Word count: 984
Within hours of posting this blog, Sidney B. Harr, the Lay Advocate for the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong, filed a formal complaint with the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office against Durham County prosecutors Kelly Gauger, Charlene Coggins-Franks, and Orange County Medical Examiner Dr. Clay Nichols. Dr. Nichols authored the April 14, 2011 Autopsy Examination Report on Reginald Daye which contained may discrepancies in its findings when compared with operative and consultative reports. Furthermore, the conclusion arrived at by Dr. Nichols – that Daye’s death was due to complications of a stab wound to the chest – is without support or documentation. No nexus is established by the medical examiner between the stab wound and Daye’s death.
Filing of this complaint was made with great sadness and reluctance, and unfortunately deemed necessary in the pursuit of justice for Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser who is wrongfully charged with Daye’s death. Many communications were made with prosecutors Kelly Gauger and Charlene Coggins-Franks, beseeching them to dismiss the baseless charges against Mangum. Letter upon letter was hand delivered to the office of the Durham County District Attorney’s office requesting him to prevent reputations from needlessly being smeared and lives destroyed… but to no avail. Even reaching out to the state’s highest elected executive official, Governor Bev Perdue, went for naught as she ignored the frequent communications pleading for the innocent victim of a vendetta prosecution to be cleared of frivolous charges and granted precious freedom so that she could finally be reunited with her three children.
Problems abound with not only the first degree murder charge, but with the little known/rarely used “larceny of chose in action” charge, as well. Prosecutors provide no credible evidence that Mangum took two cashier’s checks and lack credible evidence that she had intent or made any effort to unlawfully convert the checks for her benefit. In addition, both charges lack motive. Fact is, that like the 2010 arson case, on April 3, 2011, Crystal Mangum was the victim of an assault by an intoxicated Daye. Mangum was noted to have small lacerations around her left eye and a swollen lower lip. In addition, clumps of her hair were found at the scene, and the bathroom door she locked behind her in seeking refuge from Daye, was kicked in by him. What more is necessary to suggest physical abuse? Instead of charging Reginald Daye with domestic violence, assault on a female, false imprisonment, and placing him under arrest, Daye is not charged with a crime and is determined to be a victim of domestic violence.
What happened to Crystal Mangum should bode ill for advocacy groups such as the North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence. However, despite attempts to get the Durham-based activists involved in the injustice, they, like so many others, have elected to remain on the sidelines as spectators. They are ignoring the message being sent by prosecutors that if a spouse is being physically abused and he/she fights back in self-defense, they run the risk of being labeled the aggressor. I am betting that the people at the Coalition believe, however, that the treatment of Crystal Mangum is singular and not a widespread likelihood… something that they can live with as most Durhamians possess animosity towards Mangum as it is.
Attorney General Roy Cooper dismissed charges against the Duke Lacrosse defendants claiming that there was no credible evidence. The question with the prosecution of Crystal Mangum for murder and larceny is where is the credible evidence against her? Regarding the larceny charge, the prosecutors would be hard pressed at best to even prove that a crime was committed.
In dismissing the charges against the Duke Lacrosse defendants, A.G. Cooper questioned the credibility of Mangum, the accuser. In the current murder case against Mangum, there is no doubt that the Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011 by Dr. Clay Nichols is false, misleading, and fraudulent in its findings and conclusion. Mr. Cooper should be questioning how the prosecutors could bring such a charge based on an autopsy report that is totally lacking in credibility… grounds for immediate dismissal.
The number of 106 fatal victims of 2011 North Carolina domestic violence probably erroneously included Reginald Daye. Truth is that Daye’s death should be categorized under “deaths due to medical malpractice.” Mangum prevented herself from being a statistic of domestic violence fatalities when she fought back against her attacker by stabbing him… a non-life threatening wound. The attorney general’s concern about the high incident of deaths due to domestic violence should encourage him to protect all victims of physical abuse, including those who fight back in self-defense.
Although the Duke Lacrosse defendants never spent a day in jail, the day of the filing of the complaint with the A.G.O. marks the 470th wrongful day of incarceration of Crystal Mangum, a true victim of domestic violence and a victim of a vendetta prosecution by Durham prosecutors bent on carrying out a misguided mission to exact retribution against Mangum for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case. It is needless to say that such a perversion and miscarriage of justice against Mangum would not be occurring if Mike Nifong were still the Durham district attorney.
Whether Attorney General Cooper will allow the Durham prosecutors to continue to throw away precious taxpayer dollars on a Carpetbagger jihadist inspired vendetta against Mangum remains to be seen. Hopefully the state will be able to resolve this problem of imperfect justice without interference from the federal government and the national attention that accompanies it. For the sake of Crystal Mangum, victims of domestic abuse, Lady Justice, and all Tar Heelians, A.G. Roy Cooper will do the right thing and see that all criminal charges against Crystal Mangum are dismissed.
Click on the link below to view the Formal Complaint filed as well as related documents:
LINK: http://www.justice4nifong.com/legal/cgm/agoCOdirec.htm
211 comments:
1 – 200 of 211 Newer› Newest»Oh brother.......the hits just keep comin'! bully for you, harr.
so, now it's small lacerations and a swollen lip. I believe I recall reading, small laceration or mark on her cheek and that DID NOT require treatment. I believe I also recall that at least one officer didn't see anything and another said she had chapped lips. wow, some brutal beating and choking. There is NO evidence that her hair was pulled out, that it was pulled out that night, that it was pulled out by Daye. None. There is no evidence of when the bathroom door was broken, whether it was kicked by Daye or by Mangum, and whether the door had anything to do with anything. You base your entire fantasy on Mangum's account which does NOT jibe with the story she told to the N&O and which does NOT jibe with the evidence. Good luck with your formal complaints. What a flaming waste of oxygen you are.
When Mangum goes to trial and a jury determines her guilt or innocence, THEN we will see what her future holds. The last thing those children need is five minutes in the custody of this immoral violent professional victim killer.
You simply do not have the mental capacity to understand how the justice system works, do you. A jury will decide whether Mangum is guilty or innocent. Not you. Not her. She will have a trial and, god willing, it will be a fair one. She has gotten countless breaks and passes for her behavior....that's a part of the problem now. You and all the other excuse-ists, white people are to blame for everything, racists are to blame, in part, for Reginald Daye's death. This time she will face the consequences of her actions and, if the jury believes her story, she will walk. If not, she will go to prison. I remind you that your beloved no-conscious cline was the DA when Mangum was charged.....funny how you don't seem to remember.
Daye criminal record....taffic, insurance, one charge for assault DROPPED.
Mangum criminal record....nine convictions including violence against property, DUI, reckless driving, child abuse, resisting.
Daye alcohol history: no DUI, no charges involving alcohol, no reported history in evidence of substance abuse, drunk the night of his death at the hands of Mangum
Mangum alcohol history: DUI, reckless driving, drug-seeking behavior documented in area hospitals, doped up when interviewed by the DA, drunk the night of the killing of Daye.
Daye took Mangum in, fed her and her kids, had a job, was working, was, per her, the best relationship she had ever had.
Mangum has history of violence toward prior BF in 2010, drunkenness, no job except sex worker, being "supported by male friends".
Dr. Nichols: hundreds of forensic examinations and path work in his present and prior professional experience.
Harr: Zip.Claims to be retired emergency doctor. Never has provided his CV or evidence of his qualifications
so, you wrote to Dr. roberts and basically just told her to accept your findings and all would be well. There you go! Oh, and you told her to send her report directly to Mangum. Now, I am just sure Vann is thrilled with your continued lawyer wannabe antics. By the way, you have set yourself up for a fairly significant civil action by stating in writing to Dr. Roberts that the Nichols report is deceptive, fraudulent and full of lies.
self defense is an affirmative defense that can only be presented AT TRIAL, harr. Vann will have to figure out how to prove self defense without making Mangum testify and that, bro, is going to be a circus to watch. I doubt the jury will buy her story since there is NO evidence to support it......oh, but of course, she is known for her truthfulness.
The reason it is doubtful that Nichols will take any action against Sidney is because Sidney is a kook and anybody who knows about this wingnut will say so. AG Cooper gave Mangum a pass because she was mentally off; I suspect Harr would be viewed the same way. BUT, sooner or later, Harr is going to get his backside in more trouble with the NC Bar and, quite possibly, could find himself spanked by a judge for his interference in Mangum's case as it pertains to any lawyer's ability to get her a fair trial. Who needs enemies, Mangum has Harr!!
SIDNEY HARR:
"Within hours of posting this blog, Sidney B. Harr, the Lay Advocate for the Committee on Justice for Mike Nifong, filed a formal complaint with the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office against Durham County prosecutors Kelly Gauger, Charlene Coggins-Franks, and Orange County Medical Examiner Dr. Clay Nichols. Dr. Nichols authored the April 14, 2011 Autopsy Examination Report on Reginald Daye which contained may discrepancies in its findings when compared with operative and consultative reports. Furthermore, the conclusion arrived at by Dr. Nichols – that Daye’s death was due to complications of a stab wound to the chest – is without support or documentation. No nexus is established by the medical examiner between the stab wound and Daye’s death"
Good! To make your complaint stick you will have to testify in an open forum and submit to cross examination, which you do not have the moral backbone to do.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Filing of this complaint was made with great sadness and reluctance, and unfortunately deemed necessary in the pursuit of justice for Crystal Mangum, the Duke Lacrosse victim/accuser who is wrongfully charged with Daye’s death."
That has to be one of the grossest misrepresentations of fact you have ever published on your so called blog.
Crystal is the victimizer/false accuser in the Duke phony rape case.
You are not crusading for justice. You are conducting a vendetta against the innocent Caucasian(an innocuous term except to a blatant unrepentant racist) men who were falsely accused of raping her.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Many communications were made with prosecutors Kelly Gauger and Charlene Coggins-Franks, beseeching them to dismiss the baseless charges against Mangum. Letter upon letter was hand delivered to the office of the Durham County District Attorney’s office requesting him to prevent reputations from needlessly being smeared and lives destroyed… but to no avail."
Unfortunately(and this is something you misrepresent) in none of those communications with the District Attorney's office did you present any evidence to support a dismissal of the charges. You have made unsubstantiated allegations, you have misrepresented facts(Mr. Daye's charge of assault on a female which the DA dismissed), and you have disparaged a dead man.
Those are things you seem to enjoy, not rue or regret or express sorrow for.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Fact is, that like the 2010 arson case, on April 3, 2011, Crystal Mangum was the victim of an assault by an intoxicated Daye."
SIDNEY, do you check what you say? I think not.
What you say here is that Crystal burned Milton Walker's clothes because she was assaulted by Reginald Daye at the time.
Did you make this claim in your complaint to the AG's office?
From http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/07/15/2196533/mangum-stabbing-was-self-defense.html regarding Crystal Mangum:
"Mangum said Walker, her high school sweetheart, had started hitting her during an argument. She chased him out of the apartment with a step-ladder, she said, and was so angry she put his clothes in the bathtub and lit them on fire. She planned to put the fire out, she said, but the police arrived and handcuffed her."
