 at 12:57 PM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricating delusionalmegalomaniac:

If you are so gifted with knowledge and wisdom and judgement and deductive ability and what have you, why can you not come up with a reasonable, rational, logical explanation of why anyone should believe you that crystal mangum was raped.

The best YOU have come up with is, crystal identified her assailants, two with 100% certainty and one with 90% certainty(conveniently forgetting that in three previous phoyto lineups she could not identify any Lacrosse player as an assailant, that two of the three could show with 100% certainty that they had not been at the alleged crime scene at the time the alleged crime allegedly happened, that the third never had a mustache but crystal said he did have a mustache, that she said she was 100% sure Brad Ross had been at the party when he was not), and that no one has proven crystal was not raped.

That kind of analysis shows zero brilliance on your part. It shows only stupidity and ignorance.; March 27, 2016 at 1:07 PM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

Explain why you were never accepted into residency, why you never achieved medical specialty certification, and why you spent a truncated post medical school career filing and losing a string of frivolous, non meritorious lawsuits.

Surely, if you were as brilliant as you proclaim, you would not have such a lackluster, undistinguished, meaningless post medical school career.

From The 7 Faces of Doctor Lao:

"Apollonius of Tyana: Mirrors are often ugly and mean. When you die, you will be buried and forgotten, and that is all. And for all the good or evil, creation or destruction, your living might have accomplished, you might just as well never have lived at all."

That is highly applicable to you.

Why don't you turn yourself arund and do something meaningful. There is still time.; March 27, 2016 at 1:15 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
I think the conflict (and it wasn't alleged - even Crystal admits the conflict) was about what Meier said it was about in his arguments: jealousy. Daye had finally told Crystal he loved her, and took her to meet his family. He thought they had reached a turning point in their relationship, then as soon as they get home, she starts talking to an officer out in front of the apartment - which Daye perceives as flirting, and then Crystal says she is going to go out. Daye was jealous and angry - that's what the defense argued, and that seems to make the most sense.

The money was never an issue - it's a red herring designed to distract the easily distractable from the real issues - and it works. Look at your obsession with it - you still pretend Crystal was facing 1st Degree due to Felony Murder, and she wasn't - but you used, and continue to use, that myth to further your alleged conspiracies and betrayals of Crystal because her attorneys weren't focused on it.

This case was self-defense - Crystal stabbed Daye - there is no dispute about that - the issue is where. Unfortunately the jury believed Daye, not Crystal.

I agree that money should not have been an issue in Mangum's case, but prosecutors made it an issue when they charged her with Larceny of Chose in Action without probable cause, and then the judges refused her motions to dismiss the charge. So, on this point, we are in total agreement.; March 27, 2016 at 3:59 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

Explain why you were never accepted into residency, why you never achieved medical specialty certification, and why you spent a truncated post medical school career filing and losing a string of frivolous, non meritorious lawsuits.

Surely, if you were as brilliant as you proclaim, you would not have such a lackluster, undistinguished, meaningless post medical school career.

From The 7 Faces of Doctor Lao:

"Apollonius of Tyana: Mirrors are often ugly and mean. When you die, you will be buried and forgotten, and that is all. And for all the good or evil, creation or destruction, your living might have accomplished, you might just as well never have lived at all."

That is highly applicable to you.

Why don't you turn yourself arund and do something meaningful. There is still time.

I never professed to be brilliant, but had I been what you consider to be a successful physician, then I never would have experienced trials and tribulations which allow me to be in position to help Crystal Mangum. Had my life followed a more conventional path, I would have remained in Oregon practicing medicine. The Man Upstairs had a special mission for me.; March 27, 2016 at 4:06 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous John D. Smith said...
Sidney falsely claims: Just because Roy Cooper proclaimed (.. or said) that the Duke Lacrosse defendants were innocent does not make them innocent. What he did was uncalled for and unprecedented. Never has an attorney general, district attorney, or in-the-trenches prosecutor ever made such a statement when dropping the prosecution of a defendant. And for the mainstream media to take the statement as gospel is blasphemous.