From the News and Observer concerning Crystal Mangum:
"Mangum said Walker, her high school sweetheart, had started hitting her during an argument. She chased him out of the apartment with a step-ladder, she said, and was so angry she put his clothes in the bathtub and lit them on fire. She planned to put the fire out, she said, but the police arrived and handcuffed her."
Crystal does not back up your allegations that the police set fire to Milton Walker's clothes.
Yet you deny that you misrepresent the facts.
Misrepresentation will not fly with the AG's office.
Mangum has now publicly admitted to the arson behavior for which she was charged.
She got a pass on this charge as I recall. Now she admits to it.
She chases the 2010 guy around with a ladder vandalizes his car, threatens to stab him (in front of a policeman), sets his clothes on fire.......all in front of her children. Yet, we are reminded that Mangum is a sainted single hard-working Mom who can't get a break......sooooooo sad.
Please, Sidney and Kenny, Pleeeeeeuuuzzzzeeeee, haul her butt to Canada!!!
SIDNEY HARR:
The N&O qouting Crystal Mangum: "'All you have is people who weren’t there saying that something didn’t happen,' she said."
Have you any comment.
All the people who WERE at the Lacrosse party said nothing happened. That included Kim Pittman/Roberts.
The only people who said something did happen were people who WERE NOT at the party, e.g. DA NIFONG, Tara Levicy, KENHYDERAL, Kilgo, the North Carolina NAACP, the group of 88, and yourself for that matter.
Two people who were not at the party said nothing happened, Reade Seligman and Colin Finnerty, who could show with 100% certainty that they were not at the party but whom Crystal identified with 100% certainty as two of her assailants.
Maybe you can explain. Is Crystal saying that Mr. Seligman and Mr. Finnerty do not know what happened at the party because they were not there when they allegedly raped her?
Your explanation should be a good one.
Harr.......the police set the fire.
Mangum.......I set the fire.
Cline........my hair is on fire and the taxpayers have to pay for my new weaves.
Nifong.......I promise there will be no more fires in East Durham if I am elected.
SIDNEY HARR:
"...most Durhamians possess animosity towards Mangum as it is."
You say that out of resentment that "most Durhamites" if not all Durhamites, did not attend your non news conference where, again, you disparaged a dead man.
The case is, she said, he's dead.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Attorney General Roy Cooper dismissed charges against the Duke Lacrosse defendants claiming that there was no credible evidence. The question with the prosecution of Crystal Mangum for murder and larceny is where is the credible evidence against her? Regarding the larceny charge, the prosecutors would be hard pressed at best to even prove that a crime was committed."
Since you are filing the complaint, you will have to make the case that there is no credible evidence against her.
Your belief that the evidence is not credible is legally meaningless.
"Wives with knives"????
Mark your calendars, folks, this is gonna be good.
"I chased him with a step ladder".....the line of the day!
SIDNEY HARR:
"The number of 106 fatal victims of 2011 North Carolina domestic violence probably erroneously included Reginald Daye. Truth is that Daye’s death should be categorized under 'deaths due to medical malpractice.'”
SIDNEY, this is where you will fall down when you try to support the allegations in your complaint.
You have not made a case for medical malpractice in all your writings on the case. You have made unsupported allegations.
You have established you can not render an expert opinion in this case. You have admitted you are not an expert when you stated it does not take an expert to see the flaws in the autopsy report.
You have also established your lack of credibility.
You have given AG Cooper cause to dismiss your complaint without investigating it.
SIDNEY HARR:
...the Duke Lacrosse defendants never spent a day in jail".
That is true. That is also irrelevant to the Reginald Daye stabbing case.
SIDNEY HARR:
"the day of the filing of the complaint with the A.G.O. marks the 470th wrongful day of incarceration of Crystal Mangum, a true victim of domestic violence and a victim of a vendetta prosecution by Durham prosecutors bent on carrying out a misguided mission to exact retribution against Mangum for her role in the Duke Lacrosse case."
You have neither established that the incarceration of Crystal is wrongful(charges were filed, bail was set, bail was not made), nor have you established that Crystal was a victim of domestic violence, nor that a carpetbagger jihad exists, nor that the prosecution is conducting a vendetta against Crystal.
SIDNEY HARR:
Neither have you established that Crystal acted in self defense.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Whether Attorney General Cooper will allow the Durham prosecutors to continue to throw away precious taxpayer dollars on a Carpetbagger jihadist inspired vendetta against Mangum remains to be seen."
You have never established that a carpetbagger jihad exists.
SIDNEY HARR:
In the complaint you filed with the AG's office, you do retract your allegation that DPD officers lit the fire in Milton Walker's apartment deliberately then incriminated Crystal.
You also presume a fact not in evidence, that the police could have extinguished the fire without the assistance of the Durham Fire department.
SIDNEY HARR:
With regard to the Milton Walker incident, you are hardly an objective observer, which disqualifies you from saying that an objective observer would conclude that Crystal was over charged.
Oh boy, the carpetbagger jihad-ists.....
I wonder if Harr realizes what he is saying when he uses those terms.
After the Civil War, when the term "carpetbagger" got its infamous reputation, I wonder if Harr knows that many so-called carpetbaggers were, in fact, black men...from the south and the north.(just just whites as he assumes) Too, I wonder if Harr realizes the deep insult to Muslims in his use of the word jihad in this unholy context. He manages to insult and offend blacks and Muslims.....two out of two.....not bad for a first round draft pick racist with the IQ of a light bulb.
Blame Cline, Harr......come on, now, bro. You KNOW she's a jihad-ist, too......or maybe just an oreo or an aunt tom
SIDNEY HARR:
You said that the autopsy established "no nexus" between the stab wound and Reginald Daye's death. What does that mean?
You could have used the term "link" or "connection", either of which would have been legally appropriate(just ask Professor Coleman if you dare).
This seems to be an attempt at obfuscation on your part, or a vain attempt to display erudition.
SIDNEY HARR:
In your complaint, you state that laryngoscopy confirmed the correct placement of the initial ET tube, but later you say that the autopsy did not address the issue of the problematic placement of the first ET tube.
You have never established the initial placement or the ET tube as problematic.
SIDNEY HARR:
In your complaint you say that Crystal had some injuries you characterized as "small".
Earlier in your blog, you were alleging that Reginald Daye administered a severe beating to Crystal's head and neck.
The ER report did not report evidence of a severe beating. Nor did Crystal's mug shot show evidence of a severe beating. You have always dodged these issues, never addressed them.
In any case, you have not established that Crystal acted in self defense.
SIDNEY HARR:
Way to go, SIDNEY. You have admitted in your complaint to the AG's office you have tried to influence what Christena Roberts will report.
You have undermined her credibility as a witness for Crystal.
Maybe YOU could be charged with violating her civil rights, interfering with her right to an adequate defense.
Is this a ploy to get the charges dismissed on the ground of an inadequate defense? If so, it will not work. Read about Charles Manson flashing a newspaper with a headline reading that Nixon said Manson was guilty.
What is funniest about all this nonsense is that Harr thinks what he says matters.....just because he says it. OK, on that basis, I SAY THAT:
Mangum killed Daye over money, as in, she wanted his.
and it's true, just because I say it is....
SIDNEY HARR:
You are dragging in the phony allegations of rape Crystal made against the Duke Lacrosse players. You do not make a case against the Lacrosse team.
It is a series of lies and misrepresentations of fact.
Even if it did not, it does not make your case that Crystal is being prosecuted in retaliation for her actions against the innocent, falsely accused Duke Lacrosse players.
One of you misrepresentations of fact is that charges were filed for underage drinking. No such charges were filed. You are a liar. And you claim to be a man of high morals.
SIDNEY HARR:
I say again, if Duke settled with the Lacrosse players, they were admitting liability, regardless of what the settlement terms were.
You have yet to explain why Duke would have settled the case(to the tune of $60 million, according to you) if they could have prevailed in court. You dodge the issue.
SIDNEY HARR:
How many times have you watched Star Wars?
You believe the term"Jedi Mind Trick" is legally meaningful.
It is not. Ask Professor Coleman, if you dare.
SIDNEY HARR:
If you had any sense, you would give up on your AG complaint. It has absolutely no merit, less merit than your frivolous lawsuit against Duke.
You have really made a fool of yourself this time, if you believe you will not have to prove the allegations you have made.
The sad part of all of this is
1. a man was killed by Mangum
2. a very good lawyer, shella, left the case and she got the lawyer she did NOT want a year ago
3. the case is further delayed due to harr's antics
4. her defense, whatever it might be, MUST be handled by her attorney in COURT. Interference and blustering by an unqualified racist airhead does not help
5. Highly professional competent Duke physicians, Dr. Nicols, Shella and others...have ALL done their jobs correctly, professionally and with the proper motivation.
I woder if Sidney Harr is actually losing it? I mean, as in, dementia. This is pathetic.
In his letter to the ACLU Harr cites he NC ACLU's "lack" of support for his non-case against Duke and compares it to the NC ACLU's support for "lesbians" showing public affection in a parking lot in a public shopping center. This contrast is as clear an inication of his bigotry, homophobia and hatrd of LGBT people as we have seen to date. No wonder he thinks Peterso,the Durham bigot-in-residence, is courageous.
When Romney spoke at the NAACP meeting, the audience booed him for making his statement that he would repeal Obamacare. However, they gave him a standing ovation for his views on "traditional marriage". (as in, no equal rights for LGBTs).
Don't ever ever let Harr tell you that he support equal rights. What he supports is retribution, reverse racism and racial hatred for all white people and all people of all races who do not think, act, and behave as he thinks they should. A bigot dressed in a yellow t shirt and a silly cap is still a bigot!
"inication" should be "indication"
By the way, bro, the man from Jerusalem never ONCE spoke against homosexuality. Read your bible, pal, you might learn something......
Hey, bro, why don't you invite Dr. Roberts to join your little crusade by letting her know you broke federal law and published HIPPA PHI? In fact, she might just be tickled to publish HER reports publicly, too, and be glad to take her medical direction and oversight from a world class forensic pathologist like you.
Oh, by the way, you ARE board certified in forensics and pathology, aren't you? And you ARE currently licensed to practice medicine in the state of NC, right?
Can't wait for the NC Bar committee meeting. Now we have Harr writing letters to Vann's hired gun, instructing her on what she should put in her findings.
anonymous July 16, 2012 10:10 AM:
After this post, after reading SIDNEY's complaint to the AG, I think SIDNEY is certifiably insane.
somebody needs to rein this guy in before any further damage to Mangum's case is done. At this rate, she is going to run through all the attorneys and have to resort to having Cline represent her. Hey, wait a minute, now that isn't such a bad idea. Only......who would check the spelling and grammar?????
cute, harr. nice try, no cigar, pal. you didn't put mangum's mug shot up for the Daye killing, did you. Nope. Can't really do that because the evidence of this hour of beating and choking left her with, gasp, chapped lips and a tiny scratch on one cheeck she probably got putting on her false eyelashes. Nope, can't put up the one from 2010, either.....that one, sneering at the mug camera, drunk, isn't too attractive, either. Nope, not the pole dancing taking on the tenth night after the supposed horrible rape with terrible injuries. Nope, not the one where she is wearing her underwear (almost), sitting spraddle-legged on a chair, on the escort service web site. Nope. Not that one, either.
I am waiting to see the photo of her getting "Mother of the year", brandishing her step ladder, and wearing her paring knife. (sheathed , of course.....)
Perhaps Darnell Jones should write a letter to Dr. Christena Roberts as well and tell her how she could construct her report for the Court....seeing as how he is an expert on such matters.....having commited acts of violence himself.
Anonymous said...
Daye criminal record....taffic, insurance, one charge for assault DROPPED.
Mangum criminal record....nine convictions including violence against property, DUI, reckless driving, child abuse, resisting.
Daye alcohol history: no DUI, no charges involving alcohol, no reported history in evidence of substance abuse, drunk the night of his death at the hands of Mangum
Mangum alcohol history: DUI, reckless driving, drug-seeking behavior documented in area hospitals, doped up when interviewed by the DA, drunk the night of the killing of Daye.
Daye took Mangum in, fed her and her kids, had a job, was working, was, per her, the best relationship she had ever had.
Mangum has history of violence toward prior BF in 2010, drunkenness, no job except sex worker, being "supported by male friends".
Dr. Nichols: hundreds of forensic examinations and path work in his present and prior professional experience.
Harr: Zip.Claims to be retired emergency doctor. Never has provided his CV or evidence of his qualifications
Dr. Nichols: Fraudulent autopsy report used to charge victim of domestic violence with murder!
Anonymous said...
so, you wrote to Dr. roberts and basically just told her to accept your findings and all would be well. There you go! Oh, and you told her to send her report directly to Mangum. Now, I am just sure Vann is thrilled with your continued lawyer wannabe antics. By the way, you have set yourself up for a fairly significant civil action by stating in writing to Dr. Roberts that the Nichols report is deceptive, fraudulent and full of lies.
self defense is an affirmative defense that can only be presented AT TRIAL, harr. Vann will have to figure out how to prove self defense without making Mangum testify and that, bro, is going to be a circus to watch. I doubt the jury will buy her story since there is NO evidence to support it......oh, but of course, she is known for her truthfulness.
There will be no civil suit against me because Dr. Nichols' autopsy report is deceptive, fraudulent, and full of lies.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
In the complaint you filed with the AG's office, you do retract your allegation that DPD officers lit the fire in Milton Walker's apartment deliberately then incriminated Crystal.
You also presume a fact not in evidence, that the police could have extinguished the fire without the assistance of the Durham Fire department.
As I commented earlier, it is likely that I have been misled about the bathtub fire. Once I review it, I will dedicate a blog to the matter.
Regarding the police, if a few clothes are on fire in a bathtub, the officers should be able to extinguish it without calling in the Durham Fire department.
Anonymous said...
Oh boy, the carpetbagger jihad-ists.....
I wonder if Harr realizes what he is saying when he uses those terms.
After the Civil War, when the term "carpetbagger" got its infamous reputation, I wonder if Harr knows that many so-called carpetbaggers were, in fact, black men...from the south and the north.(just just whites as he assumes) Too, I wonder if Harr realizes the deep insult to Muslims in his use of the word jihad in this unholy context. He manages to insult and offend blacks and Muslims.....two out of two.....not bad for a first round draft pick racist with the IQ of a light bulb.
I do not use the "Carpetbagger" term as derogatory, but as descriptive, with the Duke Lacrosse defendants families being from the North and ripping off people and institutions in the South. In fact, Albion Turgee, one of the greatest fighters for equal justice... and one who is overlooked in U.S. History texts, was considered a Carpetbagger.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
In your complaint, you state that laryngoscopy confirmed the correct placement of the initial ET tube, but later you say that the autopsy did not address the issue of the problematic placement of the first ET tube.
You have never established the initial placement or the ET tube as problematic.
That the initial placement of the endotracheal tube was problematic is indicated by the negative EtCO2. That is why the laryngoscope was used to visually check tube placement... but it was mistakenly believed to be correctly positioned in the trachea when in actuality it was in the esophagus.
Let me know if you require further elucidation on this matter.
Anonymous said...
anonymous July 16, 2012 10:10 AM:
After this post, after reading SIDNEY's complaint to the AG, I think SIDNEY is certifiably insane.
19th century Britons tried to convince the world that Napoleon was insane.
Oops. My bad. I misspelled Albion Tourgee's last name.
Anonymous said...
Can't wait for the NC Bar committee meeting. Now we have Harr writing letters to Vann's hired gun, instructing her on what she should put in her findings.
You don't have long to wait. They meet tomorrow.
Hey, Sid,
Does the AG even have the power to do what you ask?
Copper did not have the authority to intervene in the lacrosse case until Nifong asked to be recused. Cooper proposed legislation to permit the Supreme Court to remove prosecutors from individual cases, but I don't know whether it was enacted.
If the AG does not have the power to act, you cannot whine if he does not do what you ask.
Hey, Sid,
Does the AG even have the power to do what you ask?
Copper did not have the authority to intervene in the lacrosse case until Nifong asked to be recused. Cooper proposed legislation to permit the Supreme Court to remove prosecutors from individual cases, but I don't know whether it was enacted.
If the AG does not have the power to act, you cannot whine if he does not do what you ask. Agreed?
Wrong again. Many of the family members of the lax guys were and are from and still living in the "south"....so try again, pal. You have repeatedly insulted blacks and muslims with these terms. Id suggest you look into the family history of some of your heros like nifong and cline and members of the duke 88........you want talk about yankees, pal? Take a close look before you run your mouth.
We will see just how well vann's hired gun fares , using your directive in court. I camnt wait.
I notice you did not and cannot answer why sister has no physical evidence of this horrible beating you have lied about so often
I have also noticed that the motions you claim not to have written still are not posted. Liar
SIDNEY HARR:
"
That the initial placement of the endotracheal tube was problematic is indicated by the negative EtCO2. That is why the laryngoscope was used to visually check tube placement... but it was mistakenly believed to be correctly positioned in the trachea when in actuality it was in the esophagus.
Let me know if you require further elucidation on this matter."
You are certifiably insane.
SIDNEY HARR:
"19th century Britons tried to convince the world that Napoleon was insane."
So?
In spite of his flaws, history considers Napoleon to be something of a genius.
What flashes of genius have you shown? None.
SIDNEY HARR:
"I do not use the "Carpetbagger" term as derogatory, but as descriptive, with the Duke Lacrosse defendants families being from the North and ripping off people and institutions in the South. In fact, Albion Turgee, one of the greatest fighters for equal justice... and one who is overlooked in U.S. History texts, was considered a Carpetbagger."
You are certifiably insane. The carpetbagger jihad does not exist.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Dr. Nichols: Fraudulent autopsy report used to charge victim of domestic violence with murder!"
Prove that.
SIDNEY HARR:
"As I commented earlier, it is likely that I have been misled about the bathtub fire. Once I review it, I will dedicate a blog to the matter."
You seem to have been misled about a lot of things, e.g., your initial unsupported allegations about what led to the stabbing of Reginald Daye. It doesn't do a lot for your credibility.
"Regarding the police, if a few clothes are on fire in a bathtub, the officers should be able to extinguish it without calling in the Durham Fire department."
So say you, who was not there to witness the incident and who initially alleged that the police set the fire as part of an attempt to frame Crystal.
SIDNEY HARR:
"There will be no civil suit against me because Dr. Nichols' autopsy report is deceptive, fraudulent, and full of lies."
If there is a lawsuit against you, you will have to prove that in court(it is an assertion you have made - hewho asserts must prove). You are incapable of proving it.
Tourgee was a republican and he lived in both the south and the north. Why don't you believe that justice should be color blind, as he did? You believe in racism hatred and homophobia. Tourgee would lbe ashamed of you
Wendy Murphy nancy grace. Msnbc the Herald Sun , the ny times....,,,.. These all vilified the lax guys. Yep there was and still is a jihad against these young men The 88 have never had the decency to apologize. The castrate signs and the black panther news conferences threatening the team......no apology for that either.
Sidney Harr is a liar
SIDNEY HARR:
"There will be no civil suit against me because Dr. Nichols' autopsy report is deceptive, fraudulent, and full of lies."
Nothing prevents Dr.Nichols from filing suit against you. If he does, you will either have to respond or default.
I say again, since you have asserted, you will have to prove.
Go and be elucidated.
SIDNEY HARR:
"There will be no civil suit against me because Dr. Nichols' autopsy report is deceptive, fraudulent, and full of lies."
This is another manifestation of your belief you are above the law.
SIDNEY HARR:
"19th century Britons tried to convince the world that Napoleon was insane."
You are doing a good job convincing your public you are insane, probably the only time in your life you have ever done a good job at anything.
Sidney Harr:
"That the initial placement of the endotracheal tube was problematic is indicated by the negative EtCO2. That is why the laryngoscope was used to visually check tube placement... but it was mistakenly believed to be correctly positioned in the trachea when in actuality it was in the esophagus."
were you there to observe the laryngoscopy? No.
If you were to testify to that in court, the prosecutor would object, successfuly, on the ground that is a conclusion of the witness.
Your demonstrated lack of knowledge of medicine disqualifies ypou as an expert witness.
SIDNEY HARR:
"I do not use the "Carpetbagger" term as derogatory, but as descriptive, with the Duke Lacrosse defendants families being from the North and ripping off people and institutions in the South."
You got that wrong. The only rip off artist in the Lacrosse case was DA NIFONG who tried to exploit the innocent Caucasian(an innocuous term except to a blatant, unrepentant racist) to get himself elected DA.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Dr. Nichols: Fraudulent autopsy report used to charge victim of domestic violence with murder!"
SIDNEY HARR:
Unsupported allegation of a carpetbagger jihad;
Unsupported allegation that Dr. Nichols fabricated his autopsy report;
Fraudulent claim that Mrs. Rae Evans initiated the non existent carpetbagger jihad.
Repeated reporting of misrepresentations of fact as the truth;
Persistent claims that the innocent falsely accused Lacrosse players are guilty;
Fraudulent claim that the Seligman family paid off Moez Elmostafa
Repeated fraudulent claims that Crystal's identifications of her assailants were reliable;
Frivolous, non meritorious lawsuit against Duke;
Violation of federal law by accessing and publication of confidential medical records;
Repeated attempts to practice law without a license;
Repeated attempts to dictate to the court what the court should decide;
Persistent refusals to explain how a rape could have occurred in the absence of said rape;
Falsely claiming to have high morals;
Falsely claiming to respect the law;
SIDNEY, you are a big scorched pot sitting in a kitchen accusing a spotlessly clean kettle of being dirty.