This statement is false. You know that it is false. Commenters on this blog have provided a handful of examples of attorneys general and other prosecutors who proclaimed defendants to be innocent when they either dropped charges or asked a court to reverse a conviction.

Although this unfortunately occurs too infrequently, there is precedent.

Sidney, I ask that you apologize for deliberately misleading your readers.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

Mr. Smith,
I have never seen an example where an attorney general or district attorney, or any prosecutor went before a court during the pretrial period and in asking the court to drop charges against the defendant also declaring him/her innocent. Can you give me an example?; March 27, 2016 at 4:10 PM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Fake Kenhyderal said...
When Shan Carter pulls a gun and shoots a known drug dealer while they're running away (killing a chid in the process), he's innocent....When officer Twiddy shoots the drug dealer without injuring any bystanders, he's guilty.

You've got a very twisted sense of right and wrong, Sid.

Fake K, there are many major differences between the two cases. In Shan's case, Tyrone Baker, the drug dealer, let it be known that he intended to kill those responsible for burglarizing his apartment. On the fateful day, Shan was minding his own business when Baker appeared and sucker punched Shan's burglary accomplice and then he turned and menacingly approached Shan with a coat draped over his gun hand. Clearly, Shan shot in self-defense. The shots fired towards Baker while he was in flight were not intended to strike him but motivate him... and none of those other shots struck him from the back (which would indicate he was fleeing when struck).

In the Denkins case, the authorities have not directly answered whether the bullets that hit him entered from his front or back. There is no doubt in my mind that they entered his back, conforming to eyewitness accounts. Had they entered Denkins' front to support the officer self-defense scenario, then the press would have been given that information to disseminate long ago... immediately. In addition, Denkins was never a threat to Officer Twiddy and took to flight upon first seeing the policeman.

Ergo, the cases are entirely different with Carter's case being self-defense and the Denkins case being a homicide by police... more likely than not.; March 27, 2016 at 4:22 PM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Anonymous Anonymous said...
harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

Explain why you were never accepted into residency, why you never achieved medical specialty certification, and why you spent a truncated post medical school career filing and losing a string of frivolous, non meritorious lawsuits.

Surely, if you were as brilliant as you proclaim, you would not have such a lackluster, undistinguished, meaningless post medical school career.

From The 7 Faces of Doctor Lao:

"Apollonius of Tyana: Mirrors are often ugly and mean. When you die, you will be buried and forgotten, and that is all. And for all the good or evil, creation or destruction, your living might have accomplished, you might just as well never have lived at all."

That is highly applicable to you.

Why don't you turn yourself arund and do something meaningful. There is still time."

"I never professed to be brilliant,"

Yes you obviously have, in your screed about Akiel Denkins.

"but had I been what you consider to be a successful physician, then I never would have experienced trials and tribulations which allow me to be in position to help Crystal Mangum."

You haven't helped crystal.

"Had my life followed a more conventional path, I would have remained in Oregon practicing medicine."

Your credentials, or lack thereof indicate you would never have been able to practice medicine, in Oregon or in any other state..

"The Man Upstairs had a special mission for me."

You chose to be a hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac,probably in reaction to all the failures in youe lifr. The Almighty did not choose that path for you.; March 27, 2016 at 5:01 PM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

You have claimed to be brilliant.

When you were summoned to appear before the NC State Bar over your practicing law without a license, you said you would dazzle the Bar with your brilliance.; March 27, 2016 at 5:11 PM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Anonymous John D. Smith said...
Sidney falsely claims: Just because Roy Cooper proclaimed (.. or said) that the Duke Lacrosse defendants were innocent does not make them innocent. What he did was uncalled for and unprecedented. Never has an attorney general, district attorney, or in-the-trenches prosecutor ever made such a statement when dropping the prosecution of a defendant. And for the mainstream media to take the statement as gospel is blasphemous.