The simple fact is that Harr's intrusion, meddling, misrepresenting and generally being an ass will have NO WEIGHT with the court when Mangum goes to trial. He is a private citizen, a loon, but nothing more than a private citizen who can spout his lies all day long. Who gives a rip?
The only really troublesome aspect of all his silly posturing is that Shella left the case. That's it. And, since Mangum IS competent to stand trial and IS competent to make her own stupid decisions, then she has to take responsibility for HER behavior as well. She and Harr are made for each other.
Otherwise, nobody gives a damn what this wingnut says and it will NOT influence the court. One comment though, I believe Vann has to be angry that Harr directly contacted Dr. Roberts with instructions on how to frame her analysis and opinion. That little stunt could cause significant problems for Vann and Mangum.
The practice committee of the NC Bar meets today. I figure Harr will be a wrist slap for acting like a lawyer wannabe....unless, that is, the committee believes he actually repeated this behavior by "assisting" with filing a second set of motions after he had been told to desist and after he said he would not play lawyer again. Perhaps the repeat offense might land him in more hot water. I hope so
The Durham News article speaking about Mangum's latest version of her relationship with Mr. Daye makes note that she says....Daye would not/did not want to take money she (mangum) had gotten from "male friends". He had, after all, been nice enough to take her in, give her food, provide for her, even "rub her feet". Sure sounds like a barbarian to me, folks. Yet this is the man she later says turned into a jealous madman. There is NO prior history, on his part, of any such aggressive violent behavior. Mangum, on the other hand, has convictions for destruction of property, alcohol-fueled reckless driving, resisting arrest, etc. She threatened to stab the 2010 BF with a knife, in front of an officer. Oh, and now she publicly admits that she, not the police as harr has previously lied, did set fire to the 2010 BF clothing.....WITH HER CHILDREN IN THE HOUSE AT THE TIME.
you tell me........which one of the two, daye or mangum, sounds like the drunken violent abusive knife weilding type?
just sayin'.......
For those keeping score, add another lie found out. Harr insisted the police framed Mangum by setting fire to the clothing in the tub. Now we know he was lying.
How long will it take Harr to make up an excuse to explain away another of his lies?
Anonymous said...
Hey, Sid,
Does the AG even have the power to do what you ask?
Copper did not have the authority to intervene in the lacrosse case until Nifong asked to be recused. Cooper proposed legislation to permit the Supreme Court to remove prosecutors from individual cases, but I don't know whether it was enacted.
If the AG does not have the power to act, you cannot whine if he does not do what you ask.
The way I see it, I can't whine if I don't ask.
Still waiting for you to post the motions written by Crystal Mangum and filed by you.
Are you surprised you haven't received a reply from Dr. Roberts?
Anonymous said...
The simple fact is that Harr's intrusion, meddling, misrepresenting and generally being an ass will have NO WEIGHT with the court when Mangum goes to trial. He is a private citizen, a loon, but nothing more than a private citizen who can spout his lies all day long. Who gives a rip?
The only really troublesome aspect of all his silly posturing is that Shella left the case. That's it. And, since Mangum IS competent to stand trial and IS competent to make her own stupid decisions, then she has to take responsibility for HER behavior as well. She and Harr are made for each other.
Otherwise, nobody gives a damn what this wingnut says and it will NOT influence the court. One comment though, I believe Vann has to be angry that Harr directly contacted Dr. Roberts with instructions on how to frame her analysis and opinion. That little stunt could cause significant problems for Vann and Mangum.
Dr. Roberts is free to frame her analysis and opinion however she chooses. Considering that she was given compensation for but ten hours of work by the Court, my letter to her was meant to help her to best efficiently use what precious time she had in evaluating the slew of medical documents presented to her. If I were Woody Vann, I would be appreciative of the assistance.
Anonymous said...
The practice committee of the NC Bar meets today. I figure Harr will be a wrist slap for acting like a lawyer wannabe....unless, that is, the committee believes he actually repeated this behavior by "assisting" with filing a second set of motions after he had been told to desist and after he said he would not play lawyer again. Perhaps the repeat offense might land him in more hot water. I hope so
I agree that I should receive nothing more than a mild reprimand... especially since I had nothing to do with the second set of motions (in pencil) filed by Mangum. In that case I was nothing more than a courier, getting the documents from point A to pointB.
I am disheartened to hear that you wish that I would get in hot water. Even though I may disagree with your opinions and actions, I would never wish ill for you. What would the Man from Nazareth think?
Anonymous said...
For those keeping score, add another lie found out. Harr insisted the police framed Mangum by setting fire to the clothing in the tub. Now we know he was lying.
How long will it take Harr to make up an excuse to explain away another of his lies?
It now seems as though my accusations that the Durham Police started the fire in the bathtub may be inaccurate. I am still investigating and will present a blog about it in the future. Just keep in mind that my statements were based on what I believed to be true. In order to tell a lie, there must be conscientious intent to mislead.
Unlike many others, I accept responsibilities for my mistakes and will admit to them. My mistake in making misleading comments about Durham police starting a bathtub fire may have been due to giving complete trust to my source of information.
Lance the Intern said...
Are you surprised you haven't received a reply from Dr. Roberts?
Intern, I am not surprised that Dr. Roberts has not replied... and I really didn't expect her to unless she had a question or wanted other assistance. I would have appreciated responses from the other three letters I wrote, however, and I believe that it was unprofessional and irresponsible for the addressees to ignore me.
Regarding the pencil written motions by Mangum, believe me: they are no smoking gun... and I doubt that you would even be able to decipher them due to the poor quality of the copies themselves. When I have plenty of time, I will try to post them just for you, however.
SIDNEY HARR:
"The way I see it, I can't whine if I don't ask."
That statement is meaningless. You whine all the time.
SIDNEY HARR:
"
Dr. Roberts is free to frame her analysis and opinion however she chooses. Considering that she was given compensation for but ten hours of work by the Court, my letter to her was meant to help her to best efficiently use what precious time she had in evaluating the slew of medical documents presented to her. If I were Woody Vann, I would be appreciative of the assistance."
Regardless of how you rationalize your letter, it will destroy Dr. Roberts credibility because the court will interpret it(correctly) as an attempt on your part to influence her.
Congratulations. You have again sabotaged Crystal's defense and you are too deluded, too megalomaniacal, too insane to realize it.
SIDNEY HARR
"
Dr. Roberts is free to frame her analysis and opinion however she chooses. Considering that she was given compensation for but ten hours of work by the Court, my letter to her was meant to help her to best efficiently use what precious time she had in evaluating the slew of medical documents presented to her. If I were Woody Vann, I would be appreciative of the assistance."
I would bet Dr. Nichols spent a whole lot more than ten hours doing the autopsy and preparing his report which is not a false, distorted report just because you designate it so.
SIDNEY HARR:
"I am disheartened to hear that you wish that I would get in hot water. Even though I may disagree with your opinions and actions, I would never wish ill for you. What would the Man from Nazareth think?"
Unlike you, I do not presume to speak for God.
Based on my knowledge of the Bible and of Scripture(I am a Sunday School teacher), I say you display none of the qualities the "Man from Nazareth" told His followers to cultivate.
You have invoked a blessing on the innocent, falsely accused, Caucasian(an innocuous term except to a blatant unrepentant racist) Lacrosse players. Blessed are you who are persecuted for justice' sake.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Even though I may disagree with your opinions and actions, I would never wish ill for you."
You sure have wished for a lot of ill for the innocent, falsely accused Caucasian Lacrosse players.
How do you feel knowing that all you have succeeded in doing was invoking a blessing on them.
SIDNEY HARR:
"I would have appreciated responses from the other three letters I wrote, however, and I believe that it was unprofessional and irresponsible for the addressees to ignore me."
Why?
Those letters are nothing but rehashes of your deluded clap trap about the case in which Crystal Mangum falsely accused three innocent Caucasian men of raping her.
They do not merit the dignity of a reply.
It shows how exalted you believe you are. The "Man from Nazareth" said something to the effect, He who exalts himself will be humbled.
Considering the results of your previous attempts to exalt yourself, I conclude you must take some perverse pleasure in humiliation.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Regarding the pencil written motions by Mangum, believe me: they are no smoking gun... and I doubt that you would even be able to decipher them due to the poor quality of the copies themselves. When I have plenty of time, I will try to post them just for you, however."
In other words, you repeatedly come up with excuses for not publishing them.
SIDNEY HARR:
"My mistake in making misleading comments about Durham police starting a bathtub fire may have been due to giving complete trust to my source of information."
I bet that source of information is Crystal. If such a source is so unreliable, why are you afraid to reveal it?
You admit to relying on a lot of unreliable sources, or at least sources which turn out to be unreliable. And you expect to be accepted as credible?!
SIDNEY HARR:
"Unlike many others, I accept responsibilities for my mistakes and will admit to them."
No you don't.
You persist in insisting the innocent, falsely accused Duke Lacrosse players are not innocent, even though there is no evidence they raped Crystal Mangum. You provide no evidence. You dodge addressing the lack of evidence. I say again, you expect to be accepted as credible?!
You persist on insisting on the existence of the carpetbagger jihad, even though you can provide no evidence for it.
You insist on saying Mrs. Rae Evans precipitated said jihad with her statement to 60 Minutes in the face of the fact that when she made her statement, the case against DA NIFONG had gotten underway weeks before she made her statement.
Again I say, you expect to be accepted as credible?!
No way.
SIDNEY HARR:
"I would have appreciated responses from the other three letters I wrote, however, and I believe that it was unprofessional and irresponsible for the addressees to ignore me."
What was in those letters were the ravings of a certifiably insane man, not the well reasoned thoughts of any professional.
SIDNEY HARR:
Where is your blatant unrepentant racist acolyte KENHYDERAL? Is he too embarrassed by his exposure as a misrepresenter of facts to post for you any more? It seems that way?
Another person who was not there who believes Crystal was raped was Malek Williams. Malek Williams posted his note on another blog in December of 2010.
In spite of KENHYDERAL's protestations to the contrary, it is questionable that Malek Williams ever posted on J4N.
What is most likely is KENHYDERAL copied and reposted his own writings and attributed them to Malek Williams.
SIDNEY HARR:
"I would have appreciated responses from the other three letters I wrote, however, and I believe that it was unprofessional and irresponsible for the addressees to ignore me."
What was unprofessional and irresponsible was that you wrote and sent those particular letters.
Jesus was not from Nazereth. He was born in Bethlehem. You, who are so very picky about pointing out red herrings and trolling endlessly for totally unimportant bull crap, should know this.
Yes, I am hoping you will get yourself in very hot water. It would be refreshing to see you, and Mangum, held accountable for your actions. The professional victim that you are, blaming others as you do, I see where you would hope to whine, excuse and wheedle your way out of difficulty. I sincerely hope you are held directly accountable.
You knew you were lying when you insisted the police set the clothes on fire because you knew there was not one shred of proof or evidence of that belief. You have tried repeatedly to pass off opinions as facts. Everybody has an ass, an elbow and opinions. Yours are no better than anyone else's and, thank god, you get caught in the trap of your own lying.
Deceit is deceit, dressed in a silly cap or dressed in jail scrubs or dressed in a DA's suit.
SIDNEY HARR:
"In order to tell a lie, there must be conscientious intent to mislead."
From Wikipedia:
"Conscientiousness is the trait of being painstaking and careful, or the quality of acting according to the dictates of one's conscience."
If one has a conscience, one can not be conscientiously intent on misleading.
Maybe you meant to say a conscious intent to mislead.
From http://www.thefreedictionary.com/conscious:
"Intentionally conceived or done; deliberate".
Maybe that is why you should get a pass on this. You have shown no signs of consciousness in your blog.
Try learning how to spell "contraire".
Anonymous@ 10:43 "Maybe you meant to say a conscious intent to mislead."
Or maybe Tracey Cline is ghost writing Sid's responses....
Sid, nobody wishes you ill. What I wish is that you be held accountable. There is a difference. Suggest you learn it. You and Mangum and so many others go through life blaming others for your problems, even tho the choices YOU make are at the root of your troubles. Most of us, black-brown-white-plaid-or otherwise, eventually learn (as in mature) that WE are responsible for what WE do. You are still trying to conjure up the same old tired evil white oppressor crap as an excuse to cover your sorry choices. so is mangum. It is clear in the quotes from her....blaming others, blaming others.
So when somebody says they hope you get in hot water, what they mean is exactly this.....they hope you are held accountable, in accord with the same rules and standards that apply to all the rest of us. YOU are not above the law.
sid is using the same bull that he used to justify his position that Nifong wasn't lying. In the words of my sainted (and frequently plain spoken) grandmother.....Horse manure.
Can you imagine telling a judge....?? Well, geez, your honor maam, I thought I was telling the truth when I said I was going 85 in a school zone because I looked at my speedometer and it said 85!!! golly, judge, what's a girl to do????
Oooops, typo in the last post. should have read...
" I thought I was telling the truth when I said I was going 25 in a school zone because I look at my speedometer and it said 25". Judge looks at me and says, "well, sir, the officer clocked you at 85.....and you, sir, should have known that you were going a little teeny tiny bit more than 25! Pay the fine.....
Harr knows when he is lying....
Anonymous @ 10:13 said : "What is most likely is KENHYDERAL copied and reposted his own writings and attributed them to Malek Williams" The reason I left this blog has nothing to do with what another Anonymous claims :".. too embarrassed by his exposure as a misrepresenter of facts to post for you any more". Or in an Anonymouses response to Lance the Interns who claimed I am not a friend of Crystal and have never done anything to help her. "Anonymous @ 8:18 said: "OK< Ken....prove it! Provide documentation (cancelled checks, receipts, etc.) that show you have donated money to bail her out or pay her legal bills. And, oh, by the way, just "saying" you have helped does NOT make it so. sorry, troll, you be sellin' it, we be not buyin' it!" ........... Help me out here dr. Harr. I will forward proof to you that I have provided financial assistance to Crystal so that you can attest to your readers of this fact. Dr. Harr can easily prove to all here that I am not Malek Williams and that I am indeed a friend of Crystal, who has helped her out financially but, despite asking him on several occasions and providing him proof as to my veracity, he has failed to back me up. This, as well as frequent racially motivated hate speech that as the blog host he refuses to censor have caused me to leave this blog. I do appreciate, though, what he has tried to do for my friend.
If you are a friend of mangum, then you ought to be mad as hell over harr's interference, meddling, and utterly inappropriate behavior. He has run off a fine attorney and now he has sent letters to vann's hired gun, telling her how to write what is supposed to be an independent expert opnion. Ridiculous.
Mangum has been screwed by this idiotic lawyer wannabe
KENHYDERAL:
You bugged out because you were exposed as a misrepresenter of facts.
No one said you were Malek Williams. I said you were copying and reposting your comments and crediting them to Malek Williams.
KENHYDERAL:
What do you define as racist hate speech. The use of the word Caucasian.
Caucasian is an innocuous term, except maybe to an unrepentant blatant racist.
Lance the intern July 17, 2012 11:02 AM:
Now why did I not think of that :-).
Right on, kennyhyderal.
KENHYDERAL:
"I do appreciate, though, what he(SIDNEY HARR) has tried to do for my friend."
Do you comprehend what SIDNEY HARR has really done for your "friend". If you did you would not be praising SIDNEY.
Crystal deserves a fair trial. That is her Constitutional right.
In contrast those who supported her in the Duke Lacrosse case did not want the accused, innocent Lacrosse players given a fair trial. The attitude was, and I believe this was expressed by Irving Joyner, that the trial should be held in Durham because a Durham jury would be more likely to return a guilty verdict.
What is going to happen if Woody Vann tries to introduce Dr. Roberts' report into evidence. The prosecution will enter into evidence SIDNEY's letter to Dr. Roberts and argue that a supporter of the defendant influenced her report. As I have noted before, there goes Dr. Roberts' credibility and any way she might have aided Crystal's defense.
I say, Mr. Vann should seek a court order forbidding SIDNEY from having anything to do with the case, on the ground that SIDNEY has compromised Crystal's right to a fair trial. Then, the next time SIDNEY tries to interfere, the Judge could have him incarcerated, hopefully for more than one day.
Well, Sidney, bet all you got was a little wrist slap, huh? and that made you feel all good and happy....that you got away with being a lawyer wannabe and screwed up Mangum's defense. Proud of yourself, I bet.
You know, the problem with this silly web site and Harr's behavior is that it is fundamentally racist in character and point of view. Harr will always act and react from the same perspective that every problem in this country is caused by "white oppressors" or those, of color, who have gone over to the wrong side, as in oreos. You can't reason with him because reason, rationality, facts, and evidence have nothing to do with his beliefs. For Harr, it's all about so-called "social justice", which is pseudo-academic code for "white people suck, black people are perfect". I don't think, for a second, that we are done with racism in this country. It still exists and it is still UGLY. but, the reverse racist thinkers like Harr have done nothing to move us forward toward a true and lasting "justice" for ALL of us.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR
"
Dr. Roberts is free to frame her analysis and opinion however she chooses. Considering that she was given compensation for but ten hours of work by the Court, my letter to her was meant to help her to best efficiently use what precious time she had in evaluating the slew of medical documents presented to her. If I were Woody Vann, I would be appreciative of the assistance."
I would bet Dr. Nichols spent a whole lot more than ten hours doing the autopsy and preparing his report which is not a false, distorted report just because you designate it so.
Because Mangum is essentially indigent, the court allowed her ten hours of reimbursement for a defense expert to review the autopsy report... I agree it is far less than the amount of time the prosecution which its endless resources has to put together a case against her. That is why it was so important that her time be spent efficiently, and that is why I attempted to give what assistance I could to her.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"Even though I may disagree with your opinions and actions, I would never wish ill for you."
You sure have wished for a lot of ill for the innocent, falsely accused Caucasian Lacrosse players.
How do you feel knowing that all you have succeeded in doing was invoking a blessing on them.
I have no problem invoking blessings on the Duke Lacrosse players, or ill-willers, such as yourself.
Anonymous said...
If you are a friend of mangum, then you ought to be mad as hell over harr's interference, meddling, and utterly inappropriate behavior. He has run off a fine attorney and now he has sent letters to vann's hired gun, telling her how to write what is supposed to be an independent expert opnion. Ridiculous.
Mangum has been screwed by this idiotic lawyer wannabe
Face the facts:
Item 1: Mangum has been charged with "Larceny of chose in action" by a Durham prosecution that cannot even present credible evidence that such a crime was even committed.
Item 2: Mangum has been charged with murder of Reginald Daye, although the stab wound she inflicted was in self-defense and it was a non-fatal wound.
Item 3: The murder charge is based on a lie - the Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011.
Item 4: Despite the above, Mangum remains in jail for more than 470 days on a $200,000 bail.
Need I say more. The charges against her should never have been filed, and should have been dismissed long ago. The prosecution is hoping for a plea deal for "time served." That's what they always do when they have no case... as with James Arthur Johnson.
I assume that the good doctor Roberts will yield to your expertise, Harr. It's plain that you have years and years of forensic/path experience, right? Bet old Woody is tickled that you continue to insert yourself into the defense team. Gonna be in the second seat in court?
Those "facts" are not facts. They are your opinions.....which do not count in court, thank god.
Woody Vann is the one hoping for a plea deal. Otherwise, he will have to put the professional victim/liar on the stand, expose her to cross, and that, pal, will be a three ring circus. Vann does NOT want Sister to testify. If she gets a chance to plead to a lesser charge, she best take it.
Anonymous said...
Well, Sidney, bet all you got was a little wrist slap, huh? and that made you feel all good and happy....that you got away with being a lawyer wannabe and screwed up Mangum's defense. Proud of yourself, I bet.
Actually I haven't heard what the outcome of the meeting was. Since nothing about it was plastered over the front page of this morning's newspaper, I'm going to assume that the most serious charge of referring my case to the district attorney was not recommended. As soon as I hear from the State Bar's committee I will post whatever written response I receive from them.
As stated before, I'm sorry to disappoint you ill-willers.
If a plea deal is offered, and Vann thinks he has a strong case, then HE will advise his client NOT to take it and to go to court. That's how it work, bro. So, if Mangum is so hot to go to court to prove self defense, then she will refuse any plea deal and take her chance with a jury. Nobody can force her to accept a plea deal,pal. If she wants to testify, Vann can put her on the stand and then, as you say, the truth will either set her free or lock her up.....
Anonymous said...
Those "facts" are not facts. They are your opinions.....which do not count in court, thank god.
Woody Vann is the one hoping for a plea deal. Otherwise, he will have to put the professional victim/liar on the stand, expose her to cross, and that, pal, will be a three ring circus. Vann does NOT want Sister to testify. If she gets a chance to plead to a lesser charge, she best take it.
The prosecutors are the ones who don't want the case to go to trial because they have no case. I think that Ms. Mangum did a good job in her interview with the reporter of the News & Observer. She can easily withstand cross-examination against these bogus charges... however the point is moot because there will be no trial. The prosecution will fold.
You don't disappoint "ill willers" (new term? carpetbagger heehaw ill willers?) .....you shame yourself.
Once again, you fail to understand the due process aspects here. Mangum can demand her case go to trial. If she thinks she has a defense, she can insist on a trial, no matter what the prosecution says. If the prosecution thinks they have no case, they will drop the charges. So far, that has NOT happened. But, you have it backwards. If Mangum wants a trial, she will get one. I assume her case is so strong, so air tight, so perfect...that she will refuse all plea deals. Of course, I also assume YOU will start whining that, if she goes to trial, the jury won't be fair and that she will get screwed. We can already hear the yowling.