This statement is false. You know that it is false. Commenters on this blog have provided a handful of examples of attorneys general and other prosecutors who proclaimed defendants to be innocent when they either dropped charges or asked a court to reverse a conviction.

Although this unfortunately occurs too infrequently, there is precedent.

Sidney, I ask that you apologize for deliberately misleading your readers.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

Mr. Smith,
I have never seen an example where an attorney general or district attorney, or any prosecutor went before a court during the pretrial period and in asking the court to drop charges against the defendant also declaring him/her innocent. Can you give me an example?"

harr the hypocritical fabricating deluded megalomaniac, you are again presenting a straw fisherman holding up a red herring.

The defendants WERE innocent, because the crime with which they were wrongfully charged never happened. Your multiple proclamations of guilt and rambling about how unprecedented the AG's action wsa, it does not change the FACT that the defendants were INNOCENT.; March 27, 2016 at 5:42 PM
Anonymous said...: Correction:

Nifong Supporter said...

"Anonymous John D. Smith said...
Sidney falsely claims: Just because Roy Cooper proclaimed (.. or said) that the Duke Lacrosse defendants were innocent does not make them innocent. What he did was uncalled for and unprecedented. Never has an attorney general, district attorney, or in-the-trenches prosecutor ever made such a statement when dropping the prosecution of a defendant. And for the mainstream media to take the statement as gospel is blasphemous.

This statement is false. You know that it is false. Commenters on this blog have provided a handful of examples of attorneys general and other prosecutors who proclaimed defendants to be innocent when they either dropped charges or asked a court to reverse a conviction.

Although this unfortunately occurs too infrequently, there is precedent.

Sidney, I ask that you apologize for deliberately misleading your readers.

John D. Smith
New York, NY

Mr. Smith,
I have never seen an example where an attorney general or district attorney, or any prosecutor went before a court during the pretrial period and in asking the court to drop charges against the defendant also declaring him/her innocent. Can you give me an example?"

harr the hypocritical fabricating deluded megalomaniac, you are again presenting a straw fisherman holding up a red herring.

The defendants WERE innocent, because the crime with which they were wrongfully charged never happened. Your multiple BLASPHEMOUS proclamations of guilt and rambling about how unprecedented the AG's action was, it does not change the FACT that the defendants were INNOCENT.; March 27, 2016 at 5:46 PM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac.

It sure does p--s you off that thes innocent men are more accomplished and better off than you are.; March 27, 2016 at 5:56 PM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

Tell us again how inappropriate it was for the AG of NC to recognize that the Duke Lacrosse players had been wrongfully prosecuted for a crime which never happened.

Tell us again how a convicted felon who was pursuing an fleeing unarmed man and firing at him with an illegally possessed firearm was acting in self defense.

Tell us again how Shan Carter, who shot and killed a 9 year old boy while in the course of committing those above crimes, is not a child murderer

Tell us again that a corrupt prosecutor who filed rape charges against innocent men while in possession of evidence which exonerated them, evidence he tried to conceal from them, was a decent, honorable minister of justice who acted with integrity.

Show us again how delusional, how ignorant, how racist you ctually are.

You repeatedly refer to the vendetta against crystal

You are the one carrying on a vendetta, all because AG Cooper did not proclaim the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players guilty.; March 28, 2016 at 3:19 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

You have claimed to be brilliant.

When you were summoned to appear before the NC State Bar over your practicing law without a license, you said you would dazzle the Bar with your brilliance.

True... I said I would dazzle them with my brilliance in reference to the subject at hand, but I did claim that I was a brilliant mental giant. There is a difference, that is not so subtle, between the two.; March 28, 2016 at 5:13 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Anonymous Anonymous said...
harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

You have claimed to be brilliant.