A good job with the N&O interview? Right, she admitted to the behavior that resulted in an arson charge and that you, falsely, blamed on the police. She admitted that Mr. Daye took her in and didn't want the money she was getting, for doing god knows what, from her "male friends". She admitted that she used a weapon in assaulting the 2010 victim. Nice. All in front of her children. Yep, a real sweetheart and mother of the year candidate.
Where are the motions you claim Mangum wrote, all by herself, and that you simply hand carried? Hmmmmm???
How do you explain the lack of physical evidence to support this horrible beating and choking you claim happened?
How do you justify that your professional judgment and expertise is superior to Dr. Nichols?
How do you explain that Mangum did not go to the nearest apartment door, and scream for help...but instead ran off to her aunt's house, where her child was...thus exposing the child to potential attack by Daye? Did Mangum think Daye could not follow? Did Mangum think it was OK to expose her child to Daye? Why didn't she herself immediately dial 911, unless she was too drunk to call. Why did her aunt say she looked drunk?
How do you, as a physician, claim ignorance of HIPPA and PHI restrictions, since every provider, healthcare organization and outpatient setting and hospital have known about, and are required to follow federal regulations that have been in effect many years.
Why have you not posted your CV and credentials that show you have more expertise than Nichols and the trauma surgeons at Duke?
How do you know how many hours were funded for expert witness? What is your involvement with Mangum now? How many times per week do you physically meet with her at the jail and/or talk to her on the phone? How many times have you met with Mr. Vann and/or, in the past, Mr. Shella? What role,if any, has Mr. Vann expressly and directly asked you to play in the defense of Mangum?
Why didn't you publish the mug shot photo of Mangum taken in 2011 when she was arrested for the Daye assault? It's out there and very clear. No evidence of a beating.....
How do you explain that the EMT and ED found no evidence of the severe beating and choking that you claim occured? Were they all in on the big white evil conspiracy, too? Do you now claim that EMT guys falsified their records?
SIDNEY HARR:
"I have no problem invoking blessings on the Duke Lacrosse players, or ill-willers, such as yourself."
If you had no problem with the Duke Lacrosse players, you would not be carrying on your vendetta against them.
Yes you are carrying on a vendetta.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Face the facts:
Item 1: Mangum has been charged with "Larceny of chose in action" by a Durham prosecution that cannot even present credible evidence that such a crime was even committed.
Item 2: Mangum has been charged with murder of Reginald Daye, although the stab wound she inflicted was in self-defense and it was a non-fatal wound.
Item 3: The murder charge is based on a lie - the Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011.
Item 4: Despite the above, Mangum remains in jail for more than 470 days on a $200,000 bail."
You have established none of the above as facts.
The court, not you, establishes what is fact based on the evidence.
That you believe you can dictate to the court what is fact again shows you believe yourself to be above the law, that you do not respect the law.
You are a hypocrite.
SIDNEY HARR:
"
Actually I haven't heard what the outcome of the meeting was. Since nothing about it was plastered over the front page of this morning's newspaper, I'm going to assume that the most serious charge of referring my case to the district attorney was not recommended. As soon as I hear from the State Bar's committee I will post whatever written response I receive from them."
Besides your delusional megalomania, what makes you think you are worthy of front page news?
SIDNEY HARR:
"The prosecutors are the ones who don't want the case to go to trial because they have no case. I think that Ms. Mangum did a good job in her interview with the reporter of the News & Observer. She can easily withstand cross-examination against these bogus charges... however the point is moot because there will be no trial. The prosecution will fold."
If put on the stand, Crystal will show she is not a credible witness, just like she did when she was interviewed by the AG's office in its investigation of the phony rape claims she made(DA NIFONG never interviewed her until 9 months into the case).
The prosecution has not folded so far.
SIDNEY HARR:
Why are you afraid to post the motions Crystal supposedly wrote?
SIDNEY HARR:
Why are you not willing to comment on what Crystal said to the Durham News(I originally attributed it to the N&O but it was the Durham News).
She said that it was people who were not there who said the rape allegations she made were false.
All the people who were at the party, including Kim Pittman/Roberts said no rape happened at the party.
The people who said a rape did happen, with the exception of Crystal herself, were people who were not at the party, including yourself.
Via your claims about the party, you graphically show you haven't got a clue about what happened at the party.
More Jeopardy:
Answer:
"Item 1: Mangum has been charged with "Larceny of chose in action" by a Durham prosecution that cannot even present credible evidence that such a crime was even committed.
Item 2: Mangum has been charged with murder of Reginald Daye, although the stab wound she inflicted was in self-defense and it was a non-fatal wound.
Item 3: The murder charge is based on a lie - the Autopsy Examination Report of April 14, 2011.
Item 4: Despite the above, Mangum remains in jail for more than 470 days on a $200,000 bail."
Question 1:
What are not facts?
Question 2:
What does SIDNEY HARR misrepresent as facts?
Anonymous July 18, 2012 7:05 AM:
The only way for Crystal to make a case for self defense is to take the stand herself.
SIDNEY HARR's deluded megalomania notwithstanding, that would be a disaster for her.
Crystal should take a plea bargain so she can get some help getting out of this mess she has gotten herself into. It's not too late.
SIDNEY HARR:
Of course, if Crystal gets the real help she so desperately needs, you will no longer have a justification for carrying on your vendetta against the innocent Duke Lacrosse players.
I believe you do not want that to happen. That is the real basis of your interest in Crystal.
SIDNEY HARR:
How would you deal with this.
Woody Vann introduces into evidence Dr. Roberts' opinion of the autopsy on Reginald Daye.
The prosecution introduces into evidence your letter to Dr. Roberts, showing that someone friendly to the defendant did try to influence what she said in her report.
Any claim you make that you did not try to influence her report would lack credibility.
Face the fact. You did try to influence what Dr. Roberts would write in her opinion of the Reginald Daye autopsy.
SIDNEY HARR:
I bet you wish I were a robot.
Correction:
In my More Jeopardy comment, number 4, the length of Crystal's incarceration, due largely in part that neither SIDNEY HARR, nor any of her so called friends will bail her out.
It's called reluctance to put your money where your mouth is.
Another Correction:
I should have said:
In my More Jeopardy comment, number 4, the length of Crystal's incarceration, due largely in part that neither SIDNEY HARR, nor any of her so called friends will bail her out, IS a fact.
It's called reluctance to put your money where your mouth is.
SIDNEY HARR, do you still claim you are the only person in the world who admits errors and tries to correct them?
I think it may actually be against the law....witness tampering, or something????.....for Harr to try to influence Vann's hired gun by telling her how to write her report. Lance or Walt, you guys know the real story on this.
Roberts is supposed to, by definition, by an independent professional expert....and her basic credibility will be called into question by the mere fact that she received Harr's letter. If I were her (and Vann) I would be sending Harr a very stern warning, from a law firm, instructing him to butt out and back off! He is doing nothing but screwing Mangum.
Isn't it amazing that Harr would say Mangum did a good job in her interview? wow.
Mangum admitted to the commission of a felony (arson) IN THE PRESENCE OF HER CHILDREN....and he thinks that's good??? holy cow, Harr, perhaps you think sister ought to be taking her three children to the pole vaulting club so they can make friends.
Mangum admitted to chasing Walk, going after him with a weapon, admitted to threatening to stab him (in the presence of an officer) and was convicted of resisting arrest.
Yep, that was one helluva good interview there, missy.
And, sure you betcha, good old Woody is just dying to put her on the stand!!!!
And just exactly what, if anything, has Harr been doing to get bathrobe boy's license back? Does anybody think that Harr's recent actions involving Mangum are actually designed to help Nifong? If I were the Fonster, I would be RUNNING from Harr.....
Anonymous July 18, 2012 10:35 AM:
SIDNEY HARR said he reported information from an unreliable source originally. SIDNEY also said he should now be praised because he admitted his error and corrected it.
Huh?
Anonymous July 18, 2012 10:28 AM:
I suggest that Woody Vann should get a court order banning SIDNEY from interfering in Crystal's case, on the ground that his interference has prejudiced her right to a free trial.
I say again, if SIDNEY continued to interfere, then the court could throw him in jail. Hopefully it would be for more than one day.
SIDNEY HARR:
Read the comment from Anonymous July 18, 2012 10:28 AM.
Do you still maintain you respect the law and do not violate it.
You may as well plead guilty now and save taxpayers' money, if charged. Your attempt to influence Dr. Roberts is public record.
Harr's letter to Roberts is, frankly, astounding. He tells her that Vann has directed her to his (Harr's web site) and notes that his findings (hahaha) on the autopsy are there for her use. He says the wants her to send her report directly to Mangum because Vann is busy. Un-bleepin'-believable. holy bat cave, woody, have you soiled your drawers yet? Here we have Harr, assuming the role as your secretary and advisor, directing your hired gun on the contents of her report and advising her where to send it. We ALL know why Harr told Roberts to send a copy of her report to Mangum. HE DID THIS BECAUSE HE CAN GET HIS HANDS ON THE REPORT FROM MANGUM. Any halfwit can figure this one out.
Would Harr's letter, etc, be considered using intimidation to get Roberts to change her opinion and subsequent testimony? Perhaps it would, dunno. He did mention Vann's name and I figure that might be an attempt to intimidate Roberts into thinking that Harr and Vann have an established pre-determined relationship that allows Harr to play a role in the defense. Harr even says that Vann has likly directed Roberts to Harr's web site and his "analysis". Not a lawyer.....but, in any case, if I were Vann, I would be mightily Pxxxxx off at Harr
SIDNEY HARR:
"Need I say more. The charges against [Crystal] should never have been filed, and should have been dismissed long ago. The prosecution is hoping for a plea deal for "time served."
The charges of rape, sexual assault and kidnapping should have never been filed against the innocent, falsely accused Duke Lacrosse players. There was never any evidence that the crimes with which they were charged ever happened.
SIDNEY evidently believes they should have never been allowed to make bail so that DA NIFONG could incarcerate them indefinitely and force them to accept a plea deal.
SIDNEY claims he is fighting for justice. What a hypocrite!
Harr is getting a demand letter to cease and desist....and Vann is on record as saying he pays no,attention to what Harr or anybody else who,is involved with J4N is doing. He also says mangum should not be associated with this bunch. Very much a butt out kind of statement from harr. Of course harr will pay no attention and keep right on......because this has nothing to do with either mangum or nifong......it is all about HARR and his own sick racist self.
Quote from Vann
“I’m the first one to say I don’t think it’s good for my client to have her name in the same paragraph with … anyone who is a member of the Committee for Justice for Nifong,” Vann said. "
Vann says hemhas not read harr's motions or the ones Harr claims Mangum wrote.
Not exactly a glowing endorsement for your lawyer wannabe interference, bro.
A butt out statement TO Harr, not from Harr....my mistake.
I think Vann's statement pretty well sums up the value of all of Harr's saber-rattling nonsense. If he keeps interferring and messin' with Vann's hired gun, all hell is gonna break loose. Of course, Missy is right in the middle of all of is and, as usual, acts like a deer in the headlights. I thought it was hilarious that she was upset that Shella resigned the case.....Sister's brain is pickled from all those pain killers and anti-anxiety meds.
Maybe Mangum should fire Vann and let Harr represent her....as her "lame advocate". I suspect the judge might tell Harr that he can't wear his little yellow t-shirt and ball cap in court though. Wouldn't it be great to see Mangum on the witness stand!! Well, your honor, I whacked Walker with a step ladder and trashed his windshield with a vacuum cleaner because I was house cleaning and he got in the way. and I did NOT stab Reggie. That was that white woman, Rae Evans, who stabbed him....
Vann cannot be happy that Harr is making false statements about the prosecutors, Nichols, Duke and others......and sending letters to paid guns, and sending complaints to the AG. It makes Vann look like he cannot control the behavior of his client and, apparently, that's true. It also puts much of Mangum's defense in question and taints the credibility of Mangum's version of events.
If Harr keeps this up, he will get himself in it with the District Attorney and that, folks, will not be pretty.
Yep, I'd say Atticus has pretty well gotten the "stay the hell outta the way" message from Vann...nicely, of course.
From the HS...
Mangum is represented by court-appointed attorney Woody Vann. Vann was originally assigned to represent Mangum, but Mangum told the court she wanted attorney Chris Shella to represent her. However, after Harr filed the motions for Mangum, Shella withdrew from representing her, and the court reappointed Vann.
On Wednesday, Vann said he is working on Mangum’s case and doesn’t pay too much attention to what Harr does. Vann has not read Harr’s motions or the motions that Harr claims Mangum wrote, he said.
Last week, Harr announced to the media that there was going to be a hearing on the Mangum case.
“There wasn’t a hearing,” Vann said.
“I wish he would stop doing things, but it’s not going to interfere with how I’m going to handle her case,” Vann said.
Read more: The Herald-Sun - Bar to tell Mangum advocate to cease and desist
If I were Vann, I would ask the court to let me take a hike, too, since it is obvious that Bro Harr is running the case.....and isn't he doing a grand job!!!
SIDNEY HARR:
Did you get lost on your way to the library today?
Are you joining KENHYDERAL in his bug out?
Any response to Woody Vann's statements?
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
Did you get lost on your way to the library today?
Are you joining KENHYDERAL in his bug out?
Any response to Woody Vann's statements?
As a matter of fact, I am currently away from my beloved Tar Heel state, getting a little, but well deserved, R & R. So my access to a library and any contributions to the blog site will be significantly diminished for the rest of the month. I will try and jump in on a computer whenever time permits, however.
SIDNEY HARR:
"As a matter of fact, I am currently away from my beloved Tar Heel state, getting a little, but well deserved, R & R. So my access to a library and any contributions to the blog site will be significantly diminished for the rest of the month. I will try and jump in on a computer whenever time permits, however."
I think you are bugging out because of what Woody Vann said about your involvement in Crystal's defense.
What you need to do is stay out of other people's lives where your meddling and interfetence have caused nothing but crap for others and shame on you. Do mangum a favor and let her attorney do his job. You are not a lawyer,and most of us think you certainly are not much of a physician either. What is clear is that you dont give a damn about Mangum.......if you did, you would stay out of her case.
SIDNEY HARR:
You are pulling a stunt similar to the one Nancy Grace pulled on April 11, 2007.
That was the day that AG Roy Cooper(exercising his First Amendment right of free speech) announced in a press conference his belief that the Duke Lacrosse players were innocent.
Nancy Grace had been very rabidly insisting the Lacrosse players were guilty. How did she cover AG Cooper's announcement? She didn't.
She bugged out(much like you are doing now) and left a substitute to host her HLN program that night.
Correction to my comment of July 19, 2012 3:26 PM:
I should have said:
I think you(SIDNEY HARR) are bugging out because of what Woody Vann said about your inappropriate and questionably legal involvement in Crystal's defense.
SIDNEY HARR:
"As a matter of fact, I am currently away from my beloved Tar Heel state, getting a little, but well deserved, R & R. So my access to a library and any contributions to the blog site will be significantly diminished for the rest of the month. I will try and jump in on a computer whenever time permits, however."
What makes you think your "contributions" to thisblog have been significant ofanything other than your racism, your deluded megalomania or your certifiable insanity.
SIDNEY HARR:
"As a matter of fact, I am currently away from my beloved Tar Heel state, getting a little, but well deserved, R & R. So my access to a library and any contributions to the blog site will be significantly diminished for the rest of the month. I will try and jump in on a computer whenever time permits, however."
If you really love the Tarheel State, you would cease and desist from being an embarrassment to the Tarheel State. Remain away from the Tarheel State and stop abusing computers.
Here is a bit of unsolicited sure to be ignored advice ........butt out and shut up Let Vann do his job. You are not helping
Here is some good news for all those who work for justice. It is my understanding that Crystal is very close to making her bail bond
KENHYERAL:
"Here is some good news for all those who work for justice. It is my understanding that Crystal is very close to making her bail bond"
That means you must consider it bad news.
It is unlikely SIDNEY or any of his J4N gang have put up any money.
Oh boy, those of us who actually live here and have to put up with this trash, are just thrilled to hear that she will soon be out, running around, and once again blaming others for the mess she leaves on the sidewalk.
Well the pole vaulting club will do a booming business , I guess. I find it Milk-spewin' funny that hissy biy calls sister's pimp a booking agent. She gets pid to take her clothes off, sit on a john's lap and gyrate, use a sex toy on herself, and visit her "clients" privately in motel rooms. But she's not a prostitute........nope, nosireeeee. Walks like a duck, quacks, etc......but it's a moose, folks. Can't wait to see what and who she abuses in 2012
If Mangum gets loose and commits yet another crime, I wonder who the wingnuts will blame? They are running out of oppressors. It's already all the white people, so I fuess weare left with aliens from the planet mongo. Yep, that 's it.......poor victim mangum has been possessed by aliens who have invaded her brain and made her lie, commit violence, use drugs, abuse her children, and kill a man. What's next for her?
Once again we have the lawyer wannabes, like Harr (and Hissy Fit himself) announcing to the rest of us ignert NC hicks how things are going to be for sister. Gosh, why does she need Vann? For that matter, why not just let her roam the streets of East Durham, free, and able to make mayhem whenever and wherever and upon whoever she pleases. Sounds like a plan, right, Vicktoria? You'll pay her bail and let her come live with you, right??
I cannot imagine how Dr. Roberts could, ethically, respond (in ANY way) to Harr's crackpot letter. If she did, her credibility would be hugely in question.
Further, to give credence to a report that accuses Nichols of lying and fraud, along with an accusation of medical murder at Duke, is to bring her own professional ethics into question. There can certainly be differences of opinion based on evidence....that's why lawyers hire professional witnesses like Roberts. However, these hired guns do NOT start their testimony by telling the court that their opposite number is a liar.
Well, if Mangum makes bail, goody for her. Because of Harr's silly actions, her court date was further delayed when Shella left and Vann returned as her lawyer. Harr has himself to blame for that debacle. Harr has NEVER answered to the guilt he must assume for causing Mangum to get saddled with Vann.....the lawyer she had originally, who she did NOT want, and who came back on the case.
God help those children if Mangum gets hold of them again.
Harr,
Why have you refused to admit that you LIED repeatedly about Mr. Daye's criminal record?
Why have you claimed a severe beating and choking when no evidence of same showed up on Mangum's mug shot?
Why have you claimed that Dr. Nichols is a liar when you have no evidence to support this assertion?
Why did you interfere with Mangum's case and cause Shella to walk? What was your real motive?
Why did you lie and say the police set Walker's clothes on fire?
I was thinking last night about how my neighbor's teenaged kid finally admitted that he had lied to his folks about something he had done several years ago. He came clean to them, so to speak. It was a huge issue because his lies hurt other people. Part of his responsibility, now, is to apologize to all involved and to make things right, as best he can.
If Mangum were any kind of moral person, with any kind of character, she would do the same with regard to the lies she told about the LAX guys. She would admit her lies, come clean, apologize and do her best to make things right. It would go a loooooong way toward fence mending in our community.
Unforunately, I don't see her ever having the courage of character and the moral fiber to do this. She knows she lied. We know she lied. The evidence is beyond question. Yet, she refuses to do the right thing. I believe there are people who encourage her to continue to lie, for their own agenda and purposes. Harr is one of these people. He has lied repeatedly and yet he never admits to his lies, never says he is sorry for his lies. What a sorry example.
Anonymous July 25, 2012 6:10 AM:
SIDNEY HARR also claims to be a person of high moral character.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"As a matter of fact, I am currently away from my beloved Tar Heel state, getting a little, but well deserved, R & R. So my access to a library and any contributions to the blog site will be significantly diminished for the rest of the month. I will try and jump in on a computer whenever time permits, however."
I think you are bugging out because of what Woody Vann said about your involvement in Crystal's defense.
Hah! Shirley, you jest! I have been in the lion's den. Do you think a reprimand from an attorney will make me scatter like a scared sparrow?
Get real.
Anonymous said...
What you need to do is stay out of other people's lives where your meddling and interfetence have caused nothing but crap for others and shame on you. Do mangum a favor and let her attorney do his job. You are not a lawyer,and most of us think you certainly are not much of a physician either. What is clear is that you dont give a damn about Mangum.......if you did, you would stay out of her case.
Face it! I'm the best thing that's ever happened for Crystal Mangum. Crystal has been in jail on bogus charges for more than a year now and tell me what exactly have the two attorneys assigned to her case done about it? Both charges should have been dismissed long ago, and she should be free. Instead, she remains in jail under $200,000 bail.
I am not content to allow her attorneys to sit back and allow the injustice against her to continue.
Crystal's case is to be brought before the court on August 6th. Let's see what happens then!
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"As a matter of fact, I am currently away from my beloved Tar Heel state, getting a little, but well deserved, R & R. So my access to a library and any contributions to the blog site will be significantly diminished for the rest of the month. I will try and jump in on a computer whenever time permits, however."
If you really love the Tarheel State, you would cease and desist from being an embarrassment to the Tarheel State. Remain away from the Tarheel State and stop abusing computers.
It is because of my love for the Tar Heel state and its Tar Heelians that I avidly advocate for equal justice for all. As far as abusing computers... could you enlighten me?
Anonymous said...
Here is a bit of unsolicited sure to be ignored advice ........butt out and shut up Let Vann do his job. You are not helping
Pray tell, please explain how I am interfering with Mr. Vann doing his job?
I would say that I am no pleased with his strategy of silence, which is similar to that used by his predecessor and the prosecution. The truth will set Crystal Mangum free... that is something that the prosecution and the mainstream media is trying to keep hidden from the public.
Mr. Vann needs to do his job by sharing all prosecution discovery with his client and filing a motion to dismiss the Larceny of chose in action charge (for which the prosecution has no credible evidence that the little known rarely used law has even been violated).