When you were summoned to appear before the NC State Bar over your practicing law without a license, you said you would dazzle the Bar with your brilliance.

True... I said I would dazzle them with my brilliance in reference to the subject at hand, but I did claim that I was a brilliant mental giant. There is a difference, that is not so subtle, between the two."

You obfuscate and dodge and try to cover your obviously exposed butt. In your recent screed about Akiel Denkins you did set yourself up as a you did claim you were a a brilliant metal giant.

Allthe personal posterior camouflge in the world will not conceal that fact.; March 28, 2016 at 5:17 AM
Anonymous said...: You have yet to do anything that hasn't hurt Crystal. You do realize only you, Kenny, and the anonymous posts the two of you fake to pretend you have support are the only ones who don't realize you are an abuser, right?

You can't be as delusional and stupid as you come across with your inability to learn - you know what you are doing, and it's manipulating Crystal for your own purposes.; March 28, 2016 at 5:17 AM
Anonymous said...: Correctuin

"Anonymous Anonymous said...
harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

You have claimed to be brilliant.

When you were summoned to appear before the NC State Bar over your practicing law without a license, you said you would dazzle the Bar with your brilliance.

True... I said I would dazzle them with my brilliance in reference to the subject at hand, but I did claim that I was a brilliant mental giant. There is a difference, that is not so subtle, between the two."

You obfuscate and dodge and try to cover your obviously exposed butt. In your recent screed about Akiel Denkins you did set yourself up as a you did claim you were a brilliant mental giant.

Allthe personal posterior camouflge in the world will not conceal that fact.

March 28, 2016 at 5:17 AM; March 28, 2016 at 5:18 AM
Nifong Supporter said...: Anonymous Anonymous said...
harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

Tell us again how inappropriate it was for the AG of NC to recognize that the Duke Lacrosse players had been wrongfully prosecuted for a crime which never happened.

Tell us again how a convicted felon who was pursuing an fleeing unarmed man and firing at him with an illegally possessed firearm was acting in self defense.

Tell us again how Shan Carter, who shot and killed a 9 year old boy while in the course of committing those above crimes, is not a child murderer

Tell us again that a corrupt prosecutor who filed rape charges against innocent men while in possession of evidence which exonerated them, evidence he tried to conceal from them, was a decent, honorable minister of justice who acted with integrity.

Show us again how delusional, how ignorant, how racist you ctually are.

You repeatedly refer to the vendetta against crystal

You are the one carrying on a vendetta, all because AG Cooper did not proclaim the innocent, falsely accused Lacrosse players guilty.

Clearly, because the NC Attorney General belongs to the executive branch of government and not the judicial, it is inappropriate and valueless for him to proclaim any defendant guilty or innocent. He can, however, request of the court to drop charges against a defendant.

Comprende?; March 28, 2016 at 5:19 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid:

You have 279 days to exonerate and free Mangum.

It has been 13 days since the Ides of March and 3,208 days since Mike Nifong was disbarred.

As you were.

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 28, 2016 at 5:33 AM
Anonymous said...: Nifong Supporter said...

"Clearly, because the NC Attorney General belongs to the executive branch of government and not the judicial, it is inappropriate and valueless for him to proclaim any defendant guilty or innocent. He can, however, request of the court to drop charges against a defendant.

Comprende?"

I do. You obviously do not. Not surprising for a hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac.

The Attorney General was not proclaiming anything. He was stating his opinion, based on the facts of the case, the facts which you admit you have never reviewed. You are trying to deny the AG his right, guaranteed by the First Amendment(which Amendment you said protected the guilt presuming rant of the New Black Panthers) to express his opinion.

In any event, regardless of what the AG actually said, the fact is, the Lacrosse defendants were innocent. The crime with which they were charged never happened.

What is blasphemous is your attitude that the Lacrosse defendants be presumed guilty in the face of pverwhelming evidence that the crime never happened.; March 28, 2016 at 6:00 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

Here is something else from the excellent ESPN documentary,Fantastic Lies.