Anonymous said...
Well, if Mangum makes bail, goody for her. Because of Harr's silly actions, her court date was further delayed when Shella left and Vann returned as her lawyer. Harr has himself to blame for that debacle. Harr has NEVER answered to the guilt he must assume for causing Mangum to get saddled with Vann.....the lawyer she had originally, who she did NOT want, and who came back on the case.
God help those children if Mangum gets hold of them again.
Fact is, I had nothing to do with any delay. Put the blame where it belongs.... with the prosecution and defense attorney.
Prosecutors are desperate to keep Mangum behind bars because if she makes bond and is freed, they will have no bargaining chip with which to use to try and force her to accept a plea deal for "time served."
Thereby, go ye enlightened.
Truly an idiot.......opened his mouth and removed all doubt.
wow, what an embarrassment this guy is....
So what you are now saying is that you, sidney harr, who has never attended law school and who is not licensed to practice law, know better than two (ore more) attorneys how to defend Mangum than they do. Wow, that's quite an amazing statement.
you do not understand how plea bargaining works. Nor do you understand that making bail has nothing to do with leverage for a time-served plea deal. Lord, man, do you not get it at all???
Prosecutors cannot "keep Mangum behind bars"....the judge in the case has set the bail and if she makes it, she will go free, awaiting trial.
The August 6 court date is only for the purpose of Vann's response to the latest round of motions. He said so himself. I guess you do not read the papers. He has also made it clear that he does not want his client associated with your wingnut crowd....and said so publicly.
We all know you will continue your little crusade and that, eventually, you will wind up facing a judge, civil or criminal, or both.
SIDNEY HARR
"Hah! Shirley, you jest! I have been in the lion's den. Do you think a reprimand from an attorney will make me scatter like a scared sparrow?"
Yes.
SIDNEY HARR:
"Face it! I'm the best thing that's ever happened for Crystal Mangum. Crystal has been in jail on bogus charges for more than a year now and tell me what exactly have the two attorneys assigned to her case done about it? Both charges should have been dismissed long ago, and she should be free. Instead, she remains in jail under $200,000 bail."
Boy are you deluded.
The best thing you have ever done in your life is to have gotten out of medicine and thereby improved patient safety from Medical incompetence.
SIDNET HARR:
"It is because of my love for the Tar Heel state and its Tar Heelians that I avidly advocate for equal justice for all. As far as abusing computers... could you enlighten me?"
No, I can't enlighten you. A deluded, certifiably insane megalomaniac i incapable of enlightenment.
You do not advocate for equal justice. You advocate that people like you and Crystal are above the law and should be immune from prosecution.
You use computersto carry on a vendetta against three innocent, falsely accused Caucasian men because they were not wrongfully convicted of rape, based on the non creible allegations of a black woman.
SIDNET HARR:
"Prosecutors are desperate to keep Mangum behind bars because if she makes bond and is freed, they will have no bargaining chip with which to use to try and force her to accept a plea deal for 'time served.'"
So why don't you and your J4N gang post bond and take away any bargaining chip?
SIDNEY HARR:
"Mr. Vann needs to do his job by sharing all prosecution discovery with his client and filing a motion to dismiss the Larceny of chose in action charge (for which the prosecution has no credible evidence that the little known rarely used law has even been violated)."
Mr. Vann is probably concerned with denying you access to confidential records which you have no legal right to access.
Had you not violated federal laws regarding confidentiality of medical records, Mr. Vann would not be reluctant about sharing such information with Crystal.
However, because you believe you are above the law, you think you are not guilty of violating feeral laws.
SIDNEY HARR:
" The truth will set Crystal Mangum free...".
You have been sayig that for months and Crystal is not free. Obviously what you have been saying about the charges, about Mr. Daye, about self defense is not true.
SIDNEY HARR:
"[Crystal] should be free. Instead, she remains in jail under $200,000 bail."
So why have you not posted bail. If she is so obviously innocent, if she has somany friends, you should have been able to collect what she would have to post.
If she were free, the prosecution would not be able to pressure into taking a deal.
Have you ever thought that one condition of her bail might be that she have no contact with you or your J$N gang?
SIDNEY HARR:
"Hah! Shirley, you jest! I have been in the lion's den. Do you think a reprimand from an attorney will make me scatter like a scared sparrow?"
Actually, I do not think you scattered like "a scared sparrow". I think you ran away like a frightened rat.
I apologize for demeaning all the rats in the world.
Where are the motions that Mangum filed? Why haven't you posted them yet?
why did you lie about daye's criminal record?
why does mangum's mug shot NOT back your claim of a beating?
why did you lie, accusing the police of setting fire to walker's clothing?
why have you not posted latest set of motions that you claim you did nothing but carry?
why did mangum run away instead of running to the nearest door at the apartment complex, banging on it, and screaming her head off?
why would Vann trust Mangum with anything since she violated Shella's specific instruction regarding confidentiality of information?
why did you violate federal law and publish HIPPA PHI?
Why did you, not once, but twice, violate NC prohibitions against practicing law without a license?
Who is going to put up Mangum's bail money that Kenny Hissy Boy says is about to be posted? How much of this money did you personally contribute from your own wallet?
From the Herald Sun
Mangum is on the Aug. 6 court case management schedule, and Vann said he is expecting to receive some new discovery from the state before then. If he finds anything new in the discovery that warrants it, he will request another bond hearing for her, he said.
“I’m only going to call for one if there is, in my mind, a change of circumstances that would warrant that request,” he said.
Nothing in this statement says that Vann thinks YOU, sidney harr, ought to be telling HIM how to defend his client. Once again, here's some advice, bro.....butt out!!!
I believe the NC Bar committee will eventually take a look, if they have not already, at the second set of motions that Harr claims he only "carried" to the court. According to Harr, he had told the committee that he would be a good boy and not play junior lawyer again. Yet he "carried" papers to the court for Mangum. If, in fact, all he did was be a courier, one does wonder why he is stalling about posting the motions?????? Perhaps it is because his hands are all over these documents. It is pretty easy to spot his flowery ninnny writing.....so sooner or later, the committee may get another complaint.
perhaps not.....but perhaps so......
Anonymous said...
I believe the NC Bar committee will eventually take a look, if they have not already, at the second set of motions that Harr claims he only "carried" to the court. According to Harr, he had told the committee that he would be a good boy and not play junior lawyer again. Yet he "carried" papers to the court for Mangum. If, in fact, all he did was be a courier, one does wonder why he is stalling about posting the motions?????? Perhaps it is because his hands are all over these documents. It is pretty easy to spot his flowery ninnny writing.....so sooner or later, the committee may get another complaint.
perhaps not.....but perhaps so......
The second set of motions filed on behalf of Crystal were by her, and they were in pencil. It is difficult to even read them because the copies are of such poor quality. One glance will show that I had nothing to do with those motions... other than to carry them to the Clerk of Court's office to be filed... an activity not restricted to attorneys.
So don't anticipate any further complaints against me based on those motions. I will upload them for you and the Intern as soon as I get back... (to keep you from pestering me about them).
Anonymous said...
From the Herald Sun
Mangum is on the Aug. 6 court case management schedule, and Vann said he is expecting to receive some new discovery from the state before then. If he finds anything new in the discovery that warrants it, he will request another bond hearing for her, he said.
“I’m only going to call for one if there is, in my mind, a change of circumstances that would warrant that request,” he said.
Nothing in this statement says that Vann thinks YOU, sidney harr, ought to be telling HIM how to defend his client. Once again, here's some advice, bro.....butt out!!!
New discovery from the state? The state is just now coming out with new discovery after an incident that occurred in April 2011?
It is obvious that Mr. Vann needs to go to court and request that the larceny of chose in action charge be dropped, as there is no credible evidence by prosecutors that such a crime was even committed. It's all part of a malicious vendetta prosecution of Mangum.
Lance the Intern said...
Where are the motions that Mangum filed? Why haven't you posted them yet?
Intern, I'm going to post those motions as soon as I get back in order to put an end to your ceaseless whining about it. However, mon ami, be forewarned that you will find no smoking gun... not even gunpowder burns. So prepare to be disappointed.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"Hah! Shirley, you jest! I have been in the lion's den. Do you think a reprimand from an attorney will make me scatter like a scared sparrow?"
Actually, I do not think you scattered like "a scared sparrow". I think you ran away like a frightened rat.
I apologize for demeaning all the rats in the world.
"Frightened!" "Frightened" of what? ... or who? Pray tell this requires further elucidation.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"[Crystal] should be free. Instead, she remains in jail under $200,000 bail."
So why have you not posted bail. If she is so obviously innocent, if she has somany friends, you should have been able to collect what she would have to post.
If she were free, the prosecution would not be able to pressure into taking a deal.
Have you ever thought that one condition of her bail might be that she have no contact with you or your J$N gang?
Why should the court impose a condition for bail that she have no contact with j4n members or me? That makes absolutely no sense. I'm not a convicted felon, gangster, or drug pusher. The court wouldn't dare enter such a demand.
My friend, reality beckons you.
Anonymous said...
SIDNEY HARR:
"Mr. Vann needs to do his job by sharing all prosecution discovery with his client and filing a motion to dismiss the Larceny of chose in action charge (for which the prosecution has no credible evidence that the little known rarely used law has even been violated)."
Mr. Vann is probably concerned with denying you access to confidential records which you have no legal right to access.
Had you not violated federal laws regarding confidentiality of medical records, Mr. Vann would not be reluctant about sharing such information with Crystal.
However, because you believe you are above the law, you think you are not guilty of violating feeral laws.
Mr. Vann owes it to his client to share all prosecution discovery and evidence with her so that she can better help him defend her. Mangum is entitled to discovery for a first degree murder charge. Whether or not such material finds its way into my hands is moot and irrelevant. Mr. Vann has an obligation to his client to act in her best interests, which would be to give her access to all discovery and evidence.
End of story.
SIDNEY HARR:
"The second set of motions filed on behalf of Crystal were by her, and they were in pencil. It is difficult to even read them because the copies are of such poor quality. One glance will show that I had nothing to do with those motions... other than to carry them to the Clerk of Court's office to be filed... an activity not restricted to attorneys.
So don't anticipate any further complaints against me based on those motions. I will upload them for you and the Intern as soon as I get back... (to keep you from pestering me about them)."
So why do you keep coming up with excuses for not posting them? It is possible to scan something and digitally enhance it to make it legible.
SIDNEY HARR:
"
New discovery from the state? The state is just now coming out with new discovery after an incident that occurred in April 2011?"
It took DA NIFONG 9 months to learn his complaining witness was not credible. In spite of this bit of gross legal malpractice, you regard him as a paragon of prosecutorial excellence.
Hypocrite!
SIDNEY HARR:
"'Frightened!' 'Frightened' of what? ... or who? Pray tell this requires further elucidation."
You are frightened of the truth.You do not tell the truth. You try to avoid the truth. That is an indication that you fear the truth>
Post a Comment