Brian Meehan's DNA was detected on the rape kit. According to the documentary, that as contamination, Meehan's DNA wound up on the rape kit materials because he had handled them.

Crystal alleged(and her hand written statement statement was part of the documentary) that multiple males had violent, forcible intimate contact with her. The corrut DA charged members of the LaCrosse team with being those males. None of their DNA was ever found on the Rape Kit.

So explain why the DNA of the accused was never found on the rape kit.

Explain how Meehan's DNA got on the Rape kit but the DNA of the accused did not.

Explain why that evidence was not exculpatory. You did claim it was not exculpatory because it did not prove they did not rape crystal. Actually it did. But you forget, the defense in a criminal trial is not required to prove the crime did not happen. The prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it did happen. The failure to find the defendants' DNA on the rape kit raised tremendous reasonable doubt that the crime did not happen.

The Documentary also showed a video of Meehan's testimony, in which he admitted under oath that he and nifong agreed not to report the finding, that the male DNA found on crystal did not match the DNA of any member of the Lacrosse team.

North Carolina Law required nifong to have those findings, not the raw data but the finings, made known to the defendants.

And you, blasphemously claim nifong acted with integrity.; March 28, 2016 at 6:17 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricating megalomaniac

kenny hissy fit:

Here is a link to Fantastic lies on YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvTtJ4LxZPI&t=6157s; March 28, 2016 at 6:18 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

Your comment of March 28, 2016 at 5:19 AM is but another example of how you hold up a picture of a straw fisherman holding up a red herring as your futile attempt at personal posterior camouflage.; March 28, 2016 at 6:21 AM
Anonymous said...: Sid:

Here is an article from Friday where a prosecutor in Illinois publically declared a defendant was innocent:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/25/us/oldest-cold-case-conviction-overturned-maria-ridulph-taken/

Abe Froman
Chicago, IL; March 28, 2016 at 9:41 AM
Anonymous said...: dharr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

Here is a quote from the article cited by Abe Froman:

"Richard Schmack, the state's attorney for DeKalb County, said his review of the case led him to conclude that McCullough could not have committed the crime.
"The People are ethically compelled and constrained to admit the existence of clear and convincing evidence showing Defendant to have been convicted of an offense which he did not commit," Schmack said in court documents."; March 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM
Walt said...: Sid wrote: "Hah! Gotcha, ...Ding-a-ling."

Wrong again Sid. You'r the only ding-a-ling. Worse, you are ignorant of the law and ignorant of the facts. You have failed to learn. Just as you failed to learn as a physician, you fail to learn as an advocate.

Without respect,
Walt-in-Durham; March 28, 2016 at 10:29 AM
Anonymous said...: harr the hypocritical fabricating delusional megalomaniac:

I again challenge you to explain this:

If someone is charged with a crime and said crime has been shown by overwhelming evidence never to have happened, how can the individual charged with the alleged crime be anything but innocent?

The first part f the prosecutor's obligation to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is to establish that a crime happened.; March 28, 2016 at 10:36 AM
Walt said...: Sid wrote: "Daye's and the prosecution's story not only does not make any sense, but is incoherent."

The only story that doesn't make any sense is yours and Crystal's. The jury, quite correctly, didn't believe her and neither do I. And, you have proven yourself to be unable or unwilling to learn. Crystal is guilty. She is a killer and she belongs in prison. Hopefully, she is working her rehabilitation plan while she is locked away. Otherwise, she will only re-offend once she is released.

Walt-in-Durham; March 28, 2016 at 10:37 AM

«Oldest ‹Older 1 – 200 of 329 Newer› Newest»

Monday, March 21, 2016

Crystal Mangum denied a fair trial by Judge Paul Ridgeway

329 comments:

Facebook Badge

Subscribe!

Labels

Blog Archive

About Me